
==== Front
Sci Rep
Sci Rep
Scientific Reports
2045-2322
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39256445
72073
10.1038/s41598-024-72073-z
Article
Nanomechanical mapping of PLA hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds links surface homogeneity to stem cell differentiation
Sitthisang Sonthikan 1
Hou Xunan 2
Treetong Alongkot 3
Xu Xin 2
Liu Weilin 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8200-8337
He Chaobin msehc@nus.edu.sg

24
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5578-0161
Sae-Ueng Udom udom.sae@biotec.or.th

5
Yodmuang Supansa supansa.y@chula.ac.th

16
1 https://ror.org/028wp3y58 grid.7922.e 0000 0001 0244 7875 Research Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330 Thailand
2 https://ror.org/01tgyzw49 grid.4280.e 0000 0001 2180 6431 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117575 Singapore
3 https://ror.org/04vy95b61 grid.425537.2 0000 0001 2191 4408 National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani, 12120 Thailand
4 https://ror.org/02sepg748 grid.418788.a 0000 0004 0470 809X Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR), Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis, Singapore, 138634 Singapore
5 grid.425537.2 0000 0001 2191 4408 National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani, 12120 Thailand
6 https://ror.org/028wp3y58 grid.7922.e 0000 0001 0244 7875 Center of Excellence in Biomaterial Engineering in Medical and Health, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330 Thailand
10 9 2024
10 9 2024
2024
14 210973 5 2024
2 9 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Polymer composite scaffolds hold promise in bone tissue engineering due to their biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and reproducibility. Among these materials, polylactic acid (PLA), a biodegradable plastics has gained attention for its processability characteristics. However, a deeper understanding of how PLA scaffold surface properties influence cell behavior is enssential for advancing its applications. In this study, 3D-printed PLA scaffolds containing hydroxyapatite (HA) were analyzed using atomic force microscopy and nanomechanical mapping. The addition of HA significantly increased key surface properties compared to unmodified PLA scaffols. Notably, the HA-modified scaffold demonstrated Gaussian distribution of stiffness and adhesive forces, in contrast to the bimodal properties observed in the unmodified PLA scaffolds. Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (hADMSC) seeded on the 3D-printed PLA scaffolds blended with 10% HA (P10) exhibited strong attachment. After four weeks, osteogenic differentiation of hADMSCs was detected, with calcium deposition reaching 6.76% ± 0.12. These results suggest that specific ranges of stiffness and adhesive forces of the composite scaffold can support cell attachement, and mineralization. The study highlights that tailoring suface properties of composite scaffolds is crucial for modulating cellular interactions, thus advancing the development of effective bone replacement materials.

Keywords

Biodegradable composite
3D printing
Osteogenesis
Nanomechanical characterization
Subject terms

Biophysics
Biological techniques
501100004192 National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA) P21-51892 Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research, and InnovationB16F640116 Postdoctoral Fellowship, Ratchadapisek Somphot Fund, Chulalongkorn UniversityMinistry of Education (MoE) in SingaporeT2EP50222-0001 Fundamental Fund 2567HEAF67300042 issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Critical-sized bone defects present significant clinical challenges, necessitating innovative solutions for effective bone regeneration1–3. While autografts and allografts are commonly used, they have limitations and potential complications4. This issue has aroused interest in artificial bone grafts due to their unlimited supply and the ability to customize their physical and biological properties5–7. Artificial grafts not only offer viable options for bone replacement but also serve as valuable tools for studying osteogenesis and bone formation, including bone models and scaffold-on-a-chip systems8,9.

Additive manufacturing (3D printing) becomes an attractive choice for bone graft fabrication as it effortlessly creates the porous structures necessary for nutrient exchange during cell proliferation and bone formation10,11. Among a wide range of material options, polylactic acid (PLA) is widely recognized for its versatility, durability, functionalization capabilities, biocompatibility, and biodegradability12,13. However, its relatively low toughness has led to efforts aimed at enhancing its ductility. A promising approach involves the rational design of polymer blends to improve properties of PLA14–16. In this context, hydroxyapatite (HA) has emerged as a valuable additive, particularly for reinforceing PLA mechanical strength. Incorporating HA into the scaffold introduces two distinct phases that mimic the composition of natural bone. The inorganic (ceramic) phase provides structural support and toughness, while the organic (polymeric) phase enhances integration with surrounding tissues and the vascular system13,16,17.

Despite these advancements, the development of PLA-HA biocomposite materials for promoting cell growth is still in its infancy and the correlation between material surface properties and cellular behavior remains largely uncharted18–20. For instance, HA has been reported to enhance cell attachment21,22, but conflicting evidence suggests it may reduce cell proliferation and increase apoptosis23,24. This discrepancy highlights the incomplete understanding of the material properties that are most conducive to cell growth within the scaffold's microenvironment. Moreover, while nanoscale material properties could provide more detailed insights, they are often overlooked due to their complexity and undetectability at the macroscale21,25,26. To comprehend cellular responses to their surrounding environment, pinpointing the material properties at the surface of a sample, cellular level is crucial27,28. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has emerged as a powerful tool for nanoscale investigations29–31. AFM employs a nanometer-sized tip on a cantilever to scan the sample’s surface, measuring parameters like stiffness, adhesion, and phase difference. This technique provides high-spatial-resolution data, allowing precise analysis of both surface morphology and mechanical properties simultaneously32–34.

In this study, we investigated the surface nanomechanical properties of 3D-printed PLA-based scaffolds functionalized with hydroxyapatite (HA). We examined scaffolds with two levels of HA addition—10% (P10) and 20% (P20)—as well as a surface-treated sample with HA coating on PLA (PC). AFM-based nanoscale quantitative mapping revealed that the P10 scaffold surface homogeneity in terms of stiffness and adhesion.These unique properties of the P10 scaffold significantly enhanced cell attachment and osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hADMSCs). This nanomechanical data-driven approach demonstrates potential for engineering scaffolds that effectively guide hADMSCs towards osteoblasts differentiation, thereby facilitating bone tissue regeneration. The study’s findings pave the way for innovative scaffold designs with the potential to revolutionize artificial bone grafts.

Material and methods

Preparation of PLA and PLA-composite scaffolds

Hydroxyapatite (HA, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and Poly(lactic acid) (PLA, grade 3051D, Natureworks, USA) pellets were dried at 60 °C for 4 h before mixing. The PLA-HA composites with varying compositions of HA (0, 10, 20%) were blended for 6 min in a laboratory internal mixer (Brabender®, Germany). The relative melting points of the blend were set at 180, 185, and 190 °C. Subsequently, the composites were ground into pellets using a high-speed pelletizer and extruded into filaments (diameter = 1.75 mm) at 160 °C and 40 RPM using a filament maker (Filabot, USA). Fused deposition modeling (FDM) was used to fabricate cylindrical scaffolds with gyroid geometry (D = 10 mm, h = 5 mm) on a Sermoon V1 3D printer (Creality 3D, China). The layer height was set to 0.2 mm. The scaffolds were labeled according to the HA content as PLA, P10, and P20, corresponding to 0, 10, and 20% HA, respectively.

