
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

34631249
27632
10.26603/001c.27632
Original Research
The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) and Lower Limb Power Profiles in Elite Rugby Union Players
Rowell Stephen MSc 1
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3323-3444
Relph Nicola PhD 2
1 Institute of Health University of Cumbria https://ror.org/05gd22996
2 Health, Social Care & Medicine Edge Hill University https://ror.org/028ndzd53
Corresponding author: Senior Lecturer in Epidemiology Edge Hill University, Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine, Ormskirk, UK. Email: nicola.relph@edgehill.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1695 577056
1 10 2021
2021
16 5 12861294
9 6 2021
17 8 2021
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. If you remix, transform, or build upon this work, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

Background

The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a clinical test that assesses landing biomechanics during a drop-jump task. Performance measures such as jump height, power, contact time and reactive strength index are used commonly in athletic populations. Comparing results from the LESS against these performance measures has not been reported in elite rugby union.

Purpose

To report i.) normative LESS scores for elite rugby union players ii.) correlations between LESS scores and performance measures and iii.) differences in performance measures between LESS scoring groups. A secondary purpose was to report the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the LESS test when used in elite rugby union players. # Study Design

Cross-sectional design.

Methods

Thirty-six male, elite rugby union players participated. Each participant completed three trials of the LESS and performance measures were recorded concurrently using the OptojumpTM. LESS trials were scored independently by the authors. Statistical analyses were used to confirm reliability, data normality, and between group differences (p<0.05).

Results

The LESS test is a reliable testing tool in elite rugby union players (excellent intra- (ICC=0.96) and inter-rater (ICC=0.94) reliability). One player demonstrated an excellent LESS score, six players had good scores, eight players moderate scores and the majority of the group, 21 players, scored poorly. LESS scores were correlated to contact time (r = -0.461, p = 0.005) only. Participants with moderate to poor LESS scores (a score ≤5) produced greater power (p=0.036, η2 = 0.139), contact time (p=0.002, η2 = 0.268) and reactive strength index (p=0.016, η2 = 0.180). There were no differences in jump height (p=0.842) between players scoring excellent to good and moderate to poor.

Conclusion

The results of the current study demonstrate excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability for the LESS, supporting its use as a clinical assessment tool in elite rugby union players. The majority of players presented with moderate to poor LESS scores, indicating an area of concern in this population. Participants scoring moderate to poor in the LESS recorded significantly higher power and reactive strength index, increased contact time but not jump height. This suggests participants with high-risk landing biomechanics may also produce higher performance measures, but these do not necessarily result in an improved jump height.

landing
performance
rugby
movement system
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Injury surveillance data demonstrates that elite rugby union has a high lower-limb injury occurrence,1 with an incidence rate of 41.1 injuries per 1000 player-hours in match situations.2 Furthermore, data from the 2015 Rugby World Cup indicates that at the international level, knee ligament injuries are responsible for causing the greatest time loss at almost 30% of the total days lost due to injury.3 Domestically, injury surveillance of the English Premiership indicates that knee injuries also accounted for the highest number of days lost.4 While the total number of knee injuries sustained reported by English Premiership teams has not changed significantly over recent years, there has been an increase in the incidence of severe knee injury.5 Furthermore, the knee joint has been classified as an area at high risk of injury across all playing positions in professional rugby union.6

Damage to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a severe knee injury which is relatively common in athletic populations.7 Professional rugby players may be at risk of 1.26 ACL injuries for every 1000 players-hours of match play8 and absence caused from this injury is on average 261 days.4 The most common non-contact mechanisms of this injury in professional rugby union are side-stepping, landing, stopping, passing, and running.9

ACL injuries frequently require surgical reconstruction, a lengthy period of rehabilitation, and have potential long-term consequences for the individual.10,11 Post ACL reconstruction, individuals are more likely to demonstrate high risk landing mechanics associated with elevated future ACL injury risk compared to a normal population.12,13 In elite sport, these injuries can negatively impact upon a team’s success, highlighting the need for appropriate strategies to reduce injury risk in this population.14 Despite ACL injuries being serious and relatively common in rugby, there is a lack of research in the area specific to elite rugby union.

