
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

38835985
117547
10.26603/001c.117547
Original Research
Strength of the Uninvolved Limb Following Return to Activity After ACL Injury: Implications for Symmetry as a Marker of Sufficient Strength
Hartshorne Matthew T 1
Turner Jeffrey A 1
Cameron Kenneth L 2
Padua Darin A 3
1 Human Movement Science Curriculum University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill https://ror.org/0130frc33
2 Keller Army Hospital
3 Department of Exercise and Sport Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill https://ror.org/0130frc33
Corresponding Author: Matthew T. Hartshorne PT, DPT Human Movement Science Curriculum University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #8700, 209 Fetzer Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 Email: hartmatt@email.unc.edu
1 6 2024
2024
19 6 657669
4 1 2024
24 4 2024
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background

Muscular strength deficits are common after ACL injury. While the Limb Symmetry Index (LSI), using the uninvolved limb as a reference, is widely used, negative strength adaptations may affect both limbs post-injury. It is uncertain how the strength of the uninvolved limb in those with an ACL injury compares to uninjured individuals, making it unclear whether it is appropriate as a benchmark for determining sufficient strength.

Purpose

To compare the strength of key lower extremity muscles of the uninvolved limb in those with history of ACL injury (ACL-I) to the dominant limb in individuals with no history of ACL injury (control).

Study Design

Cross-sectional study. Methods: A total of 5,727 military cadets were examined, with 82 females and 126 males in the ACL-I group and 2,146 females and 3,373 males in the control group. Maximum isometric strength was assessed for six muscle groups measured with a hand-held dynamometer. Separate two-way ANOVAs with limb and sex were performed for each muscle group.

Results

Significant main effects for limb were observed with the uninvolved limb in the ACL-I group displaying greater strength compared to the dominant limb in the control group for the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gluteus medius, but effect sizes were small (Cohen’s d <0.25). Significant main effects for sex were observed with greater male muscular strength in all six muscle groups with small to large effect sizes (Cohen’s d 0.49-1.46). No limb-by-sex interactions were observed.

Conclusions

There was no evidence of reduced strength in the uninvolved limb in those with a history of ACL injury compared to the dominant limb in those with no prior ACL injury. This finding suggests that, after clearance to return to activities, the uninvolved limb can be used as a standard for comparison of sufficient strength, including when using the LSI. Level of Evidence: Level 3

ACL
anterior cruciate ligament
hamstring strength
hip strength
limb symmetry index
muscle strength
quadriceps strength
return to sport
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

An estimated 200,000 people suffer an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury each year1,2 with a higher injury rate in females than males.3 While many people will undergo an ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and/or perform physical rehabilitation, evidence suggests that only 70% will return to their previous level of function.4 For those that do return to sport, approximately 30% will be at risk of suffering a subsequent ACL injury to either the contralateral limb or ipsilateral limb.5

Previous authors have shown that deficits of muscular strength, particularly in the quadriceps,6–8 hamstrings,8,9 hip abductors,4,10,11 hip extensors,12–14 and hip rotators15 of the involved side exist and may persist for many years after injury16 and contribute to poor long-term outcomes by allowing for reduced knee joint stability, altered biomechanics, and a diminished ability to adequately dampen impact forces during different weightbearing and landing activities.4,6,17 Additionally, muscular strength deficits and asymmetries between the involved side and the uninvolved side are a risk factor for primary18 and secondary19 ACL injury. Therefore, identifying muscular strength deficits may be a critical component for secondary and tertiary injury risk reduction efforts.

Limb symmetry index (LSI) is one of the most common methods for identifying muscular strength deficits in those who have suffered a prior ACL injury.20 LSI is calculated by dividing the strength of the involved limb by the strength of the uninvolved limb and multiplying that by 100 to get a percentage, equation provided below in (1).21 While using the LSI has become standard practice, sports medicine professionals and researchers have raised concerns about using the uninvolved limb as a reference, as negative strength adaptations may occur in both limbs after ACL injury.20,22–26 Furthermore, after ACLR, people often demonstrate muscle strength deficits in both the involved and uninvolved limbs when compared to their uninjured peers.23,27 Since the uninvolved limb in those with an ACLR appears to be weaker than their uninjured peers, this calls into question the appropriateness of using the uninvolved limb as the standard for comparison after an ACL injury.

(1)LSI=[ Injured Limb  Uninvolved Limb ]×100

Research on the strength of the uninvolved limb in individuals with ACL injury compared to healthy individuals is more extensively available for the quadriceps8,15,23,28 and hamstrings,3,8,23,28 and less so, for the gluteus medius,8,15 gluteus maximus,8,15,29 hip external rotators,15 and hip internal rotators.15 However, interpretation of this research is challenging due to variations in populations studied, including age,30 sport,19,30 and athletic level,19,30 small sample sizes,4,8,26,31 inconsistent testing times after injury,8,28,32,33 limited muscle groups tested,32–34 and differences in testing parameters such as muscle contraction type15,30,35 and speed.28,30,35

Thus, it is not clear if muscular strength in the uninvolved limb of those with ACL injury history is reduced compared to those with no prior ACL injury. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to compare the strength of key lower extremity muscles of the uninvolved limb in those with history of ACL injury (ACL-I) to the dominant limb in individuals with no history of ACL injury (control). These key muscles include: the quadriceps, hamstrings, gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, hip external rotators, and hip internal rotators. The hypothesis was that the uninvolved (UNINV) limb in the ACL-I group would demonstrate muscle strength deficits in all muscle groups when compared to the dominant (DOM) limb of the control group. While the study design did not allow for control of every potential confounding factor in the interpretation mentioned previously, the methods employed are believed to enhance the clinical significance of the findings within the defined scope of this study.

