
==== Front
Oncol Lett
Oncol Lett
OL
Oncology Letters
1792-1074
1792-1082
D.A. Spandidos

10.3892/ol.2024.14656
OL-28-5-14656
Case Report
Clinicopathological features of endometriosis‑associated adenocarcinoma of the rectum: A report of two cases
Zhao Ke 1
Hu Min 2
Li Xiaowen 2
Yang Runfeng 1
Huang Yi 1
1 Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, P.R. China
2 Department of Pathology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, P.R. China
Correspondence to: Professor Yi Huang, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 116 Zhuodaoquan South Road, Hongshan, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, P.R. China, E-mail: dengfeiwen2012@163.com huangyt32@hotmail.com
11 2024
30 8 2024
30 8 2024
28 5 52316 5 2024
29 7 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Zhao et al.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Endometriosis-associated adenocarcinoma of the rectum is rare and is usually misdiagnosed as colorectal carcinoma or other gynecological tumors. In the current report, the clinicopathological features of endometriosis-associated adenocarcinoma of the rectum in 2 patients were retrospectively analyzed and a literature review regarding this rare malignancy is presented. Case 1, a 49-year-old postmenopausal female patient, was admitted to Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Wuhan, China) due to a pelvic mass. Pelvic MRI revealed a 4.5×3.7-cm mass in the rectal wall, which severely adhered to the uterine wall. Microscopically, moderately differentiated glandular adenocarcinoma diffusely extended throughout all intestinal wall layers. Adenomyosis was found in the uterine body adherent to the rectum. Case 2, a 38-year-old reproductive female patient, presented with hematochezia. Histopathology of the resected tumor demonstrated benign endometriosis foci and atypical hyperplasia glands contiguous with endometrioid carcinoma invading the intestinal wall, and no other primary tumor sites were found, which satisfied the criteria for the diagnosis of malignant transformation of endometriosis of the rectum. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of both tumors revealed a Müllerian origin but not an intestinal origin. Furthermore, next-generation sequencing detected mutations of the BRCA1 (c.329dup), KRAS (c.35G>T), PIK3CA (c.3140A>G) and PTEN (c.750_751del) genes, and that microsatellite instability was high in case 1. In conclusion, endometriosis-associated adenocarcinoma of the rectum is a rare malignant tumor that should be distinguished from colorectal carcinoma for optimal treatment. Surgery and pathologic examination with IHC staining, even with molecular analysis, are essential for the final diagnosis. Primary cytoreductive surgery with resection of all macroscopic detectable lesions should be performed whenever possible. More prospective, multicenter, large-scale trials are required to examine the regimens and therapeutic value of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiology.

endometriosis
endometriosis-associated adenocarcinoma
rectum
gene mutation
treatment
Gynecological Cancer Research Fund, Beijing Kanghua Foundation for Development of Traditional Chinese and Western MedicineKH-2021-LLZX-070 The study was supported by the Gynecological Cancer Research Fund, Beijing Kanghua Foundation for Development of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine (grant no. KH-2021-LLZX-070).
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Endometriosis is a common gynecological proliferative disease that occurs in 5–15% of reproductive women globally (1). It refers to abnormal growth of endometrial tissues (glands and stroma) outside the uterus, mainly in the ovaries and extra-ovarian sites, including the sigmoid colon, rectum, bladder and abdominal wall, which causes a series of clinical symptoms, including pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea, non-menstrual pelvic pain and infertility (2).