A 1:1 ethanol and 0.25 M NaOH aqueous solution was prepared for alkali treatment and HA coating. The scaffolds were submerged into the solution and subjected to magnetic stirring at 550 RPM for 1 h. Subsequently, the scaffolds were subjected to ultrasonic cleaning with 100% ethanol for 3 min. The 3D-printed PLA scaffolds were coated with the 3% (w/v) HA in 100% ethanol under magnetic stirring at 550 RPM for 2 h. The coated scaffolds were washed multiple times using deionized water until the pH of the solution reached 7.0. The scaffolds were further soaked in pure ethanol and air-dried at room temperature for additional characterization and cell culture experiments. These scaffolds were identified as PC.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) analysis

For scaffold with cells, the scaffolds were immersed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Loba Chemie, India) and fixed overnight at 4 °C. The scaffolds underwent a 45 min dehydration process using a graded series of ethanol concentrations (30, 50, 70, 95, and 100%). Scaffolds without cells were prepared directly for coating. Then, the scaffolds were sputter-coated with gold using a sputter coater (BALZERS SCD 040, Balzers, Lichtenstein), and analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (JSM-IT300LV, Jeol, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. Furthermore, the chemical composition of the constructs was characterized using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) with the assistance of computer-controlled software (Aztec EDS system, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK).

AFM-based nanomechanical characterization

Nanomechanical properties were assessed using AFM. The scaffold was mounted on a glass slide with double-sided tape and examined on a JPK NanoWizard 3 AFM (Bruker, USA) in quantitative imaging (QI) mode, where the surface morphology and the nanomechanical data were retrieved simultaneously35. The cantilever was a non-contact probe with a spring constant of 37 N/m and a resonance frequency of 300 kHz (ACTA model, AppNano, USA). Force calibration with a thermal tune preceded data collection. Measurements covered ten randomly selected 20 µm × 20 µm surface areas (two areas per scaffold from five scaffolds) at a resolution of 256 × 256 pixels and a force threshold of 100 nN. Stiffness and adhesive force data were analyzed by plotting distribution histograms, with Gaussian or bimodal Gaussian functions used for fitting depending on the distribution. Peak center and standard deviation values were extracted from the fitting, and distribution plots were generated using the Matplotlib library in Python36.

Cultivation of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hADMSCs)

Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hADMSCs) at the fifth passage obtained from PromoCell (Germany) were used in this study. Briefly, 5 × 105 hADMSCs were seeded onto 3D-printed scaffolds, including PLA, P10, P20, and PC. The cells were cultured in an hMSC growth medium (alpha-MEM supplemented with 4% (v/v) FBS, 1% (v/v) antibiotic–antimycotic, 1% (v/v) HEPES buffer, 1% (v/v) GlutaMAX, and 1 ng/ml bFGF) for seven days and then shifted to an osteogenic medium (DMEM with 4% (v/v) FBS, 1% (v/v) antibiotic–antimycotic, 1% (v/v) HEPES buffer, 10 mM β-glycerolphosphate, 50 μM ascorbic acid, and 10 μM dexamethasone) for 21 days, with 3–4 days medium changes. Cell viability was quantified using PrestoBlue™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and live/dead cells were visualized using the live/dead Cell Double Staining kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA).

Cell viability assay

PrestoBlueTM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) measured cell viability under the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the cell-seeded scaffolds were incubated in 1 ml of medium containing 10% (v/v) PrestoBlue™ in hMSC growth medium at 37 °C for an hour in the dark. The fluorescence intensity was measured using a microplate reader at λex 560 and λem 590 nm (Varioskan Flash Multimode, Thermo Scientific, USA).

For live/dead cell viability assay, the cells/scaffold constructs were incubated in live/dead Cell Double Staining kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 30 min in the dark. The constructs were observed and analyzed using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti, USA) to determine live cells (green) and dead cells (red) after 1, 2, and 4 weeks of culture.

Assessment of calcium deposition by alizarin red staining

Alizarin Red S staining, the scaffolds were incubated in 2% (w/v) Alizarin Red S (pH 4.1–4.3) for 1 h, and repeatedly washed with DI water. The amount of Alizarin Red S bound to calcium was quantified by eluting the stain with a 10% (w/v) hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride solution. The absorbance of the eluted solution was measured at 557 nm with a spectrophotometer (Multiskan Go, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis, employing analysis of variance (ANOVA) in GraphPad Prism version 9.0, revealed group differences. The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (S.D.).

Results

3D-printed PLA and PLA-composite scaffolds

3D printing has gained significant popularity as a method for the design of customized scaffolds. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) has emerged as one of the most practical choices among various 3D printing techniques due to its versatility, environmental friendliness, and simplicity, making it ideal for printing a wide range of plastic materials37.

The printed scaffold surface was analyzed using SEM (Fig. 1). High-magnification images provided a close look at the surface morphology of the scaffolds. The surface of the PLA group appeared smooth, whereas the P10 and P20 groups exhibited a rough surface due to HA particles mixed with PLA13. Additionally, scratch marks and micropores were observed on the surface of the PC scaffold following alkali treatment and HA coating. It is possible that carbon chain cleavage resulted in the release of carbon radicals, which could bind with hydroxyl groups from the alkali solution, thus creating an ideal surface for the absorption of HA particles38. The Ca distribution images, as revealed by EDS mapping, indicate the presence of Ca in the P10, P20, and PC scaffolds. While P10 and P20 show localized variations in calcium density, PC demonstrates a more uniform calcium distribution across its surface. The calcium content in P10, P20, and PC was measured at 6.76% ± 0.12, 12.37% ± 0.12, and 3.76% ± 0.08, respectively.Fig. 1 SEM micrographs of the 3D-printed PLA, P10, P20, and PC scaffolds at magnification of 200x, 1000 × and 5000x. EDS mapping images illustrate the distribution of calcium (Ca) on the scaffold surfaces. Scale bars represent 200 µm at 200x, 50 µm at 1,000x, and 5 µm at 5000x.

AFM-based nanomechanical mapping

The hADMSCs are responsive to the microenvironments in which they reside39–41. It has been shown that even nanoscale alteration can impact cell viability and fate42,43. Therefore, we investigated the surface properties of the scaffolds at the nanometer resolution. The AFM-based quantitative imaging (QI) mode simultaneously collected the height, stiffness, and adhesive force maps. The exemplary data maps for the PLA and PLA/HA composite scaffolds (P10, P20, and PC) were displayed (Fig. 2). The data showed that the PLA and PC scaffolds had a relatively smooth surface. On the other hand, the P10 and P20 scaffolds possessed sharp and rough surfaces. The rough appearance observed from the AFM measurement agreed well with the SEM micrographs (Fig. 1 1000x–5000x). The QI mode allowed simultaneous extraction of the height, stiffness, and adhesive force of the interfaces. The QI mapping data were collected for the PLA, P10, P20, and PC scaffolds. For the PLA scaffolds, the height of the PLA surface fluctuated within a 400-nm range (Fig. 2a). The stiffness, the slope of the approaching force-distance curve, of the PLA surface was about 0.5–1.5 N/m (Fig. 2b). Lastly, the adhesive force, which is the attraction between the AFM tip and the PLA surface, varied within the 40-nN range (Fig. 2c). By comparing three QI maps of the PLA surface, it appeared that the rough regions (Fig. 2a) have high stiffness (Fig. 2b) and high adhesive force (Fig. 2c). The result agrees with previous studies that indicate that the stiffness depends on surface roughness44.Fig. 2 Exemplary AFM micrographs of (a, d, g, j) topography or height, (b, e, h, k) stiffness, and (c, f, i, l) adhesive force of the (a-c) PLA, (d-f) P10, (g-i) P20, and (j-l) PC scaffold surfaces. The scale bars (5 µm) on the right bottom corner showed the lateral (XY) dimensions. The color gradient bars on the right showed the values of height, stiffness, and adhesive force.

