
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

36518833
55536
10.26603/001c.55536
Original Research
Effects of Trigger Point Dry Needling on Strength Measurements and Activation Levels of the Gluteus Medius: A Quasi-Experimental Randomized Control Study
Schneider Eric PT, MPT, DHSc, OCS 1
Moore Elizabeth S. PhD 2
Stanborough Rob PT, DPT, MHSc, FAAOMPT 3
Slaven Emily PT, PhD, OCS, FAAOMPT 4
1 Department of Physical Therapy Mount St Joseph University
2 College of Health Sciences University of Indianapolis https://ror.org/052133d12
3 Department of Physical Therapy First Coast Rehabilitation
4 Krannert School of Physical Therapy University of Indianapolis https://ror.org/052133d12
Corresponding Author: Eric Schneider, PT, MPT, DHSc, OCS Department of Physical Therapy, Mount St Joseph University Cincinnati, OH, 45233 (513) 244-4826, eric.schneider@msj.edu
1 12 2022
2022
17 7 14041416
29 6 2022
12 9 2022
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background

Latent trigger points have been identified as a source of impaired muscle function giving rise to a reduction in force production and alterations in muscle activation patterns and movement efficiency. There is limited investigation into the effectiveness of a treatment in reducing these clinical manifestations.

Purpose

To investigate whether the application of trigger point dry needling (TDN) to latent trigger points within the gluteus medius musculature affected strength measurements and muscle activation levels immediately following intervention.

Design

Quasi experimental, single group, pretest-posttest, randomized control study

Methods

A control and an intervention side were randomly assigned for each participant (N = 39). Hand held dynamometer (HHD) force measurements and raw surface electromyography (sEMG) amplitude readings were recorded during maximal volitional isometric contractions of the gluteus medius in two separate positions before and after application of TDN. Comparison of within and between group data were conducted.

Results

A statistically significant interaction between time (pre-TDN to post-TDN) and groups (intervention side and control side), p < 0.001 was found for HHD measurements in both positions. Post hoc analysis revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) for all comparisons in the side lying neutral (SL0) position, while statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) were found for pre and post-TDN measurements within intervention side as well as between the intervention and control side for post-TDN measurements in the side lying internal rotation (SLIR) position. For sEMG amplitude measurements, statistically significant differences were found only in the SL0 position for within group comparisons on the intervention side (p = 0.009) and for between group comparisons for post-TDN measurements (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Application of TDN to latent trigger points within the gluteus medius can significantly increase gluteus muscle force production immediately following intervention while reducing the level of muscle activation required during contraction.

Level of Evidence

Level 2

gluteus medius
latent trigger points
muscle activation levels
muscle strength
trigger point dry needling
myofascial trigger points
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) have been identified as a potential source of musculoskeletal dysfunction.1–5 Myofascial trigger points have been defined as hyperirritable and palpable nodules within a taut band of muscle and are classified as either active trigger points or latent trigger points.6 Active trigger points can cause localized pain that is spontaneous in nature,4,5 while latent trigger points are not spontaneously painful and will only elicit pain when palpated.3–5 Some authors have argued that latent trigger points have the same pathophysiology as active trigger points, just to a lesser extent,3–5,7 which may explain a reduction in nociceptive input without mechanical stimulus.8–10

Most of the research on MTrPs has focused on active trigger points due to their ability to generate spontaneous pain without being palpated, even though latent trigger points are more commonly found in muscle tissue.11,12 Despite a lack of attention in the literature, latent trigger points are not without clinical significance. Regarding function, they have been found to increase muscle fatigability,13 decrease muscle strength,14 and alter muscle activation patterns.1,15 Furthermore, latent trigger points may have the potential to transition into active trigger points if left untreated.7

Trigger point dry needling (TDN) has become an increasingly popular intervention among physical therapists to reverse the effects of MTrPs.16,17 Authors of previous studies have demonstrated a reduction in substance P and calcitonin related peptide levels, while blood flow and subsequent tissue oxygenation increased following the application of TDN to MTrPs.8,18 However, there is still debate surrounding the effectiveness of TDN provided by physical therapists as a viable treatment option for musculoskeletal dysfunction as compared to other physical therapy interventions.19

A potential cause for the formation of MTrPs has hypothesized to be repetitive or unaccustomed eccentric loading of muscle tissue.4,5,7,20–22 Musculature such as the gluteus medius must eccentrically control motion of the pelvis within the frontal plane during the gait cycle23 or during other functional activities where single limb support is required.24 Subtle alterations in frontal plane gait kinematics may lead to excessive loading of the gluteus medius musculature, which in turn may lead to the formation of MTrPs. If latent trigger points are able to affect muscle function, then an asymptomatic individual may have altered stability of the pelvis and the hip during loading response of the gait and running cycles, which then has the potential to alter the alignment of the lower limb relative to the ground.

Despite the increased demand for eccentric control during functional activities, such as ambulation, there are no studies that have investigated the effects of latent trigger points on the strength of the gluteus medius. Furthermore, studies that have investigated changes in strength of lower extremity musculature following the application of dry needling to MTrPs report conflicting results.25–32 The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the application of TDN to latent trigger points within the gluteus medius musculature affected strength measurements and muscle activation levels immediately following intervention.

METHODS

Study Design

This quasi-experimental study used a single group, pretest-posttest, randomized control design (ww.ClinicalTrials.gov, ID NCT03580200). The study was approved by the Human Research Protections Program at the University of Indianapolis and a reliance agreement was enacted with Mount St Joseph University in Cincinnati, OH where data were collected.

Participants

A convenience sample of males and females age 18 to 50 years old were recruited provided they were asymptomatic at the time of screening and data collection. Asymptomatic was defined as experiencing no pain in the lumbar spine, sacroiliac region, pelvis, or bilateral lower extremities while at rest or with activity. Participants were excluded if they had one of the following: were pregnant or attempting to become pregnant; pain intensity greater than 0 out of 10 on the visual analogue scale in the lumbar spine, sacroiliac region, pelvis, and bilateral lower extremities at rest or with activity; positive Flexion Adduction Internal Rotation test (FADIR)33 on either the left or right hip; presented with signs and symptoms consistent with hip osteoarthritis during clinical screening using the criteria proposed by Altman et al.34; diagnosed with a progressive neurological disorder, a chronic pain condition such as fibromyalgia or myofascial pain syndrome, a connective tissue disorder, or osteoarthritis of the hip joint; history of hip dysplasia or Legg Calve Perthes disease.

