
==== Front
NPJ Sci Food
NPJ Sci Food
NPJ Science of Food
2396-8370
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39231995
303
10.1038/s41538-024-00303-9
Article
Unraveling the fate of mycotoxins during the production of legume protein and other derived products
Pavicich María Agustina MariaAgustina.Pavicich@UGent.be

1
Roose Lief 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3062-4725
Meerpoel Celine 1
Raes Katleen 2
De Saeger Sarah 13
1 https://ror.org/00cv9y106 grid.5342.0 0000 0001 2069 7798 Centre of Excellence in Mycotoxicology and Public Health, Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, B-9000 Belgium
2 https://ror.org/00cv9y106 grid.5342.0 0000 0001 2069 7798 Research Unit VEG-i-TEC, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Kortrijk, B-8500 Belgium
3 https://ror.org/04z6c2n17 grid.412988.e 0000 0001 0109 131X Department of Biotechnology and Food Technology, Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein Campus, Gauteng, South Africa
4 9 2024
4 9 2024
2024
8 5930 1 2024
21 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Consumers are increasingly looking for healthier and sustainable diets. Plant-based diets rich in legumes satisfy this demand. Legumes contain protein, dietary fibers and starch. Technological processes can separate these fractions, which can be used as supplements, or as ingredients. Nonetheless, legumes are susceptible to fungal infection, causing a potential health concern, since some fungi can produce mycotoxins: toxic secondary metabolites. The aim of this work was to analyze the fate of mycotoxins during different stages of the production process of legume derived products from the raw materials to final products. An extraction followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used for the analysis, revealing the presence of enniatin B (ENN B), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), deoxynivalenol, T2-toxin, nivalenol, fumonisin B1 and sterigmatocystin in raw materials, intermediate products and side streams. The alkaline solubilization steps, were effective in reducing ENN B; however, AME was found in one of the final products.

Subject terms

Mass spectrometry
Process chemistry
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011091 FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu (SPF Santé publique, Sécurité de la Chaîne alimentaire et Environnement) RT 22/07 RT 22/07 RT 22/07 RT 22/07 Pavicich María Agustina Meerpoel Celine Raes Katleen De Saeger Sarah issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

In recent years, numerous food-related trends have emerged. These trends reflect the rapidly evolving dynamics of food consumption, which in turn present significant challenges to the sustainability and security of the food supply chain. Factors such as climate change, the exponential growth of the world population, ongoing international conflicts and the outbreak of pandemics further exacerbate these challenges. As a result, all participants within the food supply chain are actively seeking innovative solutions to make the food system more sustainable. This effort is reinforced by the increasing awareness among consumers about their dietary habits, health and nutrition1,2.

A solution that is gaining global popularity is the trend of plant-based diets, including vegetarian and vegan food. These diets, which emphasize legumes, whole grains, vegetables, fruits, nuts and seeds consumption, and discourage most or all animal products, have multiple benefits3. They are not only more environmentally sustainable than meat-based diets, due to generating lower levels of greenhouse gases, but they also align with religious practices and address concerns regarding animal welfare4. Furthermore, plant-based diets offer a wide range of health benefits, including the prevention and management of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, obesity and diabetes5,6. However, vegetarians are advised to consume higher protein levels than what is typically recommended for omnivores. This is due to a lower protein quality and decreased digestibility of plant proteins7.

In plant-based diets, legumes play a key role due to their high protein content. Dietary fiber is recognized as another crucial component of a healthy diet. Legumes are considered high-fiber, as they contain a minimum of 6 g of fiber per 100 g. Studies suggest that supplementing plant-based diets with legume-derived products, such as plant-based protein powder, leads to similar results than a protein-matched mixed diet8.

Similar to other plant commodities, several fungi can infect the legume plants during growth, harvest and storage. Some of these fungi can produce mycotoxins: secondary metabolites produced by a wide diversity of toxigenic fungi9. The primary mycotoxin producers are species from Aspergillus, Fusarium, Penicillium and Alternaria. These low molecular weight compounds, are naturally ubiquitous and practically impossible to avoid10. Although pathogenic fungi can have toxic effects on plants and induce plant disease, the impact of mycotoxins on human and animal health is of greater concern worldwide. This is because mycotoxins accumulate in the edible parts of plants including legume-products11,12. They possess a wide range of toxic biological activities, such as hepatotoxicity, immunotoxicity, and carcinogenicity13. Moreover, mycotoxin contamination is a significant risk for producers, companies and export markets since it can lead to economic losses and instability in trade14. Although mycotoxins are not essential for fungi’s normal growth and development, they are produced in response to environmental changes15. For example, as temperature rises, there may be a general increase in fungi that grow in warmer conditions, including Aspergillus species that produce mycotoxins like the carcinogenic aflatoxins (AFs)16. Due to the combination of climate change and the increased sensitivity of analytical methods, the prevalence of mycotoxins has significantly increased worldwide17. The prevalence of mycotoxin contamination is higher in developing countries due to factors such as unfavorable climate, inadequate production technologies and insufficient crop storage facilities18.

