
==== Front
Nat Commun
Nat Commun
Nature Communications
2041-1723
Nature Publishing Group UK London

52046
10.1038/s41467-024-52046-6
Article
3D height-alternant island arrays for stretchable OLEDs with high active area ratio and maximum strain
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2860-3650
Kim Su-Bon 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9610-890X
Lee Donggyun 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6564-7970
Kim Junho 1
Kim Taehyun 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5174-8770
Sim Jee Hoon 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4714-9956
Yang Jong-Heon 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7882-4144
Oh Seung Jin 3
http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6063-4310
Hahn Sangin 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2981-4636
Lee Woochan 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5850-1532
Choi Dongho 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2825-7778
Kim Taek-Soo 3
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-5028
Moon Hanul hmoon@dau.ac.kr

4
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1887-6118
Yoo Seunghyup syoo_ee@kaist.ac.kr

15
1 https://ror.org/05apxxy63 grid.37172.30 0000 0001 2292 0500 School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
2 https://ror.org/03ysstz10 grid.36303.35 0000 0000 9148 4899 Electronics Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
3 https://ror.org/05apxxy63 grid.37172.30 0000 0001 2292 0500 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
4 https://ror.org/03qvtpc38 grid.255166.3 0000 0001 2218 7142 Department of Semiconductor; Department of Chemical Engineering (BK21 FOUR Graduate Program), Dong-A University, Busan, Republic of Korea
5 grid.37172.30 0000 0001 2292 0500 Graduate School of Semiconductor Technology, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
6 9 2024
6 9 2024
2024
15 78022 1 2024
23 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Stretchable optoelectronic devices are typically realized through a 2D integration of rigid components and elastic interconnectors to maintain device performance under stretching deformation. However, such configurations inevitably sacrifice the area ratio of active components to enhance the maximum interconnector strain. We herein propose a 3D buckled height-alternant architecture for stretchable OLEDs that enables the high active-area ratio and the enhanced maximum strain simultaneously. Along with the optimal dual serpentine structure leading to a low critical buckling strain, a pop-up assisting adhesion blocking layer is proposed based on an array of micro concave structures for spatially selective adhesion control, enabling a reliable transition to a 3D buckled state with OLED-compatible processes. Consequently, we demonstrate stretchable OLEDs with both the high initial active-area ratio of 85% and the system strain of up to 40%, which would require a lateral interconnector strain of up to 512% if it were attained with conventional 2D rigid-island approaches. These OLEDs are shown to exhibit reliable performance under 2,000 biaxial cycles of 40% system strain. 7 × 7 passive-matrix OLED displays with the similar level of the initial active-area ratio and maximum system strain are also demonstrated.

Conventional stretchable optoelectronics suffer from sacrificed area ratio of active components to enhance maximum strain. Here, the authors develop a 3D buckled height-alternant architecture, allowing high initial active-area ratio and maximum system strain in displays with reliable performances.

Subject terms

Mechanical engineering
Organic LEDs
Organic LEDs
issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Stretchable optoelectronic devices have attracted considerable attention as a versatile platform that has potential applications in wearable displays1–4, skin electronics5–7, robotics8,9, and healthcare technologies10–12. In stretchable devices, one of the crucial requirements is that the device performance should be maintained without functional failure under stretching deformations, as well as under bending and flexural deformations4,13–16. To achieve this important goal, the stretchable systems often rely on a complementary integration incorporating both performance-preserving rigid islands and interconnectors capable of dissipating stress under non-linear deformation8,17–24. However, such approaches in two-dimensional (2D) space inevitably sacrifice a planar density of active components to increase the maximum applicable strain of the interconnector (Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1 for details). In order to overcome this critical limitation, several groups have recently introduced advanced techniques for realizing three-dimensional (3D) mesostructures across a diverse array of materials, employing a mechanically guided assembly process based on the principle of out-of-plane buckling in elastomeric substrates25–31. In particular, approaches based on a biaxial release of thin active films integrated on pre-strained elastomeric structures were shown effective in realizing deterministic 3D assembly via consistent morphological modifications25,32,33. In the conventional mechanically guided assembly method, however, the relatively low bending stiffness of the serpentine structure, which is preferred for enhancing the maximum applicable strain, could present an inherent obstacle to the realization of robust 2D-3D transformation, as it makes it difficult to overcome the interfacial adhesion energy between the elastomeric substrate and the thin film34,35. It has thus been challenging to realize 3D-structure-based stretchable devices that can attain a high initial density and a high level of the maximum applicable strain at the same time. Furthermore, the 3D methodologies reported to date involved high-temperature operations (> 180 °C), plasma or UV ozone process, or wet processes following the transfer process, which would degrade the performance of devices involving materials with low thermal budget or solvent resistance such as organic semiconductors25–29,32,33.

Here, we propose a strategy for a mechanically guided assembly with a spatially selective adhesion control that can lead to a predictable and reliable 2D-to-3D transition while avoiding wet processes and high-temperature environment in the post-transfer process for compatibility with organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). A joint theoretical and experimental study is performed to identify a dual serpentine structure to be optimal for an efficient out-of-plane interconnector buckling that induces little deformation in the rigid islands while ensuring sufficiently low stress to be applied on the interconnector itself. To ensure the 2D thin-film membranes overcome the interfacial adhesion energy necessary for the delamination of rigid islands interconnected with serpentine structure from the elastomeric substrate, we propose a pop-up assisting adhesive blocking layer (PA-ABL) that utilizes the effective interfacial contact-area modulation enabled by the presence of an array of micro-scale concave structures. With this proposed approach, we demonstrate stretchable OLEDs with an 85% active-area ratio in the initial, non-stretch (buckled) state that present only a small discrepancy of OLED performances under 2000 biaxial cycles of 40% system strain.

Results

Overview and mechanical design of the proposed stretchable OLEDs with 3D pop-up architecture

Figure 1a depicts a schematic diagram of the proposed high-density stretchable OLEDs with a high initial active-area ratio (γa0) based on 3D height-alternant island arrays. The system consists of (i) a bottom elastomer layer, serving as the physical support for the overall system; (ii) an adhesive layer that affixes a part of the membrane onto the bottom elastomer; (iii) a thin membrane that hosts an array of OLED pixels, contact pads, and stress-relieving interconnectors; and (iv) pop-up assisting adhesive blocking layer (PA-ABL) that enables selective adhesion reduction. With the help of the adhesive layer coated on the elastomer, the pre-patterned PA-ABL and the OLED devices are sequentially transferred onto the elastomer that is biaxially stretched by equal displacement (Δx=Δy). Note that islands with OLEDs that do not face the adhesive directly due to the presence of the PA-ABL are not bonded to the elastomer unlike the other parts of the membrane, forming a selectively bonded structure. While the main function of the PA-ABL is to prevent the adhesive layer from facing the structure on its top directly, it plays an additional yet critical role in assisting the structure on its top to easily pop up. This pop-up assisting nature is attributed to the dimpled surface morphology of the proposed PA-ABL that significantly reduces the attractive interaction between the ABL and the layer on its top, as will be discussed in detail in the upcoming section. In this way, the PA-ABL over the adhesive layer functions to disengage specific regions of the OLED devices, enabling 3D height-alternant island arrays, as shown in Fig. 1b–d when the biaxial stretching is released (Δx=Δy=0). The proposed architecture utilizes a bottom-emission OLED device with polyimide as a substrate, whose key multilayer structure is shown in the cross-sectional scanning electron microscope (SEM) image (Fig. 1e).Fig. 1 Stretchable OLEDs utilizing a pop-up assisting adhesive blocking layer (PA-ABL).

a Conceptual illustration of the assembly strategy with PA-ABL and an OLED device on an elastomeric substrate. The adhesive layer is formed on the elastomeric substrate prior to symmetric biaxial pre-stretching (Δx=Δy). b The configuration image of stretchable OLEDs after biaxial strain release. The inset shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a fabricated stretchable OLED. c The schematic image of a unit OLED device in a pop-up state. d The role of PA-ABL in both 2D planar and 3D pop-up states. The proposed device is triggered by the biaxial strain release, resulting in a transition to a 3D pop-up state. The PA-ABL prevents an OLED from being lifted from facing the adhesive layer directly while significantly reducing attractive interactions between the OLED and the PA-ABL via decreased contact area resulting from its dimpled surface morphology. e The cross-sectional SEM image of the OLED device.

