
==== Front
BMC Ophthalmol
BMC Ophthalmol
BMC Ophthalmology
1471-2415
BioMed Central London

3634
10.1186/s12886-024-03634-z
Research
Effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor on early-stage post-vitrectomy macular edema in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Zhou Hantao 1
Zhang Jiayu 2
Guo Binghua 1
Lin Jue 1
Mei Jinghao 1
Deng Chuying 1
Wu Ronghan 1
Zheng Qinxiang qinxiangzheng@wmu.edu.cn

1
Lin Zhong linzhong@eye.ac.cn

1
1 https://ror.org/00rd5t069 grid.268099.c 0000 0001 0348 3990 National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027 China
2 https://ror.org/011b9vp56 grid.452885.6 The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Ruian, Zhejiang Province 325200 China
6 9 2024
6 9 2024
2024
24 39817 6 2024
13 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Purpose

To investigate the effectiveness of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy on post-vitrectomy macular edema (PVME) and determine the risk factors for PVME recovery.

Methods

This retrospective study included 179 eyes of 179 patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy and developed PVME within 3 months after surgery. Eyes were grouped according to postoperative anti-VEGF treatment.

Results

Central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased significantly from baseline to 3-month follow-up in groups with (509.9 ± 157.2 μm vs. 401.2 ± 172.1 μm, P < 0.001) or without (406.1 ± 96.1 μm vs. 355.1 ± 126.0 μm, P = 0.008) postoperative anti-VEGF treatment. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) did not differ between the two groups during follow-up. In the group not receiving anti-VEGF therapy, BCVA was significantly improved at 1, 2, and 3 months (P = 0.007, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively), while in the anti-VEGF group, BCVA was significantly improved at 1 and 3 months (P = 0.03 and P < 0.001). A thicker baseline CRT (β = 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.26–0.61; P < 0.001) was significantly associated with decreasing CRT.

Conclusion

PVME tends to spontaneously resolve in the early postoperative period. The effect of anti-VEGF therapy in the first 3 months after diagnosis appears to be limited.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-024-03634-z.

Keywords

Diabetic macular edema
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Vitrectomy
Postoperative
Anti–vascular endothelial growth factor
Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under GrantLY20H120002 Wenzhou Basic Medical and Health Technology ProjectY2023173 Zhejiang Provincial High Level Health Talents Training ProjectCZ-RC2022010 issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Nearly all patients with diabetes mellitus eventually develop diabetic retinopathy, a microvascular disease of the retina [1, 2]. Two diabetic retinopathy complications cause vision loss: diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

DME is characterized by accumulation of exudative fluid in the macula. Although its mechanism has not been completely elucidated, blood–retina barrier disruption and increased vascular permeability caused by upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and inflammatory cytokines as well as accumulation of advanced glycation end products are thought to be involved [3, 4]. When diabetic retinopathy progresses to PDR, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) may be required to remove vitreous opacities, fibrovascular proliferation and retinal traction; separate and excise the thickened posterior hyaloid; treat retinal detachment; and improve retinal ischemia [5, 6]. Despite recent advances in PPV, post-vitrectomy macular edema (PVME) is common and may hinder postoperative visual recovery in patients with PDR. One retrospective cohort study of 100 patients with PDR who underwent primary PPV reported that 11 developed PVME and received additional treatment [7]. A secondary analysis of this cohort showed a significant association between insulin treatment and reduced risk of PVME [8].

Development of PVME is associated with elevated levels of various cytokines, including interleukins, TNF-α, CXCL9, G-CSF, MCP-1, and RANTES [9, 10]. PVME after PPV for PDR is treated in the same way as DME clinically: intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF in conjunction with optimizing control of blood glucose, blood pressure, and blood lipids. However, the effect of anti-VEGF may be limited in certain cases [11–15].

