
==== Front
J Med Case Rep
J Med Case Rep
Journal of Medical Case Reports
1752-1947
BioMed Central London

4731
10.1186/s13256-024-04731-9
Case Report
Penetrating cardiac injury after percutaneous breast core-needle biopsy, unusual life-threatening complication: a case report
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1281-1906
Kanlerd Amonpon amonponk@hotmail.com
kamonpon@tu.ac.th

1
Sujarittanakarn Sasithorn 2
Lohitvisate Wanrudee 3
1 https://ror.org/002yp7f20 grid.412434.4 0000 0004 1937 1127 Trauma and Surgical Critical Care Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99/209 M.18, Klonglaung, Pathumthani Thailand
2 https://ror.org/002yp7f20 grid.412434.4 0000 0004 1937 1127 Head-Neck-Breast Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand
3 https://ror.org/002yp7f20 grid.412434.4 0000 0004 1937 1127 Breast Imaging and Intervention Division, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand
7 9 2024
7 9 2024
2024
18 43519 12 2023
26 7 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Background

Complications after percutaneous breast biopsy are infrequent but may include hematoma, pseudoaneurysm formation, persistent pain, infection, delayed wound healing, vasovagal reaction, hemothorax, pneumothorax, and neoplastic seeding. The risk factors include tumor factors (size, location, vascularity), procedure-related factors (needle diameter, number of biopsies), and interventionist experience. There has been no previous report of a fatal complication resulting from percutaneous breast biopsy.

Case presentation

We report a 54-year-old Asian woman with a 3 cm BI-RADS® 4B left breast mass in the lower-inner quadrant who was biopsied by a 16 G needle under ultrasound guidance at a province hospital. She experienced dizziness and near-syncope afterward. The initial evaluation showed evidence of cardiac tamponade with hemodynamic instability. She underwent urgent subxiphoid pericardial window and was transferred to our facility. We brought her directly to the operating room to perform an explorative median sternotomy and found a 0.2 cm hole in the right ventricle. The injured site was successfully repaired without cardiopulmonary bypass. Postoperative echocardiography demonstrated mild right ventricular dysfunction without evidence of septal or valvular injury. She survived with no significant complications.

Discussion

This case might be the first report of a life-threatening complication related to percutaneous breast core-needle biopsy. The rapid pericardial release is key to the survival of cardiac tamponade. The patient subsequently required cardiac repair and monitoring to avoid long-term complications. In this report, we suggested a safe biopsy method, complications recognition, and appropriate management of penetrating cardiac injury.

Conclusion

Penetrating cardiac injury resulting from percutaneous breast biopsy is extremely rare but can occur. A biopsy must be done cautiously, and worst-case management should promptly be considered.

Keywords

Penetrating cardiac injury
Percutaneous breast biopsy
Cardiac tamponade
Complication
Case report
issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcBackground

Percutaneous breast core-needle biopsy is the current standard method for diagnosing breast tumors. It has replaced open biopsy in terms of lower invasiveness, adequate tissue sampling, good cost-effectiveness, better cosmetic, and good patient recovery [1]. Complications of this procedure are usually mild and do not require surgical intervention. Some severe complications, such as sizable hematoma, pseudoaneurysm formation, or pneumothorax, may occur. However, there was no previous mention of cardiac injury related to this procedure.

Case profile

A healthy 54-year-old Asian woman presented with a palpable left breast mass for 2 months. She came to the outpatient department of a province hospital and underwent a mammography. The mammography showed a 3 cm ill-defined hyperdense mass in the left lower-inner quadrant without suspicious calcifications or secondary changes, consistent with the BI-RADS® 4B category (Fig. 1). She was scheduled for an ultrasound-guided percutaneous core-needle biopsy. A 16 G needle (UNIGUN™) was used. A small incision was made over the mass, and the needle was inserted against the mass. However, the ultrasound field lost the needle tip during firing. The patient complained of severe pain immediately after firing. She also had chest discomfort, diaphoresis, and fainting within 10 minutes after. The vital signs were respiration rate (R) 28 breaths per minute, heart rate (P) 70 bpm, and blood pressure (BP) 54/36 mmHg with a SpO2 of 97%.Fig. 1 Mammography demonstrating a 3 cm mass in the left breast (red arrow).R right, L left, CC craniocaudal view, MLO mediolateral oblique view