The initiation of out-of-plane buckling occurs when the compressive strain (εcomp) surpasses the critical buckling strain (εcri), inducing a transition from the non-buckled state to the buckled state36 (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 2) and thereby leading to a 3D pop-up structure with deterministic, freestanding topologies. It is preferable to keep εcri not too high to avoid the need for excessive mechanical energy to initiate the transition to the buckled state. However, the relatively low bending stiffness inherent to serpentine structure tends to result in a high εcri, underscoring the importance of identifying the ideal mechanical structure and reducing the total adhesion energy (Γadh) between the 2D rigid islands to be lifted and the PA-ABL (Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Note 2 for detailed calculations) for an effective evolution to an intended 3D buckled state34,35.Fig. 2 Analytical model and finite element analysis of out-of-plane buckled serpentines in the proposed stretchable OLEDs.

a The shape and key geometric parameters of the proposed dual serpentine. The radius (R), width (W), and two length scales (Lr and Ls) are shown. AA¯′ indicates a hinge section within which the top portion contains the most vulnerable point (Pweak) of the serpentine interconnector. The compressive strain (εcomp) of the serpentine interconnector is defined as εcomp=(Lsp−Lsproj)/Lsp. The operational stretching sequence consists of a sequence from the initial state in the popped-up condition to the state where system strain is applied. b The Von-Mises stress at Pweak (=σvonmax) is estimated as a function of (R, W) at compressive strain (εcomp) of 80%. The three cases IA, IB, and II are positioned at (R, W) = (60 μm, 40 μm), (35 μm, 35 μm), and (65 μm, 65 μm), respectively. c The spatial distribution of Von-Mises stress (σvon) at εcomp = 80% obtained by FEA in Cases IA and II. d The spatial distribution of z-axis displacement (uz) between Cases IA and IB obtained at εcomp = 15%. e The thicknesses of aluminum (Al) and pV3D3 in the multilayer configuration can result in the bending rigidity equivalent to that of a single layer (PI) with half of tPI. The thickness of Al2O3 is fixed at 60 nm. f The maximum stress applied to PI and Al vs. system tensile strain (εsys). Inset: schematic diagram showing three distinct states denoted as states A, B, and C according to εcomp and σmax.

For the mechanical design of the proposed stretchable OLEDs, the stress analysis was first done based on the buckling mechanics of single-layer interconnectors, to gain an insight without the complexity introduced via multilayer topology. From this analysis, the serpentine structure with a period (N) of 0.5 was determined to be the most advantageous for the efficient formation of a 3D pop-up structure, considering that εcri gets smaller as N decreases (Supplementary Fig. 3a and Supplementary Note 2)34,35. Among potential serpentine configurations with N = 0.5, the dual serpentine structure is shown in the inset of Figs. 1b, 2a was chosen in which anchor points are connected in symmetry to the central regions of the rigid islands with curved sides pointing outward. This structure was shown advantageous in keeping the distortion low on rigid islands, compared to other configurations such as single serpentine structures or dual serpentine structures with the anchor points near the edges of the rigid islands and the curved sides pointing inward. (Supplementary Fig. 4). Furthermore, compared to a long hinge structure, this design enhances the maximum applicable strain, allowing the proposed system to extend further beyond the 2D planar state (εcomp=0) depicted in Fig. 2a.

The radius of the arc (R) and the width (W) of the dual serpentine interconnector (Fig. 2b) were then varied to identify geometries that can ensure the reliable transition between the non-buckled and the buckled states as well as tolerance against high compressive strain to achieve high initial rigid-island area ratio (γI0), which is defined by the area of the rigid island area (AI) to the unit cell area of the array and is related to γa0 by γa0=(AI(active)/AI)γI0 where AI(active) is the active luminous area within a rigid island. Note that achieving high γI0 is thus a prerequisite to achieving high γa0 in the schemes relying on rigid island platforms. We searched for conditions where the Von-Mises stress (σvon) stays below the fatigue strength (σf) of polyimide (PI) at the most vulnerable point (Pweak) of the serpentine interconnector (i.e., σvonmax < σfPI), which is in the top portion within the hinge section shown as a cross-sectional area along A-A’ in Fig. 2a. At this point, both bending-induced and torsional stress were shown to be concentrated. Calculation of σvonmax was performed analytically using an algorithm based on elasticity theory36 and Castigliano’s theorem with εcomp set at 80% (see Supplementary Note 3 and Supplementary Figs. 5, 6 for details on calculation). The result indicates that σvonmax primarily reflects normal stress induced by the bending moment of the entire serpentine structure, which turns out to be dominant over the shear stress resulting from the torsional moment of the arms composing the serpentine (Supplementary Fig. 7). It is noted in Fig. 2c that σvonmax tends to decrease as R and W decreases in the range of R and W studied in this work. To meet the criteria of σvonmax < σfPI≈ 120 MPa, in particular, (R, W) should be in the region ‘I’ in Fig. 2c, the boundary of which is defined by the line connecting (R, W) ≈ (30μm, 74μm) and (R, W) ≈ (74μm, 30μm) (Supplementary Fig. 8 for the measured σfPI of 120 MPa).

To illustrate its importance, the mechanical properties of the serpentine structures were further evaluated with finite element analysis (FEA) for 3D configuration in three different cases represented as i) star (= Case IA), (ii) triangle (= Case II), and (iii) square (= Case IB) in Fig. 2c. Categorization of Cases IA and IB vs. Case II is based on whether σvonmax stays lower or higher than σfPI to emphasize that σvonmax < σfPI condition should be fulfilled. Within Region ‘I’, Cases IA and IB are further distinguished to illustrate the importance of securing a sufficiently low critical buckling strain by the difference in the critical buckling strain, which increases as the width decreases, as detailed in Supplementary Note 2. Case IA, which is the most suitable among the three, was chosen, in addition to the aforementioned criteria, upon consideration of a critical dimension for PI that can be reliably achieved via the patterning method used in this work. First of all, it is confirmed in Fig. 2d, comparing the spatial distribution of σvon between Case IA and Case II, that σvonmax values obtained by the analytical model match relatively well with those obtained by FEA. It is also noted that σvonmax of Case IA (analytical model: 91 MPa, FEA result: 98 MPa) is indeed below σfPI (Fig. 2d, top); in contrast, σvonmax (analytical model: 134 MPa, FEA result: 127 MPa) of Case II exceeds the fatigue strength of PI (Fig. 2d, bottom), making Case II subject to the risk of fatigue-induced failure.

Finite element analysis (FEA) further shows that it is not just σvonmax that matters in realizing a 3D pop-up structure. Figure 2e compares the spatial distribution of z-axis displacement (uz) between Cases IA and IB obtained at εcomp = 15% (see Supplementary Fig. 9 for z-axis displacement analysis), both of the cases fulfill the σvonmax < σfPI criteria, but Case IB fails to make a transition into the buckled pop-up state due to an increase in εcri attributed to its low W, while Case IA can transition into the buckling state (uz = 164.4 μm), allowing for OLED membranes to pop up even at relatively low compressive strain (see Supplementary Note 2 for a detailed calculation of εcri). For εcomp > 15%, the overall small dimension of Case IB does not allow for further compression without causing physical contacts between the edges of the serpentine structure. This case study well illustrates the importance of choosing optimal geometric parameters, such as that of Case IA, so that a high εcri can be avoided to effectively realize 3D pop-up structure.

While the analysis introduced so far is based on a single layer of PI, the actual interconnecting region consists of a multilayer assembly of PI/encapsulation/Al/encapsulation. In spite of this discrepancy, the analysis and its results obtained from a single layer could be kept valid by identifying a multilayer configuration of which the effective bending rigidity (=EI¯) is equivalent to that of the single PI layer (=EPIIPI). (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Note 4 for details). The thickness of Al2O3 was fixed at 60 nm to ensure a sufficient level of gas barrier properties. The thickness of poly(1,3,5-trimethyl-1,3,5-trivinyl cyclotrisiloxane) (pV3D3)37,38 (tpV3D3) set at 162 nm and that of Al (tAl) set at 150 nm were found to be among the combinations that meet EPIIPI=EI¯. This process was shown to preserve σvonmax(εcomp) well as shown in Supplementary Fig. 10, confirming the validity of our design approach.

As a last step, to determine the overall operation range and understand the effect of the system operation on local mechanical movement, the stress analysis was performed as a function of system tensile strain (εsys), defined as1 εsys=Lsproj−Ls0(proj)Lr+Ls0(proj)

where Ls and Lr are the lengths of the serpentine electrode and the rigid island, respectively, as denoted in Fig. 2a. The superscript ‘(proj)’ and ‘0’ in the subscript indicate the effective length of the parameters projected onto the plane of rigid islands and the value obtained in the initial non-stretched condition (εcomp = 80%), respectively. As shown in Fig. 2g, there are three distinct states (see the FEA-predicted images in the Inset: State A, State B, and State C). State A corresponds to a 3D pop-up configuration with the highest spatial density of rigid islands, State B corresponds to a planar configuration with the smallest stress, and State C corresponds to a semi-2D configuration in which serpentine electrodes are further deformed to accommodate higher system tensile strain. Note that, with the bottom elastomer stretched, the proposed dual serpentine interconnector remains in a non-buckled state to form a ‘2D planar’ state (State B) or further stretched state (State C). When a compressive strain (εcomp) of 80% is applied by releasing the strain applied to the elastomer, it transitions to a buckled state (State A). (Fig. 2a and the inset of Fig. 2g.) Transitioning among three distinct states, the designed device has an operational range of εsys from 0% to 40%. In this operational range, σvonmax remains below σfPI (≈ 120 MPa) and that of aluminum (σfAl≈ 1.75 GPa), which were verified through repeated tensile stress tests (Supplementary Fig. 8).

