
==== Front
Curr Opin Neurol
Curr Opin Neurol
CONEU
Current Opinion in Neurology
1350-7540
1473-6551
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Hagerstown, MD

38967083
WCO370509
10.1097/WCO.0000000000001294
00018
3
MOTOR NEURON DISEASE: Edited by Ryuji Kaji and Matthew C. Kiernan
The genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Nijs Melissa a
Van Damme Philip a b
a Laboratory of Neurobiology, Department of Neuroscience, Leuven Brain Institute, University of Leuven (KU Leuven)
b Neurology Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Correspondence to Philip Van Damme, Neurology Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Tel: +32 16 344280; e-mail: philip.vandamme@uzleuven.be
10 2024
22 8 2024
37 5 560569
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

Purpose of review

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has a strong genetic basis, but the genetic landscape of ALS appears to be complex. The purpose of this article is to review recent developments in the genetics of ALS.

Recent findings

Large-scale genetic studies have uncovered more than 40 genes contributing to ALS susceptibility. Both rare variants with variable effect size and more common variants with small effect size have been identified. The most common ALS genes are C9orf72, SOD1, TARDBP and FUS. Some of the causative genes of ALS are shared with frontotemporal dementia, confirming the molecular link between both diseases. Access to diagnostic gene testing for ALS has to improve, as effective gene silencing therapies for some genetic subtypes of ALS are emerging, but there is no consensus about which genes to test for.

Summary

Our knowledge about the genetic basis of ALS has improved and the first effective gene silencing therapies for specific genetic subtypes of ALS are underway. These therapeutic advances underline the need for better access to gene testing for people with ALS. Further research is needed to further map the genetic heterogeneity of ALS and to establish the best strategy for gene testing in a clinical setting.

Keywords

C9orf72
gene testing
genotype-phenotype correlation
heritability
SOD1
FWO-VlaanderenG077121N OPEN-ACCESSTRUE
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder, primarily affecting the motor system [1]. Degeneration of upper motor neurons in the motor cortex and of lower motor neurons in the brainstem and spinal cord give rise to progressive motor impairment, with muscle weakness, wasting and spasticity. Survival is typically limited to 2–5 years after disease onset, due to respiratory muscle weakness. Riluzole and multidisciplinary care with nutritional and ventilatory support remain the cornerstone of the management of ALS [2]. In up to 50% of patients, there is extramotor involvement with cognitive and behavioral impairment, due to frontal and anterior temporal neuronal loss [3]. ALS is a familial disorder in about 10% of patients (fALS); the remaining 90% do not have affected family members and are classified as sporadic ALS (sALS). ALS has a strong genetic basis, and since the discovery of the first ALS gene (superoxide dismutase 1, SOD1) in 1993 [4], more than 40 additional ALS genes have been described [5,6]. In a large proportion of patients with fALS (50–85%), an underlying mendelian gene mutation can be found [7], but also in up to 10–20% of sALS [8▪,9▪,10]. Most genes have an autosomal dominant inheritance, but reduced penetrance is a common theme. In addition, rare and common genetic variants with smaller effect size contribute to ALS risk, and combinations of genetic variants occur, suggesting that the genetic landscape of ALS is complex [6]. Although ALS is genetically a very heterogeneous disorder, the disease protein aggregating in up to 97% of patients is TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) [11]. TDP-43 is an RNA and DNA-binding protein, which mostly resides in the nucleus under normal conditions. It is able to shuttle to the cytoplasm and plays important roles in transcription, splicing and RNA transport. In ALS, mislocalization of TDP-43 to the cytoplasm with nuclear depletion and cytoplasmic aggregation, phosphorylation and cleavage is observed in motor neurons and glial cells. How mutations in a diverse set of genes lead to TDP-43 disease is poorly understood and how patients without any gene mutation develop TDP-43 disease remains enigmatic. Two notable exceptions which do not display TDP-43 pathology are ALS caused by mutations in SOD1 and fused in sarcoma (FUS), which are associated with aggregation of the respective proteins. The progress in our understanding of the molecular genetics of ALS has opened avenues for creating disease models to unravel disease pathways leading to motor neuron degeneration. This has resulted in the first FDA- and EMA-approved drug for SOD1-ALS, as intrathecally administered antisense oligonucleotides against SOD1 can reduced neurofilaments (a marker of neuronal/axonal injury) and slow down disease progression [12▪▪]. A similar gene silencing therapy for FUS-ALS is being developed and the first results look promising [13▪▪]. These precision medicine approaches are changing the therapeutic landscape of ALS, and a series of other targeted molecular therapies are now under development [14▪].

Gene testing for ALS using whole exome or whole genome sequencing and gene panel analysis is emerging, but many questions about which genes to include, how to report variants with small or uncertain effect size and how to provide genetic counseling for such variants remain. The scope of this review is to give an overview of recent advancements in the field of genetics of ALS, about genotype-phenotype correlations and how this could affect gene testing in a clinical setting. 