METHODS

This study uses data from the 2005-2009 years of enrollment in the JUMP-ACL (Joint Undertaking to Monitor and Prevent ACL Injury) study, a prospective cohort study of biomechanical risk factors for ACL injury. Participants were included if they recorded successful trials of the six muscle groups of interest. This paper represents a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline data collected at the time of enrollment to describe the strength difference of six muscle groups between the UNINV limb in the ACL-I group compared to the DOM limb of the control group.

Participants

A total of 5,908 cadets and midshipmen at the United States (U.S.) Air Force, Military and Naval Academies participated in the study and performed initial biomechanical testing during their initial summer of training (Figure 1). Informed consent was obtained from each participant in accordance with each institution’s review board. At the time of data collection, participants without a current musculoskeletal injury and were able to perform the study tasks were included. Participants were identified as having an ACL injury history (ACL-I group) or no prior ACL injury (control group) via self-report on the baseline questionnaire administered at the time of informed consent. Those in the ACL-I group had to receive a medical waiver through the Department of Defense Medical Evaluation Review Board and were deemed fit to participate in the physically demanding military training program at the U.S. Service Academies and had no physical activity restrictions at the time of consent. Additionally, from the original dataset, only participants who performed all strength tests were included in this study’s data analysis.

227057 Figure 1. Flow diagram for enrollment of participants and group allocation

Muscle Strength

Isometric strength of the quadriceps, hamstrings, gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, hip external rotators, and hip internal rotators were assessed using a hand-held dynamometer (NexGen Ergonomics, Quebec, Canada). At the time of data collection, the testing was carried out by a team of Certified Athletic Trainer Research Assistants, each of whom underwent a standardized training regimen and successfully passed a comprehensive validation assessment to ensure their competence. Previous studies have shown their intra-rater reliability (ICC2,k) for the testing positions (Figure 2) to range from 0.73 to 0.98.36 These specific testing positions were selected to minimize participant movement while ensuring efficient assessment of strength, given that strength testing was integrated into the procedures of a large-scale data collection. In the control group, the DOM limb, defined as the preferred leg to kick a ball, was used for testing while the UNINV limb was tested in the ACL-I group. In the control group, the DOM limb was selected to undergo testing as it has been demonstrated to be as strong or stronger than the non-dominant limb.37,38 This decision ensures that the ACL-I group’s UNINV limb would be compared to the highest standard. Participants were asked to push into the dynamometer as hard as they could for five seconds (Supplemental File 1). The mean force measurements across two 5-second trials were averaged together. All strength values were converted to torque by multiplying the recorded force (N) by the participant’s lever arm length (m), which was measured as the distance from the lateral femoral epicondyle to the location of the dynamometer for the quadriceps and hamstrings and from the superior aspect of the greater trochanter to the location of the dynamometer for the gluteus medius and gluteus maximus. All torque values were then normalized to the participant’s body mass, as seen in (2).

(2) Normalized Torque = Newton × meter  kilogram 

227058 Figure 2. Isometric strength testing positions for each muscle group.

Data Processing

The primary outcome variable of interest was the average mean isometric muscular strength of six different muscle groups between the uninvolved (UNINV) limb in those with a history of ACL injury who had returned to unrestricted activities (ACL-I group) to the dominant (DOM) limb in individuals with no history of ACL injury (control group). Each group’s strength variables were graphically analyzed for normality. Additionally, the strength variables underwent several data cleaning steps, including 1) winsorizing outliers that were ± 3 SD above and below the mean (<1% of variables for each muscle group for the control group and 0% for the ACL-I group), and 2) removal of rows with missing data. Missingness accounted for <1.6% of the dataset, given the large sample size it is a reasonable strategy to opt for removal as a means for handling missing data.39

Data Analysis

All analyses were completed using RStudio Version 1.3.1073. Data were analyzed by conducting separate two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) considering sex (female, male) and limb (UNINV in ACL-I group, DOM limb in the control group) for each of the six muscle groups tested using a priori alpha level of 0.05. To complement the p-values, effect sizes using Cohen’s d (d) were calculated for the main effects of sex and limb strength to provide a more comprehensive characterization of differences between groups. Effect size magnitude was interpreted as trivial (0-0.19), small (0.20-0.49), medium (0.50-0.79) and large (>0.8).40 Polarity of the effect sizes were adjusted so that positive effect sizes indicated increased strength in the UNINV limb compared to the DOM limb or increased male muscular strength compared to females. Negative effect sizes indicated reduced strength in the UNINV limb compared to the DOM limb or increased female muscular strength compared to males.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic information for each group at the time of enrollment is presented in Table 1 and the observed strength values for each limb (DOM, UNINV) by sex (females, males) are presented in Table 2. The results indicate significant main effects for limb, with the UNINV limb being stronger in the quadriceps (F1,5723 = 7.926, p = 0.005), hamstrings (F1,5723 = 4.256, p = 0.039), and gluteus medius (F1,5723 = 12.520, p <0.001), but not for the gluteus maximus (F1,5723 = 0.244, p = 0.621), hip external rotators (F1,5723 = 0.674, p = 0.412), or the hip internal rotators (F1,5723 = 0.075, p = 0.784) (Figure 3). Limb differences in strength showed trivial to small effect sizes (d) were present for the of the quadriceps (d = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.02-0.30), hamstrings (d = 0.13, 95% CI: -0.01-0.27), gluteus medius (d = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.10-0.38), gluteus maximus (d = -0.04, 95% CI: -0.18-0.10), hip external rotators (d = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.10-0.18), and hip internal rotators (d = -0.02, 95% CI: -0.16-0.12).

