
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

122643
10.26603/001c.122643
Clinical Viewpoint
Rehabilitation and Return to Sports after Achilles Tendon Repair
Marrone William PT, DPT, SCS 1
Andrews Robert PT, DPT, SCS 2
Reynolds Aaron PT, MPT, OCS, CSCS 3
Vignona Patrick PT, DPT, SCS 2
Patel Snehal PT, MPT, SCS 2
O’Malley Martin MD 2
1 Connecticut Children’s
2 Sports Medicine Institute Hospital for Special Surgery https://ror.org/03zjqec80
3 Elite Orthosport Physical Therapy & Performance
Correspondence: William Marrone PT,DPT,SCS 399 Farmington Ave Farmington, CT 06032 wmarrone@connecticutchildrens.org
1 9 2024
2024
19 9 11521165
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Rehabilitation protocols post-Achilles tendon repair vary widely, particularly regarding weight bearing (WB) and immobilization duration, impacting recovery trajectories significantly. This commentary focuses on rehabilitation strategies following acute Achilles tendon repair (ATR), emphasizing early mobilization and progressive loading. Techniques such as blood flow restriction training (BFRT) and progressive loading to restore strength and tendon mechanical properties are discussed in the context of optimizing recovery, minimizing tendon elongation and facilitating safe return to sport (RTS). This manuscript highlights current evidence and clinical insights to guide practitioners in optimizing rehabilitation protocols for athletes recovering from ATR, aiming to improve functional outcomes and support safe return to athletic activity.

Achilles Tendon Repair
Rehabilitation
Return to Sport
Physical Therapy
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

The Achilles tendon (AT) is the largest, strongest, and most powerful spring in the human body, primarily functioning to provide a tendinous connection for the soleus and gastrocnemius to the calcaneus. It endures tremendous loads, particularly during eccentric calf contractions. Rupture of the AT is a traumatic injury requiring significant force and often results in lasting functional deficits, regardless of the treatment approach.1–3 Recent years have seen an increase in AT ruptures, particularly in explosive sports such as basketball, football, and gymnastics.4,5 While the rise in AT ruptures in professional football is well-documented,6,7 the increasing popularity of recreational paddle sports, such as pickleball, has also contributed to a rise in AT injuries.

Treatment for acute AT rupture is categorized into surgical and non-surgical management. Surgical repair is generally preferred for elite athletes due to superior outcomes in reducing rerupture rates and restoring plantar flexor strength.8–12 Surgery was advocated to reduce the risk of rerupture compared to non-operative treatment with cast immobilization, however when implementing early mobilization and WB for both nonsurgical and surgical patients, it was postulated that rerupture risk was equal between the groups.12 In contrast, a recent multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing complication rates between non-operative treatment, minimally invasive surgery, and open surgery showed the non-operative group had a 10x increase in rerupture.13 Participants in this study were cast immobilized for 2 weeks from time of injury or surgery, and then allowed full WB in an orthosis with heel lifts for 6 weeks while following a standard ATR rehabilitation protocol.13 Thus while the impact of surgical vs non-surgical management on rerupture risk needs further investigation, early functional rehabilitation including weightbearing and mobilization is recommended regardless of treatment pathway. Minimally invasive techniques (PARS) have been developed to minimize surgical wound complications compared to open surgery, but studies have shown similar wound complication rates between the techniques,13,14 while open techniques are stronger and require shorter immobilization periods.14 Recently the SpeedBridge™ (Arthrex Inc, Naples, FL) has been touted as combining the advantages of open surgery with minimally invasive techniques by using suture anchors to secure the AT to the calcaneus. Clinical results with this technique have not yet been published and concern regarding persistent calcaneus pain from the suture anchors remains. Thus, open techniques remain the gold standard at this time as the strength of repair allows earlier mobilization and WB, while maintaining complication rates similar to minimally invasive techniques.

Post-operative rehabilitation guidelines vary significantly, especially regarding WB progression and immobilization duration.15 Historically, conservative WB progressions were followed aiming to minimize tendon elongation, which was associated with poor outcomes. However, recent advancements favor early progressive loading, as evidence suggests tendon elongation is unaffected by accelerated WB and early mobilization compared to delayed WB.15–18

This commentary outlines advancements in rehabilitation for athletes undergoing ATR. We highlight key principles, including early WB and mobilization, use of BFRT, progressive loading, and monitoring athletic qualities as part of the RTS continuum. We will review evidence and include clinical expertise where appropriate.

OVERVIEW

Anatomy and Basic Science

The AT’s thick and robust structure play crucial roles in strain transfer during physical activities. The AT can withstand enormous loads approaching 11x bodyweight (BW) during sporting activities such as high-speed running19,20 and 15x BW in gymnastics landings.4 A thorough understanding of the involved anatomy and biomechanics is required to guide post-operative rehabilitation.

Key anatomical factors include but are not limited to:

Thickness and Robustness: Structure of the tendon is essential for handling high loads and strain transfer. A larger cross-sectional area (CSA) after rupture improves the tendon’s load-bearing capacity. Zellers et al. found that CSA at 12 weeks post-operation was the strongest predictor of heel-rise test limb symmetry index (LSI) at 52 weeks, correlating with superior functional recovery.20

Twisting Structure: Twisting structure of the AT is integral to its anatomy. The AT twists approximately 90 degrees laterally from the middle of the calf to its insertion on the posterior calcaneus. This twisting affects strain transfer and muscle contribution based on lower leg orientation (e.g., inversion vs. eversion).21

Viscoelastic properties: Viscosity and elasticity both contribute to the AT’s role in force absorption and transmission. Tendon elasticity is important for energy storage and release during stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) activities, while viscosity is important in force absorption. Tendon healing and maturation to allow restoration of these properties is critical in restoring tendon function.

Incidence/Prevalence

AT ruptures account for 10.7% of all tendon and ligament injuries, with an annual incidence of 8 cases per 100,000 people, predominantly affecting males (79.2%) and occurring mostly during sports (65.2%).22 Acute AT ruptures usually result from high-load impacts, such as rapid ankle dorsiflexion with the hip and knee extended. Up to 90% of sports-related AT ruptures are caused by acceleration-deceleration mechanisms.23 The incidence of AT ruptures has notably increased in competitive athletes, with a 3-5x increase in the NFL over the past 25 years, including 24 cases in the 2023-2024 season.6 Chan et al. reported a significantly higher AT injury rate in women’s gymnastics (16.73/100,000 athlete exposures) compared to other sports.24 Reports of up to 46% of individuals with an AT rupture had a history of AT pain or tendinopathy,22 complicating patient management.

