
==== Front
Diabetol Metab Syndr
Diabetol Metab Syndr
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
1758-5996
BioMed Central London

1462
10.1186/s13098-024-01462-1
Research
Association of haemoglobin glycation index with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in diabetic kidney disease: a cohort study
Huang Lihua 1
He Liuliu 1
Luo Xiaoyan 2
Zhou Xiaoqing tarzan528@163.com

3
1 grid.440714.2 0000 0004 1797 9454 Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
2 https://ror.org/03s8txj32 grid.412463.6 0000 0004 1762 6325 Department of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
3 grid.440714.2 0000 0004 1797 9454 General Surgery Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
11 9 2024
11 9 2024
2024
16 2219 6 2024
2 9 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Background

While the high haemoglobin glycation index (HGI) has been extensively investigated in diabetic populations, its impact on patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) remains unclear.

Methods

We examined data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) conducted between 1999 and 2018. HGI was determined using the formula recommended by Hempe et al., which calculates the difference between measured and predicted HbA1c. Predicted HbA1c was derived from the equation: 0.024 FPG + 3.1. National death index records up to December 31, 2019, were utilized to assess mortality outcomes. To estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for both all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality, we utilized Cox proportional hazard models. A restricted cubic spline analysis was performed to explore the potential nonlinear relationship between HGI levels and mortality.

Results

Our cohort study comprised data from 1,057 participants with DKD (mean [SE] age, 61.61 [0.57] years; 48.24% female). The mean HGI level was 0.44 (SE 0.04). Over a median follow-up period of 6.67 years, we observed 381 deaths, including 140 due to CVD. Compared with participants in the second tertile of HGI levels (0.03–0.74), those in the lowest tertile of HGI (-5.29–0.02) exhibited an all-cause mortality hazard ratio of 1.39 (95% CI, 1.02–1.88) and a CVD mortality hazard ratio of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.67–1.81). Conversely, participants in the highest tertile (0.75–9.60) demonstrated an all-cause mortality hazard ratio of 1.48 (95% CI, 1.05–2.08) and a CVD mortality hazard ratio of 2.06 (95% CI, 1.13–3.77) after further adjusting for HbA1c and other important variables. Additionally, a restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a U-shaped relationship between HGI and all-cause mortality (P < 0.001 for nonlinearity) and a J-shaped relationship between HGI and CVD mortality (P = 0.044 for nonlinearity).

Conclusions

Our cohort study suggests that HGI in DKD populations exhibits a U-shaped association with all-cause mortality and a J-shaped association with CVD mortality, independent of HbA1c levels.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13098-024-01462-1.

Keywords

Diabetic kidney disease
Haemoglobin glycation index
Mortality
HbA1c
NHANES
issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD), a major complication of diabetes mellitus, is characterized by proteinuria, glomerulosclerosis, and progressive renal failure [1]. DKD affects approximately 20–40% of all diabetic patients and is a leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) worldwide [2]. Aggressive glycemic intervention is crucial for this high-risk population, significantly improving disease outcomes [3]. However, traditional glycemic monitoring metrics, such as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), have limitations. While HbA1c is widely used to measure glycemic control, its levels are influenced by factors beyond blood glucose [4]. HbA1c reflects only 60–80% of average blood glucose levels [5, 6], with the remaining 20–40% variation attributed to factors such as age [7], genetic variation [8], red blood cell longevity [9], and race [10].

In patients with DKD, the reliability of HbA1c is further compromised due to CKD-related abnormalities that affect red blood cell turnover [11], such as suppressed erythropoiesis or a shortened red blood cell lifespan. Uremia-related changes in hemoglobin conversion and carbamylation also interfere with HbA1c measurements [12]. These limitations suggest that HbA1c may not be the optimal therapeutic target or risk predictor in DKD patients.

The haemoglobin glycation index (HGI), proposed by Hempe et al. in 2002 [13], offers an alternative measure. HGI is calculated by applying fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to a linear regression equation that quantifies individual differences in glycated hemoglobin independent of blood glucose levels [14, 15]. Unlike HbA1c, HGI is not affected by red blood cell longevity [13]. Previous studies have associated high HGI with increased risks of both macrovascular and microvascular complications in diabetics [16]. High HGI also correlates with an elevated risk of CKD in healthy adults [17] and worsened renal function in type 2 diabetes patients [18]. Moreover, the benefits of intensive glucose-lowering therapy in diabetes are primarily seen in patients with low to intermediate HGI, while those with high HGI exhibit higher overall mortality rates [19].

Despite these findings, there is limited research on HGI in DKD patients. This study aims to explore the association between HGI and all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in DKD patients using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data. Our goal is to identify high-risk populations and provide a scientific basis for setting individualized glycemic control targets in the future.

Methods

Study population

The NHANES is an ongoing program designed to assess the health and nutritional status of the U.S. population. Ethical oversight for all surveys is provided by the Ethics Review Committee of the National Center for Health Statistics, with participants giving written informed consent. The survey employs multistage, stratified sampling to ensure representativeness.

This study utilized data from the NHANES database, covering the years 1999 to 2018. Patients were selectively excluded based on predefined criteria. Exclusions included individuals without DKD (n = 97,651), those under the age of 20 (n = 28), individuals with a baseline cancer diagnosis (n = 596), and those lacking data on HbA1c (n = 1), FPG (n = 1,240), mortality status (n = 2), fasting weights (n = 194), or covariates (n = 283). Additionally, individuals treated for anemia within the previous three months were excluded (n = 264) due to potential influences on erythrocyte longevity and HbA1c measurements. After applying these criteria, the analysis included 1,057 individuals with DKD (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 Study flowchart

Diagnostic criteria for diabetic kidney disease

The diagnostic criteria for DKD were established based on diagnostic standards for diabetes and aligned with the CKD guidelines set forth by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) working group [20]. These criteria encompassed either an elevated urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) exceeding 30 mg/g or a reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) falling below 60 ml/min/1.73 m² [3].

For the diagnosis of diabetes, several parameters were considered: a clinical diagnosis of diabetes by a healthcare professional, a HbA1c level exceeding 6.5%, a fasting blood glucose level of ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, a random blood glucose level of ≥ 11.1 mmol/L, or a random blood glucose level exceeding 11.1 mmol/L after a two-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Meeting any of these criteria confirmed the diagnosis of diabetes [21].

Calculation of haemoglobin glycation index

We employed the standardized HGI formula, developed by Hempe et al., a pioneering figure in HGI research [14]. This formula is grounded in data extracted from the 2005–2016 NHANES. The derivation of this formula involved a cohort of 18,675 adults who were either untreated for diabetes or did not self-report diabetes.

The projected HbA1c value (projected HbA1c = 0.024 FPG + 3.1) is determined by entering the FPG value into a regression equation describing the linear correlation between FPG and HbA1c in the reference population. HGI is computed as the disparity between the measured HbA1c and the predicted HbA1c.

