
==== Front
Can J Respir Ther
Can J Respir Ther
3251
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR
1205-9838
2368-6820
Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists Website: Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy

37781348
84260
10.29390/001c.84260
Review Article
Inhaled corticosteroids’ effect on COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3386-7925
Badi Yasra 1
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5813-9602
Hammad Mohamed 2
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-9353
Tawfik Abdelrahman G. 3
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3079-0026
Eshag Mona Muhe Eldeen 4
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6872-7180
Elhady Mahmoud M. 5
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7273-9221
Ragab Khaled Mohamed 6
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3605-1101
Nourelden Anas Zakarya 7
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5066-8735
Gamal Mohamed Hesham 8
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9639-8994
Fathallah Ahmed Hashem 6
1 All Saints University School of Medicine
2 Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine Marshall University
3 Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy University of Utah https://ror.org/03r0ha626
4 Faculty Of Medicine University of Bahri https://ror.org/05jds5x60
5 Faculty of Medicine Banha University
6 Faculty of Medicine Minia University https://ror.org/02hcv4z63
7 Faculty of Medicine Al-Azhar University https://ror.org/03ewepe58
8 Faculty of Pharmacy Tanta University https://ror.org/016jp5b92
*Corresponding author: Ahmed Hashem Fathallah Postal address: 61111 Phone: +201065464584 Email: dr.ahmedhashem12@gmail.com
1 8 2023
2023
59 154166
11 1 2023
17 7 2023
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background

More than six million people died due to COVID-19, and 10-15% of infected individuals suffer from post-covid syndrome. Corticosteroids are widely used in the management of severe COVID-19 and post-acute COVID-19 symptoms. This study synthesizes current evidence of the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on mortality, hospital length-of-stay (LOS), and improvement of smell scores in patients with COVID-19.

Methods

We searched Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus until Aug 2022. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the quality of studies. We evaluated the effectiveness of ICS in COVID-19 patients through measures of mortality, LOS, alleviation of post-acute COVID-19 symptoms, time to sustained self-reported cure, and sense of smell (visual analog scale (VAS)).

Results

Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. Our study showed a significant decrease in the LOS in ICS patients over placebo (MD = -1.52, 95% CI [-2.77 to -0.28], p-value = 0.02). Patients treated with intranasal corticosteroids (INC) showed a significant improvement in VAS smell scores from week three to week four (MD =1.52, 95% CI [0.27 to 2.78], p-value = 0.02), and alleviation of COVID-related symptoms after 14 days (RR = 1.17, 95% CI [1.09 to 1.26], p-value < 0.0001). No significant differences were detected in mortality (RR= 0.69, 95% CI [0.36 to 1.35], p-value = 0.28) and time to sustained self-reported cure (MD = -1.28, 95% CI [-6.77 to 4.20], p-value = 0.65).

Conclusion

We concluded that the use of ICS decreased patient LOS and improved COVID-19-related symptoms. INC may have a role in improving the smell score. Therefore, using INC and ICS for two weeks or more may prove beneficial. Current data do not demonstrate an effect on mortality or time to sustained self-reported cure. However, the evidence is inconclusive, and more studies are needed for more precise data.

Intra Nasal Corticosteroid
Inhaled Corticosteroid
COVID-19
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Length of Stay
This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic. Despite public health interventions, COVID-19 spread persistently, and about 615 million cases were diagnosed with more than six million deaths.1 COVID-19’s symptoms vary widely across patients and range from mild (i.e., fever, fatigue, headache, and cough) to severe (i.e., difficulty breathing, severe illness, hospitalization, and death).2 Even after fully recovering from the disease, many studies reported acute post-COVID-19 symptoms such as fatigue syndrome, cognitive impairment, dyspnea, anosmia and ageusia.3–5

At the beginning of the pandemic, pharmacological approaches for the management of the symptoms of COVID-19 were not defined. Several existing medications were tried (e.g., Ivermectin, Remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine) but were not proven beneficial in supporting COVID-19 patients.6–8 In contrast, other medications (e.g., monoclonal antibodies) were shown to reduce the duration of hospital length of stay (LOS) and mechanical ventilation.9,10 Finally, systemic corticosteroid therapies were associated with reduced mortality rates in hospitalized patients.11,12 However, systemic therapy was not recommended for noncritically ill patients13 due to potential immunosuppression risks and systemic side effects.

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and intranasal corticosteroids (INC) were also reported to be beneficial in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Several theories have been proposed to explain their beneficial effects, including, but not limited to, a reduction in the expression of proteins responsible for the virus’s entry into the host cell,14 a downregulation of coronavirus genes,15 inflammatory modularity actions and improved t-cell response and reduced epithelial cell damage.16

Current evidence about ICS effectiveness in COVID-19 patients is mixed.17–19 A study by Ezer et al. concluded that ICS and INC did not benefit COVID-19 patients.18 Another study by Ramakrishnan et al. reported that the early use of ICS and INC reduced the time to recovery and medical care needs.17 Therefore, INC’s efficacy and safety are debatable, and more reliable data are required to clarify the risk-benefit ratio.

This review seeks to synthesize studies evaluating the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and intranasal corticosteroids (INC) on mortality, hospital length-of-stay (LOS), and improvement of smell scores in patients with COVID-19 (PICO question being P: COVID-19 patients; I: Inhaled corticosteroids or Intranasal Corticosteroids; C: Placebo; O: Mortality, Length of hospital stay, Improvement of smell).

Methods

The study was designed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported under the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.20,21

Systematic literature search

A search was conducted in the following databases: Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The search was conducted from inception until August 27, 2022, using the following terms (COVID OR COVID19 OR “SARS-CoV-2” OR “SARS-CoV2” OR SARSCoV2 OR “SARSCoV-2” OR “SARS coronavirus 2”) AND (“inhaled corticosteroids” OR ICS). The complete search strategy is provided (Supplementary Table 1).

Eligibility criteria and study selection process

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the eligibility criteria: 1) Population: patients infected with COVID-19; 2) Intervention: treated with ICS or INC; 3) Comparator: control; 4) treatment Outcomes: mortality, hospital LOS, improved sense of smell, alleviation of COVID-19 related symptoms, time to self-reported recovery. Studies that did not report on at least one of the above treatment outcomes were excluded. The titles and abstracts of identified studies were reviewed for eligibility, and those meeting the criteria were advanced to full-text review. The systematic literature search was conducted by two authors independently, and conflicts were resolved by including a third author. References of the included trials were reviewed to identify additional relevant studies. Two authors defined relevant study characteristics and then, working independently, extracted data. A third author validated the outcomes of the extraction process.

