
==== Front
BMC Med
BMC Med
BMC Medicine
1741-7015
BioMed Central London

39232785
3574
10.1186/s12916-024-03574-x
Research
Cancer incidence (2000–2020) among individuals under 35: an emerging sex disparity in oncology
Cavazzani Alessandro 125
Angelini Claudia 3
Gregori Dario 4
Cardone Luca luca.cardone@cnr.it
luca.cardone@ifo.it

12
1 https://ror.org/04zaypm56 grid.5326.2 0000 0001 1940 4177 Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (IBBC), National Research Council (CNR), c/o Campus Internazionale “A.Buzzati-Traverso”, Via E. Ramarini, 32, Monterotondo Scalo Rome (RM), 00015 Italy
2 grid.417520.5 0000 0004 1760 5276 Unit of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, Rome, 00144 Italy
3 https://ror.org/04zaypm56 grid.5326.2 0000 0001 1940 4177 Institute for Applied Computing, National Research Council (CNR), Naples, Italy
4 https://ror.org/00240q980 grid.5608.b 0000 0004 1757 3470 Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
5 https://ror.org/02p77k626 grid.6530.0 0000 0001 2300 0941 Present Address: Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
4 9 2024
4 9 2024
2024
22 3639 3 2024
20 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Background

Aggressive malignancies, such as pancreatic cancer, are increasingly impacting young, female populations. Our investigation centered on whether the observed trends in cancer incidence were unique to pancreatic cancer or indicative of a broader trend across various cancer types. To delve deeper into this phenomenon, we analyzed cancer incidence trends across different age and sex groups. Furthermore, we explored differences in cancer incidence within specific young subgroups aged 18 to 26 and 27 to 34, to better understand the emerging incidence trend among young individuals.

Methods

This study collected cancer incidence data from one of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry databases (SEER22), with 10,183,928 total cases from 2000 to 2020. Data were analyzed through Joinpoint trend analysis approach to evaluate sex- and age-specific trends in cancer incidence. Exposure rates were reported as Average Annual Percentage Changes (AAPCs).

Results

The analysis revealed significant age and sex-specific disparities, particularly among individuals aged 18–26 and 27–34. Pancreatic cancer incidence rates increased more in females aged 18–26 (AAPC, 9.37% [95% CI, 7.36–11.41%]; p < .0001) than in males (4.43% [95% CI, 2.36–6.53%]; p < .0001). Notably, among gender, age, and other malignancies, young females had the highest AAPCs for pancreatic cancer. Additionally, the incidence of gastric cancer, myeloma, and colorectal malignancies also showed higher AAPCs in young females compared to males.

Conclusions

Recognizing emerging risk populations for highly lethal malignancies is crucial for early detection and effective disease management.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-024-03574-x.

Keywords

Pancreatic cancer
Gastrointestinal cancer
Incidence data
Young population
Age-sex differences
Risk populations
Early-onset cancer
issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcBackground

The existence of a significant sex gap in cancer incidence is a recurring theme in descriptive epidemiology. It has become increasingly apparent that disparities between sexes significantly influence cancer occurrence, with males recognized as having greater vulnerability to the development of cancer [1–5]. This notion has been challenged by recent studies revealing a higher incidence trend of pancreatic cancer (PC) among females aged 15–34 years compared to males [6], indicating the emergence of a novel risk population for this aggressive cancer. This observation is concerning as pancreatic cancer is currently the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide [1], and it is anticipated to become one of the deadliest cancers by 2030, primarily due to limited therapeutic advancements [7].

Early disease detection in populations at risk of PC may reduce the mortality rate. Pancreatic cancer primarily affects older adults, with approximately 90% of cases diagnosed in patients older than 55 years [8, 9]. In addition, males appear to have higher incidences than females, with this disparity being most pronounced in developed nations [9]. Hence, the emerging trend of increasing pancreatic cancer incidence among young female individuals was noteworthy since it underscores an increasing trend of the early onset of a devastating disease that has traditionally been considered to primarily affect the older adults. The observed trend of higher pancreatic cancer (PC) incidence in females aged 15–34 years compared to males was unexpected, as it deviates from common epidemiological trends typically seen in pancreatic cancer. As a possible explanation of such cancer incidences, sex-based disproportional exposure to known or unknown risk factors has been suggested [6]. Possibly, differences in exposure trends by age and sex to risk factors for pancreatic cancer, such as cigarette smoking, obesity, and diabetes, could have impacted the population over the last decades. Recently, Yan et al. analyzed the age-dependent association of risk factors with pancreatic cancer by implementing prospective cohorts with patients aged over 30 years, demonstrating that established risk factors such as cigarette smoking, obesity, and diabetes were most strongly associated with earlier-onset pancreatic cancer in the population aged 60 years or younger [10].

