
==== Front
Pain Ther
Pain Ther
Pain and Therapy
2193-8237
2193-651X
Springer Healthcare Cheshire

39028388
633
10.1007/s40122-024-00633-2
Original Research
Association of Abdominal Aortic Calcification and Clinical Outcomes in LDH Patients Treated with Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
Zhang Ying 1
Zhu Zhaoji 2
Jin Xiaohong jxhtgzy@163.com

1
Huang Peng huangpeng77@126.com
https://fyy.sdfyy.cn

1
1 https://ror.org/051jg5p78 grid.429222.d 0000 0004 1798 0228 Department of Pain, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Pinghai Road NO. 899, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province China
2 https://ror.org/05t8y2r12 grid.263761.7 0000 0001 0198 0694 Department of General Practice, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China
19 7 2024
19 7 2024
10 2024
13 5 12571269
17 5 2024
25 6 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Introduction

To determine any significant associations between abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) and clinical manifestations of pain symptoms following endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

Methods

Patients sequentially presenting with a history of unilateral radiculopathy with or without back pain, and with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed diagnosis of posterolateral disc herniation between August 2021 and December 2023 were eligible for inclusion in the study. All patients underwent endoscopic discectomy at our center during the study period. AAC stages were classified based on the Kauppila classification system using lateral lumbar radiographs.

Results

Between August 2021 and December 2023 a total of 120 patients were included in the study for analysis, of whom 82 (68.3%) exhibited mild AAC and 38 (31.7%) had moderate-severe AAC. Analyses using the multivariate linear regression model revealed a significant correlation between AAC comorbidity and postoperative clinical outcomes. At 1 year post-surgery, the mean change in leg pain following endoscopic lumbar discectomy was significantly less for patients with moderate-severe AAC (5.0 points) than for patients with mild ACC (p < 0.001). Even after adjusting for relevant confounders, this difference remained significant. Similar results were also observed in the postoperative improvement of back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index score, and the physical functioning, role physical, and bodily pain components of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire. There was no significant difference in the rate of repeat surgery or post-surgical new-onset back pain between patients with different levels of severity of AAC at 1 year post-surgery.

Conclusions

There is a significant association between the severity of AAC and clinical outcomes among patients with lumbar disk herniation who underwent endoscopic lumbar discectomy. AAC may serve as a prognostic factor in predicting surgical outcomes and guiding management strategies for patients with lumbar disk herniation following endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

Keywords

Abdominal aortic calcification
Endoscopic lumbar discectomy
Lumbar disk herniation
Pain
issue-copyright-statement© Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcKey Summary Points

Why carry out this study?	
Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is common in elderly patients, and emerging studies suggest that AAC can have broader implications for musculoskeletal disorders, especially in cases of degenerative spinal diseases	
Lumbar disc herniation is the most common cause of lower back and leg pain, and surgical interventions, such as intervertebral discectomy, to alleviate symptoms and restore nerve function is often needed	
We hypothesized that AAC will influence the clinical outcomes in patients with lumbar disk herniation who undergo endoscopic lumbar discectomy	
What was learned from the study?	
At 1 year post surgery, patients with moderate-severe AAC showed less improvement in leg pain, back pain, Oswestry Disability Index) score, and the physical functioning, role-physical), and bodily pain components of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire than patients with mild AAC	
There is a significant association between the severity of AAC and clinical outcomes after endoscopic lumbar discectomy	

Introduction

Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is a common manifestation of arterial hardening and a strong indicator of fatal systemic vascular disorders and mortality. In those individuals with AAC, the aortic media along the elastic membrane gradually becomes calcified, leading to atherosclerosis and vascular aging symptoms [1]. Studies have shown that the onset and severity of AAC are the leading cause of higher rates of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity [2, 3]. Interestingly, emerging studies suggest that AAC can have broader implications for musculoskeletal disorders, especially in cases of degenerative spinal diseases and vertebral fracture, in addition to its pathogenic contribution to cardiovascular malfunction [4–6]. It has been speculated that prolonged deposition of calcium salts on the aortic walls causes arterial hardening, resulting in abnormally high systolic and low diastolic pressure. This altered heart pressure damages arterial blood vessels during excessive systolic contraction, with consequent failure to adequately supply blood to various organs and tissues due to over-relaxation during diastole. Moreover, the presence of calcified plaques in the aorta notably narrow down the lumbar arteries, causing reduced blood flow to the spinal vasculature [3, 7, 8], which potentially compromises spinal blood circulation and induces degenerative mechanisms in the central nervous system [4, 9].

Among the myriad of spinal disorders that AAC may promote, lumbar disc herniation (LDH) predominantly increases morbidity and long-term movement disabilities, often necessitating surgical interventions, such as intervertebral discectomy, to alleviate symptoms and restore nerve function [10, 11]. The association between AAC occurrence and clinical outcomes of intervertebral discectomy has garnered increasing interest due to its potential implications for risk stratification, treatment optimization, and prognosis of this subset of patients with spinal cord disorders.