Quality assessment

Included studies were evaluated for bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs (version 1).21 This tool prompts critical assessment in the following domains 1) randomization of the population; 2) allocation of arms; 3) participant and investigator blinding; 4) assessment of outcomes and their blinding; 5) detection bias and other biases. Judgment can be a high, low, or unclear risk of bias. The GRADE approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence across included studies.22

Data extraction

We extracted 1) summary data and baseline characteristics of the study’s populations, including Study ID, study arms and the route of corticosteroid administration, study site, age, follow-up, comorbidities, outcome measurement tools, inclusion criteria; 2) outcomes data: mortality, LOS, visual analog scale (VAS) of smell score, participants with alleviation of COVID-19–related symptoms, and time to self-reported recovery.

Data synthesis

Data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) software version 5.4. In the case of dichotomous data, we presented data as risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Mean differences and 95% CI were used with continuous s data. Heterogeneity was tested using the chi-square test and I-square test (I2). A significant difference was reported if the p-value < 0.05. Data were considered heterogenous if the p-value of chi-square < 0.1 and the I2 value was greater than 50%. We pooled data in the random effects model if it were heterogeneous, while the fixed effect model was used for homogenous data. We performed a subgroup analysis based on the weeks the data was reported. We used the Cochrane leave-one-out technique when we could not resolve the heterogeneity by leaving one study out from the analysis.21

RESULTS

Literature search and study selection

Based on our research strategy, we retrieved 2221 unique articles. After title and abstract screening, 23 studies were suitable for full-text screening. Ten studies met our inclusion requirements. The 13 excluded studies were non-RCT study designs and failed to include the defined outcome measures (see Figure 1).

172428 Figure 1. PRISMA Flow chart.

Study characteristics

The ten included studies had a combined 3168 patients with a mean age of 44. Two studies were conducted in the United Kingdom, two in Iran, and one each from Egypt, Syria, the United States, France, Canada, and Korea. Included studies had follow-up duration between one to four weeks. Characteristics and outcomes of included studies are presented in Table 1.

172429 Table 1. Characteristics and outcomes of included studies.

Study, Site	Study arms and their route, (N)	Age, M(SD)year	Female, n (%)	Follow-up, weeks	Diabetes comorbidities	VAS smell score	Smell test score ,(M±SD)	Inclusion criteria	Main outcomes	Conclusion	
Intervention	control	Intervention	control	Intervention	control	Intervention	control	Intervention	control	Intervention	control	
Abdelalim 2021, Egypt	mometasone nasal spray + olfactory training, (50)	olfactory training only, (50)	23.83 (13.36)	30.5(12.59)	26(52%)	28(56%)	3 weeks	8	8	-	-	2.5 (3.43)	2.5 (3.43)	1. Adults 18 yrs or older patients 2. Confirmed case (+ve PCR) 3. Recovered/discharged (2 -ve PCR) 4. O2 suffered from sudden recent anosmia or hyposmia	1. Improvement of olfaction	“Using mometasone furoate nasal spray as a topical corticosteroid in the treatment of post-acute COVID-19 anosmia offers no superiority benefits over olfactory training, regarding smell scores, duration of anosmia, and recovery rates”	
Alsultan 2021, Syria	budesonide(14) - colchicine(14)	supportive, (21)	-	-	9(64%) colchicine - 9(64%)budesonide	12(57%)	less than week	(7)colchicine - (5)budesonide	14	-	-	-	-	-	1. ICU/death
2. Discharge w/readmission 3. Discharge w/cure	“Using colchicine and budesonide in moderate to severe ARDS patients showed better evolution of the disease, which is observed by reduced LOS and respiratory deterioration in addition to reduced mortality with colchicine. Evaluation of these drugs on ARDS induced by COVID-19 may require early employment and evaluation therapy in ventilated patients”	
Clemency 2022, USA	Ciclesonide,(197)	Placebo,(203)	43.7 (17.53)	42.9 (16.28)	112 (56.9%)	109 (53.7%)	4weeks	22	8	-	-		-	1. 12 years of age and above 2. Positive SARS-CoV-2 rapid molecular diagnostic test 3. Patient is not currently hospitalized or under immediate consideration for hospitalization 4. Patient is currently experiencing symptoms of fever, cough, and/or dyspnea., The patient has an oxygen saturation level greater than 93%. 5. Ability to show adequate use of MDI Patient	1. Time to Alleviation of COVID-19-related Symptoms by Day 30	“Ciclesonide did not achieve the primary efficacy endpoint of reduction of time to alleviation of all COVID-19–related symptoms. Future studies of inhaled steroids are needed to explore their efficacy in patients with a high risk for disease progression and in reducing the incidence of long-term COVID-19 symptoms or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2.”	
Duvignaud 2022, France	Ciclesonide,(110)	Placebo,(107)	65.67 (0.75)	67.3 (0.75)	52 (47.3%)	59 (55.1%)	2 weeks	17	16	-	-		-	1. 7 days or less 2. Positivity of a test proving an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection
3. Absence of criteria for hospitalization or oxygen therapy, Age: greater than or equal to 60 years of age or between 50 and 59 years of age, and the presence of at least one of the following risk factors: Arterial hypertension, Obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2), Diabetes, Ischemic heart disease, Heart failure, Stroke History, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Stage 3 chronic renal failure.Malignancies., Immunodeficiency of therapeutic origin (solid organ transplant or hematopoietic stem cell transplant, cancer chemotherapy, immunosuppressive therapy	1. Proportion of participants who had a moderate to severe adverse event	“Inhaled corticosteroids showed significant results to decrease the proportion of participants who had moderate to severe adverse events and need for COVID-19-related oxygen therapy at home or death.”	
Ezer 2021, Canada	Ciclesonide nasal(105)	saline + placebo nasal(98)	36.3 15.03	35.67 (13.54)	54 (51%)	55 (56%)	2 weeks	1	4	-	-	-		1. Symptomatic adult patients positive by PCR for COVID-19 within 5 days of enrollment with fever, cough, or shortness of breath 2. Provision of Informed Consent	1. Proportion of Participants With no Symptoms of Cough, Fever, or Dyspnea	“Combination of inhaled and intranasal ciclesonide did not show a statistically significant increase in resolution of symptoms among healthier young adults with COVID-19 and presenting with prominent respiratory symptoms. Further research is needed.”	
Hosseinpoor 2022, Iran	Mometasone furoate nasal spray(35)	Sodium chloride nasal spray(35)	32.23( 10.02)	34.93 (12.39)	24 (68.5%)	21 (60.0%)	4 weeks	2	4	2(3.86)	2 (3.86)	6.33 (10.05)	5.67 (8.5)	1. At day 0, patients should be at home	1. Identification Test (Iran-SIT) with normal smell function.	“No significant difference in olfactory dysfunction between the two groups during follow-up. However, based on the significant between-group difference in terms of olfactory scores changes, it seems that the nasal corticosteroids may be a positive effect on the recovery process of patients who received more than 2 weeks.”	
kasiri 2021, Iran	Mometasone furoate(40)	sodium chloride group (0.9%),(40)	35.4(9)	33.2(8.5)	19 (48.7%)	19 (50%)	4 weeks	1	0	5.2(2.3)	5.7 (1.6)	8.1(5.1)	7.9(5)	1. Adults over the age of 18 with a diagnosis of COVID-19 based on clinical criteria 2. (presence of any symptoms of cough, shortness of breath, fever, and CT scan of the lung for evidence of involvement consistent with COVID-19 infection) or PCR and had an olfactory dysfunction ( reduced or loss of sense of smell) for two weeks	1. The improvement of the olfactory score at the end of the study. 2. Visual analog scale (VAS) and the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test were used to assess the primary outcome.	“The combination of mometasone furoate nasal spray and olfactory training have significant results for COVID-19–induced olfactory dysfunction could increase the recovery rate more than olfactory training alone.	
Ramakrishnan 2021, United Kingdom	Budesonide dry powder inhaler (70)	usual care(69)	44 (13)	46 (15)	39 (56%)	41 (59%)	4 weeks	3	69	-	-	-	-	1. Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial 2. Male or Female, aged 18 years or above New onset of symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 e.g. new onset cough and/or fever, and/or loss of smell or taste within 7 or fewer days of the participant being seen at visit 1	1. Emergency department attendance of hospitalization related to COVID-19	“Budesonide, an inhaled glucocorticoid, appears to be an effective treatment for early COVID-19 infection	
Song 2021, Korea	Ciclesonide Metered Dose Inhaler,(35)	standard care,(26)	44.9 (17.9)	49.0 (16.8)	24(68.6%)	17(65.4)	2weeks	4	5	-	-	-	-	1. Patients with mild COVID-19 (NEWS scoring system 0-4) Patient within 7 days from symptom onset 2. Patient within 48 hours after laboratory diagnosis (SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR)	1. Rate of SARS-CoV-2 eradication at day 14 from study enrollment	“Ciclesonide inhalation shortened SARS-CoV-2 viral shedding duration, and it may inhibit the progression to acute respiratory failure in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19”	
Yu 2021, United Kingdom	Inhaled budesonide(833)	Usual care(1126)	64.7 (7.3)	63.8 (7.8)	429 (52%)	586 (52%)	4 weeks	169	251	-	-	-	-	-	1. The trial commenced with the primary outcome of COVID-19-related hospital admission or death within 28 days.	“ In COVID-19 patients at higher risk of complications inhaled budesonide improves time to recovery, with a chance of also reducing hospital admissions or deaths (although our results did not meet the superiority threshold).”	

