
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

36793569
65894
10.26603/001c.65894
Case Reports
The “Mother Load” and Return to Sport: A Case Report of Returning to Professional Netball Following Cesarean Section
Diggles Alexandra
Corresponding author: Alexandra Diggles. BPhty (Hons.), MPHealth Pelviology Physiotherapy. Address: Brisbane 4169, Australia. Email: info@alexandradiggles.com/
1 2 2023
2023
18 1 228239
21 3 2022
10 10 2022
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background

Increasing numbers of elite female athletes are competing in professional sport, and many wish to become pregnant and return to competitive sport after childbirth. Athletes have a higher risk of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) than non-athletes (54% versus 7%) and there is also an increased prevalence in post-partum women compared to nulliparous women (35% versus 2.8-7.9%). Additionally, PFD has been shown to influence athletic performance. High quality evidence for elite athletes is lacking, and there are no exercise guidelines specifically for these women to prepare or effectively guide their safe return to sport (RTS). The purpose of this case report is to detail the management of an elite athlete who presented following cesarean section (CS) with the goal of RTS within 16 weeks.

Case Description

A 27-year-old primiparous Caucasian professional netballer presented at four weeks post- caesarean section (CS) for RTS screening and assessment of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function. Assessment included readiness and fear of movement screening, dynamic pelvic floor muscle function, structural integrity of the CS wound, levator hiatal dimensions, bladder neck descent, and early global neuromuscular screening. Measures were collected at four weeks, eight weeks, and six months post-partum. The post-partum athlete demonstrated alterations in pelvic floor muscle function, reduced lower limb power and psychological readiness. A functionally staged dynamic and sport specific pelvic floor muscle training program was implemented and adapted to the patient for her early post-partum timeline.

Results

Rehabilitation strategies were effective in achieving the primary outcome of RTS at 16 weeks post-partum with no adverse events reported at 6 months follow-up.

Discussion

This case highlights the need for a holistic and individualised RTS management approach that includes women’s and pelvic health risk factors in a professional athlete.

Level of Evidence

5

cesarean section
female athlete
pelvic floor dysfunction
post-partum
return to sport
The author does not have any financial or personal relationship with people or organizations that may inappropriately bias the work.
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Female participation in elite sport has increased significantly in the last 10 years.1,2 Athletes returning to sport post-partum is also more common. Limited evidenced-based protocols, established time frames or injury risk data exist to guide the post-partum athlete’s return to sport (RTS).2,3 Athletes have a higher risk of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) than non-athletes (54% versus 7%)4–6 and there is also an increased prevalence in post-partum women compared to nulliparous women (35% versus 2.8-7.9%).5,7,8 It is suspected that there is an increased risk of PFD for post-partum athletes and therefore there is a need to identify best-practice for RTS in this population.

There are mixed reports of the optimal timeline for returning to sport post-partum. A recent editorial advocates for a multidisciplinary, biopsychosocial injury rehabilitation model for postpartum return to high impact activities yet such a model has not been investigated.9 Evidence suggests that 71% of athletes return to training within six weeks post-partum.10 Similarly, survey data indicates that 40% of post-partum recreational runners return to running at four weeks11 and 78% at 12 weeks.12 Contrary to this, guidelines based on expert opinion for return to running identify potential risk factors in returning to running in the first three months post-partum.8 The prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) or vaginal heaviness was reported by more than 30% and musculoskeletal pain by 84% in early post-partum runners.12 Urinary incontinence increases the risk of having musculoskeletal pain with running (RR 1.97 95% CI (1.37, 2.84)12 and negatively influences performance and participation.13 Additionally, authors have shown reduced abdominal wall strength post-partum irrespective of delivery mode which may contribute to poor trunk control, PFD and suboptimal RTS.14 Given the high rates of PFD and pain in post-partum women returning to exercise and the influence on performance, there is a clear need to evaluate PFD within a global neuromuscular assessment prior to RTS.

The purpose of this case report is to detail the management of an elite athlete who presented following cesarean section (CS) with the goal of RTS within 16 weeks. It draws on the current sports literature of physical and psychosocial factors that influence successful RTS15,16 and factors specific to post-partum RTS, referred to herein as the “mother load”.17

CASE DESCRIPTION

GT, a 27-year-old primiparous caucasian professional netballer presented at four weeks post-CS for RTS screening and assessment of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function. Her healthcare team included a sports physiotherapist, performance manager, coach, dietician, psychologist, obstetrician, sports physician, and pelvic health physiotherapist (author). GT consented to this case being published.

Patient History

GT had been playing elite netball for 10-years and had no time off training or playing due to injury. Prior to childbirth, she had no prior urinary or anal incontinence, obstructive emptying or sexual health concerns during sport or daily life.

GT reported coping well throughout pregnancy and in the acute post-partum phase. Her weight gain during pregnancy was within normal range (11.5-16Kg) based on her pre-pregnancy body mass index.18 She experienced minimal medical, musculoskeletal, or pelvic health issues during pregnancy and continued to train non-contested with the netball team until 30 weeks gestation, remaining physically active until birth in line with current guidelines.19,20 She did not complete pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy. There was no other relevant medical history.

GT underwent an elective low segment CS with standard wound closure due to breech presentation.17,21 There were no peri-operative or post-operative complications for mother or infant. Lochia stopped at three weeks post-partum. Breastfeeding was established on day four with no latching concerns, nipple, or breast discomfort. GT and infant were discharged on day five, a standard length of stay in an Australian private hospital. GT reported having a small pre-pregnancy breast size and an insignificant size increase.22 GT reported being well supported personally and by her team and team support staff. She reported her post-partum weight at her four-week initial review was 5Kg greater than pre-pregnancy.

