
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

36518836
39741
10.26603/001c.39741
Original Research
Development of an Injury Burden Prediction Model in Professional Baseball Pitchers
Bullock Garrett 1 2
Thigpen Charles 3 4
Collins Gary 5 6
Arden Nigel 1 2
Noonan Thomas 7 8
Kissenberth Michael 9
Shanley Ellen 3 4
1 Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis University of Oxford https://ror.org/052gg0110
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation Wake Forest University School of Medicine
3 University of South Carolina Center for Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Sciences
4 ATI Physical Therapy https://ror.org/00g11cc66
5 Centre for Statistics in Medicine University of Oxford https://ror.org/052gg0110
6 Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
7 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Colorado School of Medicine
8 University of Colorado Health, Steadman Hawkins Clinic
9 Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas
Corresponding Author: Garrett S. Bullock PT, DPT, DPhil Wake Forest School of Medicine 475 Vine St Winston-Salem, NC 27701 gbullock@wakehealth.edu
1 12 2022
2022
17 7 13581371
13 6 2022
16 8 2022
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background

Baseball injuries are a significant problem and have increased in incidence over the last decade. Reporting injury incidence only gives context to rate but not in relation to severity or injury time loss.

Hypothesis/Purpose

The purpose of this study was to 1) incorporate both modifiable and non-modifiable factors to develop an arm injury burden prediction model in Minor League Baseball (MiLB) pitchers; and 2) understand how the model performs separately on elbow and shoulder injury burden.

Study Design

Prospective longitudinal study

Methods

The study was conducted from 2013 to 2019 on MiLB pitchers. Pitchers were evaluated in spring training arm for shoulder range of motion and injuries were followed throughout the season. A model to predict arm injury burden was produced using zero inflated negative binomial regression. Internal validation was performed using ten-fold cross validation. Subgroup analyses were performed for elbow and shoulder separately. Model performance was assessed with root mean square error (RMSE), model fit (R2), and calibration with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results

Two-hundred, ninety-seven pitchers (94 injuries) were included with an injury incidence of 1.15 arm injuries per 1000 athletic exposures. Median days lost to an arm injury was 58 (11, 106). The final model demonstrated good prediction ability (RMSE: 11.9 days, R2: 0.80) and a calibration slope of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.04). A separate elbow model demonstrated weaker predictive performance (RMSE: 21.3; R2: 0.42; calibration: 1.25 [1.16, 1.34]), as did a separate shoulder model (RMSE: 17.9; R2: 0.57; calibration: 1.01 [0.92, 1.10]).

Conclusions

The injury burden prediction model demonstrated excellent performance. Caution should be advised with predictions between one to 14 days lost to arm injury. Separate elbow and shoulder prediction models demonstrated decreased performance. The inclusion of both modifiable and non-modifiable factors into a comprehensive injury burden model provides the most accurate prediction of days lost in professional pitchers.

Level of Evidence

2

Prognostic Model
Shoulder
Elbow
Humeral Torsion
Pitch Load
GSC was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, and Cancer Research UK (programme grant: C49297/A27294).
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Baseball injuries are a significant problem with increased incidence over the last decade.1–3 The greatest injury incidence is to the elbow and shoulder,1,4 with orthopaedic surgery signifying a significant proportion of injuries.5 These injuries have a substantial medical,6 financial,7 and psychological burden5 on the individual and team.8 Due to the significance of these injuries,6,7 individual physical risk factors have been recognized to assist clinicians in identifying baseball players at risk for arm injury.9–12 However, these methods are limited by their simplicity, without accounting for the complex interrelated nature of modifiable and non-modifiable relationship to baseball injuries.13,14

While identifying individuals at risk for injury can improve athlete injury outcomes,9 this does not give a complete clinical perspective. Reporting injury incidence only gives the rate but not injury severity or associated time loss.8 For example, the professional baseball shoulder and elbow injury incidence is 1.4 and 0.9 injuries per 1000 athlete exposures, respectively,15 but elbow injuries have over six times more days missed compared to shoulder injuries.16 Simply identifying baseball players at risk for injury would give equal weight to shoulder and elbow injuries and additionally would not distinguish between minor and severe injuries.8 Severity and site of injury will relate to the requirement for surgical interventions, including reconstruction, and hence time loss, highlighting the need to assess these parameters.17

Further, considerations must be given to the unbalanced nature of injury data, as the majority of athletes will report no injuries (i.e., no days lost), with a sparse number sustaining severe injuries, providing greater complexity to injury burden data.18 Pinpointing potential high injury burden athletes (pitchers) would allow for improved resource consolidation.8 Due to the continued rise in pitching injuries,1,2 and the incomplete clinical context of the identified injury risk factors,16 there is a need to distinguish pitchers at increased risk for greater comprehensive arm injury burden.