Although endometriosis is not a premalignant disease, it may have malignant potential and become a malignancy (3). The incidence of malignant transformation of endometriosis ranges between 0.7 and 1%, with ~75% of cases involving the ovary and the remaining 25% developing from extra-ovarian endometriosis (4,5). The pathological criteria for the diagnosis of malignant transformation of endometriosis include benign endometrial tissues coexisting in the tumor, the demonstration of the neoplasm arising from endometriosis and not elsewhere, as well as the demonstration of the histological transition between benign and malignant endometriosis (6,7). However, with the overgrowth of cancer in some cases, the benign endometriotic foci are obliterated by malignant components (8). Thus, it is challenging to diagnose endometriosis-associated cancers due to a lack of histological evidence of endometriosis and malignant transformation. A pooled analysis of case-control studies has demonstrated that endometrioid carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma are the most common pathological types of endometriosis-related malignant tumors, which mostly develop from ovarian endometriosis (4). The mechanism of endometriosis-associated cancers is unclear, and studies of the molecular mechanism have confirmed these are related to mutations in the CTNNB1, PIK3CA, ERBB2, KRAS, ARID1A and PTEN genes, and microsatellite instability (9,10).

Extra-ovarian endometriosis-associated cancer involving the rectum is rare, making the diagnosis of the disease challenging. The present report describes 2 female patients with rectal lesions that were initially diagnosed as high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia of the rectum by endoscopic biopsy. Radical resection of the lesions with pathology and further mutation analysis in case 1 confirmed the diagnosis of endometrioid carcinoma of the rectum associated with endometriosis.

Case report

Case presentation

Case 1, a 49-year-old postmenopausal female patient, was admitted to Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Wuhan, China) in September 2021 due to a pelvic mass on examination. Laboratory examination showed that the serum cancer antigen 125 level was elevated (247.300 U/ml; normal, 0–35 U/ml), while CA19-9 (0.64 U/ml; normal, <30 U/ml), CEA (1.895 ng/ml; normal, <5 ng/ml) and AFP (3.99 ng/ml; normal, <7 ng/ml) levels were within the normal range. A colonoscopy revealed an ulcerated fleshy neoplasm 12 cm from the anal margin, and it was possible to pass the endoscope beyond the lesion. The surface of the lesion was irregular and the surrounding mucosa was slightly rough. Pelvic MRI revealed a 4.5×3.7-cm mass in the anterior rectal wall, which severely adhered to the uterine wall (Fig. 1A). Since the endoscopic biopsy specimens indicated high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (highly suspected adenocarcinoma), and the lesion was in the rectum and adhered to the uterine wall, partial rectal resection with total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. There was no evidence of macroscopic tumor present after the surgery.

Case 2, a 38-year-old reproductive female patient admitted to Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Wuhan, China) in November 2023, presented with hematochezia during the past 2 weeks. The laboratory examination showed that the serum CA19-9 level was elevated (49.33 U/ml; normal, <30 U/ml), while the CEA (1.520 ng/ml; normal, <5 ng/ml) level was within the normal range. Pelvic MRI revealed eccentric rectal wall thickening with a rough serosa (Fig. 2A). The uterus and uterine endometrium were normal, and no abnormal signals were found in the pelvic wall. The endoscopic biopsy specimens at Hubei Provincial Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine (Wuhan, China) indicated high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, and a partial resection of the rectum was performed.

Pathology and mutation analysis

In case 1, a 4.5×3.7-cm hard mass involving the rectum and adherent to the posterior myometrium of the uterus was found. No other primary tumors were found in the endometrium, cervix or bilateral adnexa. Examination of the histopathological staining with hematoxylin and eosin according to a standard protocol indicated that moderately differentiated glandular adenocarcinoma diffusely extended throughout all layers of the intestinal wall (Fig. 1B). Intraluminal necrosis and segmental destruction of glands were not observed. The tumor cells were columnar with pseudostratified nuclei (Fig. 1C). Adenomyosis was found in the uterine body adherent to the rectum. A total of 26 regional lymph nodes (LNs) were assessed and showed reactive hyperplasia. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed as described in our previous study (11). The results showed that the tumor cells were positive for paired box gene 8 (PAX8; Fig. 1D), estrogen receptor (ER; Fig. 1E) and progesterone receptor (PR; Fig. 1F), and negative for caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2; Fig. 1G), special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2; Fig. 1H) and cytokeratin 20 (Fig. 1I). The mismatch repair proteins were detected by IHC staining, and mutL homolog 1 (Fig. 1J) and PMS2 (Fig. 1K) were lost. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was then performed as described previously (12) using the formalin-fixed (4% neutral formaldehyde solution; room temperature; 12–24 h) and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue to elucidate mutation profiles for 41 genes in a panel that was designed to detect colorectal cancer-associated genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, ERBB2, BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, POLE, TP53, PIK3CA, PTEN, MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 and PMS2. The key mutations in the gene panel are listed in Table SI. Mutations of the BRCA1 (c.329dup), KRAS (c.35G>T), PIK3CA (c.3140A>G) and PTEN (c.750_751del) genes were identified, and microsatellite instability (MSI)-NGS was detected to be high. The final diagnosis of rectal endometriosis-associated endometroid carcinoma was made. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) followed by AUC5 carboplatin on day 1 intravenously, every 21 days for 6 consecutive courses. The patient underwent tumor biomarker detection nearly every 3 months (Table SII), and the tumor biomarkers were within the normal range. The patient also received MRI or CT scans nearly every year, and there was no apparent recurrence or metastasis in December 2022 (Fig. S1), December 2023 (Fig. S2) and March 2024 (Fig. S3).