Outcome assessment

All-cause mortality, representing death resulting from any cause, was designated as the primary outcome. CVD mortality was delineated utilizing International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes I00 to I09, I11, I13, I20 to I51, and I60 to I69. Mortality data, acquired through linkage of the cohort database with the National Death Index up to December 31, 2019, underwent thorough analysis.

Covariates

Several covariates potentially influencing the outcomes were incorporated, covering age (years), sex (male and female), race/ethnicity (Mexican American, other Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, or other races including multi-racial), education level (< 9 years, 9–13 years, or ≥ 13 years), household poverty-to-income ratio (PIR), smoking status (never, current, and former), alcohol intake (never, moderate, and heavy), use of diabetes medications (other, insulin, oral medications, and unknown), diabetes duration (< 10 years, ≥ 10 years, and unknown). Hypertension was characterized by systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings of at least 140 mmHg and 90 mmHg, respectively, self-reported hypertension, physician-diagnosed hypertension, or the requirement for medication to regulate elevated blood pressure [22]. CVD was self-reported as a diagnosis of congestive heart failure, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, or coronary heart disease. Cancer diagnoses were self-reported by a physician. Hyperlipidemia was delineated by triglyceride (TG) levels ≥ 150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) or total cholesterol (TC) levels ≥ 200 mg/dL (5.18 mmol/L), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels ≥ 130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L), or, in men, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels < 40 mg/dL (1.04 mmol/L), or, in women, HDL levels < 50 mg/dL (1.30 mmol/L) [23]. The healthy eating index (HEI) score was computed in accordance with HEI-2015 guidelines [24]. Physical activity was defined as engaging in moderate to vigorous exercise, fitness programs, or recreational activities for more than 10 min per week; otherwise, participants were classified as inactive. The eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI 2009 (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) creatinine equation.

Statistical analyses

This study rigorously adhered to NHANES guidelines, meticulously adjusting for complex sampling designs and weights. Weighted averages for continuous variables and percentages for categorical ones were reported, ensuring accuracy and reliability. Statistical comparisons were conducted using appropriate methods: continuous variables were analyzed using ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test, while categorical data differences were assessed using the chi-square test. To assess the impact of HGI on both all-cause mortality and CVD mortality, survey-weighted Cox regression analysis was employed. HGI was categorized into three tertiles, with the second tertile serving as the reference for exploratory analysis. To mitigate potential confounding factors, four multivariate models were constructed: Model I adjusted for age and sex. Model II expanded adjustments to include race/ethnicity, education level, PIR, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, comorbidities (hypertension, CVD, hyperlipidemia), physical activity, and alcohol intake. Model III further included variables such as diabetes duration, use of diabetes medications, hemoglobin, eGFR, and HEI. Model IV introduced HbA1C. To explore the nonlinear relationship between HGI and mortality outcomes, restricted cubic spline analysis with 4 knots was conducted. The likelihood ratio test was utilized to assess nonlinearity, ensuring robustness in the analysis. Additionally, analyses were stratified by various factors including age (< 60 or ≥ 60 years), sex (male or female), race/ethnicity (Mexican American, other Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, or other races including multi-racial), PIR (< 1, 1–3, ≥ 3), smoking status (never, ever, or current), BMI (< 30 or ≥ 30), HbA1c (< 7% or ≥ 7%), hypertension (yes or no), hyperlipidemia (yes or no), CVD (yes or no), GFR category (G1, G2, G3a + G3b, G4 + G5), use of diabetes medications (other, insulin, oral medications, and unknown), and diabetes duration (< 10 years, ≥ 10 years, and unknown). Interactions between HGI and these factors were rigorously assessed, enhancing the depth of analysis and interpretation.

Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to ensure the robustness of our findings: (1) Variation in HGI calculation: The existing literature shows slight variations in the calculation of HGI, primarily due to differences in the populations used to derive the formula for predicting HbA1c. To address this, we developed distinct predictive formulas for HbA1c using both the entire cohort and a subset specifically focused on DKD. These formulas were then used to calculate HGI, validating its association with mortality outcomes. (2) Mitigating Reverse Causality Bias: To mitigate potential reverse causality bias, we excluded participants who experienced mortality within a 2-year follow-up period from the analysis.

Results

Study participants and baseline characteristics

The study enrolled a total of 1,057 participants, with a mean age of 61.61 years (standard error [SE] = 0.57), and 48.24% (n = 497) were females. The mean HGI level was 0.44 (SE 0.04). During a median follow-up period of 6.67 years, 381 deaths occurred, including 140 from CVD. Baseline characteristics across HGI tertiles—Q1 (-5.29–0.02), Q2 (0.03–0.74), and Q3 (0.75–9.60)—are detailed in Table 1. Elevated HGI levels were associated with younger age, Mexican-American ethnicity, current smoking, physical activity, insulin use, longer diabetes duration, and higher levels of HbA1c, and FPG among individuals.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study participants