Reduction of the interfacial adhesion energy for reliable 3D pop-up operation

Figure 3a outlines the proposed OLED-compatible integration method essential for constructing a 3D pop-up structure (see Supplementary Figs. 11, 12, and Methods for full details). The elastomer (Dragon Skin 10, Smooth-on Inc.) coated with the adhesive layer in its central region is pre-stretched using a customized biaxial stage. Then, an aligning block is placed to serve as a mechanical guide that ensures the OLED-containing membrane and the pop-up assisting adhesion blocking layer (PA-ABL) are aligned onto the desired region. The PA-ABL, composed of PDMS, is transferred before the OLED layer so that only the selective portion of the adhesive layer may be exposed to the OLED membrane. Finally, the OLED layer is transferred, and the biaxial pre-strain is released to induce out-of-plane buckling to complete a 3D pop-up structure in which every other rigid island is lifted up while the others remain in the original plane.Fig. 3 Overview of the assembly method and the importance of a pop-up assisting adhesion-blocking layer (PA-ABL).

a Illustration of the fabrication process comprised of a sequence involving the transfer of the PDMS layer, followed by OLED transfer and the release of pre-strain. Shown on the left is the biaxial stage with the aligning block used for precise control during the assembly process. b Maximum stress in PI (red) and Al (blue) versus εcomp obtained for the non-buckled state (circles) and the buckled state (squares). c The measured effective work of adhesion (Gc) vs. the open-area ratio (ηopen) of the PA-ABL, presented as the mean and standard deviation of three measurements. d The measured number of popped-up islands (Nup) vs. εcomp applied to serpentine connectors. e The false-color SEM images of the fabrication results after the sequential transfer of the OLED device layer and the PA-ABL obtained at ηopen = 0, 41%, and 88%. The images were taken under εcomp = 80% enabled by equal biaxial strain release. The left schematic images show the selective bonding area (shown with the white outlines in the bottom image) and the blocking (non-bonding) area between the OLED device layer and the PA-ABL. In the blocking area, the PA-ABL covers up the adhesive layer such that the island with the selected OLED is not glued and can eventually be lifted when a sufficient εcomp is applied.

εcri increasing with Γadh as discussed in Supplementary Note 2, the PA-ABL can play a pivotal role in enabling a 3D pop-up structure at low εcri by reducing the adhesion energy (Γadh)34. The lack of PA-ABL would tend to yield relatively high εcri, leading to the non-buckled state over a wide range of εcomp, which can be detrimental to the system reliability because σmax of PI and Al in the non-buckled case could be hiked even over a small increase in εcomp (Fig. 3b).

Our study further reveals that a simple planar PA-ABL would be far from ideal in reducing Γadh sufficiently. A double cantilever beam (DCB) test confirms the reduced Γadh with the proposed micro-concave structures39 (Supplementary Fig. 13 for DCB load-displacement results). As shown in Fig. 3c, the critical strain energy release rate (Gc), measured as the effective work of adhesion, is as large as 259 mJ/m2 for the flat PA-ABL. On the other hand, it gets reduced by seven times to 33 mJ/m2 once the PA-ABL has the open (i.e., non-contact)-area ratio (= ηopen) of 88%. Such a high degree of ηopen is realized in this work by an array of micro-concave structures patterned on the top surface of a PDMS layer (Supplementary Fig. 12 for the detailed fabrication procedure). The number of rigid islands transitioning from a planar state to a pop-up state under εcomp induced by biaxial pre-strain release supports the important role of reduced Gc (Fig. 3d). For a flat PA-ABL surface, the out-of-plane buckling in the interconnector was not triggered even with εcomp = 80%. For the surface with ηopen = 41%, the number of rigid islands transitioning to the pop-up state (= Nup) gradually increased from εcomp ≈ 10%. For ηopen= 88%, on the other hand, Nup was observed to increase even at εcomp as low as 5% and, moreover, its increase over εcomp was sharp enough to ensure a clear, effective transition even at low εcomp. The false-color SEM images of the stretchable OLED devices in State A with εcomp = 80% clearly illustrate the significance of the proposed PA-ABL with an array of micro-concave structures for proper, fail-free operation of stretchable OLEDs based on 3D pop-up architectures (Fig. 3e). The PA-ABL with a flat top surface, on the other hand, suppresses out-of-plane buckling of the serpentine structure and results in an intertwined appearance.

Mechanical and optoelectrical behavior under biaxial stretching

The mechanical performance was first evaluated using the proposed 3D pop-up structure composed of PI, electrodes (Al), and encapsulation layer (Fig. 4a), which corresponds to the multilayer structure of the interconnector regions in the stretchable OLEDs under study. With repetitive symmetric biaxial tensile stretching with the system strain (εsys = εx= εy) of 40%, the structure having the PA-ABL with ηopen= 88% exhibited electrical resistance (R) that maintained its initial value (R0) well with only a small increase below 5% even after 2000 cycles. On the other hand, the structure having the PA-ABL with ηopen= 41% showed R that linearly increased until ca. 500 cycles, after which its increase got steep and eventually became too large due to a mechanical fracture. These results will illustrate the importance of securing sufficiently high ηopen, being consistent with the discussion made for Fig. 3b–d. The current (I)-voltage (V) characteristics were measured for the structure with ηopen = 88% at εsys of 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%, which correspond to εcomp of 80%, 50%, 20%, − 9%, and − 39%, respectively. (Fig. 4b) The invariance is observed in the measured I–V characteristics over a wide range of εsys, further demonstrating the mechanical reliability enabled by the proposed pop-up structure with the PA-ABL having large ηopen.Fig. 4 The mechanical stability and optoelectrical characteristic of stretchable OLEDs under stretching operation.

a Resistance changes of a serpentine structure composed of PI layer, encapsulation layer, and Al layer, measured at the initial state during cyclic tests of equal biaxial stretching with the PA-ABL having open-area ratios (ηopen) of 41% and 88%, respectively. b Current-voltage characteristics of a 3D pop-up structure fabricated using the PA-ABL with ηopen = 88%. Measurement was done for equal biaxial strains of 0, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%. c The photographs of the proposed stretchable OLED devices with PA-ABL having ηopen = 88% under the applied equal biaxial strain of 0, 25%, and 40%. d Current density (J)-luminance (L)-voltage (V) characteristics and (e) Current efficiency vs L of the stretchable OLEDs under various equal biaxial strains. f Normalized J, L, and current efficiency at a driving voltage of 6 V under cyclic stretch-release test for a biaxial strain of 40% (a.u., arbitrary unit). g (Left) Schematic diagram that illustrates convex deformation. (Right) Maximum strain of the elastomer surface versus radius of curvature ratio (r/R) obtained from FEA results. (Bottom) The photographs of working stretchable OLEDs under convex deformation with various r/R ratios. h System maximum strain (εsysmax) and initial rigid-island area ratio (γI0) of previously reported 2D rigid island platforms22,23,51–59 and the proposed stretchable OLEDs. The color map indicates the interconnector strain (εi) that is required to achieve (γI0, εsysmax) in 2D rigid island platforms. The ‘star’ mark corresponds to (γI0 = 85% εsysmax = 40%), achieved with the proposed 3D platform. If this level of performance had been achieved with the conventional 2D rigid island schemes, the required interconnector strain would have been as high as 512%.

The photographs in Fig. 4c present the proposed stretchable OLED composed of a 5 × 5 array using the PA-ABL with ηopen = 88%. It can be seen that it operates quite in a uniform manner without dark spots or noticeable visual imperfection under a constant current of 0.2 mA at εsys = 0%, 25%, and 40% (see Supplementary Movie 1 for pop-up operation under biaxial stretching from εsys = 0% to 40%). Most of all, they show the 3D configuration anticipated from the FEA results in the three distinct states, highlighted by γI0(=γa0,∵AIactive=AI) of 85% at εsys = 0% and a maximum system strain of 40% (Supplementary Fig. 14 for the measured γI‘s). Although these photographs, taken with a camera equipped with a macro lens, clearly reveal the height differences within the 3D height-alternant structure, these variations are not readily perceptible to the human eye. This is due to the limited human binocular vision, which allows for the typical minimal perceivable depth of about 1-2 mm (refer to Supplementary Note 5 for further discussion.). Most importantly, as the resolution increases and thus both the islands and the serpentines become scaled down, it becomes even less likely that these height differences will be noticed. Figure 4d, e presents the electroluminescent (EL) performance of the stretchable OLEDs under εsys ranging from 0% to 40% in 10%. The low leakage current observed in the measured current density (J)―voltage (V) characteristic can be attributed to the smooth surface with root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of about 1 nm, as indicated in the Atomic force microscopy (AFM) data in Supplementary Fig. 15. The EL performance of the OLEDs showed only a slight variation under different system strain, with a current efficiency of 55 cd/A at 100 nits in the initial state and a slightly reduced current efficiency of 54 cd/A under a biaxial strain of 40%, partly due to the rigid island-based approach where the strain on the active region is kept minimal and, most of all, due to the advantage of the proposed 3D pop-up structure. The cyclic biaxial stretch-release, test performed at a rate of 10 mm/s with a biaxial strain of 40%, indicates that the EL performance, measured at the initial state with a constant voltage of 6 V (Fig. 4f and Supplementary Fig. 16 for measurement setup), also maintains its characteristics well even after 2000 cycles; the current density and luminance get reduced only by 1.9% and 2.7%, respectively, from their initial values, and the current efficiency decreases merely by 0.8% (see Supplementary Fig. 17 for SEM images of the device after biaxial stretching cycles and Supplementary Movie 2 for cyclic operation). Supplementary Fig. 18 presents the simulated spatial distribution of shear stress at the key interfaces for the adhesives and the measured lap shear strength of the adhesive. The simulation results indicate that the adhesive used in this work can withstand operational stresses without failure, even at a relatively high compressive strain of up to 80%.

