
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

33604155
18705
10.26603/001c.18705
Clinical Commentary/Current Concept Review
Hip and Groin Injury Prevention in Elite Athletes and Team Sport – Current Challenges and Opportunities
Short Steven M. DPT, SCS, FAAOMPT, CSCS 1
MacDonald Cameron W. DPT, GCS, OCS, FAAOMPT 2
Strack Donald DPT, ATC, OCS, FAAOMPT 3
1 Physical Therapy and High Performance Denver Nuggets Basketball Club
2 School of Physical Therapy Regis University https://ror.org/043ae9h44
3 Oklahoma City Thunder Physical Therapy Oklahoma City Thunder Basketball Club
Corresponding author: Steven Short Physical Therapy and High Performance – Denver Nuggets Basketball Club, Denver, CO Email: steveshortdpt@gmail.com Phone: 906-282-4747
1 2 2021
2021
16 1 270281
19 12 2019
21 4 2020
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. If you remix, transform, or build upon this work, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

Hip and groin injury (HAGI) has been reported as a source of significant time loss in elite sport. Field and court-based sports such as basketball, football, hockey, soccer, among others, require explosive multiplanar movement in single stance and high-speed change of direction. Often situations arise where sub-optimal pre-season training has occurred or congested in-season competition minimizes physiologic recovery periods between bouts of physical activity, both of which could magnify concomitant existing risk factors and increase injury risk. Identification and management of HAGI can be challenging as numerous structures within the region can be drivers of pain and injury, especially when considering the likelihood of concurrent pathology and injury reoccurrence. Focused prevention strategies have been suggested, but their practical clinical implementation has not been heavily investigated across the sporting spectrum. The purpose of this commentary is to review the historical and current state of HAGI, while focusing on applying evidence and clinical experience towards the development of future risk reduction strategies.

Level of evidence: 5

risk reduction
injury prevention
hip
groin
adductor
==== Body
pmcIs it Injury or Management That is on the Rise?

Clinical practice related to hip and groin injury (HAGI) has progressed from broad terminology (i.e chronic athletic groin pain, Gilmore’s groin, athletic pubalgia, etc) regarding diagnosis and management to highly specific subgrouping of regional diagnoses related to pathoanatomics. Recent consensus statements have attempted to define current best practice in the diagnosis and management of HAGI.1,2 While beyond the scope of this paper to explore all sources of HAGI, it is important to note some common structures and associated athletic-related pathologies. These include, but are not limited to, bony structures (femur, femoral head and neck, acetabulum, pubis) extra-articular, (adductor musculature, iliopsoas, rectus femoris), intra-articular, (acetabular labrum, acetabular cartilage, pubic symphysis), and neural structures. (Figure 1) The noted anatomy may be accordingly impacted by sprain, strain, tendinopathy, bony and/or joint stress, osteoarthritis, or a combination of pathology such as osteoarthritis and labral degeneration. Many strategies have been implemented to properly diagnose injury as demonstrated by the Doha agreement1 and have been expanded upon in follow-up clinical commentaries.3 These guidelines have recommended HAGI to be defined specifically as adductor, pubic, inguinal, iliopsoas, or hip-related groin pain.1

49516 Figure 1: Differential Diagnosis flow chart

Improved diagnostic capabilities and clinical awareness of HAGI has likely resulted in an increased incidence and prevalence of related diagnosis, which has coincided with expanded coverage within the literature. This combination of factors suggests the presence of historical underdiagnosis,4,5 the possibility of modern day overdiagnosis,2,6 and creates the potential for bias in management strategies and reported outcomes. The heterogeneity related to the comprehensive research and management of HAGI has made best practice elusive, especially when targeting isolated structures.7,8 Syndrome-based recommendations2,9 have been endorsed to better appreciate the complex, regionally interdependent and often concomitantly pathological9–11 nature about the hip, pubis, and lumbopelvis. Regional impairments such as mobility loss, strength deficits, and altered force distribution and motor control have been associated with these defined syndromes, ultimately affecting the athletic movement system. Thus, despite the diversity of specific pathoanatomy, shared clinical characteristics such as pain referral region and aforementioned residual impairment constructs (mobility, strength, motor control, deconditioning, etc) often present irrespective of sensitized or injured structure.12–14 (Figure 2)

49517 Figure 2: Shared Clinical Findings of Hip and Groin Injury flow chart

Considering the persistent historical challenges associated with management of HAGI, warranted attention has been growing towards mitigating its impact before an athlete becomes medicalized. Risk reduction for HAGI is a hot topic with limited reported success,15 and the available literature-base to support practical, evidence-based practices across various elite sports is often limited and biased.16,17 Current prevention strategies are generally based upon soft-tissue injury while still broadly being grouped in the HAGI spectrum.18,19 Select populations (professional and semiprofessional soccer, rugby union, ice hockey) dominate the literature upon which current evidence-based practice relies.17 Professionals practicing in sports outside of those populations and specifically within sports such as basketball, American football, or elsewhere may be presented with athletes who are currently underrepresented in the literature. Considerations that raise questions regarding the carryover of current risk identification and treatment strategies to a wide range of athletes include, but are not limited to, anthropometric and biomechanical profiles, sport specific demands (i.e volume of short space cutting and jumping volume vs time at defined high speed running, etc) and differing historical practices of sports medicine and science in a team-based setting across sports and countries.