Box 1 no caption available

TEXT OF REVIEW

Heritability of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

The heritability of ALS is quite high. In the majority of patients with fALS, an underlying gene mutation can be found, but also in patients with apparently sALS, the heritability is estimated to be 40–60%, based on twin and parent-offspring pair studies [15,16]. Although the genetic predisposition to develop ALS appears to be high, epigenetic factors, aging and environmental exposures also contribute to ALS risk [17]. Part of the heritability of ALS in simplex cases can be explained by monogenetic pathogenic gene mutations in known ALS genes. Extensive gene testing reveals mutations in 10–20% of sALS cases, but the majority of them remains unexplained. A small proportion of ALS risk is attributable to common variants [18]. Rare less damaging variants and combinations of different types of variants most likely contribute as well, but larger studies are required to map them better and combine them in polygenetic risk scores.

Types of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis genes

More than 40 genes have been associated with ALS over the last decades using next-generation sequencing techniques. The heterogeneity in disease causes is overwhelming, but many ALS genes tend to cluster in pathways of protein degradation machinery, RNA metabolism, axonal function and DNA repair [19] (Fig. 1). The genetic variants range from highly penetrant rare variants, over rare variants with moderate effect size to common variants with small effect size, illustrating the complex genetic landscape of ALS (Table 1) [56–80]. The prevalence of different gene mutations is also variable and may differ geographically. An overview of the most common gene mutations is given below. Many of the ALS genes can also cause ALS-FTD or FTD, underscoring the molecular link between both disorders. The reasons why some individuals with such gene mutations develop ALS or rather FTD remain unclear.

FIGURE 1 Overview of most important ALS-related genes and their roles in motor neurons. (a) NEK1 and C21orf2 play a role in ciliogenesis and cilia maintenance. (b) VCP, TBK1, C9orf72, UBQLN1, SQSTM1, VAPB, CHMP2B, ANXA11, SIGMAR1, OPTN, FIG4, ALS2 and CCNF are involved in the proteasomal and/or autophagy-mediated degradation of misfolded proteins. (c) CHCHD10, SOD1 and TDP-43 are involved in the regulation of mitochondrial dynamics. (d) FUS, TDP-43, NEK1 and C21orf2 facilitate DNA repair. (e) TDP-43, FUS, ANG, SETX, HNRNPA1/A2B1, MATR3, ATXN2 and TIA-1 regulate the RNA metabolism of motor neurons at various levels. (f) ALS2, PFN1, NEFH, PRPH, TUBA4A, SPG11 and NEK1 contribute to the assembly and/or stability of cytoskeletal components. KIF5A and DCTN1 are key players in bidirectional axonal transport. Hh, hedgehog; SMO, Smoothened receptor; UPS, ubiquitin-proteasome system; SG, stress granule; pri-miRNA, primary microRNA; premiRNA, precursor microRNA. Figure created with BioRender.com.

