
==== Front
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med
bmjosem
bmjsem
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
2055-7647
BMJ Publishing Group BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR

10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002184
bmjsem-2024-002184
Protocol
1506
Workplace active breaks for university workers: the UNIFIT pilot study protocol
http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9644-6048
Scoppolini Massini Maria 1maria.scoppolini2@unibo.it

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7451-3739
Pinelli Erika 1erika.pinelli2@unibo.it

Masini Alice 2alice.masini@uniupo.it

Zinno Raffaele 1raffaele.zinno2@unibo.it

Dallolio Laura 3laura.dallolio@unibo.it

Bragonzoni Laura 1laura.bragonzoni4@unibo.it

1 Department for Life Quality Studies, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Rimini, Italy
2 Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
3 Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Dr; maria.scoppolini2@unibo.it
None declared.

2024
05 9 2024
10 3 e00218419 8 2024
Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Abstract

Sedentary behaviour (SB) is associated with an increased risk of metabolic issues (negative effects on diabetes, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and waist circumference), cardiovascular diseases, increased risk of all-cause mortality and accelerated ageing of skeletal muscle power. The research on SB is relatively new, with much evidence regarding its negative health effects gathered within the last decade. Office workers exhibit pronounced sedentary habits, with studies indicating they can spend up to 82% of their working day sitting. To address this issue, workplaces are responsible for promoting physical activity and minimising SB among employees. In this context, one potential strategy for reducing SB and its associated risks could be implementing active breaks (ABs). ABs are defined as brief, structured periods of physical activity or exercise. This quasi-experimental pilot study aims to implement workplace ABs programme aimed at interrupting SB among the University of Bologna (Italy) workers, and it will include both intervention and control groups. The intervention group will participate in an 8-week ABs programme. The findings from this study could establish a robust basis for future large-scale research on the effectiveness of ABs interventions in workplace settings.

Sedentary
Physical activity
Behaviour
Active breaks
Workplace
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005969 Università di Bologna Fouded by by AlmaIdea (from University of Bologna)
==== Body
pmcWHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC

High sedentary behaviour (SB) levels are associated with increased health risks. Office workers are particularly known for their high levels of SB. Active breaks (ABs) represent a possible workplace intervention to reduce SB and related risks.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

The study will provide a comprehensive plan of action for implementing workplace ABs programme aimed at interrupting SB among the University of Bologna (Italy) workers during working hours.

HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY

The findings from this study will contribute to the evidence base for ABs interventions. This could provide a solid foundation for future larger-scale research on the effectiveness of ABs interventions in the workplace, potentially influencing future guidelines and policies for promoting ABs in the workplace.

Introduction

Office workers are very sedentary, with studies indicating that they can spend up to 82% of their working day sitting.13 Additionally, working from home (a change in the work model introduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic and, in some cases, still in place) appears to have exacerbated the already high levels of sitting time among office-based employees.4 Sedentary behaviour (SB) is defined as any waking behaviour while in a sitting or reclining posture, characterised by an energy expenditure ≤1.5 metabolic equivalent tasks.57 It is important to introduce two important terms to provide a clear and complete context: physical activity (PA) and physical inactivity (PI). PA is defined as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that requires energy expenditure.8 On the contrary, PI is defined as an insufficient PA level to meet guidelines.8 This leads to an SB paradigm: following PA guidelines while remaining largely sedentary is possible. Conversely, an individual may avoid structured moderate-to-vigorous PA yet still significantly reduce their SB.9

While PA has been extensively studied in health research for many years, the study of SB is relatively new, with a large portion of evidence regarding its negative health effects gathered within the last decade.9 There is scientific evidence that high levels of SB are associated with an increased risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality.10 In addition, SB has detrimental associations with fasting glucose, fasting insulin, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and waist circumference.11 A sedentary lifestyle also accelerates secondary ageing of skeletal muscle power.12 It can also contribute to mood disorders and work dissatisfaction, which in turn can impair productivity.13 14 On the other hand, consistent PA is recognised as a protective factor in the prevention and management of non-communicable diseases, including cardiovascular disease, type-2 diabetes, and breast and colon cancer.8 15 16 Furthermore, PA can contribute to the maintenance of healthy weight8 and general well-being17 while also providing benefits to mental health18 and delaying the onset of dementia.19 While there are precise guidelines regarding PA, recommendations on SB suggest limiting sedentary time only.8

The workplace can directly influence workers’ physical, mental, social and economic well-being, and it is responsible for promoting PA and reducing sedentary time among its employees.20 Considering this, a possible intervention to be carried out in the workplace to reduce SB and related risks is represented by active breaks (ABs). The ABs are defined as short periods of structured PA or exercise.