A deeper understanding of this epidemiological trend in cancer incidence among young populations is crucial for the early detection or prevention of PC and other aggressive cancers. This is particularly significant for the increasing number of younger individuals who are diagnosed with cancer. Our primary objective was to determine whether the increase in cancer incidence among young individuals, stratified by sex and age, was specific to pancreatic cancer or if it extended to other malignancies. Secondly, we aimed to investigate sex differences in cancer incidence within young subgroups to better delineate the emerging risk population among the young. To achieve this, we conducted an analysis of the SEER22 database, which reports cancer cases from 2000 to 2020.

Methods

Cancer incidence trend analysis

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program is a National Cancer Institute (NCI) instrument used for cancer surveillance. It collects cancer data from several locations and sources throughout the USA, covering almost 50% of the US population. For the aims of this study, SEER*Stat version 8.4.2 was used to calculate delay-adjusted cancer incidence rates per year. In particular, we considered pancreatic cancer, stomach cancer, lung and bronchus cancers, brain and other nervous system cancers, myeloma, colon and rectum cancers, melanoma, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer (female cases only), prostate cancer, and testicular cancer from the SEER22 database, spanning from 2000 to 2020. The patients were stratified into multiple age-sex non-overlapping groups. Then, Joinpoint Command version 4.9.0.0 (Statistical Methodology and Applications Branch, Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute) was implemented in R to run all trend analyses. Briefly, the simplest Joinpoint models were fit through Monte Carlo permutation tests on incidence rate data, and then Average Annual Percentage Changes (AAPCs) were estimated along with 95% confidence intervals; the significance of AAPC values was tested with 2-sided t-tests, and pairwise comparisons were carried out to evaluate the significance of sex as an interaction factor against it not being significant.

AAPCs measured in these analyses are summary estimates of the trend over a pre-specified fixed interval. They allow us to use a single number to describe the average APCs over a period of multiple years. They are computed as a weighted average of the APCs from the Joinpoint model, with the weights equal to the length of the APC interval. More info on the AAPC method can be found here: https://surveillance.cancer.gov/help/joinpoint/setting-parameters/method-and-parameters-tab/apc-aapctau-confidence-intervals/average-annual-percent-change-AAPC.

Statistical analysis

P-values computed for AAPCs and for sex interactions were corrected for multiplicity using the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) methodology. In all cases, the results were considered statistically significant when the adjusted p-values resulting from BH correction were < 0.05.

Results

PC incidence in females aged 18 to 34 years (henceforth defined as the young group) had a higher Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC) increase in incidence (AAPC, 6.22% [95% CI, 5.2–7.24%]; p < 0.0001) than young males (AAPC, 4.04% [95% CI, 2.84–5.26%]; p < 0.0001) with non-parallel trends (p = 0.017) (Fig. 1A and Table 1). The AAPC for PC in females aged 18 to 34 years was higher than that in females aged 35 to 54 years (hereafter referred to as the “Adult group”) (AAPC, 1.53% [95% CI, 1.24–1.82%]; p < 0.0001). Additionally, adult females had a higher AAPC compared to adult males (AAPC, 0.67% [95% CI, 0.4–0.95%]; p = 0.0001), with non-parallel trends (p = 0.0058). Overall, the AAPC of PC among young individuals was significantly higher than that among adults. Furthermore, the AAPC of PC incidence in the 55 + years age group was lower compared to young groups in both females (AAPC, 0.64% [95% CI, 0.54–0.75%]; p < 0.0001) and males (AAPC, 0.74% [95% CI, 0.58–0.9%]; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1A and Table 1).Fig. 1 Time trend of incidence for twelve cancer types, including pancreatic cancer, by sex and age. A Sex- and age-specific age-adjusted incidence rates per 100,000 population for 12 cancer types in the USA, as extracted from SEER22 data. Sex and age are grouped into six categories: 18–34-year-old (yo) males, 18–34yo females, 35–54yo males, 35–54yo females, 55 + yo males, and 55 + yo females. B Sex- and age-specific AAPC values of 2000–2020 cancer incidence trends for 12 cancer types in the USA. Sex and age are grouped into six categories: 18–34yo males, 18–34yo females, 35–54yo males, 35–54yo females, 55 + yo males, and 55 + yo females. Bars represent 95% CI. Statistical significance of AAPC values is labeled (ns: p ≥ 0.05; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001; ****: p < 0.0001)

Table 1 Sex- and age-specific trends of 2000–2020 cancer incidence for seven cancer types in the US, as extracted from SEER22 data and calculated using Joinpoint