Table 1 Overview of the most important amyotrophic lateral sclerosis genes

Gene	Chromosomal
Location	Inheritance
pattern	Segregation in ≥6 families	Frequency
fALS	Frequency
sALS	Estimated OR	Phenotype	Implicated
Pathway	
Rare variants with high effect size (OR >10)	
 C9orf72 [20,21]	9p21.2	AD	Yes	30–60%	5–10%	13.19–35.57	Adult
Bulbar onset
ALS/FTD	Proteostasis	
 SOD1 [4]	21q22.11	AD	Yes	12–20%	1–2%	54	Adult
Classic
LMN dominant	Proteostasis, Oxidative stress	
 TARDBP [25–27]	1p36.22	AD	Yes	3–5%	1%	24.57	Adult
Classic
UMN dominant
Early onset
Slow progression	RNA metabolism, stress granules	
 FUS [28]	16p11.2	AD, AR	Yes	2–4%	1%	36.19	Adult:
Classic
Juvenile: fast progression	RNA metabolism, stress granules	
 TBK1 [29,30]	12q14.2	AD	Yes	3%	<1	52.92	Adult
Classic
ALS/FTD	Proteostasis	
 TUBA4A [56]	2q35	AD	/	<1%	<1%	36	Adult
Classic	Cytoskeleton	
 UBQLN2 [57]	Xp11.21	X-linked, AD	/	<1%	<1%	22.11	Adult, Juvenile
Bulbar onset
ALS/FTD	Proteostasis	
 VCP [58]	9p13.3	AD	/	1–2%	1%	14.15	Adult
Classic
ALS/FTD	Proteostasis	
 OPTN [33]	10p13	AD, AR	Yes	1–4%	<1%	13.62	Adult
Spinal onset
Slow progression	Proteostasis	
 NEK1 [34]	4q33	AD	/	1–2%	<1%	11.84	Adult
Classic	Cytoskeleton,
DNA repair, Cilia	
Rare variants with intermediate effect size [1.2<OR<10]	
 TIA1 [59]	2p13.3	AD	/	2%	<1%	6.9	Adult
Classic
ALS/FTD	RNA metabolism, stress granules	
 ATXN2 [39]	12q24.12	AD	/	1–2%	1–3%	6.31	Adult
Spinal onset
ALS/FTD	RNA metabolism, Stress granule	
 ANXA11 [60]	10q22.3	AD	Yes	1%	1–2%	4.53	Adult
Bulbar onset	Proteostasis	
 SQSTM1 [61]	5q35.3	AD	/	<1%	<1%	3.91	Adult
Classic
ALS/FTD	Proteostasis	
 ANG [62]	14q11.2	AD	/	<1%	<1%	3.77	Adult
Classic	RNA metabolism	
 PRPH [63]	12q13.12	AD, AR	/	/	<1%	3.51	Adult
Spinal onset	Cytoskeleton	
 PFN1 [64]	17p13.2	AD	/	3%	<1%	3.26	Adult
Spinal onset
Flail leg
	Cytoskeleton,
Mitochondrial dysfunction	
 SETX [65]	9qp34.13	AD	/	<1%	<1%	3.19	Juvenile	RNA metabolism, DNA repair	
 SPG11 [66]	15q21.1	AD	Yes	<1%	<1%	2.88	Juvenile
Bulbar/spinal onset
Slow progression	Axonal transport	
 FIG4 [67]	6q21.1	AD, AR	/	<1%	<1%	2.56	Adult
Bulbar/spinal onset
	Proteostasis	
 DCTN1 [68]	2p13.1	AD	/	<1%	<1%	2.51	Adult
Classic
Slow progression	Axonal transport	
 ALS2 [69]	2q33.1	AD	/	<1%	<1%	2.48	Juvenile
UMN dominant	Proteostasis	
 VAPB [70]	20q13.32	AD	Yes	<1%	<1%	2.04	Adult
Spinal
LMN dominant
	Proteostasis	
 GLT8D1 [71]	2p21.1	AD	/	<1%	<1%	1.89	Adult
Classic
	Proteostasis	
 NEFH [72]	22q12.2	AD	/	<1%	<1%	1.73	Adult
Classic	Cytoskeleton	
 C21orf2/
CFAP410 [18]	21q22.3	NA	/	<1%	<1%	1.65	Adult
Classic	Cytoskeleton,
DNA repair, Cilia	
 CHMP2B [73]	3p11.2	AD	/	<1%	<1%	1.61	Adult
Bulbar
ALS/FTD	Proteostasis	
 CHCHD10 [74]	22q11.23	AD	/	<1%	<1%	1.51	Adult
Bulbar
ALS/FTD	Mitochondrial dysfunction	
 KIF5A [37,38]	12q13.3	AD	Yes	0.5–3%	<1%	1.38	Adult
Spinal
Early onset
Slow progression	Axonal transport	
Rare variants with small effect size (OR <1.2)	
 CCNF [75]	16p13.3	AD	/	1–3%	<1%	1.13	Adult
Classic	Proteostasis	
Rare variants with unknown effect size	
 ERBB4 [76]	2q34	AD	/	1%	<1%	NA	Adult
Classic	Tyrosine kinase	
 HNRNPA1 [77]	12q13.13	AD	/	<1%	<1%	NA	Adult
Spinal onset
Flail arm
Slow progression	RNA metabolism	
 HNRNPA2B1 [77]	7p15.2	AD	/	<1%	<1%	NA	Adult
Spinal onset
Flail arm	RNA metabolism	
 MATR3 [78]	5q31.3	AD	Yes	<1%	<1%	NA	Adult
Classic	Proteostasis	
 SIGMAR1 [79]	9p13.3	AD, AR	/	<1%	<1%	NA	Juvenile
Spinal onset
Slow progression	Proteostasis	
 SPTLC1 [80]	9q22.31	De novo	/	<1%	<1%	NA	Juvenile
Spinal onset
LMN dominant	Sphingolipid synthesis	
Common variants with small effect size	
 UNC13A [44]	19p13.11	/	/	/	15%	1.12	Adult
Bulbar onset
Fast progression	Synaptic function	
 ERGIC1 [43]	5q35	/	/	/	39.7%	NA	NA	Proteostasis	
 SLC9A8 [43]	20q13.13	/	/	/	35.3%	NA	NA	Ion homeostasis	
 SCFD1 [43]	14q12	/	/	/	33.7%	NA	NA	Proteostasis	
 RPSA [43]	3p21.3	/	/	/	29%	NA	NA	RNA metabolism	
 COG3 [43]	13q14.13	/	/	/	25.9%	NA	NA	Proteostasis	
 GPX3 [43]	5q33.1	/	/	/	25.3%	NA	NA	Oxidative stress	
 PTPRN2 [43]	7q36.3	/	/	/	12.4%	NA	NA	Tyrosine phosphatase	
 HLA [43]	6p21.3	/	/	/	9.6%	NA	NA	Immune response	
ALS2, alsin; ANG, angiogenin; ANXA11, annexin A11; ATXN2, ataxin 2; C21orf2, chromosome 21 open reading frame 2; C9orf72, chromosome 9 open reading frame 72; CCNF, cyclin F; CFAP410, cilia and flagella associated protein 410; CHCHD10, coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain containing 10; CHMP2B, charged multivesicular body protein 2B; COG3, component of oligomeric Golgi complex 3; DCTN1, dynactin subunit 1; ERBB4, Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 4; ERGIC1, endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi intermediate compartment 1; FIG4, FIG4 phosphoinositide 5-phosphatase; FUS, fused in sarcoma; GLT8D1, glycosyltransferase 8 domain containing 1; GPX3, glutathione peroxidase 3; HNRNPA1, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1; HNRNPA2B1, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2/B1; KIF5A, kinesin family member 5A; MATR3, matrin 3; NA, not assessed; NEFH, neurofilament heavy chain; NEK1, NIMA-related kinase 1; OPTN, optineurin; OR, odds ratio; PFN1, profilin 1; PRPH, peripherin; PTPRN2, protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N2; RPSA, ribosomal protein SA; SCFD1, Sec1 family domain containing 1; SETX, senataxin; SIGMAR1, sigma nonopioid intracellular receptor 1; SLC9A8, solute carrier family 9 member A8; SOD1, superoxide dismutase 1; SPG11, spastic paraplegia 11; SPTLC1, serine palmitoyltransferase long chain base subunit 1; SQSTM1, sequestosome 1; TARDBP, TAR DNA-binding protein; TBK1, TANK-binding kinase 1; TIA1, cytotoxic granule associated RNA Binding Protein; TUBA4A, tubulin alpha 4A; UBQLN2, ubiquilin 2; UNC13A, Unc-13 homolog A; VAPB, VAMP associated protein B and C; VCP, valosin containing protein.