Long established within the school environment for children,2123 these practices are now beginning to be embraced in the workplace setting for adults as well. The scientific literature confirms that performing brief physical exercises to interrupt SB can improve postprandial glycaemia, insulin responses, cardiovascular parameters and blood pressure. Additionally, there appear to be benefits for cognitive functions, although further studies are needed.2426 A review27 conducted on employees with orthostatic and sedentary jobs demonstrated that active microbreaks, including various exercise programmes such as stretching, strengthening, torso stabilisation and ergonomic interventions, were more beneficial than passive microbreaks. These active microbreaks reduced pain and feelings of fatigue and improved employees’ mood. Moreover, in office workers, ABs that involve postural changes have been shown to reduce pain and discomfort.28

Codesign methodologies actively involve end-users by leveraging their knowledge, experience and opinions,29 making the designed solutions more acceptable, adopted and sustainable.30 In particular, focus groups (FGs) are a widely used qualitative research method: a small group of individuals engage in discussions facilitated by a moderator. Participants respond to prompts during these sessions to uncover their thoughts, beliefs and attitudes regarding a specific topic.31 This method enables researchers to gain insights into people’s views, attitudes and beliefs towards health promotion and their perceptions of prevention programmes more generally.32 33

The main objective of this quasi-experimental pilot study is to implement workplace ABs programme aimed at interrupting SB among the University of Bologna (Italy) workers (UNIBO workers). This intervention was codesigned with the potential end-users through previous FGs. These FGs helped identify individual, social and environmental barriers and facilitators regarding an intervention to combat SB in the workplace. Indeed, qualitative research addresses questions regarding the why, what and how of phenomena34 and can provide insights that inform quantitative studies.35 The hypothesis is that codesigning the intervention directly with the potential end-users can be effectively implemented, ensuring feasibility and long-term adherence. The results could provide a solid foundation for future larger-scale research on the effectiveness of ABs intervention in the workplace.

Materials and methods

The present study adhered to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials reporting guideline.36

Study design

The study design is a quasi-experimental pilot study,37 characterised by including a control group (CG) and an intervention group (IG). Randomisation was not implemented as it could have increased the risk of bias.

Participant recruitment

The study will be proposed to the UNIBO workers. This will be done through direct contact via institutional email, and a letter sent to the department directors and the directors of specialisation and PhD courses. Participants will join the study only after signing the informed consent form. They will have the option to choose whether to join the CG or the IG independently. The only inclusion criterion for this study is being a worker at the UNIBO. Only participants who do not want to sign the informed consent will be excluded.

Sample size

Power computation has yet to be undertaken for this study as the study design is a pilot study. The proposed sample size is 15 participants for each group.

Intervention group

Before starting the ABs programme, participation in the IG will involve a 30 min counselling session by expert kinesiologists. The counselling session aims to provide participants with all the technical and practical information on carrying out the study. First, the questionnaires and the time frames they must complete will be explained. Subsequently, all the indications regarding the correct carrying out of the ABs will be given, starting from the safety information (how to carry out the exercises safely) and then providing all the technical indications (how to carry out the exercises correctly).

Subsequently, ABs programme will be proposed for 8 weeks. Participants in the IG will be assessed at baseline (T0) and at the end of the 8-week ABs programme follow-up (T1). Additionally, they must complete an adherence diary throughout the 8 weeks of ABs programme. The ABs programme, developed using a codesigned methodology with potential end-users, will be implemented to end-users through videos. Each video will feature a single ABs section comprising a combination of exercises such as breathing, balance, activation, muscle strengthening and stretching. Each video will have a maximum duration of 5 min. Three ABs videos will be available during the workday (at the beginning, approximately mid-day and at the end) across the five working days of the week. ABs are structured to align with the rhythms of the workday. The first break of the day focuses on activation to prepare the mind and body for optimal work performance. The second break consists of low to moderate-intensity exercises. The third and final break of the day primarily includes stretching and relaxation exercises to unwind muscles after a full workday. No equipment will be required to perform the exercises, as the ABs are designed to be executed using office furniture such as a desk and chair. Table 1 presents an example of the sequence of exercises in a single ABs section.

