
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

33604134
18797
10.26603/001c.18797
Original Research
Validity of a Sham Dry Needling Technique on a Healthy Population
Cushman Daniel M MD 1
Holman Anna MD 2
Skinner Lee PT, DPT 3
Cummings Keith DO 1
Haight Peter BS 4
Teramoto Masaru PhD, MPH, PStat 1
1 University of Utah, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
2 University of Utah, Department of Family Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
3 University of Utah, Department of Physical Therapy, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
4 University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Corresponding author: Dan Cushman, MD 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 dan.cushman.work@gmail.com Phone:801-587-7109; fax: 801-587-5482
1 2 2021
2021
16 1 4956
24 3 2020
24 7 2020
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. If you remix, transform, or build upon this work, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

Background

Various methods of sham procedures have been used in controlled trials evaluating dry needling efficacy although few have performed validation studies of the sham procedure.

Hypothesis/Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of a sham dry needling technique on healthy, active subjects.

Study Design

Validation study

Methods

Runners capable of completing a half-marathon or marathon race and were randomized to receive true (using an introducer and needle) or sham (using an introducer and fixed, blunted needle) dry needling. Blinded subjects were asked to identify if they received sham or true dry needling following the procedure. Proportions of those who correctly identified their needling were also examined on the basis of past experience of receiving dry needling.

Results

Fifty-three participants were included in this study, with 25 receiving the true dry needling procedure and 28 receiving the sham. Of those who had received dry needling in the past (n = 16), 11 (68.8%) correctly identified their respective groups. For those who had not previously received dry needling (n = 37), 13 (35.1%) accurately identified their group. Most importantly, 94.1% of dry needling-naïve participants were unable to identify they received the sham procedure (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study shows that a fixed needle in an introducer tube is a simple, inexpensive, effective sham procedure in patients who have never received dry needling before. This technique may be useful for randomized controlled trials in the future.

Levels of Evidence

2

movement system
validation
trigger points
placebos
dry needling
acupuncture
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Trigger point dry needling is a procedure in which a thin needle is inserted through the skin into the underlying muscle, directly into trigger points (TrPs), taut bands of muscle assumed to be responsible for pain, muscle dysfunction, and biomechanical alterations.1 It is becoming more commonly used as a treatment modality for a variety of musculoskeletal conditions including myofascial trigger point pain, migraine, and chronic pain.1 It has recently gained traction in the sports medicine realm for injury prevention,2 strength gains,3,4 and sports injury treatment;5–7 however, the literature to date consists of many case reports and has not demonstrated definitive evidence of its efficacy.

One of the challenges in evaluating TrP dry needling efficacy in controlled trials is establishing an adequate method to account for a subject’s placebo response. Blinding is essential in these studies to accurately determine therapeutic effect and to decrease bias effects on outcomes. Without adequate blinding, therapeutic effect can be overestimated.8 Furthermore, the simple insertion of a needle into the skin (often called superficial dry needling) may have an effect.9–11 As is the case with several physical interventions such as acupuncture,12,13 massage (usually use an alternative therapy as placebo14,15) and surgery,16 participants are not easily blinded to intervention with TrP dry needling. Given the nature of the therapy, participants can feel the needle puncture, and may have site soreness or bleeding after TrP dry needling.17

A valid control is therefore necessary to attempt to establish cause and effect from TrP dry needling. A variety of attempts at providing adequate control conditions have been attempted. Using a contralateral side as a control has been described,18 but TrP dry needling on one side has been demonstrated to have ipsilateral and contralateral effects.19–21 Others have used “false” dry needling as a control technique, such as needling at the incorrect location or depth,22–24 but insertion of a needle at any point may carry some form of pain control, likely from descending inhibition25 thus confounding results.21,26 To counteract these limitations, several attempts have been made at creating sham dry needles27–31 including specialized retractable needles32 and using a blunted needle.28,29,31 Other studies have used a tube sheath without a needle as a sham.27,33 Many dry needling and acupuncture studies have not assessed the validity of the sham intervention,8 however of those that did assess validity, a blunted needle was shown to be a reasonable sham intervention.26,31 The purpose of this study was to evaluate perception of sham TrP dry needling in healthy subjects both naïve and experienced in TrP dry needling, using a fixed needle as a sham intervention, to evaluate success of blinding of subjects to a TrP dry needling intervention.