While existing literature suggests the clinical implication of AAC in inducing spinal deformities, such as degenerative disc and spinal stenosis, the influence of AAC on patients with comorbid LDH who undergo intervertebral discectomy remains widely unexplored [7, 8, 12–14]. Understanding this clinical association is crucial because both AAC and LDH are prevalent conditions, especially in the elderly population [1, 15, 16]; in addition, emerging evidence suggests that AAC may contribute to the pathophysiology of spinal disorders through perturbed microcirculation, induction of inflammatory responses, and neural compression, as well as potentially influence the postoperative recovery and treatment outcomes [4].

Consequently, there is an urgent need for well-designed case-controlled large cohort studies to establish the clinical association between AAC onset and outcomes of LDH intervention.

We report here the results of our single-center prospective cohort study to determine any significant associations between AAC and clinical manifestations of pain symptoms following endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

Methods

Patient Population

This prospective, sequential cohort study enrolled patients who presented with a history of unilateral radiculopathy with or without back pain and with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed diagnosis of posterolateral disc herniation between August 2021 and December 2023. All patients underwent endoscopic lumbar discectomy via the transforaminal approach at our center during the study period. All surgeries were performed by the same two independent surgeons who are specialists in endoscopic lumbar spine surgery. Before surgery, all patients were examined by lumbar, lateral, and anterior-lumbar radiography, lumbar MRI, and three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) imaging of the lumbar spine. Patients with previous spine surgeries, a history of cancer, or missing follow-up data were excluded from the study.

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the study protocol (reference no. 2024–192). Patient consent was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were strictly followed for reporting and documentation of the study results [17].

Outcome Parameters

Pre- and postoperative back and leg pain symptoms were evaluated using the numeric rating scale (NRS) [18]. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), and bodily pain (BP) components of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) were also assessed. Preoperative and postoperative data were collected at the time of admission and at 1 year post-surgery, respectively. Any changes in the pain intensity were determined by subtracting the postoperative NRS score from the preoperative one. Likewise, changes in ODI, SF-36-PF, SF-36-RP, and SF-36-BP were calculated by subtracting the respective preoperative scores from the postoperative scores. AAC stages were classified based on the Kauppila classification system using lateral lumbar radiographs [19]. This system scores the degree of calcification in the anterior and posterior abdominal aorta in front of the first four lumbar vertebrae. Each segment is scored from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating no calcification, 1 indicating the presence of small, scattered calcific deposits filling less than one-third of the longitudinal wall, 2 indicating that one-third or more but less than two-thirds of the wall is calcified; and 3 indicating that two-thirds or more of the wall is calcified, totaling a maximum score of 24. Patients with scores < 4 were categorized as having mild AAC; those with scores ranging from 5 to 15 were classified as having moderate AAC; and those with scores > 15 were classified with severe AAC (Fig. 1) [20]. To evaluate the severity of lumbar degeneration, we utilized the Pfirrmann grading system at the index lumbar level [21]. Additionally, preoperative degenerative spondylolisthesis, characterized by a vertebra slipping forward at least 3 mm to the vertebra below it, was evaluated using conventional lateral radiography.Fig. 1 The abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) score assessed using a preoperative lateral radiograph of the lumbar (L) spine. The AAC score in this patient was 12 points (0 points at the L1 segment, 2 points at the L2 segment, 5 points at the L3 segment and 5 points at the L4 segment), leading to a classification of moderately severe AAC

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were presented as numbers (n) and percentages (%), and continuous variables were reported as medians with interquartile ranges or means with standard deviations (SD), depending on the distribution patterns. Differences in demographic parameters in patients with varying degrees of AAC severity were assessed using Welch’s two-sample t-test or Fisher's exact test. Linear regression analysis was used to test the linear relationship between AAC and post-surgical clinical outcomes. Potential covariates were incorporated into the regression model to conduct multivariate linear regression analysis.

A linear mixed model was used to compare differences in the improvement of clinical outcomes across patients with varying severity levels of AAC. The model included fixed effects for the severity of AAC. Random intercepts at the patient level were used, including baseline value of pain intensity score; ODI, SF-36-PF, SF-36-RP, and SF-36-BP scores; age; the degree of lumbar degeneration; and spondylolisthesis.

All statistical analyses were performed using R-Studio version 2023.03 (Posit Software, Boston, MA, USA), with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05.

Results

Demographic Characteristics

Between August 2021 and December 2023, a cohort of 134 patients presented at our clinic for endoscopic discectomy to treat LDH-associated unilateral radiculopathy. Of these, six patients were lost to follow-up at 1 year post-surgery, and eight patients were identified with various comorbidities and unique clinical conditions, resulting in 120 patients considered to be eligible for inclusion in the final analysis (Fig. 2). The baseline characteristics of these patients are detailed in Table 1. The average age of the 120 participants was 56 years, 48.3% (58/120) were female, and 71.7% (86/120) were non-smokers. In terms of herniation location, the majority (54.2%) of patients had herniation with the left-side onset, with the lumbar position L4/L5 being the most common site (51.7%). The mean (± SD) scores for back pain, leg pain, and ODI were 3.9 ± 2.2, 6.1 ± 1.7, and 31.1 ± 5.1, respectively. Also, 21 patients (17.5%) had preoperative degenerative spondylolisthesis, with most (74.2%) having Pfirrmann grades 2 and 3.Fig. 2 Overview of analysis and study population