Few studies have examined the effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapy on PVME. Therefore, this study aimed to do so. Moreover, we investigated potential risk factors for PVME recovery.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients who underwent PPV for PDR from January 2018 to March 2022 in the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University and developed PVME within 3 months of surgery. Patient data were obtained from archived electronic medical records. Patients with a history of PPV, penetrating ocular trauma, or any other ocular conditions which are associated with ME formation were excluded. We also excluded patients with less than 3 months of follow-up or non-gradable ME on optical coherence tomography and those who underwent silicone oil tamponade or any intraocular surgery within 3 months of PPV. Patients who experienced a serious postoperative complication, such as neovascular glaucoma, retinal artery occlusion, or endophthalmitis were excluded as well. Eyes were grouped according to postoperative anti-VEGF treatment status. The study only enrolled the right eye if a patient had both eyes that matched the criteria. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Human Ethics Committee Institutional Review Board of the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University before commencement (approval number: 2022-J-117). Informed consent was waived since the data analyzed in this study were deidentified.

The 23- or 25-gauge PPVs were performed under retrobulbar (50% mixture of 2% lidocaine and 0.75% bupivacaine) or general anesthesia using a Stellaris PC (Bausch & Lomb, Bridgewater Township, NJ, USA) or Constellation Vision System (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA) vitrectomy machine. Peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) or epiretinal membrane and any other additional procedures were performed at the surgeon’s discretion. Moreover, the choice of anti-VEGF agents and treatment decision was left to the physician’s discretion.

Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) was performed with a 30° scanning angle (9 × 9 mm) at the central macula for image acquisition and analysis. Central retinal thickness (CRT) was measured at the central 1-mm region of the standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study subfield. The diagnosis of PVME was confirmed if the CRT was over 300 μm [16, 17]. PVME was categorized in to three subgroups: diffuse retinal thickening (DRT), a sponge-like retinal swelling of the macula with reduced intraretinal reflectivity; cystoid macular edema (CME), intraretinal cystoid spaces of low reflectivity and highly reflective septa separating cystoid-like cavities in the macular area; and serous retinal detachment (SRD), a shallow elevation of the retina and an optically clear space between the neurosensory retina and retinal pigment epithelium [18]. CRT and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were recorded at baseline (time of PVME diagnosis) and during follow-up. Change in CRT was calculated as the difference between the baseline and 3-month follow-up CRT values. PDR was categorized as follows: stage 1, neovascularization of the retina, vitreous hemorrhage, or preretinal hemorrhage; stage 2, stage 1 criteria plus the presence of fibrovascular membranes; and stage 3, stage 2 criteria plus the presence of tractional retinal detachment [19].

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R software (version 4.2.2, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Visual acuities in the decimal system were converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) values. A BCVA value < 0.01 was recorded as logMAR 2.0. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square or Fisher exact test as appropriate. Continuous variables with a non-normal distribution were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test; those with a normal distribution were compared using the independent t-test. Baseline and follow-up CRT values were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison testing. BCVA was compared between the groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Baseline and follow-up BCVA values were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. All variables with a P-value < 0.1 in univariate liner regression analysis or variables considered clinically meaningful were entered into multivariate liner regression analysis to examine risk factors influencing the change in CRT. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to balance the heterogeneity. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 179 eyes from 179 patients were included for analysis. The mean patient age was 57.1 ± 10.5 years. One hundred eleven patients were men (62.0%). Patient characteristics in the anti-VEGF and no anti-VEGF groups are shown in Table 1. The groups significantly differed in terms of PDR grade (P = 0.03), DME before PPV (P = 0.01), time for diagnosis of PVME (P = 0.02), and pattern of PVME (P = 0.007). Baseline CRT was significantly greater in the anti-VEGF group (509.9 ± 157.2 μm vs. 406.1 ± 96.1 μm; P < 0.001). The mean number of injections per patient in the anti-VEGF group was 2.2 ± 0.7 within 3 months follow-up.