Rare variants with high effect size

Such pathogenic mutations are found in well established ALS genes and reported to segregate with disease in multiple pedigrees. The five most common ALS genes are chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72), superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), TAR DNA-binding protein (TARDBP), fused in sarcoma (FUS) and TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1). A reduced penetrance has been described for all these genes, and thus, a negative family history does not exclude the presence of a hereditary form of ALS.

Heterozygous hexanucleotide (GGGGCC) repeat expansions in C9orf72 are by far the most common, responsible for 30–60% of fALS and 5–10% of sALS [20,21]. It is also a common cause of FTD and ALS-FTD. C9orf72 plays a role in endosome maturation and autophagy and both loss-of-function and gain-of-function disease mechanisms have been implicated in the disease. The repeat expansion may hamper transcription of C9orf72, but is also transcribed in sense and antisense RNA, which leads to formation of RNA foci (containing repeat RNA and sequestered RNA-binding proteins) and to translation into dipeptide repeat proteins, which can be toxic [22].

Mutations in SOD1 (mostly dominant missense mutations) explain 10–20% of fALS and 1–2% of sALS. SOD1 gene mutation carriers rarely have concomitant FTD, although frontotemporal involvement has been reported [23,24]. SOD1 is involved in the defense against free radicals, but the mutations cause ALS by inducing SOD1 aggregation and toxicity. Reducing the expression of SOD1 by intrathecal administration of antisense oligonucleotides against SOD1 results in a drastic reduction of neurofilaments, which is followed by a clinical response (with reduced or even halted disease progression, with some improvements in motor function in a proportion of patients) [12▪▪].

Mutations in TARDBP (mostly heterozygous missense mutations) are responsible for 3–5% of fALS and found in less than 1% of sALS patients [25–27]. Frontotemporal involvement is uncommon in this type of ALS. TARDBP encodes the protein TDP-43 and missense mutations cluster in the C-terminal part of the protein (encoded by exon 6). Mutations render the protein more prone to aggregation with cytoplasmic mislocalization and nuclear clearance as a consequence.

Mutations in FUS (mostly heterozygous missense mutations) cause 2–4% of fALS and less than 1% of sALS [28]. De-novo mutations occur. Some mutations (in particular the P525L mutation) give rise to a very aggressive form of juvenile ALS, while other mutations cause adult-onset ALS, usually without cognitive or behavioral problems. FUS is also an RNA and DNA-binding protein and mutations cluster in the C-terminus of the protein containing the nuclear localization signal. Cytoplasmic aggregation of FUS and nuclear loss-of-function are thought to cause motor neuron loss.

Mutations in TBK1 are found in 1–3% of fALS and in less than 1% of sALS [29,30]. Most mutations are heterozygous loss-of-function mutations, suggesting a haploinsufficiency mechanism. TBK1 is kinase involved in autophagy regulation, for example, by phosphorylating the autophagy receptor optineurin (OPTN) and SMCR8, which forms a complex with C9orf72, thereby promoting autophagosome maturation [31,32].

OPTN mutations are found in 1–4% of fALS and in 0.4% of sALS, in particular is Asian populations [33]. The disease most commonly has a limb onset with long duration before respiratory muscle weakness develops. FTD is not common, but is present in some patients. OPTN is a multifunctional protein, which is also active as autophagy receptor.

Heterozygous loss-of-function or missense mutations in NIMA-related kinase 1 (NEK1) are present in 1–2% of fALS and 0.9% of sALS [34]. Bulbar and upper limb onset is more common and patients display prominent upper motor neuron signs, but there usually is no frontotemporal involvement. NEK1 is a kinase, which phosphorylates its binding partner C21orf2 and this complex has been thought to play a role in DNA damage repair and primary cilia function [35,36].

Rare variants with intermediate effect size

Rare heterozygous missense and loss-of-function variants in C21orf2 were found to be associated with an increased ALS risk, confirming the importance of the NEK1-C21orf2 complex for ALS [18].

