
==== Front
Int J Sports Phys Ther
Int J Sports Phys Ther
2159
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
2159-2896
NASMI Website: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

37020438
73033
10.26603/001c.73033
Original Research
Landing Technique and Ankle-dorsiflexion Range of Motion are not Associated with the History of Lower Limb Injuries among Youth Basketball Athletes
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5675-5128
Borges Gomes Luiz Augusto PT, MS 1
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3275-9540
Alves da Cunha Ronaldo PT, MS 1
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8132-985X
Dias Lopes Alexandre PT, PhD. 2
Andrelino de Souza Fábio PT 1
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4314-8681
Cruvinel Costa Felipe PT 1
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3761-0745
Vicente Andreoli Carlos MD, PhD. 1
1 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Universidade Federal de São Paulo https://ror.org/02k5swt12
2 Department of Physical Therapy, Movement & Rehabilitation Sciences Northeastern University https://ror.org/03awzbc87
Corresponding Author: Luiz Augusto Borges Gomes, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences Applied to Sport and Physical Activity, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Estado de Israel, 636, São Paulo/SP (01000-000), CEP 04022-900, Brazil. E-mail address: lab.gomes@gmail.com Telephone number: +5511941149842
1 4 2023
2023
18 2 358367
28 8 2022
15 1 2023
© The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background

Lower limb injuries generate a significant health burden in basketball. Landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion have been suggested as risk factors for lower limb injuries among youth athletes, but studies conducted specifically with basketball athletes are lacking.

Hypothesis/Purpose

To describe the period prevalence of basketball-related injuries and to examine the association of the history of lower limb injuries with landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion asymmetry among youth basketball athletes.

Study Design

Cross-Sectional Survey.

Methods

Youth basketball athletes were asked to complete a paper-based survey to investigate personal characteristics, training characteristics and their three-month history of basketball-related injuries. The Landing Error Scoring System and the Weight-Bearing Lunge Test were used to evaluate landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion. Binary logistic regression was utilized to examine the association of the investigated variables with the presence of history of lower limb injuries among the athletes.

Results

A total of 534 athletes participated. The three-month prevalence of basketball-related injuries was 23.2% (95% CI 19.7 – 27), and the majority of the reported injuries affected the lower limbs (69.7%; n=110). Sprains were the most frequent type of injury (29.1%; n=46), and the ankle (30.4%; n=48) and knee (21.5%; n=34) were the most affected anatomic locations. Landing technique (p = 0.105) and ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion asymmetry (p = 0.529) were not associated with the history of lower limb injuries.

Conclusion

The three-month prevalence of basketball-related injuries was 23.2%. Although ankle sprains were the most frequent injury, landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion asymmetry were not associated with the history of lower limb injuries among youth basketball athletes.

Level of Evidence

3

ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion
athletic injury
basketball
landing error scoring system
youth sports
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Basketball is one of the most popular youth sports worldwide.1 In the United States, basketball is the most popular sport among boys and girls aged 12-17 years and, in Brazil, it represents the sixth most practiced team sport among Brazilians aged 15-19 years.2,3 As a physical activity, basketball provides a myriad of physical, mental and psychosocial health benefits to these age groups, but it also imposes a risk of sustaining an injury during participation.4–7 The incidence of basketball-related injuries (BRIs) varies depending on factors related to the investigated population – age, sex, level of participation – and the injury definition adopted by the study authors, but according to prospective cohort studies and a recent systematic review, the vast majority of BRIs affect the lower limbs.8–12

The prevention of lower limb injuries has become a topic of great concern in basketball.2 The identification of modifiable risk factors is an important step for injury prevention.13,14 In basketball, two commonly reported risk factors for lower limb injuries are landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM), and previous studies recommended the application of specific screening methods to evaluate these variables among basketball athletes.15,16 Two of those methods include the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) and the Weight Bearing Lunge Test (WBLT), which have already proven their validity and reliability for evaluation of landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion ROM, respectively.17,18

Despite the use of these screening methods, the influence of landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion ROM on injury risk is unclear. A previous case-control study conducted with high school and collegiate athletes of eight different varsity sports found no relationship between LESS score and the risk of sustaining an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, but a more recent prospective cohort study showed that a LESS score of < 5 significantly increased the risk of sustaining an ACL injury among elite-youth soccer athletes.19,20 Studies addressing the role of ankle-dorsiflexion ROM on injury risk also show inconclusive results. A prospective cohort study conducted specifically with youth basketball athletes showed an association between lower ankle-dorsiflexion ROM and the risk of developing patellar tendinopathy.21 Regarding lateral ankle sprains, a case-control study conducted with collegiate athletes found an association between greater ankle-dorsiflexion ROM and the risk of sustaining recurrent lateral ankle sprains,22 but a previous prospective cohort study conducted with army recruits showed that the occurrence of lateral ankle sprains was associated with a reduction in ankle-dorsiflexion ROM.23

The sport and age of the investigated athletes are important reasons for these observed divergencies.20,22 To move the research forward, it is important to investigate these variables among athletes of different ages and sports. Considering the high lower limb injury rate in basketball, the purposes of this study were to describe the period prevalence of BRIs and (2) to examine the association of the history of lower limb injuries with landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion ROM asymmetry among youth basketball athletes.

