
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

37020435
73797
10.26603/001c.73797
Original Research
Graft-Specific Surgical and Rehabilitation Considerations for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with the Quadriceps Tendon Autograft
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1747-327X
Solie Braidy DPT https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1747-327X
1
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8584-8614
Monson Jill MPT https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8584-8614
2
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9910-0145
Larson Christopher MD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9910-0145
3
1 Physical Therapy Training HAUS
2 Physical Therapy Twin Cities Orthopedics
3 Orthopedics Twin Cities Orthopedics https://ror.org/01en4s460
Corresponding Author Dr. Braidy Solie, DPT Training HAUS 2645 Viking Circle, Suite #200 Eagan, MN 55121 Cell Phone: (218) 289-3624 Email: BraidySolie@traininghaus.com
1 4 2023
2023
18 2 493512
18 10 2022
28 1 2023
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstring tendon (HT) autograft has traditionally been the preferred surgical treatment for patients returning to Level 1 sports. More recently, international utilization of the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft for primary and revision ACLR has increased in popularity. Recent literature suggests that ACLR with the QT may yield less donor site morbidity than the BPTB and better patient-reported outcomes than the HT. Additionally, anatomic and biomechanical studies have highlighted the robust properties of the QT itself, with superior levels of collagen density, length, size, and load-to-failure strength compared to the BPTB. Although previous literature has described rehabilitation considerations for the BPTB and HT autografts, there is less published with respect to the QT. Given the known impact of the various ACLR surgical techniques on postoperative rehabilitation, the purpose of this clinical commentary is to present the procedure-specific surgical and rehabilitation considerations for ACLR with the QT, as well as further highlight the need for procedure-specific rehabilitation strategies after ACLR by comparing the QT to the BPTB and HT autografts.

Level of Evidence

Level 5

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
autograft
physical therapy
quadriceps tendon autograft
rehabilitation
No grant support was provided to aid in the development and publication efforts of this manuscript
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament is a well-known sports injury, with a higher injury incidence in females and those who participate in Level 1 sports.1–4 Traditionally, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstring tendon (HT) autograft has been the preferred surgical procedure for managing complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament, with a surgeon-preference towards the BPTB as the standard of care.5–9 Recently, international utilization of the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft for primary and revision ACLR has increased in popularity10–13; ACLR with the QT may yield less graft harvest site morbidity than the BPTB and better patient-reported outcomes than the HT.14–16 However, revision ACLR outcomes from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry suggests higher graft laxity and failure rates when performing primary ACLR with the QT than both the BPTB and HT17; these findings have been debated,18,19 along with other literature reporting similar graft survivorship between the QT, BPTB and HT.14–16,20

Justifying the increased utilization of the QT for ACLR, anatomic and biomechanical studies have highlighted the robust properties of the QT itself, with superior levels of collagen density, length, size and load-to-failure strength than the BPTB.21–25 However, due to the multiple muscular origins of the quadriceps tendon, the QT has the potential for more variation in laminar structure and fiber orientation than the BPTB and HT.26–28 This non-uniformity of the quadriceps tendon, along with variation in surgeon skill and reconstruction technique, has been suggested as a reason for the higher QT failure rates within the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry.17–19

In addition to intra-graft characteristics, graft-specific considerations for ACLR should also include fixation technique, management of the graft harvest site and the overall graft ligamentization process. For example, graft fixation with an interference screw may facilitate better graft incorporation than suspensory fixation and reduce the incidence of bone tunnel widening.29–31 Regarding the graft harvest site, ACLR with the QT and BPTB may produce more postoperative quadriceps weakness than the HT,14,32–34 whereas a higher incidence of kneeling-related knee pain has been reported with the BPTB than both the QT and HT autografts.14,15 Lastly, the bone-to-bone healing of the BPTB within the bone tunnels facilitates graft osteointegration, which is a more efficient incorporation process than the fibrovascular healing of an all soft-tissue graft35; these considerations influence surgical decision-making and the rehabilitation plan-of-care, to which the rehabilitation specialist must tailor their exercise prescription in an effort to optimize outcomes after ACLR.

Although previous literature has described rehabilitation considerations for the BPTB and HT autografts,28,36–39 there is less published with respect to the QT.39–41 Therefore, the purpose of this clinical commentary is to present the graft-specific surgical and rehabilitation considerations for ACLR with the QT, as well as further highlight the need for graft-specific rehabilitation strategies after ACLR by comparing the QT to the BPTB and HT autografts.

ANATOMIC AND BIOMECHANICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The quadriceps and hamstring tendons are different than the patellar tendon in their innate function to connect muscle-to-bone, whereas the patellar tendon connects bone-to-bone. Considering this, differences in stiffness and elastic properties are known to exist between autograft tissue used for ACLR,42–44 with the quadriceps tendon producing more absolute stiffness than both the patellar and semitendinosus tendons but a lower elastic modulus and relative strain tolerance than the patellar tendon24,28,44–46 (Table 1).

154871 Table 1. Biomechanical characteristics of the native anterior cruciate ligament and common autografts used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Graft Type	Cross-Sectional Area

(mm2)	Maximal

Load To Failure

(N)	Ultimate Stiffness

(N/mm)	Ultimate Stress

(N/mm2)	Ultimate Strain

(%)	Common Failure Location	
Native ACL*§	44	2160	242	49	20		
BPTB Autograft†ǁ≠	48	1580-1810	278-324	69.9	14	Deep Layer of Patellar Interface / Femoral Origin / Mid-substance	
HT Autograft‡§ǁ≠	11 (1-strand)

23 (2-strand)	1060 (1-Stand)

2330 (2-stand)

1750 (4-stand)	213 (1-Stand)

469 (2-stand)

433 (4-stand)	99 (1-Stand)

100 (2-stand)	11.6 (4-stand)	Mid-Substance / Universal Stretch	
B-QT†≠

(Full Thickness)	91	1450-2186	370-466	49	11.2	Bone-Tendon Interface	
S-QT≠

(Full Thickness)		1260	257			Proximal Graft / Universal Stretch	
S-QT≠

(Partial Thickness)		972	228			Distal Graft / Universal Stretch	
ACL; anterior cruciate ligament, BPTB; bone-patellar tendon-bone, HT; hamstring tendon, B-QT; quadriceps tendon with a patellar bone block; S-QT, all soft-tissue quadriceps tendon; *includes data from Woo et al42; †includes data from Shani et al24; ‡ includes data from Hamner et al45; § includes data from Schilaty et al43; ǁ includes data from Strauss et al44; ≠ includes data from Magnussan et al47

While these findings reflect total-graft biomechanical properties, previous work has highlighted the fact that regional variation in tendon elasticity and stiffness may also exist; the tendon region closest to the myotendinous junction is less stiff than the tendon region adjacent to the enthesis.48 This is an important consideration, as biomechanically-induced graft failure studies have reported a difference in failure location for the QT harvested with a patellar bone block (B-QT) than that of the BPTB and multiple-strand HT autografts; failure of the B-QT was most common at the bone-tendon interface,28,44 whereas universal stretch/mid-substance failures have been reported with the all soft-tissue QT (S-QT), BPTB and multiple-strand HT.28,43–45,47 These observations suggest the B-QT has more within-graft variation in regional elasticity and structure, creating increased stress at the bone-tendon interface and the observed graft failure-location.26,44,49

Compared to the HT and BPTB, more variation in laminar structure is present with the QT. In contrast to the continuous structure of the hamstring and patellar tendons, the quadriceps tendon is typically described as a common tendon with a three-layered arrangement; a superficial layer derived from rectus femoris, an intermediate layer from vastus medialis and vastus lateralis, and a deep layer from vastus intermedius.26–28 Although the extent to which laminar structure contributes to graft fixation pull-through is unknown, a biomechanical study by Arakagi et al50 reported significant suspensory fixation pull-through with a 150-newton load on the S-QT relative to a bone-block control.

GRAFT COMPOSITION AND HARVESTING TECHNIQUE CONSIDERATIONS

The harvesting technique of the QT can vary, and along with this, different rehabilitation considerations for graft composition are warranted. The B-QT facilitates partial graft osteointegration as early as 4-6 weeks after ACLR through the bone-to-bone healing of the single bone block within the bone tunnel,51,52 but likewise, carries a 1.4-8.8% risk of patellar fracture due to bone block harvest.53–55 Conversely, the S-QT is harvested without a patellar bone block and mitigates the risk of patellar fracture,54 but will take a minimum of 10 to 12-weeks for the fibrovascular interface to form between the S-QT and the bone tunnels.28,56–58 This between-graft difference in integration, in conjunction with the findings of Arakagi et al,50 suggests accelerated rehabilitation approaches may be less appropriate for the S-QT fixated with suspensory fixation, especially as graft tension is highly dependent on fixation until biological integration of the graft within the bone tunnels has occurred. While this is an extrapolated suggestion, short-term increases in graft laxity have been reported with the early introduction of open-kinetic-chain (OKC) quadriceps resistance training after ACLR, to which slightly increased levels of graft laxity were reported with the HT relative to the BPTB when OKC quadriceps resistance training with distal tibial load was initiated between 0-45 degrees of knee flexion weeks 6-12 after ACLR.59

The theoretical advantage of graft osteointegration with the B-QT is not currently supported by the literature.28,56–58 Specifically, a higher incidence of postoperative rotatory instability (16% vs 0%) and atraumatic graft ruptures (24% vs 0%) have been observed after ACLR with the B-QT compared to the S-QT54; these findings suggest ACLR with the S-QT may yield better postoperative stability than the B-QT. However, evidence is still limited,54 and the full-thickness B-QT appears to be more biomechanically similar to the BPTB than the S-QT, as well as may better-replicate the tissue properties of the native anterior cruciate ligament42,44 (Table 1). Lastly, ACLR with the S-QT may not provide adequate quadriceps tendon graft-length in some populations,60 especially women,61 and cosmetic retraction of the rectus femoris is a known complication related to proximal QT harvest.28,53,55

Outcomes comparing the full-thickness QT (F-QT) to the partial-thickness QT (P-QT) are limited with only one direct comparison published within the literature.62 QT thickness does not appear to influence donor site pain, failure rates or patient-reported outcomes.63 However, the biomechanical properties of the P-QT appear to be less robust than the F-QT44 (Table 1).

