
==== Front
Food Sci Anim Resour
Food Sci Anim Resour
Food Sci Anim Resour
Food Sci Anim Resour
kosfa
Food Science of Animal Resources
2636-0772
2636-0780
Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources

10.5851/kosfa.2024.e63
kosfa-44-5-967
Review
Current Status of Non-Thermal Sterilization by Pet Food Raw Ingredients
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6970-2380
Baek Ui-Bin 1
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5303-4595
Kim Hack-Youn 1 2 *
1 Department of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University, Yesan 32439, Korea
2 Resource Science Research Institute, Kongju National University, Yesan 32439, Korea
* Corresponding author : Hack-Youn Kim, Department of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University, Yesan 32439, Korea, Tel: +82-41-330-1241, Fax: +82-41-330-1249, E-mail: kimhy@kongju.ac.kr
9 2024
01 9 2024
44 5 967987
27 5 2024
17 7 2024
18 7 2024
© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract

Recently, as the concept of pet food that satisfies both nutritional needs and the five senses has evolved, so too has the demand for effective pet food non-thermal sterilization methods. Prominent non-thermal technologies include high-pressure processing, plasma, and radiation, which are favored for their ability to preserve nutrients, avoid residues, and minimize compositional changes, thereby maintaining quality and sensory properties. However, to assess their effectiveness on pet food, it is essential to optimize operational parameters such as pressure levels, plasma intensity, radiation dosage, and temperature. Further studies are needed to evaluate microbial sterilization efficacy and sensory attributes. This exploration is expected to lay the groundwork for preventing zoonotic diseases and improving the production of high-quality pet food.

pet food
non-thermal sterilization
high-pressure processing
plasma
radiation
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003627 Rural Development Administration RS-2023-00231378 crossmark2024-09-30
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

In recent years, the pet market, both domestically and internationally, has been expanding alongside an increase in pet-owning households. This growth is influenced by social phenomena such as aging, non-marriage, and urbanization, which have led to a rise in dual-income, no-kids (DINKs) households, nuclear families, and single-person households (Choe et al., 2023). As of 2022, one- and two-person households, which include DINKs, nuclear families, and single-person households, comprised 65% of the total household composition, significantly impacting pet ownership growth (Ministry of the Interior and Safety, 2023). According to the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (2023) “Announcement of 2022 public awareness survey on animal protection”, there were 6.02 million households with pets, representing 25.4% of all households. The pet market is anticipated to continue its growth trajectory, with projections showing an increase to 3.24 billion dollars in 2023, a 36.36% rise from 2.37 billion dollars in 2020 (Korea Rural Economic Institute, 2018).

The global pet market is broadly categorized into pet food, pet healthcare, pet services, and pet technology sectors. Among these, pet food dominated, accounting for approximately 70.94% (98.07 million dollars) of the total global pet market value of 138.24 million dollars as of 2020, marking it as the fastest-growing category (Gromek and Perek-Białas, 2022). In the Korean market, pet food represents 31.5% of the total pet-related industry and is growing at a rate of 5.4% annually (Korea Consumer Agency, 2021). Additionally, pet food constitutes 50.7% of the total pet care expenses, highlighting the expected growth in this sector (KB Management Research Institute, 2021).

The current trend in pet food is “pet humanization” which involves the anthropomorphization of pets. As part of this trend, pet foods such as “human grade”—made from ingredients safe for human consumption—and “raw food”—which consider the natural eating habits of pets—are being researched and developed (Ye et al., 2022). Additionally, many pet owners view their pets as family members, evidenced by neologisms such as “pet fam” and “pet me” in Korea, and “fur babies” and “fur family” in English-speaking countries (Rauktis et al., 2017; Seo, 2024). Consequently, pet food is developing from “feed” meant for herbivorous livestock to “food” intended for companion animals (Park et al., 2022). Therefore, for the pet food market to continue its expansion, it is crucial to manage protein-oriented animal feeds, distinct from traditional grain-oriented livestock feeds, and to establish effective non-thermal sterilization conditions for the distribution of pet food. Research on pet food forms, such as semi-wet, wet, and freeze-dried, which have better palatability than dry food, has significantly increased (Geary et al., 2023). However, semi-wet and wet pet foods, due to their higher moisture content, are more prone to microbial growth than dry pet foods (Watson et al., 2023). Moreover, health-conscious consumers (pet owners) prefer pet food without synthetic agents, which, while more natural, can deteriorate more quickly and require effective sterilization methods.

There are two main types of sterilization used to extend the shelf life of food: heat treatments such as warming, microwaves, and infrared radiation, and non-thermal treatments such as high-pressure processing (HPP), plasma, and radiation (Wang et al., 2023). Among these, heat treatments are the most common sterilization method, where food in various containers, such as pouches, cans, trays, and bottles, is heated directly or indirectly until the target sterilization temperature is reached (Barbosa-Cánovas et al., 2014). This process is crucial as it inhibits microbial activity, enhances flavor, and induces physical changes in food (Miri et al., 2008). However, heat treatment, typically at 121°C–140°C, can reduce quality characteristics such as flavor and color and destroy some nutritional components (Lazárková et al., 2011). Among nutritional components, proteins such as myoglobin are heat denatured at 30°C–35°C, and collagen begins denaturing at 58°C–65°C, disrupting the polypeptide structure (Vinnikova et al., 2019). Myoglobin, a plasma protein, changes color with heating—red at 60°C, pink at 60°C–70°C, and grayish-brown above 70°C–80°C—due to oxidation, significantly affecting the palatability of meat products (Han et al., 2024). Furthermore, the denaturation of collagen, a connective tissue protein, triggers protein hydrolysis, reducing its hardness; excessive heat denaturation can increase its toughness (Yu et al., 2017). Given the challenges associated with heat treatment, particularly for meat and fish raw ingredients rich in proteins, which are sensitive to heat, there is a transition to non-thermal sterilization technologies. These methods are being proposed as alternatives to traditional sterilization, especially for pet foods containing substantial amounts of animal protein (Lim and Ha, 2020; Shin, 2020).

Non-thermal sterilization is a technique that effectively minimizes the alteration of raw ingredients and inhibits microorganisms, incorporating physical treatments such as HPP, radiation, electric fields, and plasma, as well as chemical treatments using chemicals or cell wall-degrading enzymes (Song, 2020). With increasing consumer demand for high-quality foods that are healthful, safe from contamination, and free from synthetic products, non-thermal sterilization treatments are gaining attention as methods to ensure effective sterilization. Currently, non-thermal sterilization is primarily applied to raw food ingredients such as cereals, fruits and vegetables, seafood, and meat products, where traditional heating methods may reduce efficacy (Sunil et al., 2018). This technique halts the germination of grains, slows the ripening of fruits, inhibits the growth of parasites and microorganisms in food, and ultimately extends shelf life (Jan et al., 2017). For meat and fish, which are primary ingredients in pet food, microbial control is achieved through high-pressure washing, vacuum and modified atmosphere packaging, low-temperature systems, and disinfectant water sprays (Sohaib et al., 2016). However, meat and fish raw ingredients are more prone to external contamination and spoilage than vegetable ingredients, necessitating effective sterilization methods to eradicate harmful microorganisms completely (Molins et al., 2001). In recent years, non-thermal sterilization methods like HPP, plasma, and radiation have been explored for various meat and fish raw ingredients used in raw pet food (Lee et al., 2023; Neshovska et al., 2023; Serra-Castelló et al., 2023; Yadav and Roopesh, 2020).

The Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) stipulates that dry pet food should contain 18% to 22.5% crude protein and 5.5% to 8.5% crude fat (Dodd et al., 2021). Consequently, the main ingredients of domestically and internationally distributed pet food typically include meat products such as chicken, beef, pork, and duck, and fish products such as mackerel, tuna, and salmon, along with by-products from these sources (Montegiove et al., 2021). Unlike advanced countries in the pet food industry like the United States and Europe, Korea lacks a standard for the non-thermal sterilization of pet food, necessitating a comprehensive review of existing research to establish such a standard.

High-Pressure Processing

Food high-pressure processing technology

HPP, also known as high hydrostatic pressure or ultra-high-pressure, is a technology that can effectively sterilize harmful microorganisms while maintaining the quality characteristics of food, such as flavor, color, and nutritional content (Seo et al., 2014). This method applies Le Chatelier’s chemical equilibrium principle, where the volume and number of molecules in food decrease under pressure, leading to microbial cell membrane disintegration, protein denaturation, and sterilization (Renaud et al., 2022). Additionally, cold isostatic pressure involves pressurizing food with a liquid medium at low or room temperature (Dalai and Sahu, 2010).

