
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

34123530
22136
10.26603/001c.22136
Original Research
Kinesiology Tape: A Descriptive Survey of Healthcare Professionals in the United States
Cheatham Scott W Ph.D., DPT, PT, OCS, ATC, CSCS 1
Baker Russell T PhD, DAT, AT, CMP, PRT-c® 2
Abdenour Thomas E DHSc, ATC, CES 3
1 California State University Dominguez Hills
2 University of Idaho https://ror.org/03hbp5t65
3 Abdenour Consulting
Corresponding Author: Scott W. Cheatham Associate Professor California State University Dominguez Hills 1000 E. Victoria Street, Carson, California 90747 Scheatham@csudh.edu
1 6 2021
2021
16 3 778796
1 9 2020
26 11 2020
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. If you remix, transform, or build upon this work, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

Background

The existing body of kinesiology tape (KT) research reveals inconsistent results which challenges the efficacy of the intervention. Understanding professional beliefs and KT clinical application might provide insight for future research and development of evidence-based guidelines.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to survey and document the beliefs and clinical application methods of KT among healthcare professionals in the United States.

Design

Cross-sectional survey study.

Methods

A 30-question online survey was emailed to members of the National Athletic Trainers Association, Academy of Orthopedic Physical Therapy, and American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy. Professionals were also informed through a recruitment post in different private healthcare Facebook groups.

Results

One thousand and eighty-three respondents completed the survey. Most respondents used KT for post-injury treatment (74%), pain modulation (67%), and neuro-sensory feedback (60%). Most believed that KT stimulates skin mechanoreceptors (77%), improve local circulation (69%), and modulates pain (60%). Some respondents believed KT only created a placebo effect (40%) and use it for such therapeutic purposes (58%). Most used a standard uncut roll (67%) in black (71%) or beige (66%). Most respondents did not use any specialty pre-cut tape (83%), infused tape (99.54%), or a topical analgesic with tape (65%). The most common tape tension lengths used by respondents were 50% tension (47%) and 25% (25%) tension. Patient reported outcomes (80%) were the most common clinical measures. Most respondents provided skin prep (64%) and tape removal (77%) instructions. Some did not provide any skin prep (36%) or tape removal (23%) instruction. The average recommended times to wear KT were two to three days (60%). The maximum times ranged from two to five days (81%).

Conclusion

This survey provides insight into how professionals use KT and highlights the gap between research and practice. Future research should address these gaps to better determine evidence-based guidelines.

Level of Evidence

3

recovery
perceived pain
muscle soreness
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Dr. Kenso Kase introduced kinesiology tape (KT) in the 1970s and healthcare professionals have since made it a popular intervention across different rehabilitation, fitness, and sports settings.1 The tape is made of a cotton-base, with elastic properties and adhesive which allows it to be applied directly to the skin. KT is available in different sizes, widths, material, lengths (e.g. precut, rolls), and textures. Currently, numerous manufacturers, such as KT Tape®, Kinesio Tape®, and TheraBand® Kinesiology Tape, produce various types of tape to meet different therapeutic needs such as: sports, edema control, and neurosensory effects. Some manufacturers have expanded beyond tape production and provide professional continuing education and certification to practitioners who want to utilize KT in clinical practice.

Despite the popularity, the research regarding KT therapeutic benefits is inconclusive with many studies reporting inconsistent outcomes.2 Since 2010, approximately thirty-eight KT systematic reviews have been published appraising the efficacy for specific conditions. The reviews found inconclusive evidence for shoulder,3,4 knee,5 and elbow disorders,6 as well as spinal pain,7 proprioception,8 brachial plexus injury in children,9 muscle strength,10 and sports performance.11 Researchers also appraised the KT literature on musculoskeletal conditions,2,12–15 chronic musculoskeletal pain,16,17 sports injuries,18 in eight systematic reviews and found inconclusive results. Weak to moderate evidence was found supporting the efficacy of KT for postmastectomy lymphedema,19 children with Cerebral Palsy,20–22 stroke patients,23–26 ankle function,27 athletic performance,28,29 myofascial pain,30 and as an adjunct therapy for shoulder impingement,31 lumbosacral pain,17,32–37 and patellofemoral pain.38

The variable KT research has left many unanswered questions regarding therapeutic efficacy, which is exacerbated by variations in KT application and use, as well as a lack of translation from the research to practice. Currently, little is known regarding the training and practice patterns of professionals who utilize KT and how practice patterns correspond to application methods used in KT research. Professionals may disregard the weak body of KT evidence given individual practice experiences with the technique. Further, evidence-based practice recommendations for application are lacking and clinicians may use their own preferred methods of administering the intervention. Variations from practice to research, or across groups of clinicians with varied training, may result in inconsistencies and limit the ability to create best practice consensus or optimal guidelines for practice and research. Thus, there is a need to survey and document the KT beliefs, training, and clinical practices of healthcare professionals to understand how KT is used for patient care. To our knowledge, KT surveys examining practice patterns, perceptions, and training of professionals utilizing the technique have not been published. Obtaining such information may help guide future studies and the development of evidence-based guidelines. The purpose of this study was to survey and document the beliefs and clinical practices of KT among healthcare professionals in the United States.

METHODS

Study Type and Participants

This cross-sectional survey study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at California State University Dominguez Hills (# 20-115). Healthcare professionals were recruited via convenience sampling between March to May 2020. Emails were sent to a random sample of members from the National Athletic Trainers Association (N=3,000) and all members of the Academy of Orthopedic Physical Therapy (N=17,811) and American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy (N=6,597). This sampling technique has been used in prior myofascial intervention survey research.39,40 Healthcare professionals (N=21,775) were also informed through a recruitment post in different private healthcare Facebook groups. Prior research has documented that Facebook is an effective recruitment tool for healthcare research purposes.41

Survey Design

The online survey (SurveyMonkey® www.surveymonkey.com) included one respondent consent question and 29 questions that represented seven distinct areas:1) respondent demographics, 2) clinical perceptions about KT, 3) clinical application of standard, specialty, infused KT, topicals, and clinical measures, and 4) KT education, and referral.

The focus of respondent demographic questions was to document participant age, credentials, practice setting/s, and professional experience. The goal of clinical perceptions about KT questions were to document professional beliefs about the use of the tape with clients, KT therapeutic effects, and physiological mechanisms. Also, to document respondent beliefs about KT precautions and contraindications. The focus of the clinic application of KT questions were to document how professionals use different KT tapes, topicals, and clinical measures in their practice. Practice patterns were further assessed by documenting how professionals approached KT education such as skin prep, tape removal, length of time to wear KT, patient education, and referral.

After initial survey development was completed, the first survey draft underwent two rounds of pilot testing with four independent athletic training and physical therapy professionals to establish face validity. Based upon reviewer feedback, revisions were made, and a final set of survey items was identified.39,40 The final survey was further tested for readability using the Flesch reading-ease test and Flesch-Kincaid grade level test. The 30 questions in the final survey scored 53.2 on the Flesch Ease of Reading Test and 7.0 on the Flesch-Kincaid Grade level test, which indicated the English used in the survey was fairly easy to read at the 7th grade level.42 These methods have been used in prior myofascial intervention survey research.39,40,43

Data Analysis

Data were downloaded from SurveyMonkey for analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive data including total responses, frequency count, and percentages were calculated. Data were treated conservatively, any respondent who failed to answer an item was removed from the data set.

RESULTS

A total of 51,000 healthcare professionals were recruited. A total of 1,535 professionals began the survey. Incomplete surveys were eliminated from the data synthesis. A total of 1083 respondents finished the survey resulting in a 2.1% completion rate (1,083/51,000).

This section details most respondent answers for questions within the seven distinct survey areas using rounded values for ease of interpretation. A more detailed description of respondent answers can be found in Tables 1-7.

Respondent Demographics

Forty-five percent (n=492) of respondents were men and 54% (n=584) were women. Sixty-one percent (n=657) reported being a physical therapist, 30% (n=325) a certified athletic trainer, 4% (n=44) a physical therapist assistant, 2% (n=19) a chiropractor, 1% (n=10) a massage therapist, and 2% reported being a member of another profession. A substantial proportion of respondents reported working in a private outpatient facility (42%, n=152), hospital based facility (18%, n=197), university sports medicine or athletic training facility (12%, n=131), and secondary school setting (11%, n=125). The reported average years in practice was approximately 16 years (Table 1).

56948 Table 1: Respondent demographics (Total N=1083)

Please describe your gender.	Frequency % (N)	
Male	45.43% (492)	
Female	53.92% (584)	
Other	0.18% (002)	
Prefer not to answer	0.47% (005)	
Please choose your profession.		
Physical Therapist	60.66% (657)	
Chiropractor	01.75% (19)	
Certified Athletic Trainer	30.00% (325)	
Occupational Therapist	0.28% (3)	
Acupuncturist	0.00% (0)	
Physical Therapist Assistant	4.09% (44)	
Occupational Therapist Assistant	0.09% (1)	
Massage Therapist	0.92% (10)	
Certified Personal Trainer	0.28% (3)	
Kinesiotherapist	0.09% (1)	
Exercise Physiologist	0.18% (2)	
Educator (secondary schools, collegiate)	0.28% (3)	
Physician Assistant	0.18% (2)	
Medical Doctor, Podiatrist, Doctor of Osteopathy	0.28% (3)	
Other profession not listed	0.92% (10)	
Please choose your primary practice setting.		
Private outpatient facility	42.10% (456)	
Public outpatient facility (e.g. state, county)	1.48% (16)	
Hospital based facility	18.19% (197)	
University/college sports medicine or athletic training facility	12.09% (131)	
Secondary school athletic training facility	11.54% (125)	
Academic/research institution	2.22% (24)	
Fitness or wellness facility	1.01% (11)	
Massage therapy facility	0.28% (3)	
Military service facility	1.48% (16)	
In-home services	1.57% (17)	
Professional sports	2.59% (28)	
Skilled nursing facility/acute facility	0.74% (8)	
Industrial/occupational health services	1.94% (21)	
Other setting not listed	2.77% (30)	
How many years have you been in professional practice?		
Average years in professional practice	16.13 ±11.11 years	

Respondent also indicated several factors that influenced how KT was applied in their clinical practice. The most common influential factors were collaboration with other professionals (75%, n=812), continuing education courses or conferences (74%, n=805), prior empirical experience (64%, n=694), and peer review research and textbooks (53%, n=580). Respondents also reported relying on websites, social media, and YouTube (31%, n=338) and manufacturer instructions (29%, n=313) to inform their clinical application of KT (Table 2).