The F-QT produces a larger diameter graft and causes deeper disruption of the tissue at the graft harvest site. With this, violation of the suprapatellar pouch with F-QT harvest can produce a suprapatellar hematoma,53 which is a known complication after ACLR with the F-QT.40 More postoperative quadriceps inhibition may also be theorized with the F-QT relative to the P-QT, as full-thickness quadriceps tendon harvest will disrupt the laminar layers associated with the vastus medialis, vastus lateralis and vastus intermedius.26,27,64 Along with the inevitable increase in suprapatellar scarring, the high collagen density and graft-specific stiffness of the QT are suggested reasons for the observed incidence of arthrofibrosis after ACLR with the QT,20,40,65,66 to which the F-QT may exacerbate.67

EXTENSOR MECHANISM CONSIDERATIONS

Harvesting the P-QT may reduce the tensile strength of the quadriceps tendon by as much as 34%, which is greater than the 25% reduction in patellar tendon tensile strength after BPTB harvest.23 These findings have implications for rehabilitation, as greater impairments in quadriceps strength have been observed after ACLR with the QT and BPTB than with the HT.14,32–34,68 Following QT harvest, reduced quadriceps activation and strength may initially create a more protective healing environment at the graft harvest site. However, long-term reductions in quadriceps strength are detrimental to knee function and are one of the reasons why it may take longer to achieve performance testing milestones after ACLR with the QT and BPTB than with the HT.33,38,39,68

Considering P-QT harvest reduces the tensile strength of the quadriceps tendon by more than a third,23 a greater initial reduction in quadriceps strength may be expected after ACLR with the QT compared to the BPTB and HT.68 Quadriceps weakness from extensor mechanism graft harvest appears most extreme during the first three months after ACLR,68 suggesting any difference in quadriceps strength between ACLR with the QT and BPTB may only be distinguishable during the first three to four months after ACLR34,68; this suggestion is supported by the fact quadriceps strength is not statistically different between the QT and the BPTB at six to 24 month follow-up.34,68,69

REHABILITATION CONSIDERATIONS

Early Phase (Postoperative Weeks 0-8)

After ACLR with the QT, the graft’s composition and fixation method should be communicated to the rehabilitation specialist, as these factors dictate the overall graft ligamentization process35,70–72; the amount of tissue trauma at the graft harvest site44; and the durability of the graft-bone tunnel construct.29–31,50,73 ACLR with the F-QT carries the risk of developing a suprapatellar hematoma55,63; pain and focal swelling at the graft harvest site is indicative of a hematoma and should be differentiated from a postoperative knee effusion.40 If a suprapatellar hematoma is identified, the surgical team should be notified as physician follow-up may be indicated.

The early restoration of passive knee extension is a crucial component of rehabilitation after ACLR, regardless of graft type.74 ACLR with the QT may carry an elevated risk of postoperative stiffness due to the larger graft size,67 presence of suprapatellar scarring and ongoing quadriceps inhibition.20,40,65,66 Interventions to improve patellar mobility, knee range-of-motion and soft tissue compliance should be implemented immediately after surgery. Failure to restore passive knee extension by postoperative week eight may indicate the need for a subsequent lysis-of-adhesions procedure.20,65

Like the BPTB, ACLR with the QT requires an isolated quadriceps training load-progression to be a cornerstone of the rehabilitation program.33,34,75,76 Early phase quadriceps rehabilitation should include quadriceps setting and other activation exercises into terminal knee extension (TKE), with the goal of restoring active knee extension as soon as possible (Table 2). The early implementation of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and/or blood flow restriction during quadriceps exercise may improve neuromuscular recruitment and help mitigate thigh muscle atrophy,77–80 as well as facilitate improvements in muscle size and strength throughout rehabilitation.81–83 The quadriceps muscle load-progression should start with quadriceps setting and straight-leg raises in non-weightbearing, and progress onto closed-kinetic-chain (CKC) positions which emphasize the restoration of knee control in weightbearing (Table 2).84 The CKC quadriceps load-progression should begin with the double-leg squat exercise and incorporate body-weight isometric and isotonic contractions in low levels of knee flexion (Figure 1A) (Table 2).85

154872 Table 2. Example of a quadriceps muscle/tendon load-progression after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an all soft-tissue quadriceps tendon autograft fixated with suspensory fixation

Postoperative Month	Single-Leg
Progression	Split-Squat
Progression	Open-Kinetic-Chain
Progression	
Month 0-1	Banded TKE (Sitting at Edge of Surface)

Prescription Type: Neuromuscular Reeducation and Muscle Activation F: 3-4 times/day I: Elastic resistance band exercise (light to heavy) T: Isotonic (concentric/eccentric phase) T: 10-15 minutes each exposure V: 2-4 sets of 10-20 repetition with a 1-3 second isometric contraction in TKE P: Progression of elastic resistance band level; superimposition of NMES with exercise; progression onto blood flow restriction exercise (1-2 times/day, 3-4 set to volitional fatigue at 80% LOP)

	Quadriceps Setting (Straight Leg Raise)

Prescription Type: Neuromuscular Reeducation and Muscle Activation F: 3-6 times/day I: Progressive increase in contraction intensity onto the straight leg raise exercise T: Isometric quadriceps contraction training T: 8-10 minutes each exposure V: 2-4 sets of 10-20 repetition with a 1-3 second isometric contraction in TKE P: Progression of body position and/or onto the straight leg raise exercise (with/without external resistance at the ankle); superimposition of NMES with exercise; progression onto blood flow restriction exercise (1-2 exposures/day, 3-4 set to volitional fatigue at 80% LOP)

	Short/Long-Arc Quad (AROM)

Prescription Type: Neuromuscular Reeducation and Muscle Activation F: 3-4 times/day I: Weight of lower leg T: Isotonic (concentric/eccentric phase) T: 10-15 minutes each exposure V: 2-4 sets of 10-20 repetition with a 1-3 second isometric contraction in TKE P: Progression of contraction intensity and knee flexion angle during exercise; superimposition of NMES with exercise; progression onto blood flow restriction exercise (1-2 times/day, 3-4 set to volitional fatigue at 80% LOP)

	
Month 1-2	Banded TKE (Standing)

Prescription Type: Neuromuscular Reeducation and Muscle Activation F: 2-3 times/day I: Elastic resistance band (light to heavy) T: Isotonic (concentric/eccentric phase) T: 10-15 minutes each exposure V: 3-4 sets of 10-20 repetition with a 1-3 second isometric contraction in TKE P: Progression of elastic resistance band level; progression onto blood flow restriction exercise (1-2 times/day, 3-4 set to volitional fatigue at 80% LOP)

	Double-Leg Squat (0-60 Degrees of Knee Flexion)

Prescription Type: Neuromuscular Reeducation and Muscle Activation F: 2-3 times/day I: Body weight (0-60 degrees of knee flexion) T: Isotonic (concentric/eccentric phase) or Isometric T: 10-15 minutes each exposure V: 3-4 sets of 10-15 repetition followed by a 45-90 second isometric contractions in 45-60 degrees of knee flexion | 30-90-second rest periods between sets P: Progression of knee flexion angle, positive shin angle and duration of isometric contraction; redistribution of weight toward the surgical limb

	Long-Arc Quad (AROM with Blood Flow Restriction)

Prescription Type: Cell Swelling/Atrophy Mitigation/Hypertrophy F: 1-2 times/day I: Weight of lower leg, blood flow restriction at 80% LOP T: Isotonic (concentric/eccentric phase) | 0-90+ degrees of knee flexion T: 10-20 minutes each exposure V: 3-4 sets to volitional fatigue | 30-90-second rest periods between sets P: Addition of progressive isometric contractions at 45-90 degrees of knee flexion with/without the superimposition of NMES

	
Month 2-3	Double-Leg Wall Squat (60-90+ Degrees of Knee Flexion)

Prescription Type: Extensor Mechanism Load-Tolerance/Hypertrophy F: 3-5 times/week I: Body weight (60-90+ degrees of knee flexion) T: Isometric T: 5-10 minutes each exposure V: 3-4 sets of 45-90 second isometric contractions | 2-5-minute rest periods between sets P: Progression of knee flexion angle, positive shin angle, or duration of isometric contraction; pressure redistribution of additional weight onto the surgical limb

	Split-Squat (0-60 Degrees of Knee Flexion)

Prescription Type: Neuromuscular Reeducation and Muscle Activation F: 2-3 times/day I: Body weight (0-60 degrees of knee flexion) on involved limb T: Isotonic (concentric/eccentric phase) or Isometric T: 5-10 minutes each exposure V: 3-4 sets of 10-15 repetition followed by a 45-60 second isometric contractions in shallow knee flexion | 30-90-second rest periods between sets P: Progression of knee flexion angle, positive shin angle or duration of isometric contraction; redistribution of weight onto the surgical limb

	Knee Extension Machine (Single-Leg with Blood Flow Restriction)

Prescription Type: Hypertrophy/Strength F: 3-5 times/week I: 15-30 RM (<40-65% 1-RM) of involved limb, blood follow restriction at 80% LOP T: Isotonic (concentric/eccentric phase) | 45-90+ degrees of knee flexion T: 5-10 minutes each exposure V: 3-4 sets to volitional fatigue | 2-5-minute rest periods between sets P: Progression of external resistance at the distal tibia

	
Month 3-4	Leg Press Machine (Single-Leg with Blood Flow Restriction)

Prescription Type: Hypertrophy/Strength F: 2-4 times/week I: 10-20 RM (40-75% 1-RM) on the involved limb, blood follow restriction at 80% limb occlusion pressure T: Isotonic (concentric/eccentric phase) T: 5-10 minutes each exposure V: 3-4 sets to volitional fatigue | 2-5-minute rest periods between sets P: Progression of knee flexion angle, positive shin angle or external resistance

	Split -Squat (60-90+ Degrees Knee Flexion)

Prescription Type: Hypertrophy/Strength F: 2-4 times/week I: Body weight (60-90+ degrees of knee flexion) on the involved limb T: Isometric T: 5-10 minutes each exposure V: 3-4 sets of 45-90 second isometric contractions in progressively deeper knee flexion | 2-5-minute rest periods between sets P: Progression of knee flexion angle, positive

	Knee Extension Machine (Single-Leg with Blood Flow Restriction)

Prescription Type: Hypertrophy/Strength F: 2-4 times/week I: 15-20 RM (40-65% 1-RM) of involved limb, blood follow restriction at 80% limb occlusion pressure T: Isotonic (concentric/eccentric phase) | 0-90+ degrees of knee flexion T: 5-10 minutes each exposure V: 3-4 sets to volitional fatigue | 2-5-minute rest periods between sets P: Progression of external resistance at the distal tibial

	
Month 4-6	Leg Press (Single-Leg with Increasing Load)

Prescription Type: Hypertrophy/Strength F: 2-4 times/week I: 6-15 RM (65-85% 1-RM) on the involved limb T: Isotonic (concentric/eccentric phase) T: 5-10 minutes each exposure V: 3-4 sets to volitional fatigue | 2-5-minute rest periods between sets P: Progression of knee flexion angle, positive shin angle or external resistance