Quality of the included studies

Our included RCTs had a low to moderate quality regarding the risk of bias assessment and the specific items and details in Figure 2. The GRADE assessment revealed very low to moderate overall evidence quality (see Supplementary Table 2).

172430 Figure 2. Summary of the risk of bias of the included studies.

Green = low risk of bias, yellow = unclear risk of bias, red = high risk of bias.

Outcomes

Mortality

Five studies included mortality as an outcome measure,18,19,23–25 with a total sample of 2,414 patients. There was no significant difference in mortality between the ICS and placebo arms (RR= 0.69, 95% CI [0.36 to 1.35], p-value = 0.28). These pooled studies were homogeneous (p-value = 0.45, I2 = 0%). See Figure 3.

172431 Figure 3. Forest plot of Mortality.

Length of stay

Three studies reported data on LOS.23,25,26 Pooled analysis of a sample of 261 patients showed a significant difference. Patients receiving ICS had shorter LOS when compared to those receiving the placebo (MD = -1.52, 95% CI [-2.77 to -0.28], p-value = 0.02). We found homogeneity with a fixed model between the included studies (p-value = 0.71, I2 = 0%). See Figure 4.

172432 Figure 4. Forest plot of LOS (days)

Intranasal corticosteroid and improvement in sense of smell

Three studies examined the effects of INC on patients’ recovery of the sense of smell, measured across three different time points after the initiation of INC.27–29

Week 1: Two studies27,28 reported this outcome in week 1 with a total sample of 177. Our analysis revealed no significant difference between the INC group and placebo, with (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [-1.21 to 1.84], and p-value = 0.68). The results were heterogeneous in the random model (p-value = 0.10, I2 = 64%). The heterogeneity was not resolved even after the random effect model (see Figure 5).

172433 Figure 5. Forest plot of improvements in smell scores (VAS smell score)

Week 2: When evaluated at week 2, the pooled results were insignificant across study arms,27–29 with an (MD = 0.23, 95% CI [-1.32 to 1.79], and p-value = 0.77). The population of studies was 247. The heterogeneity could not be removed with the random model or the leave-one-out technique (p-value = 0.06 I2 = 65%). See Figure 5.

Weeks 3-4: The studies used in the analysis27–29 showed no significant difference between the INC group and placebo, with an (MD = 0.69, 95% CI [-0.86 to 2.23], and p-value = 0.38). The heterogeneity was observed ( p-value = 0.03 I2 = 71%). See Figure 5.

After we performed the leave-one-out technique, the heterogeneity was resolved by removing Kasiri et al. with a p-value = 0.83 and I2 = 0%.28 Our results became significant with a sample size of 170, favouring the INC patients over the placebo (MD = 1.52, 95% CI [0.27 to 2.78], p-value = 0.02). See Supplementary Figure 1.

