
==== Front
J Orthop Case Rep
J Orthop Case Rep
Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports
2250-0685
2321-3817
Indian Orthopaedic Research Group India

JOCR-14-220
10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i09.4786
Original Article
Philosophies And Surgical Techniques on Os Odontoideum Treatment with Literature Review
Sakhrekar Rajendra 1
Ha Ji Soo 1
Han Hee-Don 1
Kim Do-Hyoung 1
Kim Chang Wook 1
Kulkarni Shreenidhi 1
1 Department of Spine Surgery, Yonsei Okay Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
Address of Correspondence: Dr. Rajendra Sakhrekar, Department of Spine Surgery, Yonsei Okay Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. E-mail: raj.sakhrekar1@gmail.com
9 2024
9 2024
14 9 220225
14 6 2024
22 7 2024
8 2024
Copyright: © Indian Orthopaedic Research Group
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Unported, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms
Introduction:

Os-odontoideum is a rare condition described radiographically and clinically as a congenital anomaly of the second cervical vertebra (axis). It is a smooth, independent ossicle of variable size and shape separated from the base of a shortened odontoid process by an obvious gap, with no osseous connection to the body of C2.

Materials and Methods:

This study reviewed the literature on OO to evaluate its etiology, clinical presentations, differential diagnosis, imaging modalities, and outcomes in the management of asymptomatic and symptomatic cases of Os Odontoideum. Key articles from PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane were searched.

Discussion:

Considering etiology, the traumatic hypothesis is favoured over the congenital hypothesis as per recent literature on OO. Clinical presentation varies from asymptomatic to mild neck pain to severe myelopathy and neurodeficit. Various C1-C2 instrumentation and fusion techniques like wiring, trans articular screw and laminar screws have been described with success rates.

Conclusion:

Os odontoideum is a rare condition with limited existing literature. Considering the significant risks involved if conservative management opts, like severe neuro deficit to sudden death on trivial trauma and the recent improvement of imaging tools helping to understand the pathology of the disease, surgery can be indicated even in an incidentally detected os odontoideum. However, a case-by-case approach can be considered for stable asymptomatic patients depending on factors such as age, activity level, comorbidities, syndromic association, and radiographic findings.

Os-odontoideum
surgical management
etiology
Atlanto-axial instability
complications
==== Body
pmcLearning Point of the Article:

Os Odontoideum is a rare condition with limited existing literature. Considering the significant risks involved if conservative management opts, like severe neuro deficit to sudden death on trivial trauma and the recent improvement of imaging tools helping to understand the pathology of the disease, surgery can be indicated even in an incidentally detected os odontoideum. However, a case-by-case approach can be considered for stable asymptomatic patients depending on factors such as age, activity level, comorbidities, syndromic association, and radiographic findings.

Introduction

Os-odontoideum was first described by Giacomini in 1886[1]. Bevan in 1863 and Cunningham in 1886 also described OO based on anatomical and autopsy studies [2]. The word os odontoideum is derived from Latin, meaning Os (bone) and Odontoideum (tooth-like). It is a rare condition, described radiographically and clinically as a congenital anomaly of the second cervical vertebra (axis). It is a smooth, independent ossicle of variable size and shape separated from the base of a shortened odontoid process by a noticeable gap, with no osseous connection to the body of C2. It is classified variously depending on anatomy, stability, etiology and symptomatology. It is classified anatomically into two types, dystopic and orthotopic, according to Fielding et al. in 1980 [3,4]. In the dystopic type, OO is fused to the basion, while in the orthotopic, OO lies in the normal position on the odontoid process and moves with the atlas anterior arch. Based on the extent of excursion of the atlas from the axis on dynamic imaging, it is classified as stable or unstable. It is classified etiologically as congenital and post-traumatic. OO has been classified as asymptomatic or symptomatic depending on clinical presentation and an increasing risk of cervical-medullary compression [5-7]. This study tries to review and address the various controversies regarding the etiology and management options of os odontoideum.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed the literature on OO to evaluate its etiology, clinical presentations, differential diagnosis, imaging modalities and outcomes in managing asymptomatic and symptomatic cases of os odontoideum. PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Cochrane key articles were searched. Keywords like ‘Os-Odontoideum’, ‘surgical management’, ‘etiology’, ‘Atlanto-axial instability’, and ‘complications’ were used. Additional articles were identified by manually checking the references. Two independent reviewers reviewed the articles.

