
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

34123547
24097
10.26603/001c.24097
Editorial
To Reconstruct the Anterior Cruciate Ligament or Not? – Put into Panther Perspective
Thorborg Kristian PT, PhD, RISPT 1
1 Sports Orthopedic Research Center Copenhagen (SORC-C), Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amager-Hvidovre Hospital; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Author email: kristian.thorborg@regionh.dk

1 6 2021
2021
16 3 240971 5 2021
12 5 2021
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. If you remix, transform, or build upon this work, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

reconstruction
delayed
optional
return-to-sport
anterior cruciate ligament
==== Body
pmcThe anterior cruciate ligament, AKA the ACL, is the number one ligament of attention to the sports medicine professional. No other has received research and public attention like the ACL injury. Everyone knows and dreads it, from athlete to coach and young to old!

Forty years ago, the ACL injury retired most pivoting sport athletes, and the big game-changer came in the late 80s when “the cure” arrived. The ligament was then primarily reconstructed with one’s own tendon tissue, and the instability problem solved long-term. The narrative around the ACL injury changed…it was no longer career ending. Problem solved – except not quite.

I’ll never forget my first sports physical therapy conference in the United States. In a symposium debate on ACL injury, the conversation was entirely focused on graft choice – seemingly overlooking rehab as a first option. I was flabbergasted when the panel and floor together discussed and consented that the allograft was graft choice for the “couch potato,” due to it not being as strong/good as an autograft. But, did I hear this “consensus” right? When we know 50 percent of athletes who go through rehab first with optional delayed surgery, can proceed without surgery for the first 2-5 years!1,2 Unfortunately, I did! The idea of a specific graft type waiting for all who rupture their ACL is not driven by the scientific evidence. While ACL surgery is not cost-effective in the public healthcare system,3 it may be “cost-effective” in the private health care system – at least for those getting paid to do it. This may provide different perspectives and difficult conversations among healthcare professionals from different health care systems.

Recently, the Panther consensus paper was released, including healthcare professionals from different countries and healthcare systems.4 The Panther consensus panel agreed 100% that both operative and non-operative care for ACL injury is acceptable4 – so far so good. However, whether rehab first with optional delayed surgery is an acceptable approach was not clearly addressed, although tackled in high-level randomized controlled trials.1,2 The Panther group disagreed on delayed operative care as an option for temporary return to athletic participation, following non-operative care and accepting the risk of additional injury.4

According to the experts, the elite athlete competing in pivoting sports needs a reconstruction4 - but despite lots of ACL research, we still only have Level 5 evidence from consensus.4 Even if we as experts promote shared decision-making,4 the expectations from younger athletes are already so high,5 and the procedure offered so quickly, that it seems questionable if athletes are ready and receptive for grasping mean outcomes and return to sport odds. Can we expect them to make truly informed and thoughtful decisions in a few weeks?

So, how does it go with those who receive the procedure? Several graft choices later, the injury and its devastating consequence for many athletes still prevails.6,7 Many do not return to play at their pre-injury level, and of those who do, many have their sports career significantly shortened.6,7 At the same time, the rehab period these days is long – suggested to be up to two years8 – so many career dilemmas for the elite athlete exist. Future knee health may only play a small part in the decision on surgery and return to play times. The dream of ACL reconstruction as a career savior is understandable and a more attractive initial mind-set than the uncertainty around odds for successful recovery. But do we “sell” them a dream by suggesting immediate surgery?

Why not delay the final decision and increase the athlete’s experience in life without an ACL? Why not see delayed optional surgery as a way to provide athletes with individual experiences on dynamic knee stability, strength and performance,9 as well as to form realistic expectations concerning different rehab strategies? It is suggested that the question “should you return to play?” needs posing.6 But is asking this question early in the process even feasible? In less than 50 milliseconds the life and identity of an athlete is turned upside down. With such an injury comes both shock and a grieving process!10 Athletes finding themselves again require time – not immediate surgery nor definite career decisions. ACL rehab is much more than graft choice, open versus closed kinetic chain exercises, and return to sport at pre-injury level. Psychological recovery and support may be important for athletes who want to return to sport - but what about those who can’t or won’t? They need just as much support. So, more focus and research on these perspectives, please, for the benefit of all athletes! The ligament “fixation” has stolen too much of our attention.
==== Refs
Treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tear: Five year outcome of randomised trial BMJ Frobell R. B. Roos H. P. Roos E. M. Roemer F. W. Ranstam J. Lohmander L. S. 24 1 2013
1 346 1756-1833 10.1136/bmj.f232 10.1136/bmj.f232 23349407
Early surgical reconstruction versus rehabilitation with elective delayed reconstruction for patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture: COMPARE randomised controlled trial BMJ Reijman Max Eggerding Vincent van Es Eline van Arkel Ewoud van den Brand Igor van Linge Joost Zijl Jacco Waarsing Erwin Bierma-Zeinstra Sita Meuffels Duncan 9 3 2021
3 372 1756-1833 10.1136/bmj.n375 10.1136/bmj.n375 33687926
ACL reconstruction for all is not cost-effective after acute ACL rupture British Journal of Sports Medicine Eggerding Vincent Reijman Max Meuffels Duncan Edward van Es Eline van Arkel Ewoud van den Brand Igor van Linge Joost Zijl Jacco Bierma-Zeinstra Sita MA Koopmanschap Marc 18 3 2021
0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102564 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102564
Treatment after ACL injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group British Journal of Sports Medicine Diermeier Theresa Anita Rothrauff Ben B Engebretsen Lars Lynch Andrew Svantesson Eleonor Hamrin Senorski Eric Andrew Meredith Sean J Rauer Thomas Ayeni Olufemi R Paterno Mark Xerogeanes John W Fu Freddie H Karlsson Jon Musahl Volker BMJ 13 7 2020
55 1 14 22 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102200 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102200
Patient expectations of primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Feucht Matthias J. Cotic Matthias Saier Tim Minzlaff Philipp Plath Johannes E. Imhoff Andreas B. Hinterwimmer Stefan Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2016
24 1 201 207 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-014-3364-z 10.1007/s00167-014-3364-z
Return to play guidelines after anterior cruciate ligament surgery British Journal of Sports Medicine Myklebust G Bahr R 1 3 2005
3 127 131 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsm.2004.010900 10.1136/bjsm.2004.010900 15728687
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-Not Exactly a One-Way Ticket Back to the Preinjury Level: A Review of Contextual Factors Affecting Return to Sport After Surgery Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach Ardern Clare L. 24 3 2015
7 3 224 230 1941-7381 10.1177/1941738115578131 10.1177/1941738115578131 26131299
Should Return to Sport be Delayed Until 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Biological and Functional Considerations Sports Medicine Nagelli Christopher V. Hewett Timothy E. 2017
2 221 232 0112-1642 10.1007/s40279-016-0584-z 10.1007/s40279-016-0584-z 27402457
Evidence-based recommendations for the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology Filbay Stephanie R. Grindem Hege 2 2019
2 33 47 1521-6942 10.1016/j.berh.2019.01.018 10.1016/j.berh.2019.01.018 31431274
Psychological, social and contextual factors across recovery stages following a sport-related knee injury: A scoping review British Journal of Sports Medicine Truong Linda K Mosewich Amber D Holt Christopher J Le Christina Y Miciak Maxi Whittaker Jackie L 14 2 2020
10 1149 1156 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101206 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101206 32060141