Alleviation of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome symptoms

Six studies included data about the effect of ICS on post-acute COVID-19 syndrome symptoms (body temperature ≤ 37.5C and reports of all following symptoms as minor or none, with no subsequent relapse: asthenia, headache, cough, retrosternal discomfort/pain, thoracic oppression, thoracic pain, dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, anorexia, myalgia, or arthralgia).17–19,24–26 Subgrouping analysis was applied depending on the days of alleviation of symptoms on days seven and 14. Data on day seven were insignificant, with a (RR = 1.10, 95% CI [0.98 to 1.23], and p-value = 0.11). The pooled data on day seven were homogenous (p-value = 0.95, I2 = 0%). While on day 14, our results were significant in favour of the ICS group over the placebo (RR = 1.17, 95% CI [1.09 to 1.26], p-value < 0.0001). All studies in this subgroup were also homogenous (p-value = 0.24, I2 = 26%). In the comprehensive analysis, the studies were homogenous (p-value = 0.60, I2 = 0%). See Figure 6.

172434 Figure 6. Forest plot of participants with alleviation of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome symptoms

Time to self-reported recovery

Only two studies were suitable for this estimate, with a collective sample size of 307. Results revealed insignificant differences (MD = -1.28, 95% CI [-6.77 to 4.20], p-value = 0.65). The populations from the studies were heterogenous (p-value = 0.0003, I2 = 89%), and the random model could not resolve the heterogeneity (see Supplementary Figure 2).

Discussion

This study demonstrates significant reductions in LOS and improvements in select post-acute COVID-19 symptoms in patients randomized to ICS treatment. On the other hand, there is no significant difference between the ICS and placebo groups in mortality and time to self-reported recovery measures.

After adjusting for heterogeneity, our results showed a significant increase in VAS smell score in the INC groups when measured in the third to fourth week. Anosmia is one of the most prevalent post-COVID symptoms.25,30,31 The prevalence of smell problems among COVID-19 patients was 53.5%.32 While most anosmia patients recover after a few months, a small percentage appears to have a persistent smelling malfunction with severe clinical manifestations such as phantosmia or parosmia. Moreover, the mechanism of anosmia after COVID-19 infection is still unclear.33 Olfactory cleft syndrome, early apoptosis of olfactory cells, modifications to olfactory cilia and odour transmission, an impact on olfactory bulbs, an injury to epithelial olfactory cells, damage to olfactory neurons, or issues with stem cells have all been suggested as possible causes.30 Several treatments have been examined for their effectiveness in treating this and other post-acute COVID-19 symptoms. A longitudinal study found that palmitoylethanolamide, luteolin treatment, and olfactory training may improve memory and olfactory dysfunction.34 Theophylline was also tested for nasal irrigation; the results were inconclusive.35 Omega-3 is suggested for the treatment as well.36

The literature reported using oral corticosteroids to treat olfactory dysfunction.37,38 Nevertheless, using nasal corticosteroids with post-covid anosmia is questionable, and many experts still recommend it. For instance, Kasiri et al. concluded that combining ICS with olfactory training could improve olfactory dysfunction more than olfactory training alone.28 We removed Kasiri et al.28 from the analysis by the “leave one out” method to resolve the heterogeneity because it had different results from the other studies. So, we need to do more studies that measure this outcome. Additionally, Vaira et al. reported that a combination of oral corticosteroids with inhaled ones reduces long-term anosmia.39 Furthermore, Singh et al. concluded that using INC with triamcinolone oral paste significantly improved the olfactory and test function.40 At seven and 14 days, our three studies27–29 found no statistically significant difference between INC patients and placebo in terms of scent improvement. In contrast, INC patients considerably outperformed the placebo group in weeks three and four. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the INC may increase the VAS smell score, even though the individual studies’ findings were minor.

Rashid et al. mentioned that 83% of anosmia patients recovered after 30 days.41 Therefore, our observations may be attributed to the time passing, not the effect of INC. Additionally, our mean age in the studies of INC patients was 32.11, with an SD of 12.6. The mean age in the control group was 31.6, with an SD of 11. Ruth et al. reported a significant difference in smell improvement between patients below 40 years old and above 40.42 Therefore, age also was a strong confounder in our results. Our sample size was relatively small, and many confounders can affect the results. Therefore, more studies with different treatment periods and patients of different ages are needed to elucidate this outcome and evaluate the available treatments for this problem. Nevertheless, INC may positively impact patients’ recovery from anosmia after receiving them for three to four weeks, and olfactory training was the standard solution with or without medications.

Our results confirmed that the alleviation of post-acute COVID-19 symptoms (body temperature ≤ 37.5C and reports of all following symptoms as minor or none, with no subsequent relapse: asthenia, headache, cough, retrosternal discomfort/pain, thoracic oppression, thoracic pain, dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, anorexia, myalgia, or arthralgia) was significantly higher in patients receiving ICS, after two weeks of treatment. These results are compatible with the previous meta-analysis by Chen et al.43 Furthermore, our sample size was larger than Chen et al.43

ICS did not improve the mortality rate of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Five studies in the meta-analysis found no significant difference in mortality between the ICS and placebo groups.18,19,23–25 Duvignaud et al. discussed that it was difficult to conclude that ICS may improve the symptoms of COVID-19 patients or decrease the mortality rate even in a larger population.24 These results are compatible with the conclusion of the previous reviews, which suggested that corticosteroids could not reduce the risk of hospitalization or mortality in COVID-19 patients.44,45 Moreover, a retrospective study from Spain found that inhaled corticosteroids did not decrease the mortality rate in COVID-19 patients.46 To conclude, on the evidence available, ICS treatment does not reduce the mortality rates in COVID-19 patients.

This meta-analysis demonstrated that ICS significantly reduced LOS. However, we should consider these results cautiously because they depend on three studies, two of which reported non-significant results. Two studies25,26 showed no significant difference in LOS, while a third concluded that the ICS reduced the LOS.23 These discrepancies may be attributed to each study’s inclusion and exclusion criteria. For example, Song et al.26 only included mild to moderate patients. Also, they excluded patients with less than 95% oxygen saturation, immunocompromised patients, or patients with comorbidities. Furthermore, even though Yu et al. included patients with comorbidities and weakened immune systems, their trial was conducted remotely in primary care centers.25 Nevertheless, Alsultan’s sample was isolated in hospitalized patients with less than 93% oxygen saturation plus other symptoms such as a respiratory rate of less than 30 per min or a CT scan with infiltrate > 50%.23 Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further research on this topic. As we have seen in the pandemic, reducing the length of stay (LOS) in the hospital could also be a lifesaving measure for many other patients. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) may have the potential to decrease the duration of hospitalization by lowering the inflammation in the body.16 In vitro research has demonstrated that ICS has antiviral effects through the downregulation of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 gene expression, which have an essential role in the virus’s entrance to the cell47 and decreased SARS-CoV-2 replication in epithelial cells of the airway.48 Our study collected the evidence and concluded that ICS might significantly lower LOSs.