In case 2, a segment of the large bowel measuring 15 cm in length was examined, and a 1.7×1.5-cm ulcerated fleshy mass with greyish, solid and friable cut surface could be seen. Microscopically, well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma was seen scatteredly infiltrating all layers of the intestinal wall (Fig. 2B), and benign endometriosis foci contiguous with endometroid adenocarcinoma, and atypical hyperplasia between the benign and malignant endometrial tissues could be observed (Fig. 2C). The tumor cells exhibited villo-glandular or confluent glandular architectures with focal squamous differentiation in the mucosa (Fig. 2D) and cribriform patterns in the muscularis propria to subserosa. Dusty blue secretion was observed in some benign endometrial glands. Tumor metastasis was observed in 5 of the 22 local regional LNs. No other primary tumor sites were found. IHC staining was performed in the same manner as IHC staining for case 1, and the details for the antibodies are listed in Table SIII. The results showed that the tumor cells were positive for PAX8 (Fig. 2E), ER (Fig. 2F), and variably positive for PR (Fig. 2G), whereas CDX2 (Fig. 2H) and SATB2 (Fig. 2I) were focally positive. The Ki67 index was 70% (Fig. 2J). The final diagnosis was endometrioid carcinoma derived from rectal endometriosis (5,6). The patient did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, and was followed-up by detecting tumor biomarkers nearly every 3 months (Table SIV), and the tumor biomarkers were within the normal range. The patient also underwent CT examinations every half a year after resection, and there was no apparent recurrence or metastasis in July 2024 (Fig. S4).

Discussion

Endometriosis is a common gynecological disease with malignant potential and local aggressive biology (3). In 1925, Sampson (6) first reported the malignant transformation of endometriosis. Subsequently, Scott (7) summarized and proposed four essential criteria for the diagnosis of malignant transformation of endometriosis: i) Both malignant and benign endometrial tissues coexisted in the tumor; ii) histology of the neoplasm consistent with an endometrial origin; iii) no other primary tumor sites can be found; and iv) demonstration of the histological transition between benign and malignant endometriosis. In the present case 2, benign endometriosis foci contiguous with endometroid adenocarcinoma invading the intestinal wall, and atypical hyperplasia between the benign and malignant endometrial tissues could be observed, and no other primary tumor sites were found, which satisfied the criteria (7) for the diagnosis of malignant transformation of the rectal endometriosis.

However, not all cases meet the aforementioned four criteria. In the present case 1, moderately differentiated glandular adenocarcinoma diffusely extended throughout all layers of the intestinal wall, while no evidence of endometriosis was detected microscopically. We hypothesized that with the overgrowth of cancer, the benign endometriotic foci are obliterated by malignant components. Therefore, it is challenging to diagnose endometriosis-associated cancers due to a lack of histological evidence of endometriosis and malignant transformation (8).

