
==== Front
Medicine (Baltimore)
Medicine (Baltimore)
MD
Medicine
0025-7974
1536-5964
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Hagerstown, MD

39029025
MD-D-24-04631
00027
10.1097/MD.0000000000039066
3
6600
Research Article
Observational Study
Diagnosis of suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome based on the infraspinatus muscle cross-sectional area on shoulder MRI
Cho Jaeho MD jaehotv@gmail.com
a
Yi Jungmin MD jminyi19@gmail.com
b
Kim Hyunhae MD leiga11@ish.ac.kr
b
Moon Sunyoung MD tjsdudm19@naver.com
b
Choi Woobin MS binrosa0413@gmail.com
c
Kang Keum Nae MD cleanbinu@gmail.com
d
Shin Hojin US daniel.shin@emory.edu
e
Kim Young Uk MD, PhD b*
a Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
b Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University of Korea College of Medicine, International ST. Mary`s Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea
c Catholic Kwandong University of Korea College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea
d Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Police Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
e Emory University Class of 2026 Biology B.S., Atlanta, GA.
* Correspondence: Young Uk Kim, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University, College of Medicine, International ST. Mary`s Hospital, Simgokro 100Gil 25 Seo-gu, Incheon 22711, Republic of Korea (e-mail: uk201@hanmail.net; zerg016@gmail.com).
19 7 2024
19 7 2024
103 29 e3906627 4 2024
02 7 2024
03 7 2024
Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.

Suprascapular nerve entrapment (SNE) syndrome is a commonly overlooked cause of shoulder weakness and pain. It frequently causes weakness over the posterior and lateral and posterior aspects of the shoulder, as well as pain of infraspinatus muscles. Therefore, we considered that the infraspinatus muscle cross-sectional area (IMCSA) might be a new morphological parameter to analyze SNE syndrome. We assumed that the IMCSA is an important morphologic parameter in SNE syndrome diagnosis. We acquired infraspinatus muscle data from 10 patients with SNE syndrome and from 10 healthy subjects who had undergone magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder and who revealed no evidence of SNE syndrome. We analyzed the infraspinatus muscle thickness (IMT) and IMCSA at the shoulder on the imaging of the shoulder using our image analysis program. The IMCSA was measured as the whole infraspinatus muscle cross-sectional area that was most atrophied in the sagittal S-MR images. The IMT was measured as the thickest level of infraspinatus muscle. The mean IMT was 29.17 ± 2.81 mm in the healthy subjects and 25.22 ± 3.19 mm in the SNE syndrome group. The mean IMCSA was 1321.95 ± 175.91 mm2 in the healthy group and 1048.38 ± 259.94 mm2 in the SNE syndrome group. SNE syndrome patients had significantly lower IMT (P < .001) and IMCSA (P < .001) than the healthy group. The ROC curve shows that the optimal cutoff point of the IMT was 26.74 mm, with 70.0% sensitivity, 70.0% specificity, and an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.65–1.00). The best cutoff value of the IMCSA was 1151.02 mm2, with 80.0% sensitivity, 80.0% specificity, and AUC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.69–1.00). The IMT and IMCSA were both significantly associated with SNE syndrome. And the IMCSA was a highly sensitive diagnostic tool.

cross-sectional area
diagnosis
infraspinatus muscle
suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome
thickness
OPEN-ACCESSTRUE
==== Body
pmc1. Introduction

Suprascapular nerve entrapment (SNE) syndrome is a rare neuropathy.[1,2] Symptoms due to nerve system dysfunction are based on atrophy of the infraspinatus and supraspinatus muscles supplied by the suprascapular nerve.[3–6] Traumatic injuries such as, clavicular fracture, scapular fracture, shoulder dislocations, and the acromioclavicular joint, or proximal humerus fractures are common causes of nerve damage. The diagnosis of SNE syndrome is typically based on interview, physical examination, medical imaging (ultrasonography, X-ray), or electrodiagnostic study.[4] The diagnosis must be differentiated from cervical disc injury, cervical spinal cord disease, brachial plexus disease, and the damage to the rotator cuff.[7] Thus, exact diagnosis and management is important to prevent SNE syndrome.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder (MRS) is very useful for analysis of the atrophy of the infraspinatus muscle.[8] Treating physicians consider the MRS findings when analyzing morphological changes in the infraspinatus muscle when they decide on treatment choices. Previous research has assessed the infraspinatus muscle using a simple measurement at the “halfway” of the infraspinatus muscle. However, a partial and an asymmetrical atrophy of the infraspinatus muscle can occur anywhere. Thus, a measurement error bias could occur. In contrast to the infraspinatus muscle thickness (IMT), the cross-sectional area of the infraspinatus muscle will not suffer from measurement error bias, because the IMCSA the cross-sectional area of the infraspinatus muscle. Therefore, to analyze atrophy of infraspinatus muscle, we created the IMCSA as a novel image analysis tool to diagnose SNE syndrome. We assumed that the IMCSA will be an important image analysis parameter in SNE syndrome diagnosis.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

This observational study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board.

