
==== Front
Sci Rep
Sci Rep
Scientific Reports
2045-2322
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39245725
71975
10.1038/s41598-024-71975-2
Article
Soundscape analysis can be an effective tool in assessing seagrass restoration early success
La Manna Gabriella glamanna@uniss.it

12
Guala Ivan 13
Pansini Arianna 1
Stipcich Patrizia 124
Arrostuto Nicola 5
Ceccherelli Giulia 1
1 https://ror.org/01bnjbv91 grid.11450.31 0000 0001 2097 9138 Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali, Università di Sassari, Sassari, Italy
2 National Biodiversity Future Centre, Palermo, Italy
3 International Marine Center, Oristano, Italy
4 grid.4691.a 0000 0001 0790 385X Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy
5 AGRIS Sardegna, Sassari, Italy
8 9 2024
8 9 2024
2024
14 2091026 3 2024
2 9 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Restoration of vulnerable marine habitats is becoming increasingly popular to cope with widespread habitat loss and the resulting decline in biodiversity and ecosystem services. Lately, restoration strategies have been employed to enhance the recovery of degraded meadows of the Mediterranean endemic seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Typically, habitat restoration success is evaluated by the persistence of foundation species after transplantation (e.g., plant survival and growth) on the short and long-term, although successful plant responses do not necessarily reflect the recovery of ecosystem biodiversity and functions. Recently, soundscape (the spatial, temporal and frequency attribute of ambient sound and types of sound sources characterizing it) has been related to different habitat conditions and community structures. Thus, a successful restoration action should lead to acoustic restoration and soundscape ecology could represent an important component of restoration monitoring, leading to assess successful habitat and community restoration. Here, we evaluated acoustic community and metrics in a P. oceanica restored meadow and tested whether the plant transplant effectiveness after one year was accompanied by a restored soundscape. With this goal, acoustic recordings from degraded, transplanted and reference meadows were collected in Sardinia (Italy) using passive acoustic monitoring devices. Soundscape at each meadow type was examined using both spectral analysis and classification of fish calls based on a catalogue of fish sounds from the Mediterranean Sea. Seven different fish sounds were recorded: most of them were present in the reference and transplanted meadows and were associated to Sciaena umbra and Scorpaena spp. Sound Pressure Level (SPL, in dB re: 1 μPa-rms) and Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI) were influenced by the meadow type. Particularly higher values were associated to the transplanted meadow. SPL and ACI calculated in the 200–2000 Hz frequency band were also related to high abundance of fish sounds (chorus). These results showed that meadow restoration may lead to the recovery of soundscape and the associated community, suggesting that short term acoustic monitoring can provide complementary information to evaluate seagrass restoration success.

Keywords

Acoustic restoration
Fish sound
Mediterranean sea
Passive acoustic monitoring
Posidonia oceanica
Restoration success
Subject terms

Conservation biology
Restoration ecology
issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Several global and local anthropogenic stressors (e.g., ocean warming, fishing, aquaculture, recreational boating and anchoring, tourism, nutrient loading from agriculture and urban discharges) are causing damage to coastal ecosystems, impairing the health and fitness of resident biota1, causing habitat loss and reducing the provision of goods and services for human well-being2,3. In coastal areas, seagrasses are among the most productive systems2: they provide habitat and nursery areas for fish and invertebrates4; support carbon sequestration5, thus acting against global warming6,7, and nutrient cycling; stabilize sediments8,9; protect coastlines from erosion10; supply recreational services for tourism industry11. Even if the present status of seagrasses worldwide is poorly known12, a loss between 19 and 29% of the areal cover since 1879 has been estimated13,14. In the Mediterranean Sea, meadows of the endemic Posidonia oceanica have been regressed up to 50% in some areas15 because of human pressure. For this reason, the European Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and wild fauna and flora has included P. oceanica meadows among the priority habitats. Also, P. oceanica is listed among the endangered or threatened species in Annex II of the Protocol concerning Specially Protected Areas and Biological Diversity in the Mediterranean of the Barcelona Convention and it is included within the monitoring programs of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive (2008/56/EC) and the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD 2000/60/EC).

In response to seagrass degradation, several passive conservation programs (such as actions aimed at removing or mitigating environmental stressors) have been encouraged worldwide16. However, these actions may not be sufficient to lead the recovery of the ecosystems, for example, when the habitat degradation is so pervasive that a natural recovery could not occur17 or because natural recovery would take too long, especially where the damage is wide in size and seagrass recruitment is hampered by stable state feedback18,19. Therefore, in the last 30 years seagrass restoration activities have increased worldwide20,21, being considered among the most promising fields in conservation science.

Ecological restoration has been defined as the intentional activity aimed to accelerate the recovery of an ecosystem that has been degraded, damaged, or destroyed, with respect to its health, integrity, and sustainability22–24. Ecological restoration focuses on restoring the integrity of ecosystems, in terms of biodiversity, ecological processes and thus ecosystem functioning22. The success of a restoration activity occurs when ecosystem functioning returns to the state preceding the degradation25–27 and the ecosystem is self-supporting and resilient to perturbation without further assistance23. Therefore, estimating the success of a restoration is often linked to the effective measuring of the ecosystem recovery28.

Seagrass restoration monitoring typically evaluates the survival rate or individual functional plant traits of the transplanted species as an indicator of success29–31. Moreover, the success of seagrass restoration has also focused on the description of new transplanting techniques rather than providing general outcomes30,32. However, the ecological outcomes employed to evaluate ecosystem condition, and thus for the understanding of the restoration success, should include at least vegetation structure (e.g., cover and biomass), species diversity and abundance, and ecological processes (e.g., nutrient cycling and biological interactions)33–35. Fish assemblages and invertebrate populations are essential components of seagrass ecosystem functioning and services, but they have rarely been evaluated in seagrass restoration programs36,37 despite their positive feedback on the plant27.

The assessment of marine biodiversity in protected habitats usually relies on non-invasive and non-extractive methods such as the Underwater Visual Census (UVC)38. However, some nocturnal or cryptic species may be difficult to survey visually39. Soundscape, defined as the ensemble of biological, geophysical, and anthropogenic sounds that reflect various ecosystem processes40, provides information on the ecological quality of an ecosystem and the associated biodiversity41 in terms of presence, diversity and abundance of organisms. In a degraded ecosystem the soundscape is also degraded42–44 since the acoustic cues which influence the orientation, movement, settlement, spawning, resource defense and habitat selection of many marine organisms may be reduced or disappear.

In the present study we evaluated whether short-term soundscape monitoring can be effective in assessing the early success of a seagrass restoration, by estimating the biodiversity performance associated to the restored plant physical structure after transplant operations. Thus, fish sound abundance, sound pressure levels and acoustic complexity indexes from recordings collected in one of the largest restored P. oceanica meadows in the Mediterranean Sea (one year after the restoration operation was completed), were compared with those from nearby reference and dead meadows (root-rhizomes with no canopy), with the hypothesis that a successful restoration action should also lead to acoustic restoration even in the short term. Therefore, the smaller the difference of the acoustic communities between the transplanted and reference meadows, the higher would be the restoration success, and, conversely, high similarity in soundscape between dead and transplanted meadows would indicate a poor restoration performance. Results are useful to identify sound indicators of habitat quality and functioning, with the aim of using short-term acoustic monitoring as a complementary tool in the assessment of seagrass restoration success.

