
==== Front
Blood Adv
Blood Adv
Blood Advances
2473-9529
2473-9537
The American Society of Hematology

S2473-9529(24)00272-6
10.1182/bloodadvances.2024012646
Clinical Trials and Observations
Long-term outcomes of peripheral blood stem cell unrelated donors mobilized with filgrastim∗
Stefanski Heather E. hstefans@nmdp.org
1∗
Kuxhausen Michelle 1
Bo-Subait Stephanie 1
Kobusingye Hati 1
Mattila Deborah 1
Schenfeld Jennifer 2
Sandschafer Darcie 2
De Oliveira Brandao Cisio 2
Burns Linda J. 3
Shaw Bronwen E. 4
Pulsipher Michael A. 5
Miller John P. 1
Devine Steven M. 1
1 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, NMDP, Minneapolis, MN
2 Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA
3 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
4 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
5 Huntsman Cancer Institute/Intermountain Primary Children’s Hospital, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
∗ Correspondence: Heather E. Stefanski, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, NMDP, 500 North 5th St, Minneapolis, MN 54001; hstefans@nmdp.org
03 5 2024
13 8 2024
03 5 2024
8 15 41964206
23 1 2024
17 4 2024
© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.
2024
The American Society of Hematology
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Key Points

• This was a prospective long-term follow-up study including 14 530 PBSC and 7123 BM volunteer URDs from NMDP.

• PBSC and BM donors had no differences in incidence rates for myeloid, lymphoid, other cancers, autoimmune diseases, or thrombotic events.

Visual Abstract

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a life-saving procedure used to treat a variety of devastating diseases. It requires hematopoietic stem cells collected via filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) or bone marrow (BM) harvest from volunteer unrelated donors (URDs). There is a paucity of safety data regarding donors’ long-term adverse events. This prospective, observational study combined PBSC donors enrolled in the NMDP Investigational New Drug trial and BM donors between 1 July 1999 and 30 September 2015. The primary objective was to describe the long-term incidence of myeloid malignancies. The secondary objectives included describing the long-term incidence of lymphoid malignancies, nonhematologic malignancies, autoimmune disorders, and thrombotic events. A total of 21 643 donors (14 530 PBSCs and 7123 BM) were included. The incidence rate of myeloid disorders per 100 000 person-years in donors of PBSCs was 2.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-7.84) and in donors of BM, it was 4.13 (95% CI, 1.33-12.8). The incidence rate ratio of PBSCs/BM donors was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.12-3.03; P = .55). The incidence of other malignancies, autoimmunity, and thrombosis did not differ between the donor types. This comprehensive study of the long-term effects of filgrastim in URDs of PBSCs provides strong evidence that donors who receive filgrastim are not at an increased risk of these events compared with BM donors. It also provides reassurance to current donors undergoing stem cell mobilization as well as individuals considering joining stem cell registries, such as NMDP.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a life-saving procedure for the treatment of devastating diseases. The NMDP was established in 1987 to facilitate allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from anonymous, volunteer adult unrelated donors (URDs) to patients in need. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are typically collected from URDs in 2 ways: either via bone marrow (BM) harvest or by recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection. BM has been used as a source of HSC since the 1960s1; however, since the recognition that HSC can be mobilized from the BM by filgrastim treatment and collected via apheresis in the 1990s, PBSCs have been increasingly used.2,3 The data collected to date have primarily focused on short-term side effects for both BM and PBSC donors.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22

Previous reports have suggested that filgrastim increases the risk of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in patients with severe chronic neutropenia,23 breast cancer,24,25 and lung cancer.25 There have also been reports of URDs that developed myeloid malignancies after receiving filgrastim;26,27 however, additional studies with longer follow-up provided reassurance that filgrastim does not increase the risk of cancer in URDs.11,28, 29, 30, 31, 32

It has been documented that autoimmune diseases such as iritis can rarely be exacerbated after filgrastim administration in normal donors.33 Worsening autoimmune diseases can also be seen in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS),34,35 systemic lupus erythematosus,36, 37, 38 rheumatoid arthritis,39 and other immune-mediated vasculidities40, 41, 42 when treated for neutropenia with filgrastim.