Reviewing the Clinical Question

The New Oxford American Dictionary defines risk as the chance of unfortunate consequences by engaging in an action.20 In the case of athletics and exercise, the primary adverse event is musculoskeletal injury. The consequences of sporting injury are multifactorial, and can result in the worsening of mental and physical wellbeing as well as increasing the risk of future injury and disability. In elite sport, the consequence moves beyond individual harm, as competitive success and monetary investment are at stake.12,21 As sports medicine professionals, we have the potential to impact risk on microscopic and macroscopic scales. Our responsibility is to investigate methods to reduce the risk of the injury burden to our athletes, medical systems, and institutions. Despite what seems like overwhelming, yet diversely varying,16,17 consensuses on how to accomplish this goal, a critical investigation on injury prevention is necessary when trying to implement best practice in action for the field of play.

Caring for athletes involves navigating complex interacting systems which makes prediction and prevention quite challenging.22 Each sport exposes athletes to different risks and dynamic challenges and thus the initial steps in risk reduction are to identify common athletic demands and clinical problems. For example, in professional basketball, much effort has been put into the prevention of ankle and knee injury, as they have been identified as the most common and result in greatest time loss due to injury. Substantial attention has also been paid to catastrophic injuries, that often result in surgery, such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. As a result, research and clinical practice has focused on identification of related risk factor and prevention methods for such high-profile injuries. However, for example, in the National Basketball Association, all knee sprains, not just ACL tears, accounted for just 3.1% of all injuries over 17 seasons.23 Meanwhile, clinical cases of less investigated injuries, such as hip and groin injury (HAGI), have been identified as just as common, and are potentially increasing in occurence.4,23

While HAGI has been reported as 5-10% of injuries across multiple sports, in previously identified high risk sports HAGI has been reported to be a greater source of time loss, accounting for approximately 10-23% of all injury.12,18 Numerous structures within the region can be drivers of pain and injury. Additional consideration is warranted for the likelihood of concurrent pathology, injury reoccurrence, the chronicity of varying regional pathologies, and suboptimal athletic and health care outcomes.1,2 As the diagnosis and management of HAGI remains challenging, efforts should be made to investigate and improve specific injury risk reduction strategies to avert these historical challenges before they arise.

Identified Risk Factors

Highlighted non-modifiable risk factors identified in the literature include past injury history, age, time in season, and anatomy and morphology.21 While injury history and age have consistent backing in the evidence base, utilizing diagnostic imaging for identifying a priori pathoanatomic risk factors may be challenging. ‘Abnormal’ and ‘pathological’ findings about the hip and pubis, such as cam morphology2 or tendinous changes at the rectus abdominis and adductor longus origins,6 are commonly observed in asymptomatic athletes and may be sport specific adaptations. Of clinical interest are modifiable risk factors specific to the hip and groin including range of motion, hip and trunk strength, special testing, movement pattern assessment, and training variables.21,24 The evidence behind these identified risk factors and the observed difficulties in their application will be highlighted.

Analysis of ‘Modifiable’ Risk Factors

Range of Motion

Limited hip internal and external rotation in various positions, including seated, prone, bent knee fallout (flexion abduction external rotation), and the flexion adduction internal rotation (FADIR) test have all been related to HAGI. A measure of total hip rotation less than 85 degrees has also been identified as a risk factor.25 As with the consideration of total arc of motion compared to a single direction measure (such as the bent knee fall out), relative limb to limb range of motion and range of motion in sport specific positions may warrant deeper consideration as position specific findings may be related to injury.25,26 Clinical experience, unpublished data, and homogenous population data27 indicates that if clinicians are flagging ranges of motion (i.e 85 degrees total arc, bent knee fallout) as a risk factor cutoff point, nearly every athlete within select sports populations could be at risk due to limited hip mobility. In other words, if following the findings of systematic reviews,18,25 entire sporting populations would be defined as at risk of groin pain, limiting its effectiveness as a risk factor measure.

There is also a reliance on standardized ROM assessment of the hip which supports validity within studies, but may overlook the natural variance in pelvic morphology between individuals, especially when assessing hip internal rotation (IR). The natural arc of hip motion may vary between individuals due the variations in femoral version and acetabular alignment, such that an individual may demonstrate reduced hip IR in standard testing with excessive ER, but not when the individual’s natural plane of hip motion (which could be defined as hiption, similar to the concept of scaption in the glenohumeral joint) is assessed.28 Further, this measure may be impacted by the timing of data collection, as rotation has been shown to change following competition29 and may continue to be dynamic over the course of a season and career.30

Considering the prevalence of variations in athlete morphology and its complex relationship with mobility, how modifiable hip range of motion is warrants a more thorough investigation, as evidence for preventative interventions to address mobility deficits is limited and rarely included in reviews.18,27,31,32 Transient in-session range of motion increases made by modalities, manual therapy, and therapeutic exercise may be clinically important, potentially redistributing force or changing pain pressure thresholds. However lasting tissue change has not been documented nor have mobility-based intervention programs been identified as protective.32

