
==== Front
Int J Surg Case Rep
Int J Surg Case Rep
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
2210-2612
Elsevier

S2210-2612(24)00959-3
10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110178
110178
Case Report
Minimally invasive resection of gastric GIST tumor by trans-gastric approach: A case report of a novel technique
Kansoun Alaa a.kanso@hotmail.com
a⁎
Omouri Adel b
Hamed Sami a
a Department of Visceral and Endocrine Surgery, Saint Joseph Hospital, Marseille 13008, France
b Department of Viscerale Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Marseille, France
⁎ Corresponding author at: Marseille, France. a.kanso@hotmail.com
15 8 2024
9 2024
15 8 2024
122 11017825 7 2024
10 8 2024
14 8 2024
© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Limited.
2024

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction and importance

GIST (Gastro Intestinal Stromal Tumor) treatment is surgical however surgical resection, especially for gGIST (gastric GIST), may be challenging due to location of tumor and the possible sequelae post resection.

Case presentation

We present a case of 66-year-old female presented for the management of gGIST. We opted for transgastric resection assisted by robot. The resection was with free surgical margins for a 4 cm GIST tumor low in grade.

Clinical discussion

Classical wedge resection of gastric tumors poses post-operative complications especially if the tumor is located near the cardia or pylorus. Various minimally invasive techniques were described aiming to avoid post-operative complications as in stenosis and gastric reflux.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive transgastric resection of gGIST tumor seems to be worth of attention for it can prevent stenosis, hemorrhage and can preserve gastric tissue. Further studies need to be involved to endorse this technique.

Highlights

• Gastro Intestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) are mesenchymal tumors that develop most commonly in the stomach.

• For tumors located on the lesser curvature, or those close to the cardia or pylorus, a classic gastrectomy may be necessary.

• Laparoscopic transgastric resection can be safe and effective in terms of hospital stay, morbidity and on oncological level.

Keywords

gGIST
Tumor
Stomach
Minimally invasive
Transgastric
==== Body
pmc1 Introduction

Gastro Intestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) are mesenchymal tumors that develop most commonly in the stomach followed by the small intestine and rarely in rectum, colon, or esophagus [1]. The term GIST was found by Mazur and Clark since 1983 [2]. The incidence is about 15 cases/million per year according to French and global epidemiology statistics [1,3]. Notably, equal ratios between males and females are reported [1]. Furthermore, the only potentially curative treatment is surgical resection, precisely R0 resection [4,5]. To date, laparoscopic is preferable to open resection of gastric GIST (gGIST) in terms of morbidity and hospital stay [6]. Moreover, laparoscopic resection is gold standard for small tumors [1] and recent reports have shown that laparoscopy is feasible and safe even for tumors larger than 2 cm [7]. Regarding the location of GIST and narrowing it to gastric, since it is the one that concerns us, the stomach poses technical challenges for resection. For instance, in the case of tumors on the lesser curvature of the stomach or ones close to cardia or pylorus, wedge resection or even typical gastrectomy may be necessary to resect gGIST [1]. Interestingly, previous reports have shown that laparoscopic transgastric resection can be safe and effective in terms of hospital stay, morbidity and on oncological level [8]. Thus, we are eager to present a case of gGIST tumor managed by minimally invasive technique so called ‘laparoscopic transgastric’ approach. This case was reported in accordance with the SCARE criteria 2023 [9].

2 Case report

It is a case of 66-year-old female with a past medical history of idiopathic pericarditis and a past surgical history of oophorectomy for endometriosis. The patient has no allergy and is not a smoker nor alcoholic. In addition, she has a paternal history of gastric adenocarcinoma. The patient was complaining of symptoms of pyrosis with dysphonia, which alarmed her gastroenterologist to undergo a gastroscopy. In fact, they discovered a tumor at the lesser curvature of the stomach about 4 cm in size (Fig. 1).Fig. 1 A photo during gastroscopy showing the tumor arising from the lesser curvature of gastric wall, projecting into the gastric lumen.

