
==== Front
Nat Commun
Nat Commun
Nature Communications
2041-1723
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39256348
51954
10.1038/s41467-024-51954-x
Perspective
Whale recovery and the emerging human-wildlife conflict over Antarctic krill
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7318-4977
Savoca Matthew S. msavoca13@gmail.com

1
Kumar Mehr 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2057-3741
Sylvester Zephyr 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6302-905X
Czapanskiy Max F. 13
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6804-9896
Meyer Bettina 456
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4170-7294
Goldbogen Jeremy A. 1
Brooks Cassandra M. 2
1 https://ror.org/00f54p054 grid.168010.e 0000 0004 1936 8956 Department of Oceans, Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA USA
2 https://ror.org/02ttsq026 grid.266190.a 0000 0000 9621 4564 Department of Environmental Studies, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO USA
3 grid.205975.c 0000 0001 0740 6917 Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA USA
4 https://ror.org/032e6b942 grid.10894.34 0000 0001 1033 7684 Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
5 https://ror.org/033n9gh91 grid.5560.6 0000 0001 1009 3608 Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
6 grid.5560.6 0000 0001 1009 3608 Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity (HIFMB), University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
10 9 2024
10 9 2024
2024
15 770820 9 2023
20 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
The Southern Ocean ecosystem has undergone extensive changes in the past two centuries driven by industrial sealing and whaling, climate change and commercial fishing. However, following the end of commercial whaling, some populations of whales in this region are recovering. Baleen whales are reliant on Antarctic krill, which is also the largest Southern Ocean fishery. Since 1993, krill catch has increased fourfold, buoyed by nutritional supplement and aquaculture industries. In this Perspective, we approximate baleen whale consumption of Antarctic krill before and after whaling to examine if the ecosystem can support both humans and whales as krill predators. Our back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that current krill biomass cannot support both an expanding krill fishery and the recovery of whale populations to pre-whaling sizes, highlighting an emerging human-wildlife conflict. We then provide recommendations for enhancing sustainability in this region by reducing encounters with whales and bolstering the krill population.

The Southern Ocean ecosystem is recovering from 20th-century industrial whaling, while the krill fishery in this region has grown rapidly and may expand further, driven by demand for supplements and aquaculture feed. This Perspective discusses how current krill biomass is unlikely to support both a growing krill fishery and rebounding whale populations in the Southern Ocean.

Subject terms

Conservation biology
Marine biology
Fisheries
issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Humanity exerts pressure on the oceans at a global scale. The pernicious but diffuse threats from climate change are causing major transformations of the Southern Ocean ecosystem. By comparison, overharvesting of marine resources is a direct stressor that can be mitigated through regionally targeted management and regulation. The Southern Ocean is still recovering from two centuries of unsustainable exploitation, beginning with sealing in the 19th-century and then industrial whaling in the 20th-century. Following industrial whaling, the commercial fishery for Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba, hereafter “krill”) began in 1973, mainly for fish meal (largely for farmed salmon) and omega-3 supplements. Reported krill catch of the fishery has wavered since then, but has never exceeded 0.6 Mt yr−1 1. The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), the multilateral organization in charge of managing all Southern Ocean fisheries (Box 1), came into force in 1982 over trepidation regarding the ecosystem impacts of a developing krill fishery, including concerns that fishing could impede the recovery of whales and seals2. Over the last four decades, krill catch has become increasingly concentrated in the southwest Atlantic, overlapping in space and time with Antarctic predators, including whales3–5.

Krill are a vital mid-trophic link in the Southern Ocean food web. They are a highly versatile, long-lived (5–7 years on average) pelagic crustacean that primarily feed on diatoms and other small crustaceans, including cannibalizing other krill6. In addition to being a central node of the Southern Ocean food web, krill also play important roles in biogeochemical cycles by (1) transporting carbon downward via their fast-sinking fecal pellets, molts, and carcasses7–9, and (2) moving limiting iron upward into the photic zone via benthic feeding and vertical migration10. Krill often exists as a superorganism, in large, dense swarms. It is these krill swarms that are vital to Antarctic predators, particularly baleen whales11,12.

In this Perspective, we address the emerging human-wildlife conflict between whales and the krill fishery with an assessment of baleen whale prey demands using rough calculations of available data. CCAMLR’s Convention requires proactive protection of krill-dependent species from potential threats including, but not limited to, fishing activity13. While baleen whales are never explicitly mentioned in the Convention, they are krill-dependent species. In the following sections, we first detail the relevant ecological and industrial history of the Southern Ocean, explaining how baleen whales and commercial fisheries have come into conflict over krill. We then use published data to provide rudimentary estimates of the prey demands of baleen whales, using feeding data from ref. 14 and species-specific population sizes before11 and after12,15–17 whaling. Pre-exploitation baleen whale prey consumption estimates serve as a proxy for estimating the krill demands of fully recovered populations (see Supplementary Note 1 for more details). There are numerous data gaps that preclude a formal analysis of baleen whale prey consumption at spatiotemporal scales relevant to the krill fishery. These gaps include limited information on the number of heavy feeding days of each whale species, no data on feeding rates of Southern Ocean fin (Balaenoptera physalus) and blue whales (B. musculus), and an unknown number of individuals of each species the ecosystem could support (i.e., carrying capacity) to inform recovery targets. Therefore, our first-order approximation should be interpreted cautiously. We hope the present paper urges the research and management communities to address these, and many other, knowledge gaps before allowing any expansion of the krill fishery. As baleen whales continue to rebound in the 21st-century, understanding their prey requirements is vital to determine whether current or increasing krill harvests can coexist with the rising prey demand of the whales. We conclude by outlining steps that can be taken, either voluntarily or through CCAMLR regulation, to help avoid this human-wildlife conflict and ensure a sustainable future for the whales, krill, and people who depend on the Southern Ocean.

Box 1 Management, power and inequity in the Southern Ocean Since the late 19th-century, access to the Southern Ocean and Antarctica has been determined by a positive feedback loop of wealth, exploitation, and power. The Antarctic Treaty (adopted in 1959, in effect since 1961), the first of a suite of agreements collectively known as the Antarctic Treaty System, was created by 12 States, spearheaded by the USA. The Treaty is subject to consensus-based decision-making by a group of Consultative Parties. The Treaty entrenches inequity through codifying costly prerequisites to participate in decision making for the region as it requires countries to demonstrate interest by “conducting substantial research activity” in Antarctica113. Currently, 17 States have qualified under this requirement, joining the 12 original member States as voting members. Of these 29 States with decision-making power, only 9 are Global South States.

The CCAMLR is the arm of the Antarctic Treaty System that applies to marine life and has a similar membership requirement: a State must be “engaged in research or harvesting activities in relation to the marine living resources to which the convention applies” (CCAMLR Convention Article VII.2 b)13. Although only a limited number of States are currently active in the Southern Ocean krill fishery, namely Chile, China, Norway, South Korea, and Ukraine (with Russia recently notifying their intention to restart fishing), the impacts of a collapsed Southern Ocean ecosystem effects all countries. In this context, the financially demanding requirement of conducting research activity or fishing operations for States to have a voice in decision-making represents an undue burden and continues to entrench a history of Antarctic imperialism and exclusion. While this was a topic of concern raised by Global South nations in the 1980s, the requirement still exists114. Given the global value of the Southern Ocean, a global community which includes Global South nations needs to have a voice in its management.

Whales and whaling in the Southern Ocean

Rorqual whales (baleen whales in the family Balaenopteridae)—including blue, fin, humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae), and Antarctic minke (B. bonaerensis) whales—maximize krill ingestion via bulk filtration with a process known as lunge-feeding18. During periods of intense feeding, a rorqual can lunge 200–1200 times and consume several tons of krill per day14. Antarctic blue whales (B. m. intermedia), the largest blue whale subspecies, feed exclusively on krill and all other baleen whales south of the Antarctic Convergence are reliant on krill as their main prey item19. Baleen whales generally migrate to lower latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere where they stay during austral winter and spring to breed and time their return to the Southern Ocean to coincide with maximum krill availability20,21. Outside their Southern Ocean feeding grounds, rorquals may not feed for months at a time19. This life history, unique among endotherms that do not hibernate, is possible due to low mass-specific metabolic rates at extreme body size22 and endogenous stores of energy-rich blubber that made whales valuable to hunt.

At the turn of the 20th century, scientists described a Southern Ocean where “Whales’ backs and blasts were seen from horizon to horizon… The sea was swarming with Euphausia…”23. Both sights are rare today, which could be a synergistic effect because large aggregations of foraging whales led to surface swarming behavior of krill24. In 1904, Antarctic whaling began in earnest, initially led by Norwegian and Argentinian whaling interests (Fig. 1). Motivations for whaling were largely driven by the market for whale oil. However, in the Antarctic, whaling also served the purpose of staking and supporting sovereignty claims25 (Box 1). Humpback whales, the most coastal of the large species, were hunted first. The larger and more profitable blue and fin whales were also intensely harvested close to nearshore feeding grounds26, while the offshore feeding grounds of these species were initially safe from harvesting due to their remoteness. When ‘floating factory’ whaling ships were introduced in 192526, the pelagic realm was no longer a safe haven. Fifty years later—roughly the lifespan of a rorqual whale—less than 20% of humpback and sei (B. borealis) whales, 5% of fin whales, and 0.5% of blue whales remained11,27. Of the 1.5 million baleen whales killed in the 20th-century27, >90% were harvested by only four countries – Norway, United Kingdom, Japan, and the Soviet Union (Fig. 1).Fig. 1 Industrial whaling and krill fishing by nation.

