
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

35136678
31871
10.26603/001c.31871
Editorial
To Do or Not to Do? - The Value of the Preseason Assessment in Sport Injury Prevention
De Michelis Mendonça Luciana 1
1 1. Graduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance - Physical Therapy Department – Universidade Federal dos Vale do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) – Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil; President of the International Federation of Sports Physical Therapy (IFSPT)
Cooresponding author: lucianademichelis@gmail.com President of the International Federation of Sports Physical Therapy (IFSPT)

1 2 2022
2022
17 2 111113
1 12 2021
1 1 2022
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

preseason assessment
sport physical therapy
injury prevention
==== Body
pmcIn 2011, World Physiotherapy published the Standards of Physical Therapy practice (https://world.physio/sites/default/files/2020-06/G-2011-Standards-practice.pdf), which indicates that “the physical therapist performs an initial examination/assessment and evaluation to establish a diagnosis and prognosis/plan of care prior to intervention/treatment.” Since assessment is considered mandatory for a clinical decision-making process in Physical Therapy,1,2 it is expected to find sports physical therapists performing preseason assessment with their athletes. A Preseason Assessment (PA) is a battery of tests chosen to identify and characterize the health status of athletes (screening) to prevent injuries and improve performance.3 In addition, the PA might identify athletes with increased likelihood of being injured and guide the initial phase of the preventive program planned by sport physical therapists3.

Screening athletes is mandatory in other professions. For example, the American College of Sports Medicine proposes a preparticipation health screening on athletes to access exercise-related cardiovascular events.4 The argument commonly used that “general prevention programs work, so why the concern on assessing and building tailored programs?” is not enough to abandon the standards of our profession. Athletes’ health and safety should be our main concerns and our interventions should be specific for each health condition, each sport injury, each athlete. Therefore, we should deliver our efforts to targeting the best health and safety status. The purpose of this editorial is to discuss the execution of preseason assessment (PA) and planning preventive programs based on the PA results.

To understand injury occurrence, we should know about the sport action and most common movements, collect athlete’s injury history and sport practice, and identify and measure athletes’ needs (physical, psychological, sport performance, etc) to facilitate the outcome measurement (dysfunctions linked to the injury).1 If injury is an established problem in sport practice, how can we prevent it without knowing/understanding it? An important process that sports physical therapists should do to understand athletic injury is to assess, quantify, define the diagnosis, implement interventions, follow-up and re-assess. Mehl et al.5 indicated that screening, identification, and correction of endangering movement patterns like the dynamic valgus are the first crucial steps in order to prevent knee injuries in athletes. Interestingly, Mendonça et al.1 developed an international survey and the authors reported a frequency of 75% sports PT performing PA in their athletes.1 The fact that about one third of these sports physical therapists use the results of the PA to build the prevention program was surprisingly negative.1

PA would be recognized as mandatory and properly implemented (and even disseminated) if it is validated. To accomplish this, it is necessary to apply the PA results in sport injury prevention program implementation and follow-up injury occurrences to actually validate the prevention program and also the PA itself. Bittencourt et al.6 recently published a cohort study which identified that a tailored preventive program reduced the incidence of patellar tendinopathy in elite youth jumping athletes. The necessity of performing this preseason screening has been questioned, mainly based on the statement of lack of strong evidence.7

Considering that the pre-competition season usually involves athletes being exposed to frequent training sessions and friendly matches before a break-time. Even a global non-specific prevention program, such as FIFA 11+, could benefit the athlete. However, we might not do all in our power to help our athletes throughout the whole season. For example, Slauterbeck et al.8 did not find a reduction in lower extremity injury in schools using the FIFA 11+ program compared with schools using their usual pre-practice warm-up program. In elite athletes, although some studies indicate that FIFA 11+ reduces injury incidence in soccer, Ekstrand et al.9 found that hamstring injuries have increased 4% annually, during 13 years follow-up, in elite male soccer teams.

So maybe the problem is not about the PA itself, but how to perform the PA. Which tests to choose? How to apply it? How to do analyze the data? Relative limitations in performing the PA might be the time needed to organize and execute, high-cost equipment and lack of methodological rigor.1 However, those limitations could be easily addressed with strategies such as substituting tests using expensive equipment for clinical tests, keeping the scientific rigor (i.e. LESS),10 and possibly involving university students to make the process easier to execute.