Pitching is a series of coordinated movements that involve the entire body.19 The interplay between modifiable and non-modifiable intrinsic and extrinsic factors in determining injury risk and burden signify the intricacies of this problem.13 The complex nature of pitching injuries require in depth examination, reasoning, and clinical decisions.20 However, while sports medicine clinicians have advanced skills and reasoning,21 there continues to be ambiguity in determining true risk.22 A more complex approach to identify at risk athletes has been proposed,23 involving the assessment of modifiable and non-modifiable factors as a whole.23–25 One method that incorporates this approach is via risk prediction models.26 Prediction models are statistical models that combine multiple predictors to estimate an individual’s risk of an event.27–29 These tools are not designed to supersede clinical experience and decisions; rather, assist in determining the best actions (or inaction) for patients.26 Prediction models have been used extensively in clinical medicine, such as whether to prescribe of cholesterol lowering therapies through the Framingham cardiovascular risk score.30

Quantifying complex systems through prediction models is needed to enumerate injury burden.24 These predictions can be used by clinicians and other healthcare professionals to better identify baseball players at risk for a high injury burden,31 and subsequently improve injury identification.32 Therefore, the purpose of this study was to 1) incorporate both modifiable and non-modifiable factors to develop an arm injury burden prediction model in Minor League Baseball (MiLB) pitchers; and 2) understand how the model performs separately on elbow and shoulder injury burden.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

A prospective longitudinal study was conducted from 2013 to 2019 on MiLB pitchers in one Major League Baseball (MLB) organization. Prior to testing, the risk and benefits of participation were explained in verbal and written form to all participants. Participants were tested at the beginning of spring training (pre-season). All test administrators were blinded to hand dominance.33 Participants were tested for shoulder range of motion (ROM) and humeral torsion (HT). Following testing, participants were followed for the entire season for total athletic exposures and arm injuries. Each pitcher was incorporated into each individual season. If a pitcher played multiple seasons, each season was an individual observation. If a pitcher sustained an injury, the pitcher was no longer included in observation for the next season. All participant information was de-identified and coded into an encrypted centralized database. This investigation received favorable ethics approval from the University Institutional Review Board.

Patient Public Involvement

Sports medicine clinicians, performance professionals, and coaches within the organization were included in determining the variables to be collected. Presentations were performed for organizational stakeholders throughout data collection and prediction model development.

Participants

Participants were included if they were able to participate in all practices and competitions and were under a MiLB contract. Participants were excluded if they were currently injured or not participating in all spring training activities, participating in MLB spring training at time of data collection, or signed a professional contract in the middle of the season (e.g., draft, free agent, or international signing).9

Shoulder Range of Motion and Humeral Torsion

Shoulder external (ER), internal (IR), horizontal adduction (HA) range of motion (ROM) was measured using previously described methods.34–37 Internal reliability testing demonstrated excellent reliability for shoulder ER (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (2,1) =0.99; Standard error of measure (SEM) = 2.0; ICC (2,K) = 0.99; SEM= 0.95), IR (ICC (2,1)= 0.97; SEM = 2.5; ICC (2,K) = 0.97 SEM= 2.6), and HA (ICC (2,1) = 0.99; SEM =2.59; ICC (2,K) =0.97; SEM = 1.2). Shoulder ER and IR were summed to measure shoulder total ROM (TROM). Humeral torsion (HT) were measured with a 5-MHz transducer (Sonosite Inc., Bothell, WA, USA) with previously described methods.10 HT testing demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC (2,1) = 0.97; SEM = 2.5; ICC (2,K) = 0.97 SEM= 2.6). Two data collection trials were performed per shoulder and the data collection trials were averaged for analyses.38 For further explanation of the methods, please refer to the Appendix 1.

Exposure

Baseball (i.e., athlete) exposure was defined as number of days participating in training, practice, or games in a season.39 Pitching exposure was defined as the total number of pitches within a season.39

Outcome Definition

An injury was defined as an injury to a tendon, ligament, nerve, muscle, or bone that occurred during any baseball team sponsored activity or event and was followed by at least one day of missed practice or baseball games.33 If a player was unavailable to play for injury prevention reasons (i.e., has reached league or individually determined pitch or innings count limits), then their absence was not considered as an injury. Injuries were defined by the Orchard Sports Injury Classification system and arms injuries stratified by shoulder/clavicle, upper arm, elbow, and forearm.40 All other injuries and illness were also recorded, and time loss was not taken into account for overall exposure, nor included in the injury burden analyses. Arm injury burden was defined as the product of incidence and severity.8 Arm injury burden was quantified as the total number of days lost to arm injury in one baseball season.8

Residual inspection demonstrated model instability above 90 days lost to arm injury. Following research team and MLB organizational discussion, time loss to arm injury was truncated to 90 days. In other words, if a player sustained an injury of 120 days, within the model, this would be included at 90 days.

Statistical Analyses

All data were investigated for missingness prior to analyses using the R package naniar. Missing data was low (3% of entire cohort had one or more missing values), thus complete case analyses were performed. Participant characteristics were described using mean (standard deviation) for continuous normally distributed variables, median (interquartile range) for non-normally distributed continuous variables, and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Arm injury incidence was calculated by sum of arm injuries divided by sum of baseball (i.e., athlete) exposures (AE) multiplied by 1000. For expanded statistical analyses description, please refer to Appendix 2.

Linearity was not assumed, and prior to model development, continuous variables were assessed for non-linearity in relation to the outcome of days lost to arm injury. All predictors were observed to have linear relationships.

Sample Size Calculation

An a priori sample size calculation was performed prior to model development.41 It should be noted that this sample size method does not explicitly cover zero inflated models. During the study period, a total of 297 pitchers met inclusion criteria, therefore a maximum of 26 parameters (i.e., the number of degrees of freedom) could be included in the development of the injury burden prediction model. The R package pmsampsize was used to calculate the required sample size.