A Timeline of Southern Ocean whaling and krill fishing, with krill fishing occurring in recent decades shown with a transparent filter and outlined in black. B 90.4% of the 1.5 million baleen whales killed in the Southern Ocean were harvested by only four countries (11 nations total have harvested whales in the Southern Ocean). C 91.2% of all krill ever harvested in the Southern Ocean has been caught by only four nations (22 nations total have reported krill catch). Whaling data from ref. 111, krill data from ref. 1. Fin and blue whale illustrations by Alex Boersma, krill illustration from the authors.

The whaling industry suggested regulating catches as early as 193228; however, no catch limits were agreed upon until 194426,29. These initial quotas were species agnostic and instead created the Blue Whale Unit (BWU) based on oil yield from one average blue whale, where one BWU was equivalent to one blue whale, two fin whales, or two and a half humpback whales. In 1946, the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling stipulated the formation of the International Whaling Commission (IWC). That same year, the IWC established the first international catch quotas of 16,000 BWUs28,29, which were unsustainably high and did not protect the severely depleted humpback and blue whale populations. In the 1960s, bans on hunting humpback (1963) and blue (1964) whales were enacted29, although the Soviet Union continued whaling these species illegally until the 1980s30,31. Finally in 1982, IWC passed a total moratorium on commercial whaling which took effect in 1986. By then however, Southern Hemisphere baleen whale populations—with the exception of Antarctic minke whale—were depleted by >90% as compared to the pre-whaling baseline23,28.

In 1994, the IWC designated the Southern Ocean a whale sanctuary, further prohibiting whaling by signatories of the moratorium in this region. Japan continued ‘scientific whaling’ for decades following the commercial whaling ban, harvesting several hundred whales per year, mostly Antarctic minke whales. However, after intense public pressure, and a ruling against Japan in the International Court of Justice32, Japan left the IWC and ceased Southern Ocean whaling following the 2018–2019 season33. Thus, the entirety of Antarctic whaling lasted little more than a century. The cumulative biomass of the whales killed was estimated to be equivalent to one-third of all people34, and twice that of all wild mammals, on Earth at the turn of the 21st-century35.

Can Southern Ocean krill support humans and whales?

Following the IWC moratorium, krill populations in the Southern Ocean were expected to boom as a result of the reduced predation pressure from the significantly depleted whale populations (i.e., the ‘krill surplus hypothesis’36). Estimates of the circumpolar krill stock before whaling vary widely, from 44 Mt to 1350 Mt (reviewed by ref. 37). The higher end of these estimates would support both a full recovery of whale populations and a robust krill fishery, and is what was likely needed to support the estimated prey demand of pre-whaling rorqual populations14,19,38. Yet today, the total biomass of the same krill population is estimated at <400 Mt, but large uncertainties persist37,39,40. Nevertheless, krill is still by far the largest fishery in the Southern Ocean in terms of tonnage caught1.

After a 15-year lull in fishing effort (1993–2007) following the collapse of the Soviet Union, annual krill catches have increased rapidly since 2007 (Fig. 1A). The burgeoning fish meal and omega-3 supplement industries are largely responsible for this renewed interest in krill, rather than human consumption41. Currently, the total allowable krill catch across the Southern Ocean is 8.6 Mt yr−1, but reported krill catch is <10% of this upper limit1. Functionally, the 620,000 t  yr−1 ‘trigger limit’—a precautionary level to prevent an overconcentration of fishing effort—in the Southwest Atlantic sector (CCAMLR Subareas 48.1–48.4) is the maximum catch at present to protect krill-dependent species (Supplementary Note 2). However, krill catch is becoming increasingly concentrated in space and time42,43, leading to direct overlap with foraging whales3,44,45.

The estimated krill biomass in 2018–2019 from CCAMLR Subareas 48.1–48.4, which is where the vast majority of Southern Ocean resource extraction such as sealing, whaling, and krill-fishing has occurred, is 62.6 million tonnes (with a 13% coefficient of variation, CV)46. In the past two decades, all krill harvested have been taken from the waters surrounding the Antarctic Peninsula, South Shetland Islands, South Orkney Islands, and South Georgia Island (CCAMLR Subareas 48.1–48.3). Harvest limits are defined using a set of rules to account for krill replenishment and predator demand (Supplementary Note 2)47. Current krill catch in this region is ~0.5 Mt yr−1 but increasing. This is particularly true in Subarea 48.2 where catch has risen rapidly, from 37 Kt yr−1 from 2012 to 2016 to 193 Kt yr−1 from 2020 to 20221.

Krill demand has been estimated for seabirds, pinnipeds, and whales in portions of CCAMLR Subareas 48.1–48.4. In Subarea 48.1, 1,858,201 (CV: 0.156) crabeater (Lobodon carcinophaga), 151,702 (CV: 0.364) Weddell (Leptonychotes weddellii), and 5279 (CV: 0.408) leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) are estimated to consume 1.28 Mt krill yr−1 (CV: 3.4)48. These important krill consumers’ prey demand is not explicitly considered by CCAMLR, though France has initiated a monitoring program for crabeater seals with the intention to contribute to CCAMLR’s management49. Of seabirds, penguins are the major krill consumers; their estimated krill consumption is 5 Mt yr−1 in the Scotia Sea50 and 0.6 Mt yr−1 in the northwest Antarctic Peninsula alone51. Whale prey consumption has also been estimated for the northwest Antarctic Peninsula, where fin and humpback whales combined are estimated to consume ~2 Mt krill yr−1 51. In this Perspective, we estimate that current populations of these two species consume 18 Mt krill yr−1 (range: 10–31 Mt krill  yr−1) in Subareas 48.1–48.4 (Fig. 2, Table 1). Humpback whale populations in this region (Breeding Stocks A and G) have shown a > 90% recovery to carrying capacity from a low of 450 individuals in the mid 20th-century12,15,52. This is in stark contrast to fin and blue whales, though recent evidence shows signs of increasing populations15,16,53,54. Before whaling, when blue, fin, and humpback whales were at carrying capacity in this region, we estimate their combined abundance was ~180,000, which we estimate may have consumed 51 Mt krill yr−1 (range: 28–90 Mt krill yr−1; Fig. 2, Table 1). This consumption rate may have been sustainable by ecosystem engineering effects of the whales themselves, boosting primary productivity from the recycling of limiting nutrients in their fecal material24,55,56. However, at present, our estimates suggest that there is likely not enough krill in Subareas 48.1–48.4 (~63 Mt46) to support recovered whale populations, which would require total krill biomass much larger than they consume annually, even in the total absence of krill fishing.Fig. 2 Using the past and present to guide the future of the Southern Ocean.

On the left, is CCAMLR Subareas 48.1–48.4 (purple shaded region at top of inset map) before whaling where more krill would have been needed to support the prey demands of approximately 180,000 blue (at top left), fin, and humpback (bottom left) whales, in addition to other krill predators. On the right is a representation of the same region, but in the early 21st-century where a reduced krill population46,112 supports a partially recovered fin whale population (at top right), a near-fully recovered humpback whale population, an expanding krill fishery, and a still-depleted blue whale population (bottom right). We generated krill consumption estimates by combining published information on whale feeding behavior with past and present estimates of population size (see Table 1 and Supplementary Note 1 for details). The annual catch of the Antarctic krill fishery is more than the estimated annual prey demand of the current blue whale population in this region. The regions we discuss in the paper are highlighted in purple; the polar front is shown in green. Fin and humpback whale illustrations by Alex Boersma, the rest are by the authors.

Table 1 Estimated rorqual krill consumption for regions of interest

Species	CCAMLR region	Era	Estimated individual krill consumption (t d−1)	Estimated days feeding	Estimated population size	Estimated population krill consumption (Mt yr−1)	
Humpback whale

(M. novaeangliae)

	Subareas 48.1–48.4	Historic	3.15

(1.81–4.93)

	100

(90–120)

	25,973	8.03

(4.23–14.73)

	
Modern	3.15

(1.81–4.93)

	100

(90–120)

	24,900	7.69

(4.06–12.28)

	
Fin whale

(B. physalus)

	Historic	2.06

(1.25–3.12)

	100

(90–120)

	104,745	21.58

(11.78–39.22)

	
Modern	2.06

(1.25–3.12)

	100

(90–120)

	50,837	10.47

(5.72–19.03)

	
Antarctic blue whale

(B. m. intermedia)

	Historic	4.19

(2.68–6.04)

	100

(90–120)

	50,345	21.09

(12.14–36.49)

	
Modern	4.19

(2.68–6.04)

	100

(90–120)

	925	0.39

(0.22–6.70)

	
Antarctic blue whale

(B. m. intermedia)

	Division 58.4.2	Historic	4.19

(2.68–6.04)

	100

(90–120)

	61,363	25.71

(14.80–44.48)

	
Modern	4.19

(2.68–6.04)

	100

(90–120)

	476	0.2

(0.11–3.45)

	
Estimates of humpback, fin, and blue whale krill consumption in CCAMLR regions with prior (Division 58.4.2) and current (Subareas 48.1–48.4) krill fishing. Individual daily krill consumption from ref. 56. Estimated range of days feeding from refs. 19,109. Modern population sizes from the published literature for M. novaeangliae12, B. physalus16, and B. m. intermedia15,110. Historic population sizes derived from ref. 11. For more details on the calculations, see Supplementary Note 1.