56949 Table 2: Clinical perceptions about KT (N=1083)

*What are common reasons you use KT on your clients?		
Performance enhancement	20.78% (225)	
Injury prevention	15.42% (167)	
Post-injury treatment (e.g. edema, ecchymosis)	74.24% (804)	
Pain modulation	66.85% (724)	
Neuro-sensory feedback (e.g. proprioception)	60.30% (653)	
Myofascial mobility	24.01% (260)	
Neuromuscular re-education	45.52% (493)	
Pre-exercise warm-up	1.39% (15)	
Post-exercise treatment	6.00% (65)	
Placebo effect	40.44% (438)	
Posture feedback	0.64% (7)	
Patient requests KT	1.38% (15)	
Joint support	0.46% (5)	
Edema or swelling	0.74% (8)	
Other	7.01% (76)	
*Which factors have influenced how you apply KT to your clients?		
Peer reviewed research articles, textbooks	53.55% (580)	
Continuing education courses or conferences	74.33% (805)	
Manufacturer instructions	28.90% (313)	
KT textbooks	0.83% (9)	
Websites, social media posts, or videos (e.g. YouTube)	31.10% (338)	
Collaboration with other professionals	74.98% (812)	
My prior empirical experience	64.08% (694)	
Patient interest	1.66% (18)	
Other variables not listed	5.36% (20)	
*What therapeutic effects do you believe occur with KT?		
Enhanced myofascial mobility	29.46% (319)	
Pain modulation	69.80% (756)	
Increased joint ROM	15.05% (163)	
Enhanced stretch tolerance of muscles	13.48% (146)	
Enhanced post-exercise recovery	12.56% (136)	
Enhanced pre-exercise neuromyofascial excitation	13.11% (142)	
Enhanced proprioception and kinesthetic sense	69.10% (748)	
Enhance muscle activation/motor control	0.64% (7)	
Inhibit muscle activation/motor control	0.28% (3)	
Increases in local circulation (e.g. lymphatic)	65.47% (709)	
Decreased edema, swelling, and/or effusion	0.28% (3)	
Postural awareness	0.18% (2)	
Placebo effect	58.63% (635)	
Other effects not listed	3.23% (35)	
*Which physiological mechanisms do you believe occur with KT?		
Tape lifts the skin to allow improved local circulation	69.16% (749)	
Tape stimulates skin mechanoreceptors increasing proprioception	77.00% (834)	
Tape stimulates skin nociceptors resulting in pain modulation	60.20% (652)	
Tape help improve joint range of motion	15.24% (165)	
Tape helps improve muscle performance (strength)	13.85% (150)	
Tape helps improve muscle activation and motor control	46.26% (501)	
Tape can inhibit muscle activation	31.86% (345)	
Tape can create a placebo effect	73.68% (798)	
Other physiological mechanisms not listed	1.38% (15)	
*What therapeutic effects do you believe occur with your preferred KT tension length you use with clients?		
Enhanced myofascial mobility	23.45% (254)	
Pain modulation	55.31% (599)	
Increased joint ROM	9.42% (102)	
Enhanced stretch tolerance of muscles	10.80% (117)	
Enhanced post-exercise recovery	6.74% (73)	
Enhanced pre-exercise neuromyofascial excitation	10.06% (109)	
Enhanced proprioception and kinesthetic sense	58.73% (636)	
Increases in local circulation (e.g. lymphatic)	43.31% (469)	
Placebo effect	43.86% (475)	
Joint stability	0.83% (9)	
Muscle inhibition	0.18% (2)	
Other effects not listed	1.01% (11)	
**Which general precautions do you believe are most important with kinesiology tape?		
Skin reaction/allergy (e.g. irritation, itching)	50.69% (549)	
Thin skin (e.g. common in elderly)	25.48% (276)	
Lymph node removal	2.86% (31)	
Connective tissue disorder (e.g. Marfan syndrome)	3.79% (41)	
Medications that alter sensation	1.57% (17)	
Pregnancy	1.39% (15)	
impaired or altered sensation	9.08% (87)	
Unusual pain or discomfort	6.19% (67)	
***What other precautions should professionals consider with kinesiology tape?		
No other precautions	94.92% (1,028)	
Prior skin reaction to KT	0.74% (8)	
Allergy to adhesives or latex	0.74% (8)	
Patient understanding, compliance, and self-efficacy	1.01% (11)	
Patient ability to self-apply tape	0.37% (4)	
Patients with impaired judgement/cognition	0.65% (7)	
Other reason not listed above	1.57% (17)	
**Which contraindications do you believe are most important with kinesiology tape?		
Diabetes	2.40% (26)	
Peripheral neuropathy	1.39% (15)	
Acute injury	1.57% (17)	
Skin with open wounds or lesions	32.87% (356)	
Allergy to adhesives, latex, or synthetic tapes	33.33% (361)	
Deep vein thrombosis	4.80% (52)	
Congestive heart failure	1.66% (18)	
Malignancy (active)	3.51% (38)	
Renal insufficiency	0.28% (3)	
Infection or fever	1.85% (20)	
Undiagnosed rash or skin irritation	3.69% (40)	
Inability to communicate	13.48% (146)	
Lymph edema	0.55% (6)	
**What other contraindications should professionals consider with kinesiology tape?		
No other contraindications	84.76% (918)	
Patient willingness, mental status, or dependence	1.11% (12)	
Inability to reach a body region	0.74% (8)	
Skin sensitivity or tolerance	1.66% (18)	
Fragile or thin skin	1.94% (21)	
Other contraindications not listed	9.79 (106)	
* Respondents chose all options that applied to them; **Respondents ranked their answers; ***Respondents provided answers in a comment section; KT= kinesiology tape; ROM=range of motion

Several potential therapeutic effects of KT were also reported by the respondents. Most respondents believed KT modulates pain (70%, n=756), enhances proprioception and kinesthetic sense (69%, n=748), and increases local circulation (65%, n=709), while a smaller portion reported believing KT enhances myofascial mobility (29%, n=319). A substantial percentage (58%, n=635) of respondents also indicated a belief that KT creates a placebo effect (Table 2).

The reported potential physiological mechanisms that occur with KT application are reported in Table 2. Most respondents believed that KT stimulates skin mechanoreceptors increasing proprioception (77%, n=834), lifts the skin to improve local circulation (69%, n=749), stimulates skin nociceptors resulting in pain modulation (60%, n=652), and creates a placebo effect (74%; n =798). Others indicated that KT application improves muscle activation and motor control (46%, n=501) and inhibits muscle activation (32%, n=345) when used in patient care (Table 2).

Most respondents believed their preferred tension length created a therapeutic effect by enhancing proprioception and kinesthetic sense (59%, n=636), modulating pain (55%, n=599), increasing local circulation (43%, n=469), and enhancing myofascial mobility (23%, n=254). Forty-four percent (n=475) of respondents believed their preferred tension length provided a placebo effect (Table 2).

A large portion of respondents (51%, n=549) considered skin irritation and itching as precautions. Twenty-five percent (n=276) also considered thin skin as a precaution followed by impaired or altered sensation (9%, n=87). Ninety-five percent (n=1028) of respondents reported no other precautions to consider beyond the ones listed in the survey (Table 2).

Regarding KT contraindications, thirty-three percent (n=361) of respondents considered skin allergies (e.g. adhesives, latex) and 33% (n=356) considered open wounds and lesions as contraindications. Thirteen percent (n=146) considered inability to communicate as a contraindication followed by deep vein thrombosis (5%, n=52), undiagnosed rash or skin irritation (4%, n=40), malignancy (active) (3%, n=38), and diabetes (2%, n=26). Eighty-five percent (n=918) of respondents reported no other contraindications to consider beyond the ones listed in the survey (Table 2).

Clinical Application of Standard KT, Infused KT, Topicals, and Clinical Measures

Respondents reported utilizing a variety of tape brands and styles in clinical practice (Table 3). For commercial brand KT, KT Tape® (59%, n=640), RockTape® (50% n=546), Kinesio® tape (33%, n=359), and TheraBand® tape (11%, n=116) were the most commonly reported types of tape used by respondents. The respondents also indicated using a variety of tape colors, with black (71%, n=774) and beige (66%, n=713) being the most common colors used (Table 3).