During HPP, covalent bonds are less affected by pressure, while weaker electrostatic and hydrophobic bonds undergo structural deformation due to pressure (Campus, 2010). This deformation destroys the cellular structure of microorganisms and inactivates enzymes, but does not affect small molecular size vitamins and flavor compounds, thus, preserving nutritional substances (Albert et al., 2021). Moreover, HPP has the advantage of minimizing food deformation since there is no heat involved, providing uniform and instantaneous treatment to food through a liquid medium at pressures ranging from 100 to 600 MPa, resulting in minimal deformation in the size and shape of food (Li and Farid, 2016). Consequently, HPP can be applied not only to raw food products but also to packaged finished products, making it a highly adaptable technology in the food industry (Koutsoumanis et al., 2022).

HPP has applications across various fields including food, pharmaceuticals, and medicine, predominantly within the food industry. This application in the food sector began when Hite (1899) observed a reduction in microorganism levels in milk and meat subjected to high-pressures of 500–600 MPa (Torres and Velazquez, 2005). Throughout the 20th century, research into HPP technology expanded in countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan, leading to the development of HPP equipment suitable for sterilizing food by eliminating harmful microorganisms. Fig. 1 presents a schematic diagram of the structure and operational process of a currently commercialized HPP device. The container, liquid medium, and pressure range of the device have been standardized, facilitating the wider use of HPP in food processing.

Fig. 1. High-pressure processing equipment and principles.

As a result, a variety of high-pressure processed and pasteurized foods, including meat products, seafood, juices, jams, and purees, have been commercialized. The primary microorganisms affected by HPP include Listeria spp., and Campylobacter spp., making HPP particularly advantageous for sterilizing meat and fish raw ingredients, which are highly susceptible to microbial contamination (Campus, 2010). However, it has been reported that foods rich in nutrients, such as carbohydrates, proteins, fats, and salts, or those with low water activity, can exhibit microbial protective effects against HPP (Govaris and Pexara, 2021). Therefore, microbial sensitivity to pressure can vary depending on the state of the food, highlighting the need to establish specific sterilization conditions for each type of food.

Countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada, which are advanced in the development of HPP, are actively implementing HPP technology in the food industry and have established policies for foods processed by HPP. The U.S. Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), the U.K. Food Standards Agency (FSA), Canada’s Health Canada, and the Food Standards Agency of Australia and New Zealand (FSANA) have all set policies for the application of HPP in foods (Huang et al., 2017). In contrast, South Korea lacks specific policies and standards for foods processed by high-pressure, underscoring the necessity to establish precise pressure levels and durations to effectively sterilize microorganisms during HPP application.

Setting the pet food high-pressure processing standards

Table 1 reviews prior literature on the application of HPP sterilization to meat and fish raw ingredients, which are the primary animal proteins used in pet food. This table illustrates that HPP, predominantly utilized for sterilizing meat and fish products, can achieve the five-log reduction in microorganisms mandated by international regulatory bodies by processing at 400 to 600 MPa at temperatures of 4°C or 25°C in under 10 min (Bolumar et al., 2021). Key control points for effective sterilization include processing temperature, pressure, and time. Notably, lower temperatures, such as 4°C, have proven to be more effective in eliminating microorganisms than temperatures around 25°C, with the effectiveness of the microbial disinfaction increasing with longer processing times. Additionally, the processing pressure impacts the physical state of proteins in the sample and myoglobin oxidation (Pou, 2021).

Table 1. Summary of high-pressure processing standards for meat and fish raw ingredients commonly used as pet food ingredients

Raw ingredients	Processing conditions	Experimental results	Reference	
Chicken (chicken leg)	0.1, 300, 600 MPa (15±3°C, 5 min)	- Total microorganisms were reduced to undetectable levels when treated at 300 and 600 MPa.
- When treated at 300 and 600 MPa, total microorganisms decreased by 3 and 4 Log CFU/g, respectively, compared to the control after 7 days of storage.
- Treatment at 300 and 600 MPa increased CIE L* and decreased CIE a* and CIE b*.
- Treatment at 300 MPa had no effect on thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and protein oxidation.
- The addition of phosvitin during ultra-high pressure treatment increased TBARS, protein oxidation, and microbial suppression.	Jung et al. (2012)	
Total microorganisms (TSA, 37°C, 48 h)	
Storage conditions
0, 3, 7 days	
Chicken (chicken breast)	500 MPa (18°C–20°C, 10 min)	- Brochothrix thermosphacta, Pseudomonas spp., Enterobacteriaceae, Lactobacillus, and yeasts and molds were detected at 1 Log CFU/g when treated at 500 MPa at 4 and 12°C.
- The pH increased compared to the control when treated at 500 MPa.	Argyri et al. (2018)	
Total microorganisms (PCA, 30°C, 48–72 h)
Lactobacillus (MRS, 30°C, 48–72 h)
Yeast and mold (DRBC, 25°C, 48–72 h)
Gut bacteria (VRBG, 37°C, 24 h)
Pseudomonas spp. (pseudomonas agar base, 25°C, 48 h)
Salmonella enteritidis (XLD, 37°C, 16–18 h)	
Storage conditions 0, 5, 10 days
4°C, 12°C	
Pork	50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 MPa (15 min)	- Total microorganisms decreased to less than 3 Log CFU/g when treated at over 400 MPa.
- Total microorganisms of pork treated at 500 MPa for 1, 5, and 15 min, decreased from approximately 3 Log CFU/g in the control to 2.17, 1.77, and 2.33 Log CFU/g, respectively.
- The pH of the pork increased with higher treatment pressure and longer treatment time compared to the control. When treated at 500 MPa for 15 min, the pH was approximately 5.96, which was higher than the control (approximately pH 5.4) and other treatment groups (approximately pH 5.6–5.9).	Sazonova et al. (2017).	
Total microorganisms (NA, 30°C, 48 h)	
Pork Fuji (cooked O)
Smoked pork loin (cooked X)	300, 400, 500, 600 MPa (10 to 60 min)	- Cooked pork traditional ham treated at 600 MPa for 10 min showed no detection of coliform, Enterococci, or acidophilic bacteria during the 8-week storage period.
- Cooked pork traditional ham treated at 300 MPa or higher for more than 10 min showed increased CIE a*, CIE b*, and shear force, and a decrease in CIE L* compared to the control.	Karłowski et al. (2002)	
Escherichia coli
Enterococci
Mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria
Eosinophils	
Storage conditions 0, 4, 6, 8 week
4°C to 6°C	
Beef (breast, pectoral)	400, 600 MPa (35°C, 45°C, 55°C, 20 min)	- Beef treated at 400 MPa or higher at 35°C showed increased pH, CIE L*, CIE b*, and cooking loss, and a decrease in CIE a*.
- Cooking loss increased as the treatment pressure increased.	McArdle et al. (2011)	
Total microorganisms (PCA, 30°C, 72 h)
Lactobacillus (MRS, 37°C, 24 h)
Gut bacteria (VRBG, 30°C, 24 h)
Listeria Salmonella Campylobacter	
Storage conditions 0, 7, 15, 30 days	
Sliced beef	300, 450, 600 MPa (5 min)	- Treatment with pressures of 300, 450, and 600 MPa, including 2% citric acid and 2% salt solution, reduced the growth of E. faecium by 1, 4, and 6 Log cycles, respectively. Increasing the citric acid content was effective in inhibiting E. faecium.
- Treatment with pressures of 300–600 MPa, including 2% citric acid and 2% salt solution, reduced the growth of L. innocua by 6 Log cycles. Increasing the salt concentration was effective in inhibiting L. innocua.
- L. innocua is more sensitive to high-pressure treatment than E. faecium. When treated at 450 MPa with a solution containing 1% salt and 2% citric acid, L. innocua was reduced by 7 Log cycles.	Rodrigues et al. (2016)	
Listeria innocua (Oxford ager, 37°C, 48 h)
Enterococcus faecium (Enterococcosel agar, 37°C, 48 h)	
Salmon, cod, mackerel	0.1, 200, 500 MPa (2 min)	- Cod and mackerel treated at 500 MPa showed total aerobic bacteria reduced to undetectable levels.
- All treatment groups showed an increase in TBARS and pH compared to the control when treated at 200 MPa or higher.	Rode and Hovda (2016)	
Thermophilic microorganisms (Long & Hammer agar, 15°C, 5–7 days)
Hydrogen sulfide-producing microorganisms (Iron ager, 20°C, 3–4 day)	
Storage conditions
Cod: 0, 7, 11, 14, 22 days
Salmon: 0, 7, 11, 15, 18, 21, 26 days
Mackerel: 0, 4, 7, 11, 14, 19 days	
TSA, tryptic soy agar; PCA, plate count agar; MRS, De Man Rogosa Sharpe agar; DRBC, dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar; VRBG, violet red bile glucose agar; XLD, xylose lysine desoxycholate; NA, nutrient agar.