She was resuscitated with two liters of warm saline solution and was intubated immediately. The focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) revealed a 2 cm hyperechoic fluid thickness in the pericardium, likely hemopericardium (Fig. 2). She was diagnosed with cardiac tamponade and then was brought to the operating room (OR) for release with a subxiphoid pericardial window. A 300 ml blood clot was drained, and her vitals rapidly improved. The primary surgeon could not perform definitive repair, so she was referred to our facility (10 km away). Per our institute guidelines, she was transferred to the OR without additional imaging. The intraoperative vital signs were P 72 bpm and BP 160/100 mmHg with a SpO2 of 100% (FiO2 1.0). There was no active bleeding from the pericardial drain (total 250 ml) with no inotrope. The initial Hb was 10.2 g/dl.Fig. 2 Cardiac ultrasound

The explorative median sternotomy was performed without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We found 100 ml of clot retention in the pericardium with a 0.2 cm hole in the right ventricle (RV). The injured site did not involve the coronary arteries and did not actively bleed, consistent with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade IV (Fig. 3). The intraoperative cardiac monitoring showed no significant arrhythmia with a CVP of 15 mmHg. The arterial pH was 7.3, with a serum lactate of 3.5 mmol/l. The cardiac wound was primarily repaired with an interrupted 3–0 polypropylene suture in the figure-of-eight technique. The clot was removed, and the pericardial sac was irrigated with a warm saline solution. A 28F chest tube was inserted as a pericardial drain. The pericardium was fully re-approximated, and the sternum and chest wall were closed. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) with no inotropic drugs.Fig. 3 Scheme of the injury site (star). SVC superior vena cava, IVC inferior vena cava, RA right atrium, RCA right coronary artery, RV right ventricle, PA pulmonary artery, LA left atrium, LCA left coronary artery, PV pulmonary vein, LV left ventricle. This is the author’s work and permit for use

The postoperative bedside echocardiography revealed preserved left ventricular ejection function (LVEF) with an estimated LVEF of 70%, mild RV systolic dysfunction, a 0.2 cm pericardial fluid thickness with no signs of physiologic tamponade, and no evidence of septal or valvular injury. The cardiac troponin-T level mildly increased (0.718 ng/dl) 6 hours after the operation with an ST segment elevation in I, II, III, aVL, aVF, and V2–6 leads. The patient was diagnosed with postoperative pericarditis and treated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The pericardial drain was removed postoperatively on day 2. She was recovering well with no significant cardiac complications and was referred back to the primary province hospital on postoperative day 4. Her breast tumor was rescheduled for evaluation after recovery from this injury.

Discussion

The percutaneous ultrasound-guided core-needle breast biopsy has been classified as a low-risk procedure 2. The complications of percutaneous breast biopsy included bleeding, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm formation, persistent pain, infection, delayed wound healing, vasovagal reaction, hemothorax, pneumothorax, and neoplastic seeding [3–6]. Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the breast can be performed with spring-loaded needles (12–18 G) or vacuum-assisted needles (10–12 G) [3]. The factors associated with developing complications include tumor size, location, vascularity, needle gauge, amount of sampling tissue, and interventionist experience [5, 6].

This breast mass was located in the deep, low breast volume position and close to the chest wall, which may increase the risk of complications. We suggest the tips and techniques of core-needle biopsy in this position must include:Increasing the distance between the mass and the skin opening to decrease the needle–skin angle

Injecting the local anesthesia beneath the mass to increase space from the chest wall

Placing the downward needle direction parallel to the skin before firing

Locating the needle tip at the mass border or about 1 cm in front of the border to avoid through-and-through cutting significantly in the small-sized mass

Understanding the penetration depth of each instrument and keeping the distance between the needle tip and chest wall more than the penetration depth

Always keeping the whole needle visible before and during firing

The patient should be informed that this procedure involves a loud noise during the biopsy and should be shown the actual noise to avoid unintentional moves. Pillows must elevate the ipsilateral shoulder and back to increase the inner breast tissue thickness, which makes firing safer.

Penetrating cardiac injury (PCI) is one of the fatality chest injuries with a mortality rate of 16–43% [7]. However, the incidence of PCI is very low (< 1%), which leads to unfamiliar trauma management [8]. Early mortality related to PCI resulted from exsanguination, cardiac failure, or cardiac tamponade. Cardiac tamponade is the most common presentation of PCI and may have a high chance of survival if promptly diagnosed and released [9]. The diagnosis of cardiac tamponade can be made by classic clinical presentation (Beck’s triad), cardiac ultrasonography (FAST or echocardiography), or chest computed tomography. Rapid pericardial release with pericardiocentesis and subxiphoid pericardial window are still debated. However, most of the recent studies preferred a subxiphoid pericardial window in life-threatening cases or in places that cannot mandate median sternotomy [9–14].

