
==== Front
J Int Med Res
J Int Med Res
IMR
spimr
The Journal of International Medical Research
0300-0605
1473-2300
SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England

39224951
10.1177/03000605241260556
10.1177_03000605241260556
Narrative Review
11 cases of peritoneal dialysis catheter penetrating into the intestinal cavity: case series
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9298-7401
Xie Xiaojie
Huang Fengmei
Tong Xiaofang
Wang Manqin
Wu Ruiqi
Department of Nephrology, 184 Hospital, Yingtan, Jiangxi Province, China
Fengmei Huang, Department of Nephrology, 184 Hospital, Yingtan, 4 Hudong Road, Yuehu District, Yingtan, Jiangxi Province, 335000, China. Email: 413695885@qq.com
9 2024
3 9 2024
52 9 030006052412605569 3 2024
23 5 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
SAGE Publications
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
The penetration of a peritoneal dialysis catheter into the intestinal cavity is a clinically rare complication. In the present retrospective clinical case series, 11 patients with uraemia who received continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and attended hospital between 2019 and 2023 are described. The median patient age was 61.91 ± 11.33 years. All patients had previously experienced peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis and were clinically cured by infusing sensitive antibiotics into the abdominal cavity. Colonoscopy was utilised to locate the penetrating catheter and close the perforation with a titanium clip once the catheter had been removed via an external approach. Following a 2–4-week fast, the perforations healed in all 11 patients. The present authors’ experience illustrates that directly removing the catheter and clamping the perforation opening under the guidance of colonoscopy is simple to operate with few complications compared with traditional open surgery.

Peritoneal dialysis
penetration into intestinal lumen
catheter removal
perforation closure
colonoscopy
typesetterts2
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

According to global data, approximately 11% of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receive peritoneal dialysis treatment, an important alternative therapy for ESRD, and this number is increasing year by year.1–3 There are many complications related to peritoneal dialysis, but global reports on cases of peritoneal dialysis catheters penetrating the intestinal cavity are rare. Early clinical diagnosis is often difficult, and the cure rate is extremely low. Therefore, patients with uraemia undergoing peritoneal dialysis, in which the peritoneal dialysis catheter had penetrated into the intestinal cavity, were reviewed in the present case series. Furthermore, relevant studies in the published literature were reviewed and are discussed with the aim of improving the clinical understanding and treatment of catheter penetration in peritoneal dialysis.

Patients and methods

The present case series included patients with uraemia who attended 184 Hospital, Yingtan, Jiangxi Province, China for diagnosis, and who had received continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis between 2019 and 2023. The database of the hospital dialysis centre was screened for relevant patients. Data regarding history of peritonitis, clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, imaging results, diagnosis and treatment plans of the included patients were extracted from the database.

Approval by the institutional ethics committee was not deemed necessary because the study did not involve human trials or any treatment other than standard hospital care. All patient details were deidentified for this retrospective case series, so informed consent to publish the case data and accompanying images was not required.

In addition to hospital case data, the PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant articles published between 1920 and 2023 in English or Chinese, using the keywords: ‘peritoneal dialysis associated peritonitis’, ‘intestinal perforation’, ‘catheter removal’, and ‘titanium clip closure’.

Results

A total of 11 patients with uraemia who underwent continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis were included in this case series, comprising six male and five female patients, with a mean age of 61.91 ± 10.65 years (range, 46–76 years), a mean 24-h urine output of 300 ± 250 ml, and a main diagnosis of uraemia and non-continuous bed rest peritoneal dialysis. All patients had experienced peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis, with nine patients having experience it more than twice. In nine patients, catheters had penetrated the sigmoid colon, and in two patients, catheters had penetrated the rectum (Table 1).

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with uraemia who experienced peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis included in the case series.