It is important to understand injury mechanisms and also identify risk factors to inform prevention strategies.15 A recent systematic evaluation of tools which assess risk factors for ACL injury in a clinical setting emphasised that while laboratory-based measures are accurate, they often are not practically applicable.16 Measures relating to neuromuscular control have been identified as modifiable risk factors for ACL injury and interventions related to neuromuscular training have proven to reduce ACL injury risk.17,18 While successful, results of these interventions are affected by poor compliance in athletic populations.19 It has also been suggested that identification of individuals at high-risk of injury may be important in improving the adherence to risk reduction programs.20

The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a clinical test that assesses landing biomechanics during a jump-landing task in order to assess the risk of ACL injury. The LESS requires minimal and inexpensive equipment in comparison to laboratory-based biomechanical measures; while offering good inter- and intra-rater reliability and concurrent validity against laboratory based three-dimensional analysis.21,22 However, there is a lack of population specific data available for elite rugby union players, and hence further research has been advised.21

Measures of performance in jumping tasks can also be used as markers of athletic ability in sporting populations. Information on power (P) and jump height (JH) are outcome measures which are regularly used in practice.23 More recently, reactive strength index (RSI), calculated as JH divided by contact time with the ground (CT), has been measured in evaluation of athletes.24 These measures provide information on the capacity of an athlete’s stretch-shortening cycle and are related to athletic performance and monitoring of neuromuscular fatigue.25,26 A shorter contact time improves power output in this test. Measurement of these parameters is now more accessible in practical settings with systems such as the OptojumpTM, a relatively inexpensive, portable system that offers data of comparable quality to laboratory-based measurements.27,28 However, as with the LESS test, published data on these measures are lacking in elite rugby union populations.

An ACL injury to a professional rugby player can be career threatening and unfortunately is relatively common in the game. Therefore, it is imperative that risk factors are identified in this population and linked to performance measures for targeted prevention programs. The purpose of this study was to report i.) normative LESS scores for elite rugby union players ii.) correlations between LESS scores and performance measures and iii.) differences in performance measures between LESS scoring groups. A secondary purpose was to report the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the LESS test when used in elite rugby union players.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Participants

Thirty-six elite rugby union players participated in the study (age 24.9±4.63 years; height 184.6±7.54 cm, mass 105.9±14.84 kg). All participants were members of a squad playing in the Premier division of rugby union in England. The Club’s medical team approved the participation of all players, who were all uninjured. Informed consent was obtained from each participant, and they were advised of their right to withdraw from the study at any time.

Procedures

All procedures were approved by the University of Cumbria Ethics Review Board (Reference: 15/55). Height in centimetres (cm), weight in kilogrammes (kg), date of birth, playing position and lower limb dominance was recorded for each participant. A standardized warm up protocol was used for each participant which consisted of a self- paced five-minute jog, 10 body weight squats, 10 body weight lunges and 10 body weight push-ups. Each participant then performed the LESS.

LESS Procedure

Testing procedure for the LESS was taken from previous work.22 Participants started the LESS standing on top of a 30 cm high box and were asked to jump forwards a distance equal to half of their height (indicated by a line on the floor), immediately upon landing they were required to perform a maximal vertical jump (Figure 1). Participants were provided with a verbal explanation and visual demonstration prior to testing; they were also permitted practice trials until comfortable with the procedure. Each participant completed three trials of the LESS and the average taken for analysis.

69376 Figure 1. The LESS test protocol

Each LESS trial was recorded from frontal and sagittal planes with video cameras (HX-WA30, Panasonic Corporation, Osaka, Japan) located 136 inches from the landing area, with the lens of each camera set at a height of 48 inches (Figure 2). Simultaneously, measurements of P (Watts/ kg), JH (cm), CT (seconds) and RSI (m/s) were recorded using the OptojumpTM optical measurement system (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy). Each LESS trial was analyzed using the scoring criteria22 which can be seen in Appendix 1. On the basis of their LESS score, participants were individually divided into the following groups: excellent (LESS score, <4), good (LESS score, 4-5), moderate (LESS score, 5-6) and poor (LESS score, >6) jump landing mechanics.22