56950 Table 3: Clinical application of standard and specialty KT (N=1083)

*Which commercial brand KT do you commonly use in your practice?		
KT Tape	59.10% (640)	
RockTape	50.41% (546)	
Kinesio Tex	33.15% (359)	
P-Tex	0.37% (4)	
TheraBand	10.71% (116)	
Spider Tech	3.42% (37)	
Strength Tape	1.02% (11)	
Mueller	7.39% (80)	
Dynamic	3.41% (37)	
Levotape	0.83% (9)	
Leukotape	0.18% (2)	
Other brands not listed	9.04% (98)	
*Which color/s of KT do you use most often with your clients? (colors without specialty designs)		
Black	71.47% (774)	
Beige	65.83% (713)	
Blue	30.66% (332)	
Pink	17.63% (191)	
Green	2.68% (29)	
Purple	4.80% (52)	
Red	7.94% (86)	
Yellow	0.46% (5)	
Orange	0.37% (4)	
Skin tone	0.46% (5)	
White	0.27% (3)	
*Which types of standard KT do you use most often on your clients? (standard roll and pre-cut tape)		
Pre-cut strips (2 in x 10 in) (5 cm x 25 cm)	15.51% (168)	
Pre-cut strips (4 in x 10 in) (10 cm x 25 cm)	3.05% (33)	
Pre-cut strips for digits (1 in x 10 in) (2.54 cm x 25 cm)	0.37% (4)	
Uncut roll (2 in x 16.4 ft) (5 cm x 5 m)	66.85% (724)	
Uncut roll (3 in x 16.4 ft) (7.5 cm x 5 m)	10.53% (114)	
Uncut roll (4 in x 16.4 ft) (10 cm x 5 m)	6.19% (67)	
Uncut roll for digits (1 in x 16.4 ft) (2.5 cm x 5 m)	0.74% (8)	
Uncut large roll (2 in x 105 ft) (5 cm x 32 m)	35.92% (389)	
Uncut large roll (4 in x 105 ft) (10 cm x 32 m)	4.71% (51)	
*Which types of specialty pre-cut KT do you most often use in your practice?		
Blister prevention tape	0.92% (10)	
Pre-cut fan tape (e.g. edema, bruising, lymphatic drainage)	8.86% (96)	
Pre-cut X tape	2.03% (22)	
Pre-cut tape for the upper body regions	3.51% (38)	
Pre-cut tape for the lower body regions	3.97% (43)	
I do not use specialty pre-cut tape	83.28% (902)	
I cut my own tape	0.37% (4)	
When applying the KT, what is the most common tension length percentage you use for your clients?		
25% tension	24.75% (268)	
50% tension	47.09% (510)	
75% tension	18.37% (199)	
100% tension	2.12% (23)	
125% tension	0.74% (8)	
150% tension	0.28% (3)	
175% tension	0.09% (1)	
No tension	6.56% (71)	
* Respondents chose all options that applied to them; KT= kinesiology tape

Most respondents reported using the KT standard uncut roll (2in/5cm x16.4ft/5m) (67%, n=724), while the large standard uncut roll (36%, n=389), standard pre-cut strips (15% n=168), and the wide uncut roll (11%, n=114) were also commonly used by clinicians (Table 3). Only a small portion of respondents reported using the pre-cut fan tape (9%, n=96), pre-cut tape for the lower body (4%, n=43), or pre-cut tape for the upper body (3% n =38); most of the respondents (83%, n=902) reported not using any of the specialty pre-cut tape options available (Table 3).

When applying KT to clients, the most common tension length used by respondents was 50% (47%, n=510) followed by 25% (25%, n=268) and 75% (18%, n=199) tension; seven percent (n=71) of respondents reported using no tension length (Table 3).

Almost all the respondents indicated the commercially manufactured infused tapes (99.54%, n=1078) were not used in their clinical practice (Table 4). Similarly, most respondents (65%, n=704) also indicated not using any topical analgesic in combination with a non-infused KT. The most commonly utilized topical analgesics, however, were Biofreeze® (23%, n=255), RockTape RockSauce® Fire (9%, n=98), RockTape RockSauce® Ice (7%, n=77), Flexall® (6%, n=61), and Voltaren® gel (5%, n=55) with non-infused KT (Table 4).

The most common clinical measures used by respondents to assess the efficacy of KT were patient reported outcomes (80%, n=862), girth measurements (43%, n=463), joint range of motion (40%, n=435), sports specific assessment (40%, n=437), movement-based testing (36%, n=393) and muscle performance (strength) testing (31%, n=337) (Table 4).

KT Education and Referral

Regarding skin prep before applying KT, sixty-four percent (n=695) of respondents provided client instructions. Common instructions included to clean and dry skin (53%, n=576), avoid lotions, oils, topicals, or gels (37%, n=396), and trim or remove hair on the body region (12%, n=131) being taped. Thirty-six percent (n=388) of respondents did not provide any skin prep instruction (Table 5).

Most respondents (77%, n=837) provided tape removal instructions to the clients. Common instructions included slowly removing tape (44%, n=474), applying oil (mineral, baby) to tape or use of adhesive remover (18%, n=191), wetting tape before removal (10%, n=113), and do not rip off tape (7%, n=67). Twenty-three percent (n=246) did not provide any tape removal instructions (Table 5).

The average time respondents recommended clients to wear KT was two (32%, n=344) and three days (38%, n=406). The maximum time respondents recommended clients to wear KT was for five days (33%, n=357), three days (24%, n=259), four days (13%, n=140), and two days (11%, n=114) (Table 5).

The most common type of client education was live instruction (89%, n=960), and most respondents referred clients to generic websites (65%, n=704), retail stores (43%, n=469), or manufacturer websites (26%, n=277) to purchase KT. Twenty four percent (n=258) of respondents did not provide recommendations to clients on KT purchases (Table 5).

DISCUSSION

This cross-sectional study was the first survey to document healthcare professionals’ beliefs and clinical practices for KT. We attempted to provide insight into the practices of clinicians using KT and to answer clinical questions that have been unanswered in the body of KT evidence to inform future research. The results of our study, combined with the immense body of research, may help discern why inconsistencies may be found in the literature, while also providing awareness of common clinical KT practices to guide future research efforts.

Respondent clinical perceptions of KT

Professionals reported using KT for pain modulation (60-70%) , neuro-sensory feedback (e.g. proprioception) (60-77%), neuromuscular re-education (45-46%) , post-injury treatment (e.g. increase local circulation; 65-74%), myofascial mobility (24-29%), and placebo effect (40-74%). The respondents, however, reported using continuing education (74%), professional collaboration (75%), and prior experience (64%) to inform their clinical application of KT with clients. Interestingly, these sources were noted more often than peer reviewed research (53%). The current results are similar to prior myofascial intervention survey research examining clinician perceptions of IASTM; clinicians often sought out informal sources of information and utilize personal experience to guide their clinical practice.44 The varied sources of information and training may also help explain the variations in KT use in clinical practice and research, while also potentially explaining respondent beliefs about the clinical use, therapeutic benefits, and physiological effects of KT. Thus, clinician beliefs may be influenced by peer-reviewed research; however, it is also possible clinician beliefs may be more influenced by informal educational sources, as part of KT training provided by a commercial entity, or by their own clinical experiences than by the research evidence (Table 2).

For pain modulation, the research is inconclusive with some studies reporting poor efficacy when using KT for pain related to musculoskeletal injury2 and chronic musculoskeletal pain.16,17 While some researchers report weak to moderate evidence for myofascial30 and low back pain.32–34 For post-exercise soreness, several researchers have documented that KT may diminish the effects of delayed onset of muscle soreness (DOMS) after intense exercise.45–48 For neuro-sensory feedback and muscle re-education, there are mixed results in the literature. Two studies compared KT versus placebo on knee joint position sense in healthy subjects;49,50 a significant group differences was not found in either study, questioning the efficacy of KT for this type of intervention. Other researchers, however, have reported KT improved proprioception in post-ACL repair individuals51 and elderly individuals when the tape was combined with exercise (Table 2).52

For increasing circulation post injury/surgery, several studies suggest KT may increase local microcirculation53–55 and skin temperature,53–55 while decreasing tissue edema.56 Other researchers, however, did not find any significant changes in local microcirculation after KT was applied.57 Respondents also use KT to enhance myofascial mobility, which has some evidence in the literature for causing deformation of the different skin and myofascial layers locally58,59 and distally59 which supports the mechanical effects of the tape.

A substantial portion of respondents also believed KT only creates a physiological placebo (40%), and a large portion of respondents indicated using it for such therapeutic placebo effects (58%) with their clients (Table 2). Several studies have investigated the placebo effects of facilitatory and inhibitory KT taping techniques. One study found that KT promoted increased grip strength among healthy individuals but did not find any electromyography (EMG) changes in the forearm muscles, which suggests some type of indirect placebo effect.60 Others have not found any differences between KT facilitation, inhibition, sham taping, or no taping for muscle activity, strength, power, or perceived maximum strength for the forearm muscles,61–63 quadriceps,64–67 and calf muscles.67 Researchers have also reported no therapeutic differences between KT, sham tape, and control group for individuals with lateral epicondylitis68–70 and chronic low back pain.71 Professionals should consider that these results are limited to the study methods (e.g. placebo) and study populations; further research is needed to confirm or refute the placebo effects for different populations.

For KT tension length, most of the respondents believed their preferred tape tension length enhanced proprioception and kinesthetic sense (59%) and modulated pain (55%), while a substantial portion felt it increased local circulation (43%), enhanced myofascial mobility (23%)., and provided a placebo effect (40%) (Table 2). The research on the efficacy of tape length tension will be further discussed in the next section on clinical application of KT.