Case No.	Age, years	Sex	Experienced peritonitis at least once	Piercing length, cm	Piercing site	Diarrhoea	Antibiotic treatment a	
1	46	Male	Yes	3.5	Sigmoid colon	Yes	Yes	
2	48	Female	Yes	3.5	Rectum	No	Yes	
3	49	Male	Yes	4	Sigmoid colon	Yes	Yes	
4	72	Male	Yes	4	Sigmoid colon	Yes	Yes	
5	75	Female	Yes	5	Sigmoid colon	Yes	Yes	
6	76	Male	Yes	3	Rectum	Yes	Yes	
7	70	Female	Yes	4.5	Sigmoid colon	Yes	Yes	
8	49	Male	Yes	3.2	Sigmoid colon	Yes	Yes	
9	59	Female	Yes	3.9	Sigmoid colon	Yes	Yes	
10	68	Male	Yes	4.2	Sigmoid colon	No	Yes	
11	69	Female	Yes	3.6	Sigmoid colon	Yes	Yes	
a Antibiotic treatment comprised 2 g cefazolin sodium plus 2 g ceftazidime by abdominal cavity infusion for 14 days.

Of the 11 included patients, all had experienced catheter perforation into the intestinal tract during peritoneal dialysis. The patients had symptoms of abdominal pain, primarily across the entire abdomen, presenting as persistent distension and pain. The drained dialysis fluid was turbid, and laboratory tests on the drained dialysate showed a white blood cell count greater than 0.1 × 109/L and a neutrophil ratio greater than 50%. After intraperitoneal antibiotic infusion, the symptoms of abdominal pain and related test results returned to normal in all patients. Intestinal perforation caused by peritoneal catheters is a rare but severe complication with a high mortality rate. 4 Diagnosis is difficult, because early symptoms and signs are similar to peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis, and lack specific typical symptoms. Early diagnosis via symptoms and radiological imaging is also difficult,4,5 but perforation may be detected through endoscopic methods.6,7 Contrast media was used to assess the 11 patients in the present case series. After infusing contrast agent through the peritoneal dialysis fluid, a CT scan was immediately performed, which confirmed the presence of contrast agent in the intestinal tract. (Figure 1). After an abdominal dialysis catheter penetrates the intestinal cavity, there is inflammation and exudation in the abdominal cavity, which can easily cause intestinal adhesions. Conventional surgery for repairing intestinal perforation carries a higher risk and often results in poor outcomes.

Figure 1. Representative abdominal computed tomography scan image (axial plane) confirming the position of the peritoneal dialysis catheter in a patient with uraemia who experienced peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis.

Among the 11 cases in the present series, whose peritoneal dialysis catheters had penetrated into the intestinal cavity, the site of catheter penetration into the intestinal tract was located through colonoscopy. Once located, a relatively fast, simple, effective, and minimally invasive manual method was adopted for removing the peritoneal dialysis catheter from the outside, as previously described, 8 while immediately closing the intestinal perforation with a metal titanium clip (Figures 2 and 3), according to a previously published method. 9

Figure 2. Representative colonoscopy image revealing the peritoneal dialysis catheter and the perforation site in a patient with uraemia who experienced peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis.

Figure 3. Representative colonoscopy image showing titanium clips used to close the dialysis catheter perforation site in a patient with uraemia who experienced peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis.

Following treatment, the 11 patients were fasted for 2–4 weeks. In seven cases, the titanium clips fell off between 14 and 18 days after fasting, and in four cases, the clips fell off between 22 and 28 days after fasting. All clips were excreted from the intestine, and all patients underwent follow-up colonoscopy on the next day, showing that the perforation had healed.