	Split-Squat (Rearfoot-Elevated Position)

Prescription Type: Hypertrophy/Strength F: 2-4 times/week I: 6-15 RM (65-85% 1-RM) on the involved limb T: Isotonic (concentric/eccentric phase) T: 5-10 minutes each exposure V: 3-4 sets to volitional fatigue | 2-5-minute rest periods between sets P: Progression of knee flexion angle, positive shin angle or external resistance

	Knee Extension Machine (Single-Leg with Increasing Load)

Prescription Type: Hypertrophy/Strength F: 2-4 times/week I: 6-15 RM (65-85% 1-RM) on the involved limb T: Isotonic (concentric/eccentric phase) | 0-90+ degrees of knee flexion T: 5-10 minutes each exposure V: 3-4 sets to volitional fatigue | 2-5-minute rest periods between sets P: Progression of external resistance at the distal tibial

	
Month 6+	Eccentric Leg Press (2-Legs Up Concentric / 1-Leg Down Eccentric)

Prescription Type: Hypertrophy/ Eccentric Strength F: 2-3 times/week I: 1-5 RM (85-100% 1-RM) on the involved limb T: Eccentric resistance training T: 5-10 minutes each exposure V: 3-4 sets of 8-15 eccentric repetitions | 2-5-minute rest periods between sets P: Progression of knee flexion angle, positive shin angle or external resistance greater than a 1-RM (e.g., 120% 1-RM)

	Split-Squat Jumps (Lunge or Rearfoot-Elevated Position)

Prescription Type: Power F: 2-4 times/week I: Body weight to 40-60% 1-RM on the involved limb T: Isotonic (concentric/eccentric phase), emphasis on speed/effort during the concentric phase of the movement T: 5-10 minutes each exposure V: 4-5 sets of 3-5 reps | 2-5-minute rest period between sets P: Progression of knee flexion angle, positive shin angle, contraction speed or external load

	Eccentric Knee Extension Machine (2-Legs Up Concentric / 1-Leg Down Eccentric)

Prescription Type: Hypertrophy/ Eccentric Strength F: 2-3 times/week I: 1-5 RM (85-100% 1-RM) on the involved limb T: Eccentric resistance training | 0-90+ degrees of knee flexion T: 5-10 minutes each exposure V: 3-4 sets of 8-15 eccentric repetitions | 2-5-minute rest periods between sets P: Progression of external resistance greater than a 1-RM (e.g., 110% 1-RM)

	
F, frequency; I, intensity; T, type; T, time; V, volume; P, progression; AROM, active range-of-motion; TKE, terminal knee extension; LOP, limb occlusion pressure, RM, repetition maximum, 1-RM, 1-repetition maximum

154873 Figure 1. Closed-kinetic-chain load-progression for the surgical limb

Suboptimal progression of unilateral loading from a double leg regression (A) to a rear-foot elevated split-squat (B) with a subsequent increase in knee flexion angle and external resistance (C). Theoretically proper progression of unilateral loading from a double leg regression (A) to a split-squat (D) with the subsequent addition of external resistance (E). No change in knee flexion angle throughout progression (A-D-E). Red dash-arrow, approximate ground reaction force-vector; white lines, depiction of joint angles; red lines, depiction of increasing knee flexion; yellow lines in (A-D-E), depiction of knee/quadriceps-dominant movement with a positive shin angle; yellow shading, depiction of external knee flexion moment related to knee/quadriceps-dominant movement; red circles, improper exercise selection; green circles, proper exercise selection.

Graft osteointegration with the B-QT supports the implementation of an accelerated resistance training approach within the first 4-6 weeks after ACLR,59 such as OKC quadriceps resistance training with distal tibial load between 0-45 degrees of knee flexion86; the combined utilization of the B-QT with interference screw fixation may further justify this clinical decision29–31,44,50,70,71,87 (Table 3). The S-QT fixated with suspensory fixation may warrant a more traditional approach to resistance training the first 10-12 weeks after ACLR59,72,73,87,88 (Table 2); healing time is needed to mitigate the risk of fixation slippage,50,73,85,89 graft laxity and bone tunnel widening with an all soft-tissue graft,17,29–31,50 as well as facilitate optimal fibrovascular integration of the graft within the bone tunnels72,87,89–93 (Table 3).

154874 Table 3. Rehabilitation Overview

	Consideration	Location	Description of Consideration(s)	
Early Phase Rehabilitation
Considerations
(Postoperative Weeks 0-8)	Graft Composition	Intra-Articular	B-QT

Partial graft osteointegration within first 4-6 weeks

S-QT

Graft fibrovascular integration takes a minimum of 10-12 weeks

Accelerated rehabilitation approaches may be less appropriate when fixated with suspensory fixation (Table 2)

F-QT

Consider risk of a range-of-motion complications with large graft diameter and robust biomechanical properties

	
OKC Quadriceps Resistance Training / Graft Fixation	Intra-Articular	OKC Exercise with Interference Screw Fixation (B-QT)

AROM: as tolerated

OKC quadriceps resistance exercise with distal tibial load:

45-90+ degrees weeks 3-4

0-45+ degrees weeks 4-6+

OKC Exercise with Suspensory Fixation (S-QT)

AROM: as tolerated

OKC quadriceps resistance exercise with distal tibial load:

45-90+ degrees weeks 3-10

0-45+ degrees weeks 10-12+

	
Graft Harvest Site	Extra-Articular	B-QT

Low risk of patellar fracture (1.4-8.8%)

F-QT

Possibility of more persistent and global quadriceps inhibition

Differentiation of a postoperative knee effusion from a suprapatellar hematoma at graft harvest site

	
 				
Middle Phase Rehabilitation
Considerations
(Postoperative Weeks 8-16)	Graft Composition	Extra-Articular	P-QT

Superficial tendon trauma will result in more isolated involvement of the rectus femoris muscle

OKC exercise may be more provocative to graft harvest site than CKC

F-QT

Full-thickness tendon trauma may increase the potential for more global graft harvest site irritability with CKC/OKC quadriceps resistance training

	
Graft Harvest Site	Extra-Articular	Gradual and Progressive Quadriceps Loading into Deep Knee Flexion

Prone knee flexion stretching will preferentially tension the superficial layer of quadriceps tendon

Increasing the level of knee flexion during resistance training will preferentially increase the load within the quadriceps tendon relative to the patellar tendon

	
 				
Late Phase Rehabilitation
Considerations
(Postoperative Weeks 16+)	Graft Harvest Site	Extra-Articular	Ongoing Quadriceps Strengthening Program

Quadriceps strengthening program 2-3x/week (OKC + CKC)

Progressive resistance training, eccentric training, and power training

Progression of Energy Storage Activities into Increasing Knee Flexion

Combination of hip extension and knee flexion preferentially tensions the superficial layer of the quadriceps tendon (e.g., wind-up phase of kicking)

Avoid acute spikes in plyometric load into increasing levels of knee flexion

Thoughtful progression of high velocity running speed/intensity, distance and volume

Thoughtful progression of high-velocity kicking and sagittal plane deceleration training

	
B-QT, quadriceps tendon autograft with patellar bone-block; S-QT, all soft-tissue quadriceps tendon autograft; F-QT, full-thickness quadriceps tendon autograft; OKC, open-kinetic-chain; AROM, active range-of-motion; P-QT, partial-thickness quadriceps tendon autograft; CKC, closed-kinetic-chain

Middle Phase (Postoperative Weeks 8-16)

As goals related to joint homeostasis are achieved, the focus of rehabilitation transitions from resolving impairments in muscle activation and knee range-of-motion, to rebuilding the surgical limb’s functional capacity to manage load. Ongoing quadriceps weakness is expected after ACLR with the QT,14,15,33,34,75 and knee-specific load-progressions should be designed to best-manage the graft harvest site while stimulating improvements in quadriceps size and strength. Prior research has highlighted associations between knee position and extensor mechanism biomechanics,94–96 from which the quadriceps training load-progressions can be derived (Table 2).

As the knee moves into deeper knee flexion, preferential loading of the quadriceps tendon increases relative to the patellar tendon.94 This load-transition is the result of an improving patellar tendon mechanical advantage with a concurrent increase in passive tension within the quadriceps.94,95 Considering the laminar structure of the quadriceps tendon, variations in quadriceps length-tension can predispose the quadriceps tendon to greater levels of shear/compressive load, as well as non-uniform intratendinous force-transmission. Specifically, performing the prone knee flexion stretch will preferentially tension the superficial layer of the quadriceps tendon by maximally lengthening rectus femoris, compressing/shearing the deeper layers of the tendon95,97,98; this unique type of tendon loading can be prescribed in addition to strength training to mobilize the graft harvest site and may help stimulate quadriceps tendon remodeling (Figure 2).

154875 Figure 2. Selective tensioning of the superficial layer of the quadriceps tendon

Selective tensioning of the superficial layer of the quadriceps tendon is achieved by maximally lengthening rectus femoris into the combined motion of hip extension and knee flexion; low-velocity stretching may be therapeutically prescribed to shear/mobilize the graft harvest site (A), whereas high-velocity activities should be thoughtfully progressed with ongoing monitoring of the graft harvest site for any increase in tissue irritability. Asterisk, quadriceps tendon autograft harvest site; white lines, depiction of joint angles; black dash-arrow, high-velocity eccentric lengthening of the quadriceps muscle during the wind-up phase of kicking

Months 2-4 after ACLR with the QT, the CKC quadriceps load-progression should include isometric or isotonic contractions with a light to moderate external resistance. Initially, body weight isometric exercise in low levels of knee flexion may best manage graft harvest site irritability94,99 (Figure 1A) (Table 2). As exercise tolerance improves, the quadriceps load-progression should be advanced by monitoring the graft harvest site for any increase in pain/irritability with exercise while gradually progressing external resistance or the level of knee flexion95 (Figure 1A-D-E). The rehabilitation specialist should not advance too many variables at once, as simultaneously increasing external resistance and the level of knee flexion can exponentially load the quadriceps tendon and may provoke graft harvest site pain94,95 (Figure 1C).

Graft-specific load-progressions for the P-QT may also exist, in which more specific targeting of the superficial layer of the quadriceps tendon/rectus femoris with OKC exercise may be indicated.98,100 The long-arc-quad exercise should be advanced from active range-of-motion during the early phase of rehabilitation,85 to OKC quadriceps resistance training on a knee extension machine (Table 2); the rehabilitation specialist may elect to perform OKC quadriceps resistance training with the hip positioned in lower levels of hip flexion to preferentially load rectus femoris (i.e., performing OKC quadriceps resistance training with the trunk positioned in supine).95,97,98 External resistance should be thoughtfully progressed, as performing OKC quadriceps resistance training between 0-45 degrees of knee flexion will increase patellofemoral compartment stress and preferentially strain the reconstructed ACL graft85,86,101 (Figure 3A), whereas performing OKC quadriceps resistance training in deeper levels of knee flexion will preferentially load the quadriceps tendon and may provoke irritability at the graft harvest site94,95 (Figure 3B).