Model Development: Primary Analysis

To predict the number of days lost (up to 90 days) to arm injury in professional pitchers a zero inflated negative binomial regression model was utilized.42 An alternative model, a hurdle model was developed, to demonstrate similar prediction performance (Appendix 3). Predictor variables included were chosen based on the baseball injury prevention literature and included: 1) age, 2) BMI, 3) pitching role (starter versus reliever), 4) seasonal number of pitches, 5) number of pitching appearances in a season, 6) HT difference between dominant and nondominant shoulder (in degrees), 7) dominant shoulder TROM (in degrees), 8) dominant HA (in degrees), 9) lower extremity or trunk injury in the same year, 10) any previous arm injury history, 11) years played professionally, 12) received individualized injury prevention programs, 13) continent of origin, and 14) days practiced and competed in the season (exposure).9,43–52 Variable selection was performed using elastic net penalization, using ten-fold cross-validation.53 Internal validation of the model was performed using ten-fold cross validation.53 Prediction model performance was assessed by calculating the root mean square error (RMSE), explained variation (R2), and calibration. Calibration is the agreement between predicted and actual risk.32 Calibration was assessed by calculating the calibration slope with 95% confidence intervals and graphically plotting the observed values against the predicted values. Subgroup analyses were performed for elbow and shoulder separately. A sensitivity analysis was performed with the inclusion of only modifiable predictors to assist clinicians in understanding risk and treatment options including: (1) seasonal number of pitches, 2) number of pitching appearances in a season, 3) dominant shoulder TROM (in degrees), 4) dominant HA (in degrees), 5) received individualized injury prevention programs, 6) days practiced and competed in the season (exposure). All analyses were performed in R version 3.5.1 (R Core Team (2013). The R package pscl was used for zero inflation modelling and mpath for elastic net. For full code, please see Appendix 4.

Reporting of this study followed the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) recommendations.54

Results

Participant Characteristics

A total of 297 pitchers were included (age: 23.0 (2.2) years, BMI: 24.8 (2.2), left handed: 21%). A total of 84 pitchers reported an arm injury during data collection. Overall arm injury incidence was 1.15 arm injuries per 1000 AE’s, 0.5 elbow injuries per 1,000 AE’s, and 0.8 shoulder injuries per 1,000 AE’s (Table 1). Median days lost to an arm injury was 58 (11, 106).

103734 Table 1. Characteristics of the pitchers included in the study. Values are percentages unless stated otherwise.

	All Pitchers
(n = 297)	Non-Arm Injured Pitchers
(n = 203)	Arm Injured Pitchers
(n = 94)	Elbow Injury
(n = 40)	Shoulder Injury
(n = 64)	
Mean (SD) Age (years)	23.0 (2.2)	22.8 (2.2)	23.2 (2.0)	23.2 (2.4)	22.8 (2.1)	
Hand Dominance
     Left
     Right	14%
86%	19%
81%	22%
78%	16%
84%	16%
84%	
Mean (SD) BMI (kg/m2)	24.8 (2.2)	24.6 (2.3)	24.8 (2.1)	25.1 (2.3)	24.9 (2.3)	
Pitching Role
     Starting Pitcher
     Relief Pitcher	55%
45%	52%
48%	62%
38%	52%
48%	58%
42%	
Continent of Origin
     North America
     Latin America	71%
29%	66%
34%	83%
17%	68%
32%	80%
20%	
Years within Professional Baseball
     1-2 years
     3-4 years
     5+ years	73%
22%
5%	80%
3%
1%	57%
33%
11%	42%
46%
12%	58%
32%
10%	
Mean (SD) Seasonal Pitch Load	900 (657)	991 (643)	548 (615)	468 (594)	572 (609)	
Mean (SD) Dominant Total Range of Motion in degrees	160 (13)	159 (13.2)	159 (11.8)	162 (12)	159 (14)	
Mean (SD) Dominant Horizontal Adduction in degrees	-2.3 (12.2)	-2.8 (11.9)	-1.1 (14.6)	-1.4 (12.6)	-0.2 (13.2)	
Mean (SD) Humeral Torsion Difference in degrees	18.2 (13.7)	18.5 (13.5)	16.2 (11.9)	17.3 (13.4)	15.9 (12.8)	
Kinematic Chain Injury	15%	3%	11%	5%	13%	
Total range of motion = Sum of shoulder external and internal rotation range of motion

Humeral torsion difference is calculated as dominant – nondominant shoulder

Arm Injury Burden Prediction Model

Model development following tenfold internal validation demonstrated a RMSE of 11.9 days, 0.80 R2, and a calibration slope of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.04); Figure 1). Full model equation is reported in Table 2.

103735 Figure 1. Calibration Plot of the Arm Injury Burden Prediction Model.

Calibration is the relationship between predicted and actual probability of the event. Perfect calibration would be a 45-degree line. A calibration line below the blue line is over-predicting risk. A calibration line above the blue line is under-predicting risk.