While there is currently only krill fishing in the Southwest Atlantic sector, other regions of the Southern Ocean have been considered for exploitation as well. CCAMLR Division 58.4.2 (Fig. 2) has an annual krill catch quota of 2.6 Mt yr−1; however, the current catch limit is capped at 452,000 t yr−1, akin to the ‘trigger limit’ in Subareas 48.1–48.41. The eastern half of this Division has an estimated krill standing stock of 4.8 Mt57; extrapolating to the entire Division, it is unlikely that this region has more than 10 Mt krill in total at present. Recent work using population modeling derived from whaling data reported a carrying capacity of 61,363 (95% CI: 46,343–85,163) blue whales in this region17; combined with estimates of prey consumption14, a population this size in Division 58.4.2 might consume 26 Mt krill yr−1 (range: 15–44 Mt krill  yr-1; Table 1). As with Subareas 48.1–48.4, the current krill stock in Division 58.4.2 would be unable to support historic whale numbers even in the total absence of krill fishing.

In addition to krill catch being geographically compressed, transshipments of catch allow these vessels to fish with little interruption when conditions allow. This spells trouble for whales because the fishing boats can act as bulk-feeding super-predators, thus occupying the same niche as the whales. Of greatest concern is the 16,100 km2 region known as South Orkney West (SOW) located in Subarea 48.2, northwest of Coronation Island, an important whale feeding ground16,58. SOW represents <2% of all of Subarea 48.2, but >96% of all krill fishing in the entire Subarea occurs there43. Since 2000, nearly 30% of all krill harvested from the entire Southern Ocean has been from SOW43. In 2022, active krill fishing was observed in SOW among a foraging fin whale supergroup3. These factors place SOW at the epicenter of the emerging conflict between whales and commercial interests over krill.

A vision for the future of whales, krill, and people

Whalers referred to krill as ‘whale food’ and knew that finding krill swarms often meant finding whales to harvest59. It is possible that similar logic, but in reverse, may be used by the krill fishery today3. Without specific regulations in place, krill fishing vessels can ‘forage’ by locating and harvesting the largest, densest patches. These same dense krill swarms are crucial for rorqual whales; dispersed krill are not energetically viable60–63. Competition is not the only threat to whales from the fishery, there are also the threats of ship strike from fishing vessels in close proximity to whales3 and entanglement in fishing gear64. In early 2021, the krill fishery reported the deaths of three humpback whales as bycatch (two from Subarea 48.1 and one from Subarea 48.2), the first known examples of direct mortality from the fishery64. These bycatch events led to the implementation of barriers at the mouth of the net to mitigate whale bycatch65, and yet another humpback whale became entangled and died in 2022 (the following season)66. Unless new management measures are passed by CCAMLR or voluntarily agreed upon by the fishing industry (Supplementary Note 2), these interactions between whales and the krill fishery will likely increase as whales recover from whaling and fishing effort becomes increasingly concentrated in specific regions1. In addition, climate change is expected to exacerbate this conflict as krill contracts poleward67–69. To provide refuge from these stressors, restricting or precluding fishing in regions lacking data (e.g., information on krill abundance, recruitment, movement and/or predator abundance and krill requirements), with limited commercial interest (e.g., the South Sandwich Islands), or of known whale foraging aggregations (e.g., SOW, Elephant Island, the Gerlache and Bransfield Straits) would be prudent68,69. Further, variability in krill density among years should be considered by CCAMLR to reduce the likelihood of competition between the fishery and whales.

The Association of Responsible Krill Harvesting Companies (ARK; which includes the majority of krill fishing companies) agreed to several voluntary exclusion zones within 40 km of large colonies of central place foraging penguins and pinnipeds in Subarea 48.1 to mitigate harm to these krill-dependent predators70. Moreover, the government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands has closed krill fishing from November through March to prevent conflict between krill-predators and the fishery71. The effectiveness of these measures on krill predators should be closely monitored and reported. This protection of Subarea 48.3 and the adherence of the voluntary exclusion zones in Subarea 48.1 provides hope that, even in the face of CCAMLR’s inability to reach consensus on conservation strategies (Supplementary Note 2), progress can still be made. Below we highlight conservation measures that would potentially help mitigate harmful interactions between whales and the fishery and help uphold CCAMLR’s legal responsibility of precautionary ecosystem-based management.

Include whale prey demand and population recovery in krill catch limits

Currently, the prey consumption of all krill-dependent species such as penguins, pinnipeds, and whales are roughly factored into the decision rules that help determine the precautionary catch limits for krill as the amount of krill considered to escape fishing pressures (see Supplementary Note 2 for explanation of how precautionary catch limits are determined under current management). This “escapement level” is general and does not consider the needs of any specific species, including whales. Moreover, the trajectory of baleen whale populations must be considered. With a few notable exceptions72,73, populations of other major krill consumers (seabirds and pinnipeds) have been relatively stable or declined since the advent of CCAMLR74–77. In contrast, baleen whale populations have grown significantly. Humpback whale populations have almost fully recovered across much of the Southern Ocean, but the same is not true of blue whales15,17. Meanwhile, fin whale populations have just begun to grow rapidly16,53. Both blue and fin whales have potentially substantial population recoveries ahead.

Including whale prey requirements, as well as other krill-dependent species, in management is crucial but has not been done explicitly yet. As whale populations rebound, it is essential that CCAMLR includes recovered (humpback whales) and recovering (blue and fin) whales as monitoring species (Box 2). CCAMLR and the IWC should work together to quantify and include whale prey requirements in any updated krill harvesting regulations. This comes at a time when CCAMLR is currently moving towards revised and refined management for Antarctic krill (Supplementary Note 2). A key aspect to the revised approach is to spatially allocate the precautionary catch limit between smaller management units within sub-areas by including a spatial analysis to reduce any potential impact based on overlap of krill and predators. Additional efforts to conduct a management evaluation assessment of the decision rules regarding escapement, such has been begun within the toothfish fishery68, would greatly improve adequate inclusion of predator requirements for the revised krill management. Concurrent to these efforts, CCAMLR’s Scientific Committee has recommended increased future monitoring on dependent predator species, including cetaceans78. CCAMLR’s Ecosystem Monitoring Program (CEMP), which was designed to detect the impacts of fishing on krill-dependent species, is also being updated as it has not been effectively used in krill management thus far79. CEMP currently includes penguins, tube-nosed (Procellariiform) seabirds, and some pinnipeds, though notably not crabeater seals––due to challenges recording ice-associated seals. However, these seals, which have the largest krill demand of any pinniped, must also be monitored (see above comment about new contributions to crabeater seal monitoring). In addition, CEMP’s list of monitoring species should be expanded to include baleen whales (Box 2).

Box 2 Targets for sustainable use and recovery of the Southern Ocean ecosystem Strengthen spatial management Establish or expand no-take areas; implement move-on rule in the presence of foraging whales. Move-on rule is defined as: a regulation or guideline that triggers the targeted closure of an area in a fishery for a temporary period, without closing the entire fishery115.

Improve monitoring Increase data on krill egg and larvae hotspots, recruitment locations, year-class strength, and adult length distributions; conduct regular monitoring and reporting of whale population trends; quantify direct overlap between whales and the krill fishery; project changes to regions of overlap with climate change.

Mandate CCAMLR-IWC ties Continue Working Group on Incidental Mortality Associated with Fishing; add whales as CCAMLR’s Ecosystem Monitoring Program (CEMP) indicator species; include whale prey requirements in fishery’s precautionary catch limits; encourage policy coordination.

Enhance accountability Use the UN High Seas Treaty104 as an instrument to assess whether CCAMLR is meeting its mandate of conservation, “rational use”, and precautionary, ecosystem-based management.

Incorporate global viewpoints Include Global South States that receive little benefit from tourism and fisheries, but are indirectly impacted by a degraded Southern Ocean, in decision-making.