Thrombosis is of concern as a side effect of filgrastim. Administration of filgrastim leads to a potentially prothrombotic state via stimulation of tissue factors and increased endothelial markers.43 Additionally, there have been reports of healthy donors having acute arterial thrombosis related to filgrastim.44

Since 1997, NMDP has maintained an Investigational New Drug (IND) application, accepted by the Food and Drug Administration for the manufacture of PBSC products from URDs. To address whether filgrastim administration in URDs has significant long-term consequences, we evaluated the incidence of malignant, autoimmune, and thrombotic disorders after HSC donation from PBSC donors. The results of this study, the largest and most comprehensive, are presented in this manuscript.

Design and methods

The NMDP initiated an IND to collect adverse events (AEs) for donors who underwent PBSC donation in 1997. All donors were mobilized with subcutaneous filgrastim (Neupogen; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) at an approximate dose of 10 μg/kg per day for 5 days. The study population presented in this article was comprised of 2 cohorts of URDs from the United States and was activated on 1 October 2010, with all follow-up being completed by 30 September 2020. There was an early group, registered either prospectively on the NMDP PBSC IND trial or, if a BM donor, on the NMDP Registry BM follow-up trial between 1 July 1999 and 30 September 2010, and a later donor group who underwent collection from 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2015. The trials were approved by the NMDP Institutional Review Board.

The primary objective of this study was to describe the long-term incidence of malignant myeloid disorders (AML, myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic myelogenous leukemia, or chronic myeloproliferative disorders) in PBSC and BM donors and to compare the incidences between the donor cohorts, with BM donors serving as the control. The secondary objectives were to describe malignant lymphoid disorders (acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, or non-Hodgkin lymphoma), nonhematologic malignant disorders (as defined by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER] Program database45), autoimmune diseases, and thrombotic events (venous and arterial) in PBSC and BM donors.

Donors completed biennial surveys to report new diagnoses of malignancy, autoimmune, or thrombotic (MAT) events over ∼10 years, until the study conclusion. All donor follow-up assessments were administered by trained staff members of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Survey Research Group (SRG) and Donor Center staff. Donors were asked if they had developed any cancers or autoimmune disorders, or had a blood clot anywhere other than where they had an IV placed because their donation or previous follow-up, and if yes, when the diagnosis occurred.

When donors reported a MAT event, the SRG requested a medical records release form and contacted donors’ clinics to obtain relevant medical records. NMDP medical staff reviewed and then documented whether the reported MAT event was correct and occurred after collection, correct but occurred before collection, incorrect or not a MAT event, duplicative of a previously reported event, or unverified with existing records. If a donor did not return a medical records release form or SRG was unable to obtain records from their clinic, the reported MAT event was coded as unverified.

Subjects

Inclusion criteria included: URDs who donated either BM or PBSC between 1 July 1999 and 30 September 2015; URDs who received at least 1 injection of filgrastim or more but did not donate PBSC between 1 July 1999 and 30 September 2015; donation was managed by a participating US donor center; and URDs provided informed consent for participation in this study. Exclusion criteria included URD who donated filgrastim-mobilized BM, donation managed by a non-US donor center, or donor was unable to verbally communicate in any of the following languages: English, Spanish, Mandarin Chinese, Cantonese Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean, or Portuguese. This study was registered as EUPAS19126 and as NCT01362179.

Statistical methods

Counts and percentages were used to describe the frequencies of donor characteristics. Donors in the BM group included those who later underwent filgrastim mobilization, and outcomes from BM donation were censored at the time of mobilization. Donors in the PBSC group who had previously donated BM were followed for outcomes as part of the PBSC group. A descriptive analysis was used to estimate the overall and age-specific incidence rates of MAT events. Rate ratios for MAT events were estimated for donors of PBSC vs BM. To determine if there were differences in myeloid, lymphoid, and other cancer events in donors who donated PBSC or BM compared with the general population, we used the SEER Program database,45 which provides incidence rates on cancer statistics among the US population, as a post hoc analysis. Age-adjusted rates were calculated using the 2000 US Standard Population. P values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all rate ratios were calculated using Poisson regression methods. A P value of <.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were done using SAS version 9.4 (Cary, NC).

Results

A total of 32 634 donors were contacted to participate in this study (Figure 1) and 21 833 (66.9%) donors were enrolled. Of the subjects enrolled, 39 donors withdrew and 141 subjects with missing data were removed, leaving 21 653 donors in the final analyses. The total donor years were 118 720 and 72 643 for donors of PBSC and BM, respectively.Figure 1. Study enrollment flowchart.