Discussion

At present, there are few reports on cases of peritoneal dialysis causing abdominal dialysis catheters to penetrate the intestine. Early diagnosis is difficult, and the cure rate is extremely low. 10 The incidence of intestinal perforation is reported to be 0.1%, but its complications are usually serious, often due to other factors, such as intestinal tumours, acute and chronic enteritis, and mesenteric ischemic diseases.11–13 Penetration of a peritoneal dialysis catheter into the intestinal cavity in patients with peritoneal dialysis may be related to the occurrence of bacterial or fungal peritonitis caused by repeated abdominal infections. In addition, factors such as high abdominal pressure, improper placement of the catheter, formation of an abdominal sinus tract and intestinal adhesions, prolonged indwelling of the catheter, and repeated rubbing of the catheter against the intestinal wall,14–16 increase the risk of the peritoneal dialysis catheter penetrating the intestinal cavity. According to the published literature,17–19 a paediatric patient was reported with the peritoneal dialysis catheter visibly protruding from the anus. Abdominal X-ray showed no free air, and a small perforation of the sigmoid colon was visualized by laparoscopy. The perforation was effectively repaired and the catheter was removed simultaneously, but the procedure caused significant trauma. However, in recent years, the introduction of new devices has improved the success rate of endoscopic closure of intestinal perforations. The over-the-scope clip is a nitinol clip that resembles a ‘trap’ in shape and can grasp more tissue than traditional clips, allowing for the closure of larger perforations, and metal titanium clips have been successfully used to close perforations in the duodenum and colon.20–22 Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis has an adverse effect on the abdominal cavity and intestinal tract and is also an important factor causing the peritoneal dialysis catheter to penetrate into the intestinal cavity. There is a persistent micro inflammatory state in the body of patients with ESRD, and peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis is the most common associated infection.23,24 The incidence of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis is reported to be 0.06–1.66 times/patient/year in China, and 0.14–0.17 times/patient/year worldwide, with a cure rate of only 90%.25–27 Serious complications of peritoneal dialysis may also cause adhesions in the abdominal sinus and intestinal tract, encapsulated peritoneal fibrosis or sclerosing encapsulated peritonitis.28–30 Common causes of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis include advanced age, adjuvant peritoneal dialysis, higher body mass index, low serum albumin, intestinal infection, and improper peritoneal dialysis procedures. Intestinal infections may easily cause inflammation and exudation of the intestinal wall, thickening or thinning of the intestinal wall, and intestinal adhesions. In addition, the metabolic products of bacteria (such as p-cresol, trimethylamine, and H2S) affect the structure and function of the intestinal barrier,31–33 and also the structure and function of the intestinal epithelial cell barrier.34,35 At the same time, chronic kidney disease affects the metabolism of colonic microorganisms. 36 The greater omentum of the abdominal cavity may wrap around the fixed peritoneal dialysis catheter, and with other factors mentioned above, may cause the peritoneal dialysis catheter to penetrate the adjacent intestinal cavity. This incidence rate is rare, but often serious.

In summary, the main complications of peritoneal dialysis are infection-related, followed by mechanical-related complications. Peritoneal dialysis catheter-related visceral injuries are uncommon, with intestinal or bladder perforations being the primary concerns, and intestinal perforations can be catheter-related or delayed. The incidence of catheter-related intestinal perforation is relatively low, at <1%, 37 with common causes being the blind insertion of catheters using trocars during catheter placement or performing other procedures (such as omentopexy or adhesiolysis) at the same time as the catheterization in the presence of abdominal adhesions. Risk factors for delayed intestinal perforation include cessation of peritoneal dialysis treatment for >1 month without regular lavage, diverticular inflammation of the intestines, systemic amyloidosis involving the intestines, or peritonitis.19,38 Intestinal perforation during the catheterization process is often difficult to detect, leading to delayed intestinal perforation. If faecal odour is detected during the catheterization process, intestinal perforation should be considered; clinical manifestations of delayed intestinal perforation include severe watery diarrhoea (caused by catheter insertion into the intestinal lumen), abdominal muscle tension, abdominal pain, hypotension, and the catheter tip protruding from the anus. Patients with ESRD often have low immune function and are in a micro-inflammatory state. When peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis occurs, the intestinal flora is disordered, and the structure and function of the epithelial cell barrier are damaged, making the intestines more prone to adhesion or obstruction. The greater omentum in the abdominal cavity may wrap around and fix the peritoneal dialysis catheter. If the peritoneal dialysis catheter remains in the abdomen for an extended period, with its tip closely pressed against the intestinal wall and under significant abdominal pressure, the catheter can easily penetrate the weaker parts of the intestinal wall. Some perforations caused by catheters are asymptomatic due to the growth of granulation tissue around the catheter, which prevents intestinal faeces or bacteria from entering the abdominal cavity. This condition is known as asymptomatic intestinal perforation and is relatively rare. The external diameter of the peritoneal dialysis catheter is approximately 7 mm. If the catheter is removed with a temporary halt of peritoneal dialysis, as well as fasting and waiting for the perforation to heal itself without repairing the intestinal perforation site, the process may take longer and be more difficult to heal due to a lowered immune system in patients with uraemia. There is significant individual variation in this process, however, once a peritoneal dialysis patient experiences an intestinal perforation caused by the catheter, whether it was mistakenly inserted into the intestinal tract during placement or the perforation was related to previous peritonitis or intestinal diseases, failure to address the issue promptly will affect the efficiency of dialysis.