154876 Figure 3. Considerations for open-kinetic-chain quadriceps resistance training with distal tibial load

Performing quadriceps resistance training between 0-45 degrees of knee flexion with distal tibial load will produce higher patellofemoral joint stress and increase strain on the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament (A), whereas performing resisted knee extensions in deeper levels of knee flexion will preferentially load the quadriceps tendon relative to the patellar tendon. Red arc, 0-45 degrees of knee flexion; yellow arc, >45 degrees of knee flexion; Black asterisk, quadriceps tendon autograft harvest site

Late Phase (Postoperative Weeks 16+)

As the surgical limb develops the capacity to perform higher-load activities at slow contraction velocities, higher demand exercise progressions should be introduced. Patients participating in physically demanding activities, such as Level 1 sports, will benefit from exposure to plyometric and ballistic-type exercise progressions. The rehabilitation specialist should consider the quadriceps tendon a rate-limiting tissue for the introduction of plyometric exercise,23 as the QT harvest site must store and transfer energy during these progressions. Plyometric exercise should be initiated with knee-specific regressions that temper the demand for elastic energy-storage within the quadriceps tendon, such as running drills in triple-extension or frontal plane plyometric exercise94,102,103 (Figure 4).

154877 Figure 4. Sagittal deceleration task vs lateral plyometric task

The resultant ground reaction force during a sagittal plane deceleration task (top sequence from left to right) places a large amount of load on the knee and quadriceps tendon, whereas a lateral plyometric task places more relative load proximally on the lateral hip and trunk (bottom sequence from left to right). Red arrows, resultant ground reaction force-vector; white lines, depiction of joint angels; asterisks, area of high load-demand during task.

As mentioned previously, specific consideration should be given for ballistic activities that require the quadriceps tendon to transfer load while in the combined position of hip extension and knee flexion, such as the wind-up phase of kicking or high-velocity running104,105 (Figure 2B); these activities combine high angular velocities and tendinous compressive/shear force by the selective-tensioning of the superficial layer of the quadriceps tendon running continuous with rectus femoris.95,97 Sagittal plane deceleration training will also preferentially load the quadriceps tendon. During deceleration, the combination of large external knee flexion moments, increasing knee flexion angles, and high-force eccentric quadriceps contractions can produce exponentially higher load-transmission within the quadriceps tendon (Figure 4); sagittal plane deceleration training must be thoughtfully progressed per exercise-tolerance and symptom-response at the graft harvest site.

RETURN TO ACTIVITY CONSIDERATIONS

Regardless of the graft type used for ACLR, most individuals expect to restore knee joint stability and function to a level that supports the return to their pre-injury activity level.106 However, only 65% of individuals may return to their pre-injury level of sports participation,107 with knee re-injury rates between 20-30% within higher-risk cohorts.108–110 Equally troubling is the unclear association between return-to-activity testing batteries and the subsequent risk of knee re-injury within various cohorts,111–117 and although the restoration of limb function on objective performance tests appears to improve return-to-sport rates,118–120 the use of performance testing cut-points as strict, medically-required, return-to-activity criteria remains controversial.112,121–123 Recent literature has highlighted the importance of shared decision-making after ACLR,124,125 to which the use of a decision-making framework may im﻿prove the return-to-activity decision-making process.124,126–129

To best inform shared decision-making, serial physical examinations and performance testing batteries should be completed throughout rehabilitation.130,131 Physical examinations should include the assessment of knee homeostasis (effusion and irritability), stability and range-of-motion.132 After ACLR with the QT, quadriceps strength testing should be a fundamental component of the performance testing battery, as quadriceps strength appears most affected by QT harvest,33,34,68 and quadriceps strength deficits are common 9-12 months after ACLR.34 Other components of a performance testing battery may include jump/hop testing and the assessment of movement quality; these tests should include both qualitative and quantitative measurements.132 Collectively, this information can be utilized throughout rehabilitation to confirm the effectiveness of exercise interventions, adjust the exercise prescription(s), and inform return-to-activity decision-making.133

Of the various data synthesized for return-to-activity decision-making, some information may be more important than others. The timeframe between ACLR and return-to-activity has been observed to be a modifiable risk factor for knee re-injury,111,134 with the suggestion that most individuals should wait a minimum of nine months before returning to unrestricted sports participation.111,122,132 Risk calculator algorithms formulated to predict the risk of revision ACLR have been recently validated for clinical use135,136; these algorithms are based upon data that is specific to the individual of interest, including age, body mass index, preoperative knee laxity, activity level and graft type.135,136 The ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) is a validated psychometric scale, and should be used to assess an individual’s psychological readiness for sports participation after ACLR.132

Comprehensive rehabilitation and return-to-sport programming can facilitate improved limb function on objective performance tests,133,137 achieve higher return-to-sport rates and reduce the risk of knee re-injury.133,138–141 Comprehensive programming should include formal strength and conditioning sessions, as well as the integration of jumping/hopping, cutting and sport-specific load-progressions. Late phase load-progressions should include a period of on-field rehabilitation with all relevant stakeholders (e.g., athlete, coach, guardian, and rehabilitation specialist) in agreement with the return-to-practice and competition progressions.131,133,142 On-field rehabilitation should follow the control-chaos continuum and facilitate graded exposure to sports participation.133,135,142,143

Prior to commencing unrestricted activity, a final physical examination and performance testing battery should be completed with all relevant information clearly synthesized for analysis within the shared decision-making framework.124–129,133 If the individual is returning to an activity with a high risk of knee re-injury, such as Level 1 sports, secondary injury reduction strategies should be implemented regardless of performance testing status.144 Pre-activity neuromuscular warmups, such as the FIFA 11+, appear highly effective at mitigating known biomechanical risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury,145–148 and can significantly reduce the overall injury incidence rate.149

Conflicts of Interest

The above authors have no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest related to the development and publication efforts of this manuscript

Acknowledgements

We extend a special thank you to Dr. George Davies, DPT, and Dr. Steven Stovitz, MD for their gift of time, mentoring, and teaching within their respective sports medicine communities.