Table 1 Patient demographics and baseline characteristics

Characteristic	Valuea	
Age (year)	56 ± 14	
Female sex, n (%)	58 (48.3%)	
Smoking status, n (%)	
 None	86 (71.7%)	
Body mass index	25.1 ± 3.5	
Side, n (%)	
 Left	65 (54.2%)	
 Right	55 (45.8%)	
Disk herniation level, n (%)	
 L2-L3	1 (0.8%)	
 L3-L4	4 (3.3%)	
 L4-L5	62 (51.7%)	
 L5-S1	50 (41.7%)	
 Two levels	3 (2.5%)	
Kauppila score, median [IQR]b	1.0 [0.0, 5.3]	
Severity of AAC according to Kauppila score, n (%)	
 Mild (< 4)	82 (68.3%)	
 Moderate to severe (5–15)	38 (31.7%)	
Pfirrmann classification, n (%)c	
 Grade 1	4 (3.3%)	
 Grade 2	50 (41.7%)	
 Grade 3	39 (32.5%)	
 Grade 4	26 (21.7%)	
 Grade 5	1 (0.8%)	
Spondylolisthesis, n (%)	
 No	99 (82.5%)	
 Yes	21 (17.5%)	
Pain intensity scored	
 Back pain	3.9 ± 2.2	
 Leg pain	6.1 ± 1.7	
Oswestry Disablity Indexe	31.1 ± 5.1	
SF-36 scoref	
- Role-physical component, n (%)	
 0	52 (43.3%)	
 25	54 (45.0%)	
 50	14 (11.7%)	
- Physical functioning component	36.1 ± 9.2	
- Bodily pain component	29.3 ± 8.1	
Blood lipids	1.9 ± 2.3	
Blood glucose, median [IQR]	5.4 [5.0, 6.0]	
High-density lipoprotein	1.1 ± 0.3	
Low-density lipoprotein	3.0 ± 0.9	
IQR Interquartile range, L lumbar, SF-36 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire

aValues presented with ± are the mean value ± standard deviation (SD)

bThe Kauppila classification is used to evaluate the severity of abdominal aortic calcification (AAC). Scores range from 0 to 24, with lower scores indicating less severe AAC

cThe Pfirrmann classification is used to assess disk degeneration at the index lumbar level, with higher scores indicating more severe disk degeneration

eScores from the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more disability related to back and leg pain

dScores on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for leg pain and for back pain range from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating less pain

fThe SF-36 includes physical functioning, role physical, and bodily pain domains; with higher scores indicating better quality of life

AAC and Clinical Outcomes

Of the 120 patients included in the analysis, 82 (68.3%) exhibited mild AAC and 38 (31.7%) showed moderate-severe AAC symptoms. There were no notable variations in terms of preoperative leg pain, back pain, ODI score, SF36-PF, SF36-RP, and SF36-BP between the mild and moderate-severe AAC patient groups. Notably, patients with moderate-severe AAC were older and had an average higher Pfirrmann grade than those with mild AAC (Table 2). Table 2 Baseline characteristics between the mild and moderate-severe AAC patient groups

Characteristic	AAC Mild (N = 82)	AAC moderate to severe (N = 38)	p-value	
Age (year)	51 ± 14	66 ± 8	 < 0.001	
Pfirrmann classification, n (%)			 < 0.001	
 1	4 (4.9%)	0 (0.0%)		
 2	46 (56.1%)	4 (10.5%)		
 3	21 (25.6%)	18 (47.4%)		
 4	11 (13.4%)	15 (39.5%)		
 5	0 (0.0%)	1 (2.6%)		
Back pain score	3.7 ± 2.3	4.3 ± 2.2	0.224	
Leg pain score	6.3 ± 1.4	5.7 ± 2.0	0.082	
Oswestry Disablity Index	31.3 ± 5.0	30.9 ± 5.4	0.702	
SF-36-PF	36.2 ± 8.3	35.3 ± 9.1	0.607	
SF-36-RP, n (%)			0.888	
 0	35 (42.7%)	17 (44.7%)		
 25	38 (46.3%)	16 (42.1%)		
 50	9 (11.0%)	5 (13.2%)		
 SF-36-BP	29.3 ± 8.0	28.8 ± 7.8	0.731	
Values presented with ± are the mean value ± standard deviation (SD)

AAC Abdominal aortic calcification, SF-36 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire, SF-36-BP bodily pain component of SF-36, SF-36-PF physical functioning component of SF-36, SF-36-RP role physical component of SF-36

We found a linear relationship between the Kauppila classification score and postoperative improvement of leg pain, back pain, ODI score, SF-36-PF, SF-36-RP, or SF-36-BP score (Fig. 3). In addition, the multivariate linear regression model revealed a significant correlation between AAC comorbidity and postoperative clinical outcomes. Notably, the removal of relevant confounding factors such as age, body mass index, sex, spondylolisthesis, and degree of lumbar degeneration did not alter the significance of this association (Table 3).Fig. 3 Graphs showing a significant but weak linear relationship between the Kauppila classification score and clinical outcomes after endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Solid black line represents line of linear regression and shaded area represents 95% CI

