
==== Front
BMC Womens Health
BMC Womens Health
BMC Women's Health
1472-6874
BioMed Central London

3347
10.1186/s12905-024-03347-x
Research
Causality between neuroticism personality clusters and female reproductive diseases in European population: a two-sample bidirectional mendelian randomization study
Kong Xinliang 15554121516@163.com

1
Jin Fanhui 2
Tang Guodong 3
Qin Yiming 4
Liu Daoying 1
Sun Jianyi 1
1 https://ror.org/02n9as466 grid.506957.8 Shandong Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Jinan, Shandong 250014 China
2 https://ror.org/05damtm70 grid.24695.3c 0000 0001 1431 9176 Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700 China
3 Shandong Provincial Prison, Jinan, Shandong 250014 China
4 grid.464402.0 0000 0000 9459 9325 Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong 250355 China
12 9 2024
12 9 2024
2024
24 50724 4 2024
2 9 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Background

The causality between neuroticism, a personality trait characterized by the tendency to experience negative emotions, and female reproductive diseases remains unclear. To provide evidence for the development of effective screening and prevention strategies, this study employed Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causality between neuroticism clusters and female reproductive diseases.

Methods

Instrumental variables were obtained from large-scale genome-wide association studies of populations of European descent involving three neuroticism clusters (depressed affect, worry, sensitivity to environmental stress, and adversity [SESA]) in the Complex Trait Genetics database and six female reproductive diseases (infertility, polycystic ovary syndrome [PCOS], spontaneous abortion, recurrent spontaneous abortion, endometriosis, and uterine fibroids) in the FinnGen database. The bidirectional two-sample MR analysis was conducted using the inverse variance-weighted, weighted median, and MR-Egger methods, whereas the sensitivity analysis was conducted using the Cochran’s Q-test, MR-Egger intercept, and leave-one-out analysis.

Results

In the forward analysis, genetically predicted depressed affect and worry components of neuroticism significantly increased the risk of infertility (depressed affect: odds ratio [OR] = 1.399, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.054–1.856, p = 0.020; worry: OR = 1.587, 95% CI: 1.229–2.049, p = 0.000) and endometriosis (depressed affect: OR = 1.611, 95% CI: 1.234–2.102, p = 0.000; worry: OR = 1.812, 95% CI: 1.405–2.338, p = 0.000). Genetically predicted SESA component of neuroticism increased only the risk of endometriosis (OR = 1.524, 95% CI: 1.104–2.103, p = 0.010). In the reverse analysis, genetically predicted PCOS was causally associated with an increased risk of the worry component of neuroticism (Beta = 0.009, 95% CI: 0.003–0.016, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

The MR study showed that the three neuroticism personality clusters had definite causal effects on at least one specific female reproductive disease. Moreover, PCOS may increase the risk of the worry component of neuroticism. This finding suggests the need to screen for specific female reproductive diseases in populations with high neuroticism and assess the psychological status of patients with PCOS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-024-03347-x.

Keywords

Neuroticism personality clusters
Female reproductive diseases
Mendelian randomization
Causality
issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcBackground

Neuroticism is a personality trait characterized by a greater tendency to experience negative emotions [1]. Individuals with high neuroticism experience more stressful life events, exaggerated stress responses, and have longer recovery times. Therefore, they tend to have stronger emotional responses, poorer emotional coping skills, and worse emotional experiences [2–4]. Neuroticism is measured using the short form of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire [5], 12 items in the questionnaire are used to evaluate the neuroticism level, the higher the total score, the higher the neuroticism level. By conducting hierarchical clustering analyses, Nagel et al. [6, 7] identified three genetically distinct neuroticism clusters: “depressed affect”, “worry” and “sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity (SESA)”. More precise causative factors and disease outcomes can be identified by decomposing the complex traits of neuroticism into genetically homogeneous clusters. Increasing evidence suggests that neuroticism is associated with a wide range of adverse health outcomes, including mental disorders [8, 9], cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases [10], endocrine disorders [11], and cancer [12]. Neuroticism is a robust and highly heritable personality trait [13], however, some studies have shown that the stability of neuroticism decreases gradually over time [14], and that personality traits can be modified through interventions [15]. This provides the possibility of intervening in neuroticism levels for the prevention and treatment of diseases mediated by it.

With societal development and the advancement of the status of women, female reproductive diseases have received increasing attention. However, the causes of many female reproductive diseases are complex and undefined, while treatment options are limited and mostly symptomatic, placing a heavy burden on global health systems. Therefore, exploring the causes and effective interventions for female reproductive diseases has become a focus of research in recent years. Many studies have provided important evidence of the correlation between neuroticism and female reproductive diseases: Regardless of whether they undergo in vitro fertilization treatment, infertile women have significantly higher neuroticism scores [16], and neuroticism is an independent predictor of depression and anxiety in women who are unable to conceive after In vitro fertilization treatment [17]. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have higher levels of neuroticism and greater difficulty coping with stress than those without PCOS [18, 19]. Patients with endometriosis have elevated neuroticism, anxiety, and psychiatric morbidity scores relative to healthy individuals [20]. A low neuroticism score was reportedly associated with high natural killer cell activity among women with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA), however, an increased pre-conceptual level of natural killer cell activity was more likely to lead to pregnancy loss during the next pregnancy [21]. Although these observational studies have provided ample evidence of the correlation between neuroticism and female reproductive diseases, they have some inevitable defects, such as residual confounding and reverse causality [22]. Therefore, the causality between neuroticism and female reproductive diseases has not been clearly established, and methods free of confounding factors and reverse causation should be used to re-examine these correlations carefully. Thus, further studies are necessary to elucidate the causality between neuroticism and female reproductive diseases.

Mendelian randomization (MR) is an analytical method used to determine causality. The fundamental principle of MR is to use genetic variants that are closely associated with exposure factors as instrumental variables (IVs) to estimate the causality between exposure factors and disease outcomes [23]. Since genetic variants are randomly assigned at conception and cannot be altered by subsequent occurrences of the disease, MR studies are less susceptible to confounding factors and reverse causation. Therefore, here we conducted a two-sample bidirectional MR analysis using publicly available data from the genome-wide association study (GWAS) to explore the potential causality between three neurotic clusters and six common female reproductive diseases (infertility, PCOS, spontaneous abortion [SA], RSA, endometriosis, and uterine fibroids [UF]) in the European population, which can provide insights into the screening and prevention of female reproductive diseases.

Materials and methods

Study design

We implemented a bidirectional two-sample MR to investigate the causality between neuroticism clusters and female reproductive diseases. The three basic assumptions of the MR design are shown in Fig. 1A: genetic variations as IVs are strongly associated with the exposure of interest, IVs are not associated with any confounding factors, and IVs affect the risk of outcomes only through the exposure of interest [24]. A flowchart of the current MR design is presented in Fig. 1B. All analyses were conducted using summary-level data from published and publicly available GWAS [6, 7, 25], and all GWAS data were subjected to data cleaning and quality checks before publication.Fig. 1 Overview of present study design. A Three basic assumptions of the Mendelian randomization study; B Flow chart of the study design. Abbreviation: GWAS, genome-wide association study; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism

Data source for exposures and outcomes

In the forward analysis of this study, we chose the neuroticism clusters as the exposures to explore their causal effect on the risk of female reproductive diseases (outcomes); in the reverse analysis, we explored the female reproductive diseases as the exposures to detect their reverse causality with the neuroticism clusters (outcomes).