At four weeks post-CS, she was walking 30 minutes daily at a casual pace and performing two sessions per week of three sets of light intensity unweighted squats and lunges (rate of perceived exertion 2-3/10).20 There was no itching, discolouration, or discomfort around the scar.21 She did not report any symptoms, nor bother related to her pelvic floor function.23 She had not returned to sexual activity. She reported general fatigue and an average of six to eight hours accumulated sleep per night. When asked, GT identified some concerns with RTS: “birth can cause pelvic floor muscle injury and prolapse and that it can get worse if you do the wrong thing”.

Patient Goals

Play in round one of the national competition at 16 weeks post-partum

Assess her individual PFD risk

Commence pre-season training at 12 weeks post-partum

Continue to exclusively breastfeed for the first six months post-partum

Evaluation

GT’s history suggested a low predictive risk of PFD16,24 confirmed by the validated Australian pelvic floor questionnaire (APFQ) (Appendix A).23 Psychosocial screening evaluated factors known to influence RTS and post-partum wellbeing including post-partum depression and anxiety, sleep quality, readiness to return to sport, and fear of movement scales (Table 1).9,15,17

132093 Table 1. Outcome measures and examination findings at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 6-month follow-up

Outcome measure	4 weeks	8 weeks	6 months
post-⁠partum	
Psychosocial screening	EPDS (_/30)
The higher the EPDS score, the higher the likelihood of a depressive illness of varying severity	0	1	1	
DASS -21 (subgroup scores _/18-24)
DASS-21 measures the severity of emotional symptoms from within normal limits (low score) to extremely severe (highest score)	Depression 0
Anxiety3
Stress 4	Depression 0
Anxiety 2
Stress 2	Depression 0
Anxiety 2
Stress 2	
APFQ23 (domain score _/10)
The additive score for each domain is the divided by the number of questions to give an evenly weighted score for each domain. Higher scores relate to worse function.	Bladder 0.04
Bowel 0.08
Sexual 0
POP 0	NA	Bladder 0.02
Bowel 0.05
Sexual 0.06
POP 0	
Fatigue Symptom Inventory (_/63)
Higher values relating to greater fatigue interference	40*	25	13	
Tampa Scale Kinesiophobia (_/68)
Higher scores relating to greater fear and avoidance of movement	35	22	17	
Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport (_/100)
Higher scores relating to greater readiness	50*	75	100	
Pelvic floor muscle function	Levator ani tone^ by digital palpation in supine	Normal	Normal	Normal	
Levator ani strength^ by digital palpation in supine	Normal
Partial relaxation	Strong
Normal relaxation	Strong
Normal relaxation	
Endurance
(MVC, seconds)	8	15	15	
No. of sustained reps to volitional fatigue (MVC)	8	15	15	
Speed (No. of MVC achieved in 30 seconds)	10
Delayed recruitment and relaxation*	25	30	
Digital palpation of co-ordination with IAP (cough) in supine	Present
Weak ^, slow recruitment*	Present, strong^	NA	
Digital palpation of co-ordination with IAP (cough) in standing	Present, weak^, slow recruitment*	Present, strong^	Present, strong^	
GH+PB (rest)
GH+PB (bearing down)
Increasing size (>7cm) is highly associated with and predictive of vaginal support loss.	6 (2.5 +3.5)
7.5 (3.5 +4)	5 (2+3)
6.5 (3 +3.5)	5 (2+3)
6.5 (3 +3.5)	
Patient reported co-ordination with IAP
(DL jump) to volitional failure to control	Assessed at
8 weeks	20 in 1 minute	30 in 1 minute	
Bladder neck descent 2-Dimensional
Transperineal Ultrasound (mm)25,26	22	19	15	
IRD (calliper measure) at umbilicus (mm)27 and depth of palpable tension (mm)27	17; 10	NA	NA	
Rectus abdominis strength28	Grade 2*	Grade 3*	Grade 5	
POSAS 2.0 observer scale (_/60)	20	11	10	
POSAS 2.0 patient scale (_/60)	16	12	8	
EPDS Edinburgh post-partum depression scale | DASS-21 Depression anxiety stress scale | APFQ Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire | POP Pelvic organ prolapse | IAP Intra-abdominal pressure | ^ using International continence society grading of Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength and tone | MVC maximal voluntary contraction | GH genital hiatus is measured from the posterior fourchette to the middle of the urethral meatus and PB perineal body is measured from the posterior fourchette to the middle of the anus. | IRD inter-rectus distance with a normal value of <25mm | POSAS 2.0 The patient and observer scar assessment scale version 2.0 The lowest score is ‘1’ for each category which corresponds to the situation of normal skin. Score 10 equals the largest difference from normal skin (i.e. the worst imaginable scar or sensation). | SL single leg |DL double leg | NA not assessed as achieved normative range |WNL within normal limits |* significant reduction compared to pre-partum

Early post-partum physical performance tests were compared to pre-partum data (Appendix B) provided by GT’s sports physiotherapist, and which were relevant to early intervention (Table 2). Evidenced-informed screening for high level neuromuscular performance in netball8,15,29,30 was planned to be completed by the sports physiotherapist at eight weeks post-partum. A summary of key examination findings is found in Tables 1 and 2.

