
==== Front
RSC Adv
RSC Adv
RA
RSCACL
RSC Advances
2046-2069
The Royal Society of Chemistry

d4ra05796a
10.1039/d4ra05796a
Chemistry
Rational construction of luminescent Eu-doped Y-MOF for ratiometric temperature sensing†
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ra05796a

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8435-5313
Wei Wei a
Li Xi a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5929-5267
Zhang Yong-Ya a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8482-6656
Zhang Jian-Wei a
a School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shangqiu Normal University Shangqiu Henan 476000 P. R. China weiweizzuli@163.com
jwzhang85@163.com

5 9 2024
4 9 2024
5 9 2024
14 39 2834028344
10 8 2024
30 8 2024
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry
2024
The Royal Society of Chemistry
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given and it is not used for commercial purposes.
Introducing lanthanide(iii) ions into a MOF structure is one of the most effective strategies to construct luminescent MOFs with multiple emission centers for fluorescent applications. In this work, a functionalized Eu3+-doped Y-MOF (Eu@SNNU-325) was constructed by using a cation exchange strategy. The photoluminescence result shows that Eu@SNNU-325 exhibits a unique emission spectrum, namely, the absence of the organic ligand peak and the very strong Y3+/Eu3+ characteristic peaks. Interestingly, the smart luminescent Eu@SNNU-325 as a ratiometric thermometer for temperature sensing has good self-calibrated ability and a high maximum relative sensitivity (Sm) value (1.2% K−1 at 260 K). This work presents the construction of a smart Eu3+-functionalized Y-MOF thermometer through a cation exchange strategy, providing a good idea for the future development and design of Y-MOF thermometers.

A dual-emitter luminescent Eu-doped Y-MOF was successfully constructed by using a cation exchange strategy. As a self-calibrated thermometer, this Eu-doped MOF exhibits excellent fluorescence performance for wide-range temperature sensing.

National Natural Science Foundation of China 10.13039/501100001809 22301172 52472222 Science and Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province 10.13039/501100018551 22HASTIT028 pubstatusPaginated Article
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Luminescent metal–organic frameworks (LMOFs), as an important class of materials, have advantages for application in light-emitting diodes (LEDs), fluorescent sensors, and bioimaging, etc.1–15 Generally, most luminescent MOFs with single emission centers exhibit many disadvantages, such as low sensitivity, poor accuracy, and low responsiveness, which limits their widespread application.16–20 It is well known that the luminescent MOFs with lanthanide ions centers have attracted much research interest owing to their designability, high sensitivity, fast response, and high accuracy.21–23 Therefore, the rational design of lanthanide ions based-MOFs (Ln-MOFs) is still a great challenge.

In recent years, the luminescent Ln-MOF thermometers have been widely studied due to their distinct characteristic emissions, wide temperature detection range and strong anti-interference abilities.24–30 On the other hand, when constructing Ln-MOFs, selecting appropriate organic ligands as antenna chromophores plays a key role in sensitizing Ln3+ ion emissions. However, MOF materials based on rare earth Y3+ ions are still rare.

To our knowledge, a highly ultra-stable yttrium-MOF (SNNU-325, SNNU = Shaanxi Normal University) consists of the Y3+ ions, π-conjugated ligands, large octahedral cages, and quadrilateral channels, which can be potentially applied in the field of fluorescence sensing.31 This yttrium-MOF (Y-MOF) has been reported by Zhai's group, and its crystal structure, characterization, and gas adsorption/separation performance have been studied. However, the fluorescence performance of this Y-MOF has not yet been studied. Based on the structural characteristics of SNNU-325, we speculate that this MOF constructed from Y3+ ions and rich π-conjugated aromatic ligands should exhibit excellent unique fluorescence properties.

