
==== Front
Nat Commun
Nat Commun
Nature Communications
2041-1723
Nature Publishing Group UK London

52050
10.1038/s41467-024-52050-w
Article
Transverse recoil imprinted on free-electron radiation
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5054-9438
Shi Xihang 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3645-8550
Wong Lee Wei Wesley 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3456-1116
Huang Sunchao 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9601-9456
Wong Liang Jie 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2691-1892
Kaminer Ido kaminer@technion.ac.il

1
1 https://ror.org/03qryx823 grid.6451.6 0000 0001 2110 2151 Solid State Institute and Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 3200003 Israel
2 https://ror.org/02e7b5302 grid.59025.3b 0000 0001 2224 0361 School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798 Singapore
6 9 2024
6 9 2024
2024
15 780317 4 2024
26 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Phenomena of free-electron X-ray radiation are treated almost exclusively with classical electrodynamics, despite the intrinsic interaction being that of quantum electrodynamics. The lack of quantumness arises from the vast disparity between the electron energy and the much smaller photon energy, resulting in a small cross-section that makes quantum effects negligible. Here we identify a fundamentally distinct phenomenon of electron radiation that bypasses this energy disparity, and thus displays extremely strong quantum features. This phenomenon arises when free-electron transverse scattering occurs during the radiation process, creating entanglement between each transversely recoiled electron and the photons it emitted. This phenomenon profoundly modifies the characteristics of free-electron radiation mediated by crystals, compared to conventional classical analysis and even previous quantum analysis. We also analyze conditions to detect this phenomenon using low-emittance electron beams and high-resolution X-ray spectrometers. These quantum radiation features could guide the development of compact coherent X-ray sources facilitated by nanophotonics and quantum optics.

Free-electron X-ray radiation is typically treated classically. Here, the authors identify unprecedented quantum features of X-ray emission from crystals, due to transversely recoiled electron-photon entanglement, enabling precisely tuned emission via quantum control of free electrons.

Subject terms

Nanophotonics and plasmonics
X-rays
Quantum optics
Quantum optics
https://doi.org/10.13039/100013283 EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 The European Institute of Innovation and Technology | EIT Climate-KIC (Climate-KIC Holding B.V.) 851780 Kaminer Ido https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003977 Israel Science Foundation (ISF) 3525/20 Kaminer Ido https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001381 National Research Foundation Singapore (National Research Foundation-Prime Minister's office, Republic of Singapore) NRF2020-NRF-ISF004-3525 Wong Lee Wei Wesley Nanyang Assistant Professorship Start-up Grantissue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Despite the fundamental electron-photon interaction being at the core of quantum electrodynamics, the broad range of free-electron radiation effects is to a large part captured using just classical electrodynamics1–3. The underlying reason for the lack of quantumness is the intrinsic weakness of electron-photon interactions: small cross-section and negligible inelastic electron recoil by photon emission. Quantum effects appear in the dynamics of electrons once the inelastic recoil energy becomes comparable to or larger than the uncertainty in the electron energy4–6. However, despite the electron dynamics becoming quantum, the radiation itself remain classical, and its dispersion is not affected. The general conception is that for quantum effects to also appear in free-electron radiation, the inelastic electron recoil must become comparable to the actual kinetic energy of the electron. The first observation of such a quantum correction7 was believed to finally complete the picture of quantum effects induced by electron recoil.

Breaking these expectations, we identify a fundamentally distinct phenomenon of free-electron radiation – showing features of elastic recoil. While electron radiation is necessarily an inelastic process, we find that additional elastic scattering features can occur simultaneously and create new pathways for electron radiation that are intrinsically quantum. Elastic scattering effects are common in electron diffraction8–13, involving transverse changes of the electron momentum that preserve the electron coherence. Such effects were not previously related to electron radiation. For context, the inelastic process of electron radiation typically involves recoil in the longitudinal electron momentum, which is the dominant momentum component. In contrast, the elastic recoil alters the transverse electron momentum, which is typically substantially smaller than the longitudinal one and thus much more sensitive to small changes. Consequently, we use the term transverse recoil correction to distinguish the quantum correction proposed and analyzed below (Fig. 1).Fig. 1 Comparing free-electron-driven coherent X-ray radiation (CXR) in the classical and quantum formalisms.

CXR is excited by the coherent interaction of free electrons traversing a crystal, such as a silicon film. a In the classical formalism, the electron is modeled as a point charge, and the radiation as classical waves. b In the quantum formalism, the electron is represented by a wave, while the radiation by discrete photons. c Mapping the recoil effects in free-electron radiation. The axes represent the inelastic and transverse recoil on the electron, defined by the change in its energy and transverse momentum, respectively. The electron-photon joint states are defined by the energy and transverse wavevector of both electrons and photons. In the classical domain, the inelastic recoil (ΔE=ℏω) and the transverse recoil (Δq⊥) experienced by the electron are minor relative to the phase space uncertainties of the electron. Quantum corrections to electron dynamics become significant when the recoils approach the electron uncertainties. Yet, inelastic recoil effects in radiation require an even larger inelastic recoil, comparable to the electron kinetic energy7. The strongest influence of transverse recoil on the radiation appears for photon emission that is accompanied by different transverse wavevector changes (Δq⊥ and Δq⊥′), with the difference exceeding the electron uncertainty δq⊥.

The transverse recoil is inherently tied to the wave nature of electrons, which has been known for almost one hundred years, clarified and promoted by the work of Louis de Broglie14. However, the connection of electron transverse recoil to electron radiation emission has generally been overlooked, probably due to a lack of awareness in those early days of the role of entanglement in electron radiation. In recent years, pioneering works in free-electron quantum optics have revealed the intrinsic entanglement underlying the processes of free-electron radiation15–20, spawning the field of free-electron quantum optics21–27. Below, we show that such entanglement is involved in the transverse (elastic) recoil effects that alter the inelastic electron radiation processes.

We note that the term “free electrons” is widely adopted to characterize a beam of electrons after an initial acceleration stage. Despite the designation “free”, these electrons often undergo interactions with external electromagnetic fields or with various media.

In the X-ray regime of free-electron radiation, recent works predicted quantum corrections arising from entanglement created during the inelastic electron scattering responsible for the photon emission7. Another type of quantum correction was predicted to shift the dispersion relation of the radiation28–30 and recently observed in the X-ray regime7. Nevertheless, the effects of transverse recoil on radiation have remained elusive.

Here we show that the transverse recoil could be imprinted on the radiation spectra. In this novel phenomenon of free-electron X-ray radiation, a crystalline material mediates a coherent interaction31, in which the quantum nature of both the electron and the emitted photon play a crucial role. This quantum radiation phenomenon is surprising as it occurs for parameters expected to only yield classical physics, in regimes analyzed classically for a century. We present concrete examples that can be implemented in current experimental setups for X-ray radiation from electrons7,32,33, as in electron microscopes equipped with X-ray spectrometers.

We show how the signature of transverse recoil on electron radiation can arise in several mechanisms of X-ray emission from free electrons, which have been largely seen as distinct radiation phenomena and can now be studied using a uniform framework34–37. To explain this universal behavior, we develop a framework unifying the mechanisms of parametric X-ray radiation (PXR)38–40, coherent Bremsstrahlung (CB)31,41,42, and higher-order electron-driven X-rays43. We denote the unified phenomenon as coherent X-ray radiation (CXR). To account for both electron inelastic and transverse recoils, we adopt a quantum formalism comprising both the particle nature of the photons and the wave nature of the electrons (Fig. 1b). We show in what aspects CXR is affected by the inelastic and transverse recoils, and where it breaks the predictions involving the nonrecoil approximation and inelastic recoil corrections (Fig. 1a).

In the process of free-electron radiation, the electron experiences inelastic recoil, losing energy to the emitted photons. Meanwhile, the electron undergoes transverse recoil due to different transverse reciprocal lattice vector components, as illustrated in Fig. 1c. The quantum corrections due to inelastic recoil effects in radiation7,44 are known to shift the spectra relative to classical predictions. In contrast, we find that the transverse recoil effect does not simply shift the radiation spectra, but instead splits the spectra, with each split corresponding to different transverse recoil pathways. Direct estimation of the transverse-recoil-induced shifts and splits in the radiation spectra can be derived in the context of momentum-energy conservation, as detailed in the Methods. However, a full quantum theory following the Fermi’s golden rule is required to analyze the radiation intensity. We note that this splitting effect not only introduces additional shifts but also significantly diminishes the peak intensities of the CXR.

