
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

37020436
73038
10.26603/001c.73038
Original Research
Effects of Repetitive Pitching on Trunk Muscle Endurance and Thoracic and Shoulder Kinematics
Aso Takuya 1
Kagaya Yoshinori 2
1 Department of Rehabilitation Showa University Fujigaoka Rehabilitation Hospital https://ror.org/00sdj7q88
2 Department of Physical Therapy Showa University School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences
Corresponding author: Takuya Aso Department of Rehabilitation, Showa University Fujigaoka Rehabilitation Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan TEL: (045)974-2221 Fax: (045)974-2485 Email: aso4201@yahoo.co.jp
2 4 2023
2023
18 2 388396
28 8 2022
14 2 2023
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background

Baseball players are aware of the potential of shoulder problems due to repetitive throwing. However, few studies have examined how pitching repeatedly affects the thoracic spine and shoulder.

Purpose

This study aimed to determine the effects of pitching repeatedly on the endurance of trunk muscles and kinematics of the thoracic spine and shoulder.

Study design

Cohort study

Methods

Trunk muscle endurance was assessed in flexion, extension, and lateral flexion positions in 12 healthy amateur baseball players. The positions of stride foot contact (SFC) during the early cocking phase and maximal shoulder external rotation (MER) during the late cocking phase were used to compute the thoracic and shoulder kinematics in degrees. Participants were then asked to throw 135 fastballs (~9 innings with 15 throws per inning). Throwing motions were monitored throughout the first, seventh, eighth, and nine innings, whereas trunk muscular endurance was assessed before and after the repetitive throwing activity. Ball speed during pitching was measured using a radar gun. All outcome measures were statistically compared to examine differences over time.

Results

The trunk muscle endurance declined after the throwing task. In the eighth inning, compared with the first inning, the thoracic rotation angle at the SFC increased toward the throwing side. In contrast, the shoulder horizontal adduction angle at MER decreased in the seventh and ninth innings.

Conclusion

With repeated pitching, trunk muscle endurance gradually declines, and repetitive throwing significantly altered kinematics of the thoracic rotation at SFC and shoulder horizontal plane at MER.

Level of Evidence

2a

baseball
kinematics
shoulder
torso
muscles
This study was not funded.
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Baseball is one of the most popular sports in Japan, and on average, shoulder injuries occur in baseball players at a rate of 13%–35%.1–4 Additionally, it is difficult for an athlete to recover from a shoulder injury and resume their preinjury performance levels. After undergoing surgery for intrinsic shoulder impingement, Peduzzi et al.5 evaluated the effects of getting back into sports. However, 120 of 135 patients (90%) who underwent surgery returned to their athletic activities thereafter, with 52% engaging in the same sports at the same level. Only 48% of pitchers who received surgical therapy for superior labral lesions could resume playing, according to Fedoriw et al.,6 and only 7% of participants maintained their performance level. Considering all these factors, it is important to investigate the risk factors for shoulder injuries, as these are often multifactorial.3,7,8 Among them, repetitive throwing has recently been in focus.3,9 In 2014, the Major League Baseball published the Pitch Smart guidelines.10 These guidelines include specific pitch count limits, such as 120 pitches per day for athletes aged 19–22 years. Additionally, Murray et al.11 showed that the maximum shoulder external rotation angle during pitching decreased because of repetitive throwing. Chou et al.12 found that after 100 repeated tosses by high school baseball pitchers, their shoulder horizontal adduction angles at their maximum shoulder external rotation positions (MER) increased. Escamilla et al.13 reported that shoulder kinematics did not change after 105–135 pitches. According to these studies, there is no agreement on how repetitive throwing alters the shoulder’s kinematics. Few studies have examined how the shoulder kinematics change with repeated throwing; therefore, further research is required.