Herein, we have successfully synthesized this Y-MOF (SNNU-325) and further studied its structural characteristics. The result of elemental mappings demonstrates that Sc3+ ions are uniformly dispersed on the MOF. The presence of Sc3+ ions in the pores provides technical support for introducing lanthanide(iii) ions with strong luminescent properties via a cation exchange strategy (Scheme 1). More significantly, the luminescent Eu@SNNU-325 as a ratiometric thermometer not only exhibits the Y3+/Eu3+ characteristic peaks but also shows good fluorescence temperature sensing over a wide range of temperature from 80 K to 260 K.

Scheme 1 Schematics illustrating the cation exchange strategy to construct a functionalized Eu-doped Y-MOF.

Experimental

Synthesis of SNNU-325

A mixture of the ligand H3TATB (2,4,6-tris(4-carboxyphenyl)-1,3,5-triazine) (12 mg, 0.027 mmol), Y(NO3)3·6H2O (12 mg, 0.03 mmol), Sc(NO3)3·6H2O (16 mg, 0.07 mmol) and 2-FBA (2-fluorobenzoic acid) (173 mg, 1.23 mmol) was ultrasonically dissolved in DMF (N,N-dimethylformamide) (6 mL)/H2O (0.9 mL) solvent system in a glass vial (20 mL). The mixed solution was placed in an oven preheated at 90 °C for 5 days and then cooled to room temperature. After that, the colorless cubic block crystals were obtained by filtering and washing the fresh DMF and EtOH, and then dried at 50 °C.

Synthesis of Eu@SNNU-325

The above obtained Y-MOF (50 mg) and EuCl3·6H2O (50 mg) were dispersed in DMF (5 mL) and then placed in an oven at 75 °C for 24 h. The obtained Eu@SNNU-325 sample was obtained by washing several times with fresh DMF and then dried in an oven at 50 °C.

Results and discussion

Characterizations of SNNU-325 and Eu@SNNU-325

The preparation of SNNU-325 was reported in the literature.31 The PXRD peaks of as-synthesized SNNU-325 are in good agreement with the simulated peaks from the crystal structure data (Fig. 1). The author pointed out in the original paper that SNNU-325 cannot be prepared without the addition of Sc(NO3)3·6H2O. After careful analysis of this Y-MOF structure, we speculate that Sc3+ ions not only play a structural guiding role in the formation of MOF and but also as cations exist within the MOF framework. To prove our hypothesis, we first soaked the as-synthesized Y-MOF in methanol for 4 days, and then conducted EDS testing on the as-synthesized and the methanol-treated sample, respectively (Fig. S1 and S2†). The EDS results show that the atomic ratios of Sc/Y significantly decrease from 1.99 to 0.35 in the as-synthesized sample and the methanol-treated sample. The PXRD peaks of the methanol-treated sample are well-matched with the as-synthesized sample (Fig. 1). Through the methanol-treated sample for 4 days, it can be clearly observed that the Sc3+ ions only decrease in the MOF framework, but cannot be completely removed. This phenomenon indicates that there is a strong interaction force between Sc3+ ions within the MOF framework. Therefore, the presence of Sc3+ ions within the MOF framework encourages us to design Eu3+ doped Y-MOFs by using a cation exchange strategy.

Fig. 1 PXRD patterns of the simulated, as-synthesized SNNU-325, methanol-treated SNNU-325 and Eu@SNNU-325.