Interestingly, the polarization of CXR is strongly affected by the transverse recoil. PXR and CB are known to be linearly polarized when excited by ultra-relativistic electrons35,45–48. However, when excited by semi-relativistic electrons, the conventional classical formalism predicts mostly (mixed) unpolarized light because multiple radiation modes that arise from different recoil pathways cannot be separated. We show that the recoil-induced splitting separates the different radiation modes associated with different electron recoil pathways. Consequently, CXR can become strongly (linearly) polarized when the radiation is entangled with electrons with a singular transverse recoil pathway.

Our findings pave the way for shaping and enhancing free-electron radiation via tailored incident electron wavefunctions, contributing to the development of compact, coherent X-ray sources with desired quantum-optical characteristics.

Results

The big picture of quantum effects in free-electron radiation

In the processes of coherent free-electron radiation, electrons experience recoil attributed to longitudinal and transverse momentum variation12,49–52, as shown in Fig. 1c. These two recoil pathways are disregarded in the classical descriptions of electron radiation1–3,53–63 based on Maxwell equations. Under the nonrecoil approximation, the radiation power spectrum is independent of the single electron wavefunction64,65.

Electron recoil can be significantly enhanced through interaction with external laser fields. Earlier experiments11,66 have demonstrated such interaction in the form of the Kapitza-Dirac effect9 mediated by the ponderomotive force of free-space light. Studies in the last decade rely on electrons interacting with evanescent light fields, developing into a new field in electron microscopy: photon-induced near-field electron microscopy (PINEM)4–6. In such cases, the inelastic electron recoil is larger than the electron energy uncertainty, and it thus alters the electron dynamics. The quantum wave nature of the electron dynamics led to the observation of a plethora of quantum effects such as multiple quanta of photon absorption/emission51,52, free-electron quantum walk and Rabi oscillations67, and imprinting photon quantum statistics on the electron energy spectrum26.

In sharp contrast to these observations of recoil effects on electron dynamics, it is generally believed that only when the inelastic energy loss is comparable to the electron kinetic energy, will detectable quantum effects occur in the radiation itself1,28,29,65. This much stricter condition was much harder to accomplish, yet it was recently reached in experiments7 in the X-ray regime.

The role of electron inelastic recoil is also pivotal in free-electron lasers (FELs), influencing electron microbunching, gain68,69, and photon statistics70. The electron’s inelastic recoil (relative to its energy uncertainty) also determines whether an FEL operates in the classical or quantum region71,72.

Nonetheless, the essential features of currently operational FELs, such as their gain, could all be explained using the classical framework (the quantum recoil is seen as a correction69,73). In contrast, the transverse recoil effect that we propose and analyze in this work is characterized by a shift in transverse momentum. This effect does not have an analogue in current FEL research because the transverse recoil does not significantly affect existing FEL operation.

The transverse recoil effect that we identify in this work differs from all the above by its ubiquitous nature. This effect is indirectly implied in previous studies of CB and channeling radiation from dressed electrons44,74–76. There, the elastic scattering is not considered as a recoil correction but as a complete redressing of the electron state. Modulated by the periodic atomic potential, the electrons traversing the crystals follow a Bloch-type dispersion44,77, which exhibits band gaps. In contrast, this work shows that the effects of transverse electron recoil (or electron dressing) on radiation are not limited to specific cases of dressed electrons in CB, but have a much stronger effect on PXR. We capture the combined effect of PXR and CB using a combination of first and second-order perturbation theory. Most importantly, the transverse recoil effects on PXR are dominant because they occur with free electrons following first-order perturbation theory. This quantum effect by free electrons is of great significance as it applies directly to a wide range of additional electron radiation phenomena, such as Smith-Purcell radiation54,55,57,60, Cherenkov radiation28,53,59,61, transition radiation59,78, etc.58 As we show below, the quantum effect that we predict differs from previous studies so far, and it is also more accessible in current experimental setups.

The classical framework of coherent X-ray radiation

In the classical framework (Fig. 1a), the radiation is generated by a point charge subject to the Newton-Lorentz equation and the Maxwell equations37,79,80. The photon emission rate, per unit angular frequency ω and per unit solid angle Ω, from a point charge moving in a crystal with an arbitrary optical dispersion, is given by the following compact form:1 d2NdωdΩ=αω2πc2∑σ∫−∞∞dtvet⋅Ek,σret,ωe−iωt2,

where α is the fine-structure constant, c is the vacuum light speed, k and σ are the wavevector and polarization of the emitted photon. vet is the time-dependent velocity of the free electron, and Ek,σret,ω is the quantized electrical field inside the crystal, which implicitly depends on time through the electron trajectory ret. The derivation of Ek,σret,ω is detailed in the Methods.

The trajectory ret=r0+v0z^+δvtt is determined by solving the Newton-Lorentz equation within a periodic potential ϕ(r). For energetic electrons used to produce X-ray radiation, it is possible to solve for δvt as a first-order perturbation relative to the paraxial dynamics v0z^. By neglecting δvt in Eq. (1), one could obtain the emission rate of PXR, which accounts for the majority of the CXR in most cases when the electron is 300 keV and below. The initial position of the electron r0 is typically averaged over the crystalline unit cell in the simulation.

The framework above already contains certain quantum properties affecting the field modes in the crystal, and already considers the electron modulation by the periodic potential. However, this theoretical framework does not account for the electron wave nature and its dynamical evolution in the crystal, which we show below to be of substantial influence on all the radiation properties.

The quantum framework of coherent X-ray radiation

The quantum description of the free-electron-driven CXR process in crystals is based on the Hamiltonian H=He+Hph+He,ph+He,c, where He and Hph are the unperturbed Hamiltonians of free electrons and free photons, whereas He,ph and He,c are the interaction Hamiltonians of free electrons with the quantized electromagnetic vector potential81,82 and the Coulomb potential31,81 inside crystals, respectively. Their full representations are2 He=∫drψ†rcα⋅p+βmc2ψr,Hph=∑k,σℏωak,σ†ak,σ,He,ph=−ce∫drψ†rα⋅A^rψr,He,c=e∫drψ†rϕrψr,

where ψr=1V∑q,sbq,suq,seiq⋅r is the position space annihilation operator of free electrons, q and s are the wavevector and spin of each electron state, bq,s is the annihilation operator of the electron wavevector state, uq,s is the normalized four-component spinor satisfying uq,s†uq,s=1, ak,σ† and ak,σ are the photonic creation and annihilation operators, e is the electron charge, me is the electron mass, p=−iℏ∇ is the momentum operator, and α=0σσ0,β=I00−I are the Dirac matrices defined in terms of the two-dimensional Pauli matrices σ and the identity matrixI. The second quantized vector potential is denoted by A^r and the scalar (screened) Coulomb potential inside the crystal is denoted by ϕr. The complete representations of them are given by Eqs. (4) and (5) in the Methods.

We adopt a joint electron-photon state to account for the entanglement of each electron to its emitted photons15,16,20 arising due to the electron recoil (both transverse and longitudinal). Without loss of generality, we start by considering an initial electron superposition state ini=∑q,s1Vφsq∣1qs⟩ composed of multiple electron wavevectors ∣1qs⟩, where φsq is the amplitude normalized by ∑q,s1Vφsq2=1. The differential emission rate of an output photon of wavevector k is3 d2NdωdΩ=ω2c32π3∑qfsfσ∑qisigφsiqiM′qisig→qfsf,kσPXR+M′qisig→qfsf,kσCBδqi+g,qf+k2=ω2c32π3∑sfσ∑qisigqjsjhφsiqiφsj*qjM′qisig→qfsf,kσCXRM′qjsjh→qfsf,kσCXR*δqi+g,qj+h,

where ω=kc and σ are the angular frequency and polarization of photons, qi, si, qj, sj (qf, sf) run over initial (final) electron wavevector states, g and h are the reciprocal lattice vectors. M′qisig→qfsf,kσPXR and M′qisig→qfsf,kσCB are the respective scattering elements of PXR and CB processes from the initial electron state ∣1qisi⟩ to the final electron-photon joint state ∣1qfsf⟩⨂∣1kσ⟩, with the momentum conservation represented by the Kronecker delta implicitly enforced. ∣1kσ⟩ is the Fock state of radiation with one photon, and M′qisig→qfsf,kσCXR=M′qisig→qfsf,kσPXR+M′qisig→qfsf,kσCB. Details of the derivation leading to Eq. (3) and the representation of the scattering elements are given in the Methods and Supplementary Section 3.