Since the biological behavior, therapeutic management and prognosis of endometriosis-associated rectal adenocarcinoma are different from those of colorectal adenocarcinoma (13,14), it is important to distinguish the two. Colorectal adenocarcinoma usually originates from the mucosal epithelium and gradually extends through the intestinal wall with the growth of the tumor. Endometriosis-associated adenocarcinomas invade the bowel wall from the outside, involving the serosa and subserosa, and occasionally the muscular propria and mucosa (13,14). Furthermore, cases of endometriosis-associated adenocarcinomas involve the mucosa, mimicking the intraepithelial neoplasia of the colorectal carcinoma, as shown in the endoscopic biopsy specimens of the present 2 patients. Therefore, it cannot be judged entirely from the growth pattern whether or not it is a primary tumor when the tumor extends through all layers of the intestinal wall. Secondly, the histological features of the tumors are helpful for differential diagnosis. Although both well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma and well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma could display glandular or cribriform growth patterns, marked cytologic atypia and a high mitotic index are more often observed in colorectal adenocarcinoma (13,14). Abundant intraluminal ‘dirty’ necrosis and segmental destruction of glands are characteristics of colorectal carcinoma, while squamous differentiation is a characteristic feature of endometrioid carcinoma (14). IHC staining may be essential to confirm the diagnosis of colorectal endometrioid carcinoma. PAX8 is a highly sensitive and specific marker of Müllerian epithelial tumors, and a highly sensitive epithelial marker for extragenital endometriosis (15). Furthermore, ER and PR are expressed in most uterine endometrial carcinomas (16). CDX2 and SATB2 are sensitive and specific markers of colorectal carcinoma (17,18). Therefore, PAX8, ER, PR, CDX2 and SATB2 may be useful in distinguishing colorectal adenocarcinoma from endometrioid carcinoma. In the present report, both patients exhibited positive IHC staining for PAX8, ER and PR, and negative or focal staining for CDX2 and SATB2, compatible with a diagnosis of endometroid carcinoma.

Studies have demonstrated that gene mutations, such as CTNNB1, PIK3CA, ERBB2, KRAS, ARID1A and PTEN mutations, contribute to the malignant transformation of endometriosis (7,8). In case 1, diffuse endometrioid-like adenocarcinoma was observed throughout the intestinal wall. Since no other primary tumors were found in the endometrium, cervix or bilateral adnexa, and adenomyosis was found in the uterine body adherent to the rectum, we hypothesized that this case was caused by endometriosis of the rectum. Further NGS analysis detected BRCA1, KRAS, PIK3CA and PTEN gene mutations, and MSI-high in the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue, which further confirmed the diagnosis of rectal endometriosis-associated endometroid carcinoma.

Since rectal endometriosis-associated carcinoma is rare, the clinicopathological features and treatments remain to be elucidated. A total of 10 full-text articles published in English in PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) between 1978 and 2022 that described 11 patients with endometriosis-associated rectal malignancies were identified (19–28), and the characteristics of the 11 patients reported in the literature as well as the 2 patients in the present report are listed in Table I. The median age of the patients age was 52 years (range, 38–75 years), and the main symptoms were abdominal pain and rectal or vaginal bleeding. To the best of our knowledge, the etiology of endometriosis-associated rectal malignancies remains uncertain. Among the 13 cases, 8 (61.5%) patients had undergone previous pelvic surgery, including a hysterectomy for endometriosis (19,20,22,23,25–27), myomatosis (23) or myomectomy (26,28) years ago. Therefore, pelvic surgery could increase the risk of dissemination of endometriotic tissues and malignant transformation of endometriosis in the rectum. The other 5 patients had no medical history, including 1 patient (28) with endometriosis foci deposited in the rectovaginal septum and 1 patient (case 1) with adenomyosis in the surgical specimen. We hypothesized that the possible mechanism is the deposition and growth of endometrial tissues in the peritoneal cavity via retrograde menstruation.