Treatment Strategies

AT ruptures can be managed surgically or conservatively. Conservative management may be preferred in recreational athletes, but rates of surgical vs nonsurgical management vary depending on cohort.22 In competitive athletes, surgical repair is preferred due to superior outcomes in plantar flexor strength and reduced rerupture rates.10,12,25 Regardless of treatment option, there is evidence suggesting early functional rehabilitation and WB result in comparable functional outcomes and patient satisfaction.25,26 Minimizing tendon gapping and tendon elongation are critical determinants of successful outcomes. It is well established that tendon lengthening occurs after AT rupture, regardless of surgical or conservative management.27,28 Maquirriain et al. identified two main factors related to tendon lengthening: inadequate surgical construct tension and progressive elongation during rehabilitation.27 During surgery, tension of the opposite leg is gauged with the goal of increasing resting tension of the ATR relative to the uninvolved side, allotting for some elongation of the construct post-operatively.29,30 Avoiding dorsiflexion past neutral until 8 weeks post-surgery is advised, as the greatest tendon elongation occurs between 2-6 weeks post-surgery regardless of WB protocol,18 significantly impacting postoperative outcomes.16,28

Surgical Techniques

Open Repair: strongest biomechanically, longer surgical time, wound complication rate similar to minimally invasive, often recommended in high demand athletes to allow robust repair.31

Percutaneous Repair: minimally invasive, cosmetic benefits, higher risk of tendon elongation compared to open repair, suggested higher risk of sural nerve injury.31,32

SpeedBridge System™: tendon anchored to bone via anchors and hour-glass suture construct, providing less displacement and higher ultimate load to failure than other techniques in vitro. Clinical results are lacking, and calcaneal pain may persist due to suture anchors.

POST-OPERATIVE REHABILITATION

Rehabilitation plays a pivotal role in optimizing outcomes post-ATR. Specifics regarding WB and range of motion (ROM) progressions are decided by the surgeon based on surgical technique, tissue quality, type of fixation and personal preference. Communication with the treating surgeon and understanding the specifics of the surgical procedure and healing time frames will ultimately guide the rehabilitation progression. This commentary will highlight key components of an accelerated rehabilitation approach for an athlete following acute ATR. An accelerated rehabilitation approach should always be discussed with and approved by the surgeon [Table 1]. Key rehabilitation principles include early loading and mobilization, restoring tendon mechanical properties, progressive strengthening, restoring elastic qualities and navigation through the RTS continuum. The authors recommend a criterion-based progression that considers individual and contextual factors, as well as the biology of healing.

244464 Table 1. Rehabilitation Stages

Phase	Goals	Interventions	Milestones for Progression	Precautions	
Immediate Post-Operative
(0-2 weeks)	Protect surgical wound

Maintain proximal muscle strength

Minimize pain/swelling	Immobilization in short cast or CAM boot (2-3 heel wedges)

Proximal Strengthening

Ankle active ROM (Not to exceed 0 deg DF)	Wound healing, cast removed and MD clearance	Allow incision to heal

Monitor for signs of complications (i.e DVT, infection, etc.)

No passive DF

No active ankle DF past 0 deg or at surgeons discretion	
Early Rehab
(2-6 weeks)	Minimal pain

Commence isometric plantarflexion

Achieve ankle ROM within phase limits

Maintain lower limb, core and CV fitness	Progressive ambulation; initially PWB (50%) with CAM boot with heel lifts

Active ROM dorsiflexion to 0 deg with knee in 90 deg flexion

Sub-maximal isometrics in shortened position (in boot or on heel wedges)

Proximal strengthening with or without BFR (after suture removal and MD clearance)	WBAT in CAM boot

Ankle DF AROM to neutral

Minimal pain, decreased swelling	No passive DF with knee flexed past neutral for 4 weeks

No passive DF with knee extended for 10 weeks

Monitor resting DF tension in prone with knee flexed	
Intermediate Phase
6-12 weeks	Improve ankle DF ROM without excessive elongation stress

Normalize gait mechanics

Improved ankle plantarflexion strength	Double leg to single leg heel raise progression

Heel raises on heel wedge to end range

Continued BFR use	Double leg calf raise through full ROM	Monitor resting DF tension in prone with knee flexed	
Late Rehab
12-24 weeks	Improve single leg PF strength and endurance throughout full ROM	DL jump progression

Pogo jumping with band assistance	Completion of a plyometric progression

Successful completion of return to run program	Monitor loading	
Return to Sports
24+ weeks	Isokinetic/Isometric strength >90% LSI	Continued plyometric progression

Continued local and global strength progression

Initiate and progress on-field/court progression	Strength > 80% CL side

Strength > 2.5-3.0x BW with seated calf isometric

DL CMJ asymmetries < 20%

SL jump asymmetries < 20%	Monitor workload	

Key Rehabilitation Principles

Respect time frames of tendon healing 11,12,25

Phase 1: Acute Inflammatory Phase (up to 1-2 weeks): Inflammatory cells remove injured tissue.

Phase 2: Proliferative Phase (up to 4 weeks): Fibroblasts produce Type I collagen, increasing tendon strength.

Phase 3: Remodeling Phase (up to >18 months): Maturation of tendon structure, improving tensile strength and elasticity.

Early Mobilization: Mechanical loading promotes tendon healing and maturation.33–36 Studies suggest early mobilization post-ATR improves tendon healing and decreases rerupture rate when compared to delayed mobilization.11,17,33

Restore mechanical properties of the tendon: Mechanical properties of the tendon including stress, strain and shear modulus are critical in maintaining the functional integrity of the Achilles complex.37,38 Mechanical tension and mobilization support collagen fibril alignment and tendon thickness.39 Low-load BFRT (LL-BFRT) has been shown to increase AT mechanical and morphological properties similarly to conventional high-load resistance training and can be utilized during early phases of post-operative rehabilitation.40,41

Progressive Strengthening: It is well established that calf musculature undergoes significant atrophy after ATR.42–45 Progressive resisted exercises targeting local and global muscle strength deficits should be implemented and follow a functional progression. Targeting the ankle plantar flexors in varying degrees of ankle dorsiflexion can alter relative muscle contributions (i.e gastrocnemius vs soleus) to target specific deficits.46,47 Exercise variables including magnitude, duration, and rate of loading should be considered to design exercises and progressions based on the clinical need.48

Restore Elastic Actions: Elasticity of the AT is essential for the tendon’s role in SSC activities.

Return to Sport Continuum: Consider RTS as a continuum, rather than a moment in time. Quantify and monitor key criteria or key performance indicators (KPI’s) with serial testing along the continuum to guide RTS decision making.49

Immediate Post-Operative Phase (0-2 weeks)

Goals: Manage pain, control swelling, protect surgical site.