Mycotoxins are stable compounds that can resist food processing. As a result, processed food remains vulnerable to contamination, even after undergoing various processing methods19. Researchers have been studying the behavior of mycotoxins during food processing in their quest to reduce human exposure to these compounds20. A range of processes may have an influence on mycotoxins, including cleaning, milling, brewing, cooking, baking, frying, roasting, flaking, alkaline cooking, nixtamalization and extraction. Although these processes generally result in a significant decrease in mycotoxin concentrations, complete elimination is not achieved21.

In addition to the reduction in mycotoxin levels, food processing can also cause mycotoxins to be released from or bound to matrix components. Furthermore, the chemical structure of mycotoxins can be influenced, potentially resulting in degradation or modification22. These modifications can lead to the formation of degradation products that may have different toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic properties than the parent mycotoxin23.

Therefore, having detailed knowledge about the fate of mycotoxins during food processing is essential. Thus, the aim of this work was the analysis of the fluctuation in mycotoxin concentration in different stages of the production process of legume-derived products from the raw materials to final products. This analysis aims to provide insights into the potential contribution of these raw materials to mycotoxin contamination in the final commercial products.

Results

Fate of multiple mycotoxins in the production of legume-derived products

The mycotoxins that were not detected in the 41 analyzed samples are either not mentioned in the tables or indicated by “not detected” (n.d.). Some mycotoxins were detected in concentrations below the method´s LOD or LOQ, but fulfilling the identification criteria of SANTE/12089/2016. They are indicated in the tables with an * and referred in the text as detected.

Figure 1 shows the flow diagram of the production of legume protein and other derived product and other intermediate products of the food processing company and indicates in which steps of the process mycotoxins were found.Fig. 1 Flowchart representing the steps in the process to obtain product A, product B, product C, and product D from legume.

Blue boxes: the raw materials, intermediate products, final products and side streams products that were analyzed. Gray boxes: the food-processing steps. Red squares: steps in which mycotoxins were found. AME alternariol monomethyl ether, ENN B enniatin B, DON deoxynivalenol, FB1 fumonisin B1, T2 T2-toxin.

Raw materials and intermediate products

All the analyzed mycotoxins were below the method´s LOD in the two analyzed raw materials. Thus, a mass balance could not be established and concentrations in each step are informed.

The results of mycotoxin contamination of the intermediate steps of the processing of legumes are shown in Table 1. One sample of the hull contained alternariol monomethyl ether (AME). In one sample of the hydrated milled legume deoxynivalenol (DON), T2 toxin (T2) and enniatin B (ENN B) were found. The liquid fraction after the decantation sample (intermediate product) contained T2 and ENN B. Nivalenol (NIV), fumonisin B1 (FB1) and ENN B were found in one concentrate sample (intermediate product). At last, product C and D (intermediate product) was contaminated with T2 and ENN B.Table 1 Presence and concentration of multiple mycotoxins in the different intermediate steps of the production of legume-derived products

Sample	NIV	DON	FB1	T2	AME	STC	ENN B	
Concentration (µg/kg)	
Hull 1	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	a	n.d.	n.d.	
Hull 2	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
Dehulled legume1	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
Dehulled legume 2	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
Hydrated milled legume1	n.d.	a	n.d.	a	n.d.	n.d.	a	
Hydrated milled legume 2	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
Liquid Fraction 1	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
Liquid fraction 2	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	a	n.d.	n.d.	a	
Concentrate 1	a	n.d.	a	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	a	
Concentrate 2	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
Solid fraction C + D 1	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
Solid fraction C + D 2	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	a	n.d.	n.d.	a	
Large fraction 1	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
Large fraction2	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
Fine fraction 1	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
Fine fraction 2	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
NIV nivalenol, DON deoxynivalenol, FB1 fumonisin B1, T2 T2-toxin, AME alternariol monomethyl ether, STC sterigmatocystin, ENN B enniatin B, n.d. not detected according to SANTE/12089/2016.

aConcentration below LOD or LOQ but detected according to SANTE/12089/2016.

Legume-derived final products

Table 2 shows the contamination of AME in the final legume-derived products. One sample of product B tested positive for AME. In the other final legume-derived products, no mycotoxins were detected.Table 2 Concentration of alternariol monomethyl ether in the different final products

Sample	AME	
Concentration (µg/kg)	
Product A 1	n.d.	
Product A 2	n.d.	
Product A 3	n.d.	
Product B 1	n.d.	
Product B 2	a	
Product C 1	n.d.	
Product C 2	n.d.	
Product D 1	n.d.	
Product D 2	n.d.	
AME alternariol monomethyl ether, n.d. not detected according to SANTE/12089/2016.

aConcentration below LOD or LOQ but detected according to SANTE/12089/2016.