METHODS

Study design and participants

This cross-sectional study was developed in association with a state basketball federation in Brazil. The state basketball federation aimed to enhance injury prevention efforts among youth athletes affiliated with the organization. The investigation of the history of BRIs and the evaluation of landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion ROM by using two screening methods were proposed as a first step. The objectives were presented to the basketball teams during the 2018 pre-season conference and all youth basketball teams competing in the 2018 state basketball championship were invited to participate in the study. Training and match locations were visited by the researchers in previously scheduled days to recruit athletes to participate. Recruitment and data collection occurred between February and July 2018. Eligibility criteria included (1) youth athletes of both sexes, (2) aged between 10 and 19 years old. Professional athletes were not included in the study. Youth athletes who were not able to complete ankle-dorsiflexion ROM and/or landing technique evaluation due to any physical complaint were included in the study, but they participated only by completing the baseline questionnaire. All participants and their parents or legal guardians, for athletes younger than 18 years old, signed a consent or assent form prior to inclusion in the study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidade Federal de São Paulo (number 2880146).

Data collection

Data collection was accomplished in two steps. First, athletes completed a paper-based questionnaire to investigate personal characteristics, training characteristics, and their history of BRIs in the prior three months. In the second step, athletes performed landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion ROM evaluation in a random order. Data collection occurred after training sessions or official matches, providing a minimum period of ten minutes rest between the end of the activity and the beginning of the evaluations.

Baseline questionnaire

The baseline questionnaire was completely self-reported and composed of open-ended and closed-ended questions. The initial version of the questionnaire was developed by the first author of the study and later discussed and validated by all the authors in a roundtable discussion. Variables related to personal characteristics (age, sex, height, weight), training characteristics (sport experience, sport specialization, frequency and duration of practice sessions) and history of BRIs in the prior three months were collected. The investigation of the history of BRIs was carried out through two open-ended questions about the type and the anatomical location of injuries. Subsequently, all self-reported injuries were categorized by two of the authors of the study based on the first two digits of the classification The Orchard Sports Injury Classification System (OSICS) Version 10.24 Any disagreement was solved by a third author of the study. The adopted injury definition during data collection was “any physical complaint sustained by a player that resulted from a basketball match or basketball training, irrespective of the need for medical attention or time loss from basketball activities”.25

Landing technique evaluation

The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) was used to evaluate landing technique.17 All athletes received instructions and observed a test demonstration prior to the start of the assessment. Test procedures followed the description made by Padua et al.17 Athletes were positioned on a 30-cm-high box and instructed to jump horizontally towards a rectangular landing area – 100-cm-long, 50-cm-wide, and 1-cm-high – positioned at a distance of approximately 50% of their height in front of the box. Immediately after landing, they had to jump vertically as high as they were able and land again on the platform (Figure 1). Athletes completed at least three repetitions for familiarization with the jumping-landing task, which were followed by three valid trials. All valid trials were captured by two webcams (Logitech C920 Hd Pro Full Hd 1080p) placed at a distance of 3.5 m from the lens of the webcams to front of and to the side of the landing area. Both webcams were positioned on a tripod fixed at a height of 1.2 m from lens to floor. The webcams were connected to two independent notebooks and synchronized to the software provided by the manufacturer (Logitech Webcam Software, version 2.80.853.0a).

152311 Figure 1. Landing Error Scoring System

The jump was considered valid when the athlete (1) jumped from the box with both feet simultaneously, (2) jumped forward and did not perform an excessive vertical movement to reach the landing platform, (3) landed with the entire feet on the platform and (4) completed the task in a fluid motion.17

The authors did not provide any instruction to athletes regarding their landing technique during the test unless they were performing the test incorrectly. All examiners were physiotherapists who had participated in a previous two-hour training session, where they received theoretical and practical instruction about LESS.