CCAMLR, Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources; IWC, International Whaling Commission

Avoid fishing in the presence of whales

CCAMLR re-convened its Scientific Committee’s Working Group on Incidental Mortality Associated with Fishing (WG-IMAF) for the first time in 11 years in response to the lethal bycatch of three humpback whales in the 2020–2021 season, along with increasing concerns over incidental mortality of seabirds and seals44. To reduce cetacean interactions, a variety of management tools and approaches were discussed by WG-IMAF, including: acoustic deterrent devices, sonars to detect cetaceans, marine mammal exclusion devices, and other mitigation measures to decrease risks of entanglement and bycatch44. Further, the company which incidentally caught the juvenile whales made voluntary modifications and reinforcements to their marine mammal exclusion devices on their nets44,66. While this is a start, and reflects actions being taken by regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs)80, they fall short of suggesting the fishery prevents setting gear in the presence of whales68. Yet, there is precedent for implementing measures that forbid fishing or setting nets on and in the presence of cetaceans in other fisheries management bodies. For example, some tuna RFMOs require avoiding encircling dolphins80. Others require parties to eliminate incidental catch of cetaceans during fishing operations (e.g., the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean)80. Given how large and visible whales are, particularly pods of whales, implementing a measure to avoid fishing in the presence of large whales is a critical rule to implement immediately. In addition to visual observations, infrared cameras could be used to avoid whales when visibility is poor81. With technology rapidly improving, a combination of high-resolution satellite imagery and vessel tracking via automatic identification systems82 can remotely monitor compliance to such regulations. CCAMLR’s work on setting conservation measures to avoid incidental catch of seabirds is commendable, and shows that management can act quickly to allow the co-existence of seabirds and fishing83,84. Here, we reiterate the recommendation of immediate implementation of a move-on rule if whales are detected within a set distance (e.g., 100 m) of fishing operations68.

Dynamic approaches have been applied successfully elsewhere to reduce whale-ship interactions85,86. Forecasts of whale presence could be created using environmental data and whale-habitat relationships; those areas could be avoided for fishing at times when a high degree of whale presence is predicted. If data to inform these models are unavailable, more rudimentary dynamic approaches can be applied. For example, whaling records and modern observations indicate that whales feed heavily and gain weight rapidly within the first two months of returning to Antarctic waters (late November through mid-January)87,88, while other work indicates late season feeding prior to the onset of northward migration53,89. More precise information about what regions and times are most important to foraging baleen whales is needed. During particularly sensitive times, krill fishing can be avoided or monitored more closely. Future research can also determine what percentage of baleen whale foraging habitat is included in the voluntary exclusion zones implemented by ARK during these hyperphagic periods. Additional exclusion zones should also be implemented around Elephant, Clarence, and the South Orkney Islands, which would benefit land-based predators70 as well as fin whales which are known to aggregate and feed around these islands. Ideally these closures would be mandated via CCAMLR, but voluntary exclusion zones could bridge the gap and be implemented immediately. Even seemingly marginal reductions in foraging opportunities can have outsized impacts on individual and population health of capital breeding species, such as baleen whales90,91. As both krill swarms and whale aggregations are dynamic in space and time, flexible management approaches such as those outlined here are more likely to be successful than conventional static management92.

Eliminate harvesting of sensitive krill life stages

Seasonal distribution of krill shows high abundance in oceanic regions and along the shelf break during summer. In autumn, adult as well as subadult/juvenile krill are concentrated on the shelf along the Antarctic Peninsula93,94. Autumn and winter krill fishing in this region is increasing93. In this context, it is important that krill fishing should avoid sensitive life stages, such as female krill and subadults during autumn and winter, which are the spawners in the upcoming season. The current data collection on krill fishing vessels in autumn and winter measure and sex krill samples every five days (personal observations, B.M.). We believe this approach may no longer be sufficient and can be improved by a daily krill sampling frequency. In addition, upon arrival to a krill swarm, a requirement could be made for the patch to be sampled via an exploratory haul to assess if fishing should proceed based on evidence-based thresholds to protect sensitive krill life stages.

At present, the shelf break around the South Sandwich Islands (in Subarea 48.4) is the only known spawning region in Area 48 that is not impacted by fishing95. Rapid climate change in the Southwest Atlantic has already led to declining krill in their most northern spawning grounds off South Georgia Island67,96,97. More data is needed to design tangible mitigation for this issue. Monitoring approaches would need to be developed for this purpose. This monitoring can be done by observers with the 100% observer coverage across the krill fishing fleet1 in combination with hydroacoustics to identify these critical life stages due to their differences in migration and behaviors98. CCAMLR could use that data to implement measures to reduce fishing on these stages in the specific seasons. Encompassed within this element is the need to generate a krill stock hypothesis99, which is currently under development (Supplementary Note 2). This should also include appropriate data collection for improving krill fishery management.

Conclusions and outlook

Our back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that blue and fin whale populations are likely to be limited by krill availability before they can reach pre-whaling sizes. This is likely to drive increasing conflict between whales and the krill fishery. It should be noted that our whale consumption estimates are rough calculations; they will need deeper evaluation to draw final conclusions. Nonetheless, we hope that they will spur future research and conversation to include baleen whale prey demand and population trajectories in management of the krill stock. CCAMLR has an opportunity and responsibility to refine management so that Antarctic wildlife, including but not limited to whales, is not threatened by human interests including the krill fishery; however, the consensus required for change has allowed political obstinacy and economic interests to trump science to the detriment of people and planet41,100.

However, there is hope. We outline several management strategies to alleviate these conflicts including those that CCAMLR is currently developing (Box 2). A key outstanding question is: who would develop and enforce updated management approaches, especially those concerning whales? CCAMLR’s Convention stipulates that CCAMLR, and its Scientific Committee, should cooperate with the IWC as appropriate (CCAMLR Convention Article XXIII 3). Nevertheless, collaborative management for whales has proved challenging, though this may be changing. In September 2018, a resolution was adopted at the IWC general assembly to take action on whale conservation; however, Japan stated that they wanted to revisit the moratorium and consider sustainable possibilities to resume commercial whaling101. This impasse led to Japan leaving the IWC in 2019. Now, the focus on conservation not only in CCAMLR but also in the IWC might facilitate cooperation between the two organizations. Moreover, CCAMLR’s Scientific Committee has reinstituted its WG-IMAF, which has taken strides to engage with the IWC’s Scientific Committee to receive guidance on addressing whale entanglements.

Further, the fishing industry has shared data to enable monitoring of the krill stock46,102,103. This collaboration will continue to be vital. At present, working directly with ARK to create more voluntary measures based on sound science could implement changes quickly without the need for consensus. However, despite industry support, CCAMLR is unable to adopt these voluntary measures as conservation measures unless they are submitted by members directly and approved by consensus. Notably, there is now a new High Seas Treaty under the United Nations which provides a legal pathway for more comprehensive governance of the high seas, including marine protected areas (MPAs)104. The High Seas Treaty will be required to engage with the respective competent bodies in international waters, so in the Southern Ocean, this would mean CCAMLR and the wider Antarctic Treaty System. However, given CCAMLR’s inability to reach consensus on conservation initiatives in recent years, some have questioned whether it will be considered a competent body under the new High Seas Treaty105. Further, the High Seas Treaty calls for strengthening and enhancing cooperation among relevant legal frameworks, this would include between CCAMLR and the IWC (Box 2). CCAMLR can demonstrate itself as a leader in international spatial management through further strengthening coordination with the IWC, and through implementing krill management measures CCAMLR has been developing for decades alongside specific whale avoidance measures.

While CCAMLR is responsible for managing Antarctic krill, it is important to acknowledge that the Southern Ocean is an international space that provides global benefits41. The Southern Ocean and its biota provide a globally important carbon sink, accounting for 75% of heat uptake and 43% anthropogenic carbon uptake by the ocean globally106. Robust krill populations, supported by whale iron recycling14, drive carbon export in the Southern Ocean7,107,108. Thus, arguably, the global community should have a say in the process and targets of ecosystem recovery (Box 1, Box 2). The tradeoffs of fishing krill to generate luxury products versus the global benefit of keeping krill in the ocean needs to be assessed. Finally, CCAMLR is currently evaluating proposed MPAs in the western Antarctic Peninsula and Weddell Sea regions (encompassing key portions of Area 48), as well as in the East Antarctic (encompassing key portions of Area 58)49. The proposed MPA along the Antarctic Peninsula explicitly considers whales in its design. Safeguarding umbrella species such as baleen whales could afford ecosystem-wide protection68. Conservation strategies that consider the benefits of whales and krill to ocean ecosystems can help preserve the Southern Ocean and its global benefits in the 21st-century and beyond41.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-51954-x.

Acknowledgements

We thank Angus Atkinson for his expertise and assistance applying krill data, biology, and biomass assessments for this paper. Victor Smetacek was helpful in seeding some of the early ideas that led to this work. Phil Trathan for ideas and assistance with revisions. Finally, we thank the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, MAC3 Impact Philanthropies and the Pew Charitable Trusts for their support.