69135 Figure 2. Equipment set-up

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were completed in SPSS (Version 22, IBM Corporation, New York, USA). Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the LESS scoring procedure was confirmed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC 2, 1), 95% Confidence Intervals and Cronbach’s α.29,30 A randomly selected data set of 32 LESS trials was analysed by two independent researchers; the ICC value between the researchers was 0.94 and 95% confidence intervals ranged from 0.89-0.97. The Cronbach’s α value was 0.97. One researcher repeated the analysis of the randomly selected data set of 32 trials; the ICC value within the researcher was 0.96 and 95% confidence intervals ranged from 0.92-0.98. The Cronbach’s α value was 0.98. ICC results greater than 0.75 are excellent, between 0.40-0.75 are modest and less than 0.40 are poor.31 Therefore, it can be confirmed that the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the LESS analysis technique was at an acceptable level in this study and can be used reliably in elite rugby union players.29,31

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to confirm normality of the data. Significant correlations between LESS scores and lower limb performance data were tested using a Spearman’s rho analysis with significance levels set a p < 0.05. Differences between excellent – good LESS scores (≤ 5) and moderate – poor LESS scores (> 5) for all testing data were analysed using a multi-variate ANOVA with significance set at p <0.05. Effect sizes were reported as partial eta-squared (η2) and were interpreted using Cohen’s (1992) classifications as follows; 0 – 0.1 is a small effect, 0.1-0.3 is a small to medium effect, 0.3-0.5 is a medium to large effect and 0.5 and above is a large effect.

RESULTS

Table 1 presents individual results for each player. The overall mean LESS score for all players was 7.039 (± 2.378), a poor LESS score.22 Figure 3 provides a breakdown of the LESS scores in the four LESS score groups.

69136 Table 1. Individual player data

Age (years)	Height (cm)	Mass (kg)	LESS Score	Jump Height (cm)	Power (W/kg)	Contact Time (s)	Reactive Strength Index (m/s)	
18	179	77.5	6.3	50.33	51.33	0.28	1.83	
18	182	78.5	6	52.5	43.08	0.38	1.39	
23	176	83	5.3	50.8	57.89	0.24	2.16	
33	175	86.4	9.3	52.13	61.16	0.23	2.32	
25	179.8	86.6	6.7	67.9	62.65	0.3	2.28	
24	183	86.9	7.7	41	55.54	0.19	2.13	
28	176	87.5	7	48.5	49.23	0.28	1.74	
21	178.7	90	5.7	46.43	53.94	0.23	1.99	
21	176.9	92.8	5.7	60.67	47.31	0.39	1.53	
21	179	92.8	7	50.13	38.75	0.3	1.7	
28	173	97.5	8	46.27	62.2	0.19	2.42	
29	180.5	99.9	4.7	46.97	39.99	0.37	1.28	
25	188	101.3	4	47.97	39.03	0.39	1.22	
34	173	102.6	5.3	45.87	44.67	0.3	1.53	
18	193.5	105	5.3	47.2	39.57	0.38	1.26	
26	191.5	105.3	9.7	50.3	44.53	0.34	1.48	
30	172.5	105.5	11	52.63	42.07	0.4	1.34	
26	191	110	2.7	50.77	34.71	0.52	0.98	
34	183.5	110	8	46.4	52.65	0.25	1.93	
34	198	112	11	30.6	30.45	0.33	0.94	
21	182.5	112.4	7	51.07	52.43	0.27	1.88	
23	186.7	112.8	10.3	37.17	39.09	0.28	1.32	
22	191	113	7	41.9	42.33	0.29	1.44	
18	185.5	113.3	6	31.9	33.48	0.31	1.07	
24	187	114	11	34.43	41.05	0.24	1.45	
26	202.5	114.8	9.7	45.73	42.93	0.32	1.44	
29	189.5	115.1	12.7	44.87	44.77	0.24	1.88	
21	181	115.5	4.3	44.47	35.23	0.42	1.06	
23	178	116.8	8	35.37	47.29	0.2	1.76	
21	196	117	4	46.83	44.36	0.31	1.51	
25	193	119.8	5.3	40.43	31.29	0.45	0.89	
27	193.5	124.4	4.7	37.57	33.91	0.37	1.05	
20	188	125.3	9	44.23	38.13	0.37	1.21	
29	186.5	126.5	7	40.23	27.09	0.59	0.68	
27	188	129.8	4.3	33.27	28.51	0.41	0.81	
25	186	132.3	6.7	33.13	31.39	0.34	0.96	