Strength

Strength measures about the hip and trunk have been related to hip and groin pain. Of consistent interest is absolute and relative adductor strength. Common assessment methods include squeeze testing, during which a sphygmomanometer is used to measure the maximal isometric ability of the adductors in various supine positions. Other primary strength measures include handheld and isokinetic dynamometry.18,26 Low strength ratios of hip adduction to abduction, and high hip flexion to extension ratios and trunk flexion to extension ratios have all been identified as risk factors.12,26 The timing of muscle activation may be meaningful, but it has not been determined as a cause or a result of HAGI and it is currently nearly impossible to identify functional motor recruitment in sport-specific context. Furthermore, documented standardized strength assessment may not accurately measure strength variables as they relate to sport-specific tasks and associated mechanisms of injury such as defensive shuffling, kicking, single leg jumping, or how an ongoing strength profile improves any tissue’s capacity to handle such tasks. Simple strength metrics have been shown to vary according to population,33 morphology,27 timing,34 presence of pain,33 fatigue,34 and many other factors indicating a need for clinical reasoning for interpretation and application.

Similar to hip range of motion, a clinical challenge of applying strength data is that current reference data is likely population and context specific. Most documented strength assessments are performed prior to competitive seasons and not intra-season. The differing sporting and training demands, as well as differences in athlete’s biomechanical profile (i.e mechanical advantage according to leg length when performing long lever squeeze assessment) likely limits clinicians ability to interpret and apply normative data across sports, as empirical analysis of subgroup scores are quite different from current published values.33 If strength is assessed in-season or following competition, whether immediately or next day, there are minimal recommendations on the best ways to interpret or act on such information, particularly when considering congested competition schedules during which optimal recovery from intense activity is impaired.34–36

Special Testing

Special testing often combines elements of range of motion and strength for symptom provocation and the tissue and/or system impairments as they relate may indicate a level of risk for example squeeze testing37 and the FADIR test.38 Consistent monitoring of special tests may identify significant variance in prior findings and could be related to training volume or pain.34,39 These tests provide value for daily clinical reasoning in a dynamic test-retest model, but since these tests generally identify sensitized actions, structures, and/or movements, they are currently more valuable once the athlete is already nursing an injury as opposed to providing prognostic value.

Movement Assessment

Clinical movement assessments have been found to have minimal utility in identifying those at risk for hip and groin injury, despite potential construct validity. It has been shown that those with HAGI demonstrate different movement patterns in tasks of varying intensities compared to controls.40,41 Differences have been identified in star excursion balance test of posterolateral reach and altered intersegmental biomechanics in various cutting tasks in those with HAGI.42,43 Variable movement patterns during a cutting task have not been established as predictive of HAGI, however changes in these patterns, in addition to improved adductor strength, have been shown to occur with intersegmental-focused training when returning from a prior HAGI.43,44 It is unclear whether this assists in the cause of the resolution of injury or is changed due to the absence of pain and natural history. While training movement patterns is often a focus in physiotherapist practice, it warrants questioning whether changes in multi-segmental control and/or movement patterns transfers to sport specific and reactive variations of movements, or if changing asymptomatic movement patterns may provide a protective stimulus, and even potentially provide a false level of comfort to the clinician and athlete. With or without symptoms, it has been shown that efficient force distribution about the pelvis is recommended (i.e avoiding excessive trunk lean displacement, excessive displacement beyond the center of mass) and may have implications with HAGI.43–45

Monitoring Load and Objective Outcome Measures

Monitored training variables and resultant outcomes of sport training such as body composition, aerobic fitness, and sport-specific training load volume has been reported as related to injury risk. Load monitoring strategies vary greatly and include internal (physiologic) or external (mechanical) variables.46 For other highly studied injuries, such has hamstring strain, variables such as distance covered and high-speed running metrics have been documented as injury risk factors.39,47,48 It has been proposed that these factors should be applied across sports and injuries, without consideration of the differing demands of various sports.47 Court athletes may never achieve similar high speeds or distances as field athletes, while being stressed by different mechanical forces and associated physiologic consequences associated with tasks such as high volume jumping or limited-space, high intensity cutting maneuvers.49 Sport specific preparation has been identified as a common risk factor, thus, an importance must be placed on defining and training these identified variables, yet are not commonly detailed in the literature, training or in sporting practice.49 In order for sport-specific training to be provided, these qualifiers must be defined, tested, and trained to evaluate their potential protective capacity.50 Practical challenges are numerous when attempting to consistently collect and utilize objective outcome measures,49 especially when considering clinical time demands, the substantial size of data sets, the impact of internal and external factors in elite sport, and the numerous athlete health and performance demands aside from HAGI that present in daily practice.