Author contributions

M.S.S. and C.M.B. conceptualized the study; M.S.S., B.M., J.A.G., and C.M.B. framed the paper, and M.S.S. drafted the main text. M.K. drafted Box 1 and several illustrations in Fig. 2; Z.S. drafted Supplementary Note 2; M.F.C. assisted with data analysis and visualization. All authors assisted with editing the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Martin Collins, Lucas Krüger, Elisa Seyboth and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. CCAMLR. Fishery Report: Euphausia superba in Area 48. 1–30 https://fishdocs.ccamlr.org/FishRep_48_KRI_2022.pdf (2023).
2. Hofman RJ Stopping overexploitation of living resources on the high seas Mar. Policy 2019 103 91 100 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.037
Hofman, R. J. Stopping overexploitation of living resources on the high seas. Mar. Policy 103, 91–100 (2019).10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.037
3. Ryan C Commercial krill fishing within a foraging supergroup of fin whales in the Southern Ocean Ecology 2023 104 e4002 10.1002/ecy.4002 36807151
Ryan, C. et al. Commercial krill fishing within a foraging supergroup of fin whales in the Southern Ocean. Ecology 104, e4002 (2023).36807151 10.1002/ecy.4002
4. Hinke JT Identifying risk: concurrent overlap of the antarctic krill fishery with krill-dependent predators in the scotia sea PLoS ONE 2017 12 1 24 10.1371/journal.pone.0170132
Hinke, J. T. et al. Identifying risk: concurrent overlap of the antarctic krill fishery with krill-dependent predators in the scotia sea. PLoS ONE 12, 1–24 (2017).10.1371/journal.pone.0170132
5. Watters GM Hinke JT Reiss CS Long-term observations from Antarctica demonstrate that mismatched scales of fisheries management and predator-prey interaction lead to erroneous conclusions about precaution Sci. Rep. 2020 10 1 9 10.1038/s41598-020-59223-9 31913322
Watters, G. M., Hinke, J. T. & Reiss, C. S. Long-term observations from Antarctica demonstrate that mismatched scales of fisheries management and predator-prey interaction lead to erroneous conclusions about precaution. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–9 (2020).31913322 10.1038/s41598-020-59223-9
6. Siegel, V. Biology and Ecology of Antarctic Krill 10.1007/978-3-319-29279-3 (2016).
7. Belcher A Krill faecal pellets drive hidden pulses of particulate organic carbon in the marginal ice zone Nat. Commun. 2019 10 889 10.1038/s41467-019-08847-1 30792498
Belcher, A. et al. Krill faecal pellets drive hidden pulses of particulate organic carbon in the marginal ice zone. Nat. Commun. 10, 889 (2019).30792498 10.1038/s41467-019-08847-1
8. Manno C Continuous moulting by Antarctic krill drives major pulses of carbon export in the north Scotia Sea, Southern Ocean Nat. Commun. 2020 11 6051 10.1038/s41467-020-19956-7 33247126
Manno, C. et al. Continuous moulting by Antarctic krill drives major pulses of carbon export in the north Scotia Sea, Southern Ocean. Nat. Commun. 11, 6051 (2020).33247126 10.1038/s41467-020-19956-7
9. Cavan EL The importance of Antarctic krill in biogeochemical cycles Nat. Commun. 2019 10 1 13 30602773
Cavan, E. L. et al. The importance of Antarctic krill in biogeochemical cycles. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–13 (2019).30602773
10. Schmidt K Seabed foraging by antarctic krill: Implications for stock assessment, bentho-pelagic coupling, and the vertical transfer of iron Limnol. Oceanogr. 2011 56 1411 1428 10.4319/lo.2011.56.4.1411
Schmidt, K. et al. Seabed foraging by antarctic krill: Implications for stock assessment, bentho-pelagic coupling, and the vertical transfer of iron. Limnol. Oceanogr. 56, 1411–1428 (2011).10.4319/lo.2011.56.4.1411
11. Tulloch VJD Plagányi ÉE Matear R Brown CJ Richardson AJ Ecosystem modelling to quantify the impact of historical whaling on Southern Hemisphere baleen whales Fish Fish 2018 19 117 137 10.1111/faf.12241
Tulloch, V. J. D., Plagányi, É. E., Matear, R., Brown, C. J. & Richardson, A. J. Ecosystem modelling to quantify the impact of historical whaling on Southern Hemisphere baleen whales. Fish Fish 19, 117–137 (2018).10.1111/faf.12241
12. Zerbini, A. N. et al. Assessing the recovery of an Antarctic predator from historical exploitation. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6,190368 (2019).
13. CCAMLR. The Convention on the Conservation of Marine Living Resources. https://www.ccamlr.org/en/organisation/camlr-convention-text (1980).
14. Savoca MS Baleen whale prey consumption based on high resolution foraging measurements Nature 2021 599 85 90 10.1038/s41586-021-03991-5 34732868
Savoca, M. S. et al. Baleen whale prey consumption based on high resolution foraging measurements. Nature 599, 85–90 (2021).34732868 10.1038/s41586-021-03991-5
15. Baines M Population abundance of recovering humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae and other baleen whales in the Scotia Arc, South Atlantic Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2021 676 77 94 10.3354/meps13849
Baines, M. et al. Population abundance of recovering humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae and other baleen whales in the Scotia Arc, South Atlantic. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 676, 77–94 (2021).10.3354/meps13849
16. Biuw M Estimated summer abundance and krill consumption of fin whales throughout the Scotia Sea during the 2018/2019 summer season Sci. Rep. 2024 14 7493 10.1038/s41598-024-57378-3 38553485
Biuw, M. et al. Estimated summer abundance and krill consumption of fin whales throughout the Scotia Sea during the 2018/2019 summer season. Sci. Rep. 14, 7493 (2024).38553485 10.1038/s41598-024-57378-3
17. Hamabe, K., Matsuoka, K. & Kitakado, T. Estimation of abundance and population dynamics of the Antarctic blue whale in the Antarctic Ocean south of 60°S, from 70°E to 170°W. Mar. Mam. Sci. 671–687 10.1111/mms.13006 (2023).
18. Goldbogen JA How baleen whales feed: the biomechanics of engulfment and filtration Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2017 9 367 386 10.1146/annurev-marine-122414-033905
Goldbogen, J. A. et al. How baleen whales feed: the biomechanics of engulfment and filtration. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 9, 367–386 (2017).10.1146/annurev-marine-122414-033905
19. Lockyer, C. Growth and energy budgets of large baleen whales from the southern hemisphere. in Mammals in the seas: large cetaceans 379–487 (Rome, Italy, 1981).
20. Croll D From wind to whales: trophic links in a coastal upwelling system Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2005 289 117 130 10.3354/meps289117
Croll, D. et al. From wind to whales: trophic links in a coastal upwelling system. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 289, 117–130 (2005).10.3354/meps289117
21. Abrahms, B. et al. Memory and resource tracking drive blue whale migrations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 5582–5587 (2019).
22. Goldbogen, J. A. et al. Why whales are big but not bigger: physiological drivers and ecological limits in the age of ocean giants. Science. 366, 1367–1372 (2019).
23. Bruce WS Some observations on Antarctic Cetacea Scott. Natl Exped. 1915 491 505
Bruce, W. S. Some observations on Antarctic Cetacea. Scott. Natl Exped. 491, 505 (1915).
24. Willis J Whales maintained a high abundance of krill; both are ecosystem engineers in the Southern Ocean Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2014 513 51 69 10.3354/meps10922
Willis, J. Whales maintained a high abundance of krill; both are ecosystem engineers in the Southern Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 513, 51–69 (2014).10.3354/meps10922
25. Dorsey, K. Whales and Nations: Environmental Diplomacy On The High Seas (University of Washington Press, 2013).
26. Hofman RJ Sealing, whaling and krill fishing in the southern ocean: past and possible future effects on catch regulations Polar Rec. 2017 53 88 99 10.1017/S0032247416000644
Hofman, R. J. Sealing, whaling and krill fishing in the southern ocean: past and possible future effects on catch regulations. Polar Rec. 53, 88–99 (2017).10.1017/S0032247416000644
27. Rocha RC Clapham PJ Ivashchenko Y Emptying the oceans: a summary of industrial whaling catches in the 20th century Mar. Fish. Rev. 2014 76 37 48 10.7755/MFR.76.4.3
Rocha, R. C., Clapham, P. J. & Ivashchenko, Y. Emptying the oceans: a summary of industrial whaling catches in the 20th century. Mar. Fish. Rev. 76, 37–48 (2014).10.7755/MFR.76.4.3
28. Smith G The International Whaling Commission: an analysis of the past and reflections on the future Nat. Resour. Lawyer 1984 16 543 567
Smith, G. The International Whaling Commission: an analysis of the past and reflections on the future. Nat. Resour. Lawyer 16, 543–567 (1984).
29. Tonnessen, J. N. & Johnsen, A. O. The History of Modern Whaling (University of California Press, 1982).
30. Ivashchenko YV Clapham PJ Too much is never enough: the cautionary tale of soviet illegal whaling MFR 2014 76 1 21 10.7755/MFR.76.1_2.1
Ivashchenko, Y. V. & Clapham, P. J. Too much is never enough: the cautionary tale of soviet illegal whaling. MFR 76, 1–21 (2014).10.7755/MFR.76.1_2.1
31. Christensen LB Marine mammal populations: reconstructing historical abundances at the global scale Fish. Cent. Res. Rep. 2006 14 167