The inclusion criteria were that the subjects for the SNE syndrome group must:

Each patient had a history of arm/shoulder heaviness or weakness.

Burning/radiating discomfort to the back or neck.

Shoulder movement impairments.

Loss of shoulder range of motion.

Atrophy of infraspinatus muscles.

Patients were excluded if they reported:

previous shoulder and elbow fracture history.

previous shoulder and elbow surgery.

No available of MRS.

The participants were an SNE syndrome group comprising 10 patients. There were 8 (80.0%) male and 2 (20.0%) female, with a mean age of 43.90 ± 15.57 years (range, 20–57 years) (Table 1). To contrast the IMT and IMCSA between subjects without and with SNE syndrome, we enrolled a healthy group consisting of subjects who wanted to take MRS for accurate diagnosis. The healthy group was patients who had shoulder discomfort and wanted to undergo MRS. There were no abnormal findings on MRS in the healthy group.

Table 1 Comparison of the demographic characteristics of the normal and SNE syndrome groups.

Variable	Healthy group
n = 10	SNE syndrome group
n = 10	Statistical significance	
Gender (male/female)	6/4	8/2	NS	
Age (yrs)
IMT (mm)	42.70 ± 13.28
29.17 ± 2.81	43.90 ± 15.57
25.22 ± 3.19	NS
P < .001	
IMCSA (mm2)	1321.95 ± 175.91	1048.38 ± 259.94	P < .001	
IMCSA = infraspinatus muscle cross-sectional area, IMT = infraspinatus muscle thickness, NS = not statistically significant (P > .05), SNE syndrome = suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome.

In the normal group, 10 subjects (6 men and 4 women) were enrolled with an average age of 42.70 ± 13.28 years (range, 20–67 years).

2.2. Imaging parameters

Using a 3.0T MRS system (Siemens vision) and and 3T Ingina scanners (Philips Healthcare, Eindhoven, Netherlands), we obtained sagittal T1-weighted images. The MRS imaging parameters were as follows: flip angle 35°, field of view 160 cm × 160 cm, repetition time 619.0 ms, number of signals averaged = 2, echo time 13.0 ms, 3 > echo train length, slice thickness 3.00 mm, matrix size 512 × 307, and scan time 4 minutes 32 seconds.

2.3. Image analysis

The IMT and IMCSA measurements were performed by the 18 years experienced specialist. T1-weighted sagittal TSE MRS images were acquired for visualization of the most atrophied infraspinatus muscle. IMT and IMCSA were measured at MRS (INFINITT, Incheon, Simgokro, Republic of Korea) using the INFINITT Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). INFINITT PACS also offers a diagnostic viewer with enterprise imaging solutions. Sagittal T1-weighted MRS images showed a tortuous appearance of the infraspinatus muscle. We measured the IMCSA as the cross-sectional area of the muscle margin of the infraspinatus muscle that was the most atrophied area in the MRS images. And, we also measured the IMT at the midline between the insertion and origin (Fig 1A and B). We have added 3D reconstruction image of shoulder (Fig. 2).

Figure 1. Measurement of both infraspinatus muscle thickness (IMT) (white arrow) (A) and infraspinatus muscle cross-sectional area (IMCSA) (white arrow) (B) was acquired on MR T1 weighted images.

Figure 2. 3D reconstruction image of shoulder. The blue plane is the slicing plane; infraspinatus muscle thickness (IMT) and infraspinatus muscle cross-sectional area (IMCSA).

2.4. Statistical analysis

IMT and IMCSA between SNE syndrome and normal subjects were compared using independent t tests. The optimal cutoff point is identified by the significant AUC of ROC analysis. A value of P < .05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyzes were performed using Windows version 22.0 (IBM/SPSS, Inc., Incheon, Korea).