By applying prospective cohort study data from self-reported British populations in the UK Biobank (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/), two recent GWAS [6, 7] identified three distinct neuroticism clusters from the 12 Eysenck Personality Questionnaire using hierarchical clustering analyses: “depressed affect” (N = 357,957), “worry” (N = 348,219), and “sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity (SESA)” (N = 351,827). The depressed affect cluster was defined by the following four questions: “Do you often feel lonely?”, “Do you ever feel ‘just miserable’ for no reason?”, “Does your mood often go up and down?” and “Do you often feel fed up?”. The worry cluster was defined by the following four questions: “Are you a worrier?”, “Do you suffer from nerves?”, “Would you call yourself a nervous person?” and “Would you call yourself tense or highly stung?”. The SESA cluster was defined by the following three questions: “Are your feelings easily hurt?”, “Do you worry too long after an embarrassing experience?” and “Are you often troubled by feelings of guilt?”. Significant and replicable genetic differences were observed among the three clusters. Genome-wide summary statistics data on three neuroticism clusters (depressed affect, worry, and SESA) were available from the Complex Trait Genetics (CTG) database (https://ctg.cncr.nl/software/summary_statistics/).

Data on female reproductive diseases, including female infertility (13,142 cases, 107,564 controls), PCOS (1,424 cases, 200,581 controls), SA (16,906 cases, 149,622 controls), RSA (571 cases, 107,564 controls), endometriosis (15,088 cases, 107,564 controls), and UF (31,661 cases, 179,209 controls), were accessed from the FinnGen database (https://www.finngen.fi/en/access_results) R9 release on 11 May 2023 [25]. The FinnGen database is a large-scale biomedicine project based on the Finnish population, involving data from the nationwide longitudinal health register collected since 1969 from every resident in Finland.

All GWAS data were derived from the European population, and there was no overlap between participants in the exposure and outcome groups. Detailed information on the exposures and outcomes is provided in the Supplementary Material 1 (Table S1).

Selection of genetic instruments

Progress in the selection of genetic instruments was performed in R software version 4.2.3 (https://www.r-project.org/) with R packages “TwoSample MR (version 0.5.7)” and “Radial MR (version 1.1)”, specific R codes are available in Supplementary Material 2. A meticulous selection process is implemented to select appropriate IVs: (1) To ensure a robust association between the exposure and IVs, we set the standard of “p < 5 × 10–8” for screening single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), this standard is recognized as a genome-wide significant threshold. When fewer than three SNPs were screened based on this standard, the p-value would be amplified to 5 × 10–6, which was widely used in previous studies [26, 27]. When there were fewer than three SNPs, an MR analysis was not conducted. (2) To obtain independent IVs, we selected SNPs with the linkage disequilibrium (LD) r2 < 0.001 in the 10,000-kb region, this standard could be considered the most rigorous cutoff to mitigate LD. (3) To prevent bias from weak IVs, we selected SNPs with F-statistic > 10 as the IVs [28]. F-statistics were calculated using the formula F=R2×N-k-1k×1-R2, where N indicates the sample size of the exposure, k indicates the number of IVs, and for each SNP, k is 1. R2 indicates the proportion of variance in the exposure of interest explained by a given SNP and was calculated using the formula R2=2×EAF×1-EAF×β22×EAF×1-EAF×β2+2×EAF×1-EAF×N×SE2, where β indicates the genetic effect of SNP on the exposure, EAF is the effect allele frequency, SE is the standard error, and N indicates sample size [29, 30]. (4) To ensure that IVs were not related to outcomes, SNPs associated with outcomes at genome-wide significance were removed. (5) To ensure that the effect of an SNP on the exposure and the outcome corresponded to the same allele, data harmonization was performed to unify allelic direction and remove palindromic SNPs (allele frequency > 0.42, which is the default parameter of “harmonize_data” function in “TwoSample MR” package). (6) To identify and remove outliers, MR-radial was implemented before each MR analysis [31].

After rigorous SNP filtering (Supplementary Material 1: Tables S2–S4), the number of IVs varied from 33 to 47 for the neuroticism clusters (Supplementary Material 1: Table S4). Due to the limited number of SNPs reaching p < 5 × 10–8 in some female reproductive diseases (infertility, PCOS, and SA), a relaxed p threshold (5 × 10–6) was used to screen IVs in these diseases. Since the number of SNPs screened for RSA remained less than three, even according to p < 5 × 10–6, MR analysis of the causality of RSA on neuroticism clusters was not performed. The number of IVs varied from 10 to 45 for the remaining female reproductive diseases (Supplementary Material 1: Table S4). The F-statistic values for all IVs used in this study were > 10, indicating their high quality and reliability.

MR analysis

The MR analysis was performed using the “TwoSample MR” package in R software, specific R codes are available in Supplementary Material 2. The data required for the analysis are available in Supplementary Material 3. The threshold for a significant difference was set at p < 0.05. Three models were used to perform this bidirectional MR study: inverse variance-weighted (IVW), weighted median (WM), and MR-Egger regression models. The IVW method can integrate the Wald ratio estimates for each SNP to produce a composite effect estimate, which assumes that all IVs are valid with no horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity, therefore, it has higher statistical power [32]. Compared to the fixed-effects IVW method, the random-effects IVW method can obtain a more conservative causal estimate, accounting for the uncertainty due to pleiotropy. Therefore, the random-effects IVW method was regarded as the primary estimator for identifying significant causality. The WM and MR-Egger methods were used for the complementary analysis of IVW. The WM model can provide a consistent estimate of causality when at least 50% of the IVs are effective [33]. The MR-Egger regression model can still provide an unbiased estimate, even if all SNPs included in the selection are invalid [34]. Therefore, these methods provide more robust estimates over a wider range.

Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysis was performed using the “TwoSample MR” package in the R software, specific R codes are available in Supplementary Material 2. The data required for the analysis are available in Supplementary Material 3. Three analytical methods were applied for the sensitivity analysis. Cochran’s Q-test was used to detect heterogeneity among SNPs, and a value of p > 0.05 indicated no significant heterogeneity [35]. MR-Egger intercept analysis was used to detect pleiotropy, the value of the MR-Egger intercept analysis was p > 0.05, indicating the absence of horizontal pleiotropy [36]. Leave-one-out (LOO) analysis was used to recalculate and visualize the overall effect in the IVW analysis by sequentially omitting each SNP, and assess whether the observed causality depends on any individual SNP [37]. The results were typically considered robust if the results of all three analyses were negative.

Results

Causality of neuroticism clusters on female reproductive diseases

The forward MR analysis was as follows: In primary estimates (IVW method), genetically predicted depressed affect cluster could significantly increase the risk of infertility (odds ratio (OR) = 1.399, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.054–1.856, p = 0.020) and endometriosis (OR = 1.611, 95% CI: 1.234–2.102, p = 0.000) (Fig. 2). Similar to the depressed affect cluster, the genetically proxied worry cluster was positively associated with infertility (OR = 1.587, 95% CI: 1.229–2.049, p = 0.000) and endometriosis (OR = 1.812, 95% CI: 1.405–2.338, p = 0.000) (Fig. 2). Genetically predicted SESA cluster only increased the risk of endometriosis (OR = 1.524, 95% CI: 1.104–2.103, p = 0.010) (Fig. 2). Corresponding complementary analyses are shown in Supplementary Material 1 (Table S5), in which causalities similar to those of the IVW method were demonstrated in the WM model but not in the MR-Egger model. In addition, the IVW method detected a statistically significant protective effect of the worry cluster on SA (OR = 0.767; 95% CI, 0.610–0.965; p = 0.024) (Fig. 2), whereas no significant causality was observed in the complementary analyses (Supplementary Material 1: Table S5). Thus, there was no convincing evidence to support causality between any other neuroticism cluster and female reproductive diseases (Fig. 2; Supplementary Material 1: Table S5).Fig. 2 Primary analyses (IVW method) of the causal effect of neuroticism clusters on female reproductive diseases. Mendelian randomization estimates are presented as OR with corresponding 95% CI, which provide an estimate of the relative outcome risk caused by each standard-deviation increase in exposure. Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; RSA, recurrent spontaneous abortion; SA, spontaneous abortion; SESA, sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; UF, uterine fibroids