The initial phase of recovery post-ATR is characterized by maximal protection of the healing repair. Protection of the repair site allows the initial phases of tendon and wound healing and minimizes the risk of complications. Any signs of infection or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) should be brought to the surgeon’s attention immediately. Traditionally the patient is non-weight bearing (NWB) with a short leg cast or CAM boot to promote wound healing and protect the repair. Length of immobilization varies among surgeons and surgical techniques. Accelerated WB protocols are variable, but may allow immediate partial WB (PWB) in a CAM boot with heel lifts.11 The use of a heel lift can reduce plantar flexor activity by 57% during normal gait, thus decreasing strain on the surgical repair.50 During the immediate post-operative phase, proximal and core strengthening can be initiated as part of in-person rehabilitation or a home exercise program. With clearance from the treating surgeon, BFRT may be initiated at this time on the ipsilateral or contralateral limb. Exercise selection can vary based on post-operative restrictions, however proximal exercises for the hip and knee musculature are typically safe to initiate immediately after surgery. Submaximal volitional plantar flexion isometrics may be initiated in the boot or cast to facilitate venous return and stimulate calf activity in a protected, shortened position within the immobilizer. Care should be taken to minimize sweating around the wound which may increase the risk for infection. Elevation and cryotherapy can be used to manage post-operative pain and swelling.

Controlled Mobilization Phase (2-6 weeks)

Goals: Progression to full WB (FWB) in boot, improve gastrocsoleus activation, minimize pain and swelling, initiate cardiovascular training when incision is well healed.

The primary goal during this phase is to accommodate ambulating in the boot and provide controlled tension to the repair while avoiding tendon elongation. Accelerated WB protocols will typically progress from PWB to FWB in the CAM boot by 4-6 weeks. Patient education regarding load progression and managing walking volumes should be stressed at this time. The patient may ambulate with a shorter stride length to avoid adverse stress on the repair. While AT length is difficult to measure directly, passive tension as a proxy measure can be evaluated with the patient prone, knee bent to 90 degrees and hip in a neutral position [Figure 1]. The resting position of the ankle is measured and monitored.27,30

242444 Figure 1. Resting position of the ankle. Can be used as proxy measure for tendon elongation. Excessive elongation would result in resting position being in relative dorsiflexion compared to the contralateral side.

Sudden increases in relative dorsiflexion ROM should be communicated to the surgeon and considered when reducing heel lift height or increasing WB. Once progressed to FWB in the CAM boot, with surgeon’s clearance the patient may begin gait training in an athletic shoe with heel lifts.

Ankle active range of motion (AROM) exercises can be initiated at this time. Ankle dorsiflexion is typically limited to neutral with the knee flexed for 4-6 weeks post-operatively to avoid elongation stress on the repair. Early initiation of AROM can facilitate proper collagen fibril formation,39,51 and early mobilization has been shown to reduce AT elongation and improve clinical outcomes.17,52,53 While early protected mobilization seems to be beneficial, it is generally recommended that passive stretching of the calf complex be avoided for up to 12 weeks post-surgery to protect the repair from elongation. It is expected and often preferred that patients have a sensation of tightness throughout the early phases of rehab, potentially indicating that tendon elongation is occurring at an appropriate rate. It is rare for a patient to complain of their Achilles being “too tight” at long-term follow up. Immobilization in a boot will restrict rearfoot, midfoot and hallux motion, allowing potential joint mobility dysfunctions. Assessment and treatment of joint mobility dysfunctions should be initiated within a protected ROM to improve joint mobility without passively stretching the Achilles complex. When the incisions are well healed, soft tissue mobilization can reduce tone of the surrounding musculature.

Plantar flexion isometrics can be continued with submaximal, non-painful efforts at end range plantar flexion ROM. This position puts the gastrocsoleus complex in a shortened position and minimizes elongation stress on the repair while promoting stiffness in the tendon. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can be used to improve muscle activation with isometric gastrocnemius contractions during the early phases of rehabilitation. Biofeedback using fixed dynamometers or force plates can be used to provide an external focus and quantify contraction intensity to gradually increase exercise demands [Figure 2].

242445 Figure 2. Sub-maximal plantar flexor isometrics in shortened muscle length (combined knee flexion/ankle PF). Using Forceframe (VALD) for biofeedback.

While the use of BFR has limited research regarding its use in post-operative ATR rehab, there is evidence to support its use as a mainstay in lower extremity post-operative rehabilitation. In a randomized controlled trial of patients who underwent ATR, Hansen et al demonstrated greater isokinetic strength in the operative calf muscle at 3 months post-operative when using BFRT compared to the control group consisting of standard of care rehab.54 The use of LL-BFRT with Achilles tendinopathy has been shown to apply similar mechanical adaptations to heavy loading.40,41,55 It is the authors’ experience that BFR can help reduce atrophy and preserve lower extremity strength after surgery. As stated previously, BFR may be initiated in the first 2 weeks with exercises such as straight leg raises, side lying hip abduction and long arc quads to maintain lower extremity strength and hypertrophy while protecting the ATR. Plantar flexion isometrics can be progressed to limited range isotonic progressive resisted exercises (PRE) with BFR as ROM and tolerance to contraction improve. We recommend an emphasis on the use of BFR during the first 12 weeks of rehab to target plantar flexor and proximal lower extremity strength. In mid-late phase rehab (i.e > 12 weeks), a greater emphasis is put on mechanical loading and progressive resistance without BFR, using moderate to higher loads. In later phases of rehab, the authors continue to use BFR as an adjunctive treatment for “deload” days or additional session volume targeting muscle hypertrophy. Anecdotally the use of BFR for ischemic preconditioning may be beneficial to enhance muscle recruitment and recovery. While the authors have observed a significant benefit in this patient population, further research is warranted regarding ideal use of BFR following ATR.

Early Rehabilitation Phase (6-12 weeks)

Goals: Normalize gait, restore ankle plantar flexor strength, gradually restore closed chain ankle dorsiflexion ROM.

The primary goals of this phase are to return to “normal” walking with gradual restoration of plantar flexor strength and foot and ankle joint mobility. Once the patient progresses to FWB in a boot, they may be cleared to transition to an athletic shoe and begin to reduce heel wedge height. The AT undergoes peak loads approaching 2-4x BW during the gait cycle.19 To meet strength and mobility demands, an assistive device is reintroduced to ensure proper gait mechanics as the AT is exposed to increased loading without the walking boot’s protection. Gradual reduction of heel wedge height will help normalize gait mechanics while restoring tension on the repair. Monitoring symptoms and resting tension of the AT can help guide decision making when reducing heel lift height to control tendon elongation. Common gait deviations include a prolonged stance phase and avoidance of push-off in terminal stance, which can be addressed with targeted drills and cueing. Continuing to avoid passive stretching of the gastrocsoleus complex is necessary until 12 weeks. The transition to a shoe may create sensations of limited ROM, but as previously mentioned, a tight feeling is normal and should not prompt aggressive ROM work.