Table 1 Patient characteristics according to group

Category	No anti-VEGF group
(n = 100)	Anti-VEGF group
(n = 79)	P-value	
Age (mean ± SD, years)	57.4 ± 10.7	56.6 ± 10.4	0.64	
Gender (n, %)

 Male

 Female

	62 (62.0)

38 (38.0)

	49 (62.0)

30 (38.0)

	0.99	
Laterality (n, %)

 Right

 Left

	50 (50.0)

50 (50.0)

	42 (53.2)

37 (46.8)

	0.67	
Grade of PDR (n, %)

 Stage 1

 Stage 2

 Stage 3

	33 (33.0)

34 (34.0)

33 (33.0)

	32 (40.5)

36 (45.6)

11 (13.9)

	0.03	
Duration of DM (n, %)

 < 10 years

 10 ~ 20 years

 ≥20 years

	26 (26.0)

47 (47.0)

27 (27.0)

	24 (30.4)

39 (49.4)

16 (20.3)

	0.31	
HbA1c (mean ± SD, %)	8.0 ± 1.5	8.1 ± 1.7	0.96	
FPG (mean ± SD, mmol/L)	8.2 ± 2.9	8.3 ± 2.5	0.77	
ILM peeling during vitrectomy (n, %)

 No

 Yes

	26 (26.0)

74 (74.0)

	22 (27.8)

57 (72.2)

	0.78	
Combined cataract surgery during vitrectomy (n, %)

 No

 Yes

	19 (19.0)

81 (81.0)

	10 (12.7)

69 (87.3)

	0.25	
DME before vitrectomy (n, %)

 No

 Yes

	20 (30.8)

45 (69.2)

	30 (53.6)

26 (46.4)

	0.01	
Time for diagnosis of PVME (mean ± SD, days)	13.6 ± 14.4	19.3 ± 18.2	0.02	
CRT (mean ± SD, µm)	406.1 ± 96.1	509.9 ± 157.2	< 0.001	
BCVA (logMAR) *	0.8 (0.5, 1.5)	0.8 (0.5, 1.3)	0.71	
Pattern of PVME (n, %)

 CME

 DRT

 SRD

	36 (36.0)

57 (57.0)

7 (7.0)

	40 (50.6)

27 (34.2)

12 (15.2)

	0.007	
Number of injections	-	2.2 ± 0.7	-	
VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; SD, standard deviation; PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; DM, diabetes mellitus; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; ILM, internal limiting membrane; DME, diabetic macular edema; PVME, post-vitrectomy macular edema; CRT, central retinal thickness; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; CME, cystoid macular edema; DRT, diffuse retinal thickening; SRD, serous retinal detachment

*Presented as medians (interquartile range) and tested using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test

Figure 1 shows the changes in CRT over time in both groups during follow-up. In the no anti-VEGF group, CRT decreased from 406.1 ± 96.1 μm at baseline to 383.9 ± 116.9 μm at 1 month (P = 0.57), 375.6 ± 137.0 μm at 2 months (P = 0.22), and 355.1 ± 126.0 μm at 3 months (P = 0.008). In contrast, CRT in the anti-VEGF group significantly decreased from 509.9 ± 157.2 μm at baseline to 436.3 ± 164.1 μm at 1 month (P = 0.02), 432.8 ± 166.6 μm at 2 months (P = 0.01), and 401.2 ± 172.1 μm at 3 months (P < 0.001).

Fig. 1 Central retinal thickness (CRT) values in the (a) no anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) group and (b) anti-VEGF group at baseline and during follow-up. ns, not significant; *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001

BCVA values over time are shown in Table 2. BCVA did not significantly differ between the groups at any point. In the no anti-VEGF group, BCVA was significantly improved over baseline at 1, 2 and 3 months (P = 0.007, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). In the anti-VEGF group, BCVA was significantly improved at 1 and 3 months (P = 0.03 and P < 0.001).