227059 Table 1. Participant demographics by group and sex. Values are presented as mean ± SD.

	ACL-I Group
(n=208)	Control Group
(n = 5,519)	
Sex	82 Females	126 Males	2,146 Females	3,373 Males	
Age
(years)	18.71+0.77	19.06+1.01*	18.57+0.77	18.86+0.96	
Height
(cm)	165.64+6.50	178.70+7.23	165.63+6.54	178.08+7.15	
Mass
(kg)	64.00+8.41	81.68+13.81*	62.87+7.97	77.39+12.30	
ACL-I = Prior ACL injury group; Control = No prior ACL injury group

*indicates statistically higher value compared to males in the control group (p<0.05)

227060 Figure 3. Difference in muscle strength of the six muscle groups between the DOM limb of the control (light purple) and the UNINV limb of the ACL-I (dark purple) groups during the hand-held dynamometer isometric muscle strength testing. This illustration is the combination of a violin plot and box plot to aid the best representation of the data. The shaded area reports the kernel distribution of the data. Overlaid is a box plot, with the box representing the 25th-to-75th percentile. The whiskers describe the upper and lower limits of the data. The median of the data is represented by the solid line. There was a significant main effect for limb in the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gluteus medius, but not for the gluteus maximus, hip external rotators, or hip internal rotators. While there were significant main effects for limb, effect sizes were trivial to small for all muscles (effect size (d) range -0.04 – 0.24), with greater strength in the UNINV limb compared to the DOM limb in all the muscles groups except for gluteus maximus, hip external rotators, and the hip internal rotators. ACL-I = participants with a history of a prior anterior cruciate ligament injury; DOM = dominant leg of the control group; UNINV = uninvolved limb of the ACL-I group; * = p < 0.05.

Significant main effects for sex were observed, with males demonstrating greater strength in the quadriceps (F1,5723 = 2519.699, p <0.001), hamstrings (F1,5723 = 1251.848, p <0.001), gluteus medius (F1,5723 = 492.309, p <0.001), gluteus maximus (F1,5723 = 335.107, p <0.001), hip external rotators (F1,5723 = 2968.519, p <0.001), and hip internal rotators (F1,5723 = 545.594, p <0.001) (Figure 4). Effect sizes ranged from small to large for the sex differences in strength of the quadriceps (d = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.30 -1.42), hamstrings (d = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.90-1.01), gluteus medius (d = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.55-0.66), gluteus maximus (d = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.44-0.55), hip external rotators (d = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.42 -1.54), and hip internal rotators (d = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.58-0.69).

227061 Figure 4. Difference in muscle strength of the six muscle groups between males (light blue) and females (dark blue) during the hand-held dynamometer isometric muscle strength testing. This illustration is the combination of a violin plot and box plot to aid the best representation of the data. The shaded area reports the kernel distribution of the data. Overlaid is a box plot, with the box representing the 25th-to-75th percentile. The whiskers describe the upper and lower limits of the data. The median of the data is represented by the solid line. There was a significant main effect for sex in all the muscle groups tested. There were small to large effect sizes for all muscles (effect size (d) range 0.50 – 1.48), with greater strength in males than females in all the muscle groups. * = p < 0.05.

There were no limb-by-sex interactions observed for the quadriceps (F1,5723 = 0.008, p = 0.927), hamstrings (F1,5723 = 0.416, p = 0.519), gluteus medius (F1,5723 = 1.034, p = 0.309), gluteus maximus (F1,5723 = 2.830, p = 0.093), hip external rotators (F1,5723 = 0.520, p = 0.471), or hip internal rotators (F1,5723 = 3.695, p = 0.055) (Table 2). The lack of a significant limb-by-sex interaction indicates that the observed differences in strength between limbs was similar for males and females.

227062 Table 2. Sex-and Limb-Specific Differences in Lower Extremity Muscle Torque. Strength values are presented as mean + SD (95% CI)

Muscle Group	Injury Group	Female Muscle Torque
(Nm/kg)	Male Muscle Torque
(Nm/kg)	
Quadriceps†‡	ACL-I	1.60+0.31 (1.54-1.67)	2.13+0.48 (2.04-2.21)	
Control	1.53+0.32 (1.52-1.55)	2.05+0.42 (2.04-2.06)	
Hamstrings†‡	ACL-I	0.84+0.19 (0.80-0.88)	1.02+0.20 (0.98-1.06)	
Control	0.80+0.19 (0.79-0.81)	1.00+0.19 (0.99-1.01)	
Gluteus Medius†‡	ACL-I	1.31+0.29 (1.25-1.38)	1.60+0.43 (1.52-1.67)	
Control	1.25+0.35 (1.24-1.27)	1.48+0.41 (1.47-1.49)	
Gluteus Maximus‡	ACL-I	0.98+0.28 (0.92-1.04)	1.06+0.32 (1.00-1.11)	
Control	0.95+0.27 (0.93-0.96)	1.10+0.32 (1.09-1.11)	
Hip External Rotators‡	ACL-I	0.67+0.12 (0.65-0.70)	0.88+0.15 (0.85-0.90)	
Control	0.65+0.12 (0.65-0.66)	0.87+0.16 (0.87-0.88)	
Hip Internal Rotators‡	ACL-I	0.73+0.13 (0.70-0.75)	0.78+0.17 (0.75-0.81)	
Control	0.70+0.14 (0.70-0.71)	0.80+0.16 (0.80-0.81)	
ACL-I = Prior ACL injury group; Control = No prior ACL injury group

Note: Uninvolved (UNINV) limb of the ACL-I group, and the dominant (DOM) limb of the control group were tested.

