
==== Front
J Orthop Case Rep
J Orthop Case Rep
Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports
2250-0685
2321-3817
Indian Orthopaedic Research Group India

JOCR-14-152
10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i09.4762
Case Report
Modified Use of Humerus Nail for Management of Tibia Diaphyseal Fracture – Rare Case Report
Phupate Akshay 1
Vashishtha Arjit 1
Kale Arun 1
Godse Amol 1
1 Department of Orthopaedics, Seth G.S Medical Collage and K.E.M Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Address of Correspondence: Dr. Akshay Phupate, Department of Orthopaedics, Seth G.S Medical Collage and K.E.M Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: akshayphupate2@gmail.com
9 2024
9 2024
14 9 152156
24 6 2024
05 7 2024
8 2024
Copyright: © Indian Orthopaedic Research Group
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Unported, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms
Introduction:

There have been very few cases of intramedullary (IM) nailing for tibia shaft fracture using a humerus nail. We present to you a unique case of humerus nail used in tibia shaft fracture in a short-stature patient.

Case Report:

A 26-year-old female, was brought to our emergency room, she sustained trauma to her left leg while she was walking on the road hit by an automobile (pedestrian injury) with complaints of pain and swelling in her left leg. She has a family history of short stature. X-ray suggested of left tibia diaphyseal fracture with a left calcaneum fracture (undisplaced). Preoperatively, tibia length came out to be 22 cm. The shortest tibia nail available is 26 cm. Hence, the plan was to do IM humerus nailing. Closed reduction with internal fixation was done with a similar method as in tibia nailing. Titanium nail of size 8 mm × 22 cm was used. In the humerus nail, the bend is lateral, which was kept posteriorly as Herzog bends in the tibia nail. Postoperatively, patient was given below knee slab with nil weight bearing for 6 weeks.

Conclusion:

Use of IM humerus nailing in tibia diaphyseal fracture fixation is possible. It provides rotational stability, leg length control, early mobilization and is also available in smaller sizes. Tibial fracture fixation with humeral nails in patients with short limb lengths is one of the possible options with satisfactory outcomes.

Tibia fracture
humerus nail
short limb
nailing
==== Body
pmcLearning Point of the Article:

Tibial diaphyseal fracture fixation with humerus intramedullary nailing in patients with short limb length is one of the possible options with satisfactory outcomes

Introduction

Tibial shaft fractures are the most common long-bone fracture, accounting for 1.9% of all fractures [1,2]. While conservative management with closed manipulation and cast immobilization has been the mainstay of treatment for minimally displaced, lowenergy tibia fractures [3] in certain circumstances, surgical stabilization may be required. Potential surgical indications include open fractures, “floating knees” (concomitant femur and tibia fracture), patients with compartment syndrome, and unstable fracture patterns that fail closed treatment.

Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is the gold standard for the treatment of displaced tibial shaft fractures in adults [4,5].

Recently, there have been a few studies that reported that the small intramedullary (IM) interlocking nail, such as IM humeral nail, could be used in femoral fixation in normal adolescent patients due to the advantages of the entry point lateral to the tip of greater trochanter resulting in avoiding iatrogenic vascular injury and being the IM locking device with a smaller diameter and shorter length than a conventional femoral nail which was appropriate for small-sized adolescent femoral anatomy [6].

There have been very few cases of IM humerus nailing in tibia diaphyseal fracture. This study is a rare case report of an IM humerus nailing done in a tibia diaphyseal fracture. We discuss the patient’s clinical presentation, pre-operative planning, surgical intervention, and post-operative course.

Case Report

A 26-year-old female was brought to our emergency room, she had sustained trauma to left leg while she was walking on the road hit by an automobile (pedestrian injury) with complaints of pain and swelling in her left leg. She has a family history of short stature.

On inspection, the patient’s overall health was satisfactory. The patient was conscious and aware of time, place, and person. She had stable vitals on presentation. Upon clinical examination, swelling and tenderness over the middle part of the left leg and heel were present. Her range of motion was restricted and painful. Deformity and abnormal mobility at the fracture site were presented. On vascular and neurological evaluation, the patient’s extremities were found to be unharmed. She also gave a history of fracture of the same leg tibia and fibula, which was managed conservatively with above knee slab and cast.

Radiographic evaluation suggested of left tibia diaphyseal fracture with left calcaneum fracture and old united tibia and fibula fracture (Fig. 1).

Figure 1 X-ray of left leg showing diaphyseal fracture of tibia with calcaneum fracture. Furthermore, an old healed, diaphyseal healed fracture can be seen just proximal to this fracture.

Pre-operative planning was carried out by measuring tibia length (taken from tibial tuberosity to medial malleolus) came out to be 22 cm (Fig. 2). The shortest tibia nail length available was 26 cm.

Figure 2 Pre-operative planning showing tibia length to be 22 cm.

In preoperatively, planning X-ray was done with a humerus nail of size 22 cm and of diameter 8 mm (Fig. 3). Calcaneum fracture was undisplaced so was planned to conserve it with below knee (BK) slab.

Figure 3 Pre-operative planning radiograph to check the length of humerus nail of size 22 cm and diameter 8mm.

Surgical procedure

Following a pre-operative assessment, the patient was scheduled for closed reduction with internal fixation was done with a similar method as in tibia nailing in a hanging leg position (Fig. 4). Incision was taken from the inferior pole of the patella to tibial tubercle. Entry was taken with awl medial to lateral tibial spine and confirmed under fluoroscopy in both anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views.