Methods

Subjects

Subjects were recruited as part of a separate study,34 including only marathon and half-marathon runners. Exclusion criteria included runners under 18 years of age, those with acute or chronic skin breakdown in the area of needling (such as abrasions, infection, chafing, etc.), inability to complete the half- or full marathon, and inability or unwillingness to complete questionnaires. Potential participants received email notifications prior to the 2018 Salt Lake City Marathon describing the study. A block randomization schedule was used prior to the study to place each consecutive subject into a real or sham dry needling group, as outlined below.

Personnel and procedures

Two practitioners completed the TrP dry needling sessions – one sports medicine physician with five years of dry needling experience and one physical therapist with two years of dry needling experience. This was performed immediately following the aforementioned race, within an hour of completing the race. Subjects were placed in a prone position initially. Alcohol wipes were used on the bilateral calves to sterilize the test area. Based on the subject’s randomization, the practitioner used either the real or sham dry needle on each lateral and medial soleus muscle. The patient was then placed supine on the table, and the process was repeated for the vastus medialis and vastus lateralis muscles. This allowed for a total of eight locations, four on each lower extremity. These sites were chosen due to common clinical complaints seen in the running population. The same treatment group (sham or true TrP dry needling) was used for all muscles on each subject. Subjects were not allowed to watch the procedure (heads remained on the table). Subjects could not see the needles being removed from packaging. All subjects were told that some patients feel a sharp feeling during the procedure. All subjects were also aware that they may receive either real or sham dry needling, but were not told what sham dry needling entailed. Subjects reported on their experience two days after the procedure, which allowed for adequate time for TrP dry needling soreness to set in,35 which is a common side effect of the procedure. They were given three possible responses: “I definitely had the real dry needling,” “I definitely had the sham (placebo) dry needling”, or “I am not sure if I had the real or sham dry needling.” This is in line with the study by Park et al.,32 who reported their findings in a similar manner.

True trigger point dry needling procedure

For subjects who underwent true TrP dry needling, the gloved practitioner opened a new package and placed the 0.25 x 40 solid-bore filiform (solid, not hollow) needle into the introducer tube. The tube was placed on the patient’s leg and the needle was tapped to insert the needle quickly into the skin; the needle remained, and the tube was removed. The practitioner then moved the needle deeper and aimed for a taut band of muscle, with the goal of eliciting a local twitch response (LTR) in the area. A local twitch response is a complex reflex that has been associated with pain relief.36,37 Repeated passes were made with the needle until a LTR was obtained and repeated until no further LTRs occurred in that area (a “pistoning” technique). If no LTR was obtained after 10 passes, the needle was withdrawn. Only single-use, sterile needles were used. Manual pressure was used if bleeding was noted (which occurs in approximately 16% of patients17).

Sham dry needling procedure

A sham needle/introducer was created to allow for an identical-appearing needle and introducer, but without inserting the needle (Figure 1). Prior to the study, a single needle was removed, and its sharp point was first cut off around 5 mm proximal to the tip. The shortened needle was blunted for safety and then glued into the introducer with clear glue (cyanoacrylate) so it appeared like a normal dry needle (with the thicker end slightly protruding from the introducer). These sham needles thus had no sharp tip protruding, the needle could not be removed from the introducer, and thus the needle never contacted the skin. The practitioner would hold one of these needles in the same manner they would hold a true dry needle, and would place it on the patient’s skin. They would tap it identically, but as the needle was glued in, no needle would penetrate the skin. Subjects would still feel the introducer pressed hard against their skin however, similar to a prior sham-controlled study.27 The practitioner would then proceed to gently manipulate the introducer/needle apparatus on the skin, in the same location, for approximately thirty seconds at each location, which matched our approximate clinical time for performing this procedure with the true method. In between patients, the sham needles were placed in 70% isopropyl alcohol to ensure sterility.

49676 Figure 1: Sham dry needle apparatus. Arrowhead represents tip of needle.

Statistical methods

Initial power analysis was based on similar studies,26,31 estimating approximately 20 subjects in each group. Descriptive statistics were calculated for subjects’ demographics. Proportions of those who correctly identified their needling were compared by past experience of receiving dry needling, using a two-sample test of proportions. Lastly, the effectiveness of sham needling as a placebo was examined by comparing the proportion of subjects in the sham needling group who were unable to identify which needling they received (either identified that they received real dry needing or were not sure if they received real or sham) to a chance occurrence (= 50%), using an exact binomial test. Statistics were performed with Stata/MP 16.0 for Windows (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX).