Approximately 30% of processed foods treated with high-pressure sterilization are meat products. The sterilization of meat products using high-pressure is already widespread, as the quality and sensory properties of meat products are relatively stable under high-pressure conditions compared to fresh meat (Bolumar et al., 2021). However, unlike processed meat products, raw meat is influenced by various factors such as the characteristics of the meat, and the temperature, pressure, and duration of processing. For example, chicken or fish meat, which is softer than pork or beef, tends to undergo protein gelation when pressurized at 200 to 300 MPa (Chen et al., 2018). Additionally, the color of meat changes more sensitively in red meats rich in myoglobin. Pressurizing above 300 MPa disrupts the physical structure of myoglobin, accelerating oxidation, which results in increased brightness and reduced CIE a* of the meat; however, these color changes induced by HPP treatment tend to lessen over extended storage periods (Bak et al., 2017).

Therefore, it is necessary to compare the sterilization efficiency and quality between raw ingredients and finished products and to investigate the suitable HPP conditions for microorganisms with high contamination potential depending on the type of product (dry, wet, semi-wet, freeze-dried, etc.).

Plasma

Food plasma sterilization technology

Plasma is a fourth state of matter in which ions and electrons, separated by high energy, are either in an energy equilibrium or non-equilibrium state, as depicted in Fig. 2. It consists of ions, electrons, free radicals, and ultraviolet radiation, serving as the source for phenomena such as lightning, aurora borealis, neon signs, and fluorescent lights (Jeon et al., 2020). Plasma can be categorized into hot plasma (equilibrium plasma; arc discharges) and cold plasma [non-equilibrium plasma; corona and dielectric barrier discharges (DBDs)], according to the equilibrium state of ions and electrons, as illustrated in Fig. 3. Cold plasma is also referred to as non-equilibrium plasma because the electron temperature is higher than the overall gas temperature (Fiebrandt et al., 2018).

Fig. 2. Plasma, is the fourth form of matter.

Fig. 3. Different plasma generation methods and their characteristics.

Furthermore, low-temperature plasmas are produced and sustained in an ionized gas state by arc discharge, corona discharge, and DBD at low-pressure (depressurization) or at normal pressure (atmospheric pressure; Birania et al., 2022). Arc discharge is characterized by generating high-temperature plasma in a very confined area at normal pressure, while corona discharge also generates plasma at normal pressure, resulting in a limited processing area, albeit with comparatively less heat generation than arc discharge (Dalvi-Isfahan et al., 2023). Conversely, dielectric barrier plasma is created by attaching one or two dielectric plates to two parallel metal plates connected to direct current or alternating current electrodes, producing less heat and covering a larger processing area (Nasiru et al., 2021).

Among the low-temperature plasma technologies, normal pressure plasma is predominantly utilized in conjunction with low-temperature sterilization. However, controlling the plasma production rate is challenging, and temperature increases can occur due to excessive energy input (Domonkos et al., 2021). In contrast, low-pressure plasma is ideal for non-thermal sterilization as it allows for a controlled rate of plasma generation and minimizes heat production (Fiebrandt et al., 2018). Alongside low-pressure plasma, plasma-activated water (PAW) is also being explored as a non-thermal sterilization method for meat, fruits, and vegetables (Sammanee et al., 2022).

Microbial sterilization by plasma has been explored since the mid-1990s, though its practical applications in the food industry commenced in the early 2000s (Li and Farid, 2016). Plasma sterilization is particularly advantageous because it does not involve chemical treatments or leave residues. Its uses in the food industry have expanded to include sterilizing microorganisms, removing contaminants, extending shelf life, inactivating enzymes, eliminating toxins, enhancing food packaging, and treating wastewater (Hati et al., 2018).

The mechanism of microbial sterilization by plasma primarily involves DNA modification through ultraviolet rays emitted by the plasma (UV inactivation), the release of volatile substances from chemical bond sterilization (photodesorption), and the adsorption reaction of reactive compounds (etching; Mravlje et al., 2021). This method is effective against harmful pathogens such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Listeria spp., noroviruses, and hepatitis viruses. These pathogens are commonly found in environments associated with animal slaughter, making them critical targets for sterilization in the food processing industry.

Plasma technology is frequently applied to meat products such as chicken, pork, and beef. It efficiently sterilizes various harmful substances and microorganisms while minimally impacting quality characteristics like color and texture, making it a valuable technology for ensuring safety in the food supply (Misra and Jo, 2017).

Setting the pet food plasma sterilization standards

Table 2 is a prior study of plasma sterilization technologies applied to meat and fish raw ingredients, which are the animal proteins most commonly used in pet food. The table shows that plasma, primarily utilized for sterilizing meat and fish, operates under normal pressure or low-pressure at temperatures below 44°C. This setup minimizes protein modification and is achieved through the use of dielectric barrier plasma or PAW (Sen and Mutlu, 2013).

Table 2. Summary of plasma sterilization standards for meat and fish raw ingredients commonly used as pet food ingredients

Raw ingredients	Processing conditions	Experimental results	Reference	
Chicken (chicken breast)	Normal pressure plasma (10 s, 30 s, 1 min, 2 min, 3 min)
Gap: 1.0–1.5 cm
Voltage: 6.0–11.0 kV
Frequency: 23.0 to 38.5 kHz
He: 5.0 L/min
O2: 50, 100 mL/min	- The thicker and rougher the surface of the sample, the less effective the plasma treatment.
- The sterilization of L. innocua on skinless chicken breast has been reported with a gap of 1 cm, voltage of 8–11 kV, frequency of 30–38.5 kHz, and O2 flow rate of 0–25 mL/min for 4 min.
- The sterilization of L. innocua on chicken breast with skin has been reported with a gap of 1 cm, voltage of 7 kV, frequency of 38.5 kHz for 3 min, and with a gap of 1 cm, voltage of 8 kV, frequency of 38.5 kHz for 30 s.
- Voltages above 9 kV caused overheating of the transformer, and stable operation was achieved at a frequency of 23 kHz.	Noriega et al. (2011)	
Total microorganisms (TSA, 30°C, 24 h)
Listeria innocua (TSB, 30°C, 48 h)	
Chicken/pork (chicken breast/ pork belly)	Plasma-activated water (PAW) (immersion, 25.5°C, 15 min)
Voltage: 125 W, 15 kV
Frequency: 50 Hz
60 ppm H2O2, 500 mL	- Treatment of pork and chicken with hydrogen peroxide PAW resulted in a greater reduction of C. jejuni compared to other microorganisms.
- Hydrogen peroxide PAW treatment on the surface of pork resulted in an increase in pH, CIE L*, temperature, and water activity, and a decrease in CIE a* and CIE b*.
- Hydrogen peroxide PAW treatment on the surface of chicken resulted in an increase in pH and CIE a*, and a decrease in CIE L*, CIE b*, and temperature.	Sammanee et al. (2022)	
Salmonella typhimurium (XLD, 37°C, 24 h)
Campylobacter jejuni (mCCD, 41.5°C, 48 h)
Escherichia coli (ECD, 44°C, 24 h)
Staphylococcus aureus (BPA, 37°C, 48 h)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (GSP, 30°C, 48 h)	
Storage conditions
0, 3, 7, 10 days
4°C to 6°C	
Pigs (sirloin)	Vacuum plasma (5, 10 min)
Frequency: 20–100 kHz	- When treated with helium gas and plasma, total microorganisms, psychrophilic bacteria, yeasts, and molds were detected at 2.49, 2.56, and 1.35 Log CFU/cm2, respectively.
- When treated with argon gas and plasma, total microorganisms, psychrophilic bacteria, yeasts, and molds were detected at 3.13, 3.13, and 1.86 Log CFU/cm2, respectively.
- When treated with nitrogen gas and plasma, total microorganisms, psychrophilic bacteria, yeasts, and molds were detected at 5.02, 5.09, and 3.37 Log CFU/cm2, respectively.
- pH showed no significant effect when treated with vacuum plasma.	Ulbin-Figlewicz et al. (2015)	
Total microorganisms (PCA, 30°C, 72 h)
Total yeast and mold (SDAC, 25°C, 5 day)	
Beef (10 g)	PAW (1 mL spray, 0, 5, 10, 20, 30 min)
Voltage: 10 kV
Frequency: 8 kHz
40 mL deionized water	- A 5 min treatment with PAW resulted in a pH decrease of 3.7 compared to the control.
- Longer treatment with PAW led to an increase in volatile basic nitrogen (VBN) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS).
- PAW treatment resulted in a decrease in CIE a* after 4 days of storage.	Zhao et al. (2018)	
Total microorganisms (PCA, 37°C)
Total bacteria (PCA, 27°C)	
Storage conditions
6, 12, 24, 48, 96, 192 h, 4°C	
Mackerel (fillet)	PAW (immersion, 25°C, 10 min)
Voltage: 550 W
Frequency: 25 kHz
200 ppm CH3COOH 30 mL	- A 10 min treatment with plasma-activated peracetic acid (PA-PAA) resulted in a 3.8 Log CFU/g reduction in total microorganisms.
- PA-PAA treatment had no significant effect on color and TBARS.	Zhao et al. (2021)	
Total microorganisms (30°C, 48 h/6.5°C, 10 day)
E. coli (MacConkey, 37°C, 24 h)
L. innocua (Oxford, 37°C, 24 h)
Pseudomonas fluorescens (CFN, 30°C, 24 h)	
TSA, tryptic soy agar; TSB, tryptic soy broth; XLD, xylose lysine desoxycholate agar; mCCD, modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar; ECD, Escherichia coliform detection agar; BPA, Baird Parker agar; GSP, glutamate starch phenol red agar; PCA, plate count agar; SDAC, sabouraud dextrose agar with chloramphenicol; CFN, cetrimide fucidin nalidixic acid agar.