Transverse recoil effects on the spectral and polarization characteristics of the radiation

In this section, we demonstrate that CXR depicted by the quantum formalism sharply contrasts with the classical descriptions. We find that the angular spectral distribution of CXR features numerous spectral peaks, which are split, shifted, and reduced in intensity, as compared to the classical predictions. Additionally, photons at different peaks exhibit complex polarization characteristics, in contrast to the unpolarized nature predicted by the classical framework.

In this study, we utilize a plane wave electron, which is a common approximation for a transversely delocalized electron (e.g., a wide Gaussian beam) consisting of momentum components that are tightly focused around a central value (see Supplementary Section 6). In Fig. 2, we present the radiation spectrum from electrons with kinetic energies of 30 keV, 300 keV, and 5 MeV traversing 30 nm silicon films along the normal. In what follows, we introduce two terms, quantum CXR and classical CXR, to distinguish between describing CXR in the quantum formalism, as described by Eqs. (2) and (3), and in the classical formalism, by Eq. (1). By comparison, we note that the angular spectral distribution of quantum CXR is more complex than those of classical CXR. The classical CXR follows the linearized dispersion ω=k−g⋅v0z^, which does not account for the full dispersion of the electron. Consequently, the predicted radiation frequencies are determined by the longitudinal periodicity (along the electron trajectory) of the crystal structures, similar to Smith-Purcell radiation54,55,57,60. However, the spectra of quantum CXR, in certain radiation direction associated with the same longitudinal periodicity, exhibit multiple peaks. By increasing the electron energy, the multiple peaks in the spectrum approach each other, gradually converging to coincide with the spectrum of classical CXR. This spectral behavior agrees with the analysis from energy-momentum conservation in the Methods.Fig. 2 Transverse recoil effects in the spectra of CXR.

a, c, and e plot the angular spectral distribution of quantum CXR. b, d, and f compare the spectra of quantum CXR and classical CXR at the radiation angle θ=100∘. The curves in (a, c, e) and the radiation peaks of quantum CXR in (b, d, f) are associated with different reciprocal lattice vectors g=nx,ny,nz2πa, where a is the lattice constant of silicon. In contrast, the frequency of the classical CXR is solely determined by the longitudinal reciprocal lattice vectors labeled by nz. Therefore, the quantum CXR peaks split and shift toward lower photon energies, as shown in (d) and (f). By increasing the electron energy, the multiple peaks gradually converge to coincide with the classically predicted peaks, as shown in (a) and (b). The electrons move along the z direction with kinetic energies of 5 MeV, 300 keV, and 30 keV.

During the radiation process, the electrons are scattered by the reciprocal lattice of the crystal structure, as represented by the Kronecker delta in Eq. (3). The transverse (g⊥) and longitudinal (g∥) reciprocal lattice vector components are associated with the transverse and longitudinal electron recoils, respectively. This is due to the fact that g⊥ and g∥ bring distinct modifications upon the electron states, causing the electron to deflect and decelerate, respectively. Realizing that the emitted photons and final electrons are entangled, the radiation spectra are associated with various g⊥ and g∥. Analysis of energy-momentum conservation shows that g⊥ and g∥ contribute quantum corrections on the same order to the emitted photon frequency (see Methods). Thus, we conclude that the quantum characteristics of CXR arise from a combination of longitudinal and transverse recoil effects.

Despite the inelastic nature of the spontaneous radiation process, inelastic recoil can be negligible in its effect on the radiation, and in fact, this is usually the case for most experimental scenarios. In such cases, transverse recoil becomes the dominant factor for quantum effects on radiation. This situation is demonstrated in Fig. 2c–f and by additional examples in Supplementary Section 4. Figure 2b, d and f present the emission spectra at a fixed radiation direction. These plots correspond to an X-ray spectrometer that captures a wide spectral range while located at a fixed angle. To highlight the transverse recoil effects, the next section presents the angular distribution of photons at specific fixed energies.

We note that in CXR from van der Waals (vdW) materials, such as WSe233 and graphite7, the radiation peaks corresponding to g⊥=0 are dominant, while those with g⊥≠0 are significantly weaker (refer to Supplementary Section 5 for details). This explains why the transverse-recoil-induced spectral splits were not observable in previous experiments7,33. The quantum effects will become evident for CXR from silicon once locating the spectrometer at a small angle relative to the electron beam direction. In larger radiation directions, as shown in Fig. 2b, d, f, distinguishing the split peaks demands higher angular and energy resolution. However, measuring at small radiation angles simplifies the requirements from the spectrometer, making detection feasible using existing experimental platforms, as evidenced in Fig. 2e. For a detailed analysis, refer to Supplementary Section 10.

The unique polarization pattern of CXR and its strong deviation from the classical prediction is also attributed to the transverse recoil. Interestingly, the classically predicted PXR and CB from ultra-relativistic electrons are linearly polarized when scattered by a single reciprocal lattice vector45–48. However, once considering scattering by multiple transverse reciprocal lattice vectors37,80, the radiation from semi-relativistic electrons becomes almost unpolarized (black dashed curve Fig. 3b). We find that this unpolarized nature arises from disregarding the transverse recoil in the classical theories. In the quantum formalism, radiation peaks could be associated with different transverse recoil pathways (Fig. 3a). Once the radiation at a certain angle and energy is connected to an individual recoil pathway, its polarization is strongly linear (curve II in Fig. 3b). Whenever the radiation at a certain angle and energy is connected to two transverse recoil pathways, photons of different polarizations combine incoherently, resulting in a mixed state of unpolarized light.Fig. 3 Transverse recoil effects in the polarization of monochromatic CXR.

a Quantum CXR peaks (II-V) are associated with different transverse recoil pathways, i.e., transverse reciprocal lattice vectors (g⊥). The classical CXR peak (I) is associated with all possible transverse recoil pathways. b The degree of polarization (DOP) of radiation at photon energy ℏω=2.6keV. The classical approach predicts nearly unpolarized light, as represented by the black dashed curve. The quantum CXR peak (II), which is associated with an individual recoil pathway, is linearly polarized. The spectra and the DOP are analyzed with radiation in the x−z plane, where the polarization angle is set to zero. The inset on the right illustrates the silicon unit cell, the radiation angle θ in the x−z plane, and the polarization angle. The electron energy is 30 keV.

Transverse recoil effects in the angular distribution favoring the experimental detection

We compare the angular distributions of the monochromatic X-rays in Fig. 4. The azimuthal angle φ and the polar angle θ represent the radiation angle with respect to the x−z plane and the electron velocity, respectively. Under normal incidence, the azimuthal distribution of quantum CXR, as shown in Fig. 4c, clearly exhibits the same rotational symmetry as the transverse reciprocal lattices. In contrast, the azimuthal distribution of classical CXR is approximately rotationally symmetric, as depicted in Fig. 4a.Fig. 4 Transverse recoil effects in the angular distribution of monochromatic CXR.

The azimuthal angle φ and the polar angle θ represent the radiation angle with respect to the x−z plane and the electron velocity, respectively. The tilt angle θele extends between the z-axis of the crystal (as sketched in Fig. 3) and electron velocity. When θele=0, the azimuthal distribution of classical CXR (a) is approximately rotationally symmetric. However, the azimuthal distribution of quantum CXR (c) exhibits the same rotational symmetry as the transverse reciprocal lattices, which are composed of square unit cells. When the sample is tilted, the angular distribution pattern of classical CXR (b) splits and becomes azimuthally anisotropic, decreasing the peak intensities. However, the quantum CXR d becomes enhanced at specific peaks along φ=0∘ and 180∘. The photon energy is 2.0 keV. The tilt angle in (b) and (d) is θele=tan−1qxqz=2.21∘, where qx=6πa and qz are the x and z components of the wavevector of a 30 keV electron. The inset on the top-right illustrates the sample tilt angle θele and the radiation angle θ.

The peaks of classical CXR also split by tilting the crystal relative to the electron velocity (Fig. 4b). The radiation direction of classical CXR is determined by the dispersion ω=k−g⋅v. When the electron is normally incident along the z-axis, the z component reciprocal lattice vector (g∥=gz) determines the radiation dispersion. We then orient the xyz frame based on the crystal structure as depicted in the inset of Fig. 3. When the sample is tilted by an angle θele, the longitudinal reciprocal lattice vector g∥=gzcosθele−gxsinθele. Therefore, different in-plane components gx of the reciprocal lattice vectors result in the split radiation pattern in Fig. 4b. The peak intensities in the classical theory, correspondingly, always decrease by tilting the sample.