Results

A total of 404 5-min-long acoustic samples were analysed (for a total of 35.7 h of recording), while 274 files (for a total of 22.8 h of recording) were removed due to the presence of shipping noise (no other anthropogenic sounds have been found). Seven different fish sound types were recorded and most of them were present in the reference [number of sounds = 7643 (80%)] and transplanted [number of sounds = 702 (20%)] meadows, being associated to the mostly common vocal species of P. oceanica meadows: Scorpaena spp. (/kwas/; 77.6%) and Sciaena umbra (RPS; 22.2%) (Fig. 1). In the dead meadow, five fish sound types were recorded but with irrelevant abundance [number of sounds = 10 (0.001%)]. The presence of chorus (high abundance of fish sounds) of both Sciaena umbra and Scorpaena spp. was detected only in transplanted and reference meadows, from 8 p.m. to 5 a.m. (mostly between 10 p.m. and 12 a.m.) (Fig. 1). The results of acoustic richness and abundance were coherent with those obtained by fish visual census. In fact, both fish richness (number of species/125 m2), abundance (number of individuals/125 m2) and biomass (g/125 m2) were higher in transplanted and reference meadows compared to dead meadows (Fig. 2).Fig. 1 (a) Occurrence (in percentage) of chorus (/kwas/ and RPS) per meadow type. (b) Fish sound occurrence (in percentage) per meadow type: LFPS low frequency fast pulse train, APPPS accelerating pulse period pulse series, PS pulse series with irregular period, DS down sweep sound, DSS down sweep series, RPS repeated pulse series produced by Sciaena umbra; /kwas/: Ultra-fast pulse series produced by Scorpaena spp. (c) Occurrence (in percentage) of chorus (/kwas/ and RPS) per hour.

Fig. 2 Fish richness (number of species/125 m2), abundance (number of individuals/125 m2) and biomass (g/125 m2) found by scuba UVC.

Based on the linear mixed models (LMMs), all the soundscape metrics were influenced by the meadow type (Fig. 3), particularly higher values were associated with the transplanted meadow. Sound Pressure Level (SPL200–2000 Hz) and Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI200–2000 Hz) were also related to the fish sound abundance class (Table 1, Fig. 4), namely, higher values were associated to fish chorus.Fig. 3 Relationships between acoustic indexes (SPL200–2000 Hz, ACI200–2000 Hz, SPL2000–11,000 Hz and ACI2000–11,000 Hz) and meadow type as predicted by the LMMs. The points and bars are mean ± CI.

Table 1 Outputs of the LMMs applied on SPL200–2000 Hz and ACI200–2000 Hz showing the effect of meadow type (transplanted, reference and dead) and fish sound abundance class (no chorus, chorus) and outputs of the LMMs applied on SPL2000–11,000 Hz and ACI2000–11,000 Hz showing the effect of meadow type. R2 marginal indicates the proportion of variance explained by the fixed component of the models, while R2 conditional indicates the proportion of variance explained by both the fixed and random (site and hour) components of the models.

SPL200–2000 Hz	Estimate	Std. error	z value	P value	
Intercept	101.2029	1.2681	79.80	< 0.0001	
Meadow (reference)	0.7834	1.6884	0.46	0.6426	
Meadow (transplanted)	3.6489	1.6989	2.15	0.0317	
Fish (no chorus)	− 1.2898	0.2565	− 5.03	< 0.0001	
R2 (cond) = 0.83; R2 (marg) = 0.25	
SPL2000–11,000 Hz	Estimate	Std. error	z value	P value	
Intercept	102.905	0.890	115.63	< 0.0001	
Meadow (reference)	− 2.473	1.250	− 1.98	0.0479	
Meadow (transplanted)	7.158	1.253	5.71	< 0.0001	
R2 (cond) = 0.98; R2 (marg) = 0.82	
ACI200–2000 Hz	Estimate	Std. error	z value	P value	
Intercept	87.5006	0.4913	178.09	< 0.0001	
Meadow (reference)	1.0863	0.6642	1.64	0.1019	
Meadow (transplanted)	1.4722	0.6698	2.20	0.0280	
Fish (no chorus)	− 0.2796	0.1290	− 2.17	0.0302	
R2 (cond) = 0.75; R2 (marg) = 0.26	
ACI2000–11000 Hz	Estimate	Std. error	z value	P value	
Intercept	449.544	2.757	163.04	< 0.0001	
Meadow (reference)	3.253	3.841	0.85	0.3970	
Meadow (transplanted)	24.560	3.872	6.34	< 0.0001	
R2 (cond) = 0.92; R2 (marg) = 0.72	

Fig. 4 Relationships between acoustic indexes (SPL200–2000 Hz, ACI200–2000 Hz) and fish sound abundance class (chorus and no chorus) as predicted by the LMMs. The points and bars are mean ± CI.

Discussions

The active restoration of declined seagrass meadows supports the recovery of the vegetation itself but, as foundation species, it should also enhance biodiversity and ecosystem functions45; thus, inferring the functional recovery of the ecosystem is pivotal when the restoration success has to be evaluated. To assess the early effectiveness of a restoration operation, short-term monitoring (< 2 years after the transplantation) which evaluates functional (phenological and lepidochronological parameters), structural (shoot density and % coverage) and ecological descriptors (associated flora and fauna) should be implemented46. In this framework, the present study highlighted that soundscape analysis may represent an effective complementary tool with the potential to measure early ecosystem recovery after a seagrass restoration operation.

The status of fish assemblages can be used as a proxy to assess ecosystem functioning. To investigate the fish fauna of a recovering system, such as a restored meadow, non-invasive methods, such as the Underwater Visual Census (UVC) are usually used, even if these methods can fail in detecting cryptic or nocturnal species39,47. Fish call analysis showed that, both in the reference and transplanted meadows, acoustic signals were produced in relevant abundance (chorus) by Sciaena umbra and Scorpaena spp., species that were undetected by the UVC carried out at the same sites. The signals emitted by Sciaena umbra and Scorpaena spp. are among the most common fish sounds in P. oceanica beds and have been considered a potential proxy for seagrass monitoring48,49. In the dead meadow, five fish sound types were recorded, but from their tiny abundance only a sporadic presence of fish in this highly degraded habitat can be assumed, and this would be consistent with the UVC detections (only one taxon, Atherinidae; S4). In addition, even with short-term acoustic recordings, we were able to detect cryptic and soniferous species (e.g. Scorpaena spp.) which had not been noticed during the visual census. These findings confirm the potential effectiveness of the acoustic monitoring as a complementary technique to fish visual census, especially useful for cryptic species39,48–50.

In our recordings, almost 80% of recorded sounds, known as /kwas/, were attributed to Scorpaena spp. This sound showed potential to be used for monitoring seagrasses since: (i) it was measured in many different P. oceanica beds over a large spatial scale48–50; (ii) due to its acoustic characteristic, it is less masked by shipping noise than other fish sounds, thus can be detected even in highly anthropized areas48; (iii) it likely occurs independently of the season and species reproductive state48, unlike other fish sound, such as those emitted by Sciaena umbra, which are strongly related to the mating season51. Further, from our results, /kwas/ sounds showed to be related to different habitat quality, proving to be particularly useful in monitoring seagrass restoration success. However, to be able to generalize this result on a Mediterranean scale, further studies would be necessary considering P. oceanica restored meadows of various ages (the resilience of plant traits depends on the elapsed time since settlement52) and locations across the Basin.