Non-thermal plasma sterilization applied to chicken has been mainly studied for chicken breasts and thighs, using dielectric plasma (Lee et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2022) or immersion in PAW (Kang et al., 2022; Qian et al., 2021; Sammanee et al., 2022). However, chicken with skin has a non-uniform surface, which reduces the microbial inactivation effect compared to chicken with a uniform surface (Noriega et al., 2011). Effective microbial inactivation of chicken skin can be achieved with a radiation gap of 1.0 cm, a voltage of 7.0 kV, and a frequency of 38.5 kHz for 3 min, or a 30 s exposure at 8.0 kV. Conversely, skinless chicken breasts showed negative results for Listeria at a radiation distance of 1.0 cm, voltages of 8.0–11.0, and frequencies of 38.5–30.0 kHz, suggesting that higher voltage and frequency are effective in sterilizing Listeria in chicken.

Other factors affecting the effectiveness of plasma sterilization include exposure time, flow rate, moisture, temperature, and gas composition. Regarding atmospheric composition, nitrogen, argon, and helium are the most commonly used gases (Ulbin-Figlewicz et al., 2015). The effects of vacuum dielectric plasma sterilization of pork loin with these different gas compositions showed that helium had the highest microbial inactivation rate, with yeast and mold showing higher disinfection effects than total microorganisms and thermophilic bacteria. Plasma with different gas compositions did not significantly affect the pH of the sample, indicating that it does not cause significant changes to the original product. Despite these advantages, dielectric barrier plasma has the drawback of requiring large and expensive equipment for large-scale treatment. Consequently, PAW is being researched as a more feasible alternative (Du et al., 2022).

PAW is produced by passing an electrode through the liquid in a water tank by using a plasma generator, and this PAW is treated by spraying it onto the surface of the sample or immersing the sample in it (Hadinoto et al., 2023; Lotfy and Khalil, 2022; Qian et al., 2022). This type of PAW is typically produced using hydrogen peroxide, perchloric acid, sodium hypochlorite, and acetic acid. The typical application conditions for PAW involve a 10 min treatment at temperatures around 25°C. Studies have shown that hydrogen peroxide plasma treatment of pork and chicken is highly effective against pathogens such as Campylobacter and Salmonella enteritidis, but not against Pseudomonas (Sammanee et al., 2022). The pH and chromaticity measurements indicate variations between deep and surface treatments, suggesting that the use of PAW should be carefully managed to avoid adversely affecting the palatability of the food. When applied to mackerel, PAW also resulted in a decrease in pH without significant changes in chromaticity.

Unlike dielectric barrier plasma, PAW can be used in large quantities either through immersion or spraying. However, it is important to assess the effects of different types of PAW on the palatability of food to ensure suitability. Therefore, while plasma sterilization of pet food ingredients and finished products with uniform surfaces is typically superior in maintaining quality and sensory properties when treated with dielectric barrier plasma at around 25°C, this method is more costly compared to treatments using PAW. Consequently, comparative studies between different plasma treatment methods for pet food ingredients and finished products are essential to determine the most cost-effective and quality-preserving sterilization technique.

Radiation

Food radiation sterilization technology

Radiation is categorized into natural and artificial types, as illustrated in Fig. 4. Artificial radiation includes alpha (α), beta (β), and gamma (γ) rays emitted from radioactive isotopes, mechanically generated X-rays, electron beams generated by electron accelerators, and neutron rays produced by nuclear reactors (Shahi et al., 2021). Ionizing radiation, which has the property of ionizing the atoms or molecules of a substance through which it passes, results in the formation of ions. This category includes alpha rays, gamma rays, electron beams, ultraviolet rays, and neutrons (Akhila et al., 2021).

Fig. 4. Types and extent of radiation.

Food irradiation has been consistently raising safety concerns, and in response, relevant international organizations such as Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and World Health Organization (WHO) have demonstrated the safety of irradiating food with less than 10 kGy of gamma rays, X-rays, electron beams, and ultraviolet rays (UV; Venugopalan and Suprasanna, 2022). This is because radiation leaves no chemical residues and is largely unaffected by environmental conditions (Jildeh et al., 2021). Gamma rays and X-rays, known for their strong penetrative power, allow for the treatment of opaque samples or packaged finished products, which helps prevent secondary contamination that could occur during repackaging after sterilization (Mshelia et al., 2023).

Gamma rays are emitted radially around the radiation nucleus, while X-rays and electron beams involve the use of electricity to generate artificially accelerated electrons, focusing on sterilizing concentrated areas. In contrast, UV and electron beams, which have weaker penetrating power than gamma and X-ray rays, can be precisely controlled via a power source, offering advantages in terms of process control, rapidity, accuracy, and efficiency. Among the ultraviolet spectrum, UV is categorized into UVA (315–400 nm), UVB (280–315 nm), and UVC (200–280 nm), with UVC being the type used for microbial sterilization (Shahi et al., 2021).

These radiation types are employed in various applications, such as inhibiting the germination and rooting of agricultural products, sterilizing pathogens and parasites, controlling the ripening of agricultural products, and extending their shelf life.

The use of radiation in the food industry began in 1895 with Roentgen’s discovery of X-rays and the subsequent recognition of their potential to sterilize microorganisms in food. In 1921, radiation was first utilized in the United States to sterilize trichinosis in pork (Jildeh et al., 2021). Initially, the high cost of radiation equipment limited its practical use. However, by 1950, the mass production of radioactive materials facilitated comprehensive research (Demir et al., 2019). Radiation sterilizes food either directly by damaging microbial nucleic acids, which inhibits nucleic acid synthesis and microbial division, or indirectly. Indirect sterilization occurs when radiation generates decomposition products such as free radicals in water molecules; these highly reactive radicals combine with oxygen to form oxidizing agents, which damage microbial cell membranes and thus sterilize the microorganisms (Li and Farid, 2016).

Given the varying susceptibility of microorganisms to radiation, its application is categorized into complete sterilization, pathogenic microorganism sterilization, and partial sterilization (Rosario et al., 2021). Complete sterilization involves high-dose radiation (30–50 kGy) targeting endospore-producing microorganisms such as Bacillus spp. and Clostridium spp. This level of radiation is employed for foods requiring high safety standards such as canned food, hospital food, space food, sports food, and aseptic feeds for laboratory animals. Pathogenic microorganism sterilization, which uses a radiation dose of 1 to 10 kGy, targets harmful microorganisms in food. Partial sterilization aims to reduce the microbial load in food with radiation doses ranging from 0.5 to 10 kGy to extend its shelf life and refrigeration period.