Kinesin Family Member 5A (KIF5A) mutations are found in 0.5% of fALS and 0.1% of sALS [37,38]. The mutations cluster in exon 27 and alter the tail domain of the protein. The disease progression is typically somewhat slower and is characterized by prominent upper motor neuron signs. KIF5A is involved in anterograde axonal transport.

Intermediate repeat expansions in the ataxin2 gene (ATXN2) have been associated with ALS [39,40]. ATXN2 was found to be a modifier of TDP-43 toxicity and reducing ATXN2 expression was later shown to modify the phenotype of TDP-43 overexpression mice [41]. Repeat of at least 33 cause spinocerebellar ataxia type 2, but intermediate repeat lengths (in particular 29–33) are associated with an increased risk of developing ALS (odds ratio 3.06) [42]. ATXN2 lowering using ASOs is currently being investigated as therapy for ALS [14▪].

Common variants with small effect size

Genome-wide association studies have revealed 15 loci associated with ALS risk, but many of them tag rare variants in known ALS genes [43]. The best studied common variant is rs12608932 in Unc13 Homolog A (UNC13A) [44], which confers a small risk for both ALS and FTD [45▪]. Homozygosity for the C-allele at rs12608932, which is present in about 15% of individuals, also modifies the ALS phenotype, with more common bulbar-onset disease, cognitive impairment and FTD and a shorter survival [45▪]. At the molecular level, nuclear TDP-43 depletion induces miss-splicing of UNC13A resulting in reduced UNC13A levels [46▪▪], and this is favored by the at-risk allele in UNC13A[47▪▪].

GENOTYPE-PHENOTYPE CORRELATIONS

Although it is not possible to discriminate sporadic ALS from specific subtypes of hereditary ALS on clinical grounds, several specific genotype-phenotype correlations exist (see Table 1). This suggest that certain genetic variants selectively affect the vulnerability of certain pools of neurons. Mutations in C9orf72 are more commonly associated with a bulbar onset ALS and with concomitant FTD and a more aggressive disease course. Mutations in SOD1 most frequently present a decade earlier than sALS, with a lower limb onset and predominant lower motor neuron involvement. The disease progression can be slow or fast, depending on the mutation [48▪].

Mutations in TARDBP present more commonly with upper limb onset and typically have a younger disease onset but slow disease progression [49▪]. Bulbar onset is uncommon for TARDBP-ALS. FUS mutations can present as aggressive juvenile ALS (in particular de-novo P525L mutations), or axial ALS with profound neck extensor weakness, or classic ALS with slower disease progression [50,51▪]. Cognitive impairment is uncommon.

Mutations in TBK1 often present with FTD and patients presenting with ALS often develop frontotemporal involvement later in the disease [29,30].

GENE TESTING

With the advent of molecular therapies for specific genetic subtypes of ALS and ongoing gene therapy trials, there is a pressing need for better gene testing in ALS [52]. In patients with a family history of ALS, this has become common practice, but as many mutations in ALS genes have incomplete penetrance, testing apparently sporadic cases is important as well, irrespective of the age at disease onset [53]. There is a growing consensus to offer gene testing to all ALS patients, but the access to gene testing and the test modalities are variable geographically. Current guidelines state that all persons with ALS should be offered genetic testing, consisting of candidate gene testing for the most common genes, including C9orf72, SOD1, TARDBP and FUS at a minimum [54▪▪]. Gene panel analysis following whole-exome or whole-genome testing is possible, but there is no consensus on which genes to include in such panels. Recent studies suggest that pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants can be detected in 10–25% of apparently sporadic cases [8▪,10,55]. How to deal with new variants of unknown significance is a matter of debate, but the meaning of such variants will become clear with time as more and more results from gene panels become available. The turn-around time of a test is also an important factor to take into account to choose the method for gene testing and should preferably be less than 1–3 months, certainly for genes for which molecular therapies can be offered.

Gene testing should not be offered without access to genetic counseling and education. It should include a personalized risk assessment and discussion about the heritability of ALS and the potential impact of a positive test result preceding the decision to undergo gene testing [54▪▪]. Posttest counseling should include discussions about the impact of negative, uncertain or positive test results, the risks for family members and the available options with regards to preventing transmission of gene mutations to future generations.

CONCLUSION

Our knowledge about the genetics of ALS has expanded significantly in the last two decades, but the genetic landscape appears to be complex. Pathogenetic mutations underly 15–20% of all ALS, but rare variants with smaller effect size, common variants with small effect size and combinations thereof contribute to the susceptibility of ALS. As the first genetic therapies are emerging, gene testing for all patients becomes an important issue, but the optimal testing approach remains less clear.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank our patients and their families for participating in our research studies.

Financial support and sponsorship

P.V.D. holds a senior clinical investigatorship of FWO-Vlaanderen (G077121N) and is supported by the E. von Behring Chair for Neuromuscular and Neurodegenerative Disorders, the ALS Liga België and the KU Leuven funds ‘Een Hart voor ALS’, ‘Laeversfonds voor ALS Onderzoek’ and the ‘Valéry Perrier Race against ALS Fund’.