† indicates p <0.05 for the main effect for limb

‡ indicates p <0.05 for the main effect for sex

DISCUSSION

The primary purpose of this study was to compare the muscular strength of the uninvolved (UNINV) limb in those with a history of ACL injury who had returned to unrestricted activities (ACL-I group) to the dominant (DOM) limb in individuals with no history of ACL injury (control group). The most important finding was that there was no clinically meaningful evidence (effect size, d < 0.25) of strength deficits in the UNINV limb for the quadriceps, hamstrings, gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, hip external rotators, or hip internal rotators muscle groups. While the UNINV limb in the ACL-I group displayed statistically higher strength values for the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gluteus medius muscle groups when compared to the DOM limb of the control group. This may be secondary to compensatory movement patterns and/or neuromuscular control changes developed after injury, resulting in more load on the uninvolved limb, which has been shown in other literature.41–45 Given the small effect sizes, it is important to interpret the significance of the findings with caution as they might not be clinically meaningful. Take into consideration that larger sample sizes used in studies can increase the likelihood of detecting statistically significant differences (p-value < 0.05) even when the effect size is negligible, resulting in type I errors or false positives. Therefore, the results indicate that in those who have returned to unrestricted activities after ACLR, the UNINV limb’s strength can be used as a benchmark for determining if the individual has sufficient strength by comparing it to their involved limb.

The sample included in this study was substantial, with 5,519 participants in the control group and 208 participants in the ACL-I group, which represents the largest study examining lower extremity strength profiles to the best knowledge of the authors. Although there were statistically significant main effects for limb with greater strength in the UNINV limb in those with ACL injury history for the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gluteus medius in this sample, their respective effects sizes were small (d < 0.25). Consequently, while the results may be statistically significant, they may not be clinically relevant. There were no limb-by-sex interactions meaning the differences in muscle strength between the UNINV limb (ACL-I group) and the dominant limb (control group) were consistent across both sexes. Therefore, these results suggest that sports medicine professionals may use limb symmetry for muscle strength assessment in patients who have been cleared to participate in all activities after an ACL injury without concerns about strength deficits in the UNINV limb.

Maximal Isometric Muscle Strength

Although previously suggested mechanisms for muscle weakness in the UNINV limb after injury exist including prolonged arthrogenic inhibition,26,46 deconditioning,23 or lack of re-conditioning,23 the findings of the current study showed no difference in UNINV muscular strength compared to the DOM limb of healthy controls at the time of testing.

Although previously suggested mechanisms for muscle weakness in the uninvolved (UNINV) limb after injury, such as prolonged arthrogenic inhibition,26,46 deconditioning,23 or lack of re-conditioning,23 this study’s findings present a nuanced picture. While small statistically significant differences in three of the muscle groups were observed between the UNINV and dominant (DOM) limbs of healthy controls, the associated effect sizes were consistently small to trivial, suggesting that, from a clinical perspective, the observed differences may not be practically significant. In essence, although there were statistical differences in muscle strength, the limited impact on a practical level implies that the UNINV limb can be considered a reliable surrogate for comparison to the DOM limb. This reinforces the notion that, despite subtle statistical variations, the UNINV limb remains a valuable benchmark for assessing muscle strength in individuals with a history of ACL injury who have returned to unrestricted activities.

Knee Strength

Previous studies examining quadriceps and hamstrings strength in those with a history of an ACL injury and those with no prior ACL injury individuals have produced conflicting results. The present study supports previous research reporting no clinically significant differences in the UNINV limb strength of the quadriceps19,33–35,47–51 and hamstrings8,19,26,33,35,50,52,53 for individuals with ACLR compared to healthy controls after approximately six months. However, other studies have reported both increased8 and decreased23,26,54,55 quadriceps strength and decreased hamstrings23 strength in the UNINV limb after ACL injury when compared to those with no prior ACL injury. The reason for the discrepancies in these findings is unclear, but factors such as time since injury/reconstruction,15,23,35,47,48 graft type,35,51 patient population characteristics (age,19,23,34 sex breakdown,19 and fitness level19,34), and strength assessment methods19,23,52 may play roles. This study aimed to mitigate the potential impact of these factors through the inclusion/exclusion criteria focusing in on a relatively homogenous participant group in terms of age and fitness level and focused in on one aspect of strength isometric testing. The conflicting results highlight the need for future research to clarify the relationship between strength in individuals with a history of ACL injury and strength in individuals with no prior ACL injury across multiple time points, both acutely and chronically.

Hip Strength

The results of the current study, indicating a small effect but likely not clinically meaningful discernible difference in gluteus medius strength between the UNINV limb in the ACL-I group and the DOM limb in the healthy control group, align with findings in recreational athletes acutely,26 when cleared to return to play,8,11,34 and several years after ACLR.56 Of note, while weaker hip abduction muscle strength has been linked to potential knee injury positions10,57 and decreased gluteus medius strength in the involved limb after a knee injury,10,58 to the best of the authors’ knowledge, no studies have reported a decrease in gluteus medius of the UNINV limb after an ACL injury.

The majority of previous research investigating gluteus maximus strength supports the current study’s findings that demonstrate no discernable differences in gluteus maximus strength between the UNINV limb in those with a history of ACL injury and the DOM limb in those with no prior ACL injury.8,26,29 Conversely, Tate et al. identified weakness in the UNINV limb’s gluteus maximus after ACLR compared to the DOM limb in healthy controls.4 The difference may be explained by their participants’ lower fitness level, as they were only recreationally active at least 2x/week for 30 minutes and engaged in jumping or cutting activities at least 1x/month. That activity level would be relatively low compared to the activity level of the military cadets in this study. Interestingly, Bell et al. observed that individuals with weaker quadriceps strength in the UNINV limb after ACLR demonstrated an increase in gluteus maximus strength in the UNINV limb compared to healthy controls, possibly as a compensatory mechanism.15 However, they found no differences in the UNINV limb’s gluteus maximus strength in participants with high quadriceps strength in the UNINV limb compared to healthy controls. Notably, the average time from surgery for the ACLR group was approximately two to three years in their study, which represents a period of having returned to unrestricted activity. While the current study did not ask when the ACL injury occurred, all participants had been cleared for unrestricted activity.