Aquatic therapy and unweighted treadmills are helpful in restoring proper gait mechanics by gradually increasing WB demands as the patient weans from their assistive device. It is important that the WB progression aligns with ideal gait mechanics. Poor mechanics lead to joint dysfunction, adverse muscle tone or inhibited strength, especially with fatigue. In a single subject case report by Zellers et al., upon transition from a CAM boot to athletic shoes, their patient demonstrated a decline in tendon mechanical properties including shear modulus and tendon viscosity as examined on continuous shear wave elastography (cSWE).38 The authors suggested that this may explain why some patients are prone to rerupture upon transitioning from the boot and that the tendon will require increasing load for further remodeling and restoration of mechanical properties. Extra care is taken to avoid progressing to lengthened positions too quickly to prevent elongation stress on the repair. The patient should be educated to avoid movements that put excessive eccentric stress on the ankle (i.e. stair negotiation) without an appropriate strength base. Therefore, it may be necessary for the patient to remain in their CAM boot outside of physical therapy as their gait mechanics, strength, and load tolerance improve.

Progressive strengthening of the ankle plantar flexors should occur during this phase. The AT sustains enormous loads during athletic activities such as running, jumping and hopping.19,20 Progressive loading can help develop the necessary local muscle strength to tolerate these high stresses. Plantar flexor loading progressions can be initiated with the knee flexed to avoid progressing both variables of resistance and muscle/tendon length too quickly [Figure 3].

242446 Figure 3. Seated ankle plantar flexor isotonics (PRE’s)

242447 Figure 4. Sample ankle plantar flexor progression.

A sample plantar flexion strength progression is demonstrated in [Figure 4], using the concepts of progressive loading and muscle/tendon length to avoid over-stressing the repair. Milestones to achieve a full ROM heel raise may occur 8 weeks or later for double leg, and 12 or more weeks for single leg. While this is a good strength target, it has been reported that only 50% of patients were able to complete a single leg heel raise at 12 weeks post-injury.56

242448 Figure 5. Standing bilateral heel rise with emphasis on loading through the first MTP. Encouraged to achieve maximal heel height without compensation.

242449 Figure 6. Standing bilateral heel rise isometric with force plates for biofeedback and asymmetry monitoring. Can be used for both training and testing.

Quality of motion should be assessed during calf exercises, teaching proper heel raise technique by pushing through the 1st metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint and avoiding compensation through great toe flexion. Intralimb compensations are often demonstrated after ATR and can persist long after surgery if they are not addressed.43,45,57 Appropriate exercise selection and reduction of weight demands can improve movement quality without common compensations. The authors have found gravity-assisted devices (e.g. AlterGⓇ) and aquatic therapy to be valuable when developing single leg strength and the ability to perform a single leg heel raise without compensation. Submerging in water to umbilicus height has been shown to reduce BW by approximately 50%. Aquatic therapy can be utilized to reinforce movement quality with various movements and also provides additional benefits such as cardiovascular training and swelling reduction via hydrostatic pressure.58

Fundamental movement patterns such as squats, step-ups and lunges can be progressed within available ROM. Baxter et al reported on the peak Achilles stress during various functional movements and traditional exercises.48 While this study was done on healthy individuals, it serves as a model for incremental stress on the Achilles based on exercise selection. Movement quality during exercises and soreness rules can help guide strength progressions for local and global muscle strength during this phase. Cardiovascular fitness can be further developed at this time with stationary cycling. Progression to an elliptical and stair climber may be initiated when the patient can ascend an 8” step with good concentric control and sufficient closed-chain ankle dorsiflexion ROM.

Late Rehabilitation Phase (12-24 weeks)

Goals: Gradual and progressive loading, strength measures > 70-80% limb symmetry index (LSI), initiate plyometric progression/return to running.

Mid-late stage rehab is characterized by restoring full sport-specific ROM along with fundamental local and global strength and neuromuscular control in preparation for impact activities. Gradual restoration of controlled closed kinetic chain dorsiflexion is of the utmost importance due to its crucial role in sport-specific movements such as deceleration. The authors advise implementing progressive resistance exercises to build functional strength and athleticism, while constantly evaluating movement quality to detect potential deficiencies and failed load transfer. Principles of kinetic linking can be used to integrate local muscle strength into full body movements along the kinetic chain.49,59

A key milestone during this phase is returning to plyometric activities including running and jumping, which are heavily reliant on the stretch-shortening capabilities of the AT complex. It is recommended that the rehab specialist ensure sufficient strength of the plantar flexors prior to initiating plyometric movements. This can be accomplished by assessing quantity and quality of double and single leg heel raises and technical capabilites with pre-running drills, as well as objective isometric and isokinetic assessments of force output if available. Low amplitude impact activities such as ladder drills and band-assisted pogo hops can be initiated to introduce SSC activities [Figure 5]

242450 Figure 5. Band Assisted single leg pogo jump. Commonly used as introductory exercise for SL plyometrics. Band facilitates bodyweight assistance to reduce demands on lower leg.

242451 Figure 6. Triple extension wall drill. Phase 1 includes holding A frame position while in triple extension. Can be progressed to marches and then switches to gradually increase demands in preparation for running.

As strength and plyometric ability improve, progression may occur from intensive to extensive plyometric variations including box jumps and eventually drop vertical jumps. We recommend the rehabilitation professional does not rush this process, ensuring development of sufficient workloads of intensive plyometrics prior to progressing to higher demand movements.

Timelines to initiate running are highly variable after ATR. It is our preference for field and court sport athletes to demonstrate 1.5-2.0x BW isometric seated PF strength, 10 single leg heel raises through full available ROM, and good control and mechanics through single leg squatting movements prior to initiation of a running progression. Initiation of running is typically started no sooner than 12-16 weeks after surgery. Use of an AlterGⓇ treadmill or pool can allow for earlier introduction of impact activities at reduced BW. Additionally, the use of pre-running drills can be used to introduce concepts of foot-ankle complex stiffness and short contact times in preparation for level ground running [Figure 6].

Throughout the rehabilitative process, and especially while preparing the athlete for the RTS phase, it is important to consider the contralateral limb. Due to a significant reduction in activity and chronic load deficit throughout ATR rehabilitation, the contralateral limb may be exposed to higher risk of re-injury upon RTS. While relatively small, a higher incidence of contralateral AT rupture following ATR has been reported compared to that of initial AT rupture in the general population.60,61 After initial AT rupture, 1.3 to 5.5% of adult patients have been reported to experience subsequent contralateral AT rupture.60,61 Occupations involving physical activity were identified as a significant risk factor for contralateral AT rupture.61 Our preference is to implement similar strength and functional training techniques to the contralateral limb as the athlete recovers from ATR. Monitoring metrics of the contralateral limb such as peak torque to BW, reactive strength, and other data points described below is also advised as the athlete prepares for the RTS phase.

Return to Sport Phase (24+ weeks)

Goals: progress training volume, satisfy strength and power requirements (>90% of KPI’s), monitor loading throughout RTS clearance continuum.