Sound pressure levels (SPLs) differed between meadow type, in both the frequency bands, proving that this soundscape metric can be useful in detecting seagrass habitat condition, at least when extreme states (dead, reference and transplanted meadows) are compared. Interestingly, the highest spectra levels were present in the transplanted meadows and not in the reference ones, especially in the 2000–11,000 Hz frequency band. The combination of seagrass patches and dead meadows, which characterize the transplanted area, may have favored the settlement of numerous invertebrate species, whose sounds fall in the 2000–11,000 Hz frequency band, making this habitat noisier53. Even if a quantitative evaluation of invertebrates has not been considered here, in other Mediterranean areas a high macro-invertebrates species diversity and abundance in dead P. oceanica has been found54 and it would be explained by the presence of many empty spaces and crevices of high complexity created by the remaining portion of dead rhizomes and roots, offering several micro-habitats to cryptic fauna. For example, the snapping shrimp Alpheus nitescens, known to produce sounds with peak frequencies between 3 and 60 kHz55, often occupies hollows and crevices in substrata like dead meadows54.

Dead meadows and P. oceanica patches can be colonized by algae and other sessile epibiota, that could attract herbivore species such as the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus [56; authors pers. obs.], able to produce indirect sound in the frequency between 6 and 50 kHz through their moving or grazing activities55. These sounds could also attract fish species44,57,58, both in the larval and adult stages, coherently with the UVC results, which detected higher fish richness, abundance, and biomass in the transplanted meadows compared to the reference, likely because the higher habitat heterogeneity corresponds to a wider variety of food and shelter opportunities. Therefore, the likely higher habitat complexity of the transplanted meadows may result in a louder soundscape, as it was found in other environmental contexts, such as the tropical coral reefs42,53,59–61.

Uncertainties may arise about the influence of the sea-bottom physical structure on the soundscape of these habitats. For example, it could be argued that the lower sound pressure levels (in the lowest frequency band) recorded in the dead meadows, compared to the other meadow types, could be due to the absorption of sound waves by sediments62. However, if this was true, a similarity between dead and transplanted meadows would be expected because in the latter type a large part of dead matte and sediment are still present. Therefore, the higher sound pressure level found in the transplanted meadow does not support the hypothesis that the soundscape is largely influenced by the physical features of the bottom but supports biodiversity differences. Nevertheless, further studies should be designed to disentangle the physical from the community influences in seagrass soundscapes.

Spectra level in the 200–2000 Hz frequency band was also related to the presence of fish chorus. The influence of fish chorus is particularly evident in the SPL200-2000 Hz increase between 10 and 11 pm (S3), corresponding to the hours with the highest abundance of fish calls. The influence of chorusing activity in driving changes in SPL was also found in other marine habitats, such as temperate and tropical reefs63,64. Other than the sounds produced by fish to communicate, sources of noise able to increase SPL200–2000 Hz could be related to the sounds produced by herbivorous fish. In fact, these sounds produced by the herbivorous fish grazing have been measured in coral reefs and fall in the band between 160 and 1000 Hz64, although in the Mediterranean Sea they have never been reported.

ACI in both frequency bands was associated with the meadow type, being higher in transplanted meadows compared to dead meadows. Further, ACI200–2000 Hz was related to fish chorus. The use of ACI to evaluate the soundscape of restored habitat showed to have some potentiality, especially for rapidly discovering pulsed biological signals63 or abundant fish calls49. In fact, ACI is minimally affected by sounds with small amplitude variation over time (such as boat noise;65,66, while it can reach higher values when sounds with larger internal variability, such as those produced by snapping shrimps or fish chorus, are present63,67.

The results of both mesocosm and field experiments and recent literature reviews highlighted that ACI can provide valuable information on sound abundance, even when the sound source has not been identified68, but also its inadequacy in discriminating the diversity of sound types69. In habitats such as P. oceanica meadows, where the acoustic richness of species is limited and largely dominated by some sound types (such as /kwas/)49, the use of ACI can be considered a valuable tool in evaluating seagrass restoration success, also considering that its calculation is less time consuming than manual acoustic analysis. However, in the hypothesis of a widespread use of ACI as a tool for following up P. oceanica restorations, attention should be paid to the frequency and temporal resolution used for its calculation, since the setting strongly influences ACI values49.

Conclusions

Monitoring techniques and restoration success evaluation are still poorly defined70. However, the estimate of the success of ecological restoration is pivotal both in terms of resource management and definition of best practices31. To our best knowledge, this is the first attempt to apply acoustic monitoring and soundscape metrics to evaluate seagrass restoration success in an early stage after transplantation. Short-term acoustic recordings can be used for rapid and cost-effective restoration assessments, as soundscape can be related to habitat type and quality42,57,71. The results on sound spectral levels and acoustic complexity index support the hypotheses that both these metrics would be representative of biogenic sounds: SPL and ACI in the lowest frequency were related to fish chorus, while SPL and ACI in the highest frequency bands could be driven by invertebrate sounds (even if invertebrates have not been monitored here). However, some limitations of the present study should be highlighted to lead future investigations. Empirical evidence on the efficiency of soundscape metrics, such as SPL and ACI, in ecological research is still controversial64,71,72, and this hampers the generalized use of these soundscape metrics as indicators of marine habitat quality68 and restoration success. However, soundscape metrics have the strong advantage of being automatically calculated, and even if they are still not ready to be used as a standalone monitoring tool68, our results encourage further research to implement their use as a complementary tool to evaluate habitat restoration success, together with fish and invertebrate call characterization. Moreover, future studies encompassing aged meadows, distributed over a wide spatial scale and under different environmental conditions, should be performed to corroborate these preliminary results. In fact, our acoustic analysis covered only one young restoration operation over a few recording days: a larger sample size, collected over longer time periods, would also be necessary to draw more general conclusions.

Methods

Study area and meadow features

Acoustic recordings were collected off Porto Torres (northern Sardinia, Italy, Western Mediterranean Sea), where one of the largest P. oceanica restoration operations of the Basin31 has been realized to compensate the meadow loss due to the port enlargement. From July 2022, 140,000 cuttings (each bearing from one to three shoots) were transplanted over a 0.7 ha surface of dead meadow (the restoration area has a rectangular shape with a size of 280 × 85 m). Twenty cuttings per m2 were anchored onto degradable mats of natural coconut nets coupled with a frame fixed on the bottom. To evaluate the early restoration success, acoustic recordings gained at the transplanted area were compared to those collected in meadows with natural conditions (as a reference habitat) and in dead meadows (as a degraded habitat) located in the same zone (with the same type of substrates), close to the transplanted area, and thus exposed to similar natural conditions23. Three sites per each meadow type (transplanted, reference, and dead) were chosen (Figs. 5, 6; Table 2). Due to the limited size of the transplanted area, recordings were carried out at sites spatially separated by approximately 70 m but not on consecutive days within a month to improve the probability of detecting sounds emitted by different species/individuals.Fig. 5 Map of the study area (left) and mooring system (right), the latter as described in La Manna et al., 2021.

Fig. 6 Meadow types: dead, reference and transplanted. Photo credits: Ivan Guala.

Table 2 Sampling scheme and features of each meadow type. The acoustic samples referred to the number of 5-min long samples used in the acoustic and statistical analysis, after the removal of samples due to the presence of shipping noise. Each acoustic recording started at 6 p.m. and ended at 6.59 a.m. the day after. The duty cycle was 5 min of recordings followed by 5 min of pause (thus 30 min of recordings every 60 min for a total of 6.5 h of recordings per deployment).