Side streams

Table 3 illustrates the results of mycotoxin contamination in the side streams. These are the steps that do not continue in the process line. Both dust samples were contaminated with DON and AME with concentrations ranging from 39 µg/kg to 46 µg/kg. Sterigmatocystin (STC) was also found in one dust sample. In one sample of the washing water, DON and ENN B were found. The same results were observed for one soluble C sample. One soluble D sample was also contaminated with DON and ENN B.Table 3 Presence and concentration of multiple mycotoxins in the different side streams of the production of legume-derived products

Sample	DON	AME	STC	ENN B	
Concentration (µg/kg)	
Dust 1	a	39	n.d.	n.d.	
Dust 2	a	46	a	n.d.	
Washing water 1	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
Washing water 2	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	a	
Soluble B 1	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
Soluble B 2	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
Soluble C 1	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
Soluble C 2	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	a	
Soluble D 1	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
Soluble D 2	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	a	
DON deoxynivalenol, AME alternariol monomethyl ether, STC sterigmatocystin, ENN B enniatin B, n.d. not detected according to SANTE/12089/2016.

aConcentration below LOD or LOQ but detected according to SANTE/12089/2016.

Discussion

Since literature regarding the fate of mycotoxins in the production and isolation of legume products is extremely limited, in this section, each mycotoxin and its fate is discussed individually.

ENN B was detected in certain intermediate products and side streams obtained during the processing of legumes, particularly following the process of milling and the alkaline solubilization. Moreover, since there is a loop in the wash water, ENN B could also be present due to a contamination from another batch. These processing steps can potentially cause the release of ENN B from its matrix. This results in redistribution and concentration within specific mill fractions, leading to its presence in the resulting intermediate products19. ENN B was found in legume based products in different countries24,25, but in our study ENN B was not detected in the final legume protein nor the other derived products. This absence could be due to either the sampled fraction not containing any ENN B or the influence of specific processing steps. Thermal treatment is a crucial factor in how processing can impact the mycotoxin levels in the final food product. Most mycotoxins are heat-resistant, and conventional food preparation methods involving temperatures up to 100 °C generally have minimal effects on them. However, higher temperatures used in processes like frying, roasting, toasting and extrusion have the potential to reduce mycotoxins levels in the remaining product22. Washing and alkaline solubilization were also frequently applied to obtain the final products and with soluble products as side streams. Water-soluble mycotoxins can be partially washed off26. Although ENN B is almost insoluble in water, it dissolves well in organic solvents. An effective method for solubilization involves the use of an alkaline solution. The solubilization step seems to be crucial for reducing the concentration of ENN B in the final products. It is known that ENN B has the ability to form complexes with alkaline ions, such as potassium and sodium, through the carbonyl oxygen atoms within its structure27. Therefore, when an alkaline solubilization process is employed, ENN B can bind to the alkali present in the solution, which may facilitate the selective extraction of ENN B to the soluble side streams.

DON was detected in the dust samples, which consists of small broken particles of the legumes and is generated by particle abrasion or friction any time the legume is moved or transferred. However, the whole legume samples taken prior to processing did not test positive for this mycotoxin. This absence may be attributed to a concentration effect in the dust particles. This was also observed in previous work, were there was a 13 fold accumulation of DON in dust compared to the wheat28. The sieving that excludes the dust seems to be an essential step to reduce mycotoxins in the final products. The dust is not utilized further in the processing, ensuring that the consumers are not directly exposed to it. In particular, this process uses a filter before releasing the dust to the environment to reduce the exposure to harmful compounds into the environment. DON, produced by Fusarium spp., was also detected at a much lower concentration in the hydrated milled legume sample. This presence can potentially be attributed to the release of DON from the matrix due to the hydration and milling steps, but further investigation is needed.

FB1 was detected in an intermediate product of the production of legume-derived products; specifically after undergoing thermal treatment and concentration processes. The aim of the concentration is to increase the total solid content of the food. However, during this process, certain contaminants such as FB1, have the potential to become more concentrated, leading to detectable levels in the resulting intermediate product21. Fumonisins (FBs) are known to exhibit relative heat stability and reduction occurs during processes involving temperatures exceeding 150 °C21. Consequently, the temperature employed was below this threshold, leading to the explanation of the presence of FB1 in the intermediate product. Nevertheless, the final products of the processing of legumes did not contain detectable levels of FBs. This observation suggests that further processing steps, such as thermal treatment and drying, effectively reduce the levels of some mycotoxins to undetectable amounts.