Table 2 Visual acuity over time

BCVA
(IQR, logMAR)	No anti-VEGF group	Anti-VEGF group	P-value	
Baseline	0.8 (0.5, 1.5)	0.8 (0.5, 1.3)	0.71	
1 month	0.6 (0.4, 1.0) *	0.6 (0.3, 1.0) *	0.96	
2 months	0.5 (0.3, 1.0) *	0.7 (0.4, 1.0)	0.09	
3 months	0.5 (0.2, 0.8) *	0.5 (0.3, 0.8) *	0.75	
BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; IQR, interquartile range; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor

*Significant difference compared to baseline (P < 0.05)

Thicker baseline CRT (β = 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.26–0.61; P < 0.001) was significantly associated with decreasing CRT; anti-VEGF therapy was not (Table 3).

Table 3 Multivariate linear regression analysis of risk factors influencing change in central retinal thickness

Category	Multi-factor analysis	
β (95% CI)	P-value	
Age (years)	-0.47 (-2.68 to 1.74)	0.68	
Gender (male vs. female)	39.37 (-6.44 to 85.19)	0.09	
Grade of PDR

 Stage 1

 Stage 2

 Stage 3

	Ref

-15.91 (-70.25 to 38.43)

-19.71 (-81.67 to 42.26)

	0.56

0.53

	
HbA1c (%)	2.81 (-13.10 to 18.73)	0.73	
FPG (mmol/L)	3.00 (-6.24 to 12.25)	0.52	
Baseline CRT (µm)	0.44 (0.26 to 0.61)	< 0.001	
Baseline BCVA (logMAR)	14.35 (-22.39 to 51.08)	0.44	
Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF	-2.54 (-51.00 to 45.92)	0.92	
CI, confidence interval; PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; CRT, central retinal thickness; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; logMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor

Propensity score matching resulted in 50 matched pairs of patients. Patient characteristics of the matched pairs are shown in Supplementary Table 1. CRT did not significantly differ between the two groups during the follow-up period after matching (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Discussion

In this study of patients who developed ME early after PPV for PDR, CRT showed a decreasing trend in the first 3 months after the diagnosis of ME regardless of anti-VEGF treatment. Furthermore, BCVA did not significantly differ between patients who received anti-VEGF treatment and those who did not. Thicker CRT at the time of PVME diagnosis was significantly associated with decreasing CRT in the follow-up period.

Anti-VEGF therapy is currently the first-line treatment for DME because it improves retinal hypoxia and inflammation by inhibiting both VEGF and downstream inflammatory cytokines, which suppresses leukocyte chemotaxis and adhesion in the retinal vessels [20]. However, anti-VEGF therapy is not always effective. Bressler et al. reported that DME persisted in almost 50% of patients after six monthly intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF [11]. Adding a steroid to anti-VEGF treatment in DME patients may reduce CRT, improve BCVA, and reduce anti-VEGF treatment frequency, suggesting that inflammation plays an important role in DME [12–14]. This view is consistent with our previous study which found that intraoperative injection of triamcinolone acetonide prevents PVME after PPV for PDR but preoperative and intraoperative injection of anti-VEGF does not (unpublished). In a 3-year natural history study, sham-treated DME patients with no history of PPV showed a decreasing trend in CRT [21]. Chen et al. reported that most patients with DME exhibit a stable CRT without treatment over a median duration of 8 months, providing additional evidence that DME tends to progress slowly [22]. Notably, this slow progression is not limited to non-vitrectomized eyes with DME. Behera et al. examined treatment of eyes with DME after PPV and found a statistically significant reduction in CRT regardless of DME treatment; in addition, changes in CRT and BCVA were comparable in treated patients and those who were simply observed [15].