After data collection, in a second step, the videos were analyzed by three of the study authors, who were blinded to injury history. Intrarater and interrater reliability were estimated prior to the beginning of the analysis. For reliability analysis, the authors independently scored 24 jumping-landing task videos from eight different athletes at two time points, separated by one week. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC’s) were estimated based on a mean-rating, consistency, 2-way mixed-effects model. The ICC’s for intrarater and interrater reliability were 0.87 and 0.81, respectively.

The software Kinovea for motion analysis (version 0.8.15; Copyright 2006-2011 - Joan Charmant & Contrib.) was used during all the LESS analysis. The raters gave scores to each of the three valid attempts completed by each athlete and the final score was represented by the average value obtained in the three attempts. All LESS items were assessed bilaterally, and a preferred limb was not chosen for the analysis. The score for each item was awarded in cases where the athlete presented the landing error in at least one of the valid attempts made, regardless of whether the error was observed in only one or both lower limbs, in the cases of the items assessed bilaterally.

Ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion evaluation

Weight-Bearing Lunge Test (WBLT), as described by previous authors, was used to evaluate the ankle-dorsiflexion ROM.18,21–23 A one-meter tape line was drawn on the floor and continued up to the wall for one more meter. Athletes were positioned with their heel and second toe aligned on the line. After positioning, the athlete was instructed to lunge forward to touch the vertical line in the wall with their knee, while maintaining foot alignment and heel contact with the floor. The evaluated foot was gradually moved away from the wall until the athlete was able to make only a slight contact with their knee on the vertical line. At that moment, ankle-dorsiflexion ROM was measured placing a smartphone 10 centimeters below the proximal region of the tibial tuberosity (Figure 2). The Ankle-dorsiflexion measurement was performed using the iHandy Level app (iHandy Ltd.), which is a valid and reliable tool for joint angle measurement.26 Lower limbs were randomly evaluated, and the final score was represented by the ankle-dorsiflexion ROM asymmetry observed.

152312 Figure 2. Weight-Bearing Lunge Test

All raters were physiotherapists who had participated in a previous two-hour face-to-face training where they received theoretical and practical instruction on the test. Raters were blinded to the presence of injury history during data collection. We did not conduct an intrarater and interrater reliability analysis of the measurements for ankle-dorsiflexion ROM before data collection.

Statistical analysis

All youth basketball teams affiliated with the state basketball federation were invited to participate in this study and a convenience sample of youth athletes was utilized to describe the three-month prevalence of BRI, landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion ROM asymmetry in this population.

Descriptive statistics were used to present the distribution of the investigated variables. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to verify the distribution of the data. An univariate analysis, using Independent Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney test, was conducted to verify differences in LESS scores and ankle-dorsiflexion ROM asymmetry between athletes with and without history of lower limb injuries. Additionally, binary logistic regression was used in a multivariate analysis to investigate the association of the investigated variables with the presence of history of lower limb injuries among the athletes. Covariates and variables identified as associated factors in previous studies were used in the model. The model was adjusted considering multicollinearity and goodness-of-fit. The results were presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI. For continuous variables the ORs indicate the change in odds for a one-unit increase in the independent variable. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The software Jamovi (version 1.6.21.0) was used for the analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-three male and female youth basketball teams belonging to 44 clubs participated in the 2018 state basketball championship. The state basketball championship categorizes youth by age to form the teams. Male competitions were played in seven categories: U-12 (17 teams), U-13 (20 teams), U-14 (17 teams), U-15 (17 teams), U-16 (16 teams), U-17 (13 teams) and U-19 (14 teams). Female competitions were played in five categories: U-13 (five teams), U-14 (four teams), U-15 (six teams), U-17 (nine teams) and U-19 (five teams).

In total, 540 athletes were recruited to participate in the study. After checking and confirming the eligibility criteria, 534 athletes belonging to 42 teams from 23 clubs were included in the final sample. Six athletes were not included because they were also members of the professional teams in their clubs.

All participants completed the baseline questionnaire. Landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion ROM assessments were completed by 448 and 500 athletes, respectively. However, LESS results of 86 athletes were not included in the final analysis due to technical problems with the quality of the videos and / or execution errors identified during the analysis, which invalidated one or more jumps performed by the athlete.

Characteristics

The majority of the participants were male (88.7%; n = 474). The median age of the athletes was 12 (IQR = 2) years old and 77.5% (n = 414) of them reported basketball as the only sport modality in which they participate. Detailed information about athletes’ characteristics is described in Table 1.

152313 Table 1. Athletes Characteristics. All continuous variables are expressed by the median and interquartile range. Categorical variables are expressed in percentage and total number of athletes.