Successful RTS after ATR is highly variable (61-100% RTS in elite athletes) and largely dependent on level of activity and demands of each sport.5 High demand jumping and explosive sports are often associated with lower RTS rates and performance deficits upon RTS.5 In a review of RTS rates and performance, NBA players showed deficits in performance metrics such as minutes per game and player efficiency rating in the first 2 years after injury.5 ATR typically yields positive long-term outcomes, but various studies have highlighted specific residual effects. Cretnik in 2019 reported a low re-rupture rate of 1%, with 80.89% of patients returning to their previous level of activity, however 16.48% experienced decreased ROM.60 Plantar flexion strength deficits are common and often range between 10-30% LSI after 1 year post-operative, with large inter-individual variation.43,44,62,63 Disproportionate weakness in end-range plantar flexion has been identified and may be related to anatomic factors such as tendon elongation and changes in tendon compliance.64 Deficits in heel-rise endurance of 20-30% persist for greater than 12 months post ATR.65,66 These studies collectively indicate that while many patients regain significant function, some experience long-term deficits in strength, elasticity, and ROM.

There is poor understanding of the ideal battery of RTS testing after ATR in athletes. Over the last couple decades, significant advancement in RTS testing protocols has been made regarding ACL injury.49,67,68 In the absence of evidence, clinicians can use clinical reasoning and extrapolate testing considerations from other long term rehabilitation to design RTS testing batteries.

Draovitch et al. described RTS clearance as a systematic approach to testing, focusing on identifying key neuromuscular capabilities and systematically testing them along the rehab continuum to help guide RTS decision making.49 The gold standard to assess ankle strength requires an isokinetic dynamometer [Figure 7]. Historically, isokinetic strength assessments of plantar flexion and dorsiflexion have been used post-ATR. While isometric strength may be assessed with force plates and dynamometers earlier in the rehabilitation process, the authors typically wait until 4 months post-operative to begin isokinetic strength testing. When using isokinetic testing, a target of > 90% LSI and peak isometric strength of 1.5-2.0x BW is recommended, although reference values can vary based on testing methodolgies and cohort demographics. Strength assessment of the ankle plantar flexors in the seated position has been described using force plates or various dynamometers.69 In the absence of preinjury data, LSI can be used to evaluate plantar flexion strength in comparison to the contralateral limb. Population specific normative data is limited, but is available for specific cohorts.69,70 Allometric scaling can be used to evaluate strength in relation to an individual’s body weight. In elite athletes a target seated ankle plantar flexion force output of 1.5-2.0x BW or greater has been suggested as a benchmark for isometric strength in healthy individuals.70 Muscular endurance and muscle-tendon unit function can be assessed with the heel rise work test as described by Silbernagel et al [Figure 8].26,65,66,71 Single leg heel rise performance LSI (involved/uninvolved x 100) can be calculated based on number of repetitions as well as total work (repetition x height of heel raise).

242452 Figure 7. Isokinetic testing of ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion strength.

242453 Figure 9. Standing Heel Rise Test: measure of muscular endurance. Limb symmetry indices for number of reps or total work (# of repetitions x height of heel rise)

Jump testing with or without dual force plate technologies has been used to assess lower extremity neuromuscular qualities, performance, and interlimb asymmetries in athletes. The countermovement jump is an assessment of slow SSC ability. Drop vertical jumps and repeated jump testing can be used to assess reactive strength. The reactive strength index (RSI) is an assessment of fast SSC plyometric ability (< 250 ms) and a KPI for explosive sports. RSI is typically calculated as a ratio of jump height divided by ground contact time. An RSI of >1.3 for double leg drop vertical jumps (DLDVJ) and >0.5 for single leg drop vertical jumps (SLDVJ) has been suggested in the ACL literature for field sport athletes.68 The single leg hop for distance (SLHD) can be used to assess horizontal power and dynamic lower extremity function. Kotsifaki et al., demonstrated that during a horizontal hop for distance, nearly 43% of the energy contributing to the propulsive phase of jumping is generated from the ankle. Distance metrics as well as 3D biomechanics to observe movement quality can be an informative component of a RTS testing battery.72 The table below summarizes sample jump testing that can be used to assess various neuromuscular qualities [Table 2]. We recommend utilizing jump testing to assess both double leg and single leg plyometric abilities. Upon demonstration of proper mechanics and loading patterns during pre-planned sport-specific movements, recent advancements in end-stage RTS training including neurocognitive and reactive training should be implemented.64 Sport-specific field-based testing should be performed and compared to pre-injury or position-specific normative values.

244174 Table 2. Return to Sport Testing Recommendations

Milestone	Testing Methodology	Benchmark	
Strength	Isokinetic testing at 30deg/s (speeds can be variable)
Seated Isometric Soleus Strength Test	> 90% LSI
Isometric (Soleus) : 1.5-2.0x BW	
Muscular Endurance	Single Leg Heel Rise Test	> 90% LSI (# of repetitions)
> 90% LSI total work (Work = # of repetitions x heel rise height)	
Power (Slow-SSC Ability)	Countermovement Jump
SL Countermovement Jump
Single Leg Hop For Distance	< 10-20% Asymmetry for interlimb asymmetries
< 10% asymmetries in SL jump height
< 10% asymmetries in SL hop distance
3D biomechanics when available	
Reactive Strength (Fast-SSC Ability)	Drop vertical jump
SL Drop vertical jump	DL RSI > 1.5
SL RSI > 0.5
< 10% asymmetries	
For additional information regarding these tests/metrics please refer to the following references:

https://valdperformance.com: Vald Forcedecks User Guide

Comfort, P., Jones, P. A., & McMahon, J. J. (Eds.). (2019b). Performance assessment in strength and conditioning (First). Routledge.

Reconditioning Phase

The progression of sport-specific loads and conditioning may be the most poorly understood phase of rehabilitation. As the athlete transitions back into on-field/on-court activities, the focus is on building in components of skill development, force and load accumulation, and sport-specific workload capacities to prepare for full activity.49 As defined by Buckthorpe et al., the 4 pillars of quality on-field rehabilitation include (1) restoring movement quality, (2) physical conditioning, (3) restoring sport-specific skills, and (4) progressive development of chronic training load.73 Communication between all stakeholders is critical to avoid load spikes during critical transition phases of rehab, which may increase risk of injury. It is our experience that clinicians often underload during the late phases of rehabilitation, leading to a relative overload during the transition phases of performance training. Effective communication between all stakeholders can help ensure smooth transitions through phases of rehabilitation and help guide successful return to performance.

CONCLUSION

AT ruptures, particularly prevalent in explosive sports, have prompted advancements in both surgical techniques and post-operative rehabilitation protocols. These innovations aim to enhance functional recovery, minimize rerupture rates, and facilitate a timely return to sport.

Key principles in rehabilitation emphasize the importance of respecting tendon healing phases, implementing early functional rehabilitation and mobilization, and progressive strengthening of the tendon and surrounding musculature. Care should be taken to control tendon elongation which is a critical determinant of long-term functional outcomes. Techniques like BFRT and NMES are gaining traction for their potential benefits in muscle preservation and strength restoration post-operatively.