The advantages of radiation include shorter processing times compared to heating, no chemical residues, and easier handling (Yang et al., 2023). However, certain radiation doses can lead to undesirable changes such as discoloration and softening of fruits, oxidation of meat products, and consumer resistance due to concerns about radiation exposure (Ahn et al., 2013; Shahbaz et al., 2016). Therefore, determining the appropriate type and dose of radiation for meat-based pet food is crucial.

Setting the pet food radiation sterilization standards

Table 3 presents a prior study on radiation sterilization technology applied to meat and fish products, which are primary sources of animal proteins in pet food. It demonstrates that gamma rays and electron beams below 10 kGy are the most prevalent forms of radiation used for the sterilization of meat and fish, achieving general sterilization at doses above 6 kGy across all cultures. However, doses around 3 kGy were found to produce excessive peroxides and volatiles, leading to off-flavors and other issues affecting palatability (Farkas, 1998). Consequently, research is being conducted on the impact of radiation on samples supplemented with natural or synthetic antioxidants.

Table 3. Summary of radiation sterilization standards for meat and fish raw ingredients commonly used as pet food ingredients

Raw ingredients	Processing conditions	Experimental results	Reference	
Chicken (machine-boned chicken)	Gamma rays (0.30, 0.60, 0.90, 1.20, 1.80, 2.70, 3.60 kGy)	- Gamma irradiation treatment at 20°C exhibited a higher inhibitory effect on S. typhimurium compared to –20°C and 0°C.
- Atmospheric pressure conditions showed a higher inhibitory effect on S. typhimurium compared to vacuum conditions.
- When irradiated with 3.6 kGy at 20°C, Salmonella was detected at 2.75 Log CFU/g under atmospheric pressure conditions and 3.06 Log CFU/g under vacuum conditions.
- When irradiated with 3.0 kGy at –20°C, Salmonella was detected at 3.93 Log CFU/g under atmospheric pressure conditions and 4.29 Log CFU/g under vacuum conditions.	Thayer and Boyd (1991)	
Salmonella typhimurium (TSA, 35°C, 24 h)	
Chicken (chicken patty)
Guava leaf extract	Gamma rays (2 kGy)	- Under atmospheric pressure conditions, total phenol content (TPC), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) were lower, while total volatile basic nitrogen (TVBN), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), peroxide value (POV), total anaerobic bacteria, and fecal coliforms were higher compared to vacuum conditions.
- As the concentration of guava leaf extract increased, the detection of total anaerobic bacteria and fecal coliforms decreased.
- Treatment with 2 kGy resulted in an increase in TPC, DPPH, FRAP, CIE L*, CIE a*, and CIE b* compared to the control, while TVBN, TBARS, and POV decreased.	Sadiq et al. (2023)	
Total microorganisms (PCA)	
Storage conditions
0, 5, 10 days	
Pork (ground pork, 30 g)	Gamma rays (5 kGy)	- The control treated with 5 kGy showed no detection of P. aeruginosa and L. casei.
- After irradiation treatment and inoculation with P. aeruginosa, there was an increase in pH compared to the control.
- After irradiation treatment and inoculation with L. casei, there was a decrease in pH compared to the control.	Kim et al. (2004)	
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (NA, 37°C, 48 h)
Lactobacillus casei (MRS, 37°C, 48 h)	
Pork (minced pork, bologna sausage)	Electron beam (2.5 MeV, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 kGy)
X-Ray (5 MeV, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 kGy)	- Compared to electron beams, X-rays showed lower protein solubility, detection of total anaerobic bacteria, CIE L*, and CIE a*, but higher TBARS, CIE b*, and cooking yield.
- Treatment with 2 kGy or more resulted in increased collagen solubility, TBARS, CIE a*, and CIE b*, and decreased detection of total anaerobic bacteria and CIE L*.
- In fresh pork, treatment with 2–6 kGy using electron beams reduced the detection of total anaerobic bacteria by 1.69–2.88 Log CFU/g, and no detection was observed from 8 kGy onwards.
- In fresh pork, treatment with 2–6 kGy using X-rays reduced the detection of total anaerobic bacteria by 1.99–2.94 Log CFU/g, and no detection was observed from 8 kGy onwards.	Shin et al. (2014)	
Total microorganisms (PCA, 37°C, 48 h)	
Beef (ground beef)
Antioxidants (cinnamaldehyde, ascorbic acid, inorganic pyrophosphate)	Gamma rays (2 kGy)	- Treatment with 2 kGy resulted in a reduction of mesophilic bacteria, psychrotrophic bacteria, and yeasts and molds by 2.58, 3.76, and 1.32 Log CFU/g, respectively.
- Treatment with 2 kGy showed no significant difference in pH and general components, but there was a decrease in heme iron content and an increase in TBARS, peroxide, CIE L*, and CIE a*.	Ayari et al. (2016)	
Mesophilic bacteria (PCA, 30°C, 3 day)
Total coliforms (VRBA, 30°C, 24 h)
Isolated Escherichia coli (VRBA, 44°C, 24 h)
Yeast and mold (SD, 25°C, 3–5 day)
Staphylococcus aureus (MSA, 35°C, 24–48 h)
Listeria monocytogenes (PALCAM, 35°C, 24–48 h)
Bacillus cereus (EE, 30°C, 24 h)	
Storage conditions
0, 7, 12, 21 days	
Herring (canned)	Gamma rays (1.5, 3, 6 kGy)
Electromagnetic radiation, X-rays (4.8 MeV, 1.5, 3, 6 kGy)	- Gamma irradiation and electron beam treatment at 6 kGy resulted in the detection of microbes at approximately 1 Log CFU/g.
- X-ray treatment at 3–6 kGy resulted in detection of microbes at approximately 1 Log CFU/g.
- Treatment at 6 kGy resulted in the generation of a ‘smoking’ aroma.	Sanzharova et al. (2021)	
Mesophilic bacteria
Conditions Anaerobes (PCA, 32°C)
Salmonella spp. (Bismuth sulphite agar)
Total coliforms (MacConkey agar)
Listeria spp. (Oxford agar)
Staphylococci spp. (Chapman Stone agar)	
Storage conditions 15, 30 days	
TSA, tryptic soy agar; PCA, plate count agar; NA, nutrient agar; MRS, De Man Rogosa Sharpe agar; VRBA, violet red bile agar; SD, sabouraud dextrose agar; MSA, mannitol salt agar; PALCAM, polymyxin B acriflavine lithium chloride ceftazidime aesculin mannitol agar; EE, egg yolk emulsion.

The inclusion of guava leaf extract, which contains antioxidants, has shown to inhibit aerobic microorganisms and E. coli even at a dose of 2 kGy, indicating that natural antioxidants maintain their activity post-radiation (Sadiq et al., 2023). Furthermore, synthetic antioxidants such as inorganic pyrophosphate, cinnamaldehyde, and ascorbic acid have demonstrated significant inhibitory effects against mesophilic and thermophilic microorganisms, with antibacterial activity ranking in the order of inorganic pyrophosphate, cinnamaldehyde, and ascorbic acid (Ayari et al., 2016).

Additionally, antioxidants like tea polyphenols, grape seed extract, D-sodium erythorbate, chitosan, carvacrol, and mangosteen pulp have proven effective in reducing microbial presence during radiation (Chen et al., 2023; Fitrianto et al., 2024; Hu et al., 2021). It is suggested that incorporating these antioxidants could reduce the necessary radiation dose for microorganisms with high radiation resistance or for finished products that require the prevention of external contamination factors during consumption.

Harmful microorganisms that form resistant spores or are highly resistant to radiation require treatment at higher doses than common harmful microorganisms (Lv et al., 2021). Notably, Bacillus cereus, Proteus mirabilis, and Enterococcus faecalis exhibit D10-values for gamma rays and electron beams that are approximately twice as high as those for general harmful microorganisms such as E. coli and Staphylococcus spp. This differential resistance should be taken into account when selecting the appropriate disinfection radiation dose (De Lara et al., 2002; Ebrahim et al., 2022). Moreover, a radiation dose of 45 kGy has been found adequate for sterilizing Clostridium spp. in various meat products, including smoked turkey, chicken fillet, chicken luncheon, beef luncheon, ground meat, and raw sausage (Ebrahim et al., 2022).