In the sensitivity analysis, Cochran’s Q test did not detect any evidence of heterogeneity in the forward analysis (Table 1). The MR-Egger intercept test revealed pleiotropy in the analysis between the SESA cluster and PCOS but not in any other analysis (Table 1). The LOO analysis indicated that a few specific SNPs had a potential impact on the IVW result between the depressed affect cluster and PCOS, whereas other specific SNPs had a potential impact on the IVW result between the worry cluster and SA, suggesting that the protective effect of genetically predicted worry cluster on SA was not robust (Supplementary Material 1: Figure S1). In addition, the LOO analysis suggested that the other estimation results were robust (Supplementary Material 1: Figure S1). Table 1 Heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy for genetically causal effect of neuroticism clusters on female reproductive diseases

Exposure	Outcome	Horizontal pleiotropy	Heterogeneity (IVW method)	
MR Egger_intercept	pval	Cochran’s Q	Q_pval	
Depressed	Infertility	-0.005	0.622	25.092	0.976	
PCOS	-0.029	0.421	32.736	0.872	
SA	-0.006	0.541	34.221	0.798	
RSA	-0.011	0.844	20.891	0.995	
Endometriosis	0.004	0.677	31.548	0.880	
UF	0.000	0.993	50.397	0.104	
Worry	Infertility	-0.010	0.384	30.927	0.957	
PCOS	-0.052	0.136	37.599	0.664	
SA	0.005	0.653	41.305	0.588	
RSA	-0.038	0.482	24.074	0.991	
Endometriosis	0.017	0.134	26.905	0.966	
UF	0.008	0.332	31.511	0.903	
SESA	Infertility	-0.019	0.139	24.357	0.945	
PCOS	-0.091	0.016	41.264	0.330	
SA	-0.005	0.700	34.727	0.433	
RSA	-0.100	0.090	27.086	0.884	
Endometriosis	0.008	0.599	44.516	0.107	
UF	-0.005	0.652	34.933	0.330	
Abbreviation: IVW Inverse variance-weighted, PCOS Polycystic ovary syndrome, RSA Recurrent spontaneous abortion, SA Spontaneous abortion, SESA Sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity, UF Uterine fibroids

Therefore, in the forward MR analysis, genetically predicted depressed affect and worry components of neuroticism were associated with higher risks of infertility and endometriosis, while genetically predicted SESA cluster increased the risk of endometriosis.

Causality of female reproductive diseases on neuroticism clusters

In the reverse MR analysis, the IVW method detected that genetically predicted PCOS could increase the risk of the three neuroticism clusters (depressed affect: Beta = 0.006, 95% CI: 0.000–0.012, p = 0.036; worry: Beta = 0.009, 95% CI: 0.003–0.016, p = 0.003; SESA: Beta = 0.006, 95% CI: 0.000–0.012, p = 0.040) (Fig. 3), while the IVW method also detected a significant protective effect of SA on the SESA cluster (Beta = -0.022, 95% CI: -0.043– -0.002, p = 0.033) (Fig. 3). The WM and MR-Egger methods yielded directionally consistent results in the aforementioned analyses (Supplementary Material 1: Table S6). No causality was detected between other female reproductive diseases and the neuroticism clusters (Fig. 3; Supplementary Material 1: Table S6).Fig. 3 Primary analyses (IVW method) of the causal effect of female reproductive diseases on neuroticism clusters. Mendelian randomization estimates are presented as Beta values with the corresponding 95% CI, which provide an estimate of the relative outcome risk caused by exposure. Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; SA, spontaneous abortion; SESA, sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; UF, uterine fibroids

In the sensitivity analysis, heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were not detected in any of the MR results (Table 2). The LOO analysis revealed that the causality between PCOS and worry cluster was the only robust analysis of the causalities mentioned above (Supplementary Material 1: Figure S2). Table 2 Heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy for genetically causal effect of female reproductive diseases on neuroticism clusters

Exposure	Outcome	Horizontal pleiotropy	Heterogeneity (IVW method)	
MR Egger_intercept	pval	Cochran’s Q	Q_pval	
Infertility	Depressed	0.002	0.241	11.084	0.522	
Worry	0.001	0.620	10.989	0.530	
SESA	0.003	0.070	14.554	0.409	
PCOS	Depressed	0.001	0.736	10.255	0.418	
Worry	0.001	0.756	6.673	0.671	
SESA	-0.001	0.748	5.281	0.872	
SA	Depressed	-0.002	0.278	7.792	0.732	
Worry	-0.002	0.440	4.108	0.942	
SESA	-0.002	0.352	7.879	0.641	
Endometriosis	Depressed	-0.004	0.067	22.399	0.319	
Worry	0.000	0.800	16.498	0.685	
SESA	-0.002	0.322	16.213	0.643	
UF	Depressed	0.000	0.586	42.116	0.553	
Worry	0.000	0.870	41.226	0.461	
SESA	0.001	0.312	38.284	0.676	
Abbreviation: IVW Inverse variance-weighted, PCOS Polycystic ovary syndrome, SA Spontaneous abortion, SESA Sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity, UF Uterine fibroids

Therefore, in the reverse analysis, we detected only robust causality in which genetically predicted PCOS could increase the risk of worry cluster.

Discussion

In the current study, a bidirectional two-sample MR study was conducted to assess causality between neuroticism personality clusters and female reproductive diseases. The findings of the forward analysis supported that genetically predicted depressed affect and worry components of neuroticism could significantly increase the risk of infertility and endometriosis, while genetically predicted SESA cluster could increase the risk of endometriosis. In the reverse analysis, genetically predicted PCOS was causally associated with an increased risk of the worry component of personality. These results provide further evidence to clarify the causality between the components of neuroticism and female reproductive diseases.

The forward analysis provided strong evidence that the neuroticism clusters were causally linked to a higher risk of infertility and endometriosis. Previous studies consistently demonstrated a correlation between neuroticism and these conditions: infertile women exhibit higher levels of neuroticism than their male partners [16, 38, 39]. High neuroticism levels predicted pregnancy failure post-treatment and increased anxiety and depression scores after follow-up [40]. Similarly, patients with endometriosis exhibit higher levels of neuroticism, introversion, and anxiety personality traits [20]. However, most previous studies were cross-sectional and could not establish causality between neuroticism and female reproductive diseases. This study used the MR analysis to confirm that neuroticism is a risk factor for infertility and endometriosis. The underlying mechanism may involve abnormal activity in the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) and sympathetic nervous system (SNS) axes. Owing to the rapid arousal and slow suppression of emotions in individuals with high neuroticism [41], they are likely to experience more chronic or severe stress, leading to HPA and SNS dysregulation [42, 43]. Stress-related biomarkers such as corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), cortisol, and catecholamines may play an important role in the development of infertility and endometriosis.