The purpose of the PA is not to predict injury, but it to screen our athletes, identify risk profiles, and set specific parameters to improve their capacity to deal with sport demands.6 We should use PA results to build a tailored preventive program to help our athletes achieve the strength and skill to perform.6 Considering that PA procedures could be performed on the field using low-cost equipment, these regimens should be promoted and facilitated in sports organizations world-wide, by means of shared consensus amongst the organization’s medical and technical staffs.
==== Refs
How injury registration and preseason assessment are being delivered: An international survey of sports physical therapists Physical Therapy in Sport Mendonça Luciana D. Ley Christophe Schuermans Joke Wezenbeek Evi Witvrouw Erik 2021
53 S1466 853X(21)00147 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.08.014 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.08.014
Identifying and Prioritizing Clinical Guideline Recommendations Most Relevant to Physical Therapy Practice for Hip and/or Knee Osteoarthritis Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Teo Pek Ling Hinman Rana S. Egerton Thorlene Dziedzic Krysia S. Bennell Kim L. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) 7 2019
49 7 501 512 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2019.8676 10.2519/jospt.2019.8676 31258044
Can pre-season fitness measures predict time to injury in varsity athletes?: a retrospective case control study Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy,Rehabilitation, Therapy & Technology Kennedy Michael D Fischer Robyn Fairbanks Kristine Lefaivre Lauren Vickery Lauren Molzan Janelle Parent Eric 23 7 2012
4 1 26 1758-2555 10.1186/1758-2555-4-26 10.1186/1758-2555-4-26 22824555
Updating ACSM’s Recommendations for Exercise Preparticipation Health Screening Med Sci Sports Exerc Riebe DEBORAH Franklin BARRY A. Thompson PAUL D. Garber CAROL EWING Whitfield GEOFFREY P. Magal MEIR Pescatello LINDA S. 11 2015
47 11 2473 2479 0195-9131 10.1249/mss.0000000000000664 10.1249/mss.0000000000000664
Evidence-based concepts for prevention of knee and ACL injuries. 2017 guidelines of the ligament committee of the German Knee Society (DKG) Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Mehl Julian Diermeier Theresa Herbst Elmar Imhoff Andreas B. Stoffels Thomas Zantop Thore Petersen Wolf Achtnich Andrea 2018
138 1 51 61 0936-8051 10.1007/s00402-017-2809-5 10.1007/s00402-017-2809-5 28983841
Preventive effect of tailored exercises on patellar tendinopathy in elite youth athletes: A cohort study Physical Therapy in Sport Bittencourt Natália Franco Neto Oliveira Rodrigo Ribeiro Vaz Rodrigo Paula Mascarenhas Silva Rodrigo Scattone Mendonça Luciana Michelis 1 2022
53 60 66 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.11.006 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.11.006
Why screening tests to predict injury do not work—and probably never will…: a critical review British Journal of Sports Medicine Bahr Roald 19 4 2016
50 13 776 780 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096256 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096256
Implementation of the FIFA 11+ Injury Prevention Program by High School Athletic Teams Did Not Reduce Lower Extremity Injuries: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial The American Journal of Sports Medicine Slauterbeck James R. Choquette Rebecca Tourville Timothy W. Krug Mickey Mandelbaum Bert R. Vacek Pamela Beynnon Bruce D. SAGE Publications 17 9 2019
47 12 2844 2852 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546519873270 10.1177/0363546519873270
Hamstring injuries have increased by 4% annually in men's professional football, since 2001: a 13-year longitudinal analysis of the UEFA Elite Club injury study British Journal of Sports Medicine Ekstrand Jan Waldén Markus Hägglund Martin 8 1 2016
50 12 731 737 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095359 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095359
The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) Is a valid and reliable clinical assessment tool of jump-landing biomechanics: The JUMP-ACL study The American Journal of Sports Medicine Padua Darin A. Marshall Stephen W. Boling Michelle C. Thigpen Charles A. Garrett William E., Jr Beutler Anthony I. 2 9 2009
37 10 1996 2002 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546509343200 10.1177/0363546509343200
