
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

35136680
31727
10.26603/001c.31727
Clinical Viewpoint
Current Views of Scapular Dyskinesis and its Possible Clinical Relevance
Sciascia Aaron PhD, ATC, PES, SMTC, FNAP 1
Kibler W. Ben MD 2
1 Institute of Clinical Outcomes and Research Lexington Clinic https://ror.org/04pvxsf55
2 Shoulder Center of Kentucky Lexington Clinic https://ror.org/04pvxsf55
Cooresponding Author ascia@lexclin.com

2 2 2022
2022
17 2 117130
2 11 2021
8 1 2022
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Scapular dyskinesis is a condition that is frequently observed clinically but not often understood. Too often it is viewed as a diagnosis which is not accurate because it is a physical impairment. This misclassification of dyskinesis has resulted in literature that simultaneously supports and refutes scapular dyskinesis as a relevant clinical entity as it relates to arm function. These conflicting views have not provided clear recommendations for optimal evaluation and treatment methods. The authors’ experience and scholarship related to scapular function and dysfunction support that scapular dyskinesis is an impairment that has causative factors, that a pathoanatomical approach should not be the primary focus but should be considered as part of a comprehensive examination, that a qualitative examination for determining the presence or absence of a scapular contribution to shoulder dysfunction is currently the best option widely available to clinicians, and that rehabilitation approaches should be reconsidered where enhancing motor control becomes the primary focus rather than increasing strength.

scapular dyskinesis
shoulder
shoulder rehab
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The scapula has been identified as a key component of effective shoulder and arm function, due to its roles in scapulohumeral rhythm and its association with a wide variety of clinical shoulder injuries. A series of investigations, consensus groups, and clinical commentaries have established: the definition of scapular dyskinesis,1,2 the relationship of dyskinesis to shoulder pain and injury,3–6 guidelines for operative and non-operative treatment,6–8 and an algorithm for the clinical evaluation process.9 However, the existence of disparate reports on how scapular function can both positively and negatively influence shoulder function has not provided clinicians with clear understanding of the clinical importance the scapula. This is likely due to 3 key characteristics related to scapular function. First, the multitude of muscles that attach to the scapula allow for simultaneous and synchronous muscle activation and stabilization to occur during arm movement. This allows for numerous degrees of freedom to exist which results in variations between individuals performing the same task.10 Second, the thorax has an ellipsoid design which does not allow for single planar movement to occur exclusively. The lack of single planar movement is due not only to the shape of the thorax but also due to the varied fiber orientation of the muscles acting upon the scapula. Scapular motion is comprised of complex rotations and translations which are necessary to allow the scapula to function as part of scapulohumeral rhythm, the integrated coupled motion of the moving arm and scapula that is the basis for effective upper extremity use. The scapular rotations (anterior/posterior tilt, upward/downward rotation, and internal/external rotation) are described as accessory arthrokinematic motions while the scapular translations (elevation/depression and medial/lateral translation) can be characterized as physiologic motions such as the voluntary gross actions of humeral flexion, abduction, or rotation.11–16 Medial translation (dynamic movement of the scapula around the thorax posteriorly towards the vertebral column) and lateral translation (dynamic movement of the scapula around the thorax anteriorly towards the chest) should be used to describe active motion while retraction and protraction should be used to described the end position of the scapula after the movement has ceased.15

Scapular roles involve almost every aspect of shoulder and arm function. It is the “G” of dynamic glenohumeral concavity/compression, the “A” of stable acromioclavicular joint articulation, and “S” of scapulohumeral rhythm.6 Finally, the scapula is a link within the kinetic chain (the coordinated, integrated proximal to distal muscle activity sequencing that allows arm tasks to occur).17 The scapula has a number of crucial roles but most importantly, it serves as the link that transfers energy from the large muscles of the trunk, lower extremity, and core to the smaller muscles of the arm during arm movements.17

Scapular Dyskinesis

When scapular motion becomes altered, the appropriate term to use would be scapular dyskinesis. “Dys” (alteration of) “kinesis” (motion) is a general term that reflects loss of control of normal scapular physiology, mechanics, and motion. Scapular “winging” has been used as a term synonymous with dyskinesis; however, “winging” is best reserved for altered scapular motion driven by neurological compromise.18 Neurologically based winging is clinically observed when any portion of the scapula excessively departs from its contact with the thorax immediately upon the initiation of arm motion and remains disconnected throughout the ascent and descent phases of the arm movement. Conversely, altered scapular positioning can be observed in the resting position of the arm but is more often seen dynamically in the descent phase of arm motion. During the dynamic arm movement, scapular dyskinesis can be clinically characterized by medial or inferior medial border prominence, early scapular elevation or shrugging upon arm elevation, and/or rapid downward rotation upon arm lowering.2 The leading theory is that arm function suffers when scapular dyskinesis is present due to an alteration in the coupled glenoid and humerus relationship.2 However, a cause versus effect relationship between scapular motion and shoulder injury has not been concretely established.6 Considering the literature has consistently noted that scapular dyskinesis, in isolation, is not an injury or a musculoskeletal diagnosis but rather a physical impairment,6 scapular dyskinesis should be viewed as an impairment with a causative origin.

Reconsidering the Clinical Examination

Eighty-three percent of patients with shoulder pain report that the reason for seeking treatment was an inability to achieve their desired function in important activities – they perceived a dysfunction that they wish to be addressed.19 Function can be modelled as anatomy acted upon by physiology to produce mechanics that facilitate accomplishment of a specific task. In this model, dysfunction results from various combinations of pathoanatomy, pathophysiology, and pathomechanics that create ineffective or inefficient decompensations or possible injury that are manifested as symptoms.9,20 This model can be a useful framework to organize the clinical evaluation process.

