
==== Front
Afr J Paediatr Surg
Afr J Paediatr Surg
AJPS
Afr J Paediatr Surg
African Journal of Paediatric Surgery: AJPS
0189-6725
0974-5998
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow India

39162752
AJPS-21-184
10.4103/ajps.ajps_82_23
Case Report
Tailgut Cyst in a Child: A Case Report and Review of Literature
Shukla Ramendra
Patel Jay Divyesh 1
Chandna Sudhir B.
Parikh Urvish
Department of Paediatric Surgery, SVP Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
1 Department of General Surgery, SVP Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
Address for correspondence: Dr. Jay Divyesh Patel, Room No. 13062, 13th Floor, SVP Hospital, Near Ellis Bridge, Paldi, Ahmedabad - 380 006, Gujarat, India. E-mail: jaypatel6226@gmail.com
Jul-Sep 2024
09 8 2024
21 3 184187
05 7 2023
05 9 2023
25 10 2023
Copyright: © 2024 African Journal of Paediatric Surgery
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Tailgut cysts are rare congenital abnormalities that develop due to failure of embryologic tailgut to involute. This generally manifests as a presacral, retrorectal and multicystic mass. It has a high propensity in female patients including paediatric age group. The clinical presentation varies depending on the age of patient, location and size of the cyst. The symptoms are mostly due to mass effects and rarely complications such as malignancy. Being a rare entity, it is generally misdiagnosed. Differential diagnosis mostly includes rectal duplication cyst, sacrococcygeal teratoma and anterior meningocele. Radiological imaging such as computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging is useful in the diagnosis. The treatment of choice is complete excision to prevent recurrence, infection and malignant degeneration. We have reviewed previous literature and given our valuable information regarding the same.

Perineal lesion
presacral tumour
retrorectal tumour
tailgut cyst
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Tailgut cysts are rare congenital malformations that are embryologic remnants of the post-natal component of the hindgut.[1] The data available for tailgut cysts demonstrate a 5:1 predominance of these lesions in females. Tailgut cysts can present at any age. The majority of cysts remains asymptomatic, often missed on digital rectal exams. Most of the cases are seen in the 30–60 years of age group. Mass effect can lead to such symptoms as constipation, tenesmus, dysphasia, and/or polyuria; and lesion infection may manifest as a perianal fistula or a pelvic abscess.[123] Based on recent studies, the overall rate of malignant transformation of tailgut cysts is estimated to be as high as 26%.[4]

As the embryo folds during the 4th week of gestation, the cloacal membrane progresses ventrally and encloses a portion of the future gut that is distal to the eventual hindgut-a region known as the ‘tailgut’. Typically,[1] the tailgut involutes around the 6th week of gestation; however, when this process fails, a tailgut cyst remains.[1] Tailgut cysts arise in areas with complex anatomy and embryology. The retrorectal or presacral space is bounded anteriorly by the rectum, posteriorly by the sacrum, superiorly by the peritoneal reflection, inferiorly by the pelvic diaphragm muscles (levator ani and coccygeus), and laterally by the ureters and iliac arteries and veins.[2]

Tailgut cysts are congenital, retrorectal and multicystic lesions also known as postanal gut cysts. Only 20 cases have been reported in English literature in the paediatric age group.

CASE REPORT

A 4-year-old male patient presented to the paediatric surgery clinic with the complaint of vague lower abdominal pain for the past 4–5 months, which was non-radiating, increased after food intake and mild-to-moderate in intensity. It was associated with abdominal fullness after meals. Not associated with nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, blood in urine/stool, pain while defecating, urinary complaints and fever. The patient had a history of left-sided inguinal herniotomy at the age of 7 months. The patient had a rotavirus infection at the age of 3 years (at that time patient had diarrhoea and vomiting for which he was admitted to the hospital for 8 days).

There was no family history of malignancy and the patient’s drug history was insignificant.

On examination, the abdomen was soft and non-tender.

Digital rectal examination demonstrated the presence of approximately 6 cm × 5 cm soft, cystic, non-tender, non-mobile swelling palpated at 6 o’clock position with no active bleeding or pus discharge at that time.