Meadow type	Site	Date of recordings	N° of acoustic samples	Hours of recordings	Depth	Shoot density	Meadow coverage	
Transplanted	RE1	28–29 June 2023	39	3.25	20	25 ± 5	10%	
RE2	19–20 July 2023	36	3.00	20	25 ± 5	10%	
RE2_2	23–24 July 2023	33	2.75	20	25 ± 5	10%	
Reference	N1	28–29 June 2023	46	3.83	25	252 ± 56	90%	
N3	19–20 July 2023	57	4.75	24	265 ± 32	90%	
N4	23–24 July 2023	56	4.67	23	256 ± 26	90%	
Dead	DM2	28–29 June 2023	53	4.42	25	0	0%	
DM3	19–20 July 2023	61	5.08	25	0	0%	
DM34	23–24 July 2023	47	3.91	20	0	0%	

In each reference site, the meadow density was estimated using 40 × 40 cm quadrats (n = 3 per site; Table 2); percentage coverage was visually estimated on a 5 m radius surface around a fixed point73. Further, in the same period of the acoustic recordings (28 June–24 July 2023), fish assemblage was estimated with the Underwater Visual Census by scuba divers along 25 × 5 m transects (three transects per site, nine transects per meadow type). Fish richness (number of species/125 m2), abundance (number of individuals/125 m2) and biomass (g/125 m2) were calculated. Fish biomass was estimated using the relationship between fish length (L) and weight (W): W = aLb. Length was estimated visually by the scuba divers while the species-specific morphometric values a and b were obtained from Fishbase74.

Acoustic sampling

In each site, an underwater autonomous acoustic recorder (URec384k-Nauta RCS, here after URec) was deployed by a scuba diver, mooring the system with 5 kg ballast weights and a buoy (Fig. 5). Each URec was featured with a Sensor Technology SQ26 pre-amplified hydrophone (Sensitivity between − 166 and − 175 dB re: V/m Pa, flat frequency response up to 30 kHz), a DODOTRONIC programmable recorder (gain 0 dB), battery set, and 256–400 Gb-SD memory card. The URec was set to record 13 h per deployment (from 6:00 p.m. to 6:59 a.m.) with a duty cycle of 5 min of recordings followed by 5 min of pause (thus 30 min of recordings every 60 min), at a sampling rate of 96 kHz and 16-bit resolution. The nocturnal hours of June-July were chosen to detect the highest fish acoustic activities (in the Mediterranean coastal area48–50,75). Recordings were all done in good weather conditions, namely sea state < 2 (Douglas scale) and wind force < 2 (Beaufort scale), to reduce the influence of wind and waves on the sea ambient noise levels.

Acoustic analysis

The recordings were visually and aurally inspected by Raven Pro 1.6 (Cornell University), displaying the spectrogram 300 s at a time with frequencies between 0 and 11 kHz (FFT length = 8192; Hamming window, 50% overlap); then, each sample was inspected to verify the presence of shipping noise and eliminated in that case.

Fish sounds were classified following the same procedure applied in50, using a catalogue of known sounds from the Mediterranean Sea48–51,71,75,76 based on the acoustic characteristics of fish sound (Table 3). Further, we defined two fish sound abundance classes: “chorus” (when more animals make calls that overlap or are produced in rapid succession77, and “no chorus” (when fish sounds are present in quantity between 0 and < 10 sounds− 1 min). Then, for each sample, we calculated the Sound Pressure Level (SPL dB re: 1 μPa-rms, “SPL”) and the Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI), in two bandwidths: 200–2000 Hz (to account for fish calls) and 2000–11,000 kHz (to account for invertebrate sounds) (Table 3). SPL and ACI were particularly useful when the focus of the study extends over the species-level and concerns the evaluation of the habitat quality and ecosystem functioning through the description of soundscape patterns and dynamics61,68,78; furthermore, ACI is among the acoustic indexes with the highest predictive performance in comparison with other commonly used ones also in the marine environment68. The soundscape metrics were calculated in R software version 3.6.1.79 using PAMGuide (a templated code able to calculate absolute sea ambient noise level80, and the libraries seewave41 and soundecology81.Table 3 Soundscape metrics and fish sound types used in this study.

Soundscape metrics	Description	
Sound Pressure Level (SPL dB re 1 μPa-rms)	SPL represents the broadband time-varying acoustic energy levels at a receiver82 and was calculated as the root mean square of the pressure level recorded83. It is an intensity index, that can be related to biological sounds only in the absence of geophonies or anthropophonies. Even if SPL cannot provide information on the number or identity of biological sound sources82, this index is largely employed to compare soundscape differences within and between habitat and ecosystems and to identify soundscape temporal patterns39,50,63,84,56	
Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI)	ACI estimates the complexity of an acoustic recording in space and time67, by comparing sound intensity at subsequent time steps. This index is minimally affected by sounds having small amplitude variation over time (as background or boat noise), while has higher values when more variable transient sounds (as the biological sounds) were present in the recording. Even if ACI has been largely employed in soundscape ecology studies, its ability to identify changes in fish sound abundance and diversity is controversial69,56, also because its value depends on the temporal and frequency resolution used for its calculation. Based on the finding of69 we calculated ACI with frequency resolution = 11.72 Hz and temporal resolution of 0.085 s	
Fish sound types	Description	
DS–DSS	Single or series of down-sweeping sounds, with peak frequency higher than 200 Hz76	
APPPS	Alternating pulse period pulse series associated with Ophidion spp.75	
RPP	Regular pulse series associated with Sciaena umbra51	
PS	Irregular series of at least three impulsive sounds with peak frequency ≥ 200 Hz76	
LPS	Sequence of pulses (at least three) with irregular pulse period and peak frequency < 200 Hz76	
/kwas/	Ultra-fast pulse series with frequency around 800 Hz and pseudo-harmonics appearance in the spectrogram, associated with Scorpaena spp.48	

Statistical analysis

Four separate linear mixed models (LMMs) were used to test the relationship between the response variables (SPL200–2000 Hz, SPL2000–11000 Hz, ACI200–2000 Hz, ACI2000–11,000 Hz) and the factor meadow type (three levels: transplanted, reference and dead meadows). LMMs are an extension of generalized linear models that allow to model the covariance structure that is generated by the grouping of data85 through the inclusion of a random component. They are particularly useful when a variable is measured more than once from the same group, and thus data may be not independent86, as in the case of recordings taken at regular intervals over long periods and from multiple close sites68. Thus, to control for the highest correlation between measurements taken from the same site and hour (S1, S2), both factors were used as random components in the LMMs. When modelling SPL200–2000 Hz and ACI200–2000 Hz, we also tested the influence of fish sound abundance as a factor with two levels: no chorus and chorus. Model validation was performed by means of graphical inspection of residuals (i.e., residuals vs. fitted values plots; plots of residuals vs. each explanatory variable in the model and not in the model; S3). To perform the LMMs, the function glmmTMB of the R package glmmTMB87 was used.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-71975-2.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank AGRIS Sardegna for the logistic supports and Lauren Polimeno for English editing. GC and GLM acknowledge the support of NBFC to University of Sassari, funded by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, PNRR, Missione 4, Componente 2, “Dalla ricerca all’impresa”, Investimento 1.4 Project CN00000033. This manuscript reflects only the authors’ views and opinions, neither the European Union nor the European Commission can be considered responsible for them.