The mixture of as-synthesized Y-MOF and EuCl3·6H2O under DMF solvent was further employed to construct Eu-functionalized Y-MOFs by post-synthetic modification strategy. By comparing the powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) peaks (Fig. 1), the peaks of Eu@SNNU-325 remain highly consistent with that of the as-synthesized sample, indicating that this Y-MOF still maintains its crystalline structure after the incorporation of Eu3+ ions into the framework. As shown in Fig. 2a and b, the SEM images show that the morphologies of Eu3+ remain consistent before and after being introduced into the MOF framework. The elemental mapping images clearly show the homogeneous distribution of C, N, O, F, Cl, Y, Sc and Eu elements in the Eu@SNNU-325 (Fig. S3†), indicating that the Eu3+ ions were incorporated into the MOF framework through the Sc3+ ions exchange process. Notably, the presence of F or Cl elements in the Eu@SNNU-325 are originated from the raw materials (2-FBA and EuCl3·6H2O). Moreover, the FT-IR spectra of SNNU-325 and Eu@SNNU-325 are basically consistent, further indicating that the incorporation of Eu3+ ions not change the original structure (Fig. 2c). To demonstrate whether Eu3+ has exchanged Y3+ ions in the skeleton, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of SNNU-325 and Eu@SNNU-325 were recorded. The results show that the O 1s XPS spectra of SNNU-325 and Eu@ SNNU-325 remain consistent, indicating that Eu3+ ions are not bonded to oxygen atoms in the MOF skeleton, and also indicating that Eu3+ ions do not exchange Y3+ ions in the skeleton (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2 SEM images of SNNU-325 (a) and Eu@SNNU-325 (b). (c) FT-IR spectra of SNNU-325 and Eu@ SNNU-325. (d) The O 1s XPS spectra of SNNU-325 and Eu@ SNNU-325.

Photoluminescence study

Considering the unique Y3+ ion characteristic, rich π-conjugated organic ligand, and the very obvious Eu3+ emission bands, we measured the solid-state photoluminescence (PL) spectra of SNNU-325 and Eu@SNNU-325 at room temperature. As shown in Fig. 3a, the emission spectrum of SNNU-325 shows two characteristic emission centers (λex = 355 nm), one at 435 nm belonging to ligand emission,32 and the other at 488, 544, 578, 592, 618, 651 and 699 nm belonging to Y3+ ion characteristic emission.33 However, the emission spectrum of Eu@SNNU-325 is consistent with that of SNNU-325, except for the disappearance of the emission peak of the TATB3− ligand (λex = 300 nm) (Fig. 3b). It can be clearly observed that the absence of the emission band (at about 435 nm) arising from the ligand, indicating that the ligand emission process in Eu@SNNU-325 should be suppressed by the energy transfer from the ligand to the Eu3+ and Y3+ ions.34,35 Under UV-light irradiation, SNNU-325 displays dark purple visible emission, and Eu@SNNU-325 displays red visible emission (insets in Fig. 3b). The above results demonstrate that the emission spectrum of Eu3+ doped Y-MOFs has not changed compared to that of Y-MOF, but affect the energy transfer between the organic ligand and Eu3+ and Y3+ ions, resulting in Eu@MOF displaying strong red emission of Eu3+. This phenomenon is very rare in other Eu3+-doped MOF systems.

Fig. 3 Excitation and emission spectra of SNNU-325 (λex = 353 nm) (a) and Eu@SNNU-325 (λex = 300 nm) (b) (insets show the photographs under 254 nm UV light).

Temperature-dependent emission properties

The significant luminescence characteristics of Y3+/Eu3+ ions in the Eu@SNNU-325 inspired us to evaluate its application in the field of low-temperature sensing. The temperature-dependent fluorescence performance of Eu@SNNU-325 was studied over a wide range of temperature from 80 K to 300 K. As shown in Fig. 4, the luminescence intensities in the Eu@SNNU-325 gradually decrease of both I618 and I544 with the increasing temperature under excitation at 300 nm, which can be mainly attributed to the thermal deactivation of the Y3+/Eu3+ ions. As a ratiometric luminescent thermometer, the intensity ratio of I618/I544 (Δ) of Eu@SNNU-325 was used to evaluate its temperature sensing performance. The Boltzmann equation (Δ = (A1 − A2)/(1 + exp((T − T0)/dT)) + A2) was used to fit the relationship between Δ and the a wide temperature range (80–260 K). Interestingly, the result shows that Eu@SNNU-325 exhibits a good fit (R2 = 0.9946) (Fig. 5a, and Table S1†).

Fig. 4 Temperature-dependent emission spectra of Eu@SNNU-325 recorded in the range of 80–300 K.

Fig. 5 (a) Temperature-dependent emission intensity ratio Δ (I618/I544) and the fitted curve of Eu@SNNU-325 from 80 to 260 K. (b) Temperature-dependent relative sensitivity (Sr) of Eu@SNNU-325.