The examining finger was able to reach above the mass and feel the coccyx. Perianal examination revealed a normal resting tone and no perineal descent or prolapse furthermore, no skin tag, fissure, fistula or haemorrhoids were present. There was no gross perianal pathology. Apart from this, the rest of the physical exam was unremarkable. Laboratory studies were within normal limits, and there was no radiographic evidence of extra-pelvic disease.

The serum alpha-fetoprotein and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin were within normal limits.

Ultrasonography (USG) abdomen suggested a 41 mm × 33 mm sized well-defined cystic lesion with internal echoes and septations noted in the right mesorectal region adjacent to the rectum, with no evidence of internal vascularity.

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen showed a benign septate cystic lesion measuring 59 mm × 50 mm × 42 mm seen in the presacral region with retrorectal concavity and causing compression over the rectum [Figure 1a and b].

Figure 1 (a and b) Contrast computed tomography scan of abdomen and pelvis [red arrows indicate related structure in picture]

The patient underwent complete resection of the mass through a posterior (Kraske) approach. After positioning the patient, the cyst was rectally palpated and was found to be deviating towards the right side. Hence, an incision was made extending 3 cm from the coccyx superiorly. Sharp dissection was used to carry the incision down directly over the marked plane which extended bilaterally over the gluteal region. The subcutaneous tissue and fatty layer were divided bilaterally and the cyst was exposed after cutting the few gluteal muscle fibres. The mass had multiple tense and cystic loculations, one of which was inadvertently entered, releasing a thick, non-malodorous and purulent fluid consistent with sterile pus. The lesion was resected en bloc with its fibrous attachments to the distal coccyx but the coccyx was spared. The cyst was dissected taking all precautions not to enter the rectum. The levator ani was closed in the midline and gluteal muscle fibres were sutured to the respective position. A corrugated drain was brought out laterally from a separate incision. The remaining layers of the incision were re-approximated and closed. The patient tolerated the operation without any complications, and her post-operative course was uneventful. The drain was removed after 5 days. The patient returned to the clinic 2 weeks later for the removal of skin sutures and achieved a complete functional recovery soon thereafter.

Histopathology

Sections reveal cyst wall lined by stratified squamous epithelium, pseudostratified ciliated columnar and transitional lining. Subepithelial tissue shows a bundle of smooth muscle in the cyst wall. Many mixed inflammatory cells chiefly lymphocytes, polymorph and foamy macrophages are also seen [Figure 2].

Figure 2 Histopathology slide

DISCUSSION

Tailgut cysts are typically located in presacral space and extend below the pelvic floor anterior to the coccyx and are therefore retroanal as well as retrorectal. The largest published series of 53 cases collected over four decades from the US Armed Forces Institute of Pathology noted that women outnumbered men by 3:1.[5] Tailgut cysts are more common in young and middle aged but quite rare in the paediatric group and hence make this review important.

Fewer than 100 adult cases have been reported in literature worldwide and only 18 cases in English literature in the paediatric group. Tailgut cysts can present in a variety of ways. Almost 50% of adult cases are asymptomatic and discovered incidentally.[5] The remainder present with symptoms of a pelvic mass (e.g. constipation, pelvic pain and urinary symptoms) or from cyst complications (recurrent perianal or retrorectal abscesses, cutaneous perianal sinuses or fistulae, rectal bleeding or malignant degeneration).[6]

Finally, malignant transformation into neuroendocrine tumours, adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma can occur; thus, accurate diagnosis and treatment are critical.[7]

In children, the cyst most commonly presents as an incidental finding on pre- or post-natal ultrasound scans or as a gluteal or perianal mass [Table 1]. There may be a postanal or sacral dimple,[8] as noted in some affected adults.[6] The cases till now had presented with pelvic or abdominal pain, gluteal cystic mass, renal symptoms, rectal prolapse, constipation, imperforate anus or stenosis. The tailgut cyst has been mostly incidentally diagnosed on USG.