Few studies have reported the natural history of early-stage new-onset PVME or the effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapy. Yang et al. reported that macular thickening and macular cystic change after vitrectomy for PDR was developed in 37% and 28.7% of patients, respectively, and improvement of both abnormalities spontaneously or after triamcinolone acetonide treatment was observed in some cases [23]. In a retrospective multicenter observational study in India, DME post PPV showed a significant reduction in central subfield thickness and vision gain whether treated or not, suggesting DME post PPV may not require immediate treatment [15]. It is worth noting that the study above had a mean latency of 6.8 ± 6.8 months of DME post PPV, while this study focused more on early post PPV period, with a mean latency of 16.1 ± 16.3 days. In this study, a greater reduction of CRT was associated with thicker baseline CRT, probably because a thicker CRT has greater potential for reduction, regardless of anti-VEGF therapy. After adjusting for confounding factors using multivariate linear regression, use of anti-VEGF therapy did not show a significant effect on either CRT reduction or BCVA improvement. This suggests that PVME is mainly caused by postoperative inflammation and microstructural damage to a vulnerable vascular bed, poor endothelial integrity, and loss of pericytes in patients with PDR, which may recover spontaneously and gradually within 3 months of diagnosis. PPV shifts the vitreous towards a more antiangiogenic environment, as evidenced by reduced levels of angiopoietin-2, hepatocyte growth factor, and VEGF [24, 25]. However, PPV seems to be unsatisfactory for controlling intraocular inflammation [9, 10]. Even after successful PPV, elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines may persist, indicating prolonged inflammation, which may cause PVME [9, 10]. Therefore, the effect of anti-VEGF therapy seems to be limited. Moreover, the lower half-lives and increased clearance of anti-VEGF drugs in vitrectomized eyes may reduce their effects and necessitate an increase in frequency of treatments. More frequent intravitreal injections have been associated with ocular pain, ischemic retinopathy, endophthalmitis, raised intraocular pressure, glaucoma and an overall increase in the cost of treatment [26–29].

This study has several limitations. Its retrospective design is a major limitation. Furthermore, because of the short follow-up period, the assessment of the effect of anti-VEGF on PVME was incomplete. However, it is worth mentioning that this study focused more on the early postoperative period. Lastly, instead of using the ETDRS chart to present BCVA, BCVA in decimal system was converted to logMAR values. Although this strategy was widely used, it still may cause a slight bias.

Conclusion

Spontaneous recovery of PVME had a similar trend as compared to those with anti-VEGF therapy. A reduction in CRT was more apparent in patients who presented with a greater baseline CRT.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Acknowledgements

We thank Liwen Bianji (Edanz) (https://www.liwenbianji.cn) for editing the language of a draft of this manuscript.

Author contributions

ZL had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: ZL and HTZ. Acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data: ZL, HTZ, JYZ, BHG, JHM, CYD, and JL. Drafting of the manuscript: ZL and HTZ. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: all authors. Administrative, technical, or material support: ZL, QXZ, and RHW. Study supervision: ZL.

Funding

Wenzhou Basic Medical and Health Technology Project (No. Y2023173); Zhejiang Provincial High Level Health Talents Training Project (No. CZ-RC2022010); Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant (No. LY20H120002).

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethical approval

The research protocol complies with the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Human Ethics Committee Institutional Review Board of the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (approval number: 2022-J-117). Informed consent was waived since the data analyzed in this study were deidentified.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Hantao Zhou and Jiayu Zhang contributed equally to Co-first authors.
==== Refs
References