		Haemoglobin glycation index		
-5.29–0.02	0.03–0.74	0.75–9.60	
Variables	Total (n = 1057)	Q1(n = 353)	Q2 (n = 352)	Q3 (n = 352)	P-value	
Age, years	61.61 (0.57)	62.43 (1.04)	63.47 (0.92)	58.38 (1.00)	0.001	
Sex, n (%)					0.07	
 Female	497 (48.24)	155 (44.64)	180 (54.96)	162 (45.18)		
 Male	560 (51.76)	198 (55.36)	172 (45.04)	190 (54.82)		
Race-ethnicity, n (%)					< 0.001	
 Mexican American	232 (10.51)	65 (8.70)	62 (7.09)	105 (16.84)		
 Non-Hispanic Black	244 (14.51)	62 (9.67)	88 (14.99)	94 (20.29)		
 Non-Hispanic White	405 (61.07)	172 (72.46)	145 (63.83)	88 (42.98)		
 Other Hispanic	97 (6.33)	30 (4.54)	31 (6.90)	36 (8.01)		
 Other Race	79 (7.58)	24 (4.63)	26 (7.19)	29 (11.89)		
Poverty Income Ratio	2.49 (0.07)	2.68 (0.12)	2.47 (0.11)	2.26 (0.12)	0.06	
BMI, kg/m2	32.99 (0.35)	32.78 (0.51)	32.38 (0.63)	34.00 (0.56)	0.08	
Education Level, n (%)					0.25	
 Low (< 9 years)	220 (12.75)	59 (9.31)	77 (13.41)	84 (16.51)		
 Medium (9–13 years)	448 (43.08)	161 (44.98)	144 (41.21)	143 (42.74)		
 High (≥ 13 years)	389 (44.17)	133 (45.71)	131 (45.38)	125 (40.75)		
Smoking status, n (%)					0.03	
 Never Smoker	512 (47.27)	158 (45.72)	171 (46.30)	183 (50.42)		
 Former Smoker	369 (35.44)	145 (39.00)	126 (39.48)	98 (26.12)		
 Current Smoker	176 (17.29)	50 (15.28)	55 (14.22)	71 (23.47)		
Comorbidity						
Hyperlipidemia, n (%)					0.43	
 No	110 (9.63)	46 (11.36)	31 (8.01)	33 (9.24)		
 Yes	947 (90.37)	307 (88.64)	321 (91.99)	319 (90.76)		
Hypertension, n (%)					0.3	
 No	206 (21.52)	55 (17.96)	69 (22.91)	82 (24.59)		
 Yes	851 (78.48)	298 (82.04)	283 (77.09)	270 (75.41)		
CVD					0.37	
 No	727 (70.11)	248 (73.17)	230 (68.97)	249 (67.44)		
 Yes	330 (29.89)	105 (26.83)	122 (31.03)	103 (32.56)		
Alcohol intake, %					0.05	
 None	890 (82.62)	282 (78.38)	297 (84.21)	311 (86.32)		
 Moderate	47 (4.79)	8 (3.57)	22 (6.30)	17 (4.62)		
 Heavy	120 (12.60)	63 (18.05)	33 (9.49)	24 (9.05)		
Physical Activity, n (%)					0.04	
 Inactive	594 (51.83)	193 (45.63)	213 (58.39)	188 (52.35)		
 Active	463 (48.17)	160 (54.37)	139 (41.61)	164 (47.65)		
GFR category, n (%)					0.14	
 G1	361 (36.41)	109 (37.00)	103 (30.56)	149 (42.39)		
 G2	271 (23.75)	101 (27.84)	88 (23.42)	82 (18.79)		
 G3a	240 (24.23)	77 (19.60)	97 (29.77)	66 (23.88)		
 G3b	123 (10.98)	36 (10.32)	47 (11.35)	40 (11.43)		
 G4	48 (3.42)	24 (4.39)	13 (3.24)	11 (2.36)		
 G5	14 (1.21)	6 (0.85)	4 (1.66)	4 (1.15)		
Use of diabetes medications, n (%)					< 0.001	
 Other*	266 (27.53)	121 (34.32)	104 (32.81)	41 (12.54)		
 Insulin	107 (9.75)	30 (6.91)	23 (6.13)	54 (17.65)		
 Oral medications	560 (51.64)	160 (45.99)	186 (51.95)	214 (58.68)		
 Unknow	124 (11.08)	42 (12.78)	39 (9.10)	43 (11.13)		
Diabetes duration, n (%)					< 0.001	
 <10 years	349 (33.56)	103 (30.73)	124 (34.60)	122 (36.06)		
 ≥10 years	373 (33.57)	102 (26.10)	107 (31.31)	164 (45.98)		
 Unknow	335 (32.86)	148 (43.17)	121 (34.09)	66 (17.96)		
Mortstat, n (%)					0.24	
 Alive	676 (64.95)	211 (63.74)	236 (69.16)	229 (61.66)		
 Deaths	381 (35.05)	142 (36.26)	116 (30.84)	123 (38.34)		
Follow-up in years	6.67 (3.33,10.67)	6.00 (2.92,10.08)	6.75 (3.67,11.17)	6.92 (3.58,11.08)	0.18	
Laboratory						
 Hemoglobin, (g/dL)	14.12 (0.08)	14.44 (0.14)	13.87 (0.13)	14.00 (0.15)	0.01	
 HEI	50.45 (0.52)	52.04 (1.01)	49.80 (0.81)	49.12 (0.80)	0.08	
 eGFR, (mL/min/1.73 m2)	75.11 (1.15)	75.03 (1.92)	71.87 (1.85)	78.96 (2.26)	0.07	
 HbA1c, (%)	7.35 (0.08)	6.49 (0.09)	7.00 (0.10)	8.89 (0.14)	< 0.001	
 FBG, (mg/dL)	159.06 (2.72)	161.91 (4.07)	148.94 (3.92)	167.05 (5.20)	0.01	
Notes: Data are represented as the weighted proportion (%) or mean ± SE.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CVD, cardiovascular disease; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HEI, healthy eating index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin A1c; FBG, fasting blood glucose.

* Indicated drugs except hypoglycemic medications.

HGI and all-cause and CVD mortality

In model IV of the weighted multivariate Cox regression analysis, a non-linear relationship between HGI levels and both all-cause and CVD mortality was observed. Compared with Q2 (0.03–0.74), the hazard ratios (HRs) for Q1 (-5.29–0.02) and Q3 (0.75–9.60) for all-cause mortality were 1.39 (95% CI: 1.02–1.88) and 1.48 (95% CI: 1.05–2.08), respectively. Regarding CVD mortality, compared with Q2, the HRs for Q1 and Q3 were 1.10 (95% CI: 0.67–1.81) and 2.06 (95% CI: 1.13–3.77), respectively (Table 2). Additionally, a smoothed curve fit depicted a U-shaped association between HGI and both all-cause mortality (P < 0.001 for nonlinearity) and a J-shaped association between HGI and CVD mortality (P = 0.044 for nonlinearity) (Fig. 2).

Table 2 Hazard ratios for all-cause and CVD mortality among patients with diabetic kidney disease in NHANES 1999 to 2018

	Hazard ratio (95% CI)		
Model	Q1
(-5.29–0.02)	Q2
(0.03–0.74)	Q3
(0.75–9.60)	P value for trend	
All-cause mortality					
Deaths/Total (n)	142/353	116/352	123/352		
Non-adjusted Model	1.35 (0.97–1.88)	1.00 [Reference]	1.26 (0.90–1.77)	0.17	
Model I	1.36 (1.00-1.84)	1.00 [Reference]	1.66 (1.18–2.33)	0.003	
Model II	1.29 (0.95–1.75)	1.00 [Reference]	1.66 (1.18–2.34)	0.003	
Model III	1.34 (0.99–1.82)	1.00 [Reference]	1.58 (1.13–2.22)	0.01	
Model IV	1.39 (1.02–1.88)	1.00 [Reference]	1.48 (1.05–2.08)	0.01	
CVD mortality					
Deaths/Total	47/353	39/352	54/352		
Non-adjusted Model	1.08 (0.67–1.74)	1.00 [Reference]	1.66 (0.94–2.95)	0.09	
Model I	1.14 (0.74–1.77)	1.00 [Reference]	2.29 (1.30–4.02)	0.01	
Model II	1.07 (0.66–1.74)	1.00 [Reference]	2.23 (1.23–4.05)	0.01	
Model III	1.04 (0.64–1.68)	1.00 [Reference]	2.30 (1.30–4.09)	0.01	
Model IV	1.10 (0.67–1.81)	1.00 [Reference]	2.06 (1.13–3.77)	0.03	
Notes:

Model I: adjusted for age (continuous), sex (male or female)

Model II: adjusted for Model I plus race (Mexican American, other Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, or other races including multi-racial), education (< 9, 9–13, ≥ 13), BMI (continuous), poverty income ratio (continuous), smoking status (never, former, current), hypertension (no, yes), CVD (no, yes), hyperlipidemia (no, yes), physical activity (inactive, active), alcohol intake (none, moderate, heavy)

Model III: adjusted for Model II plus diabetes duration (< 10 years, ≥ 10 years, unknow), use of diabetes medications (other, insulin, oral medications, unknow), HEI (continuous), eGFR (continuous), hemoglobin (continuous)