Fig. 1

An attempt to excise the tumor endoscopically had failed. However, during echo endoscopy (Fig. 2) the tumor was well identified and a biopsy was taken to confirm the presence of GIST. The workup was completed by a TAP (Thoracic-abdomen-pelvis) scanner, which showed the tumor (Fig. 3) and a lesion situated on segment 7 of the liver. A MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) was done to rule out metastasis, and indeed it was compatible with hemangioma. We discussed the case with other colleagues from gastroenterology, radiology and oncology departments during our regular staff meeting and we ruled in the indication of surgical resection. Taking into account the location of the tumor, we were hesitant to do a classic atypical resection of the stomach with a healthy margin knowing that this may leave the patient with a high risk of stenosis. On the other hand, a total gastrectomy seemed to be aggressive for such a benign disease. So, we decided to raise the standard and try a new technically- challenging procedure using robot and laparoscopy in order to resect the tumor from within the stomach. Indication to resection was the tumor size being >2 cm. The tumor was resected according to the technique described in the next section and the pathology report showed negative margins of a 4.5 cm GIST. In addition, the mitotic index was <5 and it was classified as low grade pT2N0M0. The hospital stay was without any complications; the naso-gastric tube was removed the next day as well as the foley catheter. Furthermore, water then food were allowed progressively and at day 3 she was able to eat normally. Biologically, no inflammatory signs were detected and we did not find any indication that would trigger radiological control.Fig. 2 Echo-endoscopy image showing the tumor (blue-pointed line). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 2

Fig. 3 Scanner showing the gGIST tumor via the sagittal, coronal and the axial cut retrospectively. The tumor being pointed by the red arrow. gGIST: gastric Gastro Intestinal Stromal Tumor. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 3

3 Operative technique

Under general anesthesia, the patient was in dorsal decubitus French position. Pneumoperitoneum was accomplished via Veress needle at the Palmer point. A total of 4 trocars were inserted; 3 trocars were inserted in a lateral semicircular position in the supra umbilical and the left upper quadrant position of the abdomen, in addition to 1 trocar in the right upper quadrant region. Precisely, we inserted one 5-mm trocar, two 10-mm trocars and one 12-mm trocar for the endo GIA (Gastro Intestinal Anastomosis) stapler. Exploration of the abdominal cavity was evident of bulging – representing our tumor- at the lesser curvature of the stomach close to the cardia. However, no carcinosis, hepatic metastasis or other findings were marked. Decision was taken to apply three incisions on the anterior wall of the stomach to have access into the gastric lumen. By laparoscopy, we advanced the 12 mm, 10 mm and 5 mm balloon- trocars into the stomach as shown in (Fig. 4).Fig. 4 An illustration showing the trocars introduced into the stomach, the liver being pushed by the liver retractor, the spleen in proximity with the stomach and the tumor at the lesser curvature in proximity to the cardia.

Fig. 4

Insufflation of the stomach was restricted to 8 mmHg. Notably; we did not find it necessary to clamp the duodenum; however, we inserted a calibration tube into the esophagus to prevent stenosis. The tumor was identified to be approximately 4 cm in size and 2 cm away from the cardia (Fig. 5). It was narrower on the base resembling to a stalk hence allowing it to be stapled. No other lesions were identified inside the stomach. Three violet Endo GIA cartridges of 4.5 cm were used to accomplish the resection of the tumor (Fig. 5). Notably, using the left trocar we double-checked before stapling that no other organ was injured before firing.Fig. 5 Intra gastric laparoscopic view showing, successively, the tumor, the stapling and the final result.