In conclusion, advancements in surgical and rehabilitation techniques for AT ruptures have significantly improved outcomes for high-level athletes. Adopting evidence-based practices and individualized care plans is crucial for optimizing functional recovery and ensuring a successful return to sport.
==== Refs
Mechanical and strain behaviour of human Achilles tendon during in vitro testing to failure Eur Cell Mater Nagelli C. V. Hooke A. Quirk N.. 21 4 2022
43 153 161 10.22203/eCM.v043a12 10.22203/eCM.v043a12
Major functional deficits persist 2 years after acute Achilles tendon rupture Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Olsson N. Nilsson-Helander K. Karlsson J.. 8 2011
19 8 1385 93 10.1007/s00167-011-1511-3 10.1007/s00167-011-1511-3 21533539
Predictors of Clinical Outcome After Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures Am J Sports Med Olsson N. Petzold M. Brorsson A. Karlsson J. Eriksson B.I. Silbernagel K.G. 6 2014
42 6 1448 55 10.1177/0363546514527409 10.1177/0363546514527409 24658347
Factors Associated With Achilles Tendon Rupture in Women's Collegiate Gymnastics Sports Health Bonanno J. Cheng J. Tilley D. Abutalib Z. Casey E. 2022
14 3 358 368 10.1177/19417381211034510 10.1177/19417381211034510 34338076
Return-to-play and performance after operative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture in elite male athletes: a scoping review Br J Sports Med LaPrade C. M. Chona D. V. Cinque M. E.. 5 2022
56 9 515 520 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104835 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104835 35144918
An Apparent Achilles Heel of the NFL: Have Achilles Tendon Injuries Significantly Increased to Unacceptably High Incidence Levels in the NFL and if so, why? A Clinical Insight Int J Sports Phys Ther Hewett T.E. Lavender C.D. Schaver A.L. 2024
19 2 145 147 10.26603/001c.92082 10.26603/001c.92082 38313673
Did the NFL Lockout expose the Achilles heel of competitive sports? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Myer G.D. Faigenbaum A.D. Cherny C.E. Heidt R.S., Jr. Hewett T.E. 10 2011
41 10 702 5 10.2519/jospt.2011.0107 10.2519/jospt.2011.0107
Seasonal Variation of Achilles Tendon Injury J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Caldwell J. E. Lightsey H. M. Trofa D. P. Swindell H. W. Greisberg J. K. Vosseller J. T. 8 2018
2 8 e043 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00043 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00043 30631830
Surgical Treatment Versus Conservative Management for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials J Foot Ankle Surg Deng S. Sun Z. Zhang C. Chen G. Li J. 1 11 2017
56 6 1236 1243 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.036 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.036
A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatments of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures Am J Sports Med Lantto I. Heikkinen J. Flinkkila T.. 9 2016
44 9 2406 14 10.1177/0363546516651060 10.1177/0363546516651060 27307495
Acute achilles tendon rupture: a randomized, controlled study comparing surgical and nonsurgical treatments using validated outcome measures Am J Sports Med Nilsson-Helander K. Silbernagel K.G. Thomeé R.. 11 2010
38 11 2186 93 10.1177/0363546510376052 10.1177/0363546510376052
Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a multicenter randomized trial using accelerated functional rehabilitation J Bone Joint Surg Am Willits K. Amendola A. Bryant D.. 1 12 2010
92 17 2767 75 10.2106/jbjs.I.01401 10.2106/jbjs.I.01401
Nonoperative or Surgical Treatment of Acute Achilles' Tendon Rupture N Engl J Med Myhrvold S. B. Brouwer E. F. Andresen T. K. M.. 14 4 2022
386 15 1409 1420 10.1056/NEJMoa2108447 10.1056/NEJMoa2108447
Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Percutaneous Achilles Repair System Versus Open Technique for Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures Foot Ankle Int Hsu A. R. Jones C. P. Cohen B. E. Davis W. H. Ellington J. K. Anderson R. B. 11 2015
36 11 1279 86 10.1177/1071100715589632 10.1177/1071100715589632
Duration of immobilisation after Achilles tendon rupture repair by open surgery: a retrospective cohort study J Orthop Surg Res Xu X. Y. Gao S. Lv Y.. 17 3 2021
16 1 196 10.1186/s13018-021-02342-4
The Ruptured Achilles Tendon Elongates for 6 Months After Surgical Repair Regardless of Early or Late Weightbearing in Combination With Ankle Mobilization: A Randomized Clinical Trial Am J Sports Med Eliasson P. Agergaard A. S. Couppé C.. 8 2018
46 10 2492 2502 10.1177/0363546518781826 10.1177/0363546518781826 29965789
Achilles tendon elongation after rupture repair: a randomized comparison of 2 postoperative regimens Am J Sports Med Kangas J. Pajala A. Ohtonen P. Leppilahti J. 1 2007
35 1 59 64 10.1177/0363546506293255
Comparison of Tendon Lengthening With Traditional Versus Accelerated Rehabilitation After Achilles Tendon Repair: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Am J Sports Med Okoroha K.R. Ussef N. Jildeh T.R.. 6 2020
48 7 1720 1726 10.1177/0363546520909389 10.1177/0363546520909389 32203675
The load borne by the Achilles tendon during exercise: A systematic review of normative values Scand J Med Sci Sports Demangeot Y. Whiteley R. Gremeaux V. Degache F. 2 2023
33 2 110 126 10.1111/sms.14242 10.1111/sms.14242
Biomechanical loading of Achilles tendon during normal locomotion Clin Sports Med Komi P. V. Fukashiro S. Järvinen M. 7 1992
11 3 521 31 1638639
The twisted structure of the Achilles tendon unraveled: A detailed quantitative and qualitative anatomical investigation Scand J Med Sci Sports Pękala P. A. Henry B. M. Ochała A.. 12 2017
27 12 1705 1715 10.1111/sms.12835 10.1111/sms.12835
Incidence, demographics, characteristics and management of acute Achilles tendon rupture: An epidemiological study PLoS One Briggs-Price S. Mangwani J. Houchen-Wolloff L.. 2024
19 6 e0304197 10.1371/journal.pone.0304197 10.1371/journal.pone.0304197 38905182
Achilles Tendon Rupture: Mechanisms of Injury, Principles of Rehabilitation and Return to Play J Funct Morphol Kinesiol Tarantino D. Palermi S. Sirico F. Corrado B. 17 12 2020
5 4 10.3390/jfmk5040095 10.3390/jfmk5040095
Epidemiology of Achilles tendon injuries in collegiate level athletes in the United States Int Orthop Chan J. J. Chen K. K. Sarker S.. 3 2020
44 3 585 594 10.1007/s00264-019-04471-2 10.1007/s00264-019-04471-2 31907586