Practical Gaps in Screening

Despite significant investigation, much debate continues to take place regarding the value of screening for athletic injury risk factors and its effectiveness has been extensively questioned.24,51 Current evidence pertaining to heterogenous HAGI risk factors is often disproportionately represented from select homogenous populations. Derivation of risk factors frequently relies on retrospective study design as opposed to more rigid prospectively designed trials. The lack of prospective studies is not shocking, as data collection and application in elite sport presents numerous practical challenges, including appropriate design, collection, sharing, and publication of relevant data.24,51 The culture and history of each individual sport presents with varying attitudes and opportunities to cultivating and prioritizing the development of research practices.49 These limitations leave questions as to whether or not sample sizes are robust enough to hold clinical value, if specific qualities are the result of, or potential cause of injury, if these factors are able to be shared across various sports and genders, or if risk reduction research and development can even take place in environments of interest.49

Intervention Over Identification

As opposed to a narrow focus on isolated risk factors, reducing the occurrence of hip and groin injury or otherwise may be best served by focusing on global neuromuscular training combined with individualized and context- specific ‘prevention’ programs that avoid training load error.52 With shared regional factors (mobility, strength, motor control, altered force distribution, tissue tolerance, etc) about HAGI, global principals are appropriate to apply to mitigation programs. Ultimately, achieving less injury may rely on an adequate volume and adherence of training in these risk reduction strategies, most specifically, appropriately dosed and performed exercise.32,53 Despite this working hypothesis, a general well planned, balanced, and executed multi-component exercise training program may be protective regardless of the targeted constructs listed above.15 Developing numerous qualities within the variables of strength and aerobic capacity may be key modifiers in decreasing an athlete’s risk for HAGI regardless of underlying proposed risk factors defined earlier in this paper.53–55 Objective data obtained historically via traditional screening methods may not be predictive in a classical prevention ideology, but may continue to hold secondary value in establishing baselines profiles, and be used to monitor progress and changes in the athletes dynamic system to inform clinical reasoning and athlete care.34,39,46,56,57 Monitoring profiles of strength and exercise load metrics are emerging as recommended evidence-based practice for secondary risk reduction allowing for clinicians to make real-time programming decisions to reduce risk.34,39,57 The nature of dosing requires further investigation,58 as an adequate baseline and minimal effective dose of exercise may serve as protective.59 Timing the dose as it relates to match day and in relation to activity timing may provide improved adherence and effectiveness.59–62

Again, despite the heterogeneity of the pathology of HAGI, it is valuable to note the homogeneity of physiotherapist intervention. Education, assessment, exercise, movement training, appropriate mobility intervention, optimal dosing of intervention, and continued monitoring have all been commonly recommended in the comprehensive management of various hip joint, osseous and soft-tissue related injuries.63 (Figure 3) Similarly, mobility, hip strength, and motor control are constructs that can be defined respectively as risk factors, injury impairments and rehabilitation goals.43,56 (Figure 4) The authors recommend that these same constructs be appropriately implemented into future focused risk reduction programs (Figures 5 and 6). As these trainable constructs have been consistently identified across the HAGI spectrum,43 targeting them appropriately could have a mediating effect on past and/or future injury.35,56 By focusing on these factors and treating each individual with respect to their sporting demands and body’s specific natural adaptations,64 it may be possible to develop clinical guidelines for HAGI reduction similar to what has been done regarding ACL prevention.65 As evidence-informed recommendations have been globally applied to comprehensive knee injury reduction,65 with further development, the same could be done for HAGI. The nature of global training principles may result in significant similarities between these programs, which is to the benefit of their application.

49518 Figure 3: Construct recommendations for hip injury rehabilitation

Adapted and modeled from Heerey, J. et al. Impairment-based rehabilitation rollowing hip arthroscopy: Postoperative protocol for the HIP ARThroscopy international randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(4):336-42.63

49519 Figure 4: Construct recommendations for groin injury rehabilitation

Adapted and modeled from King E, Franklyn-Miller A, Richter C, et al. Clinical and biomechanical outcomes of rehabilitation targeting intersegmental control in athletic groin pain: prospective cohort of 205 patients. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(16):1054-62.43

49520 Figure 5: Applied construct recommendations for hip and groin injury risk reduction programs

Adapted and modeled from Heerey, J. et al. Impairment-based rehabilitation rollowing hip arthroscopy: Postoperative protocol for the HIP ARThroscopy international randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(4):336-42.63

49521 Figure 6: Implementation of Constructs into Risk Reduction Programs

A. Local hip and trunk strength via adductor side plank B. Functional exercises include single leg knee and hip dominant drills, here demonstrated by a lateral lunge C. Basic compound movement motor control trained by triplanar single leg tasks and can be monitored as demonstrated by the Y-Balance posterolateral reach D. Active assisted mobility exercise with considerations for the individuals hip and lumbopelvic morphology E. Sport-specific compound movement motor control. Sport training including practice and adjunct speed, agility, and quickness training can include the monitoring and coaching of desired mechanics while establishing sporting conditioning. Sagittal plane segmental movement goals include increased ankle dorsiflexion, and reduced knee flexion, anterior pelvic tilt, hip flexion and trunk flexion. Frontal plane segmental movement goals include reduced trunk rotation and side flexion, pelvic drop knee valgus, and foot external rotation. This may increase the power and work and the knee and ankle, while decreasing the demands on the hip and lumbopelvis.43 F. Functional exercise that trains hip, trunk, and compound movements as demonstrated by a hexbar deadlift G. Monitoring strategies are guided by baseline assessment and continued monitoring. Adduction strength is one variable that can be tracked, as well as other metrics such as additional strength measures, range of motion, and training load variables (i.e volume, intensity, etc)

Of course, the remedy is not as simple or as straight forward as it may seem. Similar to the discussion of highlighted risk factors above, the efficacy and effectiveness of these programs remains limited to the sports in which they have been trialed via the scientific process, integrated, individualized, and accepted as common practice. For example, detailed general programs have been trialed in sports such as European football but few other team based sports.15–17,52 This has been most recently identified in a systematic review detailing the challenges of finding level 1 evidence in elite sport and then applying strategies of lower levels of evidence with high levels of bias.16,17 Transference troubles have been seen clinically in recognized pathology-based prevention programs such as neuromuscular training to reduce knee injuries. Many such programs have been established related to a specific gender and age population (adolescent females) and mechanism of injury may be dissimilar when comparing across sports, gender, and sporting maneuvers65,66 (i.e dynamic valgus produced by jump landing vs change of direction task).