Table 3 Results of multivariable linear model analysis

Outcomes	b	Standard error	t	p-value	β (95% confidence interval)	
Back pain	– 1.51	0.47	– 3.18	0.002	– 1.5 (– 2.4 to – 0.6)	
Leg pain	– 1.10	0.44	– 2.52	0.013	– 1.1 (– 2.0 to – 0.2)	
Oswestry Disablity Index	– 6.35	1.66	– 3.82	 < 0.001	– 6.3 (– 9.6 to – 3.1)	
SF-36-PF	– 8.73	3.07	– 2.85	0.005	– 8.7 (– 14.7 to – 2.7)	
SF-36-RP	– 14.93	8.08	– 1.85	0.067	– 14.9 (– 30.8 to 0.9)	
SF-36-BP	– 16.41	3.98	– 4.12	 < .001	– 16.4 (– 24.2 to – 8.6)	
Multivariable linear model analysis adjusted for baseline clinical indicators, age, Pfirrmann classification, and Spondylolisthesis

SF-36 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire, SF-36-BP bodily pain component of SF-36, SF-36-PF physical functioning component of SF-36, SF-36-RP role physical component of SF-36

At 1-year post-surgery, the mean change in leg pain was 3.5 points in patients with moderate-severe AAC, which was significantly lower than the mean change in patients with mild AAC (5.0 points) (p < 0.001). Even after adjusting for relevant confounders, this difference remained significant. Similar results were also observed in the postoperative improvement of back pain, ODI score, and SF36-PF, SF36-RP, and SF36-BP scores (Table 4; Fig. 4). Table 4 Difference in mean change between patients with mild abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) and those with moderate to severe AAC

Outcomes	AAC mild (N = 82)	AAC moderate to severe (N = 38)	Difference in change (95% confidence interval)	p-valuea	
Mean change from baseline	Mean change from baseline	
Leg pain (n points)	5.1	3.5	1.4 (0.7–2.0)	 < 0.001	
Back pain (n points)	2.9	1.1	1.6 (1.0–2.1)	 < 0.001	
Oswestry Disablity Index score	25.1	15.9	6.0 (3.2–8.9)	 < 0.001	
SF-36-PF score	50.1	36 .3	9.8 (4.2–15.7)	 < 0.001	
SF-36-RP score	61.0	32.2	17.7 (3.6–32.9)	0.012	
SF-36-BP score	48.7	25.9	18.3 (10.8–26.5)	 < 0.001	
New onset of back pain after surgery, n (%)	2 (2.4%)	2 (5.3%)	Odds ratio: 3.0 (0.2–52.6)	0.447	
Reoperation within 1 year, n (%)	5 (6.1%)	2 (5.3%)	Odds ratio: 0.8 (0.2–4.8)	0.835	
SF-36 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire, SF-36-BP bodily pain component of SF-36, SF-36-PF physical functioning component of SF-36, SF-36-RP role physical component of SF-36

aSignificance of effects was estimated using the two-sided linear mixed-effects model with fixed (severity of AAC) and random (baseline clinical indicators, age, Pfirrmann classification, and spondylolisthesis) effects

Fig. 4 Comparison of clinical outcomes after endoscopic lumbar discectomy between patients with mild AAC and those with moderate to severe AAC revealed significant differences. A Difference in the improvement of leg pain from baseline (p < 0.001). B Difference in the improvement of back pain from baseline (p < 0.001). C Difference in the improvement of ODI (p < 0.001). D Difference in improvement of SF36-BP from baseline (p < 0.001). E Difference in the improvement of SF36-RP from baseline (p = 0.012). F Difference in improvement of SF36-PF from baseline (p < 0.001). AAC Abdominal aortic calcification, ODI Oswestry Disability Index, SF-36 Short Form 36 health survey questionnaire, BP bodily pain component of SF-36, RP role physical component of SF-36, PF physical functioning component of SF-36

In patients without preoperative back pain, the severity of AAC was not significantly correlated with an increased risk of developing post-surgical new-onset back pain (Odds ratio {OR] 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2–52.6, p = 0.447). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the rate of repeat surgery 1 year after the first surgery (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.2–4.8, p = 0.835).

Discussion

The results of this study revealed a compelling association between AAC severity and postoperative pain outcomes in patients with LDH treated for unilateral radiculopathy. One year after endoscopic discectomy, patients with mild AAC experienced significantly greater mean changes in their back and leg pain scores compared to those with moderate-severe AAC. Beyond pain outcomes, the degree of AAC severity also impacted the postoperative functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with LDH. Importantly, patients with mild AAC demonstrated greater improvements in their functional scores, as indicated by corresponding ODI scores and SF-36 domain scores, than those with moderate-severe AAC symptoms. We did not observe any significant between-group differences regarding the rate of repeat surgery and new onset back pain. These findings suggest that AAC severity may play a crucial role in determining the efficacy of endoscopic lumbar discectomy and alleviating pain symptoms as well as overall functional recovery.