When someone pitches, motion and energy are transferred from the lower extremities to the upper extremity in what is known as a kinetic chain.14 For the upper extremities to move smoothly and stay injury-free, the thoracic spine, which sits between the lower and upper extremities, must be controlled, which requires strong trunk muscles.15 Aguinaldo et al.16 investigated the connection between pitching-related thoracic movement and shoulder joint strain. In the early cocking phase, Aguinaldo et al.16 suggested that early thoracic rotation enhanced shoulder rotational force and speculated that early thoracic rotation may contribute to throwing-related overuse injuries. Furthermore, according to Douoguih et al.,17 early thoracic rotation during the early cocking phase was linked to a noticeably increased risk of upper extremity injuries that required surgery.

Although thoracic movement control is essential to prevent shoulder injury, changes in thoracic kinematics occur during pitching. Therefore, all adverse effects of recurrent throwing on trunk muscle function should be examined.

This study aimed to determine the effects of pitching repeatedly on the endurance of trunk muscles and kinematics of the thoracic spine and shoulder. After repeated tossing, hypothesized that the trunk muscular function would decline and the throwing action would change.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants

Twelve healthy male recreational baseball players were recruited to participate in this study. Players who had previously injured upper or lower extremities injuries or who had shoulder pain at the time of testing were excluded. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

Experimental protocol

The repetitive throwing task and measurement protocol are shown in Figure 1. The repetitive throwing task was based on the reports of Dale et al.18 and Yanagisawa and Taniguchi.19 All participants were allowed five minutes to warm up and stretch using their preferred routine before the repetitive throwing task (i.e., shoulder and trunk stretching and plyometrics). Next, they threw 135 fastballs (~9 innings with 15 throws per inning at ball intervals of 15 seconds) at maximum effort from the set position toward the target. The distance between the pivot foot of the participants and the target was set at 3 m, and the size of the target was 1.1 × 1.1 m. The target was placed on the extension line of the force plate that was used during 3D motion capture (Figure 2). An official baseball (ZETT Corporation, Osaka, Japan) that weighed 145.0–147.0 g was used during the repetitive throwing task. Five minutes were provided as rest time between each inning.

151835 Figure 1. Repetitive throwing task and experimental protocol

The repetitive throwing task was conducted for nine innings with 15 pitches per inning. Trunk muscle endurance was measured before and after the repetitive throwing task. The throwing motion was measured in the first, seventh, eighth, and ninth innings.

151836 Figure 2. Laboratory setup

The distance from the pivot foot position to the target was set at 3 m. The pivot foot position was on the force plate located at the back.

Before and following the repetitive throwing motion, trunk muscular function was assessed. The throwing motion was monitored during the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd pitches (1st inning), the 103rd, 104th, and 105th pitches (7th inning), the 118th, 119th, and 120th pitches (8th inning), and the 133rd, 134th, and 135th pitches (9th inning). Additionally, the ball speed was measured using a radar gun (Pocket Radar; Pocket Radar Inc., Santa Rosa, CA USA) while assessing the throwing motion. An analysis of ball velocity was performed to ensure that the ball speed had not dropped. Moreover, ball velocity did not drop in all innings (1st inning, 54.1 ± 6.7 mph; 7th inning, 55.6 ± 6.1 mph; 8th inning, 55.6 ± 5.5 mph; 9th inning, 56.9 ± 6.4 mph).

Trunk muscle endurance assessment

Trunk muscle endurance was measured using a stopwatch (ADME001; Seiko Watch Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) for flexion (Figure 3a), extension (Figure 3b), and throwing and nonthrowing lateral flexion (Figure 3c).20–22 The measurement of trunk muscle endurance used in this study is straightforward, and the reliability of the measurement is high.20,21 The trunk flexion muscle endurance was measured in the supine position with the hips and knees flexed at 90° and arms crossed over the chest. It was timed after the participant bent their trunk so that both elbows met the front of their thighs and when both elbows left the thighs. Trunk extension muscle endurance was assessed in the prone position with the pelvis aligned with the edge of the bed and arms crossed over the chest. The participants kept their trunk parallel to the floor and the time until failure to preserve this trunk position. The trunk lateral flexion muscle endurance was measured in the side-lying position, with the shoulder abducted at 90° and elbow flexed at 90°. Participants maintained a straight position, and the duration between failures to maintain these postures failures were recorded.