Conclusions

Identification of injuries with high incidence and prevalence within sport is common practice and leads to investigation of prevention, and more practically, risk reduction. In the case of HAGI, practitioners continue to rely on generalized risk factors and select populations to provide current best practice despite the growing number of identified HAGI cases. Athletes across sports possess inherent characteristics that predispose them to specific sporting success, and may require a diverse set of risk modifying interventions to increase the odds of prolonged health and sports participation. In order to further improve these programs, the authors extend a call to action to refine important clinical questions and extensively test them in order to advance the practical evidence-base which may improve athlete health. This requires creating integrated institutions and avenues within all levels (youth, collegiate, semi-professional, professional) and geographical locations (including the United States) of sporting populations. This call to action can begin by proactively implementing current evidence-informed interventions, such as global exercise programs with injury-specific construct modifications, within diverse sporting populations. Assessing the residual outcomes and modifying programs accordingly could reverse trends of increasing HAGI in understudied populations. Until then, recommendations and practice will rely on clinical experience and at times liberal interpretations of practice across sporting populations.

Conflict of Interests

Authors declare no conflicts of interest
==== Refs
Doha agreement meeting on terminology and definitions in groin pain in athletes Br J Sports Med Weir A. Brukner P. Delahunt E. Ekstrand J. Griffin D. Khan K. M. Lovell G. Meyers W. C. Muschaweck U. Orchard J. Paajanen H. Philippon M. Reboul G. Robinson P. Schache A. G. Schilders E. Serner A. Silvers H. Thorborg K. Tyler T. Verrall G. de Vos R. J. Vuckovic Z. Holmich P. 2015
49 12 768 74 1473-0480 (Electronic) 0306-3674 (Linking) 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094869 26031643
The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement Br J Sports Med Griffin D. R. Dickenson E. J. O'Donnell J. Agricola R. Awan T. Beck M. Clohisy J. C. Dijkstra H. P. Falvey E. Gimpel M. Hinman R. S. Holmich P. Kassarjian A. Martin H. D. Martin R. Mather R. C. Philippon M. J. Reiman M. P. Takla A. Thorborg K. Walker S. Weir A. Bennell K. L. 2016
50 19 1169 76 1473-0480 (Electronic) 0306-3674 (Linking) 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096743 27629403
Clinical examination, diagnostic imaging, and testing of athletes with groin pain: An evidence-based approach to effective management Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Thorborg Kristian Reiman Michael P. Weir Adam Kemp Joanne L. Serner Andreas Mosler Andrea B. HÖlmich Per 2018
48 4 239 249 10.2519/jospt.2018.7850 29510653
Hip and groin injuries in professional basketball players: Impact on playing career and quality of life after retirement Sports Health Ekhtiari S. Khan M. Burrus T. Madden K. Gagnier J. Rogowski J. P. Maerz T. Bedi A. 2019
11 3 218 222 10.1177/1941738119838274 31013191
Epidemiology of hip injuries in the National Basketball Association: A 24-year overview Orthop J Sports Med Jackson T. J. Starkey C. McElhiney D. Domb B. G. 2013
1 3 2325967113499130 10.1177/2325967113499130 26535239
Do MRI and ultrasound of the anterior pelvis correlate with, or predict, young football players' clinical findings? A 4-year prospective study of elite academy soccer players Br J Sports Med Robinson P. Grainger A. J. Hensor E. M. Batt M. E. O'Connor P. J. 2015
49 3 176 82 1473-0480 (Electronic) 0306-3674 (Linking) 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092932 24603080
Advancing hip and groin injury management: from eminence to evidence British Journal of Sports Medicine Thorborg Kristian Hölmich Per 2013
47 10 602 10.1136/bjsports-2012-092090 23407439
There is limited and inconsistent reporting of postoperative rehabilitation for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: A scoping review of 169 studies Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Reiman Michael Boyd Jada Ingel Nicolette Reichert Ashley Westhoven Max Peters Scott 2020
50 5 252 258 10.2519/jospt.2020.9189 32272028
The role of femoroacetabular impingement in core muscle injury/athletic pubalgia: Diagnosis and management Front Surg Strosberg D. S. Ellis T. J. Renton D. B. 2016
3 6 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00006 26904546
Spine-hip relations in patients with hip osteoarthritis EFORT open reviews Rivière Charles Lazic Stefan Dagneaux Louis Van Der Straeten Catherine Cobb Justin Muirhead-Allwood Sarah 2018
3 2 39 44 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170020 29657844
Sports hernia and femoroacetabular impingement in athletes: A systematic review World journal of clinical cases Munegato Daniele Bigoni Marco Gridavilla Giulia Olmi Stefano Cesana Giovanni Zatti Giovanni 2015
3 9 823 830 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i9.823 26380829
Prevention of groin injuries in sports: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Br J Sports Med Esteve E. Rathleff M. S. Bagur-Calafat C. Urrutia G. Thorborg K. 2015
49 12 785 91 1473-0480 (Electronic) 0306-3674 (Linking) 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094162 25730819
The recognition and evaluation of patterns of compensatory injury in patients with mechanical hip pain Sports health Hammoud Sommer Bedi Asheesh Voos James E. Mauro Craig S. Kelly Bryan T. SAGE Publications 2014
6 2 108 118 1941-7381 1941-0921 10.1177/1941738114522201 24587859
A combined treatment approach emphasizing impairment-based manual therapy and exercise for hip-related compensatory injure in elite athletes: A case series International journal of sports physical therapy Short Steve Short Gretchen Strack Donald Anloague Philip Brewster Brian 2017
12 6 994 1010 29158960
Including the Copenhagen adduction exercise in the FIFA 11+ provides missing eccentric hip adduction strength effect in male soccer players: A randomized controlled trial Am J Sports Med Haroy J. Thorborg K. Serner A. Bjorkheim A. Rolstad L. E. Holmich P. Bahr R. Andersen T. E. 2017
45 13 3052 3059 10.1177/0363546517720194 28806100
Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of common lower extremity muscle injuries in sport – grading the evidence: a statement paper commissioned by the Danish Society of Sports Physical Therapy (DSSF) British Journal of Sports Medicine Ishøi Lasse Krommes Kasper Husted Rasmus Skov Juhl Carsten B. Thorborg Kristian 2020
bjsports 2019 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101228
Exercise-based strategies to prevent muscle injury in elite footballers: A systematic review and best evidence synthesis Sports Medicine Fanchini Maurizio Steendahl Ida Bo Impellizzeri Franco M. Pruna Ricard Dupont Gregory Coutts Aaron J. Meyer Tim McCall Alan 2020
50 1653 1666 10.1007/s40279-020-01282-z 32185630
Which factors differentiate athletes with hip/groin pain from those without? A systematic review with meta-analysis Br J Sports Med Mosler A. B. Agricola R. Weir A. Holmich P. Crossley K. M. 2015
49 12 810 1473-0480 (Electronic) 0306-3674 (Linking) 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094602 26031646
Musculoskeletal screening tests and bony hip morphology cannot identify male professional soccer players at risk of groin injuries: A 2-year prospective cohort study The American Journal of Sports Medicine Mosler Andrea B. Weir Adam Serner Andreas Agricola Rintje Eirale Cristiano Farooq Abdulaziz Bakken Arnhild Thorborg Kristian Whiteley Rod J. Hölmich Per Bahr Roald Crossley Kay M. 2018
46 6 1294 1305 10.1177/0363546518763373 29585730
Risk OED Online Oxford University Press 2019