Although previous studies demonstrated an association between AAC severity and treatment outcomes in various musculoskeletal disorders, the specific impact of AAC comorbidity on endoscopic lumbar discectomy in patients with LDH has not been explored in detail [22–24]. The results of some studies indicate a positive correlation between AAC severity and the extent of lumbar disc degeneration, suggesting a link to the occurrence of back pain [4, 7, 25]. Several studies have investigated the impact of AAC on surgical outcomes after spine surgery. For example, Sakaura et al. reported that the AAC score has significantly negative correlations with both the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score at 2-year post-decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal canal stenosis and the improvement of the JOA score [26]. Another study focusing on the association between AAC and lower back pain onset in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis revealed that AAC can hinder recovery from back pain after lumbar spine fusion surgery [9]. Also, Guven et al. showed that AAC is a significant predictor of perioperative blood loss in posterior spinal fusion surgery [27].

The mechanistic underpinnings of the observed associations between AAC severity and surgical outcomes merit further exploration. The main potential pathophysiology can be explained as AAC being an indicator of the risk of systemic vascular problems, including atherosclerosis [1]. Vascular calcification is not limited to large vessels such as the aorta, but also affects smaller arteries like the coronary and lumbar arteries that supply the lumbar spine [28]. Severe AAC, particularly atherosclerosis in the ostia of segment arteries and stenotic changes in the lumbar artery, can result in reduced spinal blood flow, reducing the delivery of essential nutrients and oxygen to spinal tissues. This, in turn, can lead to conditions like degenerative disc disease, facet arthritis, and stenosis, ultimately impacting post-operative outcomes [29, 30]. Additionally, AAC is associated with elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines [31]. Heightened inflammatory response can impair tissue healing, increase postoperative pain, and contribute to the recurrence of symptoms. Thirdly, AAC can alter the biomechanical properties of the aorta and surrounding structures, potentially affecting spinal mechanics. Changes in spinal biomechanics due to AAC may contribute to altered load distribution on the lumbar spine, potentially affecting the stability and success of the discectomy.

Compromised vascular status may also contribute to an increased risk of infections. AAC is also associated with endothelial dysfunction, characterized by impaired vasodilation and increased vascular stiffness [32]. Endothelial dysfunction can cause suboptimal tissue oxygenation, compromise wound healing, and increase susceptibility to postoperative complications such as thrombosis and ischemia [33]. Severe AAC alters spinal blood flow dynamics and increases the risk of vascular injury during surgical procedures [7].

The findings of this study are likely to have practical implications for clinical decision-making and patient counseling. Surgeons and healthcare providers should consider AAC severity as a potential prognostic factor when discussing surgical risks, expected outcomes, and postoperative care plans with patients and their caregivers. Tailoring intervention strategies and follow-up protocols based on the AAC severity may improve patient satisfaction, functional recovery, and long-term outcomes.

The novelty of this study lies in its focused investigation of the impact of AAC severity on the recovery of postoperative pain symptoms and functional outcomes in lumbar discectomy-treated patients. It is the first study to evaluate the impact of AAC on clinical outcomes after endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Here, we strictly adjusted all possible confounding factors, including baseline clinical indicators, age, spondylolisthesis, and degree of lumbar degeneration, to test the rigor of the study results, and found that the observed differences in pain and functional outcomes between the mild and moderate-severe AAC patient groups remained statistically significant, underscoring a high significance of the association between AAC severity and postoperative clinical outcomes.

Limitations and Future Directions

Several limitations of this study warrant acknowledgment. First, the small sample size and reliance on a single-center cohort might limit the generalizability of our study findings. Second, long-term follow-up investigations, which we could not accommodate in this report, assessing the durability of outcomes and the impact of interventions targeting AAC are also warranted. Third, a significant association was observed between the severity of AAC symptoms and the clinical outcomes of endoscopic lumbar discectomy. However, establishing causation is challenging due to potential confounding factors that were not addressed in the current study, such as lifestyle factors, inflammatory markers, and socioeconomic status. Future randomized controlled trials is still needed. Furthermore, exploring the molecular and cellular mechanisms linking AAC severity to surgical outcomes could pave the way for targeted therapies and personalized treatment strategies.

Conclusion

The findings of this study highlight a significant association between the severity of AAC symptoms and clinical outcomes among the comorbid LDH patients who underwent endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Notably, patients with mild AAC demonstrated superior postoperative improvements in terms of back and leg pain symptoms, functional scores, and postoperative quality of life compared to those with moderate-severe AAC, suggesting that AAC severity may serve as a prognostic factor in predicting surgical outcomes and guiding LDH patient management strategies following endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Finally, assessment of AAC symptoms is recommended as part of the preoperative evaluation of patients with LDH, allowing better risk stratification and effective personalized care planning.

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants of the study

Medical Writing

The authors wish to thank MedEditing LLC company for providing medical writing support, which was funded by the authors, in accordance with Good Publication Practice Guidelines (https://www.ismpp.org/gpp-2022).