There is no consensus on the therapeutic approach for endometriosis-associated colorectal malignancies, since most of the literature reported are case reports (19–28), and the main treatment is radical resection and primary cytoreductive surgery of all macroscopic detectable lesions, with adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, the chemotherapeutic regimens have been individualized, and the overall effectiveness of chemotherapy or radiotherapy is unknown. Among the 13 cases, all patients underwent rectal or rectosigmoid colon resection, 8 underwent total hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy (19,20,22,23,25–28), and 5 underwent para-aortic and pelvic LN dissections. A total of 4 patients exhibited LN metastasis, including 1 patient with para-aortic LN metastasis and 3 patients with local LN metastasis. Furthermore, 1 patient was offered neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy before surgery. A total of 7 patients received chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy, and 2 patients received radiotherapy as adjuvant therapy. Therefore, chemotherapy may be the first-line adjuvant treatment and, similar to treatments for endometrial cancer, the chemotherapeutic regimens typically consist of platinum and taxane (29). Furthermore, 1 of the 2 patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy (28) suffered local pelvic recurrence 24 months later, and the patient could only receive chemotherapy for recurrence. Thus, radiation therapy may be performed after surgery or for treatment of local recurrence after the primary surgery and chemotherapy. Among 9 patients reported in the literature and the 2 patients in the present report, the median follow-up duration of rectal endometriosis-associated carcinoma was 22 months (range, 3–84 months), and 2 patients exhibited recurrence after 22 and 24 months, respectively.

In conclusion, endometriosis-associated carcinoma of the rectum is a rare malignant tumor that should be distinguished from colorectal cancer so that the optimal treatment is implemented. For patients who have previously received surgery for endometriosis who present with abdominal pain and rectal bleeding, the clinical suspicion of endometriosis-associated cancer of the rectum is suggested. Surgery and pathologic examination with IHC staining, even with molecular analysis, are essential for the final diagnosis. Since there is currently no consensus on the standard therapeutic approach for rectal endometriosis-associated malignancies, primary cytoreductive surgery with resection of all macroscopic detectable lesions should be performed whenever possible. Although surgery combined with chemotherapy was performed in most patients reported in the literature, the chemotherapeutic regimens were individualized, and the exact therapeutic value of chemotherapy is unclear. Therefore, more prospective, multicenter, large-scale trials are required for the treatment of rectal endometriosis-associated cancer.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Data

Supporting Data

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study are not publicly available due to protection of patient privacy but may be requested from the corresponding author.

Authors' contributions

KZ and YH were involved in the conception and design of the study. MH acquired and analyzed the data. XL and RY performed the research and assessed the results. KZ drafted the manuscript and MH revised the manuscript. KZ and YH confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (approval no. LLHBCH2024YN-016; Wuhan, China), and written informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from each patient.

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from each patient to publish their details and images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Use of artificial intelligence tools

During the preparation of this work, artificial intelligence tools were used to improve the readability and language of the manuscript, and subsequently, the authors revised and edited the content produced by the artificial intelligence tools as necessary, taking full responsibility for the ultimate content of the present manuscript.

Figure 1. MRI and pathological features of case 1. (A) Pelvic MRI revealed a mass in the rectum that severely adhered to the uterine wall. Histopathologic features of the adenocarcinoma infiltrating the rectum: (B) Moderately differentiated glandular adenocarcinoma diffusely extending throughout all layers of the intestinal wall (scale bar, 5 mm). (C) Tumor cells were columnar with pseudostratified nuclei (scale bar, 400 µm). Immunohistochemical staining of the tumor revealed that (D) paired box gene 8 staining was positive (scale bar, 200 µm), (E) estrogen receptor staining was positive (scale bar, 100 µm), (F) progesterone receptor staining was positive (scale bar, 200 µm), (G) caudal type homeobox 2 staining was negative (scale bar, 200 µm), (H) special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 staining was negative (scale bar, 200 µm), (I) cytokeratin 20 was negative (scale bar, 300 µm), and (J) mutL homolog 1 (scale bar, 200 µm) and (K) PMS2 were lost (scale bar, 200 µm).