Risk factors for lower extremity injury: a review of the literature British Journal of Sports Medicine Murphy D F Connolly D A J Beynnon B D 2003
37 1 13 29 10.1136/bjsm.37.1.13 12547739
The gap betweem research and clinical practice for injury prevention im elite sport: A clinical commentary International journal of sports physical therapy Short Steven Tuttle Matthew 2020
15 6 1229 1234 10.26603/ijspt20201229 33344038
Injury in the national basketball association: a 17-year overview Sports Health Drakos M. C. Domb B. Starkey C. Callahan L. Allen A. A. 2010
2 4 284 90 1941-7381 (Print) 1941-0921 (Linking) 10.1177/1941738109357303 23015949
Risk Factors for Sports Injuries a methodological approach Br J Sports Med Bahr R. 2003
37 384 392 14514527
Is lower hip range of motion a risk factor for groin pain in athletes? A systematic review with clinical applications Br J Sports Med Tak I. Engelaar L. Gouttebarge V. Barendrecht M. Van den Heuvel S. Kerkhoffs G. Langhout R. Stubbe J. Weir A. 2017
51 22 1611 1621 1473-0480 (Electronic) 0306-3674 (Linking) 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096619 28432076
Risk factors for groin injury in sport: an updated systematic review Br J Sports Med Whittaker J. L. Small C. Maffey L. Emery C. A. 2015
49 12 803 9 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094287 25833903
Is bony hip morphology associated with range of motion and strength in asymptomatic male soccer players? Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Mosler Andrea B. Agricola Rintje Thorborg Kristian Weir Adam Whiteley Rod J. Crossley Kay M. Hölmich Per 2018
48 4 250 259 10.2519/jospt.2018.7848 29548272
Hip manual therapy for aging and older adults Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation MacDonald Cameron W. 2016
32 2 106 113 10.1097/TGR.0000000000000074
Acute effects of a single football training or match on passive hip rotation range of motion in semi-professional football players: A pilot study Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) De-la-Cruz-Torres Blanca Abuín-Porras Vanesa Blanco-Morales Maria de-la-Cueva-Reguera Mónica Calvo-Lobo César López-López Daniel Romero-Morales Carlos 2020
56 5 228 10.3390/medicina56050228 32397596
The impact of workload on the evolution of hip internal and external rotation in professional baseball players over the course of the season Orthop J Sports Med Camp C. L. Zajac J. M. Pearson D. Wang D. Sinatro A. S. Ranawat A. S. Dines J. S. Coleman S. H. 2018
6 2 2325967117752105 10.1177/2325967117752105 29435468
The relationship between cam morphology and hip and groin symptoms and signs in young male football players Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports van Klij P. Ginai A. Z. Heijboer M. P. Verhaar J. A. N. Waarsing J. H. Agricola R. 2020
30 1221 1231 10.1111/sms.13660 32201993
Effectiveness of multicomponent lower extremity injury prevention programmes in team-sport athletes: an umbrella review Br J Sports Med Brunner R. Friesenbichler B. Casartelli N. C. Bizzini M. Maffiuletti N. A. Niedermann K. 2019
53 5 282 288 1473-0480 (Electronic) 0306-3674 (Linking) 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098944 30201793
Field-based evaluation of hip adductor and abductor strength in professional male ice hockey players: Reference values and influencing factors Phys Ther Sport Oliveras R. Bizzini M. Brunner R. Maffiuletti N. A. 2020
43 204 209 1466-853x 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.03.006 32222647
In-season monitoring of hip and groin strength, health and function in elite youth soccer: Implementing an early detection and management strategy over two consecutive seasons J Sci Med Sport Wollin M. Thorborg K. Welvaert M. Pizzari T. 2018
21 10 988 993 1878-1861 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.03.004 29555148
Can the workload-injury relationship be moderated by improved strength, speed and repeated-sprint qualities? J Sci Med Sport Malone S. Hughes B. Doran D. A. Collins K. Gabbett T. J. 2019
22 1 29 34 1878-1861 (Electronic) 1878-1861 (Linking) 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.01.010 30057364
Five-second squeeze testing in 333 professional and semiprofessional male ice hockey players: How are hip and groin symptoms, strength, and sporting function related? Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine Wörner Tobias Thorborg Kristian Eek Frida 2019
7 2 2325967119825858 2325967119825858 10.1177/2325967119825858 30815497