It is recommended that radiation sterilization treatment of pet food raw ingredients should be conducted within the maximum allowable dose of 10 kGy. Furthermore, quality and sensory properties studies should be performed for each type of raw ingredient to ensure safety and acceptability. For finished pet food products, it is necessary to conduct quality and sensory properties studies to determine the appropriate radiation sterilization dose, particularly for microorganisms with high contamination potential, considering the shape and distribution form of the product, such as pouches or cans.

Conclusion

The commercialization of non-thermal sterilization technology in the food industry is actively underway, and introducing non-thermal sterilization for pet food is considered highly valuable as the culture of pet humanization spreads. The main non-thermal sterilization technologies are HPP, plasma, and radiation. Unlike traditional sterilization methods such as chemical and heat sterilization, these non-thermal methods offer quality and sensory advantages, including leaving no residue on food, minimizing deformation of raw ingredients, and preserving nutrients.

Autoclaving involves the application of high-pressure to raw ingredients or finished products, ensuring even sterilization across the entire surface of the sample, regardless of its shape, nature, or packaging status. However, protein gel formation and color changes can occur at pressures of 200–400 MPa, making it crucial to identify pressures that effectively sterilize microbes at lower pressures. Therefore, it is necessary to study the sterilization efficiency and quality parameters such as color, water retention, shear force, and sensory properties like flavor and panel evaluation between raw and finished pet food products.

Plasma technology applies plasma sterilization to sterilize the surface of raw ingredients or finished products. Dielectric barrier plasma technology, which uses dielectrics to expand the usable range and lower the treatment temperature, is primarily studied. However, dielectric barrier plasma is less economical than PAW. Additionally, PAW can impart a sour taste depending on the type of treated water, necessitating a comparison of the efficiency of both methods. Consequently, studying the quality and sensory properties of pet food according to various plasma methods is essential.

Radiation involves penetrating raw ingredients or finished products with radiation and can be conducted while the sample is packaged. However, certain radiation doses may cause discoloration and off-flavors, requiring pet sensory studies. Therefore, selecting the appropriate radiation dose and conducting quality and sensory properties studies for various ingredients and finished products is crucial in the radiation treatment of pet food.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. RS-2023-00231378), Rural Development Administration, Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Contributions

Ethics Approval

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Conceptualization: Baek UB, Kim HY. Investigation: Baek UB. Writing - original draft: Baek UB. Writing - review & editing: Baek UB, Kim HY.