Informed consent was obtained following eligibility screening but immediately prior to data collection. The primary investigator (PI), a licensed physical therapist with 13 years of clinical experience was responsible for data collection and the application of TDN for all participants throughout the study.

Randomization

A simple randomizing method of flipping a coin was used to assign each participant an intervention side, which was the side of the body that received TDN, and a control side, which was the side of the body that did not receive TDN.

Outcome Measures

Strength of the gluteus medius muscle was defined as the amount of force output measured by a handheld dynamometer (HHD) during a maximal volitional isometric contraction (MVIC) break test.35–37 Force output was measured in kilograms (kg) using a microFET2 HHD (Hoggan Scientific, LLC, Salt Lake City, UT) on both the control and intervention sides. The HHD is commonly used to assess force production and has been shown to be a reliable and valid measurement tool for assessing strength of the lower extremity musculature.36,38–40

Surface electromyography (sEMG) amplitude readings of the gluteus medius were recorded at the same time as HHD measurements on both the control and intervention sides. Raw sEMG data were collected using a two-channel sEMG recording system (MP36R, Biopac, Goleta, CA) and were measured in millivolts (mV). Parameters for recording the raw sEMG data included a rejection ratio of > 110 dB at 60 Hz, a gain of 1000 Hz, band pass filtered at 20-450 Hz, and a sampling rate of 2000 Hz.37,41,42 Recorded sEMG amplitude readings can be used as a direct measure of the activation level of a muscle during a contraction43–45 and is a common method of assessing the activation level of the gluteus medius muscle during a MVIC as well as dynamic movements.37,41,42,46–48

Prior to the start of data collection, intrarater and test-retest reliability was established for the PI’s HHD and sEMG measurements during MVIC break testing of the gluteus medius. Ten participants with characteristics consistent with the study’s sample were recruited. A 10-minute break was given between measurements. All calculated ICCs (3, 1) were greater than .75 indicating acceptable intrarater and test-retest reliability49 (Table 1).

120088 Table 1. Reliability of primary investigators HHD and sEMG measurements

Reliability of HHD and sEMG measurements within trials	
	Pre 10 min break
ICC* (95% CI)	Post 10 min break
ICC* (95% CI)	
HHD measurements			
SL0 on R	0.96 (0.89 - 0.99)	0.96 (0.89 - 0.99)	
SLIR on R	0.92 (0.79 - 0.98)	0.98 (0.95 - 0.99)	
SL0 on L	0.94 (0.84 - 0.98)	0.95 (0.85 - 0.99)	
SLIR on L	0.95 (0.87 - 0.99)	0.95 (0.87 - 0.99)	
sEMG measurements			
SL0 on R	0.83 (0.60 - 0.95)	0.94 (0.83 - 0.98)	
SLIR on R	0.92 (0.78 - 0.98)	0.93 (0.80 - 0.98)	
SL0 on L	0.96 (0.88 - 0.99)	0.91 (0.76 - 0.97)	
SLIR on L	0.93 (0.81 - 0.98)	0.81 (0.55 - 0.94)	
Test retest reliability of HHD and sEMG measurements prior to and following 10 min break	
	HHD measurements
ICC *(95% CI)	sEMG measurements
ICC* (95% CI)	
SL0 on R pre and post	0.91 (0.80 - 0.97)	0.85 (0.69 - 0.95)	
SLIR on R pre and post	0.91 (0.80 - 0.97)	0.92 (0.82 - 0.98)	
SL0 on L pre and post	0.94 (0.87 - 0.98)	0.90 (0.80 - 0.97)	
SLIR on L pre and post	0.93 (0.85 - 0.98)	0.87 (0.74 - 0.96)	
Abbreviations: HHD = hand held dynamometer; sEMG = surface electromyography; ICC = interclass coefficient; CI = confidence interval; SL0 = side lying neutral position; SLIR = side lying internal rotation position; R = right; L = left

lying internal rotation position; R = right; L = left

*(3, 1) model was used for ICC calculation

Testing Procedure

Bipolar sEMG electrodes were placed 2 cm apart in a position distal to the iliac crest, midway between the anterior and posterior superior iliac spines and in line with the proximal tip of the greater trochanter.41,42 A reference electrode was placed on the greater trochanter (Figure 1). Electrode placement on the intervention side was marked by a sterile surgical pen as electrodes needed to be removed during the application of TDN.

120089 Figure 1. Surface EMG electrode placement for gluteus medius

Abbreviations: EMG = electromyography

To ensure that the participant understood the position of testing, the leg to be tested was passively moved in to the testing position with verbal cueing. The pelvis was kept from rotating backwards by a manual stabilization force placed on the posterior and lateral iliac crest.35,36 The participant was then asked to assume the testing position without assistance, but with standardized verbal cueing from the PI. After the participant successfully achieved the proper position for testing without compensation on three consecutive attempts, a trial MVIC break test was performed.

Application of TDN to the gluteus medius was not limited to one specific region of the muscle. As such, all subdivisions of the gluteus medius muscle needed to be active during each MVIC break test. Using the recommendations of Otten et al.37 the hip was placed in two separate testing positions that were found to have the highest sEMG activation levels for all three subdivisions of the gluteus medius. Participants were positioned in side lying with their bottom or stabilization leg in a position of approximately 30 degrees of hip flexion and 90 degrees of knee flexion. The first testing position had the hip on the side being tested in a neutral or zero starting position (SL0) at the hip with the knee fully extended. Neutral or zero starting position was defined as a position where the hip is in neutral position with respect to hip flexion and extension, abduction and adduction, as well as internal rotation and external rotation (Figure 2). The second testing position had the hip in a position of neutral hip flexion and extension as well as abduction and adduction, but the hip was maximally internally rotated (SLIR) with the knee fully extended (Figure 3).