Conflicts of interest

P.V.D. has served in advisory boards for Biogen, CSL Behring, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Ferrer, QurAlis, Cytokinetics, Argenx, UCB, Muna Therapeutics, Alector, Augustine Therapeutics, VectorY, Zambon, Amylyx, Sapreme Technologies, Novartis (paid to institution). P.V.D. has received speaker fees from Biogen and Amylyx (paid to institution).

REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

▪ of special interest

▪▪ of outstanding interest
==== Refs
REFERENCES

1 Masrori P Van Damme P . Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a clinical review. Eur J Neurol 2020; 27 :1918–1929.32526057
2 Van Damme P Al-Chalabi A Andersen PM . European Academy of Neurology (EAN) guideline on the management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in collaboration with European Reference Network for Neuromuscular Diseases (ERN EURO-NMD). Eur J Neurol 2024; 31 :e16264.38470068
3 Phukan J Pender NP Hardiman O . Cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6 :994–1003.17945153
4 Rosen DR . Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature 1993; 362 :59–62.8446170
5 Al-Chalabi A van den Berg LH Veldink J . Gene discovery in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: implications for clinical management. Nat Rev Neurol 2017; 13 :96–104.27982040
6 Goutman SA Hardiman O Al-Chalabi A . Emerging insights into the complex genetics and pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2022; 21 :465–479.35334234
7 Muller K Brenner D Weydt P . Comprehensive analysis of the mutation spectrum in 301 German ALS families. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2018; 89 :817–827.29650794
8▪ Van Daele SH Moisse M van Vugt J . Genetic variability in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 2023; 146 :3760–3769.37043475
In this study, whole genome sequencing data from 6013 sporadic ALS patients was analyzed using a diagnostic algorithm using the ACMG variant classification, thereby revealing that a pathogenic mutation is present in 11% of cases and that a genetic risk factor can be identified in an additional 17%.

9▪ Ruf WP Boros M Freischmidt A . Spectrum and frequency of genetic variants in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Commun 2023; 5 :fcad152.37223130
This study reports on the results of gene panel testing in 2267 German sporadic ALS patients and confirms that pathogenic mutations are identified in 13% of cases.

10 Shepheard SR Parker MD Cooper-Knock J . Value of systematic genetic screening of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2021; 92 :510–518.33589474
11 Neumann M Sampathu DM Kwong LK . Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science 2006; 314 :130–133.17023659
12▪▪ Miller TM Cudkowicz ME Genge A . Trial of antisense oligonucleotide tofersen for SOD1 ALS. N Engl J Med 2022; 387 :1099–1110.36129998
Landmark study describing the positive biomarker and clinical effects of the first gene silencing therapy for a genetic subtype of ALS, caused by mutations in the SOD1 gene. The therapy is FDA and EMA-approved and is bringing hope to the ALS field that similar molecular strategies might work for other forms of ALS as well.

13▪▪ Korobeynikov VA Lyashchenko AK Blanco-Redondo B . Antisense oligonucleotide silencing of FUS expression as a therapeutic approach in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Med 2022; 28 :104–116.35075293
This study describes the development of an antisense oligonucleotide against FUS for FUS-ALS and reports on the results in preclinical models and the first in human experiences.

14▪ Van Daele SH Masrori P Van Damme P . The sense of antisense therapies in ALS. Trends Mol Med 2024; 30 :252–262.38216448
This study gives an overview of the antisense oligonucleotide therapies under development for ALS.