1. Kollias AN, Ulbig MW. Diabetic retinopathy: early diagnosis and effective treatment. Volume 107. Deutsches Arzteblatt International; 2010. 5.
2. Cheung N Mitchell P Wong TY Diabetic retinopathy Lancet (London England) 2010 376 9735 124 36 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62124-3 20580421
Cheung N, Mitchell P, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy. Lancet (London England). 2010;376(9735):124–36.20580421 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62124-3
3. Bhagat N et al. Diabetic macular edema: pathogenesis and treatment. Surv Ophthalmol, 2009. 54(1).
4. Tan GS Diabetic macular oedema Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017 5 2 143 55 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30052-3 27496796
Tan GS, et al. Diabetic macular oedema. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(2):143–55.27496796 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30052-3
5. Berrocal MH Acaba LA Acaba A Surgery for Diabetic Eye complications Curr Diab Rep 2016 16 10 99 10.1007/s11892-016-0787-6 27612846
Berrocal MH, Acaba LA, Acaba A. Surgery for Diabetic Eye complications. Curr Diab Rep. 2016;16(10):99.27612846 10.1007/s11892-016-0787-6
6. Mason JO Visual outcome and risk factors for light perception and no light perception vision after vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy Am J Ophthalmol 2005 140 2 231 5 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.02.052 15992755
Mason JO, et al. Visual outcome and risk factors for light perception and no light perception vision after vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(2):231–5.15992755 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.02.052
7. Nishi K Factors correlated with visual outcomes at two and four years after vitreous surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy PLoS ONE 2021 16 1 e0244281 10.1371/journal.pone.0244281 33444332
Nishi K, et al. Factors correlated with visual outcomes at two and four years after vitreous surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(1):e0244281.33444332 10.1371/journal.pone.0244281
8. Lei C Zhang Y Zhang M The association between different hypoglycemic regimens and postoperative diabetic macular edema after vitrectomy in the Japanese patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy Front Endocrinol 2022 13 764254 10.3389/fendo.2022.764254
Lei C, Zhang Y, Zhang M. The association between different hypoglycemic regimens and postoperative diabetic macular edema after vitrectomy in the Japanese patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:764254.10.3389/fendo.2022.764254
9. Yoshida S Increased vitreous concentrations of MCP-1 and IL-6 after vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy: possible association with postoperative macular oedema Br J Ophthalmol 2015 99 7 960 6 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306366 25631486
Yoshida S, et al. Increased vitreous concentrations of MCP-1 and IL-6 after vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy: possible association with postoperative macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(7):960–6.25631486 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306366
10. Sun H Vitreous inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, not altered after preoperative adjunctive conbercept injection, but Associated with Early Postoperative Macular Edema in patients with proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Front Physiol 2022 13 846003 10.3389/fphys.2022.846003 35309074
Sun H, et al. Vitreous inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, not altered after preoperative adjunctive conbercept injection, but Associated with Early Postoperative Macular Edema in patients with proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. Front Physiol. 2022;13:846003.35309074 10.3389/fphys.2022.846003
11. Bressler NM Persistent Macular Thickening following Intravitreous Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Central-involved Diabetic Macular Edema with Vision Impairment: a secondary analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA Ophthalmol 2018 136 3 257 69 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6565 29392288
Bressler NM, et al. Persistent Macular Thickening following Intravitreous Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Central-involved Diabetic Macular Edema with Vision Impairment: a secondary analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136(3):257–69.29392288 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6565
12. Elman MJ et al. Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology, 2010. 117(6).
13. Maturi RK Effect of adding dexamethasone to continued Ranibizumab treatment in patients with Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema: a DRCR Network Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA Ophthalmol 2018 136 1 29 38 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4914 29127949
Maturi RK, et al. Effect of adding dexamethasone to continued Ranibizumab treatment in patients with Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema: a DRCR Network Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136(1):29–38.29127949 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4914
14. Shimura M Reduction in the frequency of intravitreal bevacizumab administrations achieved by posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema Jpn J Ophthalmol 2016 60 5 401 7 10.1007/s10384-016-0458-9 27306783