Table 1 Exercises of a single ABs section

Exercises	Number of repetitions	
Shoulder elevation depression	5	
Shoulder protraction retraction	5	
Neck flexion extension	5	
Chair squats	10	
Step touch	10	
Stretching of the spine	10	

Control group

Participants in the CG will solely continue their regular working routine. They will be assessed at baseline (T0) and after 8 weeks follow-up (T1).

Primary outcome

The primary outcome will be evaluating the efficacy of the ABs programme by assessing the interruptions of SB during working hours. This will be achieved through the measurement of adherence to the ABs sections. Adherence will be calculated using the adherence diary as the percentage of ABs completed compared with the total number of scheduled ABs sections. The reasons for dropping out of the ABs programme will be investigated as part of the adherence assessment.

Secondary outcomes

The secondary outcomes will encompass various assessments across domains, including PA levels, health and work productivity, musculoskeletal discomfort, work environment satisfaction and ABs intervention satisfaction.

The levels of PA will be assessed through modifications in the responses to the PASSI (Progressi delle Aziende Sanitarie per la Salute in Italia) questionnaire.38 The PASSI questionnaire is a public health surveillance tool that collects information on the adult Italian population regarding behavioural risk factors and preventive measures for non-communicable diseases.38

Health and work productivity will be evaluated through modifications in the responses to the Health and Work Questionnaire (HWQ).39 The questionnaire measures workplace productivity and worker health.39

Musculoskeletal discomfort will be evaluated through modifications in the responses to the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ).40 The questionnaire collects information regarding musculoskeletal symptoms.41

Work-environment satisfaction will be evaluated through modifications in an ad hoc satisfaction questionnaire. This is composed of 5-point Likert scale questions.

ABs programme satisfaction will be evaluated through an ad hoc satisfaction questionnaire comprising 5-point Likert scale questions.

The reasons for interruption and abandonment will be carefully evaluated during the study.

Data collection and measures

The instruments used to collect the primary and secondary outcome measures and the timing of their use are summarised in table 2.

Table 2 Participants information and primary and secondary outcome measures

	Baseline (T0)	8 weeks (T1)	
Sociodemographic parameters	
 Date of birth	X	X	
 Gender	X	X	
 Occupation	X	X	
Participants information	
 Weight	X	X	
 Height	X	X	
 Right/left-handed	X	X	
 Current job position	X	X	
 Type of work	X	X	
 Department worked in	X	X	
 Total duration of current job position	X	X	
 Total duration employed by the present company	X	X	
 Permanent/temporary employment	X	X	
 Continuous/shift work schedule	X	X	
 Shift rotation	X	X	
 Average weekly working hours	X	X	
Assessment scale	
 Adherence to the ABs programme*		X	
 PASSI questionnaire38	X	X	
 Health and Work Questionnaire39	X	X	
 Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire40	X	X	
 Work environment satisfaction ad hoc questionnaire	X	X	
 ABs programme satisfaction ad hoc questionnaire*		X	
* For IG only.

ABsactive breaksIGintervention groupPASSIProgressi delle Aziende Sanitarie per la Salute in Italia

Safety

The entire study will be carried out to ensure maximum safety for the participants. The counselling session will guide the IG regarding the correct and safest way to perform each ABs. Moreover, each video depicting the ABs will provide clear and detailed instructions (both audio and video) regarding the correct and safest way to carry out each exercise. The research staff will remain available to the groups (both IG and CG) for any information and support.

Statistical analysis

The adherence and satisfaction will be described as the mean and SD or median and IQR and percentages of adherence for all participants, as appropriate. Subsequently, adherence and satisfaction percentages will be categorised into <50% low, 50%–75% medium and >75% high.

The interaction effect between group and time on questionnaire scores (PASSI Questionnaire, NMQ, HWQ, Work environment satisfaction ad hoc Questionnaire) will be assessed through a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance.

Demographic characteristics will be analysed with descriptive statistics using mean and SD or frequency and percentage as appropriate. The χ2 test will be used to compare participants’ characteristics between groups.

Discussion

The main aim of this quasi-experimental pilot study is to implement ABs programme to interrupt SB among the UNIBO workers.