103736 Table 2. Arm Injury Burden Prediction Model.

Count Portion of the Model	
	Coefficient	*95% CI	
Intercept	1.62	0.11, 210	
Age	-0.02	0.89, 1.05	
Body Mass Index	0.05	0.99, 1.16	
Right Arm Dominance ø	0.04	0.68, 1.72	
Starting Pitcher¥	0.08	0.76, 1.38	
Number of Pitching Appearances	-0.02	0.97, 0.99	
Dominant Shoulder Total Range of Motion	0.01	1.00, 1.03	
Dominant Shoulder Horizontal Adduction	-0.01	0.98, 0.99	
Previous Arm Injury History	0.07	0.61, 1.47	
2 to 4 Years Played Professionally‡	-0.37	0.45, 0.83	
5+ Years Played Professionally‡	0.08	0.60, 2.03	
Received Individualized Injury Prevention Program	-0.11	0.55, 1.01	
Continent of Origin§	0.06	0.76, 1.08	
Exposure Days	-0.006	0.98, 0.99	
Zero Portion of the Model	
Intercept	-5.82	0.00, 8.99	
Right Arm Dominanceø	-0.21	0.01, 1.87	
Starting Pitcher¥	-0.06	0.15, 1.78	
Number of Pitching Appearances	0.01	0.97, 1.08	
Kinematic Chain Injury	0.86	2.12, 73	
Continent of Origin§	0.07	0.74, 11.16	
Exposure Days	0.05	1.03, 1.07	
The zero-inflated negative binomial model incorporates two models (count and zero) into one comprehensive model. As such, the count and zero model should be considered one model

95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval

*95% confidence intervals are exponentially transformed

øReference is Left

¥Reference is relief pitcher

‡Reference is 0 to 1 years played professionally

§Reference is North America

The zero-inflated negative binomial model incorporates two models (count and zero) into one comprehensive model. As such, the count and zero model should be considered one model

Elbow Injury Burden Prediction Model

Elbow injury burden model development demonstrated a RMSE of 21.3 days, 0.42 R2, and a calibration slope of 1.25 (95% CI: 1.16, 1.34; Figure 2).

103737 Figure 2. Calibration Plot of the Elbow Injury Burden Prediction Model.

Calibration is the relationship between predicted and actual probability of the event. Perfect calibration would be a 45-degree line. A calibration line below the blue line is over-predicting risk. A calibration line above the blue line is under-predicting risk.

Shoulder Injury Burden Prediction Model

Shoulder injury burden model development demonstrated a RMSE of 17.9 days, 0.57 R2, and a calibration slope of 1.01 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.10; Figure 3).

103738 Figure 3. Calibration Plot of the Shoulder Injury Burden Prediction Model.

Calibration is the relationship between predicted and actual probability of the event. Perfect calibration would be a 45-degree line. A calibration line below the blue line is over-predicting risk. A calibration line above the blue line is under-predicting risk.

Sensitivity Analysis

The inclusion of only modifiable predictors within the prediction model decreased performance compared to the original model (RMSE: 21.2, R2: 0.42, Calibration: 1.12 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.25).

Discussion

Summary

This prediction model demonstrated excellent performance, as demonstrated by the high R2 and calibration slope. Due to the model error of 12 days, predictions of one to 14 days should be interpreted with caution. Stratifying by predicting individual elbow or shoulder burden decreased prediction model performance. Including only modifiable predictors demonstrated decreased prediction performance.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians integrate a plethora of skills, tools, and experience to keep athletes on the field.55 The complexity associated with examination and performance, including advances in technology,56 load monitoring,57 and rehabilitation and performance testing,23 necessitates the need employ these tools and information. Within baseball, athletes are physically examined in spring training and traditionally this information is used to assess each individual risk factor.9 This prediction model incorporated multiple predictors into one cohesive model to calculate a predicted number of days lost to arm injury, ranging from 0 to 90. These individual injury burden predictions are meant to help reduce complexity of a difficult issue through clarifying prognosis,58 to improve a clinician’s ability to care for their patients.

This model reported an RMSE of 12 days. What this means clinically is that for any predicted days of injury burden, the actual number of days lost to injury will be within 12 days of the predicted value. While an error rate of 12 days for higher burden injuries (i.e., >30 days) may not alter clinical interpretation, a difference between 0 and 14 days could affect clinical decisions. To give an example, if the model predicted 3 days lost to injury, the days lost could be between one and 15 days. This would be clinically interpreted as a minor to moderate arm injury. On the other hand, if a pitcher was predicted to have 60 days lost to injury, a 12 day difference (48 to 72 days) would not affect clinical decisions. The pitcher would still be identified as a pitcher who could sustain a serious arm injury during the season. These findings suggest that this injury burden model can help identify pitchers who are at risk for sustaining a high injury burden during the season. However, these models should be interpreted with caution for predicted injury burden for one to 14 days.

Individual Elbow and Shoulder Models

Elbow and shoulder injury burden models demonstrated decreased performance compared to the primary model and had reduced sample sizes therefore, should be interpreted with caution. The discrepancies between elbow and shoulder injury burden may decrease the performance of these models. Elbow and shoulder injuries can have different risk factors,9,10,59 with mechanisms of injury occurring during different points within the pitching motion.19,60 Different clinical interventions may be required to reduce shoulder verses elbow injury risk.61,62 The contrasting injury burden risk factors between shoulders and elbows may decrease the prediction precision of individual shoulder or elbow models. Future research is required to develop separate shoulder and elbow burden prediction models.

Inclusion of Only Modifiable Predictors

Including only modifiable predictors demonstrated decreased injury burden prediction compared to the inclusion of modifiable and non-modifiable predictors. Previous work14 has called for the inclusion of both modifiable and non-modifiable predictors to improve understanding and ultimately decrease sports injuries. However, while this has been proposed for many years,14 the majority of current evidence only includes isolated modifiable factors when assessing injury risk.9 As these results suggest, without the inclusion of non-modifiable predictors, clinicians are inhibited from having an improved understanding of current injury risk. While it may seem from a clinical perspective that including non-modifiable predictors does not improve how a clinician will treat a patient, a more comprehensive injury risk examination allows the clinician to better identify athletes at risk for sustaining an injury.63 These prediction models are not recommended to be used to identify which specific interventions or factors should be the focus of care.28,29 Prediction models are not causal, as such, if a particular predictor is “significant” with a specific athlete, this does not mean that particular predictor should be intervened upon. A thorough physical exam and clinical reasoning should be used to identify which tests and measures to intervene on.