151837 Figure 3. Trunk muscle endurance assessment

a. Trunk flexion muscle endurance; b. trunk extension muscle endurance; c. trunk lateral flexion muscle endurance

Motion analysis

Throwing motions were measured using a three-dimensional motion analysis system (Vicon MX; Vicon Motion Systems Ltd., London, UK), which utilizes nine infrared strobe cameras and two force plates (BP400600-OP-2K-STT; Advanced Mechanical Technology, Inc., Watertown, MA, USA). Data were captured at 1000Hz, and force plate data were collected at 1000Hz. Thirty-nine reflective markers were fixed to anatomic landmarks according to the Plug-In Gait model (Vicon Motion Systems Ltd.) (spinous process of the 7th cervical vertebra, spinous process of the 10th thoracic vertebra, sternal notch, xiphoid process, right scapula, bilateral anterior/posterior head, acromioclavicular joint, lateral upper arm, lateral humeral epicondyle, lateral forearm, radial/ulnar styloid, second metacarpal head, anterior/posterior superior iliac spine, lateral thigh, lateral femoral condyle, lateral shank, lateral malleoli, second metatarsal head, and calcaneus). The thoracic angles (anterior/posterior tilt, throwing/nonthrowing side lateral tilt, and nonthrowing/throwing side rotation) and shoulder angles (horizontal adduction/abduction, abduction/adduction, and internal/external rotation) at stride foot contact during the early cocking phase (SFC) and at the maximum shoulder external rotation position during the late cocking phase (MER) were calculated based on the Vicon Plug-In Gait model.23 The SFC was defined as the instant when the vertical ground reaction force from the nonthrowing side foot exceeded 10 N, and the MER was determined using the joint angle data.24 Marker trajectory data were low-pass filtered using a fourth-order Butterworth filter with a cutoff frequency set at 13.4 Hz.25 The axes were defined as follows: the Y-axis extended toward the pitch, the X-axis extended from the first base toward the third base and was orthogonal to the Y-axis, and the Z-axis was perpendicular to both the Y- and X-axes. The thoracic angle was defined as the absolute angle of the thoracic segment to the laboratory axis (Figure 4). The shoulder adduction angle was defined as the angle between the thoracic segment and the upper arm segment.

151838 Figure 4. Coordinate system for the thoracic segment and definition of thoracic rotation

a. Coordinate system; b. definition of thoracic rotation

CL, laboratory coordinate system; CT, thoracic coordinate system.

XL, X-axis of CL; YL, Y-axis of CL; ZL, Z-axis of CL

The thoracic angle was defined as an absolute angle with respect to a coordinate system, with the flat floor in the laboratory as a reference plane. The rotation to the nonthrowing side was taken as a positive value for the rotation angle of the thoracic (In the case of right-handed throws, the left rotation was taken as a positive value).

Statistical analysis

IBM SPSS Statistics, version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Shapiro and Wilk’s W-statistic was used to screen all data for normality of distribution. The paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare trunk muscle endurance before and after throwing, depending on whether normality was present or not. The changes in kinematics were analyzed in innings 7, 8, and 9, depending on normality, and the significance level was adjusted by Bonferroni analysis for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Effect sizes and 95% (CI) between each measure were also calculated. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) using the paired t-test were rated small (0.20≤d<0.50), moderate (0.50≤d<0.80), and large (d ≥ 0.80).26 Effect sizes (r) using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were rated small (0.10 ≤ r < 0.30), moderate (0.30 ≤ r < 0.50), and large (r ≥ 0.50).26

RESULTS

Twelve athletes participated in this study (mean age, 22.8 ± 2.9 years; mean body mass, 67.5 ± 8.7 kg; mean height, 170.4 ± 5.4 cm; mean experience, 13.6 ± 1.9 years) (Table 1).