Figure 4 Intraoperative image showing the hanging leg position of the limb. Reaming with 7 mm, 8 mm, and 9 mm number solid reamers was done.

A titanium nail of size 8 mm × 22 cm (as preoperatively planned) was done. In the humerus nail, the bend is laterally which was kept posteriorly as Herzog bends in the tibia nail. Proximal locking was done with the help of a jig and distal locking was done with a perfect circle technique with a leg in extension AP screw was put. The reduction was checked under C-arm in AP and lateral views.

Post operatively on vascular an d neurological evaluation, the patient’s extremities were found to be unharmed and were given BK slab with limb elevation for calcaneum fracture (Fig. 5). In postoperative rehabilitation started on day 1 with knee range of motion, quadriceps strengthening exercises as per pain tolerance and mobilized nil weight bearing with help of walker (Fig. 6). Suture removal was done after 2 weeks and patient was mobilized with full weight bearing after 6 weeks. Post-operative 1 year patient is fully weight-bearing also the fracture has united without any complication (Fig. 7).

Figure 5 Post-operative X-ray showing humerus intramedullary nail in situ with good reduction.

Figure 6 Post-operative patient was mobilized nil weight with the help of a walker.

Figure 7 Post-operative 1-year follow-up radiograph showing good union and alignment of fracture.

Discussion

The introduction of IMNs revolutionized fracture care in the years following the World War II enabling early patient mobilization and weight-bearing [7]. While multiple long bones are amenable to rigid IMN, a contraindication to this technique in the tibia is a patient with open physis with substantial growth remaining. For these instances, flexible IMNs have been developed which spare the physis and can be inserted distant from the fracture site allowing the fracture site to not have to be opened in most circumstances. Multiple studies have now shown good outcomes with this technique for unstable tibia fractures in the pediatric population [8-10]. There are several drawbacks to flexible IMNs compared with rigid locked IMNs, including the lack of construct rigidity which allows potential loss of reduction, a short period of immobilization is frequently required, and weight-bearing is typically delayed for 4–6 weeks.

IM humerus nails are indicated in fractures of the humerus shaft. Comparing tibia IMN to humerus IMN (Fig. 8).

Figure 8 (a) tibia nail having Herzog bend of 11°. Humerus intramedullary nail having bend of 4°.

Herzog’s bend proximally in the tibia is 11° while in the humerus is 4°.

There have been very few cases of humerus nail used in tibia shaft fracture [11].

First, the humeral nail compared to conventional tibial IMN, is available in smaller diameters and shorter lengths and is more suitable for these patients’ tibial anatomy with narrow medullary canal and short limb

Second, the humeral nail has a narrow width and a lateral bend at its proximal end which allows its insertion with minimal physeal violation, and 90–100° of the cephalomedullary angle for the proximal locking blade or screw

Third, because of the interlocking property of the nail, the humeral nail would offer superior biomechanical benefits than gold standard rush pin fixation as it provides rotational stability and leg length control.

However, there were also limitations for using a humeral nail for tibial reconstruction in these patients but are minimal, like proximal tibial physeal damage cannot be avoided, which predisposes for future growth disturbances of the proximal tibia. The absence of Herzog’s bend limits the nail entry to a more proximal and posterior area of the tibial articular surface.

Conclusion

This is the first study to show the use of IMN for tibia shaft fracture using a humerus nail in patients with short limb length is possible. It provides rotational stability, leg length control, early mobilization and is also available in smaller sizes. Therefore, we concluded that tibial fixation with humeral nails in patients with short limb length is one of the possible options with satisfactory outcomes.

Clinical Message

Tibial diaphyseal fracture fixation with humerus IMN in patients with short limb length is one of the possible options with satisfactory outcomes.

Conflict of Interest: Nil

Source of Support: Nil

Consent: The authors confirm that informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report
==== Refs
1 Court-Brown CM Caesar B Epidemiology of adult fractures:A review Injury 2006 37 691 7 16814787
2 Russell TA Fractures of the tibial diaphysis In:Orthopaedic Knowledge Update:Trauma 1 1 1996 Rosemont, Il American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 171 9
3 Thompson GH Wilber JH Marcus RE Internal fixation of fractures in children and adolescents. A comparative analysis Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984 188 10 20
4 Bhandari M Guyatt G Tornetta P 3rd Schemitsch EH Swiontkowski M Sanders D Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008 90 2567 78 19047701
5 Bong MR Kummer FJ Koval K Egol KA Intramedullary nailing of the lower extremity:Biomechanics and biology J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007 15 97 106 17277256
6 Sa-ngasoongsong P Saisongcroh T Angsanuntsukh C Woratanarat P Mulpruek P Using humeral nail for surgical reconstruction of femur in adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta World J Orthop 2017 8 735 40 28979858
7 Duan X Al-Qwbani M Zeng Y Zhang W Xiang Z Intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 1 CD008241 22258982
8 Kc KM Acharya P Sigdel A Titanium elastic nailing system (TENS) for tibia fractures in children:Functional outcomes and complications JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2016 55 55 60 28029668
9 Heo J Oh CW Park KH Kim JW Kim HJ Lee JC Elastic nailing of tibia shaft fractures in young children up to 10 years of age Injury 2016 47 832 6 26606988
10 Sankar WN Jones KJ David Horn B Wells L Titanium elastic nails for pediatric tibial shaft fractures J Child Orthop 2007 1 281 6 19308521
11 Pradeep H Pillai AG Ravikumar AS Humerus nail for tibial reconstruction in adolescent with osteogenesis imperfecta - A rare surgical case report Indian J Orthop Surg 2022 8 236 9