On the contrary, the intensities of specific peaks of quantum CXR increase when the in-plane periodicity of a tilted sample is phase-matched with the electron wavevector. For instance, the phase of the plane wave electron becomes exp−i6πax+iqzz in Fig. 4, with the tilting angle θele=tan−16π/aqz, where qz is the z component of the electron wavevector. The quantum CXR in Fig. 4d exhibits brighter monochromatic peaks in the plane φ=0∘ and 180∘. The disparities over the angular distribution could facilitate the experimental verification of quantum CXR even without requiring high-resolution angle-resolved detectors.

Coherently shaped CXR by tailoring electron wavefunctions

Transverse recoil effects in CXR provide a new route to coherently control free-electron radiation. When the initial electron state in momentum space is tightly focused around a central value, the quantum processes associated with different transverse recoil pathways are incoherently summed, i.e., Eq. (3) becomes d2NdωdΩ∝∑qisig∣φsiqiM′qisig→qfsf,kσCXR∣2, with additional summation over photon polarization and electron spin. However, we can coherently sum different transverse recoil pathways when the electron wavefunction is engineered to have transverse wavevectors focused along different transverse reciprocal lattice vectors. The underlying principle enabling this coherent summation was first applied to bremsstrahlung radiation from an electron superposition state scattered by a single atom15 and by monolayer 2D materials83.

Here, we rely on this coherent summation for a 3D bulk crystal, thus capturing the full effect of CB. More importantly, we show that such coherent summation can also be applied for the mechanism of PXR from bulk crystals, thus covering the unified effect of CXR. In such a context, PXR constitutes the primary component of the radiation, with transverse recoil pathways being discretely distributed. For specific electron wavefunctions, various photon emission pathways that correspond to different transverse recoils converge to the same joint electron-photon state. Such configurations allow the amplitudes of the emission pathways to interfere coherently, resulting in the strong enhancement of quantum features arising from transverse recoil.

We demonstrate this principle by a superposition of two electron plane wave states ini=121q1s+eiφ12∣1q2s⟩, which can be created by a bi-prism or a phase plate in electron microscopy84,85. We choose q1 and q2 to differ by exactly one transverse reciprocal lattice vector g⊥ such that q1=q2+g⊥. This choice creates interference terms in Eq. (3). Constructive interference can be achieved by tuning the relative phase φ12. The results are presented in Fig. 5, where the tailored-electron-driven CXR becomes more directional with further separated and brighter peaks along φ = 0° and 180°. Note that the enhancement of the peak intensity results from the coherent interference of the electron superposition state, rather than the electron oblique incidence of each separated state. A quantitative analysis is provided in Supplementary Section 7, comparing the radiation patterns driven by electrons with two plane wave states 1q1s, ∣1q2s⟩ and their superposition state.Fig. 5 Coherently shaped CXR by a tailored electron wavefunction.

Panels a and b compare the angular distribution of monochromatic CXR driven by a plane wave electron and a tailored electron, respectively. The tailored-electron-driven CXR has brighter peaks along φ=0∘ and φ=180∘, owing to coherent enhancement. Panel c presents the spectra in one radiation direction, showing that the coherent enhancement applies to a broad frequency range. The superposition state of the tailored electron is ini=12(1q1=2πa,4πa,qz+1q2=2πa,−4πa,qz). The electron energy is 30 keV.

Discussion

The electron transverse recoil is intrinsically tied to the wave nature of electrons, as predicted by de Broglie14 and observed in electron scattering experiments8. Six years after de Broglie’s work, Kapitza and Dirac proposed that electrons can also be transversely (elastically) scattered by a standing wave of light9,11. However, the weak cross-section led to the effect being demonstrated only decades later using a strong field laser10. More recent works proposed12 and observed13 variants on the Kapitza-Dirac effect by the inelastic and elastic interaction with plasmon standing waves. These effects all concern the electron dynamics rather than its radiation. In electron radiation processes, transverse recoil effects have been largely overlooked, possibly due to the common approximation of electron dispersion as linear. It could also be due to a lack of awareness of the implications of having the emitted photons entangled to different pathways of electrons undergoing different transverse recoils.

This work shows that both the transverse and longitudinal recoil of the electrons can result in quantum effects on radiation. We develop a full quantum formalism that captures all X-ray emission processes from free electron interactions with crystals, considering the electron quantum wave nature and the second quantization of the radiation. This unified description fully considers the electron recoil and the entanglement between the electron and the radiation. The quantum formalism shows especially strong features for free-electron-driven CXR by semi-relativistic electrons, which is a regime of great promise for devising compact coherent X-ray sources33,43,63,80,86,87. We also anticipate that transverse recoil effects on radiation would disappear when the electron spatial coherence is smaller than the crystal transverse periodicity (see Supplementary Section 6). The work presented here is not limited to CXR, but rather extends to free-electron interactions with materials that exhibit lateral nanoscale features43,88. In all of these, the quantum transverse recoil effects are expected to arise when the lateral features are smaller than the electron spatial coherence.

The complex, multi-peaked spectra of quantum CXR reflects the nonlinear and spectrally broadband nature of free electrons, which could be used to generate photons with user-defined spectral and spatial properties by leveraging the versatility of the interaction, especially by using designed nanophotonic materials. The peak intensity and separation in energy space could be tuned by tailoring the electron wavefunction. For the case of an incident collimated electron beam, the radiation exhibits narrow frequency-resolved peaks, which could potentially be utilized in X-ray metrology to lock a spectral peak to a desired core-level energy transition. By controlling the relative phase between the peaks, we can also shape the temporal profile of the X-ray pulse, possibly reaching attosecond and even zeptosecond timescales.

In conclusion, our work shows that mostly elastic, transverse recoil plays significant roles in free-electron radiation, despite the inelastic nature of each photon emission process. Disregarding the transverse recoil misses all the effects related to the wave nature of electrons, preventing an accurate analysis of the free-electron interactions with nanostructures. Our findings may spark interest in developing compact, coherent and polarized X-ray sources43,88, which may facilitate the development of novel methods in X-ray spectroscopy and microscopy89.

Methods

Quantized electrical field, vector potential and screened Coulomb potential

This section outlines the components necessary for calculating CXR from free electrons, which are used both in the classical and in the quantum frameworks.

We define the electric field Er and second quantized electromagnetic vector potential A^r of a single photon in a bulk crystal81,90. Each Fourier component differs from the counterpart in vacuum by a term that is proportional to χg, which is the Fourier component of the susceptibility χr=∑gχgωeig⋅r, with truncating accuracy up to Oχg. The susceptibility χ(r) is deduced from the electronic density distribution90, which can be derived by the screened Coulomb potential as described below. Within the Born approximation, Er and A^r are4 Er=∑k,σiℏω2ε0V1+∑gχ−gωk2I−k−g⊗k−gk−g2−k2e−ig⋅r⋅eσeik⋅r+c.c.,A^r=∑k,σℏ2ε0ωV1+∑gχ−gωk2I−k−g⊗k−gk−g2−k2e−ig⋅r⋅eσak,σeik⋅r+c.c.,

where ε0 is the vacuum permittivity, I is a unit dyadic tensor, eσ is the polarization vector, and k=k. The perturbed term, which is proportional to χ−g, characterizes the Bragg scattering of free photons or photonic modes by supplementing one reciprocal lattice vector g. The complete derivation is available in Supplementary Section 2. Ek,σr=∑gχ−gωk2I−k−gk−gk−g2−k2⋅eσeik−g⋅r is adopted in Eq. (1).

Meanwhile, the screened Coulomb potential of the silicon atom is modeled by a sum of Yukawa potentials fitted to the results of the Dirac-Hartree-Fock-Slater self-consistent calculations15,91. The full potential generated by all atoms is5 ϕr=∑i,j−Zje4πε0r−ri−Rj∑kCjke−μjkr−ri−Rja0,

where indices i,j,k run over the unit cells, the atoms inside one unit cell, and the fitting parameters of the Yukawa potentials, respectively, ri is the coordinate of the i-th unit cell, Rj is the coordinate of the atom with index j inside one unit cell, Zj is the atomic number, a0 is the Bohr radius, Cjk and μjk are the fitting parameters of different atoms91. For silicon, C1=0.5160, C2=0.4840, μ1=5.8492 and μ2=1.1732. During the CB process, the electron experiences transverse and inelastic reoils induced by the Coulomb potential and the energy loss from emitting photons, respectively.

Scattering element of CXR

This section describes the scattering matrix elements of CXR, used for calculating Eq. (3) in the quantum framework, combining contributions from PXR and CB.