151839 Table 1. Characteristics of the participants (n = 12)

	Mean ± SD	Range	
Age (years)	22.8 ± 2.9	20–28	
Body mass (kg)	67.5 ± 8.7	57–85	
Height (cm)	170.4 ± 5.4	165–180	
Experience (years)	13.6 ± 2.9	11–16	
SD, standard deviation

Changes in the trunk muscle endurance before and after repetitive throwing are shown in Table 2. Endurance of the trunk flexors [p = 0.001, d = 1.10 (95% CI: 3.8,10.6)], extensors [p = 0.002, d = 1.30 (95% CI: 3.7,12.8)], lateral flexors on the throwing side [p < 0.001, d = 1.11 (95% CI: 6.0,11.7)], and lateral flexors on the nonthrowing side [p < 0.001, d = 1.76 (95% CI: 7.1,15.7)] was significantly decreased after repetitive throwing.

151840 Table 2. Data regarding trunk muscle endurance before and after repetitive throwing

Variable	Before	After	p-value	
Trunk muscle endurance (s)				
Flexion	22.7 ± 7.3	15.5 ± 5.7	0.001	
Extension	32.9 ± 7.2	24.7 ± 5.3	0.002	
Lateral flexion in the throwing side	23.9 ± 8.4	15.0 ± 7.6	<0.001	
Lateral flexion in the nonthrowing side	25.9 ± 8.1	14.5 ± 4.3	<0.001	
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Table 3 shows thoracic spine and shoulder kinematics at SFC and MER in the first, seventh, eighth, and ninth innings. The thoracic rotation angle at the SFC in the eighth inning was significantly lower than that in the first inning [p = 0.013, d = 0.20 (95% CI: 0.4,3.0)]. The shoulder horizontal adduction angle at MER in the seventh [p = 0.013, d = 0.38 (95% CI: 0.7,4.7)] and ninth [p = 0.004, d = 0.42 (95% CI: 1.1,4.6)] innings was significantly lower than that in the first inning. No differences were found in other variables.

151841 Table 3. Thoracic and shoulder kinematics in each inning

		Inning	
		1st	7th	8th	9th	
SFC										
Thoracic angle (degrees)										
Anterior tilt
p-value	2.7 ± 9.3	−3.5 ± 6.7	2.0 ± 10.4	1.5 ± 9.6	
	0.073	0.836	0.702	
Lateral tilt
p-value	−4.9 ± 6.8	−1.9 ± 9.2	−6.8 ± 5.8	−4.8 ± 5.7	
	0.424	0.122	0.971	
Rotation
p-value	−13.7 ± 8.7	−15.5 ± 8.8	−15.4 ± 8.3	−14.5 ± 10.6	
	0.017	0.013	0.541	
Shoulder angle (degrees)										
Horizontal adduction
p-value	−26.7 ± 15.8	−29.8 ± 14.8	−28.8 ± 15.4	−28.2 ± 15.0	
	0.125	0.323	0.422	
Abduction
p-value	75.7 ± 18.4	74.3 ± 17.4	73.4 ± 17.0	74.5 ± 17.3	
	0.443	0.352	0.595	
Internal rotation
p-value	−24.7 [−48.9, −13.0]	−19.0[−31.7,3.7]	−12.0[−47.3,6.4]	−20.4[−39.3,−4.2]	
	0.019	0.041	0.638	
MER										
Thoracic angle (degrees)										
Anterior tilt
p-value	−4.2 ± 20.6	11.2 ± 15.8	9.2 ± 22.0	13.9 ± 17.1	
	0.075	0.118	0.033	
Lateral tilt
p-value	18.3 ± 7.9	19.4 ± 12.1	18.5 ± 8.3	18.7 ± 11.0	
	0.791	0.892	0.902	
Rotation
p-value	100.4 ± 6.9	102.3 ± 10.4	100.5 ± 6.6	99.7 ± 6.9	
	0.447	0.970	0.636	
Shoulder angle (degrees)										
Horizontal adduction
p-value	9.2 ± 6.7	6.6 ± 7.0	7.0 ± 6.5	6.4 ± 6.6	
	0.013	0.035	0.004	
Abduction
p-value	97.9 ± 9.4	98.4 ± 9.9	98.7 ± 10.6	98.4 ± 10.7	
	0.563	0.475	0.655	
Internal rotation
p-value	−147.9 ± 14.7	−149.8 ± 15.0	−150.2 ± 15.5	−150.6 ± 16.4	
	0.146	0.122	0.031	
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation and medians and interquartile.