Sex and age are grouped into six categories: 18–34yo males, 18–34yo females, 35–54yo males, 35–54yo females, 55+yo males, and 55+yo females. AAPC (95% CI) = Average Annual Percent Change (95% confidence interval). p-value (Average Annual Percentage Change) = p-value yielded by testing the significance of the difference of the AAPC from 0. pADJ (Average Annual Percentage Change) = p-value yielded by correcting for multiplicity p-values from the p-value (Average Annual Percentage Change) column, using the BH procedure. Values corrected account for both sexspecific and non-sex-specific cancer types (N = 57). Model = modeling of the difference between males and females cancer incidence trends. “NP” indicates the difference is statistically different, thus the trends are “Not-Parallel”; “P” indicates the difference is not statistically different, thus the trends are “Parallel”. p-value (sex interaction) = p-value yielded by testing the significance of the difference between males and females trends. pADJ (Ssex Iinteraction) = p-value yielded by correcting for multiplicity p-values from the p-value (sex interaction) column, using the BH procedure. Values corrected account for non-sex-specific cancer types (N = 21)

We then examined the time-trend incidence statistics for various types of cancer. Among the analyzed tumor types, young females showed a more significant percentage increase in the incidence of stomach cancer (AAPC, 2.37% [95% CI, 0.47–4.31%]; p = 0.019) compared to males (AAPC, -0.17% [95% CI, -1.05–0.72%]; p = 0.704), with non-parallel trends (p = 0.024). Similarly, in myeloma, young females exhibited a higher AAPC (AAPC, 2.82% [95% CI, 1.06–4.60%]; p < 0.0045) than males (AAPC, -0.16% [95% CI, -1.52–1.22%]; p < 0.814), also with non-parallel trends (p = 0.0073). Colorectal cancer also demonstrated a moderate relative increase in incidence rates among young females (AAPC, 3.95% [95% CI, 1.85–6.09%]; p = 0.0003) compared to males (AAPC, 3.22% [95% CI, 2.84–3.59%]; p < 0.0001), with non-parallel trends (p = 0.0058). In contrast, AAPC studies on lung and bronchus cancers, brain and nervous system cancers, and melanoma did not reveal a similar sex-specific trend of incidence growth in the young population (Fig. 1A and Table 1). Of note, in the 35–54 age group, females also showed higher AAPC than males for pancreatic and stomach cancer, myeloma, and melanoma.

To investigate whether the heightened incidence was specific to certain tumor types or indicative of a shift in cancer incidence rates based on sex, we also examined the trend in the incidence of sex-specific cancers over the same period. Young females did not show a substantial percentage increase in the incidence rate of cervical cancer (AAPC, -1.0% [95% CI, -1.69 − -0.3%]; p = 0.0068), ovarian cancer (AAPC, 0.71% [95% CI, 0.28–1.13%]; p = 0.0036), or breast cancer (AAPC, 1.16% [95% CI, 0.98–1.13%]; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1A and Additional file1: Tables S1). Additionally, the analysis of sex-specific tumors in young males revealed a mild yet significant increase in AAPC for testicular cancer (AAPC, 1.0% [95% CI, 0.48–1.53%]; p = 0.0003) (Fig. 1A and Additional file1: Tables S1). Overall, AAPC for pancreatic cancer, gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, and myeloma in young females ranked the highest among the investigated sex and age groups, as well as in comparison to other malignancies (Fig. 1B). These data are particularly relevant, given that these tumors are among the most lethal types.

To further investigate sex differences in cancer incidence among young subgroups, individuals aged less than 34 years were divided into two age subgroups: 18–26 years and 27–34 years. Remarkably, females aged 18 to 26 years exhibited the highest relative increase in incidence rates of pancreatic cancer (AAPC, 9.37% [95% CI, 7.36–11.41%]; p < 0.0001) compared to males (AAPC, 4.43% [95% CI, 2.36–6.53%]; p = 0.0005), with non-parallel trends (p = 0.041). Females aged 27 to 34 years showed a trend of increasing incidence similar to males (AAPC, 4.46% [95% CI, 3.62–5.31%]; p < 0.0001), with parallel trends (Fig. 2 and Table 2). Therefore, the change of the incidence of pancreatic cancer over time among females was highest in the 18 to 26 age subgroup. Additionally, a substantial increase in AAPC was observed in the 27 to 34 age subgroup, albeit not differing by sex.Fig. 2 Time trend of incidence for pancreatic cancer by sex in young subgroups. Sex- and age-specific age-adjusted incidence rates per 100,000 population for pancreatic cancer in the USA, as extracted from SEER22 data. Sex and age are grouped into six categories: 18–34yo males, 18–34yo females, 18–26yo males, 18–26yo females, 27–34yo males, and 27–34yo females. Males = red line; females = blue line

Table 2 Sex- and age-specific trends of 2000–2020 cancer incidence for seven cancer types in the US, as extracted from SEER22 data and calculated using Joinpoint