Two studies examined the effects of ICS on time to recovery from COVID-19 symptoms.17,23 Ramakrishnan et al. reported a significant difference between the ICS and placebo groups.17 At the same time, the meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the ICS group and the placebo. However, this outcome is very subjective, and studies could not rely on it alone in the investigation. As a result, studies with larger populations are needed.

Limitations

The studies included in our meta-analysis were at moderate risk of bias, so higher-quality RCTs are warranted. We are the first meta-analysis to investigate the VAS smell score, mortality, and LOS outcomes. However, several limitations can affect our analysis. First, pooling patients of different health statuses may affect the data’s validity. Including six unblinded RCTs may also affect the results by reporting bias.17,23–27 Secondly, the heterogeneity could not be resolved in the improvement of the VAS score and time-sustained self-reported cure outcomes, leading to the placebo effect and selection bias. Therefore, this could affect the significance of the results regarding the clinical practice. Third, studies in this meta-analysis were conducted in different waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, and patients had different circumstances.

We recommend more RCTs on the effect of ICS and INC in COVID-19 patients with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up durations. Also, more RCTs should be done to compare ICS and INC treatment with moderate and severe COVID-19 infection in terms of efficacy and safety outcomes.

Conclusion

We concluded that ICS significantly decreases patient LOS, and INC may have a role in improving the smell score. The ICS also enhances recovery from COVID-19-related symptoms. On the other hand, neither ICS nor INC affects mortality rates or time to self-reported recovery. Our conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to the mixed results and small sample sizes of the included studies.

Contributors

All authors contributed to the conception or design of the work, the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of the data. All authors were involved in drafting and commenting on the paper and have approved the final version.

Competing interests

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form and declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not required for this article type.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

AI Statement

The authors confirm that no generative AI or AI-assisted technology was used to generate content.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table 1. Systematic Literature Search

Supplementary Table 2: GRADE Assessment

Supplementary Figure 1. Forest plot of Improvements in smell scores (VAS smell score)(after excluding Kasiri et al)