[] indicates interquartile.

Each variable was compared in the 1st vs. 7th inning, 1st vs. 8th inning, and 1st vs. 9th inning.

MER = maximum external rotation during the late cocking phase; SFC = stride foot contact during the early cocking phase

DISCUSSION

Because shoulder injuries related to pitching occur in 13%–35% of baseball players,1–4 and the likelihood of performance recovery is low,5,6 the link between repetitive throwing and shoulder injury has recently come under scrutiny.3,9 There is a lack of consensus agreement on specific changes that repetitive throwing might cause in shoulder kinematics.11–13 While the most agree that good trunk function is essential in controlling shoulder kinematics, the changes in thoracic kinematics and trunk muscle strength related to repetitive pitching are unclear.15 The results of the current study reveal that the trunk muscle endurance diminished and thoracic rotation and shoulder horizontal plane kinematics were altered by repetitive throwing.

Despite studies on how shoulder and hip muscle function changes when throwing repeatedly,19,27 variations in trunk muscle function have not yet been examined. In this line, Mullaney et al.27 showed that shoulder internal rotation strength decreased after about 100 pitches, whereas Yanagisawa and Taniguchi19 showed that hip adduction and abduction strength decreased after 117 pitches. Although the body segments assessed varied, the current study conforms to previous reports.

Hirashima et al.28 examined the rectus abdominis and external oblique muscles activity during throwing using surface electromyography. They showed that the external oblique muscles on the nonthrowing side were active in inhibiting early thoracic rotation during the early cocking phase. In contrast, the external oblique muscles on the throwing side were active to direct the thorax toward the throwing direction during the late cocking phase. However, the rectus abdominis muscle was shown to be active immediately before ball release. The paraspinal muscles have been described as active from SFC to ball release for postural control of the trunk.29 Based on these observations, the authors of the current study hypothesized that abdominals and trunk extensors were engaged to control the thoracic movement during each phase of throwing and that repeated throwing reduced trunk muscle endurance.

Early thoracic rotation at the SFC is one of the thoracic kinematics during throwing that should be focused on since it is frequently linked to shoulder injury.16,17 Although trunk muscle endurance decreases occurred in this trial, the thoracic rotation angle to the nonthrowing side at the SFC did not increase. In healthy participants, the decrease in trunk muscle endurance might not necessarily lead to poor trunk motion, such as early thoracic rotation. However, the thoracic rotation angle at the SFC increased toward the throwing side in the eighth inning. The variations observed in this study do not have therapeutic relevance because no reports demonstrate a connection between the changes in thoracic kinematics exhibited herein and shoulder injury.

The shoulder horizontal adduction angle at MER dropped in the seventh and ninth innings. However, the effect size for the change in shoulder horizontal adduction angle with recurrent throwing was small in this study. Several studies have focused on how repetitive throwing affects the shoulder’s horizontal adduction angle. Chou et al.12 showed that 100 pitches increased the shoulder horizontal adduction angle at the MER in top-level high school baseball players. Conversely, Escamilla et al.13 showed that 105–135 repetitive throws did not change the shoulder horizontal adduction angle in Division I college baseball players. Considering factors that lead to a decrease in the shoulder horizontal adduction angle at MER, Mullaney et al.27 reported that the shoulder internal rotation strength decreased after 100 pitches. Additionally, Dale et al.18 showed that fatigue of the shoulder internal rotator muscles began even after 60 pitches. Throwing repeatedly is likely to reduce the shoulder internal rotation strength because the subscapularis, pectoralis major, and latissimus dorsi muscles are very active from the late cocking phase to the acceleration period.30 Jobe31 considered that a decrease in the function of the shoulder anterior components may contribute to a decrease in the shoulder horizontal adduction angle during the late cocking phase. Furthermore, of the subscapularis, pectoralis major, and latissimus dorsi muscles, the subscapularis and pectoralis major are thought to contribute to the maintaining of the glenohumeral joint horizontal adduction position.30 However, although there were no changes in thoracic kinematics affecting shoulder kinematics in this study, a deficit in muscle function of the anterior shoulder components, such as the subscapularis and pectoralis major muscles, may lead to a change in the shoulder horizontal plane kinematics at MER.