PXR and CB are first and second-order processes in quantum electrodynamics81, with the corresponding scattering element Mqisi→qfsf,kσPXR=δsi,sfiℏ∫−∞∞dt1qfsf1kσ∣He,pht∣1qisi and Mqisi→qfsf,kσCB=δsi,sf(iℏ)2∫−∞∞dt1∫−∞t1dt21qfsf1kσ∣He,ct1He,pht2+He,pht1He,ct2∣1qisi, respectively. This calculation neglects the electron spin flip and employs the approximation uqf,s≈uqi,s, which is a very good approximation for a wide range of photon energies including the optical and X-ray spectral ranges. Due to the periodic nature of the interaction Hamiltonians He,ph and He,c, the scattering elements can be written as Mqisi→qfsf,kσPXR/CB=∑gM′qisig→qfsf,kσPXR/CBδqi+g,qf+k, where momentum conservation is enforced by the Kronecker delta. Details of the derivation can be found in Supplementary Section 3.

Radiation spectra correction by transverse recoil pathways

This section derives the unique spectral features of CXR: the split and shift of the radiation spectra, which arise from transverse recoils in the context of energy-momentum conservation. To simplify the analysis without losing of generality, we confine the radiation processes to the x−z plane, and obtain the energy-momentum conservation equations6 qiz+gz=qfz+ωccosθgx=qfx+ωcsinθEiqiz=Efqfx,qfz+ℏω,

where qiz is the incident electron wavevector, qfx and qfz are the x and z components of the final electron wavevector, gx and gz are the x and z components of one reciprocal lattice vector, θ is the radiation angle relative to the electron velocity, Ei and Ef are the energies of the incident and final electrons, ω is the radiation angular frequency. The radiation angular frequency, derived from Eq. (6) under the approximation of small recoil, is explicitly defined by the following equations7 ω=ℏqizγmqiz−qfz−ℏ2γmqiz−qfz2−ℏ2γmqfx2qfx=gx−ωcsinθqiz−qfz=−gz+ωccosθ,

where γ is the Lorentz factor.

We adopt the linearized electron dispersion approximation by retaining only the first order of electron wavevector changes. Then, Eq. (7) reduces to the classical dispersion equation,8 ωc=v−gz+ωcccosθc,

where v=ℏqizγm is the velocity of the incident electron, and the subscript c is used to denote the classical value. However, by retaining up to the second order of electron wavevector changes, we obtain the quantum-corrected radiation spectra with the frequency ω=ωc+δω and radiation direction θ=θc+δθ, as plotted in Fig. 2. The quantum corrected values δω and δθ are connected by9 δω1−βcosθc+δθsinθc+δθ22cosθcβωc≈−ℏ2γmqiz−qfz2+qfx2≈−ℏ2γmωc2v2+gx−ωccsinθc2,

We retain the second order of δθ to include the case where sinθc=0.

Combining Eqs. (8) and (9), we note that the photon energy, which causes the electron to be inelastically recoiled, is primarily tied to the longitudinal reciprocal lattice vector component gz, and is only weakly affected by the transverse reciprocal lattice vector components gx. However, the electron transverse recoils, denoted by qfx in Eq. (7), are mainly affected by gx. Multiple gx components generate different pathways of electron transverse recoil, and meanwhile, shift and split the radiation spectra as outlined by Eq. (9). By keeping δω constant under two different transverse reciprocal lattice vector components, gx=0 and gx′, Eq. (9) corresponds to the illustration shown in Fig. 1c.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-52050-w.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the ERC (Starter Grant No. 851780) and the ISF-NRF (Grant No. 3525/20). L.J.W. acknowledges the support of the National Research Foundation, Singapore (Project ID NRF2020-NRF-ISF004-3525) and the Nanyang Assistant Professorship Start-up Grant. X. Shi is supported in part by a fellowship of the Israel Council for Higher Education and by the Technion’s Helen Diller Quantum Center.