Systematic reviews have attempted to compile and critique the value of examination maneuvers and have concluded that there are deficiencies in clinical utility, stark contrasts in methodologies between studies, and less than optimal levels of critical appraisal results.21,22 Interestingly, the focus of clinical utility conflicts with scapular dyskinesis as an entity because clinical utility is rooted in diagnostic accuracy. Considering scapular dyskinesis is not a diagnosis but is instead an impairment, clinical utility is not attainable. The difficulty in establishing diagnostic accuracy for an impairment is that there is no consistent acceptable gold standard to compare to. Although several attempts have been made to utilize biomechanical assessments (i.e. 3-dimensional analysis) as a gold standard,23–35 the establishment of where anatomical landmarks reside in space in relation to the equipment based on surface markers are in essence surrogates for actual location. Bone pin studies that insert sterile pins directly into the bone are likely best characterized as a gold standard but their invasive nature and difficulty in utilization prevent them from being routine clinical tools.12–14,16 As such, qualitative assessments of scapular position and motion currently serve as the best clinical tools for identify alterations although there are inherent concerns with the subjective nature of the assessments.

The aforementioned algorithm consists of 3 stages of this qualitative assessment (Figure 1). The first is the establishment of the presence or absence of dyskinesis, using the scapular dyskinesis test.36,37 The second is establishing the relationship between the observed dyskinesis and the clinical symptoms using the corrective maneuvers, the Scapular Assistance Test and the Scapular Retraction Test.1,2,6 The third is the evaluation of the possible causative factors, using a step wise evaluation process and standard testing (Figure 2).18

79878 Figure 1. Scapular Contribution Algorithm

79879 Figure 2. Evaluation Approach

The establishment of the presence or absence of scapular dyskinesis is best accomplished with the scapular dyskinesis test.6,36,37 The exam is conducted by having the patient raise the arms in forward flexion to maximum elevation, and then lower them 3-5 times (Figure 3). If the clinician is not sure if an alteration of motion is present, the patient can be asked to repeat the scapular dyskinesis test with a 3-5 pound weights in each hand and/or by performing up to 10 repetitions of arm elevation. The added weight and additional repetitions may help accentuate any altered motion. As noted earlier, scapular dyskinesis is more easily observed in the descent phase of arm motion. Prominence of any aspect of the medial scapular border on the symptomatic side is recorded as “yes” (prominence detected) or “no” (prominence not detected).

80397 Figure 3. Scapular Dyskinesis Test. The patient elevates the arms overhead 3-5 times while the examiner visually observes the scapular movement.

Three muscle tests: manual resistance of the arm at 130° of flexion (targets the serratus anterior),38,39 manual resistance of the arm at 130-150° of abduction (targets the lower and middle trapezius),38 and extension of the arm at the side (targets the rhomboids)40 should be performed. The distinction between these testing maneuvers and other muscle tests for the shoulder is that the clinician attempts to “break” the patient’s arm position and observe if the scapula is visibly moving out of position. The combination of both the break in position and scapular movement are suggestive of scapular muscle weakness.

Finally, the corrective maneuvers designed to “correct” scapular motion and/or scapular positioning should be employed.6 The scapular assistance test helps evaluate scapular contributions to shoulder pain based on motion alterations, the scapular retraction test evaluates scapular contributions to rotator cuff strength, and the low row evaluates contributions to arm strength. The scapular assistance test is performed when the examiner applies pressure to the medial aspect of the inferior angle of the scapula to assist scapular upward rotation and posterior tilt as the patient elevates the arm (Figure 4). A positive result occurs when the painful arc during arm motion is relieved and the arc of motion is increased. The scapular retraction test is performed when the examiner first grades the strength in forward flexion using standard manual muscle testing procedures with the patient in their normal posture (Figure 5A). The examiner then places and manually stabilizes the medial border of the scapula in a retracted position while retesting the arm strength (Figure 5B). A positive test occurs when the demonstrated strength increases while the scapula is in the retracted position and stabilized by the clinician. In the low row test, the patient is asked to place his or her arm in slight humeral extension and then instructed to resist movement of the arm into forward flexion (Figure 6). The examiner (positioned posterior to the patient) then instructs the patient to contract the gluteal muscles while applying the same anterior force on the arm. If strength increases with the gluteal contraction, this is an indication that scapular and shoulder muscle activation may be facilitated by involving hip and core strength, which suggests lower extremity/core strengthening should be included in the treatment plan for the shoulder. A positive corrective maneuver informs the clinician that the rehabilitation should primarily focus on scapular mobility, scapular strength, or core strength rather than take a rotator cuff activation or strengthening focus.

80398 Figure 4. Scapular Assistance Test. The scapula is stabilized with one hand and the other hand ‘assists’ the scapula through its correct motion plane.

80400 Figure 5. Scapular Retraction Test. The examiner first performs a traditional flexion manual strength test (a). The examiner stabilizes the medial border of the scapula and repeats the test (b).

80401 Figure 6. Low Row Test. The examiner manually resists arm extension without followed by with gluteal muscle activation.

This qualitative approach aligns well with recent proposals on applying a classification system in the clinical setting that is based on movement-impairments rather than pathoanatomy.9,20 The system begins broad but can be subclassified based on the examination findings. The focus of the system is to help identify causes of dysfunction in order for the examination to better guide the treatment. For example, if altered scapular motion is identified via the scapular dyskinesis test, the clinician should initially identify the specific observable components (i.e. medial border promienance, scapular body positioning, etc) and simultaneously consider what is the likely cause of the alteration (i.e. deficiencies in mobility, strength, and/or motor control, or overt anatomical injury). The additional examination components of the corrective maneuvers, mobility testing, strength testing, and kinetic chain testing would help the clinician better identify the contributing cause.