As the demands for integrating displays over various objects increase, so does the importance of displays that can conform over 3D objects beyond mere flatness40–42. That is, when operating stretchable OLEDs, deformation over a curved surface can be as important as stretching in a two-dimensional plane. The graph in Fig. 4g shows the FEA results for the maximum strain induced by convex deformation at various radius of curvature ratios (r/R) depicted in the schematic diagram. The maximum of analyzed strain (εxmax, εymax) on the surface of the elastomer reaches from ca. 4% at r/R = 0.2 (mild convex deformation) to ca. 25% at r/R = 1 (steep convex deformation) (see Supplementary Fig. 19 for detailed FEA results). The fabricated device showed stable operation and little variations in EL performance under convex deformation across r/R values ranging from 0.2 to 1 (Refer to the photographs in Fig. 4g and Supplementary Fig. 20), affirming the reliability and structural integrity of the proposed stretchable OLEDs even under convex deformation. Mechanical analysis and the results of experiments that compare the performance evolution over time among glass-reference OLEDs and stretchable OLEDs — with and without the 2000 stretch-and-release cycles — indicate that (i) the 1.5 dyad encapsulation layers provide a sufficient level of protection against ambient air for the purpose of this study; and that (ii) the encapsulation properties are maintained well even after the repeated stretching cycles (Supplementary Figs. 21, 22). While the application of an encapsulation layer with 2.5 dyads will further enhance the barrier properties for long-term protection of organic devices, it should be noted that the strain across the encapsulation stacks can increase, particularly at the edges. Nevertheless, our simulation study suggests that high strain is localized to a very small region along the edge, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 22b, and that the majority of the island area experiences far less strain than the crack onset strain of Al2O3. As long as the active region remains within the ‘safe zone’ (e.g., within the central 0.95×0.95 mm2), adequate protection against ambient air can still be considered feasible, from the practical perspectives, with a minimal decrease γa0. (Refer to Supplementary Fig. 22e for further details.).

A stretchable passive matrix OLED with a high active area ratio

To illustrate the benefits of the proposed pop-up approach for stretchable displays, we have configured our proposed stretchable OLEDs in the form of a 7 × 7 passive matrix (PM) array, which simultaneously exhibits high, γI0,γa0, and εsysmax. The OLED device with a 3D height-alternant island array was fabricated using PA-ABL with ηopen = 88%. Tested by fabricating several samples and examining the distribution of critical buckling strain, the pop-up mechanism enabled with PA-ABL was shown to be reproducible in a consistent manner (Supplementary Fig. 23). Figure 5a shows the overall system setup that consists of (i) a computer-controlled, Arduino (Arduino®, Arduino mega 2560) based driver; (ii) a customized flexible printed circuit board (FPCB) connecting a stretchable PMOLED and the driver with Ag paste; and (iii) a biaxial translational stage holding the stretchable PMOLED at a given system strain. The PMOLED structure includes vertical scan lines linked to the cathode and horizontal data lines connected to the anode. The 7 × 7 pixel array includes both bonded and pop-up pixels, as shown in detail in Supplementary Fig 24.Fig. 5 Demonstration of Stretchable Passive-Matrix OLED with 3D Pop-Up Structure.

a The overall system setup for the implementation of the stretchable passive-matrix OLED display. On the right side, a simplified schematic diagram is presented that shows the bonded and pop-up pixels composing the 7 × 7 arrays, whose detailed layer configurations are provided in Supplementary Fig. 24. b Schematic diagram of the system setup for demonstrating the passive matrix. c Photographs displaying the characters in “3D OLED” one by one when biaxial system strains of 0%, 25%, and 45% are applied.

We demonstrated dynamic operation of the proposed PMOLEDs by sequentially activating the characters ‘3’, ‘D’, ‘O’, ‘L’, ‘E’, and ‘D’ (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Movie 3) at biaxial system strains of 0%, 25%, and 45%. Each character was activated through specific sets of voltage streams applied to the data and scan lines (Supplementary Fig. 25). It is noteworthy that, even for PM operation, this process not only achieved γI0 and γa0 as high as 85% and 82%, respectively, but also demonstrated operation at a maximum strain of 45%, highlighting the significant benefits of the present technology for stretchable displays. In addition, OLEDs on the proposed platform were shown to cause little heat accumulation and exhibit spectral consistency during the continuous operation over time (Supplementary Fig. 26). Unlike previous works adopting 3D architectures for stretchable devices27,43,44, our methodology neither uses post-transfer wet processes and thermally-induced bonding processes27,43 nor has a much smaller active luminous area with respect to the rigid island area even for matrix-type display applications27,44. (Supplementary Table 1 for detailed comparison).

To extend this platform into more sophisticated display applications, it is crucial to assess whether our processes are compatible with high pixel-per-inch (ppi) resolutions and active-matrix (AM) displays. Currently, state-of-the-art stretchable display prototypes, demonstrated by major display manufacturers, feature AM displays with the minimum dimension of polyimide islands corresponding to 100 ppi (254 µm) and 200 ppi (127 µm)45,46. Based on this polyimide-based island technology, the methodology proposed here should also be compatible with a similar level of pixel density and AM configuration. Furthermore, it is important to note that a single rigid island may host multiple pixels. Considering the number of electrode lines required for either PM or AM operation per pixel, configuring four pixels per island is reasonable when arranging the individual arms of the dual serpentine interconnectors in both horizontal and vertical directions to have one (PM) or multiple (e.g., two each in AM) electrode line(s) per arm.

Regarding AM operation, it is crucial to recognize that the adequacy of available electrode lines is not the only concern. The technology should also be compatible with the preparation of the in-pixel components such as thin-film transistors (TFTs) and capacitors. Polyimides, in fact, have been a standard substrate material used in industry for displays adopting flexible AMOLEDs, not just for prototype stretchable displays. This is due to the excellent chemical resistance and relatively high serviceable temperature of polyimides that enable the preparation of low-temperature poly-Si (LTPS) or oxide semiconductors for TFTs and the photolithographic patterning of in-pixel components (TFTs, capacitors, electric lines, etc.). As our devices are initially built on polyimide substrates and the transfer process occurs after the fabrication of all essential components, including encapsulation, any standard process used in the fabrication of flexible or stretchable PM or AMOLED in industry can be applied with little modification, enabling more straightforward industrial adoption.

Discussion

In summary, we proposed a strategy involving 3D pop-up structures to realize stretchable OLEDs that can simultaneously achieve a high initial density of rigid islands and a high maximum interconnector strain. Utilizing a mechanically guided assembly method and OLED-compatible fabrication strategy, the proposed OLEDs were designed to get stretched up to a system biaxial strain (εsys) of 40% while making effective transitions among the initial non-stretched state (εsys = 0%) with the highest spatial density of rigid islands, a state corresponding to a planar configuration with the smallest stress (εsys ≈ 25%), and a state having a semi-2D configuration in which the serpentine electrodes are further deformed to accommodate higher system strain (εsys ≈ 40%). Two essential factors for the successful realization of the proposed 3D pop-up structures were as follows: (i) the mechanical design of out-of-plane buckled interconnectors based on an optimal dual serpentine structure that ensures rigid islands to be lifted effectively at a relatively low compressive strain while maintaining the maximum stress applied onto the most vulnerable portion (σmax) to remain below the fatigue strength values for the substrate (PI) and the aluminum electrodes across the serpentine interconnectors; (ii) substantial reduction of interfacial adhesion energy (Γadh) between the 2D membranes to be popped up and the regions underneath them, which was enabled by the proposed pop-up assisting adhesion blocking layer (PA-ABL) that selectively covers up adhesive layers. The top surface of the proposed PA-ABL was designed to have a dimpled surface with an array of concave micropatterns, realizing the open-area ratio (ηopen) of up to 88% so that the adhesion energy between the PA-ABL and the rigid island on its top can be reduced to a significant degree. With the proposed PA-ABL, a reduction in Γadh by more than five times was demonstrated with respect to that of a planar adhesion blocking layer. Comparison made between the present and previous works in terms of the maximum system strain and the initial rigid-island area ratio (γI0) suggests that it is difficult, in conventional 2D rigid island platforms, to achieve a maximum interconnector strain (εi) far exceeding the empirical threshold of εi=140% line in Fig. 4h while maintaining a high γI0. Note that εi in 2D, rigid island platforms are related to εsys by εsys=1−γI0εi. The level of γI0 (= 85%) and the maximum system strain (= 40%) achieved with the proposed stretchable OLEDs can be considered significant in that it could be achieved only with interconnectors that can sustain strain of 512% if it were done with a 2D rigid island platform (Fig. 4h). To further enhance the maximum strain of the dual serpentine structure proposed in this study, consideration can be given to reducing the thickness of polyimides. This is partly because both tensile properties and pop-up states in this structure are predominantly governed by buckling mechanisms that can be facilitated by a thinner substrate18. However, any reduction in thickness should be approached with caution, considering the risks associated with the transfer and laser lift-off processes.

While this work presents a solution to overcome the fundamental limitations of 2D rigid island platforms in terms of γI0 and γa0, it does not fully address the challenges posed by the stretching-induced increase in the lateral gap between islands and the resulting image distortion in stretchable displays (e.g., resolution loss, aspect ratio change, etc.). Nevertheless, the high initial pixel density that becomes available with the proposed technology can be advantageous in mitigating stretching-induced image distortion, for instance, by introducing surplus pixels that are inactive in the initial state but selectively activated upon stretching to compensate for distortion.