Model IV: adjusted for Model III plus HbA1c

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HEI, healthy eating index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin A1c

Fig. 2 Associations between haemoglobin glycation index with all-cause (A) and CVD mortality (B) among participants with diabetic kidney disease in NHANES 1999–2018. HRs were adjusted for age (continuous), sex (male or female), race (Mexican American, other Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, or other races including multi-racial), education (<9, 9-13, ≥13), BMI (continuous), poverty income ratio (continuous), smoking status (never, former, current), hypertension (no, yes), CVD (no, yes), hyperlipidemia (no, yes), physical activity (inactive, active), alcohol intake (none, moderate, heavy), diabetes duration (<10 years, ≥10 years, unknow), use of diabetes medications (other, insulin, oral medications unknow), HEI (continuous), eGFR (continuous), hemoglobin (continuous), HbA1c (continuous)

Stratified and sensitivity analyses

Stratified analysis across various demographic and clinical factors, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking status, BMI, HbA1c, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, CVD, GFR category, use of diabetes medications, and diabetes duration, revealed no evidence suggesting alterations in the U-shaped relationship between HGI and all-cause mortality (Table 3). Additionally, no significant interactions were detected among any of the strata of variables.

Table 3 Associations of haemoglobin glycation index with all-cause mortality in various subgroups among participants with diabetic kidney disease in NHANES 1999–2018

Subgroup	Haemoglobin glycation index	P for interaction	
Q1	Q2	Q3	
(-5.29–0.02)	(0.03–0.74)	(0.75–9.60)		
Age				0.23	
 <60 years	2.84 (1.43–5.62)	Ref.	3.06 (1.25–7.51)		
 ≥60 years	1.25 (0.92–1.70)	Ref.	1.36 (0.92–2.02)		
Sex				0.07	
 Male	2.00 (1.25–3.18)	Ref.	2.00 (1.24–3.24)		
 Female	1.26 (0.88–1.81)	Ref.	1.16 (0.69–1.92)		
Race-ethnicity				0.62	
 Mexican American	3.58 (1.46–8.80)	Ref.	1.85 (0.86-4.00)		
 Non-Hispanic Black	1.57 (0.82–3.02)	Ref.	1.14 (0.65-2.00)		
 Non-Hispanic White	1.22 (0.84–1.79)	Ref.	1.63 (1.06–2.51)		
 Other Hispanic	3.93 (1.27–12.16)	Ref.	0.49 (0.08–2.96)		
 Other Race	3.10 (0.19–51.56)	Ref.	4.95 (0.89–27.60)		
Poverty Income Ratio				0.10	
 <1.0	0.96 (0.51–1.80)	Ref.	0.96 (0.52–1.75)		
 1.0–3.0	1.63 (1.15–2.32)	Ref.	1.50 (0.93–2.40)		
 ≥3.0	2.67 (1.36–5.24)	Ref.	2.82 (1.28–6.23)		
BMI- kg/m2					
 <30	1.53 (1.04–2.25)	Ref.	1.86 (1.08–3.22)	0.63	
 ≥30	1.45 (0.91–2.33)	Ref.	1.36 (0.92–2.01)		
Smoking Status				0.33	
 Never Smoker	1.58 (0.97–2.57)	Ref.	1.05 (0.61–1.81)		
 Former Smoker	1.44 (0.92–2.26)	Ref.	1.95 (1.21–3.15)		
 Current Smoker	1.04 (0.46–2.36)	Ref.	2.38 (1.17–4.83)		
Hypertension				0.31	
 No	0.57 (0.21–1.51)	Ref.	0.76 (0.36–1.61)		
 Yes	1.50 (1.08–2.08)	Ref.	1.59 (1.13–2.23)		
Hyperlipidemia				0.95	
 No	2.47 (0.81–7.51)	Ref.	1.18 (0.36–3.81)		
 Yes	1.38 (1.02–1.86)	Ref.	1.52 (1.06–2.18)		
CVD				0.70	
 No	1.50 (0.96–2.34)	Ref.	1.70 (1.10–2.62)		
 Yes	1.35 (0.84–2.17)	Ref.	1.06 (0.66–1.69)		
GFR category					
 G1	1.46 (0.67–3.22)	Ref.	1.93 (0.92–4.03)	0.08	
 G2	1.71 (0.78–3.78)	Ref.	1.87 (0.91–3.83)		
 G3a + G3b	0.86 (0.55–1.36)	Ref.	1.29 (0.84–1.99)		
 G4 + G5	1.46 (0.23–9.06)	Ref.	0.28 (0.03–2.31)		
Use of diabetes medications				0.18	
 Other	1.10 (0.70–1.73)	Ref.	2.11 (1.06–4.23)		
 Insulin	6.76 (1.53–29.97)	Ref.	4.77 (0.94–24.18)		
 Oral medications	1.40 (0.85–2.29)	Ref.	1.31 (0.87–1.98)		
 Unknow	1.44 (0.32–6.38)	Ref.	8.10 (1.77–37.02)		
Diabetes duration				0.39	
 <10 years	2.06 (1.05–4.06)	Ref.	1.69 (0.91–3.15)		
 ≥10 years	1.14 (0.65–2.02)	Ref.	1.33 (0.81–2.17)		
 Unknow	1.14 (0.70–1.85)	Ref.	2.17 (1.15–4.09)		
HbA1c				0.52	
 <7.0%	1.15 (0.81–1.63)	Ref.	1.78 (1.15–2.77)		
 ≥7.0%	1.76 (0.94–3.32)	Ref.	1.49 (0.86–2.56)		
Notes:

Adjusted for age (continuous), sex (male or female), race (Mexican American, other Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, or other races including multi-racial), education (< 9, 9–13, ≥ 13), BMI (continuous), poverty income ratio (continuous), smoking status (never, former, current), hypertension (no, yes), CVD (no, yes), hyperlipidemia (no, yes), physical activity (inactive, active), alcohol intake (none, moderate, heavy), diabetes duration (< 10 years, ≥ 10 years, unknow), use of diabetes medications (other, insulin, oral medications unknow), HEI (continuous), eGFR (continuous), hemoglobin (continuous), HbA1c (continuous); the strata variable was not included when stratifying by itself

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HEI, healthy eating index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin A1c

Furthermore, after deriving the predicted HbA1c using a distinct population and recalculating the HGI (Additional file 1: Figure S1), the main findings of the current study were replicated, with no significant alterations observed in the results (Additional file 1: Table S1). Moreover, our sensitivity analyses, excluding participants who died within 2 years of follow-up, demonstrated overall robustness in the results (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Discussion

In a comprehensive prospective cohort study of adults with DKD in the United States, we observed U- and J-shaped associations of HGI with all-cause mortality and CVD mortality, respectively. Notably, these associations were independent of HbA1c. Stratified analyses across various demographic and clinical factors, as well as sensitivity analyses, confirmed the stability and robustness of our findings.