132094 Table 2. Early post-partum musculoskeletal functional screening

Outcome measure	4 weeks	8 weeks	6 months post-partum	
Musculoskeletal screening
(stage one)	SL heel raise	Left 19*
Right 17*	Left 27
Right 26	Sports physiotherapist evaluation	
SL hamstring bridge	Left 15*
Right 15*	Left 33
Right 32	
SL maximal hop for distance (cm)	Deemed not
appropriate due to wound healing	Left 215
Right 203	
DL squat	20, moderate fatigue	Tested to 25, asymptomatic	
Lunge repetitions to moderate fatigue	Left 8*
Right 7*
Good technique	Left 19
Right 17
Good technique	
Balance test single leg (seconds)
•   Eyes open
•   Eyes closed	30 seconds
15 seconds*	30 seconds
30 seconds	
SL single leg | DL double leg | * significant reduction compared to pre-partum

Diagnosis

GT did not meet diagnostic criteria for PFD such as urological or anorectal disorders, prolapse or pain syndromes31 or diastasis rectus abdominis (DRA).14,27 Given that the definition of PFM dysfunction requires patient concern and alteration in normal pelvic floor muscle function,31 GT’s examination identified sub-clinical alterations in PFM:

Neuromotor deficits

delayed recruitment (voluntary and functional)

delayed relaxation

Reduced endurance with sustained and rapid contractions

Reduced power during a rise in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP)

Musculoskeletal screening identified reduced rectus abdominis strength (as per previously published testing guidelines),14,28 reduced lower limb strength compared to her pre-partum data (Appendix B) and reduced stationary balance testing of < 30seconds.

Biopsychosocial screening identified changes commensurate to four weeks postpartum9,17 including:

Moderate fear of movement

Belief that all women are at risk of PFD post-partum impacting her ability to RTS.

Intervention

Stage one of GT’s pelvic health physiotherapy management started in the immediate post-partum phase2 as part of a collaborative and criteria based RTS model (Figure 1).8,15,29,30,32 During this stage, the pelvic health physiotherapist directed case management.

132095 Figure 1. Patient management timeline.

Blue time points represent individual evaluation with the pelvic health physiotherapist. Green time points represent key rehabilitation milestones.

Management was informed by time-based wound healing principles17,21 and criterion-based assessments such as asymptomatic response to exercise testing.15,20,30,32 During all stages, the patient was asked to keep a diary to record training, breastfeeding, sleep, and symptoms. Exploratory interviews with post-partum athletes suggest that social support, childcare, and training specificity are all enablers of successful return.9,17 The shared-decision and development of GT’s netball-specific exercise program considered child minding, caring needs, lactation, and GT’s availability while targeting optimal training dosage.29,32

Stage 1: Proliferative healing and preparation (up to 8 weeks post-partum)

The focus of pelvic health physiotherapy intervention in Stage 1 was:

multidisciplinary engagement

education to reduce fear of movement and address PFD beliefs

sleep optimization

wound healing

PFM rehabilitation

Obstetrician clearance to return to a graded training schedule was given at six weeks post-partum. Nutritional and psychology reviews were initiated given their link to UI2,16,17 and RTS readiness, performance, and sleep.11,15,17 DEXA scans were undertaken as per the team’s medical protocol for all athletes. For GT, this enabled monitoring of unattenuated axial bone loss associated with lactation and the consequent increased risk of bone stress injury.10,17

Individualized education sessions provided clear, simple and evidence-informed knowledge that a CS is unlikely to result in pelvic floor muscle injury.12,24 This was facilitated by a lecture-style and teach-back approach that outlined the neuromuscular changes that occur in pregnancy and compare and contrasting modes of delivery. During the teach-back discussion and when asked GT reported reduced fear of PFM injury with RTS. Other major themes of generalized education were sleep optimization,8,17 feeding postures, bra considerations,9,17,22 and timing of physical activity around expressing.2,17

Relative contraindications to early post-partum exercise were increasing longitudinal wound tension and wound pain (> 4/10).11,21 In the immediate post-partum phase, there is minimal scar integrity (< 30% tensile strength).21 Scar dressing with silicone tape and daily massage to reduce hypertrophic scarring21 were taught and patient self-efficacy confirmed. Abdominal wall compression wear during activity was recommended8,21,33 given it may be more effective than core-based exercise in the immediate post-partum phase for pain intensity and perceived function.33 Abdominal wall exercises were not specifically given, and wound pain was used to guide her response to general exercise. To minimize longitudinal scar tension, verbal and visual instructions were given to avoid trunk rotation and limit cross-body exercises.

There is insufficient evidence in pelvic floor rehabilitation guidelines regarding pain rating and training load early post-partum.8,11 In early post-partum studies, women reported no pain from commencing PFM exercises immediately post-birth, therefore early PFM training was commenced.34

GT’s PFM training program (Table 3) was developed in line with exercise prescription15,29,32 and PFM training guidelines8,20,26,30,35,36 to target GT’s impairments and train specifically for the characteristics of netball.15,29,37 Netball requires endurance and repeated explosive effort (power). Athletes involved in impact sports have been shown to have, and require above, normal PFM strength38 to withstand the increased IAP that occurs with running and jumping.2,4,6,12,36,38 The aim of this PFM training program was to achieve hypertrophy,26,35 speed of muscle recruitment during explosive tasks36 and endurance.2,26,35 Verbal feedback, digital palpation and patient verbal confirmation of awareness were used in all prescribed postures to facilitate a correct technique.35,36 Early training (week 4) focused on repeated daily exposure to achieve neural adaptation with normalisation of motor recruitment and relaxation. Initial intra-vaginal pressure biofeedback (Peritron®, discontinued, Cardio-Design, Victoria) was conducted to guide correct sub-maximal voluntary contraction and relaxation at her first session. Progressive daily PFM training has been shown to be effective in addressing PFM dysfunction26,35 with greater benefit from a combined strength and neuromotor program (Table 2, week 6).39 GT was shown how to self-progress her repetitions and postural load if the quality of PFM contraction was maintained. Progressive overload was achieved by increasing repetitions or increasing load by modifying task to challenge IAP demands.30,32,40 Recommendations were given to perform the strength-based exercise earlier in the day and the endurance-based exercise later in the day to allow for sufficient recovery.15 However, a shared-decision making approach was taken to optimise the likely times of exercise completion around breastfeeding and other childcare needs. Other strategies included metronome pacing and an activity diary to facilitate adherence.39