56951 Table 4: Clinical application of Infused KT, topicals, and clinical measures (N=1083)

*Which type/s of commercial infused KT do you use with your clients?	
Tape infused with CBD (Hemp)	0.18% (2)	
Tape infused with Menthol	0.28% (3)	
Tape infused with Copper	0.18% (2)	
Tape infused with Tourmaline	0.09% (1)	
I do not use infused tape	99.54% (1078)	
*Which commercially available topical analgesic/s due you use in combination with non-infused KT? (most common brands or types)	
Biofreeze	23.55% (255)	
Tiger Balm	3.51% (38)	
Flexall	5.63% (61)	
RockSauce Fire	9.05% (98)	
RockSauce Ice	7.11% (77)	
Solonpas	1.29% (14)	
IcyHot	1.39% (15)	
Mineral Ice	0.18% (2)	
Ben Gay	0.18% (2)	
CBD Topical	2.22% (24)	
Cramer Atomic Balm	1.75% (19)	
Arnica	3.60% (39)	
Voltaren Gel	5.08% (55)	
Hydro cortisone	0.92% (10)	
Sombra	1.75% (19)	
Other brands not listed	3.51% (38)	
I do not use any topical analgesic	65.00% (704)	
*What clinical measures do you use to assess the effects of KT?	
Joint range of motion (e.g. goniometer, inclinometer)	40.17% (435)	
Pressure pain threshold (e.g. algometer)	17.08% (185)	
Patient reported outcomes (e.g. NRS, VAS pain scales)	79.59% (862)	
Movement based testing (e.g. FMS, SFMA)	36.29% (393)	
Muscle performance (strength) testing	31.12% (337)	
Activity or sports specific assessment	40.35% (437)	
Girth measurements (e.g. edema)	42.75% (463)	
Gait assessment	0.55% (6)	
Palpation	0.37% (4)	
Observation/visual changes	0.65% (7)	
Other measures not listed	0.92% (10)	
I do not use clinical measures to assess the effects of KT	11.08% (120)	
* Respondents chose all options that applied to them; KT= kinesiology tape; CBD: Cannabidiol

56952 Table 5: KT education and referral (N=1083)

Do you instruct your clients to prepare their skin before applying the KT?		
Yes	64.17% (695)	
No	35.83% (388)	
*If yes to the prior question, what instructions do you provide to your clients?		
Clean and dry skin (e.g. soap/water, isopropyl alcohol)	53.18% (576)	
Avoid lotions, oils, topicals, or gels	36.56% (396)	
Trim or remove hair in body region	12.10% (131)	
Inspect skin integrity, rashes, open wounds, etc.	1.10% (12)	
Do you instruct your clients on how to safely remove the KT?		
Yes	77.29% (837)	
No	22.71% (246)	
*If yes, what instructions do you provide to your clients for removing KT?		
Wet tape before removal	10.44% (113)	
Remove tape slowly	43.77% (474)	
Remove tape slowly and pull skin in opposite direction	1.75% (19)	
Remove tape in the direction of hair growth	5.35% (58)	
Remove tape parallel to skin	2.21% (24)	
Apply oil (baby, mineral) to tape, or use adhesive remover	17.64% (191)	
Do not rip off tape	6.19% (67)	
What is the average time you recommend clients to wear KT?		
Less than One Day	2.40% (26)	
One Day	8.59% (93)	
Two Days	31.76% (344)	
Three Days	37.49% (406)	
Four Days	8.03% (87)	
Five Days	4.06% (44)	
Greater than 5 days	1.57% (17)	
I do not recommend	6.09% (66)	
What is the maximum time you recommend clients to wear the KT?		
Less than One Day	1.11% (12)	
One Day	3.14% (34)	
Two Days	10.53% (114)	
Three Days	23.92% (259)	
Four Days	12.93% (140)	
Five Days	32.96% (357)	
Greater than 5 days	5.82% (63)	
I do not recommend	9.60% (104)	
**What are common types of education you use to teach clients about KT?		
Live instruction	88.64% (960)	
Video instruction	3.14% (34)	
Self-guided program (e.g. client chooses parameters)	3.97% (43)	
Education materials (e.g. handouts with exercises)	4.25% (46)	
***Where do you direct your clients to purchase KT?		
Manufacturer website	25.58% (277)	
Generic websites (e.g. Amazon)	65.00% (704)	
Retail Store (brick and mortar)	43.30% (469)	
Sell in my facility	16.90% (183)	
Provide it free to patients	1.57% (17)	
Commercial distributor/medical supply	0.28% (3)	
I don't recommend	23.82% (258)	
Other recommendations not listed	5.82% (6)	
* Respondents provided answers in a comment section; **Respondents ranked their answers; **Respondents chose all options that applied to them

For precautions, most respondents considered skin reaction (51%), thin skin (25%), and impaired or altered sensation (e.g. diabetes neuropathy) as the most important to consider for potential KT application adverse events (Table 2). There is a small body of research that has directly studied the side effects and tolerability of KT among individuals with neurological disorders,72,73 cancer related lymphoedema,74,75and healthy individuals.76 The incidences of side effects (e.g. skin reaction) or intolerance reported among these studies ranged between 4% to 33%.72–77 Unfortunately, the research on KT side effects is sparse. The existing data may not represent the actual number of occurrences among different client populations such as athletes and individuals with musculoskeletal disorders.77 These two populations may use KT the most and may not be well represented in the current literature. Sports medicine professionals could benefit from knowing the incident rates of KT side effects in this population to improve clinical decision making and inform their practice patterns.

For KT contraindications, most respondents considered skin allergies (33%), open wounds and lesions (33%), and inability to communicate (13%) as the most important (Table 2). Some researchers suggest using a small piece of KT on the forearm to check for a skin reaction to the tape (e.g. redness, itching, etc) noted within 15 minutes.78 These precautions and contraindication align with recommendations in the literature but may not represent all possible conditions.77,79–81 Professionals should consider that these conditions have not been fully investigated and should properly screen each client prior to administering KT as an intervention.

Clinical Application of KT

Most respondents (47%) purchased tape from three manufacturers, but our results also indicate that clinicians utilize KT from a variety of manufacturers. Clinicians reported using a variety of popular KT colors with clients: black (71%), beige (66%), blue (31%), and pink (18%) (Table 3). Researchers have previously examined the influence of KT color on athletic performance, quadriceps strength, and neuromuscular function among healthy individuals.82 Five conditions were measured: no tape, KT beige sham, beige KT with 50% tension, red KT with 50% tension, and blue KT with 50% tension.82 The researchers found that KT, regardless of color or condition, did not alter athletic performance, lower leg strength, or neuromuscular function.82 The current evidence suggests clinicians may utilize the KT colors preferred by their clients without concerns for it detrimentally affecting athletic performance.

Respondents most often used the KT standard uncut rolls (67%), followed by the large standard uncut roll (36%) then standard pre-cut strips (15%). These respondents did not indicate the use of any specialty pre-cut strips (83%), commercially infused tape (99%), or a combination of a topical analgesic and non-infused tape (65%) in clinical practice; however, a small portion of respondents (23%) did report combining Biofreeze with non-infused tape (Table 3 and 4). While previous research on KT practice patterns was not identified in the literature, the current findings are not unexpected. Clinicians have reported using a variety of IASTM instruments and utilizing instruments from numerous manufactures44; thus, it is not surprising to have similar practice patterns arise with KT. Research regarding the therapeutic effects of different infused KT or the effects of a non-infused KT with a topical analgesic was also not identified in the literature. Due to this lack of evidence, professionals will need to rely on the assessment of patient outcomes and good clinical judgement when matching a specific tape to their clients.

Respondents reported commonly used a KT tension length range of 25-75%, with 50% tension (47%) being the most used among respondents (Table 3). While the actual tension force being used was not validated with the survey responses and the current results do not elucidate whether or how clinicians adjust the tension length based on pathology or patient need; however, the respondent choices for tension length are consistent with general KT recommendations in the literature. A 25% to 50% tape tension length has been recommended for treatment of fascia and circulatory conditions, stimulating, and inhibiting muscle activity.83 A tension length range of 75 to 100% has been recommended for treatment of tendons and ligaments.83 These recommendations are often shared among professionals, but are not necessarily evidence based.

Different KT tensions were not found to have positive effects among healthy individuals for quadriceps strength,84,85 knee joint range of motion,85 lower extremity hop test,84 the gastrocnemius and soleus H-Reflex,86,87 and EMG activity of the quadriceps and hamstrings during a loaded squat exercise.88 However, other researchers have reported that KT does facilitate the H-Reflex89 and shoulder muscle EMG activity90 among healthy individuals. Researchers have also documented that different tape tension lengths (15-50%) did not produce significant changes in EMG paraspinal muscle activity among individuals with chronic low back pain91,92 and non-specific low back pain.93 The research on KT tension length is inconclusive and has been focused more on healthy versus injured participants, which presents a barrier for interpreting the research. Without sound evidence to guide practice, professional will be forced to rely on their clinical outcomes, personal preferences, or information from informal sources to guide tension length due to the lack of evidence.

For clinical measures, most respondent used patient reported outcomes (80%), girth measurement (43%), joint ROM (40%), movement-based testing sports specific assessments (40%), movement-based testing (36%), and muscle performance (31%) to measure the effects of KT (Table 4). These outcomes are commonly used in the research2,18,27–30,33 and are similar to the types of outcome measures used by clinicians when assessing the effectiveness of IASTM.44

KT Education and Referral

For skin prep, most respondents (64%) instructed patients to clean and dry skin first, avoid topical lotions, oils, and gels, and to trim or remove hair on the body region being taped. For KT removal, most respondents (77%) instructed their patients to slowly remove the tape, applying oil (mineral, baby) to tape or use of adhesive remover, wet tape before removal, and do not rip off the tape (Table 5). The results of the survey demonstrate some common instructions often taught by tape manufacturers or shared among professionals.77 The most concerning finding was that 36% of respondents did not provide any skin prep instructions and 23% did not provide any tape removal instructions to their clients (Table 5). The current findings are consistent with previous research on IASTM clinician practice patterns for following training recommendations; researchers reported that more than 45% of their respondents indicated failing to following training recommendations from some to all the time.44 The lack of instruction or failure to following training or best practice recommendations may present a risk for injury because the clinician or client may not use the tape correctly. Currently, research is lacking on the best practice recommendations for skin prep and KT removal and little is known about any potential related complications (e.g. allergic reaction, infection, etc.) to KT use in this area.

For length of time wearing tape, most respondents (70%) recommended for clients to wear KT an average of two to three days with a maximum wear time of three to five days (Table 5). These recommendation are consistent with research that has examined the effects of KT wear time of three to seven days on balance and functional performance among healthy individuals,94 among individuals with myofascial pain syndrome and trigger points,95–98 chronic ankle instability,99 subacromial shoulder impingement,100,101 rheumatoid arthritis,102 knee osteoarthritis,103 total knee replacement,104 and lymphedema.105 Studies have also been performed measuring hamstring extensibility,106 increased local tissue temperature,54 and quadriceps strength107 in subjects wearing KT within this time range. Survey respondent recommendations for KT wear time seem to be in line with the research. Professionals should determine KT wear time on an individual basis and always monitor for side effects such as skin irritation or allergy,77 and future research should examine how clinicians adjust wear time based on client need or clinical scenario.