69377 Figure 3. LESS scores for the participants

Table 2 details lower limb performance data in the two LESS groups; excellent – good and moderate – poor LESS scores. LESS score significantly correlated to only one of the lower limb performance tests conducted in this study; this was contact time of the LESS test (r = -0.461, p = 0.005). However, when the participants were divided into excellent to good LESS scores (≤ 5) (n = 7) and moderate to poor LESS scores (> 5) (n = 29), to allow for lower samples sizes in the excellent scoring group, there were significant differences in performance. Participants with LESS scores > 5 produced significantly greater power (mean difference = 8.45W/kg, p = 0.036, η2 = 0.139), lower contact time (mean difference = 0.1s, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.268) and greater reactive strength index (mean difference = 0.46m/s, p = 0.016, η2 = 0.180) compared to the participants with LESS scores ≤ 5 during the LESS testing procedure. No significant differences were found between participants with excellent to good and moderate to poor LESS scores in the performance parameter of JH (p = 0.842). There was also no significant correlation between body mass and LESS score (p =0.932).

69137 Table 2. Lower limb performance test data (means ± SD displayed).

Lower Limb Test	Excellent to Good LESS Score Group	Moderate to Poor LESS Score Group	p value	n2 value	
Jump Height (cm)	45.0 ± 6.12	45.8 ± 8.52	0.842	0.001	
Power (W/kg)	37.0 ± 5.43	45.4 ± 8.98	0.036*	0.139	
Contact Time (s)	0.40 ± 0.069	0.30 ± 0.068	0.002†	0.268	
Reactive Strength Index (m/s)	1.14 ± 0.246	1.60 ± 0.418	0.016*	0.180	
*Significant difference between the two LESS groups at p < 0.05 level.

†Significant difference between the two LESS groups at p < 0.01 level.

DISCUSSION

The purpose of this study was to report i.) normative LESS scores for elite rugby union players ii.) correlations between LESS scores and performance measures and iii.) differences in performance measures between LESS scoring groups. A secondary purpose was to report the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the LESS test when used in elite rugby union players.

Results from the current study are in agreement with previous work in reporting excellent intra and inter-rater reliability for the LESS scoring procedure.21,22 In light of this, the current results support the use of the LESS for assessment of landing mechanics in elite level rugby union players. There is evidence that the LESS is able to identify individuals at risk of sustaining ACL injury in elite-youth soccer players.32 While the current results were not used to attempt to identify individuals at risk, the proportion of elite rugby union players presenting with scores ranked as moderate-poor (81%), suggests further investigation is warranted in this population.

Interestingly, results demonstrated that participants recording moderate-poor LESS scores recorded significantly higher P, and RSI but longer CT and lower JH when compared to those scoring excellent-good in the LESS test. Participants are advised to jump as high as possible when performing the LESS test.22 It is not known if higher risk mechanics which were displayed by these participants (such as increased power) occur during an attempt to improve performance measures or due to an inability to perform what are considered more optimal landing biomechanics when performing a maximal drop jump. Furthermore, it is not known where the higher performance measures are derived from in the moderate-poor LESS group; whether they are being created through the active neuromuscular system or through the loading of passive structures through the observed biomechanics. It is important to note that low effect sizes reported indicate that the magnitude and hence meaningfulness of these findings may be limited. These results suggest that future research should consider concurrent measurement of these performance markers alongside the LESS to develop a greater understanding of this relationship.

There was no significant relationship between body mass and LESS scores. This is an unexpected finding as it is perhaps logical to assume that heavier players would use differing biomechanics than lighter players.33 However, this finding may be due to the limited sample size and should be considered by researchers in the future.

Neuromuscular training is known to improve neuromuscular control and reduce ACL injury risk, although practical application has proven problematic.17–19 Whether improvements in neuromuscular control would affect performance measures, such as those measured in the current study is not known. The lack of significant difference in JH in participants with moderate-low LESS scores compared with significant differences in P, CT and RSI may suggest that high risk landing biomechanics can translate to potential performance decrements; an area which has not yet been investigated with this clinical tool.