120090 Figure 2. Side lying neutral position for MVIC testing

120091 Figure 3. Side lying internal rotation position for MVIC testing

The resistance applied during each MVIC break test was applied gradually until maximal resistance was provided for a total of five seconds, or until the participant could no longer hold the testing position.35 To standardize the resistance applied for each trial as well as each participant, the entire body weight of the PI was placed 4 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus.35,36 The exact position of where the pressure should be placed was measured and marked on both the control and intervention sides.

Three MVIC break tests were performed first on the control side and then the intervention side. One minute of rest was given in between each test for both the SL0 and SLIR positions in an attempt to reduce the effects of muscular fatigue.47 If compensatory movements were observed during the recording of a strength measurement, the measure obtained was not recorded, the form was corrected and another test was performed. Once three valid tests were performed on the control and intervention each side, the HHD values were averaged.14,36 Following application of TDN, the same procedure for measuring strength and muscle activation levels of the gluteus medius was repeated.

Intervention

Following the pre-TDN measurement of gluteus medius strength and muscle activation levels, latent trigger points were identified in the gluteus medius musculature on both the control and intervention sides using the methods proposed by Simons et al.20 Each participant was positioned in side lying with the hip on the side that was assessed in a slightly adducted position so normal muscle fibers were still on slack while the taut bands of muscle were placed under tension, which made them more easily palpable.11,12,14,15

Participants needed at least two latent trigger points in the gluteus medius muscle on the intervention side in order to receive TDN.14 Trigger point dry needling was applied to each of the identified latent trigger points in an attempt to elicit a localized twitch response (LTR). Once a LTR was elicited, the needle was manipulated either further into the muscle tissue or at a different angle until no more LTRs were elicited, or if the participant verbally requested the intervention to stop. Once the needle was removed, manual pressure was held at the site of needle insertion for a total of 30 seconds to achieve hemostasis.25,29 The same process was repeated for all identified latent trigger points within the gluteus medius muscle. The application of TDN was stopped when no more LTR were elicited and there were no more palpable latent trigger points.

Following the application of TDN, each participant was asked to stand up and walk for two minutes in an attempt to assess each participants’ level of soreness with functional movement. Time was managed by the PI for standardization purposes. Following the two minutes, participants were asked to rate their level of soreness on a 0 to 10 scale with a response of 0 representing, “No soreness at all” and a response of 10 representing, “The worst soreness imaginable”.

Data Management

Biopac Student Lab software (Biopac, Goleta, CA) was used to analyze the recorded sEMG data. Raw sEMG readings were visually inspected and the peak amplitude that occurred during each MVIC was identified. Readings were then transformed using a root mean square calculation. Data were smoothed over 1000 points representing a 500 ms window around the identified peak amplitude, 250 ms prior to the peak and 250 ms following the peak.43 If the 500 ms window included readings that were not part of the MVIC, the next closest peak within the MVIC was identified and used. The mean amplitude within the 500 ms window was recorded for each trial.

Once a mean sEMG amplitude was found for each trial, the three trials in the SL0 and SLIR positions were averaged and recorded for both the intervention and control sides. The recorded HHD force measurements for all three trials in each position were also averaged and recorded for both sides. This process was performed for all measurements recorded prior to and following the application of TDN. The averaged values for the sEMG and HHD measurements were used for statistical analysis.

In order to be compared between trials or between individuals, sEMG readings must be normalized.44,45 The method of normalization has been debated, but normalization using a MVIC is a widely used44 and reliable method47 of comparing sEMG readings of the gluteus medius. The resultant sEMG data for measurements recorded prior to the application of TDN were used as the 100% MVIC reference for both the intervention and control sides. Averaged sEMG measurements recorded following the application of TDN were expressed as a percentage of the 100% MVIC.

Statistical Analysis

An a priori sample size estimation was conducted based on using a repeated measures ANOVA, analyzing the between-within interaction effect of four measurements between two groups and the following parameters, two-tailed test, alpha of 0.05, power of 0.80, a moderate effect size of 0.20. A minimum sample size of 36 participants was needed. To account for a potential participant dropout rate of 10% as well as individuals not presenting with latent trigger points in the gluteus medius when palpated, 40 participants were recruited.

All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Normality of the data was determined using the Shapiro-Wilk test. All comparisons were two-tailed and an alpha level of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant unless otherwise noted. Effect sizes were interpreted using the recommendations of Cohen.50 Descriptive statistics were used to describe the baseline characteristics of the sample.

A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess if there was a significant interaction between time (pre-TDN and post-TDN) and groups (intervention side and control side) for HHD force measurements for the SL0 and SLIR positions. Post hoc analysis using paired t tests with a Bonferroni correction (alpha level of p < 0.013) were used to identify which pairs had a significant difference. Effect size of the interaction between time and groups were calculated (partial eta squared).

To assess whether there was a significant difference in sEMG measurements within the intervention side and the control side over time as well as between sides prior to and following the application of TDN, pairwise tests were conducted for both the SL0 and SLIR positions. Since sEMG data were not normally distributed, Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests with Bonferroni correction (alpha level of p < 0.013) were conducted. Effect sizes for the results of the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test were calculated (Cohen’s d) using the recommendations of Field.51

RESULTS

Description of Sample

Forty participants were recruited and met the inclusion criteria for the study. One participant’s results were excluded due to the protocol for data collection not being followed (Figure 4). Therefore, the total sample size for the study was 39 participants. Descriptive statistics for the baseline characteristics of the sample can be found in Table 2.