Copenhagen five-second squeeze: a valid indicator of sports-related hip and groin function Br J Sports Med Thorborg K. Branci S. Nielsen M. P. Langelund M. T. Holmich P. 2017
51 7 594 599 1473-0480 (Electronic) 0306-3674 (Linking) 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096675 27935487
Sub-elite football players with hip-related groin pain and a positive flexion, adduction, and internal rotation test exhibit distinct biomechanical differences compared with the asymptomatic side J Orthop Sports Phys Ther King M. G. Semciw A. I. Hart H. F. Schache A. G. Middleton K. J. Heerey J. J. Agricola R. Crossley K. M. 2018
48 7 584 593 10.2519/jospt.2018.7910 29739301
Monitoring the effect of football match congestion on hamstring strength and lower limb flexibility: Potential for secondary injury prevention? Phys Ther Sport Wollin M. Thorborg K. Pizzari T. 2018
29 14 18 1873-1600 (Electronic) 1466-853X (Linking) 10.1016/j.ptsp.2017.09.001 29156302
Predicting sport and occupational lower extremity injury risk through movement quality screening: a systematic review Br J Sports Med Whittaker J. L. Booysen N. de la Motte S. Dennett L. Lewis C. L. Wilson D. McKay C. Warner M. Padua D. Emery C. A. Stokes M. 2017
51 7 580 585 1473-0480 (Electronic) 0306-3674 (Linking) 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096760 27935483
The association of physical performance tests with injury in collegiate athletes Br J Sports Med Hegedus E. J. 2017
51 13 1039 1040 1473-0480 (Electronic) 0306-3674 (Linking) 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097223 28188127
The star excursion balance test: Criterion and divergent validity on patients with femoral acetabular impingement Man Ther Johansson A. C. Karlsson H. 2016
26 104 109 10.1016/j.math.2016.07.015 27525357
Clinical and biomechanical outcomes of rehabilitation targeting intersegmental control in athletic groin pain: prospective cohort of 205 patients British Journal of Sports Medicine King Enda Franklyn-Miller Andrew Richter Chris O’Reilly Eamon Doolan Mark Moran Kieran Strike Siobhan Falvey Éanna 2018
52 16 1054 1062 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097089 29550754
Athletic groin pain (part 2): a prospective cohort study on the biomechanical evaluation of change of direction identifies three clusters of movement patterns British Journal of Sports Medicine Franklyn-Miller A Richter C King E Gore S Moran K Strike S Falvey E C 2017
51 5 460 468 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096050 28209597
Distinct cut task strategy in Australian football players with a history of groin pain Phys Ther Sport Edwards S. Brooke H. C. Cook J. L. 2017
23 58 66 1873-1600 (Electronic) 1466-853X (Linking) 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.07.005 27693099
Internal and External Training Load: 15 Years On International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance Impellizzeri Franco M. Marcora Samuele M. Coutts Aaron J. 2019
14 2 270 273 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0935 30614348
Debunking the myths about training load, injury and performance: empirical evidence, hot topics and recommendations for practitioners British Journal of Sports Medicine Gabbett Tim J 2018
bjsports 2018 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099784
Recommendations for hamstring injury prevention in elite football: translating research into practice British Journal of Sports Medicine Buckthorpe Matthew Wright Steve Bruce-Low Stewart Nanni Gianni Sturdy Thomas Gross Aleksander Stephan Bowen Laura Styles Bill Della Villa Stefano Davison Michael Gimpel Mo 2019
53 7 449 456 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099616 30413424
Quantifying physical demands in the National Basketball Association-challenges around developing best-practice models for athlete care and performance Int J Sports Physiol Perform McLean B. D. Strack D. Russell J. Coutts A. J. 2019
14 4 414 420 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0384 30039990
Measuring physical demands in basketball: an explorative systematic review of practices Sports Med Russell J. L. McLean B. D. Impellizzeri F. M. Strack D. S. Coutts A. J. 2020
10.1007/s40279-020-01375-9
Why screening tests to predict injury do not work—and probably never will…: a critical review British Journal of Sports Medicine Bahr Roald 2016
50 13 776 780 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096256 27095747