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.
==== Refs
References

Ahn DU Kim IS Lee EJ 2013 Irradiation and additive combinations on the pathogen reduction and quality of poultry meat Poult Sci 92 534 545 10.3382/ps.2012-02722 23300322
Akhila PP Sunooj KV Aaliya B Navaf M Sudheesh C Sabu S Sasidharan A Mir SA George J Khaneghah AM 2021 Application of electromagnetic radiations for decontamination of fungi and mycotoxins in food products: A comprehensive review Trends Food Sci Technol 114 399 409 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.06.013
Albert T Braun PG Saffaf J Wiacek C 2021 Physical methods for the decontamination of meat surfaces Curr Clin Microbiol Rep 8 9 20 10.1007/s40588-021-00156-w
Argyri AA Papadopoulou OS Nisiotou A Tassou CC Chorianopoulos N 2018 Effect of high pressure processing on the survival of Salmonella Enteritidis and shelf-life of chicken fillets Food Microbiol 70 55 64 10.1016/j.fm.2017.08.019 29173640
Ayari S Han J Vu KD Lacroix M 2016 Effects of gamma radiation, individually and in combination with bioactive agents, on microbiological and physicochemical properties of ground beef Food Control 64 173 180 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.12.034
Bak KH Bolumar T Karlsson AH Lindahl G Orlien V 2017 Effect of high pressure treatment on the color of fresh and processed meats: A review Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 59 228 252 10.1080/10408398.2017.1363712 28846443
Barbosa-Cánovas GV Medina-Meza I Candoğan K Bermúdez-Aguirre D 2014 Advanced retorting, microwave assisted thermal sterilization (MATS), and pressure assisted thermal sterilization (PATS) to process meat products Meat Sci 98 420 434 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.027 25060584
Birania S Attkan AK Kumar S Kumar N Singh VK 2022 Cold plasma in food processing and preservation: A review J Food Process Eng 45 e14110 10.1111/jfpe.14110
Bolumar T Orlien V Sikes A Aganovic K Bak KH Guyon C Stübler AS de Lamballerie M Hertel C Brüggemann DA 2021 High-pressure processing of meat: Molecular impacts and industrial applications Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 20 332 368 10.1111/1541-4337.12670 33443800
Campus M 2010 High pressure processing of meat, meat products and seafood Food Eng Rev 2 256 273 10.1007/s12393-010-9028-y
Chen W Yang J Huang N Zhang Q Zhong Y Yang H Liu W Yue Y 2023 Effect of combined treatments of electron beam irradiation with antioxidants on the microbial quality, physicochemical characteristics and volatiles of vacuum-packed fresh pork during refrigerated storage Food Control 145 109480 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109480
Chen X Tume RK Xiong Y Xu X Zhou G Chen C Nishiumi T 2018 Structural modification of myofibrillar proteins by high-pressure processing for functionally improved, value-added, and healthy muscle gelled foods Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 58 2981 3003 10.1080/10408398.2017.1347557 28678522
Choe SY Lee JS Choi YB 2023 A research on the status of domestic and foreign industries related to pet funeral and pet loss syndrome J Hum Soc Sci 14 481 494 10.22143/HSS21.14.2.34
Dalai SR Sahu JK 2010 High hydrostatic pressure (HPP) in food processing: Design aspects and applications Assam Univ J Sci Technol 6 70 87
Dalvi-Isfahan M Havet M Hamdami N Le-Bail A 2023 Recent advances of high voltage electric field technology and its application in food processing: A review with a focus on corona discharge and static electric field J Food Eng 353 111551 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2023.111551
De Lara J Fernández PS Periago PM Palop A 2002 Irradiation of spores of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus subtilis with electron beams Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 3 379 384 10.1016/S1466-8564(02)00053-X
Demir ES Ozgenc E Gundogdu EA 2019 Radiation sterilization applications Int J Sci Technol Res 5 112 119
Dodd SAS Shoveller AK Fascetti AJ Yu ZZ Ma DWL Verbrugghe A 2021 A comparison of key essential nutrients in commercial plant-based pet foods sold in Canada to American and European canine and feline dietary recommendations Animals 11 2348 10.3390/ani11082348 34438805
Domonkos M Tichá P Trejbal J Demo P 2021 Applications of cold atmospheric pressure plasma technology in medicine, agriculture and food industry Appl Sci 11 4809 10.3390/app11114809
Du Y Yang F Yu H Xie Y Yao W 2022 Improving food drying performance by cold plasma pretreatment: A systematic review Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 21 4402 4421 10.1111/1541-4337.13027 36037152
Ebrahim H Abou ElNour S Hammad AA Abouzeid M Abdou D 2022 Comparative effect of gamma and electron beam irradiation on some food borne pathogenic bacteria contaminating meat products Egypt J Pure Appl Sci 60 62 72 10.21608/ejaps.2022.119119.1021
Farkas J 1998 Irradiation as a method for decontaminating food: A review Int J Food Microbiol 44 189 204 10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00132-9 9851599
Fiebrandt M Lackmann JW Stapelmann K 2018 From patent to product? 50 Years of low-pressure plasma sterilization Plasma Process Polym 15 1800139 10.1002/ppap.201800139
Fitrianto N Samiyarsih S Husen F Frediansyah A Hidayat GA 2024 Effect of gamma irradiation on the microbiological properties, phenolic content, and antioxidant activity of mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L) flesh during storage AIP Conf Proc 2967 040001 10.1063/5.0194030
Geary EL Parsons CM Utterback PL Templeman JR Swanson KS 2023 Standardized amino acid digestibility and nitrogen-corrected true metabolizable energy of frozen raw, freeze-dried raw, fresh, and extruded dog foods using precision-fed cecectomized and conventional rooster assays J Anim Sci 101 skad377 10.1093/jas/skad377 37950347
Govaris A Pexara A 2021 Inactivation of foodborne viruses by high-pressure processing (HPP) Foods 10 215 10.3390/foods10020215 33494224
Gromek N Perek-Białas J 2022 Why is pet goods consumption imperceptible for economists? A scoping review SN Bus Econ 2 172 10.1007/s43546-022-00349-5 36258697
Hadinoto K Yang H Zhang T Cullen PJ Prescott S Trujillo FJ 2023 The antimicrobial effects of mist spraying and immersion on beef samples with plasma-activated water Meat Sci 200 109165 10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109165 36958246
Han J Wang Y Wang Y Hao S Zhang K Tian J Jin Y 2024 Effect of changes in the structure of myoglobin on the color of meat products Food Mater Res 4 e011 10.48130/fmr-0024-0003
Hati S Patel M Yadav D 2018 Food bioprocessing by non-thermal plasma technology Curr Opin Food Sci 19 85 91 10.1016/j.cofs.2018.03.011
Hu Z Xiao Y Wang B Jin TZ Lyu W Ren D 2021 Combined treatments of low dose irradiation with antimicrobials for inactivation of foodborne pathogens on fresh pork Food Control 125 107977 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.107977
Huang HW Wu SJ Lu JK Shyu YT Wang CY 2017 Current status and future trends of high-pressure processing in food industry Food Control 72 1 8 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.07.019
Jan A Sood M Sofi SA Norzom T 2017 Non-thermal processing in food applications: A review Int J Food Sci Nutr 2 171 180
Jeon EB Choi MS Kim JY Park SY 2020 Combined effects of low-temperature heating and atmospheric plasma on the populations of Escherichia coli and sensorial quality of red pepper powder J Food Hyg Saf 35 68 74 10.13103/JFHS.2020.35.1.68
Jildeh ZB Wagner PH Schöning MJ 2021 Sterilization of objects, products, and packaging surfaces and their characterization in different fields of industry: The status in 2020 Phys Status Solidi A Appl Res 218 2000732 10.1002/pssa.202000732
Jung S Kang MG Kim IS Nam KC Ahn DU Jo CR 2012 Effect of addition of phosvitin and high pressure processing on microbiological quality and lipid and protein oxidation of minced chicken leg meat Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 32 212 219 10.5851/kosfa.2012.32.2.212
Kang T Yim D Kim SS Baek KH Kim HJ Jo C 2022 Effect of plasma-activated acetic acid on inactivation of Salmonella Typhimurium and quality traits on chicken meats Poult Sci 101 101793 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101793 35325832
Karłowski K Windyga B Fonberg-Broczek M Ścieżyńska H Grochowska A Górecka K Mroczek J Grochalska D Barabasz A Arabas J Szczepek J Porowski S 2002 Effects of high pressure treatment on the microbiological quality, texture and colour of vacuum packed pork meat products High Press Res 22 725 732 10.1080/08957950212424
KB Management Research Institute 2021 2021 Korea pet report Available from: https://www.kbfg.com/kbresearch/report/reportView.do?reportId=2000160 Accessed at May 27, 2024
Kim JK Jo CR Kim HJ Lee KH Kim YJ Byun MW 2004 Relationship of specific microbial growth and TBARS value in radiation-sterilized raw ground pork Prev Nutr Food Sci 9 312 316 10.3746/jfn.2004.9.4.312
Korea Consumer Agency 2021 Study on the use of consumer market evaluation indicators in Korea: Focusing on the furniture and pet-related products market Available from: https://www.kca.go.kr/smartconsumer/sub.do?menukey=7301&mode=view&no=1003084033 Accessed at May 27, 2024
Korea Rural Economic Institute 2018 Research on development plans for companion animal-related industries Available from: https://www.krei.re.kr/krei/researchReportView.do?key=67&biblioId=509979&pageType=010101&pageUnit=10&searchCnd=all&searchKrwd=&pageIndex=1&engView=#n Accessed at May 27, 2024
Koutsoumanis K Alvarez-Ordóñez A Bolton D Bover-Cid S Chemaly M Davies R De Cesare A Herman L Hilbert F Lindqvist R Nauta M Peixe L Ru G Simmons M Skandamis P Suffredini E Castle L Crotta M Grob K Milana MR Petersen A Sagués AXR Silva FV Barthélémy E Christodoulidou A Messens W Allende A 2022 The efficacy and safety of high-pressure processing of food EFSA J 20 e07128 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7128 35281651
Lazárková Z Buňka F Buňková L Holáň F Kráčmar S Hrabě J 2011 The effect of different heat sterilization regimes on the quality of canned processed cheese J Food Process Eng 34 1860 1878 10.1111/j.1745-4530.2009.00376.x
Lee A Maks-Warren N Aguilar V Piszczor K Swicegood B Ye M Warren J O’Neill E Fleck M Tejayadi S 2023 Inactivation of Salmonella, shiga toxin-producing E. coli, and Listeria monocytogenes in raw diet pet foods using high-pressure processing J Food Prot 86 100124 10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100124 37414286
Lee ES Cheigh CI Kang JH Lee SY Min SC 2020 Evaluation of in-package atmospheric dielectric barrier discharge cold plasma treatment as an intervention technology for decontaminating bulk ready-to-eat chicken breast cubes in plastic containers Appl Sci 10 6301 10.3390/app10186301
Li X Farid M 2016 A review on recent development in non-conventional food sterilization technologies J Food Eng 182 33 45 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.02.026
Lim JS Ha JW 2020 The potential of X-ray irradiation as a new pasteurization technology for food Food Sci Ind 53 264 276
Lotfy K Khalil S 2022 Effect of plasma-activated water on microbial quality and physicochemical properties of fresh beef Open Phys 20 573 586 10.1515/phys-2022-0049