Supplementary Figure 2: Forest plot of time to self-reported recovery (day)
==== Refs
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Situation Report 2022 Organization W.H. https://covid19.who.int/ Available from:
Symptoms, complications and management of long COVID: a review Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Aiyegbusi Olalekan Lee Hughes Sarah E Turner Grace Rivera Samantha Cruz McMullan Christel Chandan Joht Singh Haroon Shamil Price Gary Davies Elin Haf Nirantharakumar Krishnarajah Sapey Elizabeth Calvert Melanie J on behalf of the TLC Study Group SAGE Publications 15 7 2021
114 9 428 442 0141-0768 10.1177/01410768211032850 10.1177/01410768211032850 34265229
Fatigue and cognitive impairment in Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis Brain, Behavior, and Immunity Ceban Felicia Ling Susan Lui Leanna M.W. Lee Yena Gill Hartej Teopiz Kayla M. Rodrigues Nelson B. Subramaniapillai Mehala Di Vincenzo Joshua D. Cao Bing Lin Kangguang Mansur Rodrigo B. Ho Roger C. Rosenblat Joshua D. Miskowiak Kamilla W. Vinberg Maj Maletic Vladimir McIntyre Roger S. 3 2022
101 93 135 0889-1591 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.12.020 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.12.020 34973396
Prevalence of post-COVID-19 symptoms in hospitalized and non-hospitalized COVID-19 survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis European Journal of Internal Medicine Fernández-de-Las-Peñas César Palacios-Ceña Domingo Gómez-Mayordomo Víctor Florencio Lidiane L Cuadrado María L. Plaza-Manzano Gustavo Navarro-Santana Marcos 10 2021
92 55 70 0953-6205 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.06.009 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.06.009 34167876
Post-COVID-19 Symptom Burden: What is Long-COVID and How Should We Manage It? Lung Sykes Dominic L. Holdsworth Luke Jawad Nadia Gunasekera Pumali Morice Alyn H. Crooks Michael G. Springer Science and Business Media LLC 11 2 2021
199 2 113 119 0341-2040 10.1007/s00408-021-00423-z 10.1007/s00408-021-00423-z 33569660
Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines American Journal of Therapeutics Bryant Andrew Lawrie Theresa A. Dowswell Therese Fordham Edmund J. Mitchell Scott Hill Sarah R. Tham Tony C. 21 6 2021
28 4 e434 e460 1075-2765 10.1097/mjt.0000000000001402 10.1097/mjt.0000000000001402 34145166
Remdesivir and three other drugs for hospitalised patients with COVID-19: final results of the WHO Solidarity randomised trial and updated meta-analyses The Lancet 5 2022
399 10339 1941 1953 0140-6736 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00519-0 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00519-0 35512728
Use of hydroxychloroquine to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection and treat mild COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia Tanni Suzana E. Bacha Hélio A. Naime Alexandre Bernardo Wanderley M. 31 10 2021
47 5 e20210236 1806-3756 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210236 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210236 34669839
Efficacy and harms of tocilizumab for the treatment of COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis PLoS One Piscoya Alejandro Parra Del Riego Angela Cerna-Viacava Renato Rocco Jonathon Roman Yuani M. Escobedo Angel A. Pasupuleti Vinay White C. Michael Hernandez Adrian V. 3 6 2022
17 6 e0269368 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone.0269368 10.1371/journal.pone.0269368 35657993
Antibody and cellular therapies for treatment of covid-19: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis BMJ Siemieniuk Reed AC Bartoszko Jessica J Díaz Martinez Juan Pablo Kum Elena Qasim Anila Zeraatkar Dena Izcovich Ariel Mangala Sophia Ge Long Han Mi Ah Agoritsas Thomas Arnold Donald Ávila Camila Chu Derek K Couban Rachel Cusano Ellen Darzi Andrea J Devji Tahira Foroutan Farid Ghadimi Maryam Khamis Assem Lamontagne Francois Loeb Mark Miroshnychenko Anna Motaghi Sharhzad Murthy Srinivas Mustafa Reem A Rada Gabriel Rochwerg Bram Switzer Charlotte Vandvik Per O Vernooij Robin WM Wang Ying Yao Liang Guyatt Gordon H Brignardello-Petersen Romina 23 9 2021
374 n2231 1756-1833 10.1136/bmj.n2231 10.1136/bmj.n2231 34556486
Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in COVID-19 based on evidence for COVID-19, other coronavirus infections, influenza, community-acquired pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis Canadian Medical Association Journal Ye Zhikang Wang Ying Colunga-Lozano Luis Enrique Prasad Manya Tangamornsuksan Wimonchat Rochwerg Bram Yao Liang Motaghi Shahrzad Couban Rachel J. Ghadimi Maryam Bala Malgorzata M. Gomaa Huda Fang Fang Xiao Yingqi Guyatt Gordon H. CMA Joule Inc. 14 5 2020
192 27 E756 E767 0820-3946 10.1503/cmaj.200645 10.1503/cmaj.200645 32409522
Corticosteroids in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis Intensive Care Medicine Chaudhuri Dipayan Sasaki Kiyoka Karkar Aram Sharif Sameer Lewis Kimberly Mammen Manoj J. Alexander Paul Ye Zhikang Lozano Luis Enrique Colunga Munch Marie Warrer Perner Anders Du Bin Mbuagbaw Lawrence Alhazzani Waleed Pastores Stephen M. Marshall John Lamontagne François Annane Djillali Meduri Gianfranco Umberto Rochwerg Bram Springer Science and Business Media LLC 19 4 2021
47 5 521 537 0342-4642 10.1007/s00134-021-06394-2 10.1007/s00134-021-06394-2 33876268
A systematic review of corticosteroid treatment for noncritically ill patients with COVID-19 Scientific Reports Shuto Hisayuki Komiya Kosaku Yamasue Mari Uchida Sonoe Ogura Takashi Mukae Hiroshi Tateda Kazuhiro Hiramatsu Kazufumi Kadota Jun-ichi Springer Science and Business Media LLC 1 12 2020
10 1 20935 2045-2322 10.1038/s41598-020-78054-2 10.1038/s41598-020-78054-2 33262415
COVID-19–related Genes in Sputum Cells in Asthma. Relationship to Demographic Features and Corticosteroids [published correction appears in Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec 15;202(12):1744-1746] American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Peters Michael C. Sajuthi Satria Deford Peter Christenson Stephanie Rios Cydney L. Montgomery Michael T. Woodruff Prescott G. Mauger David T. Erzurum Serpil C. Johansson Mats W. Denlinger Loren C. Jarjour Nizar N. Castro Mario Hastie Annette T. Moore Wendy Ortega Victor E. Bleecker Eugene R. Wenzel Sally E. Israel Elliot Levy Bruce D. Seibold Max A. Fahy John V. 1 7 2020
202 1 83 90 1073-449X 10.1164/rccm.202003-0821oc 10.1164/rccm.202003-0821oc 32348692
Inhaled corticosteroids downregulate SARS-CoV-2-related genes in COPD: results from a randomised controlled trial European Respiratory Journal Milne Stephen Li Xuan Yang Chen Xi Leitao Filho Fernando Sergio Hernández Cordero Ana I. Yang Cheng Wei Tony Shaipanich Tawimas van Eeden Stephan F. Leung Janice M. Lam Stephen Sin Don D. European Respiratory Society (ERS) 1 4 2021
58 1 2100130 0903-1936 10.1183/13993003.00130-2021 10.1183/13993003.00130-2021 33795322