Sex and age are grouped into four categories: 18–26yo males, 18–26yo females, 27–34yo males, and 27–34yo females. AAPC (95% CI) = Average Annual Percent Change (95% Cconfidence Iinterval). p-value (Average Annual Percentage Change) = p-value yielded by testing the significance of the difference of the AAPC from 0. pADJ (Average Annual Percentage Change) = p-value yielded by correcting for multiplicity p-values from the p-value (Average Annual Percentage Change) column, using the BH procedure. Values corrected account for all cancer types (N = 28). Model = modeling of the difference between male and female cancer incidence trends. “NP” indicates the difference is statistically different, thus the trends are “Not-Parallel”; “P” indicates the difference is not statistically different, thus the trends are “Parallel”. p-value (sex interaction) = p-value obtained by testing the significance of the difference between male and female trends. pADJ (sex interaction) = p-value yielded by correcting for multiplicity p-values from the p-value (sex interaction) column, using the BH procedure. Values corrected account for all cancer types (N = 14). “NP*” indicates the difference is statistically different when tested alone, but not after correction for multiplicity

In the 18–26 age subgroup, females also exhibited higher AAPC for colorectal cancer incidence rates (AAPC, 6.18% [95% CI, 2.91–9.55%]; p = 0.0004) compared to males (AAPC, 5.15% [95% CI, 4.23–6.07%]; p < 0.0001), with non-parallel trends (p = 0.0056) (Table 2).

On the other hand, the AAPC of incidence for stomach cancer and myeloma showed the highest rate increase among females within the 27–34 age subgroup. For stomach cancer, the AAPC was 2.65% (95% CI, 0.06–5.32%) (p = 0.084) for females and -0.28% (95% CI, -1.23% to 0.68%) for males (p = 0.66), with non-parallel trends (p = 0.075). The differences were statistically significant when tested individually, yet they did not remain significant after correction for multiplicity (Table 2). Regarding myeloma, the AAPC was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.03–4.61%) (p = 0.0076) for females and -0.35% (95% CI, -1.83–1.15%) for males (p = 0.727), with non-parallel trends (p = 0.015) (Table 2).

Notably, the increase in PC incidence among females 18 to 26 subgroups, nearly a 10% annual percentage change, was the highest among all demographic groups and tumor types investigated in this study.

Discussion

The data confirmed the emergence of an unexpected sex gap in oncology, particularly among individuals younger than 35 years old. There are possible explanations for the above phenomenon: it is possible that changes in youth lifestyle over the past two decades have resulted in increased exposure to risk factors for pancreatic cancer and other gastrointestinal malignancies, previously relevant to the lifestyles of adults and seniors. There is a widespread belief that the young population is increasingly exposed to risk factors for cancer, yet a database-driven, systematic investigation is lacking. For instance, chronic pancreatitis or gastric inflammation are significant risk factors for digestive tract cancers [11, 12]. Alongside, longstanding diabetes, obesity, cigarette smoking, and heavy drinking are consolidated modifiable risk factors for both PC and GI cancers [13–15]. Therefore, addressing the prevalence of these risk factors in at-risk populations becomes crucial. Establishing a registry that documents chronic inflammations, such as pancreatitis, along with other identified risk factors, annotated with age, sex, and demographic information, could greatly contribute to our pathological understanding of PC and GI cancers in young individuals at risk. Previous studies have shown sex-dependent differences in pancreatic cancer risk factors exposure [16–18]. Other studies have suggested an enrichment of risk factors for pancreatic cancer among younger cases [19–21], which partly supports the differential etiology of pancreatic cancer by age at diagnosis. Obesity is a significant risk factor for pancreatic cancer. A more pronounced correlation between higher body mass index (BMI) and the risk of pancreatic cancer in men, possibly because of variations in fat distribution and hormonal factors has been found [22]. Furthermore, Genkinger and colleagues reported that being obese throughout early adulthood carries a greater risk compared to gaining weight later in life, highlighting the significance of the length of time a person is obese in relation to cancer development [23]. Diabetes, namely type 2 diabetes, has been recognized as a risk factor for pancreatic cancer [24]. Meta-analysis studies showed that diabetes had a more pronounced correlation risk for pancreatic cancer with both genders [25]. Although several studies have addressed age- and sex-dependent differences in exposure to risk factors for pancreatic cancer, these studies focused mainly on population aged > 30/40 years, and there is a lack of research that systematically investigates the pattern of young individuals' exposure to risk factors for pancreatic or gastrointestinal cancers.