The scientific literature confirms that adherence to PA is fundamental for its efficacy.4244 To improve adherence, the ABs programme of this pilot study was codesigned with input from potential end-users, which could also increase satisfaction. Adherence and satisfaction will be evaluated through adherence diaries and ad hoc satisfaction questionnaires, respectively. The chosen methods will provide accurate and specific data tailored to the aspects of interest. The existing scientific literature on ABs confirms their benefits for sedentary working populations. Specifically, ABs with postural changes have been shown to reduce pain and discomfort.28 In this pilot study, we will evaluate these outcomes using the NMQ.40 Additionally, research indicates that ABs improve interpersonal relationships, reduce absenteeism and enhance workplace vigour without impairing performance.45 46 To investigate these effects further, we will administer the HWQ.39 This could provide insights into how ABs may affect workplace productivity and worker health. By interrupting SB in the workplace through implementing ABs, psychophysical processes can be initiated within daily routines, potentially leading to an increase in daily PA. To evaluate this aspect, we will analyse the responses provided in the PASSI Questionnaire.38

An innovative aspect of our study is that we codesigned the ABs programme with the target group. By understanding the opinions and perspectives on barriers and facilitators of workplace health promotion through PA, we aim to implement a ‘worker-centred’ intervention. Many ABs interventions may appear optimal in theory but encounter challenges with adherence and feasibility in practice.47 Through codesign,29 we hope to address these issues effectively. Another important aspect of this study is its connection to neuroscience. ABs are delivered via video, harnessing the power of mirror neurons in workers to trigger a cascade of positive effects. The ability to imitate the gestures of others, both unconsciously and consciously, is based on the Mirror Neuron System (MNS).48 Observing ABs videos specifically created by the research staff and observing colleagues, supervisors or employers performing ABs could activate the MNS, potentially promoting the practice of ABs in the workplace. This could conceivably foster greater collaboration during the performance of ABs, improving the work environment and relationships with colleagues, supervisors and employers. This study is aimed at the working community of the UNIBO, including administrative workers, professors, researchers and fellows. These individuals are closely linked to students and the future workforce. This relationship could promote the transmission of ABs culture from workers to students, potentially contributing to creating and maintaining a future work environment that embraces and promotes ABs. Furthermore, the ABs proposed in this study can be performed in any context and environment without requiring specific equipment or clothing. This allows the ABs to be carried out in the office, at home, or in any work setting. This aspect is particularly relevant given the changes in work methodologies introduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic.4 Lastly, the study includes a CG, which provides an advantage: this design compares outcomes between those participating in ABs programme in the workplace and those maintaining their regular work routines.

This study has several limitations to note. First, obtaining a quantitative measure of the impact of the ABs programme on general health is impossible due to the absence of technological tools (eg, accelerometers and heart rate monitors). Secondarily, the workers might spend more time walking than usual depending on the time of year or the tasks assigned. Additionally, due to its pilot nature, the sample size is small, with approximately 15 subjects per group, which inherently limits its generalisability. Finally, the follow-up period will be limited to just 8 weeks, which may be relatively short. Future research should include tools to assess general health parameters and trials with longer follow-up periods to better evaluate ABs’ effectiveness in interrupting SB and the associated benefits.

Conclusion

This quasi-experimental pilot study provides a comprehensive plan for implementing workplace ABs programme to interrupt SB among the UNIBO workers. The findings of this pilot study could provide a robust foundation for future large-scale research on the effectiveness of workplace ABs interventions, thereby contributing to the scientific evidence supporting ABs interventions.

Data availability statement

No data are available.

Funding: The research was funded within by 'Stand Up University, break sedentary behaviours: UNIFIT study' project by AlmaIdea (from University of Bologna).

Data availability free text: Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication: Not applicable.

Ethics approval: This study involves human participants and the local bioethical committee approved this study: protocol N. 0289784. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. The study processes will follow the protocol, and any protocol amendments will be submitted to the University of Bologna Bioethics Committee. All documents will be kept confidential. The study protocol will be published in peer-reviewed journals. The study results will be disseminated via conference presentations, reports to the grant funder, websites or social media and publications in peer-reviewed journals. The presentation of the study will keep the anonymity of participants.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Patient and public involvement: University of Bologna (Italy) workers were involved in the co-creation of the ABs programme through previous Focus Group.
==== Refs
References