No differences were observed in hip external or internal rotator strength between the UNINV limb in individuals with ACL-I and the DOM limb in the healthy control group. Previous hip external rotator strength findings are mixed.15,34 Discrepancies between the two studies may be attributed to the age discrepancy between the two cohorts (~14 vs. ~18 years old) and the fact that research demonstrating reduced hip external rotator strength in the UNINV limb solely focused on female athletes.34 Only one study was identified examining hip internal rotation strength, which also reported no discernible differences in strength between the UNINV limb in individuals with a history of ACL injury and the DOM limb in those without prior ACL injury.15 In summary, the results of this study lend support to findings indicating that strength of the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, hip internal rotators, and external rotators of the UNINV limb does not appear to be decreased in military cadets who have returned to unrestricted activity after ACL injury.

Sex Differences

While there was no evidence of reduced strength in the UNINV limb for both sexes, males were statistically stronger than females in all muscle groups. The statistically significant differences were accompanied by small to large effect sizes indicating meaningful differences (Figure 4). These findings are consistent with previous research on young athletic populations, which also showed that males were stronger than females.59,60 Therefore, when designing rehabilitation programs, sports medicine professionals should consider sex differences in lower extremity muscular strength. Additionally, future research should establish normative values using sex-specific lower extremity muscular strength standards.

Clinical Application

Sports medicine professionals may use this study’s findings to assess and monitor strength deficits in patients with a history of ACL injury who have returned to unrestricted activities. By using the uninvolved limb’s strength in individuals with a history of ACL injury as a proxy for the dominant limb in those without prior ACL injury when utilizing the limb symmetry index, clinicians can develop individualized and effective rehabilitation protocols, including strength training programs, to restore muscle symmetry and optimize functional outcomes. This study also highlights the importance of accounting for sex differences in lower extremity muscular strength when establishing normative values for future research. Using the uninvolved limb as a benchmark for comparison, sports medicine professionals can make more informed clinical decisions, design effective rehabilitation programs, and improve musculoskeletal injury risk screenings for individuals with a history of ACL injury.

It should be noted that while this study has a large sample size and provides valuable insights into using the uninvolved limb as an appropriate benchmark, it’s important to acknowledge that all participants had been medically cleared for physical activity at the time of the study. Therefore, they do not represent individuals in the early or sub-acute phases post-surgery, where the use of the non-injured limb as a reference for LSI might be less applicable. Additionally, practitioners should proceed with caution if attempting to compare the average strength values with those reported in previous studies. The variations in testing positions and the equipment used pose a challenge for direct comparisons. For example, research indicates that maximal isometric strength values obtained from hand-held dynamometers are often lower than those measured by isokinetic dynamometers.61 This discrepancy underscores the challenges in comparing strength measures across different methodologies. Furthermore, while isometric strength assessments provide a measure of muscle force generation, they might not comprehensively reflect the intricate dynamics of neuromuscular control that influence functional movement. This is an important consideration as persistent neuromuscular deficits, even in the presence of observed isometric strength symmetry, could impact movement quality and elevate the risk of secondary injuries.41–45

Despite these considerations, this study’s findings support the practice among sports medicine professionals of using the uninvolved limb as an appropriate benchmark for assessing and monitoring strength deficits in individuals with a history of an ACL injury who have resumed unrestricted activities.

Limitations and Strengths

Several limitations to this study should be noted. First, only the uninvolved limb in those with a history of an ACL injury was tested as that was the protocol at the time of testing. Therefore, while there is no specific information about the involved limb, the findings of this study does support that the UNINV limb is not weaker than the dominant limb of healthy controls.

Second, while participants were all cleared to return to unrestricted activity at the time of enrollment, the time interval between injury and testing was not standardized. Previous research has shown that the muscle strength comparison between previously injured individuals and healthy controls may differ in terms of symmetry depending on the timing of testing, with most strength values being asymmetrical early and then normalizing around seven months.8,11,19 With most athletes being given clearance to return to activity between 6-12 months,62–64 the majority of those in this study’s ACL-I group are most likely greater than seven months post-injury meaning that their strength may have normalized to that of healthy controls. The exact timing of when the muscular strength becomes symmetrical should be explored in future research.

Third, for those participants with an ACLR, the graft type was not specified, thus limiting the ability to determine if graft type may influence the appropriateness of using the UNINV limb after an ACL injury as the benchmark for comparison of muscular strength and symmetry. However, previous research has suggested that muscle strength differences between graft types may only be clinically relevant during the early phases of rehabilitation after ACLR.65 Since this study’s patient population was in the later phases and cleared to return to unrestrictive activity, this limitation may not be significant.

Fourth, the participants examined in this study were first-year military cadets at different academies. As such, they may have greater physical fitness and/or motivation compared to a typical population.

Fifth, the strength symmetry between the UNINV limb in those with a history of ACL injury and the DOM limb in those with no prior ACL injury may only be specific to the type of muscle strength testing and the muscle testing positions used in this study. It is unclear if similar findings would be observed in different testing positions or under different testing conditions, such as concentric or eccentric contractions during isokinetic testing or when assessing different strength parameters such as peak force or rate of force development.

Finally, while this study supports using the UNINV limb in those with a history of an ACL injury as a surrogate for the DOM limb of healthy controls, it does not provide information on all the lower extremity muscles such as the soleus or adductors, or the absolute magnitude of muscular strength or strength symmetry required for reducing secondary injury risk. Although potentially not clinically significant, the implications of the observed small differences in muscular strength, particularly during injury mechanisms in the context of reinjury or contralateral injury risk, deserve focused attention in future research endeavors. Future studies should address these identified gaps.