Stiffness and adhesion distributions

We analyzed the height, stiffness, and adhesive force distributions across different scaffold types. Height, stiffness, and adhesive forces were extracted and plotted as distributions, revealing distinct patterns (Fig. 3). PLA and PC scaffolds displayed bimodal Gaussian distributions for height, stiffness, and adhesive forces. P20 scaffolds displayed a Gaussian distribution of height but bimodal distributions of stiffness and adhesive forces. In contrast, the P10 scaffold exhibited Gaussian distributions of all three parameters, indicating surface homogeneity. For height (Fig. 3a–d), the PLA scaffolds showed an average height of 1.01 µm, with a small part having an average height of 1.24 µm. The P20 scaffolds had an average of 1.92 µm, with a small portion having an average of 2.42 µm. The surfaces of the P10 and PC scaffolds exhibited average heights of 6.56 and 0.26 µm, respectively. For stiffness (Fig. 3e–h), the PLA scaffolds predominantly showed an average stiffness of 1.20 N/m, with a small portion having an average stiffness of 2.56 N/m. In contrast, the P20 scaffolds featured a majority with an average stiffness of 4.54 N/m, and a small portion had an average stiffness of 1.65 N/m. The PC scaffolds had a dominant stiffness of 1.75 N/m, with a small portion having an average stiffness of 3.71 N/m. Notably, the P10 scaffolds displayed the most uniform stiffness, averaging 1.69 N/m. These variations in stiffness are attributed to the presence of hydroxyapatite (HA) particles in P10 (1.69 N/m), P20 (4.54 N/m), and PC (1.75 N/m) scaffolds, resulting in higher stiffness compared to PLA (1.20 N/m) presumably due to the addition of the HA particles45. The surfaces of the PC scaffolds also had higher stiffness than the PLA scaffolds, possibly due to an HA layer. Some studies also suggest that the HA presence contributes to the reinforcement of the scaffold, which may be associated with the increasing stiffness in our case26.Fig. 3 Height (Z), stiffness (k), and adhesive force (Fadh) distributions of the surfaces of the (a, e, i) PLA, (b, f, j) P10, (c, g, k) P20, and (d, h, l) PC scaffolds. The centers and the standard deviation (S.D.) extracted from the distribution fitting were displayed as center ± S.D.

Similarly, adhesive force distributions showed bimodal Gaussian patterns in PLA, P20, and PC scaffolds, while P10 exhibited a Gaussian distribution (Fig. 3i–l). Most PLA scaffolds displayed an average adhesive force of 57.3 nN, with a small portion having an average adhesive force of 23.9 nN. For P20, the dominant adhesive force was 166.3 nN, while a small portion had an average adhesive force of 114.7 nN. PC scaffolds mainly exhibited an average adhesive force of 38.3 nN, with a small portion having an average adhesive force of 26.2 nN. Lastly, the P10 scaffolds demonstrated uniform adhesive force distribution, averaging 58.8 nN. We found that both P10 and P20 scaffolds exhibited high adhesive forces. Our result suggests that HA incorporation enhances surface stickiness, agreeing with other studies that adding reinforcing filler can increase adhesion interfaces and, thus, create adhesive force between the surface and the AFM tip46. However, despite having HA as a top layer, the PC scaffolds showed a lower average adhesion force than PLA. The result implies that the HA corporation method with PLA can affect the nanomechanical properties of the scaffold. The presence of the HA layer in the PC scaffolds did not increase the surface adhesion, but mixing the HA as reinforcing filler allows the co-existence of two phases—HA and PLA, which, in turn, increase the surface adhesion. These nanomechanical characterizations provide critical insights into scaffold surface properties. Next, we explore how these properties influence the behavior of hADMSCs, which have clinical relevance and are instrumental in in vitro bone formation studies.

Cell attachment and metabolic activity

AFM results indicated that HA addition or coating altered the nanoscale surface properties of PLA scaffolds. To understand their impact on cellular behavior, hADMSCs were seeded and differentiated into osteoblasts, serving as a proof of concept of bone tissue engineering. Fluorescence of PrestoBlue™ assay results (Fig. 4a) reflected cellular metabolic activity. After three days, hADMSCs showed robust attachment to all scaffolds, as indicated by strong fluorescence signals. However, by day seven, the PC scaffold group exhibited significantly lower metabolic activity compared to the other groups. These findings suggest that PLA, P10, and P20 scaffolds support cell attachment and viability. SEM analysis (Fig. 4b) after seven days revealed spread-out cell morphologies on PLA, P10, and P20 scaffolds, indicating favorable cell adhesion and proliferation. In contrast, cells appeared rounded on the PC scaffold, correlating with reduced viability. These observations suggest that the surface properties of scaffolds play a crucial role in influencing cell adhesion and viability. PLA/HA composite materials have shown promise for bone scaffolds with osteogenic and osteoconductive potential12,40. Based on cell attachment and viability results, we selected P10 and P20 scaffolds to investigate long-term hADMSCs osteogenic differentiation. Both scaffolds exhibited sustained cell viability and even distribution on the scaffold surface for up to 4 weeks (Fig. 4c).Fig. 4 The hADMSCs (a) viability cultured on the PLA, P10, P20, and PC scaffolds for three days and seven days. All data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) and *indicates a statistically significant difference with p-value < 0.05, (b) morphology by SEM micrographs cultured in the PLA, P10, P20, and PC scaffolds for seven days at different magnifications. The scale bars are 200 µm for 200x, 50 µm for 1000x, and 10 µm for 5000x, (c) images of live/dead staining of P10 and P20 scaffolds for 1, 2, and 4 weeks (green: live cells, red: dead cells). The white scale bars are 100 µm.

The mineralization and calcium deposition in the cell/scaffold constructs were visualized using Alizarin Red S staining (Fig. 5a,b), which has a high affinity for calcium ions. This staining method is commonly used to assess calcium deposition during osteogenic differentiation. The non-cell seeded scaffolds were initially stained with Alizarin Red S, and the resulting staining intensity reflected the baseline levels of hydroxyapatite incorporated in the scaffolds. Alizarin Red staining of the P10 scaffold significantly increased after 2 weeks of osteogenic differentiation, and the staining reached its peak at week 4. The staining intensity of the P20 scaffold gradually increased until week 4. We found that osteogenic differentiation at 4 weeks in the P10 group was significantly higher than in the P20 group. This is related to the quantitative analysis of the cell viability test at 4 weeks, where P10 showed higher cell viability than P20, as shown in (Figure S1). Together, the results suggest that the P10 scaffold appeared to be the most suitable for hADMSCs culture and osteoblast differentiation.Fig. 5 Evaluation of osteogenic differentiation of hADMSCs in P10 and P20 scaffolds. (a) Alizarin Red S staining detected calcium deposition in scaffolds at 2 and 4 weeks. A non-seeded scaffold was a control group without cells. The white scale bars are 1 cm. (b) The corresponding quantitative analysis of Alizarin red S staining for calcium deposition. The data are shown as mean ± SD. ** and *** indicate a statistically significant difference with p-value < 0.01 and 0.0001.