Author contributions

X.S., L.J.W., and I.K. contributed to the conception and design of the work. X.S. performed the calculations. X.S., L.W.W.W., S.H., L.J.W., and I.K. were involved in interpreting the results. L.J.W. and I.K. supervised the project.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and the Supplementary Material. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. García de Abajo FJ Optical excitations in electron microscopy Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010 82 209 275 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.209
García de Abajo, F. J. Optical excitations in electron microscopy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 209–275 (2010).10.1103/RevModPhys.82.209
2. Pellegrini C Marinelli A Reiche S The physics of x-ray free-electron lasers Rev. Mod. Phys. 2016 88 015006 10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015006
Pellegrini, C., Marinelli, A. & Reiche, S. The physics of x-ray free-electron lasers. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015006 (2016).10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015006
3. Gover A Superradiant and stimulated-superradiant emission of bunched electron beams Rev. Mod. Phys. 2019 91 035003 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035003
Gover, A. et al. Superradiant and stimulated-superradiant emission of bunched electron beams. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035003 (2019).10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035003
4. Barwick B Flannigan DJ Zewail AH Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy Nature 2009 462 902 906 10.1038/nature08662 20016598
Barwick, B., Flannigan, D. J. & Zewail, A. H. Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy. Nature 462, 902–906 (2009).20016598 10.1038/nature08662
5. García de Abajo FJ Asenjo-Garcia A Kociak M Multiphoton absorption and emission by interaction of swift electrons with evanescent light fields Nano Lett 2010 10 1859 1863 10.1021/nl100613s 20415459
García de Abajo, F. J., Asenjo-Garcia, A. & Kociak, M. Multiphoton absorption and emission by interaction of swift electrons with evanescent light fields. Nano Lett 10, 1859–1863 (2010).20415459 10.1021/nl100613s
6. Park ST Lin M Zewail AH Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy (PINEM): theoretical and experimental New J. Phys. 2010 12 123028 10.1088/1367-2630/12/12/123028
Park, S. T., Lin, M. & Zewail, A. H. Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy (PINEM): theoretical and experimental. New J. Phys. 12, 123028 (2010).10.1088/1367-2630/12/12/123028
7. Huang S Quantum recoil in free-electron interactions with atomic lattices Nat. Photon. 2023 17 224 230 10.1038/s41566-022-01132-6
Huang, S. et al. Quantum recoil in free-electron interactions with atomic lattices. Nat. Photon. 17, 224–230 (2023).10.1038/s41566-022-01132-6
8. Davisson C Germer LH The scattering of electrons from single crystals of nickel Nature 1927 119 558 560 10.1038/119558a0
Davisson, C. & Germer, L. H. The scattering of electrons from single crystals of nickel. Nature 119, 558–560 (1927).10.1038/119558a0
9. Kapitza PL Dirac PAM The reflection of electrons from standing light waves Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1933 29 297 300 10.1017/S0305004100011105
Kapitza, P. L. & Dirac, P. A. M. The reflection of electrons from standing light waves. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 29, 297–300 (1933).10.1017/S0305004100011105
10. Freimund DL Aflatooni K Batelaan H Observation of the Kapitza–Dirac effect Nature 2001 413 142 143 10.1038/35093065 11557974
Freimund, D. L., Aflatooni, K. & Batelaan, H. Observation of the Kapitza–Dirac effect. Nature 413, 142–143 (2001).11557974 10.1038/35093065
11. Batelaan H Colloquium: illuminating the Kapitza-Dirac effect with electron matter optics Rev. Mod. Phys. 2007 79 929 941 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.929
Batelaan, H. Colloquium: illuminating the Kapitza-Dirac effect with electron matter optics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 929–941 (2007).10.1103/RevModPhys.79.929
12. García de Abajo FJ Barwick B Carbone F Electron diffraction by plasmon waves Phys. Rev. B 2016 94 041404 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.041404
García de Abajo, F. J., Barwick, B. & Carbone, F. Electron diffraction by plasmon waves. Phys. Rev. B 94, 041404 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.94.041404
13. Tsesses S Tunable photon-induced spatial modulation of free electrons Nat. Mater. 2023 22 345 352 10.1038/s41563-022-01449-1 36702889
Tsesses, S. et al. Tunable photon-induced spatial modulation of free electrons. Nat. Mater. 22, 345–352 (2023).36702889 10.1038/s41563-022-01449-1
14. Broglie L De Recherches sur la théorie des Quanta (Researches on the quantum theory) Ann. Phys. 1925 10 22 128 10.1051/anphys/192510030022
Broglie, L. & De Recherches sur la théorie des Quanta (Researches on the quantum theory). Ann. Phys. 10, 22–128 (1925).10.1051/anphys/192510030022
15. Wong LJ Control of quantum electrodynamical processes by shaping electron wavepackets Nat. Commun. 2021 12 1700 10.1038/s41467-021-21367-1 33731697
Wong, L. J. et al. Control of quantum electrodynamical processes by shaping electron wavepackets. Nat. Commun. 12, 1700 (2021).33731697 10.1038/s41467-021-21367-1
16. Karnieli A Rivera N Arie A Kaminer I The coherence of light is fundamentally tied to the quantum coherence of the emitting particle Sci. Adv. 2021 7 eabf8096 10.1126/sciadv.abf8096 33931454
Karnieli, A., Rivera, N., Arie, A. & Kaminer, I. The coherence of light is fundamentally tied to the quantum coherence of the emitting particle. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf8096 (2021).33931454 10.1126/sciadv.abf8096
17. Ben Hayun A Shaping quantum photonic states using free electrons Sci. Adv. 2021 7 eabe4270 10.1126/sciadv.abe4270 33692108
Ben Hayun, A. et al. Shaping quantum photonic states using free electrons. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe4270 (2021).33692108 10.1126/sciadv.abe4270
18. Mechel C Quantum correlations in electron microscopy Optica 2021 8 70 78 10.1364/OPTICA.402693
Mechel, C. et al. Quantum correlations in electron microscopy. Optica 8, 70–78 (2021).10.1364/OPTICA.402693
19. Lim J Kumar S Ang YS Ang LK Wong LJ Quantum Interference between fundamentally different processes is enabled by shaped input wavefunctions Adv. Sci. 2023 10 2205750 10.1002/advs.202205750
Lim, J., Kumar, S., Ang, Y. S., Ang, L. K. & Wong, L. J. Quantum Interference between fundamentally different processes is enabled by shaped input wavefunctions. Adv. Sci. 10, 2205750 (2023).10.1002/advs.202205750
20. Konečná A Iyikanat F García de Abajo FJ Entangling free electrons and optical excitations Sci. Adv. 2022 8 eabo7853 10.1126/sciadv.abo7853 36427323
Konečná, A., Iyikanat, F. & García de Abajo, F. J. Entangling free electrons and optical excitations. Sci. Adv. 8, eabo7853 (2022).36427323 10.1126/sciadv.abo7853
21. Kfir O Entanglements of electrons and cavity photons in the strong-coupling regime Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019 123 103602 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.103602 31573279
Kfir, O. Entanglements of electrons and cavity photons in the strong-coupling regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 103602 (2019).31573279 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.103602
22. Di Giulio V Kociak M García de Abajo FJ Probing quantum optical excitations with fast electrons Optica 2019 6 1524 1534 10.1364/OPTICA.6.001524
Di Giulio, V., Kociak, M. & García de Abajo, F. J. Probing quantum optical excitations with fast electrons. Optica 6, 1524–1534 (2019).10.1364/OPTICA.6.001524
23. Gover A Yariv A Free-electron–bound-electron resonant interaction Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020 124 64801 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.064801
Gover, A. & Yariv, A. Free-electron–bound-electron resonant interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 64801 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.064801
24. Ruimy R Gorlach A Mechel C Rivera N Kaminer I Toward atomic-resolution quantum measurements with coherently shaped free electrons Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021 126 233403 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.233403 34170167
Ruimy, R., Gorlach, A., Mechel, C., Rivera, N. & Kaminer, I. Toward atomic-resolution quantum measurements with coherently shaped free electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 233403 (2021).34170167 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.233403
25. Zhao Z Sun X-Q Fan S Quantum entanglement and modulation enhancement of free-electron–bound-electron interaction Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021 126 233402 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.233402 34170160
Zhao, Z., Sun, X.-Q. & Fan, S. Quantum entanglement and modulation enhancement of free-electron–bound-electron interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 233402 (2021).34170160 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.233402
26. Dahan R Imprinting the quantum statistics of photons on free electrons Science 2022 373 eabj7128 10.1126/science.abj7128
Dahan, R. et al. Imprinting the quantum statistics of photons on free electrons. Science 373, eabj7128 (2022).10.1126/science.abj7128
27. Dahan R Creation of optical Cat and GKP states using shaped free electrons Phys. Rev. X 2023 13 31001
Dahan, R. et al. Creation of optical Cat and GKP states using shaped free electrons. Phys. Rev. X 13, 31001 (2023).
28. Ginzburg VL Quantum theory of radiation of electron uniformly moving in medium Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz 1940 10 589 600
Ginzburg, V. L. Quantum theory of radiation of electron uniformly moving in medium. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz 10, 589–600 (1940).
29. Kaminer I Quantum čerenkov radiation: spectral cutoffs and the role of spin and orbital angular momentum Phys. Rev. X 2016 6 011006