15 Al-Chalabi A Fang F Hanby MF . An estimate of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis heritability using twin data. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010; 81 :1324–1326.20861059
16 Ryan M Heverin M McLaughlin RL . Lifetime risk and heritability of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 2019; 76 :1367–1374.31329211
17 Vasta R Chia R Traynor BJ . Unraveling the complex interplay between genes, environment, and climate in ALS. EBioMedicine 2022; 75 :103795.34974309
18 van Rheenen W Shatunov A Dekker AM . Genome-wide association analyses identify new risk variants and the genetic architecture of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Genet 2016; 48 :1043–1048.27455348
19 Brown RH Al-Chalabi A . Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2017; 377 :162–172.28700839
20 DeJesus-Hernandez M Mackenzie IR Boeve BF . Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron 2011; 72 :245–256.21944778
21 Renton AE Majounie E Waite A . A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD. Neuron 2011; 72 :257–268.21944779
22 Beckers J Tharkeshwar AK Van Damme P . C9orf72 ALS-FTD: recent evidence for dysregulation of the autophagy-lysosome pathway at multiple levels. Autophagy 2021; 17 :3306–3322.33632058
23 Forsberg KM Graffmo KS Stenvall E . Widespread CNS pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis homozygous for the D90A SOD1 mutation. Acta Neuropathol 2023; 145 :13–28.36385230
24 De Vocht J Van Weehaeghe D Ombelet F . Differences in cerebral glucose metabolism in ALS patients with and without C9orf72 and SOD1 mutations. Cells 2023; 12 :933.36980274
25 Sreedharan J Blair IP Tripathi VB . TDP-43 mutations in familial and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science 2008; 319 :1668–1672.18309045
26 Kabashi E Valdmanis PN Dion P . TARDBP mutations in individuals with sporadic and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Genet 2008; 40 :572–574.18372902
27 Van Deerlin VM Leverenz JB Bekris LM . TARDBP mutations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with TDP-43 neuropathology: a genetic and histopathological analysis. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7 :409–416.18396105
28 Kwiatkowski TJ Jr Bosco DA Leclerc AL . Mutations in the FUS/TLS gene on chromosome 16 cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science 2009; 323 :1205–1208.19251627
29 Freischmidt A Wieland T Richter B . Haploinsufficiency of TBK1 causes familial ALS and fronto-temporal dementia. Nat Neurosci 2015; 18 :631–636.25803835
30 Cirulli ET Lasseigne BN Petrovski S . Exome sequencing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis identifies risk genes and pathways. Science 2015; 347 :1436–1441.25700176
31 Wild P Farhan H McEwan DG . Phosphorylation of the autophagy receptor optineurin restricts Salmonella growth. Science 2011; 333 :228–233.21617041
32 Sellier C Campanari ML Julie Corbier C . Loss of C9ORF72 impairs autophagy and synergizes with polyQ Ataxin-2 to induce motor neuron dysfunction and cell death. EMBO J 2016; 35 :1276–1297.27103069
33 Maruyama H Morino H Ito H . Mutations of optineurin in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature 2010; 465 :223–226.20428114
34 Kenna KP van Doormaal PT Dekker AM . NEK1 variants confer susceptibility to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Genet 2016; 48 :1037–1042.27455347
35 Gregorczyk M Pastore G Munoz I . Functional characterization of C21ORF2 association with the NEK1 kinase mutated in human in diseases. Life Sci Alliance 2023; 6 :e202201740.37188479
36 De Decker M Zelina P Moens TG . C21orf2 mutations found in ALS disrupt primary cilia function. bioRxiv 2022; 10.1101/2022.02.28.482239
37 Nicolas A Kenna KP Renton AE . Genome-wide analyses identify KIF5A as a novel ALS gene. Neuron 2018; 97 :1268–1283. e6.
38 Brenner D Yilmaz R Muller K . Hot-spot KIF5A mutations cause familial ALS. Brain 2018; 141 :688–697.29342275
39 Elden AC Kim HJ Hart MP . Ataxin-2 intermediate-length polyglutamine expansions are associated with increased risk for ALS. Nature 2010; 466 :1069–1075.20740007
40 Van Damme P Veldink JH van Blitterswijk M . Expanded ATXN2 CAG repeat size in ALS identifies genetic overlap between ALS and SCA2. Neurology 2011; 76 :2066–2072.21562247
41 Becker LA Huang B Bieri G . Therapeutic reduction of ataxin-2 extends lifespan and reduces pathology in TDP-43 mice. Nature 2017; 544 :367–371.28405022
42 Sproviero W Shatunov A Stahl D . ATXN2 trinucleotide repeat length correlates with risk of ALS. Neurobiol Aging 2017; 51 :178.e1–178.e9.
43 van Rheenen W van der Spek RAA Bakker MK . Common and rare variant association analyses in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis identify 15 risk loci with distinct genetic architectures and neuron-specific biology. Nat Genet 2021; 53 :1636–1648.34873335
44 van Es MA Veldink JH Saris CG . Genome-wide association study identifies 19p13.3 (UNC13A) and 9p21.2 as susceptibility loci for sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Genet 2009; 41 :1083–1087.19734901
45▪ Willemse SW Harley P van Eijk RPA . UNC13A in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: from genetic association to therapeutic target. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2023; 94 :649–656.36737245
This study reviews the role of UNC13A in ALS and how this genetic risk factor influences the phenotype and molecular pathology of ALS.

46▪▪ Ma XR Prudencio M Koike Y . TDP-43 represses cryptic exon inclusion in the FTD-ALS gene UNC13A. Nature 2022; 603 :124–130.35197626
This publication links loss of TDP-43 function to the expression of a cryptic exon in UNC13A, leading to reduced UNC13A expression.

47▪▪ Brown AL Wilkins OG Keuss MJ . TDP-43 loss and ALS-risk SNPs drive mis-splicing and depletion of UNC13A. Nature 2022; 603 :131–137.35197628
This publication reports on the molecular link between TDP-43 nuclear loss-of-function and reduced UNC13A expression and reveals the mechanism by which UNC13A variants exacerbate the effects of decreased TDP-43 function.

48▪ Domi T Schito P Sferruzza G . Unveiling the SOD1-mediated ALS phenotype: insights from a comprehensive meta-analysis. J Neurol 2024; 271 :1342–1354.37930481
This study reviews the genotype-phenotype correlations of SOD1-ALS.

49▪ Lombardi M Corrado L Piola B . Variability in clinical phenotype in TARDBP mutations: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis case description and literature review. Genes (Basel) 2023; 14 :2039.38002982
This study reports on the phenotype of TARDBP-ALS in Italian cases and previously published cases.

50 Naumann M Peikert K Gunther R . Phenotypes and malignancy risk of different FUS mutations in genetic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2019; 6 :2384–2394.31682085
51▪ Grassano M Brodini G De Marco G . Phenotype analysis of fused in sarcoma mutations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurol Genet 2022; 8 :e200011.36105853
This study describes the phenotype of 22 Italian FUS-ALS patients and meta-analysis of previously published cases.