Conclusion

Intestinal perforation caused by a peritoneal dialysis catheter may be diagnosed by examination of the drained peritoneal dialysate composition and abdominal CT scans. As patients with peritoneal dialysis often have intestinal adhesions, it may be difficult to locate the perforation site and safely separate adjacent intestinal tubes using conventional surgical laparotomy. In such cases, fasting to empty the intestines and using an external manual method to remove the peritoneal dialysis catheter, while closing the perforation site with a titanium clip under colonoscopy guidance, might be a treatment method worthy of clinical promotion.

Acknowledgements

The successful completion of this study could not have been achieved without the help and support of many individuals. The authors are grateful to all members of the laboratory who provided substantial assistance during the experiments.

Data accessibility statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Author contributions: All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Study design: XX, FH; Literature search: XX, FH, XT; Manuscript preparation: XX, FH, XT, MW, RW.

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

ORCID iD: Xiaojie Xie https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9298-7401
==== Refs
References

1 Yang CY Ling XT Hu XX , et al . Clinical interpretation of physical activity and exercise in peritoneal dialysis: International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis and the Global Renal Exercise Network practice recommendations. Chinese General Practice 2023; 26 : 1031–1037.
2 Lambie M Zhao JH Mccullough K , et al . Variation in peritoneal dialysis time on therapy by country: results from the peritoneal dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17 : 861–871.35641246
3 Li PK Chow KM Van de Luijtgaarden MW , et al . Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis. Nat Rev Nephrol 2017; 13 : 90–103.28029154
4 Shima H Mizoguchi S Morine Y , et al . Intestinal perforation by a peritoneal dialysis catheter in which fungal peritonitis led to diagnosis: a rare case report. CEN Case Rep 2018; 7 : 208–210.29611117
5 Fujii K Washida N Arai E , et al . Adhesive intestinal obstruction increases the risk of intestinal perforation in peritoneal dialysis patients: a case report. BMC Nephrol 2018; 19 : 153.29954334
6 Volpe MD Iberti M Ortensia A , et al . Erosion of the sigmoid by a permanent peritoneal catheter. Perit Dial Int 1984; 4 : 108.
7 Jamison MH Fleming SJ Ackrill P , et al . Erosion of rectum by Tenckhoff catheter. Br J Surg 1988; 75 : 360.3359151
8 Cheng SQ Chen YM Zhou TT , et al . Clinical application of extracorporeal manual removal of peritoneal dialysis catheter. Chinese Journal of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation 2020; 29 : 531–535.
9 Li B Hu XY Wu JN , et al . Analysis of diagnosis and treatment experience of 19 cases of iatrogenic colonic perforation. Journal of Colorectal and Anal Surgery 2021; 27 : 262–266.
10 Zhou Y Chen JJ Lou JZ , et al . One case of peritoneal dialysis complicated by intestinal perforation. Anhui Medical Journal 2016; 37 : 504–505.
11 Shao Q Xia Y Zhang Q , et al . Intestinal fistula accompanied by recurrent peritonitis associated with peritoneal dialysis: a case report. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20 : 157.32448191
12 Brown PA McCormick BB Knoll G , et al . Complications and catheter survival with prolonged embedding of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23 : 2299–2303.18281722
13 Fujiwara M Soda T Okada T , et al . Bowel perforation by a peritoneal dialysis catheter: report of two cases. BMC Nephrol 2017; 18 : 312.29037159
14 Nakamura H Kitazawa K Kato K , et al . Stercoral perforation of the sigmoid colon in a patient undergoing CAPD: case report. Perit Dial Int 2004; 24 : 399–401.15335156
15 Meguro H Mori H Fukushima K , et al . A study of three cases of ADPKD with complications due to elevation of the intra-abdominal pressure during peritoneal dialysis. Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi 2010; 43 : 587–594.