Fig. 5

The lesion was put into an EndoCatch bag and sent to analysis. Notably, the specimen was intact without fragmentation. Interestingly, we were able to identify bleeding at the level of staple line and it was managed by a suture. Moreover, the stomach wall was examined laparoscopically, hence, we double-checked and ruled out stenosis and/or hemorrhage. The balloon- trocars were removed and, with the assistance of the robot da Vinci X, we closed the stomach incisions by V-lock 3/0.Peritoneal toilette was done and the aponeurosis was closed by Vicryl 0 and skin by Caprosyn 3/0.

4 Discussion

Laparoscopic resection is not contra-indicated for large tumors [10] as long as the principles of safe margins are preserved. For instance, various techniques were described to accomplish minimally invasive approach insuring free margin resection. One of them is enucleation; however, it is not recommended at least according to the TNCD (Thesaurus National de Cancerologie Digestive), the French cancerology guidelines [1], and to other previous reports due to the high risk of recurrence [11]. On the other hand, and thanks to the presence of stapling devices, wedge resection is becoming the most widely used method to resect gastric tumors including gGIST. Unfortunately, adopting this technique can't be universal for all tumors especially for intraluminal ones or tumors on posterior gastric wall, close to pylorus or juxta cardia tumors [12]. Moreover, wedge resection can be associated with stomach deformity, stenosis and gastric reflux [12]. Actually, previous reports [11,12] showed that wedge resection depends on the redundancy and mobility in parts of the stomach as in fundus and the greater curvature. However, this elasticity is lacking in locations as the lesser curvature, which renders wedge resection limited as a choice [13]. Interestingly, a method called ‘lift and cut’ described by Okumura et al. in 2016 showed that, due to the extensibility of mucosa and submucosa, the tumor can be everted into the abdominal cavity and thus stapled with safe oncological margins [14]. Another method described in 2011 by Jung Ho Shim is similar to our technique as in introducing balloon-trocars into the stomach in order to access the tumor. This latter report showed that the approach is safe and feasible [15]. Actually, Ohashi already described the technique we described back in 1995 [16] where he named it ‘laparoscopic intragastric surgery’ whereby he operated on 8 patients following this technique and monitoring its effectiveness.

Benefits of minimally invasive resection of gGIST seems to be of significant importance; as in to avoid total gastrectomy for tumor locations near the cardia or on the lesser curvature. Furthermore, it prevents the risk of stenosis, especially if the tumor is located near the cardia. On the other hand, using our technique, instant hemostatic control can be secured due to direct inspection of the intra gastric lumen. For such a disease that rarely necessitates lymph node dissection, a minimally invasive technique of resection, as the one described by us, seems to be worth of attention and to be applied in practice.

5 Study limitations

More studies are needed, especially, prospective ones in order to have this technique as a gold standard at least for tumors close to cardia or pylorus or on lesser curvature of the stomach.

6 Conclusion

Various operative techniques have been described to manage gGIST tumors. Our technique, although difficult, challenges surgeons to prevent stenosis, hemorrhage and to preserve gastric tissue. This report aims to highlight the effectiveness of laparoscopic trans-gastric resection in the era where minimally invasive approach is becoming more and more demanded.

Abbreviations

GIST gastro intestinal stromal tumor

gGIST gastric gastro intestinal stromal tumor

TAP thoracic-abdomen-pelvis

MRI magnetic resonance imaging

TNCD Thesaurus National de Cancerologie Digestive

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.

Provenance and peer review

Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.

Ethical approval

The study type is exempt from ethical approval except for approval from the patient according to the protocol of the Saint Joseph Hospital-Marseille.

Funding

None.

Author contribution

Writing the paper: KANSOUN ALAA.

Data collection: OMOURI ADEL, KANSOUN ALAA.

Interpretation: KANSOUN ALAA.

Supervision: HAMED SAMI.

Guarantor

Alaa Kansoun.