3. Results

Demographic characteristics assessed were age at date of sex and diagnosis. Significant differences were not found in the demographic data. The mean IMT was 29.17 ± 2.81 mm in the healthy subjects sand 25.22 ± 3.19 mm in the SNE syndrome group. The mean IMCSA was 1321.95 ± 175.91 mm2 in the healthy group and 1048.38 ± 259.94 mm2 in the SNE syndrome group. SNE syndrome patients had significantly lower IMT (P < .001) and IMCSA (P < .001) than the healthy group (Table 1). Optimal cutoff values are identified by the significant AUC of the curve analysis (IMT was 26.74 mm, with 70.0% sensitivity, 70.0% specificity, and an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.65–1.00)) (Table 2 and Fig. 2). The optimal cutoff point of the IMCSA was 1151.02 mm2, with 80.0% sensitivity, 80.0% specificity, and AUC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.69–1.00) (Table 3 and Fig. 3).

Table 2 Each cutoff threshold, sensitivity and specificity of the IMT.

IMT
(mm)	Sensitivity
(%)	Specificity
(%)	
18.06	0.0	100	
25.39	50.0	90.0	
26.74*	70.0	70.0	
28.24	80.0	60.0	
29.45	90.0	50.0	
32.98	100	10.0	
IMT = infraspinatus muscle thickness.

* The optimal cutoff score on the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Table 3 Each cutoff threshold, Sensitivity and Specificity of the IMCSA.

IMCSA
(mm2)	Sensitivity
(%)	Specificity
(%)	
658.52	10.0	100	
1012.08	40.0	100	
1151.02*	80.0	80.0	
1154.78	80.0	70.0	
1213.81	80.0	60.0	
1486.32	100	20.0	
IMCSA = infraspinatus muscle cross-sectional area.

* The most suitable cutoff score on the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Figure 3. The best cutoff score for IMCSA was 1151.02 mm2 versus 26.74 mm of IMT, with sensitivity 80.0% versus 70.0%, specificity 80.0% versus 70.0%. IMT AUC of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.65–1.00). IMCSA AUC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.69–1.00).

4. Discussion

The most important finding of our study was to find out the role of the IMCSA in SNE syndrome. We demonstrated that the IMCSA had 80.0% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity for predicting SNE syndrome. In contrast, the IMT had 70.0% sensitivity, 70.0% specificity.

SNE syndrome, is a condition which is due to damage and irritation to the suprascapular nerve. This condition can result in weakness, pain, or both depending on the cause. The suprascapular nerve has a sensory and motor innervation. Its motor innervation is to the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles.[9–11] Traumatic injuries such as, clavicular fracture, scapular fracture, shoulder dislocation, the acromioclavicular joint, or proximal humerus fractures are common causes of nerve damage. Another cause of SNE include iatrogenic damages during exertional overload in physical or athletes laborers, surgical procedures, tuberous changes of this area. One important cause is that symptoms due to nerve irritation are based on progressive atrophy of the infraspinatus muscle, which is supplied by the scapular nerve.[12–14] Thus, analysis of infraspinatus muscle is very important. However, there is no study to analyze infraspinatus muscles objectively.

Multiple imaging techniques, such as plain X-ray, MRS, computed tomography, and shoulder ultrasonography, are available.[15–18] However, it is difficult to evaluate SNE syndrome by means of imaging modalities, because of the lack of a reliable objective imaging parameter. And, atrophied infraspinatus muscle has been considered to be a major morphologic parameter of SNE syndrome. However, the infraspinatus muscle exhibits wavy or curved contours, ligamentous discontinuities, variable signal intensity, contour elongation, and muscle irregularities within areas of atrophy.[19] Therefore, a single measurement may result in an incorrect measurement. IMCSA, which measures the total cross-sectional area of the infraspinatus muscle, was thought to be able to predict SNE syndrome through the cross-sectional area of the infraspinatus muscle, unlike IMT. Ultimately, we demonstrated that IMCSA is superior to IMT as a morphological measurement tool for SNE syndrome. Eventually, we demonstrated that the IMCSA is better than the IMT as a morphological measurement tool of SNE syndrome. In the current original research, we demonstrated that the IMCSA had 80.0% sensitivity 80.0% specificity for predicting SNE syndrome. In contrast, the IMT had 70.0% sensitivity, 70.0% specificity, and an AUC of 0.83. These results show that IMCSA predicts SNE syndrome better than IMT.