Recently it has been suggested that the goal of predicting injury risk through the use of a specific test is unlikely to be sufficiently successful, however, may offer an insight into factors related to the injury process.34 In elite rugby union players the mechanism of injury for the ACL has been reported to occur more commonly during episodes of contact;9 in contrast to non-contact sports where non-contact mechanisms (such as jumping/landing) are more regularly observed.35–37 While this may be the case, the present study highlights the need for further investigation into the relationship between landing biomechanics and performance measures. This may be more clinically feasible in an elite rugby union setting, where player management is multi-disciplinary in nature.38

While not measured in this study, distinct biomechanical differences have been identified when comparing single- and double-leg landings and suggest that clinical assessments such as the LESS should reflect this when assessing lower limb landing biomechanics.39 Injury data supports this view and highlights that most commonly the mechanism of ACL injuries occurs in a single-leg position.40 Further development and investigation of the LESS to incorporate a single-leg landing assessment may be beneficial in improving the quality of results obtained for this clinical test.

Conclusion

The results of the current research indicate that a large percentage of elite rugby union players recorded poor results for the LESS. Participants recording moderate-poor LESS produced significantly greater measures of P, CT and RSI during their drop-jump performance, while JH was not significantly different compared to those scoring good-excellent in the LESS. Reliability of the LESS as a clinical tool is further supported. The authors suggest that further investigation of the utility of the LESS in an elite rugby environment is warranted given results from the current research, scarcity of other data, and significance of knee injury in the sport.