The demographics of the donors are described in Table 1. There were 14 530 donors in the PBSC cohort, of whom 3.6% had previously donated BM. Most PBSC donors were male (59%) and white (76%). The median age (range) at the first filgrastim injection was 33 (18-62) years and the median time to follow-up was 7 years (0.6-20.2) (Table 1). There were 7123 donors in the BM donor cohort, of whom 6.3% were later exposed to filgrastim. Most BM donors were male (57%) and White (71%). The median age (range) at the first BM collection was 35 years (19-61), and the median time of follow-up after collection was 9 years (0-29.2).Table 1. Demographic characteristics of donors

Characteristic	PBSC donors
n (%)	BM donors
n (%)	P value	
No. of donors	14 530	7123		
No. of filgrastim exposures, n (%)				
 1	13 579 (93)	N/A		
 2	416 (3)	N/A		
 3	6 (<1)	N/A		
No. of BM donations, n (%)				
 1	N/A	6496 (91)		
 2	N/A	169 (2)		
 3	N/A	12 (<1)		
No. of both BM donations and filgrastim exposures∗, n (%)			.846	
 1 BM donation,1 filgrastim exposure	498 (3)	416 (6)		
 1 BM donation, 2 filgrastim exposures	13 (<1)	12 (<1)		
 2 BM donations, 1 filgrastim exposure	18 (<1)	18 (<1)		
Sex, n (%)			.019	
 Female	5975 (41)	3048 (43)		
 Male	8 555 (59)	4075 (57)		
Race, n (%)			<.001	
 White	10 980 (76)	5070 (71)		
 Hispanic	1 252 (9)	798 (11)		
 Black	498 (3)	396 (6)		
 Asian/Pacific Islander	800 (6)	407 (6)		
 Native American	103 (1)	68 (1)		
 Multiple races/other	848 (6)	360 (5)		
 Unknown/decline	49 (<1)	24 (<1)		
Age at first BM collection or first filgrastim injection, y, n (%)			<.001	
 Median (min-max)	33 (18-62)	35 (19-61)	<.001	
 18-29	5 896 (41)	2542 (36)		
 30-39	3 871 (27)	2186 (31)		
 40-49	3 231 (22)	1804 (25)		
 50+	1 532 (11)	591 (8)		
Year of first BM collection or first filgrastim injection, n (%)			<.001	
 1989	0	1 (<1)		
 1990	0	4 (<1)		
 1991	0	3 (<1)		
 1992	0	7 (<1)		
 1993	0	19 (<1)		
 1994	0	9 (<1)		
 1995	0	10 (<1)		
 1996	0	25 (<1)		
 1997	0	30 <1)		
 1998	0	36 (1)		
 1999	15 (<1)	281 (4)		
 2000	137 (1)	492 (7)		
 2001	195 (1)	435 (6)		
 2002	317 (2)	457 (6)		
 2003	466 (3)	375 (5)		
 2004	453 (3)	307 (4)		
 2005	537 (4)	243 (3)		
 2006	587 (4)	272 (4)		
 2007	652 (4)	276 (4)		
 2008	777 (5)	280 (4)		
 2009	850 (6)	297 (4)		
 2010	1 001 (7)	329 (5)		
 2011	1 450 (10)	510 (7)		
 2012	1 772 (12)	656 (9)		
 2013	2 010 (14)	656 (9)		
 2014	1 817 (13)	625 (9)		
 2015	1 479 (10)	484 (7)		
 2016	15 (<1)	4 (<1)		
Median (min-max) follow-up, y	7.0 (0.6-20.2)	9.0 (0.0-29.2)	<.001	
N/A, not applicable; min, minimum; max, maximum; y, years.

∗ Donors in the BM group who later had exposure to filgrastim were censored at the time of filgrastim exposure.