A decreased shoulder horizontal adduction angle at MER is closely associated with shoulder injuries and is a risk factor for posterior superior impingement syndrome.31,32 Posterior superior impingement syndrome is a phenomenon in which the rotator cuff is trapped between the humeral head and glenoid fossa during the late cocking phase.31,32 Mihata et al.33 reproduced the MER position in cadaveric shoulders and reported that the pressure between the greater tuberosity and glenoid increased as the shoulder horizontal adduction angle decreased. In this study, the shoulder horizontal adduction angle at MER decreased in the seventh and ninth innings, suggesting that pitching >100 pitches may contribute to increased mechanical stress within the shoulder.

This study has some limitations. First, the trunk muscle endurance was evaluated using a method that is easy to use in clinical and field situations. However, the technique used in this study could not deny subjectivity. In the future, we should employ a more accurate method of assessment. Second, the throwing motion function was only assessed during specific innings. Japanese starting pitchers often throw more than seven innings, but in the United States, they barely reach this number. Whether the throwing motion will change in less than seven innings needs to be determined. Therefore, assessing pitching data in every inning would be relevant, particularly in American baseball. Third, based on previous reports, the authors speculate that the decreased shoulder horizontal adduction angle at MER increases mechanical stress within the shoulder.31–33 This study only showed changes in shoulder motion with repetitive throwing in healthy participants, and whether a healthy athlete whose shoulder motion is altered by repetitive throwing will develop shoulder injuries in the future remains unknown. If the relationship between changes in shoulder motion with repeated throwing and the incidence of shoulder injury can be clarified, this may lead to preventive actions for future injuries.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that with 135 repeated throws trunk muscular endurance was reduced. In addition, thoracic rotation at SFC and shoulder horizontal plane at MER kinematics were altered by repetitive throwing.