Author contributions

G.L.M.: Conceptualization; methodology; data collection and analysis; writing original draft. I.G.: Methodology; data collection and analysis. A.P.: Methodology; data collection P.S.: Methodology; data collection. N.A.: Methodology; data collection. G.C.: Conceptualization; writing original draft.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Adams SM Assessing cause and effect of multiple stressors on marine systems Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2005 51 649 657 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.11.040 16291182
Adams, S. M. Assessing cause and effect of multiple stressors on marine systems. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 51, 649–657 (2005).16291182 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.11.040
2. Costanza RR d’Arge R de Groot S Farber M Grasso B Hannon K The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital Nature 1997 387 253 260 10.1038/387253a0
Costanza, R. R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260 (1997).10.1038/387253a0
3. Kennish MJ Management strategies to mitigate anthropogenic impacts in estuarine and coastal marine environments: A review Open J. Ecol. 2022 12 667 688 10.4236/oje.2022.1210038
Kennish, M. J. Management strategies to mitigate anthropogenic impacts in estuarine and coastal marine environments: A review. Open J. Ecol. 12, 667–688 (2022).10.4236/oje.2022.1210038
4. Heck KL Hays G Orth RJ Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2003 253 123 136 10.3354/meps253123
Heck, K. L., Hays, G. & Orth, R. J. Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 253, 123–136 (2003).10.3354/meps253123
5. Macreadie PI Baird ME Trevathan-Tackett SM Larkum AW Ralph PJ Quantifying and modelling the carbon sequestration capacity of seagrass meadows—A critical assessment Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2014 83 430 439 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.07.038 23948090
Macreadie, P. I., Baird, M. E., Trevathan-Tackett, S. M., Larkum, A. W. & Ralph, P. J. Quantifying and modelling the carbon sequestration capacity of seagrass meadows—A critical assessment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 83, 430–439 (2014).23948090 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.07.038
6. McLeod E Chmura GL Bouillon S A blueprint for blue carbon: Toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2 Front. Ecol. Environ. 2011 9 552 560 10.1890/110004
McLeod, E. et al. A blueprint for blue carbon: Toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 552–560 (2011).10.1890/110004
7. Gattuso, J. P., Magnan, A. K., Bopp, L., Cheung, W. W., Duarte, C. M., Hinkel, J., et al. Ocean solutions to address climate change and its effects on marine ecosystems. Front. Mar. Sci. 337 (2018).
8. Hemminga, M. A., Duarte, C. M. Seagrass Ecology (Cambridge University Press, 2000). 10.1017/cbo9780511525551.
9. Larkum AWD Orth RJ Duarte CM Seagrasses: Biology, ecology and conservation Phycologia 2006 45 5
Larkum, A. W. D., Orth, R. J. & Duarte, C. M. Seagrasses: Biology, ecology and conservation. Phycologia 45, 5 (2006).
10. Fonseca, M. S., Kenworthy, W. J., Thayer, G. W. Guidelines for the Conservation and Restoration of Seagrasses in the United States and Adjacent Waters (Science for Solutions, 1998).
11. Lamb, J. B., van de water, J. A. J. M., Bourne, D. G., Hein, M. Y., Fiorenza, E. A., et al. Seagrass ecosystems reduce exposure to bacterial pathogens of humans, fishes, and invertebrates. Science 355, 731–733 (2017).
12. Jayathilake DRM Costello MJA Modelled global distribution of the seagrass biome Biol. Conserv. 2018 226 120 126 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.009
Jayathilake, D. R. M. & Costello, M. J. A. Modelled global distribution of the seagrass biome. Biol. Conserv. 226, 120–126 (2018).10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.009
13. Waycott M Duarte CM Carruthers TJB Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009 106 12377 12381 10.1073/pnas.0905620106 19587236
Waycott, M. et al. Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 12377–12381 (2009).19587236 10.1073/pnas.0905620106
14. Dunic JC Brown CJ Connolly RM Turschwell MP Côté IM Long-term declines and recovery of meadow area across the world’s seagrass bioregions Glob. Change Biol. 2021 27 4096 4109 10.1111/gcb.15684
Dunic, J. C., Brown, C. J., Connolly, R. M., Turschwell, M. P. & Côté, I. M. Long-term declines and recovery of meadow area across the world’s seagrass bioregions. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 4096–4109 (2021).10.1111/gcb.15684
15. Marbà N Díaz-Almela E Duarte CM Mediterranean seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) loss between 1842 and 2009 Biol. Conserv. 2009 176 183 190 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.05.024
Marbà, N., Díaz-Almela, E. & Duarte, C. M. Mediterranean seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) loss between 1842 and 2009. Biol. Conserv. 176, 183–190 (2009).10.1016/j.biocon.2014.05.024
16. Orth RJ Carruthers TJB Dennison WC Duarte CM Fourqurean JW Heck KL Hughes AR A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems Bioscience 2006 56 987 996 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[987:AGCFSE]2.0.CO;2
Orth, R. J. et al. A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. Bioscience 56, 987–996 (2006).10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[987:AGCFSE]2.0.CO;2
17. Perkol-Finkel S Airoldi L Loss and recovery potential of marine habitats: an experimental study of factors maintaining resilience in subtidal algal forests at the Adriatic Sea PLoS One 2010 5 e10791 10.1371/journal.pone.0010791 20520726
Perkol-Finkel, S. & Airoldi, L. Loss and recovery potential of marine habitats: an experimental study of factors maintaining resilience in subtidal algal forests at the Adriatic Sea. PLoS One 5, e10791 (2010).20520726 10.1371/journal.pone.0010791
18. Carr J D’Odorico P McGlathery K Wiberg P Stability and bistability of seagrass ecosystems in shallow coastal lagoons: Role of feedbacks with sediment resuspension and light attenuation J. Geophys. Res. 2010 115 G03011
Carr, J., D’Odorico, P., McGlathery, K. & Wiberg, P. Stability and bistability of seagrass ecosystems in shallow coastal lagoons: Role of feedbacks with sediment resuspension and light attenuation. J. Geophys. Res. 115, G03011 (2010).
19. McGlathery KJ Reidenbach MA D'Odorico P Fagherazzi S Pace ML Porter JH Nonlinear dynamics and alternative stable states in shallow coastal systems Oceanography 2013 26 220 231 10.5670/oceanog.2013.66
McGlathery, K. J. et al. Nonlinear dynamics and alternative stable states in shallow coastal systems. Oceanography 26, 220–231 (2013).10.5670/oceanog.2013.66
20. Fonseca MS Julius BE Kenworthy WJ Integrating biology and economics in seagrass restoration: How much is enough and why? Ecol. Eng. 2000 15 227 237 10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00078-1
Fonseca, M. S., Julius, B. E. & Kenworthy, W. J. Integrating biology and economics in seagrass restoration: How much is enough and why?. Ecol. Eng. 15, 227–237 (2000).10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00078-1
21. van Katwijk MM Global analysis of seagrass restoration: The importance of large-scale planting J. Appl. Ecol. 2016 53 567 578 10.1111/1365-2664.12562
van Katwijk, M. M. et al. Global analysis of seagrass restoration: The importance of large-scale planting. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 567–578 (2016).10.1111/1365-2664.12562
22. SER (Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group). The SER Primer on Ecological Restoration. (Society for Ecological Restoration, Science & Policy Working Group, 1998).