Myeloid malignancies

The incidence rate of myeloid disorders in PBSC donors was 2.53 (95% CI, 0.82-7.84) and in BM donors was 4.13 (95% CI, 1.33-12.8) per 100 000 person-years (Table 2). The incidence rate ratio of PBSC/BM donors was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.12-3.03; P = .55) (Table 2). The incidence rates by age range are shown in Table 3., Table 4., Table 5. but as shown, there were very few events in both groups (3 each).Table 2. Incidence rates of MAT events

Outcomes	PBSC donors	BM donors	Rate ratio (95% CI)	P value	
Person-years	No. of events	Incidence rate∗ (95% CI)	Person-years	No. of events	Incidence rate∗ (95% CI)	
Myeloid	118 712	3	2.53 (0.82-7.84)	72 641	3	4.13 (1.33-12.8)	0.61 (0.12-3.03)	.55	
Lymphoid	118 649	17	14.33 (8.91-23.05)	72 572	10	13.78 (7.41-25.61)	1.04 (0.48-2.27)	.92	
Other malignancies	116 213	535	460.36 (423.0-501.0)	70 553	368	521.59 (471.1-577.6)	0.88 (0.77-1.00)	.05	
Autoimmune	116 566	449	385.19 (351.2-422.4)	71 269	262	367.62 (325.8-414.9)	1.03 (0.89-1.21)	.66	
Thrombosis	117 977	156	132.23 (113.0-154.7)	72 172	95	131.63 (107.7-160.9)	1.01 (0.78-1.30)	.95	
CI, Confidence interval

∗ Incidence rate per 100 000 person-years.

Table 3. Incidence rate of MAT events, stratified by age: crude incidence rate of MAT events in PBSC donors

Age, years	18-29	30-39	40-49	50+	
No. of donors	5896	3871	3231	1532	
Donor-years	41 450	33 548	29 717	13 969	
Myeloid					
 Donor-years	41 444	33 584	29 715	13 968	
 Events	1	0	1	1	
 Crude rate∗	2.41	0.00	3.37	7.16	
 95% CI	(0.341-7.13)	N/A	(0.47-23.89)	(1.01-50.82)	
Lymphoid					
 Donor-years	41 432	33 558	29 704	13 956	
 Events	4	5	5	3	
 Crude rate∗	9.65	14.90	16.83	21.50	
 95% CI	(3.62-25.72)	(6.20-35.79)	(7.01-40.44)	(6.93-66.64)	
Other malignancies					
 Donor-years	41 249	33 099	28 644	13 221	
 Events	49	105	225	156	
 Crude rate∗	118.79	317.23	785.50	1179.97	
 95% CI	(89.80-157.2)	(262.1-384.0)	(689.6-894.7)	(1009.5-1379.1)	
Autoimmune					
 Donor-years	40 855	32 915	29 105	13 690	
 Events	137	140	115	57	
 Crude rate∗	335.33	425.34	395.12	416.35	
 95% CI	(238.7-396.4)	(360.5-501.8)	(329.2-474.2)	(321.3-539.5)	
Thrombosis					
 Donor-years	41 345	33 401	29 409	13 821	
 Events	25	40	60	31	
 Crude rate∗	60.47	119.76	204.02	224.29	
 95% CI	(40.86-89.48)	(87.86-163.2)	(158.5-262.7)	(157.8-318.8)	
CI, Confidence Interval

∗ Incidence rate per 100 000 person-years.

Table 4. Incidence rate of MAT events, stratified by age: crude incidence rate of MAT events in BM donors by age

Age, years	18-29	30-39	40-49	50+	
No. of donors	2542	2186	1804	591	
Donor-years	21 549	23 995	20 671	6428	
Myeloid					
 Donor-years	21 549	23 993	20 671	6428	
 Events	0	2	1	0	
 Crude rate∗	0.00	8.34	4.84	0.00	
 95% CI	N/A	2.08-33.33	0.68-34.34	N/A	
Lymphoid					
 Donor-years	21 547	23 985	20 653	6387	
 Events	1	3	2	4	
 Crude rate∗	4.64	12.51	9.68	62.63	
 95% CI	0.65-32.95	4.03-38.78	2.42-38.72	23.51-166.8	
Other malignancies					
 Donor-years	21 305	23 513	19 786	5949	
 Events	41	91	156	80	
 Crude rate∗	192.44	387.02	788.45	1344.74	
 95% CI	141.7-261.3	315.3-475.1	674.4-921.8	1081.7-1671.8	
Autoimmune					
 Donor-years	21 194	23 611	20 208	6257	
 Events	73	71	84	34	
 Crude rate∗	344.44	300.71	415.67	543.43	
 95% CI	273.9-433.1	238.4-379.3	335.8-514.6	388.6-759.8	
Thrombosis					
 Donor-years	21 460	23 871	20 506	6335	
 Events	20	27	34	14	
 Crude rate∗	93.19	113.11	165.80	221.01	
 95% CI	60.14-144.4	77.58-164.9	118.5-232.0	131.0-372.9	
N/A, not applicable; CI, Confidence Interval.