This study has many limitations. First, SNE syndrome has a variety of causes, including trauma, rotator cuff damages, repetitive overhead activities, and the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus muscles.[20–30] However, we only focused on the infraspinatus muscle. Second, there may be incorrect measurements of IMCSA and SMT in MRS. Despite efforts to analyze these morphological measurements to best represent the supraspinatus on sagittal image sections, the sagittal images evaluated to measure cross-sectional images may be inconsistent due to differences in cut level or angle of the MRS. It is caused by individual anatomical differences and technical issues. Third, alternative imaging tools to evaluate SNE syndrome include ultrasonography, intraosseous ganglion, computed tomography, and superior transverse shoulder ligament, but only IMCSA and IMT measurements of MRS were analyzed in this study protocol. Fourth, functional instability was not considered. This is because functional instability is a subjective finding that can vary depending on interpretation. Efforts are being made to create objective morphological indicators.

Despite these limitations, this is the first study to document an association between IMCSA and SNE syndrome.

5. Conclusion

The aim of this observational study was to assess the role of the IMCSA in SNE syndrome. We demonstrated that the IMCSA had high sensitivity (80.0%), high specificity (80.0%), and an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.69–1.00) for predicting SNE syndrome. The IMT and IMCSA were both significantly associated with SNE syndrome. And the IMCSA was a highly sensitive diagnostic tool.

Acknowledgments

The all authors thank the International ST. Mary`s Hospital.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Young Uk Kim.

Data curation: Young Uk Kim.

Formal analysis: Jaeho Cho, Young Uk Kim.

Funding acquisition: Jaeho Cho, Young Uk Kim.

Investigation: Hojin Shin, Young Uk Kim.

Methodology: Jaeho Cho, Young Uk Kim.

Project administration: Jaeho Cho, Young Uk Kim.

Resources: Hyunhae Kim, Young Uk Kim.

Software: Young Uk Kim.

Visualization: Sunyoung Moon.

Writing – original draft: Jungmin Yi, Woobin Choi, Keum Nae Kang.

Abbreviations:

IMCSA infraspinatus muscle cross-sectional area

IMT infraspinatus muscle thickness

MRS magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder

SNE syndrome suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

How to cite this article: Cho J, Yi J, Kim H, Moon S, Choi W, Kang KN, Shin H, Kim YU. Diagnosis of suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome based on the infraspinatus muscle cross-sectional area on shoulder MRI. Medicine 2024;103:29(e39066).
==== Refs
References