All these efforts have been directed towards establishing the clinical diagnosis of dyskinesis and identifying the anatomical (pathoanatomy) and physiological (pathophysiology) factors underlying the observed alterations of position and motion as a basis for developing treatment protocols. An unpublished survey from our institution of 462 consecutive patients with shoulder pain who met the algorithm stage 1 and stage 2 criteria were examined for all causative factors, using the step wise testing protocols. This survey revealed that 34.7% of the patients had a pathoanatomical basis for their dyskinesis (clavicle fractures, acromioclavicular joint disorders, glenohumeral joint internal derangements, neurological injury, periscapular muscle injury), while 65.3 % had a pathophysiological basis (muscle imbalance, inhibition, tightness/inflexibility, serratus anterior/lower trapezius insufficiency). In addition, some of those with a pathoanatomical basis also had primary or secondary pathophysiology as well.

These findings suggest a 2-part evaluation process for patients with observed scapular dyskinesis that can be linked to the clinical symptoms. One part should identify those patients whose dyskinesis is secondary to identified pathoanatomy. Treatment may include rehabilitation but frequently will require surgical means of restoration of the anatomy. Those whose dyskinesis is secondary to pathophysiology will need aa comprehensive evaluation process to understand the muscular alterations that will serve as the basis for treatment.

In summary, scapular dyskinesis associated with clinical symptoms results from pathoanatomy in roughly 1/3 of the cases. The absence of demonstrable pathoanatomy is common and should direct the evaluation process to a comprehensive evaluation of the many possible alterations of physiology.

Reconsidering Treatment Approaches

As an impairment, scapular dyskinesis has been posited to be primarily the result of soft-tissue deficiencies, thus the treatment focus has centered on mobility and strength enhancement.5–8,17,41–52 However, various reports have noted that interventions directed at correcting these deficiencies, mostly manual therapy and therapeutic exercise, have little influence on the scapular motion itself.48,49,52,53 There are several possible reasons for these findings.

First, mobility alterations are rarely acute in the scapula and/or shoulder. Although overhead athletes often experience an acute decrease in glenohumeral rotation following a throwing episode/exposure, the decrease in motion can resolve within 24-96 hours on average both with and without intervention.54–59 The chronicity of mobility deficits tends to be lengthy resulting in bony adaptations, capsular thickening, and various tendon responses.60 Although immediate gains in motion have been reported following the application of manual therapy interventions, they have not been shown to be long lasting.61–69 These interventions have positively impacted pain and self-reported function which is more likely rooted in the neurophysiological effects related to endogenous pain control.66 In other words, the immediate clinical but unsustainable result of increased motion after the application of manual therapy is not related to tissue correction but rather pain modulation that results in immediate demonstrable motion increases.

Second, therapeutic exercises designed to target specific shoulder and scapular muscles have been described but these were primarily identified with electromyographic methodologies.70–76 Although electromyography has helped identify which positions and maneuvers bias specific muscles, the oft mistaken interpretation of the results is that the muscle activity is an occurrence specific to individual muscles. This thought process conflicts with the known summation of activation phenomenon that has been consistently reported in the literature.77–85 Furthermore, the foundational work was performed on asymptomatic individuals.70–75 It is quite possible that differences exist between individuals with shoulder pathology or impairments such as scapular dyskinesis compared to those who are asymptomatic. Finally, the identified maneuvers were often performed in an isolated manner with the body in vertical or horizontal (prone or supine) stationary positions. These positions could lead to a less than optimal rehabilitation outcome likely due to the encouragement of inefficient or improper motor patterns.6,34,86–89 Taken together, these results suggests that a focus on increasing strength may not be the ideal intervention.

Finally, if strength shouldn’t be the focus, then it is possible scapular dysfunction is more likely rooted in issues related to motor control. One of the primary principles of motor control is based on the type and amount of feedback a person receives during task performance.89–92 In most upper extremity tasks, visual feedback is utilized for joint positioning and error correction. However, the scapula cannot be visualized due to its posterior location on the thorax. It is possible that the lack of visual feedback leads to the alterations in motion that manifests as scapular dyskinesis. Previous reports have shown that intentional attempts at repositioning the scapula prior to elevating and/or rotating the humerus, called conscious correction, increases scapular muscle activity and enhances scapular kinematics.34,86,89 Additionally, visual feedback,93–97 auditory feedback,93,94 and kinesthetic feedback93,94 have been shown to positively influence scapular muscle activity and positioning. Considering the scapula as a ‘link’ within the kinetic chain, the feedback approach may be better suited for re-establishing scapular control as it relates to the sequential activation within the kinetic chain. The isolated strengthening approach may not re-establish scapular mobility and control as they are single-planar by design and do not allow for the patient to intently focus on the scapula directly. Using motor control as the focus, previous reports have suggested employing an integrated approach where the patient is required to perform exercises from a sitting or standing position to perform (and learn) the necessary motor patterns that require integrated use of the majority of the kinetic chain segments (i.e., using the legs and trunk to facilitate scapular and shoulder movement and muscle activation).41,47,98–101 However, although these works have verified increased shoulder and scapular muscle activation when trunk and/or leg movements are integrated into the exercise maneuvers, there are no empirical reports or randomized control trials that have compared a motor control/kinetic chain focused program against a program that does not utilize this approach.