Despite these limitations, the current study contributes valuable insights into the muscular strength of individuals with a history of ACL injury, particularly after clearance to return to unrestricted activity. By supporting the use of the UNINV limb as a surrogate for the DOM limb of healthy controls, these findings offer a practical benchmark for clinicians. The large sample size, including both males and females and ACL-injured and healthy individuals, enhances the robustness and applicability of the results. Moreover, the comprehensive examination of various lower extremity muscles provides a foundation for future research to build upon, addressing several research gaps identified in this study.

CONCLUSION

In this investigation, there was no conclusive evidence of reduced muscular strength in the uninvolved (UNINV) limb in those with a history of ACL injury compared to the dominant (DOM) limb in those with no prior ACL injury, regardless of sex. Despite detecting a slight increase in muscular strength in three of the six muscle groups of the UNINV limb in individuals with a history of an ACL injury compared to the DOM limb of healthy controls, the small effect sizes (d < 0.25) caution against overemphasizing these differences as clinically significant. These findings suggest that after an individual with a history of ACL injury has been cleared for unrestrictive activities, using the uninvolved limb as a standard for comparison for sufficient strength, such as when using the LSI, appears appropriate. This study shows that isometric muscle strength values in the uninvolved limb of individuals with ACL injury are equivalent or stronger than those of the dominant limb in individuals with no prior ACL injury, supporting the use of the uninvolved limb as a reliable benchmark for assessing muscular strength in those with a history of ACL injury.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental File 1