The proposed stretchable OLEDs with the 3D height-alternant island array structure, composed of a 5 × 5 array using the PA-ABL with ηopen = 88%, were shown to operate in a uniform manner at various system strains, as well as under tight convex deformation, which illustrates the versatile nature of the proposed stretchable OLEDs and affirms their reliability and structural integrity. A 7 × 7 PMOLED operation was also demonstrated withγI0 85%, γa0 82%, and εsysmax of up to 45%. With the high initial active area ratio and a semi-2D operation where square lattice geometry is maintained while being stretched, the proposed stretchable displays will be preferred in applications wherein displays are used mostly in the initial state but have to deal with occasional stretching, as in the wearable applications. With (i) the comprehensive yet step-by-step design strategies that are compatible even with materials having a low thermal budget and low chemical resistance and (ii) the use of materials like polyimide and its laser lift-off / patterning processes that are already employed in the AMOLED display industry, we believe our methodology can open up an effective and practical pathway towards the realization of stretchable OLEDs or many other optoelectronic systems that can fulfill the demanding requirements of various applications.

Methods

Fabrication of the proposed stretchable OLEDs

The fabrication process of stretchable OLEDs can be majorly categorized into three stages: (i) fabrication of the OLED device layer, (ii) fabrication of the pop-up assisting adhesive blocking layer (PA-ABL), and (iii) transfer and 3D morphing processes.

Fabrication of OLED device layers

On a 4-inch glass wafer, polyamic acid (KPI-1200, Komec) was formed via spin coating and subsequently converted into a 2.5 μm-thick polyimide (PI) film through a thermal imidization process at 280 °C for an hour. A 100 nm-thick aluminum was deposited onto the PI thin-film via a sputtering process, and patterned by a conventional photolithography process. With the aluminum patterns serving as an embedded mask, the PI film was patterned through a reactive ion etching (RIE) process under an oxygen plasma condition (RF power: 300 W, O2 gas inflow: 25 sccm), after which the aluminum patterns were removed using its etchant (Supplementary Fig. 11). A 160 nm-thick pV3D3 film was deposited through a free-radical polymerization reaction, utilizing an initiator of tert-butyl peroxide (TBPO) and a monomer of 1,3,5-trimethyl-1,3,5-trivinylcyclotrisiloxane (V3D3) in a custom-built iCVD chamber. On top of the pV3D3 layer, a 60 nm thick-Al2O3 layer was deposited through an atomic layer deposition (ALD, Lucida D100 NCD Co.) at a low temperature of 70 °C, using a trimethylaluminum (TMA) precursor and H2O reactant. Another 160 nm pV3D3 layer was deposited on the Al2O3 layer, using the same iCVD process as before. The pV3D3/Al2O3/pV3D3 structure was intended for a bottom encapsulation, and the layers for the OLED device were sequentially deposited using a shadow mask technique (refer to Supplementary Fig. 27 for detailed design of the shadow masks). Initially, a 100 nm-thick indium zinc oxide (IZO) layer as an anode, was deposited selectively onto the rigid island using a RF sputtering process in a vacuum chamber at a pressure of 5.8 × 10−3 torr. A 150 nm-thick aluminum layer was then, deposited utilizing a vacuum thermal evaporator (HS-1100, Digital Optics & Vacuum) selectively onto the interconnector area to provide electrical connections between the IZO patterns. On top of the IZO layer, organic semiconductor layers were deposited using the vacuum thermal evaporator, in the sequence of a 140 nm-thick 4,4′-cyclohexylidenebis [N,N-bis(4- methylphenyl)benzenamine] (TAPC) layer as a hole injection layer, a 10 nm-thick tris(4-carbazoyl-9-ylphenyl) amine (TCTA) layer as a hole transport layer, a 30 nm-thick TCTA: Ir(dmppy-ph)2tmd: 4, 6-bis(3,5-di(pyridin-3-yl)phenyl)−2-methylpyrimidine (B3PYMPM) (48: 48: 4 wt. %) layer as an emission layer, and a 70 nm-thick B3PYMPM layer as an electron transport layer. Lastly, LiF (1 nm)/Al (150 nm) layers were deposited as a top cathode. In the 5 × 5 rigid island configuration, the horizontal lines of the top cathode and vertical lines of the bottom anode overlap in the rigid island area (Supplementary Fig. 27). A top encapsulation structure, which was the same structure as the bottom encapsulation, was formed on top of the OLED device. In preparation for the transfer process, the OLED device layer was delaminated from the glass wafer using a laser-lift off (LLO) technique via an excimer laser equipment (KORONATM, AP systems) (Supplementary Fig. 11). Before transferring onto an elastomeric substrate, the cathode electrode pad and anode electrode pad of the OLED device were connected to a customized FPCB using Ag paste. Supplementary Fig. 28 shows the difference in EL performance between the OLED devices before and after the delamination process. The difference in performance mainly originated from a thermal degradation induced by the LLO process.

Fabrication of adhesive blocking layer

For the fabrication of the PA-ABLs with open-area ratio (ηopen) values of 0, 41%, and 88%, three templates with different surface shapes were prepared corresponding to each ηopen values: a flat glass substrate covered by a 1 µm-thick fluorinated polymer layer for ηopen of 0, a sapphire substrate with a 1.4 µm minor axis, 1.8 µm major axis microlens array (MLA) surface (HNPS01, LUMTEC, Taiwan) covered by the 1 µm-thick fluorinated polymer layer for ηopen of 41%, and the sapphire substrate with the MLA surface covered by a 100 nm-thick Al2O3 layer and fluorinated self-assembled monolayer (SAM) for ηopen of 88% (Supplementary Fig. 12). All template substrates were sized 25 mm by 25 mm square. The fluorinated polymer layer (NovecTM 1700 Electronic Grade Coating, 3MTM) was prepared by spin-coating followed by a curing process at room temperature for 10 min. The Al2O3 layer was deposited by the ALD process. The fluorinated SAM was introduced using vaporized Trichloro (1H, 1H, 2H, 2H perfluorooctyl) silane (Sigma-Aldrich) in a vacuum desiccator. On top of the templates, A PDMS layer was spin-coated and cured at 100 °C for 30 min to be the PA-ABLs. The selection of PDMS was driven by its low modulus of elasticity and its compatibility with the reactive ion etching (RIE) patterning process using a metal mask. The thickness of the PA-ABL (= ca. 2.6 µm) was chosen by considering that PA-ABL should be thin enough so as not to make the PA-ABL/adhesive/elastomer assembly too stiff over tensile strain and that it should be thicker than the height of the concave lens array to be formed (Supplementary Fig. 29). The fluorinated polymer and the fluorinated SAM were introduced to reduce the surface energy of the templates, thus the PDMS based PA-ABL can be easily delaminated and transferred to the bottom elastomeric substrate coated with an adhesive, as described in the “Transfer and 3D morphing processes” section. For the PDMS layers to perform as PA-ABLs, which enables selective bonding between the OLED device layer and the bottom elastomeric substrate with an adhesive, they were patterned using the RIE process (RF power: 300 W, O2 gas inflow: 25 sccm, CF4 gas inflow: 10 sccm), through a metal shadow mask (Supplementary Fig. 12).

Transfer process and 3D morphing process

As a bottom elastomeric substrate, a 1 mm-thick elastomer (Dragon Skin 10, Smooth-on Inc.) film was formed through a spin-coating and curing process at room temperature for 6 h. An adhesive material (DOWSILTM SE 9186) was spin-coated on the elastomeric substrate. A film tape (PI Film Tape 5413, 3 M) was used to cover the edges of the elastomeric substrate before the adhesive coating and removed together with the adhesive on it. This is to define the adhesive area on which the PA-ABL and the OLED device layer would be transferred. The elastomeric substrate was then, stretched by 30 mm in biaxial directions using a customized biaxial stage equipped with two motorized linear translators (T-LSR075D, Zaber Technologies Inc.), and an aligning block was positioned on the top. The 25 mm by 25 mm square substrate with the PA-ABL was positioned within the aligner, the PA-ABL was transferred onto the elastomeric substrate with the adhesive surface, and thus the adhesive turned out to be exposed only in the area without the PA-ABL. The OLED device layer was then, transferred onto the bottom elastomeric substrate aligned with the PA-ABL using the aligning block. During the transfer process, the OLED device layer was selectively bonded where PA-ABL was not applied thus, the adhesive was exposed. Considering the bottom emitting direction of the OLED device, the OLED device layer was attached in the upside-down direction. After the curing process of the adhesive at room temperature, the biaxial pre-strain applied to the elastomeric substrate was released, and consequently, the stretchable OLED device, initially in a 2D state, morphed into a 3D pop-up structure. Furthermore, to perform the electroluminescence characterization of the stretchable OLEDs, silver paste (P-100, CANS) was used to connect the OLED contact pads to the customized flexible printed circuit board (FPCB) for seamless external connection. While it was applied manually in this work, automatic dispensing equipment may be used to reduce the potential inconsistency of manual application and ensure uniform connectivity, crucial for reliable operation. Alternatively, anisotropic conductive film (ACF) may also be used47.

Finite element analysis (FEA) for out-of-plane buckled serpentine and convex deformation

The mechanical behaviors considering a serpentine interconnector under out-of-plane buckling and convex deformation of the stretchable OLED were analyzed by FEA using computational module software (COMSOLTM Multiphysics). The module analysis, based on geometric nonlinearity, was carried out under conditions stipulating a minimum element size of 5 μm and 15 μm for the serpentine interconnector and convex deformation, respectively, utilizing a stationary solver. The elastic moduli used in the analyses were 4 GPa for PI (EPI), 70 GPa for aluminum (EAl), 134.4 GPa for aluminum oxide (EAl2O3), and 0.86 GPa for pV3D3 (EpV3D3). For predicting the mechanical behavior of the elastomer, the analysis was conducted based on the Ogden model, which typifies a near incompressibility of hyperelastic materials.