Results

A total of 53 subjects were included in this data analysis. Of those, 28 (52.8%) and 25 (47.2%) received the sham and true TrP dry needling, respectively (Table 1).

50039 Table 1: Subject demographics.

 	 	Dry needling		
Variable	Sham (n = 28, 52.8%)	True (n = 25, 47.2%)		
Gender [frequency (%)]	Male	8 (28.6)	12 (48.0)		
	Female	20 (71.4)	13 (52.0)		
Race [frequency (%)]	Marathon	7 (25.0)	8 (32.0)		
	Half-marathon	21 (75.0)	17 (68.0)		
Age	41.9 (12.5)	42.7 (11.8)		
Height (cm)	168.4 (6.4)	173.6 (8.8)		
Weight (kg)	68.9 (13.7)	72.3 (14.1)		
Body mass index (kg/m2)	24.3 (4.6)	23.8 (3.5)		
Values are mean (SD) unless specified otherwise

The results of dry needling identifications by prior experience of dry needling are summarized in Table 2. Of all subjects, regardless of group assignment, 28 (52.8%) subjects were unsure which group they were in, 24 (45.3%) identified their group appropriately, and 1 (1.9%) was incorrect. Of those who had received dry needling in the past (n = 16), 11 (68.8%) correctly identified their respective groups. For those who had not previously received dry needling (n = 37), 13 (35.1%) accurately identified their group. The difference in the proportions was statistically significant (z = 2.26, p = 0.024).

50040 Table 2: Dry needling identifications by prior experience of dry needling.

 	 	Dry needling	
Prior experience of dry needling	Identification	Sham (n = 28, 52.8%)	True (n = 25, 47.2%)	
Yes (n = 16)	I am not sure if I had the real or sham.	4	1	
	I definitely had the sham dry needling.	7*	0	
 	I definitely had the real dry needling.	0	4*	
No (n = 37)	I am not sure if I had the real or sham.	15	8	
	I definitely had the sham dry needling.	1*	0	
 	I definitely had the real dry needling.	1	12*	
Values are frequency.

*Correct identification.

Of the 28 subjects in the sham needling group, 11 subjects had received dry needling in the past, while 17 had not. For those who had previously received dry needling, 7 (63.6%) subjects were able to identify that they received the sham needling. The exact binomial test showed that this proportion was not significantly different from 50.0%, a chance occurrence (p = 0.549). Meanwhile, of the dry needling-naïve subjects, only one (5.9%) was able to identify that they received the sham needling. This proportion was significantly lower than 50%, a chance occurrence (5.9% [95% CI, 0 – 17%], p < 0.01). Similarly, one (5.9%) dry needling-naïve subject felt they had received true TrP dry needling.

Discussion

This study examined the validity of a fixed needle as a sham dry needling procedure. Validating a non-penetrating type of sham procedure as an effective placebo treatment is important as this type of sham procedure is likely more inert than a penetrating sham procedure9–11 and thus decreases confounding factors caused by superficial needling or “false” dry needling techniques when evaluating dry needling outcomes.19–21 The sham technique in this study mimicked dry needling in that the participants felt the introducer tube, but the needle did not penetrate the skin. The sham needling was done in the same location, setting, position, and for approximately the same amount of time as the true TrP dry needling procedure. Subjects were not able to see the procedure being done in either the true or sham dry needling group. Mitchell et al.26 performed a similar study with a blunted needle to examine dry needling-naïve subjects’ view on whether a sham needle penetrated the skin. The needling technique in their study did not, however, include “pistoning” as the practitioners did in our study. To the authors’ knowledge, no study has examined this particular type of sham TrP dry needling procedure.12,38 There have been many validation studies examining non-penetrating sham techniques in acupuncture research showing that these can be successful shams, particularly in subjects naïve to acupuncture.23,39–42 Of note, even the non-penetrating sham dry needling procedure may have some limited therapeutic effects as trigger point massage and myofascial release are treatments used for myofascial pain, and pistoning a guide tube over a trigger point, may affect the trigger point to a limited extent.