Kaminer, I. et al. Quantum čerenkov radiation: spectral cutoffs and the role of spin and orbital angular momentum. Phys. Rev. X 6, 011006 (2016).
30. Tsesses S Bartal G Kaminer I Light generation via quantum interaction of electrons with periodic nanostructures Phys. Rev. A 2017 95 013832 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.013832
Tsesses, S., Bartal, G. & Kaminer, I. Light generation via quantum interaction of electrons with periodic nanostructures. Phys. Rev. A 95, 013832 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevA.95.013832
31. Mikhail L Ter-Mikhaelyan Electromagnetic radiative processes in periodic media at high energies Physics-Uspekhi 2001 44 571 10.1070/PU2001v044n06ABEH000886
Mikhail, L. & Ter-Mikhaelyan Electromagnetic radiative processes in periodic media at high energies. Physics-Uspekhi 44, 571 (2001).10.1070/PU2001v044n06ABEH000886
32. Baryshevsky VG Coherent bremsstrahlung and parametric X-ray radiation from nonrelativistic electrons in a crystal Tech. Phys. Lett. 2006 32 392 395 10.1134/S1063785006050087
Baryshevsky, V. G. et al. Coherent bremsstrahlung and parametric X-ray radiation from nonrelativistic electrons in a crystal. Tech. Phys. Lett. 32, 392–395 (2006).10.1134/S1063785006050087
33. Shentcis M Tunable free-electron X-ray radiation from van der Waals materials Nat. Photon. 2020 14 686 692 10.1038/s41566-020-0689-7
Shentcis, M. et al. Tunable free-electron X-ray radiation from van der Waals materials. Nat. Photon. 14, 686–692 (2020).10.1038/s41566-020-0689-7
34. Blazhevich SV First observation of interference between parametric X-ray and coherent bremsstrahlung Phys. Lett. A 1994 195 210 212 10.1016/0375-9601(94)90154-6
Blazhevich, S. V. et al. First observation of interference between parametric X-ray and coherent bremsstrahlung. Phys. Lett. A 195, 210–212 (1994).10.1016/0375-9601(94)90154-6
35. Kleiner VL Nasonov NN Safronov AG Interference between parametric and coherent bremsstrahlung radiation mechanisms of a fast charged particle in a crystal Phys. status solidi 1994 181 223 231 10.1002/pssb.2221810122
Kleiner, V. L., Nasonov, N. N. & Safronov, A. G. Interference between parametric and coherent bremsstrahlung radiation mechanisms of a fast charged particle in a crystal. Phys. status solidi 181, 223–231 (1994).10.1002/pssb.2221810122
36. Morokhovskyi V Freudenberger J Genz H Morokhovskii V Richter A Theoretical description and experimental detection of the interference between parametric X radiation and coherent bremsstrahlung Phys. Rev. B 2000 61 3347 3352 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.3347
Morokhovskyi, V., Freudenberger, J., Genz, H., Morokhovskii, V. & Richter, A. Theoretical description and experimental detection of the interference between parametric X radiation and coherent bremsstrahlung. Phys. Rev. B 61, 3347–3352 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevB.61.3347
37. Feranchuk ID Ulyanenkov A Harada J Spence JCH Parametric x-ray radiation and coherent bremsstrahlung from nonrelativistic electrons in crystals Phys. Rev. E 2000 62 4225 4234 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.4225
Feranchuk, I. D., Ulyanenkov, A., Harada, J. & Spence, J. C. H. Parametric x-ray radiation and coherent bremsstrahlung from nonrelativistic electrons in crystals. Phys. Rev. E 62, 4225–4234 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevE.62.4225
38. Garybyan GM Yang C Quantum microscopic theory of radiation by a charged particle moving uniformly in a crystal Sov. Phys. JETP 1972 34 495
Garybyan, G. M. & Yang, C. Quantum microscopic theory of radiation by a charged particle moving uniformly in a crystal. Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 495 (1972).
39. Baryshevsky VG Feranchuk ID Transition radiation of γ rays in a crystal Sov. Phys. JETP 1972 34 502 504
Baryshevsky, V. G. & Feranchuk, I. D. Transition radiation of γ rays in a crystal. Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 502–504 (1972).
40. Feranchuk ID Ivashin AV Theoretical investigation of the parametric X-ray features J. Phys. 1985 46 1981 1986 10.1051/jphys:0198500460110198100
Feranchuk, I. D. & Ivashin, A. V. Theoretical investigation of the parametric X-ray features. J. Phys. 46, 1981–1986 (1985).10.1051/jphys:0198500460110198100
41. Williams EJ Correlation of certain collision problems with radiation theory Kong. Dan. Vid. Sel. Mat. Fys. Med. 1935 13N4 1 50
Williams, E. J. Correlation of certain collision problems with radiation theory. Kong. Dan. Vid. Sel. Mat. Fys. Med. 13N4, 1–50 (1935).
42. Überall H High-energy interference effect of bremsstrahlung and pair production in crystals Phys. Rev. 1956 103 1055 1067 10.1103/PhysRev.103.1055
Überall, H. High-energy interference effect of bremsstrahlung and pair production in crystals. Phys. Rev. 103, 1055–1067 (1956).10.1103/PhysRev.103.1055
43. Wong LJ Kaminer I Prospects in x-ray science emerging from quantum optics and nanomaterials Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021 119 130502 10.1063/5.0060552
Wong, L. J. & Kaminer, I. Prospects in x-ray science emerging from quantum optics and nanomaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 130502 (2021).10.1063/5.0060552
44. Sandström SE Überall H Channeling radiation and coherent bremsstrahlung for simple lattices: A three-dimensional approach Phys. Rev. B 1991 43 12701 12706 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.12701
Sandström, S. E. & Überall, H. Channeling radiation and coherent bremsstrahlung for simple lattices: A three-dimensional approach. Phys. Rev. B 43, 12701–12706 (1991).10.1103/PhysRevB.43.12701
45. Lohmann D Linearly polarized photons at MAMI (Mainz) Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1994 343 494 507 10.1016/0168-9002(94)90230-5
Lohmann, D. et al. Linearly polarized photons at MAMI (Mainz). Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 343, 494–507 (1994).10.1016/0168-9002(94)90230-5
46. Morokhovskii VV Polarization of parametric X radiation Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997 79 4389 4392 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4389
Morokhovskii, V. V. et al. Polarization of parametric X radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4389–4392 (1997).10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4389
47. Shchagin AV Linear polarization of parametric X-rays Phys. Lett. A 1998 247 27 36 10.1016/S0375-9601(98)00528-3
Shchagin, A. V. Linear polarization of parametric X-rays. Phys. Lett. A 247, 27–36 (1998).10.1016/S0375-9601(98)00528-3
48. Schmidt KH Measurement of the linear polarization of Parametric X-radiation Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 1998 145 8 13 10.1016/S0168-583X(98)00204-3
Schmidt, K. H. et al. Measurement of the linear polarization of Parametric X-radiation. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 145, 8–13 (1998).10.1016/S0168-583X(98)00204-3
49. Talebi N Electron-light interactions beyond the adiabatic approximation: Recoil engineering and spectral interferometry Adv. Phys. X 2018 3 1499438
Talebi, N. Electron-light interactions beyond the adiabatic approximation: Recoil engineering and spectral interferometry. Adv. Phys. X 3, 1499438 (2018).
50. Feist A Yalunin SV Schäfer S Ropers C High-purity free-electron momentum states prepared by three-dimensional optical phase modulation Phys. Rev. Res. 2020 2 43227 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043227
Feist, A., Yalunin, S. V., Schäfer, S. & Ropers, C. High-purity free-electron momentum states prepared by three-dimensional optical phase modulation. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 43227 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043227
51. Dahan R Resonant phase-matching between a light wave and a free-electron wavefunction Nat. Phys. 2020 16 1123 1131 10.1038/s41567-020-01042-w
Dahan, R. et al. Resonant phase-matching between a light wave and a free-electron wavefunction. Nat. Phys. 16, 1123–1131 (2020).10.1038/s41567-020-01042-w
52. Tsarev M Thurner JW Baum P Nonlinear-optical quantum control of free-electron matter waves Nat. Phys. 2023 19 1350 1354 10.1038/s41567-023-02092-6
Tsarev, M., Thurner, J. W. & Baum, P. Nonlinear-optical quantum control of free-electron matter waves. Nat. Phys. 19, 1350–1354 (2023).10.1038/s41567-023-02092-6
53. Liu F Integrated Cherenkov radiation emitter eliminating the electron velocity threshold Nat. Photon. 2017 11 289 292 10.1038/nphoton.2017.45
Liu, F. et al. Integrated Cherenkov radiation emitter eliminating the electron velocity threshold. Nat. Photon. 11, 289–292 (2017).10.1038/nphoton.2017.45
54. Roques-Carmes C Towards integrated tunable all-silicon free-electron light sources Nat. Commun. 2019 10 3176 10.1038/s41467-019-11070-7 31320664
Roques-Carmes, C. et al. Towards integrated tunable all-silicon free-electron light sources. Nat. Commun. 10, 3176 (2019).31320664 10.1038/s41467-019-11070-7
55. Ye Y Deep-ultraviolet smith–purcell radiation Optica 2019 6 592 597 10.1364/OPTICA.6.000592
Ye, Y. et al. Deep-ultraviolet smith–purcell radiation. Optica 6, 592–597 (2019).10.1364/OPTICA.6.000592
56. Zhang D Coherent surface plasmon polariton amplification via free-electron pumping Nature 2022 611 55 60 10.1038/s41586-022-05239-2 36323808
Zhang, D. et al. Coherent surface plasmon polariton amplification via free-electron pumping. Nature 611, 55–60 (2022).36323808 10.1038/s41586-022-05239-2
57. Smith SJ Purcell EM Visible light from localized surface charges moving across a grating Phys. Rev. 1953 92 1069 10.1103/PhysRev.92.1069
Smith, S. J. & Purcell, E. M. Visible light from localized surface charges moving across a grating. Phys. Rev. 92, 1069 (1953).10.1103/PhysRev.92.1069
58. Ritchie RH Plasma losses by fast electrons in thin films Phys. Rev. 1957 106 874 10.1103/PhysRev.106.874
Ritchie, R. H. Plasma losses by fast electrons in thin films. Phys. Rev. 106, 874 (1957).10.1103/PhysRev.106.874