Christensen, L. B. Marine mammal populations: reconstructing historical abundances at the global scale. Fish. Cent. Res. Rep. 14, 167 (2006).
32. Mangel M Whales, science, and scientific whaling in the International Court of Justice Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2016 113 14523 14527 10.1073/pnas.1604988113 27799524
Mangel, M. Whales, science, and scientific whaling in the International Court of Justice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 14523–14527 (2016).27799524 10.1073/pnas.1604988113
33. Sellheim, N. & Morishita, J. Japan’s Withdrawal from International Whaling Regulation. (Routledge, 2023). 10.4324/9781003250814.
34. Walpole SC The weight of nations: an estimation of adult human biomass BMC Public Health 2012 12 1 10.1186/1471-2458-12-439 22214479
Walpole, S. C. et al. The weight of nations: an estimation of adult human biomass. BMC Public Health 12, 1 (2012).22214479 10.1186/1471-2458-12-439
35. Bar-On YM Phillips R Milo R The biomass distribution on Earth Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018 115 6506 6511 10.1073/pnas.1711842115 29784790
Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R. & Milo, R. The biomass distribution on Earth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6506–6511 (2018).29784790 10.1073/pnas.1711842115
36. Laws RM Seals and whales of the Southern Ocean Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 1977 279 81 96
Laws, R. M. Seals and whales of the Southern Ocean. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 279, 81–96 (1977).
37. Siegel, V. & Watkins, J. L. Distribution, biomass and demography of Antarctic Krill, Euphausia superba. In Proc. Biology and Ecology of Antarctic Krill (ed. Siegel, V.) 21–100 (Spinger, 2016).
38. Reilly S Biomass and energy transfer to baleen whales in the South Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean Deep-Sea Res. Part II: Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2004 51 1397 1409 10.1016/S0967-0645(04)00087-6
Reilly, S. et al. Biomass and energy transfer to baleen whales in the South Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. Part II: Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 51, 1397–1409 (2004).10.1016/S0967-0645(04)00087-6
39. Hill SL Is current management of the antarctic krill fishery in the atlantic sector of the southern ocean precautionary? CCAMLR Sci. 2016 23 31 51
Hill, S. L. et al. Is current management of the antarctic krill fishery in the atlantic sector of the southern ocean precautionary? CCAMLR Sci. 23, 31–51 (2016).
40. Atkinson A Siegel V Pakhomov EA Jessopp MJ Loeb V A re-appraisal of the total biomass and annual production of Antarctic krill Deep Sea Res. Part I: Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2009 56 727 740 10.1016/j.dsr.2008.12.007
Atkinson, A., Siegel, V., Pakhomov, E. A., Jessopp, M. J. & Loeb, V. A re-appraisal of the total biomass and annual production of Antarctic krill. Deep Sea Res. Part I: Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 56, 727–740 (2009).10.1016/j.dsr.2008.12.007
41. Brooks BCM Protect global values of the Southern Ocean ecosystem Science 2022 378 477 480 10.1126/science.add9480 36264826
Brooks, B. C. M. et al. Protect global values of the Southern Ocean ecosystem. Science 378, 477–480 (2022).36264826 10.1126/science.add9480
42. Watters GM Hinke JT Conservation in the Scotia Sea in light of expiring regulations and disrupted negotiations Conserv. Biol. 2022 36 1 4 10.1111/cobi.13925
Watters, G. M. & Hinke, J. T. Conservation in the Scotia Sea in light of expiring regulations and disrupted negotiations. Conserv. Biol. 36, 1–4 (2022).10.1111/cobi.13925
43. Trathan PN The ecosystem approach to management of the Antarctic krill fishery - the ‘devils are in the detail’ at small spatial and temporal scales J. Mar. Syst. 2022 225 103598 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2021.103598
Trathan, P. N. et al. The ecosystem approach to management of the Antarctic krill fishery - the ‘devils are in the detail’ at small spatial and temporal scales. J. Mar. Syst. 225, 103598 (2022).10.1016/j.jmarsys.2021.103598
44. CCAMLR. Report of the Working Group on Incidental Mortality Associated with Fishing, Annex 8. https://meetings.ccamlr.org/system/files/meeting-reports/e-sc-41-rep.pdf (2022).
45. Reisinger RR Spatiotemporal overlap of baleen whales and krill fisheries in the western antarctic peninsula region Front. Mar. Sci. 2022 9 914726 10.3389/fmars.2022.914726
Reisinger, R. R. et al. Spatiotemporal overlap of baleen whales and krill fisheries in the western antarctic peninsula region. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 914726 (2022).10.3389/fmars.2022.914726
46. Krafft BA Standing stock of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana, 1850) (Euphausiacea) in the Southwest Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean, 2018–19 J. Crustac. Biol. 2021 41 1 17 10.1093/jcbiol/ruab071
Krafft, B. A. et al. Standing stock of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana, 1850) (Euphausiacea) in the Southwest Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean, 2018–19. J. Crustac. Biol. 41, 1–17 (2021).10.1093/jcbiol/ruab071
47. CCAMLR Secretariat. CCAMLR’s Approach to Managing the Krill Fishery (2022). Euphausia Superba in Area 48. CCAMLR https://fishdocs.ccamlr.org/SAreport_48_KRI_2022.pdf (2023).
48. Forcada J Responses of Antarctic pack-ice seals to environmental change and increasing krill fishing Biol. Conserv. 2012 149 40 50 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.02.002
Forcada, J. et al. Responses of Antarctic pack-ice seals to environmental change and increasing krill fishing. Biol. Conserv. 149, 40–50 (2012).10.1016/j.biocon.2012.02.002
49. SC-CAMLR. Report of the Forty-Second Meeting of the Scientific Committee. SC-CAMLR-42 https://meetings.ccamlr.org/system/files/meeting-reports/e-sc-42-rep.pdf (2023).
50. Trathan, P. N. & Hill, S. L. The Importance of Krill Predation in the Southern Ocean. 321–350 10.1007/978-3-319-29279-3_9 (2016).
51. Warwick-Evans V Using seabird and whale distribution models to estimate spatial consumption of krill to inform fishery management Ecosphere 2022 13 1 24 10.1002/ecs2.4083 38988721
Warwick-Evans, V. et al. Using seabird and whale distribution models to estimate spatial consumption of krill to inform fishery management. Ecosphere 13, 1–24 (2022).38988721 10.1002/ecs2.4083
52. Bortolotto GA Danilewicz D Andriolo A Secchi ER Zerbini AN Whale, whale, everywhere: increasing abundance of western south atlantic humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in their wintering grounds PLOS ONE 2016 11 e0164596 10.1371/journal.pone.0164596 27736958
Bortolotto, G. A., Danilewicz, D., Andriolo, A., Secchi, E. R. & Zerbini, A. N. Whale, whale, everywhere: increasing abundance of western south atlantic humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in their wintering grounds. PLOS ONE 11, e0164596 (2016).27736958 10.1371/journal.pone.0164596
53. Herr H Return of large fin whale feeding aggregations to historical whaling grounds in the Southern Ocean Sci. Rep. 2022 12 9458 10.1038/s41598-022-13798-7 35798799
Herr, H. et al. Return of large fin whale feeding aggregations to historical whaling grounds in the Southern Ocean. Sci. Rep. 12, 9458 (2022).35798799 10.1038/s41598-022-13798-7
54. Calderan S South Georgia blue whales five decades after the end of whaling Endanger. Species Res. 2020 43 359 373 10.3354/esr01077
Calderan, S. et al. South Georgia blue whales five decades after the end of whaling. Endanger. Species Res. 43, 359–373 (2020).10.3354/esr01077
55. Roman J Whales as marine ecosystem engineers Front. Ecol. Environ. 2014 12 377 385 10.1890/130220
Roman, J. et al. Whales as marine ecosystem engineers. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 377–385 (2014).10.1890/130220
56. Savoca MS Baleen whale prey consumption based on high-resolution foraging measurements Nature 2021 599 85 90 10.1038/s41586-021-03991-5 34732868
Savoca, M. S. et al. Baleen whale prey consumption based on high-resolution foraging measurements. Nature 599, 85–90 (2021).34732868 10.1038/s41586-021-03991-5
57. Cox MJ Two scales of distribution and biomass of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) in the eastern sector of the CCAMLR Division 58.4.2 (55°E to 80°E) Plos ONE 2022 17 e0271078 10.1371/journal.pone.0271078 36001623
Cox, M. J. et al. Two scales of distribution and biomass of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) in the eastern sector of the CCAMLR Division 58.4.2 (55°E to 80°E). Plos ONE 17, e0271078 (2022).36001623 10.1371/journal.pone.0271078
58. Viquerat S Herr H Mid-summer abundance estimates of fin whales Balaenoptera physalus around the South Orkney Islands and Elephant Island Endanger. Species Res. 2017 32 515 524 10.3354/esr00832
Viquerat, S. & Herr, H. Mid-summer abundance estimates of fin whales Balaenoptera physalus around the South Orkney Islands and Elephant Island. Endanger. Species Res. 32, 515–524 (2017).10.3354/esr00832
59. Hardy, A. Great Waters: A Voyage of Natural History to Study Whales, Plankton, and the Waters of the Southern Ocean. 24, 459–459 (Harper & Row, New York, New York, 1967).