The main findings from this study demonstrate that this type of sham dry needling is an effective control for subjects naïve to dry needling. It was far less effective in subjects who had previously experienced dry needling; these subjects more reliably determined whether they received the true or sham needle. Of the participants who were naïve to dry needling, only one was able to correctly identify that they underwent true TrP dry needling. This was equal to the number of dry needling-naïve participants (1) who felt they received the true needling when in fact they received the sham. This was likely because the same introducer tube was used as in true TrP dry needling. An introducer tube alone without a needle has been shown to be difficult for participants to distinguish from true needling also using an introducer tube in other comparison trials.26,27,33,43

The subjects who had prior experience with dry needling were more likely to be able to identify their assigned group. One likely reason was that the sham procedure did not cause the same sensation as what they previously received. Some studies have shown that participants are able to detect a difference in the “sharp” sensation of a needle versus a blunted tip,26 whereas other studies show that subjects detect a “sharp” sensation equally with both blunted and true needle;29,31,32 this study did not specifically ask subjects for their definition of the sensation they felt. Some subjects experience secondary symptoms after TrP dry needling such as muscle aches31 and they might not necessarily experience this with a sham procedure. This study allowed for time to elapse for delayed-onset soreness, for which subjects who had previously received dry needling may have recognized. Some of the subjects may have received different types of dry needling in the past, perhaps using multiple needles, electrodes or other methods. This sham procedure was meant to mimic dry needling using an introducer tube and repeated passes with the needle to obtain a twitch response. The difference in method alone might have impacted their ability to correctly identify their group. The sham procedure also would not have elicited the twitch response that subjects might have experienced in the past.

This study was primarily limited by the smaller number of participants. Though the study was powered for 20 participants, only 17 naïve subjects were identified. However, it still demonstrated a significant finding. Second, the practitioners could not be blinded to the intervention given the nature of TrP dry needling, which could introduce bias from the practitioners, although blinding practitioners would likely not be feasible in the current study. Third, the technique used by the two practitioners, a physician and a physical therapist, may be different than used by other practitioners and may limit generalizability. For example, this sham method likely will not be usable for practitioners who use electrical stimulation through their needles. This technique used several needle passes, which diminishes electromyographic muscle activity,44 and also likely contributes to improved clinical pain relief,37,45 but may cause increased soreness initially from tissue trauma. Finally, the participants in this study were half-marathon and marathon runners and thus may not be fully generalizable to patients in other settings. The authors chose endurance runners capable of completing a half-marathon given their homogenous nature and their anecdotally high level of relief from myofascial treatments.

Given the aforementioned limitations, this study contains a number of strengths, in that the participants were blinded to the procedure and the study used an easily-reproducible, inexpensive sham needle technique. This study used a non-penetrating sham technique which could potentially decrease confounding effects of other sham techniques.

Conclusion

The results of this study indicate that a fixed needle in an introducer tube is a simple, inexpensive, effective sham procedure in patients who have never received dry needling before. These subjects were less able to identify if they received the sham or true TrP dry needling than the subjects who had experienced dry needling.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Ethical Approval