Discussion

Pathophysiology:

The etiology of the OO has always remained controversial since its description in the 19th century. The aetiologies proposed are congenital or traumatic. However, the current evidence from the literature supports the traumatic over the congenital hypothesis more. The authors supporting the congenital hypothesis describe OO results from a failure of fusion of the dens with the body of the axis during embryonic development or failure of fusion of the secondary ossification center at the apex with its central part of the dens or the failure of proper caudal migration of the dens during development. The congenital OO etiology is further supported by its presence in identical twins and siblings and its association of OO with many congenital syndromes like Down’s syndrome, Morquio’s disease, achondroplasia, Klippel-Feil syndrome, Larson syndrome and other associated anomalies at the CVJ with no significant history of trauma. The congenital hypothesis was debated as the neurocentral synchondrosis is located below the level of the superior articulating facet. In contrast, the gap in OO is frequently located above the plane of the superior articulating facet [7-9].

Fielding and Griffin proposed the acquired/posttraumatic/vascular hypothesis in the 1980s, describing the formation of OO due to an unrecognized fracture of the odontoid after a trivial fall in childhood. The subsequent contraction of the apical and alarligaments, the distraction of the fractured fragment, and then reducing or detaching the blood supply gave rise to the OO [3,4].

Clinical Presentation

OO is more commonly seen among males in the second and third decades. The clinical presentation in OO patients is highly variable, ranging from incidental findings in asymptomatic patients to local symptoms like neck pain, restriction of neck movements, shoulder pain, torticollis, and occipital headaches. There are also cervical myelopathic symptoms and signs like weakness, paresthesia, ataxia, urinary complaints, and symptoms related to vertebra-basilar ischemia [10].

Differential Diagnosis of OS

Based on clinical presentation, differential diagnosis of OO can vary from cervical spondylosis, mechanical neck pain, degenerative disc disease or atlantoaxial subluxation as seen in rheumatoid arthritis. It could also be confused with acute fracture of dens. However, OO could be ruled out on the history itself by the absence of a significant history of falls or trauma and depending on radiological characteristics like the smooth surface of the ossicle and the below body of C2, and also the presence of sclerosis and hypertrophy of the anterior tubercle of the atlas [7,8].

Imaging and indicators of instability [Fig. 1]

Figure 1 Normal anatomy and Os Odontoideum.

OO can be diagnosed on plain radiographs with the anteroposterior, lateral neutral and dynamic views (flexion and extension) and open mouth view. In addition to plain lateral radiographs, CT of the CVJ to understand bony anatomy and abnormalities, CT angiography to study the course of the vertebral artery, and MRI of the CVJ to look for cord and soft tissue compression and anomalies. Recently, using kinematic MRI to diagnose OO was advised by Hughes et al. [11]. A recent article by Goyal et al. described the criteria for atlantoaxial instability.

Criteria for AAI [12,13]

Atlanto-dens interval of more than 5 mm [Fig. 2]

Overriding of the anterior arch of the atlas over the odontoid

Space available for the cord (SAC) of less than 13 mm [Fig. 3]

Violation of the Steel’s rule of thirds (one-third cord, one-third odontoid, and one-third safe space) [Fig. 4]

Translation of the tip of the odontoid of more than 4 mm of the basion

Figure 2 Unstable Os Odontoideum with increased Atlanto-Dens interval >5mm

Figure 3 Unstable Os Odontoideum with cord signals with reduced available space for the cord[SAC]

Figure 4 Steel’s Rule of Thirds

Management

The American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (AANS/CNS) provided evidence-based clinical recommendations for treating os odontoideum in 2001 [14,15].

No clinical evidence was found supporting the recommendation of operative treatment standards or guidelines for os odontoideum.

For asymptomatic patients, clinical and radiographic surveillance may be the appropriate management.

Patients with neurological symptoms/signs and C1–2 instability are generally managed with posterior fixation and fusion.

Other operative measures may be warranted in irreducible cervicomedullary compression and/or occipitocervical instability.

The lack of high-quality studies was noted

Evidence-based clinical studies recommend surgical management in symptomatic OO patients (e.g. cervical myelopathy). Although, controversy still exists in the management of asymptomatic patients.

In 1982, Spierings and Braakman [16] noted high mortality in OO patients who were treated with surgical management. Hence, the authors suggested conservative treatment in more than 60% of their cases, including asymptomatic patients.