120092 Figure 4. CONSORT flow diagram

Abbreviations: MVIC = maximal volitional isometric contraction

120093 Table 2. Descriptive statistics for demographic information of sample (n=39)

	Mean (SD)	Minimum	Maximum	
Age (years)	28.72 (5.47)	19.00	41.00	
Height (inches)	67.18 (3.76)	58.00	74.00	
Weight (pounds)	167.67 (27.89)	107.00	232.00	
Hours of weekly activity	7.00 (5.00)*	0.00	40.00	
Number of trigger points				
Intervention side‡	4.00 (1.00)*	3.00	8.00	
Control side	4.97 (1.65)	2.00	9.00	
Number of needles used	7.00 (2.00)*	5.00	10.00	
Level of soreness post TDN	3.00 (2.00)*†	0.00†	8.00†	
	N	%		
Gender				
Male	16	41.03%		
Female	23	58.97%		
Side of lower extremity dominance				
Right	33	84.62%		
Left	6	15.38%		
Abbreviations: TDN = trigger point dry needling; SD = standard deviation

*Was not normally distributed. Results are reported as median and interquartile range

†Soreness was measured on a scale of 0 to 10

‡ Denotes the side that received TDN

Hand Held Dynamometer

Hand held dynamometer measurements of force for the intervention and control sides for both the SL0 and SLIR positions are presented in Table 3 and Figure 5. There was a statistically significant interaction between the time (pre-TDN to post-TDN) and groups (intervention side and control side) for both positions, SL0 position, F(1,38) = 107.89, p < 0.001 and SLIR position, F(1,38) = 93.37, p < 0.001. The overall effect sizes were large for the interactions in the SL0 position (partial eta squared = 0.74) and the SLIR position (partial eta squared = 0.71).

120094 Table 3. Descriptive statistics for HHD measurements, reported in kilograms

	SL0 Position (n = 39)
Mean (SD)	SLIR Position (n = 39)
Mean (SD)	
Intervention*			
Pre-TDN	18.86 (4.20)	17.92 (4.56)	
Post-TDN	21.39 (4.77)	21.49 (4.71)	
Control			
Pre-TDN	20.56 (5.27)	18.49 (4.47)	
Post-TDN	19.25 (4.77)	18.77 (4.58)	
Abbreviations: HHD = hand held dynamometer; TDN = trigger point dry needling; SLO = side lying neutral position; SLIR = side lying internal rotation position

*Denotes the side that received TDN

120095 Figure 5. Comparisons of HHD measurements prior to and following TDN

Abbreviations: HHD = hand held dynamometer; SL0 = side lying neutral; SLIR = side lying internal rotation; TDN = trigger point dry needling; kg = kilograms

Pairwise post hoc analyses were statistically significant (p < 0.001) for all comparisons in the SL0 position: pre-TDN to post-TDN within and between the intervention side and the control side for both time periods. For the SLIR position, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) for pre-TDN and post-TDN measurements within the intervention side and between the intervention and control side for the post-TDN measurements. There was no significant difference (p = 0.146) within the control side when comparing pre-TDN and post TDN measurements, or when comparing pre-TDN measurements between the intervention and control sides (p = 0.074).

Hand held dynamometer measurements for the control side in the SL0 position decreased by 1.31 kg following the application of TDN. Three separate paired t tests were used to assess differences between the three trials of HHD measurements taken on the control side following the application of TDN. Significant differences were found for the measurements recorded between trial 1 and trial 2 (mean difference = -0.71, t(38) = -2.42, p = 0.020) and trial 1 and trial 3 (mean difference = -0.97, t(38) = -3.60, p = 0.001). No significant difference was found between measurements recorded for trial 2 and trial 3 (mean difference = -0.26, t(38) = -1.08, p = 0.287).

Surface Electromyography

Surface EMG measurements of amplitude for the intervention and control sides for both positions are presented in Table 4 and Figure 6. Within group analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between pre-TDN and post-TDN sEMG amplitude measurements on the intervention side in the SL0 position Z(39) = - 2.60, p = 0.009 with a medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.62). There were no statistically significant differences between pre-TDN and post-TDN sEMG amplitude measurements in the SL0 position on the control side, Z(39) = -1.46, p = 0.145. For the SLIR position, there was no statistically significant difference within either the intervention side, Z(39) = -2.09, p = 0.037 or the control side, Z(39) = -1.00, p = 0.317.

120096 Table 4. Descriptive statistics for sEMG amplitude readings, reported in millivolts

	SL0 Position (n = 39)	SLIR Position (n = 39)	
Median (IQR)	% MVIC	Median (IQR)	% MVIC	
Intervention*					
Pre-TDN	0.23 (0.19)	100%	0.22 (0.19)	100%	
Post-TDN	0.18 (0.15)	78.17%	0.20 (0.13)	90.32%	
Control					
Pre-TDN	0.24 (0.14)	100%	0.20 (0.15)	100%	
Post-TDN	0.23 (0.12)	95.89%	0.21 (0.14)	107.07%	
sEMG = surface electromyography; TDN = trigger point dry needling; MVIC = maximal volitional isometric contraction; IQR = interquartile range; SLO = side lying neutral position; SLIR = side lying internal rotation position

*Denotes the side that received TDN

120097 Figure 6. Comparison of sEMG measurements prior to and following TDN

Abbreviations: sEMG = surface electromyography; TDN = trigger point dry needling; MVIC = maximal volitional isometric contraction

Between TDN group comparisons for the SL0 position revealed there was not a statistically significant difference in pre-TDN sEMG amplitude measurements between the intervention side and control side, Z(39) = -1.17, p = 0.241. However, there was a statistically significant difference in post-TDN sEMG amplitude measurements between the intervention side and control side in the SL0 position, Z(39) = -3.08, p = 0.002 with a medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.74). In the SLIR position, the difference between the intervention side and control side at pre-TDN and post-TDN was not statistically significant, Z(39) = -0.27, p = 0.786 and Z(39) = -0.20, p = 0.042, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the application of TDN to latent trigger points within the gluteus medius musculature affected strength measurements and muscle activation levels immediately following intervention. Participants within this study had to be asymptomatic to ensure that the latent trigger points themselves were the sole reason for muscle weakness, not pain or articular dysfunction. Furthermore, to specifically assess the effect that TDN had on strength measurements, it had to be completed in isolation of any other therapeutic intervention. As such, this is the first study to investigate the effects of TDN in isolation on strength measurements of the gluteus medius in asymptomatic individuals.