Lv R Liu D Zhou J 2021 Bacterial spore inactivation by non-thermal technologies: Resistance and inactivation mechanisms Curr Opin Food Sci 42 31 36 10.1016/j.cofs.2020.12.014
McArdle RA Marcos B Kerry JP Mullen AM 2011 Influence of HPP conditions on selected beef quality attributes and their stability during chilled storage Meat Sci 87 274 281 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.10.022 21115227
Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs 2023 Announcement of 2022 public awareness survey on animal protection Available from: https://www.mafra.go.kr/home/5109/subview.do?enc=Zm5jdDF8QEB8JTJGYmJzJTJGaG9tZSUyRjc5MiUyRjU2NTI4MiUyRmFydGNsVmlldy5kbyUzRg%3D%3D Accessed at May 27, 2024
Ministry of the Interior and Safety 2023 Administrative safety statistics yearbook (as of December 31, 2022) Available from: https://www.mois.go.kr/frt/bbs/type001/commonSelectBoardArticle.do;jsessionid=pT-BxuWpYTx41tVDoMbilg+-.node10?bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000013&nttId=102952 Accessed at May 27, 2024
Miri T Tsoukalas A Bakalis S Pistikopoulos EN Rustem B Fryer PJ 2008 Global optimization of process conditions in batch thermal sterilization of food J Food Eng 87 485 494 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.12.032
Misra NN Jo C 2017 Applications of cold plasma technology for microbiological safety in meat industry Trends Food Sci Technol 64 74 86 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.04.005
Molins RA Motarjemi Y Käferstein FK 2001 Irradiation: A critical control point in ensuring the microbiological safety of raw foods Food Control 12 347 356 10.1016/S0956-7135(01)00035-4
Montegiove N Pellegrino RM Emiliani C Pellegrino A Leonardi L 2021 An alternative approach to evaluate the quality of protein-based raw materials for dry pet food Animals 11 458 10.3390/ani11020458 33572462
Mravlje J Regvar M Vogel-Mikuš K 2021 Development of cold plasma technologies for surface decontamination of seed fungal pathogens: Present status and perspectives J Fungi 7 650 10.3390/jof7080650 34436189
Mshelia RD Dibal NI Chiroma SM 2023 Food irradiation: An effective but under-utilized technique for food preservations J Food Sci Technol 60 2517 2525 10.1007/s13197-022-05564-4 37599853
Nasiru MM Frimpong EB Muhammad U Qian J Mustapha AT Yan W Zhuang H Zhang J 2021 Dielectric barrier discharge cold atmospheric plasma: Influence of processing parameters on microbial inactivation in meat and meat products Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 20 2626 2659 10.1111/1541-4337.12740 33876887
Neshovska H Kirov V Shindarska Z 2023 Microbiological evaluation of raw dog foods underwent HPP (high pressure processing) treatment Int J Vet Sci Anim Husb 8 229 233 10.22271/veterinary.2023.v8.i3d.549
Noriega E Shama G Laca A Díaz M Kong MG 2011 Cold atmospheric gas plasma disinfection of chicken meat and chicken skin contaminated with Listeria innocua Food Microbiol 28 1293 1300 10.1016/j.fm.2011.05.007 21839378
Park E Park S Yoon Y 2022 Non-thermal decontamination on chicken tenderloin-based pet food with 2.5% lactic acid and hypochlorous acid water Food Life 2022 27 31 10.5851/fl.2022.e2
Pou KRJ 2021 Applications of high pressure technology in food processing Int J Food Stud 10 248 281 10.7455/ijfs/10.1.2021.a10
Qian J Wang C Zhuang H Nasiru MM Zhang J Yan W 2021 Evaluation of meat-quality and myofibrillar protein of chicken drumsticks treated with plasma-activated lactic acid as a novel sanitizer LWT-Food Sci Technol 138 110642 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110642
Qian J Yan L Ying K Luo J Zhuang H Yan W Zhang J Zhao Y 2022 Plasma-activated water: A novel frozen meat thawing media for reducing microbial contamination on chicken and improving the characteristics of protein Food Chem 375 131661 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131661 34863602
Rauktis ME Rose L Chen Q Martone R Martello A 2017 “Their pets are loved members of their family”: Animal ownership, food insecurity, and the value of having pet food available in food banks Anthrozoös 30 581 593 10.1080/08927936.2017.1370225
Renaud C de Lamballerie M Guyon C Astruc T Venien A Pottier L 2022 Effects of high-pressure treatment on the muscle structure of salmon (Salmo salar) Food Chem 367 130721 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130721 34371280
Rode TM Hovda MB 2016 High pressure processing extend the shelf life of fresh salmon, cod and mackerel Food Control 70 242 248 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.05.045
Rodrigues I Trindade MA Caramit FR Candoğan K Pokhrel PR Barbosa-Cánovas GV 2016 Effect of high pressure processing on physicochemical and microbiological properties of marinated beef with reduced sodium content Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 38 328 333 10.1016/j.ifset.2016.09.020
Rosario DKA Rodrigues BL Bernardes PC Conte-Junior CA 2021 Principles and applications of non-thermal technologies and alternative chemical compounds in meat and fish Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 61 1163 1183 10.1080/10408398.2020.1754755 32319303
Sadiq A Arshad MS Amjad RB Munir H Rohi M Khalid W Nadeem MT Suleria HAR 2023 Impact of gamma irradiation and guava leaf extract on the quality and storage stability of chicken patties Food Sci Nutr 11 4485 4501 10.1002/fsn3.3174 37576041
Sammanee P Ngamsanga P Jainonthee C Chupia V Sawangrat C Kerdjana W Lampang KN Meeyam T Pichpol D 2022 Decontamination of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria on pork and chicken meat by liquid plasma immersion Foods 11 1743 10.3390/foods11121743 35741942
Sanzharova NI Kobyalko VO Polyakova IV 2021 Comparison of the effectiveness of antimicrobial radiation treatment of fish preserves on different installations IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 640 032001 10.1088/1755-1315/640/3/032001
Sazonova S Galoburda R Gramatina I 2017 Effect of high pressure processing on microbial load in pork Res Rural Dev 1 237 243 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.035
Sen Y Mutlu M 2013 Sterilization of food contacting surfaces via non-thermal plasma treatment: A model study with Escherichia coli-contaminated stainless steel and polyethylene surfaces Food Bioprocess Technol 6 3295 3304 10.1007/s11947-012-1007-2
Seo SH Kim EM Kim YB Cho EK Woo HJ Lee MA 2014 Quality improvement of Galbijjim using superheated steam and high hydrostatic pressure J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 43 1423 1430 10.3746/jkfn.2014.43.9.1423
Seo YS 2024 Canine preferences for pet food terrine based on the processing method J Environ Sci Int 33 179 185 10.5322/JESI.2024.33.2.179
Serra-Castelló C Possas A Jofré A Garriga M Bover-Cid S 2023 High pressure processing to control Salmonella in raw pet food without compromising the freshness appearance: The impact of acidulation and frozen storage Food Microbiol 109 104139 10.1016/j.fm.2022.104139 36309441
Shahbaz HM Akram K Ahn JJ Kwon JH 2016 Worldwide status of fresh fruits irradiation and concerns about quality, safety, and consumer acceptance Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 56 1790 1807 10.1080/10408398.2013.787384 25830470
Shahi S Khorvash R Goli M Ranjbaran SM Najarian A Mohammadi Nafchi A 2021 Review of proposed different irradiation methods to inactivate food-processing viruses and microorganisms Food Sci Nutr 9 5883 5896 10.1002/fsn3.2539 34646553
Shin JK 2020 Commercial pasteurization of foods using high voltage pulsed electric fields treatment Food Sci Ind 53 284 294
Shin MH Lee JW Yoon YM Kim JH Moon BG Kim JH Song BS 2014 Comparison of quality of bologna sausage manufactured by electron beam or X-ray irradiated ground pork Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 34 464 471 10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.4.464 26761284
Sohaib M Anjum FM Arshad MS Rahman UU 2016 Postharvest intervention technologies for safety enhancement of meat and meat based products; a critical review J Food Sci Technol 53 19 30 10.1007/s13197-015-1985-y 26787929
Song KM 2020 Current status of research on microbial disinfection of food using ultrasound Food Sci Ind 53 277 283
Sunil Chauhan N Singh J Chandra S Chaudhary V Kumar V 2018 “Non-thermal techniques: Application in food industries” a review J Pharmacogn Phytother 7 1507 1518
Thayer DW Boyd G 1991 Effect of ionizing radiation dose, temperature, and atmosphere on the survival of Salmonella Typhimurium in sterile, mechanically deboned chicken meat Poult Sci 70 381 388 10.3382/ps.0700381 2027844
Torres JA Velazquez G 2005 Commercial opportunities and research challenges in the high pressure processing of foods J Food Eng 67 95 112 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.05.066
Ulbin-Figlewicz N Brychcy E Jarmoluk A 2015 Effect of low-pressure cold plasma on surface microflora of meat and quality attributes J Food Sci Technol 52 1228 1232 10.1007/s13197-013-1108-6 25694745
Venugopalan VP Suprasanna P 2022 Use of radiation in food and agriculture Curr Sci 123 370 376 10.18520/cs/v123/i3/370-376
Vinnikova L Synytsia O Kyshenia A 2019 The problems of meat products thermal treatment Food Sci Technol 13 2073 8684 10.15673/fst.v13i2.1386
Wang J Chen J Sun Y He J Zhou C Xia Q Dang Y Pan D Du L 2023 Ultraviolet-radiation technology for preservation of meat and meat products: Recent advances and future trends Food Control 148 109684 10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109684
Watson PE Thomas DG Bermingham EN Schreurs NM Parker ME 2023 Drivers of palatability for cats and dogs: What it means for pet food development Animals 13 1134 10.3390/ani13071134 37048390
Yadav B Roopesh MS 2020 In-package atmospheric cold plasma inactivation of Salmonella in freeze-dried pet foods: Effect of inoculum population, water activity, and storage Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 66 102543 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102543
Yang J Pan M Han R Yang X Liu X Yuan S Wang S 2023 Food irradiation: An emerging processing technology to improve the quality and safety of foods Food Rev Int 1 23 10.1080/87559129.2023.2272961
Ye H Bhatt S Deutsch J Suri R 2022 Is there a market for upcycled pet food? J Clean Prod 343 130960 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130960
Yu TY Morton JD Clerens S Dyer JM 2017 Cooking-induced protein modifications in meat Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 16 141 159 10.1111/1541-4337.12243 33371543
Zhao Y Chen R Tian E Liu D Niu J Wang W Qi Z Xia Y Song Y Zhao Z 2018 Plasma-activated water treatment of fresh beef: Bacterial inactivation and effects on quality attributes IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci 4 113 120 10.1109/TRPMS.2018.2883789
Zhao Y Shao L Jia L Meng Z Liu Y Wang Y Zou B Dai R Li X Jia F 2022 Subcellular inactivation mechanisms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa treated by cold atmospheric plasma and application on chicken breasts Food Res Int 160 111720 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111720 36076413
Zhao YM Oliveira M Burgess CM Cropotova J Rustad T Sun DW Tiwari BK 2021 Combined effects of ultrasound, plasma-activated water, and peracetic acid on decontamination of mackerel fillets LWT-Food Sci Technol 150 111957 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111957