In 2000, Dai et al [6]. Suggested that five asymptomatic OO cases managed conservatively remained stable at follow-up. In 2008, Klimo et al. [8,9] contradictorily believed that stressful events can easily cause spinal cord injury. Regardless of the clinical presentation, Klimo et al. recommended surgical intervention in OO. Literature has suggested in asymptomatic stable OO patients, even a trivial trauma could lead to significant neurological deficit or death [17-19].

Surgical techniques:

Various surgical techniques have been advised, like

Occiput-cervical fusion- is rarely used as it reduces the range of motion

C1 – C2 sublaminar wiring techniques

C1 – C2 Clamps, Hooks and Claws

C1 C2 trans articular screw

C1 lateral mass- C2 pars screw with plates (Goel technique)

C1 lateral mass- C2 lamina screw

C1 lateral mass screw—C2 pedicle screw fixation with rods (Harms technique)

With C2 intralaminar screw fixation

C1–2 interfacet spacers with C1–2 fixation

C1 – C2 wiring

Gallie et al. [20,21] 1939 described the C1-2 wiring technique elaborately. In this technique, wires are passed under the lamina of the C1 arch and hooked to the spinous process of C2. The tricortical iliac crest bone graft is compressed between C1-C2 to achieve fusion. In 2002, Brookmeyer et al. recently used cables instead of wires for C1-C2 stabilization. The inability to correct rotatory forces, non-union and gradual loss of reduction are significant drawbacks of this technique. Recently, a few authors described the use of hooks at the C1 posterior arch to improve the stability and strength of the construct.

C1 C2 trans articular screw instrumentation

Magerl et al. [22] in 1987 demonstrated C1-C2 trans articular screw technique. It provides a biomechanically solid and stable construct in comparison with C1-C2 wiring. Although a long learning curve, technically demanding precision and accuracy, and risk of neurovascular injuries like high riding vertebral artery injury, this technique has shown promising results over the years [23].

C1 lateral mass and C2 pars screw instrumentation

Goel and Laheri [24] 1994 described C1 lateral mass and C2 pars screw with plate instrumentation with good results. Harms et al. [25] 2001 modified this technique with the use of polyaxial screws and a rod system. This technique showed a relatively easy learning curve and good clinical and radiological outcomes. It is one of the safest, most reproducible, most accepted and widely used procedures in the current literature.

C1 lateral mass- C2 lamina screw

In some instances, a high-riding vertebral artery increases the risk of injury. In such a scenario use of C2 laminar screws is well described with good outcomes.

Limitations

This study has a few limitations. This study is not a systematic review, so the evidence about each debatable issue is insufficient. However, this study will provide the current concept about etiology and current concepts in the management of os odontoideum. Also, this study could not suggest specific guidelines because more highly qualified, relevant studies were needed.

Conclusion

Os odontoideum is a rare condition with limited existing literature. The etiology is debatable, but recent literature favours the acquired/post-traumatic/vascular hypothesis. OO could present with broad manifestations of symptoms; precise clinical and radiological diagnosis could help in OO treatment and prevent likely devastating complications. Considering the significant risks involved if conservative management opts like severe neuro deficit to sudden death on trivial trauma and the improvement of imaging tools helping to understand the pathology of the disease, the morphology of the nearby vital structure along with the relative safety of the current surgical procedures, surgery can be indicated even in an incidentally detected os odontoideum. However, a case-by-case approach can be considered for stable asymptomatic patients depending on factors such as age, activity level, comorbidities, syndromic association, and radiographic findings.

Clinical Message

Os odontoideum is a rare congenital anomaly of the second cervical vertebra with the significant risks involved if conservative management is opted, a case-by-case approach can be considered for stable asymptomatic patients depending on factors such as age, activity level, comorbidities, syndromic association, and radiographic findings.