Thank you to the physical therapists, sports scientists, and licensed athletic trainers at Training HAUS for their ongoing teamwork and support, as well as the research department at Twin Cities Orthopedics for their support with ongoing research projects.
==== Refs
Knee injury patterns among men and women in collegiate basketball and soccer The American Journal of Sports Medicine Arendt Elizabeth Dick Randall SAGE Publications 11 1995
23 6 694 701 0363-5465 10.1177/036354659502300611 10.1177/036354659502300611
The relative incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury in men and women at the United States Naval Academy The American Journal of Sports Medicine Gwinn David E. Wilckens John H. McDevitt Edward R. Ross Glen Kao Tzu-Cheg SAGE Publications 1 2000
28 1 98 102 0363-5465 10.1177/03635465000280012901 10.1177/03635465000280012901
Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: Part 1, mechanisms and risk factors The American Journal of Sports Medicine Hewett Timothy E. Myer Gregory D. Ford Kevin R. SAGE Publications 2 2006
34 2 299 311 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546505284183 10.1177/0363546505284183
‘What’s my risk of sustaining an ACL injury while playing football (soccer)?’ A systematic review with meta-analysis British Journal of Sports Medicine Montalvo Alicia M Schneider Daniel K Silva Paula L Yut Laura Webster Kate E Riley Michael A Kiefer Adam W Doherty-Restrepo Jennifer L Myer Gregory D 2019
53 21 1333 1340 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097261 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097261 29599121
Beliefs and attitudes of members of the American Academy of orthopaedic surgeons regarding the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Marx Robert G Jones Edward C Angel Michael Wickiewicz Thomas L Warren Russell F 9 2003
19 7 762 770 0749-8063 10.1016/s0749-8063(03)00398-0 10.1016/s0749-8063(03)00398-0 12966385
Why bone-patella tendon-bone grafts should still be considered the gold standard for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction British Journal of Sports Medicine Carmichael J. R Cross M. J 8 3 2009
43 5 323 325 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058024 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058024 19273472
Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia The American Journal of Sports Medicine Gifstad Tone Foss Olav A. Engebretsen Lars Lind Martin Forssblad Magnus Albrektsen Grethe Drogset Jon Olav SAGE Publications 8 9 2014
42 10 2319 2328 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546514548164 10.1177/0363546514548164 25201444
Generalised joint hypermobility increases ACL injury risk and is associated with inferior outcome after ACL reconstruction: a systematic review BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Sundemo David Hamrin Senorski Eric Karlsson Louise Horvath Alexandra Juul-Kristensen Birgit Karlsson Jon Ayeni Olufemi R Samuelsson Kristian BMJ 11 2019
5 1 e000620 2055-7647 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000620 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000620 31798951
Generalized joint laxity Is associated with increased failure rates of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Krebs Nathan M. Barber-Westin Sue Noyes Frank R. 7 2021
37 7 2337 2347 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.021 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.021 33621648
“Anatomic” anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of surgical techniques and reporting of surgical data Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery van Eck Carola F. Schreiber Verena M. Mejia Hector A. Samuelsson Kristian van Dijk C. Niek Karlsson Jon Fu Freddie H. 9 2010
26 9 S2 S12 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.03.005 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.03.005 20810090
Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a global perspective. Part 1 Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Middleton K. K. Hamilton T. Irrgang J. J. Karlsson J. Harner C. D. Fu F. H. Springer Science and Business Media LLC 5 2 2014
22 7 1467 1482 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-014-2846-3 10.1007/s00167-014-2846-3
Editorial Commentary: Quadriceps tendon autograft use for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction predicted to increase Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Lubowitz James H. 1 2016
32 1 76 77 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.004 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.004
Quadriceps tendon autograft is becoming increasingly popular in revision ACL reconstruction Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Winkler Philipp W. Vivacqua Thiago Thomassen Stephan Lovse Lisa Lesniak Bryson P. Getgood Alan M. J. Musahl Volker 2022
30 1 149 160 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-021-06478-y 10.1007/s00167-021-06478-y 33591370
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes for quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring-tendon autografts The American Journal of Sports Medicine Mouarbes Dany Menetrey Jacques Marot Vincent Courtot Louis Berard Emilie Cavaignac Etienne 21 2 2019
47 14 3531 3540 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546518825340 10.1177/0363546518825340
Quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis The American Journal of Sports Medicine Dai Wenli Leng Xi Wang Jian Cheng Jin Hu Xiaoqing Ao Yingfang 8 9 2021
50 12 3425 3439 0363-5465 10.1177/03635465211030259 10.1177/03635465211030259 34494906
Quadricep ACL reconstruction techniques and outcomes: an updated ccoping review of the quadricep tendon Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Cohen Dan Slawaska-Eng David Almasri Mahmoud Sheean Andrew de Sa Darren 10 11 2021
14 6 462 474 1935-9748 10.1007/s12178-021-09726-3 10.1007/s12178-021-09726-3 34755275
Quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with high revision rates: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Registry Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Lind Martin Strauss Marc J. Nielsen Torsten Engebretsen Lars 2020
28 7 2163 2169 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-019-05751-5 10.1007/s00167-019-05751-5
Low surgical routine increases revision rates after quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Lind Martin Strauss Marc J. Nielsen Torsten Engebretsen Lars 2021
29 6 1880 1886 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-020-06220-0 10.1007/s00167-020-06220-0
Higher re-rupture rate in quadriceps tendon ACL reconstruction surgeries performed in Denmark: let’s return to the mean Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Ollivier Matthieu Jacquet Christophe Pailhe Régis Cognault Jérémy Cavaignac Etienne Seil Romain Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2 4 2020
28 11 3655 3656 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-020-05961-2 10.1007/s00167-020-05961-2
Graft failure, revision ACLR, and reoperation rates after ACLR with quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts: a registry study with review of 475 patients The American Journal of Sports Medicine Schmücker Malte Haraszuk Jørgen Hölmich Per Barfod Kristoffer W. SAGE Publications 8 6 2021
49 8 2136 2143 0363-5465 10.1177/03635465211015172 10.1177/03635465211015172 34102074
Central quadriceps tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: morphometric and biomechanical evaluation The American Journal of Sports Medicine Harris N. Lindsay Smith David A. B. Lamoreaux Lisa Purnell Mark 1 1997
25 1 23 28 0363-5465 10.1177/036354659702500105 10.1177/036354659702500105
Comparative analysis of the morphologic structure of quadriceps and patellar tendon: a descriptive laboratory study Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Hadjicostas Panayiotis T. Soucacos Panayotis N. Berger Irina Koleganova Nadezda Paessler Hans H. 7 2007
23 7 744 750 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.032 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.032 17637410
Residual strength of the quadriceps versus patellar tendon after harvesting a central free tendon graft Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Adams Douglas J. Mazzocca Augustus D. Fulkerson John P. 1 2006
22 1 76 79 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.10.015 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.10.015
Biomechanical comparison of quadriceps and patellar tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Shani Raj H. Umpierez Erica Nasert Michael Hiza Elise A. Xerogeanes John 1 2016
32 1 71 75 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.051 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.051
Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Musahl Volker Engler Ian D. Nazzal Ehab M. Dalton Jonathan F. Lucidi Gian Andrea Hughes Jonathan D. Zaffagnini Stefano Della Villa Francesco Irrgang James J. Fu Freddie H. Karlsson Jon 2022
30 1 34 51 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-021-06825-z 10.1007/s00167-021-06825-z
Clinical anatomy of the quadriceps femoris and extensor apparatus of the knee Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® Waligora Andrew C. Johanson Norman A. Hirsch Bruce Elliot Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) 19 8 2009
467 12 3297 3306 0009-921X 10.1007/s11999-009-1052-y 10.1007/s11999-009-1052-y 19690926
New insight in the architecture of the quadriceps tendon Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Grob Karl Manestar Mirjana Filgueira Luis Ackland Timothy Gilbey Helen Kuster Markus S. 3 11 2016
3 1 32 2197-1153 10.1186/s40634-016-0068-y 10.1186/s40634-016-0068-y 27813020
quadriceps tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Mehran Nima Damodar Dhanur Shu Yang Justin Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) 15 1 2020
28 2 45 52 1067-151X 10.5435/jaaos-d-19-00032 10.5435/jaaos-d-19-00032
Histological findings of tendon-bone healing following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring grafts Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Nebelung W. Becker R. Urbach D. Röpke M. Roessner A. Springer Science and Business Media LLC 7 3 2003
123 4 158 163 0936-8051 10.1007/s00402-002-0463-y 10.1007/s00402-002-0463-y 12734713
Comparison of three techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Differences in anterior tibial translation and tunnel enlargement with each technique The American Journal of Sports Medicine Otsuka Hironori Ishibashi Yasuyuki Tsuda Eiichi Sasaki Kazuhiro Toh Satoshi 3 2003
31 2 282 288 0363-5465 10.1177/03635465030310022101 10.1177/03635465030310022101 12642266
Tendon healing in a bone tunnel differs at the tunnel entrance versus the tunnel exit: an effect of graft-tunnel motion? The American Journal of Sports Medicine Rodeo Scott A. Kawamura Sumito Kim Hyon-Jeong Dynybil Christian Ying Liang SAGE Publications 11 2006
34 11 1790 1800 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546506290059 10.1177/0363546506290059
Bone-patellar tendon-bone versus hamstring tendon autografts for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Schuette Hayden B. Kraeutler Matthew J. Houck Darby A. McCarty Eric C. 11 2017
5 11 2325967117736484 2325-9671 10.1177/2325967117736484 10.1177/2325967117736484 29152522
Knee strength deficits following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction differ between quadriceps and hamstring tendon autografts Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Johnston Peta T. Feller Julian A. McClelland Jodie A. Webster Kate E. Springer Science and Business Media LLC 19 4 2021
30 4 1300 1310 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-021-06565-0 10.1007/s00167-021-06565-0
Knee muscle strength after quadriceps tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Johnston Peta T. McClelland Jodie A. Feller Julian A. Webster Kate E. 2021
29 9 2918 2933 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-020-06311-y 10.1007/s00167-020-06311-y
Hamstring tendons or bone-patellar tendon-bone graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research Thaunat Mathieu Fayard Jean Marie Sonnery-Cottet Bertrand 2 2019
105 1 S89 S94 1877-0568 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.05.014 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.05.014
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, hamstring versus bone–patella tendon–bone grafts: a systematic literature review of outcome from surgery The Knee Herrington Lee Wrapson Charlotte Matthews Martyn Matthews Helen 1 2005
12 1 41 50 0968-0160 10.1016/j.knee.2004.02.003 10.1016/j.knee.2004.02.003
The outcome at 15 years of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft for ‘isolated’ anterior cruciate ligament rupture The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume Bourke H. E. Gordon D. J. Salmon L. J. Waller A. Linklater J. Pinczewski L. A. 5 2012
94-B 5 630 637 0301-620X 10.1302/0301-620x.94b5.28675 10.1302/0301-620x.94b5.28675
Athletes with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were slower to meet rehabilitation milestones and return-to-sport criteria than athletes with hamstring tendon autograft or soft tissue allograft : secondary analysis from the ACL-SPORTS trial Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Smith Angela Hutchinson Capin Jacob J. Zarzycki Ryan Snyder-Mackler Lynn Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) 5 2020