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the conceptualization, methodology, writing-review, and editing of the manuscript. Ying Zhang conducted the clinical investigation. Peng Huang developed the study design, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. ZhaoJi Zhu and XiaoHong Jin contributed to validation of the data and revision of the manuscript. All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors(ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Funding

The Rapid Service Fee was partly funded by the The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow Unversity and partly funded by the authors.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors (Ying Zhang, Zhaoji Zhu, Xiaohong Jin, Peng Huang) have nothing to disclose.

Ethical Approval

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the study protocol (Reference No. 2024–192). Patient consent was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were strictly followed for reporting and documentation of the study results [17]. The use of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Pfirrmann grading system in the manuscript was permitted by the respective developers.

Prior Publication We confirm that the content of this manuscript has not been previously published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Portions of this work have not been presented at conferences or included in preprint repositories.

Ying Zhang and Zhaoji Zhu have contribute equally to this work.
==== Refs
References

1. Szulc P Abdominal aortic calcification: a reappraisal of epidemiological and pathophysiological data Bone 2016 84 25 37 10.1016/j.bone.2015.12.004 26688274
Szulc P. Abdominal aortic calcification: a reappraisal of epidemiological and pathophysiological data. Bone. 2016;84:25–37.26688274 10.1016/j.bone.2015.12.004
2. Lehto S Niskanen L Suhonen M Rönnemaa T Laakso M Medial artery calcification. A neglected harbinger of cardiovascular complications in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996 16 8 978 983 10.1161/01.ATV.16.8.978 8696962
Lehto S, Niskanen L, Suhonen M, Rönnemaa T, Laakso M. Medial artery calcification. A neglected harbinger of cardiovascular complications in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16(8):978–83.8696962 10.1161/01.ATV.16.8.978
3. Jayalath RW Mangan SH Golledge J Aortic calcification Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005 30 5 476 488 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.04.030 15963738
Jayalath RW, Mangan SH, Golledge J. Aortic calcification. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30(5):476–88.15963738 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.04.030
4. Schönnagel L Muellner M Suwalski P Abdominal aortic calcification is independently associated with lumbar endplate degeneration Eur Spine J. 2023 32 10 3387 93 10.1007/s00586-023-07871-6 37584697
Schönnagel L, Muellner M, Suwalski P, et al. Abdominal aortic calcification is independently associated with lumbar endplate degeneration. Eur Spine J. 2023;32(10):3387–93.37584697 10.1007/s00586-023-07871-6
5. El Maghraoui A Rezqi A Mounach A Achemlal L Bezza A Ghozlani I Relationship between vertebral fracture prevalence and abdominal aortic calcification in men Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 51 9 1714 20 10.1093/rheumatology/kes126 22661554
El Maghraoui A, Rezqi A, Mounach A, Achemlal L, Bezza A, Ghozlani I. Relationship between vertebral fracture prevalence and abdominal aortic calcification in men. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51(9):1714–20.22661554 10.1093/rheumatology/kes126
6. Majjad A Ghassem MA Toufik H Relationship between vertebral fracture prevalence and abdominal aortic calcification in women with rheumatoid arthritis Bone. 2020 141 115599 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115599 32822872
Majjad A, Ghassem MA, Toufik H, et al. Relationship between vertebral fracture prevalence and abdominal aortic calcification in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Bone. 2020;141:115599.32822872 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115599
7. Kauppila LI Atherosclerosis and disc degeneration/low-back pain–a systematic review Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009 37 6 661 670 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.02.006 19328027
Kauppila LI. Atherosclerosis and disc degeneration/low-back pain–a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37(6):661–70.19328027 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.02.006
8. Sfyri P Matsakas A Crossroads between peripheral atherosclerosis, western-type diet and skeletal muscle pathophysiology: emphasis on apolipoprotein E deficiency and peripheral arterial disease J Biomed Sci 2017 24 1 42 10.1186/s12929-017-0346-8 28688452
Sfyri P, Matsakas A. Crossroads between peripheral atherosclerosis, western-type diet and skeletal muscle pathophysiology: emphasis on apolipoprotein E deficiency and peripheral arterial disease. J Biomed Sci. 2017;24(1):42.28688452 10.1186/s12929-017-0346-8
9. Schönnagel L Muellner M Suwalski P Association of abdominal aortic calcification and lower back pain in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis Pain. 2024 165 2 376 82 37856648
Schönnagel L, Muellner M, Suwalski P, et al. Association of abdominal aortic calcification and lower back pain in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Pain. 2024;165(2):376–82.37856648
10. Deyo RA Mirza SK CLINICAL PRACTICE. Herniated lumbar intervertebral disk N Engl J Med 2016 374 18 1763 1772 10.1056/NEJMcp1512658 27144851