Variable	Total sample (n=534)	With history of lower limb injuries (n=86)	Without history of lower limb injuries (n=414)	
Sexb				
Male	88.7 (474)	15.8 (75)	84.2 (399)	
Female	11.3 (60)	28.4 (17)	71.6 (43)	
Age (years)a	12 (2)	12 (3.25)	12 (1.75)	
BMI (kg/m²)a	20.1 (4.94)	21.3 (3.90)	19.8 (4.92)	
Sport experience (months)a	24 (24)	36 (30.3)	24 (24)	
Basketball exposure (hours/week)a	7.5 (4)	8 (7.63)	7.5 (3)	
Categoryb				
U-12	39.5 (211)	11.8 (25)	88.2 (186)	
U-13	43.4 (232)	14.2 (33)	85.8 (199)	
U-14	4.7 (25)	20 (5)	80 (20)	
U-15	4.7 (25)	44 (11)	56 (14)	
U-17	4.4 (24)	41.6 (10)	58.4 (14)	
U-19	3.2 (17)	47 (8)	53 (9)	
Sport specializationb				
Specialist	77.5 (414)	17.4 (72)	82.6 (342)	
Generalist	22.5 (120)	16.7 (20)	83.3 (100)	
BMI = body mass index,

a Continuous variables

b Categorical variables

Prevalence of Basketball-related Injuries

The three-month prevalence of BRIs was 23.2% (95% CI 19.7 – 27), with 158 injuries sustained by 124 athletes. Sprains were the most frequent type of injury (29.1%; n = 46) (Table 2).

152314 Table 2. Type of Basketball-related Injuries

Type of injury	% (n)a	
Non specific injury	17.1 (27)	
Bruising/haematoma	1.9 (3)	
Laceration/abrasion	1.3 (2)	
Whiplash	0 (0)	
Muscle injury	12.6 (20)	
Tendon injury	10.1 (16)	
Joint sprains	29.1 (46)	
Cartilage injury	0 (0)	
Joint dislocations	7 (11)	
Chronic instability	0 (0)	
Synovitis, impingement, bursitis	1.3 (2)	
Fracture	12 (19)	
Stress fracture	0 (0)	
Other stress/overuse injury	6.3 (10)	
Organ injury	0 (0)	
Nerve injury	0 (0)	
Vascular injury	0 (0)	
Arthritis	0 (0)	
Other injury not elsewhere specified	1.3 (2)	
a The type of basketball-related injuries are expressed in percentage and total number of injuries.

The ankle (30.4%; n = 48) and knee (21.5%; n = 34) were the most affected anatomic locations (Table 3). Lower limb injuries accounted for the majority of the reported musculoskeletal injuries (69.7%; n = 110) and the three-month prevalence of lower limb musculoskeletal injuries was 17.2% (95% CI 14.1 – 20.7).

152315 Table 3. Anatomic Location of Basketball-related Injuries

Anatomic location	% (n)a	
Head	1.9 (3)	
Neck	0.6 (1)	
Shoulder	6.3 (10)	
Upper arm	1.3 (2)	
Elbow	0.6 (1)	
Forearm	1.9 (3)	
Wrist and hand	9.5 (15)	
Chest	0.6 (1)	
Trunk and abdomen	0 (0)	
Thoracic spine	0 (0)	
Lumbar spine	7 (11)	
Pelvis and buttock	0.6 (1)	
Hip and groin	1.3 (2)	
Thigh	3.2 (5)	
Knee	21.5 (34)	
Lower leg	5.1 (8)	
Ankle	30.4 (48)	
Foot	7.6 (12)	
Location unspecified	0.6 (1)	
a The anatomic location of basketball-related injuries are expressed in percentage and total number of injuries.

Landing Technique and Ankle-dorsiflexion Range of Motion

The mean LESS score among the investigated athletes was 5.45 (± 2.34) points. There was no statistically significant difference between LESS scores in the groups with and without a three-month history of lower limb injuries (p = 0.167) (Table 4).

152316 Table 4. Landing Technique of the Athletes. LESS Score is expressed by the mean and standard deviation.

Variable	Total sample (n=362)	With history of lower limb injuries (n=57)	Without history of lower limb injuries (n=305)	p-⁠value	
LESS score	5.45 (± 2.34)	5.06 (± 2.41)	5.52 (± 2.32)	0.167	
LESS = landing error scoring system

The median ankle-dorsiflexion ROM obtained was 37.2° (IQR 9.1°). There was no statistically significant difference between the ROM asymmetry values obtained by the groups with and without a three-month history of lower limb injuries (p = 0.961) (Table 5).

152317 Table 5. Ankle-dorsiflexion Range of Motion Asymmetry of the Athletes. ADROM asymmetry is expressed by the median and interquartile range.