Effect of specific exercise-based football injury prevention programmes on the overall injury rate in football: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the FIFA 11 and 11+ programmes Br J Sports Med Thorborg K. Krommes K. K. Esteve E. Clausen M. B. Bartels E. M. Rathleff M. S. 2017
51 7 562 571 1473-0480 (Electronic) 0306-3674 (Linking) 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097066 28087568
Strength training as superior, dose-dependent and safe prevention of acute and overuse sports injuries: a systematic review, qualitative analysis and meta-analysis Br J Sports Med Lauersen J. B. Andersen T. E. Andersen L. B. 2018
52 24 1557 1563 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099078 30131332
Systematic review of the association between physical fitness and musculoskeletal injury risk: Part 3-flexibility, power, speed, balance, and agility J Strength Cond Res de la Motte S. J. Lisman P. Gribbin T. C. Murphy K. Deuster P. A. 2019
33 6 1723 1735 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002382 29239989
A systematic review of the association between physical fitness and musculoskeletal injury risk: Part 1-cardiorespiratory endurance J Strength Cond Res Lisman P. J. de la Motte S. J. Gribbin T. C. Jaffin D. P. Murphy K. Deuster P. A. 2017
31 6 1744 1757 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001855 28538328
Physical performance tests predict injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association athletes: a three-season prospective cohort study Br J Sports Med Hegedus E. J. McDonough S. Bleakley C. Baxter G. D. DePew J. T. Bradbury I. Cook C. 2016
50 21 1333 1337 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094885 26746910
A novel hamstring strain injury prevention system: post-match strength testing for secondary prevention in football British Journal of Sports Medicine Wollin Martin Thorborg Kristian Drew Michael Pizzari Tania 2019
bjsports 2019 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100707 31248869
Improving the reporting of therapeutic exercise interventions in rehabilitation research Int J Sports Phys Ther Page P. Hoogenboom B. Voight M. 2017
12 2 297 304 28515984
The effect of nordic hamstring exercise intervention volume on eccentric strength and muscle architecture adaptations: A systematic review and meta-analyses Sports Med Cuthbert M. Ripley N. McMahon J. J. Evans M. Haff G. G. Comfort P. 2019
50 83 99 10.1007/s40279-019-01178-7
Rescheduling Part 2 of the 11+ reduces injury burden and increases compliance in semi-professional football Scand J Med Sci Sports Whalan M. Lovell R. Steele J. R. Sampson J. A. 2019
29 1941 1951 10.1111/sms.13532 31376194
Scheduling of eccentric lower limb injury prevention exercises during the soccer micro-cycle: Which day of the week? Scand J Med Sci Sports Lovell R. Whalan M. Marshall P. W. M. Sampson J. A. Siegler J. C. Buchheit M. 2018
28 10 2216 2225 0905-7188 10.1111/sms.13226 29797592
The Minimum Effective Training Dose Required to Increase 1RM Strength in Resistance-Trained Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Sports Med Androulakis-Korakakis P. Fisher J. P. Steele J. 2020
50 4 751 765 0112-1642 10.1007/s40279-019-01236-0 31797219
Impairment-based rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy: Postoperative protocol for the HIP ARThroscopy international randomized controlled trial Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Heerey Josh Risberg May Arna Magnus Janicke Moksnes HÅvard Ødegaard Thomas Crossley Kay Kemp Joanne L. 2018
48 4 336 342 10.2519/jospt.2018.8002 29607764
Physical activity during adolescence and the development of cam morphology: a cross-sectional cohort study of 210 individuals British Journal of Sports Medicine Palmer Antony Fernquest Scott Gimpel Mo Birchall Richard Judge Andrew Broomfield John Newton Julia Wotherspoon Mark Carr Andrew Glyn-Jones Sion 2018
52 9 601 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097626 28798039
Exercise-based knee and anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Arundale A. J. H. Bizzini M. Giordano A. Hewett T. E. Logerstedt D. S. Mandelbaum B. Scalzitti D. A. Silvers-Granelli H. Snyder-Mackler L. 2018
48 9 A1 a42 10.2519/jospt.2018.0303
Anatomical and morphological characteristics may explain why groin pain is more common in male than female athletes Br J Sports Med Schache A. G. Woodley S. J. Schilders E. Orchard J. W. Crossley K. M. 2017
51 7 554 555 1473-0480 (Electronic) 0306-3674 (Linking) 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096945 27935484