Disclaimers

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank all the individuals who participated in this study. The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the manuscript review and editing support.
==== Refs
Rate of upper extremity injury in high school baseball pitchers who played catcher as a secondary position Journal of Athletic Training Hibberd Elizabeth E. Oyama Sakiko Myers Joseph B. 1 5 2018
53 5 510 513 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-322-16 10.4085/1062-6050-322-16 29771138
Epidemiology of shoulder injuries in young baseball players and grading of radiologic findings of Little Leaguer's shoulder The Journal of Medical Investigation Kanematsu Yoshiji Matsuura Tetsuya Kashiwaguchi Shinji Iwase Takenobu Suzue Naoto Iwame Toshiyuki Fukuta Shoji Hamada Daisuke Goto Tomohiro Sairyo Koichi 2015
62 3.4 123 125 1343-1420 10.2152/jmi.62.123 10.2152/jmi.62.123 26399334
Effect of pitch type, pitch count, and pitching mechanics on risk of elbow and shoulder pain in youth baseball pitchers The American Journal of Sports Medicine Lyman Stephen Fleisig Glenn S. Andrews James R. Osinski E. David 7 2002
30 4 463 468 0363-5465 10.1177/03635465020300040201 10.1177/03635465020300040201 12130397
Longitudinal study of elbow and shoulder pain in youth baseball pitchers Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise Lyman STEPHEN Fleisig GLENN S. Waterbor JOHN W. FUNKHOUSER ELLEN M. PULLEY LEAVONNE ANDREWS JAMES R. OSINSKI E. DAVID ROSEMAN JEFFREY M. 11 2001
33 11 1803 1810 0195-9131 10.1097/00005768-200111000-00002 10.1097/00005768-200111000-00002
Internal impingement of the shoulder in overhead athletes: retrospective multicentre study in 135 arthroscopically-treated patients Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research Peduzzi Lisa Grimberg Jean Chelli Mikael Lefebvre Yves Levigne Christophe Kany Jean Clavert Philippe Bertiaux Simon Garret Jérôme Hardy Alexandre Holzer Nicolas Sanchez Matthieu 12 2019
105 8 S201 S206 1877-0568 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.006 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.006
Return to play after treatment of superior labral tears in professional baseball players The American Journal of Sports Medicine Fedoriw Wasyl W. Ramkumar Prem McCulloch Patrick C. Lintner David M. 27 3 2014
42 5 1155 1160 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546514528096 10.1177/0363546514528096
Correlates with history of injury in youth and adolescent pitchers Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Chalmers Peter N. Sgroi Terrance Riff Andrew J. Lesniak Matthew Sayegh Eli T. Verma Nikhil N. Cole Brian J. Romeo Anthony A. 7 2015
31 7 1349 1357 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.017 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.017 25953122
Predicting and preventing injury in Major League Baseball Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) Erickson B.J. Chalmers P.N. Bush-Joseph C.A. Romeo A.A. 2016
45 152 156 26991568
The impact of fatigue on baseball pitching mechanics in adolescent male pitchers Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Erickson Brandon J. Sgori Terrance Chalmers Peter N. Vignona Patrick Lesniak Matthew Bush-Joseph Charles A. Verma Nikhil N. Romeo Anthony A. 5 2016
32 5 762 771 0749-8063 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.051 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.051 26952088
Pitch Smart Major League Baseball 2022-2-18 https://www.mlb.com/pitch-smart/pitching-guidelines
The effects of extended play on professional baseball pitchers The American Journal of Sports Medicine Murray Tricia A. Cook Timothy D. Werner Sherry L. Schlegel Theodore F. Hawkins Richard J. 3 2001
29 2 137 142 0363-5465 10.1177/03635465010290020501 10.1177/03635465010290020501 11292037
Change in pitching biomechanics in the late-inning in Taiwanese high school baseball pitchers Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Chou Paul Pei-Hsi Huang Yen-Po Gu Yi-Hsuan Liu Chiang Chen Shen-Kai Hsu Kai-Cheng Wang Rong-Tyai Huang Ming-Jer Lin Hwai-Ting 6 2015
29 6 1500 1508 1064-8011 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000791 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000791 25474340
Pitching biomechanics as a pitcher approaches muscular fatigue during a simulated baseball game The American Journal of Sports Medicine Escamilla Rafael F. Barrentine Steven W. Fleisig Glenn S. Zheng Naiquan Takada Yoshihiro Kingsley David Andrews James R. 1 2007
35 1 23 33 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546506293025 10.1177/0363546506293025
Shoulder injuries in the throwing athlete The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume Braun Sepp Kokmeyer Dirk Millett Peter J 4 2009
91 4 966 978 0021-9355 10.2106/jbjs.h.01341 10.2106/jbjs.h.01341 19339585
Rehabilitation of the overhead athlete’s elbow Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach Wilk Kevin E. Macrina Leonard C. Cain E. Lyle Dugas Jeffrey R. Andrews James R. 30 7 2012
4 5 404 414 1941-7381 10.1177/1941738112455006 10.1177/1941738112455006 23016113
Effects of upper trunk rotation on shoulder joint torque among baseball pitchers of various levels Journal of Applied Biomechanics Aguinaldo Arnel L. Buttermore Janet Chambers Henry 2 2007
23 1 42 51 1065-8483 10.1123/jab.23.1.42 10.1123/jab.23.1.42
Early cocking phase mechanics and upper extremity surgery risk in starting professional baseball pitchers Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Douoguih Wiemi A. Dolce Donald L. Lincoln Andrew E. 1 4 2015
3 4 232596711558159 2325-9671 10.1177/2325967115581594 10.1177/2325967115581594 26665056
The effects of repetitive overhead throwing on shoulder rotator isokinetic work-fatigue N Am J Sports Phys Ther Dale R.B. Kovaleski J.E. Ogletree T. Heitman R.J. Norrell P.M. 2007
2 74 80 21522204
Changes in lower extremity function and pitching performance with increasing numbers of pitches in baseball pitchers Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation Yanagisawa Osamu Taniguchi Hidenori 27 6 2018
14 3 430 435 2288-176X 10.12965/jer.1836196.098 10.12965/jer.1836196.098 30018930
Lumbar trunk muscle endurance testing: an inexpensive alternative to a machine for evaluation Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Ito Toshikazu Shirado Osamu Suzuki Hideki Takahashi Masaaki Kaneda Kiyoshi Strax Thomas E. 1 1996
77 1 75 79 0003-9993 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90224-5 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90224-5
Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation McGill Stuart M. Childs Aaron Liebenson Craig 8 1999
80 8 941 944 0003-9993 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90087-4 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90087-4 10453772
Trunk muscle endurance, flexibility, stride foot balance, and contralateral trunk lean in collegiate baseball pitchers Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Myrick Karen M. Pallone Adam S. Feinn Richard S. Ford Kaitlin M. Garbalosa Juan C. 10 2019
33 10 2641 2647 1064-8011 10.1519/jsc.0000000000003292 10.1519/jsc.0000000000003292
Shadow pitching deviates ball release position: kinematic analysis in high school baseball pitchers BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation Miyazaki Shigeaki Yamako Go Totoribe Koji Sekimoto Tomohisa Kadowaki Yuko Tsuruta Kurumi Chosa Etsuo 17 3 2021
13 1 26 2052-1847 10.1186/s13102-021-00255-7 10.1186/s13102-021-00255-7 33731187
Effect of excessive contralateral trunk tilt on pitching biomechanics and performance in high school baseball pitchers The American Journal of Sports Medicine Oyama Sakiko Yu Bing Blackburn J. Troy Padua Darin A. Li Li Myers Joseph B. 24 7 2013
41 10 2430 2438 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546513496547 10.1177/0363546513496547
Kinematic comparisons of throwing different types of baseball pitches Journal of Applied Biomechanics Escamilla Rafael F. Fleisig Glenn S. Barrentine Steven W. Zheng Naiquan Andrews James R. 2 1998
14 1 1 23 1065-8483 10.1123/jab.14.1.1 10.1123/jab.14.1.1
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science Cohen J. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc Mahwah, NJ 1988