Variable	Total sample (n=500)	With history of lower limb injuries (n=86)	Without history of lower limb injuries (n=414)	p-⁠value	
ADROM asymmetry	2.30 (2.70)	2.15 (2.60)	2.30 (2.70)	0.961	
ADROM = ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion

Factors associated with Lower Limb Injuries

Table 6 describes the results of the multivariate analysis. Binomial logistic regression model showed that the category of the athlete was the only factor associated with the presence of a three-month history of lower limb injuries. LESS score (p = 0.105) and ankle-dorsiflexion ROM asymmetry (p = 0.529) were not associated with the presence of a three-month history of lower limb injuries.

152318 Table 6. Binary Logistic Regression Model

Variable	Distribution % (n)	OR (95% CI)	p-value	
Sex				
Female	16 (58)	1		
Male	84 (304)	1.26 (0.52-3.03)	0.599	
BMI (Kg/cm²)		0.97 (0.89-1.07)	0.641	
Category				
U-12	51 (185)	1		
U-13	25.7 (93)	1.82 (0.79-4.15)	0.155	
U-14	7 (25)	3.04 (0.92-10.03)	0.067	
U-15	6.1 (22)	7.66 (2.50-23.48)	<0.001	
U-17	6.3 (23)	7.64 (2.55-22.88)	<0.001	
U-19	3.9 (14)	10.34 (2.47-43.13)	0.001	
LESS score		0.89 (0.77-1.02)	0.105	
ADROM asymmetry		0.95 (0.83-1.10)	0.529	
OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, BMI = body mass index, ADROM = ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion, LESS = landing error scoring system.

Collinearity statistics of the included variables (tolerance): sex (0.80), BMI (0.93), category (0.94), ADROM asymmetry (0.97), LESS (0.95)

Predictive Measures of the model: accuracy (0.83), specificity (0.98), sensitivity (0.05) Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.143

DISCUSSION

The aims of this study were to describe the period prevalence of BRIs and to examine the association of lower limb injuries with landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion ROM asymmetry among youth basketball athletes. The three-month prevalence of BRIs among the investigated athletes was 23.2% and the majority of the reported injuries affected the lower limbs. The ankle and knee were the most common anatomical locations affected by injuries and sprains were the most common type of injury. There was no association of landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion ROM asymmetry with the history of lower limb injuries. Multivariate analysis showed that the category – meaning youth athletes were categorized by age for competition – was the only variable associated with the history of lower limb injuries.

Two previous studies conducted with youth basketball athletes found different period prevalence of BRIs, with values varying from 19.6% to 39%.27,28 The prevalence of BRIs may vary according to injury definition, seasonality of data collection, population characteristics and recall bias. Both previous studies adopted a ‘time loss’ injury definition and investigated a one-year prevalence of BRIs among youth basketball athletes with a similar mean age, but the level of participation and the weekly basketball exposure of the athletes varied across the studies. According to the age category, some athletes tend to present a greater probability of suffering a BRI. Pappas et al. also found an increase in injury rates for the five most common basketball injuries presenting to emergency departments when comparing 7- to 11-year-old category to 12- to 17-year-old category.29 One possible explanation for this difference is an increase in total exposure and intensity of basketball activities and findings of the multivariate analysis may offer support for this hypothesis.29,30 Leppänen et al. investigated competitive athletes participating in basketball activities for 9-10 hours/week and Vanderlei et al. investigated boys and girls participating in a sport initiation program – with a low level of training and competitiveness – during 6-7 hours/week.27,28 A broader injury definition was adopted in this study to investigate the three-month prevalence of BRIs in a sample of competitive athletes, but the injury prevalence found was similar to that reported by Vanderlei et al.27 It may have occurred because the recall period was lower, and the majority of the participants were from categories of initiation in competitive basketball – U-12 and U-13 – and presented a low weekly basketball exposure. A three-month recall period was adopted to reduce the influence of recall bias that may have affected prevalence estimations, but on the other hand this choice increased the influence of the seasonality of data collection in the results. Data collection was conducted during the beginning of the 2018 regular season and the three-month recall period included off-season months. Regarding anatomical location and type of the reported injuries, the current findings are similar to those reported in a recent systematic review and two prospective cohort studies conducted with high school and collegiate athletes. These studies results indicated that the majority of the BRIs affected the ankle and knee, and sprains were the most common type of injury.10–12