Conflict of Interest: Nil

Source of Support: Nil

Consent: The authors confirm that informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report
==== Refs
1 Giacomini C Sull'esistenza dell'“os odontoideum”nell'uomo Gior Accad Med Torino 1886 49 24 28
2 Bevan WL Shepherd SW A Dictionary of the Bible:Comprising its Antiquities, Biography, Geography, and Natural History 1863 Boston, MA, USA Houghton Mifflin and Company 1268 1270
3 Fielding JW Griffin PP Os odontoideum:an acquired lesion J Bone Joint Surg 1974 56 187 190 4812163
4 Fielding JW Hensinger R Hawkins R Os odontoideum J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980 62 3 376 383 7364809
5 Ricciardi JE Kaufer H Louis DS Acquired os odontoideum following acute ligament injury. Report of a case J Bone Joint Surg 1976 58 410 412 1262376
6 Dai L Yuan W Ni B Jia L Os odontoideum:Etiology, diagnosis, and management Surg Neurol 2000 53 2 106 109 doi:10.1016/S0090-3019(99)00184-6 10713186
7 Jumah F Alkhdour S Mansour S He P Hroub A Adeeb N Hanif R Mortazavi MM Tubbs RS Nanda A Os Odontoideum:A Comprehensive Clinical and Surgical Review Cureus 2017 Aug 8 9 8 e1551 doi:10.7759/cureus.1551 PMID:29018648 PMCID:PMC5630463 29018648
8 Klimo p Jr Kan P Rao G Apfelbaum R Brockmeyer D Os odontoideum:Presentation, diagnosis, and treatment in a series of 78 patients J Neurosurg Spine 2008 9 4 332342 Website.http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/SPI.2008.9.10.332
9 Klimo P Jr Coon V Brockmeyer D Incidental os odontoideum:current management strategies Neurosurg Focus 2011 31 10 10.3171/2011.9.focus11227
10 Goel A Patil A Shah A Dandpat S Rai S Ranjan S Os Odontoideum:Analysis of 190 Surgically Treated Cases World Neurosurg 2020 Feb 134 e512 e523 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.107 Epub 2019 Oct 26 PMID:31669688 31669688
11 Hughes TB Jr Richman JD Rothfus WE Diagnosis of Os odontoideum using kinematic magnetic resonance imaging A case report Spine 1999 24 715 718 10209804
12 Goel A Indicators of atlantoaxial instability J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2021 12 2 103 106 Apr-Jun 34194154
13 Jordan Lacy Jitin Bajaj Atlantoaxial Instability StatPearls Publishing, NCBI bookshelf Jan2021
14 The Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Os Odontoideum SpineUniverse Web site 2001 http://www.spineuniverse.com/pdf/traumaguide/19.pdf
15 Wilson JR Dettori JR Vanalstyne EM Fehlings MG Addressing the challenges and controversies of managing os odontoideum:results of a systematic review Evid Based Spine Care J 2010 May 1 1 67 74 doi:10.1055/s-0028-1100896 PMID:23544027 PMCID:PMC3608999
16 Spierings E Braakman R The management of os odontoideum:Analysis of 37 cases Bone Joint J 1982 64 4 422 428 Website.http://www.bjj.boneandjoint.org.uk/content/64-B/4/422
17 McGoldrick JM Marx JA Traumatic central cord syndrome in a patient with os odontoideum Ann Emerg Med 1989 18 12 1358 1361 doi:10.1016/S0196-0644(89)80276-892 2589705
18 Dempster AG Heap SW Fatal high cervical spinal cord injury in an automobile accident complicating os odontoideum Am J Foren Med Pathol 1990 11 3 252 256
19 Zhang Z Zhou Y Wang J Acute traumatic cervical cord injury in patients with os odontoideum J Clin Neurosci 2010 17 10 1289 1293 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2010.01.051 20655229
20 Rahimizadeh A Rahimizadeh A Os Odontoideum:Review article Orthop Res Traumatol Open J 2016 1 2 33 55 doi:10.17140/ORTOJ-1-107
21 Goyal N Bali S Ahuja K Chaudhary S Barik S Kandwal P Posterior Arthrodesis of Atlantoaxial Joint in Congenital Atlantoaxial Instability Under 5 Years of Age:A Systematic Review J Pediatr Neurosci 2021 16 2 97 105 Apr-Jun [PMC free article] [PubMed] 35018176
22 Magerl F Seemann P-S Stable posterior fusion of the atlas and axis by transarticular screw fixation Cervical Spine I 1987 322 327 doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-8882-8_59
23 Gluf W M Brockmeyer D L Atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation:a review of surgical indications, fusion rate, complications, and lessons learned in 67 pediatric patients J Neurosurg Spine 2005 2 164 169 15739528
24 Goel A Laheri V Plate and screw fixation for atlantoaxial subluxation Acta Neurochir 1994 129 1-2 47 53 doi:10.1007/BF01400872 7998495
25 Harms J Melcher RP Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation Spine 2001 26 22 2467 2471 11707712