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Thank you to all that made the JUMP-ACL testing possible.
==== Refs
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: creating a permissive healing phenotype in military personnel and civilians for faster recovery Mil Med Morris J. L. McEwen P. Letson H. L. Dobson G. P. 2022
187 1310 1317 10.1093/milmed/usac093 35389483
Biopsychosocial model domains in clinical practice guidelines for return to sport after ACL injury: systematic review using the AGREE II checklist Sports Health de Queiroz J. H. M. Murakawa Y. A. B. de Castro S. S. Almeida G. P. L. de Oliveira R. R. 2023
15 2 165 175 10.1177/19417381221094582 35581734
Sex differences in the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, and meniscal injuries in collegiate and high school sports: 2009-2010 through 2013-2014 Am J Sports Med Stanley L. E. Kerr Z. Y. Dompier T. P. Padua D. A. 2016
44 6 1565 1572 10.1177/0363546516630927
The associations between hip strength and hip kinematics during a single leg hop in recreational athletes post ACL reconstruction compared to healthy controls Int J Sports Phys Ther Tate J. Suckut T. Wages J. Lyles H. Perrin B. 2017
12 3 341 28593088
Incidence of contralateral and ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport Clin J Sport Med Paterno M. V. Rauh M. J. Schmitt L. C. Ford K. R. Hewett T. E. 2012
22 2 116 121 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318246ef9e 22343967
Quantifying quadriceps muscle strength in patients with ACL injury, focal cartilage lesions, and degenerative meniscus tears: differences and clinical implications Orthop J Sports Med Eitzen I. Grindem H. Nilstad A. Moksnes H. Risberg M. A. 2016
4 10 2325967116667717 10.1177/2325967116667717 27766275
Timeline of gains in quadriceps strength symmetry and patient-reported function early after ACL reconstruction Int J Sports Phys Ther Pottkotter K. A. Di Stasi S. L. Schmitt L. C.. 2020
15 6 995 10.26603/ijspt20200995 33344016
Lower extremity muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction J Athl Train Thomas A.C. Villwock M. Wojtys E.M. Palmieri-Smith R.M. 2013
48 5 610 620 10.4085/1062-6050-48.3.23 24067150
Likelihood of ACL graft rupture: not meeting six clinical discharge criteria before return to sport is associated with a four times greater risk of rupture Br J Sports Med Kyritsis P. Bahr R. Landreau P. Miladi R. Witvrouw E. 2016
50 15 946 951 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095908 27215935
Hip muscle strength predicts noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury in male and female athletes: a prospective study Am J Sports Med Khayambashi K. Ghoddosi N. Straub R. K. Powers C. M. 2016
44 2 355 361 10.1177/0363546515616237 26646514
Evaluation of proximal joint kinematics and muscle strength following ACL reconstruction surgery in female athletes J Orthop Res Noehren B. Abraham A. Curry M. Johnson D. Ireland M.L. 2014
32 10 1305 1310 10.1002/jor.22678 25044305
Relationships between knee valgus, hip-muscle strength, and hip-muscle recruitment during a single-limb step-down J Sport Rehabil Hollman J. H. Ginos B. E. Kozuchowski J. Vaughn A. S. Krause D. A. Youdas J. W. 2009
18 1 104 117 10.1123/jsr.18.1.104 19321910
A review of recent perspectives on biomechanical risk factors associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury Res Sports Med Hughes G. 2014
22 2 193 212 10.1080/15438627.2014.881821 24650339
Anterior cruciate ligament injury: identification of risk factors and prevention strategies Curr Sports Med Rep Acevedo R. J. Rivera-Vega A. Miranda G. Micheo W. 2014
13 3 186 191 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000053 24819011
Hip strength in patients with quadriceps strength deficits after ACL reconstruction Med Sci Sports Exerc Bell D.R. Trigsted S.M. Post E.G. Walden C.E. 2016
48 10 1886 1892 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000999 27254260
Return to play following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review about strength deficits Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Petersen W. Taheri P. Forkel P. Zantop T. 2014
134 1417 1428 10.1007/s00402-014-1992-x 25091127
Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport Am J Sports Med Paterno M. V. Schmitt L. C. Ford K. R.. 2010
38 10 1968 1978 10.1177/0363546510376053 http://ajs.sagepub.com/content/38/10/1968.short 20702858
Biomechanical deficits at the hip in athletes with ACL reconstruction are ameliorated with neuromuscular training Am J Sports Med Nagelli C. Wordeman S. Di Stasi S. Hoffman J. Marulli T. Hewett T.E. 2018
46 11 2772 2779 10.1177/0363546518787505 30074811
Quadriceps and hamstrings strength reference values for athletes with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction who play popular pivoting sports, including soccer, basketball, and handball: a scoping review J Orthop Sports Phys Ther van Melick N. van der Weegen W. van der Horst N. 2022
52 3 142 155 10.2519/jospt.2022.10693 10.2519/jospt.2022.10693 34972481
Limb symmetry indexes can overestimate knee function after anterior cruciate ligament injury J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Wellsandt E. Failla M. J. Snyder-Mackler L. 2017
47 5 334 338 10.2519/jospt.2017.7285 28355978
Single-legged hop tests as predictors of self-reported knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study Am J Sports Med Logerstedt D. Grindem H. Lynch A.. 2012
40 10 2348 2356 10.1177/0363546512457551 10.1177/0363546512457551 22926749
Bilateral deficit of voluntary quadriceps muscle activation after unilateral ACL tear Med Sci Sports Exerc Urbach D. Nebelung W. Weiler H. T. Awiszus F. 1999
31 12 1691 1696 10.1097/00005768-199912000-00001 10613416
Contralateral limb strength deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring tendon graft Clin Biomech Hiemstra L. A. Webber S. MacDonald P. B. Kriellaars D. J. 2007
22 5 543 550 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.01.009
Maximizing quadriceps strength after ACL reconstruction Clin Sports Med Palmieri-Smith R. M. Thomas A. C. Wojtys E. M. 2008
27 3 405 424 10.1016/j.csm.2008.02.001 18503875
Effects of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on voluntary activation of quadriceps femoris: a prospective twitch interpolation study J Bone Joint Surg Br Urbach D. Nebelung W. Becker R. Awiszus F. 2001
83 8 1104 1110 10.1302/0301-620X.83B8.0831104 11764420
Do muscle strength deficits of the uninvolved hip and knee exist in young athletes before anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Orthop J Sports Med Hannon J. Wang-Price S. Goto S. Garrison J.C. Bothwell J.M. 2017
5 1 2325967116683941 10.1177/2325967116683941 28203600
Evaluation of active knee flexion and hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Nakamura N. Horibe S. Sasaki S.. 2002
18 6 598 602 10.1053/jars.2002.32868
Progressive strength training restores quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength within 7 months after ACL reconstruction in amateur male soccer players Phys Ther Sport Welling W. Benjaminse A. Lemmink K. Dingenen B. Gokeler A. 2019
40 10 18 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.08.004 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.08.004 31425918
Hip strength following hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Clin J Sport Med Hiemstra L. A. Gofton W. T. Kriellaars D. J. 2005
15 3 180 182 10.1097/01.jsm.0000157795.93004.ea 15867563
Quadriceps strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with uninjured matched controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis Orthop J Sports Med Brown C. Marinko L. LaValley M. P. Kumar D. 2021
9 4 2325967121991534 10.1177/2325967121991534 33889639
Quadriceps and hamstring strength symmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study J Sport Rehabil Harput G. Tunay V. B. Ithurburn M. P. 2021
30 1 1 8 10.1123/jsr.2019-0271
Knee strength deficits after hamstring tendon and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Med Sci Sports Exerc Hiemstra L. A. Webber S. MacDONALD P. B. Kriellaars D. J. 2000
32 8 1472 1479 10.1097/00005768-200008000-00016 10949014
Are muscle strength and function of the uninjured lower limb weakened after anterior cruciate ligament injury? Two-year follow-up after reconstruction Am J Sports Med Chung K. S. Ha J. K. Yeom C. H.. 2015
43 12 3013 3021 10.1177/0363546515606126 26460100
Energy absorption contribution and strength in female athletes at return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison with healthy controls Orthop J Sports Med Boo M. E. Garrison J. C. Hannon J. P.. 2018
6 3 2325967118759522 10.1177/2325967118759522 29552573
A 6-year follow-up of the effect of graft site on strength, stability, range of motion, function, and joint degeneration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Am J Sports Med Keays S. L. Bullock-Saxton J. E. Keays A. C. Newcombe P. A. Bullock M. I. 2007
35 5 729 739 10.1177/0363546506298277 17322130
Muscle strength and qualitative jump-landing differences in male and female military cadets: The Jump-ACL study J Sports Sci Med Beutler A.I. Sarah J. Marshall S.W. Padua D.A. Boden B.P. 2009
8 4 663 21132103
Isokinetic hamstrings: quadriceps ratios in intercollegiate athletes J Athl Train Rosene J. M. Fogarty T. D. Mahaffey B. L. 2001
36 4 378 12937479
Effect of hamstring-emphasized resistance training on hamstring: quadriceps strength ratios J Strength Cond Res Holcomb W. R. Rubley M. D. Lee H. J. Guadagnoli M. A. 2007
21 1 41 10.1519/00124278-200702000-00008 17313266
Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good Couns Psychol Parent M. C. 2013
41 4 568 600 10.1177/0011000012445176
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences Cohen J. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc Publ Hillsdale, NJ 1988