Prior to the study, Institutional Review Board approval was obtained through the authors’ home institution (IRB # 108243). All subjects signed written informed consent prior to undergoing study procedures.
==== Refs
Travell & Simons’ Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual. Upper Half of Body Simons D.G. Travell J.G. Simons L.S. Wolters Kluwer Health 1999
1. Vol 1
Trigger point dry needling and proprioceptive exercises for the management of chronic ankle instability: A randomized clinical trial Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Salom-Moreno Jaime Ayuso-Casado Blanca Tamaral-Costa Beatriz Sánchez-Milá Zacarías Fernández-de-las-Peñas César Alburquerque-Sendín Francisco 2015
2015 1 9 1741-427X 10.1155/2015/790209 10.1155/2015/790209 26064172
The effects of needling therapies on muscle force production: A systematic review and meta-analysis Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Mansfield Cody J. Vanetten Lucas Willy Richard di Stasi Stephanie Magnussen Robert Briggs Matthew Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) 3 2019
49 3 154 170 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2019.8270 10.2519/jospt.2019.8270 30501386
Effect of dry needling on thigh muscle strength and hip flexion in elite soccer players Med Sci Sports Exerc Haser CHRISTIAN Stöggl THOMAS Kriner MONIKA MIKOLEIT JÖRG WOLFAHRT BERND SCHERR JOHANNES HALLE MARTIN PFAB FLORIAN 2 2017
49 2 378 383 0195-9131 10.1249/mss.0000000000001111 10.1249/mss.0000000000001111
Rehabilitation of proximal hamstring tendinopathy utilizing eccentric training, lumbopelvic stabilization, and trigger point dry needling: 2 case reports Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Jayaseelan Dhinu J. Moats Nick Ricardo Christopher R. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) 3 2014
44 3 198 205 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2014.4905 10.2519/jospt.2014.4905 24261928
Treatment of subacute posterior knee pain in an adolescent ballet dancer utilizing trigger point dry needling: A case report Int J Sports Phys Ther Mason J.S. Tansey K.A. Westrick R.B. 2014
9 1 116 124 24567862
Shoulder impingement in tennis/racquetball players treated with subscapularis myofascial treatments Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Ingber Reuben S. 5 2000
81 5 679 682 0003-9993 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90053-4 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90053-4 10807110
Effectiveness and adequacy of blinding in the moderation of pain outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analyses of dry needling trials PeerJ Braithwaite Felicity A. Walters Julie L. Li Lok Sze Katrina Moseley G. Lorimer Williams Marie T. McEvoy Maureen P. PeerJ 31 7 2018
6 e5318 2167-8359 10.7717/peerj.5318 10.7717/peerj.5318 30083458
Trigger point dry needling Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy Dommerholt Jan Mayoral del Moral Orlando Gröbli Christian 10 2006
14 4 70E 87E 1066-9817 10.1179/jmt.2006.14.4.70e 10.1179/jmt.2006.14.4.70e
Superficial versus deep dry needling Acupuncture in Medicine Baldry Peter SAGE Publications 8 2002
20 2-3 78 81 0964-5284 10.1136/aim.20.2-3.78 10.1136/aim.20.2-3.78 12216605
Immediate effect of Fuʼs subcutaneous needling for low back pain Chinese Medical Journal Fu Zhong-hua Chen Xin-yuan Lu Li-juan Lin Jian Xu Jian-guo 6 2006
119 11 953 957 0366-6999 10.1097/00029330-200606010-00014 10.1097/00029330-200606010-00014 16780777
Sham interventions in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture-a review Complementary Therapies in Medicine Dincer F Linde K. 12 2003
11 4 235 242 0965-2299 10.1016/s0965-2299(03)00124-9 10.1016/s0965-2299(03)00124-9
Sham acupuncture may be as efficacious as true acupuncture: A systematic review of clinical trials The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine Moffet Howard H. 3 2009
15 3 213 216 1075-5535 10.1089/acm.2008.0356 10.1089/acm.2008.0356 19250001
Psychophysiological effects of massage-myofascial release after exercise: A randomized sham-control study The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine Arroyo-Morales Manuel Olea Nicolas Martínez Marin Manuel Hidalgo-Lozano Amparo Ruiz-Rodríguez Concepción Díaz-Rodríguez Lourdes 12 2008
14 10 1223 1229 1075-5535 10.1089/acm.2008.0253 10.1089/acm.2008.0253
Massage for low-back pain Cochrane Database Syst Rev Furlan Andrea D Giraldo Mario Baskwill Amanda Irvin Emma Imamura Marta 1 9 2015
1465-1858 10.1002/14651858.cd001929.pub3 10.1002/14651858.cd001929.pub3
Sham surgery in orthopedics: A systematic review of the literature Pain Med Louw A. Diener I. Fernández-de-las-Peñas C. Puentedura E.J. 7 2016