50 5 259 266 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2020.9111 10.2519/jospt.2020.9111 31775553
ACL reconstruction rehabilitation: clinical data, biologic healing, and criterion-based milestones to inform a return-to-sport guideline Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach Brinlee Alexander W. Dickenson Scott B. Hunter-Giordano Airelle Snyder-Mackler Lynn SAGE Publications 13 12 2021
14 5 770 779 1941-7381 10.1177/19417381211056873 10.1177/19417381211056873 34903114
Implications for early postoperative care after quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a technical note J Athl Train Hunnicutt Jennifer L. Slone Harris S. Xerogeanes John W. 12 5 2020
55 6 623 627 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-172-19 10.4085/1062-6050-172-19 32396469
Quadriceps tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of postoperative rehabilitation and complication profiles Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Zhang Kailai Beshay Tony Murphy Ben Sheean Andrew de SA Darren 2021
38 6 2062 2072 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.12.020 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.12.020 34942315
Biomechanics of knee ligaments The American Journal of Sports Medicine Woo Savio L-Y. Debski Richard E. Withrow John D. Janaushek Marsie A. SAGE Publications 7 1999
27 4 533 543 0363-5465 10.1177/03635465990270042301 10.1177/03635465990270042301 10424228
Mechanics of cadaveric anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions during simulated jump landing tasks: lessons learned from a pilot investigation Clinical Biomechanics Schilaty Nathan D. Martin R. Kyle Ueno Ryo Rigamonti Luca Bates Nathaniel A. 6 2021
86 105372 0268-0033 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105372 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105372 34052693
Full thickness quadriceps tendon grafts with bone had similar material properties to bone-patellar tendon-bone and a four-strand semitendinosus grafts: a biomechanical study Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Strauss Marc J. Miles Jon W. Kennedy Mitchell L. Dornan Grant J. Moatshe Gilbert Lind Martin Engebretsen Lars LaPrade Robert F. 2022
30 5 1786 1794 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-021-06738-x 10.1007/s00167-021-06738-x
Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery Hamner DYSON L. Brown CHARLES H. Steiner MARK E. Hecker AARON T. Hayes WILSON C. 4 1999
81 4 549 57 0021-9355 10.2106/00004623-199904000-00013 10.2106/00004623-199904000-00013 10225801
Mechanical tensile properties of the quadriceps tendon and patellar ligament in young adults The American Journal of Sports Medicine Stäubli Hans U. Schatzmann Lukas Brunner Peter Rincón Liliana Nolte Lutz-P. SAGE Publications 1 1999
27 1 27 34 0363-5465 10.1177/03635465990270011301 10.1177/03635465990270011301
ACL graft failure location differs between allografts and autografts Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & Technology Magnussen Robert A Taylor Dean C Toth Alison P Garrett William E 14 6 2012
4 1 22 1758-2555 10.1186/1758-2555-4-22 10.1186/1758-2555-4-22 22697165
Regional variation of tibialis anterior tendon mechanics is lost following denervation Journal of Applied Physiology Arruda Ellen M. Calve Sarah Dennis Robert G. Mundy Kevin Baar Keith 10 2006
101 4 1113 1117 8750-7587 10.1152/japplphysiol.00612.2005 10.1152/japplphysiol.00612.2005
Structural interfaces and attachments in biology Thomopoulos Stavros Birman Victor Genin Guy M. Springer New York 2013
9781461433163 10.1007/978-1-4614-3317-0 10.1007/978-1-4614-3317-0
Biomechanical comparison of three suspensory techniques for all soft tissue central quadriceps tendon graft fixation Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation Arakgi Michelle E. Burkhart Timothy A. Hoshino Takashi Degen Ryan Getgood Alan 6 2022
4 3 e843 e851 2666-061X 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.12.008 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.12.008 35747631
Augmentation of bone tunnel healing in anterior cruciate ligament grafts: application of calcium phosphates and other materials Journal of Tissue Engineering Baxter F. R. Bach J. S. Detrez F. Cantournet S. Corté L. Cherkaoui M. Ku D. N. 1 2010
1 1 712370 2041-7314 10.4061/2010/712370 10.4061/2010/712370 21350646
Graft maturity of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament 6 months postoperatively: a magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of quadriceps tendon with bone block and hamstring tendon autografts Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Ma Yong Murawski Christopher D. Rahnemai-Azar Amir Ata Maldjian Catherine Lynch Andrew D. Fu Freddie H. 2015
23 3 661 668 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-014-3302-0 10.1007/s00167-014-3302-0
Quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive review of current literature and systematic review of clinical results Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Slone Harris S. Romine Spencer E. Premkumar Ajay Xerogeanes John W. 3 2015
31 3 541 554 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.010 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.010 25543249
Bone versus all soft tissue quadriceps tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Crum Raphael J. Kay Jeffrey Lesniak Bryson P. Getgood Alan Musahl Volker de SA Darren 3 2021
37 3 1040 1052 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.018 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.018 33098947
Less than 1% risk of donor-site quadriceps tendon rupture post-ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft: a systematic review Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Singh Harasees Glassman Isaac Sheean Andrew Hoshino Yuichi Nagai Kanto de SA Darren Springer Science and Business Media LLC 18 10 2022
31 2 572 585 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-022-07175-0 10.1007/s00167-022-07175-0
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction utilizing central quadriceps free tendon Orthopedic Clinics of North America Theut Peter C Fulkerson John P Armour E.F Joseph Michael 1 2003
34 1 31 39 0030-5898 10.1016/s0030-5898(02)00068-8 10.1016/s0030-5898(02)00068-8
Quadriceps Tendon—A reliable alternative for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament Clinics in Sports Medicine DeAngelis Joseph P. Fulkerson John P. 10 2007
26 4 587 596 0278-5919 10.1016/j.csm.2007.06.005 10.1016/j.csm.2007.06.005
Tendon healing in bone tunnel after human anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of histological results The Journal of Knee Surgery Lu Hongbin Chen Can Xie Shanshan Tang Yifu Qu Jin 2019
32 05 454 462 1538-8506 10.1055/s-0038-1653964 10.1055/s-0038-1653964 29783272
Early versus late start of open kinetic chain quadriceps exercises after ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring grafts: a prospective randomized outcome study Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Heijne Annette Werner Suzanne Springer Science and Business Media LLC 17 3 2007
15 4 472 473 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-007-0313-0 10.1007/s00167-007-0313-0
Patients with a quadriceps tendon shorter than 60 mm require a patellar bone plug autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Yamasaki Shinya Hashimoto Yusuke Han Changhun Nishino Kazuya Hidaka Noriaki Nakamura Hiroaki 2021
29 6 1927 1935 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-020-06261-5 10.1007/s00167-020-06261-5
Estimating the adequacy of the free quadriceps tendon autograft length using anthropometric measures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Yuksel Yavuz Kose Ozkan Torun Ebru Ergun Tarkan Yardibi Fatma Sarikcioglu Levent Springer Science and Business Media LLC 6 10 2021
142 8 2001 2010 1434-3916 10.1007/s00402-021-04197-0 10.1007/s00402-021-04197-0
Comparison of single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon–bone autografts Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Kim Sung-Jae Jo Seung-Bae Kumar Praveen Oh Kyung-Soo 1 2009
25 1 70 77 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.004 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.004
No difference between full thickness and partial thickness quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Kanakamedala Ajay C. de Sa Darren Obioha Obianuju A. Arakgi Michelle E. Schmidt Patrick B. Lesniak Bryson P. Musahl Volker 2019
27 1 105 116 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-018-5042-z 10.1007/s00167-018-5042-z
Quantitative study of the quadriceps muscles and trochlear groove geometry related to instability of the patellofemoral joint Journal of Orthopaedic Research Farahmand Farzam Sejiavongse Wongwit Amis Andrew A. Wiley 1 1998
16 1 136 143 0736-0266 10.1002/jor.1100160123 10.1002/jor.1100160123
Risk Factors for manipulation under anesthesia and/or lysis of adhesions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Huleatt Joel Gottschalk Michael Fraser Kelsey Boden Allison Dalwadi Poonam Xerogeanes John Hammond Kyle 9 2018
6 9 2325967118794490 2325-9671 10.1177/2325967118794490 10.1177/2325967118794490 30211246
Perioperative complications and early clinical outcomes following ACL reconstruction with soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft in adolescent athletes Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Jasty Naveen Cook Danielle Liotta Elizabeth Hayworth Benton 1 7 2021
9 7 2325-9671 10.1177/2325967121s00223 10.1177/2325967121s00223
Localized anterior arthrofibrosis after soft-tissue quadriceps tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is more common in patients who are female, undergo meniscal repair, and have grafts of larger diameter Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Haley Rebecca M. Lamplot Joseph D. Myer Gregory D. Diekfuss Jed A. Reed Joan Hash Regina Simon Janet E. Xerogeanes John W. 12 2022
0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.11.027 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.11.027
Quadriceps strength following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: normative values based on sex, graft type and meniscal status at 3, 6 & 9 months Int J Sports Phys Ther Schwery Nicole A. Kiely Michael T. Larson Christopher M. Wulf Corey A. Heikes Christie S. Hess Ryan W. Giveans M. Russell Solie Braidy S. Doney Chrisopher P. 1 4 2022
17 3 2159-2896 10.26603/001c.32378 10.26603/001c.32378 35391858
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quadriceps versus patellar autograft Clin Orthop Relat Res Han Hyuk Soo Seong Sang Cheol Lee Sahnghoon Lee Myung Chul 1 2008
466 1 198 204 0009-921X 10.1007/s11999-007-0015-4 10.1007/s11999-007-0015-4 18196393
Bone-patellar tendon–bone autograft maturation is superior to double-bundle hamstring tendon autograft maturation following anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Fukuda Hideaki Ogura Takahiro Asai Shigehiro Omodani Toru Takahashi Tatsuya Yamaura Ichiro Sakai Hiroki Saito Chikara Tsuchiya Akihiro Takahashi Kenji 2022
30 5 1661 1671 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-021-06653-1 10.1007/s00167-021-06653-1
Graft maturity of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament 6 months postoperatively: a magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of quadriceps tendon with bone block and hamstring tendon autografts Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Ma Yong Murawski Christopher D. Rahnemai-Azar Amir Ata Maldjian Catherine Lynch Andrew D. Fu Freddie H. 2015
23 3 661 668 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-014-3302-0 10.1007/s00167-014-3302-0
Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament neovascularization and ligamentization Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Scranton P E, Jr. Lanzer W L Ferguson M S Kirkman T R Pflaster D S 10 1998
14 7 702 716 0749-8063 10.1016/s0749-8063(98)70097-0 10.1016/s0749-8063(98)70097-0
Soft tissue fixation strategies of human quadriceps tendon grafts: a biomechanical study Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Michel Philipp A. Domnick Christoph Raschke Michael J. Kittl Christoph Glasbrenner Johannes Deitermann Lucas Fink Christian Herbort Mirco 11 2019
35 11 3069 3076 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.05.025 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.05.025
Minimum 10-year results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how the loss of normal knee motion compounds other factors related to the development of osteoarthritis after surgery The American Journal of Sports Medicine Shelbourne K.Donald Gray Tinker 2009
37 3 471 480 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546508326709 10.1177/0363546508326709 19059893
Association between neuromuscular variables and graft harvest in soft tissue quadriceps tendon versus bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament autografts Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Letter Michael Beauperthuy Andrew Parrino Rosalia L. Posner Kevin Baraga Michael G. Best Thomas M. Kaplan Lee D. Eltoukhy Moataz Strand Keri L. Buskard Andrew Signorile Joseph F. 1 10 2021