Similarly to DON, STC was found in the dust samples, yielding the same observation about DON. However, only one dust sample was contaminated and STC was not detected in any other steps, requiring the analysis of more batches to establish the risk of exposure to this mycotoxin.

AME, T2 and NIV were detected in the products obtained during various processing steps. AME, produced by Alternaria spp., was found in high concentration in the dusts and in one of the final products B. These fungi were reported in several legumes worldwide29–31 and AME was also reported in legumes25. AME was the mycotoxin that was more frequent along the process. This mycotoxin is known to resist conventional processing steps32 and was also reported in human biomonitoring studies, indicating exposure to this mycotoxin33. Even though AME is not regulated in legumes, and there are only recommended levels for this mycotoxin in some food products34, this mycotoxin should not be overlooked regulatory bodies since it can occur in a great variety of food products.

On the contrary, T2 and NIV were not detected in any of the final products. This suggests that the applied processing steps, such as thermal treatment and washing reduced these mycotoxins levels to undetectable. The overall mycotoxin contamination in these products seems to be lower than the reports in cereals35. Comparing the exposure to mycotoxins through legumes to that through cereals commonly consumed in vegan or vegetarian diets may suggest that the former is likely lower. Nonetheless, more studies and a comprehensive risk assessment are needed to evaluate the contribution of legume products to the mycotoxin exposure in vegan or vegetarian diets.

Notably, ochratoxin A (OTA), the only mycotoxin that is regulated in legumes36 was not detected in any step of the two batches that were analyzed. Nonetheless, the analysis of more batches is recommended to understand the fate of this mycotoxin in the production of legume based products. It is worth noting that this work was done on naturally low contaminated material, and thus, represents the natural contamination of these products. To gain further insights on the fate of other mycotoxins during this production process, it is recommended to artificially contaminate the raw material, or to infect it with toxigenic fungi to be able to establish a mass balance.

To our knowledge, this is the first study on the fate of multiple mycotoxins in the production of legume protein and other derived products. The findings of this study suggests that certain processing steps can impact mycotoxin levels in legumes and legume-derived products. Notably, the milling process has the potential to release mycotoxins from their natural matrix. On the other hand, the study also highlights the effectiveness of the thermal treatment and solubilization in reducing mycotoxin concentrations in the final products. These observations emphasize the importance of implementing effective processing techniques to minimize mycotoxin contamination in legume-derived products. More studies, including a higher number of samples, different seasons and regions are needed to analyze the presence of AME in the final product B.

Methods

Materials

OTA, ±10 µg/mL in acetonitrile (ACN), aflatoxin mix containing AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, AFG2, ±20 µg/mL in ACN, DON, ±100 µg/mL in ACN, zearalenone (ZEN), ±100 µg/mL in ACN, fumonisin mix containing FB1, FB2, ±50 µg/mL in 50/50 ACN/H2O, NIV, ±100 µg/mL in ACN, neosolaniol (NEO), ±100 µg/ml in ACN, DOM, ±50 µg/mL in ACN, T2, ±100 µg/mL in ACN, HT2, ±100 µg/mL in ACN, 3-ADON, ±100 µg/mL in ACN, 15-ADON, ±100 µg/mL in ACN, diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS), ±100 µg/mL in ACN, fusarenon-X (FX), ±100 µg/mL in ACN, STC, ±50 µg/mL in ACN, all the above components were acquired from Biopure, Food Risk Management B.V., RomerLabs agent (Oostvoorne Nederland). Roquefortine C (ROQ-C), 0,5 mg, was purchased at Enzo Life Sciences, (Axxora Platform, Brussels, Belgium), ZAN, 10 mg, at Sigma (Darmstadt, Germany), AME, 5 mg, and alternariol (AOH), 5 mg, at Sigma (Darmstadt, Germany), FB3, 1 mg, at Medical Research Council (Swindow, UK), ENN B, ±1 mg/mL in methanol was acquired at Fermentek (Jerusalem, Israel). Acetic acid was provided by Merck (Overijse, Belgium), Methanol absolute LC-MS (for mobile phase) by Biosolve Chemicals (Valkenswaard, The Netherlands), ammonium acetate by Merck (Overijse, Belgium), n-hexane by BDH HiperSolv CHROMANORM (VWR International, Leuven, Belgium), ACN HPLC by Biosolve Chemicals (Valkenswaard, The Netherlands). All used solvents were HPLC or MS-grade.

Samples

A total of 41 legume samples of 1 kg each from a legume processing company were included to examine the fluctuations in mycotoxin levels during processing. The samples originated from two production batches with different production dates and different raw material suppliers, and were followed from the raw material to the final products. Due to a non-disclosure agreement, the nature of the legume from the Fabaceae family and the company cannot be disclosed.