The sensitive response to stressful events in individuals with high neuroticism triggers overactivation of the HPA axis, leading to increased CRH and cortisol secretion. This phenomenon disrupts ovulation by interfering with the pulsatile release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and inhibiting ovarian steroidogenesis, resulting in infertility [44, 45]. Excessive cortisol also suppresses immune cell function [46], allowing endometrial cells carried by the retrograde menstrual flow to escape immune surveillance and form lesions in the peritoneal cavity [47], thereby causing endometriosis. Similarly, when individuals with high neuroticism experience stressful events, the SNS axis becomes overactivated, subsequently, the impulses reach the adrenal medulla, causing a surge in catecholamine secretion. Excess catecholamines impair follicular quality and endometrial decidualization [48, 49], thereby contributing to infertility. Similar to cortisol, excess catecholamines suppress immune cells, facilitating the implantation of ectopic endometrial cells into the peritoneal cavity [46, 47]. In addition, excess catecholamines promote angiogenesis and cellular proliferation in the ectopic endometrium [50], thereby advancing endometriosis. However, the effect of neuroticism on HPA and SNS axes activities remains controversial. Several studies have suggested that high neuroticism leads to the hyperactivation of HPA and SNS axes [51–56], others argue that no such associations exist [57–59], and some even claim that it suppresses these axes [60–62]. Factors such as heterogeneity of neuroticism, selection of observational indicators, and confounder control may have influenced the conclusions [63]. Additionally, long-term chronic stress exposure may trigger human adaptive strategies to cope with chaotic environments, resulting in the HPA and SNS axes blunting in individuals with high neuroticism, thereby preventing persistent endocrine and cardiovascular responses [64, 65]. Thus, the HPA and SNS axes were gradually desensitized from an overactivated state to an inhibited state over time, leading to differences in the findings. However, diminished cortisol function induced by HPA axis inhibition may also suppress the immune system, which could trigger a pro-inflammatory state [66], similarly contributing to the progression of infertility and endometriosis [67]. In summary, further investigations are required to determine whether HPA and SNS axes abnormalities mediate the association between neuroticism and these diseases.

In the reverse analysis, we found that genetically predicted PCOS increased the risk of the worry component of neuroticism. Several studies have confirmed that patients with PCOS exhibit more negative personality traits: In addition to higher levels of neuroticism, these patients demonstrate greater emotionality and fear, increased anger and anxiety symptoms, and lower openness to experience and conscientiousness scores [19, 68]. However, the causality of these associations remains unclear. This study demonstrated that PCOS leads to an increased risk of the worry cluster of neuroticism. We attributed these possible causes to changes in the physical features caused by PCOS. PCOS induces more significant changes in appearance than other female reproductive diseases, such as obesity, acne, and hirsuteness. These changes result in women with PCOS experiencing significantly lower confidence or satisfaction with their bodies and a greater tendency to develop perceptions of low self-esteem and feelings of lack of attractiveness. Therefore, they are more likely to avoid social interactions, thus affecting the normal establishment of social and intimate relationships [69, 70]. In some cultures, having children after marriage is an important part of a woman’s social values, and infertility caused by PCOS can weaken the couple’s relationship and threaten the continuity of marriage [71, 72]. These factors lead to greater social pressure and less social support for women with PCOS, both of which have been recognized as contributors to high levels of neuroticism [73]. Another possible explanation is that blood glucose levels mediate PCOS triggering high levels of neuroticism. Some studies have shown that women with PCOS suffer from a much higher prevalence of reactive hypoglycemia than healthy women [74], which triggers neuroticism-like manifestations such as anger, anxiety, and moodiness [75, 76]. However, in this study, we only found a robust result that PCOS was causally related to the higher risk of worry component of neuroticism; the results for the depressed affect and SESA clusters were not robust. In fact, most studies confirmed that PCOS is closely related to various abnormal psychological states such as depression, anxiety, and decreased self-esteem [77, 78]. However, some psychological disorders share similar symptoms and are difficult to differentiate, and some women with PCOS lack a professional diagnosis of the psychological disorder. Therefore, more distinct studies should be conducted on women with PCOS for a single state of neuroticism or psychological disorders.

Elucidating the causality between neuroticism clusters and female reproductive diseases has important clinical implications. For women with high neuroticism identified through screening, it is important to address their neuroticism with therapies such as positive psychology exercises. In addition, more attention should be focused on their reproductive health. Early screening and intervention can minimize the risk and progression of infertility and endometriosis. Similarly, PCOS is prone to inducing neuroticism, and more attention should be focused on the psychological status of patients with PCOS during treatment and therapy. Focusing on the causality between neuroticism clusters and female reproductive diseases can help break the vicious circle and prevent the occurrence of comorbidities.

Our study has the following strengths: To the best of our knowledge, it is the first MR analysis to explore the causality between genetically distinct neuroticism clusters and female reproductive diseases. Meanwhile, more precise causative factors and disease outcomes can be identified by dividing the complex traits of neuroticism into genetically homogeneous clusters. Finally, we applied a bidirectional two-sample MR design to reduce residual confounding and mitigate the reverse causality of observational studies.

This study has several limitations. First, it included only individuals of European ancestry, thereby reducing the generalizability of its findings. Second, the reproductive diseases we studied were female-specific. However, no sex-specific analysis has been reported for genetically distinct neuroticism clusters, resulting in potential bias. Moreover, due to the limited number of SNPs reaching genome-wide significance in some female reproductive diseases, a relaxed p threshold was used for these diseases. Finally, the Beta value for the positive result obtained in the reverse analysis was only 0.009, possibly due to the insufficient sample size of the selected GWAS databases. The result still require validation in a future study with a larger sample size.

Conclusions

Through a series of procedures including genetic instrument selection, MR analysis, and sensitivity analysis, our study found that the neuroticism personality clusters, including depressed affect, worry, and SESA, exerted definite causal effects on at least one specific female reproductive disease (infertility or endometriosis) to differing degrees. Genetically predicted PCOS may increase the risk of the worry component of neuroticism. This finding suggests the need to screen for specific female reproductive diseases in populations with high neuroticism and assess the psychological status of patients with PCOS.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 1.

Supplementary Material 2.

Supplementary Material 3.

Abbreviations

CRH Corticotropin-releasing hormone

GWAS Genome-wide association study

HPA Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal

IVs Instrumental variables

IVW Inverse variance-weighted

LOO Leave-one-out

MR Mendelian randomization

PCOS Polycystic ovary syndrome

RSA Recurrent spontaneous abortion

SA Spontaneous abortion

SESA Sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity

SNP Single nucleotide polymorphism

SNS Sympathetic nervous system

UF Uterine fibroids

WM Weighted median

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the investigators and participants of the original GWAS. We are grateful for the GWAS sharing of the summary data used in this study.

Authors’ contributions

XK and FJ conceived and designed the study. GT, YQ, and DL performed the data analysis. XK prepared the first draft of the manuscript. FJ and JS performed the subsequent amendments. XK revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or nonprofit sectors.