∗ Incidence rate per 100 000 person-years.

Table 5. Incidence rate of MAT events, stratified by age: incidence rate ratio of observed MAT events in PBSC donors and BM donors by age

Age, years	18-29	30-39	40-49	50+	
Myeloid					
 Rate ratio	NE	NE	0.70	NE	
 95% CI			0.04-11.2		
 P value			.80		
Lymphoid					
 Rate ratio	2.09	1.20	1.75	0.34	
 95% CI	0.23-18.7	0.29-5.00	0.34-9.01	0.08-1.53	
 P value	.51	.81	.50	.16	
Other malignancies					
 Rate ratio	0.61	0.81	0.98	0.89	
 95% CI	0.40-0.92	0.61-1.07	0.80-1.21	0.68-1.17	
 P value	.02∗	.1344	.87	.41	
Autoimmune					
 Rate ratio	0.98	1.42	0.93	0.74	
 95% CI	0.73-1.30	1.06-1.89	0.70-1.24	0.48-1.13	
 P value	.86	.02∗	.62	.16	
Thrombosis					
 Rate ratio	0.69	1.04	1.24	1.01	
 95% CI	0.38-1.24	0.63-1.69	0.81-1.88	0.54-1.90	
 P value	.21	.89	.32	.97	
NE, not evaluable; CI, Confidence Interval.

∗ Statistically significant result (P < .05).

Lymphoid malignancies

The incidence rate of lymphoid malignancies in PBSC donors was 14.33 (95% CI, 8.91-23.05) and that in BM donors was 13.78 (95% CI, 7.41-25.61) per 100 000 person-years (Table 2). The incidence rate ratio was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.48-2.27; P = .92) (Table 2). The crude incidence rate was highest in donors >50 years of age in both PBSC (21.50; 95% CI, 6.93-66.64) (Table 3) and BM donors (62.63; 95% CI, 23.51-166.8) (Table 4) and the incidence rate ratio for donors >50 years of age was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.08-1.53; P = .16) (Table 5).

Nonhematologic malignancies

The incidence rate of nonhematologic malignancies, as defined in the SEER database, for PBSC donors was 460.36 (95% CI, 423.0-501.0) and in BM donors was 521.59 (95% CI, 471.1-577.6) per 100 000 person-years with an incidence rate ratio of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77-1.00; P = .05) (Table 2). The crude incidence rates of other malignancies increased as donors aged in both PBSC and BM donors (Tables 3-4). However, in the 18 to 29 age group, there was a statistically significant incidence rate ratio of other malignancies (0.61, 95% CI, 0.40-0.92; P = .02) (Table 5) with the BM group having increased numbers of other types of malignancies, although the numbers were very low. The incidence rate ratio was not statistically significant in the other age groups.

Autoimmune diseases

The incidence rate of autoimmune diseases (eg, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, vasculitides, MS, and immune thrombocytopenia, etc) in PBSC donors was 385.19 (95% CI, 351.2-422.4) and in BM donors was 367.62 (95% CI, 325.8-414.9) per 100 000 person-years with an incidence rate ratio of 1.03 (95% CI, 0.89-1.21; P = .66) (Table 2). Interestingly, there was a significant difference in the incidence rate ratio among donors aged 30 to 39 years. The PBSC donors had an incidence rate of 425.3 (95% CI, 360.5-501.8) (Table 3), and the BM donors had an incidence rate of 300.71 (95% CI, 238.4-379.3) (Table 4) and an incidence rate ratio of 1.42 (95% CI, 1.06-1.89; P = .02) (Table 5). This phenomenon was not observed in other age groups.

Thrombotic events

The incidence rate of thrombotic events in PBSC donors was 132.23 (95% CI, 113.0-154.7) and in BM donors it was 131.63 (95% CI, 107.7-160.9) per 100 000 person-years and the incidence rate ratio was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.78-1.30; P = .95). The incidence of thrombotic events was not different between PBSC and BM donors in the different age groups (Table 3., Table 4., Table 5.).