1 Parry S Straker L The contribution of office work to sedentary behaviour associated risk BMC Public Health 2013 13 296 10.1186/1471-2458-13-296 23557495
2 Hadgraft NT Healy GN Owen N et al Office workers’ objectively assessed total and prolonged sitting time: individual-level correlates and worksite variations Prev Med Rep 2016 4 184 91 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.06.011 27413681
3 Maes I Ketels M Van Dyck D et al The occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ): a validation study with accelerometer-assessed measures BMC Public Health 2020 20 1072 10.1186/s12889-020-09180-9 32631292
4 Morton S Fitzsimons C Jepson R et al What works to reduce sedentary behavior in the office, and could these intervention components transfer to the home working environment?: a rapid review and transferability appraisal Front Sports Act Living 2022 4 954639 10.3389/fspor.2022.954639 35966113
5 Sedentary Behaviour Research Networ Letter to the Editor: Standardized use of the terms 'sedentary' and 'sedentary behaviours' Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2012 37 540 2 10.1139/h2012-024 22540258
6 Tremblay MS Aubert S Barnes JD et al Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2017 14 75 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8 28599680
7 Jalayondeja C Jalayondeja W Mekhora K et al Break in Sedentary Behavior Reduces the Risk of Noncommunicable Diseases and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors among Workers in a Petroleum Company Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017 14 501 10.3390/ijerph14050501 28486414
8 World Health Organization WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour 2020
9 Henson J De Craemer M Yates T Sedentary behaviour and disease risk BMC Public Health 2023 23 2048 10.1186/s12889-023-16867-2 37858149
10 Wilmot EG Edwardson CL Achana FA et al Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis Diabetologia 2012 55 2895 905 10.1007/s00125-012-2677-z 22890825
11 Powell C Herring MP Dowd KP et al The cross-sectional associations between objectively measured sedentary time and cardiometabolic health markers in adults - a systematic review with meta-analysis component Obes Rev 2018 19 381 95 10.1111/obr.12642 29178252
12 Booth FW Roberts CK Laye MJ Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases Compr Physiol 2012 2 1143 211 10.1002/cphy.c110025 23798298
13 Giurgiu M Koch ED Ottenbacher J et al Sedentary behavior in everyday life relates negatively to mood: an ambulatory assessment study Scand J Med Sci Sports 2019 29 1340 51 10.1111/sms.13448 31044456
14 Rosenkranz SK Mailey EL Umansky E et al Workplace Sedentary Behavior and Productivity: a Cross-Sectional Study Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 17 6535 10.3390/ijerph17186535 32911740
15 Lee IM Shiroma EJ Lobelo F et al Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy Lancet 2012 380 219 29 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9 22818936
16 McTiernan A Friedenreich CM Katzmarzyk PT et al Physical Activity in Cancer Prevention and Survival: a Systematic Review Med Sci Sports Exerc 2019 51 1252 61 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001937 31095082
17 Das P Horton R Rethinking our approach to physical activity The Lancet 2012 380 189 90 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61024-1
18 Schuch FB Vancampfort D Richards J et al Exercise as a treatment for depression: a meta-analysis adjusting for publication bias J Psychiatr Res 2016 77 42 51 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.02.023 26978184
19 Livingston G Sommerlad A Orgeta V et al Dementia prevention, intervention, and care The Lancet 2017 390 2673 734 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6
20 Vella S Vassallo P Borg Buontempo M et al Improving employee health in the workplace Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Directorate 2022 Available https://hpdp.gov.mt/sites/default/files/2023-08/improving_employee_health_in_the_workplace_en.pdf
21 Masini A Marini S Gori D et al Evaluation of school-based interventions of active breaks in primary schools: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Sci Med Sport 2020 23 377 84 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.10.008 31722840
22 Infantes-Paniagua Á Silva AF Ramirez-Campillo R et al Active School Breaks and Students’ Attention: a Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis Brain Sci 2021 11 675 10.3390/brainsci11060675 34064202
23 Masini A Ceciliani A Dallolio L et al Evaluation of feasibility, effectiveness, and sustainability of school-based physical activity 'active break' interventions in pre-adolescent and adolescent students: a systematic review Can J Public Health 2022 113 713 25 10.17269/s41997-022-00652-6 35737219
24 Loh R Stamatakis E Folkerts D et al Effects of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Physical Activity Breaks on Blood Glucose, Insulin and Triacylglycerol Measures: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Sports Med 2020 50 295 330 10.1007/s40279-019-01183-w 31552570