16 Bogdanova N Markoff A Horst J. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease– clinical and genetic aspects. Kidney Blood Press Res 2002; 25 : 265–283.12435872
17 Maxted AP Davies B Colliver D , et al . Peritoneal dialysis catheter removal post-transplant – a rare case of delayed bowel perforation. Perit Dial Int 2017; 37 : 650–651.29123002
18 Rotellar C Sivarajan S Mazzoni MJ , et al . Bowel perforation in CAPD patients. Perit Dial Int 1992; 12 : 396–398.1420500
19 Wang R Chen Z Wang J , et al . Delayed bowel perforation in a peritoneal dialysis patient: a case report and literature review. Perit Dial Int 2014; 34 : 460–466.24991055
20 Huang P Zhang XF Zhang X. One case of duodenal perforation caused by ERCP successfully clipped by metal titanium clips. Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2013; 30 : 115–116.
21 Ma WC Zhang XF Lou QF , et al . Clinical application of minimally invasive conservative treatment in elderly patients with iatrogenic duodenal perforation. Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2020; 37 : 134–136.
22 Gao X Ding Y Zhi J , et al . Application of titanium clips in acute colonoscopy-related perforation. Clinical Meta-analysis 2015: 434–435.
23 Li PK Chow KM Cho Y , et al . ISPD peritonitis guideline recommendations: 2022 update on prevention and treatment. Perit Dial Int 2022; 42 : 110–153.35264029
24 Bieber S Mehrotra R. Peritoneal dialysis access associated infections. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2019; 26 : 23–29.30876613
25 Chinese Expert Group on the Prevention and Control of Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infections . Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of peritoneal dialysis-related infections. Chinese Journal of Nephrology 2018; 34 : 139–148.
26 Zhang S Zhao H Wu B , et al . Effects of seasonal changes on peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients. Chinese Journal of Nephrology 2017; 33 : 488–494.
27 Zhu J Tan H Xing L , et al . Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis caused by peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a case report. Chinese Journal of Nephrology 2020; 36 : 554–556.
28 Szeto CC Li PK. Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 14 : 1100–1105.31068338
29 McCrory MA Heard MA Wright JG , et al . Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis: a rare cause of bowel obstruction. Am Surg 2023; 89 : 3496–3498.36872044
30 Srisajjakul S Prapaisilp P Bangchokdee S. Imaging pearls and differential diagnosis of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: emphasis on computed tomography. Clin Imaging 2023; 94 : 116–124.36527797
31 Glorieux G Gryp T Perna A. Gut-derived metabolites and their role in immune dysfunction in chronic kidney disease. Toxins (Basel) 2020; 12 : 245.32290429
32 Al Hinai EA Kullamethee P Rowland IR , et al . Modelling the role of microbial p-cresol in colorectal genotoxicity. Gut Microbes 2019; 10 : 398–411.30359553
33 Wong X Carrasco-Pozo C Escobar E , et al . Deleterious effect of p-cresol on human colonic epithelial cells prevented by proanthocyanidin-containing polyphenol extracts from fruits and proanthocyanidin bacterial metabolites. J Agric Food Chem 2016; 64 : 3574–3583.27039931
34 Vaziri ND Zhao YY Pahl MV. Altered intestinal microbial flora and impaired epithelial barrier structure and function in CKD: the nature, mechanisms, consequences and potential treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016; 31 : 737–746.25883197
35 Perna AF Glorieux G Zacchia M , et al . The role of the intestinal microbiota in uremic solute accumulation: a focus on sulfur compounds. Nephrol 2019; 32 : 733–740.
36 Poesen R Windey K Neven E , et al . The influence of CKD on colonic microbial metabolism. J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 27 : 1389–1399.26400570
37 Peppelenbosch A Van Kuijk WH Bouvy ND , et al . Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement technique and complications. NDT Plus 2008; 1 : iv23–iv28.25983982
38 Chu PY Siu KL. A rare but serious complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: delayed perforation of the colon by the Tenckhoff catheter. Hong Kong Med J 2016; 22 : 286–288.27305696