Early Th2 inflammation in the upper respiratory mucosa as a predictor of severe COVID-19 and modulation by early treatment with inhaled corticosteroids: a mechanistic analysis[published correction appears in Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Jun;10(6):e60] The Lancet Respiratory Medicine Baker Jonathan R. Mahdi Mahdi Nicolau Dan V., Jr. Ramakrishnan Sanjay Barnes Peter J. Simpson Jodie L. Cass Steven P. Russell Richard E. K. Donnelly Louise E. Bafadhel Mona 6 2022
10 6 545 556 2213-2600 10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00002-9 10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00002-9 35397798
Inhaled budesonide in the treatment of early COVID-19 (STOIC): a phase 2, open-label, randomised controlled trial [published correction appears in Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jun;9(6):e55] The Lancet Respiratory Medicine Ramakrishnan Sanjay Nicolau Dan V., Jr. Langford Beverly Mahdi Mahdi Jeffers Helen Mwasuku Christine Krassowska Karolina Fox Robin Binnian Ian Glover Victoria Bright Stephen Butler Christopher Cane Jennifer L Halner Andreas Matthews Philippa C Donnelly Louise E Simpson Jodie L Baker Jonathan R Fadai Nabil T Peterson Stefan Bengtsson Thomas Barnes Peter J Russell Richard E K Bafadhel Mona 7 2021
9 7 763 772 2213-2600 10.1016/s2213-2600(21)00160-0 10.1016/s2213-2600(21)00160-0 33844996
Inhaled and intranasal ciclesonide for the treatment of covid-19 in adult outpatients: CONTAIN phase II randomised controlled trial BMJ Ezer Nicole Belga Sara Daneman Nick Chan Adrienne Smith Benjamin M Daniels Shay-Anne Moran Kristen Besson Charlotte Smyth Louisa Y Bartlett Susan J Benedetti Andrea Martin James G Lee Todd C McDonald Emily G 2 11 2021
375 e068060 1756-1833 10.1136/bmj-2021-068060 10.1136/bmj-2021-068060 34728476
Efficacy of Inhaled Ciclesonide for Outpatient Treatment of Adolescents and Adults With Symptomatic COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA Internal Medicine Clemency Brian M. Varughese Renoj Gonzalez-Rojas Yaneicy Morse Caryn G. Phipatanakul Wanda Koster David J. Blaiss Michael S. 1 1 2022
182 1 42 49 2168-6106 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6759 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6759 34807241
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement Annals of Internal Medicine Moher David Liberati A. Tetzlaff J. Altman D.G. 18 8 2009
151 4 264 0003-4819 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials BMJ Higgins J. P. T. Altman D. G. Gotzsche P. C. Juni P. Moher D. Oxman A. D. Savovic J. Schulz K. F. Weeks L. Sterne J. A. C. Cochrane Bias Methods Group Cochrane Statistical Methods Group 18 10 2011
343 d5928 0959-8138 10.1136/bmj.d5928 10.1136/bmj.d5928 22008217
GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool McMaster University and Evidence Prime 2022
http://gradepro.org
Efficacy of Colchicine and Budesonide in Improvement Outcomes of Patients with Coronavirus Infection 2019 in Damascus, Syria: A Randomized Control Trial Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases Alsultan Mohammad Obeid Ameer Alsamarrai Omar Anan Mohamed Taher Bakr Aliaa Soliman Nawwar Kurdy Mamdoh Mosa Muhannad Hag Saleh Zain Hujij Fatima Barhoum Jafar 31 12 2021
2021 2129006 1 7 1687-7098 10.1155/2021/2129006 10.1155/2021/2129006 34984065
Inhaled ciclesonide for outpatient treatment of COVID-19 in adults at risk of adverse outcomes: a randomised controlled trial (COVERAGE) Clinical Microbiology and Infection Duvignaud Alexandre Lhomme Edouard Onaisi Racha Sitta Rémi Gelley Ambre Chastang Julie Piroth Lionel Binquet Christine Dupouy Julie Makinson Alain Lefèvre Benjamin Naccache Jean-Marc Roussillon Caroline Landman Roland Wallet Cédrick Karcher Sophie Journot Valérie Nguyen Duc Pistone Thierry Bouchet Stéphane Lafon Marie-Edith Molimard Mathieu Thiébaut Rodolphe de Lamballerie Xavier Joseph Jean-Philippe Richert Laura Saint-Lary Olivier Djabarouti Sarah Wittkop Linda Anglaret Xavier Malvy Denis 7 2022
28 7 1010 1016 1198-743X 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.02.031 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.02.031 35304280
Inhaled budesonide for COVID-19 in people at high risk of complications in the community in the UK (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial [published correction appears in Lancet. 2021 Aug 18;:] The Lancet Yu Ly-Mee Bafadhel Mona Dorward Jienchi Hayward Gail Saville Benjamin R Gbinigie Oghenekome Van Hecke Oliver Ogburn Emma Evans Philip H Thomas Nicholas P B Patel Mahendra G Richards Duncan Berry Nicholas Detry Michelle A Saunders Christina Fitzgerald Mark Harris Victoria Shanyinde Milensu de Lusignan Simon Andersson Monique I Barnes Peter J Russell Richard E K Nicolau Dan V Jr Ramakrishnan Sanjay Hobbs F D Richard Butler Christopher C Yu Ly-Mee Bafadhel Mona Dorward Jienchi Hayward Gail Saville Benjamin R Gbinigie Oghenekome van Hecke Oliver Ogburn Emma Evans Philip H Thomas Nicholas PB Patel Mahendra G Richards Duncan Berry Nicholas Detry Michelle A Saunders Christina T Fitzgerald Mark Harris Victoria Shanyinde Milensu de Lusignan Simon Andersson Monique I Barnes Peter J Russell Richard EK Nicolau Dan V Ramakrishnan Sanjay Hobbs FD Richard Butler Christopher C 9 2021
398 10303 843 855 0140-6736 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01744-x 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01744-x 34388395
Ciclesonide Inhaler Treatment for Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 2 Trial Journal of Clinical Medicine Song Joon-Young Yoon Jin-Gu Seo Yu-Bin Lee Jacob Eom Joong-Sik Lee Jin-Soo Choi Won-Suk Lee Eun-Young Choi Young-Ah Hyun Hak-Jun Seong Hye Noh Ji-Yun Cheong Hee-Jin Kim Woo-Joo 12 8 2021
10 16 3545 2077-0383 10.3390/jcm10163545 10.3390/jcm10163545 34441840
Corticosteroid nasal spray for recovery of smell sensation in COVID-19 patients: A randomized controlled trial American Journal of Otolaryngology Abdelalim Abdelrahman Ahmed Mohamady Ayman Abdelaal Elsayed Rasha Abdelhamid Elawady Mona Ahmed Ghallab Abdelhakim Fouad 3 2021
42 2 102884 0196-0709 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102884 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102884 33429174
Mometasone furoate nasal spray in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction: A randomized, double blind clinical trial International Immunopharmacology Kasiri Hossein Rouhani Nima Salehifar Ebrahim Ghazaeian Monireh Fallah Sahar 9 2021
98 107871 1567-5769 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107871 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107871 34147912
Intranasal Corticosteroid Treatment on Recovery of Long-Term Olfactory Dysfunction Due to COVID-19 The Laryngoscope Hosseinpoor Masoumeh Kabiri Mona Rajati Haghi Mohsen Ghadam Soltani Toktam Rezaei Alireza Faghfouri Atiyeh Poustchian Gholkhatmi Zahra Bakhshaee Mehdi 25 8 2022
132 11 2209 2216 0023-852X 10.1002/lary.30353 10.1002/lary.30353 36054369
Mechanism of Anosmia Caused by Symptoms of COVID-19 and Emerging Treatments ACS Chemical Neuroscience Najafloo Raziyeh Majidi Jila Asghari Alimohamad Aleemardani Mina Kamrava Seyed Kamran Simorgh Sara Seifalian Amelia Bagher Zohreh Seifalian Alexander M. American Chemical Society (ACS) 5 10 2021