Acute rupture of tendon Achillis. A prospective randomised study of comparison between surgical and non-surgical treatment J Bone Joint Surg Br Möller M. Movin T. Granhed H. Lind K. Faxén E. Karlsson J. 8 2001
83 6 843 8 10.1302/0301-620x.83b6.11676 10.1302/0301-620x.83b6.11676 11521926
Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis of randomized trials J Bone Joint Surg Am Soroceanu A. Sidhwa F. Aarabi S. Kaufman A. Glazebrook M. 5 12 2012
94 23 2136 43 10.2106/jbjs.K.00917 10.2106/jbjs.K.00917
Achilles tendon rupture: avoiding tendon lengthening during surgical repair and rehabilitation Yale J Biol Med Maquirriain J. 9 2011
84 3 289 300 21966048
Early E-modulus of healing Achilles tendons correlates with late function: similar results with or without surgery Scand J Med Sci Sports Schepull T. Kvist J. Aspenberg P. 2 2012
22 1 18 23 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01154.x 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01154.x
Functional Ankle Range of Motion but Not Peak Achilles Tendon Force Diminished With Heel-Rise and Jumping Tasks After Achilles Tendon Repair Am J Sports Med Zellers J. A. Baxter J. R. Grävare Silbernagel K. 7 2021
49 9 2439 2446 10.1177/03635465211019436 10.1177/03635465211019436 34115525
Achilles Tendon Resting Angle Relates to Tendon Length and Function Foot Ankle Int Zellers J. A. Carmont M. R. Silbernagel K. G. 3 2018
39 3 343 348 10.1177/1071100717742372 29272160
A Biomechanical Comparison of an Open Repair and 3 Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Repair Techniques During a Simulated, Progressive Rehabilitation Protocol Am J Sports Med Clanton T. O. Haytmanek C. T. Williams B. T.. 8 2015
43 8 1957 64 10.1177/0363546515587082 10.1177/0363546515587082 26063402
Outcomes and Complications of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Am J Sports Med Attia A.K. Mahmoud K. d'Hooghe P. Bariteau J. Labib S.A. Myerson M.S. 3 2023
51 3 825 836 10.1177/03635465211053619 10.1177/03635465211053619 34908499
Low-level mechanical stimulation is sufficient to improve tendon healing in rats J Appl Physiol (1985) Andersson T. Eliasson P. Hammerman M. Sandberg O. Aspenberg P. 11 2012
113 9 1398 402 10.1152/japplphysiol.00491.2012 10.1152/japplphysiol.00491.2012
Stimulation of tendon repair: mechanical loading, GDFs and platelets. A mini-review Int Orthop Aspenberg P. 12 2007
31 6 783 9 10.1007/s00264-007-0398-6 10.1007/s00264-007-0398-6
Rat Achilles tendon healing: mechanical loading and gene expression J Appl Physiol (1985) Eliasson P. Andersson T. Aspenberg P. 8 2009
107 2 399 407 10.1152/japplphysiol.91563.2008 10.1152/japplphysiol.91563.2008
The role of mechanical loading in tendon development, maintenance, injury, and repair J Bone Joint Surg Am Galloway M. T. Lalley A. L. Shearn J. T. 4 9 2013
95 17 1620 8 10.2106/jbjs.L.01004 10.2106/jbjs.L.01004 24005204
Achilles tendon cross-sectional area at 12 weeks post-rupture relates to 1-year heel-rise height Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Zellers J. A. Pohlig R. T. Cortes D. H. Grävare Silbernagel K. 1 2020
28 1 245 252 10.1007/s00167-019-05608-x 10.1007/s00167-019-05608-x
FROM ACUTE ACHILLES TENDON RUPTURE TO RETURN TO PLAY - A CASE REPORT EVALUATING RECOVERY OF TENDON STRUCTURE, MECHANICAL PROPERTIES, CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES Int J Sports Phys Ther Zellers J. A. Cortes D. H. Silbernagel K. G. 12 2016
11 7 1150 1159
Early Tensile Loading in Nonsurgically Treated Achilles Tendon Ruptures Leads to a Larger Tendon Callus and a Lower Elastic Modulus: A Randomized Controlled Trial Am J Sports Med Rendek Z. Bon Beckman L. Schepull T.. 10 2022
50 12 3286 3298 10.1177/03635465221117780 10.1177/03635465221117780
Similar patterns of tendon regional hypertrophy after low-load blood flow restriction and high-load resistance training Scand J Med Sci Sports Centner C. Jerger S. Lauber B.. 6 2023
33 6 848 856 10.1111/sms.14321 10.1111/sms.14321 36703264
Low-load blood flow restriction training induces similar morphological and mechanical Achilles tendon adaptations compared with high-load resistance training J Appl Physiol (1985) Centner C. Lauber B. Seynnes O. R.. 1 12 2019
127 6 1660 1667 10.1152/japplphysiol.00602.2019 10.1152/japplphysiol.00602.2019
Persistent Deficits after an Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Narrative Review Transl Sports Med Hoeffner R. Svensson R. B. Bjerregaard N. Kjær M. Magnusson S. P. 2022
2022 7445398 10.1155/2022/7445398 10.1155/2022/7445398 38655161
Tendon Length, Calf Muscle Atrophy, and Strength Deficit After Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: Long-Term Follow-up of Patients in a Previous Study J Bone Joint Surg Am Heikkinen J. Lantto I. Piilonen J.. 20 9 2017
99 18 1509 1515 10.2106/jbjs.16.01491 10.2106/jbjs.16.01491
Tendon Elongation and Function After Delayed or Standard Loading of Surgically Repaired Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Randomized Controlled Trial Am J Sports Med Hoeffner R. Agergaard A. S. Svensson R. B.. 3 2024
52 4 1022 1031 10.1177/03635465241227178 10.1177/03635465241227178 38353060
Lower extremity work along with triceps surae structure and activation is altered with jumping after Achilles tendon repair J Orthop Res Zellers J. A. Marmon A. R. Ebrahimi A. Grävare Silbernagel K. 4 2019
37 4 933 941 10.1002/jor.24260 10.1002/jor.24260 30816587
Evidence of different sensitivity of muscle and tendon to mechano-metabolic stimuli Scand J Med Sci Sports Lambrianides Y. Epro G. Arampatzis A. Karamanidis K. 5 2024
34 5 e14638 10.1111/sms.14638 10.1111/sms.14638 38671559
Optimal pennation angle of the primary ankle plantar and dorsiflexors: variations with sex, contraction intensity, and limb J Appl Biomech Manal K. Roberts D.P. Buchanan T.S. 11 2006
22 4 255 63 10.1123/jab.22.4.255 10.1123/jab.22.4.255
Exercise Progression to Incrementally Load the Achilles Tendon Med Sci Sports Exerc Baxter J.R. Corrigan P. Hullfish T.J. O'Rourke P. Silbernagel K.G. 1 2021
53 1 124 130 10.1249/mss.0000000000002459 10.1249/mss.0000000000002459
The Return-to-Sport Clearance Continuum Is a Novel Approach Toward Return to Sport and Performance for the Professional Athlete Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Draovitch P. Patel S. Marrone W.. 1 2022
4 1 e93 e101 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.026 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.026