Figure 2. MRI and pathological features of case 2. (A) Pelvic MRI revealed eccentric rectal wall thickening with a rough serosa (green arrow, thickening rectal wall). (B) Well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma scatteredly infiltrated all layers of the intestinal wall (scale bar, 5 mm). (C) Tumor cells displayed villo-glandular architectures in the mucosa (scale bar, 200 µm). (D) Tumor cells displayed cribriform patterns in the muscularis propria to subserosa, and endometriosis foci as well as atypical glands were seen adjacent to the neoplastic cells (scale bar, 200 µm). Immunohistochemical staining showed that the tumor cells were positive for (E) paired box gene 8 (scale bar, 600 µm) and (F) estrogen receptor (scale bar, 200 µm), (G) variably positive for progesterone receptor (scale bar, 200 µm), and focally positive for (H) caudal type homeobox 2 (scale bar, 200 µm) and (I) special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (scale bar, 200 µm). (J) The Ki67 index was 70% (scale bar, 200 µm).

Table I. Characteristics of patients with endometriosis-associated recto-sigmoid adenocarcinoma.

First author/s, year	Age, years	Signs/symptoms	Medical history	Histology	Treatment	LN metastasis	Follow-up	(Refs.)	
Present case 1	49	Pelvic mass on	None	Endometrioid	TH + BSO + RR + CT	None	NR after	-	
		examination		carcinoma			27 months		
Present case 2	38	Hematochezia	None	Endometrioid	RR	Metastasis of	NR after	-	
				carcinoma		5 out of 22	3 months		
						LNs			
Lott et al, 1978	53	Rectal bleeding	TH + BSO for PE	Endometrioid	RRS	None	NR after	(19)	
			15 years ago	carcinoma			48 months		
Jones et al, 2002	52	Rectal bleeding	TH + BSO for	Endometrioid	RRS	None	NR after	(20)	
			rectovaginal DIE	carcinoma			9 months		
			12 years ago						
Takeuchi et al,	67	Backache and	None	Endometrioid	RH + pelvic and para-aortic	Para-aortic	ND	(21)	
2004		abdominal pain		carcinoma	LND + RRS + CT	LN metastasis			
Kobayashi et al,	45	Hematochezia with	Estrogen therapy +	Endometrioid	Resection of bilateral ovarian	Metastasis of	ND	(22)	
2010		abdominal pain	RO 17 years ago	carcinoma	tumors + RRS + appendix + CT	6 out of 8 LNs			
García-Marín et al,	57	Rectorrhagia	TH + BSO for PE	Poorly	Neoadjuvant CT/RT +	ND	NR after	(23)	
2015			and myomatosis	differentiated	RR+ CT		84 months		
			15 years ago	adenocarcinoma					
Palla et al, 2017	75	Abdominal pain	None	Endometrioid	RS	ND	NR after	(24)	
		and enterorrhagia		carcinoma			6 months		
Li et al, 2018	55	Rectorrhagia and	Excision of	High-grade	TH + BSO + RR + CT	Metastasis of	RE 22 months	(25)	
				serous			later		
		abdominal pain	bilateral ovarian	carcinoma		8 out of	30 LNs		
			chocolate cysts						
			25 years ago						
Yang et al, 2019	57	Vaginal bleeding	Caesarean section	Endometrioid	RH + BSO + pelvic LND + RR +	None	NR after	(26)	
		and abdominal	and myomectomy	carcinoma	pelvic peritonectomy +		12 months		
		pain	>20 years ago		omentectomy + appendectomy + CT				
Li et al, 2022	49	Hypogastralgia	RSO + myomectomy	Endometrioid	RH + LSO + pelvic and para-	None	NR after	(27)	
		and diarrhea	for right ovarian	carcinoma	aortic LND + RR + omentectomy +		10 months		
			endometriosis cyst		appendectomy + CT				
			and uterine fibroid						
Ulrich et al,	41	Abdominal	None	Endometrioid	RH + BSO + pelvic LND +	None	NR after 24	(28)	
2005 (case 1)		discomfort		carcinoma	RR + RT		months		
Ulrich et al,	51	Vaginal bleeding	TH for myomas	Endometrioid	Resection of proximal vagina +	None	RE 24 months	(28)	
2005 (case 2)			6 years	carcinoma	RR + BSO + pelvic LND + RT		later		
BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; CT, chemotherapy; DIE, deeply infiltrating endometriosis; LN, lymph node; LND, lymph node dissection; LSO, left salpingo-oophorectomy; ND, not described; NR, no recurrence; PE, pelvic endometriosis; RE, recurrence; RH, radical hysterectomy; RO, right oophorectomy; RR, rectal resection; RRS, resection of the recto-sigmoid colon; RS, resection of the sigmoid colon; RSO, right salpingo-oophorectomy; RT, radiotherapy; TH, total hysterectomy.
==== Refs
References