Table 1 Reports of tailgut cysts in children

Reference	Age	Sex	Largest dimension (s) (cm)	Presenting features	
Raven	2 months	Female	5	Intestinal obstruction	
Hjermstad and Helwig	Neonate	Male	–	Prolapsing rectal lesion	
Hjermstad and Helwig	Neonate	Female	–		
Rafindadi et al.	Neonate	Male	25×20	Cystic gluteal mass	
Oh et al.	Neonate	Female	9	Prenatal US at 36 weeks gestation showed a sacrococcygeal mass	
Al-Khuzaie et al.	Neonate	Female	10×8	Cystic gluteal mass	
Sung et al.	12 years	Male	4×3	Recurrent abdominal pain and vomiting	
Antao et al.	14 weeks	Male	1.3×0.7	Incidental finding on US scan in a neonate with anal stenosis	
Podberesky et al.	2 years	Female	2.6×1.2	Incidental finding on MRI scan for sacral vascular malformation	
Jang et al.	14 years	Male	5×3	Acute abdominal pain and dysuria	
Galluzzo et al.	12 years	Female	12×11	Lumbar pain	
Kim and Park	Neonate	Female	2.3×1.2	Subcutaneous mobile postanal mass	
Nakagawa et al.	Neonate	Female	10.2×9.3	Prenatal US at 23 weeks’ gestation showed a presacral cyst	
Peter et al.	19 months	Male	–	Large perianal swelling since birth	
Garcia-Palacios et al.	8 years	Female	–	Postanal retrorectal mass and constipation	
Chung et al.	Neonate	Female	5×4	Prenatal US at 25 week’s gestation showed a presacral cyst	
Hansen and Qvist	4.5 years	Female	Not stated	Rectal prolapse (with a presacral mass)	
Raisolsadat et al.	Neonate	Female	4×3	At posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for imperforate anus	
Nadeem Haidar	14 months	Female	6.3×4.4	Abdominal distension, urinary retention, renal failure	
Nadeem Haidar	7 months	Male	5.7×4.3	Cystic gluteal mass	
Current case	4 years	Male	5.9×5	Vague lower abdominal pain	
US: Ultrasound, MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging

In our case, the child had diarrhoea and was incidentally diagnosed with a cystic lesion in the presacral space but conservative management was decided initially in the peripheral hospital and now the child after a few years presented in our outpatient department with recurrent lower abdominal pain and on USG the size of cyst was found to be increased which was confirmed by CT scan.

Imaging, namely magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT scans, is the principal method by which retrorectal masses can be diagnosed.[9] Other imaging modalities can be useful but are not diagnostic.[9] MRI is the optimum imaging technique. Cysts typically show a variable signal intensity on T1-weighted images (which depends on the protein content of the fluid) and are hyperintense on T2-weighted images.[810] The presence of a solid component in the lesion rules out the tailgut cyst.

Retrorectal cysts have various and different pathology. The cystic sacrococcygeal teratoma consists of all three germ layers and has solid components. Dermoid cysts are usually unilocular and lined by stratified squamous epithelium with dermal appendages. An anterior sacral meningocele communicates with the spinal subarachnoid space through a bony defect in the sacrum. The anorectal duplication cyst is unilocular and has a common wall with the rectum. The rare malignant tumour chordomas contain solid components.

In studies of the tailgut, it has been found that a lining of two to four layers of cuboidal cells is present with no definite muscular outer layer. A well-defined muscular wall with a myenteric plexus should be absent in a tailgut cyst to differentiate from a duplication cyst.[3] The pathological changes of tailgut cysts are distinctive. The lesions are usually multilocular and multicystic. Although a variety of epithelial types almost always line the cysts, the presence of some glandular or transitional epithelium is required to exclude epidermoid and dermoid cysts.[5]

Histopathology sections in our case revealed a cyst wall lined by stratified squamous epithelium, pseudostratified ciliated columnar and transitional lining. Subepithelial tissue shows a bundle of smooth muscle in the cyst wall. Many mixed inflammatory cells chiefly lymphocytes, polymorphs and foamy macrophages are also seen.