Discussion

The surface properties where cells reside can influence cell functions, including attachment, proliferation, and differentiation47–50. Eukaryotic cells respond to their surroundings through mechanosensing signals that trigger metabolic pathways regulating cell behavior and fate51,52. For example, cells tend to become neurons on soft surfaces and transform into muscle and bone cells at intermediate and high stiffness ranges, respectively50. To investigate the effect of surface properties on cell behavior, we analyzed the nanomechanical properties of 3D-printed scaffold surfaces. Nanomechanical mapping revealed that the PLA, P20, and PC scaffolds displayed bimodal distributions of stiffness and adhesive forces, while the P10 scaffold exhibited homogeneous surface properties, characterized by a Gaussian distribution of both stiffness and adhesion. Previous studies showed that the bimodal distributions normally reflect two composition phases26,34,44. In this study, the presence of a sufficient amount of HA and PLA in P20 and PC scaffolds seems to give rise to the bimodal stiffness and adhesion distributions, agreeing with the previous work. The bimodal distributions of PLA scaffold may be caused by printing traits, which may occur for pure PLA. Since HA has a much higher modulus than PLA, adding 10% of HA as a reinforcing filler may help obscure such traits, resulting in a Gaussian distribution of the stiffness and adhesion in the P10 scaffold. Adding more HA (i.e., 20%) could cause HA agglomeration within the PLA matrix, thus displaying the two-phase behavior and the bimodal distributions46. Lastly, the coating of HA in the PC scaffold directly introduces a separated phase of the HA, resulting in bimodal distributions.

The scaffold surface properties, such as roughness, wettability, and surface energy, have been demonstrated to be crucial for cell attachment, growth, and differentiation53,54. Several studies showed that high surface roughness increased space for cells residing13 and thus promoted cell attachment during the initial stage of the cells55–57. Regarding MSC differentiation, Adipocytes, in contrast to osteoblasts, are highly sensitive to topographical features58. High surface wettability is also shown to control the adhesion of cellular proteins and modulate cell adhesion59.

In this study, hADMSCs exhibited better attachment to P10 and P20 scaffolds than PLA and PC scaffolds. Higher surface roughness of P10 and P20 scaffolds, providing more contact points for cell anchoring58,60. Mineralization analysis revealed higher calcium deposition on the P10 scaffold than on the P20 scaffold. Since calcium mineralization is linked to cell differentiation, the result indicates that hADMSCs can differentiate into bone cells on the P10 scaffold better than on the P20 scaffold. The hADMSCs cell differentiation result suggests that the P10 scaffold provides a more conducive mechanical environment for cellular function61,62.

While the scaffold properties are extensively studied, surface homogeneity at the nanoscale is rarely investigated and discussed. The single distributions of the stiffness and the adhesive force of the P10 scaffold indicate a high degree of surface homogeneity compared to the PLA and PLA-composite materials. Our result suggests that homogenous surface properties of the P10 scaffold promote cell attachment and differentiation. The finding agrees with the previous study showing that a uniform β-phase poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) surface promotes uniform distribution of the fibroblast cells on the surface63. A study by Beijer et al. also showed that non-uniform surface topography caused hMSC cells to create an adapted cellular state where the shrinkage of cell and nucleus, protein condensation, and mitochondria reduction can be observed60. Furthermore, Chun Yang and colleagues confirmed that hMSC osteogenesis is influenced by surface pattern regularity. Cells on regularly patterned scaffolds were more spread, larger in area, and exhibited darker staining with alkaline phosphatase (ALP), indicating higher expression of the osteogenic marker ALP, like hMSCs cultured on uniformly stiff gels. In contrast, minimal staining was observed in hMSCs cultured on randomly patterned and uniformly soft surfaces, suggesting significantly lower osteogenesis64. Therefore, it is evident that the hADMSCs cells prefer the P10 scaffold due to its surface homogeneity properties.

The P10 scaffold also has unique properties. Its stiffness (1.69 N/m) and adhesive force (58.8 nN) were relatively in the middle range of the stiffness (1.20–4.54 N/m) and adhesive force values (23.9–116.3 nN). Surface stiffness in this work is essentially the surface energy, which has been shown to promote cell retention and adhesion53. Adhesive force in this work is directly proportional to wettability and surface charge, which help with cell attachment. Our results imply that hADMSCs favor distinct stiffness (surface energy) and adhesion force (surface charge) for the best growth condition. Such specific surface characteristics may differ for different cell types. Studies showed that different parts of the neuron cells favor different surface stiffness65,66. Fibroblasts prefer soft over hard surfaces54. The surface energy can influence the interactions between cells and the extracellular matrix, broadly impacting cell adhesion responses. Our work emphasizes the need to understand cell-surface interaction and cellular response to microenvironments to improve the design and engineering of bone-replacement material synthesis67.

Furthermore, the preparation method may affect the material properties. In this case, we employed two methods of incorporating HA into PLA, blending and surface coating. Despite the PC scaffold having HA content on the surface, hADMSCs exhibited poor cell viability when cultured on the PC scaffold, suggesting that contact with HA from surface modification may have a toxic effect on hADMSCs68,69. This outcome may be due to HA particle agglomeration38 and residual alkali or other chemicals70,71. HA agglomeration creates stress points for cells, adversely affecting their morphology and potentially leading to cell death. Residual alkali from surface treatment can increase local pH, producing cell toxicity. These changes in surface chemistry may render the material less conducive to cell attachment and proliferation72. Therefore, it is crucial to thoroughly evaluate the preparation method of these scaffolds before considering their in vivo usage.

Conclusion

The present study investigated the nanomechanical mapping of HA-composite PLA scaffolds and the potential association with in vitro cellular responses. The P10 scaffold modified by adding 10% of HA showed the highest cell attachment, viability, and mineralization among the four scaffold types. The AFM-based nanomechanical mapping provided high-spatial-resolution interface data of the PLA-composite scaffolds. Notably, the P10 scaffold exhibited uniform distributions of stiffness and adhesive force within an intermediate range. The result suggests an association between optimal conditions for cell growth and homogeneity of the surface properties. The study highlights the importance of understanding the material properties at a nanoscale resolution to reveal distinct properties that may not be evident in low-resolution data. The surface homogeneity is critical for interactions between cells and the scaffold interface. It must be further investigated for its potential correlation with other osteogenesis properties, such as osteoinductivity, osteointegrity, and osteoconductivity16. The insight into these correlations used as a design guideline will allow us to synthesize, functionalize, and tailor the scaffolds with specific requirements to maximize cell growth and enhance scaffold in vivo performance. Furthermore, the high-spatial-resolution data from AFM opens up the potential for future application of machine-learning analysis approaches73,74.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-72073-z.

Acknowledgements

US acknowledges funding support from the NSRF via the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research, and Innovation (grant number B16F640116) and the National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Thailand (Project Number P21-51892). SS is funded by a Postdoctoral Fellowship, Ratchadapisek Somphot Fund, Chulalongkorn University. SY received research funds from Fundamental Fund 2567, grant number: HEAF67300042. XH and CH acknowledge the financial support from the Ministry of Education (MoE) in Singapore, grant number T2EP50222-0001. The funding sources had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, manuscript writing, manuscript editing, and manuscript submission.