1 Simoens S Dunselman G Dirksen C Hummelshoj L Bokor A Brandes I Brodszky V Canis M Colombo GL DeLeire T The burden of endometriosis: Costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres Hum Reprod 27 1292 1299 2012 10.1093/humrep/des073 22422778
2 Taylor HS Kotlyar AM Flores VA Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease: Clinical challenges and novel innovations Lancet 397 839 852 2021 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00389-5 33640070
3 Stern RC Dash R Bentley RC Snyder MJ Haney AF Robboy SJ Malignancy in endometriosis: Frequency and comparison of ovarian and extraovarian types Int J Gynecol Pathol 20 133 139 2001 10.1097/00004347-200104000-00004 11293158
4 Pearce CL Templeman C Rossing MA Lee A Near AM Webb PM Nagle CM Doherty JA Cushing-Haugen KL Wicklund KG Association between endometriosis and risk of histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: A pooled analysis of case-control studies Lancet Oncol 13 385 394 2012 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70404-1 22361336
5 Benoit L Arnould L Cheynel N Diane B Causeret S Machado A Collin F Fraisse J Cuisenier J Malignant extraovarian endometriosis: A review Eur J Surg Oncol 32 6 11 2006 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.08.011 16289714
6 Sampson JA Endometrial carcinoma of the ovary, arising in endometrial tissue of that organ Arch Surg 10 1 72 1925 10.1001/archsurg.1925.01120100007001
7 Scott RB Malignant changes in endometriosis Obstet Gynecol 2 283 289 1953 13087921
8 Gadducci A Zannoni GF Endometriosis-associated extraovarian malignancies: A challenging question for the clinician and the pathologist Anticancer Res 40 2429 2438 2020 10.21873/anticanres.14212 32366386
9 Thomas EJ Campbell IG Molecular genetic defects in endometriosis Gynecol Obstet Invest 50 (Suppl 1) S44 S50 2000 10.1159/000052878
10 Sapalidis K Machairiotis N Zarogoulidis P Vasilakaki S Sardeli C Koimtzis G Pavlidis E Katsaounis A Giannakidis D Michalopoulos N Genes' interactions: A major contributor to the malignant transformation of endometriosis Int J Mol Sci 20 1842 2019 10.3390/ijms20081842 31013963
11 Zhao K Zhao T Yang R Liu J Hu M Peroxiredoxin 2 as a potential prognostic biomarker associated with angiogenesis in cervical squamous cell cancer Oncol Lett 28 328 2024 10.3892/ol.2024.14461 38807674
12 Del Vecchio F Mastroiaco V Di Marco A Compagnoni C Capece D Zazzeroni F Capalbo C Alesse E Tessitore A Next-generation sequencing: Recent applications to the analysis of colorectal cancer J Transl Med 15 246 2017 10.1186/s12967-017-1353-y 29221448
13 Ponz de Leon M Di Gregorio C Pathology of colorectal cancer Dig Liver Dis 33 372 388 2001 10.1016/S1590-8658(01)80095-5 11432519
14 Kir G Gurbuz A Karateke A Kir M Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical profile of ovarian metastases from colorectal carcinoma World J Gastrointest Surg 2 109 116 2010 10.4240/wjgs.v2.i4.109 21160859
15 Arakawa T Fukuda S Hirata T Neriishi K Wang Y Takeuchi A Saeki A Harada M Hirota Y Matsumoto T PAX8: A highly sensitive marker for the glands in extragenital endometriosis Reprod Sci 27 1580 1586 2020 10.1007/s43032-020-00186-7 32430717