To further evaluate the sensing sensitivity, the relative sensitivity (Sr, Sr = |(∂Δ/∂T)/Δ|) was used as an important index. Because Sr represents an intrinsic nature of the thermometer. As a result, the maximum relative sensitivity (Sm) was determined to be 1.2% K−1 at 260 K (Fig. 5b), which was comparable to that of the other reported luminescent MOF thermometers such as Tb0.80Eu0.20(bpda) (1.39),36 ZJU-88⊃perylene (1.28)37 and Nd0.577Yb0.423BDC-F4 (1.2).38 The above results show that Eu@SNNU-325 can be used as a smart thermometer for self-calibrating temperature sensing.

Conclusions

In summary, a functionalized Eu-doped Y-MOF (Eu@SNNU-325) has been constructed by the cation exchange strategy. The obtained Eu@SNNU-325 was characterized by combining the PXRD, SEM, XPS, FT-IR, and EDX mapping. Due to the introduction of Eu3+ ions into the Y-MOF framework, Eu@SNNU-325 exhibits the characteristic emission centers of Y3+/Eu3+ ions. Moreover, the smart luminescent Eu@SNNU-325 exhibits highly sensitive temperature sensing over a wide range of temperature from 80 K to 260 K. Most importantly, the maximum relative sensitivity (Sm) of Eu@SNNU-325 reached 1.2% K−1 at 260 K, indicating that it can be applied as a temperature transfer material in practical applications. This work provides a powerful and effective synthesis strategy for constructing Eu-doped Y-MOFs and applying a field of fluorescence temperature sensing.

Data availability

Data are available upon request from the authors.

Author contributions

Wei Wei: experiment instruction, methodology. Xi Li: data curation. Yong-Ya Zhang: software. Jian-Wei Zhang: writing – review and editing.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Supplementary Material

RA-014-D4RA05796A-s001

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22301172 and 52472222) and the Science and Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province (22HASTIT028).
==== Refs
References