Author contributions

SS, US, and SY: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Funding acquisition. XH, AT, XX, CH, and WL: Methodology, Investigation, Resources, Writing—review & editing. All authors approved the manuscript submission.

Data availability

The raw data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as it is also part of an ongoing study. However, the processed data required to reproduce these findings are available in the manuscript and the supporting information section.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Mirkhalaf M Men Y Wang R No Y Zreiqat H Personalized 3D printed bone scaffolds: A review Acta Biomater. 2023 156 110 124 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.014 35429670
Mirkhalaf, M., Men, Y., Wang, R., No, Y. & Zreiqat, H. Personalized 3D printed bone scaffolds: A review. Acta Biomater. 156, 110–124 (2023).35429670 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.014
2. Koons GL Diba M Mikos AG Materials design for bone-tissue engineering Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020 5 584 603 10.1038/s41578-020-0204-2
Koons, G. L., Diba, M. & Mikos, A. G. Materials design for bone-tissue engineering. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 584–603 (2020).10.1038/s41578-020-0204-2
3. Roddy E DeBaun MR Daoud-Gray A Yang YP Gardner MJ Treatment of critical-sized bone defects: Clinical and tissue engineering perspectives Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 2018 28 351 362 10.1007/s00590-017-2063-0 29080923
Roddy, E., DeBaun, M. R., Daoud-Gray, A., Yang, Y. P. & Gardner, M. J. Treatment of critical-sized bone defects: Clinical and tissue engineering perspectives. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 28, 351–362 (2018).29080923 10.1007/s00590-017-2063-0
4. Campana V Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: From basic science to clinical practice J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2014 25 2445 10.1007/s10856-014-5240-2 24865980
Campana, V. et al. Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: From basic science to clinical practice. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 25, 2445 (2014).24865980 10.1007/s10856-014-5240-2
5. Gaharwar AK Singh I Khademhosseini A Engineered biomaterials for in situ tissue regeneration Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020 5 686 705 10.1038/s41578-020-0209-x
Gaharwar, A. K., Singh, I. & Khademhosseini, A. Engineered biomaterials for in situ tissue regeneration. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 686–705 (2020).10.1038/s41578-020-0209-x
6. Vidal L In situ production of pre-vascularized synthetic bone grafts for regenerating critical-sized defects in rabbits Acta Biomater. 2020 114 384 394 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.030 32688088
Vidal, L. et al. In situ production of pre-vascularized synthetic bone grafts for regenerating critical-sized defects in rabbits. Acta Biomater. 114, 384–394 (2020).32688088 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.030
7. Bohner M Loosli Y Baroud G Lacroix D Commentary: Deciphering the link between architecture and biological response of a bone graft substitute Acta Biomater. 2011 7 478 484 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.08.008 20709195
Bohner, M., Loosli, Y., Baroud, G. & Lacroix, D. Commentary: Deciphering the link between architecture and biological response of a bone graft substitute. Acta Biomater. 7, 478–484 (2011).20709195 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.08.008
8. Han J Development of a scaffold-on-a-chip platform to evaluate cell infiltration and osteogenesis on the 3D-printed scaffold for bone regeneration ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2023 9 968 977 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01367 36701173
Han, J. et al. Development of a scaffold-on-a-chip platform to evaluate cell infiltration and osteogenesis on the 3D-printed scaffold for bone regeneration. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 9, 968–977 (2023).36701173 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01367
9. Ilhan E Fabrication of tissue-engineered tympanic membrane patches using 3D-printing technology J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021 114 104219 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104219 33302170
Ilhan, E. et al. Fabrication of tissue-engineered tympanic membrane patches using 3D-printing technology. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 114, 104219 (2021).33302170 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104219
10. Zhang L Yang G Johnson BN Jia X Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair Acta Biomater. 2019 84 16 33 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.039 30481607
Zhang, L., Yang, G., Johnson, B. N. & Jia, X. Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair. Acta Biomater. 84, 16–33 (2019).30481607 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.039
11. Bose S Vahabzadeh S Bandyopadhyay A Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing Mater. Today 2013 16 496 504 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017
Bose, S., Vahabzadeh, S. & Bandyopadhyay, A. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater. Today 16, 496–504 (2013).10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017
12. Wang W 3D printing of PLA/n-HA composite scaffolds with customized mechanical properties and biological functions for bone tissue engineering Compos. B Eng. 2021 224 109192 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109192
Wang, W. et al. 3D printing of PLA/n-HA composite scaffolds with customized mechanical properties and biological functions for bone tissue engineering. Compos. B Eng. 224, 109192 (2021).10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109192
13. Hao S Modulatory effects of the composition and structure on the osteogenic enhancement for superparamagnetic scaffolds Eng. Sci. 2018 4 100 110
Hao, S. et al. Modulatory effects of the composition and structure on the osteogenic enhancement for superparamagnetic scaffolds. Eng. Sci. 4, 100–110 (2018).
14. Hou X Lu X He C Strong interface via weak interactions: Ultratough and malleable polylactic acid/polyhydroxybutyrate biocomposites Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2022 43 2100619 10.1002/marc.202100619
Hou, X., Lu, X. & He, C. Strong interface via weak interactions: Ultratough and malleable polylactic acid/polyhydroxybutyrate biocomposites. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 43, 2100619 (2022).10.1002/marc.202100619
15. Hou X Entropy-driven ultratough blends from brittle polymers ACS Macro Lett. 2021 10 406 411 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00844 35549235
Hou, X. et al. Entropy-driven ultratough blends from brittle polymers. ACS Macro Lett. 10, 406–411 (2021).35549235 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00844
16. Donate R Monzón M Alemán-Domínguez ME Additive manufacturing of PLA-based scaffolds intended for bone regeneration and strategies to improve their biological properties E-Polymers 2020 20 571 599 10.1515/epoly-2020-0046
Donate, R., Monzón, M. & Alemán-Domínguez, M. E. Additive manufacturing of PLA-based scaffolds intended for bone regeneration and strategies to improve their biological properties. E-Polymers 20, 571–599 (2020).10.1515/epoly-2020-0046
17. Hou X Entropically toughened robust biodegradable polymer blends and composites for bone tissue engineering ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024 16 2912 2920 10.1021/acsami.3c14716 38174974
Hou, X. et al. Entropically toughened robust biodegradable polymer blends and composites for bone tissue engineering. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 2912–2920 (2024).38174974 10.1021/acsami.3c14716
18. Patil S Dhyani V Kaur T Singh N Spatiotemporal control over cell proliferation and differentiation for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications using silk fibroin scaffolds ACS Appl. Bio. Mater. 2020 3 3476 3493 10.1021/acsabm.0c00305 35025219