Adhesion measurement and preparation of specimen

The double cantilever beam (DCB) fracture mechanics test was conducted to quantify the effective work of adhesion (Gc) between the pV3D3 layer, that is, the top surface of the OLED device layer, and the PA-ABL make of PDMS. Two distinct types of specimens were prepared, each having either the surface of the pV3D3 layer or the PA-ABL. For the specimen with the pV3D3 surface, a 160 nm-thick pV3D3 layer was deposited using the iCVD process on a 25 μm-thick PI film, which served as a carrier substrate (see Supplementary Fig. 30 for illustration of specimen preparation). The other specimen with the PA-ABL was prepared to have the ηopen values of 0, 41% and 88% on a flat glass or on sapphire glasses with an MLA surface, as described in the “Fabrication of PA-ABL” part in Methods. An adhesive glue (DOWSILTM SE 9186 clear) was spin-coated on the back surface of the three PA-ABLs, and then 25 μm-thick PI films were attached to the adhesive glue as a carrier substrate. After the curing process of the adhesive glue at room temperature for 10 h, the PA-ABLs were delaminated from the flat glass and the sapphire glasses, with the support of the PI films. Gc between the two specimens of the pV3D3 surface and the PA-ABL surfaces was measured using high-precision DCB test equipment (DTS Company, Delaminator Adhesion Test System). The prepared specimens were bonded with a 275 μm-thick Si wafer (size: 10 mm × 40 mm) as a back-up substrate to apply sufficient bending strain energy for the separation of the target pV3D3/PA-ABL interface. After adhering to the pV3D3 and PA-ABL interfaces, the specimen was mounted onto the loading grips, and a load (F) ― displacement (d) curve was obtained through the operation of a load cell and a linear actuator (Supplementary Fig. 13). Gc, was then extracted from the F―d curve using beam bending mechanics39,48,49. Note that Gc is not determined solely by the load value but is significantly influenced also by the crack length. Gc can be calculated using the following equation.2 Gc=12Pc2a2E′b2h31+0.64ha2

where a is the crack length, C is the elastic compliance, E’ is the plane-strain modulus of the beam, B is the specimen width, h is the half height for the substrate, and Pc is the critical load where the load versus displacement curve begins to decrease. Since the measurement area of the DCB test was sufficiently large relative to the feature size of the micro-scale concave structure, the Gc values derived from the DCB test can be considered as representative values and used for the analysis of the OLED device layer and the PA-ABL interfaces in the proposed stretchable OLEDs.

Measurement of pop-up rigid island counts

To observe the 3D morphing process of the stretchable OLED, the initial pre-strain applied to the elastomeric substrate was gradually released with the interval corresponding to the compressive strain of serpentine (εcomp) of 5%. Orthogonal view images were captured using camera equipment (ILCE-7M3, Sony) equipped with a macro lens (FE 90 mm F2.8 Macro G OSS, Sony). The number of pop-up rigid islands in the fabricated stretchable OLEDs was counted from the orthogonal view images, as a function of εcomp.

The electroluminescent measurements of the stretchable OLEDs

The optoelectrical performance of the stretchable OLEDs, including current density (J) and luminance (L), was measured using CS 2000 equipment (KONICA MINOLTA, Inc.) and a source meter (Keithley 2400, Keithley Inc.) under ambient conditions. The current efficiency (ηCE) was calculated based on the J and L values. A system strain (εsys = εx= εy) of up to 40% was applied to the stretchable OLEDs during the electroluminescent measurement, using the customized biaxial stage.

FEM-based mechanical simulation for array-based 3D pop-up simulation

A simulation study of the array-based 3D pop-up structure on the elastomer was performed using static analysis in ANSYSTM simulations. To achieve ideal strain uniformity on the elastomer, it was compressed in both vertical and horizontal directions equally. The stress-strain curves of an elastomer (Dragon skin 10) were measured using motorized force test equipment (ESM303 tensile tester, Mark-10), and results from these measurements were utilized as input data for simulations. The mechanical properties of elastomers were accurately modeled using Yeoh’s 2nd-order hyperelastic model derived from these curves50. The Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio for PDMS were set at 1.2 MPa and 0.49, respectively, while for the adhesive material (DOWSILTM SE 9186), these were set at 1.1 MPa and 0.49. The three-dimensional structure was constructed using a 5 µm-thick layer of polyimide, which has an effective bending rigidity comparable to that of OLED materials.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1

Supplementary Movie 2

Supplementary Movie 3

Source data

Source Data

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-52046-6.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Dr. B. I. Choi from the Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) for the measurement of the water vapor transmission rate. S.B.K., D.G.L., J.H.K., T.H.K., J.H.S., S.J.O., S.I.H., W.C.L., D.H.C., T.-S.K., H.M. and S.Y. would like to acknowledge the financial support from the Engineering Research Center of Excellence (ERC) Program supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF), Korean Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (Grant No. NRF-2017R1A5A1014708). S.B.K., D.G.L. and J.H.K. would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (RS-2024-00344386). J.-H.Y. would like to acknowledge the financial support from the Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) grant funded by the Korea government. (21ZB1200, The Development of the Technologies for ICT Materials, Components and Equipment).

