
==== Front
J Orthop Case Rep
J Orthop Case Rep
Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports
2250-0685
2321-3817
Indian Orthopaedic Research Group India

JOCR-14-167
10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i09.4768
Case Report
Management of Non-Union Distal Femur Fracture with Augmentation Nail-Plate Construct: A Case Report
Khan Mohammad Jesan 1
Firoz M Ahsan 1
Anwer Adnan 1
Agrawal Pranjal 1
Rashid Mamoon 1
Asif Areeb 2
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
Address of Correspondence: Dr. Adnan Anwer, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India. E-mail: dr.adnan.amu@gmail.com
9 2024
9 2024
14 9 167172
16 6 2024
25 7 2024
8 2024
Copyright: © Indian Orthopaedic Research Group
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Unported, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms
Introduction:

Non-union fractures of the distal femur pose significant challenges in orthopedic surgery, often requiring revision procedures to achieve successful bone healing. In cases where the initial implant has failed, innovative solutions are necessary to promote bone union and functional recovery.

Case Report:

We present a case of a non-union distal femur fracture in a 22-year-old male patient, with a broken implant in situ. The patient had previously undergone internal fixation with a locking plate, which subsequently failed to promote bone healing. The patient was reoperated using a supracondylar nail and augmented with a distal femur locking plate to address the non-union. The combination of the supracondylar nail and distal femur locking plate successfully provided stability to the fracture site, promoting bone union and enabling functional recovery. Radiographic evidence and clinical assessment demonstrated excellent healing progress.

Conclusion:

This case report highlights the importance of individualized treatment for non-union distal femur fractures, especially when prior implant failure occurs. The combined approach of a supracondylar nail and distal femur locking plate can be a valuable option in addressing complex non-union fractures, achieving stable fixation, and facilitating successful bone healing.

Non-union fracture distal femur
broken implant
supracondylar nail
locking plate
revision surgery
==== Body
pmcLearning Point of the Article:

This case report sheds light on the importance of individualized treatment plans for non-union distal femur fractures, particularly when complications such as implant failure are encountered. It underscores the significance of a multidisciplinary approach, meticulous pre-operative planning, and the judicious use of advanced fixation techniques in achieving successful outcomes in challenging orthopedic cases.

Introduction

Non-union distal femur fractures pose a formidable challenge in orthopedic practice. These fractures, a distinct subtype of periarticular fractures, are on the rise, particularly in elderly and osteoporotic patients [1]. These complex injuries often result from a multitude of factors, including the extent of comminution, soft tissue damage, and inherent difficulties in achieving stable fixation. Accounting for approximately 6% of all femur fractures, nearly half of them are open fractures [2,3]. Despite the availability of various treatment options, the clinical and functional outcomes often involve complications such as significant morbidity, joint stiffness, and delayed union. The complexity escalates when there is the presence of a broken implant in situ from a previous surgical intervention, which further complicates non-union management. In these instances, innovative solutions and comprehensive surgical strategies become imperative to promote bone healing and restore the patient’s functional capacity. Conventionally, distal femur locking compression plate and retrograde supracondylar nailing have been the go-to modalities for treating distal femur fractures, both exhibiting similar union rates [4,5]. However, while dual plating offers a more robust fixation, the necessity for a second surgical incision introduces potential soft tissue complications, potentially hindering fracture healing. In cases with complex fracture patterns, neither of these methods provides adequate biomechanical stability for early weight-bearing and mobilization, particularly in the presence of osteoporosis [5-9]. The use of nail plate constructs (NPCs) offers a promising solution by enhancing biomechanical stability and restoring limb alignment. This approach potentially facilitates early rehabilitation, weight-bearing, and reduces the risk of fixation failure [10-14]. The biomechanics of the NPC differ from the lateral locking plate. The retrograde intramedullary nail redirects the weight-bearing axis closer to the anatomical axis of the femur, dispersing forces across the surrounding cortex and through the nail-cortical interface. This combination creates a more robust architectural foundation, enabling early patient mobilization and improving the prospects of achieving union [8,9]. Research by Liporace and Yoon [10] highlights how the intramedullary implant’s placement initially shifts the weight-bearing axis toward the femur’s anatomical axis, with the lateral locking plate providing additional stability to minimize movement at the fracture site.

This article explores a compelling case in which a non-union distal femur fracture was encountered in a 22-year-old male patient, with the added complexity of a fractured implant still in place from a prior fixation attempt using a distal femur locking plate. The successful management of this challenging scenario required a unique approach.

By revising the surgical strategy and implementing a combination of a supracondylar nail and a distal femur locking plate, this case provides a valuable example of the intricate decision-making and surgical technique employed to address non-union fractures in a manner that promotes bone union and reestablishes mobility.

Case Report

A 22-year-old male presented with a complaint of pain in the right distal thigh with a history of closed fracture in the distal femur which he got operated on with open reduction internal fixation with distal femur locking compression plate 1.5 months back.