16 Smith D Stewart CJR Clarke EM Lose F Davies C Armes J Obermair A Brennan D Webb PM Nagle CM Spurdle AB ER and PR expression and survival after endometrial cancer Gynecol Oncol 148 258 266 2018 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.027 29217139
17 Werling RW Yaziji H Bacchi CE Gown AM CDX2, a highly sensitive and specific marker of adenocarcinomas of intestinal origin: An immunohistochemical survey of 476 primary and metastatic carcinomas Am J Surg Pathol 27 303 310 2003 10.1097/00000478-200303000-00003 12604886
18 Magnusson K de Wit M Brennan DJ Johnson LB McGee SF Lundberg E Naicker K Klinger R Kampf C Asplund A SATB2 in combination with cytokeratin 20 identifies over 95% of all colorectal carcinomas Am J Surg Pathol 35 937 948 2011 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31821c3dae 21677534
19 Lott JV Rubin RJ Salvati EP Salazar GH Endometrioid carcinoma of the rectum arising in endometriosis: Report of a case Dis Colon Rectum 21 56 60 1978 10.1007/BF02586549 639640
20 Jones KD Owen E Berresford A Sutton C Endometrial adenocarcinoma arising from endometriosis of the rectosigmoid colon Gynecol Oncol 86 220 222 2002 10.1006/gyno.2002.6643 12144831
21 Takeuchi K Yamanaka Y Hamana S Ohara N Maruo T Invasive adenocarcinoma arising from uterine adenomyosis involving the rectosigmoid colon Int J Gynecol Cancer 14 1004 1006 2004 10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200409000-00038 15361215
22 Kobayashi S Sasaki M Goto T Asakage N Sekine M Suzuki T Tsukada K Yamasaki S Ukawa S Endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising from endometriosis of the rectosigmoid Dig Endos 22 59 63 2010 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2009.00925.x
23 García-Marín JA Pellicer-Franco EM Soria-Aledo V Mengual-Ballester M Valero-Navarro G Aguayo-Albasini JL Malignant degeneration of rectal endometriosis Rev Esp Enferm Dig 107 761 763 2015 26671590
24 Palla VV Karaolanis G Bliona T Katafigiotis I Anastasiou I Hassiakos D Endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising from colon endometriosis SAGE Open Med Case Rep 5 2050313X17745204 2017 29238580
25 Li N Zhou W Zhao L Zhou J Endometriosis-associated recto-sigmoid cancer: A case report BMC Cancer 18 905 2018 10.1186/s12885-018-4797-4 30236076
26 Yang H Gu JJ Qi Y Zhao W Wang XL Endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the rectovaginal septum with invasion of the rectum: A case report and review of literature World J Surg Oncol 17 206 2019 10.1186/s12957-019-1743-0 31801560
27 Li B Wang Y Wang Y Li S Liu K Deep infiltrating endometriosis malignant invasion of cervical wall and rectal wall with lynch syndrome: A rare case report and review of literature Front Oncol 12 832228 2022 10.3389/fonc.2022.832228 35402227
28 Ulrich U Rhiem K Kaminski M Wardelmann E Trog D Valter M Richter ON Parametrial and rectovaginal adenocarcinoma arising from endometriosis Int J Gynecol Cancer 15 1206 1209 2005 10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200511000-00041 16343215
29 Knisely A Huang Y Li Y Prabhu VS Wright JD Adjuvant and first line chemotherapy use for endometrial cancer Gynecol Oncol Rep 41 101002 2022 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101002 35620299