SEER data comparison

To address the differences between the 2 cohorts and the general population, the SEER database was used, and age-adjusted rates were calculated using the 2000 US Standard Population.45 The general population was more likely to have all types of cancer than PBSC donors (Table 6). The incidence rate of myeloid malignancies in PBSC donors was 2.53 (95% CI, 0.82-7.84) and 17.91 (95% CI, 17.85-17.96) in the general population with a rate ratio of 0.14 (95% CI, 0.05-0.44; P < .001), in lymphoid malignancies the incidence rate in PBSC donors was 14.33 (95% CI, 8.91-23.05) and 33.76 (95% CI, 33.68-33.84) in the general population with a rate ratio of 0.42 (95% CI, 0.26-0.68; P < .001), and in other malignancies the incidence rate in PBSC donors was 460.36 (95% CI, 423.0-501.0) and 568.3 (95% CI, 567.9-568.6) in the general population with a rate ratio of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74-0.88; P < .001) (Table 6). The incidence rate of myeloid malignancies in BM donors was 4.13 (95% CI, 1.33-12.8) and 17.91 (95% CI, 17.85-17.96) in the general population with a rate ratio of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.07-0.72; P = .011), in lymphoid malignancies the incidence rate in BM donors was 13.78 (95% CI, 7.41-25.61) and 33.76 (95% CI, 33.68-33.84) in the general population with a rate ratio of 0.41 (95% CI, 0.22-0.76; P = .005), and in other malignancies the incidence rate in BM donors was 521.59 (95% CI, 471.1-577.6) and 568.3 (95% CI, 567.9-568.6) in the general population with a rate ratio of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-1.02; P = .100) (Table 7).Table 6. Age-adjusted incidence rates of malignancies in donors compared with the US general population: PBSC donors vs US general population (SEER)

Outcomes	PBSC donors	US general
population (SEER)	Rate ratio (95% CI)	P value	
Person, -years	No. of events	Incidence rate∗ (95% CI)	Person-years	No. of events	Incidence rate∗ (95% CI)	
Myeloid	118 712	3	2.53 (0.82-7.84)	2 211 987 365	396 134	17.91 (17.85-17.96)	0.14 (0.05-0.44)	<.001†	
Lymphoid	118 649	17	14.33 (8.91-23.05)	2 211 987 365	746 740	33.76 (33.68-33.84)	0.42 (0.26-0.68)	<.001†	
Other malignancies	116 213	535	460.36 (423.0-501.0)	2 211 987 365	12 569 821	568.3 (567.9-568.6)	0.81 (0.74-0.88)	<.001†	
CI, Confidence Interval

∗ Age-adjusted incidence rate per 100 000 person-years.

† Result is statistically significant (P < .05).

Table 7. Age-adjusted incidence rates of malignancies in donors compared with the US general population: BM donors vs US general population (SEER)

Outcomes	BM donors	US general
population (SEER)	Rate ratio (95% CI)	P value	
Person- years	No. of events	Incidence rate∗ (95% CI)	Person-years	No. of events	Incidence rate∗ (95% CI)	
Myeloid	72 641	3	4.13 (1.33-12.8)	2 211 987 365	396 134	17.91 (17.85-17.96)	0.23 (0.07-0.72)	.011†	
Lymphoid	72 572	10	13.78 (7.41-25.61)	2 211 987 365	746 740	33.76 (33.68-33.84)	0.41 (0.22-0.76)	.005†	
Other malignancies	70 553	368	521.59 (471.1-577.6)	2 211 987 365	12 569 821	568.3 (567.9-568.6)	0.92 (0.83-1.02)	.100	
∗ Age-adjusted incidence rate per 100 000 person-years.

† Result is statistically significant (P < .05).

Discussion

This is the largest and most comprehensive study on the long-term outcomes in URDs. This provides evidence that filgrastim in the setting of mobilization of PBSC in URDs is not associated with an increase in hematological or nonhematological malignancies, nor is it associated with an increase in autoimmune disorders or thrombotic events.