On radiological examination, it was discovered that the Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen (AO) 33–A3 fracture distal end femur showed no signs of healing with broken LCP in situ (Fig. 1).

Figure 1 Pre-operative X-ray at presentation showing AO 33 A3 fracture distal end of the femur with broken implant in situ.

The patient was planned for revision surgery and managed by removing the broken distal femur locking plate and fixation of the fracture with retrograde supracondylar nail and augmentation plating with distal femur locking compression plate with cancellous bone grafting using ipsilateral iliac crest (Fig. 2).

Figure 2 Post-operative X-ray showing broken implant removal followed by fracture fixation with supracondylar nail and augmentation plating with distal femur locking compression plate and iliac crest bone grafting.

Postoperatively the patient was followed at 4, 8, and 14 months (Fig. 3-5) with the radiological examination which showed intact implants and signs of fracture healing.

Figure 3 Follow-up X-ray at 4 months.

Figure 4 Follow-up X-ray at 8 months showing uniting fracture.

Figure 6 Final follow-up at 14 months showing fracture union.

Discussion

The management of non-union distal femur fractures has undergone significant evolution over the years, with numerous techniques developed for their treatment. In the early 20th century, conservative approaches predominated for these fractures. It was not until around 1970 that the emerging principles of the AO were applied to address these fractures [15-18]. Despite the variety of treatment options available today, non-union distal femur fractures remain challenging and complex. The two most commonly employed fixation methods for distal femur fractures are retrograde intramedullary nails and locking plates. However, neither has conclusively demonstrated superiority over the other [4-7]. A meta-analysis conducted by Jankowski et al. indicated similar union rates between locking plates and retrograde intramedullary nails [19]. A more recent approach involves combining both nail and a plate, initially described for non-unions of the distal femur where a rigid construct is required for effective management. This augmentation of long bone non-unions, previously treated with intramedullary nails, is not entirely novel. Its effectiveness was demonstrated by Birjandinejad et al. in 2009, involving a series of 38 cases, including femoral and tibial non-unions primarily treated with intramedullary nails. Their findings indicated healing in 36 fractures, including all femoral fractures, with the addition of a 4.5 mm compression plate alongside the existing nail [11]. Attum et al. conducted a retrospective study for non-unions of the distal femur utilizing a nail-plate combination, with each patient in their study ultimately achieving union [9]. A meta-analysis by Quinzi et al. did not reveal significant differences in the frequency of major complications or re-operations among fractures treated with locking plates, retrograde intramedullary nails, or distal femoral replacement, though they noted differing complication profiles [20]. The underlying concept of the nail-plate combination technique revolves around augmenting fixation points, creating a fixed-angle construct, and shifting the weight-bearing axis more medially along the anatomic axis. This approach confers enhanced biomechanical stability, combining the advantages of both nailing and plating. This technique proves indispensable in fractures involving elderly, osteopenic, or obese patients who require early mobilization, minimizing complications such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and pressure ulcers. It is also crucial in cases of complex fractures with significant communication or segmental defects [9], as well as in inter and periprosthetic fractures [21].

The management of non-union distal femur fractures complicated by broken implants is a challenging endeavor in orthopedic surgery. This case report highlights the potential benefits of using a combination of a supracondylar nail and distal femur locking plate to address such complex cases. Nevertheless, further research and clinical studies are needed to establish the broader applicability and long-term outcomes of this surgical approach. The importance of individualized care, a multidisciplinary approach, and meticulous surgical technique cannot be overstated in achieving favorable results in these intricate orthopedic scenarios.

Limitations study

The short duration of follow-up is the limitation of this case report. Further research, including larger clinical studies, is needed to validate the efficacy and safety of the combined surgical technique in addressing non-union distal femur fractures with broken implants.

Conclusion

Non-union fractures of the distal femur, especially when complicated by the presence of a broken implant, pose intricate challenges in the field of orthopedic surgery. In this case report, we have demonstrated that a combined approach involving the use of a supracondylar nail and a distal femur locking plate can be a promising solution to address such complex scenarios. The case presented here reflects several important considerations and outcomes.

First and foremost, the successful management of non-union fractures requires a patient-specific approach. Each case is unique, and the treatment strategy must be tailored to the individual’s specific circumstances, taking into account factors such as the fracture pattern, bone quality, and previous implant status.

Early mobilization and post-operative physiotherapy play a pivotal role in the recovery process, aiding in the restoration of function and minimizing the risk of complications.

While the presented case had a positive outcome with radiographic evidence of bone healing and clinical improvement, (Fig. 6-9) it is essential to acknowledge that complications can still occur.

Figure 6 Clinical image showing post-operative flexion range of motion.

Figure 7 Clinical image showing post-operative extension range of motion.

Figure 8 Clinical image showing post-operative straight leg raising.

Figure 9 Clinical image showing squatting (excellent range of motion).