Research registration number

N/A.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mrs. Sarah Ghazarian for taking the time to proof-read the paper.
==== Refs
References

1 Landi B. Blay J.Y. Bonvalot S. Brasseur M. Coindre J.M. Emile J.F. Hautefeuille V. Honore C. Lartigau E. Mantion G. Pracht M. Le Cesne A. Ducreux M. Bouche O. Thésaurus National de Cancérologie Digestive (TNCD) Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs): French Intergroup Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO) Dig. Liver Dis. 51 9 Sep 2019 1223 1231 10.1016/j.dld.2019.07.006 31387778
2 Mazur M.T. Clark H.B. Gastric stromal tumors: reappraisal of histogenesis Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 7 1983 507 519 6625048
3 Soreidi K. Sandovik O.M. Soreide J.A. Giljaca V. Jureckova A. Bulusu V.R. Global epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): a systematic review of population-based cohort studies Cancer Epidemiol. 40 2016 39 46 10.1016/j.anep.2015.10.031 26618334
4 Casali P.G. Abecassis N. Bauer S. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: ESMOEUROCAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Ann. Oncol. 33 2022 20 33 34560242
5 von Mehren M. Randall R.L. Benjamin R.S. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, version 2.2014 J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 12 2014 853 862
6 Bellorin O. Kundel A. Ni M. Litong D. Surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach JSLS 18 1 Jan-Mar 2014 46 49 10.4293/108680813X13693422522150 (PMID: 24680142; PMCID: PMC3939341) 24680142
7 De Vogelaere K. Van Loo I. Peters O. Hoorens A. Haentjens P. Delvaux G. Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is safe and effective, irrespective of tumor size Surg. Endosc. 26 8 Aug 2012 2339 2345 10.1007/s00464-012-2186-7 (Epub 2012 Feb 21. PMID: 22350238) 22350238
8 Arora E. Gala J. Nanavati A. Patil A. Bhandarwar A. Laparoscopic transgastric resection of a large gastric GIST: a case report and review of literature Surg. J. (N Y) 7 4 Dec 15 2021 e337 e341 10.1055/s-0041-1739116 (PMID: 34934813; PMCID: PMC8679662) 34934813
9 Sohrabi C. Mathew G. Maria N. Kerwan A. Franchi T. Agha R.A. The SCARE 2023 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines Int. J. Surg. Lond. Engl. 109 5 2023 1136
10 Koh Y.X. Chok A.Y. Zheng H.L. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach Ann. Surg. Oncol. 20 2013 3549 3560 23793362
11 Siow S.L. Mahendran H.A. Wong C.M. Laparoscopic transgastric resection for intraluminal gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors located at the posterior wall and near the gastroesophageal junction Asian J. Surg. 40 2017 407 414 26922628
12 Honda M. Hiki N. Nunobe S. Long-term and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors Surg. Endosc. 28 2014 2317 2322 24566748
13 Privette A. McCahill L. Borrazzo E. Single R.M. Zubarik R. Laparoscopic approaches to resection of suspected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on tumor location Surg. Endosc. 22 2008 487 494 17712592
14 Okumura S. Kanaya S. Hosogi H. Ito T. Miura S. Okada T. Shimoike N. Akagawa S. Kawada H. Arimoto A. Our experience with laparoscopic partial gastrectomy by the ‘lift-and-cut method’ for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor with maximal preservation of the remnant stomach Surg. Endosc. 31 8 Aug 2017 3398 3404 10.1007/s00464-016-5367-y (Epub 2016 Dec 6. PMID: 27924391) 27924391
15 Shim Jung Ho Lee Han Hong Yoo Han Mo Jeon Hae Myung Park Cho Hyun Kim Jun Gi Song Kyo Young Intragastric approach for submucosal tumors located near the Z-line: a hybrid laparoscopic and endoscopic technique J. Surg. Oncol. 104 2011 312 315 10.1002/jso.21934 21465489
16 Ohashi S. Laparoscopic intraluminal (intragastric) surgery for early gastric cancer. A new concept in laparoscopic surgery Surg. Endosc. 9 1995 169 171 7597587