Most respondents used live education (89%) for the clients and referred them to generic websites (65%) and retails stores (43%) to purchase KT. Twenty four percent did not provide recommendations (Table 5). Unfortunately, there is no research measuring the efficacy of different modes or instruction or the influences on professional referral to purchase KT. Only one related myofascial intervention study measured the efficacy of different modes of education for myofascial rolling. The researchers compared a 2-minutes live instruction, video instruction, and a self-administered program for the quadriceps. The study outcomes were passive knee flexion range of motion and pain threshold. The researchers found that all modes produced similar post intervention outcomes for all measures. The researchers concluded that professionals should match the best instructional mode to each patient to provide the best experience.108 Future studies are needed with KT.

Practice Implications and Future Research

This survey revealed several trends in the beliefs and clinical application of KT among healthcare professionals: a gap exists between the respondent beliefs, professional practices, and the current evidence. Weaknesses in the research for guiding clinical practice may be caused by two primary issues: tape manufacturing and study method differences. First, the large body of research consists of studies that have used different tape brands. This presents a major issue when comparing study outcomes due to the differences among tape mechanical properties (e.g. tension, strain). Three recent studies measured the material and mechanical properties of 23 different KT brands and found all had different mechanical properties making it difficult for a direct comparison across studies.83,109,110 Second, most of the KT research has variable outcomes due to different study methods and these study methods do not always match common clinical practice. Researchers have used different manufactured tape, taping techniques (e.g. tape elongation length), and outcomes which prevents a direct comparison or reproducibility among studies or direct translation to clinical practice.11,12,18

The KT conflicting evidence creates a gap between professional practice, education, and research. Professionals may rely on their own preferred KT techniques because there are discrepancies between the KT guidelines, techniques taught in professional education courses,77 application in clinical practice, and what is reported in the research. As noted in the introduction, thirty-eight systematic reviews have been published since 2010 with inconclusive results. These issues may reflect the portion of respondents that believe KT only creates a physiological placebo (40%) and use it for such therapeutic placebo effects (59%) with their clients. Future research needs to address the issues of variations across tape manufacturing and study methods, while also exploring adverse and long-term effects of KT application. Further, researchers need to establish the most common clinical practice patterns for KT application to inform study methodologies. In addition to examining the effects of KT, researchers also must learn how clinician training influences KT application and patient outcomes, how clinicians determine KT tension and wear time and how these factors influence patient outcomes, and how individual client differences (e.g., age, activity level, pathology, etc.) influence KT application.

Limitations

Several limitations need to be discussed for this investigation. First, this survey was sent electronically to a cross-sectional sample of healthcare professionals with a 2.1% response rate. A larger sample or a different method for sampling with a higher response rate may have produced different results; the results could be influenced by non-response error. However, to the researcher’s knowledge this is the first KT survey study. Second, the results can only be generalized to the healthcare professionals surveyed. Other healthcare professionals may have provided different responses. Third, the survey contained a limited number of items. Different questions may have revealed different ideas of how professionals use KT. For example, the survey did not ask about respondent preference for KT direction such as the tape is tensioned along muscle origin to insertion for facilitation or opposite for inhibition. The current evidence contradicts these directional techniques.111–114 The survey focused on tape tension length only versus directional strategies. Finally, this survey was sent to members of three professional organizations. The results many not fully represent the perceptions and practices from other non-member healthcare professionals. However, the results do provide insight into responses among different healthcare professionals, but further research is needed to determine how respondent demographics may have influenced KT perceptions.