12 20 3795 3805 1948-7193 10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00477 10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00477 34609841
COVID-19 and anosmia: A review based on up-to-date knowledge American Journal of Otolaryngology Meng Xiangming Deng Yanzhong Dai Zhiyong Meng Zhisheng 9 2020
41 5 102581 0196-0709 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102581 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102581 32563019
The prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in covid-19 - A systematic review Auris Nasus Larynx Wu Daniel Wang Victoria Y. Chen Ya-Hui Ku Chih-Hung Wang Pa-Chun Elsevier BV 4 2022
49 2 165 175 0385-8146 10.1016/j.anl.2021.07.007 10.1016/j.anl.2021.07.007 34332803
Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients Infected with 2019 Novel Coronavirus Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Bakhshaee Mehdi Barzegar-Amini Maral Motedayen Zohreh Khojasteh-Taheri Roshanak Rafiee Mahdi Amini Mahnaz Layegh Parvaneh Hashemzadeh Kamila Omidvar Delaram H. Hwang Peter Hosseinpoor Masoomeh 5 2021
33 3 163 171 10.22038/ijorl.2021.51614.2750 10.22038/ijorl.2021.51614.2750 34222108
Effect of Ultra-Micronized Palmitoylethanolamide and Luteolin on Olfaction and Memory in Patients with Long COVID: Results of a Longitudinal Study Cells De Luca Pietro Camaioni Angelo Marra Pasquale Salzano Giovanni Carriere Giovanni Ricciardi Luca Pucci Resi Montemurro Nicola Brenner Michael J. Di Stadio Arianna MDPI AG 17 8 2022
11 16 2552 2073-4409 10.3390/cells11162552 10.3390/cells11162552 36010630
Efficacy and Safety of Saline Nasal Irrigation Plus Theophylline for Treatment of COVID-19-Related Olfactory Dysfunction: The SCENT2 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Gupta Shruti Lee Jake J. Perrin Amber Khan Amish Smith Harrison J. Farrell Nyssa Kallogjeri Dorina Piccirillo Jay F. 1 9 2022
148 9 830 837 2168-6181 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.1573 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.1573 35797024
Omega-3 supplementation in postviral olfactory dysfunction: a pilot study Rhinology journal Hernandez A.K. Woosch D. Haehner A. Hummel T. 3 2 2022
60 2 139 144 0300-0729 10.4193/rhin21.378 10.4193/rhin21.378
Efficacy and safety of oral corticosteroids and olfactory training in the management of COVID-19-related loss of smell European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Le Bon Serge-Daniel Konopnicki Deborah Pisarski Nathalie Prunier Léa Lechien Jérôme R. Horoi Mihaela Springer Science and Business Media LLC 9 1 2021
278 8 3113 3117 0937-4477 10.1007/s00405-020-06520-8 10.1007/s00405-020-06520-8 33423106
Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of Oral and Nasal Corticosteroids in COVID-19 Patients with Olfactory Dysfunction: A European Multicenter Study Pathogens Saussez Sven Vaira Luigi Chiesa-Estomba Carlos Le Bon Serge Horoi Mihaela Deiana Giovanna Petrocelli Marzia Boelpaep Philippe Salzano Giovanni Khalife Mohamad Hans Stephane De Riu Giacomo Hopkins Claire Lechien Jerome MDPI AG 4 6 2021
10 6 698 2076-0817 10.3390/pathogens10060698 10.3390/pathogens10060698 34199734
Efficacy of corticosteroid therapy in the treatment of long- lasting olfactory disorders in COVID-19 patients Rhinology journal Vaira L.A. Hopkins C. Petrocelli M. Lechien J.R. Cutrupi S. Salzano G. Chiesa-Estomba C.M. Saussez S. De Riu G. 2021
59 1 21 25 0300-0729 10.4193/rhin20.515 10.4193/rhin20.515
The outcome of fluticasone nasal spray on anosmia and triamcinolone oral paste in dysgeusia in COVID-19 patients American Journal of Otolaryngology Singh Chandra Veer Jain Shraddha Parveen Sana 5 2021
42 3 102892 0196-0709 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102892 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102892 33493729
Effect of nasal corticosteroid in the treatment of anosmia due to COVID-19: A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study American Journal of Otolaryngology Rashid Rasheed Ali Zgair Atheer Al-Ani Raid M. 9 2021
42 5 103033 0196-0709 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103033 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103033 33839489
Time course of anosmia and dysgeusia in patients with mild SARS-CoV-2 infection Infectious Diseases Levinson Ruth Elbaz Meital Ben-Ami Ronen Shasha David Levinson Tal Choshen Guy Petrov Ksenia Gadoth Avi Paran Yael 18 6 2020
52 8 600 602 2374-4235 10.1080/23744235.2020.1772992 10.1080/23744235.2020.1772992
The effect of inhaled corticosteroids on the outcomes of patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology Chen Chao-Hsien Wang Cheng-Yi Wang Ya-Hui Chen Ching-Yi Chen Kuang-Hung Lai Chih-Cheng Wei Yu-Feng Fu Pin-Kuei 4 5 2022
15 5 593 600 1751-2433 10.1080/17512433.2022.2094769 10.1080/17512433.2022.2094769 35786288
Inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Griesel Mirko Wagner Carina Mikolajewska Agata Stegemann Miriam Fichtner Falk Metzendorf Maria-Inti Nair Avinash Anil Daniel Jefferson Fischer Anna-Lena Skoetz Nicole 9 3 2022
2022 3 CD015125 1465-1858 10.1002/14651858.cd015125 10.1002/14651858.cd015125 35262185
Inhaled ciclesonide for outpatients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection Hsu Chi-Kuei Chao Chien-Ming Lai Chih-Cheng 12 2022
55 6 Pt 1 1129 1130 1684-1182 10.1016/j.jmii.2022.08.002 10.1016/j.jmii.2022.08.002 35995666
Inhaled bronchodilators use and clinical course of adult inpatients with Covid-19 pneumonia in Spain: A retrospective cohort study Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Villamañán Elena Sobrino Carmen Carpio Carlos Moreno Marta Arancón Ana Lara Catalina Pérez Ester Jiménez Carlos Zamarrón Ester Jiménez-Nácher Inmaculada Herrero Alicia Álvarez-Sala Rodolfo 8 2021
69 102007 1094-5539 10.1016/j.pupt.2021.102007 10.1016/j.pupt.2021.102007 34129946
Inhaled corticosteroids downregulate the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 in COPD through suppression of type I interferon Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Finney Lydia J. Glanville Nicholas Farne Hugo Aniscenko Julia Fenwick Peter Kemp Samuel V. Trujillo-Torralbo Maria-Belen Loo Su Ling Calderazzo Maria Adelaide Wedzicha Jadwiga A. Mallia Patrick Bartlett Nathan W. Johnston Sebastian L. Singanayagam Aran 2 2021
147 2 510 519.e5 0091-6749 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.09.034 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.09.034 33068560
Inhibitory effects of glycopyrronium, formoterol, and budesonide on coronavirus HCoV-229E replication and cytokine production by primary cultures of human nasal and tracheal epithelial cells Respiratory Investigation Yamaya Mutsuo Nishimura Hidekazu Deng Xue Sugawara Mitsuru Watanabe Oshi Nomura Kazuhiro Shimotai Yoshitaka Momma Haruki Ichinose Masakazu Kawase Tetsuaki 5 2020
58 3 155 168 2212-5345 10.1016/j.resinv.2019.12.005 10.1016/j.resinv.2019.12.005 32094077