Patil, S., Dhyani, V., Kaur, T. & Singh, N. Spatiotemporal control over cell proliferation and differentiation for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications using silk fibroin scaffolds. ACS Appl. Bio. Mater. 3, 3476–3493 (2020).35025219 10.1021/acsabm.0c00305
19. Zheng S Guan Y Yu H Huang G Zheng C Poly-L-lysine-coated PLGA/poly(amino acid)-modified hydroxyapatite porous scaffolds as efficient tissue engineering scaffolds for cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation New J. Chem. 2019 43 9989 10002 10.1039/C9NJ01675A
Zheng, S., Guan, Y., Yu, H., Huang, G. & Zheng, C. Poly-L-lysine-coated PLGA/poly(amino acid)-modified hydroxyapatite porous scaffolds as efficient tissue engineering scaffolds for cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. New J. Chem. 43, 9989–10002 (2019).10.1039/C9NJ01675A
20. Liedert A Kaspar D Augat P Ignatius A Claes L Liedert A Kaspar D Augat P Ignatius A Claes L Mechanobiology of bone tissue and bone cells Mechanosensitivity in Cells and Tissues 2005 Academia
Liedert, A., Kaspar, D., Augat, P., Ignatius, A. & Claes, L. Mechanobiology of bone tissue and bone cells. In Mechanosensitivity in Cells and Tissues (eds Liedert, A. et al.) (Academia, 2005).
21. Mondal S Hydroxyapatite nano bioceramics optimized 3D printed poly lactic acid scaffold for bone tissue engineering application Ceram. Int. 2020 46 3443 3455 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.057
Mondal, S. et al. Hydroxyapatite nano bioceramics optimized 3D printed poly lactic acid scaffold for bone tissue engineering application. Ceram. Int. 46, 3443–3455 (2020).10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.057
22. Diao H Si Y Zhu A Ji L Shi H Surface modified nano-hydroxyapatite/poly(lactide acid) composite and its osteocyte compatibility Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2012 32 1796 1801 10.1016/j.msec.2012.04.065
Diao, H., Si, Y., Zhu, A., Ji, L. & Shi, H. Surface modified nano-hydroxyapatite/poly(lactide acid) composite and its osteocyte compatibility. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 32, 1796–1801 (2012).10.1016/j.msec.2012.04.065
23. Jin Y Oxidative stress-induced apoptosis of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells by hydroxyapatite nanoparticles through lysosomal and mitochondrial pathways RSC Adv. 2017 7 13010 13018 10.1039/C7RA01008G
Jin, Y. et al. Oxidative stress-induced apoptosis of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells by hydroxyapatite nanoparticles through lysosomal and mitochondrial pathways. RSC Adv. 7, 13010–13018 (2017).10.1039/C7RA01008G
24. Shi Z Huang X Cai Y Tang R Yang D Size effect of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on proliferation and apoptosis of osteoblast-like cells Acta Biomater. 2009 5 338 345 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.07.023 18753024
Shi, Z., Huang, X., Cai, Y., Tang, R. & Yang, D. Size effect of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on proliferation and apoptosis of osteoblast-like cells. Acta Biomater. 5, 338–345 (2009).18753024 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.07.023
25. Ji S Guvendiren M 3D printed wavy scaffolds enhance mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis Micromachines 2019 11 31 10.3390/mi11010031 31881771
Ji, S. & Guvendiren, M. 3D printed wavy scaffolds enhance mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis. Micromachines 11, 31 (2019).31881771 10.3390/mi11010031
26. Martínez-Tong DE Quantitative mapping of mechanical properties in polylactic acid/natural rubber/organoclay bionanocomposites as revealed by nanoindentation with atomic force microscopy Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014 104 34 39 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.08.030
Martínez-Tong, D. E. et al. Quantitative mapping of mechanical properties in polylactic acid/natural rubber/organoclay bionanocomposites as revealed by nanoindentation with atomic force microscopy. Compos. Sci. Technol. 104, 34–39 (2014).10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.08.030
27. Mandriota N Cellular nanoscale stiffness patterns governed by intracellular forces Nat. Mater. 2019 18 1071 1077 10.1038/s41563-019-0391-7 31209386
Mandriota, N. et al. Cellular nanoscale stiffness patterns governed by intracellular forces. Nat. Mater. 18, 1071–1077 (2019).31209386 10.1038/s41563-019-0391-7
28. Ingber DE Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction Ann. Med. 2009 35 564 577 10.1080/07853890310016333
Ingber, D. E. Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction. Ann. Med. 35, 564–577 (2009).10.1080/07853890310016333
29. Kwon J Cho H Nanomechanical characterization of bone quality depending on tissue age via bimodal atomic force microscopy Nanomanuf. Metrol. 2023 6 1 11 10.1007/s41871-023-00208-3
Kwon, J. & Cho, H. Nanomechanical characterization of bone quality depending on tissue age via bimodal atomic force microscopy. Nanomanuf. Metrol. 6, 1–11 (2023).10.1007/s41871-023-00208-3
30. Collinson DW Sheridan RJ Palmeri MJ Brinson LC Best practices and recommendations for accurate nanomechanical characterization of heterogeneous polymer systems with atomic force microscopy Prog. Polym. Sci. 2021 119 101420 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101420
Collinson, D. W., Sheridan, R. J., Palmeri, M. J. & Brinson, L. C. Best practices and recommendations for accurate nanomechanical characterization of heterogeneous polymer systems with atomic force microscopy. Prog. Polym. Sci. 119, 101420 (2021).10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101420
31. Alsteens D Atomic force microscopy-based characterization and design of biointerfaces Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017 2 1 16 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.8
Alsteens, D. et al. Atomic force microscopy-based characterization and design of biointerfaces. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 1–16 (2017).10.1038/natrevmats.2017.8
32. Garcia R Nanomechanical mapping of soft materials with the atomic force microscope: Methods, theory and applications Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020 49 5850 5884 10.1039/D0CS00318B
Garcia, R. Nanomechanical mapping of soft materials with the atomic force microscope: Methods, theory and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 5850–5884 (2020).10.1039/D0CS00318B
33. Hu J Global mapping of live cell mechanical features using peakforce QNM AFM Biophys. Rep. 2020 6 9 18 10.1007/s41048-019-00103-9
Hu, J. et al. Global mapping of live cell mechanical features using peakforce QNM AFM. Biophys. Rep. 6, 9–18 (2020).10.1007/s41048-019-00103-9
34. Zhang S Quantitative nanomechanical mapping on poly(lactic acid)/poly(ε-caprolactone)/carbon nanotubes bionanocomposites using atomic force microscopy Polym Test 2019 77 105904 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105904
Zhang, S. et al. Quantitative nanomechanical mapping on poly(lactic acid)/poly(ε-caprolactone)/carbon nanotubes bionanocomposites using atomic force microscopy. Polym Test 77, 105904 (2019).10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105904
35. JPK Instruments. QI mode-Quantitative Imaging with the Nanowizard 3 AFM. https://www.jpk.com/app-technotes-img/AFM/pdf/jpk-tech-quantitative-imaging.14-1.pdf (2014).
36. Matplotlib: Python plotting—Matplotlib 3.4.1 documentation. https://matplotlib.org/.
37. Wickramasinghe S Do T Tran P FDM-based 3D printing of polymer and associated composite: A review on mechanical properties, defects treatments Polymers 2020 12 1529 10.3390/polym12071529 32664374
Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T. & Tran, P. FDM-based 3D printing of polymer and associated composite: A review on mechanical properties, defects treatments. Polymers 12, 1529 (2020).32664374 10.3390/polym12071529