52 Salmon K Kiernan MC Kim SH . The importance of offering early genetic testing in everyone with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 2022; 145 :1207–1210.35020823
53 Mehta PR Iacoangeli A Opie-Martin S . The impact of age on genetic testing decisions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 2022; 145 :4440–4447.36162820
54▪▪ Roggenbuck J Eubank BHF Wright J . Evidence-based consensus guidelines for ALS genetic testing and counseling. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2023; 10 :2074–2091.37691292
Recent consensus guideline about genetic testing in ALS, taking into account the complex genetic landscape and the recent developments in ALS genetics.

55 Grassano M Calvo A Moglia C . Systematic evaluation of genetic mutations in ALS: a population-based study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022; 93 :1190–1193.35896380
56 Smith BN Ticozzi N Fallini C . Exome-wide rare variant analysis identifies TUBA4A mutations associated with familial ALS. Neuron 2014; 84 :324–331.25374358
57 Deng HX Chen W Hong ST . Mutations in UBQLN2 cause dominant X-linked juvenile and adult-onset ALS and ALS/dementia. Nature 2011; 477 :211–215.21857683
58 Johnson JO Mandrioli J Benatar M . Exome sequencing reveals VCP mutations as a cause of familial ALS. Neuron 2010; 68 :857–864.21145000
59 Mackenzie IR Nicholson AM Sarkar M . TIA1 mutations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia promote phase separation and alter stress granule dynamics. Neuron 2017; 95 :808–816. e9.28817800
60 Smith BN Topp SD Fallini C . Mutations in the vesicular trafficking protein annexin A11 are associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Sci Transl Med 2017; 9 :eaad9157.28469040
61 Fecto F Yan J Vemula SP . SQSTM1 mutations in familial and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol 2011; 68 :1440–1446.22084127
62 Greenway MJ Andersen PM Russ C . ANG mutations segregate with familial and 'sporadic’ amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Genet 2006; 38 :411–413.16501576
63 Gros-Louis F Lariviere R Gowing G . A frameshift deletion in peripherin gene associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Biol Chem 2004; 279 :45951–45956.15322088
64 Wu CH Fallini C Ticozzi N . Mutations in the profilin 1 gene cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature 2012; 488 :499–503.22801503
65 Chen YZ Bennett CL Huynh HM . DNA/RNA helicase gene mutations in a form of juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS4). Am J Hum Genet 2004; 74 :1128–1135.15106121
66 Daoud H Zhou S Noreau A . Exome sequencing reveals SPG11 mutations causing juvenile ALS. Neurobiol Aging 2012; 33 :839.e5–839.e9.
67 Chow CY Landers JE Bergren SK . Deleterious variants of FIG4, a phosphoinositide phosphatase, in patients with ALS. Am J Hum Genet 2009; 84 :85–88.19118816
68 Munch C Sedlmeier R Meyer T . Point mutations of the p150 subunit of dynactin (DCTN1) gene in ALS. Neurology 2004; 63 :724–726.15326253
69 Yang Y Hentati A Deng HX . The gene encoding alsin, a protein with three guanine-nucleotide exchange factor domains, is mutated in a form of recessive amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Genet 2001; 29 :160–165.11586297
70 Nishimura AL Mitne-Neto M Silva HC . A mutation in the vesicle-trafficking protein VAPB causes late-onset spinal muscular atrophy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 75 :822–831.15372378
71 Cooper-Knock J Moll T Ramesh T . Mutations in the glycosyltransferase domain of GLT8D1 are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cell Rep 2019; 26 :2298–2306. e5.30811981
72 Figlewicz DA Krizus A Martinoli MG . Variants of the heavy neurofilament subunit are associated with the development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Hum Mol Genet 1994; 3 :1757–1761.7849698
73 Parkinson N Ince PG Smith MO . ALS phenotypes with mutations in CHMP2B (charged multivesicular body protein 2B). Neurology 2006; 67 :1074–1077.16807408
74 Johnson JO Glynn SM Gibbs JR . Mutations in the CHCHD10 gene are a common cause of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 2014; 137 :e311.25261972
75 Williams KL Topp S Yang S . CCNF mutations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Nat Commun 2016; 7 :11253.27080313
76 Takahashi Y Fukuda Y Yoshimura J . ERBB4 mutations that disrupt the neuregulin-ErbB4 pathway cause amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 19. Am J Hum Genet 2013; 93 :900–905.24119685
77 Kim HJ Kim NC Wang YD . Mutations in prion-like domains in hnRNPA2B1 and hnRNPA1 cause multisystem proteinopathy and ALS. Nature 2013; 495 :467–473.23455423
78 Johnson JO Pioro EP Boehringer A . Mutations in the Matrin 3 gene cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Neurosci 2014; 17 :664–666.24686783
79 Al-Saif A Al-Mohanna F Bohlega S . A mutation in sigma-1 receptor causes juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2011; 70 :913–919.21842496
80 Mohassel P Donkervoort S Lone MA . Childhood amyotrophic lateral sclerosis caused by excess sphingolipid synthesis. Nat Med 2021; 27 :1197–1204.34059824