High HGI was confirmed to be an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality and CVD mortality in the diabetic population in a meta-analysis that included six prospective cohort studies and one nested case-control study [25]. The current study further confirmed the U- and J-shaped associations of HGI with all-cause mortality and CVD mortality, respectively, in a DKD population. Our conclusions differ from those in previous studies in diabetic populations in that we found that not only did high HGI increase the risk of all-cause mortality, but low HGI also increased the risk of all-cause mortality. Differences in the study populations may account for the inconsistent findings. In the DKD population, glucose metabolism becomes more complex due to CKD, and multiple factors mediate insulin resistance, including decreased β-cell response to blood glucose, decreased renal insulin clearance, and increased hepatocellular gluconeogenesis [26]. Additionally, the suppression of erythropoiesis due to CKD directly affects the measurement of HbA1c, and the combination of these factors results in a mismatch between HbA1c and blood glucose (as quantified by HGI) that may become more pronounced in patients with DKD. These factors may complicate the association of HGI with clinical outcomes in patients with DKD.

In the current study, high HGI increased the risk of all-cause mortality and CVD mortality. The possible mechanism for this is that high HGI reflects long-term glucose fluctuations and glycation patterns [15], which are associated with poor prognosis. The literature confirms that glycemic fluctuations in diabetic patients lead to more severe diabetic complications [27]. Hypoglycemia and poor postprandial glycemic control are more prevalent in diabetic patients with high HGI [16], and the resulting dysregulation of glucose homeostasis can exacerbate vascular endothelial dysfunction and promote atherosclerosis [28]. Additionally, higher HGI values are associated with higher glycation [29], which has been shown to cause damage to neuronal and vascular tissues and promote early atherogenesis [30]. This mechanism also corroborates with previous studies in which high HGI was reported to be associated with coronary artery calcification [31] and carotid atherosclerosis [32]. Moreover, in the current study, we found that patients with high HGI were younger, had a longer duration of diabetes, and had a higher rate of insulin use, which is consistent with findings from the ACCORD Trial [19] and the ADVANCE trial [33]. These combined factors may suggest that patients with high HGI may have a type of diabetes that is more difficult to treat; however, these findings may not be applicable to explain the increased risk of all-cause mortality and CVD mortality in patients with DKD due to the fact that the association of high HGI with all-cause and CVD mortality remained stable and did not interact across diabetes duration and diabetic medication use in stratified analyses.

Another important finding of our study is that low HGI also leads to increased all-cause mortality in patients with DKD, but the association with CVD mortality was not significant. The association of low HGI with adverse clinical outcomes has been reported previously in the literature. In a study that also used NHANES data, it was reported that low HGI increased all-cause mortality in the prediabetic and diabetic population, but this association was only found in men [34]. Low HGI was also found to increase the risk of death at 365 days in another study of ICU patients with critical coronary artery disease [35], and an increased risk of all-cause mortality was also found in another population from China undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention [36]. It may increase the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with DKD through the following mechanisms. First, HGI reflects the disparity between laboratory-measured HbA1c and projected HbA1c levels. Individuals exhibiting an HGI notably below zero are deemed to possess measured HbA1c levels significantly lower than the average HbA1c level observed in the population at corresponding FPG levels. Thus, erroneous HbA1c levels may be accepted as evidence of good glycemic control in patients in the low HGI subgroup, which may lead to further exacerbation of the condition in patients who would otherwise be required to receive glycemic therapy but who are not receiving effective glycemic control. Secondly, A low HGI (indicative of low HbA1c) might serve as an indicator of frequent hypoglycemia, a recognized risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity (such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and sudden cardiac death) and mortality [37]. CKD increases the risk of hypoglycemia due to several factors, including impaired renal regeneration, reduced renal insulin clearance, compromised insulin degradation from uremia, heightened erythrocyte glucose uptake during hemodialysis, impaired counter-regulatory hormonal responses (such as cortisol and growth hormone), nutritional deficiencies, and fluctuations in exposure to oral hypoglycemic agents and exogenous insulin [38]. In addition, we failed to find an association between low HGI and CVD mortality, which may be due to a lack of statistical certainty because of fewer CVD events. However, the above are only our speculations, and the exact mechanisms of HGI associated with all-cause and CVD mortality still need to be further investigated.

Previous studies have debated the clinical value of HGI, with some suggesting that HGI is merely a surrogate for HbA1c. Studies have shown that the association of high HGI with the risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes was mediated by HbA1c [39], and that HGI did not predict adverse CVD events and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes when HbA1c was included in statistical models [40]. However, Mee Kyoung Kim et al. found that HGI was independently associated with long-term CVD events in type 2 diabetic patients without CVD at baseline [41]. The current study confirmed the association of HGI with all-cause mortality and CVD mortality independently of HbA1c in patients with DKD. The reason for this discrepancy is not clear at this time, but we hypothesize that HGI should play a role independently of HbA1c because the literature confirms that HGI is an indicator reflecting genetic variation [33], which is the main cause of interpersonal differences in HbA1c and has also been shown to be independent of blood glucose concentration [13]. Meanwhile, in a further stratified analysis, we found that the association between HGI and all-cause mortality remained stable across HbA1c strata (< 7.0%, ≥ 7.0%), further supporting the independent role of HGI. It should be noted that there are differences in the way HGI is calculated in the existing literature, which may also be one of the reasons for the differences in the conclusions. In the current study, HGI was calculated using the standardized hemoglobin glycemic index recommended by Hempe et al. (the discoverers of HGI), which was extrapolated using FPG from adults without diabetes or pre-diabetes at baseline of the NHANES and HbA1c [14]. This facilitates the standardization of HGI. Other literature mostly uses the whole population recruited in the study [34] or a screened study population [33, 42] to calculate HGI, thus potentially contributing to the uncertainty of the conclusions. To further validate the stability of the conclusions of the current study, we used different HGI calculations from previous studies and repeated the main study in sensitivity analyses, respectively, and obtained consistent conclusions.

The U-shaped and J-shaped relationships between HGI and all-cause mortality, as well as CVD mortality, respectively, have profound clinical implications for DKD patients. These findings indicate that both extremely low and high HGI values are associated with increased mortality risks, emphasizing the critical need for clinicians to target an optimal HGI range rather than the lowest possible value. The risk at low HGI levels may be attributed to frequent hypoglycemia or malnutrition, while high HGI levels are indicative of poor glycemic control and a higher glycation burden. This highlights the necessity for personalized glycemic targets that consider individual factors influencing HGI, thereby advocating for a tailored approach to glycemic management in DKD patients. Our results underscore the potential benefits of integrating HGI into clinical practice for risk assessment and treatment decision-making, as previous studies have shown that intensified glucose-lowering interventions have yielded diverse outcomes across HGI subgroups in type 2 diabetes mellitus [19]. Specifically, while interventions have been favorable for those with low to medium HGI levels, patients with high HGI have demonstrated increased all-cause mortality and limited CVD event reduction, reinforcing the importance of HGI in optimizing patient outcomes. Future research should concentrate on defining the optimal HGI range for DKD patients and creating interventions to maintain HGI within this range, ensuring a more personalized and effective clinical approach.