To date, clinical recommendations supporting motor control/kinetic chain-based rehabilitation approaches have been made via expert opinion/consensus papers.2,6–8,102,103 An example of such a program has been provided with the clinical highlights being:

Short lever progression

Sitting and standing preferred over prone or supine exercises

Target impairments in the order of mobility, motor control, strength (if necessary) and endurance

Utilize longer lever maneuvers later in the rehabilitation program

Advance to plyometric based maneuvers just prior to discharge

An example of short lever exercise application would be to begin with exercies that require the arms to be in an adducted position (i.e. the arms position against the thorax) rather than positions that require the arms to be elevated or abducted for exercise performance (Figure 7A-B and Figure 8). These early interventions attempt to establish proper scapular positioning early in the rehabilitation and begin to utilize the major of kinetic chain segments to create the integrated muscle activation and sequencing. Although they could be classified as short lever exercises, maneuvers such as scapular shrugging or elevation should be avoided in the first 4-6 weeks of rehabilitation. This is intentional to not overly bias the upper trapezius which could delay the restoration of balance amongst scapular muscle activation. Progression into more dynamic motions that would still be considered short lever maneuvers (Figures 9 and 10) may be added to the treatment progression once the patient has demonstrated that the initial exercises can be performed without exacerbating the previous symptoms. Progression into dynamic motions that begin to include limited amounts of arm elevation or abduction (approximately 30-45°) (Figures 11 and 12), and then culminating with traditional long lever exercises (90° of arm elevation or abduction) in the later or last stages of rehabilitation can be incorporated into the treatment program in the later phases of rehabilitation, but only when the previous maneuvers have been mastered by the patient and have demonstrated little to no symptom exacerbation. Dosage recommendations include beginning with 1-2 sets of 5-10 repetitions with no external resistance. Additional sets and repetitions can be added based on symptoms and exercise tolerance, with a goal of 5-6 sets of 10 repetitions being able to be performed without an increase in symptoms before adding resistance. Resistance may be added next beginning with light free weights (2-3 pounds maximum) and then progressing to elastic resistance. The stability of free weights allows those devices to be utilized prior to elastic resistance because elastic resistance, although effective at increasing scapular muscle activity,100 has high variability when used by patients, especially when arm position is progressed throughout a treatment program.104 If elastic resistance were to be utilized, it can be adequately monitored and progressed using perceived exertion scales.105 Feedback may be incorporated throughout the treatment program but there is not an exclusive type to recommend considering various forms of feedback have been shown to have positive clinical influence.93–97 However, it should be noted that too much feedback can be detrimental to learning as the patient becomes reliant on the knowledge of performance.90

80402 Figure 7. Conscious correction of scapula begins with the patient standing (a) and being instructed to actively “squeeze your shoulder blades together” (b). Utilization of mirrors or mobile devices can assist patients with visualizing correct scapular positioning.

80403 Figure 8. The Low Row begins in the starting position of standing and knees slightly bent (a). The patient performs extension of the hips and trunk to facilitate scapular retraction (b).

80404 Figure 9. Lawnmower with arm close to body begins with the patient standing and the arm close to the body as if supported by a sling (a). The patient is instructed to extend the hips and trunk followed by rotation of the trunk to facilitate scapular medial translation and retraction (b).

80405 Figure 10. The Robbery maneuver requires instructions to the patient to “place the elbows in the back pockets” moving from a trunk and hip slightly flexed position (a) and moving to an extended position (b).

80406 Figure 11. Lawnmower with arm away from body is the advancement of the previous lawnmower exercise with the arm in a slightly flexed position to begin (a) but the same hip extension and trunk rotation components (b).

80407 Figure 12. The Fencing exercise begins with the arm elevated to 90° in the frontal plane (a) and performed by side stepping and simultaneously retracting the scapula and adducting the arm (b).

Conclusions

Scapular dyskinesis is an impairment that has causative factors, and those factors should be discerned from a comprehensive physical examination. The examination should not exclude assessments related to identifying pathoanatomical causes but the pathoanatomical approach should not be the primary focus of the examination. Using clinician experience and the best available evidence, a qualitative examination for determining the presence or absence of a scapular contribution to shoulder dysfunction is currently the best option widely available to clinicians. Future investigations should attempt to standardize methodological approaches to perform better comparisons between studies and generate higher quality results. Finally, rehabilitation approaches should be reconsidered where enhancing motor control becomes the primary focus rather than increasing strength.
==== Refs
The role of the scapula in athletic function Am J Sports Med Kibler W. B. 1998
26 325 337 10.1177/03635465980260022801 9548131
Scapula Summit 2009 J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Kibler W. B. Ludewig P. M. McClure P. W. Uhl T. L. Sciascia A. D. 2009
39 11 A1 A13 10.2519/jospt.2009.030
Scapular dyskinesis and its relation to shoulder pain J Am Acad Orthop Surg Kibler W. B. McMullen J. 2003
11 142 151 10.5435/00124635-200303000-00008 12670140
Current concepts: Scapular dyskinesis Br J Sports Med Kibler W. B. Sciascia A. D. 2010
44 5 300 305 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058834 19996329
Scapular dyskinesis and its relation to shoulder injury J Am Acad Orthop Surg Kibler W. B. Sciascia A. Wilkes T. 2012
20 6 364 372 10.5435/JAAOS-20-06-364 22661566
Clinical implications of scapular dyskinesis in shoulder injury: The 2013 consensus statement from the "scapula summit" Br J Sports Med Kibler W. B. Ludewig P. M. McClure P. W. Michener L.A. Bak K. Sciascia A.D. 2013
47 877 885 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092425 23580420
A kinetic chain approach for shoulder rehabilitation J Ath Train McMullen J. Uhl T. L. 2000
35 3 329 337
Kinetic chain rehabilitation: A theoretical framework Rehabil Res Pract Sciascia A. Cromwell R. 2012
2012 1 9 10.1155/2012/853037
Principles of Physical Examination Mechanics, Pathomechanics and Injury in the Overhead Athlete: A Case-Based Approach to Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Management Sciascia A.D. Kibler W. B. Kibler W.B Sciascia A.D. Springer Switzerland 2019
63 74
Solving Bernstein's problem: A proposal for the development of coordinated movement by selection Child Development Sporns O. Edelman G. M. 1993
64 960 981 8404271
3-Dimensional scapular orientation and muscle activity at selected positions of humeral elevation J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Ludewig P. M. Cook T. M. Nawoczenski D. A. 1996
24 57 65 8832468
Motion of the shoulder complex during multiplanar humeral elevation J Bone Joint Surg Am Ludewig P. M. Phadke V. Braman J. P. Hassett D. R. Cieminski C. J. LaPrade R. F. 2009
91A 2 378 389 10.2106/JBJS.G.01483
Comparison of 3-Dimensional Shoulder Complex Kinematics in Individuals With and Without Shoulder Pain, Part 1: Sternoclavicular, Acromioclavicular, and Scapulothoracic Joints J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Lawrence R. L. Braman J. P. LaPrade R. F. Ludewig P. M. 2014
44 636 645 10.2519/jospt.2014.5339 25103135
Comparison of 3-Dimensional Shoulder Complex Kinematics in Individuals With and Without Shoulder Pain, Part 2: Glenohumeral Joint J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Lawrence R. L. Braman J. P. Staker J.L. LaPrade R. F. Ludewig P. M. 2014
44 646 655 10.2519/jospt.2014.5556 25103132
Mechanics of the Scapula in Shoulder Function and Dysfunction Disorders of the Scapula and Their Role in Shoulder Injury: A Clinical Guide to Evaluation and Management Ludewig P. M. Lawrence R. L. Kibler W.B. Sciascia A.D. Springer Switzerland 2017
7 24
Direct 3-dimensional measurement of scapular kinematics during dynamic movements in vivo J Shoulder Elbow Surg McClure P. W. Michener L. A. Sennett B. J. Karduna A. R. 2001
10 269 277 11408911
Kinetic chain abnormalities in the athletic shoulder Sports Med Arthrosc Rev Sciascia A. D. Thigpen C. A. Namdari S. Baldwin K. 2012
20 1 16 21 10.1097/JSA.0b013e31823a021f 22311288
Disorders of the Scapula and Their Role in Shoulder Injury – A Clinical Guide to Evaluation and Management Springer Switzerland 2017