We present data on time trend incidence among different types of cancer by sex and age. Caution is necessary when comparing incidence time trends among different tumor types due to the distinct epidemiological pathways and preventive measures affecting certain tumors, particularly when compared to pancreatic cancer. Indeed, in addition to the changing exposure to risk factors, the altered trend in cancer incidence over the years can also be related to other factors that are peculiar to each tumor type, such as participation in early-detection screening programs, changes in diagnostic methods, or tumor prevention campaigns. In certain cases, particularly colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer, participation in early-detection cancer screening programs, preventive vaccination campaigns, and a higher awareness about the role of active prevention in cancer have changed and reduced the age of cancer diagnosis. This is the case of the anti-HPV vaccination campaign against cervical cancer that has greatly reduced cervical cancer incidence among young women and has specifically influenced the trend of age-dependent cancer incidence. Consequently, while cancer incidence may be rising among females overall, the trends for certain tumors, such as cervical cancer, are uniquely influenced by the success of ongoing screening programs for early disease detection or prevention and do not necessarily reflect trends of exposure to risk factors. It is also important to recall that participation in cancer prevention or early detection programs might only partially explain the observed trends in cancer-type incidence within age-specific groups. This is because the recommended initiating screening ages are often different among cancer types and age groups. For example, in 2016, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended screening for colorectal cancer starting at age 50 years and continuing until age 75 years. The USPSTF changed its guidelines in 2021 to recommend initiating screening at 45 years due to an increasing incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer. Therefore, screening programs might have influenced the prevalence of diagnoses for colorectal cancer by increasing the number of individuals diagnosed before the age of 54 and decreasing the risk for those over 54. However, the extent to which these screening programs influence the diagnosis of individuals aged 18 to 35 is unknown and probably restricted to certain tumor types [26]. Similarly, the HPV vaccine is recommended for routine vaccination at age 11 or 12 years. It is also recommended for everyone through age 26 years if not adequately vaccinated when younger. However, HPV vaccination is not recommended for individuals older than 26 years. Thus, preventive vaccination might have a peculiar age-dependent impact and should be considered. Furthermore, due to the lack of nationwide screening initiatives and established guidelines for early detection of pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, and myeloma, the influence of screening programs on the incidence of these diseases among the overall population is probably limited. Conversely, heightened knowledge regarding the symptoms, genetic susceptibility, and family history associated with cancer could have increased both physician and population consciousness regarding targeted diagnostic methodologies. This, in turn, could have facilitated the early detection of the disease and impacted the variability observed in early-disease diagnosis trends.

Data presented here prompts the question of whether a sex disparity in cancer-associated risk among young individuals, particularly concerning exposures to risk factors for various malignancies including PC, may exist. Most studies examining the association between cancer risks, exposure to risk factors, and age typically focus on individuals aged 30 and above. Therefore, conducting additional ad hoc surveys is imperative to explore whether a discernible asymmetry in cancer-associated risk between sexes exists among the younger population, especially in relation to risk behaviors prevalent among adolescents.

While lifestyle choices and exposure to risk factors contribute to some sex disparities in cancer incidence, others are likely influenced by hormonal fluctuations, genetic, epigenetic, and immune-related factors, including differences in sex chromosomes [4, 27–30]. As for hormonal influences, a protective role of estrogens has been described, while testosterone and other androgens promote cellular proliferation and inhibit apoptosis, leading to increased cancer risk. Genetic differences between men and women can also play a significant role in the sex disparities observed in pancreatic cancer incidence [30]. Several genetic polymorphisms and mutations are associated with pancreatic cancer risk, and these can differ based on sex. Similarly, BRCA2 mutations are associated with a higher risk of pancreatic cancer, and the prevalence of these mutations can differ between men and women [30]. Furthermore, differences in immune response, particularly in terms of inflammation and immune surveillance, further explain the disparity in pancreatic cancer incidence between men and women. Sex differences in immune response to cancer can also be related to sex hormones or sex chromosome-associated genes impacting immune cells such as myeloid cells and T cells to shape the tumor microenvironment of both innate and adaptive immunity. For example, sex hormones can differentially regulate macrophage polarization with estrogen controlling the tumor-suppressive (M1) state, while androgens induce pro-inflammatory, tumor-promoting (M2) polarization of macrophages, a key event associated with pancreatic cancer progression [29, 30].

How can the insights provided here contribute to the prevention of pancreatic and GI cancers at earlier stages and reduce the mortality rate? Firstly, it is suggested that future targeted media campaigns should raise awareness about the correlation between behavioral risks and disease incidence among individuals aged 18 to 34 years. Secondly, these findings can serve as a foundation for the development of precise screening programs aimed at the early detection of pancreatic and GI cancers in emerging risk populations. Such programs can be tailored to specific sex and age subgroups, particularly those with heightened susceptibility to cancer or increased exposure to risk factors.