Our case was diagnosed with PCI and cardiac tamponade by clinical presentation of obstructive shock and pericardial effusion on the FAST examination. The primary general surgeon decided to perform an emergent subxiphoid pericardial window. This action is appropriate and become a life-saving procedure. In Thailand, there is still a need for cardiothoracic surgeons. We suggest teaching the subxiphoid pericardial window to all general surgical residents, which should be considered an essential procedure before completing the training. A cadaveric workshop or animal model may be required. Familiarity with this procedure might increase survival in patients with PCI.

The current evidence recommends early surgical interventions as the mainstay treatment of PCI [10–14]. The previous studies preferred a median sternotomy approach in PCI with optimum hemodynamics to allow better visualization and good results. In contrast, left anterolateral thoracotomy (referred to as resuscitative thoracotomy) is usually utilized in extreme PCI cases [9–14]. The use of CPB during repair should be considered in substantial cardiac dysfunction, arrhythmia, or impending cardiac failure caused by PCI (usually occurring with coronary or valvular injuries), sizeable cardiac wound, difficult-to-assess locations, or failure to repair. The suggested ventricle repair technique included figure-of-eight stitches with 3–0 polypropylene sutures or pledged polypropylene sutures with a horizontal mattress technique in a simple laceration. Placing interrupted horizontal mattresses deep beneath the coronary bed must be considered in injuries adjacent to coronary arteries [14].

A small hole in the right ventricle with no active bleeding was notable in this case. The on-call trauma surgeon performed the cardiorrhaphy without CPB and selected small-bite figure-of-eight stitches with a 3–0 polypropylene suture (no pledged) for repairing this wound. This stitch did not involve the left coronary artery, even though the wound was quite close to the vessel. The pumping heart was the troubleshot of this procedure. However, the confidence in inserting the needle in the diastole phase might be helpful. Full-thickness repair should be attempted in the first bite. It became easier if the first bite was successful. Our suggested technique was gently pulling up the first sutures to approximate the wound edge and reinserting the second shot across the first bite. Pledged suture may not required in this wound. Cardiac arrhythmia should be considered after stitches. Fortunately, this case had no significant fatal arrhythmia. We suggested an intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to visualize internal cardiac structures and estimate cardiac function. We did not perform TEE in this case owing to availability. However, postoperative transthoracic echocardiography was performed in the ICU. This case developed mild post-pericardiotomy syndrome within the first 24 hours after surgery. This complication was treated with NSAIDs. She survived with no early cardiac sequelae.

Conclusion

This case might be the first report of PCI following a percutaneous breast core-needle biopsy. This complication may be infrequent, but it is a fatality. Careful breast biopsy and prompt diagnosis of fatal complications must be considered. Rapid pericardial releasing procedures should be implemented in surgical training curriculums, especially the subxiphoid pericardial window. Directing to the OR protocol and gentle cardiorrhaphy might improve the outcomes.

Abbreviations

BI-RADS® Breast imaging report and data system

FAST Focused assessment with sonography for trauma

CPB Cardiopulmonary bypass

RV Right ventricle

AAST The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma

CVP Central venous pressure

ICU Intensive care unit

LVEF Left ventricular ejection function

NSAIDs Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs

PCI Penetrating cardiac injury

TEE Transesophageal echocardiography

OR Operating room

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Research Group in Surgery from the Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University.

Author contributions

AK contributed to the literature search, draft writing, critical revision, and final approval of the final version for submission. SS and WL contributed to critical revision and draft writing.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Availability of data and material

The data supporting this study’s findings are available from Thammasat University Hospital. However, restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study and are not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, and the Thammasat University Hospital.

Declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participants

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Levin DC Parker L Schwartz GF Percutaneous needle vs surgical breast biopsy: previous allegations of overuse of surgery are in error J Am Coll Radiol 2012 9 2 137 140 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.10.002 22305700
Levin DC, Parker L, Schwartz GF, et al. Percutaneous needle vs surgical breast biopsy: previous allegations of overuse of surgery are in error. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012;9(2):137–40.22305700 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.10.002
2. Patel IJ Rahim S Davidson JC Society of interventional radiology consensus guidelines for the periprocedural management of thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions-part II: recommendations J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 30 8 1168 84 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.04.017 31229333
Patel IJ, Rahim S, Davidson JC, et al. Society of interventional radiology consensus guidelines for the periprocedural management of thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions-part II: recommendations. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(8):1168–84.31229333 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.04.017
3. Lewis JD Groszkiewicz A Hefelfinger L Clinically significant bleeding complications of percutaneous breast biopsy: 10-year analysis and a proposed management algorithm Clin Imaging 2023 104 110017 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.110017 37979400
Lewis JD, Groszkiewicz A, Hefelfinger L, et al. Clinically significant bleeding complications of percutaneous breast biopsy: 10-year analysis and a proposed management algorithm. Clin Imaging. 2023;104: 110017.37979400 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.110017
4. Simon JR Kalbhen CL Cooper RA Accuracy and complication rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: initial results Radiology 2000 215 3 694 697 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn37694 10831686
Simon JR, Kalbhen CL, Cooper RA, et al. Accuracy and complication rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: initial results. Radiology. 2000;215(3):694–7.10831686 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn37694
5. Bick U Trimboli RM Athanasiou A Image-guided breast biopsy and localisation: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging Insights Imaging 2020 11 1 12 10.1186/s13244-019-0803-x 32025985
Bick U, Trimboli RM, Athanasiou A, et al. Image-guided breast biopsy and localisation: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging. Insights Imaging. 2020;11(1):12.32025985 10.1186/s13244-019-0803-x
6. Dahabreh IJ, Wieland LS, Adam GP, et al. Core Needle and Open Surgical Biopsy for Diagnosis of Breast Lesions: An Update to the 2009 Report. AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Rockville (MD) 2014.
7. Degiannis E Loogna P Doll D Penetrating cardiac injuries: recent experience in South Africa World J Surg 2006 30 7 1258 1264 10.1007/s00268-005-0463-5 16773259
Degiannis E, Loogna P, Doll D, et al. Penetrating cardiac injuries: recent experience in South Africa. World J Surg. 2006;30(7):1258–64.16773259 10.1007/s00268-005-0463-5
8. Lustenberger T Talving P Lam L Penetrating cardiac trauma in adolescents: a rare injury with excessive mortality J Pediatr Surg 2013 48 4 745 749 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.08.020 23583128
Lustenberger T, Talving P, Lam L, et al. Penetrating cardiac trauma in adolescents: a rare injury with excessive mortality. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(4):745–9.23583128 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.08.020
9. Rahim Khan HA Gilani JA Pervez MB Penetrating cardiac trauma: a retrospective case series from Karachi J Pak Med Assoc 2018 68 8 1285 1287 30108408
Rahim Khan HA, Gilani JA, Pervez MB, et al. Penetrating cardiac trauma: a retrospective case series from Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018;68(8):1285–7.30108408
10. Mishra B Gupta A Sagar S Traumatic cardiac injury: experience from a level-1 trauma centre Chin J Traumatol 2016 19 6 333 336 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.08.001 28088937
Mishra B, Gupta A, Sagar S, et al. Traumatic cardiac injury: experience from a level-1 trauma centre. Chin J Traumatol. 2016;19(6):333–6.28088937 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.08.001
11. Soto JR Murry JS Truitt MS Penetrating cardiac injuries at a Level II trauma center: a 15-year review Am Surg 2015 81 3 324 325 10.1177/000313481508100338 25760212
Soto JR, Murry JS, Truitt MS, et al. Penetrating cardiac injuries at a Level II trauma center: a 15-year review. Am Surg. 2015;81(3):324–5.25760212 10.1177/000313481508100338
12. Heus C Mellema JJ Giannakopoulos GF Outcome of penetrating chest injuries in an urban level I trauma center in the Netherlands Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2019 45 3 461 465 10.1007/s00068-015-0533-9 26038051
Heus C, Mellema JJ, Giannakopoulos GF, et al. Outcome of penetrating chest injuries in an urban level I trauma center in the Netherlands. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019;45(3):461–5.26038051 10.1007/s00068-015-0533-9
13. Isaza-Restrepo A Bolivar-Saenz DJ Tarazona-Lara M Penetrating cardiac trauma: analysis of 240 cases from a hospital in Bogota Colombia World J Emerg Surg 2017 12 26 10.1186/s13017-017-0138-1 28616061
Isaza-Restrepo A, Bolivar-Saenz DJ, Tarazona-Lara M, et al. Penetrating cardiac trauma: analysis of 240 cases from a hospital in Bogota. Colombia World J Emerg Surg. 2017;12:26.28616061 10.1186/s13017-017-0138-1
14. Ball CG Lee A Kaminsky M Technical considerations in the management of penetrating cardiac injury Can J Surg 2022 65 5 E580 E592 10.1503/cjs.008521 36302130
Ball CG, Lee A, Kaminsky M, et al. Technical considerations in the management of penetrating cardiac injury. Can J Surg. 2022;65(5):E580–92.36302130 10.1503/cjs.008521