9 10 2325-9671 10.1177/23259671211041591 10.1177/23259671211041591 34708139
Short-term isokinetic and isometric strength outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescents Physical Therapy in Sport Weaver Adam Ness Brandon M. Roman Dylan P. Giampetruzzi Nicholas Cleland Joshua A. Pace J. Lee Crepeau Allison E. 1 2022
53 75 83 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.11.009 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.11.009
Effect of early implementation of electrical muscle stimulation to prevent muscle atrophy and weakness in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology Hasegawa Satoshi Kobayashi Masahiko Arai Ryuzo Tamaki Akira Nakamura Takashi Moritani Toshio 8 2011
21 4 622 630 1050-6411 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.01.005 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.01.005 21334221
Selective fatigue of fast motor units after electrically elicited muscle contractions Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology Hamada Taku Kimura Tetsuya Moritani Toshio 10 2004
14 5 531 538 1050-6411 10.1016/j.jelekin.2004.03.008 10.1016/j.jelekin.2004.03.008
The effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in association with whey protein supplementation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Acta Ortopédica Brasileira Mendonça GABRIELA OTÍLIA Severino MARIA LUIZA BIANCHINI Oliveira KELLE MOREIRA de OLIVEIRA MARCELO LIMA DE SOUZA GIOVANE GALDINO DE SIMÃO ADRIANO PRADO LOBATO DANIEL FERREIRA MOREIRA ANDRADE RANIELLY ALVES FRANCO RICARDO ZENUN CRUZ MARCELO STEGMANN DA CARVALHO LEONARDO CÉSAR 12 2021
29 6 316 322 1809-4406 10.1590/1413-785220212906237983 10.1590/1413-785220212906237983 34849097
A systematic review of the effects of blood flow restriction training on quadriceps muscle atrophy and circumference post ACL reconstruction International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Charles Derek White Ryan Reyes Caleb Palmer Drew 12 2020
15 6 882 891 2159-2896 10.26603/ijspt20200882 10.26603/ijspt20200882 33344004
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is effective in strengthening the quadriceps muscle after anterior cruciate ligament surgery Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Hauger Annette V. Reiman M. P. Bjordal J. M. Sheets C. Ledbetter L. Goode A. P. 2018
26 2 399 410 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-017-4669-5 10.1007/s00167-017-4669-5
Blood flow restriction training in rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery: a review Techn Orthop Hughes Luke Rosenblatt Ben Paton Bruce Patterson Stephen David 6 2018
33 2 106 113 0885-9698 10.1097/bto.0000000000000265 10.1097/bto.0000000000000265
Exercise with blood flow restriction to improve quadriceps function long after ACL reconstruction International Journal of Sports Medicine Kilgas Matthew A. Lytle Lydia L.M. Drum Scott N. Elmer Steven J. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 23 7 2019
40 10 650 656 0172-4622 10.1055/a-0961-1434 10.1055/a-0961-1434
Anterior cruciate ligament strain and tensile forces for weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing exercises: a guide to exercise selection Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Escamilla Rafael F. Macleod Toran D. Wilk Kevin E. Paulos Lonnie Andrews James R. 3 2012
42 3 208 220 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2012.3768 10.2519/jospt.2012.3768 22387600
Loaded open-kinetic-chain exercises stretch the anterior cruciate ligament more than closed-kinetic-chain exercises: In-vivo assessment of anterior cruciate ligament length change Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Wang Cong Qiu Jiayu Wang Yufan Li Changzhao Kernkamp Willem A. Xi Xin Yu Yan Li Pingyue Tsai Tsung-Yuan 2 2023
63 102715 2468-7812 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102715 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102715
Anterior cruciate ligament strain in-vivo: A review of previous work Journal of Biomechanics Beynnon Bruce D Fleming Braden C 6 1998
31 6 519 525 0021-9290 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00044-x 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00044-x 9755036
Tendon healing in bone tunnel after human anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of histological results The Journal of Knee Surgery Lu Hongbin Chen Can Xie Shanshan Tang Yifu Qu Jin 2019
32 05 454 462 1538-8506 10.1055/s-0038-1653964 10.1055/s-0038-1653964 29783272
The effect of open- versus closed-kinetic-chain exercises on anterior tibial laxity, strength, and function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Perriman Alyssa Leahy Edmund Semciw Adam Ivan Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) 7 2018
48 7 552 566 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2018.7656 10.2519/jospt.2018.7656 29685058
RSA can measure ACL graft stretching and migration Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research Khan Rashid Konyves Arpad Rama K R. Boddu Siva Thomas Rhidian Amis Andrew A 7 2006
448 139 145 0009-921X 10.1097/01.blo.0000224016.42669.17 10.1097/01.blo.0000224016.42669.17 16826108
Isometry testing for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction revisited Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Morgan Craig D. Kalmam Victor R. Grawl Daniel M. 12 1995
11 6 647 659 0749-8063 10.1016/0749-8063(95)90104-3 10.1016/0749-8063(95)90104-3
The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation site at the tibia on knee stability: evaluation using a robotic testing system Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Ishibashi Yasuyuki Rudy Theodore W. Livesay Glen A. Stone Jeffrey D. Fu Freddie H. Woo Savio L.-Y. 4 1997
13 2 177 182 0749-8063 10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90152-3 10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90152-3 9127075
Graft fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction The American Journal of Sports Medicine Brand Jeff Weiler Andreas Caborn David N. M. Brown Charles H. Johnson Darren L. SAGE Publications 1 5 2000
28 5 761 774 0363-5465 10.1177/03635465000280052501 10.1177/03635465000280052501
Anatomy and biomechanics of the native and reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament: surgical implications Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Kraeutler Matthew J. Wolsky Ryan M. Vidal Armando F. Bravman Jonathan T. 1 3 2017
99 5 438 445 0021-9355 10.2106/jbjs.16.00754 10.2106/jbjs.16.00754
Multiplane loading of the extensor mechanism alters the patellar ligament force/quadriceps force ratio J Biomech Eng Powers Christopher M. Chen Yu-Jen Scher Irving S. Lee Thay Q. 29 1 2010
132 2 0148-0731 10.1115/1.4000852 10.1115/1.4000852
Distinguishing quadriceps tendinopathy and patellar tendinopathy: semantics or significant? Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Sprague Andrew Epsley Scott Silbernagel Karin Grävare Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) 9 2019
49 9 627 630 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2019.0611 10.2519/jospt.2019.0611 31475629
Three-dimensional modelling of human quadriceps femoris forces Journal of Biomechanics Chiu Loren Z.F. Daehlin Torstein E. 5 2021
120 110347 0021-9290 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110347 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110347 33711598
Stiffness of individual quadriceps muscle assessed using ultrasound shear wave elastography during passive stretching Journal of Sport and Health Science Xu Jingfei Hug François Fu Siu Ngor 4 2018
7 2 245 249 2095-2546 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.07.001 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.07.001 30356470
Localization of muscle damage within the quadriceps femoris induced by different types of eccentric exercises Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports Maeo S. Saito A. Otsuka S. Shan X. Kanehisa H. Kawakami Y. 2018
28 1 95 106 0905-7188 10.1111/sms.12880 10.1111/sms.12880 28314055
Isometric contractions are more analgesic than isotonic contractions for patellar tendon pain Clin J Sport Med Rio Ebonie van Ark Mathijs Docking Sean Moseley G. Lorimer Kidgell Dawson Gaida Jamie E. van den Akker-Scheek Inge Zwerver Johannes Cook Jill 5 2017
27 3 253 259 1050-642X 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000364 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000364 27513733
Signal intensity of MR-images of thigh muscles following acute open- and closed chain kinetic knee extensor exercise – index of muscle use European Journal of Applied Physiology Enocson A.G. Berg H.E. Vargas R. Jenner G. Tesch P.A. Springer Science and Business Media LLC 26 5 2005
94 4 357 363 1439-6319 10.1007/s00421-005-1339-y 10.1007/s00421-005-1339-y
Biomechanical considerations for rehabilitation of the knee Clinical Biomechanics McGinty Gerald Irrgang James J Pezzullo Dave 3 2000
15 3 160 166 0268-0033 10.1016/s0268-0033(99)00061-3 10.1016/s0268-0033(99)00061-3 10656977
The effects of frontal- and sagittal-plane plyometrics on change-of-direction speed and power in adolescent female basketball players Int J Sports Physiol Perform McCormick Brian T. Hannon James C. Newton Maria Shultz Barry Detling Nicole Young Warren B. 1 2016
11 1 102 107 1555-0265 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0058 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0058
Lower-limb joint mechanics during maximum acceleration sprinting J Exp Biol Schache Anthony G. Lai Adrian K. M. Brown Nicholas A. T. Crossley Kay M. Pandy Marcus G. 1 1 2019
1 1477-9145 10.1242/jeb.209460 10.1242/jeb.209460
Effect of running speed on lower limb joint kinetics Med Sci Sports Exerc Schache ANTHONY G. Blanch PETER D. Dorn TIM W. Brown NICHOLAS A. T. Rosemond DOUG Pandy MARCUS G. 7 2011
43 7 1260 1271 0195-9131 10.1249/mss.0b013e3182084929 10.1249/mss.0b013e3182084929 21131859
Rectus femoris muscle injuries in football: a clinically relevant review of mechanisms of injury, risk factors and preventive strategies British Journal of Sports Medicine Mendiguchia Jurdan Alentorn-Geli Eduard Idoate Fernando Myer Gregory D 2013
47 6 359 366 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091250 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091250 22864009
Expectations for return to preinjury sport before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction The American Journal of Sports Medicine Webster Kate E. Feller Julian A. SAGE Publications 16 1 2019
47 3 578 583 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546518819454 10.1177/0363546518819454
Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors British Journal of Sports Medicine Ardern Clare L Taylor Nicholas F Feller Julian A Webster Kate E BMJ 25 8 2014
48 21 1543 1552 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093398 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093398
Younger patients are at increased risk for graft rupture and contralateral injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction The American Journal of Sports Medicine Webster Kate E. Feller Julian A. Leigh Warren B. Richmond Anneka K. SAGE Publications 22 1 2014
42 3 641 647 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546513517540 10.1177/0363546513517540
Exploring the high reinjury rate in younger patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction The American Journal of Sports Medicine Webster Kate E. Feller Julian A. SAGE Publications 20 7 2016
44 11 2827 2832 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546516651845 10.1177/0363546516651845
Incidence of second ACL injuries 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport The American Journal of Sports Medicine Paterno Mark V. Rauh Mitchell J. Schmitt Laura C. Ford Kevin R. Hewett Timothy E. SAGE Publications 21 4 2014
42 7 1567 1573 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546514530088 10.1177/0363546514530088 24753238
Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study British Journal of Sports Medicine Grindem Hege Snyder-Mackler Lynn Moksnes Håvard Engebretsen Lars Risberg May Arna BMJ 9 5 2016
50 13 804 808 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096031 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096031 27162233
Rehabilitation and return to sport testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: where are we in 2022? Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation Gokeler Alli Dingenen Bart Hewett Timothy E. 1 2022
4 1 e77 e82 2666-061X 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.025 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.025 35141539
Is there an association in young patients between quadriceps or hamstring strength after ACL reconstruction and graft rupture? Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Blucher Nicola C. Feller Julian A. Devitt Brian M. Klemm Haydn J. Whitehead Timothy S. McClelland Jodie A. Webster Kate E. 1 6 2022
10 6 232596712211010 2325-9671 10.1177/23259671221101003 10.1177/23259671221101003 35677023
Predicting anterior cruciate ligament reinjury from return-to-activity assessments at 6 months postsurgery: a prospective cohort study J Athl Train Bodkin Stephan G. Hertel Jay Diduch David R. Saliba Susan A. Novicoff Wendy M. Brockmeier Stephen F. Miller Mark D. Gwathmey F. Winston Werner Brian C. Hart Joseph M. 2022