There was no association between landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion ROM and the history of lower limb injuries. These associations are not well established in the literature. Smith et al. found no association between LESS scores and ACL injuries among high-school and collegiate athletes of eight different sport modalities, but Padua et al. showed that a LESS score > 5 was associated to an increased risk of sustaining an ACL injury specifically among elite-youth soccer athletes.19,20 In the present study only basketball athletes were investigated, and the outcome was not ACL injury. Mean LESS score for total sample was 5.34 and both groups – with and without history of lower limb injuries, had a mean LESS score > 5. Regarding ankle-dorsiflexion ROM, three previous studies identified an association between ankle-dorsiflexion ROM, measured using the WBLT, and lower limb injuries. Backman and Danielson prospectively investigated youth basketball athletes and showed that an ankle-dorsiflexion ROM < 36.5° were associated with an increased risk of developing patellar tendinopathy during the season.21 In a case-control study conducted with collegiate athletes of eight different modalities, Kobayashi et al. found that an ankle-dorsiflexion ROM > 49.5° were associated with an increased risk of suffering recurrent lateral ankle sprain, but, on the other hand, a large prospective cohort study conducted with army recruits showed that an ankle-dorsiflexion ROM < 34° was associated with a five-fold risk of suffering a lateral ankle sprain.22,23 Based on these results, it is unclear if restriction of or excess of ankle-dorsiflexion ROM are associated with the occurrence of lower limb injuries. All three previous studies used the absolute ankle-dorsiflexion ROM value as the outcome. In the present study, ankle-dorsiflexion ROM asymmetry was adopted. Mean ankle-dorsiflexion ROM asymmetry for total sample was 2.30 and there was no difference when comparing the group with and without history of lower limb injuries. Absolute ankle-dorsiflexion ROM may be a more relevant variable to be further investigated. Age, sex, sport, and the injury defined as the outcome are potential factors that could influence this association.19,20 This study investigated only basketball athletes and participants were younger than the athletes investigated in these three previous studies. The majority of them were beginning in competitive basketball with a low weekly basketball exposure. Additionally, the outcome was lower limb injuries in general and not restricted to ACL injuries, patellar tendinopathy, or lateral ankle sprains. LESS and WBLT were proposed and previously investigated as screening tools for specific lower limb injuries, but the statistical power did not enable the consideration of these specific injuries as the outcomes in the current analysis.15,16 Statistical power was cited as a limitation by the authors of a previous study, and they raised the need for multicenter initiatives to better elucidate these associations.19

This study described the prevalence of BRI’s and investigated landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion ROM among a large sample of youth athletes from a specific sport. Regardless of these strengths, the study has some limitations. First, a cross-sectional study is not the ideal study design to measure injury rates and describe injury patterns due to the seasonality of data collection. Additionally, the associations found in a cross-sectional study are subjected to reverse causation and cannot establish causal relationships between the investigated variables and the occurrence of lower limb injuries. Second, a broader injury definition was adopted, all BRIs were self-reported and, due to recall bias, athletes were more prone to report substantial injuries and to potentially forget minor complaints. For ankle-dorsiflexion ROM evaluation, although previous face-to-face training on data collection procedures was conducted, it was not possible to conduct a reliability analysis of the raters because data collection occurred in different locations and had a different set of raters in each location. Ankle-dorsiflexion ROM asymmetry was used as the outcome because the laterality of the injuries was not collected. Previous studies adopted the absolute ROM of the affected limb as the outcome of the analysis which may affect the association.21–23 Lastly, although broader inclusion criteria were established, the majority of the sample was composed by male athletes from U-12 and U-13 basketball teams. All male U-12 basketball teams and 75% of the male U-13 basketball teams affiliated with the State Basketball Federation were investigated, but difficulties recruiting female and older male athletes reduced the external validity of the current findings.

Establishing the epidemiology and modifiable risk factors for injuries are essential to inform the development and the implementation of injury prevention interventions among different group of athletes.13,14 These results may influence future studies including prospective investigations to bring more solid data about the epidemiology of BRIs among youth basketball athletes and to better elucidate the role of landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion ROM as risk factors for lower limb injuries in this population. For clinical practice, although the current prevalence data is insufficient, in the absence of large prospective cohort studies, these results may be useful for clinicians to direct their injury prevention efforts for the most common BRIs observed among youth basketball athletes. Finally, clinicians should be cautious to infer the injury risk of youth basketball athletes solely based on the results of screening tests, such as LESS and WBLT. Screening tests may be applied, but we need to consider the multicausality of sports-related injuries and the predictive capacity of these tests when interpreting their results.