Stage 2: Return to training (from 8 weeks post-partum)

At her week eight assessment, GT had reduced abdominal strength compared to pre-partum. With wound and abdominal fascial strength continuing to increase to 80% at 12 weeks,2,8,17,21 graded abdominal strengthening and trunk rotation activities were permitted, with continued scar taping21 and symptom monitoring. Insufficient evidence currently exists for best-practice abdominal wall strengthening post-partum.14,41 All women post-partum, with and without a diagnosis of DRA, have reduced abdominal wall strength compared to nulliparous controls, however the importance of this remains unknown.14,41,42 Expert opinion supports a focus on integrated abdominal wall control compared to isolated muscle strength variables.43 In consideration of an integrated approach to rehabilitation, initial abdominal wall exercise was prescribed as isometric lower abdominal wall activation in supine and quadruped postures as outlined in Berg-Poppe et al41 and progression principles were applied as outlined by Christopher et al.30 Given the lack of specificity identified in the literature for post-partum abdominal wall rehabilitation,41,42 exercises were progressed when able to achieve five sets of 10, with 15-second recovery periods as based on abdominal wall training guidelines for sporting injuries.32 Quadruped exercise was progressed to add in upper limb movement once perceived as easy by GT and confirmed by the physiotherapist that there was minimal trunk deviation, no compensation, doming or breath-holding during the task. Static exercise such as plank and side plank were progressed from knee based to full versions using the same criteria of observed quality and once achieving one minute endurance, five repetitions. The abdominal wall program was completed three non-consecutive days per week.

The PFM training program was progressed to focus on power training and netball-specific dynamic exercises to induce pre-active and supra-maximal PFM contraction (Table 3).35–37 This included PFM pre-activation with a cough, a five-meter chest pass at rapid speed, lunge to knee drive, and progression from double to single leg jumping to volitional failure.36 Throwing distance, weight, IAP demand and hop distance were progressed based on symptom monitoring and perceived levels of exertion.29,30,32,40

132096 Table 3. GT’s Pelvic floor muscle training program

Training Aim	Frequency	Repetitions	Sets	Holds	Rest	Considerations	Progression	
Week 4
Focus: Neuromotor control	
Neuromotor control	2-3 times/day	10-15	3	1-2s	5s
2-3mins between sets
4-6 hourly intervals daily	Aiming for 60-70% MVC (manometry biofeedback)
Focus on relaxation
Rest with loss of quality or use of other muscle groups	Initial position: Supine with knees bent
Progress to sitting and standing	
Week 6
Focus: Progressive power and dynamic control	
Hypertrophy	Daily	3-4	3	2s	10s
2-3mins between sets	Aim for MVC
Focus on fast ramp-up <1s
Metronome app as auditory cue	Reduced rest time to 5 secs
Aim for volitional failure
Self-progression to seated or standing	
Endurance	Daily	8-12	3	8-10s	10s
2-3mins between sets	Aim for 80% MVC	3 sets 8x8s holds
2 sets 12x8s holds
3 sets 12x10s holds	
Neuromotor
control	1-2 times/day	15-20	2	-	5s
2-3mins between sets	Aiming for fast pre-activation and hold during task
Task:
Stand to sit
Seated shoulder press	Progressive load to achieve moderate exertion
e.g Holding infant or increased weight with shoulder press	
Week 8
Focus: Increased co-activation in dynamic tasks	
Power/
Endurance	Daily	15	3	10s	10s
2-3mins between sets	Fast MVC
Fast ramp up <1s	Upright with upper body weight	
Neuromotor control	2-3 times per week
>48hours rest between sessions	1 minute	3		2-3mins between sets	Fast MVC
Task:
Cough
Knee drive
Chest pass
DL Jump	Added upper body or ankle weight
Increased jump/hop distance
Single leg hop	
Week 16
Focus: Confidence and integration into training regime	
Power/
Endurance	3 times per week	15	3-4	10s	10s
2-3mins between sets	Fast MVC
Seated or standing with load	Increased upper body load	
Neuromotor	3 times per week	15-20	2-3		2-3mins between sets	Dynamic multi-directional stepping/hopping	Level of load and task progressed to perceived difficulty	
MVC maximal voluntary contraction | NA Not Applicable | SL Single Leg | DL Double leg | s seconds | mins minutes

Having attained normal PFM function and being asymptomatic during Stage 1 functional testing, GT commenced a return to run program at 10 weeks post-partum.29

Stage 3: Return to Sport (14 weeks post-partum)

Ongoing PFM training was integrated into GT’s conditioning sessions to maintain function following the 12-week training program. Her program included PFM control during multi-directional stepping/hopping to volitional failure and PFM endurance.36 GT was prescribed PFM training three times per week to align with exercise prescription guidelines for rest and recovery given her high intensity training load at this stage.9,15,32,37 Abdominal wall exercise included cross-body control with load and progressive balance demands, and ongoing plank and quadruped exercise. Scar taping was ceased. Throwing and catching drills with reaching outside base of support provided ongoing challenge for abdominal function.