Several strengths characterize our study, beginning with the utilization of a nationally representative sample. This approach facilitates the extrapolation of findings to the broader population of the United States. In addition, with the comprehensive data collected in NHANES, we were able to control for potential confounding effects from a variety of demographics, socioeconomics, lifestyles, dietary factors, and medication use. Finally, we performed stratification and sensitivity analyses to verify the reliability of the findings. However, the current study has some limitations. First, given the observational nature of our investigation, only causal relationships can be proposed, and residual confounding or confounding by unmeasured factors cannot be completely excluded. Second, the predicted HbA1c used to calculate HGI was based on a single FPG measurement. While this is a common practice in previous studies, it has limitations in accurately calculating HGI, as the mean glucose of the participants may have varied from the recommended value. Ideally, more glucose measurements, including postprandial levels, should be used to calculate HGI to improve accuracy. Third, it is important to note that a significant number of patients were excluded from our analysis due to the lack of FPG measurements. While this exclusion was necessary for the calculation of HGI, it may have introduced some selection bias. The characteristics of the excluded patients might differ from those included in the study, potentially affecting the generalizability of our results. Future studies with more complete data on FPG measurements could help address this limitation.

Conclusion

Our study provides important insights into the association between the HGI and mortality outcomes in patients with DKD. We observed significant U- and J-shaped associations of HGI with all-cause and CVD mortality, respectively, in this population, independent of traditional glycemic markers such as HbA1c.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the patients for their participation.

Author contributions

XYL conducted analyses. LHH and LLH wrote the first draft of the article. XQZ conceived the study design. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available on the NHANES website: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The survey protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Review Board of the National Center for Health Statistics (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/irba98.htm), and NHANES has obtained written informed consent from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lihua Huang contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.
==== Refs
References