CONCLUSION

The three-month BRIs prevalence among youth basketball athletes was 23.2%. Although ankle sprains were the most frequent injury, landing technique and ankle-dorsiflexion ROM asymmetry were not associated with the history of lower limb injuries. The age category of the athlete was the only variable associated with the history of lower limb injuries.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
==== Refs
The ‘Sequence of Prevention’ for musculoskeletal injuries among recreational basketballers: a systematic review of the scientific literature The Physician and Sportsmedicine Kilic Özgür van Os Vivian Kemler Ellen Barendrecht Maarten Gouttebarge Vincent 16 1 2018
46 2 197 212 0091-3847 10.1080/00913847.2018.1424496 10.1080/00913847.2018.1424496
The NBA and youth basketball: Recommendations for promoting a healthy and positive experience Sports Medicine DiFiori John P. Güllich Arne Brenner Joel S. Côté Jean Hainline Brian Ryan Edward III Malina Robert M. Springer Science and Business Media LLC 30 6 2018
48 9 2053 2065 0112-1642 10.1007/s40279-018-0950-0 10.1007/s40279-018-0950-0 29961207
Diagnóstico Nacional Do Esporte (DIESPORTE) Ministério do Esporte (BR) 2015
2022-1-9 http://arquivo.esporte.gov.br/diesporte/7.php
Moderate to vigorous physical activity and sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents JAMA Ekelund Ulf Luan J Sherar L Esliger D Griew P Cooper A 15 2 2012
307 7 704 0098-7484 10.1001/jama.2012.156 10.1001/jama.2012.156 22337681
Does exercise influence pediatric bone? A systematic review Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research Specker Bonny Thiex Natalie W. Sudhagoni Ramu G. 11 2015
473 11 3658 3672 0009-921X 10.1007/s11999-015-4467-7 10.1007/s11999-015-4467-7 26208606
A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: Informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity Eime Rochelle M Young Janet A Harvey Jack T Charity Melanie J Payne Warren R Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2013
10 1 98 1479-5868 10.1186/1479-5868-10-98 10.1186/1479-5868-10-98 23945179
Risk factors for sports injuries -- a methodological approach British Journal of Sports Medicine Bahr R 1 10 2003
37 5 384 392 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsm.37.5.384 10.1136/bjsm.37.5.384 14514527
Injury risk in professional basketball players The American Journal of Sports Medicine Deitch John R. Starkey Chad Walters Sheri L. Moseley J. Bruce SAGE Publications 7 2006
34 7 1077 1083 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546505285383 10.1177/0363546505285383 16493173
The epidemiology of US high school basketball injuries, 2005–2007 The American Journal of Sports Medicine Borowski Laurel A. Yard Ellen E. Fields Sarah K. Comstock R. Dawn SAGE Publications 2 9 2008
36 12 2328 2335 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546508322893 10.1177/0363546508322893
The first decade of web-based sports injury surveillance: Descriptive epidemiology of injuries in US high school boys’ basketball (2005–2006 through 2013–2014) and National Collegiate Athletic Association men’s basketball (2004–2005 through 2013–2014) Journal of Athletic Training Clifton Daniel R. Onate James A. Hertel Jay Pierpoint Lauren A. Currie Dustin W. Wasserman Erin B. Knowles Sarah B. Dompier Thomas P. Marshall Stephen W. Comstock R. Dawn Kerr Zachary Y. 1 11 2018
53 11 1025 1036 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-148-17 10.4085/1062-6050-148-17 30715912
The first decade of web-based sports injury surveillance: Descriptive epidemiology of injuries in US high school girls’ basketball (2005–2006 through 2013–2014) and National Collegiate Athletic Association women’s basketball (2004–2005 through 2013–2014) Journal of Athletic Training Clifton Daniel R. Hertel Jay Onate James A. Currie Dustin W. Pierpoint Lauren A. Wasserman Erin B. Knowles Sarah B. Dompier Thomas P. Comstock R. Dawn Marshall Stephen W. Kerr Zachary Y. 1 11 2018
53 11 1037 1048 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-150-17 10.4085/1062-6050-150-17 30715913
Epidemiology of sports injuries in basketball: integrative systematic review BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Andreoli Carlos Vicente Chiaramonti Bárbara Camargo Biruel Elisabeth Pochini Alberto de Castro Ejnisman Benno Cohen Moises BMJ 12 2018
4 1 e000468 2055-7647 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000468 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000468 30687514
Incidence, severity, aetiology and prevention of sports injuries Sports Medicine van Mechelen Willem Hlobil Hynek Kemper Han C.G. 8 1992
14 2 82 99 0112-1642 10.2165/00007256-199214020-00002 10.2165/00007256-199214020-00002 1509229
A new framework for research leading to sports injury prevention Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Finch Caroline 5 2006
9 1-2 3 9 1440-2440 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.02.009 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.02.009 16616614