38. Chen W Alkali treatment facilitates functional nano-hydroxyapatite coating of 3D printed polylactic acid scaffolds Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021 120 111686 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111686
Chen, W. et al. Alkali treatment facilitates functional nano-hydroxyapatite coating of 3D printed polylactic acid scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 120, 111686 (2021).10.1016/j.msec.2020.111686
39. Abdallah BM Kassem M Human mesenchymal stem cells: From basic biology to clinical applications Gene Ther. 2007 15 109 116 10.1038/sj.gt.3303067 17989700
Abdallah, B. M. & Kassem, M. Human mesenchymal stem cells: From basic biology to clinical applications. Gene Ther. 15, 109–116 (2007).17989700 10.1038/sj.gt.3303067
40. Docheva D Popov C Mutschler W Schieker M Human mesenchymal stem cells in contact with their environment: Surface characteristics and the integrin system J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2007 11 21 38 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00001.x 17367499
Docheva, D., Popov, C., Mutschler, W. & Schieker, M. Human mesenchymal stem cells in contact with their environment: Surface characteristics and the integrin system. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 11, 21–38 (2007).17367499 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00001.x
41. Pittenger MF Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells Science 1999 1979 284 143 147 10.1126/science.284.5411.143
Pittenger, M. F. et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1979(284), 143–147 (1999).10.1126/science.284.5411.143
42. Rothdiener M Stretching human mesenchymal stromal cells on stiffness-customized collagen type I generates a smooth muscle marker profile without growth factor addition Sci. Rep. 2016 6 1 15 10.1038/srep35840 28442746
Rothdiener, M. et al. Stretching human mesenchymal stromal cells on stiffness-customized collagen type I generates a smooth muscle marker profile without growth factor addition. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–15 (2016).28442746 10.1038/srep35840
43. Danti S D’Acunto M Trombi L Berrettini S Pietrabissa A A micro/nanoscale surface mechanical study on morpho-functional changes in multilineage-differentiated human mesenchymal stem cells Macromol. Biosci. 2007 7 589 598 10.1002/mabi.200600271 17477443
Danti, S., D’Acunto, M., Trombi, L., Berrettini, S. & Pietrabissa, A. A micro/nanoscale surface mechanical study on morpho-functional changes in multilineage-differentiated human mesenchymal stem cells. Macromol. Biosci. 7, 589–598 (2007).17477443 10.1002/mabi.200600271
44. Serra T Ortiz-Hernandez M Engel E Planell JA Navarro M Relevance of PEG in PLA-based blends for tissue engineering 3D-printed scaffolds Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014 38 55 62 10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.003
Serra, T., Ortiz-Hernandez, M., Engel, E., Planell, J. A. & Navarro, M. Relevance of PEG in PLA-based blends for tissue engineering 3D-printed scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 38, 55–62 (2014).10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.003
45. Zheng L 3D-printed scaffolds based on PLA/HA nanocomposites for trabecular bone reconstruction J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2016 741 012068 10.1088/1742-6596/741/1/012068
Zheng, L. et al. 3D-printed scaffolds based on PLA/HA nanocomposites for trabecular bone reconstruction. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 741, 012068 (2016).10.1088/1742-6596/741/1/012068
46. Akindoyo JO Beg MDH Ghazali S Heim HP Feldmann M Effects of surface modification on dispersion, mechanical, thermal and dynamic mechanical properties of injection molded PLA-hydroxyapatite composites Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017 103 96 105 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.09.013
Akindoyo, J. O., Beg, M. D. H., Ghazali, S., Heim, H. P. & Feldmann, M. Effects of surface modification on dispersion, mechanical, thermal and dynamic mechanical properties of injection molded PLA-hydroxyapatite composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 103, 96–105 (2017).10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.09.013
47. Bobbert FSL Zadpoor AA Effects of bone substitute architecture and surface properties on cell response, angiogenesis, and structure of new bone J. Mater. Chem. B 2017 5 6175 6192 10.1039/C7TB00741H 32264433
Bobbert, F. S. L. & Zadpoor, A. A. Effects of bone substitute architecture and surface properties on cell response, angiogenesis, and structure of new bone. J. Mater. Chem. B 5, 6175–6192 (2017).32264433 10.1039/C7TB00741H
48. Monchaux E Vermette P Effects of surface properties and bioactivation of biomaterials on endothelial cells Front. Biosci. (Schol. Ed.) 2010 2 239 255 20036944
Monchaux, E. & Vermette, P. Effects of surface properties and bioactivation of biomaterials on endothelial cells. Front. Biosci. (Schol. Ed.) 2, 239–255 (2010).20036944
49. Wells RG The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior Hepatology 2008 47 1394 1400 10.1002/hep.22193 18307210
Wells, R. G. The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior. Hepatology 47, 1394–1400 (2008).18307210 10.1002/hep.22193
50. Cheng X Enhanced biocompatibility of polyurethane-type shape memory polymers modified by plasma immersion ion implantation treatment and collagen coating: An in vivo study Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019 99 863 874 10.1016/j.msec.2019.02.032
Cheng, X. et al. Enhanced biocompatibility of polyurethane-type shape memory polymers modified by plasma immersion ion implantation treatment and collagen coating: An in vivo study. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 99, 863–874 (2019).10.1016/j.msec.2019.02.032
51. Chen S Tuning surface properties of bone biomaterials to manipulate osteoblastic cell adhesion and the signaling pathways for the enhancement of early osseointegration Coll. Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018 164 58 69 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.01.022
Chen, S. et al. Tuning surface properties of bone biomaterials to manipulate osteoblastic cell adhesion and the signaling pathways for the enhancement of early osseointegration. Coll. Surf. B Biointerfaces 164, 58–69 (2018).10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.01.022
52. Lee MH Ducheyne P Lynch L Boettiger D Composto RJ Effect of biomaterial surface properties on fibronectin–α5β1 integrin interaction and cellular attachment Biomaterials 2006 27 1907 1916 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.003 16310247
Lee, M. H., Ducheyne, P., Lynch, L., Boettiger, D. & Composto, R. J. Effect of biomaterial surface properties on fibronectin–α5β1 integrin interaction and cellular attachment. Biomaterials 27, 1907–1916 (2006).16310247 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.003
53. Idaszek J Kijeńska E Łojkowski M Swieszkowski W How important are scaffolds and their surface properties in regenerative medicine Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016 388 762 774 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.038
Idaszek, J., Kijeńska, E., Łojkowski, M. & Swieszkowski, W. How important are scaffolds and their surface properties in regenerative medicine. Appl. Surf. Sci. 388, 762–774 (2016).10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.038
54. Chang HI Wang Y Chang HI Wang Y Daniel E Cell responses to surface and architecture of tissue engineering scaffolds Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering-Cells and Biomaterials 2011 IntechOpen
Chang, H. I., Wang, Y., Chang, H. I. & Wang, Y. Cell responses to surface and architecture of tissue engineering scaffolds. In Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering-Cells and Biomaterials (ed. Daniel, E.) (IntechOpen, 2011).
55. Tong CY Derek CJC Membrane surface roughness promotes rapid initial cell adhesion and long term microalgal biofilm stability Environ. Res. 2022 206 112602 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112602 34968430