Results reported from previous research assessing the effect of TDN to latent trigger points in the gastrocnemius found no significant difference in strength measurements as measured by a HHD immediately following intervention.25,26 In contrast, participants within this study demonstrated a statistically significant increase in HHD measurements of gluteus medius force production immediately following the application of TDN in both testing positions. While the minimal clinically important difference for HHD measurements of the gluteus medius muscle has not been established,52,53 a large treatment effect size was found for interactions in the SL0 position (partial eta squared = 0.74) and the SLIR position (partial eta squared = 0.71) following the application of TDN suggesting a strong relationship between intervention and the difference in HHD measurements over time as well as between groups. These results are consistent with previous studies that investigated immediate changes in force production of hip musculature measured by a HHD following the application of dry needling to MTrPs in the lower extremities for both symptomatic29,30 and asymptomatic individuals when combined with other interventions.31

Strength as measured by HHD force measurements was not the only outcome measure utilized in this study. Participants demonstrated a statistically significant decrease (78.17% of pre-TDN readings) in sEMG amplitude readings on the intervention side following the application of TDN even though HHD force measurements increased by 2.52 kg in the SL0 position. While not statistically significant, sEMG amplitude readings in the SLIR position also decreased (90.32% of pre-TDN readings) on the intervention side, while HHD force measurements increased by 3.38 kg. Recorded sEMG amplitude readings can be used as a direct measure of the activation level of a muscle during a contraction.43–45 Both Dwyer et al54 and Penney et al41 found an increase in sEMG amplitude readings recorded during functional activities for individuals who demonstrated weakness of the gluteus medius muscle during baseline testing. These results suggest individuals who present with weakness of a muscle will require an increased level of muscle activation during a contraction, which may be a compensatory mechanism used to increase the amount of motor unit recruitment in order to achieve a given force output.55 As such, the inverse relationship of HHD force measurements and sEMG amplitude readings found in this study suggests a more efficient gluteus medius muscle contraction following the application of TDN, as participants required less motor unit recruitment to achieve greater levels of force production.

Based on the results of this study, latent trigger points can be identified as a potential source for impaired muscle function of the gluteus medius muscle resulting in a weak and inefficient muscle contraction. Authors of previous research have stressed the importance of eliciting a LTR during TDN to ensure that the myofilament needle has come in contact with a myofascial trigger point.56,57 While it is still unclear if the elicitation of one or multiple LTRs during the application of dry needling is essential for reductions in pain and disability in various patient populations,58,59 the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of TDN specifically to latent trigger points within the gluteus medius muscle. As such, it was critical that a LTR was elicited during the application of TDN to ensure that the needle had in fact come in contact with a latent trigger point.25,26,32 All of the study participants demonstrated a palpable LTR and subjectively reported feeling a LTR during the application of TDN.

The exact mechanism of how TDN can reverse the effects of MTrPs is still unknown.5 Following the application of dry needling as well as the elicitation of a LTR, an increase in blood flow and subsequent tissue oxygenation have been found, along with a reduction of the biochemicals associated with pain and a localized muscle contraction within the milieu of a myofascial trigger point.8,18 Increases in localized blood flow and biochemical changes within the tissue itself may explain the increase in force production following the application of TDN observed during this study. Specifically, a reduction of calcitonin gene related peptide may allow for improved overlap of actin and myosin proteins through elimination of the localized muscle contracture22 which has the potential to improve cross bridge formation within the sarcomere unit, thereby improving muscle force production. Furthermore, Lucas1 argued that a reduction of group III and IV afferent input to second order neurons could potentially reverse alpha motor neuron inhibition, thereby improving neuromuscular control which may further explain the inverse relationship between HHD force measurements and sEMG amplitude readings found in this study following the application of TDN. Similarly, changes in neuromuscular function including a reduction in resting muscle tone25,26 as well as a decrease in muscle contraction time25 have been found following the elicitation of a LTR during the application of TDN to latent trigger points within the gastrocnemius.

An unexpected outcome of the study was that there was also a statistically significant difference in HHD measurements for the control side in the SL0 position as force measurements decreased by 1.31 kg. A possible explanation for this result could be found in the order in which the strength measurements were recorded and the level of soreness experienced following the application of TDN. Post-TDN strength assessments were completed first on the control side and then the intervention side. Participants reported an increased level of soreness in the gluteus medius muscle on the intervention side during the first MVIC break test trial on their control side while in the SL0 position. Even though strength was being assessed on the control side, participants reported an increased level of soreness on the side that they were lying on potentially due to the need for stabilization during testing. Post needling soreness is commonly reported following the application of TDN58 and may have affected the participants’ ability to generate force during their first MVIC break test trial on the control side in the SL0 position.

To support this explanation, post-TDN HHD force measurements of all three trials in the SL0 position on the control side were analyzed for differences. Significant differences for the measurements recorded between trial 1 and trial 2 and trial 1 and trial 3, while no significant difference was found between measurements recorded for trial 2 and trial 3. It is plausible that the level of soreness experienced in the gluteus medius musculature following the application of TDN reduced with each subsequent MVIC break test trial. This phenomenon may explain why there was no significant difference found between measurements recoded for trial 2 and trial 3 in the SL0 position as well as no significant difference between any of the measurements recorded in the SLIR position on the control side, which were collected following the measurements in the SL0 position. Clinically, TDN is rarely performed in isolation and as such, clinicians should be aware of the possibility for post needling soreness and its potential effect on force production. Results of this analysis suggest that it may be beneficial to perform isolated gluteus medius contractions in an open chain position prior to any functional strengthening activities. This may reduce the effects that post-needling soreness may have on force production, thereby potentially reducing the risk for compensatory movement patterns during strengthening activities.

Study Limitations

The PI, who collected all of the data and applied the intervention to each of the study’s participants, was not blinded to which side received TDN and which side was the control. Even with standardized protocols, the risk of inadvertent bias during MVIC testing cannot be eliminated.