23. SER (Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group). The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration (available from www.ser.org). (Society for Ecological Restoration International, 2004).
24. Bullock JM Aronson J Newton AC Pywell RF Rey-Benayas JM Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: Conflicts and opportunities Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011 26 541 549 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011 21782273
Bullock, J. M., Aronson, J., Newton, A. C., Pywell, R. F. & Rey-Benayas, J. M. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: Conflicts and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 541–549 (2011).21782273 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011
25. Peterson CH Kneib RT Manen CA Scaling restoration actions in the marine environment to meet quantitative targets of enhanced ecosystem services Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2003 264 73 176 10.3354/meps264173
Peterson, C. H., Kneib, R. T. & Manen, C. A. Scaling restoration actions in the marine environment to meet quantitative targets of enhanced ecosystem services. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 264, 73–176 (2003).10.3354/meps264173
26. Shackelford N Hobbs RJ Burgar JM Erickson TE Fontaine JB Laliberte E Primed for change: Developing ecological restoration for the 21st century Restor. Ecol. 2013 21 297 304 10.1111/rec.12012
Shackelford, N. et al. Primed for change: Developing ecological restoration for the 21st century. Restor. Ecol. 21, 297–304 (2013).10.1111/rec.12012
27. Valdez SR Zhang YS van der Heide T Vanderklift MA Tarquinio F Orth RJ Silliman BR Positive ecological interactions and the success of seagrass restoration Front. Mar. Sci. 2020 7 91 10.3389/fmars.2020.00091
Valdez, S. R. et al. Positive ecological interactions and the success of seagrass restoration. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 91 (2020).10.3389/fmars.2020.00091
28. Fournet MEH Stabenau E Madhusudhana S Rice AN Altered acoustic community structure indicates delayed recovery following ecosystem perturbations Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci. 2022 274 107948 10.1016/j.ecss.2022.107948
Fournet, M. E. H., Stabenau, E., Madhusudhana, S. & Rice, A. N. Altered acoustic community structure indicates delayed recovery following ecosystem perturbations. Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci. 274, 107948 (2022).10.1016/j.ecss.2022.107948
29. Tan YM Dalby O Kendrick GA Statton J Sinclair EA Fraser MW Seagrass restoration is possible: Insights and lessons from Australia and New Zealand Front. Mar. Sci. 2020 7 1 21 10.3389/fmars.2020.00617 32802822
Tan, Y. M. et al. Seagrass restoration is possible: Insights and lessons from Australia and New Zealand. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 1–21 (2020).32802822 10.3389/fmars.2020.00617
30. Boudouresque CF Blanfuné A Pergent G Thibaut T Restoration of seagrass meadows in the Mediterranean Sea: A critical review of effectiveness and ethical issues Water 2021 13 1034 10.3390/w13081034
Boudouresque, C. F., Blanfuné, A., Pergent, G. & Thibaut, T. Restoration of seagrass meadows in the Mediterranean Sea: A critical review of effectiveness and ethical issues. Water 13, 1034 (2021).10.3390/w13081034
31. Pansini A Bosch-Belmar M Berlino M Sarà G Ceccherelli G Collating evidence on the restoration efforts of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica: Current knowledge and gaps Sci. Total Environ. 2022 851 158320 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158320 36037894
Pansini, A., Bosch-Belmar, M., Berlino, M., Sarà, G. & Ceccherelli, G. Collating evidence on the restoration efforts of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica: Current knowledge and gaps. Sci. Total Environ. 851, 158320 (2022).36037894 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158320
32. Bacci, T., La Porta, B., Maggi, C., Nonnis, O., Paganelli, D., Rende, F.S., Targusi, M. Conservazione e Gestione Della Naturalità Negli Ecosistemi Marino-Costieri. In Il Trapianto Delle Praterie di Posidonia oceanica. Manuali e Linee Guida n.106/2014; ISPRA: Rome, Italy, 2014, 1–97 (2014).
33. Noss RF Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach Conserv. Biol. 1990 4 355 364 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x
Noss, R. F. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach. Conserv. Biol. 4, 355–364 (1990).10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x
34. Ruiz-Jaen MC Aide TM Restoration success: How is it being measured? Restor. Ecol. 2005 13 569 577 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00072.x
Ruiz-Jaen, M. C. & Aide, T. M. Restoration success: How is it being measured?. Restor. Ecol. 13, 569–577 (2005).10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00072.x
35. Ruiz-Jaen MC Aide TM Vegetation structure, species diversity, and ecosystem processes as measures of restoration success For. Ecol. Manag. 2005 218 159 173 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.07.008
Ruiz-Jaen, M. C. & Aide, T. M. Vegetation structure, species diversity, and ecosystem processes as measures of restoration success. For. Ecol. Manag. 218, 159–173 (2005).10.1016/j.foreco.2005.07.008
36. Scapin L Zucchetta M Facca C Sfriso A Franzoi P Using fish assemblage to identify success criteria for seagrass habitat restoration Web Ecol. 2016 16 33 36 10.5194/we-16-33-2016
Scapin, L., Zucchetta, M., Facca, C., Sfriso, A. & Franzoi, P. Using fish assemblage to identify success criteria for seagrass habitat restoration. Web Ecol. 16, 33–36 (2016).10.5194/we-16-33-2016
37. Beheshti, K.M., Williams, S.L., Boyer, K.E., Endris, C., Clemons, A., Grimes, T. et al. Rapid enhancement of multiple ecosystem services following the restoration of a coastal foundation species. Ecol. Appl. 32, e02466 (2022).
38. Murphy HM Jenkins GP Observational methods used in marine spatial monitoring of fishes and associated habitats: A review Mar. Freshw. Res. 2010 61 236 252 10.1071/MF09068
Murphy, H. M. & Jenkins, G. P. Observational methods used in marine spatial monitoring of fishes and associated habitats: A review. Mar. Freshw. Res. 61, 236–252 (2010).10.1071/MF09068
39. Staaterman E Ogburn MB Altieri AH Brandl SJ Whippo R Seemann J Goodison M Duffy JE Bioacoustic measurements complement visual biodiversity surveys: Preliminary evidence from four shallow marine habitats Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2017 575 207 215 10.3354/meps12188
Staaterman, E. et al. Bioacoustic measurements complement visual biodiversity surveys: Preliminary evidence from four shallow marine habitats. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 575, 207–215 (2017).10.3354/meps12188
40. Pijanowski BC Villanueva-Rivera LJ Dumyahn SL Farina A Krause B Napoletano BM Soundscape ecology: The science of sound in the landscape BioScience 2011 61 203 216 10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.6
Pijanowski, B. C. et al. Soundscape ecology: The science of sound in the landscape. BioScience 61, 203–216 (2011).10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.6
41. Sueur J Aubin T Simonis C Seewave: A free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis Bioacoustics 2008 18 213 226 10.1080/09524622.2008.9753600
Sueur, J., Aubin, T. & Simonis, C. Seewave: A free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics 18, 213–226 (2008).10.1080/09524622.2008.9753600
42. Butler J Stanley JA Butler MJ Underwater soundscapes in near-shore tropical habitats and the effects of environmental degradation and habitat restoration J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2016 479 89 96 10.1016/j.jembe.2016.03.006
Butler, J., Stanley, J. A. & Butler, M. J. Underwater soundscapes in near-shore tropical habitats and the effects of environmental degradation and habitat restoration. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 479, 89–96 (2016).10.1016/j.jembe.2016.03.006