For quantification, matrix matched calibration curves (MMCC) were constructed on blank legume flour. The blank sample must be similar to the products being analyzed and the mycotoxin concentration should be lower than the limit of detection (LOD)37.

For the construction of the MMCC, five blank samples were spiked with a multi-mycotoxin mix and were stored in the dark for 15 min so the mycotoxins could be absorbed in the samples. Sample preparation was performed using a validated method as described by Chilaka et al.20. Briefly, each sample was thoroughly homogenized, and milled, from which a representative portion of 5 g was spiked with internal standards zearalanone (ZAN) and deepoxy-deoxynivalenol (DOM) at a concentration of 250 and 150 μg/kg, respectively. DOM was used as internal standard for DON, DON-3G, 3-ADON, and 15-ADON while ZAN was used for the other mycotoxins. The sample was extracted with 20 mL of extraction solvent [ACN/H2O/acetic acid (79/20/1, v/v/v)], vortexed, agitated and centrifuged at 4000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was passed through a pre-conditioned C18 SPE column (Phenomenex, Utrecht, The Netherlands). The extraction was repeated by adding 5 mL of the extraction solvent ACN/H2O/acetic acid (79/20/1, v/v/ v) and the combined extract was made up to 25 mL with the extraction solvent (ACN/H2O/acetic acid (79/20/1, v/v/v)). The extract was transferred into the extraction tube and defatted using 10 mL of hexane. The defatted extract was divided into two parts, 10 mL of the first part was filtered through a glass filter, and 12.5 mL of the second part was mixed with 27.5 mL of ACN/acetic acid (99/1, v/v). Thirty milliliters of the mixture were further purified by passing through a MultiSep® 226 AflaZon+ multifunctional column (Romer Labs, Gernsheim Germany). The total Multisep 226 eluate was added to 2 mL of the glass filtered portion, and the mixture was evaporated to dryness under a gentle nitrogen flow in a thermostatic water bath heated at 40 °C. The residue was then redissolved in 150 μL of the injection solvent containing mobile phase A (H2O/MeOH/acetic acid (94/5/1, v/v/ v) +5 mM ammonium acetate) and mobile phase B (H2O/MeOH/ acetic acid (2/97/1, v/v/v) +5 mM ammonium acetate) mixed in the ratio of 3/2, v/v. The redissolved extract was centrifuged for 10 min at 14000 g, and further filtered using Ultrafree® PVDF centrifuge filters (Millipore Bedford, MA, USA) and analyzed using LC-MS/MS.

LC-MS/MS analysis

An LC-MS/MS Waters Acquity HPLC coupled with a Micromass Quattro Premier XE triple quadrupole mass spectrometer was used. The column used was a Symmetry C18 (150 mm × 2.1 mm i.d. 5 µm) column with a guard column (10 mm × 2.1 mm i.d.) of the same material (Waters, Zellik, Belgium), and was kept at room temperature. During the run, a gradient elution program was employed. This gradient program involved varying amounts of mobile phase A and mobile phase B. These were used at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The total analytical run time was 28 min. The gradient started at 95% mobile phase A with a linear decrease to 35% in 7 min. Mobile phase A decreased to 25% at 4 min, and an isocratic period of 100%, mobile phase B started at 11 min for 2 min. Initial column conditions were reached at 23 min using a linear decrease of mobile phase B, and the column was reconditioned for 5 min before the following injection. An injection volume of 10 μL was used. The capillary voltage was 3.2 kV and nitrogen was used as the desolvation gas. The mass spectrometer was operated with selected reaction monitoring (SRM) channels in the positive electrospray ionization (ESI+) mode. Source and desolvation temperatures were set at 150 and 350 °C, respectively. The instrumental control and data processing were performed with Masslynx™ version 4.1 and Quanlynx® version 4.1 software (Micromass, Manchester, UK). Prior to the study, the cone voltage at which the precursor ion is most abundant for each component was determined, as well as the corresponding precursor ion. Then, the collision energy and fragment ions formed, and their corresponding ionization mode were determined. More information about the MS/MS transition of each mycotoxin and the validation parameters according to Commission Regulation (EC) No. 401/2006 (68) and Commission Decision (EC) No. 2002/657 are described in refs. 20,37–39 and in the supplementary material. The performance of the method, including the LOD, LOQ, accuracy and precision, expressed as apparent recovery (Rapp), repeatability (RSDr), and intermediate precision (RSDR) are included in the Supplementary Material 2 and 3. The Waters QuanLynx software was used to determine the mycotoxin concentration in the food samples. For each set of analyses, a MMCC was constructed. When the identification criteria for mycotoxins in food and feed stated in the Guidance document SANTE/12089/201640 were met, but the concentration was lower than the LOD or LOQ, the sample was considered positive, but no concentration is given.