Upper and lower extremity muscle fatigue after a baseball pitching performance The American Journal of Sports Medicine Mullaney Michael J. McHugh Malachy P. Donofrio Tom M. Nicholas Stephen J. 1 2005
33 1 108 113 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546504266071 10.1177/0363546504266071
Sequential muscle activity and its functional role in the upper extremity and trunk during overarm throwing Journal of Sports Sciences Hirashima Masaya Kadota Hiroshi Sakurai Shizuka Kudo Katzutoshi Ohtsuki Tatsuyuki 1 2002
20 4 301 310 0264-0414 10.1080/026404102753576071 10.1080/026404102753576071
Dynamic EMG analysis of torque transfer in professional baseball pitchers Spine Watkins ROBERT G. Dennis STEVEN Dillin WILLIAM H. SCHNEBEL BROCK SCHNEIDERMAN GARY JOBE FRANK FARFAN HARRY PERRY JACQUELINE PINK MARILYN 4 1989
14 4 404 408 0362-2436 10.1097/00007632-198904000-00011 10.1097/00007632-198904000-00011 2524110
An electromyographic analysis of the upper extremity in pitching Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery DiGiovine Nick M. Jobe Frank W. Pink Marilyn Perry Jacquelin 1 1992
1 1 15 25 1058-2746 10.1016/s1058-2746(09)80011-6 10.1016/s1058-2746(09)80011-6
Posterior superior glenoid impingement: expanded spectrum Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery Jobe Christopher M. 10 1995
11 5 530 536 0749-8063 10.1016/0749-8063(95)90128-0 10.1016/0749-8063(95)90128-0
Impingement of the deep surface of the supraspinatus tendon on the posterosuperior glenoid rim: an arthroscopic study Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Walch G. Boileau P. Noel E. Donell S.T. 9 1992
1 5 238 245 1058-2746 10.1016/s1058-2746(09)80065-7 10.1016/s1058-2746(09)80065-7 22959196
Excessive glenohumeral horizontal abduction as occurs during the late cocking phase of the throwing motion can be critical for internal impingement The American Journal of Sports Medicine Mihata Teruhisa McGarry Michelle H. Kinoshita Mitsuo Lee Thay Q. 2010
38 2 369 374 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546509346408 10.1177/0363546509346408 19915100