During the informed consent process, participants were instructed that the purpose of the study was to assess the effects of TDN on strength measurements of the gluteus medius, whether that be an increase or decrease in strength in an attempt to reduce the risk of performance bias. However, since participants were not blinded to which side received TDN and which side was the control side, performance bias cannot be completely ruled out.

Sham needles have been utilized in studies that have investigated the effects of dry needling to account for a potential placebo effect.27 When it comes to TDN studies, participants are able to feel the difference in needle depth penetration between the sham and TDN needles, as well as the elicitation of a LTR. Furthermore, if study participants have previously received TDN they may be able to realize the difference between the placebo and actual intervention. Future research on this topic could include other types of dry needling including superficial dry needling techniques, which may make it easier to include sham needles as a true placebo, while also reducing the potential for post needling soreness.58

While the side of dominance was recorded for each of this study’s participants, it was not considered during statistical analysis outside of descriptive statistics for demographic information of the sample. Future studies may consider if side of dominance has an effect on the number of MTrPs found in the muscle tissue as well as study outcomes.

This study only assessed the outcome measures immediately following the application of TDN. Future studies should assess the effects of TDN on muscle strength at different post-treatment time intervals. Furthermore, TDN’s effect on muscle force production or activity during functional movements should also be investigated as this may have a more direct clinical application to improving performance during activities of daily living.

CONCLUSION

Application of TDN to latent trigger points within the gluteus medius musculature was able to significantly increase gluteus muscle force production immediately following intervention while reducing the level of electromyographic muscle activation required during force production testing. These results suggest that latent trigger points may have a negative impact on gluteus medius muscle strength as well as the efficiency of contraction. Clinically, latent trigger may be considered as a potential source of impaired muscle function.

Clinical Trials Registration Number

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID NCT035802000

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest
==== Refs
The impact of latent trigger points on regional muscle function Current Pain and Headache Reports Lucas Karen R. 10 2008
12 5 344 349 1531-3433 10.1007/s11916-008-0058-6 10.1007/s11916-008-0058-6
Latent myofascial trigger points Current Pain and Headache Reports Ge Hong-You Arendt-Nielsen Lars Springer Science and Business Media LLC 11 5 2011
15 5 386 392 1531-3433 10.1007/s11916-011-0210-6 10.1007/s11916-011-0210-6
Clinical implication of latent myofascial trigger point Current Pain and Headache Reports Celik Derya Kaya Mutlu Ebru 26 6 2013
17 8 353 360 1531-3433 10.1007/s11916-013-0353-8 10.1007/s11916-013-0353-8
Myofascial trigger points: an evidence-informed review Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy Dommerholt Jan Bron Carel Franssen Jo 10 2006
14 4 203 221 1066-9817 10.1179/106698106790819991 10.1179/106698106790819991
Myofascial trigger points then and now: A historical and scientific perspective PM&R Shah Jay P. Thaker Nikki Heimur Juliana Aredo Jacqueline V. Sikdar Siddhartha Gerber Lynn 24 2 2015
7 7 746 761 1934-1482 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.01.024 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.01.024 25724849
Myofascial pain and dysfunction: The trigger point manual Travell J.G. Simons D.G. Williams & Wilkins Baltimore, MD 1983
1
Pathophysiologic and electrophysiologic mechanisms of myofascial trigger points Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Hong Chang-Zern Simons David G. 7 1998
79 7 863 872 0003-9993 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90371-9 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90371-9 9685106
Biochemicals associated with pain and inflammation are elevated in sites near to and remote from active myofascial trigger points Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Shah Jay P. Danoff Jerome V. Desai Mehul J. Parikh Sagar Nakamura Lynn Y. Phillips Terry M. Gerber Lynn H. 1 2008
89 1 16 23 0003-9993 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.018 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.018
Uncovering the biochemical milieu of myofascial trigger points using in vivo microdialysis: An application of muscle pain concepts to myofascial pain syndrome Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies Shah Jay P. Gilliams Elizabeth A. 10 2008
12 4 371 384 1360-8592 10.1016/j.jbmt.2008.06.006 10.1016/j.jbmt.2008.06.006
An in vivo microanalytical technique for measuring the local biochemical milieu of human skeletal muscle Journal of Applied Physiology Shah Jay P. Phillips Terry M. Danoff Jerome V. Gerber Lynn H. 11 2005
99 5 1977 1984 8750-7587 10.1152/japplphysiol.00419.2005 10.1152/japplphysiol.00419.2005
The relationship between latent trigger points and depression levels in healthy subjects Clinical Rheumatology Çelik Derya Kaya Mutlu Ebru Springer Science and Business Media LLC 11 2 2012
31 6 907 911 0770-3198 10.1007/s10067-012-1950-3 10.1007/s10067-012-1950-3
How common are latent myofascial trigger points in the scapular positioning muscles Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain Lucas Karen R. Rich Peter A. Polus Barbara I. 2009
16 4 279 286 1058-2452 10.1080/10582450802479800 10.1080/10582450802479800
Accelerated muscle fatigability of latent myofascial trigger points in humans Pain Medicine Ge Hong-You Arendt-Nielsen Lars Madeleine Pascal Oxford University Press (OUP) 7 2012
13 7 957 964 1526-2375 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01416.x 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01416.x 22694218
The relationship between latent trigger point and muscle strength in healthy subjects: a double-blind study Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Celik Derya Yeldan İpek 1 12 2011
24 4 251 256 1878-6324 10.3233/bmr-2011-0302 10.3233/bmr-2011-0302
Latent myofascial trigger points: their effects on muscle activation and movement efficiency Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies Lucas Karen R Polus Barbara I Rich Peter A 7 2004
8 3 160 166 1360-8592 10.1016/j.jbmt.2003.12.002 10.1016/j.jbmt.2003.12.002
Analysis of competencies for dry needling by physical therapists: Final report Caramagno J. Adrian L. Mueller L. Purl J. Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy 2015