Supplementary information

Supplementary material

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41538-024-00303-9.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Belgian Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment through the contract RT 22/07.

Author contributions

M.A.P. and L.R. carried out the laboratory work and wrote the original draft; M.A.P, C.M, K.R. and S.D.S. conceptualized and designed the study. C.M., K.R. and S.D.S. acquired funding, and S.D.S. supervised the project. All authors co-wrote, edited, and reviewed the manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Santeramo FG Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry Food Res. Int. 2018 104 39 47 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.039 29433781
Santeramo, F. G. et al. Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry. Food Res. Int. 104, 39–47 (2018).29433781 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.039
2. Hassoun A Emerging trends in the agri-food sector: Digitalisation and shift to plant-based diets Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2022 5 2261 2269 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.11.010 36425597
Hassoun, A. et al. Emerging trends in the agri-food sector: Digitalisation and shift to plant-based diets. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 5, 2261–2269 (2022).36425597 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.11.010
3. McMacken M Shah S A plant-based diet for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes J. Geriatr. Cardiol. 2017 14 342 354 28630614
McMacken, M. & Shah, S. A plant-based diet for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. J. Geriatr. Cardiol. 14, 342–354 (2017).28630614
4. Craig WJ The safe and effective use of plant‐based diets with guidelines for health professionals Nutrients 2021 13 1 29 10.3390/nu13114144
Craig, W. J. et al. The safe and effective use of plant‐based diets with guidelines for health professionals. Nutrients 13, 1–29 (2021).10.3390/nu13114144
5. Shaw KA Benefits of a plant-based diet and considerations for the athlete Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2022 122 1163 1178 10.1007/s00421-022-04902-w 35150294
Shaw, K. A. et al. Benefits of a plant-based diet and considerations for the athlete. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 122, 1163–1178 (2022).35150294 10.1007/s00421-022-04902-w
6. Satija A Hu FB Plant-based diets and cardiovascular health Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2018 28 437 441 10.1016/j.tcm.2018.02.004 29496410
Satija, A. & Hu, F. B. Plant-based diets and cardiovascular health. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 28, 437–441 (2018).29496410 10.1016/j.tcm.2018.02.004
7. Agnoli C Position paper on vegetarian diets from the working group of the Italian Society of Human Nutrition Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017 27 1037 1052 10.1016/j.numecd.2017.10.020 29174030
Agnoli, C. et al. Position paper on vegetarian diets from the working group of the Italian Society of Human Nutrition. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 27, 1037–1052 (2017).29174030 10.1016/j.numecd.2017.10.020
8. Hevia-Larraín V High-Protein Plant-Based Diet Versus a Protein-Matched Omnivorous Diet to Support Resistance Training Adaptations: A Comparison Between Habitual Vegans and Omnivores Sport. Med. 2021 51 1317 1330 10.1007/s40279-021-01434-9
Hevia-Larraín, V. et al. High-Protein Plant-Based Diet Versus a Protein-Matched Omnivorous Diet to Support Resistance Training Adaptations: A Comparison Between Habitual Vegans and Omnivores. Sport. Med. 51, 1317–1330 (2021).10.1007/s40279-021-01434-9
9. Embaby EM Reda M Abdel-Wahhab MA Omara H Mokabel AM Occurrence of toxigenic fungi and mycotoxins in some legume seeds Agric. Technol. 2013 9 151 164
Embaby, E. M., Reda, M., Abdel-Wahhab, M. A., Omara, H. & Mokabel, A. M. Occurrence of toxigenic fungi and mycotoxins in some legume seeds. Agric. Technol. 9, 151–164 (2013).
10. Alshannaq, A. & Yu, J. H. Occurrence, toxicity, and analysis of major mycotoxins in food. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14, 10.3390/ijerph14060632 (2017).
11. Augustin Mihalache O Carbonell-Rozas L Cutroneo S Dall’Asta C Multi-mycotoxin determination in plant-based meat alternatives and exposure assessment Food Res. Int. 2023 168 112766 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112766 37120216
Augustin Mihalache, O., Carbonell-Rozas, L., Cutroneo, S. & Dall’Asta, C. Multi-mycotoxin determination in plant-based meat alternatives and exposure assessment. Food Res. Int. 168, 112766 (2023).37120216 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112766
12. Acuña-Gutiérrez, C., Jiménez, V. M. & Müller, J. Occurrence of mycotoxins in pulses. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 10.1111/1541-4337.13008 (2022).
13. Moretti A Logrieco AF Susca A Mycotoxins: An underhand food problem Methods Mol. Biol. 2017 1542 3 12 10.1007/978-1-4939-6707-0_1 27924528