Author contributions

S.B.K. conceived the idea for the stretchable OLEDs with a 3D height-alternant island array, and S.B.K. and S.Y. conceived the idea for pop-up-assisting adhesion-blocking layers with an array of micro concave structures. S.Y., H.M., and S.B.K. coordinated experiments and simulations. S.B.K., D.G.L., and J.H.K. mechanically designed the stretchable OLEDs to maximize strain using modules based on the finite element method in COMSOL Multiphysics and ANSYS. S.B.K., D.G.L., and T.H.K. designed the associated experiments and measurement methods. S.B.K., J.H.S. and J.-H.Y. contributed to the optimization and yield improvement of the stretchable OLEDs fabrication process. S.B.K., S.J.O. and T.-S.K. performed and analyzed the measurements of interfacial adhesion energy. S.B.K., S.I.H., W.C.L. and D.H.C. performed and analyzed the measurements and demonstrations of the fabricated stretchable OLEDs. S.B.K. analyzed all the measurement data of the stretchable OLEDs, and S.B.K. and S.Y. coordinated the manuscript. All authors reviewed and discussed the results presented in the manuscript. S.Y. and H.M. contributed equally as corresponding authors.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Tae-il Kim, and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files. Source data for Figs. 2b, e, 3b–d, 4a, b, d–g and Supplementary Figs. 1b, 3, 7, 8c–f, 9b, 10a, 12b, 14, 18b, d, 20, 22a, c–e, 23, 26b, and 28b are provided in the Source Data files. Additional data are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided in this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Jeon Y Parallel-stacked flexible organic light-emitting diodes for wearable photodynamic therapeutics and color-tunable optoelectronics ACS Nano 2020 14 15688 15699 10.1021/acsnano.0c06649 33155466
Jeon, Y. et al. Parallel-stacked flexible organic light-emitting diodes for wearable photodynamic therapeutics and color-tunable optoelectronics. ACS Nano 14, 15688–15699 (2020).33155466 10.1021/acsnano.0c06649
2. Kim J Ultrathin quantum dot display integrated with wearable electronics Adv. Mater. 2017 29 1700217 10.1002/adma.201700217
Kim, J. et al. Ultrathin quantum dot display integrated with wearable electronics. Adv. Mater. 29, 1700217 (2017).10.1002/adma.201700217
3. Song H Water stable and matrix addressable OLED fiber textiles for wearable displays with large emission area Npj Flex. Electron. 2022 6 66 10.1038/s41528-022-00199-z
Song, H. et al. Water stable and matrix addressable OLED fiber textiles for wearable displays with large emission area. Npj Flex. Electron. 6, 66 (2022).10.1038/s41528-022-00199-z
4. Zhang Z A colour-tunable, weavable fibre-shaped polymer light-emitting electrochemical cell Nat. Photon. 2015 9 233 238 10.1038/nphoton.2015.37
Zhang, Z. et al. A colour-tunable, weavable fibre-shaped polymer light-emitting electrochemical cell. Nat. Photon. 9, 233–238 (2015).10.1038/nphoton.2015.37
5. Choi M Full-color active-matrix organic light-emitting diode display on human skin based on a large-area MoS2 backplane Sci. Adv. 2020 6 eabb5898 10.1126/sciadv.abb5898 32923597
Choi, M. et al. Full-color active-matrix organic light-emitting diode display on human skin based on a large-area MoS2 backplane. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb5898 (2020).32923597 10.1126/sciadv.abb5898
6. Zhang Z High-brightness all-polymer stretchable LED with charge-trapping dilution Nature 2022 603 624 630 10.1038/s41586-022-04400-1 35322250
Zhang, Z. et al. High-brightness all-polymer stretchable LED with charge-trapping dilution. Nature 603, 624–630 (2022).35322250 10.1038/s41586-022-04400-1
7. Zhou Y Stretchable high-permittivity nanocomposites for epidermal alternating-current electroluminescent displays ACS Mater. Lett. 2019 1 511 518 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00376
Zhou, Y. et al. Stretchable high-permittivity nanocomposites for epidermal alternating-current electroluminescent displays. ACS Mater. Lett. 1, 511–518 (2019).10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00376
8. Kim R-H Waterproof AlInGaP optoelectronics on stretchable substrates with applications in biomedicine and robotics Nat. Mater. 2010 9 929 937 10.1038/nmat2879 20953185
Kim, R.-H. et al. Waterproof AlInGaP optoelectronics on stretchable substrates with applications in biomedicine and robotics. Nat. Mater. 9, 929–937 (2010).20953185 10.1038/nmat2879
9. Larson C Highly stretchable electroluminescent skin for optical signaling and tactile sensing science 2016 351 1071 1074 10.1126/science.aac5082 26941316
Larson, C. et al. Highly stretchable electroluminescent skin for optical signaling and tactile sensing. science 351, 1071–1074 (2016).26941316 10.1126/science.aac5082
10. Jinno H Self-powered ultraflexible photonic skin for continuous bio-signal detection via air-operation-stable polymer light-emitting diodes Nat. Commun. 2021 12 2234 10.1038/s41467-021-22558-6 33854058
Jinno, H. et al. Self-powered ultraflexible photonic skin for continuous bio-signal detection via air-operation-stable polymer light-emitting diodes. Nat. Commun. 12, 2234 (2021).33854058 10.1038/s41467-021-22558-6
11. Lee W Universal assembly of liquid metal particles in polymers enables elastic printed circuit board Science 2022 378 637 641 10.1126/science.abo6631 36356149
Lee, W. et al. Universal assembly of liquid metal particles in polymers enables elastic printed circuit board. Science 378, 637–641 (2022).36356149 10.1126/science.abo6631
12. Lee Y Standalone real-time health monitoring patch based on a stretchable organic optoelectronic system Sci. Adv. 2021 7 eabg9180 10.1126/sciadv.abg9180 34088675
Lee, Y. et al. Standalone real-time health monitoring patch based on a stretchable organic optoelectronic system. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg9180 (2021).34088675 10.1126/sciadv.abg9180
13. Kim S Negatively strain‐dependent electrical resistance of magnetically arranged nickel composites: Application to highly stretchable electrodes and stretchable lighting devices Adv. Mater. 2014 26 3094 3099 10.1002/adma.201304686 24615882
Kim, S. et al. Negatively strain‐dependent electrical resistance of magnetically arranged nickel composites: Application to highly stretchable electrodes and stretchable lighting devices. Adv. Mater. 26, 3094–3099 (2014).24615882 10.1002/adma.201304686
14. Li S Peele BN Larson CM Zhao H Shepherd RF A stretchable multicolor display and touch interface using photopatterning and transfer printing Adv. Mater. 2016 28 9770 9775 10.1002/adma.201603408 27717071
Li, S., Peele, B. N., Larson, C. M., Zhao, H. & Shepherd, R. F. A stretchable multicolor display and touch interface using photopatterning and transfer printing. Adv. Mater. 28, 9770–9775 (2016).27717071 10.1002/adma.201603408
15. Liang J Li L Niu X Yu Z Pei Q Elastomeric polymer light-emitting devices and displays Nat. Photon. 2013 7 817 824 10.1038/nphoton.2013.242
Liang, J., Li, L., Niu, X., Yu, Z. & Pei, Q. Elastomeric polymer light-emitting devices and displays. Nat. Photon. 7, 817–824 (2013).10.1038/nphoton.2013.242
16. Liu, W. et al. High-efficiency stretchable light-emitting polymers from thermally activated delayed fluorescence. Nat. Mater. 22, 737–745 (2023).
17. Biswas S Integrated multilayer stretchable printed circuit boards paving the way for deformable active matrix Nat. Commun. 2019 10 4909 10.1038/s41467-019-12870-7 31659160
Biswas, S. et al. Integrated multilayer stretchable printed circuit boards paving the way for deformable active matrix. Nat. Commun. 10, 4909 (2019).31659160 10.1038/s41467-019-12870-7
18. Kim D-H Materials and noncoplanar mesh designs for integrated circuits with linear elastic responses to extreme mechanical deformations Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008 105 18675 18680 10.1073/pnas.0807476105 19015528
Kim, D.-H. et al. Materials and noncoplanar mesh designs for integrated circuits with linear elastic responses to extreme mechanical deformations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18675–18680 (2008).19015528 10.1073/pnas.0807476105
19. Xu S Stretchable batteries with self-similar serpentine interconnects and integrated wireless recharging systems Nat. Commun. 2013 4 1543 10.1038/ncomms2553 23443571
Xu, S. et al. Stretchable batteries with self-similar serpentine interconnects and integrated wireless recharging systems. Nat. Commun. 4, 1543 (2013).23443571 10.1038/ncomms2553
20. Kim T Lee H Jo W Kim TS Yoo S Realizing stretchable OLEDs: a hybrid platform based on rigid island arrays on a stress‐relieving bilayer structure Adv. Mater. Technol. 2020 5 2000494 10.1002/admt.202000494
Kim, T., Lee, H., Jo, W., Kim, T. S. & Yoo, S. Realizing stretchable OLEDs: a hybrid platform based on rigid island arrays on a stress‐relieving bilayer structure. Adv. Mater. Technol. 5, 2000494 (2020).10.1002/admt.202000494
21. Guo Z Kirigami‐based stretchable, deformable, ultralight thin‐film thermoelectric generator for BodyNET application Adv. Energy Mater. 2022 12 2102993 10.1002/aenm.202102993
Guo, Z. et al. Kirigami‐based stretchable, deformable, ultralight thin‐film thermoelectric generator for BodyNET application. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2102993 (2022).10.1002/aenm.202102993
22. Qi J A kirigami-inspired island-chain design for wearable moistureproof perovskite solar cells with high stretchability and performance stability Nanoscale 2020 12 3646 3656 10.1039/C9NR10691J 32016245
Qi, J. et al. A kirigami-inspired island-chain design for wearable moistureproof perovskite solar cells with high stretchability and performance stability. Nanoscale 12, 3646–3656 (2020).32016245 10.1039/C9NR10691J
23. Lim MS Two-dimensionally stretchable organic light-emitting diode with elastic pillar arrays for stress relief Nano Lett. 2020 20 1526 1535 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03657 31990561
Lim, M. S. et al. Two-dimensionally stretchable organic light-emitting diode with elastic pillar arrays for stress relief. Nano Lett. 20, 1526–1535 (2020).31990561 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03657
24. Kim J Stretchable silicon nanoribbon electronics for skin prosthesis Nat. Commun. 2014 5 5747 10.1038/ncomms6747 25490072
Kim, J. et al. Stretchable silicon nanoribbon electronics for skin prosthesis. Nat. Commun. 5, 5747 (2014).25490072 10.1038/ncomms6747
25. Ahn J Nanoscale three-dimensional fabrication based on mechanically guided assembly Nat. Commun. 2023 14 833 10.1038/s41467-023-36302-9 36788240
Ahn, J. et al. Nanoscale three-dimensional fabrication based on mechanically guided assembly. Nat. Commun. 14, 833 (2023).36788240 10.1038/s41467-023-36302-9
26. Fu H Morphable 3D mesostructures and microelectronic devices by multistable buckling mechanics Nat. Mater. 2018 17 268 276 10.1038/s41563-017-0011-3 29379201
Fu, H. et al. Morphable 3D mesostructures and microelectronic devices by multistable buckling mechanics. Nat. Mater. 17, 268–276 (2018).29379201 10.1038/s41563-017-0011-3