Availability of data and materials

All data used in this study are publicly available, and the original studies are cited. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Digman JM Higher-order factors of the Big Five J Pers Soc Psychol 1997 73 6 1246 1256 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246 9418278
Digman JM. Higher-order factors of the Big Five. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;73(6):1246–56.9418278 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246
2. Canli T Toward a neurogenetic theory of neuroticism Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008 1129 153 174 10.1196/annals.1417.022 18591477
Canli T. Toward a neurogenetic theory of neuroticism. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1129:153–74.18591477 10.1196/annals.1417.022
3. Lahey BB Public health significance of neuroticism Am Psychol 2009 64 4 241 256 10.1037/a0015309 19449983
Lahey BB. Public health significance of neuroticism. Am Psychol. 2009;64(4):241–56.19449983 10.1037/a0015309
4. Watson D Clark LA Harkness AR Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology J Abnorm Psychol 1994 103 1 18 31 10.1037/0021-843X.103.1.18 8040477
Watson D, Clark LA, Harkness AR. Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology. J Abnorm Psychol. 1994;103(1):18–31.8040477 10.1037/0021-843X.103.1.18
5. Eysenck SBG Eysenck HJ Barrett P A revised version of the psychoticism scale Personality Individ Differ 1985 6 1 21 29 10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1
Eysenck SBG, Eysenck HJ, Barrett P. A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality Individ Differ. 1985;6(1):21–9.10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1
6. Nagel M Jansen PR Stringer S Watanabe K de Leeuw CA Bryois J Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for neuroticism in 449,484 individuals identifies novel genetic loci and pathways Nat Genet 2018 50 7 920 927 10.1038/s41588-018-0151-7 29942085
Nagel M, Jansen PR, Stringer S, Watanabe K, de Leeuw CA, Bryois J, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for neuroticism in 449,484 individuals identifies novel genetic loci and pathways. Nat Genet. 2018;50(7):920–7.29942085 10.1038/s41588-018-0151-7
7. Nagel M Speed D van der Sluis S Østergaard SD Genome-wide association study of the sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity neuroticism cluster Acta Psychiatr Scand 2020 141 5 476 478 10.1111/acps.13155 31972866
Nagel M, Speed D, van der Sluis S, Østergaard SD. Genome-wide association study of the sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity neuroticism cluster. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020;141(5):476–8.31972866 10.1111/acps.13155
8. Kendler KS Kessler RC Neale MC Heath AC Eaves LJ The prediction of major depression in women: toward an integrated etiologic model Am J Psychiatry 1993 150 8 1139 1148 10.1176/ajp.150.8.1139 8328557
Kendler KS, Kessler RC, Neale MC, Heath AC, Eaves LJ. The prediction of major depression in women: toward an integrated etiologic model. Am J Psychiatry. 1993;150(8):1139–48.8328557 10.1176/ajp.150.8.1139
9. Clark LA Watson D Mineka S Temperament, personality, and the mood and anxiety disorders J Abnorm Psychol 1994 103 1 103 116 10.1037/0021-843X.103.1.103 8040472
Clark LA, Watson D, Mineka S. Temperament, personality, and the mood and anxiety disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 1994;103(1):103–16.8040472 10.1037/0021-843X.103.1.103
10. Jokela M Pulkki-Råback L Elovainio M Kivimäki M Personality traits as risk factors for stroke and coronary heart disease mortality: pooled analysis of three cohort studies J Behav Med 2014 37 5 881 889 10.1007/s10865-013-9548-z 24203126
Jokela M, Pulkki-Råback L, Elovainio M, Kivimäki M. Personality traits as risk factors for stroke and coronary heart disease mortality: pooled analysis of three cohort studies. J Behav Med. 2014;37(5):881–9.24203126 10.1007/s10865-013-9548-z
11. Goodwin RD Cox BJ Clara I Neuroticism and physical disorders among adults in the community: results from the National Comorbidity Survey J Behav Med 2006 29 3 229 238 10.1007/s10865-006-9048-5 16724279
Goodwin RD, Cox BJ, Clara I. Neuroticism and physical disorders among adults in the community: results from the National Comorbidity Survey. J Behav Med. 2006;29(3):229–38.16724279 10.1007/s10865-006-9048-5
12. Niedzwiedz CL Robb KA Katikireddi SV Pell JP Smith DJ Depressive symptoms, neuroticism, and participation in breast and cervical cancer screening: Cross-sectional and prospective evidence from UK Biobank Psychooncology 2020 29 2 381 388 10.1002/pon.5272 31663185
Niedzwiedz CL, Robb KA, Katikireddi SV, Pell JP, Smith DJ. Depressive symptoms, neuroticism, and participation in breast and cervical cancer screening: Cross-sectional and prospective evidence from UK Biobank. Psychooncology. 2020;29(2):381–8.31663185 10.1002/pon.5272
13. Vukasović T Bratko D Heritability of personality: A meta-analysis of behavior genetic studies Psychol Bull 2015 141 4 769 785 10.1037/bul0000017 25961374
Vukasović T, Bratko D. Heritability of personality: A meta-analysis of behavior genetic studies. Psychol Bull. 2015;141(4):769–85.25961374 10.1037/bul0000017
14. Ormel J Rijsdijk FV Continuing change in neuroticism during adulthood—structural modelling of a 16-year, 5-wave community study Personality Individ Differ 2000 28 3 461 478 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00112-9
Ormel J, Rijsdijk FV. Continuing change in neuroticism during adulthood—structural modelling of a 16-year, 5-wave community study. Personality Individ Differ. 2000;28(3):461–78.10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00112-9
15. Roberts BW Luo J Briley DA Chow PI Su R Hill PL A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention Psychol Bull 2017 143 2 117 141 10.1037/bul0000088 28054797
Roberts BW, Luo J, Briley DA, Chow PI, Su R, Hill PL. A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychol Bull. 2017;143(2):117–41.28054797 10.1037/bul0000088
16. Edelmann RJ Connolly KJ Gender differences in response to infertility and infertility investigations: Real or illusory Br J Health Psychol 2000 5 4 365 375 10.1348/135910700168982
Edelmann RJ, Connolly KJ. Gender differences in response to infertility and infertility investigations: Real or illusory. Br J Health Psychol. 2000;5(4):365–75.10.1348/135910700168982
17. Volgsten H Ekselius L Poromaa IS Svanberg AS Personality traits associated with depressive and anxiety disorders in infertile women and men undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010 89 1 27 34 10.3109/00016340903447396 19947903
Volgsten H, Ekselius L, Poromaa IS, Svanberg AS. Personality traits associated with depressive and anxiety disorders in infertile women and men undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(1):27–34.19947903 10.3109/00016340903447396
18. Cesta CE Kuja-Halkola R Lehto K Iliadou AN Landén M Polycystic ovary syndrome, personality, and depression: A twin study Psychoneuroendocrinology 2017 85 63 68 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.08.007 28825976
Cesta CE, Kuja-Halkola R, Lehto K, Iliadou AN, Landén M. Polycystic ovary syndrome, personality, and depression: A twin study. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;85:63–8.28825976 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.08.007
19. Barry JA Hardiman PJ Saxby BK Kuczmierczyk A Testosterone and mood dysfunction in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome compared to subfertile controls J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2011 32 2 104 111 10.3109/0167482X.2011.568129 21473679
Barry JA, Hardiman PJ, Saxby BK, Kuczmierczyk A. Testosterone and mood dysfunction in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome compared to subfertile controls. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;32(2):104–11.21473679 10.3109/0167482X.2011.568129
20. Low WY Edelmann RJ Sutton C A psychological profile of endometriosis patients in comparison to patients with pelvic pain of other origins J Psychosom Res 1993 37 2 111 116 10.1016/0022-3999(93)90077-S 8463987
Low WY, Edelmann RJ, Sutton C. A psychological profile of endometriosis patients in comparison to patients with pelvic pain of other origins. J Psychosom Res. 1993;37(2):111–6.8463987 10.1016/0022-3999(93)90077-S