1. 11 Chronic kidney Disease and Risk Management: standards of Care in Diabetes-2024 Diabetes Care 2024 47 Suppl 1 S219 30 38078574
11. Chronic kidney Disease and Risk Management: standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(Suppl 1):S219–30.38078574
2. de Boer IH Khunti K Sadusky T Tuttle KR Neumiller JJ Rhee CM Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: a Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) Diabetes Care 2022 45 12 3075 90 10.2337/dci22-0027 36189689
de Boer IH, Khunti K, Sadusky T, Tuttle KR, Neumiller JJ, Rhee CM, et al. Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: a Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO). Diabetes Care. 2022;45(12):3075–90.36189689 10.2337/dci22-0027
3. KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease Kidney Int 2022 102 5s S1 127 36272764
KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2022;102(5s):S1–127.36272764
4. DeFronzo RA Ferrannini E Groop L Henry RR Herman WH Holst JJ Type 2 diabetes mellitus Nat Reviews Disease Primers 2015 1 15019 10.1038/nrdp.2015.19 27189025
DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E, Groop L, Henry RR, Herman WH, Holst JJ, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Reviews Disease Primers. 2015;1:15019.27189025 10.1038/nrdp.2015.19
5. Gonzalez-Covarrubias V Sánchez-Ibarra H Lozano-Gonzalez K Villicaña S Texis T Rodríguez-Dorantes M Transporters TBC1D4, and ARID5B variants to explain Glycated Hemoglobin variability in patients with type 2 diabetes Pharmacology 2021 106 11–12 588 96 10.1159/000517462 34265779
Gonzalez-Covarrubias V, Sánchez-Ibarra H, Lozano-Gonzalez K, Villicaña S, Texis T, Rodríguez-Dorantes M, Transporters, et al. TBC1D4, and ARID5B variants to explain Glycated Hemoglobin variability in patients with type 2 diabetes. Pharmacology. 2021;106(11–12):588–96.34265779 10.1159/000517462
6. Nathan DM Kuenen J Borg R Zheng H Schoenfeld D Heine RJ Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values Diabetes Care 2008 31 8 1473 8 10.2337/dc08-0545 18540046
Nathan DM, Kuenen J, Borg R, Zheng H, Schoenfeld D, Heine RJ. Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(8):1473–8.18540046 10.2337/dc08-0545
7. Pani LN Korenda L Meigs JB Driver C Chamany S Fox CS Effect of aging on A1C levels in individuals without diabetes: evidence from the Framingham offspring study and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001–2004 Diabetes Care 2008 31 10 1991 6 10.2337/dc08-0577 18628569
Pani LN, Korenda L, Meigs JB, Driver C, Chamany S, Fox CS, et al. Effect of aging on A1C levels in individuals without diabetes: evidence from the Framingham offspring study and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001–2004. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(10):1991–6.18628569 10.2337/dc08-0577
8. Snieder H Sawtell PA Ross L Walker J Spector TD Leslie RD HbA(1c) levels are genetically determined even in type 1 diabetes: evidence from healthy and diabetic twins Diabetes 2001 50 12 2858 63 10.2337/diabetes.50.12.2858 11723071
Snieder H, Sawtell PA, Ross L, Walker J, Spector TD, Leslie RD. HbA(1c) levels are genetically determined even in type 1 diabetes: evidence from healthy and diabetic twins. Diabetes. 2001;50(12):2858–63.11723071 10.2337/diabetes.50.12.2858
9. McCarter RJ Hempe JM Gomez R Chalew SA Biological variation in HbA1c predicts risk of retinopathy and nephropathy in type 1 diabetes Diabetes Care 2004 27 6 1259 64 10.2337/diacare.27.6.1259 15161772
McCarter RJ, Hempe JM, Gomez R, Chalew SA. Biological variation in HbA1c predicts risk of retinopathy and nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(6):1259–64.15161772 10.2337/diacare.27.6.1259
10. Herman WH Cohen RM Racial and ethnic differences in the relationship between HbA1c and blood glucose: implications for the diagnosis of diabetes J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012 97 4 1067 72 10.1210/jc.2011-1894 22238408
Herman WH, Cohen RM. Racial and ethnic differences in the relationship between HbA1c and blood glucose: implications for the diagnosis of diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(4):1067–72.22238408 10.1210/jc.2011-1894
11. Stauffer ME Fan T Prevalence of anemia in chronic kidney disease in the United States PLoS ONE 2014 9 1 e84943 10.1371/journal.pone.0084943 24392162
Stauffer ME, Fan T. Prevalence of anemia in chronic kidney disease in the United States. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e84943.24392162 10.1371/journal.pone.0084943
12. Tang M Berg A Rhee EP Allegretti AS Nigwekar S Karumanchi SA The impact of Carbamylation and Anemia on HbA1c’s Association with renal outcomes in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease Diabetes Care 2023 46 1 130 7 10.2337/dc22-1399 36399777
Tang M, Berg A, Rhee EP, Allegretti AS, Nigwekar S, Karumanchi SA, et al. The impact of Carbamylation and Anemia on HbA1c’s Association with renal outcomes in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(1):130–7.36399777 10.2337/dc22-1399
13. Hempe JM Gomez R McCarter RJ Jr Chalew SA High and low hemoglobin glycation phenotypes in type 1 diabetes: a challenge for interpretation of glycemic control J Diabetes Complicat 2002 16 5 313 20 10.1016/S1056-8727(01)00227-6
Hempe JM, Gomez R, McCarter RJ Jr., Chalew SA. High and low hemoglobin glycation phenotypes in type 1 diabetes: a challenge for interpretation of glycemic control. J Diabetes Complicat. 2002;16(5):313–20.10.1016/S1056-8727(01)00227-6
14. Hempe JM Yang S Liu S Hsia DS Standardizing the haemoglobin glycation index Endocrinol Diabetes Metabolism 2021 4 4 e00299 10.1002/edm2.299
Hempe JM, Yang S, Liu S, Hsia DS. Standardizing the haemoglobin glycation index. Endocrinol Diabetes Metabolism. 2021;4(4):e00299.10.1002/edm2.299
15. Hempe JM Hsia DS Variation in the hemoglobin glycation index J Diabetes Complicat 2022 36 7 108223 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2022.108223
Hempe JM, Hsia DS. Variation in the hemoglobin glycation index. J Diabetes Complicat. 2022;36(7):108223.10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2022.108223
16. van Steen SC Woodward M Chalmers J Li Q Marre M Cooper ME Haemoglobin glycation index and risk for diabetes-related complications in the action in diabetes and vascular disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled evaluation (ADVANCE) trial Diabetologia 2018 61 4 780 9 10.1007/s00125-017-4539-1 29308539
van Steen SC, Woodward M, Chalmers J, Li Q, Marre M, Cooper ME, et al. Haemoglobin glycation index and risk for diabetes-related complications in the action in diabetes and vascular disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled evaluation (ADVANCE) trial. Diabetologia. 2018;61(4):780–9.29308539 10.1007/s00125-017-4539-1
17. Nakasone Y Miyakoshi T Sakuma T Toda S Yamada Y Oguchi T Hemoglobin glycation index: a novel risk factor for incident chronic kidney disease in an apparently healthy Population J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2024 109 3 e1055 60 10.1210/clinem/dgad638 37931239
Nakasone Y, Miyakoshi T, Sakuma T, Toda S, Yamada Y, Oguchi T, et al. Hemoglobin glycation index: a novel risk factor for incident chronic kidney disease in an apparently healthy Population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024;109(3):e1055–60.37931239 10.1210/clinem/dgad638
18. Lin CH Lai YC Chang TJ Jiang YD Chang YC Chuang LM Hemoglobin glycation index predicts renal function deterioration in patients with type 2 diabetes and a low risk of chronic kidney disease Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022 186 109834 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109834 35314255
Lin CH, Lai YC, Chang TJ, Jiang YD, Chang YC, Chuang LM. Hemoglobin glycation index predicts renal function deterioration in patients with type 2 diabetes and a low risk of chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;186:109834.35314255 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109834
19. Hempe JM Liu S Myers L McCarter RJ Buse JB Fonseca V The hemoglobin glycation index identifies subpopulations with harms or benefits from intensive treatment in the ACCORD trial Diabetes Care 2015 38 6 1067 74 10.2337/dc14-1844 25887355
Hempe JM, Liu S, Myers L, McCarter RJ, Buse JB, Fonseca V. The hemoglobin glycation index identifies subpopulations with harms or benefits from intensive treatment in the ACCORD trial. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(6):1067–74.25887355 10.2337/dc14-1844
20. de Boer IH Rue TC Hall YN Heagerty PJ Weiss NS Himmelfarb J Temporal trends in the prevalence of diabetic kidney disease in the United States JAMA 2011 305 24 2532 9 10.1001/jama.2011.861 21693741
de Boer IH, Rue TC, Hall YN, Heagerty PJ, Weiss NS, Himmelfarb J. Temporal trends in the prevalence of diabetic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA. 2011;305(24):2532–9.21693741 10.1001/jama.2011.861
21. ElSayed NA Aleppo G Aroda VR Bannuru RR Brown FM Bruemmer D 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of Care in Diabetes-2023 Diabetes Care 2023 46 Suppl 1 S19 40 10.2337/dc23-S002 36507649
ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, Bannuru RR, Brown FM, Bruemmer D, et al. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of Care in Diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(Suppl 1):S19–40.36507649 10.2337/dc23-S002
22. Zhang X Wei R Wang X Zhang W Li M Ni T The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among individuals with hypertension Cardiovasc Diabetol 2024 23 1 117 10.1186/s12933-024-02191-5 38566082
Zhang X, Wei R, Wang X, Zhang W, Li M, Ni T, et al. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among individuals with hypertension. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23(1):117.38566082 10.1186/s12933-024-02191-5
23. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report Circulation 2002 106 25 3143 421 10.1161/circ.106.25.3143 12485966
Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP). Expert Panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106(25):3143–421.12485966 10.1161/circ.106.25.3143
24. Krebs-Smith SM Pannucci TE Subar AF Kirkpatrick SI Lerman JL Tooze JA Update of the healthy eating index: HEI-2015 J Acad Nutr Dietetics 2018 118 9 1591 602 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021
Krebs-Smith SM, Pannucci TE, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Lerman JL, Tooze JA, et al. Update of the healthy eating index: HEI-2015. J Acad Nutr Dietetics. 2018;118(9):1591–602.10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021
25. Zhang L Wang M Zhang R Zhong Y Fan H Wang M Hemoglobin glycation index in relationship to the risk of cardiovascular complication in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Diabetes Complicat 2020 34 10 107673 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107673
Zhang L, Wang M, Zhang R, Zhong Y, Fan H, Wang M, et al. Hemoglobin glycation index in relationship to the risk of cardiovascular complication in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Complicat. 2020;34(10):107673.10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107673
26. Rahhal MN Gharaibeh NE Rahimi L Ismail-Beigi F Disturbances in insulin-glucose metabolism in patients with Advanced Renal Disease with and without diabetes J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019 104 11 4949 66 10.1210/jc.2019-00286 31162534
Rahhal MN, Gharaibeh NE, Rahimi L, Ismail-Beigi F. Disturbances in insulin-glucose metabolism in patients with Advanced Renal Disease with and without diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(11):4949–66.31162534 10.1210/jc.2019-00286
27. Shah MS Brownlee M Molecular and Cellular mechanisms of Cardiovascular disorders in Diabetes Circul Res 2016 118 11 1808 29 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.306923
Shah MS, Brownlee M. Molecular and Cellular mechanisms of Cardiovascular disorders in Diabetes. Circul Res. 2016;118(11):1808–29.10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.306923
28. Torimoto K Okada Y Mori H Tanaka Y Relationship between fluctuations in glucose levels measured by continuous glucose monitoring and vascular endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus Cardiovasc Diabetol 2013 12 1 10.1186/1475-2840-12-1 23280391
Torimoto K, Okada Y, Mori H, Tanaka Y. Relationship between fluctuations in glucose levels measured by continuous glucose monitoring and vascular endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013;12:1.23280391 10.1186/1475-2840-12-1
29. Chalew SA McCarter RJ Thomas J Thomson JL Hempe JM A comparison of the glycosylation gap and Hemoglobin Glycation Index in patients with diabetes J Diabetes Complicat 2005 19 4 218 22 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2005.01.004
Chalew SA, McCarter RJ, Thomas J, Thomson JL, Hempe JM. A comparison of the glycosylation gap and Hemoglobin Glycation Index in patients with diabetes. J Diabetes Complicat. 2005;19(4):218–22.10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2005.01.004
30. Cosson E Banu I Cussac-Pillegand C Chen Q Chiheb S Jaber Y Glycation gap is associated with macroproteinuria but not with other complications in patients with type 2 diabetes Diabetes Care 2013 36 7 2070 6 10.2337/dc12-1780 23378625
Cosson E, Banu I, Cussac-Pillegand C, Chen Q, Chiheb S, Jaber Y, et al. Glycation gap is associated with macroproteinuria but not with other complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(7):2070–6.23378625 10.2337/dc12-1780
31. Rhee EJ Cho JH Kwon H Park SE Park CY Oh KW Association between coronary artery calcification and the Hemoglobin Glycation Index: the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017 102 12 4634 41 10.1210/jc.2017-01723 29029196
Rhee EJ, Cho JH, Kwon H, Park SE, Park CY, Oh KW, et al. Association between coronary artery calcification and the Hemoglobin Glycation Index: the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(12):4634–41.29029196 10.1210/jc.2017-01723
32. Marini MA Fiorentino TV Succurro E Pedace E Andreozzi F Sciacqua A Association between hemoglobin glycation index with insulin resistance and carotid atherosclerosis in non-diabetic individuals PLoS ONE 2017 12 4 e0175547 10.1371/journal.pone.0175547 28426788
Marini MA, Fiorentino TV, Succurro E, Pedace E, Andreozzi F, Sciacqua A, et al. Association between hemoglobin glycation index with insulin resistance and carotid atherosclerosis in non-diabetic individuals. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(4):e0175547.28426788 10.1371/journal.pone.0175547
33. van Steen SC Schrieks IC Hoekstra JB Lincoff AM Tardif JC Mellbin LG The haemoglobin glycation index as predictor of diabetes-related complications in the AleCardio trial Eur J Prev Cardiol 2017 24 8 858 66 10.1177/2047487317692664 28186441
van Steen SC, Schrieks IC, Hoekstra JB, Lincoff AM, Tardif JC, Mellbin LG, et al. The haemoglobin glycation index as predictor of diabetes-related complications in the AleCardio trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24(8):858–66.28186441 10.1177/2047487317692664
34. Yang J, Shangguan Q, Xie G, Yang M, Sheng G. Sex-specific associations between haemoglobin glycation index and the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in individuals with pre-diabetes and diabetes: a large prospective cohort study. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism; 2024.
35. Wei X Chen X Zhang Z Wei J Hu B Long N Risk analysis of the association between different hemoglobin glycation index and poor prognosis in critical patients with coronary heart disease-A study based on the MIMIC-IV database Cardiovasc Diabetol 2024 23 1 113 10.1186/s12933-024-02206-1 38555454
Wei X, Chen X, Zhang Z, Wei J, Hu B, Long N, et al. Risk analysis of the association between different hemoglobin glycation index and poor prognosis in critical patients with coronary heart disease-A study based on the MIMIC-IV database. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23(1):113.38555454 10.1186/s12933-024-02206-1
36. Cheng MD Tang JN Liu ZY Guo QQ Zhang JC Zhang ZL Association of hemoglobin glycation index with prognosis of coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective cohort study Diabetes Vasc Dis Res 2023 20 4 14791641231193306 10.1177/14791641231193306
Cheng MD, Tang JN, Liu ZY, Guo QQ, Zhang JC, Zhang ZL, et al. Association of hemoglobin glycation index with prognosis of coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res. 2023;20(4):14791641231193306.10.1177/14791641231193306
37. Yu TM Lin CL Chang SN Sung FC Kao CH Increased risk of stroke in patients with chronic kidney disease after recurrent hypoglycemia Neurology 2014 83 8 686 94 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000711 25031280
Yu TM, Lin CL, Chang SN, Sung FC, Kao CH. Increased risk of stroke in patients with chronic kidney disease after recurrent hypoglycemia. Neurology. 2014;83(8):686–94.25031280 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000711
38. Rhee CM Kovesdy CP Kalantar-Zadeh K Glucose homeostasis, hypoglycemia, and the burnt-out diabetes phenomenon in kidney disease Semin Nephrol 2021 41 2 96 103 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2021.03.004 34140100
Rhee CM, Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Glucose homeostasis, hypoglycemia, and the burnt-out diabetes phenomenon in kidney disease. Semin Nephrol. 2021;41(2):96–103.34140100 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2021.03.004
39. Wu JD Liang DL Xie Y Chen MY Chen HH Sun D Association between Hemoglobin Glycation Index and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and all cause mortality in type 2 Diabetic patients: a Meta-analysis Front Cardiovasc Med 2021 8 690689 10.3389/fcvm.2021.690689 34124211
Wu JD, Liang DL, Xie Y, Chen MY, Chen HH, Sun D, et al. Association between Hemoglobin Glycation Index and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and all cause mortality in type 2 Diabetic patients: a Meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:690689.34124211 10.3389/fcvm.2021.690689
40. Østergaard HB Mandrup-Poulsen T Berkelmans GFN van der Graaf Y Visseren FLJ Westerink J Limited benefit of haemoglobin glycation index as risk factor for cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes patients Diabetes Metab 2019 45 3 254 60 10.1016/j.diabet.2018.04.006 29784563
Østergaard HB, Mandrup-Poulsen T, Berkelmans GFN, van der Graaf Y, Visseren FLJ, Westerink J. Limited benefit of haemoglobin glycation index as risk factor for cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Metab. 2019;45(3):254–60.29784563 10.1016/j.diabet.2018.04.006
41. Kim MK Jeong JS Yun JS Kwon HS Baek KH Song KH Hemoglobin glycation index predicts cardiovascular disease in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 10-year longitudinal cohort study J Diabetes Complicat 2018 32 10 906 10 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.08.007
Kim MK, Jeong JS, Yun JS, Kwon HS, Baek KH, Song KH, et al. Hemoglobin glycation index predicts cardiovascular disease in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 10-year longitudinal cohort study. J Diabetes Complicat. 2018;32(10):906–10.10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.08.007
42. Basu S Raghavan S Wexler DJ Berkowitz SA Characteristics Associated with decreased or increased mortality risk from glycemic therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes and High Cardiovascular Risk: machine learning analysis of the ACCORD Trial Diabetes Care 2018 41 3 604 12 10.2337/dc17-2252 29279299
Basu S, Raghavan S, Wexler DJ, Berkowitz SA. Characteristics Associated with decreased or increased mortality risk from glycemic therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes and High Cardiovascular Risk: machine learning analysis of the ACCORD Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(3):604–12.29279299 10.2337/dc17-2252