Follow-up and Outcomes

The primary outcome was successful return to full match play at 16 weeks post-partum. Reassessment at six months post-partum identified improved PFM function. There was no injury reported during the season. GT continued successfully breastfeeding. As little is known about early post-partum recovery and the influence of high-impact activity,2,8,17,44 a six-month review identified no de novo PFD. A critical component of GT’s successful RTS was communication between all stakeholders and consideration of all biopsychosocial factors.9,17 GT provided her perspective on RTS: “It has really helped having Netball (state) and the state team, they’ve been amazing.” Her satisfaction with intervention:”It was really well planned out for me; it was very doable”.

DISCUSSION

Current post-partum guidelines do not provide clear criteria to evaluate a post-partum athlete prior to RTS, however several criteria have been suggested when returning to sport following injury: pain/symptom free clinical evaluation, minimal range of motion/strength deficits, sport specific functional field testing, and no apprehension during full effort.10,15,29 These criteria can be applied in pelvic health to evaluate a holistic post-partum RTS management plan.

Clinical evaluation for post-partum RTS should include screening for PFD risk factors. Pre-existing PFD risk factors include: pre-pregnancy symptoms, prior vigorous exercise, depression and recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI).7,24,25 Most significantly, pre-pregnancy symptoms (and severity) are associated with a 15-17 times increased risk of persistent UI or urgency24 and these are the most prevalent symptoms in athletes.6,24 In a multivariate analysis, vigorous exercise (> 4 times per week), depression and rUTI were all associated with a 40-200% increased risk of post-partum PFD.16 While exercise status correlates with greater risk of developing symptoms, recent studies identify a two- to three-fold increased chance of earlier return to running with higher weekly running volumes and running during pregnancy.11,12,44 Therefore, both volume of exercise and the presence of PFD need to be evaluated. The author suggests that ante-natal screening for PFD, knowledge of an athlete’s exercise habits, and the use of a validated PFD screening questionnaire23 may identify risk factors as well as identify athletes antenatally that would benefit from assessment and intervention. In GT’s case, an asymptomatic history was an enabling factor for RTS.

Fascial support and pelvic floor resting position have a direct influence on urethral closing pressure and the development of PFD.26,38 Tissue distensibility increases during pregnancy irrespective of delivery mode.45 Many studies identify increased rates of UI, POP and anal incontinence (AI) with longitudinal studies reporting birthing mode as an independent risk factor.24 While CS has been shown to be protective for the incidence of urinary symptoms and prolapse (POP),7 pregnancy may change the risk profile during the immediate post-partum phase for an asymptomatic athlete, sub-optimal function should also be addressed to achieve RTS. In relation to CS birth, there is no significant difference of pelvic floor morphology and bladder neck mobility during pregnancy and post-birth with a return to pre-pregnancy values observed.45 Women experiencing vaginal heaviness were 50% less likely to return to running and this correlated with pre-pregnancy urinary symptoms, rUTI and vigorous exercise.11,12,24 Wound healing,21 self-selected timing of RTS,17 higher levels of fatigue,17 nutritional demands17 and post-operative pain2,12,17 may be a reason for a CS not being an enabling factor for return to running11 despite being a lower PFD risk.16,24 An additional factor can be the influence on abdominopelvic control. Current research suggests that abdominal wall strength and control remains reduced at 26 weeks post-partum irrespective of activity levels or type of birth.14 Unfortunately, the mixed quality and heterogeneity of the research has provided low certainty as to the type and benefit on improving function of the abdominal wall with post-partum rehabilitation.14,33,41,42

Athletes have been shown to have UI despite strong PFM, whereas increased bladder neck descent (BND) was a risk factor for UI.4,25,26,38 Similarly, excessive lengthening of the urogenital hiatus over time is an independent risk factor for UI and POP and may be related to altered perineal muscle function, repetitive high IAP as well as vaginal birth.7,25,45 Early return to heavy work post-partum has been associated with a three-times increased risk of POP symptoms.44 However, women who return to high-impact exercise early post-partum have no difference in PFM strength, reported UI or POP symptoms compared to non-exercisers at six weeks or 12 months.44 Interestingly, intensity and long training hours of athletes correlate with the onset of PFD16 suggesting chronic overload may be a risk factor versus exercise itself. This may place an athlete with a full-time training load at greater risk of developing PFD on RTS. This case study evaluated urogenital hiatus and bladder neck descent using 2D transperineal ultrasound at rest and under load, performed longitudinally to monitor structural change.25,26 A consideration for future studies would be pre- and post-training assessments of tissue distensibility and whether this correlates to the development of symptoms and influences RTS. On reflection regarding this case, earlier engagement of a pelvic health physiotherapist prior to pregnancy would have allowed better planning in the post-partum phase.9 In future practice, the acute post-partum phase (up to six weeks) would be advocated as a time for tissue restoration and building psychosocial resilience. Further multidisciplinary planning would be beneficial to include technical skills/drills in early stages of rehabilitation in a low intensity and controlled environments.

Optimizing neuromuscular pelvic floor function can improve urethral closing pressures and the levator plate position.26,31,35,39 PFM strength, timing, and coordination are highly correlated with UI,26,35,36 and vital to support IAP loads during running and landing in netball.2,4,16,26,40 Impaired reaction times are associated with a three-fold risk of UI.36 There is grade 1 evidence for PFM training in the general population,35 and sport and training specificity should be considered when prescribing PFM training.4,15,46 The authors acknowledge the limitation of the sport specific training protocols provided in this case and support future work to provide multi-disciplinary RTS protocols. The author suggests promotion and engagement with stakeholders and sporting decision-makers to create greater opportunities for primary pelvic health screening in female athletes.