Tong, C. Y. & Derek, C. J. C. Membrane surface roughness promotes rapid initial cell adhesion and long term microalgal biofilm stability. Environ. Res. 206, 112602 (2022).34968430 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112602
56. Kang S Hoek EMV Choi H Shin H Effect of membrane surface properties during the fast evaluation of cell attachment Sep. Sci. Technol. 2007 41 1475 1487 10.1080/01496390600634673
Kang, S., Hoek, E. M. V., Choi, H. & Shin, H. Effect of membrane surface properties during the fast evaluation of cell attachment. Sep. Sci. Technol. 41, 1475–1487 (2007).10.1080/01496390600634673
57. Huang HH Effect of surface roughness of ground titanium on initial cell adhesion Biomol. Eng. 2004 21 93 97 10.1016/j.bioeng.2004.05.001 15567102
Huang, H. H. et al. Effect of surface roughness of ground titanium on initial cell adhesion. Biomol. Eng. 21, 93–97 (2004).15567102 10.1016/j.bioeng.2004.05.001
58. Ortiz R Laser surface microstructuring of a bio-resorbable polymer to anchor stem cells, control adipocyte morphology, and promote osteogenesis Polymers (Basel) 2018 10 1337 10.3390/polym10121337 30961262
Ortiz, R. et al. Laser surface microstructuring of a bio-resorbable polymer to anchor stem cells, control adipocyte morphology, and promote osteogenesis. Polymers (Basel) 10, 1337 (2018).30961262 10.3390/polym10121337
59. Al-Azzam N Alazzam A Micropatterning of cells via adjusting surface wettability using plasma treatment and graphene oxide deposition PLoS ONE 2022 17 e0269914 10.1371/journal.pone.0269914 35709175
Al-Azzam, N. & Alazzam, A. Micropatterning of cells via adjusting surface wettability using plasma treatment and graphene oxide deposition. PLoS ONE 17, e0269914 (2022).35709175 10.1371/journal.pone.0269914
60. Beijer NRM Dynamic adaptation of mesenchymal stem cell physiology upon exposure to surface micropatterns Sci. Rep. 2019 10.1038/s41598-019-45284-y 31235713
Beijer, N. R. M. et al. Dynamic adaptation of mesenchymal stem cell physiology upon exposure to surface micropatterns. Sci. Rep.10.1038/s41598-019-45284-y (2019).31235713 10.1038/s41598-019-45284-y
61. Maazouz Y Chizzola G Döbelin N Bohner M Cell-free, quantitative mineralization measurements as a proxy to identify osteoinductive bone graft substitutes Biomaterials 2021 275 120912 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120912 34098150
Maazouz, Y., Chizzola, G., Döbelin, N. & Bohner, M. Cell-free, quantitative mineralization measurements as a proxy to identify osteoinductive bone graft substitutes. Biomaterials 275, 120912 (2021).34098150 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120912
62. González-Vázquez A Planell JA Engel E Extracellular calcium and CaSR drive osteoinduction in mesenchymal stromal cells Acta Biomater. 2014 10 2824 2833 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.004 24525034
González-Vázquez, A., Planell, J. A. & Engel, E. Extracellular calcium and CaSR drive osteoinduction in mesenchymal stromal cells. Acta Biomater. 10, 2824–2833 (2014).24525034 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.004
63. Low YKA β-Phase poly(vinylidene fluoride) films encouraged more homogeneous cell distribution and more significant deposition of fibronectin towards the cell–material interface compared to α-phase poly(vinylidene fluoride) films Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014 34 345 353 10.1016/j.msec.2013.09.029
Low, Y. K. A. et al. β-Phase poly(vinylidene fluoride) films encouraged more homogeneous cell distribution and more significant deposition of fibronectin towards the cell–material interface compared to α-phase poly(vinylidene fluoride) films. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 34, 345–353 (2014).10.1016/j.msec.2013.09.029
64. Yang C Spatially patterned matrix elasticity directs stem cell fate Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016 113 E4439 E4445 10.1073/pnas.1609731113 27436901
Yang, C. et al. Spatially patterned matrix elasticity directs stem cell fate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E4439–E4445 (2016).27436901 10.1073/pnas.1609731113
65. Zhang QY Stiff substrates enhance cultured neuronal network activity Sci. Rep. 2014 10.1038/srep06215 25534772
Zhang, Q. Y. et al. Stiff substrates enhance cultured neuronal network activity. Sci. Rep.10.1038/srep06215 (2014).25534772 10.1038/srep06215
66. Yi B Xu Q Liu W An overview of substrate stiffness guided cellular response and its applications in tissue regeneration Bioact. Mater. 2022 15 82 35386347
Yi, B., Xu, Q. & Liu, W. An overview of substrate stiffness guided cellular response and its applications in tissue regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 15, 82 (2022).35386347
67. Song Y Micromechanical compatibility between cells and scaffolds directs the phenotypic transition of stem cells ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021 13 58152 58161 10.1021/acsami.1c17504 34808061
Song, Y. et al. Micromechanical compatibility between cells and scaffolds directs the phenotypic transition of stem cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 58152–58161 (2021).34808061 10.1021/acsami.1c17504
68. Coelho CC Grenho L Gomes PS Quadros PA Fernandes MH Nano-hydroxyapatite in oral care cosmetics: Characterization and cytotoxicity assessment Sci. Rep. 2019 9 1 10 10.1038/s41598-019-47491-z 30626917
Coelho, C. C., Grenho, L., Gomes, P. S., Quadros, P. A. & Fernandes, M. H. Nano-hydroxyapatite in oral care cosmetics: Characterization and cytotoxicity assessment. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–10 (2019).30626917 10.1038/s41598-019-47491-z
69. Zhao X Cytotoxicity of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles is shape and cell dependent Arch. Toxicol. 2013 87 1037 1052 10.1007/s00204-012-0827-1 22415765
Zhao, X. et al. Cytotoxicity of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles is shape and cell dependent. Arch. Toxicol. 87, 1037–1052 (2013).22415765 10.1007/s00204-012-0827-1
70. Gomes HI Mayes WM Rogerson M Stewart DI Burked IT Alkaline residues and the environment: A review of impacts, management practices and opportunities J. Clean. Prod. 2016 112 3571 3582 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.111
Gomes, H. I., Mayes, W. M., Rogerson, M., Stewart, D. I. & Burked, I. T. Alkaline residues and the environment: A review of impacts, management practices and opportunities. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 3571–3582 (2016).10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.111
71. Yang J Enhancing the cell affinity of macroporous poly(L-lactide) cell scaffold by a convenient surface modification method Polym. Int. 2003 52 1892 1899 10.1002/pi.1272
Yang, J. et al. Enhancing the cell affinity of macroporous poly(L-lactide) cell scaffold by a convenient surface modification method. Polym. Int. 52, 1892–1899 (2003).10.1002/pi.1272
72. Tan J Effect of local alkaline microenvironment on the behaviors of bacteria and osteogenic cells ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018 10 42018 42029 10.1021/acsami.8b15724 30412372
Tan, J. et al. Effect of local alkaline microenvironment on the behaviors of bacteria and osteogenic cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 42018–42029 (2018).30412372 10.1021/acsami.8b15724
73. Sokolov I Noninvasive diagnostic imaging using machine-learning analysis of nanoresolution images of cell surfaces: Detection of bladder cancer Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018 115 12920 12925 10.1073/pnas.1816459115 30509988
Sokolov, I. et al. Noninvasive diagnostic imaging using machine-learning analysis of nanoresolution images of cell surfaces: Detection of bladder cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 12920–12925 (2018).30509988 10.1073/pnas.1816459115
74. Kalinin SV Big, deep, and smart data in scanning probe microscopy ACS Nano 2016 10 9068 9086 10.1021/acsnano.6b04212 27676453
Kalinin, S. V. et al. Big, deep, and smart data in scanning probe microscopy. ACS Nano 10, 9068–9086 (2016).27676453 10.1021/acsnano.6b04212