Conclusions

Recognizing these emerging risk groups for early-onset malignancies is crucial for early detection and reducing the overall lethality of cancer. The data presented here also hint at the initiation of debates concerning gender medicine, preventive medicine, and health program management—all crucial competencies for addressing the future impact of the rising incidence of early-onset malignancies, which unfortunately still bear the highest lethality rate.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Table S1. Age-specific trends of 2000-2020 cancer incidence for five sex-specific cancer types in the US, as extracted from SEER22 data and calculated using Joinpoint. Sex and age are grouped into six categories: 18-34yo males, 18-34yo females, 35-54yo males, 35-54yo females, 55+yo males, and 55+yo females. AAPC [95% CI] = Average Annual Percent Change [95% Confidence Interval]. p-value (Average Annual Percentage Change) = p-value yielded by testing the significance of the difference of the AAPC from 0. pADJ (Average Annual Percentage Change) = p-value yielded by correcting for multiplicity p-values from the p-value (Average Annual Percentage Change) column, using the BH procedure. Values corrected account for both sex-specific and non-sex-specific cancer types (N = 57).

Abbreviations

PC Pancreatic cancer

GI Gastrointestinal

AAPC Average Annual Percentage Change

CI Confidence interval

SEER Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results

NCI National Cancer Institute

BH Benjamini-Hochberg

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the members of the Cardone Lab for their insightful discussions.

Authors’ contributions

A.C. and L.C. conceptualized the study and were responsible for data curation and analysis. A.C. developed and implemented the formal analysis methodology. Both A.C. and L.C. drafted the original manuscript and wrote the first draft of the paper. Additionally, L.C. played a key role in securing the necessary funding for the research project and provided guidance and oversight throughout its execution to ensure smooth progress. L.C. edited the final version of the manuscript. C.A. and D.G. contributed to data analysis and methodology, as well as to editing the first draft of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

A. Cavazzani was supported by a fellowship from the IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute. L. Cardone’s research laboratory is supported by Associazione “Nastro Viola” Italy, for Pancreatic Cancer research.

Availability of data and materials

The data underlying this article were generated by using publically available data retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, which is a National Cancer Institute (NCI) instrument used for cancer surveillance activities. Data extracted from publically available databases and according to the provided licensing have been extracted and analyzed as described in Methods. Further details regarding the statistical analysis and study protocols for all pertinent variable analyses can be obtained by contacting the authors, A. Cavazzani (cavazzani.alessandro@gmail.com) and L. Cardone (luca.cardone@cnr.it).