The lack of PFM functional measures that offer predictive validity of pelvic health risk and RTS was a clinical challenge in this case and the research is underdeveloped compared to other rehabilitation protocols.4,15,30 While not validated, the author considered symptom responses during jumping to identify any issues prior to the introduction of sport-specific training. There is currently limited evidence for the prevention of PFD with PFM training. Specific ante-natal PFM training has been shown to reduce the risk of developing UI by 62%,47 however, research in general sporting populations would suggest targeted training does not prevent injury.15,29,32 Further research into the prognostic value of PFM functional field testing may assist safe RTS.

CONCLUSION

A postpartum athlete experiences the “mother load” of perinatal musculoskeletal and physiological changes as well as experiencing the demands of early high intensity training. Current evidence suggests PFD has a significant influence on returning to exercise and that athletes are at greater risk of PFD. The RTS timeline in GT’s case is limited to an asymptomatic woman following CS returning to netball. This case study proposes a battery of tests to detect PFD and integrates pelvic health into a RTS program. Multidisciplinary planning should begin during early pregnancy and include a pelvic health physiotherapist. A range of factors should be considered, PFD, delivery, wound healing, sleep, breastfeeding, and breast changes. Future areas of research include developing post-partum RTS protocols, diagnosis, prevention, and management of PFD in athletes and the longitudinal effects of PFD and RTS.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author of this paper has nothing to disclose.

Supplementary Material

Appendix B

Musculoskeletal Screening Form

Appendix A

Austrailian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Dr Kerrie Evans PhD, MHealthSc(ManipPhty), BAppSc(Phty), FACP, GAICD and Dr Margaret Sherburn PhD, MWmnsHlth, BAppSci (Phty).
==== Refs
Girl Power: Measuring the Rise of Women’s Sport in Australia 6 3 2019
https://www.nielsen.com/au/en/insights/article/2019/girl-power-measuring-the-rise-of-women-s-sport-in-australia/
Exercise and pregnancy in recreational and elite athletes: 2016/17 evidence summary from the IOC Expert Group Meeting, Lausanne. Part 3—exercise in the postpartum period British Journal of Sports Medicine Bø Kari Artal Raul Barakat Ruben Brown Wendy J Davies Gregory A L Dooley Michael Evenson Kelly R Haakstad Lene A H Kayser Bengt Kinnunen Tarja I Larsén Karin Mottola Michelle F Nygaard Ingrid van Poppel Mireille Stuge Britt Khan Karim M 22 6 2017
51 21 1516 1525 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097964 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097964
Relative dearth of ‘sex differences’ research in sports medicine Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Schilaty Nathan D. Bates Nathaniel A. Hewett Timothy E. 5 2018
21 5 440 441 1440-2440 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.028 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.028 29248307
Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence in High-Impact Sport Athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis Journal of Human Kinetics Pires Telma Pires Patrícia Moreira Helena Viana Rui 7 7 2020
73 1 279 288 1899-7562 10.2478/hukin-2020-0008 10.2478/hukin-2020-0008 32774559
Are former female elite athletes more likely to experience urinary incontinence later in life than non-athletes? Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports Bø K. Sundgot-Borgen J. 2 2010
20 1 100 104 0905-7188 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00871.x 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00871.x
High level rhythmic gymnasts and urinary incontinence: Prevalence, risk factors, and influence on performance Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports Gram Marte Charlotte Dobbertin Bø Kari 2020
30 1 159 165 0905-7188 10.1111/sms.13548 10.1111/sms.13548 31484216
Association of Delivery Mode With Pelvic Floor Disorders After Childbirth JAMA Blomquist Joan L. Muñoz Alvaro Carroll Megan Handa Victoria L. 18 12 2018
320 23 2438 2447 0098-7484 10.1001/jama.2018.18315 10.1001/jama.2018.18315 30561480
Return to running postnatal - guideline for medical, health and fitness professionals managing this population Physiotherapy Donnelly G. Brockwell E. Goom T. 5 2020
107 e188 e189 0031-9406 10.1016/j.physio.2020.03.276 10.1016/j.physio.2020.03.276
Reframing return-to-sport postpartum: the 6 Rs framework British Journal of Sports Medicine Donnelly Gráinne M Moore Isabel S Brockwell Emma Rankin Alan Cooke Rosalyn 2022
56 5 244 245 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104877 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104877 34836883
Elite athletes get pregnant, have healthy babies and return to sport early postpartum BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Sundgot-Borgen Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen Christine Myklebust Grethe Sølvberg Nina Torstveit Monica Klungland 11 2019
5 1 e000652 2055-7647 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000652 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000652 31803497
What are the biopsychosocial risk factors associated with pain in postpartum runners? Development of a clinical decision tool PLoS One Christopher Shefali Mathur Cook Chad E. Snodgrass Suzanne J. 12 8 2021
16 8 e0255383 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone.0255383 10.1371/journal.pone.0255383 34383792
Multidisciplinary, biopsychosocial factors contributing to return to running and running related stress urinary incontinence in postpartum women British Journal of Sports Medicine Moore Isabel S James Megan L Brockwell Emma Perkins Joanna Jones Alex L Donnelly Gráinne M 18 6 2021
55 22 1286 1292 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104168 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104168
Effect of pelvic floor symptoms on women's participation in exercise: a mixed-methods systematic review with meta-analysis Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Dakic Jodie G. Hay-Smith Jean Cook Jill Lin Kuan-Yin Calo Marlena Frawley Helena 10 5 2021
51 7 345 361 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2021.10200 10.2519/jospt.2021.10200
Impaired trunk flexor strength, fatigability, and steadiness in postpartum women Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise Deering RITA E. Cruz MEREDITH Senefeld JONATHON W. Pashibin TATYANA Eickmeyer SARAH Hunter SANDRA K. 8 2018
50 8 1558 1569 1530-0315 10.1249/mss.0000000000001609 10.1249/mss.0000000000001609 29554014
Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus British Journal of Sports Medicine van Melick Nicky van Cingel Robert E H Brooijmans Frans Neeter Camille van Tienen Tony Hullegie Wim Nijhuis-van der Sanden Maria W G 18 8 2016
50 24 1506 1515 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095898 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095898
Occurrence rates and predictors of lower urinary tract symptoms and incontinence in female athletes Urologia Journal Simeone C. Moroni A. Pettenò A. Antonelli A. Zani D. Orizio C. Cunico S. Cosciani 4 2010
77 2 139 146 0391-5603 10.1177/039156031007700210 10.1177/039156031007700210 20890872
Exercise in the postpartum period: practical applications Current Sports Medicine Reports Mottola Michelle F. 12 2002
1 6 362 368 1537-890X 10.1249/00149619-200212000-00010 10.1249/00149619-200212000-00010
Weight gain during pregnancy: re-examining the guidelines Rasmussen K.M. Yaktine A.L. Committee to re-examine IOM pregnancy weight guidelines Food and nutrition board, board on children, youth and families, Institute of Medicine, National Research Council National Academies Press Washington, DC 2009

Guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists for exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period British Journal of Sports Medicine Artal R O'Toole M 1 2 2003
37 1 6 12; discussion 12 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsm.37.1.6 10.1136/bjsm.37.1.6 12547738
Australian guidelines for physical activity in pregnancy and postpartum Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Brown Wendy J. Hayman Melanie Haakstad Lene A.H. Lamerton Tayla Mena Gabriela P. Green Anita Keating Shelley E. Gomes Grace A.O. Coombes Jeff S. Mielke Gregore I. 6 2022
25 6 511 519 1440-2440 10.1016/j.jsams.2022.03.008 10.1016/j.jsams.2022.03.008 35418334
A randomized, controlled trial to determine the efficacy of paper tape in preventing hypertrophic scar formation in surgical incisions that traverse Langer's skin tension lines Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Atkinson Jo-An M. McKenna Kryss T. Barnett Adrian G. McGrath David J. Rudd Michael 11 2005
116 6 1648 56; discussion 1657 0032-1052 10.1097/01.prs.0000187147.73963.a5 10.1097/01.prs.0000187147.73963.a5
Can physical characteristics and sports bra use predict exercise-induced breast pain in elite female athletes? Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine Brisbine Brooke R. Steele Julie R. Phillips Elissa J. McGhee Deirdre E. 2021
31 6 e380 e384 1050-642X 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000831 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000831 32073475
The minimal important difference of the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire International Urogynecology Journal Baessler Kaven Mowat Alexandra Maher Christopher F. 2019
30 1 115 122 0937-3462 10.1007/s00192-018-3724-1 10.1007/s00192-018-3724-1 30088031
What is to blame for postnatal pelvic floor dysfunction in primiparous women—pre-pregnancy or intrapartum risk factors? European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology Durnea Constantin M. Khashan Ali S. Kenny Louise C. Durnea Uliana A. Dornan James C. O’Sullivan Suzanne M. O’Reilly Barry A. 7 2017
214 36 43 0301-2115 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.036 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.036 28525825
Ultrasound assessment of pelvic organ prolapse: the relationship between prolapse severity and symptoms Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology Dietz H. P. Lekskulchai O. 2007
29 6 688 691 0960-7692 10.1002/uog.4024 10.1002/uog.4024 17471449
Pelvic floor muscle training in women with stress urinary incontinence causes hypertrophy of the urethral sphincters and reduces bladder neck mobility during coughing Neurourology and Urodynamics McLean Linda Varette Kevin Gentilcore-Saulnier Evelyne Harvey Marie-Andree Baker Kevin Sauerbrei Eric 17 7 2013
32 8 1096 1102 0733-2467 10.1002/nau.22343 10.1002/nau.22343 23861324
Clinical assessment of pelvic floor and abdominal muscles 3 months post partum: an inter-rater reliability study BMJ Open Vesting Sabine Olsen Monika Fagevik Gutke Annelie Rembeck Gun Larsson Maria E H 9 2021
11 9 e049082 2044-6055 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049082 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049082 34475166
Measurement methods to assess diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle (DRAM): A systematic review of their measurement properties and meta-analytic reliability generalisation Manual Therapy van de Water A.T.M. Benjamin D.R. 2 2016
21 41 53 1356-689X 10.1016/j.math.2015.09.013 10.1016/j.math.2015.09.013
Pain-free versus pain-threshold rehabilitation following acute hamstring strain injury: A randomized controlled trial Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Hickey Jack T. Timmins Ryan G. Maniar Nirav Rio Ebonie Hickey Peter F. Pitcher Christian A. Williams Morgan D. Opar David A. 2 2020
50 2 91 103 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2020.8895 10.2519/jospt.2020.8895
Rehabilitation of the postpartum runner: A 4-phase approach Journal of Women's Health Physical Therapy Christopher Shefali Mathur Gallagher Sandra Olson Amanda Cichowski Sara Deering Rita E. 17 2 2022
46 2 73 86 1556-6803 10.1097/jwh.0000000000000230 10.1097/jwh.0000000000000230
An International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for pelvic floor muscle assessment Neurourology and Urodynamics Frawley Helena Shelly Beth Morin Melanie Bernard Stéphanie Bø Kari Digesu Giuseppe Alessandro Dickinson Tamara Goonewardene Sanchia McClurg Doreen Rahnama'i Mohammad S. Schizas Alexis Slieker-Ten Hove Marijke Takahashi Satoru Voelkl Guevara Jenniffer 12 4 2021
40 5 1217 1260 0733-2467 10.1002/nau.24658 10.1002/nau.24658
Clinical examination, diagnostic imaging, and testing of athletes with groin pain: An evidence-based approach to effective management Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Thorborg Kristian Reiman Michael P. Weir Adam Kemp Joanne L. Serner Andreas Mosler Andrea B. HÖlmich Per 4 2018