21. Hori S Nakano Y Furukawa TA Ogasawara M Katano K Aoki K Psychosocial factors regulating natural-killer cell activity in recurrent spontaneous abortions Am J Reprod Immunol 2000 44 5 299 302 10.1111/j.8755-8920.2000.440509.x 11125793
Hori S, Nakano Y, Furukawa TA, Ogasawara M, Katano K, Aoki K, et al. Psychosocial factors regulating natural-killer cell activity in recurrent spontaneous abortions. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2000;44(5):299–302.11125793 10.1111/j.8755-8920.2000.440509.x
22. Boyko EJ Observational research–opportunities and limitations J Diabetes Complications 2013 27 6 642 648 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2013.07.007 24055326
Boyko EJ. Observational research–opportunities and limitations. J Diabetes Complications. 2013;27(6):642–8.24055326 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2013.07.007
23. Richmond RC, Davey Smith G. Mendelian randomization: Concepts and scope. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2022;12(1):a040501.
24. Boef AG Dekkers OM le Cessie S Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting Int J Epidemiol 2015 44 2 496 511 10.1093/ije/dyv071 25953784
Boef AG, Dekkers OM, le Cessie S. Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(2):496–511.25953784 10.1093/ije/dyv071
25. Kurki MI Karjalainen J Palta P Sipilä TP Kristiansson K Donner KM FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population Nature 2023 613 7944 508 518 10.1038/s41586-022-05473-8 36653562
Kurki MI, Karjalainen J, Palta P, Sipilä TP, Kristiansson K, Donner KM, et al. FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature. 2023;613(7944):508–18.36653562 10.1038/s41586-022-05473-8
26. Han X Wu TQ Bian Y Chen L Feng X Psychological distress and uterine fibroids: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study BMC Womens Health 2024 24 1 351 10.1186/s12905-024-03196-8 38890689
Han X, Wu TQ, Bian Y, Chen L, Feng X. Psychological distress and uterine fibroids: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):351.38890689 10.1186/s12905-024-03196-8
27. Yang X Wang J Hong H Feng X Zhang X Song J The association between diets and periodontitis: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study Front Genet 2024 15 1398101 10.3389/fgene.2024.1398101 38881793
Yang X, Wang J, Hong H, Feng X, Zhang X, Song J. The association between diets and periodontitis: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Front Genet. 2024;15:1398101.38881793 10.3389/fgene.2024.1398101
28. Burgess S Small DS Thompson SG A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization Stat Methods Med Res 2017 26 5 2333 2355 10.1177/0962280215597579 26282889
Burgess S, Small DS, Thompson SG. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization. Stat Methods Med Res. 2017;26(5):2333–55.26282889 10.1177/0962280215597579
29. Chen H Mi S Zhu J Jin W Li Y Wang T No Causal Association Between Adiponectin and the Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Mendelian Randomization Study Front Genet 2021 12 670282 10.3389/fgene.2021.670282 34630505
Chen H, Mi S, Zhu J, Jin W, Li Y, Wang T, et al. No causal association between adiponectin and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a Mendelian randomization study. Front Genet. 2021;12:670282.34630505 10.3389/fgene.2021.670282
30. Dan YL Wang P Cheng Z Wu Q Wang XR Wang DG Circulating adiponectin levels and systemic lupus erythematosus: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021 60 2 940 946 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa506 32944772
Dan YL, Wang P, Cheng Z, Wu Q, Wang XR, Wang DG, et al. Circulating adiponectin levels and systemic lupus erythematosus: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60(2):940–6.32944772 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa506
31. Bowden J Spiller W Del Greco MF Sheehan N Thompson J Minelli C Improving the visualization, interpretation and analysis of two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization via the Radial plot and Radial regression Int J Epidemiol 2018 47 4 1264 1278 10.1093/ije/dyy101 29961852
Bowden J, Spiller W, Del Greco MF, Sheehan N, Thompson J, Minelli C, et al. Improving the visualization, interpretation and analysis of two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization via the Radial plot and Radial regression. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(4):1264–78.29961852 10.1093/ije/dyy101
32. Pierce BL Burgess S Efficient design for Mendelian randomization studies: subsample and 2-sample instrumental variable estimators Am J Epidemiol 2013 178 7 1177 1184 10.1093/aje/kwt084 23863760
Pierce BL, Burgess S. Efficient design for Mendelian randomization studies: subsample and 2-sample instrumental variable estimators. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(7):1177–84.23863760 10.1093/aje/kwt084
33. Bowden J Davey Smith G Haycock PC Burgess S Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator Genet Epidemiol 2016 40 4 304 314 10.1002/gepi.21965 27061298
Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock PC, Burgess S. Consistent estimation in mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016;40(4):304–14.27061298 10.1002/gepi.21965
34. Bowden J Davey Smith G Burgess S Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression Int J Epidemiol 2015 44 2 512 525 10.1093/ije/dyv080 26050253
Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(2):512–25.26050253 10.1093/ije/dyv080
35. Greco MF Minelli C Sheehan NA Thompson JR Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome Stat Med 2015 34 21 2926 2940 10.1002/sim.6522 25950993
Greco MF, Minelli C, Sheehan NA, Thompson JR. Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome. Stat Med. 2015;34(21):2926–40.25950993 10.1002/sim.6522
36. Burgess S Thompson SG Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method Eur J Epidemiol 2017 32 5 377 389 10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x 28527048
Burgess S, Thompson SG. Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32(5):377–89.28527048 10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x
37. Hemani G Bowden J Davey SG Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies Hum Mol Genet 2018 27 R2 R195 r208 10.1093/hmg/ddy163 29771313
Hemani G, Bowden J, Davey SG. Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27(R2):R195-r208.29771313 10.1093/hmg/ddy163
38. Bargiel-Matusiewicz K Kroemeke A Personality traits and coping styles in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome Arch Med Sci 2015 11 6 1244 1249 10.5114/aoms.2015.56350 26788086
Bargiel-Matusiewicz K, Kroemeke A. Personality traits and coping styles in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Arch Med Sci. 2015;11(6):1244–9.26788086 10.5114/aoms.2015.56350
39. Coşkuner Potur D Onat G Doğan MY An evaluation of the relationship between violence exposure status and personality characteristics among infertile women Health Care Women Int 2019 40 11 1135 1148 10.1080/07399332.2019.1622704 31274387
Coşkuner Potur D, Onat G, Doğan MY. An evaluation of the relationship between violence exposure status and personality characteristics among infertile women. Health Care Women Int. 2019;40(11):1135–48.31274387 10.1080/07399332.2019.1622704
40. Verhaak CM Smeenk JM Evers AW van Minnen A Kremer JA Kraaimaat FW Predicting emotional response to unsuccessful fertility treatment: a prospective study J Behav Med 2005 28 2 181 190 10.1007/s10865-005-3667-0 15957573
Verhaak CM, Smeenk JM, Evers AW, van Minnen A, Kremer JA, Kraaimaat FW. Predicting emotional response to unsuccessful fertility treatment: a prospective study. J Behav Med. 2005;28(2):181–90.15957573 10.1007/s10865-005-3667-0
41. Suls J Martin R The daily life of the garden-variety neurotic: reactivity, stressor exposure, mood spillover, and maladaptive coping J Pers 2005 73 6 1485 1509 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00356.x 16274443
Suls J, Martin R. The daily life of the garden-variety neurotic: reactivity, stressor exposure, mood spillover, and maladaptive coping. J Pers. 2005;73(6):1485–509.16274443 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00356.x
