
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

37020433
73311
10.26603/001c.73311
IFSPT International Perspective
Alternative Flexibility Training
Behm David G 1
Aragão-Santos Jose Carlos 1 2
Korooshfard Negar 1 3
Anvar Saman Hadjizadeh 1
1 School of Human Kinetics and Recreation Memorial University of Newfoundland
2 Universidade Federal de Sergipe
3 Department of Sport Sciences, Faculties of Educational Science and Psychology University of Shiraz
Corresponding Author: David G Behm School of Human Kinetics and Recreation Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, A1M 3L8 dbehm@mun.ca tel: 709-864-3408 fax: 709-864-3979
2 4 2023
2023
18 2 285287
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Over the last approximately 20 years, research has reported on performance impairments following prolonged durations of static stretching. This has led to a paradigm shift towards dynamic stretching. There has also been a greater emphasis using foam rollers, vibration devices, and other techniques. Recent commentaries and meta-analyses suggest that stretching need not be listed as a fitness component as other activities such as resistance training can provide similar range of motion benefits. The commentary aims to review and compare the effects of static stretching and alternative exercises for improving range of motion.

static stretching
dynamic stretching
foam rolling
vibration
resistance training
flexibility
This study was supported by Dr. David Behm’s Discovery Grant from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Static stretching was a mainstay for decades for warm-ups before activities, training to increase range of motion (ROM), and rehabilitation from injuries.1 The popularity of static stretching came into question starting in the late 1990s with research reporting acute static stretching-induced performance (i.e., strength, power, balance, sprint speed) decrements.1,2 Recent research has elucidated the weakness of these prior studies, including a lack of ecological validity in terms of static stretching durations, testing times, lack of inclusion of dynamic activities within a warm-up, and nocebo effects among others.1,2 Static stretching produces trivial effects on subsequent performance when less than 60 seconds of stretching per muscle group is incorporated into warm-ups that included dynamic activities.1,2

Static stretching has recently taken another hit, with commentaries3,4 suggesting that stretching need not be incorporated as a fitness component like training for muscle strength and endurance, cardiorespiratory endurance, or body composition since activities such as resistance training, foam rolling, and local vibration can similarly increase flexibility. Though static stretching has fallen out of favour as a warmup activity, it still has merit as a means to increase ROM.

While the popularity of static stretching has diminished, the implementation of dynamic stretching during warm-ups has increased.1,2 Our recent meta-analysis5 reported no significant differences between static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) for increasing ROM. There were also no significant differences between stretching at higher or lower intensities. Therefore, though dynamic stretching may be an important warm-up component, it does not offer improvements over static stretching for increasing ROM.

Furthermore, the advent of new techniques to increase ROM does not necessarily mean that these alternative methods are better. Therefore, this perspective aims to expound on these alternatives.

Resistance Training Effects on Range of Motion

Although it has been known for centuries that resistance training can improve muscle strength, power, and endurance, our recent meta-analysis documented that resistance training (free weights, machines, Pilates, but not calisthenics) can provide similar ROM increases as static stretching.6 Subgroup analyses found that “untrained and sedentary” individuals had significantly higher, large magnitude ROM improvements than the small increases with “trained or active people”. Since resistance training can provide moderate magnitude improvements in ROM, stretching before or after resistance training may not be necessary.

Foam Rolling Effects on Range of Motion

Foam rolling is a popular modality that acutely and chronically increases ROM7 without performance deficits.8 Our recent meta-analysis7 concluded that foam rolling had a moderate magnitude effect on ROM with >4 weeks of foam rolling training. There were differences between muscles as foam rolling increased joint ROM when used on the hamstrings and quadriceps, but not ankle dorsiflexion when foam rolling was employed on the triceps surae. We suggested that certain joints with more limited ROM such as the ankle or with a prior history of injuries (e.g., sprains) may not be as receptive to foam rolling. Another meta-analysis9 from our lab revealed no significant ROM differences between single bouts of stretching and foam rolling suggesting they are equally effective. As such, the underlying mechanisms of increased stretch tolerance or soft-tissue compliance would likely be similar for static stretching and foam rolling.

Vibration

Local muscle vibration alone and combined with static stretching have been used to increase ROM.1 The research findings are diverse with vibration (35 Hz with 2 mm amplitude) and static stretching augmenting hamstrings flexibility more than static stretching alone, while in other studies, local vibration (i.e., 30 Hz at 4 mm displacement, 44 Hz with 0.1 mm displacement) alone induced similar ROM improvements as static stretching and was more effective than dynamic stretching.1 The reported mechanisms underlying vibration-induced increases in ROM are increased stretch threshold, augmented blood flow, diminishing muscle viscosity, and decreases in the phasic and static stretch reflexes.1

Don’t count out static stretching (yet)!