Musculoskeletal screening and functional testing: considerations for basketball athletes Int J Sports Phys Ther Bird S.P. Markwick W.J. 2016
11 5 784 802 27757291
A systematic evaluation of field-based screening methods for the assessment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk Sports Medicine Fox Aaron S. Bonacci Jason McLean Scott G. Spittle Michael Saunders Natalie 2016
46 5 715 735 0112-1642 10.1007/s40279-015-0443-3 10.1007/s40279-015-0443-3 26626070
The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a valid and reliable clinical assessment tool of jump-landing biomechanics The American Journal of Sports Medicine Padua Darin A. Marshall Stephen W. Boling Michelle C. Thigpen Charles A. Garrett William E., Jr. Beutler Anthony I. 2 9 2009
37 10 1996 2002 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546509343200 10.1177/0363546509343200
Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion Australian Journal of Physiotherapy Bennell Kim Talbot Richard Wajswelner Henry Techovanich Wassana Kelly David Hall AJ 1998
44 3 175 180 0004-9514 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60377-9 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60377-9 11676731
A prospective evaluation of the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) as a screening tool for anterior cruciate ligament injury risk The American Journal of Sports Medicine Smith Helen C. Johnson Robert J. Shultz Sandra J. Tourville Timothy Holterman Leigh Ann Slauterbeck James Vacek Pamela M. Beynnon Bruce D. 2012
40 3 521 526 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546511429776 10.1177/0363546511429776 22116669
The Landing Error Scoring System as a screening tool for an anterior cruciate ligament injury–prevention program in elite-youth soccer athletes Journal of Athletic Training Padua Darin A. DiStefano Lindsay J. Beutler Anthony I. de la Motte Sarah J. DiStefano Michael J. Marshall Steven W. 1 6 2015
50 6 589 595 1062-6050 10.4085/1062-6050-50.1.10 10.4085/1062-6050-50.1.10 25811846
Low range of ankle dorsiflexion predisposes for patellar tendinopathy in junior elite basketball players The American Journal of Sports Medicine Backman Ludvig J. Danielson Patrik SAGE Publications 14 9 2011
39 12 2626 2633 0363-5465 10.1177/0363546511420552 10.1177/0363546511420552
Intrinsic predictive factors of noncontact lateral ankle sprain in collegiate athletes Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Kobayashi Takumi Yoshida Masahiro Yoshida Makoto Gamada Kazuyoshi 1 12 2013
1 7 232596711351816 2325-9671 10.1177/2325967113518163 10.1177/2325967113518163 26535263
Effects of ankle dorsiflexion range and pre-exercise calf muscle stretching on injury risk in Army recruits Australian Journal of Physiotherapy Pope Rodney Herbert Rob Kirwan John 1998
44 3 165 172 0004-9514 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60376-7 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60376-7 11676730
The Orchard Sports Injury Classification System (OSICS) Version 10 Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine Rae Katherine Orchard John 5 2007
17 3 201 204 1050-642X 10.1097/jsm.0b013e318059b536 10.1097/jsm.0b013e318059b536 17513912
Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures in studies of football (soccer) injuries British Journal of Sports Medicine Fuller C W 1 3 2006
40 3 193 201 0306-3674 10.1136/bjsm.2005.025270 10.1136/bjsm.2005.025270 16505073
Mobile smartphone applications for body position measurement in rehabilitation: A review of goniometric tools PM&R Milani Patrizia Coccetta Carlo Alberto Rabini Alessia Sciarra Tommaso Massazza Giuseppe Ferriero Giorgio 15 5 2014
6 11 1038 1043 1934-1482 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.05.003 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.05.003
Sports injuries among adolescent basketball players according to position on the court International Archives of Medicine Vanderlei Franciele Marques Bastos Fabio Nascimento de Lemes Ítalo Ribeiro Vanderlei Luiz Carlos Marques Júnior Jayme Netto Pastre Carlos Marcelo Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2013
6 1 5 1755-7682 10.1186/1755-7682-6-5 10.1186/1755-7682-6-5 23402247
Overuse injuries in youth basketball and floorball Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine Leppänen Mari Pasanen Kati Kujala Urho M Parkkari Jari 5 2015
2015 173 173 1179-1543 10.2147/oajsm.s82305 10.2147/oajsm.s82305 26045679
The epidemiology of pediatric basketball injuries presenting to US emergency departments: 2000-2006 Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach Pappas Evangelos Zazulak Bohdanna T. Yard Ellen E. Hewett Timothy E. SAGE Publications 1 6 2011
3 4 331 335 1941-7381 10.1177/1941738111409861 10.1177/1941738111409861 23016025
Injury risk is different in team and individual youth sport Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Theisen Daniel Frisch Anne Malisoux Laurent Urhausen Axel Croisier Jean-Louis Seil Romain 5 2013
16 3 200 204 1440-2440 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.07.007 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.07.007 22902319