Deyo RA, Mirza SK. CLINICAL PRACTICE. Herniated lumbar intervertebral disk. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(18):1763–72.27144851 10.1056/NEJMcp1512658
11. Bailey CS Rasoulinejad P Taylor D Surgery versus conservative care for persistent sciatica lasting 4 to 12 months N Engl J Med. 2020 382 12 1093 102 10.1056/NEJMoa1912658 32187469
Bailey CS, Rasoulinejad P, Taylor D, et al. Surgery versus conservative care for persistent sciatica lasting 4 to 12 months. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(12):1093–102.32187469 10.1056/NEJMoa1912658
12. Sakaura H Ikegami D Fujimori T Sugiura T Mukai Y Hosono N Does atherosclerosis have negative impacts on early adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar interbody fusion? Global Spine J. 2021 11 5 674 8 10.1177/2192568220919370 32875899
Sakaura H, Ikegami D, Fujimori T, Sugiura T, Mukai Y, Hosono N. Does atherosclerosis have negative impacts on early adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar interbody fusion? Global Spine J. 2021;11(5):674–8.32875899 10.1177/2192568220919370
13. Mohammad A Lohan D Bergin D The prevalence of aortic calcification on vertebral fracture assessment imaging among patients with rheumatoid arthritis J Clin Densitom. 2014 17 1 72 7 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.02.014 23541718
Mohammad A, Lohan D, Bergin D, et al. The prevalence of aortic calcification on vertebral fracture assessment imaging among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Densitom. 2014;17(1):72–7.23541718 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.02.014
14. Li W Djuric N Cobbaert C Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA Modic changes in the lumbar spine: exploring their association with abdominal aortic calcification as a potential indicator of systemic atherosclerosis World Neurosurg. 2024 184 e503 10 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.157 38310947
Li W, Djuric N, Cobbaert C, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA. Modic changes in the lumbar spine: exploring their association with abdominal aortic calcification as a potential indicator of systemic atherosclerosis. World Neurosurg. 2024;184:e503–10.38310947 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.157
15. Teh R Prince RL Sim M Abdominal aortic calcification, cardiac troponin I and atherosclerotic vascular disease mortality in older women Heart. 2022 108 16 1274 80 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319879 34952862
Teh R, Prince RL, Sim M, et al. Abdominal aortic calcification, cardiac troponin I and atherosclerotic vascular disease mortality in older women. Heart. 2022;108(16):1274–80.34952862 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319879
16. Ramaswami R Ghogawala Z Weinstein JN Management of sciatica N Engl J Med 2017 376 12 1175 1177 10.1056/NEJMclde1701008 28328334
Ramaswami R, Ghogawala Z, Weinstein JN. Management of sciatica. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(12):1175–7.28328334 10.1056/NEJMclde1701008
17. Cuschieri S The STROBE guidelines Saudi J Anaesth 2019 13 Suppl 1 S31 s34 10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18 30930717
Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13(Suppl 1):S31-s34.30930717 10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18
18. Bielewicz J Daniluk B Kamieniak P VAS and NRS, same or different? Are visual analog scale values and numerical rating scale equally viable tools for assessing patients after microdiscectomy? Pain Res Manag 2022 2022 5337483 10.1155/2022/5337483 35391853
Bielewicz J, Daniluk B, Kamieniak P. VAS and NRS, same or different? Are visual analog scale values and numerical rating scale equally viable tools for assessing patients after microdiscectomy? Pain Res Manag. 2022;2022:5337483.35391853 10.1155/2022/5337483
19. Kauppila LI Polak JF Cupples LA Hannan MT Kiel DP Wilson PW New indices to classify location, severity and progression of calcific lesions in the abdominal aorta: a 25-year follow-up study Atherosclerosis. 1997 132 2 245 50 10.1016/S0021-9150(97)00106-8 9242971
Kauppila LI, Polak JF, Cupples LA, Hannan MT, Kiel DP, Wilson PW. New indices to classify location, severity and progression of calcific lesions in the abdominal aorta: a 25-year follow-up study. Atherosclerosis. 1997;132(2):245–50.9242971 10.1016/S0021-9150(97)00106-8
20. Verbeke F Van Biesen W Honkanen E Prognostic value of aortic stiffness and calcification for cardiovascular events and mortality in dialysis patients: outcome of the calcification outcome in renal disease (CORD) study Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 6 1 153 9 10.2215/CJN.05120610 20829424
Verbeke F, Van Biesen W, Honkanen E, et al. Prognostic value of aortic stiffness and calcification for cardiovascular events and mortality in dialysis patients: outcome of the calcification outcome in renal disease (CORD) study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(1):153–9.20829424 10.2215/CJN.05120610
21. Urrutia J Besa P Campos M The Pfirrmann classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: an independent inter- and intra-observer agreement assessment Eur Spine J. 2016 25 9 2728 33 10.1007/s00586-016-4438-z 26879918
Urrutia J, Besa P, Campos M, et al. The Pfirrmann classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: an independent inter- and intra-observer agreement assessment. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(9):2728–33.26879918 10.1007/s00586-016-4438-z