Dry needling: peripheral and central considerations Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy Dommerholt Jan 11 2011
19 4 223 227 1066-9817 10.1179/106698111x13129729552065 10.1179/106698111x13129729552065 23115475
The influence of dry needling of the trapezius muscle on muscle blood flow and oxygenation Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics Cagnie Barbara Barbe Tom De Ridder Eline Van Oosterwijck Jessica Cools Ann Danneels Lieven 11 2012
35 9 685 691 0161-4754 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.10.005 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.10.005
The effectiveness of trigger point dry needling for musculoskeletal conditions by physical therapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Gattie Eric Cleland Joshua A. Snodgrass Suzanne 3 2017
47 3 133 149 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2017.7096 10.2519/jospt.2017.7096 28158962
The trigger point manual Simons D.G. Travell J.G. Simmons L. Williams and Wilkins Baltimore, MD 1999

Effects of postural and visual stressors on myofascial trigger point development and motor unit rotation during computer work Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology Hoyle Jeffrey A. Marras William S. Sheedy James E. Hart Dennis E. 2 2011
21 1 41 48 1050-6411 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.04.006 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.04.006
An expansion of Simons’ integrated hypothesis of trigger point formation Current Pain and Headache Reports Gerwin Robert D. Dommerholt Jan Shah Jay P. 12 2004
8 6 468 475 1531-3433 10.1007/s11916-004-0069-x 10.1007/s11916-004-0069-x
Kinesiology of the hip: A focus on muscular actions Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Neumann Donald A. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) 2 2010
40 2 82 94 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2010.3025 10.2519/jospt.2010.3025
The architectural design of the gluteal muscle group: Implications for movement and rehabilitation Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Ward Samuel R. Winters Taylor M. Blemker Silvia S. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) 2 2010
40 2 95 102 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2010.3302 10.2519/jospt.2010.3302
Effects of dry needling of latent trigger points on viscoelastic and muscular contractile properties: preliminary results of a randomized within-participant clinical trial Journal of Clinical Medicine Pérez-Bellmunt Albert Casasayas-Cos Oriol López-de-Celis Carlos Rodríguez-Sanz Jacobo Rodríguez-Jiménez Jorge Ortiz-Miguel Sara Meca-Rivera Toni Fernández-de-las-Peñas César 27 8 2021
10 17 3848 2077-0383 10.3390/jcm10173848 10.3390/jcm10173848 34501299
The effect of dry needling on gastrocnemius muscle stiffness and strength in participants with latent trigger points Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology Albin S.R. Koppenhaver S.L. MacDonald C.W. Capoccia S. Ngo D. Phippen S. Pineda R. Wendlandt A. Hoffman L.R. 12 2020
55 102479 1050-6411 10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102479 10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102479
The effects of needling therapies on muscle force production: a systematic review and meta-analysis Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Mansfield Cody J. Vanetten Lucas Willy Richard di Stasi Stephanie Magnussen Robert Briggs Matthew 3 2019
49 3 154 170 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2019.8270 10.2519/jospt.2019.8270 30501386
Efficacy of myofascial trigger point dry needling in the prevention of pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Mayoral Orlando Salvat Isabel Martín María Teresa Martín Stella Santiago Jesús Cotarelo José Rodríguez Constantino 2013
2013 1 8 1741-427X 10.1155/2013/694941 10.1155/2013/694941 23606888
Effectiveness of dry needling therapy on pain, hip muscle strength, and physical function in patients with hip osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Ceballos-Laita Luis Jiménez-Del-Barrio Sandra Marín-Zurdo Javier Moreno-Calvo Alejandro Marín-Boné Javier Albarova-Corral María Isabel Estébanez-de-Miguel Elena 5 2021
102 5 959 966 0003-9993 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.01.077 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.01.077 33567336
Spinal and peripheral dry needling versus peripheral dry needling alone among individuals with a history of lateral ankle sprain: a randomized control trial International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Rossi Ainsley Blaustein Sara Brown Joshua Dieffenderfer Kari Ervin Elaine Griffin Steven Frierson Elizabeth Geist Kathleen Johanson Marie 12 2017
12 7 1034 1047 2159-2896 10.26603/ijspt20171034 10.26603/ijspt20171034 29234555
Effect of dry needling on thigh muscle strength and hip flexion in elite soccer players Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise Haser CHRISTIAN Stöggl THOMAS Kriner MONIKA MIKOLEIT JÖRG WOLFAHRT BERND SCHERR JOHANNES HALLE MARTIN PFAB FLORIAN 2 2017
49 2 378 383 0195-9131 10.1249/mss.0000000000001111 10.1249/mss.0000000000001111
Acute effects of dry needling on myofascial trigger points in the triceps surae of ballet dancers: a pilot randomized controlled trial International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Janowski Jennifer A Phelan-Smith Deanna M L Kroat Brady Maria N Michels Kelsey L Timm Alexandra H Boucher Nicole M Casteen Kedron D Village David Sleeper Mark D 1 4 2021
16 2 418 430 2159-2896 10.26603/001c.21475 10.26603/001c.21475 33842037
The diagnostic validity of hip provocation maneuvers to detect intra-articular hip pathology PM&R Maslowski Erin Sullivan William Forster Harwood Jeri Gonzalez Peter Kaufman Marla Vidal Armando Akuthota Venu 3 2010
2 3 174 181 1934-1482 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.01.014 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.01.014 20359681
The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip Arthritis & Rheumatism Altman R. Alarcón G. Appelrouth D. Bloch D. Borenstein D. Brandt K. Brown C. Cooke T. D. Daniel W. Feldman D. Greenwald R. Hochberg M. Howell D. Ike R. Kapila P. Kaplan D. Koopman W. Marino C. McDonald E. McShane D. J. Medsger T. Michel B. Murphy W. A. Osial T. Ramsey-Goldman R. Rothschild B. Wolfe F. 5 1991
34 5 505 514 0004-3591 10.1002/art.1780340502 10.1002/art.1780340502 2025304
Muscles Testing and Function With Posture and Pain Kendall F.P. McCreary E.K. Provance P.G. Rodgers M.M. Romani W.A. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Baltimore, MD 2005