Conclusion

This is the first KT survey to document professional beliefs and clinical practices for KT. Professionals use different types and brands of KT. They also apply KT with different lengths and tensions to treat a variety of conditions, including as a placebo by nearly 60% of the respondents. Professionals also believe KT provides numerous positive therapeutic effects for clients, but little is known regarding how the therapeutic effects might be produced with KT application. The KT conflicting results may be caused by two primary issues: tape manufacturing and study method differences. Future research addressing these two issues should be pursued to validate or refute the efficacy of KT.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest with this study.
==== Refs
The effects of kinesiotape on athletic-based performance outcomes in healthy, active individuals: A literature synthesis J Can Chiropr Assoc Drouin J.L. McAlpine C.T. Primak K.A.. 2013
57 4 356 365 24302784
Effect of kinesiology taping on pain in individuals with musculoskeletal injuries: Systematic review and meta-analysis The Physician and Sportsmedicine Montalvo Alicia M. Cara Ed Le Myer Gregory D. 1 5 2014
42 2 48 57 0091-3847 10.3810/psm.2014.05.2057 10.3810/psm.2014.05.2057
The clinical efficacy of kinesio taping in shoulder disorders: A systematic review and meta analysis Clinical Rehabilitation Celik Derya Karaborklu Argut Sezen Coban Ozge Eren Ilker SAGE Publications 12 5 2020
34 6 723 740 0269-2155 10.1177/0269215520917747 10.1177/0269215520917747
Efficacy of kinesio taping in treatment of shoulder pain and disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Physiotherapy Ghozy Sherief Dung Nguyen Minh Morra Mostafa Ebraheem Morsy Sara Elsayed Ghadeer Gamal Tran Linh Minh Le Huu Nhat Abbas Alzhraa Salah Loc Tran Thai Huu Hieu Truong Hong Dung Truong Cong Huy Nguyen Tien Elsevier BV 6 2020
107 176 188 0031-9406 10.1016/j.physio.2019.12.001 10.1016/j.physio.2019.12.001 32026818
Effectiveness of Elastic Taping in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Ye Wenwen Jia Chengsen Jiang Junliang Liang Qiu He Chengqi Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) 2020
99 6 495 503 1537-7385 10.1097/phm.0000000000001361 10.1097/phm.0000000000001361 31851010
Sticking to the facts: A systematic review of the effects of therapeutic tape in lateral epicondylalgia Physical Therapy in Sport George Caitlin E. Heales Luke J. Stanton Robert Wintour Sally-Anne Kean Crystal O. 11 2019
40 117 127 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.08.011 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.08.011
Effect of taping on spinal pain and disability: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials Phys Ther Vanti Carla Bertozzi Lucia Gardenghi Ivan Turoni Francesca Guccione Andrew A. Pillastrini Paolo 1 4 2015
95 4 493 506 0031-9023 10.2522/ptj.20130619 10.2522/ptj.20130619
Can a Conservative Rehabilitation Strategy Improve Shoulder Proprioception? A Systematic Review J Sport Rehabil Ager Amanda L. Borms Dorien Bernaert Magali Brusselle Vicky Claessens Mazarine Roy Jean-Sébastien Cools Ann 2020
30 1 136 151 1056-6716 10.1123/jsr.2019-0400 10.1123/jsr.2019-0400 32736342
Systematic review of the effectiveness of Kinesio taping for children with brachial plexus injury Physiotherapy Research International Hassan Basant Saiid Abbass Mai Elsayed Elshennawy Shorouk 2020
25 1 e1794 1358-2267 10.1002/pri.1794 10.1002/pri.1794 31231910
Effects of Kinesio® taping on skeletal muscle strength—A meta-analysis of current evidence Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Csapo Robert Alegre Luis M. 7 2015
18 4 450 456 1440-2440 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.06.014 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.06.014 25027771
Effectiveness of kinesiology tape on sports performance abilities in athletes: A systematic review Physical Therapy in Sport Reneker Jennifer C. Latham Lisa McGlawn Ryan Reneker Matthew R. 5 2018
31 83 98 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2017.10.001 10.1016/j.ptsp.2017.10.001 29248350
Current evidence does not support the use of Kinesio Taping in clinical practice: A systematic review Journal of Physiotherapy Parreira Patrícia do Carmo Silva Costa Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Hespanhol Luiz Carlos, Jr. Lopes Alexandre Dias Costa Leonardo Oliveira Pena 3 2014
60 1 31 39 1836-9553 10.1016/j.jphys.2013.12.008 10.1016/j.jphys.2013.12.008 24856938
A systematic review of the effectiveness of Kinesio Taping--fact or fashion? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med Kalron A. Bar-Sela S. 2013
49 5 699 709 23558699
The clinical effects of Kinesio®Tex taping: A systematic review Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Morris D. Jones D. Ryan H. Ryan C. G. 2013
29 4 259 270 0959-3985 10.3109/09593985.2012.731675 10.3109/09593985.2012.731675 23088702
A systematic review of the effectiveness of kinesio taping for musculoskeletal injury The Physician and Sportsmedicine Mostafavifar Mehran Wertz Jess Borchers James 11 2012
40 4 33 40 0091-3847 10.3810/psm.2012.11.1986 10.3810/psm.2012.11.1986
Kinesio taping in musculoskeletal pain and disability that lasts for more than 4 weeks: Is it time to peel off the tape and throw it out with the sweat? A systematic review with meta-analysis focused on pain and also methods of tape application British Journal of Sports Medicine Lim Edwin Choon Wyn Tay Mathew Guo Xiang BMJ 16 1 2015
49 24 1558 1566 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094151 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094151
Kinesio taping in treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine Sheng Y Duan Z Qu Q Chen W Yu B Acta Dermato-Venereologica 2019
51 10 734 740 1650-1977 10.2340/16501977-2605 10.2340/16501977-2605 31544952
Kinesio taping in treatment and prevention of sports injuries: A meta-analysis of the evidence for its effectiveness Sports Medicine Williams Sean Whatman Chris Hume Patria A. Sheerin Kelly 2 2012
42 2 153 164 0112-1642 10.2165/11594960-000000000-00000 10.2165/11594960-000000000-00000
Effects of Kinesio Taping on breast cancer-related lymphedema: A meta-analysis in clinical trials Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Kasawara Karina Tamy Mapa Jéssica Monique Rossetti Ferreira Vilma Added Marco Aurélio Nemitalla Shiwa Silvia Regina Carvas Jr Nelson Batista Patricia Andrade 8 1 2018
34 5 337 345 0959-3985 10.1080/09593985.2017.1419522 10.1080/09593985.2017.1419522
Therapeutic effects of kinesio taping in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review Archivos Argentinos de Pediatria Ortiz Ramírez J Pérez de la Cruz S 1 12 2017
115 6 356 361 0325-0075 10.5546/aap.2017.eng.e356 10.5546/aap.2017.eng.e356
The efficacy of kinesiology taping for improving gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review South African Journal of Physiotherapy Unger Marianne Carstens Juan P. Fernandes Natasha Pretorius Rulanda Pronk Suzelle Robinson Ashleigh C. Scheepers Kara 29 8 2018
74 1 459 2410-8219 10.4102/sajp.v74i1.459 10.4102/sajp.v74i1.459 30214950
Effects of elastic therapeutic taping on motor function in children with motor impairments: A systematic review Disability and Rehabilitation Cunha Andréa Baraldi Lima-Alvarez Carolina Daniel Rocha Ana Carolinne Portela Tudella Eloisa 2018
40 14 1609 1617 0963-8288 10.1080/09638288.2017.1304581 10.1080/09638288.2017.1304581 28325096
Systematic review on effectiveness of shoulder taping in hemiplegia Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases Ravichandran Hariharasudhan Janakiraman Balamurugan Sundaram Subramanian Fisseha Berihu Gebreyesus Tsiwaye Yitayeh Gelaw Asmare 6 2019
28 6 1463 1473 1052-3057 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.03.021 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.03.021 30956057
Use of Kinesio taping in lower-extremity rehabilitation of post-stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice Wang Mian Pei Zi-Wen Xiong Bei-Dou Meng Xian-Mei Chen Xiao-Li Liao Wei-Jing 5 2019
35 22 32 1744-3881 10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.01.008 10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.01.008 31003662
Kinesio taping for balance function after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Hu Yijuan Zhong Dongling Xiao Qiwei Chen Qiang Li Juan Jin Rongjiang 16 7 2019
2019 8470235 1741-427X 10.1155/2019/8470235 10.1155/2019/8470235 31379969
Efficacy of adhesive taping as an adjunt to physical rehabilitation to influence outcomes post-stroke: A systematic review Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation Grampurohit Namrata Pradhan Sujata Kartin Deborah 23 1 2015
22 1 72 82 1074-9357 10.1179/1074935714z.0000000031 10.1179/1074935714z.0000000031
Kinesio taping is superior to other taping methods in ankle functional performance improvement: A systematic review and meta-analysis Clinical Rehabilitation Wang Yun Gu Yu Chen Jiancong Luo Wenhao He Wanying Han Zhongyu Tian Jing 18 7 2018
32 11 1472 1481 0269-2155 10.1177/0269215518780443 10.1177/0269215518780443
Effects of kinesio tape on lower limb muscle strength, hop test, and vertical jump performances: A meta-analysis BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Yam Ming Lok Yang Zuyao Zee Benny Chung-Ying Chong Ka Chun 14 5 2019
20 1 212 1471-2474 10.1186/s12891-019-2564-6 10.1186/s12891-019-2564-6 31088546
Effectiveness of taping on functional performance in elite athletes: A systematic review Journal of Biomechanics Lau Kenney Ki-Lee Cheng Kenneth Chik-Chi 6 2019
90 16 23 0021-9290 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.016 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.016 31079878
Evidence for kinesio taping in management of myofascial pain syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis Clinical Rehabilitation Zhang Xue-Feng Liu Lin Wang Bin-Bin Liu Xu Li Ping SAGE Publications 4 2 2019
33 5 865 874 0269-2155 10.1177/0269215519826267 10.1177/0269215519826267
Does taping in addition to physiotherapy improve the outcomes in subacromial impingement syndrome? A systematic review Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Saracoglu Ismail Emuk Yusuf Taspinar Ferruh 2018
34 4 251 263 0959-3985 10.1080/09593985.2017.1400138 10.1080/09593985.2017.1400138 29111849
Effects of kinesiotape on pain and disability in individuals with chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Clinical Rehabilitation Li Yuejie Yin Ying Jia Gongwei Chen Hong Yu Lehua Wu Dandong SAGE Publications 2019
33 4 596 606 0269-2155 10.1177/0269215518817804 10.1177/0269215518817804 30526011
Kinesio taping for chronic low back pain: A systematic review Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies Nelson Nicole L. 7 2016
20 3 672 681 1360-8592 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.04.018 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.04.018 27634093
Effects of kinesio taping alone versus sham taping in individuals with musculoskeletal conditions after intervention for at least one week: A systematic review and meta-analysis Physiotherapy Ramírez-Vélez Robinson Hormazábal-Aguayo Ignacio Izquierdo Mikel González-Ruíz Katherine Correa-Bautista Jorge Enrique García-Hermoso Antonio Elsevier BV 12 2019
105 4 412 420 0031-9406 10.1016/j.physio.2019.04.001 10.1016/j.physio.2019.04.001
Effectiveness of kinesio taping in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis Spine Luz Júnior Maurício Antônio Da Almeida Matheus Oliveira De Santos Raiany Silva Civile Vinicius Tassoni Costa Leonardo Oliveira Pena Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) 1 1 2019
44 1 68 78 0362-2436 10.1097/brs.0000000000002756 10.1097/brs.0000000000002756
The effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: A systematic review Journal of Physical Therapy Science Al-Subahi Moayad Alayat Mohamed Alshehri Mansour Abdullah Helal Omar Alhasan Hammad Alalawi Ahmed Takrouni Abdullah Alfaqeh Ali Society of Physical Therapy Science 2017
29 9 1689 1694 0915-5287 10.1589/jpts.29.1689 10.1589/jpts.29.1689 28932014
Short-term effect of kinesiotaping on chronic nonspecific low back pain and disability: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Phys Ther Lin Shanshan Zhu Bo Huang Guozhi Wang Chuhuai Zeng Qing Zhang Shanshan 2020
100 2 238 254 0031-9023 10.1093/ptj/pzz163 10.1093/ptj/pzz163 31696916
Systematic review of the effect of taping techniques on patellofemoral pain syndrome Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach Logan Catherine A. Bhashyam Abhiram R. Tisosky Ashley J. Haber Daniel B. Jorgensen Anna Roy Adam Provencher Matthew T. SAGE Publications 15 6 2017
9 5 456 461 1941-7381 10.1177/1941738117710938 10.1177/1941738117710938 28617653
Roller massage: survey of physical therapy professionals and a commentary on clinical standards- part ii International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Cheatham Scott W. Stull Kyle R. Ambler-Wright Tony 8 2018
13 5 920 930 2159-2896 10.26603/ijspt20180920 10.26603/ijspt20180920 30276024
Roller Massage: A Descriptive Survey of Allied Health Professionals J Sport Rehabil Cheatham Scott W. 1 8 2019
28 6 640 649 1056-6716 10.1123/jsr.2017-0366 10.1123/jsr.2017-0366
The use of facebook in recruiting participants for health research purposes: A systematic review Journal of Medical Internet Research Whitaker Christopher Stevelink Sharon Fear Nicola JMIR Publications Inc. 28 8 2017
19 8 e290 1438-8871 10.2196/jmir.7071 10.2196/jmir.7071 28851679
A method for the design and development of medical or health care information websites to optimize search engine results page rankings on Google Journal of Medical Internet Research Dunne Suzanne Cummins Niamh Maria Hannigan Ailish Shannon Bill Dunne Colum Cullen Walter JMIR Publications Inc. 27 8 2013
15 8 e183 1438-8871 10.2196/jmir.2632 10.2196/jmir.2632 23981848
Knowledge of self-myofascial release among allied health students in the United States: A descriptive survey Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies Cheatham Scott W. Stull Kyle R. 7 2018
22 3 713 717 1360-8592 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.01.015 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.01.015 30100301
Instrument assisted soft-tissue mobilization: A survey of practice patterns among allied health professionals J Athl Train Cheatham S W Baker R T Larkin L Baker J Casanova M 2020