Descriptive Analysis of Common Functional Limitations Identified by Patients With Shoulder Pain J Sport Rehabil Smith-Forbes E.V. Moore-Reed S.D. Westgate P.M. Kibler W. B. Uhl T.L. 2015
24 179 188 25611598
Changing Our Diagnostic Paradigm: Movement System Diagnostic Classification Int J Sports Phys Ther Ludewig P. M. Kamonseki D.H. Staker J.L. Lawrence R.L. Camargo P.R. Braman J.P. 2017
12 884 893 29158950
Measurement properties of existing clinical assessment methods evaluating scapular positioning and function. A systematic review Physiother Theory Pract Larsen C.M. Juul-Kristensen B. Lund H. Søgaard K. 2014
30 453 482 24678755
Reliability of Performance-Based Clinical Measurements to Assess Shoulder Girdle Kinematics and Positioning: Systematic Review Phys Ther D’hondt N.E. Kiers H. Pool J.J.M. Hacquebord S.T. Terwee C.B. Veeger D.H.E.J. 2017
97 124 144 27587801
Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement Phys Ther Ludewig P. M. Cook T. M. 2000
80 3 276 291 10696154
Dynamic measurements of three-dimensional scapular kinematics: a validation study J Biomech Eng Karduna A. R. McClure P. W. Michener L. A. Sennett B. 2001
123 2 184 90 0148-0731 (Print) 0148-0731 10.1115/1.1351892 11340880
Shoulder function and 3-dimensional kinematics in people with shoulder impingement syndrome before and after a 6-week exercise program Physical Therapy McClure P.W. Bialker J. Neff N. Williams G. N. Karduna A. 2004
84 9 832 848 15330696
Differences in 3-dimensional shoulder kinematics between persons with multidirectional instability and asymptomatic controls Am J Sports Med Ogston J. B. Ludewig P. M. 2007
35 1361 1370 10.1177/0363546507300820 17420507
Three-Dimensional Scapular Kinematics During the Throwing Motion J Appl Biomech Meyer K.E. Saether E.E. Soiney E.K. Shebeck M.S. Paddock K.L. Ludewig P. M. 2008
24 24 34 18309180
Three-dimensional scapular and clavicular kinematics and scapular muscle activity during retraction exercises Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy Oyama S. Myers J. B. Wassinger C. A. Lephart S. M. 2010
40 3 169 179 20195020
Scapular kinematics and associated impingement risk in manual wheelchair users during propulsion and a weight relief lift Clinical Biomechanics Morrow M.M. Kaufman K.R. An K.N. 2011
26 4 352 357 21216055
Scapular Kinematics and Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis J Sport Rehabil Timmons M.K. Thigpen C.A. Seitz A. L. Karduna A. R. Michener L.A. 2012
21 4 354 370 22388171
How to assess scapular dyskinesis precisely: 3-dimensional wing computer tomography--a new diagnostic modality J Shoulder Elbow Surg Park J. Y. Hwang J. T. Kim K. M. Makkar D. Moon S. G. Han K. J. 2013
22 8 1084 91 1532-6500 (Electronic) 1058-2746 (Linking) 10.1016/j.jse.2012.10.046 23352185
The effect of trunk rotation during shoulder exercises on the activity of the scapular muscle and scapular kinematics J Shoulder Elbow Surg Yamauchi T. Hasegawa S. Matsumura A. Nakamura M. Ibuki S. Ichihashi N. 2015
24 955 964 25556806
Measurement of dynamic scapular kinematics using an acromion marker cluster to minimize skin movement artifact J Vis Exp Warner M. B. Chappell P. H. Stokes M. J. 2015
96 e51717 1940-087X (Electronic) 1940-087X (Linking) 10.3791/51717 25742242
Alterations of scapular kinematics and associated muscle activation specific to symptomatic dyskinesis type after conscious control Man Ther Ou H.L. Huang T.S. Chen Y.T. Chen W.Y. Chang Y.L. Lu T.W. Chen T.H. Lin J. J. 2016
26 97 103 10.1016/j.math.2016.07.013 27525356
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Scapular Kinematics During Arm Elevation in Baseball Players With Scapular Dyskinesis: Comparison of Dominant and Nondominant Arms J Sport Rehabil Park J. Y. Kim J. Seo B. H. Yu H. D. Sim J. H. Lee J. H. Oh K. S. Chung S. W. 2019
1 9 1543-3072 (Electronic) 1056-6716 (Linking) 10.1123/jsr.2017-0216 28714786
A clinical method for identifying scapular dyskinesis: Part 1: Reliability J Athl Train McClure P. W. Tate A. R. Kareha S. Irwin D. Zlupko E. 2009
44 2 160 164 10.4085/1062-6050-44.2.160 19295960
A clinical method for identifying scapular dyskinesis: Part 2: Validity J Athl Train Tate A. R. McClure P. W. Kareha S. Irwin D. Barbe M. F. 2009
44 2 165 173 10.4085/1062-6050-44.2.165 19295961
Scapular muscle tests in subjects with shoulder pain and functional loss: Reliability and construct validity Physical Therapy Michener L.A. Boardman Iii N. D. Pidcoe P.E. Frith A.M. 2005
85 1128 1138 16253043
Normalization procedures using maximum voluntary isometric contractions for the serratus anterior and trapezius muscles during surface EMG analysis Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology Ekstrom R. A. Soderberg G. L. Donatelli R.A. 2005
15 418 428 15811612