25 da Silva GO Santini LB Farah BQ et al Effects of Breaking Up Prolonged Sitting on Cardiovascular Parameters: a systematic Review Int J Sports Med 2022 43 97 106 10.1055/a-1502-6787 34535019
26 Chueh TY Chen YC Hung TM Acute effect of breaking up prolonged sitting on cognition: a systematic review BMJ Open 2022 12 e050458 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050458
27 Vitoulas S Konstantis V Drizi I et al The Effect of Physiotherapy Interventions in the Workplace through Active Micro-Break Activities for Employees with Standing and Sedentary Work Healthcare (Basel) 2022 10 2073 10.3390/healthcare10102073 36292520
28 Waongenngarm P Areerak K Janwantanakul P The effects of breaks on low back pain, discomfort, and work productivity in office workers: a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials Appl Ergon 2018 68 230 9 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.003 29409639
29 Batalden M Batalden P Margolis P et al Coproduction of healthcare service BMJ Qual Saf 2016 25 509 17 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315
30 Jessup RL Osborne RH Buchbinder R et al Using co-design to develop interventions to address health literacy needs in a hospitalised population BMC Health Serv Res 2018 18 989 10.1186/s12913-018-3801-7 30572887
31 Krueger RA Casey MA Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research 5th edn SAGE 2015
32 Scheier LM Kumpfer KL Brown JL et al Formative Evaluation to Build an Online Parenting Skills and Youth Drug Prevention Program: mixed Methods Study JMIR Form Res 2019 3 e14906 10.2196/14906 31687934
33 Coverdale GE Long AF Emotional wellbeing and mental health: an exploration into health promotion in young people and families Perspect Public Health 2015 135 27 36 10.1177/1757913914558080 25568200
34 Berk M Otmar R Dean O et al The use of mixed methods in drug discovery Clinical trial design challenges in mood disorders Elsevier 2015 59 74
35 Madar R Adini B Greenberg D et al Physician and nurses’ perception of paediatric trauma care in Israeli emergency departments Nurs Crit Care 2022 27 55 65 10.1111/nicc.12635 33913224
36 Chan AW Tetzlaff JM Altman DG et al SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials Ann Intern Med 2013 158 200 7 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583 23295957
37 Harris AD McGregor JC Perencevich EN et al The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006 13 16 23 10.1197/jamia.M1749 16221933
38 Baldissera S Campostrini S Binkin N et al Features and initial assessment of the Italian Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (PASSI), 2007-2008 Prev Chron Dis 2011 8 A24
39 Shikiar R Halpern MT Rentz AM et al Development of the Health and Work Questionnaire (HWQ): an instrument for assessing workplace productivity in relation to worker health W R M 2004 22 219 29
40 Ghersi R Martinelli S Richeldi A et al The Italian version of Nordic Musculoskeletal Standardized Questionnaire G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2007 29 564 6 18409834
41 Kuorinka I Jonsson B Kilbom A et al Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms Appl Ergon 1987 18 233 7 10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-x 15676628
42 Rivera-Torres S Fahey TD Rivera MA Adherence to Exercise Programs in Older Adults: informative Report Gerontol Geriatr Med 2019 5 10.1177/2333721418823604
43 Morgan F Battersby A Weightman AL et al Adherence to exercise referral schemes by participants - what do providers and commissioners need to know? A systematic review of barriers and facilitators BMC Public Health 2016 16 227 10.1186/s12889-016-2882-7 26944952
44 Hicks GE Benvenuti F Fiaschi V et al Adherence to a community-based exercise program is a strong predictor of improved back pain status in older adults: an observational study Clin J Pain 2012 28 195 203 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318226c411 21750458
45 Michishita R Jiang Y Ariyoshi D et al The practice of active rest by workplace units improves personal relationships, mental health, and physical activity among workers J Occup Health 2017 59 122 30 10.1539/joh.16-0182-OA 27980249
46 Michishita R Jiang Y Ariyoshi D et al The Introduction of an Active Rest Program by Workplace Units Improved the Workplace Vigor and Presenteeism Among Workers: a Randomized Controlled Trial J Occup Environ Med 2017 59 1140 7 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001121 28816734
47 Ma JK Floegel TA Li LC et al Tailored physical activity behavior change interventions: challenges and opportunities Transl Behav Med 2021 11 2174 81 10.1093/tbm/ibab106 34424344
48 Proverbio AM Zani A Mirror neurons in action: erps and neuroimaging evidence Boggio PS Wingenbach TSH da Silveira Coêlho ML Social and affective neuroscience of everyday human interaction Springer International Publishing 2023 65 84