Supplementary Material

Appendix 1 Scoring Criteria for the LESS
==== Refs
Recent trends in rugby union injuries Clinics in Sports Medicine Brooks John H.M. Kemp Simon P.T. 1 2008
27 1 51 73 0278-5919 10.1016/j.csm.2007.09.001 10.1016/j.csm.2007.09.001
Rugby world cup 2011: International rugby board injury surveillance study British Journal of Sports Medicine Fuller Colin W Sheerin Kelly Targett Steve 2013
47 18 1184 1191 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091155 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091155
Rugby World Cup 2015: World Rugby injury surveillance study British Journal of Sports Medicine Fuller Colin W Taylor Aileen Kemp Simon P T Raftery Martin 2017
51 1 51 57 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096275 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096275
The epidemiology of knee injuries in English professional rugby union The American Journal of Sports Medicine Dallalana Richard J. Brooks John H. M. Kemp Simon P. Williams Andrew M. 5 2007
35 5 818 830 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546506296738 10.1177/0363546506296738 17293461
England Professional Rugby Injury Surveillance Project. 2014-15 Season Report Rugby Football Union 2021-8-18 https://silo.tips/download/england-professional-rugby-injury-surveillance-project-season-report-march-2016
Injury-prevention priorities according to playing position in professional rugby union players British Journal of Sports Medicine Brooks J. H. M. Kemp S. P. T. 2011
45 10 765 775 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsm.2009.066985 10.1136/bjsm.2009.066985 20484316
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear New England Journal of Medicine Spindler Kurt P. Wright Rick W. 13 11 2008
359 20 2135 2142 0028-4793 10.1056/nejmcp0804745 10.1056/nejmcp0804745 19005197
Return to Play of Rugby Players After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft: Return to Sports and Graft Failure According to Age Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Takazawa Yuji Ikeda Hiroshi Saita Yoshitomo Kawasaki Takayuki Ishijima Muneaki Nagayama Masataka Kaneko Haruka Kaneko Kazuo 1 2017
33 1 181 189 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.06.009 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.06.009
Mechanisms of ACL injury in professional rugby union: A systematic video analysis of 36 cases British Journal of Sports Medicine Montgomery Connor Blackburn Jeff Withers Daniel Tierney Gregory Moran Cathal Simms Ciaran 2018
52 15 994 1001 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096425 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096425 28039125
The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: Osteoarthritis The American Journal of Sports Medicine Lohmander L. Stefan Englund P. Martin Dahl Ludvig L. Roos Ewa M. 10 2007
35 10 1756 1769 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546507307396 10.1177/0363546507307396
Update on rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine Nyland John Brand E Fisher B 9 2010
1 151 166 1179-1543 10.2147/oajsm.s9327 10.2147/oajsm.s9327 24198553
Effect of fatigue on landing performance assessed with the landing error scoring system (less) in patients after ACL reconstruction. A pilot study Int J Sports Phys Ther Gokeler A. Eppinga P. Dijkstra P.U.. 2014
9 3 302 311 24944848
Drop-Landing Performance and Knee-Extension Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction J Athl Train Kuenze Christopher M. Foot Nathaniel Saliba Susan A. Hart Joseph M. 1 6 2015
50 6 596 602 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-50.2.11 10.4085/1062-6050-50.2.11 25978101
Time loss injuries compromise team success in Elite Rugby Union: A 7-year prospective study British Journal of Sports Medicine Williams Sean Trewartha Grant Kemp Simon P Brooks John H M Fuller Colin W Taylor Aileen E Cross Matthew J Stokes Keith A 2016
50 11 651 656 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094798 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094798 26552415
A dynamic model of etiology in sport injury: The recursive nature of risk and causation Clin J Sport Med Meeuwisse Willem H Tyreman Hugh Hagel Brent Emery Carolyn 5 2007
17 3 215 219 1050-642X 10.1097/jsm.0b013e3180592a48 10.1097/jsm.0b013e3180592a48 17513916
A Systematic Evaluation of Field-Based Screening Methods for the Assessment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury Risk Fox Aaron S. Bonacci Jason McLean Scott G. Spittle Michael Saunders Natalie Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2016
46 5 715 735 0112-1642 10.1007/s40279-015-0443-3 10.1007/s40279-015-0443-3
Effectiveness of Knee Injury and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Prevention Programs: A Meta-Analysis PLoS One Donnell-Fink Laurel A. Klara Kristina Collins Jamie E. Yang Heidi Y. Goczalk Melissa G. Katz Jeffrey N. Losina Elena 4 12 2015
10 12 e0144063 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone.0144063 10.1371/journal.pone.0144063 26637173
Risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury: A review of the literature - part 1: Neuromuscular and anatomic risk Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach Smith Helen C. Vacek Pamela Johnson Robert J. Slauterbeck James R. Hashemi Javad Shultz Sandra Beynnon Bruce D. 2012
4 1 69 78 1941-7381 10.1177/1941738111428281 10.1177/1941738111428281 23016072
Compliance with neuromuscular training and anterior cruciate ligament injury risk reduction in female athletes: A meta-analysis J Athl Train Sugimoto Dai Myer Gregory D. Bush Heather M. Klugman Maddie F. Medina McKeon Jennifer M. Hewett Timothy E. 1 11 2012
47 6 714 723 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-47.6.10 10.4085/1062-6050-47.6.10 23182020
Differential neuromuscular training effects onACL injury risk factors in"high-risk" versus "low-risk" athletes BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Myer Gregory D Ford Kevin R Brent Jensen L Hewett Timothy E 8 5 2007
8 39 1471-2474 10.1186/1471-2474-8-39 10.1186/1471-2474-8-39 17488502
Reliability of clinician scoring of the landing error scoring system to assess jump-landing movement patterns J Sport Rehabil Markbreiter Jessica G. Sagon Bronson K. Valovich McLeod Tamara C. Welch Cailee E. 5 2015
24 2 214 218 1056-6716 10.1123/jsr.2013-0135 10.1123/jsr.2013-0135 25203628
The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a valid and reliable clinical assessment tool of jump-landing biomechanics: The JUMP-ACL study The American Journal of Sports Medicine Padua Darin A. Marshall Stephen W. Boling Michelle C. Thigpen Charles A. Garrett William E., Jr Beutler Anthony I. 2 9 2009
37 10 1996 2002 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546509343200 10.1177/0363546509343200
Strength and power predictors of sports speed The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Cronin John B. Hansen Keir T. 2005
19 2 349 357 1064-8011 10.1519/14323.1 10.1519/14323.1 15903374
The use of contact time and reactive strength index to optimise fast stretch-shortening cycle training Strength Cond J Flanagan Eamonn P Comyns Thomas M 10 2008
30 5 32 38 1524-1602 10.1519/ssc.0b013e318187e25b 10.1519/ssc.0b013e318187e25b
Which measure of drop jump performance best predicts sprinting speed? J Strength Cond Res Barr Matt J Nolte Volker W 7 2011
25 7 1976 1982 1064-8011 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181e4f7ba 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181e4f7ba 21701285
Establishing the reliability and meaningful change of the drop-jump reactive-strength index J Aust Strength Cond Beattie K.B. Flanagan E.P. 2015
23 5 12 18
Validity and reliability of Optojump photoelectric cells for estimating vertical jump height J Strength Cond Res Glatthorn Julia F Gouge Sylvain Nussbaumer Silvio Stauffacher Simone Impellizzeri Franco M Maffiuletti Nicola A 2 2011
25 2 556 560 1064-8011 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181ccb18d 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181ccb18d
Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System J Hum Kinet. Healy Robin Kenny Ian C. Harrison Andrew J. 1 12 2016
54 23 32 1899-7562 10.1515/hukin-2016-0032 10.1515/hukin-2016-0032 28031754
Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (and Sex and Drugs and Rock ‘n’ Roll Field A.P. Sage London 2013

Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science Sports Medicine Hopkins Will G. 2000
30 1 1 15 0112-1642 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001 10907753
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin Shrout Patrick E. Fleiss Joseph L. 1979
86 2 420 428 1939-1455 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 18839484
The Landing Error Scoring System as a Screening Tool for an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury–Prevention Program in Elite-Youth Soccer Athletes J Athl Train Padua Darin A. DiStefano Lindsay J. Beutler Anthony I. de la Motte Sarah J. DiStefano Michael J. Marshall Steven W. 1 6 2015
50 6 589 595 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-50.1.10 10.4085/1062-6050-50.1.10 25811846
On-field Performances of Rugby Union Players—A Review J Strength Cond Res Ziv Gal Lidor Ronnie 3 2016
30 3 881 892 1064-8011 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001129 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001129 26907847
Why screening tests to predict injury do not work—and probably never will…: A critical review British Journal of Sports Medicine Bahr Roald 19 4 2016
50 13 776 780 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096256 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096256
Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury in basketball: Video analysis of 39 cases The American Journal of Sports Medicine Krosshaug Tron Nakamae Atsuo Boden Barry P. Engebretsen Lars Smith Gerald Slauterbeck James R. Hewett Timothy E. Bahr Roald 3 2007
35 3 359 367 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546506293899 10.1177/0363546506293899 17092928
Injury mechanisms for anterior cruciate ligament injuries in team handball: A systematic video analysis The American Journal of Sports Medicine Olsen O.E. Myklebust Grethe Engebretsen Lars Bahr Roald 6 2004
32 4 1002 1012 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546503261724 10.1177/0363546503261724 15150050
Three distinct mechanisms predominate in non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in male professional football players: A systematic video analysis of 39 cases British Journal of Sports Medicine Waldén Markus Krosshaug Tron Bjørneboe John Andersen Thor Einar Faul Oliver Hägglund Martin 23 4 2015
49 22 1452 1460 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094573 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094573 25907183
Managing player load in professional rugby union: A review of current knowledge and practices British Journal of Sports Medicine Quarrie Kenneth L Raftery Martin Blackie Josh Cook Christian J Fuller Colin W Gabbett Tim J Gray Andrew J Gill Nicholas Hennessy Liam Kemp Simon Lambert Mike Nichol Rob Mellalieu Stephen D Piscione Julien Stadelmann Jörg Tucker Ross 2017
51 5 421 427 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096191 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096191 27506436
Biomechanical Comparison of Single- and Double-Leg Jump Landings in the Sagittal and Frontal Plane Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Taylor Jeffrey B. Ford Kevin R. Nguyen A.D. Shultz Sandra J. 1 6 2016
4 6 2325967116655158 2325-9671 10.1177/2325967116655158 10.1177/2325967116655158 27482527
Video analysis of anterior cruciate ligament injury: Abnormalities in hip and ankle kinematics The American Journal of Sports Medicine Boden Barry P. Torg Joseph S. Knowles Sarah B. Hewett Timothy E. 2 2009
37 2 252 259 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546508328107 10.1177/0363546508328107