For individuals with injuries that do not permit resistance training, another static stretching benefit is increased muscle strength and hypertrophy with daily static stretching of 10-60 minutes.10 Prior reviews have reported that static stretching did not have positive effects to prevent all cause injuries.11 However, our current reviews reported reduced musculotendinous injury incidence, improved balance,11 and reduced pain12 with static stretching as part of the warm-up before an activity or as part of a separate training program (≥30 seconds per muscle group with a total duration of ≥5 minutes). Unilateral static stretching can also have global body effects with large magnitude ROM increases in non-stretched limbs.1

Summary

Hence, while there are other activities such as dynamic stretching, PNF, resistance training, foam rolling, and vibration that can increase ROM, the reported demise of static stretching may be premature as it provides an array of fitness, performance, and health benefits and can be used in conjunction with other modalities where increased ROM is a priority of the goal activity. While resistance training and foam rolling can contribute to moderate magnitude increases in ROM, individuals who seek greater improvements may wish to augment these activities with stretch training.
==== Refs
The Science and Physiology of Flexibility and Stretching: Implications and Applications in Sport Performance and Health Behm David G. Routledge London, UK. 1 11 2018
9781315110745 10.4324/9781315110745 10.4324/9781315110745
Mechanisms underlying performance impairments following prolonged static stretching without a comprehensive warm-up European Journal of Applied Physiology Behm David G. Kay Anthony D. Trajano Gabriel S. Blazevich Anthony J. 2021
121 1 67 94 1439-6319 10.1007/s00421-020-04538-8 10.1007/s00421-020-04538-8 33175242
Time to Move From Mandatory Stretching? We Need to Differentiate “Can I?” From “Do I Have To?” Frontiers in Physiology Afonso José Olivares-Jabalera Jesús Andrade Renato 22 7 2021
12 714166 1664-042X 10.3389/fphys.2021.714166 10.3389/fphys.2021.714166 34366900
The Case for Retiring Flexibility as a Major Component of Physical Fitness Sports Medicine Nuzzo James L. 2020
50 5 853 870 0112-1642 10.1007/s40279-019-01248-w 10.1007/s40279-019-01248-w 31845202
Acute effects of various stretching techniques on range of motion: A systematic review with meta-analysis Sports Medicine Behm D.G. Alizadeh S. Daneshjoo Ali Hadjizadeh Anvar Saman Graham A. Zahiri A Goudini R Edwards C Culleton R Scharf C Konrad A 2023
in press
Resistance training induces improvements in range of motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Sports Medicine Alizadeh Shahab Daneshjoo Abdolhamid Zahiri Ali Anvar Saman Hadjizadeh Goudini Reza Hicks Jared P. Konrad Andreas Behm David George 9 1 2023
53 3 707 722 0112-1642 10.1007/s40279-022-01804-x 10.1007/s40279-022-01804-x 36622555
Foam rolling training effects on range of motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Sports Medicine Konrad Andreas Nakamura Masatoshi Tilp Markus Donti Olyvia Behm David G. 26 5 2022
52 10 2523 2535 0112-1642 10.1007/s40279-022-01699-8 10.1007/s40279-022-01699-8 35616852
The Effects of Foam Rolling Training on Performance Parameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis including Controlled and Randomized Controlled Trials International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Konrad Andreas Nakamura Masatoshi Behm David George 15 9 2022
19 18 11638 1660-4601 10.3390/ijerph191811638 10.3390/ijerph191811638 36141907
A comparison of a single bout of stretching or foam rolling on range of motion in healthy adults European Journal of Applied Physiology Konrad Andreas Nakamura Masatoshi Paternoster Florian K. Tilp Markus Behm David G. 17 3 2022
122 7 1545 1557 1439-6319 10.1007/s00421-022-04927-1 10.1007/s00421-022-04927-1 35298696
Chronic Effects of Static Stretching Exercises on Muscle Strength and Power in Healthy Individuals Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review with Multi-level Meta-analysis Sports Medicine Arntz Fabian Markov Adrian Behm David G. Behrens Martin Negra Yassine Nakamura Masatoshi Moran Jason Chaabene Helmi 31 1 2023
53 3 723 745 0112-1642 10.1007/s40279-022-01806-9 10.1007/s40279-022-01806-9 36719536
Effects of stretching on injury risk reduction and balance Journal of Clinical Exercise Physiology Behm David G. Kay Anthony D. Trajano Gabriel S. Alizadeh Shahab Blazevich Anthony J. 1 9 2021
10 3 106 116 2165-7629 10.31189/2165-6193-10.3.106 10.31189/2165-6193-10.3.106
Effects of acute and chronic stretching on pain control Journal of Clinical Exercise Physiology Behm David G. Kay Anthony D. Trajano Gabriel S. Alizadeh Shahab Blazevich Anthony J. 1 12 2021
10 4 150 159 2165-7629 10.31189/2165-6193-10.4.150 10.31189/2165-6193-10.4.150