Changes in Involved and Uninvolved Limb Function During Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Implications for Limb Symmetry Index Measures Am J Sports Med Rohman E. Steubs J.T. Tompkins M. 2015
43 6 1391 1398 10.1177/0363546515576127 10.1177/0363546515576127 25828078
Limb asymmetries in landing and jumping 2 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Clin J Sport Med Paterno M. V. Ford K. R. Myer G. D. Heyl R. Hewett T. E. 2007
17 4 258 262 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31804c77ea 17620778
Effects of sex on compensatory landing strategies upon return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Paterno M. V. Schmitt L. C. Ford K. R. Rauh M. J. Myer G. D. Hewett T. E. 2011
41 8 553 559 10.2519/jospt.2011.3591 21808100
Loading response following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during the parallel squat exercise Clin Biomech Neitzel J. A. Kernozek T. W. Davies G. J. 2002
17 7 551 554 10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00063-3
Lower-extremity compensations following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Phys Ther Ernst G. P. Saliba E. Diduch D. R. Hurwitz S. R. Ball D. W. 2000
80 3 251 260 10.1093/ptj/80.3.251 10696152
Gamma loop dysfunction in quadriceps on the contralateral side in patients with ruptured ACL Med Sci Sports Exerc Konishi Y. Konishi H. Fukubayashi T. 2003
35 6 897 900 10.1249/01.MSS.0000069754.07541.D2 12783035
Participants at three months post-operative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) demonstrate differences in lower extremity energy absorption contribution and quadriceps strength compared to healthy controls The Knee Garrison J. C. Hannon J. Goto S. Giesler L. Bush C. Bothwell J. M. 2018
25 5 782 789 10.1016/j.knee.2018.06.014 30001937
Speed, not magnitude, of knee extensor torque production is associated with self-reported knee function early after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA Hsieh C. J. Indelicato P. A. Moser M. W. Vandenborne K. Chmielewski T. L. 2015
23 11 3214 3220 10.1007/s00167-014-3168-1
Contribution of neuromuscular factors to quadriceps asymmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction J Athl Train Johnson A.K. Palmieri-Smith R.M. Lepley L.K. 2018
53 4 347 354 10.4085/1062-6050-463-16 29652169
Comparison of functional outcome measures after ACL reconstruction in competitive soccer players: a randomized trial JBJS Mohammadi F. Salavati M. Akhbari B. Mazaheri M. Mir S. M. Etemadi Y. 2013
95 14 1271 1277 10.2106/JBJS.L.00724
Functional capability is enhanced with semitendinosus than patellar tendon ACL repair Med Sci Sports Exerc Rudroff T. 2003
35 9 1486 1492 10.1249/01.MSS.0000084425.07852.7D 12972866
Strength, functional outcome, and postural stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction J Athl Train Mattacola C. G. Perrin D. H. Gansneder B. M. Gieck J. H. Saliba E. N. McCue III F. C. 2002
37 3 262 12937583
Limb differences in hamstring muscle function and morphology after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Phys Ther Sport Rush J. L. Norte G. E. Lepley A. S. 2020
45 168 175 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.06.012 32781270
Quadriceps neural alterations in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed patients: A 6-month longitudinal investigation Scand J Med Sci Sports Lepley A. Gribble P. Thomas A. Tevald M. Sohn D. Pietrosimone B. 2015
25 6 828 839 10.1111/sms.12435 25693627
Bilateral alterations in running mechanics and quadriceps function following unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Pamukoff D. N. Montgomery M. M. Choe K. H. Moffit T. J. Garcia S. A. Vakula M. N. 2018
48 12 960 967 10.2519/jospt.2018.8170 30032698
The associations between hip strength and hip kinematics during a single leg hop in recreational athletes post ACL reconstruction compared to healthy controls Int J Sports Phys Ther Tate J. Suckut T. Wages J. Lyles H. Perrin B. 2017
12 3 341 28593088
Relationship between hip and knee strength and knee valgus during a single leg squat J Appl Biomech Claiborne T. L. Armstrong C. W. Gandhi V. Pincivero D. M. 2006
22 1 41 50 10.1123/jab.22.1.41 16760566
Hip isometric strength following knee surgery J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Jaramillo J. Worrell T. W. Ingersoll C. D. 1994
20 3 160 165 10.2519/jospt.1994.20.3.160 7951293
Lower-extremity strength profiles and gender-based classification of basketball players ages 9-22 years J Strength Cond Res Buchanan P. A. Vardaxis V. G. 2009
23 2 406 419 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181942140 19209081
The relationship of hamstrings and quadriceps strength to anterior cruciate ligament injury in female athletes Clin J Sport Med Off J Can Acad Sport Med Myer G. D. Ford K. R. Foss K. D. B. Liu C. Nick T. G. Hewett T. E. 2009
19 1 3 8 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318190bddb 19124976
Assessment of Quadriceps Muscle Performance by Hand-Held, Isometric, and Isokinetic Dynamometry in Patients With Knee Dysfunction J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Reinking M. F. Bockrath-Pugliese K. Worrell T. Kegerreis R. L. Miller-Sayers K. Farr J. 1996
24 3 154 159 10.2519/jospt.1996.24.3.154 10.2519/jospt.1996.24.3.154 8866274
Eighty-three per cent of elite athletes return to preinjury sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review with meta-analysis of return to sport rates, graft rupture rates and performance outcomes Br J Sports Med Lai C. C. Ardern C. L. Feller J. A. Webster K. E. 2018
52 2 128 138 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096836 28223305
Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament injury: current recommendations for sports participation Sports Med Kvist J. 2004
34 269 280 10.2165/00007256-200434040-00006 15049718
Return to the preinjury level of competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: two-thirds of patients have not returned by 12 months after surgery Am J Sports Med Ardern C. L. Webster K. E. Taylor N. F. Feller J. A. 2011
39 3 538 543 10.1177/0363546510384798 21098818
Quadriceps strength following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: normative values based on sex, graft type and meniscal status at 3, 6 & 9 months Int J Sports Phys Ther Schwery N. A. Kiely M. T. Larson C. M.. 2022
17 3 434 10.26603/001c.32378 35391858