42. Liu Q Zhou R Oei TP Wang Q Zhao Y Liu Y Variation in the stress response between high- and low-neuroticism female undergraduates across the menstrual cycle Stress 2013 16 5 503 509 10.3109/10253890.2013.797958 23597234
Liu Q, Zhou R, Oei TP, Wang Q, Zhao Y, Liu Y. Variation in the stress response between high- and low-neuroticism female undergraduates across the menstrual cycle. Stress. 2013;16(5):503–9.23597234 10.3109/10253890.2013.797958
43. Garcia-Banda G Chellew K Fornes J Perez G Servera M Evans P Neuroticism and cortisol: pinning down an expected effect Int J Psychophysiol 2014 91 2 132 138 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.12.005 24361230
Garcia-Banda G, Chellew K, Fornes J, Perez G, Servera M, Evans P. Neuroticism and cortisol: pinning down an expected effect. Int J Psychophysiol. 2014;91(2):132–8.24361230 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.12.005
44. Joseph DN, Whirledge S. Stress and the HPA Axis: balancing homeostasis and fertility. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(10):2224.
45. Ghizzoni L Mastorakos G Vottero A Barreca A Furlini M Cesarone A Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) inhibits steroid biosynthesis by cultured human granulosa-lutein cells in a CRH and interleukin-1 receptor-mediated fashion Endocrinology 1997 138 11 4806 4811 10.1210/endo.138.11.5474 9348209
Ghizzoni L, Mastorakos G, Vottero A, Barreca A, Furlini M, Cesarone A, et al. Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) inhibits steroid biosynthesis by cultured human granulosa-lutein cells in a CRH and interleukin-1 receptor-mediated fashion. Endocrinology. 1997;138(11):4806–11.9348209 10.1210/endo.138.11.5474
46. Reiche EM Nunes SO Morimoto HK Stress, depression, the immune system, and cancer Lancet Oncol 2004 5 10 617 625 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01597-9 15465465
Reiche EM, Nunes SO, Morimoto HK. Stress, depression, the immune system, and cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2004;5(10):617–25.15465465 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01597-9
47. Zhang T De Carolis C Man GCW Wang CC The link between immunity, autoimmunity and endometriosis: a literature update Autoimmun Rev 2018 17 10 945 955 10.1016/j.autrev.2018.03.017 30107265
Zhang T, De Carolis C, Man GCW, Wang CC. The link between immunity, autoimmunity and endometriosis: a literature update. Autoimmun Rev. 2018;17(10):945–55.30107265 10.1016/j.autrev.2018.03.017
48. Li XH Ma YG Geng LH Qin L Hu H Li SW Baseline psychological stress and ovarian norepinephrine levels negatively affect the outcome of in vitro fertilisation Gynecol Endocrinol 2011 27 3 139 143 10.3109/09513590.2010.501871 20670099
Li XH, Ma YG, Geng LH, Qin L, Hu H, Li SW. Baseline psychological stress and ovarian norepinephrine levels negatively affect the outcome of in vitro fertilisation. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27(3):139–43.20670099 10.3109/09513590.2010.501871
49. Wu J Kong S Guo C Wang J Lu J Jiang R An exaggerated epinephrine-adrenergic receptor signaling impairs uterine decidualization in mice Reprod Toxicol 2019 90 109 117 10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.09.003 31520687
Wu J, Kong S, Guo C, Wang J, Lu J, Jiang R, et al. An exaggerated epinephrine-adrenergic receptor signaling impairs uterine decidualization in mice. Reprod Toxicol. 2019;90:109–17.31520687 10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.09.003
50. Long Q Liu X Qi Q Guo SW Chronic stress accelerates the development of endometriosis in mouse through adrenergic receptor β2 Hum Reprod 2016 31 11 2506 2519 10.1093/humrep/dew237 27664956
Long Q, Liu X, Qi Q, Guo SW. Chronic stress accelerates the development of endometriosis in mouse through adrenergic receptor β2. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(11):2506–19.27664956 10.1093/humrep/dew237
51. Yoshino A Kimura Y Yoshida T Takahashi Y Nomura S Relationships between temperament dimensions in personality and unconscious emotional responses Biol Psychiatry 2005 57 1 1 6 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.09.027 15607293
Yoshino A, Kimura Y, Yoshida T, Takahashi Y, Nomura S. Relationships between temperament dimensions in personality and unconscious emotional responses. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57(1):1–6.15607293 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.09.027
52. Nater UM Hoppmann C Klumb PL Neuroticism and conscientiousness are associated with cortisol diurnal profiles in adults–role of positive and negative affect Psychoneuroendocrinology 2010 35 10 1573 1577 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.02.017 20299157
Nater UM, Hoppmann C, Klumb PL. Neuroticism and conscientiousness are associated with cortisol diurnal profiles in adults–role of positive and negative affect. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010;35(10):1573–7.20299157 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.02.017
53. Roger D, Najarian B. The relationship between emotional rumination and cortisol secretion under stress. Pers Individ Diff. 1998;24(4):531–8.
54. Zobel A Barkow K Schulze-Rauschenbach S Von Widdern O Metten M Pfeiffer U High neuroticism and depressive temperament are associated with dysfunctional regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical system in healthy volunteers Acta Psychiatr Scand 2004 109 5 392 399 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00313.x 15049775
Zobel A, Barkow K, Schulze-Rauschenbach S, Von Widdern O, Metten M, Pfeiffer U, et al. High neuroticism and depressive temperament are associated with dysfunctional regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical system in healthy volunteers. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004;109(5):392–9.15049775 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00313.x
55. Norris CJ Larsen JT Cacioppo JT Neuroticism is associated with larger and more prolonged electrodermal responses to emotionally evocative pictures Psychophysiology 2007 44 5 823 826 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00551.x 17596178
Norris CJ, Larsen JT, Cacioppo JT. Neuroticism is associated with larger and more prolonged electrodermal responses to emotionally evocative pictures. Psychophysiology. 2007;44(5):823–6.17596178 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00551.x
56. Wilson GD Kumari V Gray JA Corr PJ The role of neuroticism in startle reactions to fearful and disgusting stimuli Personality Individ Differ 2000 29 6 1077 1082 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00255-X
Wilson GD, Kumari V, Gray JA, Corr PJ. The role of neuroticism in startle reactions to fearful and disgusting stimuli. Personality Individ Differ. 2000;29(6):1077–82.10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00255-X
57. van Santen A Vreeburg SA Van der Does AJ Spinhoven P Zitman FG Penninx BW Psychological traits and the cortisol awakening response: results from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety Psychoneuroendocrinology 2011 36 2 240 248 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.07.014 20724080
van Santen A, Vreeburg SA, Van der Does AJ, Spinhoven P, Zitman FG, Penninx BW. Psychological traits and the cortisol awakening response: results from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011;36(2):240–8.20724080 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.07.014
58. McCleery JM Goodwin GM High and low neuroticism predict different cortisol responses to the combined dexamethasone–CRH test Biol Psychiatry 2001 49 5 410 415 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)01056-8 11274652
McCleery JM, Goodwin GM. High and low neuroticism predict different cortisol responses to the combined dexamethasone–CRH test. Biol Psychiatry. 2001;49(5):410–5.11274652 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)01056-8
59. Chida Y Hamer M Chronic psychosocial factors and acute physiological responses to laboratory-induced stress in healthy populations: a quantitative review of 30 years of investigations Psychol Bull 2008 134 6 829 885 10.1037/a0013342 18954159
Chida Y, Hamer M. Chronic psychosocial factors and acute physiological responses to laboratory-induced stress in healthy populations: a quantitative review of 30 years of investigations. Psychol Bull. 2008;134(6):829–85.18954159 10.1037/a0013342