Kinesiotaping diminishes delayed muscle soreness but does not improve muscular performance Int J Sports Med Camacho M.A. Herrera E. Barela J.A.. 8 2020
41 9 596 602 32396966
The effectiveness of kinesio taping in recovering from delayed onset muscle soreness: A cross-over study J Sport Rehabil Kirmizigil B. Chauchat J R Yalciner O. 2019 1 28
Effects of kinesio taping on the relief of delayed onset muscle soreness: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial J Sport Rehabil Hazar Kanik Zeynep Citaker Seyit Yilmaz Demirtas Canan Celik Bukan Neslihan Celik Bulent Gunaydin Gurkan 1 11 2019
28 8 781 786 1056-6716 10.1123/jsr.2018-0040 10.1123/jsr.2018-0040
The effects of kinesio taping on architecture, strength and pain of muscles in delayed onset muscle soreness of biceps brachii Journal of Physical Therapy Science Lee Yong Sin Bae Sea Hyun Hwang Jin Ah Kim Kyung Yoon Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015
27 2 457 459 0915-5287 10.1589/jpts.27.457 10.1589/jpts.27.457 25729190
Assessment of the impact of kinesiology taping application versus placebo taping on the knee joint position sense. preliminary report Ortop Traumatol Rehabil Hadamus Anna Grabowicz Marta Wąsowski Patryk Mosiołek Anna Boguszewski Dariusz Białoszewski Dariusz 30 4 2018
20 2 139 148 1509-3492 10.5604/01.3001.0012.0425 10.5604/01.3001.0012.0425 30152782
The effect of kinesiology tape on knee proprioception in healthy subjects Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies Torres Rui Trindade Raquel Gonçalves Rui Soles 10 2016
20 4 857 862 1360-8592 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.02.009 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.02.009
Effects on proprioception by kinesio taping of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament rupture European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Bischoff Lars Babisch Christian Babisch Jürgen Layher Frank Sander Klaus Matziolis Georg Pietsch Stefan Röhner Eric Springer Science and Business Media LLC 10 3 2018
28 6 1157 1164 1633-8065 10.1007/s00590-018-2167-1 10.1007/s00590-018-2167-1
Does Kinesiology tape counter exercise-related impairments of balance in the elderly? Gait Posture Hosp S. Csapo R. Heinrich D.. 2018
62 167 172 29550696
Short-term effect of different taping methods on local skin temperature in healthy adults Frontiers in Physiology Liu Kun Duan Zhouying Chen Lihua Wen Zixing Zhu Shengqun Qu Qiang Chen Wenhua Zhang Shuxin Yu Bo 20 5 2020
11 488 1664-042X 10.3389/fphys.2020.00488 10.3389/fphys.2020.00488 32508677
Short-term effect of kinesiology taping on temperature distribution at the site of application Research in Sports Medicine Slomka Bartosz Rongies Witold Ruszczuk Pawel Sierdzinski Janusz Saganowska Dorota Zdunski Sebastian Worwag Marta E. Informa UK Limited 25 3 2018
26 3 365 380 1543-8627 10.1080/15438627.2018.1447468 10.1080/15438627.2018.1447468
Is kinesio taping to generate skin convolutions effective for increasing local blood circulation? Med Sci Monit Yang J.M. Lee J.H. 2018
24 288 293 29332101
Kinesiotaping for postoperative oedema – what is the evidence? A systematic review BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation Hörmann Julie Vach Werner Jakob Marcel Seghers Saskia Saxer Franziska 2 3 2020
12 1 14 2052-1847 10.1186/s13102-020-00162-3 10.1186/s13102-020-00162-3 32158546
The immediate effects of kinesiology taping on cutaneous blood flow in healthy humans under resting conditions: A randomised controlled repeated-measures laboratory study PLOS ONE Banerjee Gourav Briggs Michelle Johnson Mark I. Claydon-Mueller Leica S. Public Library of Science (PLoS) 21 2 2020
15 2 e0229386 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone.0229386 10.1371/journal.pone.0229386
Kinesio taping influences the mechanical behaviour of the skin of the low back: A possible pathway for functionally relevant effects Journal of Biomechanics Cimino Stephanie R. Beaudette Shawn M. Brown Stephen H.M. 1 2018
67 150 156 0021-9290 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.12.005 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.12.005
MRI analyses show that kinesio taping affects much more than just the targeted superficial tissues and causes heterogeneous deformations within the whole limb Journal of Biomechanics Pamuk Uluç Yucesoy Can A. 12 2015
48 16 4262 4270 0021-9290 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.036 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.036
Placebo effect of facilitatory Kinesio tape on muscle activity and muscle strength Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Mak Dominic Ngo-Tung Au Ivan Pui-Hung Chan Mavis Chan Zoe Yau-Shan An Winko Wenkang Zhang Janet Hanwen Draper David Cheung Roy Tsz-Hei 2019
35 2 157 162 0959-3985 10.1080/09593985.2018.1441936 10.1080/09593985.2018.1441936 29461139
Type effect of inhibitory KT tape on measured vs. perceived maximal grip strength Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies MacPhail Aislinn Joan Campbell Au Ivan Pui-Hung Chan Mavis Mak Dominic Ngo-Tung An Winko Wenkang Chan Zoe Yau-Shan Zhang Janet Hanwen Wong Kenny So Ann Chan Nora Kwok Chris Lau Patrick Draper David Cheung Roy Tsz-Hei 7 2018
22 3 639 642 1360-8592 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.10.011 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.10.011 30100290
Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of Kinesio tape: Fact or fad? Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Cai C. Au I.P.H. An W. Cheung R.T.H. 2 2016
19 2 109 112 1440-2440 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.01.010 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.01.010
Acute effects of Kinesio taping on muscle strength and fatigue in the forearm of tennis players Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Zhang Shen Fu Weijie Pan Jiahao Wang Lin Xia Rui Liu Yu 6 2016
19 6 459 464 1440-2440 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.07.012 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.07.012 26229044
NO effect of kinesiology tape on passive tension, strength or quadriceps muscle activation of during maximal voluntary isometric contractions in resistance trained men International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy de Freitas Fabio S. Brown Lee E. Gomes Willy A. Behm David G. Marchetti Paulo H. 8 2018
13 4 661 667 2159-2896 10.26603/ijspt20180661 10.26603/ijspt20180661 30140559
Kinesiology tape does not facilitate muscle performance: A deceptive controlled trial Manual Therapy Poon K.Y. Li S.M. Roper M.G. Wong M.K.M. Wong O. Cheung R.T.H. 2 2015
20 1 130 133 1356-689X 10.1016/j.math.2014.07.013 10.1016/j.math.2014.07.013
Kinesio taping does not alter quadriceps isokinetic strength and power in healthy nonathletic men: A prospective crossover study BioMed Research International Korman Paweł Straburzyńska-Lupa Anna Rutkowski Radosław Gruszczyński Jakub Lewandowski Jacek Straburzyński-Lupa Marcin Łochyński Dawid 2015
2015 626257 2314-6133 10.1155/2015/626257 10.1155/2015/626257 26819953
Kinesiology tape does not promote vertical jumping performance: A deceptive crossover trial Manual Therapy Cheung R.T.H. Yau Q.K.C. Wong K. Lau P. So A. Chan N. Kwok C. Poon K.Y. Yung P.S.H. 2 2016
21 89 93 1356-689X 10.1016/j.math.2015.06.001 10.1016/j.math.2015.06.001
Effects of kinesio tape in individuals with lateral epicondylitis: A deceptive crossover trial Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Au Ivan P.H. Fan Pak Che Patricia Lee Wang Yiu Leong Man Wai Tang Oi Yin An Winko W. Cheung Roy T. 12 9 2017
33 12 914 919 0959-3985 10.1080/09593985.2017.1359871 10.1080/09593985.2017.1359871
Could forearm kinesio taping improve strength, force sense, and pain in baseball pitchers with medial epicondylitis? Clin J Sport Med Chang Hsiao-Yun Wang Chun-Hou Chou Kun-Yu Cheng Shih-Chung 7 2012
22 4 327 333 1050-642X 10.1097/jsm.0b013e318254d7cd 10.1097/jsm.0b013e318254d7cd 22584958
Kinesio taping reduces elbow pain during resisted wrist extension in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis: A randomized, double-blinded, cross-over study BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Cho Yen-Ting Hsu Wen-Yen Lin Li-Fong Lin Yen-Nung 19 6 2018
19 1 193 1471-2474 10.1186/s12891-018-2118-3 10.1186/s12891-018-2118-3 29921250
Kinesio taping® is not better than placebo in reducing pain and disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled trial Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy Luz Júnior Maurício A. Sousa Manoel V. Neves Luciana A. F. S. Cezar Aline A. C. Costa Leonardo O. P. FapUNIFESP (SciELO) 12 2015
19 6 482 490 1809-9246 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0128 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0128 26647750
Skin irritation incidence following kinesiology tape use in patients with neurological disorders: Multicenter observation. Annales Academiae Medicae Silesiensis de Ru Esther Mikołajewska Emilia Medical University of Silesia 31 1 2017
71 7 13 1734-025X 10.18794/aams/65322 10.18794/aams/65322
Side effects of kinesiotaping – own observations [Skutki uboczne kinesiotapingu - obserwacje własne (artykuł w j angioelskim)]. J Health Sci Mikołajewska E. 2011
1 4 93 99
A meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of kinesiology taping in the management of cancer-related lymphoedema European Journal of Cancer Care Gatt M. Willis S. Leuschner S. Wiley 2017
26 5 e12510 0961-5423 10.1111/ecc.12510 10.1111/ecc.12510
Safety and tolerability of Kinesio® Taping in patients with arm lymphedema: Medical device clinical study Supportive Care in Cancer Martins Jacqueline de Carvalho Aguiar Suzana Sales Fabro Erica Alves Nogueira Costa Rejane Medeiros Lemos Thiago Vilela de Sá Vinicius Gienbinsky Guapyassú de Abreu Raphael Mello Andrade Mauro Figueiredo Carvalho de Thuler Luiz Claudio Santos Bergmann Anke Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2016
24 3 1119 1124 0941-4355 10.1007/s00520-015-2874-7 10.1007/s00520-015-2874-7 26268783
Skin reactions after using kinesio tex tape. a pilot study López R. García-Muro San José F. 10 11 2015
30th Annual Research Symposium Kinesio Taping Association International Tokyo, Japan 2015-11-10
The Guidelines for application of kinesiology tape for prevention and treatment of sports injuries Healthcare Andrýsková Adéla Lee Jung-Hoon MDPI AG 26 5 2020
8 2 144 2227-9032 10.3390/healthcare8020144 10.3390/healthcare8020144 32466467
Mobilization with movement and kinesiotaping compared with a supervised exercise program for painful shoulder: Results of a clinical trial Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics Djordjevic Olivera C. Vukicevic Danijela Katunac Ljiljana Jovic Stevan 7 2012
35 6 454 463 0161-4754 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.07.006 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.07.006 22921332
The kinesio taping method for myofascial pain control Evid Based Complement Altern Med Wu W.-T. Hong C.-Z. Chou L.-W. 2015
2015 950519 950519