27. Lee Y Kim BJ Hu L Hong J Ahn J-H Morphable 3D structure for stretchable display Mater. Today 2022 53 51 57 10.1016/j.mattod.2022.01.017
Lee, Y., Kim, B. J., Hu, L., Hong, J. & Ahn, J.-H. Morphable 3D structure for stretchable display. Mater. Today 53, 51–57 (2022).10.1016/j.mattod.2022.01.017
28. Ning X Mechanically active materials in three-dimensional mesostructures Sci. Adv. 2018 4 eaat8313 10.1126/sciadv.aat8313 30225368
Ning, X. et al. Mechanically active materials in three-dimensional mesostructures. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat8313 (2018).30225368 10.1126/sciadv.aat8313
29. Zhang F Rapidly deployable and morphable 3D mesostructures with applications in multimodal biomedical devices Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021 118 e2026414118 10.1073/pnas.2026414118 33836614
Zhang, F. et al. Rapidly deployable and morphable 3D mesostructures with applications in multimodal biomedical devices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2026414118 (2021).33836614 10.1073/pnas.2026414118
30. Lim Seungyun Assembly of foldable 3D microstructures using graphene hinges Adv. Mater. 2020 32 2001303 10.1002/adma.202001303
Lim, Seungyun et al. Assembly of foldable 3D microstructures using graphene hinges. Adv. Mater. 32, 2001303 (2020).10.1002/adma.202001303
31. Kim Tae-il Kim Rak-Hwan Rogers JohnA Microscale inorganic light-emitting diodes on flexible and stretchable substrates IEEE Photon. J. 2012 4 607 612 10.1109/JPHOT.2012.2188998
Kim, Tae-il, Kim, Rak-Hwan & Rogers, JohnA. Microscale inorganic light-emitting diodes on flexible and stretchable substrates. IEEE Photon. J. 4, 607–612 (2012).10.1109/JPHOT.2012.2188998
32. Yan Z Mechanical assembly of complex, 3D mesostructures from releasable multilayers of advanced materials Sci. Adv. 2016 2 e1601014 10.1126/sciadv.1601014 27679820
Yan, Z. et al. Mechanical assembly of complex, 3D mesostructures from releasable multilayers of advanced materials. Sci. Adv. 2, e1601014 (2016).27679820 10.1126/sciadv.1601014
33. Zhao H Mechanically guided hierarchical assembly of 3D mesostructures Adv. Mater. 2022 34 2109416 10.1002/adma.202109416
Zhao, H. et al. Mechanically guided hierarchical assembly of 3D mesostructures. Adv. Mater. 34, 2109416 (2022).10.1002/adma.202109416
34. i S Mechanics of buckled serpentine structures formed via mechanics-guided, deterministic three-dimensional assembly J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2019 125 736 748 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.01.019
i, S. et al. Mechanics of buckled serpentine structures formed via mechanics-guided, deterministic three-dimensional assembly. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 125, 736–748 (2019).10.1016/j.jmps.2019.01.019
35. Zhao J Cao H Shuai Y Theoretical modeling of vibrations of mechanically assembled 3D serpentine structures J. Appl. Mech. 2023 90 071002 10.1115/1.4056965
Zhao, J., Cao, H. & Shuai, Y. Theoretical modeling of vibrations of mechanically assembled 3D serpentine structures. J. Appl. Mech. 90, 071002 (2023).10.1115/1.4056965
36. Timoshenko, S. P. & Gere, J. M. Theory of elastic stability. (Courier Corporation, 2009).
37. Kim A single‐chamber system of initiated chemical vapor deposition and atomic layer deposition for fabrication of organic/inorganic multilayer films Adv. Eng. Mater. 2017 19 1600819 10.1002/adem.201600819
Kim et al. A single‐chamber system of initiated chemical vapor deposition and atomic layer deposition for fabrication of organic/inorganic multilayer films. Adv. Eng. Mater. 19, 1600819 (2017).10.1002/adem.201600819
38. Moon Hanul Synthesis of ultrathin polymer insulating layers by initiated chemical vapour deposition for low-power soft electronics Nat. Mater. 2015 14 628 635 10.1038/nmat4237 25751074
Moon, Hanul et al. Synthesis of ultrathin polymer insulating layers by initiated chemical vapour deposition for low-power soft electronics. Nat. Mater. 14, 628–635 (2015).25751074 10.1038/nmat4237
39. Kanninen M An augmented double cantilever beam model for studying crack propagation and arrest Int. J. Fract. 1973 9 83 92 10.1007/BF00035958
Kanninen, M. An augmented double cantilever beam model for studying crack propagation and arrest. Int. J. Fract. 9, 83–92 (1973).10.1007/BF00035958
40. Kim Fabrication of practical deformable displays: advances and challenges Light. Sci. Appl. 2023 12 61 10.1038/s41377-023-01089-3 36869021
Kim et al. Fabrication of practical deformable displays: advances and challenges. Light. Sci. Appl. 12, 61 (2023).36869021 10.1038/s41377-023-01089-3
41. Nematollahisarvestani Ali A review on united states patents to prevent mechanical failures in foldable smartphones J. Electron. Packag. 2021 143 020802 10.1115/1.4048011
Nematollahisarvestani, Ali et al. A review on united states patents to prevent mechanical failures in foldable smartphones. J. Electron. Packag. 143, 020802 (2021).10.1115/1.4048011
42. Kim Precise tuning of multiple perovskite photoluminescence by volume-controlled printing of perovskite precursor solution on cellulose paper ACS Nano 2022 16 2521 2534 10.1021/acsnano.1c09140 35044152
Kim et al. Precise tuning of multiple perovskite photoluminescence by volume-controlled printing of perovskite precursor solution on cellulose paper. ACS Nano 16, 2521–2534 (2022).35044152 10.1021/acsnano.1c09140
43. Lee Jongho Stretchable GaAs photovoltaics with designs that enable high areal coverage Adv. Mater. 2011 23 986 10.1002/adma.201003961 21226014
Lee, Jongho et al. Stretchable GaAs photovoltaics with designs that enable high areal coverage. Adv. Mater. 23, 986 (2011).21226014 10.1002/adma.201003961
44. Lee Donggyun Stretchable OLEDs based on a hidden active area for high fill factor and resolution compensation Nat. Commun. 2024 15 4349 10.1038/s41467-024-48396-w 38834548
Lee, Donggyun et al. Stretchable OLEDs based on a hidden active area for high fill factor and resolution compensation. Nat. Commun. 15, 4349 (2024).38834548 10.1038/s41467-024-48396-w
45. Wang P A 200 PPI oval shape stretchable AMOLED display SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2022 53 524 525 10.1002/sdtp.15539
Wang, P. et al. A 200 PPI oval shape stretchable AMOLED display. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 53, 524–525 (2022).10.1002/sdtp.15539
46. Jung H High-resolution active-matrix micro-LED stretchable displays J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2023 31 201 210 10.1002/jsid.1223
Jung, H. et al. High-resolution active-matrix micro-LED stretchable displays. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 31, 201–210 (2023).10.1002/jsid.1223
47. Lee Toward all-day wearable health monitoring: An ultralow-power, reflective organic pulse oximetry sensing patch Sci. Adv. 2018 4 eaas9530 10.1126/sciadv.aas9530 30430132
Lee et al. Toward all-day wearable health monitoring: An ultralow-power, reflective organic pulse oximetry sensing patch. Sci. Adv. 4, eaas9530 (2018).30430132 10.1126/sciadv.aas9530
48. Sharratt B Wang L Dauskardt R Anomalous debonding behavior of a polymer/inorganic interface Acta Mater. 2007 55 3601 3609 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.012
Sharratt, B., Wang, L. & Dauskardt, R. Anomalous debonding behavior of a polymer/inorganic interface. Acta Mater. 55, 3601–3609 (2007).10.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.012
49. Kang S Kim TS Capillary‐force‐driven switchable delamination of nanofilms and its application to green selective transfer Adv. Mater. Technol. 2021 6 2001082 10.1002/admt.202001082
Kang, S. & Kim, T. S. Capillary‐force‐driven switchable delamination of nanofilms and its application to green selective transfer. Adv. Mater. Technol. 6, 2001082 (2021).10.1002/admt.202001082
50. Yeoh OonH Some forms of the strain energy function for rubber Rubber Chem. Technol. 1993 66 754 771 10.5254/1.3538343
Yeoh, OonH. Some forms of the strain energy function for rubber. Rubber Chem. Technol. 66, 754–771 (1993).10.5254/1.3538343
51. Mohan AV Merging of thin‐and thick‐film fabrication technologies: Toward soft stretchable “Island–bridge” devices Adv. Mater. Technol. 2017 2 1600284 10.1002/admt.201600284
Mohan, A. V. et al. Merging of thin‐and thick‐film fabrication technologies: Toward soft stretchable “Island–bridge” devices. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2, 1600284 (2017).10.1002/admt.201600284
52. Hu H Stretchable ultrasonic transducer arrays for three-dimensional imaging on complex surfaces Sci. Adv. 2018 4 eaar3979 10.1126/sciadv.aar3979 29740603
Hu, H. et al. Stretchable ultrasonic transducer arrays for three-dimensional imaging on complex surfaces. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar3979 (2018).29740603 10.1126/sciadv.aar3979
53. Choi M Stretchable active matrix inorganic light‐emitting diode display enabled by overlay‐aligned roll‐transfer printing Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017 27 1606005 10.1002/adfm.201606005
Choi, M. et al. Stretchable active matrix inorganic light‐emitting diode display enabled by overlay‐aligned roll‐transfer printing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1606005 (2017).10.1002/adfm.201606005
54. Park SC Millimeter thin and rubber‐like solid‐state lighting modules fabricated using roll‐to‐roll fluidic self‐assembly and lamination Adv. Mater. 2015 27 3661 3668 10.1002/adma.201500839 25966304
Park, S. C. et al. Millimeter thin and rubber‐like solid‐state lighting modules fabricated using roll‐to‐roll fluidic self‐assembly and lamination. Adv. Mater. 27, 3661–3668 (2015).25966304 10.1002/adma.201500839
55. Han M Catheter-integrated soft multilayer electronic arrays for multiplexed sensing and actuation during cardiac surgery Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2020 4 997 1009 10.1038/s41551-020-00604-w 32895515
Han, M. et al. Catheter-integrated soft multilayer electronic arrays for multiplexed sensing and actuation during cardiac surgery. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 997–1009 (2020).32895515 10.1038/s41551-020-00604-w
56. Kim D-H Epidermal electronics Science 2011 333 838 843 10.1126/science.1206157 21836009
Kim, D.-H. et al. Epidermal electronics. Science 333, 838–843 (2011).21836009 10.1126/science.1206157
57. Ohmae, H. et al. in SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. 102–105 (Wiley Online Library).
58. Van Den Brand J Flexible and stretchable electronics for wearable health devices Solid-State Electron. 2015 113 116 120 10.1016/j.sse.2015.05.024
Van Den Brand, J. et al. Flexible and stretchable electronics for wearable health devices. Solid-State Electron. 113, 116–120 (2015).10.1016/j.sse.2015.05.024
59. Kim N Kim J Seo J Hong C Lee J Stretchable inorganic LED displays with double-layer modular design for high fill factor ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022 14 4344 4351 10.1021/acsami.1c23160 35029968
Kim, N., Kim, J., Seo, J., Hong, C. & Lee, J. Stretchable inorganic LED displays with double-layer modular design for high fill factor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 4344–4351 (2022).35029968 10.1021/acsami.1c23160