Strengths and Potential Limitations

This study utilized a seven-year prospective cohort that was specifically designed to assess arm injuries in professional baseball players. All data collectors were physical therapists, specifically trained and evaluated for reliability in the physical examination techniques, improving the consistency and reliability of these data. Only a small proportion of data were missing, allowing for a complete case analysis, increasing the validity of these findings. An a priori sample size calculation was performed to create a stable prediction model, increasing the utility of these findings. Internal validation was performed in order to shrink optimism, increasing the generalizability of these results. The full model is reported, increasing transparency and usefulness for future validation.64 Time lost to injury was truncated at 90 days. Pitchers may be placed on the injured list longer than 90 days; however, truncation was performed at 90 days due to the paucity of players sustaining time loss greater than this time period and the organizational significance of this time period. A small proportion of pitchers were excluded due to participating MLB spring training during data collection. These pitchers were predominantly at the AAA or AA level, decreasing the generalizability of these results to high MiLB players. Injury history was limited to professional baseball seasons and orthopaedic surgery prior to signing a professional baseball contract. As pitchers may sustain arm injuries that last only a few days or a week, there is the potential for residual confounding. All impairment data were collected prior to the season. As predictors can change throughout the season, this decreases the clinical utility of these results. Player salary and signing bonuses were not included in these analyses. As MLB organizational investment may influence time loss to injury, this decreases the precision in these models. This model was not externally validated. It is recommended that external validation should be performed prior to integrating in a clinical setting. This prediction model should be used with caution without further validation.

Conclusions

This professional baseball injury burden model may have clinical utility in predicting pitchers that are at risk for sustaining a high injury burden within the season. However, caution should be advised with predictions between 1 to 14 days lost to arm injury as this is below the prescribed model error. The inclusion of modifiable and non-modifiable predictors demonstrated improved prediction performance, suggesting that prediction models should include both types of predictors when evaluating injury risk. Separate elbow and shoulder prediction models demonstrated decreased performance and should be interpreted with caution due to low sample size. Further research is required to externally validate this model to understand the generalizability of these findings.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Material