60. Goldbogen JA Prey density and distribution drive the three-dimensional foraging strategies of the largest filter feeder Funct. Ecol. 2015 29 951 961 10.1111/1365-2435.12395
Goldbogen, J. A. et al. Prey density and distribution drive the three-dimensional foraging strategies of the largest filter feeder. Funct. Ecol. 29, 951–961 (2015).10.1111/1365-2435.12395
61. Hazen EL Friedlaender AS Goldbogen JA Blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) optimize foraging efficiency by balancing oxygen use and energy gain as a function of prey density Sci. Adv. 2015 1 e1500469 10.1126/sciadv.1500469 26601290
Hazen, E. L., Friedlaender, A. S. & Goldbogen, J. A. Blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) optimize foraging efficiency by balancing oxygen use and energy gain as a function of prey density. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500469 (2015).26601290 10.1126/sciadv.1500469
62. Cade, D. E., Kahane-Rapport, S. R., Wallis, B., Goldbogen, J. A. & Friedlaender, A. S. Evidence for size-selective predation by antarctic humpback whales. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 747788 (2022).
63. Friedlaender, A. S. et al. The advantages of diving deep: fin whales quadruple their energy intake when targeting deep krill patches. Funct. Ecol. 34, 497–506 10.1111/1365-2435.13471 (2019).
64. CCAMLR. Further Information Requested by WG-FSA-2021 on Humpback Whale (Megaptera Novaeangliae) Mortality Incidents Recorded by the Krill Fishery in Subareas 48.1 and 48.2 during the 2020/21 Season. SC-CAMLR-40/BG/27; https://meetings.ccamlr.org/en/sc-camlr-40/bg/27 (2021).
65. CCAMLR. Report of the Working Group on Incidental Mortality Associated with Fishing https://meetings.ccamlr.org/system/files/meeting-reports/e-sc-41-a08_3.pdf (2022).
66. Parker, S., Forster, I., Leaper, R. & Kelly, N. Collaboration on Whale Incidental Mortality in the Antarctic Krill Fishery. (2023).
67. Atkinson A Stepping stones towards Antarctica: switch to southern spawning grounds explains an abrupt range shift in krill Glob. Change Biol. 2022 28 1359 1375 10.1111/gcb.16009
Atkinson, A. et al. Stepping stones towards Antarctica: switch to southern spawning grounds explains an abrupt range shift in krill. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 1359–1375 (2022).10.1111/gcb.16009
68. Trathan PN The future of the South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands marine protected area in a changing environment: the choice between industrial fisheries, or ecosystem protection Mar. Policy 2023 155 105773 10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105773
Trathan, P. N. The future of the South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands marine protected area in a changing environment: the choice between industrial fisheries, or ecosystem protection. Mar. Policy 155, 105773 (2023).10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105773
69. Trathan PN What is needed to implement a sustainable expansion of the Antarctic krill fishery in the Southern Ocean? Mar. Policy 2023 155 105770 10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105770
Trathan, P. N. What is needed to implement a sustainable expansion of the Antarctic krill fishery in the Southern Ocean? Mar. Policy 155, 105770 (2023).10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105770
70. Godø OR Trathan P Voluntary actions by the Antarctic krill fishing industry help reduce potential negative impacts on land-based marine predators during breeding, highlighting the need for CCAMLR action ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2022 79 1457 1466 10.1093/icesjms/fsac092
Godø, O. R. & Trathan, P. Voluntary actions by the Antarctic krill fishing industry help reduce potential negative impacts on land-based marine predators during breeding, highlighting the need for CCAMLR action. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 79, 1457–1466 (2022).10.1093/icesjms/fsac092
71. Government of South Georgia & the South Sandwich Islands. South Georgia & The South Sandwich Islands Marine Protected Area Enhancements. https://gov.gs/mpa-enhancements/.
72. Waluda, C. M., Gregory, S. & Dunn, M. J. Long-term variability in the abundance of Antarctic fur seals Arctocephalus gazella at Signy Island, South Orkneys. Polor Biol. 33, 305–312 (2010).
73. Strycker N A global population assessment of the Chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarctica) Sci. Rep. 2020 10 19474 10.1038/s41598-020-76479-3 33173126
Strycker, N. et al. A global population assessment of the Chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarctica). Sci. Rep. 10, 19474 (2020).33173126 10.1038/s41598-020-76479-3
74. Weimerskirch H Inchausti P Guinet C Barbraud C Trends in bird and seal populations as indicators of a system shift in the Southern Ocean Antarct. Sci. 2003 15 249 256 10.1017/S0954102003001202
Weimerskirch, H., Inchausti, P., Guinet, C. & Barbraud, C. Trends in bird and seal populations as indicators of a system shift in the Southern Ocean. Antarct. Sci. 15, 249–256 (2003).10.1017/S0954102003001202
75. Trivelpiece WZ Variability in krill biomass links harvesting and climate warming to penguin population changes in Antarctica Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011 108 7625 7628 10.1073/pnas.1016560108 21482793
Trivelpiece, W. Z. et al. Variability in krill biomass links harvesting and climate warming to penguin population changes in Antarctica. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 7625–7628 (2011).21482793 10.1073/pnas.1016560108
76. Dunn MJ Population size and decadal trends of three penguin species nesting at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands PLoS ONE 2016 11 e0164025 10.1371/journal.pone.0164025 27783668
Dunn, M. J. et al. Population size and decadal trends of three penguin species nesting at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. PLoS ONE 11, e0164025 (2016).27783668 10.1371/journal.pone.0164025
77. Trathan PN Ratcliffe N Masden EA Ecological drivers of change at South Georgia: the krill surplus, or climate variability Ecography 2012 35 983 993 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07330.x
Trathan, P. N., Ratcliffe, N. & Masden, E. A. Ecological drivers of change at South Georgia: the krill surplus, or climate variability. Ecography 35, 983–993 (2012).10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07330.x
78. CCAMLR. Report of the Forty-First Meeting of the Commission. https://meetings.ccamlr.org/system/files/meeting-reports/e-cc-41-rep.pdf (2022).
79. CCAMLR. Report of the Working Group on Ecosystem Monitoring and Management 2023 ( WG-EMM-2023). https://meetings.ccamlr.org/system/files/meeting-reports/e-sc-42-a6.pdf (2023).
80. Elliott B Tarzia M Read AJ Cetacean bycatch management in regional fisheries management organizations: current progress, gaps, and looking ahead Front. Mar. Sci. 2023 9 1006894 10.3389/fmars.2022.1006894
Elliott, B., Tarzia, M. & Read, A. J. Cetacean bycatch management in regional fisheries management organizations: current progress, gaps, and looking ahead. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 1006894 (2023).10.3389/fmars.2022.1006894
81. Baille LMR Zitterbart DP Effectiveness of surface-based detection methods for vessel strike mitigation of North Atlantic right whales Endanger. Species Res. 2022 49 57 69 10.3354/esr01202
Baille, L. M. R. & Zitterbart, D. P. Effectiveness of surface-based detection methods for vessel strike mitigation of North Atlantic right whales. Endanger. Species Res. 49, 57–69 (2022).10.3354/esr01202
82. Kroodsma DA Tracking the global footprint of fisheries Science 2018 359 904 908 10.1126/science.aao5646 29472481
Kroodsma, D. A. et al. Tracking the global footprint of fisheries. Science 359, 904–908 (2018).29472481 10.1126/science.aao5646
83. Croxall JP The role of science and advocacy in the conservation of Southern Ocean albatrosses at sea Bird. Conserv. Int. 2008 18 S13 S29 10.1017/S0959270908000300
Croxall, J. P. The role of science and advocacy in the conservation of Southern Ocean albatrosses at sea. Bird. Conserv. Int. 18, S13–S29 (2008).10.1017/S0959270908000300
84. Collins, M. A. et al. Mitigating the impact of longline fisheries on seabirds: lessons learned from the South Georgia patagonian toothfish fishery (CCAMLR Subarea 48.3). Mari. Poli. 131, 104618 (2021).
85. Hazen EL WhaleWatch: a dynamic management tool for predicting blue whale density in the California current J. Appl. Ecol. 2017 54 1415 1428 10.1111/1365-2664.12820
Hazen, E. L. et al. WhaleWatch: a dynamic management tool for predicting blue whale density in the California current. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 1415–1428 (2017).10.1111/1365-2664.12820
86. Ceballos V Taggart C Johnson H Comparison of visual and acoustic surveys for the detection and dynamic management of North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) in Canada Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2023 5 1 14
Ceballos, V., Taggart, C. & Johnson, H. Comparison of visual and acoustic surveys for the detection and dynamic management of North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) in Canada. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 5, 1–14 (2023).