[1] Al-Redouan A Kachlik D . Suprascapular notch cross-sectional area on MRI is not highly accurate in the diagnosis of suprascapular nerve entrapment: counter point of view. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022;75 :536–8.35974474
[2] Asami A Sonohata M Morisawa K . Bilateral suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome associated with rotator cuff tear. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000;9 :70–2.10717866
[3] Barragan Echenique DM Dolan MT Koh JL Goldberg BA Amirouche F . Infraspinatus muscle fiber moment arms during abduction: a biomechanical comparison of values for intact rotator cuff, supraspinatus tear, superior capsular reconstruction, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10 :23259671221098378.35651480
[4] Cano-Martinez JA Nicolas-Serrano G Villodres Corpas J Bento-Gerard J . Arthroscopic release of proximal supra-scapular nerve entrapment: medium-term results. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed). 2021;65 :91–8.33177013
[5] Cohn MR Cregar WM Drager J Lu Y Garrigues GE . Suprascapular nerve entrapment due to an ossified spinoglenoid ligament after scapular fracture: a case report. JBJS Case Connect. 2020;10 :e20.00477.
[6] Gosk J Rutowski R Wiacek R Reichert P . Experience with surgery for entrapment syndrome of the suprascapular nerve. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2007;9 :128–33.17510608
[7] Harbaugh KS Swenson R Saunders RL . Shoulder numbness in a patient with suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome: cutaneous branch of the suprascapular nerve: case report. Neurosurgery. 2000;47 :1452–5; discussion 1455.11126919
[8] Orellana-James NG Ginja MM Regueiro M . Sub-acute and chronic MRI findings in bilateral canine fibrotic contracture of the infraspinatus muscle. J Small Anim Pract. 2013;54 :428–31.23656382
[9] Joo YB Lee WY Chung HJ . Suprascapular nerve entrapment caused by a large hematoma of the scapula: a case report. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24 :589.37468872
[10] Koptas K Zielinska N Tubbs RS Olewnik L . An unreported infraspinatus muscle variation-two-headed infraspinatus minor muscle and three-headed fusion with the teres minor muscle. Surg Radiol Anat. 2022;44 :1305–8.35962136
[11] Labetowicz P Synder M Wojciechowski M . Protective and predisposing morphological factors in suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome: a fundamental review based on recent observations. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017 :4659761.28691025
[12] Lawrence RL Veluswamy B Dobben EA Klochko CL Soliman SB . Predictors of infraspinatus muscle degeneration in individuals with an isolated supraspinatus tendon tear. Skeletal Radiol. 2023;52 :695–703.36195776
[13] Leider JD Derise OC Bourdreaux KA . Treatment of suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2021;13 :25554.34745481
[14] Meyer JS Hessenauer FM Reichel T Pham M Plumhoff P Rueckl K . Isolated mononeuropathy of the suprascapular nerve: traumatic traction injury as an important differential diagnosis to the entrapment syndrome. JSES Int. 2020;4 :499–502.32939475
[15] Hoshikawa K Yuri T Giambini H Mura N Kiyoshige Y . The functional role of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle subregions during forward flexion: a shear wave elastography study. JSES Int. 2022;6 :849–54.36081699
[16] Park J Su MY Kim YU . Accuracy of suprascapular notch cross-sectional area by MRI in the diagnosis of suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome: a retrospective pilot study. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022;75 :496–501.35700981
[17] Park J Su MY Kim YU . Response to “Suprascapular notch cross-sectional area on MRI is not highly accurate in the diagnosis of suprascapular nerve entrapment: counter point of view”. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022;75 :539–40.35974473
[18] Pecina M . Who really first described and explained the suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83 :1273–4.11507137
[19] Vij N Fabian I Hansen C Kasabali AJ Urits I Viswanath O . Outcomes after minimally invasive and surgical management of suprascapular nerve entrapment: a systematic review. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022;14 :37157.35936798
[20] Wu WT Chang KV Mezian K Nanka O Lin CP Ozcakar L . Basis of shoulder nerve entrapment syndrome: an ultrasonographic study exploring factors influencing cross-sectional area of the suprascapular nerve. Front Neurol. 2018;9 :902.30405524
[21] Wu WT Mezian K Ricci V Lin CS Chang KV Ozcakar L . Dynamic ultrasound examination painting the picture of omohyoid muscle strain and associated suprascapular nerve entrapment. Pain Med. 2023;24 :1197–9.37354517
[22] Yi JW Cho NS Rhee YG . Intraosseous ganglion of the glenoid causing suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome: a case report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18 :e25–27.19157912
[23] Atar MO Korkmaz N Aslan SG . Comparison of ultrasound-guided subacromial corticosteroid and ozone (O(2)-O(3)) injections in the treatment of chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Korean J Pain. 2023;36 :128–36.36533317
[24] Byeon GJ Shin SW Yoon JU Kim EJ Baek SH Ri HS . Infusion methods for continuous interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Korean J Pain. 2015;28 :210–6.26175882
[25] Heo Y Cho N Cho H Won HS Yang M Kim YD . New insights into pathways of the accessory nerve and transverse cervical artery for distal selective accessory nerve blockade. Korean J Pain. 2020;33 :48–53.31888317
[26] Yoon JY Park JH Lee KJ Kim HS Rhee SM Oh JH . The effect of postoperatively applied far-infrared radiation on pain and tendon-to-bone healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a clinical prospective randomized comparative study. Korean J Pain. 2020;33 :344–51.32989199
[27] Cho H Kang S Won HS Yang M Kim YD . New insights into pathways of the dorsal scapular nerve and artery for selective dorsal scapular nerve blockade. Korean J Pain. 2019;32 :307–12.31569924
[28] Mustafaoglu R Yasaci Z Zirek E Griffiths MD Ozdincler AR . The relationship between smartphone addiction and musculoskeletal pain prevalence among young population: a cross-sectional study. Korean J Pain. 2021;34 :72–81.33380570
[29] Gurudut P Godse AN . Effectiveness of graded motor imagery in subjects with frozen shoulder: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Korean J Pain. 2022;35 :152–9.35354678
[30] Lee EY Won HS Yang M Kim H Kim YD . Comparison of international medical costs for interventional pain treatment: a focus on Korea and Japan. Korean J Pain. 2024;37 :51–8.38072796