Appendix 4

Appendix 3

Appendix 2

Appendix 1
==== Refs
Epidemiology of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in Major and Minor League Baseball pitchers: comprehensive report of 1429 cases Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Camp Christopher L. Conte Stan D'Angelo John Fealy Stephen A. 5 2018
27 5 871 878 1058-2746 10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.024 10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.024
Disability days in major league baseball The American Journal of Sports Medicine Conte Stan Requa Ralph K. Garrick James G. 7 2001
29 4 431 436 0363-5465 10.1177/03635465010290040801 10.1177/03635465010290040801 11476381
Summative report on time out of play for Major and Minor League Baseball: an analysis of 49,955 injuries from 2011 through 2016 The American Journal of Sports Medicine Camp Christopher L. Dines Joshua S. van der List Jelle P. Conte Stan Conway Justin Altchek David W. Coleman Struan H. Pearle Andrew D. 9 4 2018
46 7 1727 1732 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546518765158 10.1177/0363546518765158
Prevalence of ulnar collateral ligament surgery in professional baseball players The American Journal of Sports Medicine Conte Stan A. Fleisig Glenn S. Dines Joshua S. Wilk Kevin E. Aune Kyle T. Patterson-Flynn Nancy ElAttrache Neal 29 4 2015
43 7 1764 1769 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546515580792 10.1177/0363546515580792
The Relationship Between Baseball Participation and Health: A Systematic Scoping Review Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Bullock Garrett S. Uhan Jerneja Harriss Elinor K. Arden Nigel K. Filbay Stephanie R. 2 2020
50 2 55 66 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2020.9281 10.2519/jospt.2020.9281
Cost of injuries from a prospective cohort study of North Carolina high school athletes Injury Prevention Knowles S B Marshall S W Miller T Spicer R Bowling J M Loomis D Millikan R W Yang J Mueller F O 12 2007
13 6 416 421 1353-8047 10.1136/ip.2006.014720 10.1136/ip.2006.014720 18056320
Injury Trends in Major League Baseball Over 18 Seasons: 1998-2015 Conte S. Camp C.L. Dines J.S. 2016
45 3 116 123 . 2016;45(3):116-123.
Why we should focus on the burden of injuries and illnesses, not just their incidence British Journal of Sports Medicine Bahr Roald Clarsen Benjamin Ekstrand Jan 2018
52 16 1018 1021 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098160 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098160 29021247
Deficits in glenohumeral passive range of motion increase risk of elbow injury in professional baseball pitchers: a prospective study The American Journal of Sports Medicine Wilk Kevin E. Macrina Leonard C. Fleisig Glenn S. Aune Kyle T. Porterfield Ron A. Harker Paul Evans Timothy J. Andrews James R. 18 6 2014
42 9 2075 2081 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546514538391 10.1177/0363546514538391
Humeral torsion as a risk factor for shoulder and elbow injury in professional baseball pitchers The American Journal of Sports Medicine Noonan Thomas J. Thigpen Charles A. Bailey Lane B. Wyland Douglas J. Kissenberth Michael Hawkins Richard J. Shanley Ellen 21 7 2016
44 9 2214 2219 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546516648438 10.1177/0363546516648438
Effect of pitch type, pitch count, and pitching mechanics on risk of elbow and shoulder pain in youth baseball pitchers The American Journal of Sports Medicine Lyman Stephen Fleisig Glenn S. Andrews James R. Osinski E. David 7 2002
30 4 463 468 0363-5465 10.1177/03635465020300040201 10.1177/03635465020300040201 12130397
The influence of body composition on youth throwing kinetics Pediatric Exercise Science Garner John C. MacDonald Chris Wade Chip Johnson Andrea Ford M. Allison 8 2011
23 3 379 387 0899-8493 10.1123/pes.23.3.379 10.1123/pes.23.3.379 21881158
An inferential and descriptive statistical examination of the relationship between cumulative work metrics and injury in Major League Baseball pitchers Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Karakolis Thomas Bhan Shivam Crotin Ryan L. 8 2013
27 8 2113 2118 1064-8011 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3182785059 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3182785059 23090322
Assessing causation in sport injury: a multifactorial model Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine Meeuwisse Willem H. 7 1994
4 3 166 170 1050-642X 10.1097/00042752-199407000-00004 10.1097/00042752-199407000-00004
Epidemiology of shoulder and elbow injuries among United States high school baseball players: school years 2005-2006 through 2014-2015 The American Journal of Sports Medicine Saper Michael G. Pierpoint Lauren A. Liu Wei Comstock R. Dawn Polousky John D. Andrews James R. 2018
46 1 37 43 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546517734172 10.1177/0363546517734172
The epidemiology of single season musculoskeletal injuries in professional baseball Orthopedic Reviews Li Xinning Zhou Hanbing Williams Phillip Steele John J. Nguyen Joseph Jäger Marcus Coleman Struan 22 2 2013
5 1 3 2035-8164 10.4081/or.2013.e3 10.4081/or.2013.e3 23705061
Elbow injuries in professional baseball: epidemiological findings from the Major League Baseball Injury Surveillance System The American Journal of Sports Medicine Ciccotti Michael G. Pollack Keisha M. Ciccotti Michael C. D’Angelo John Ahmad Christopher S. Altchek David Andrews James Curriero Frank C. 2 6 2017
45 10 2319 2328 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546517706964 10.1177/0363546517706964
Improving predictor selection for injury modelling methods in male footballers BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Philp Fraser Al-Shallawi Ahmad Kyriacou Theocharis Blana Dimitra Pandyan Anand BMJ 1 2020
6 1 e000634 2055-7647 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000634 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000634 32095267
Kinetics of baseball pitching with implications about injury mechanisms The American Journal of Sports Medicine Fleisig Glenn S. Andrews James R. Dillman Charles J. Escamilla Rafael F. 3 1995
23 2 233 239 0363-5465 10.1177/036354659502300218 10.1177/036354659502300218 7778711
Sports injuries of the knee ligaments: their diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and prevention Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise Erikkson EJNAR 1976
8 3 133 144 0195-9131 10.1249/00005768-197600830-00001 10.1249/00005768-197600830-00001
Netter's orthopaedic clinical examination: An evidence-based approach Cleland J. Koppenhaver S. Su J. Elsevier Health Sciences 2015