Cui Y. Yue Y. Qian G. Chen B. Chem. Rev. 2012 112 1126 1162 10.1021/cr200101d 21688849
Li B. Fan H.-T. Zang S.-Q. Li H.-Y. Wang L.-Y. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018 377 307 329 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.09.004
McLaurin E. J. Bradshaw L. R. Gamelin D. R. Chem. Mater. 2013 25 1283 1292 10.1021/cm304034s
Karmakar A. Li J. Chem. Commun. 2022 58 10768 10788 10.1039/D2CC03330E 36089893
Wen G.-H. Chen X.-M. Xu K. Xie X. Bao S.-S. Zheng L.-M. Dalton Trans. 2021 50 17129 17139 10.1039/D1DT02977K 34779803
Dong J. Zhao D. Lu Y. Sun W.-Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019 7 22744 22767 10.1039/C9TA07022B
Bhowal S. Ghosh A. RSC Adv. 2021 11 27787 27800 10.1039/D1RA03078G 35480748
Li S.-Y. Yan X. Lei J. Ji W.-J. Fan S.-C. Zhang P. Zhai Q.-G. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022 14 55997 56006 10.1021/acsami.2c19916 36507798
Hu Z. Deibert B. J. Li J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014 43 5815 5840 10.1039/C4CS00010B 24577142
Zhang Y. Yuan S. Day G. Wang X. Yang X. Zhou H.-C. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018 354 28 45 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.06.007
Yang G.-L. Jiang X.-L. Xu H. Zhao B. Small 2021 17 2005327 10.1002/smll.202005327 33634574
Liu Y. Xie X.-Y. Cheng C. Shao Z.-S. Wang H.-S. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019 7 10743 10763 10.1039/C9TC03208H
Ding M. Flaig R. W. Jiang H.-L. Yaghi O. M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019 48 2783 2828 10.1039/C8CS00829A 31032507
Cui Y. Li B. He H. Zhou W. Chen B. Qian G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016 49 483 493 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00530 26878085
Yue D. Li Z. Chen D. Li W. Qin B. Zhang B. Li Y. Zhao D. Wang Z. J. Solid State Chem. 2023 327 124279 10.1016/j.jssc.2023.124279
Zhu Z.-H. Ni Z. Zou H.-H. Feng G. Tang B. Z. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021 31 2106925 10.1002/adfm.202106925
Li Z.-J. Wang X. Zhu L. Ju Y. Wang Z. Zhao Q. Zhang Z.-H. Duan T. Qian Y. Wang J.-Q. Lin J. Inorg. Chem. 2022 61 7467 7476 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00545 35514048
Velasco E. Zhang G. Teat S. J. Tan K. Ullah S. Thonhauser T. Li J. Inorg. Chem. 2023 62 16435 16442 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c02115 37767939
Yao C. Xu Y. Xia Z. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018 6 4396 4399 10.1039/C8TC01018H
Yang C. Xu X. Yan B. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2023 10 2951 2960 10.1039/D3QI00444A
Wu S. Min H. Shi W. Cheng P. Adv. Mater. 2020 32 1805871 10.1002/adma.201805871 30790371
Yin H.-Q. Yin X.-B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020 53 485 495 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00575 31999097
Wang Y.-M. Tian X.-T. Zhang H. Yang Z.-R. Yin X.-B. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018 10 22445 22452 10.1021/acsami.8b06901 29883089
Yang Y. Wang Y. Feng Y. Song X. Cao C. Zhang G. Liu W. Talanta 2020 208 120354 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120354 31816801
Li K. Mei D. Yan B. Chem. Eng. J. 2023 475 146380 10.1016/j.cej.2023.146380
Li L. Zou J.-Y. You S.-Y. Zhang L. Inorg. Chem. 2023 62 14168 14179 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00739 37606309
Hong C. Li L. Zou J.-Y. You S.-Y. Wang E.-L. Zhang L. Liu Y.-W. Huang Y.-L. Inorg. Chem. 2024 63 4697 4706 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c04357 38407040
Wang E.-L. Li L. Zou J.-Y. Hong C. Zhang L. You S.-Y. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024 7 17748 17758 10.1021/acsanm.4c03004
Xia T. Wang J. Jiang K. Cui Y. Yang Y. Qian G. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018 29 861 864 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.10.038
Xing S. Janiak C. Chem. Commun. 2020 56 12290 12306 10.1039/D0CC04733C 32969441
Lei J. Zhang P. Xue Y.-Y. Xu J. Li H.-P. Lv H.-J. Wang Y. Li S.-N. Zhai Q.-G. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022 283 120211 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.120211
Zhang J.-W. Li X. Zhang Y.-Y. Hu X.-C. J. Mol. Struct. 2024 1309 138154 10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.138154
Li D.-P. Wang F. Tian Y. Liu S.-M. Liu D.-C. Yang B. Xu B.-Q. Opt. Mater. 2020 108 109757 10.1016/j.optmat.2020.109757
Chen Y.-J. Dou C.-X. Yin P.-P. Chen J.-T. Yang X.-G. Li B. Ma L.-F. Wang L.-Y. Dalton Trans. 2023 52 13872 13877 10.1039/D3DT01869E 37772935
He R. Wang Y.-L. Ma H.-F. Yin S.-G. Liu Q.-Y. Dyes Pigm. 2018 151 342 347 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.01.018
Zhao D. Rao X. Yu J. Cui Y. Yang Y. Qian G. Inorg. Chem. 2015 54 11193 11199 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01623 26575207
Cui Y. Song R. Yu J. Liu M. Wang Z. Wu C. Yang Y. Wang Z. Chen B. Qian G. Adv. Mater. 2015 27 1420 1425 10.1002/adma.201404700 25581401
Lian X. Zhao D. Cui Y. Yang Y. Qian G. Chem. Commun. 2015 51 17676 17679 10.1039/C5CC07532G 26489451