Moretti, A., Logrieco, A. F. & Susca, A. Mycotoxins: An underhand food problem. Methods Mol. Biol. 1542, 3–12 (2017).27924528 10.1007/978-1-4939-6707-0_1
14. Capcarova M Zbynovska K Kalafova A Bulla J Bielik P Environment contamination by mycotoxins and their occurrence in food and feed: Physiological aspects and economical approach J. Environ. Sci. Heal. Part B Pestic. Food Contam. Agric. Wastes 2016 51 236 244 10.1080/03601234.2015.1120617
Capcarova, M., Zbynovska, K., Kalafova, A., Bulla, J. & Bielik, P. Environment contamination by mycotoxins and their occurrence in food and feed: Physiological aspects and economical approach. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. Part B Pestic. Food Contam. Agric. Wastes 51, 236–244 (2016).10.1080/03601234.2015.1120617
15. Pleadin, J., Frece, J. & Markov, K. Mycotoxins in food and feed. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 89, 297–345 (2019).
16. Zingales V Taroncher M Martino PA Ruiz MJ Caloni F Climate Change and Effects on Molds and Mycotoxins Toxins 2022 14 1 13 10.3390/toxins14070445
Zingales, V., Taroncher, M., Martino, P. A., Ruiz, M. J. & Caloni, F. Climate Change and Effects on Molds and Mycotoxins. Toxins 14, 1–13 (2022).10.3390/toxins14070445
17. Eskola M Worldwide contamination of food-crops with mycotoxins: Validity of the widely cited ‘FAO estimate’ of 25% Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020 60 2773 2789 10.1080/10408398.2019.1658570 31478403
Eskola, M. et al. Worldwide contamination of food-crops with mycotoxins: Validity of the widely cited ‘FAO estimate’ of 25%. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 60, 2773–2789 (2020).31478403 10.1080/10408398.2019.1658570
18. Al-Jaal B Salama S Al-Qasmi N Jaganjac M Mycotoxin contamination of food and feed in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries and its detection Toxicon 2019 171 43 50 10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.10.003 31586556
Al-Jaal, B., Salama, S., Al-Qasmi, N. & Jaganjac, M. Mycotoxin contamination of food and feed in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries and its detection. Toxicon 171, 43–50 (2019).31586556 10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.10.003
19. Bullerman LB Bianchini A Stability of mycotoxins during food processing Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007 119 140 146 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.035 17804104
Bullerman, L. B. & Bianchini, A. Stability of mycotoxins during food processing. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 119, 140–146 (2007).17804104 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.035
20. Chilaka CA De Boevre M Atanda OO De Saeger S Fate of Fusarium mycotoxins during processing of Nigerian traditional infant foods (ogi and soybean powder) Food Res. Int 2019 116 408 418 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.08.055 30716963
Chilaka, C. A., De Boevre, M., Atanda, O. O. & De Saeger, S. Fate of Fusarium mycotoxins during processing of Nigerian traditional infant foods (ogi and soybean powder). Food Res. Int. 116, 408–418 (2019).30716963 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.08.055
21. Milani J Maleki G Effects of processing on mycotoxin stability in cereals J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014 94 2372 2375 10.1002/jsfa.6600 24497303
Milani, J. & Maleki, G. Effects of processing on mycotoxin stability in cereals. J. Sci. Food Agric. 94, 2372–2375 (2014).24497303 10.1002/jsfa.6600
22. Schaarschmidt S Fauhl-Hassek C The fate of mycotoxins during secondary food processing of maize for human consumption Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021 20 91 148 10.1111/1541-4337.12657 33443798
Schaarschmidt, S. & Fauhl-Hassek, C. The fate of mycotoxins during secondary food processing of maize for human consumption. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 20, 91–148 (2021).33443798 10.1111/1541-4337.12657
23. Stadler D Berthiller F Suman M Schuhmacher R Krska R Novel analytical methods to study the fate of mycotoxins during thermal food processing Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020 412 9 16 10.1007/s00216-019-02101-9 31637463
Stadler, D., Berthiller, F., Suman, M., Schuhmacher, R. & Krska, R. Novel analytical methods to study the fate of mycotoxins during thermal food processing. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 412, 9–16 (2020).31637463 10.1007/s00216-019-02101-9
24. Aranega, J. P. R. B. & De Oliveira, C. A. F. Occurrence of mycotoxins in conserved grass and legume forages: a systematic review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 10.2478/aoas-2023-0030 (2023).
25. Augustin Mihalache O Dellafiora L Dall’Asta C A systematic review of natural toxins occurrence in plant commodities used for plant-based meat alternatives production Food Res. Int. 2022 158 111490 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111490 35840202