Why screening tests to predict injury do not work—and probably never will…: a critical review British Journal of Sports Medicine Bahr Roald 19 4 2016
50 13 776 780 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096256 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096256
Periodic health examination and injury prediction in professional football (Soccer): theoretically, the prognosis is good Sports Medicine Hughes Tom Sergeant Jamie C. van der Windt Danielle A. Riley Richard Callaghan Michael J. 27 4 2018
48 11 2443 2448 0112-1642 10.1007/s40279-018-0928-y 10.1007/s40279-018-0928-y 29704189
Complex systems approach for sports injuries: moving from risk factor identification to injury pattern recognition—narrative review and new concept British Journal of Sports Medicine Bittencourt N F N Meeuwisse W H Mendonça L D Nettel-Aguirre A Ocarino J M Fonseca S T 21 7 2016
50 21 1309 1314 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095850 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095850
Causal thinking and complex system approaches in epidemiology International Journal of Epidemiology Galea S. Riddle M. Kaplan G. A 2010
39 1 97 106 0300-5771 10.1093/ije/dyp296 10.1093/ije/dyp296 19820105
Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how? Bmj Moons K. G M Royston P. Vergouwe Y. Grobbee D. E Altman D. G 23 2 2009
338 feb23 1 b375 b375 0959-8138 10.1136/bmj.b375 10.1136/bmj.b375
Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker Heart Moons Karel G M Kengne Andre Pascal Woodward Mark Royston Patrick Vergouwe Yvonne Altman Douglas G Grobbee Diederick E BMJ 7 3 2012
98 9 683 690 1355-6037 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301246 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301246 22397945
Methods matter: clinical prediction models will benefit sports medicine practice, but only if they are properly developed and validated British Journal of Sports Medicine Bullock Garrett S Hughes Tom Sergeant Jamie C Callaghan Michael J Riley Richard Collins Gary 2 7 2021
55 23 1319 1321 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104329 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104329
Clinical prediction models in sports medicine: A guide for clinicians and researchers Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Bullock Garrett S. Hughes Tom Sergeant Jamie C. Callaghan Michael J. Riley Richard D. Collins Gary S. 10 2021
51 10 517 525 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2021.10697 10.2519/jospt.2021.10697
A general cardiovascular risk profile: the Framingham Study The American Journal of Cardiology Kannel William B. McGee Daniel Gordon Tavia 7 1976
38 1 46 51 0002-9149 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90061-8 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90061-8 132862
Prediction and prevention of musculoskeletal injury: a paradigm shift in methodology British Journal of Sports Medicine Quatman C E Quatman C C Hewett T E 1 11 2009
43 14 1100 1107 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsm.2009.065482 10.1136/bjsm.2009.065482 19884108
Calibration of risk prediction models: impact on decision-analytic performance Medical decision making Van Calster Ben Vickers Andrew J. 2015
35 2 162 169 0272-989X 10.1177/0272989x14547233 10.1177/0272989x14547233 25155798
Preseason shoulder range of motion screening as a predictor of injury among youth and adolescent baseball pitchers Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Shanley Ellen Kissenberth Micheal J. Thigpen Charles A. Bailey Lane B. Hawkins Richard J. Michener Lori A. Tokish John M. Rauh Mitchell J. 7 2015
24 7 1005 1013 1058-2746 10.1016/j.jse.2015.03.012 10.1016/j.jse.2015.03.012 25957112
Glenohumeral internal rotation deficits in professional pitchers enrolled in an internal rotation stretching program The American Journal of Sports Medicine Lintner David Mayol Magdiel Uzodinma Obinna Jones Rex Labossiere David 4 2007
35 4 617 621 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546506296736 10.1177/0363546506296736 17293473
Rotational motion changes in the glenohumeral joint of the adolescent/Little League baseball player The American Journal of Sports Medicine Meister Keith Day Timothy Horodyski Marybeth Kaminski Thomas W. Wasik Michael P. Tillman Susan 5 2005
33 5 693 698 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546504269936 10.1177/0363546504269936 15722284
Assessing posterior shoulder contracture: the reliability and validity of measuring glenohumeral joint horizontal adduction J Athl Train Laudner K.G. Stanek J.M. Meister K. 2006
41 4 375 380 17273461
Reliability, precision, accuracy, and validity of posterior shoulder tightness assessment in overhead athletes The American Journal of Sports Medicine Myers Joseph B. Oyama Sakiko Wassinger Craig A. Ricci Robert D. Abt John P. Conley Kevin M. Lephart Scott M. 11 2007
35 11 1922 1930 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546507304142 10.1177/0363546507304142
Shoulder range of motion measures as risk factors for shoulder and elbow injuries in high school softball and baseball players The American Journal of Sports Medicine Shanley Ellen Rauh Mitchell J. Michener Lori A. Ellenbecker Todd S. Garrison J. Craig Thigpen Charles A. 17 6 2011
39 9 1997 2006 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546511408876 10.1177/0363546511408876
The use of a pitch count estimator to calculate exposure in collegiate baseball pitchers Physical Therapy in Sport Shanley Ellen Bailey Lane Sandago Michael P. Pinkerton Abigail Singleton Steven B. Thigpen Charles A. 11 2015
16 4 344 348 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.02.002 10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.02.002
The Orchard sports injury classification system (OSICS) version 10 Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine Rae Katherine Orchard John 5 2007
17 3 201 204 1050-642X 10.1097/jsm.0b013e318059b536 10.1097/jsm.0b013e318059b536 17513912
Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model Bmj Riley Richard D Ensor Joie Snell Kym I E Harrell Frank E Jr Martin Glen P Reitsma Johannes B Moons Karel G M Collins Gary van Smeden Maarten BMJ 18 3 2020
368 m441 1756-1833 10.1136/bmj.m441 10.1136/bmj.m441
Patients discharged from higher‐quality skilled nursing facilities spend more days at home Health Services Research Simning Adam Orth Jessica Temkin‐Greener Helena Li Yue 2021
56 1 102 111 0017-9124 10.1111/1475-6773.13543 10.1111/1475-6773.13543 32844434