60. LeBlanc J Ducharme MB Influence of personality traits on plasma levels of cortisol and cholesterol Physiol Behav 2005 84 5 677 680 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.02.020 15885243
LeBlanc J, Ducharme MB. Influence of personality traits on plasma levels of cortisol and cholesterol. Physiol Behav. 2005;84(5):677–80.15885243 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.02.020
61. Oswald LM Zandi P Nestadt G Potash JB Kalaydjian AE Wand GS Relationship between cortisol responses to stress and personality Neuropsychopharmacology 2006 31 7 1583 1591 10.1038/sj.npp.1301012 16407895
Oswald LM, Zandi P, Nestadt G, Potash JB, Kalaydjian AE, Wand GS. Relationship between cortisol responses to stress and personality. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31(7):1583–91.16407895 10.1038/sj.npp.1301012
62. Di Simplicio M Costoloni G Western D Hanson B Taggart P Harmer CJ Decreased heart rate variability during emotion regulation in subjects at risk for psychopathology Psychol Med 2012 42 8 1775 1783 10.1017/S0033291711002479 22067596
Di Simplicio M, Costoloni G, Western D, Hanson B, Taggart P, Harmer CJ. Decreased heart rate variability during emotion regulation in subjects at risk for psychopathology. Psychol Med. 2012;42(8):1775–83.22067596 10.1017/S0033291711002479
63. Ormel J Bastiaansen A Riese H Bos EH Servaas M Ellenbogen M The biological and psychological basis of neuroticism: current status and future directions Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2013 37 1 59 72 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.004 23068306
Ormel J, Bastiaansen A, Riese H, Bos EH, Servaas M, Ellenbogen M, et al. The biological and psychological basis of neuroticism: current status and future directions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(1):59–72.23068306 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.004
64. Susman EJ Psychobiology of persistent antisocial behavior: stress, early vulnerabilities and the attenuation hypothesis Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2006 30 3 376 389 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.08.002 16239030
Susman EJ. Psychobiology of persistent antisocial behavior: stress, early vulnerabilities and the attenuation hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(3):376–89.16239030 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.08.002
65. Poppelaars ES Klackl J Pletzer B Wilhelm FH Jonas E Social-evaluative threat: Stress response stages and influences of biological sex and neuroticism Psychoneuroendocrinology 2019 109 104378 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104378 31382169
Poppelaars ES, Klackl J, Pletzer B, Wilhelm FH, Jonas E. Social-evaluative threat: Stress response stages and influences of biological sex and neuroticism. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019;109:104378.31382169 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104378
66. Gold PW The organization of the stress system and its dysregulation in depressive illness Mol Psychiatry 2015 20 1 32 47 10.1038/mp.2014.163 25486982
Gold PW. The organization of the stress system and its dysregulation in depressive illness. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20(1):32–47.25486982 10.1038/mp.2014.163
67. Ortiz R Gemmill JAL Sinaii N Stegmann B Khachikyan I Chrousos G Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Responses in Women with Endometriosis-Related Chronic Pelvic Pain Reprod Sci 2020 27 10 1839 1847 10.1007/s43032-020-00201-x 32572832
Ortiz R, Gemmill JAL, Sinaii N, Stegmann B, Khachikyan I, Chrousos G, et al. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses in women with endometriosis-related chronic pelvic pain. Reprod Sci. 2020;27(10):1839–47.32572832 10.1007/s43032-020-00201-x
68. Urban W Nizioł A Pytlewski A Zaborowska Ł Dadański E Rutkowski K Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Personality and Temperamental Characteristics J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2022 44 7 813 818 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.03.011 35390518
Urban W, Nizioł A, Pytlewski A, Zaborowska Ł, Dadański E, Rutkowski K, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome: personality and temperamental characteristics. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2022;44(7):813–8.35390518 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.03.011
69. Fliegner M Richter-Appelt H Krupp K Brunner F Sexual Function and Socio-Sexual Difficulties in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019 79 5 498 509 10.1055/a-0828-7901 31148850
Fliegner M, Richter-Appelt H, Krupp K, Brunner F. Sexual function and socio-sexual difficulties in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019;79(5):498–509.31148850 10.1055/a-0828-7901
70. Alkheyr Z Murad M Das P Aljenaee K Kamel C Hajji SA Self-esteem and body image satisfaction in women with PCOS in the Middle East: Cross-sectional social media study PLoS ONE 2024 19 4 e0301707 10.1371/journal.pone.0301707 38662709
Alkheyr Z, Murad M, Das P, Aljenaee K, Kamel C, Hajji SA, et al. Self-esteem and body image satisfaction in women with PCOS in the Middle East: Cross-sectional social media study. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(4):e0301707.38662709 10.1371/journal.pone.0301707
71. H AL, Szatkowski L, Gibson J, Fiaschi L, Bains M. Psychosocial impacts of infertility among omani women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a qualitative study. Int J Fertil Steril. 2023;17(2):107–14.
72. Schmid J Kirchengast S Vytiska-Binstorfer E Huber J Infertility caused by PCOS–health-related quality of life among Austrian and Moslem immigrant women in Austria Hum Reprod 2004 19 10 2251 2257 10.1093/humrep/deh432 15333601
Schmid J, Kirchengast S, Vytiska-Binstorfer E, Huber J. Infertility caused by PCOS–health-related quality of life among Austrian and Moslem immigrant women in Austria. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(10):2251–7.15333601 10.1093/humrep/deh432
73. Xue K, Gao B, Chen F, Wang M, Cheng J, Zhang B, et al. Covariation of preadult environmental exposures, adult brain imaging phenotypes, and adult personality traits. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28(11):4853–66.
74. Mumm H Altinok ML Henriksen JE Ravn P Glintborg D Andersen M Prevalence and possible mechanisms of reactive hypoglycemia in polycystic ovary syndrome Hum Reprod 2016 31 5 1105 1112 10.1093/humrep/dew046 27008892
Mumm H, Altinok ML, Henriksen JE, Ravn P, Glintborg D, Andersen M. Prevalence and possible mechanisms of reactive hypoglycemia in polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(5):1105–12.27008892 10.1093/humrep/dew046
75. McCrimmon RJ Ewing FM Frier BM Deary IJ Anger state during acute insulin-induced hypoglycaemia Physiol Behav 1999 67 1 35 39 10.1016/S0031-9384(99)00036-0 10463626
McCrimmon RJ, Ewing FM, Frier BM, Deary IJ. Anger state during acute insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. Physiol Behav. 1999;67(1):35–9.10463626 10.1016/S0031-9384(99)00036-0
76. McCrimmon RJ Frier BM Deary IJ Appraisal of mood and personality during hypoglycaemia in human subjects Physiol Behav 1999 67 1 27 33 10.1016/S0031-9384(99)00035-9 10463625
McCrimmon RJ, Frier BM, Deary IJ. Appraisal of mood and personality during hypoglycaemia in human subjects. Physiol Behav. 1999;67(1):27–33.10463625 10.1016/S0031-9384(99)00035-9
77. Damone AL Joham AE Loxton D Earnest A Teede HJ Moran LJ Depression, anxiety and perceived stress in women with and without PCOS: a community-based study Psychol Med 2019 49 9 1510 1520 10.1017/S0033291718002076 30131078
Damone AL, Joham AE, Loxton D, Earnest A, Teede HJ, Moran LJ. Depression, anxiety and perceived stress in women with and without PCOS: a community-based study. Psychol Med. 2019;49(9):1510–20.30131078 10.1017/S0033291718002076
78. de Niet JE de Koning CM Pastoor H Duivenvoorden HJ Valkenburg O Ramakers MJ Psychological well-being and sexarche in women with polycystic ovary syndrome Hum Reprod 2010 25 6 1497 1503 10.1093/humrep/deq068 20356900
de Niet JE, de Koning CM, Pastoor H, Duivenvoorden HJ, Valkenburg O, Ramakers MJ, et al. Psychological well-being and sexarche in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(6):1497–503.20356900 10.1093/humrep/deq068