The relative stress on the Achilles tendon during ambulation in an ankle immobiliser: implications for rehabilitation after Achilles tendon repair Br J Sports Med Akizuki K. H. Gartman E. J. Nisonson B. Ben-Avi S. McHugh M. P. 10 2001
35 5 329 34 10.1136/bjsm.35.5.329 10.1136/bjsm.35.5.329
The effects of early mobilization in the healing of achilles tendon repair Foot Ankle Int Pneumaticos S. G. McGarvey W. C. Mody D. R. Trevino S. G. 7 2000
21 7 551 7 10.1177/107110070002100704 10.1177/107110070002100704 10919619
Does Early Functional Mobilization Affect Long-Term Outcomes After an Achilles Tendon Rupture? A Randomized Clinical Trial Orthop J Sports Med Aufwerber S. Heijne A. Edman G. Silbernagel K. G. Ackermann P. W. 3 2020
8 3 2325967120906522 10.1177/2325967120906522 10.1177/2325967120906522 32206673
Functional weight-bearing mobilization after Achilles tendon rupture enhances early healing response: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Valkering K. P. Aufwerber S. Ranuccio F. Lunini E. Edman G. Ackermann P. W. 6 2017
25 6 1807 1816 10.1007/s00167-016-4270-3 27539402
Effect of Blood Flow Restriction Therapy Following Achilles Rupture and Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial Hansen O. B. Eble S. K. Drakos M. C. 20 1 2022
Foot Ankle Orthop 10.1177/2473011421S00032
Achilles tendon rupture healing is enhanced by intermittent pneumatic compression upregulating collagen type I synthesis Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Abdul Alim M. Domeij-Arverud E. Nilsson G. Edman G. Ackermann P.W. 7 2018
26 7 2021 2029 10.1007/s00167-017-4621-8 28668970
Ability to perform a single heel-rise is significantly related to patient-reported outcome after Achilles tendon rupture Scand J Med Sci Sports Olsson N. Karlsson J. Eriksson B. I. Brorsson A. Lundberg M. Silbernagel K. G. 2 2014
24 1 152 8 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01497.x 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01497.x
Constituent Lower Extremity Work (CLEW) approach: A novel tool to visualize joint and segment work Gait Posture Ebrahimi A. Goldberg S. R. Wilken J. M. Stanhope S. J. 7 2017
56 49 53 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.024 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.024 28494322
BENEFITS AND USE OF AQUATIC THERAPY DURING REHABILITATION AFTER ACL RECONSTRUCTION -A CLINICAL COMMENTARY Int J Sports Phys Ther Buckthorpe M. Pirotti E. Villa F. D. 12 2019
14 6 978 993
Biotensegrity and myofascial chains: A global approach to an integrated kinetic chain Med Hypotheses Dischiavi S. L. Wright A. A. Hegedus E. J. Bleakley C. M. 1 2018
110 90 96 10.1016/j.mehy.2017.11.008 10.1016/j.mehy.2017.11.008
Incidence of Achilles tendon rupture: 25-year regional analysis with a focus on bilateral ruptures J Int Med Res Čretnik A. Košir R. 11 2023
51 11 3000605231205179 10.1177/03000605231205179 10.1177/03000605231205179
Risk Factors for Contralateral Tendon Rupture in Patients With Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture J Foot Ankle Surg Hong J.Y. Kang C. Kim T.G.. 2023
62 5 779 784 10.1053/j.jfas.2023.03.008 10.1053/j.jfas.2023.03.008 37031886
Calf Muscle Performance Deficits Remain 7 Years After an Achilles Tendon Rupture Am J Sports Med Brorsson A. Grävare Silbernagel K. Olsson N. Nilsson Helander K. 2 2018
46 2 470 477 10.1177/0363546517737055 10.1177/0363546517737055
Deficits 10-years after Achilles tendon repair Int J Sports Med Horstmann T. Lukas C. Merk J. Brauner T. Mündermann A. 6 2012
33 6 474 9 10.1055/s-0032-1301932 22499571
Neurocognitive and Reactive Return to Play Testing Protocol in Overhead Athletes Following Upper Extremity Injury Int J Sports Phys Ther Wilk K. E. Thomas Z. M. Mangine R. E. Fuller P. Davies G. J. 2023
18 6 1364 1375 10.26603/001c.89926 38050554
Deficits in heel-rise height and achilles tendon elongation occur in patients recovering from an Achilles tendon rupture Am J Sports Med Silbernagel K. G. Steele R. Manal K. 7 2012
40 7 1564 71 10.1177/0363546512447926 10.1177/0363546512447926 22593092
Full symptomatic recovery does not ensure full recovery of muscle-tendon function in patients with Achilles tendinopathy Br J Sports Med Silbernagel K. G. Thomeé R. Eriksson B. I. Karlsson J. 4 2007
41 4 276 280 10.1136/bjsm.2006.033464 10.1136/bjsm.2006.033464 17261555
Return to sports after an ACL reconstruction in 2024 - A glass half full? A narrative review Phys Ther Sport Welling W. 5 2024
67 141 148 10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.05.001 10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.05.001 38749349
Aspetar clinical practice guideline on rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Br J Sports Med Kotsifaki R. Korakakis V. King E.. 5 2023
57 9 500 514 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106158 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106158 36731908
Plantarflexor strength and endurance deficits associated with mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy: The role of soleus Phys Ther Sport O'Neill S. Barry S. Watson P. 5 2019
37 69 76 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.03.002 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.03.002 30884279
Normative isometric plantarflexion strength values for professional level, male rugby union athletes Phys Ther Sport Lee M. Lancaster M. Tulloch L.. 5 2023
61 114 121 10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.03.007 10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.03.007 37003219
A new measurement of heel-rise endurance with the ability to detect functional deficits in patients with Achilles tendon rupture Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Silbernagel K. G. Nilsson-Helander K. Thomeé R. Eriksson B. I. Karlsson J. 2 2010
18 2 258 64 10.1007/s00167-009-0889-7 10.1007/s00167-009-0889-7
Vertical and Horizontal Hop Performance: Contributions of the Hip, Knee, and Ankle Sports Health Kotsifaki A. Korakakis V. Graham-Smith P. Sideris V. Whiteley R. 3 2021
13 2 128 135 10.1177/1941738120976363 10.1177/1941738120976363 33560920
On-field Rehabilitation Part 1: 4 Pillars of High-Quality On-field Rehabilitation Are Restoring Movement Quality, Physical Conditioning, Restoring Sport-Specific Skills, and Progressively Developing Chronic Training Load J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Buckthorpe M. Della Villa F. Della Villa S. Roi G.S. 8 2019
49 8 565 569 10.2519/jospt.2019.8954 10.2519/jospt.2019.8954 31291553