Augustin Mihalache, O., Dellafiora, L. & Dall’Asta, C. A systematic review of natural toxins occurrence in plant commodities used for plant-based meat alternatives production. Food Res. Int. 158, 111490 (2022).35840202 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111490
26. Karlovsky P Impact of food processing and detoxification treatments on mycotoxin contamination Mycotoxin Res. 2016 32 179 205 10.1007/s12550-016-0257-7 27554261
Karlovsky, P. et al. Impact of food processing and detoxification treatments on mycotoxin contamination. Mycotoxin Res. 32, 179–205 (2016).27554261 10.1007/s12550-016-0257-7
27. Burgess J. Stability constants. In: Ions in Solution. Elsevier. 74–92 (1999).
28. Sanders M Deoxynivalenol content in wheat dust versus wheat grain: a comparative study World Mycotoxin J. 2014 7 285 290 10.3920/WMJ2014.1700
Sanders, M. et al. Deoxynivalenol content in wheat dust versus wheat grain: a comparative study. World Mycotoxin J. 7, 285–290 (2014).10.3920/WMJ2014.1700
29. Pérez-Pizá MC Striker GG Stenglein SA Seed-borne diseases in pasture grasses and legumes: state of the art and gaps in knowledge J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2023 130 225 244 10.1007/s41348-022-00703-7
Pérez-Pizá, M. C., Striker, G. G. & Stenglein, S. A. Seed-borne diseases in pasture grasses and legumes: state of the art and gaps in knowledge. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 130, 225–244 (2023).10.1007/s41348-022-00703-7
30. Kononenko G Burkin A Gavrilova O Gagkaeva T Fungal species and multiple mycotoxin contamination of cultivated forage crops Agric. Food Sci. 2015 24 323 330 10.23986/afsci.52313
Kononenko, G., Burkin, A., Gavrilova, O. & Gagkaeva, T. Fungal species and multiple mycotoxin contamination of cultivated forage crops. Agric. Food Sci. 24, 323–330 (2015).10.23986/afsci.52313
31. Li W Evaluation and control of Alternaria alternata causing leaf spot in soybean in Northeast China J. Appl. Microbiol. 2023 134 lxad004 10.1093/jambio/lxad004 36631298
Li, W. et al. Evaluation and control of Alternaria alternata causing leaf spot in soybean in Northeast China. J. Appl. Microbiol. 134, lxad004 (2023).36631298 10.1093/jambio/lxad004
32. Pavicich MA Fate of free and modified Alternaria mycotoxins during the production of apple concentrates Food Control 2020 118 107388 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107388
Pavicich, M. A. et al. Fate of free and modified Alternaria mycotoxins during the production of apple concentrates. Food Control 118, 107388 (2020).10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107388
33. Jamnik T Next-generation biomonitoring of the early-life chemical exposome in neonatal and infant development Nat. Commun. 2022 13 1 14 10.1038/s41467-022-30204-y 34983933
Jamnik, T. et al. Next-generation biomonitoring of the early-life chemical exposome in neonatal and infant development. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–14 (2022).34983933 10.1038/s41467-022-30204-y
34. Commission Recommendation (EU) 2022/553. Scientific Opinion on the risks for animal and public health related to the presence of Alternaria toxins in feed and food. J. Eur. Union 9, 90–92 (2022).
35. Khodaei D Javanmardi F Khaneghah AM The global overview of the occurrence of mycotoxins in cereals: a three-year survey Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021 39 36 42 10.1016/j.cofs.2020.12.012
Khodaei, D., Javanmardi, F. & Khaneghah, A. M. The global overview of the occurrence of mycotoxins in cereals: a three-year survey. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 39, 36–42 (2021).10.1016/j.cofs.2020.12.012
36. European Commission. Commission regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 off. J. Eur. Union 2018 2016 48 119
European Commission. Commission regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006. off. J. Eur. Union 2016, 48–119 (2018).
37. Kieckens, A. & De Saeger, S. LC-MS/MS method validation and quantification of multi- mycotoxins in South African underutilized food crops, 2021–2022 (Univ. Gent, 2022).
38. De Boevre M Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, T-2-toxin and some masked metabolites in different cereals and cereal-derived food. Food Addit Contam. Part A 2012 29 819 835 10.1080/19440049.2012.656707
De Boevre, M. et al. Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, T-2-toxin and some masked metabolites in different cereals and cereal-derived food. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 29, 819–835 (2012).10.1080/19440049.2012.656707
39. Monbaliu S Development of a multi-mycotoxin liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for sweet pepper analysis Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2009 23 3 11 10.1002/rcm.3833 19051227
Monbaliu, S. et al. Development of a multi-mycotoxin liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for sweet pepper analysis. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 23, 3–11 (2009).19051227 10.1002/rcm.3833
40. European Commission. SANTE/12089 /2016 Guidance document on identification of mycotoxins in food and feed. Off. J. Eur. Union 1–4 (2016).