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Siegel RL Miller KD Wagle NS Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2023 CA Cancer J Clin 2023 73 17 48 10.3322/caac.21763 36633525
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73:17–48.36633525 10.3322/caac.21763
2. Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2019 CA Cancer J Clin 2019 69 7 34 10.3322/caac.21551 30620402
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.30620402 10.3322/caac.21551
3. Cook MB Dawsey SM Freedman ND Inskip PD Wichner SM Quraishi SM Sex Disparities in Cancer Incidence by Period and Age Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 2009 18 1174 1182 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1118
Cook MB, Dawsey SM, Freedman ND, Inskip PD, Wichner SM, Quraishi SM, et al. Sex Disparities in Cancer Incidence by Period and Age. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2009;18:1174–82.10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1118
4. Rubin JB The spectrum of sex differences in cancer Trends Cancer 2022 8 303 315 10.1016/j.trecan.2022.01.013 35190302
Rubin JB. The spectrum of sex differences in cancer. Trends Cancer. 2022;8:303–15.35190302 10.1016/j.trecan.2022.01.013
5. Dorak MT Karpuzoglu E Gender differences in cancer susceptibility: an inadequately addressed issue Front Genet 2012 3 268 10.3389/fgene.2012.00268 23226157
Dorak MT, Karpuzoglu E. Gender differences in cancer susceptibility: an inadequately addressed issue. Front Genet. 2012;3:268.23226157 10.3389/fgene.2012.00268
6. Gaddam S Abboud Y Oh J Samaan JS Nissen NN Lu SC Incidence of Pancreatic Cancer by Age and Sex in the US, 2000–2018 JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association 2021 326 2075 2077 10.1001/jama.2021.18859 34689206
Gaddam S, Abboud Y, Oh J, Samaan JS, Nissen NN, Lu SC, et al. Incidence of Pancreatic Cancer by Age and Sex in the US, 2000–2018. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 2021;326:2075–7.34689206 10.1001/jama.2021.18859
7. Rahib L Smith BD Aizenberg R Rosenzweig AB Fleshman JM Matrisian LM Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: The unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the united states Can Res 2014 74 2913 2921 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155
Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: The unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the united states. Can Res. 2014;74:2913–21.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155
8. McGuigan A Kelly P Turkington RC Jones C Coleman HG McCain RS Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes World J Gastroenterol 2018 24 4846 4861 10.3748/wjg.v24.i43.4846 30487695
McGuigan A, Kelly P, Turkington RC, Jones C, Coleman HG, McCain RS. Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:4846–61.30487695 10.3748/wjg.v24.i43.4846
9. Zhao ZY, Liu W. Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Technol Cancer Res Treatment. 2020;19:1–13.
10. Yuan C Kim J Wang QL Lee AA Babic A Amundadottir LT The age-dependent association of risk factors with pancreatic cancer Ann Oncol 2022 33 693 701 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.03.276 35398288
Yuan C, Kim J, Wang QL, Lee AA, Babic A, Amundadottir LT, et al. The age-dependent association of risk factors with pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2022;33:693–701.35398288 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.03.276
11. Kirkegård J Cronin-Fenton D Heide-Jørgensen U Mortensen FV Acute Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Nationwide Matched-Cohort Study in Denmark Gastroenterology 2018 154 1729 1736 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.02.011 29432727
Kirkegård J, Cronin-Fenton D, Heide-Jørgensen U, Mortensen FV. Acute Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Nationwide Matched-Cohort Study in Denmark. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:1729–36.29432727 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.02.011
12. Greten FR Grivennikov SI Inflammation and Cancer: Triggers, Mechanisms, and Consequences Immunity 2019 51 27 41 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.025 31315034
Greten FR, Grivennikov SI. Inflammation and Cancer: Triggers, Mechanisms, and Consequences. Immunity. 2019;51:27–41.31315034 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.025
13. Klein AP Pancreatic cancer epidemiology: understanding the role of lifestyle and inherited risk factors Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021 18 493 502 10.1038/s41575-021-00457-x 34002083
Klein AP. Pancreatic cancer epidemiology: understanding the role of lifestyle and inherited risk factors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18:493–502.34002083 10.1038/s41575-021-00457-x
14. Wood LD Canto MI Jaffee EM Simeone DM Pancreatic Cancer: Pathogenesis, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Gastroenterology 2022 163 386 402.e1 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.056 35398344
Wood LD, Canto MI, Jaffee EM, Simeone DM. Pancreatic Cancer: Pathogenesis, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Gastroenterology. 2022;163:386–402.e1.35398344 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.056
15. Khalaf N El-Serag HB Abrams HR Thrift AP Burden of Pancreatic Cancer: From Epidemiology to Practice Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021 19 876 884 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.02.054 32147593
Khalaf N, El-Serag HB, Abrams HR, Thrift AP. Burden of Pancreatic Cancer: From Epidemiology to Practice. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19:876–84.32147593 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.02.054
16. Stocks T Rapp K Bjørge T Manjer J Ulmer H Selmer R Blood Glucose and Risk of Incident and Fatal Cancer in the Metabolic Syndrome and Cancer Project (Me-Can): Analysis of Six Prospective Cohorts PLoS Med 2009 6 e1000201 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000201 20027213
Stocks T, Rapp K, Bjørge T, Manjer J, Ulmer H, Selmer R, et al. Blood Glucose and Risk of Incident and Fatal Cancer in the Metabolic Syndrome and Cancer Project (Me-Can): Analysis of Six Prospective Cohorts. PLoS Med. 2009;6: e1000201.20027213 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000201
17. McWilliams RR Maisonneuve P Bamlet WR Petersen GM Li D Risch HA Risk Factors for Early-Onset and Very-Early-Onset Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Pancreas 2016 45 311 316 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000392 26646264