22. Simon SP Fodor D Muntean L Poanta L Cristea P Rednic S Bone mineral density, vertebral fractures and body mass index in postmenopausal women with abdominal aortic calcification Endocr Res. 2014 39 1 1 6 10.3109/07435800.2013.794425 23650982
Simon SP, Fodor D, Muntean L, Poanta L, Cristea P, Rednic S. Bone mineral density, vertebral fractures and body mass index in postmenopausal women with abdominal aortic calcification. Endocr Res. 2014;39(1):1–6.23650982 10.3109/07435800.2013.794425
23. Szulc P Kiel DP Delmas PD Calcifications in the abdominal aorta predict fractures in men: MINOS study J Bone Miner Res 2008 23 1 95 102 10.1359/jbmr.070903 17892380
Szulc P, Kiel DP, Delmas PD. Calcifications in the abdominal aorta predict fractures in men: MINOS study. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(1):95–102.17892380 10.1359/jbmr.070903
24. Golestani R Tio R Zeebregts CJ Abdominal aortic calcification detected by dual X-ray absorptiometry: a strong predictor for cardiovascular events Ann Med. 2010 42 7 539 45 10.3109/07853890.2010.515604 20839917
Golestani R, Tio R, Zeebregts CJ, et al. Abdominal aortic calcification detected by dual X-ray absorptiometry: a strong predictor for cardiovascular events. Ann Med. 2010;42(7):539–45.20839917 10.3109/07853890.2010.515604
25. Kauppila LI McAlindon T Evans S Wilson PW Kiel D Felson DT Disc degeneration/back pain and calcification of the abdominal aorta. A 25-year follow-up study in Framingham Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997 1997 14 1642 1647 10.1097/00007632-199707150-00023
Kauppila LI, McAlindon T, Evans S, Wilson PW, Kiel D, Felson DT. Disc degeneration/back pain and calcification of the abdominal aorta. A 25-year follow-up study in Framingham. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(14):1642–7.10.1097/00007632-199707150-00023
26. Sakaura H Ikegami D Fujimori T Sugiura T Owaki H Fuji T Abdominal aortic calcification is a significant poor prognostic factor for clinical outcomes after decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal canal stenosis Global Spine J. 2019 9 7 724 8 10.1177/2192568219827265 31552153
Sakaura H, Ikegami D, Fujimori T, Sugiura T, Owaki H, Fuji T. Abdominal aortic calcification is a significant poor prognostic factor for clinical outcomes after decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Global Spine J. 2019;9(7):724–8.31552153 10.1177/2192568219827265
27. Guven AE Evangelisti G Schönnagel L Abdominal aortic calcification is an independent predictor of perioperative blood loss in posterior spinal fusion surgery Eur Spine J. 2024 33 5 2049 55 10.1007/s00586-024-08184-y 38480623
Guven AE, Evangelisti G, Schönnagel L, et al. Abdominal aortic calcification is an independent predictor of perioperative blood loss in posterior spinal fusion surgery. Eur Spine J. 2024;33(5):2049–55.38480623 10.1007/s00586-024-08184-y
28. Kauppila LI Prevalence of stenotic changes in arteries supplying the lumbar spine. A postmortem angiographic study on 140 subjects Ann Rheum Dis 1997 56 10 591 595 10.1136/ard.56.10.591 9389219
Kauppila LI. Prevalence of stenotic changes in arteries supplying the lumbar spine. A postmortem angiographic study on 140 subjects. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56(10):591–5.9389219 10.1136/ard.56.10.591
29. Sethi A Taylor DL Ruby JG Calcification of the abdominal aorta is an under-appreciated cardiovascular disease risk factor in the general population Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 9 1003246 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1003246 36277789
Sethi A, Taylor DL, Ruby JG, et al. Calcification of the abdominal aorta is an under-appreciated cardiovascular disease risk factor in the general population. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:1003246.36277789 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1003246
30. Beckworth WJ Holbrook JF Foster LG Ward LA Welle JR Atherosclerotic disease and its relationship to lumbar degenerative disk disease, facet arthritis, and stenosis with computed tomography angiography PM R. 2018 10 4 331 7 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.09.004 28918116
Beckworth WJ, Holbrook JF, Foster LG, Ward LA, Welle JR. Atherosclerotic disease and its relationship to lumbar degenerative disk disease, facet arthritis, and stenosis with computed tomography angiography. PM R. 2018;10(4):331–7.28918116 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.09.004
31. Engelen SE Robinson AJB Zurke YX Monaco C Therapeutic strategies targeting inflammation and immunity in atherosclerosis: how to proceed? Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022 19 8 522 42 10.1038/s41569-021-00668-4 35102320
Engelen SE, Robinson AJB, Zurke YX, Monaco C. Therapeutic strategies targeting inflammation and immunity in atherosclerosis: how to proceed? Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022;19(8):522–42.35102320 10.1038/s41569-021-00668-4
32. Karwowski W, Naumnik B, Szczepański M, Myśliwiec M. The mechanism of vascular calcification—a systematic review. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18(1):Ra1-11.
33. Deanfield JE Halcox JP Rabelink TJ Endothelial function and dysfunction: testing and clinical relevance Circulation 2007 115 10 1285 1295 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.652859 17353456
Deanfield JE, Halcox JP, Rabelink TJ. Endothelial function and dysfunction: testing and clinical relevance. Circulation. 2007;115(10):1285–95.17353456 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.652859