43. Rossi T Connell SD Nagelkerken I The sounds of silence: Regime shifts impoverish marine soundscapes Landsc. Ecol. 2017 32 239 248 10.1007/s10980-016-0439-x
Rossi, T., Connell, S. D. & Nagelkerken, I. The sounds of silence: Regime shifts impoverish marine soundscapes. Landsc. Ecol. 32, 239–248 (2017).10.1007/s10980-016-0439-x
44. Gordon TA Radford AN Davidson IK Barnes K McCloskey K Nedelec SL Acoustic enrichment can enhance fish community development on degraded coral reef habitat Nat. Commun. 2019 10 1 7 10.1038/s41467-019-13186-2 30602773
Gordon, T. A. et al. Acoustic enrichment can enhance fish community development on degraded coral reef habitat. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–7 (2019).30602773 10.1038/s41467-019-13186-2
45. Angelini C van der Heide T Griffin JN Morton JP Derksen-Hooijberg M Lamers LPM Foundation species’ overlap enhances biodiversity and multifunctionality from the patch to landscape scale in southeastern United States salt marshes Proc. R. Soc. B 2015 282 1 9 10.1098/rspb.2015.0421
Angelini, C. et al. Foundation species’ overlap enhances biodiversity and multifunctionality from the patch to landscape scale in southeastern United States salt marshes. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 1–9 (2015).10.1098/rspb.2015.0421
46. Toma, T. S. P., Overbeck, G. E., de Mendonça, M. S., Fernandes, G. W. Optimal references for ecological restoration: The need to protect references in the tropics. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 21, 25–32 (2023).
47. Stewart BD Beukers JS Baited technique improves censuses of cryptic fish in complex habitats Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2000 197 259 272 10.3354/meps197259
Stewart, B. D. & Beukers, J. S. Baited technique improves censuses of cryptic fish in complex habitats. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 197, 259–272 (2000).10.3354/meps197259
48. Di Iorio L Raick X Parmentier E Boissery P Valentini Poirier CA Gervaise C Posidonia meadows calling: A ubiquitous fish sound with monitoring potential Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 2018 4 248 263 10.1002/rse2.72
Di Iorio, L. et al. Posidonia meadows calling: A ubiquitous fish sound with monitoring potential. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 4, 248–263 (2018).10.1002/rse2.72
49. Bolgan, M., Di Iorio, L., Dailianis, T., Catalan, I.A., Lejeune, P., Picciulin, M. et al. Fish acoustic community structure in Neptune seagrass meadows across the Mediterranean basin. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 1–19 (2022).
50. La Manna G Picciulin M Crobu A Perretti F Ronchetti F Manghi M Ruiu A Ceccherelli G Marine soundscape and fish biophony of a Mediterranean marine protected area PeerJ 2021 9 e12551 10.7717/peerj.12551 35003918
La Manna, G. et al. Marine soundscape and fish biophony of a Mediterranean marine protected area. PeerJ 9, e12551 (2021).35003918 10.7717/peerj.12551
51. Picciulin, M., Calcagno, G., Sebastianutto, L., Bonacito, C., Codarin, A., Costantini, M. et al. Diagnostics of nocturnal calls of Sciaena umbra (L., fam., Sciaenidae) in a nearshore Mediterranean marine reserve. Bioacoustics. 22, 3 (2012).
52. Froese, R., Pauly, D. Editors. 2024.FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org (2024).
53. Lillis A Eggleston DB Bohnenstiehl DR Estuarine soundscapes: Distinct acoustic characteristics of oyster reefs compared to soft-bottom habitats Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2014 505 1 17 10.3354/meps10805
Lillis, A., Eggleston, D. B. & Bohnenstiehl, D. R. Estuarine soundscapes: Distinct acoustic characteristics of oyster reefs compared to soft-bottom habitats. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 505, 1–17 (2014).10.3354/meps10805
54. Borg JA Rowden AA Attrill MJ Wanted dead or alive: High diversity of macroinvertebrates associated with living and ‘dead’ Posidonia oceanica matte Mar. Biol. 2006 149 667 677 10.1007/s00227-006-0250-3
Borg, J. A. et al. Wanted dead or alive: High diversity of macroinvertebrates associated with living and ‘dead’ Posidonia oceanica matte. Mar. Biol. 149, 667–677 (2006).10.1007/s00227-006-0250-3
55. Coquereau L Grall J Chauvaud L Gervaise C Clavier J Jolivet A Di Iorio L Sound production and associated behaviours of benthic invertebrates from a coastal habitat in the north-east Atlantic Mar. Biol. 2016 163 127 10.1007/s00227-016-2902-2
Coquereau, L. et al. Sound production and associated behaviours of benthic invertebrates from a coastal habitat in the north-east Atlantic. Mar. Biol. 163, 127 (2016).10.1007/s00227-016-2902-2
56. Ceccherelli G Pais A Pinna S Serra S Sechi N On the movement of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus towards Posidonia oceanica seagrass patches J. Shellfish Res. 2009 28 397 403 10.2983/035.028.0224
Ceccherelli, G., Pais, A., Pinna, S., Serra, S. & Sechi, N. On the movement of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus towards Posidonia oceanica seagrass patches. J. Shellfish Res. 28, 397–403 (2009).10.2983/035.028.0224
57. Radford CA Stanley JA Simpson SD Jeffs AG Juvenile coral reef fish use sound to locate habitats Coral Reefs 2011 30 295 305 10.1007/s00338-010-0710-6
Radford, C. A., Stanley, J. A., Simpson, S. D. & Jeffs, A. G. Juvenile coral reef fish use sound to locate habitats. Coral Reefs 30, 295–305 (2011).10.1007/s00338-010-0710-6
58. Piercy JJB Codling EA Hill AJ Smith DJ Simpson SD Habitat quality affects sound production and likely distance of detection on coral reefs Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2014 516 35 47 10.3354/meps10986
Piercy, J. J. B., Codling, E. A., Hill, A. J., Smith, D. J. & Simpson, S. D. Habitat quality affects sound production and likely distance of detection on coral reefs. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 516, 35–47 (2014).10.3354/meps10986
59. Freeman LA Freeman SE Rapidly obtained ecosystem indicators from coral reef soundscapes Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2016 561 69 82 10.3354/meps11938
Freeman, L. A. & Freeman, S. E. Rapidly obtained ecosystem indicators from coral reef soundscapes. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 561, 69–82 (2016).10.3354/meps11938
60. Ricci SW Eggleston DB Bohnenstiehl DR Lillis A Temporal soundscape patterns and processes in an estuarine reserve Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2016 550 25 38 10.3354/meps11724
Ricci, S. W., Eggleston, D. B., Bohnenstiehl, D. R. & Lillis, A. Temporal soundscape patterns and processes in an estuarine reserve. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 550, 25–38 (2016).10.3354/meps11724
61. Elise S Urbina-Barreto I Pinel R Mahamadaly V Bureau S Assessing key ecosystem functions through soundscapes: A new perspective from coral reefs Ecol. Indic. 2019 107 105623 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105623
Elise, S. et al. Assessing key ecosystem functions through soundscapes: A new perspective from coral reefs. Ecol. Indic. 107, 105623 (2019).10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105623
62. Hughes SJ Ellis DD Chapman DM Staal PR Low-frequency acoustic propagation loss in shallow water over hard-rock seabeds covered by a thin layer of elastic–solid sediment J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1990 88 283 297 10.1121/1.399951
Hughes, S. J., Ellis, D. D., Chapman, D. M. & Staal, P. R. Low-frequency acoustic propagation loss in shallow water over hard-rock seabeds covered by a thin layer of elastic–solid sediment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 283–297 (1990).10.1121/1.399951
63. Buscaino G Ceraulo M Pieretti N Corriasi V Farina A Filiciotto F Temporal patterns in the soundscape of the shallow waters of a Mediterranean marine protected area Sci. Rep. 2016 6 34230 10.1038/srep34230 27677956