Hip abductor muscle volume and strength differences between women with chronic hip joint pain and asymptomatic controls Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Mastenbrook Matthew J. Commean Paul K. Hillen Travis J. Salsich Gretchen B. Meyer Gretchen A. Mueller Michael J. Clohisy John C. Harris-Hayes Marcie Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) 12 2017
47 12 923 930 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2017.7380 10.2519/jospt.2017.7380 28992772
Electromyography activation levels of the 3 gluteus medius subdivisions during manual strength testing Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Otten Roald Tol Johannes L. Holmich Per Whiteley Rodney 8 2015
24 3 244 251 1056-6716 10.1123/jsr.2013-0149 10.1123/jsr.2013-0149 25054571
The reliability and validity of handheld dynamometry for the measurement of lower-extremity muscle strength in older adults Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Arnold Cathy M Warkentin Kathryn D Chilibeck Philip D Magnus Charlene R A 3 2010
24 3 815 824 1064-8011 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181aa36b8 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181aa36b8 19661831
Isometric muscle strength in youth assessed by hand-held dynamometry: a feasibility, reliability, and validity study Pediatric Physical Therapy Hébert Luc J. Maltais Désirée B. Lepage Céline Saulnier Joanne Crête Mélanie Perron Marc 2011
23 3 289 299 0898-5669 10.1097/pep.0b013e318227ccff 10.1097/pep.0b013e318227ccff 21829128
Reliability of measurements of hip abduction strength obtained with a hand-held dynamometer Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Ieiri Akira Tushima Eiki Ishida Kazuhiro Inoue Masahiro Kanno Taiki Masuda Takeshi 2015
31 2 146 152 0959-3985 10.3109/09593985.2014.960539 10.3109/09593985.2014.960539 25264015
Determining the activation of gluteus medius and the validity of the single leg stance test in chronic, nonspecific low back pain Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Penney Tracy Ploughman Michelle Austin Mark W. Behm David G. Byrne Jeannette M. 10 2014
95 10 1969 1976 0003-9993 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.009 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.009
A comparison of surface and fine wire EMG recordings of gluteus medius during selected maximum isometric voluntary contractions of the hip Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology Semciw Adam I. Neate Rachel Pizzari Tania 12 2014
24 6 835 840 1050-6411 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.08.015 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.08.015
Evaluation of surface electromyography during maximal voluntary contraction Bamman M.M Ingram S.G. Caruso J.F. Greenisen M.C. 1997
11 2 68 72
How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25years of research Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology Burden Adrian 12 2010
20 6 1023 1035 1050-6411 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.07.004 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.07.004
A guide for use and interpretation of kinesiologic electromyographic data Physical Therapy Soderberg Gary L Knutson Loretta M 1 5 2000
80 5 485 498 0031-9023 10.1093/ptj/80.5.485 10.1093/ptj/80.5.485
Electromyographic analysis of gluteus medius and gluteus maximus during rehabilitation exercises Int J Sports Phys Ther Boren K. Conrey C. Le Coguic J. Paprocki L. Voight M. Robinson T.K. 2011
6 3 206 223 22034614
Reliability of electromyographic normalization methods for evaluating the hip musculature Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology Bolgla Lori A. Uhl Timothy L. 2 2007
17 1 102 111 1050-6411 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.11.007 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.11.007
Test–retest reliability of cardinal plane isokinetic hip torque and EMG Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology Claiborne Tina L. Timmons Mark K. Pincivero Danny M. 10 2009
19 5 e345 e352 1050-6411 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.07.005 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.07.005
Foundations Of Clinical Research: Applications To Practice Portney L.G. Watkins M.P. Prentice Hall Health Upper Saddle River, NJ 2000

A power primer. Psychological Bulletin Cohen Jacob 1992
112 1 155 159 1939-1455 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 19565683
Discovering Statistics using IBM SPPS statistics Field A. SAGE Thousand Oaks, CA 2013

Considerations and practical options for measuring muscle strength: A narrative review BioMed Research International Bohannon Richard W. 17 1 2019
2019 8194537 8194537 2314-6133 10.1155/2019/8194537 10.1155/2019/8194537 30792998
Hand held myometry/dynamometry Romney W. Weisbach C. Anderson H. Yoshida R 2016
https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/hand-held-myometry-dynamometry Available at:
Comparison of gluteus medius muscle activity during functional tasks in individuals with and without osteoarthritis of the hip joint Clinical Biomechanics Dwyer Maureen K. Stafford Kelly Mattacola Carl G. Uhl Timothy L. Giordani Mauro 8 2013
28 7 757 761 0268-0033 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.07.007 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.07.007 23911109
Electromyographic patterns suggest changes in motor unit physiology associated with early osteoarthritis of the knee Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Ling S.M. Conwit R.A. Talbot L. Shermack M. Wood J.E. Dredge E.M. Weeks M.J. Abernethy D.R. Metter E.J. 10 2007
15 10 1134 1140 1063-4584 10.1016/j.joca.2007.03.024 10.1016/j.joca.2007.03.024 17543548
Lidocaine injection versus dry needling to myofascial trigger point. The importance of the local twitch response American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Hong Chang-Zern 7 1994
73 4 256 263 0894-9115 10.1097/00002060-199407000-00006 10.1097/00002060-199407000-00006 8043247
Detecting local twitch responses of myofascial trigger points in the lower-back muscles using ultrasonography Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Rha Dong-wook Shin Ji Cheol Kim Yong-Kyun Jung Jae Hwan Kim Young Uhk Lee Sang Chul 10 2011
92 10 1576 1580.e1 0003-9993 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.005 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.005
The local twitch response during trigger point dry needling: is it necessary for successful outcomes? Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies Perreault Thomas Dunning James Butts Raymond 10 2017
21 4 940 947 1360-8592 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.03.008 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.03.008
The effect of dry needling on the active trigger point of upper trapezius muscle: Eliciting local twitch response on long-term clinical outcomes Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Hakim Iman Kamali Takamjani Ismail Ebrahimi Sarrafzadeh Javad Ezzati Kamran Bagheri Rasool 11 9 2019
32 5 717 724 1878-6324 10.3233/bmr-181286 10.3233/bmr-181286