Kinesiology taping as an adjunct for pain management in cancer? BMJ case reports Banerjee Gourav Rebanks Jonathan Briggs Michelle Johnson Mark I 14 7 2016
2016 bcr2016216439 1757-790X 10.1136/bcr-2016-216439 10.1136/bcr-2016-216439 27417994
Could kinesiology taping help mitigate pain, breathlessness and abdominal-related symptoms in cancer? BMJ Case Reports Banerjee Gourav Rose Alison Briggs Michelle Johnson Mark I 24 2 2017
2017 bcr2016216695 1757-790X 10.1136/bcr-2016-216695 10.1136/bcr-2016-216695 28237944
The influence of kinesiology tape colour on performance and corticomotor activity in healthy adults: A randomised crossover controlled trial BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation Cavaleri Rocco Thapa Tribikram Beckenkamp Paula R. Chipchase Lucy S. 1 11 2018
10 1 17 2052-1847 10.1186/s13102-018-0106-4 10.1186/s13102-018-0106-4 30410769
Elastic therapeutic tape: Do they have the same material properties? Journal of Physical Therapy Science Boonkerd Chuanpis Limroongreungrat Weerawat Society of Physical Therapy Science 2016
28 4 1303 1306 0915-5287 10.1589/jpts.28.1303 10.1589/jpts.28.1303 27190472
The effects of varied tensions of kinesiology taping on quadriceps strength and lower limb function Int J Sports Phys Ther de Jesus J.F. Franco Y.R. Nannini S.B.. 2017
12 1 85 93 28217419
Kinesio Taping effects with different directions and tensions on strength and range of movement of the knee: A randomized controlled trial Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy Lemos Thiago Vilela Júnior José Roberto de Souza Santos Maikon Gleibyson Rodrigues, II Rosa Marlon Maia Noronha Silva Luiz Guilherme Cardoso da Matheus João Paulo Chieregato 7 2018
22 4 283 290 1413-3555 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.04.001 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.04.001 29728298
Acute effects of kinesiology tape tension on soleus muscle h-reflex modulations during lying and standing postures PLoS One Chen Yung-Sheng Tseng Wei-Chin Chen Che-Hsiu Bezerra Pedro Ye Xin Tremblay François Public Library of Science (PLoS) 30 7 2020
15 7 e0236587 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone.0236587 10.1371/journal.pone.0236587
Can inhibitory and facilitatory kinesiotaping techniques affect motor neuron excitability? A randomized cross-over trial Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies Yoosefinejad Amin Kordi Motealleh Alireza Abbasalipur Shekoofeh Shahroei Mahan Sobhani Sobhan 4 2017
21 2 234 239 1360-8592 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.06.011 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.06.011 28532863
Effect of 3 different applications of kinesio taping denko® on electromyographic activity: Inhibition or facilitation of the quadriceps of males during squat exercise J Sports Sci Med Serrão J.C. Mezêncio B. Claudino J.G.. 2016
15 3 403 409 27803618
What is the effect and mechanism of kinesiology tape on muscle activity? Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies Bagheri Rasool Pourahmadi Mohammad Reza Sarmadi Ali Reza Takamjani Ismail Ebrahimi Torkaman Giti Fazeli Sayyed Hamed 4 2018
22 2 266 275 1360-8592 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.06.018 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.06.018 29861218
The Effect of taping on isometric shoulder strength and emg activity of the shoulder during functional movements Int J Prev Treat Sanzo P. 2017
6 28 33
Short-term effects of kinesio taping® on electromyographic characteristics of paraspinal muscles, pain, and disability in patients with lumbar disk herniation Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Grześkowiak Marcin Krawiecki Zbigniew Łabędź Wojciech Kaczmarczyk Jacek Lewandowski Jacek Łochyński Dawid 7 2019
28 5 402 412 1056-6716 10.1123/jsr.2017-0086 10.1123/jsr.2017-0086 29405872
Can kinesio taping® influence the electromyographic signal intensity of trunk extensor muscles in patients with chronic low back pain? arandomized controlled trial Braz J Phys Ther Pires L.G. Padula R.S. Junior M.. 2019
24 6 539 549 31866161
Immediate and short-term effects of kinesio taping tightness in mechanical low back pain: A randomized controlled trial PM Velasco-Roldán Olga Riquelme Inmaculada Ferragut-Garcías Alejandro Heredia-Rizo Alberto Marcos Rodríguez-Blanco Cleofás Oliva-Pascual-Vaca Ángel 2018
10 1 28 35 1934-1482 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.05.003 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.05.003
The immediate and long-term effects of kinesiotape® on balance and functional performance Int J Sports Phys Ther Wilson V. Douris P. Fukuroku T.. 2016
11 2 247 253 27104058
The Short-term and long-term effects of kinesio taping on the pain, range of motion and disability of neck in patients with myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized clinical trial Trauma Monthly Rasti Zabih Allah Shamsoddini Alireza 3 11 2018
24 1 1 6 2251-7464 10.5812/traumamon.69226 10.5812/traumamon.69226
Short-term effects of kinesio taping in the treatment of latent and active upper trapezius trigger points: Two prospective, randomized, sham-controlled trials Scientific Reports Noguera-Iturbe Yolanda Martínez-Gramage Javier Montañez-Aguilera Francisco Javier Casaña José Lisón Juan Francisco 9 10 2019
9 1 14478 2045-2322 10.1038/s41598-019-51146-4 10.1038/s41598-019-51146-4 31597934
Short-term effects of kinesio taping and cross taping application in the treatment of latent upper trapezius trigger points: A prospective, single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Halski Tomasz Ptaszkowski Kuba Słupska Lucyna Paprocka-Borowicz Małgorzata Dymarek Robert Taradaj Jakub Bidzińska Gabriela Marczyński Daniel Cynarska Aleksandra Rosińczuk Joanna 2015
2015 191925 1741-427X 10.1155/2015/191925 10.1155/2015/191925 26491458
Friction massage versus kinesiotaping for short-term management of latent trigger points in the upper trapezius: A randomized controlled trial Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Mohamadi Marzieh Piroozi Soraya Rashidi Iman Hosseinifard Saeed 12 9 2017
25 1 25 2045-709X 10.1186/s12998-017-0156-9 10.1186/s12998-017-0156-9 28912947
Extended use of kinesiology tape and balance in participants with chronic ankle instability J Athl Train Jackson Kristen Simon Janet E. Docherty Carrie L. 1 1 2016
51 1 16 21 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-51.2.03 10.4085/1062-6050-51.2.03 26752273
The clinical and sonographic effects of kinesiotaping and exercise in comparison with manual therapy and exercise for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: A preliminary trial Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics Kaya Derya Ozer Baltaci Gul Toprak Ugur Atay Ahmet Ozgur 7 2014
37 6 422 432 0161-4754 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.03.004 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.03.004 25108752
comparison of kinesio taping and manual therapy with supervised exercise therapy for the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome Int J Physiother Mohamed Shahul Hameed Pakkir Alatawi Salem F. 1 10 2019
6 5 2348-8336 10.15621/ijphy/2019/v6i5/186839 10.15621/ijphy/2019/v6i5/186839
Kinesio Taping® of the metacarpophalangeal joints and its effect on pain and hand function in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis South African J Physiother Roberts Sarah Ramklass Serela Joubert Robin 26 2 2016
72 1 314 314 2410-8219 10.4102/sajp.v72i1.314 10.4102/sajp.v72i1.314 30135891
The effectiveness of kinesio taping® for pain management in knee osteoarthritis: A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease Donec Venta Kubilius Raimondas 1 2019
11 1759720 19869135 1759-720X 10.1177/1759720x19869135 10.1177/1759720x19869135 31497072
Effects of Kinesio taping compared to arterio-venous Impulse System™ on limb swelling and skin temperature after total knee arthroplasty International Orthopaedics Windisch Christoph Brodt Steffen Röhner Eric Matziolis Georg 2017
41 2 301 307 0341-2695 10.1007/s00264-016-3295-z 10.1007/s00264-016-3295-z 27688220
Comparative study between the effects of kinesio taping and pressure garment on secondary upper extremity lymphedema and quality of life following mastectomy: A randomized controlled trial Integrative Cancer Therapies Tantawy Sayed A. Abdelbasset Walid K. Nambi Gopal Kamel Dalia M. 1 2019
18 1534735419847276 1534-7354 10.1177/1534735419847276 10.1177/1534735419847276 31068019
temporal pattern of kinesiology tape efficacy on hamstring extensibility Int J Sports Phys Ther Farquharson C. Greig M. 2015
10 7 984 991 26674300
The effects of varied tensions of kinesiology taping on quadriceps strength and lower limb function Int J Sports Phys Ther de Jesus J.F. Franco Y.R.D.S. Nannini S.B.. 2017
12 1 85 93 28217419
Comparison of video-guided, live instructed, and self-guided foam roll interventions on knee joint range of motion and pressure pain threshold: A randomized controlled trial Int J Sports Phys Ther Cheatham S.W. Kolber M.J. Cain M. 2017
12 2 242 249 28515979
A study of reproducibility of kinesiology tape applications: Review, reliability and validity BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Selva Francisco Pardo Alberto Aguado Xavier Montava Ignacio Gil-Santos Luis Barrios Carlos 9 4 2019
20 1 153 1471-2474 10.1186/s12891-019-2533-0 10.1186/s12891-019-2533-0 30961572
Comparison of the mechanical properties of therapeutic elastic tapes used in sports and clinical practice Physical Therapy in Sport Matheus Joao Paulo Chieregato Zille Rafael Ribeiro Gomide Matheus Liana Barbaresco Lemos Thiago Vilela Carregaro Rodrigo Luiz Shimano Antônio Carlos 3 2017
24 74 78 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.08.014 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.08.014 28111063
Effect of kinesiology tape application direction on quadriceps strength Medicine Choi Im-Rak Lee Jung-Hoon Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) 6 2018
97 24 e11038 0025-7974 10.1097/md.0000000000011038 10.1097/md.0000000000011038 29901599
Therapeutic elastic tapes applied in different directions over the triceps surae do not modulate reflex excitability of the soleus muscle J Sport Rehabil Magalhães Igor E.J. Mezzarane Rinaldo A. Carregaro Rodrigo L. 2020
30 1 22 29 1056-6716 10.1123/jsr.2018-0435 10.1123/jsr.2018-0435 32087597
Effects of Kinesio taping in patients with quadriceps inhibition: A randomized, single-blinded study Physical Therapy in Sport Kim Kyung-Min Davis Brandon Hertel Jay Hart Joseph 3 2017
24 67 73 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.08.015 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.08.015 28126423
Acute effects of kinesio taping on muscular strength and endurance parameters of the finger flexors in sport climbing: A randomised, controlled crossover trial European Journal of Sport Science Limmer Mirjam Buck Susanne de Marées Markus Roth Ralf 2020
20 4 427 436 1746-1391 10.1080/17461391.2019.1633415 10.1080/17461391.2019.1633415 31258054