Revision of the Shoulder Normalization Tests Is Required to Include Rhomboid Major and Teres Major J Orthop Res Ginn K. A. Halaki M. Cathers I. 2011
29 1846 1849 21710606
Electromyographic analysis of specific exercises for scapular control in early phases of shoulder rehabilitation Am J Sports Med Kibler W. B. Sciascia A. D. Uhl T. L. Tambay N. Cunningham T. 2008
36 9 1789 1798 10.1177/0363546508316281 18469224
Effectiveness of rehabilitation for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome J Hand Ther Michener L.A. Walsworth M. K. Burnet E.N. 2004
17 152 164 15162102
Comprehensive impairment-based exercise and manual therapy intervention for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a case series Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy Tate A. R. McClure P.W. Young I.A. Salvatori R. Michener L.A. 2010
40 8 474 493 10.2519/jospt.2010.3223
Rehabilitation of shoulder impingement syndrome and rotator cuff injuries: An evidence-based review Br J Sports Med Ellenbecker T. S. Cools A. 2010
44 319 327 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058875 20371557
Stretching the posterior shoulder structures in subjects with internal rotation deficit: Comparison of two stretching techniques Shoulder and Elbow Cools A. Johansson F.R. Cagnie B. Cambier D. Witvrouw E. E. 2012
4 1 56 63
Scapular muscle rehabilitation exercises in overhead athletes with impingement symptoms: effect of a 6-week training program on muscle recruitment and functional outcome American Journal of Sports Medicine De May K. Danneels L. Cagnie B. Cools A.M. 2012
40 8 1906 1915 10.1177/0363546512453297 22785606
Kinetic chain influences on upper and lower trapezius muscle activation during eight variations of a scapular retraction exercise in overhead athletes J Sci Med Sport De May K. Daneels L. Cagnie B. Van den Bosch L. Flier J. Cools A.M. 2013
16 65 70 22658589
Effects of Stretching and Strengthening Exercises, With and Without Manual Therapy, on Scapular Kinematics, Function, and Pain in Individuals With Shoulder Impingement: A Randomized Controlled Trial J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Camargo P.R. Alburquerque-Sendín F. Avila M.A. Haik M.N. Vieira A. Salvini T.F. 2015
45 984 997 10.2519/jospt.2015.5939 26471852
Scapular Kinematics Pre- and Post-Thoracic Thrust Manipulation in Individuals With and Without Shoulder Impingement Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Study J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Haik M.N. Alburquerque-Sendín F. Silva C.Z. Siqueira Jr A.L. Ribeiro I.L. Camargo P.R. 2014
44 475 487 10.2519/jospt.2014.4760 24853923
The effect of long versus short pectoralis minor resting length on scapular kinematics in healthy individuals J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Borstad J. D. Ludewig P. M. 2005
35 4 227 238 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.4.227 15901124
Comparison of three stretches for the pectoralis minor muscle J Shoulder Elbow Surg Borstad J. D. Ludewig P. M. 2006
15 3 324 330 16679233
Effects of a stretching protocol for the pectoralis minor on muscle length, function, and scapular kinematics in individuals with and without shoulder pain J Hand Ther Rosa D.P. Borstad J.D. Pogetti L.S. Camargo P.R. 2017
30 20 29 10.1016/j.jht.2016.06.006 27769843
Thoracic Spine Manipulation in Individuals With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome Does Not Immediately Alter Thoracic Spine Kinematics, Thoracic Excursion, or Scapular Kinematics: A Randomized Controlled Trial J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Kardouni J.R. Pidcoe P.E. Shaffer S.W. Finucane S.D. Cheatham S.A. Sousa C.O. Michener L.A. 2015
45 527 538 10.2519/jospt.2015.5647 25996365
Changes in shoulder and elbow passive range of motion after pitching in professional baseball players Am J Sports Med Reinold M. M. Wilk K. E. Macrina L. C. Sheheane C. Dun S. Fleisig G. S. Crenshaw K. Andrews J. R. 2008
36 3 523 527 10.1177/0363546507308935 17991783
An acute throwing episode decreases shoulder internal rotation Clin Orthop Rel Res Kibler W. B. Sciascia A. D. Moore S. D. 2012
470 1545 1551 10.1007/s11999-011-2217-z
Thixotropy in skeletal muscle and in muscle spindles: A review Progress in Neurobiology Proske U. Morgan D. L. Gregory J. E. 1993
41 705 721 8140258
Do cross-bridges contribute to the tension during stretch of passive muscle? Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility Proske U. Morgan D. L. 1999
20 433 442 10555062
Muscle damage from eccentric exercise: Mechanism, mechanical signs, adaptation and clinical applications J Physiol Proske U. Morgan D. L. 2001
537 2 333 345 11731568
Warm up stretches reduce sensations of stiffness and soreness after eccentric exercise Med Sci Sport Exerc Reisman S. Walsh L.D. Proske U. 2005