Tailgut cysts are considered to be remnants of the embryonic tailgut that normally regresses completely during normal development. In human embryos, the tailgut becomes visible at about 29 days (Carnegie stage 11), is fully developed by day 35 and has largely regressed by day 44 (Carnegie stage 18).[11] It is lined by stratified columnar epithelium. An alternative and less likely source of tailgut cysts is the neurenteric canal,[12] which is a transient communication between the yolk sac and the amniotic cavity in the embryo before the definitive notochord is formed.[5]

Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for both asymptomatic lesions (due to risks including infection, rupture, fistula formation and malignant transformation) and symptomatic tailgut cysts.[131415] Approaches to tailgut cyst depend on the level of location of the lesion above or below the S3 level (may vary widely, from laparoscopic to transabdominal to transsacral to transanal).

Retrorectal masses lying entirely below S3 can safely be accessed through a posterior, or Kraske, approach, while lesions lying above S3 can be excised through an anterior, or abdominal approach.[13] When lesions lie both above and below the level of S3, an integrated abdominosacral approach may be required.[13] During the posterior approach, a coccygectomy may provide better surgical exposure.[13] If the tailgut cyst is not resected entirely, there is a possibility for recurrence.[13]

Amongst the various treatment options, complete resection with clear margins is the most effective one and has the least incidence of recurrence and better patient outcomes.[1316] Following excision, an annual digital rectal examination is recommended; furthermore, a CT scan is recommended in post-operative years 1 and 5.[13]

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given his consent for his images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that his name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal his identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
==== Refs
REFERENCES

1 Haydar M Griepentrog K Tailgut cyst: A case report and literature review Int J Surg Case Rep 2015 10 166 8 25853843
2 Krivokapic Z Dimitrijevic I Barisic G Markovic V Krstic M Adenosquamous carcinoma arising within a retrorectal tailgut cyst: Report of a case World J Gastroenterol 2005 11 6225 7 16273657
3 Sakr A Kim HS Han YD Cho MS Hur H Min BS Single-center experience of 24 cases of tailgut cyst Ann Coloproctol 2019 35 268 74 31726003
4 Nicoll K Bartrop C Walsh S Foster R Duncan G Payne C Malignant transformation of tailgut cysts is significantly higher than previously reported: Systematic review of cases in the literature Colorectal Dis 2019 21 869 78 30932326
5 Hjermstad BM Helwig EB Tailgut cysts. Report of 53 cases Am J Clin Pathol 1988 89 139 47 3277378
6 Killingsworth C Gadacz TR Tailgut cyst (retrorectal cystic hamartoma): Report of a case and review of the literature Am Surg 2005 71 666 73 16217950
7 Liang F Li J Yu K Zhang K Liu T Li J Tailgut cysts with malignant transformation: Features, diagnosis, and treatment Med Sci Monit 2020 26 e919803 31926113
8 Podberesky DJ Falcone RA Emery KH Care MM Anton CG Miles L Tailgut cyst in a child Pediatr Radiol 2005 35 194 7 15351921
9 Shetty AS Loch R Yoo N Mellnick V Fowler K Narra V Imaging of tailgut cysts Abdom Imaging 2015 40 2783 95 26017036
10 Kim KR Park WK Radiologic features of a tailgut cyst in a neonate: A case report J Korean Radiol Soc 2008 58 177 80
11 Hashimoto R Development of the human tail bud and splanchnic mesenchyme Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2013 53 27 33 23480355
12 Antao B Lee AC Gannon C Arthur R Sugarman ID Tailgut cyst in a neonate with anal stenosis Eur J Pediatr Surg 2004 14 212 4 15211416
13 Raven RW Sacrococcygeal cysts and tumors Br J Surg 1935 23 337 61
14 Oh JT Son SW Kim MJ Kim L Kim H Hwang EH Tailgut cyst in a neonate J Pediatr Surg 2000 35 1833 5 11101749
15 Sung MT Ko SF Niu CK Hsieh CS Huang HY Perirenal tailgut cyst (cystic hamartoma) J Pediatr Surg 2003 38 1404 6 14523832
16 Jang SH Jang KS Song YS Min KW Han HX Lee KG Unusual prerectal location of a tailgut cyst: A case report World J Gastroenterol 2006 12 5081 3 16937513