Correlation of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and total rotational motion to shoulder injuries in professional baseball pitchers The American Journal of Sports Medicine Wilk Kevin E. Macrina Leonard C. Fleisig Glenn S. Porterfield Ronald Simpson Charles D. II Harker Paul Paparesta Nick Andrews James R. 2011
39 2 329 335 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546510384223 10.1177/0363546510384223 21131681
Changes in shoulder and elbow passive range of motion after pitching in professional baseball players The American Journal of Sports Medicine Reinold Michael M. Wilk Kevin E. Macrina Leonard C. Sheheane Chris Dun Shouchen Fleisig Glenn S. Crenshaw Ken Andrews James R. 2008
36 3 523 527 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546507308935 10.1177/0363546507308935 17991783
Humeral Torsion as a Risk Factor for Shoulder and Elbow Injury in Professional Baseball Pitchers The American Journal of Sports Medicine Noonan Thomas J. Thigpen Charles A. Bailey Lane B. Wyland Douglas J. Kissenberth Michael Hawkins Richard J. Shanley Ellen 21 7 2016
44 9 2214 2219 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546516648438 10.1177/0363546516648438
The Relationship Between Humeral Torsion and Arm Injury in Baseball Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach Helmkamp Joshua K. Bullock Garrett S. Rao Allison Shanley Ellen Thigpen Charles Garrigues Grant E. SAGE Publications 6 2 2020
12 2 132 138 1941-7381 10.1177/1941738119900799 10.1177/1941738119900799 32027223
Relationship between humeral torsion and injury in professional baseball pitchers The American Journal of Sports Medicine Polster Joshua M. Bullen Jennifer Obuchowski Nancy A. Bryan Jason A. Soloff Lonnie Schickendantz Mark S. 20 6 2013
41 9 2015 2021 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546513493249 10.1177/0363546513493249
The differences of humeral torsion angle and the glenohumeral rotation angles between young right-handed and left-handed pitchers Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Takeuchi Satoshi Yoshida Masahito Sugimoto Katsumasa Tsuchiya Atsushi Takenaga Tetsuya Goto Hideyuki 4 2019
28 4 678 684 1058-2746 10.1016/j.jse.2018.09.002 10.1016/j.jse.2018.09.002 30502031
Kinetic chain abnormalities in the athletic shoulder Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review Sciascia Aaron Thigpen Charles Namdari Surena Baldwin Keith 3 2012
20 1 16 21 1062-8592 10.1097/jsa.0b013e31823a021f 10.1097/jsa.0b013e31823a021f 22311288
Initial Kinematic Chain Injuries Increase Hazard of Subsequent Arm Injuries in Professional Baseball Pitchers Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Bullock Garrett S. Thigpen Charles A. Noonan Thomas K. Kissenberth Michael J. Shanley Ellen 9 2022
31 9 1773 1781 1058-2746 10.1016/j.jse.2022.04.016 10.1016/j.jse.2022.04.016 35598837
Starting pitchers demonstrate a greater hazard of arm injury compared to relief pitchers Journal of Athletic Training Bullock Garrett S. Thigpen Charles A. Collins Gary S. Arden Nigel K. Noonan Thomas K. Kissenberth Michael J. Shanley Ellen 2022
57 1 65 71 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-0262.21 10.4085/1062-6050-0262.21 35040985
The impact of pitch counts and days of rest on performance among major-league baseball pitchers Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Bradbury John C. Forman Sean L. 5 2012
26 5 1181 1187 1064-8011 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31824e16fe 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31824e16fe 22344048
Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) Zou Hui Hastie Trevor Wiley 4 2005
67 2 301 320 1369-7412 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement BMJ Collins G. S. Reitsma J. B. Altman D. G. Moons K. G. M. 7 1 2015
350 g7594 1756-1833 10.1136/bmj.g7594 10.1136/bmj.g7594
Intra-and interobserver reproducibility of the shoulder laxity examination The American Journal of Sports Medicine Levy Andrew S. Lintner Scott Kenter Keith Speer Kevin P. 7 1999
27 4 460 463 0363-5465 10.1177/03635465990270040901 10.1177/03635465990270040901 10424215
Legal and Ethical Implications of Athletes' Biometric Data Collection in Professional Sport Marq Sports L Rev Osborne B. 2017
28 37
Relationship between training load and injury in professional rugby league players Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Gabbett Tim J. Jenkins David G. 5 2011
14 3 204 209 1440-2440 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.12.002 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.12.002 21256078
Key steps and common pitfalls in developing and validating risk models BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Wynants L Collins GS Van Calster B 2017
124 3 423 432 1470-0328 10.1111/1471-0528.14170 10.1111/1471-0528.14170 27362778
Deficits in glenohumeral passive range of motion increase risk of shoulder injury in professional baseball pitchers: a prospective study The American Journal of Sports Medicine Wilk Kevin E. Macrina Leonard C. Fleisig Glenn S. Aune Kyle T. Porterfield Ron A. Harker Paul Evans Timothy J. Andrews James R. 13 8 2015
43 10 2379 2385 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546515594380 10.1177/0363546515594380
Relationships between throwing mechanics and shoulder distraction in collegiate baseball pitchers Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Werner Sherry L. Guido John A., Jr Stewart Gregory W. McNeice Ryan P. VanDyke Travis Jones Deryk G. 1 2007
16 1 37 42 1058-2746 10.1016/j.jse.2006.05.007 10.1016/j.jse.2006.05.007
Current concepts in the evaluation and treatment of the shoulder in overhead throwing athletes, part 2: injury prevention and treatment Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach Reinold Michael M. Gill Thomas J. Wilk Kevin E. Andrews James R. 3 2010
2 2 101 115 1941-7381 10.1177/1941738110362518 10.1177/1941738110362518 23015928
Rehabilitation of the thrower's elbow Clinics in Sports Medicine Wilk Kevin E. Reinold Michael M. Andrews James R. 10 2004
23 4 765 801 0278-5919 10.1016/j.csm.2004.06.006 10.1016/j.csm.2004.06.006
Including modifiable and non-modifiable factors improves injury risk assessment in professional baseball pitchers J Orthop Sport Phys Ther Shanley E. Thigpen C.A. Collins G.S.. 2022 0 1 42
Black Box Prediction Methods in Sports Medicine Deserve a Red Card for Reckless Practice: A Change of Tactics is Needed to Advance Athlete Care Sports Medicine Bullock Garrett S. Hughes Tom Arundale Amelia A. J. H. Ward Patrick Collins Gary S. Kluzek Stefan 14 10 2022
1 7 0112-1642 10.1007/s40279-022-01771-3 10.1007/s40279-022-01771-3