37 929 936
Glenohumeral Motion Deficits: Friend Or Foe? Int J Sports Phys Ther Manske R. Wilk K.E. Davies G. Ellenbecker T. Reinold M. 2013
8 537 553 24175137
A randomized controlled single-blinded comparison of stretching versus stretching and joint mobilization for posterior shoulder tightness measured by internal rotation motion loss Sports Health Manske R. C. Meschke M. Porter A. Smith B. Reiman M.A. 2010
2 2 94 100 23015927
The effect of therapeutic exercise and mobilization on patients with shoulder dysfunction: A systematic review with meta-analysis J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Brudvig T.J. Kulkarni H. Shah S. 2011
41 10 734 748 21891875
The effectiveness of shoulder stretching and joint mobilizations on posterior shoulder tightness J Sport Rehabil Harshbarger N.D. Eppelheimer B.L. Valovich McLeod T.C. Welch McCarty C. 2013
22 4 313 319 23799831
Comparison of Maitland and Kaltenborn mobilization techniques for improving shoulder pain and range of motion in frozen shoulders J Phys Ther Sci Moon G.D. Lim J.Y. Kim D.Y. Kim T.H. 2015
27 1391 1395 26157227
The effectiveness of manual therapy in the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder: A systematic review Man Ther Ho C.Y.C. Sole G. Munn J. 2009
14 463 474 19467911
The Mechanisms of Manual Therapy in the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Pain: A Comprehensive Model Man Ther Bialosky J.E. Bishop M.D. Price D.D. Robinson M.E. George S.Z. 2009
14 531 538 19027342
Effectiveness of manual therapies: the UK evidence report Chiro Osteo Bronfort G. Haas M. Evans R. Leininger B. Triano J. 2010
18 3
Subacromial impingement syndrome—effectiveness of physiotherapy and manual therapy Br J Sports Med Gebremariam L. Hay E. M. van der Sande R. Rinkel W.D. Koes B.W. Huisstede B.M.A. 2014
48 1202 1208 24217037
The Efficacy of Manual Therapy for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Desjardins-Charbonneau A. Roy J.S. Dionne C.E. Fremont P. MacDermid J.C. Desmeules F. 2015
45 330 350 25808530
Electromyographic analysis of the glenohumeral muscles during a baseball rehabilitation program Am J Sports Med Townsend H. Jobe F. W. Pink M. Perry J. 1991
19 264 272 1867334
EMG analysis of posterior rotator cuff exercises Ath Train Blackburn T. A. McLeod W. D. White B. Wofford L. United States 1990
25 1 40;42 45
EMG analysis of the scapular muscles during a shoulder rehabilitation program Am J Sports Med Moseley J. B. Jobe F. W. Pink M. M. Perry J. Tibone J. E. 1992
20 2 128 134 1558238
Electromyographic activity and applied load during shoulder rehabilitation exercises using elastic resistance Am J Sports Med Hintermeister R. A. Lange G. W. Schultheis J. M. Bey M. J. Hawkins R. 1998
26 2 210 220 9548114
Serratus anterior muscle activity during selected rehabilitation exercises Am J Sports Med Decker M. J. Hintermeister R. A. Faber K. J. Hawkins R. J. 1999
27 6 784 791 10569366
Electromyographic analysis of the rotator cuff and deltoid musculature during common shoulder external rotation exercises J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Reinold M. M. Wilk K.E. Fleisig G.S. Zheng N. Barrentine S. W. Chmielewski T. Cody R.C. Jameson G.C. Andrews J. R. 2004
34 385 394 15296366
Current Concepts in the Scientific and Clinical Rationale Behind Exercises for Glenohumeral and Scapulothoracic Musculature J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Reinold M.M. Escamilla R. Wilk K.E. 2009
39 105 117 10.2519/jospt.2009.2835 19194023
Contributions of body parts to throwing performance Biomechanics IV Toyoshima S. Hoshikawa T. Miyashita M. Nelson R.C. Morehouse C. A. University Park Press Baltimore 1974
169 174
Sequential muscle activity and its functional role in the upper extremity and trunk during overarm throwing J Sport Sci Hirashima M. Kadota H. Sakurai S. Kudo K. Ohtsuki T. 2002
20 301 310 10.1080/026404102753576071
Control of 3D Limb Dynamics in Unconstrained Overarm Throws of Different Speeds Performed by Skilled Baseball Players J Neurophysiol Hirashima M. Kudo K. Watarai K. Ohtsuki T. 2007
97 1 680 691 10.1152/jn.00348.2006 17079349
Kinetic chain of overarm throwing in terms of joint rotations revealed by induced acceleration analysis J Biomech Hirashima M. Yamane K. Nakamura Y. Ohtsuki T. 2008
41 2874 2883 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.06.014 18678375
Sequential motions of body segments in striking and throwing skills: Description and explanations J Biomech Putnam C. A. 1993
26 125 135 8505347
Movement systems as dynamical systems: The functional role of variability and its implications for sports medicine Sports Medicine Davids K. Glazier P. S. Araujo D. Bartlett R. 2003
33 4 245 260 12688825
Constraints on the complete optimization of human motion Sports Medicine Glazier P. S. Davids K. 2009