59. Ginzburg VL Radiation by uniformly moving sources (Vavilov-Cherenkov effect, transition radiation, and other phenomena) Phys. Usp. 1996 39 973 982 10.1070/PU1996v039n10ABEH000171
Ginzburg, V. L. Radiation by uniformly moving sources (Vavilov-Cherenkov effect, transition radiation, and other phenomena). Phys. Usp. 39, 973–982 (1996).10.1070/PU1996v039n10ABEH000171
60. Adamo G Light well: a tunable free-electron light source on a chip Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009 103 113901 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.113901 19792372
Adamo, G. et al. Light well: a tunable free-electron light source on a chip. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 113901 (2009).19792372 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.113901
61. Liu S Surface polariton cherenkov light radiation source Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012 109 153902 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.153902 23102309
Liu, S. et al. Surface polariton cherenkov light radiation source. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 153902 (2012).23102309 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.153902
62. Peralta EA Demonstration of electron acceleration in a laser-driven dielectric microstructure Nature 2013 503 91 94 10.1038/nature12664 24077116
Peralta, E. A. et al. Demonstration of electron acceleration in a laser-driven dielectric microstructure. Nature 503, 91–94 (2013).24077116 10.1038/nature12664
63. Wong LJ Kaminer I Ilic O Joannopoulos JD Soljačić M Towards graphene plasmon-based free-electron infrared to X-ray sources Nat. Photon. 2016 10 46 52 10.1038/nphoton.2015.223
Wong, L. J., Kaminer, I., Ilic, O., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Soljačić, M. Towards graphene plasmon-based free-electron infrared to X-ray sources. Nat. Photon. 10, 46–52 (2016).10.1038/nphoton.2015.223
64. Remez R Observing the quantum wave nature of free electrons through spontaneous emission Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019 123 060401 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.060401 31491157
Remez, R. et al. Observing the quantum wave nature of free electrons through spontaneous emission. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 060401 (2019).31491157 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.060401
65. García de Abajo FJ Di Giulio V Optical excitations with electron beams: challenges and opportunities ACS Photonics 2021 8 945 974 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01950 35356759
García de Abajo, F. J. & Di Giulio, V. Optical excitations with electron beams: challenges and opportunities. ACS Photonics 8, 945–974 (2021).35356759 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01950
66. Lin K Ultrafast Kapitza-Dirac effect Science 2024 383 1467 1470 10.1126/science.adn1555 38547290
Lin, K. et al. Ultrafast Kapitza-Dirac effect. Science 383, 1467–1470 (2024).38547290 10.1126/science.adn1555
67. Feist A Quantum coherent optical phase modulation in an ultrafast transmission electron microscope Nature 2015 521 200 203 10.1038/nature14463 25971512
Feist, A. et al. Quantum coherent optical phase modulation in an ultrafast transmission electron microscope. Nature 521, 200–203 (2015).25971512 10.1038/nature14463
68. Madey JMJ Stimulated emission of bremsstrahlung in a periodic magnetic field J. Appl. Phys. 1971 42 1906 1913 10.1063/1.1660466
Madey, J. M. J. Stimulated emission of bremsstrahlung in a periodic magnetic field. J. Appl. Phys. 42, 1906–1913 (1971).10.1063/1.1660466
69. Becker W McIver JK Quantum descriptions of free-electron lasers J. Phys. Colloq. 1983 44 C1-289 C1-311 10.1051/jphyscol:1983125
Becker, W. & McIver, J. K. Quantum descriptions of free-electron lasers. J. Phys. Colloq. 44, C1-289–C1-311 (1983).10.1051/jphyscol:1983125
70. Becker W Zubairy MS Photon statistics of a free-electron laser Phys. Rev. A 1982 25 2200 2207 10.1103/PhysRevA.25.2200
Becker, W. & Zubairy, M. S. Photon statistics of a free-electron laser. Phys. Rev. A 25, 2200–2207 (1982).10.1103/PhysRevA.25.2200
71. Bonifacio R Piovella N Robb GRM The quantum free electron laser: A new source of coherent, short-wavelength radiation Fortschr. Phys. 2009 57 1041 1051 10.1002/prop.200900097
Bonifacio, R., Piovella, N. & Robb, G. R. M. The quantum free electron laser: A new source of coherent, short-wavelength radiation. Fortschr. Phys. 57, 1041–1051 (2009).10.1002/prop.200900097
72. Kling P What defines the quantum regime of the free-electron laser? New J. Phys. 2015 17 123019 10.1088/1367-2630/17/12/123019
Kling, P. et al. What defines the quantum regime of the free-electron laser? New J. Phys. 17, 123019 (2015).10.1088/1367-2630/17/12/123019
73. Bambini A Renieri A Stenholm S Classical theory of the free-electron laser in a moving frame Phys. Rev. A 1979 19 2013 2025 10.1103/PhysRevA.19.2013
Bambini, A., Renieri, A. & Stenholm, S. Classical theory of the free-electron laser in a moving frame. Phys. Rev. A 19, 2013–2025 (1979).10.1103/PhysRevA.19.2013
74. Reese GM Spence JCH Yamamoto N Coherent bremsstrahlung from kilovolt electrons in zone axis orientations Philos. Mag. A 1984 49 697 716 10.1080/01418618408233297
Reese, G. M., Spence, J. C. H. & Yamamoto, N. Coherent bremsstrahlung from kilovolt electrons in zone axis orientations. Philos. Mag. A 49, 697–716 (1984).10.1080/01418618408233297
75. Andersen, J. U. & Lægsgaard, E. Coherent bremsstrahlung and sidebands for channeled electrons. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 33, 11–17 (1988).
76. Kurizki G Bloch waves and band structure for diffracted and channeled particles in crystals Phys. Rev. B 1986 33 49 63 10.1103/PhysRevB.33.49
Kurizki, G. Bloch waves and band structure for diffracted and channeled particles in crystals. Phys. Rev. B 33, 49–63 (1986).10.1103/PhysRevB.33.49
77. Überall H Sáenz AW Channeling radiation and coherent bremsstrahlung Phys. Lett. A 1982 90 370 374 10.1016/0375-9601(82)90634-X
Überall, H. & Sáenz, A. W. Channeling radiation and coherent bremsstrahlung. Phys. Lett. A 90, 370–374 (1982).10.1016/0375-9601(82)90634-X
78. Lin X Controlling Cherenkov angles with resonance transition radiation Nat. Phys. 2018 14 816 821 10.1038/s41567-018-0138-4
Lin, X. et al. Controlling Cherenkov angles with resonance transition radiation. Nat. Phys. 14, 816–821 (2018).10.1038/s41567-018-0138-4
79. Balanov A Gorlach A Kaminer I Temporal and spatial design of x-ray pulses based on free-electron-crystal interaction APL Photonics 2021 6 070803 10.1063/5.0041809
Balanov, A., Gorlach, A. & Kaminer, I. Temporal and spatial design of x-ray pulses based on free-electron-crystal interaction. APL Photonics 6, 070803 (2021).10.1063/5.0041809
80. Huang S Enhanced Versatility of Table-Top X-Rays from Van der Waals Structures Adv. Sci. 2022 9 2105401 10.1002/advs.202105401
Huang, S. et al. Enhanced Versatility of Table-Top X-Rays from Van der Waals Structures. Adv. Sci. 9, 2105401 (2022).10.1002/advs.202105401
81. Baryshevsky, V. G., Feranchuk, I. D. & Ulyanenkov, A. P. Parametric X-Ray Radiation in Crystals: Theory, Experiment and Applications. (Springer, 2005).
82. Rivera N Kaminer I Light–matter interactions with photonic quasiparticles Nat. Rev. Phys. 2020 2 538 561 10.1038/s42254-020-0224-2
Rivera, N. & Kaminer, I. Light–matter interactions with photonic quasiparticles. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 538–561 (2020).10.1038/s42254-020-0224-2
83. Wong LWW Free-electron crystals for enhanced X-ray radiation Light Sci. Appl. 2024 13 29 10.1038/s41377-023-01363-4 38267427
Wong, L. W. W. et al. Free-electron crystals for enhanced X-ray radiation. Light Sci. Appl. 13, 29 (2024).38267427 10.1038/s41377-023-01363-4
84. Guzzinati G Probing the symmetry of the potential of localized surface plasmon resonances with phase-shaped electron beams Nat. Commun. 2017 8 14999 10.1038/ncomms14999 28401942
Guzzinati, G. et al. Probing the symmetry of the potential of localized surface plasmon resonances with phase-shaped electron beams. Nat. Commun. 8, 14999 (2017).28401942 10.1038/ncomms14999
85. Verbeeck J Demonstration of a 2 × 2 programmable phase plate for electrons Ultramicroscopy 2018 190 58 65 10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.03.017 29689445
Verbeeck, J. et al. Demonstration of a 2 × 2 programmable phase plate for electrons. Ultramicroscopy 190, 58–65 (2018).29689445 10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.03.017
86. Shi X Free-electron-driven X-ray caustics from strained van der Waals materials Optica 2023 10 292 301 10.1364/OPTICA.472462
Shi, X. et al. Free-electron-driven X-ray caustics from strained van der Waals materials. Optica 10, 292–301 (2023).10.1364/OPTICA.472462
87. Shi X Free-electron interactions with van der Waals heterostructures: a source of focused X-ray radiation Light Sci. Appl. 2023 12 148 10.1038/s41377-023-01141-2 37321995
Shi, X. et al. Free-electron interactions with van der Waals heterostructures: a source of focused X-ray radiation. Light Sci. Appl. 12, 148 (2023).37321995 10.1038/s41377-023-01141-2
88. Roques-Carmes C Free-electron–light interactions in nanophotonics Appl. Phys. Rev. 2023 10 011303 10.1063/5.0118096
Roques-Carmes, C. et al. Free-electron–light interactions in nanophotonics. Appl. Phys. Rev. 10, 011303 (2023).10.1063/5.0118096
89. Donnelly C Three-dimensional magnetization structures revealed with X-ray vector nanotomography Nature 2017 547 328 331 10.1038/nature23006 28726832
Donnelly, C. et al. Three-dimensional magnetization structures revealed with X-ray vector nanotomography. Nature 547, 328–331 (2017).28726832 10.1038/nature23006
90. Authier, A. Dynamical Theory of X-ray Diffraction. (Oxford University Press, 2001).
91. Salvat F Martnez JD Mayol R Parellada J Analytical Dirac-Hartree-Fock-Slater screening function for atoms (Z=192) Phys. Rev. A 1987 36 467 10.1103/PhysRevA.36.467
Salvat, F., Martnez, J. D., Mayol, R. & Parellada, J. Analytical Dirac-Hartree-Fock-Slater screening function for atoms (Z=192). Phys. Rev. A 36, 467 (1987).10.1103/PhysRevA.36.467