pnw164
Adverse events associated with therapeutic dry needling International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Boyce David Wempe Hannah Campbell Courtney Fuehne Spencer Zylstra Edo Smith Grant Wingard Christopher Jones Richard 2 2020
15 1 103 113 2159-2896 10.26603/ijspt20200103 10.26603/ijspt20200103
Dry needling to a key myofascial trigger point may reduce the irritability of satellite MTrPs American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Hsieh Yueh-Ling Kao Mu-Jung Kuan Ta-Shen Chen Shu-Min Chen Jo-Tong Hong Chang-Zern Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) 5 2007
86 5 397 403 0894-9115 10.1097/phm.0b013e31804a554d 10.1097/phm.0b013e31804a554d 17449984
Short-term changes in neck pain, widespread pressure pain sensitivity, and cervical range of motion after the application of trigger point dry needling in patients with acute mechanical neck pain: A randomized clinical trial Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Mejuto-Vázquez María J. Salom-Moreno Jaime Ortega-Santiago Ricardo Truyols-Domínguez Sebastián Fernández-de-las-Peñas César Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) 4 2014
44 4 252 260 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2014.5108 10.2519/jospt.2014.5108 24568260
Remote dose-dependent effects of dry needling at distant myofascial trigger spots of rabbit skeletal muscles on reduction of substance p levels of proximal muscle and spinal cords Bio Med Res Int Hsieh Y.L. Yang C.C. 2014
2014 982121
Bilateral activation of motor unit potentials with unilateral needle stimulation of active myofascial trigger points American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Audette Joseph F. Wang Feng Smith Howard 5 2004
83 5 368 374 0894-9115 10.1097/01.phm.0000118037.61143.7c 10.1097/01.phm.0000118037.61143.7c 15100626
Remote effects of dry needling on the irritability of the myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Tsai Chien-Tsung Hsieh Lin-Fen Kuan Ta-Shen Kao Mu-Jung Chou Li-Wei Hong Chang-Zern 2 2010
89 2 133 140 0894-9115 10.1097/phm.0b013e3181a5b1bc 10.1097/phm.0b013e3181a5b1bc
Randomised trial of trigger point acupuncture compared with other acupuncture for treatment of chronic neck pain Complementary Therapies in Medicine Itoh Kazunori Katsumi Yasukazu Hirota Satoko Kitakoji Hiroshi 9 2007
15 3 172 179 0965-2299 10.1016/j.ctim.2006.05.003 10.1016/j.ctim.2006.05.003 17709062
Does EMG (dry needling) reduce myofascial pain symptoms due to cervical nerve root irritation? Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol Chu J. 1997
37 5 259 272 9298338
Relationship between electroacupuncture analgesia and descending pain inhibitory mechanism of nucleus raphe magnus Pain Liu Xiang Zhu Bing Zhang Shouxin Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) 3 1986
24 3 383 396 0304-3959 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90124-7 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90124-7 3485785
The construction of sham dry needles and their validity Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Mitchell Ulrike H. Stoneman Paul Larson Robert E. Page Garritt L. 14 6 2018
2018 1 6 1741-427X 10.1155/2018/9567061 10.1155/2018/9567061 30013605
Comparison of dry needling vs. Sham on the performance of vertical jump International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Bandy William D Nelson Russell Beamer Lisa 10 2017
12 5 747 751 2159-2896 10.26603/ijspt20170747 10.26603/ijspt20170747
The effect of dry needling in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial Clinical Rheumatology Tekin Levent Akarsu Selim Durmuş Oğuz Çakar Engin Dinçer Ümit Kıralp Mehmet Zeki Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2013
32 3 309 315 0770-3198 10.1007/s10067-012-2112-3 10.1007/s10067-012-2112-3 23138883
Introducing a placebo needle into acupuncture research The Lancet Streitberger K Kleinhenz J Elsevier BV 8 1998
352 9125 364 365 0140-6736 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)10471-8 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)10471-8
A review and analysis of placebo treatments, placebo effects, and placebo controls in trials of medical procedures when sham is not inert The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine Birch Stephen 4 2006
12 3 303 310 1075-5535 10.1089/acm.2006.12.303 10.1089/acm.2006.12.303 16646730
Developing and validating a sham acupuncture needle Acupuncture in Medicine Tough Elizabeth A White Adrian R Richards Suzanne H Lord Brian Campbell John L SAGE Publications 9 2009
27 3 118 122 0964-5284 10.1136/aim.2009.000737 10.1136/aim.2009.000737 19734382