57 4 325 333 1938-162X 10.4085/1062-6050-0407.20 10.4085/1062-6050-0407.20 35439312
Are 6-month functional and isokinetic testing measures risk factors for second anterior cruciate ligament injuries at long term follow-up? The Journal of Knee Surgery Marigi Erick M. Hale Rena F. Bernard Christopher D. Bates Nathaniel Stuart Michael J. Hewett Timothy E. Krych Aaron J. 10 6 2022
10 2022 1538-8506 10.1055/s-0042-1748824 10.1055/s-0042-1748824
Biomechanical but not strength or performance measures differentiate male athletes who experience ACL reinjury on return to Level 1 sports The American Journal of Sports Medicine King Enda Richter Chris Daniels Katherine A.J. Franklyn-Miller Andy Falvey Eanna Myer Gregory D. Jackson Mark Moran Ray Strike Siobhan SAGE Publications 22 2 2021
49 4 918 927 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546520988018 10.1177/0363546520988018 33617291
Return to sport: Does excellent 6-month strength and function following ACL reconstruction predict midterm outcomes? Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Sousa Paul L. Krych Aaron J. Cates Robert A. Levy Bruce A. Stuart Michael J. Dahm Diane L. 2017
25 5 1356 1363 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-015-3697-2 10.1007/s00167-015-3697-2
Young athletes after ACL reconstruction with quadriceps strength asymmetry at the time of return-to-sport demonstrate decreased knee function 1 year later Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Ithurburn Matthew P. Altenburger Alex R. Thomas Staci Hewett Timothy E. Paterno Mark V. Schmitt Laura C. 2018
26 2 426 433 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-017-4678-4 10.1007/s00167-017-4678-4
Age, gender, quadriceps strength and hop test performance are the most important factors affecting the achievement of a patient-acceptable symptom state after ACL reconstruction Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Cristiani Riccardo Mikkelsen Christina Edman Gunnar Forssblad Magnus Engström Björn Stålman Anders 2020
28 2 369 380 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-019-05576-2 10.1007/s00167-019-05576-2 31230125
Symmetries in muscle torque and landing kinematics are associated with maintenance of sports participation at 5 to 10 years after ACL reconstruction in young men Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Hetsroni Iftach Wiener Yohay Ben-Sira David Iacono Antonio Dello Marom Niv van Stee Mischa Ayalon Moshe 1 6 2020
8 6 2325-9671 10.1177/2325967120923267 10.1177/2325967120923267 32566693
A minority of athletes pass symmetry criteria in a series of hop and strength tests irrespective of having an ACL reconstructed knee or being noninjured Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach Markström Jonas L. Naili Josefine E. Häger Charlotte K. 27 6 2022
15 1 45 51 1941-7381 10.1177/19417381221097949 10.1177/19417381221097949 35762123
What is the evidence for and validity of return-to-sport testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? a systematic review and meta-analysis Sports Medicine Webster Kate E. Hewett Timothy E. Springer Science and Business Media LLC 23 3 2019
49 6 917 929 0112-1642 10.1007/s40279-019-01093-x 10.1007/s40279-019-01093-x
When is it safe to return to sport after ACL reconstruction? reviewing the criteria Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach Kaplan Yonatan Witvrouw Erik SAGE Publications 28 5 2019
11 4 301 305 1941-7381 10.1177/1941738119846502 10.1177/1941738119846502 31136725
Characteristics of complex systems in sports injury rehabilitation: examples and implications for practice Sports Medicine - Open Yung Kate K. Ardern Clare L. Serpiello Fabio R. Robertson Sam 22 2 2022
8 1 24 2199-1170 10.1186/s40798-021-00405-8 10.1186/s40798-021-00405-8 35192079
Optimization of the return-to-sport paradigm after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A critical step back to move forward Sports Medicine Dingenen Bart Gokeler Alli Springer Science and Business Media LLC 11 1 2017
47 8 1487 1500 0112-1642 10.1007/s40279-017-0674-6 10.1007/s40279-017-0674-6
Strategic assessment of risk and risk tolerance (StARRT) framework for return-to-play decision-making British Journal of Sports Medicine Shrier Ian BMJ 2 6 2015
49 20 1311 1315 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094569 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094569
return to sport decision-based models Return to Sport after ACL Reconstruction and Other Knee Operations Shrier Ian Springer International Publishing 2019
53 65 9783030223601 10.1007/978-3-030-22361-8_4 10.1007/978-3-030-22361-8_4
return-to-play in sport: a decision-based model Clin J Sport Med Creighton David W Shrier Ian Shultz Rebecca Meeuwisse Willem H Matheson Gordon O 9 2010
20 5 379 385 1050-642X 10.1097/jsm.0b013e3181f3c0fe 10.1097/jsm.0b013e3181f3c0fe 20818198
A framework for clinicians to improve the decision-making process in return to sport Sports Medicine - Open Yung Kate K. Ardern Clare L. Serpiello Fabio R. Robertson Sam 13 4 2022
8 1 52 2199-1170 10.1186/s40798-022-00440-z 10.1186/s40798-022-00440-z 35416633
How much time is needed between serial “return to play” assessments to achieve clinically important strength gains in patients recovering from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? The American Journal of Sports Medicine Bodkin Stephan G. Rutherford Margaret H. Diduch David R. Brockmeier Stephen F. Hart Joe M. 2020
48 1 70 77 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546519886291 10.1177/0363546519886291 31756121
Patient function in serial assessments throughout the post-ACL reconstruction progression Physical Therapy in Sport Bodkin S.G. Hertel J. Bruce A.S. Diduch D.R. Saliba S.A. Novicoff W.M. Hart J.M. 1 2021
47 85 90 1466-853X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.11.025 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.11.025
Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury return to sport consensus group Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Meredith Sean J. Rauer Thomas Chmielewski Terese L. Fink Christian Diermeier Theresa Rothrauff Benjamin B. Svantesson Eleonor Hamrin Senorski Eric Hewett Timothy E. Sherman Seth L. Lesniak Bryson P. Bizzini Mario Chen Shiyi Cohen Moises Villa Stefano Della Engebretsen Lars Feng Hua Ferretti Mario Fu Freddie H. Imhoff Andreas B. Kaeding Christopher C. Karlsson Jon Kuroda Ryosuke Lynch Andrew D. Menetrey Jacques Musahl Volker Navarro Ronald A. Rabuck Stephen J. Siebold Rainer Snyder-Mackler Lynn Spalding Tim van Eck Carola Vyas Dharmesh Webster Kate Wilk Kevin the Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group 1 6 2020
8 6 232596712093082 2325-9671 10.1177/2325967120930829 10.1177/2325967120930829 32647735
Return to elite-level basketball after surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament of the knee with meniscal repairs– it takes teamwork and time to restore performance: a case report J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Cases Solie B. Kiely M. Doney C. Schwery N. Jones J. Bjerke B. 2022
2 4 1 22
Young athletes who return to sport before 9 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have a rate of new injury 7 times that of those who delay return Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Beischer Susanne Gustavsson Linnéa Senorski Eric Hamrin Karlsson Jón Thomeé Christoffer Samuelsson Kristian Thomeé Roland Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) 2 2020
50 2 83 90 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2020.9071 10.2519/jospt.2020.9071
Machine learning algorithm to predict anterior cruciate ligament revision demonstrates external validity Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Martin R. Kyle Wastvedt Solvejg Pareek Ayoosh Persson Andreas Visnes Håvard Fenstad Anne Marie Moatshe Gilbert Wolfson Julian Lind Martin Engebretsen Lars Springer Science and Business Media LLC 1 1 2022
30 2 368 375 0942-2056 10.1007/s00167-021-06828-w 10.1007/s00167-021-06828-w 34973096
Validation of a risk calculator to personalize graft choice and reduce rupture rates for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction The American Journal of Sports Medicine Marmura Hana Getgood Alan M.J. Spindler Kurt P. Kattan Michael W. Briskin Isaac Bryant Dianne M. SAGE Publications 4 5 2021
49 7 1777 1785 0363-5465 10.1177/03635465211010798 10.1177/03635465211010798 33945339
The muscle strength of the knee joint after ACL reconstruction depends on the number and frequency of supervised physiotherapy visits International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Czamara Andrzej Krzemińska Katarzyna Widuchowski Wojciech Dragan Szymon Lukasz 9 10 2021
18 20 10588 1660-4601 10.3390/ijerph182010588 10.3390/ijerph182010588 34682334
Return to sport composite test after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (K-STARTS): factors affecting return to sport test score in a retrospective analysis of 676 patients Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach Franck Florent Saithna Adnan Vieira Thais Dutra Pioger Charles Vigne Gregory Le Guen Meven Rogowski Isabelle Fayard Jean-Marie Thaunat Mathieu Sonnery-Cottet Bertrand SAGE Publications 6 2 2021
13 4 364 372 1941-7381 10.1177/1941738120978240 10.1177/1941738120978240 33550916
Patient characteristics and predictors of return to sport at 12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the importance of patient age and postoperative rehabilitation Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Edwards Peter K. Ebert Jay R. Joss Brendan Ackland Timothy Annear Peter Buelow Jens-Ulrich Hewitt Ben 9 2018
6 9 232596711879757 2325-9671 10.1177/2325967118797575 10.1177/2325967118797575 30263898
A secondary injury prevention program may decrease contralateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: 2-year injury rates in the ACL-SPORTS randomized controlled trial Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Johnson Jessica L. Capin Jacob J. Arundale Amelia J.H. Zarzycki Ryan Smith Angela H. Snyder-Mackler Lynn Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) 9 2020
50 9 523 530 0190-6011 10.2519/jospt.2020.9407 10.2519/jospt.2020.9407 32741328
Two year ACL reinjury rate of 2.5%: outcomes report of the men in a secondary ACL injury prevention program (ACL-SPORTS) International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Arundale Amelia J.H. Capin Jacob J. Zarzycki Ryan Smith Angela H. Snyder-Mackler Lynn 6 2018
13 3 422 431 2159-2896 10.26603/ijspt20180422 10.26603/ijspt20180422 30038828
Optimising the late-stage rehabilitation and return-to-sport training and testing process after ACL reconstruction Sports Medicine Buckthorpe Matthew Springer Science and Business Media LLC 19 4 2019
49 7 1043 1058 0112-1642 10.1007/s40279-019-01102-z 10.1007/s40279-019-01102-z
Progressing rehabilitation after injury: consider the ‘control-chaos continuum’ British Journal of Sports Medicine Taberner Matt Allen Tom Cohen Daniel Dylan BMJ 8 2 2019
53 18 1132 1136 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100157 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100157 30737202
Why screening tests to predict injury do not work—and probably never will…: a critical review British Journal of Sports Medicine Bahr Roald BMJ 19 4 2016
50 13 776 780 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096256 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096256
Do exercises used in injury prevention programmes modify cutting task biomechanics? A systematic review with meta-analysis British Journal of Sports Medicine Pappas Evangelos Nightingale Elizabeth J Simic Milena Ford Kevin R Hewett Timothy E Myer Gregory D 2015
49 10 673 680 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093796 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093796 25492646
The effects of injury prevention programs on the biomechanics of landing tasks: a systematic review with meta-analysis The American Journal of Sports Medicine Lopes Thiago Jambo Alves Simic Milena Myer Gregory D. Ford Kevin R. Hewett Timothy E. Pappas Evangelos 2018
46 6 1492 1499 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546517716930 10.1177/0363546517716930 28759729
Age influences biomechanical changes after participation in an anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention program The American Journal of Sports Medicine Thompson-Kolesar Julie A. Gatewood Corey T. Tran Andrew A. Silder Amy Shultz Rebecca Delp Scott L. Dragoo Jason L. 2018
46 3 598 606 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546517744313 10.1177/0363546517744313 29281799
Biomechanical changes during a 90o cut in collegiate female soccer players with participation in the 11+ Int J Sports Phys Ther Dix Celeste Arundale Amelia Silvers-Granelli Holly Marmon Adam Zarzycki Ryan Snyder-Mackler Lynn 2 6 2021
16 3 2159-2896 10.26603/001c.22146 10.26603/001c.22146 34123519
A majority of anterior cruciate ligament injuries can be prevented by injury prevention programs: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and cluster–randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis The American Journal of Sports Medicine Huang Yu-Lun Jung Jaehun Mulligan Colin M.S. Oh Jaekeun Norcross Marc F. 2020
48 6 1505 1515 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546519870175 10.1177/0363546519870175 31469584