87. Lockyer, C. Estimation of the Energy Costs of Growth, Maintenance and Reproduction in the Female Minke Whale (Balaenoptera Acutorostrata), from the Southern Hemisphere. Rep. Int. Whal. Commn. 31, 337–34 (1981).
88. Nichols, R. C. et al. Intra-seasonal variation in feeding rates and diel foraging behaviour in a seasonally fasting mammal, the humpback whale. R. Soc. Open Sci. 9, 211674 (2022).
89. Bierlich, K. C. et al. Seasonal gain in body condition of foraging humpback whales along the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 1036860 (2022).
90. Pallin, L. J. et al. A surplus no more? variation in krill availability impacts reproductive rates of antarctic baleen whales. Glob. Chang. Biol. 29, 2108–2121 10.1111/gcb.16559 (2023).
91. Gavrilchuk K Lesage V Fortune SME Trites AW Plourde S Foraging habitat of North Atlantic right whales has declined in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada, and may be insufficient for successful reproduction Endanger. Species Res. 2021 44 113 136 10.3354/esr01097
Gavrilchuk, K., Lesage, V., Fortune, S. M. E., Trites, A. W. & Plourde, S. Foraging habitat of North Atlantic right whales has declined in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada, and may be insufficient for successful reproduction. Endanger. Species Res. 44, 113–136 (2021).10.3354/esr01097
92. Pons, M. et al. Trade-offs between bycatch and target catches in static versus dynamic fishery closures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 119, e211450811 (2022).
93. Meyer, B. et al. Successful ecosystem-based management of Antarctic krill should address uncertainties in krill recruitment, behaviour and ecological adaptation. Commun. Earth Environ. 1, 1–12 (2020).
94. Siegel V Distribution and population dynamics of Euphausia superba: summary of recent findings Polar Biol. 2005 29 1 22 10.1007/s00300-005-0058-5
Siegel, V. Distribution and population dynamics of Euphausia superba: summary of recent findings. Polar Biol. 29, 1–22 (2005).10.1007/s00300-005-0058-5
95. Siegel V Krill demography and large-scale distribution in the southwest Atlantic during January/February 2000 Deep Sea Res. Part II: Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2004 51 1253 1273 10.1016/S0967-0645(04)00078-5
Siegel, V. et al. Krill demography and large-scale distribution in the southwest Atlantic during January/February 2000. Deep Sea Res. Part II: Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 51, 1253–1273 (2004).10.1016/S0967-0645(04)00078-5
96. Atkinson A Krill (Euphausia superba) distribution contracts southward during rapid regional warming Nat. Clim. Change 2019 9 142 147 10.1038/s41558-018-0370-z
Atkinson, A. et al. Krill (Euphausia superba) distribution contracts southward during rapid regional warming. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 142–147 (2019).10.1038/s41558-018-0370-z
97. Trathan PN Fielding S Warwick-Evans V Freer J Perry F Seabird and seal responses to the physical environment and to spatio-temporal variation in the distribution and abundance of Antarctic krill at South Georgia, with implications for local fisheries management ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2022 79 2373 2388 10.1093/icesjms/fsac168
Trathan, P. N., Fielding, S., Warwick-Evans, V., Freer, J. & Perry, F. Seabird and seal responses to the physical environment and to spatio-temporal variation in the distribution and abundance of Antarctic krill at South Georgia, with implications for local fisheries management. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 79, 2373–2388 (2022).10.1093/icesjms/fsac168
98. Tarling GA Varying depth and swarm dimensions of open-ocean Antarctic krill Euphausia superba Dana, 1850 (Euphausiacea) over diel cycles J. Crustac. Biol. 2018 38 716 727
Tarling, G. A. et al. Varying depth and swarm dimensions of open-ocean Antarctic krill Euphausia superba Dana, 1850 (Euphausiacea) over diel cycles. J. Crustac. Biol. 38, 716–727 (2018).
99. Merkel B Quantifying circumpolar summer habitat for Antarctic krill and Ice krill, two key species of the Antarctic marine ecosystem ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2023 80 1773 1786 10.1093/icesjms/fsad110
Merkel, B. et al. Quantifying circumpolar summer habitat for Antarctic krill and Ice krill, two key species of the Antarctic marine ecosystem. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 80, 1773–1786 (2023).10.1093/icesjms/fsad110
100. Brooks CM Science-based management in decline in the Southern Ocean Science 2016 354 185 187 10.1126/science.aah4119 27738163
Brooks, C. M. et al. Science-based management in decline in the Southern Ocean. Science 354, 185–187 (2016).27738163 10.1126/science.aah4119
101. SC-CAMLR. Report of the Scientific Committee. IWC/67/Rep01 https://archive.iwc.int/pages/download.php?direct=1&noattach=true&ref=6940&ext=pdf&k= (2018).
102. Niklitschek EJ Skaret G Distribution, density and relative abundance of Antarctic krill estimated by maximum likelihood geostatistics on acoustic data collected during commercial fishing operations Fish. Res. 2016 178 114 121 10.1016/j.fishres.2015.09.017
Niklitschek, E. J. & Skaret, G. Distribution, density and relative abundance of Antarctic krill estimated by maximum likelihood geostatistics on acoustic data collected during commercial fishing operations. Fish. Res. 178, 114–121 (2016).10.1016/j.fishres.2015.09.017
103. Skaret G Distribution and biomass estimation of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) off the South Orkney Islands during 2011–2020 ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2023 80 1472 1486 10.1093/icesjms/fsad076
Skaret, G. et al. Distribution and biomass estimation of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) off the South Orkney Islands during 2011–2020. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 80, 1472–1486 (2023).10.1093/icesjms/fsad076
104. UN General Assembly. Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. https://www.un.org/bbnjagreement/en (2023).
105. Nocito ES Brooks CM The influence of Antarctic governance on marine protected areas in the biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction agreement negotiations Npj Ocean Sustain. 2023 2 1 12 10.1038/s44183-023-00019-5
Nocito, E. S. & Brooks, C. M. The influence of Antarctic governance on marine protected areas in the biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction agreement negotiations. Npj Ocean Sustain. 2, 1–12 (2023).10.1038/s44183-023-00019-5
106. Frölicher TL Dominance of the Southern Ocean in anthropogenic carbon and heat uptake in CMIP5 models J. Clim. 2015 28 862 886 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00117.1
Frölicher, T. L. et al. Dominance of the Southern Ocean in anthropogenic carbon and heat uptake in CMIP5 models. J. Clim. 28, 862–886 (2015).10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00117.1
107. Lavery TJ Whales sustain fisheries: blue whales stimulate primary production in the Southern Ocean Mar. Mammal. Sci. 2014 30 888 904 10.1111/mms.12108
Lavery, T. J. et al. Whales sustain fisheries: blue whales stimulate primary production in the Southern Ocean. Mar. Mammal. Sci. 30, 888–904 (2014).10.1111/mms.12108
108. Trinh R Ducklow HW Steinberg DK Fraser WR Krill body size drives particulate organic carbon export in West Antarctica Nature 2023 618 526 530 10.1038/s41586-023-06041-4 37316721
Trinh, R., Ducklow, H. W., Steinberg, D. K. & Fraser, W. R. Krill body size drives particulate organic carbon export in West Antarctica. Nature 618, 526–530 (2023).37316721 10.1038/s41586-023-06041-4
109. Leaper R Lavigne D How much do large whales eat? J. Cetacea. Res. Manag. 2007 9 179 188 10.47536/jcrm.v9i3.666
Leaper, R. & Lavigne, D. How much do large whales eat? J. Cetacea. Res. Manag. 9, 179–188 (2007).10.47536/jcrm.v9i3.666
110. Hamabe K Matsuoka K Kitakado T Estimation of abundance and population dynamics of the Antarctic blue whale in the Antarctic Ocean south of 60°S, from 70°E to 170°W Mar. Mammal. Sci. 2023 39 671 687 10.1111/mms.13006
Hamabe, K., Matsuoka, K. & Kitakado, T. Estimation of abundance and population dynamics of the Antarctic blue whale in the Antarctic Ocean south of 60°S, from 70°E to 170°W. Mar. Mammal. Sci. 39, 671–687 (2023).10.1111/mms.13006
111. Allison, C. IWC Summary Catch Database Version 7.1. (2021).
112. Atkinson A Siegel V Pakhomov E Rothery P Long-term decline in krill stock and increase in salps within the Southern Ocean Nature 2004 432 100 103 10.1038/nature02996 15525989
Atkinson, A., Siegel, V., Pakhomov, E. & Rothery, P. Long-term decline in krill stock and increase in salps within the Southern Ocean. Nature 432, 100–103 (2004).15525989 10.1038/nature02996
113. Hanessian, J. The Antarctic Treaty 1959. Int. Comp. Law Q. 9(3), 436–480 (1960).
114. Hemmings, A. D., Dodds, K. & Roberts, P. Introduction: the politics of Antarctica. In Proc. Handbook on the Politics of Antarctica (eds. Dodds, K. J., Hemmings, A. D. & Roberts, P.) 1–17 (Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., Northhampton, MA, 2017). 10.4337/9781784717681.00010.
115. Dunn, D. et al. Empirical move-on rules to inform fishing strategies: a New England case study. Fish Fish. 15, 359–375 (2013).