McWilliams RR, Maisonneuve P, Bamlet WR, Petersen GM, Li D, Risch HA, et al. Risk Factors for Early-Onset and Very-Early-Onset Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 2016;45:311–6.26646264 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000392
18. Andersson G Wennersten C Borgquist S Jirström K Pancreatic cancer risk in relation to sex, lifestyle factors, and pre-diagnostic anthropometry in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study Biol Sex Differ 2016 7 66 10.1186/s13293-016-0120-8 27980714
Andersson G, Wennersten C, Borgquist S, Jirström K. Pancreatic cancer risk in relation to sex, lifestyle factors, and pre-diagnostic anthropometry in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study. Biol Sex Differ. 2016;7:66.27980714 10.1186/s13293-016-0120-8
19. Li D Morris JS Liu J Hassan MM Day RS Bondy ML Body mass index and risk, age of onset, and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer JAMA 2009 301 2553 2562 10.1001/jama.2009.886 19549972
Li D, Morris JS, Liu J, Hassan MM, Day RS, Bondy ML, et al. Body mass index and risk, age of onset, and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. JAMA. 2009;301:2553–62.19549972 10.1001/jama.2009.886
20. McWilliams RR Bamlet WR Rabe KG Olson JE de Andrade M Petersen GM Association of family history of specific cancers with a younger age of onset of pancreatic adenocarcinoma Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006 4 1143 1147 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.05.029 16861052
McWilliams RR, Bamlet WR, Rabe KG, Olson JE, de Andrade M, Petersen GM. Association of family history of specific cancers with a younger age of onset of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1143–7.16861052 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.05.029
21. James TA Sheldon DG Rajput A Kuvshinoff BW Javle MM Nava HR Risk factors associated with earlier age of onset in familial pancreatic carcinoma Cancer 2004 101 2722 2726 10.1002/cncr.20700 15534880
James TA, Sheldon DG, Rajput A, Kuvshinoff BW, Javle MM, Nava HR, et al. Risk factors associated with earlier age of onset in familial pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;101:2722–6.15534880 10.1002/cncr.20700
22. Arslan AA Helzlsouer KJ Kooperberg C Shu XO Steplowski E Bueno-De-Mesquita HB Anthropometric measures, body mass index, and pancreatic cancer: A pooled analysis from the pancreatic cancer cohort consortium (PanScan) Arch Intern Med 2010 170 791 802 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.63 20458087
Arslan AA, Helzlsouer KJ, Kooperberg C, Shu XO, Steplowski E, Bueno-De-Mesquita HB, et al. Anthropometric measures, body mass index, and pancreatic cancer: A pooled analysis from the pancreatic cancer cohort consortium (PanScan). Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:791–802.20458087 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.63
23. Genkinger JM Kitahara CM Bernstein L Berrington de Gonzalez A Brotzman M Elena JW Central adiposity, obesity during early adulthood, and pancreatic cancer mortality in a pooled analysis of cohort studies Ann Oncol 2015 26 2257 66 10.1093/annonc/mdv355 26347100
Genkinger JM, Kitahara CM, Bernstein L, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Brotzman M, Elena JW, et al. Central adiposity, obesity during early adulthood, and pancreatic cancer mortality in a pooled analysis of cohort studies. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:2257–66.26347100 10.1093/annonc/mdv355
24. Ben Q Xu M Ning X Liu J Hong S Huang W Diabetes mellitus and risk of pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of cohort studies Eur J Cancer 2011 47 1928 1937 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.03.003 21458985
Ben Q, Xu M, Ning X, Liu J, Hong S, Huang W, et al. Diabetes mellitus and risk of pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:1928–37.21458985 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.03.003
25. Huxley R Ansary-Moghaddam A Berrington de González A Barzi F Woodward M Type-II diabetes and pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of 36 studies Br J Cancer 2005 92 2076 83 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602619 15886696
Huxley R, Ansary-Moghaddam A, Berrington de González A, Barzi F, Woodward M. Type-II diabetes and pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of 36 studies. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:2076–83.15886696 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602619
26. US Preventive Services Task ForceDavidson KW Barry MJ Mangione CM Cabana M Caughey AB Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement JAMA 2021 325 1965 77 10.1001/jama.2021.6238 34003218
US Preventive Services Task Force, Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, Cabana M, Caughey AB, et al. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2021;325:1965–77.34003218 10.1001/jama.2021.6238
27. Li CH Prokopec SD Sun RX Yousif F Schmitz N Al-Shahrour F Sex differences in oncogenic mutational processes Nat Commun 2020 11 4330 10.1038/s41467-020-17359-2 32859912
Li CH, Prokopec SD, Sun RX, Yousif F, Schmitz N, Al-Shahrour F, et al. Sex differences in oncogenic mutational processes. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4330.32859912 10.1038/s41467-020-17359-2
28. Dart A The Y chromosome as a risk factor Nat Rev Cancer 2023 23 511 511 10.1038/s41568-023-00605-2 37414916
Dart A. The Y chromosome as a risk factor. Nat Rev Cancer. 2023;23:511–511.37414916 10.1038/s41568-023-00605-2
29. Xiao T Lee J Gauntner TD Velegraki M Lathia JD Li Z Hallmarks of sex bias in immuno-oncology: mechanisms and therapeutic implications Nat Rev Cancer 2024 24 338 355 10.1038/s41568-024-00680-z 38589557
Xiao T, Lee J, Gauntner TD, Velegraki M, Lathia JD, Li Z. Hallmarks of sex bias in immuno-oncology: mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Nat Rev Cancer. 2024;24:338–55.38589557 10.1038/s41568-024-00680-z
30. Li H Jiang W Liu S Yang M Chen S Pan Y Connecting the mechanisms of tumor sex differences with cancer therapy Mol Cell Biochem 2024 479 213 231 10.1007/s11010-023-04723-1 37027097
Li H, Jiang W, Liu S, Yang M, Chen S, Pan Y, et al. Connecting the mechanisms of tumor sex differences with cancer therapy. Mol Cell Biochem. 2024;479:213–31.37027097 10.1007/s11010-023-04723-1