Shimura M, et al. Reduction in the frequency of intravitreal bevacizumab administrations achieved by posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2016;60(5):401–7.27306783 10.1007/s10384-016-0458-9
15. Behera UC Is immediate treatment necessary for diabetic macular edema after pars plana vitrectomy for tractional complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy? Int Ophthalmol 2021 41 11 3607 14 10.1007/s10792-021-01923-w 34170479
Behera UC, et al. Is immediate treatment necessary for diabetic macular edema after pars plana vitrectomy for tractional complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy? Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41(11):3607–14.34170479 10.1007/s10792-021-01923-w
16. Lai TT Huang JS Yeh PT Incidence and risk factors for cystoid macular edema following scleral buckling Eye 2017 31 4 566 71 10.1038/eye.2016.264 27935601
Lai TT, Huang JS, Yeh PT. Incidence and risk factors for cystoid macular edema following scleral buckling. Eye. 2017;31(4):566–71.27935601 10.1038/eye.2016.264
17. Boyer DS Three-year, randomized, sham-controlled trial of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with diabetic macular edema Ophthalmology 2014 121 10 1904 14 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.024 24907062
Boyer DS, et al. Three-year, randomized, sham-controlled trial of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(10):1904–14.24907062 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.024
18. Wu Q, et al. Detection of morphologic patterns of diabetic macular edema using a deep learning approach based on optical coherence tomography images. Volume 41. Philadelphia, Pa; 2021. pp. 1110–7. 5Retina.
19. Evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of diabetic retinopathy in China (2022) Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases, 2023, 39(2): 99–124.
20. Noma H, Yasuda K, Shimura M. Involvement of cytokines in the Pathogenesis of Diabetic Macular Edema. Int J Mol Sci, 2021. 22(7).
21. Yoon YH Natural history of diabetic macular edema and factors predicting outcomes in sham-treated patients (MEAD study) Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019 257 12 2639 53 10.1007/s00417-019-04464-2 31654188
Yoon YH, et al. Natural history of diabetic macular edema and factors predicting outcomes in sham-treated patients (MEAD study). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(12):2639–53.31654188 10.1007/s00417-019-04464-2
22. Chen H Optical coherence tomography analysis of patients with untreated diabetic macular edema Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2020 258 3 653 61 10.1007/s00417-019-04549-y 31879819
Chen H, et al. Optical coherence tomography analysis of patients with untreated diabetic macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258(3):653–61.31879819 10.1007/s00417-019-04549-y
23. Yang C-M Macular appearance after diabetic vitrectomy for fibrovascular proliferation: an optical coherence tomography study Acta Ophthalmol 2010 88 2 193 8 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01420.x 19094167
Yang C-M, et al. Macular appearance after diabetic vitrectomy for fibrovascular proliferation: an optical coherence tomography study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88(2):193–8.19094167 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01420.x
24. Yoshida S Antiangiogenic shift in vitreous after vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012 53 11 6997 7003 10.1167/iovs.12-9671 22977138
Yoshida S, et al. Antiangiogenic shift in vitreous after vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(11):6997–7003.22977138 10.1167/iovs.12-9671
25. Yoshida S Reduced concentrations of angiogenesis-related factors in vitreous after vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010 248 6 799 804 10.1007/s00417-010-1301-5 20135140
Yoshida S, et al. Reduced concentrations of angiogenesis-related factors in vitreous after vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;248(6):799–804.20135140 10.1007/s00417-010-1301-5
26. Edington M Connolly J Chong NV Pharmacokinetics of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2017 13 12 1217 24 10.1080/17425255.2017.1404987 29134820
Edington M, Connolly J, Chong NV. Pharmacokinetics of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2017;13(12):1217–24.29134820 10.1080/17425255.2017.1404987
27. Gunther JB Altaweel MM Bevacizumab (Avastin) for the treatment of ocular disease Surv Ophthalmol 2009 54 3 372 400 10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.02.004 19422965
Gunther JB, Altaweel MM. Bevacizumab (Avastin) for the treatment of ocular disease. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009;54(3):372–400.19422965 10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.02.004
28. Smiddy WE Clinical applications of cost analysis of diabetic macular edema treatments Ophthalmology 2012 119 12 2558 62 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.015 23062655
Smiddy WE. Clinical applications of cost analysis of diabetic macular edema treatments. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(12):2558–62.23062655 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.015
29. Falavarjani KG Nguyen QD Adverse events and complications associated with intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents: a review of literature Eye 2013 27 7 787 94 10.1038/eye.2013.107 23722722
Falavarjani KG, Nguyen QD. Adverse events and complications associated with intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents: a review of literature. Eye. 2013;27(7):787–94.23722722 10.1038/eye.2013.107