Vigilance in monitoring for potential complications, such as infection, implant failure, or malalignment, is crucial for timely intervention.

Clinical Message

This case report exemplifies the need for innovative and individualized approaches in the management of challenging non-union distal femur fractures. The use of a supracondylar nail and distal femur locking plate offers a potential solution, but the field requires more extensive research and clinical evidence to firmly establish the reliability and long-term outcomes of this approach. Despite the complexities involved, with careful planning, and a patient-centred approach, it is possible to achieve favorable results in addressing these intricate orthopedic scenarios. Furthermore, the first treatment should be optimal to avoid revision.

Conflict of Interest: Nil

Source of Support: Nil

Consent: The authors confirm that informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report
==== Refs
1 Griffin XL Parsons N Zbaeda MM McArthur J Interventions for treating fractures of the distal femur in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 2015 CD010606 26270891
2 Reudi TP Buckley RE Moran CG AO Principles of Fracture Management 2007 Switzerland AO Publishing
3 Martinet O Cordey J Harder Y Maier A Bühler M Barraud GE The epidemiology of fractures of the distal femur Injury 2000 3 C62 3
4 Gill S Mittal A Raj M Singh P Singh J Kumar S Extra articular supracondylar femur fractures managed with locked distal femoral plate or supracondylar nailing:A comparative outcome study J Clin Diagn Res 2017 11 RC19 23 28658862
5 Markmiller M Konrad G Südkamp N Femur-LISS and distal femoral nail for fixation of distal femoral fractures:Are there differences in outcome and complications? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004 426 252 7
6 Demirtaş A Azboy I Özkul E Gem M Alemdar C Comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing and bridge plating in the treatment of extra-articular fractures of the distal femur Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2014 48 521 26 25429577
7 Hierholzer C Von Rüden C Pötzel T Woltmann A Bühren V Outcome analysis of retrograde nailing and less invasive stabilization system in distal femoral fractures:A retrospective analysis Indian J Orthop 2011 45 243 50 21559104
8 Park J Lee JH Comparison of retrograde nailing and minimally invasive plating for treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures (OTA 33-A) above total knee arthroplasty Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016 136 331 8 26646847
9 Attum B Douleh D Whiting PS White-Dzuro GA Dodd AC Shen MS Outcomes of distal femur nonunions treated with a combined nail/plate construct and autogenous bone grafting J Orthop Trauma 2016 31 e301 4
10 Liporace FA Yoon RS Nail plate combination technique for native and periprosthetic distal femur fractures J Orthop Trauma 2019 33 e64 8 30277982
11 Birjandinejad A Ebrahimzadeh MH Ahmadzadeh-Chabock H Augmentation plate fixation for the treatment of femoral and tibial nonunion after intramedullary nailing Orthopedics 2009 32 409 19634823
12 Wright DJ DeSanto DJ McGarry MH Lee TQ Scolaro JA Supplemental fixation of supracondylar distal femur fractures:A biomechanical comparison of dual-plate and plate-nail constructs J Orthop Trauma 2020 34 434 40 32032183
13 Starr AJ Jones AL Reinert CM The “swashbuckler”:A modified anterior approach for fractures of the distal femur J Orthop Trauma 1999 13 138 40 10052790
14 Başcı O Karakaşlı A Kumtepe E Güran O Havıtçıoğlu H Combination of anatomical locking plate and retrograde intramedullary nail in distal femoral fractures:Comparison of mechanical stability Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2015 26 21 6 25741916
15 Mahorner HR Bradburn M Fractures of the femur:Report of 308 cases Surg Gynecol Obstet 1933 56 1066 979
16 Wenzel H Casey PA Herbert P Belin J Die operative behandlung der distalen femurfraktur Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen Bulletin 1970
17 Krettek C Schandelmaier P Miclau T Bertram R Holmes W Tscherne H Transarticular joint reconstruction and indirect plate osteosynthesis for complex distal supracondylar femoral fractures Injury 1997 1 A31 41
18 Neer CS 2nd Grantham SA Shelton ML Supracondylar fracture of the adult femur. A study of one hundred and ten cases J Bone Joint Surg Am 1967 49 591 613 6025996
19 Jankowski JM Szukics PF Shah JK Keller DM Pires RE Liporace FA Comparing intramedullary nailing versus locked plating in the treatment of Native distal femur fractures:Is one superior to the other? Indian J Orthop 2021 55 646 54 33995868
20 Quinzi DA Ramirez G Kaplan NB Myers TG Thirukumaran CP Ricciardi BF Early complications and reoperation rates are similar amongst open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nail, and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femur fractures:A systematic review and meta-analysis Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021 141 997 1006 33743062
21 Garala K Ramoutar D Li J Syed F Arastu M Ward J Distal femoral fractures:A comparison between single lateral plate fixation and a combined femoral nail and plate fixation Injury 2022 53 634 9 34836629