Buscaino, G. et al. Temporal patterns in the soundscape of the shallow waters of a Mediterranean marine protected area. Sci. Rep. 6, 34230 (2016).27677956 10.1038/srep34230
64. Dimoff SA Halliday WD Pine MK Tietjen KL Juanes F Baum JK The utility of different acoustic indicators to describe biological sounds of a coral reef soundscape Ecol. Indic. 2021 124 107435 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107435
Dimoff, S. A. et al. The utility of different acoustic indicators to describe biological sounds of a coral reef soundscape. Ecol. Indic. 124, 107435 (2021).10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107435
65. Harris SA Shears NT Radford CA Ecoacoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity on temperate reefs Methods Ecol. Evol. 2016 7 713 724 10.1111/2041-210X.12527
Harris, S. A., Shears, N. T. & Radford, C. A. Ecoacoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity on temperate reefs. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 713–724 (2016).10.1111/2041-210X.12527
66. Nguyen Hong Duc, P. Cazau, D., White, P.R., Gérard, O., Detcheverry, J., Urtizberea, F., Adam, O. Use of ecoacoustics to characterize the marine acoustic environment off the North Atlantic French Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon Archipelago. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 9, 177 (2021).
67. Pieretti N Farina A Morri D A new methodology to infer the singing activity of an avian community: The Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI) Ecol. Indic. 2011 11 868 873 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.11.005
Pieretti, N., Farina, A. & Morri, D. A new methodology to infer the singing activity of an avian community: The Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI). Ecol. Indic. 11, 868–873 (2011).10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.11.005
68. Alcocer I Lima H Sugai LSM Llusia D Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: A meta-analysis Biol. Rev. 2022 97 2209 2236 10.1111/brv.12890 35978471
Alcocer, I., Lima, H., Sugai, L. S. M. & Llusia, D. Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: A meta-analysis. Biol. Rev. 97, 2209–2236 (2022).35978471 10.1111/brv.12890
69. Bolgan M Amorim MCP Fonseca PJ Acoustic Complexity of vocal fish communities: A field and controlled validation Sci. Rep. 2018 8 10559 10.1038/s41598-018-28771-6 30002420
Bolgan, M. et al. Acoustic Complexity of vocal fish communities: A field and controlled validation. Sci. Rep. 8, 10559 (2018).30002420 10.1038/s41598-018-28771-6
70. Pansini, A., Deroma, M., Guala, I., Monnier, B., Pergent-Martini, C., Piazzi, L., et al. The resilience of transplanted seagrass traits encourages detection of restoration success. J. Environ. Manag. 357 (2024).
71. Bertucci F Lejeune P Payrot J Parmentier E Sound production by dusky grouper Epinephelus marginatus at spawning aggregation sites J. Fish Biol. 2015 87 400 421 10.1111/jfb.12733 26177857
Bertucci, F., Lejeune, P., Payrot, J. & Parmentier, E. Sound production by dusky grouper Epinephelus marginatus at spawning aggregation sites. J. Fish Biol. 87, 400–421 (2015).26177857 10.1111/jfb.12733
72. Kaplan M Mooney T Partan J Solow A Coral reef species assemblages are associated with ambient soundscapes Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2015 533 93 107 10.3354/meps11382
Kaplan, M., Mooney, T., Partan, J. & Solow, A. Coral reef species assemblages are associated with ambient soundscapes. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 533, 93–107 (2015).10.3354/meps11382
73. Buia MC Gambi MC Dappiano M The seagrass systems Biol. Mar. Mediterranea 2004 11 133 184
Buia, M. C., Gambi, M. C. & Dappiano, M. The seagrass systems. Biol. Mar. Mediterranea 11, 133–184 (2004).
74. La Porta, B., Bacci, T. Manual for the Planning, Implementation and Monitoring of Transplantation of Posidonia oceanica (ed. La Porta, B.) (Bacci Tiziano Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research-ISPRA, 2022).
75. Kéver L Lejeune P Michel LN Parmentier E Passive acoustic recording of Ophidion rochei calling activity in Calvi Bay (France) Mar. Ecol. 2016 37 1315 1324 10.1111/maec.12341
Kéver, L., Lejeune, P., Michel, L. N. & Parmentier, E. Passive acoustic recording of Ophidion rochei calling activity in Calvi Bay (France). Mar. Ecol. 37, 1315–1324 (2016).10.1111/maec.12341
76. Desiderà E Guidetti P Panzalis P Navone A Valentini-Poirrier CA Boissery P Di Iorio L Acoustic fish communities: Sound diversity of rocky habitats reflects fish species diversity Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2019 608 183 197 10.3354/meps12812
Desiderà, E. et al. Acoustic fish communities: Sound diversity of rocky habitats reflects fish species diversity. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 608, 183–197 (2019).10.3354/meps12812
77. Cato DH Marine biological choruses observed in tropical waters near Australia J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1978 64 736 743 10.1121/1.382038
Cato, D. H. Marine biological choruses observed in tropical waters near Australia. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 736–743 (1978).10.1121/1.382038
78. Bradfer-Lawrence, T., Desjonqueres, C., Eldridge, A., Johnston, A., Metcalf, O. Using acoustic indices in ecology: Guidance on study design, analyses and interpretation. Methods Ecol. Evol. 00, 1–13 (2022).
79. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2019).
80. Merchant ND Fristrup KM Johnson MP Tyack PL Witt ML Blondel P Parks SE Measuring acoustic habitats Methods Ecol. Evol. 2015 6 257 265 10.1111/2041-210X.12330 25954500
Merchant, N. D. et al. Measuring acoustic habitats. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 257–265 (2015).25954500 10.1111/2041-210X.12330
81. Villanueva-Rivera, L.J., Pijanowski, B.C. Soundscape Ecology, R package version 1.3.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=soundecology (2018).
82. Lindseth A Lobel P Underwater soundscape monitoring and fish bioacoustics: A review Fishes 2018 3 36 10.3390/fishes3030036
Lindseth, A. & Lobel, P. Underwater soundscape monitoring and fish bioacoustics: A review. Fishes 3, 36 (2018).10.3390/fishes3030036
83. McWilliam JN Hawkins AD A comparison of inshore marine soundscapes J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2013 446 166 176 10.1016/j.jembe.2013.05.012
McWilliam, J. N. & Hawkins, A. D. A comparison of inshore marine soundscapes. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 446, 166–176 (2013).10.1016/j.jembe.2013.05.012
84. Archer S Halliday W Riera A Mouy X Pine M Chu J First description of a glass sponge reef soundscape reveals fish calls and elevated sound pressure levels Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2018 595 245 252 10.3354/meps12572
Archer, S. et al. First description of a glass sponge reef soundscape reveals fish calls and elevated sound pressure levels. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 595, 245–252 (2018).10.3354/meps12572
85. Brooks M Kristensen K van Benthem KJ Magnusson A Berg CV glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling R J. 2017 9 378 400 10.32614/RJ-2017-066
Brooks, M. et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 9, 378–400 (2017).10.32614/RJ-2017-066
86. Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N. J., Saveliev, A. A., Smith, G.H. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R 579 (2009).
87. Pieretti N Danovaro R Acoustic indexes for marine biodiversity trends and ecosystem health Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 2020 375 2090447 10.1098/rstb.2019.0447
Pieretti, N. & Danovaro, R. Acoustic indexes for marine biodiversity trends and ecosystem health. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 375, 2090447 (2020).10.1098/rstb.2019.0447