39 1 16 28
A sequence of postural movements precedes voluntary movement Neurosci Let Bouisset S. Zattara M. 1981
22 263 270
Posturo-kinetic organisation during the early phase of voluntary upper limb movement. 1 Normal subjects Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry Zattara M. Bouisset S. 1988
51 956 965 3204405
Conscious Correction of Scapular Orientation in Overhead Athletes Performing Selected Shoulder Rehabilitation Exercises: The Effect on Trapezius Muscle Activation Measured by Surface Electromyography J Orthop Sports Phys Ther De May K. Danneels L. Cagnie B. Huyghe L. Seyns E. Cools A.M. 2013
43 1 3 10 10.2519/jospt.2013.4283 23160271
Scapular dyskinesia: evolution towards a systems-based approach Shoulder Elbow Willmore E.G. Smith M.J. 2016
8 61 70 10.1177/1758573215618857 27583003
Analysis of the kinetic chain in asymptomatic individuals with and without scapular dyskinesis Clin Biomech Pires E.D. Camargo P.R. 2018
54 8 15 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.02.017
Progressive conscious control of scapular orientation with video feedback has improvement in muscle balance ratio in patients with scapular dyskinesis: a randomized controlled trial J Shoulder Elbow Surg Huang T.S. Du W.Y. Wang T.G. Tsai Y. S. Yang J.L. Huang C.Y. Lin J. J. 2018
27 1407 1414 10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.006 29886062
Influence of three accuracy levels of knowledge of results on motor skill acquisition J Hum Sport Exerc Sanchez F.J.N. Gonzalez J.G. 2010
5 3 476 484
Interaction of Feedback Frequency and Task Difficulty in Children’s Motor Skill Learning Phys Ther Sidaway B. Bates J. Occhiogrosso B. Schlagenhaufer J. Wilkes D. 2012
92 948 957 22421736
The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function Brain Ramachandran V.S. Altschuler E.L. 2009
132 1693 1710 19506071
Motion analysis study of a scapular orientation exercise and subjects' ability to learn the exercise Manual Therapy Mottram S.L. Woledge R.C. Morrissey D. 2009
14 13 18 17910930
Motor control retraining exercises for shoulder impingement: effects on function, muscle activation, and biomechanics in young adults Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Worsley P. Warner M. Mottram S. Gadola S. Veeger H. E.J. Hermens H. Morrissey D. Little P. Cooper C. Carr A. Stokes M. 2012
10.1016/j.jse.2012.06.010
Single-Session Video and Electromyography Feedback in Overhead Athletes With Scapular Dyskinesis and Impingement Syndrome J Ath Train Du W.Y. Huang T.S. Chiu Y.C. Mao S.J. Hung L.W. Liu M.F. Yang J.L. Lin J.J. 2020
55 265 273 10.4085/1062-6050-490-18
Real-time kinematic biofeedback improves scapulothoracic control and performance during scapular-focused exercises: A single-blind randomized controlled laboratory study Hum Move Sci Antunes A. Carnide F. Matias R. 2016
48 44 53 10.1016/j.humov.2016.04.004
Real-time visual feedback can be used to activate scapular upward rotators in people with scapular winging: an experimental study J Physiother Weon J.H. Kwon O.Y. Cynn H.S. Lee W.H. Kim T.H. Yi C.H. 2011
57 101 107 21684491
Electromyographic Analysis Of Traditional And Kinetic Chain Exercises For Dynamic Shoulder Movements J Strength Cond Res Oliver G.D. Plummer H.A. Gascon S.S. 2016
30 3146 3154 26937768
Quantitative Analysis Of Proximal And Distal Kinetic Chain Musculature During Dynamic Exercises J Strength Cond Res Oliver G.D. Washington J.K. Barfield J.W. Gascon S.S. Gilmer G. 2018
32 1545 1553 29786622
Lumbopelvic-Hip Complex And Scapular Stabilizing Muscle Activations During Fullbody Exercises With And Without Resistance Bands J Strength Cond Res Wasserberger K.W. Downs J.L. Barfield J.W. Williams T.K. Oliver G.D. 2020
34 2840 2848 30216253
Are kinetic chain rowing exercises relevant in shoulder and trunk injury prevention training? Br J Sports Med De May K. Danneels L. Cagnie B. Cools A. 2011
45 4 320
The disabled throwing shoulder - Spectrum of pathology: 10 year update Arthroscopy Kibler W. B. Kuhn J.E. Wilk K.E. Sciascia A. D. Moore S. D. Laudner K. G. Ellenbecker T. S. Thigpen C. A. Uhl T.L. 2013
29 1 141 161 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.10.009 23276418
Managing Scapular Dyskinesis Ath Train Sports Healthcare Sciascia A. 2020
12 102 107 10.3928/19425864-20191113-01
Analysis of Scapular Muscle EMG Activity During Elastic Resistance Oscillation Exercises From the Perspective of Different Arm Positions Sports Health Tsuruike M. Ellenbecker T.S. Kagaya Y. Lemings L. 2020
12 395 400 10.1177/1941738120929305 32525452
Concurrent Validation Of The Omniresistance Exercise Scale Of Perceived Exertion With Thera-Band Resistance Bands J Strength Cond Res Colado J.C. Garcia-Masso X. Triplett T.N. Flandez J. Borreani S. Tella V. 2012
26 3018 3024 22210471