Validating a new non-penetrating sham acupuncture device: Two randomised controlled trials Acupuncture in Medicine Park Jongbae White Adrian Stevinson Clare Ernst Edzard James Martin SAGE Publications 12 2002
20 4 168 174 0964-5284 10.1136/aim.20.4.168 10.1136/aim.20.4.168
Acupuncture for episodic tension-type headache: A multicentre randomized controlled trial Cephalalgia White A.R. Resch K.-L. Chan J.C.K. Norris C.D. Modi S.K. Patel J.N. Ernst E. 9 2000
20 7 632 637 0333-1024 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2000.00097.x 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2000.00097.x 11128820
Postrace dry needling does not reduce subsequent soreness and cramping-a randomized controlled trial Clin J Sports Med Cushman Daniel M. Cummings Keith Skinner Lee Holman Anna Haight Peter Brobeck Matthew Teramoto Masaru Tang Chi 13 2 2020
Publish Ah(00) 1 7 1050-642X 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000794 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000794
Post-needling soreness after myofascial trigger point dry needling: Current status and future research Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies Martín-Pintado-Zugasti Aitor Mayoral del Moral Orlando Gerwin Robert D. Fernández-Carnero Josue 10 2018
22 4 941 946 1360-8592 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.01.003 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.01.003
An in vivo microanalytical technique for measuring the local biochemical milieu of human skeletal muscle Journal of Applied Physiology Shah Jay P. Phillips Terry M. Danoff Jerome V. Gerber Lynn H. 11 2005
99 5 1977 1984 8750-7587 10.1152/japplphysiol.00419.2005 10.1152/japplphysiol.00419.2005
Lidocaine injection versus dry needling to myofascial trigger point. The importance of the local twitch response American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Hong Chang-Zern 7 1994
73 4 256 263 0894-9115 10.1097/00002060-199407000-00006 10.1097/00002060-199407000-00006 8043247
Dry needling: A literature review with implications for clinical practice guidelines Physical Therapy Reviews Dunning James Butts Raymond Mourad Firas Young Ian Flannagan Sean Perreault Thomas 6 2 2014
19 4 252 265 1083-3196 10.1179/108331913x13844245102034 10.1179/108331913x13844245102034 25143704
Randomized trial of trigger point acupuncture treatment for chronic shoulder pain: A preliminary study Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies Itoh Kazunori Saito Shingo Sahara Shunsaku Naitoh Yuki Imai Kenji Kitakoji Hiroshi 4 2014
7 2 59 64 2005-2901 10.1016/j.jams.2013.02.002 10.1016/j.jams.2013.02.002 24745863
Description and validation of a noninvasive placebo acupuncture procedure The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine Sherman Karen J. Hogeboom Charissa J. Cherkin Daniel C. Deyo Richard A. 2 2002
8 1 11 19 1075-5535 10.1089/107555302753507140 10.1089/107555302753507140
Validation of a simplified sham acupuncture technique for its use in clinical research: A randomised, single blind, crossover study Acupuncture in Medicine Kreiner Marcelo Zaffaroni Ana Alvarez Ramón Clark Glenn SAGE Publications 3 2010
28 1 33 36 0964-5284 10.1136/aim.2009.001735 10.1136/aim.2009.001735 20351375
A controlled trial of placebo versus real acupuncture The Journal of Pain Goddard G Shen Y Steele B Springer N 4 2005
6 4 237 242 1526-5900 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.12.009 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.12.009 15820911
Relief of low back pain immediately after acupuncture treatment - A randomised, placebo controlled trial Acupuncture in Medicine Inoue Motohiro Kitakoji Hiroshi Ishizaki Naoto Tawa Munenori Yano Tadashi Katsumi Yasukazu Kawakita Kenji SAGE Publications 9 2006
24 3 103 108 0964-5284 10.1136/aim.24.3.103 10.1136/aim.24.3.103 17013356
Electromyographic activity evolution of local twitch responses during dry needling of latent trigger points in the gastrocnemius muscle: A cross-sectional study Pain Med Baraja-Vegas Luis Martín-Rodríguez Saúl Piqueras-Sanchiz Francisco Martín-Ruiz Julio Yeste Fabregat Mireia Florencio Lidiane L Fernández-de-las-Peñas César 2020
21 6 1224 1229 1526-2375 10.1093/pm/pnz182 10.1093/pm/pnz182 31361323
Myofascial pain syndrome: Correlation between the irritability of trigger points and the prevalence of local twitch responses during trigger point injection Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain Kuan Ta-Shen Hong Chang-Zern Chen Shu-Min Tsai Chien-Tsung Yen Wei-Chang Chen Jo-Tong Feng Chi-Yen 27 11 2012
20 4 250 256 1058-2452 10.3109/10582452.2012.733804 10.3109/10582452.2012.733804