48 4 239 249 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2018.7850 10.2519/jospt.2018.7850 29510653
Effect of abdominal exercises versus abdominal supporting belt on post-partum abdominal efficiency and rectus separation Int J Medical Med Health Sci El-Mekawy H. Eldeeb A. El- Lythy M.. 2013
7 44 48
Does pelvic floor muscle contraction early after delivery cause perineal pain in postpartum women? European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology Neels Hedwig De Wachter Stefan Wyndaele Jean-Jacques Wyndaele Michel Vermandel Alexandra 1 2017
208 1 5 0301-2115 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.11.009 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.11.009
Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Dumoulin Chantale Cacciari Licia P Hay-Smith E Jean C 4 10 2018
10 10 CD005654 1465-1858 10.1002/14651858.cd005654.pub4 10.1002/14651858.cd005654.pub4 30288727
Pelvic floor muscle displacement during jumps in continent and incontinent women: An exploratory study Neurourology and Urodynamics Moser Helene Leitner Monika Eichelberger Patric Kuhn Annette Baeyens Jean-Pierre Radlinger Lorenz 7 9 2019
38 8 2374 2382 0733-2467 10.1002/nau.24161 10.1002/nau.24161 31493349
Acute physiological and perceptual responses to a netball specific training session in professional female netball players PLoS One Birdsey Laurence P. Weston Matthew Russell Mark Johnston Michael Cook Christian J. Kilduff Liam P. 9 2 2022
17 2 e0263772 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone.0263772 10.1371/journal.pone.0263772 35139123
Pelvic floor function in elite nulliparous athletes Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology Kruger J. A. Dietz H. P. Murphy B. A. 2007
30 1 81 85 0960-7692 10.1002/uog.4027 10.1002/uog.4027 17497753
Comparisons of approaches to pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Hay-Smith E. Jean C Herderschee Roselien Dumoulin Chantale Herbison G Peter 7 12 2011
12 CD009508 1465-1858 10.1002/14651858.cd009508 10.1002/14651858.cd009508
Reproducibility of intra-abdominal pressure measured during physical activities via a wireless vaginal transducer Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery Egger Marlene J. Hamad Nadia M. Hitchcock Robert W. Coleman Tanner J. Shaw Janet M. Hsu Yvonne Nygaard Ingrid E. 5 2015
21 3 164 169 2151-8378 10.1097/spv.0000000000000167 10.1097/spv.0000000000000167 25730430
Use of exercise in the management of postpartum diastasis recti: A systematic review Journal of Women's Health Physical Therapy Berg-Poppe Patti Hauer Michaela Jones Cassandra Munger Mattison Wethor Cassidy 1 2022
46 1 35 47 1556-6803 10.1097/jwh.0000000000000231 10.1097/jwh.0000000000000231
Women with diastasis recti abdominis might have weaker abdominal muscles and more abdominal pain, but no higher prevalence of pelvic floor disorders, low back and pelvic girdle pain than women without diastasis recti abdominis Physiotherapy Gluppe Sandra Ellström Engh Marie Kari Bø 6 2021
111 57 65 0031-9406 10.1016/j.physio.2021.01.008 10.1016/j.physio.2021.01.008 33691943
Establishing expert-based recommendations for the conservative management of pregnancy-related diastasis rectus abdominis: A delphi consensus study Journal of Women's Health Physical Therapy Dufour Sinéad Bernard Stéphanie Murray-Davis Beth Graham Nadine 4 2019
43 2 73 81 1556-6803 10.1097/jwh.0000000000000130 10.1097/jwh.0000000000000130
The influence of early exercise postpartum on pelvic floor muscle function and prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction 12 Months postpartum Physical Therapy Tennfjord Merete Kolberg Engh Marie Ellström Bø Kari 4 5 2020
100 9 1681 1689 0031-9023 10.1093/ptj/pzaa084 10.1093/ptj/pzaa084 32367136
Postpartum recovery of levator hiatus and bladder neck mobility in relation to pregnancy Obstetrics & Gynecology Stær-Jensen Jette Siafarikas Franziska Hilde Gunvor Benth Jūratė Šaltytė Bø Kari Engh Marie Ellström 3 2015
125 3 531 539 0029-7844 10.1097/aog.0000000000000645 10.1097/aog.0000000000000645 25730212
Pelvic floor muscle function in women with and without urinary incontinence: are strength and endurance the only relevant functions? a cross-sectional study Physiotherapy Vieira Gabriella Ferreira Saltiel Fernanda Miranda-Gazzola Ana Paula Gonçalves Kirkwood Renata Noce Figueiredo Elyonara Mello 12 2020
109 85 93 0031-9406 10.1016/j.physio.2019.12.006 10.1016/j.physio.2019.12.006
Pelvic floor muscle training for prevention and treatment of urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Woodley Stephanie J Boyle Rhianon Cody June D Mørkved Siv Hay-Smith E Jean C 22 12 2017
12 12 CD007471 1465-1858 10.1002/14651858.cd007471.pub3 10.1002/14651858.cd007471.pub3 29271473