Concerns were raised about the association between filgrastim and AML due to several reports. Bennett et al26 published 2 cases of AML among 200 individuals who had received filgrastim. In these cases, matched sibling donors, who donated PBSC to their siblings with AML, developed AML ∼4 years after filgrastim exposure. NMDP reviewed their donor outcomes and published on 20 cases of cancer (none of them leukemia or lymphoma) reported among 4015 URDs who had passed their first anniversary of PBSC donation.46 There have been reports from multiple registries that looked at the incidence of cancer after donation during different time frames in PBSC donors. Nacheva et al32 tested 50 PBSC donors for mutations common in hematological malignancies and showed that PBSC samples collected before, on the day of donation, and 90 and 180 days after filgrastim administration had no damaging effects on the genome integrity and did not differ between samples from individuals who donated BM 3 to 5 years prior or healthy people. Additional reports by NMDP showed no increase in cancer, autoimmune diseases, or stroke related to filgrastim in 6768 PBSC donors.17 MD Anderson reported that none of the 343 donors from their institution had been diagnosed with acute or chronic leukemia with a median follow-up of 39 months.47 The Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation reported a long-term follow-up of 1708 PBSC donors and showed no difference in hematological malignancies compared with a retrospective cohort of BM donors.48 A prospective Swedish national cohort study analyzed cancer incidence after donation in 1082 Swedish PBSC donors and did not find differences in the incidence of hematological malignancies or other malignancies between PBSC donors and BM donors or nondonating siblings.49 Notably, different formulations of filgrastim have been used in URDs, such as lenograstim or biosimilars, and data have shown no differences in efficacy or side effects.50, 51, 52, 53 Moreover, the World Marrow Donor Association has recommended that biosimilars may be used for mobilization51 and have a mechanism for the ongoing surveillance of donor adverse events.54 Although the PBSC donors in this study received Neupogen, these results could be applicable to donors who received other types of filgrastim. To our knowledge, the study presented here is the first study that analyzed long-term effects of filgrastim on URDs over a 10-year period and confirmed no association between PBSC donors and an increased risk of any type of malignancy, including myeloid, lymphoid, or other types of cancer, compared with BM donors.

Other studies have compared the cancer rates between PBSC donors and the general population. Hölig et11 al published the results of 3928 PBSC donors at the University of Dresen and showed that malignancies were found in 0.3% of the donors; the incidence of Hodgkin lymphoma differed significantly compared with the general population. There was not an increased risk of Hodgkin lymphoma in our study; however, the number of donors was much greater in this study and was more reassuring than in the previous study.11 Halter et al30 published a retrospective multicenter EBMT study covering 51 024 first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donations (27 770 BM donors and 23 254 PBSC donors) from predominantly related donors and found that the incidence of hematological malignancies was below the age-specific incidence in the normal population. To elucidate whether PBSC donors were more likely to develop cancer than the general population, we used the SEER database for comparison. URDs that donate BM and PBSC are, in general, healthier than the general population, as they are younger and must also meet the eligibility criteria to donate, and their overall rates of cancer are lower. An important consideration for PBSC and BM donors is that follow-up is shorter than the lifetime follow-up of the general population. However, this comparison suggests that filgrastim did not potentiate cancer risk in this population, and the findings presented here give additional reassurance that both hematological and nonhematological malignancies are not increased in PBSC donors.

One of the secondary objectives of this study was to determine whether filgrastim increased the incidence of autoimmune disorders. Filgrastim has been used in patients with lupus, MS, Felty syndrome, and temporal arteritis to treat neutropenia.35, 36, 37, 38,40, 41, 42 In URDs who received filgrastim, we did not see an increase in the incidence of the development of autoimmune diseases. However, when the results were stratified based on age, PBSC donors that were 30 to 39 years of age had a higher risk of having autoimmune diseases than BM donors, although the numbers of events were very low (140/3871 [3.6%]). This same phenomenon was not observed in other age ranges. A recent report by Conrad et al55 estimates that 1 of 10 people are affected by autoimmune diseases; the 3.6% observed in the 30 to 39 PBSC age group is less than the expected rate in the general population, giving support that short-term filgrastim use in a donor does not appear to potentiate autoimmune disorders. The low incidence of autoimmune disorders in BM donors could be because BM donors at risk could have been screened out before donation.

Thrombosis has been a concern as a side effect of filgrastim due to reports of arterial thrombosis and a potentially increased prothrombotic state.43,44 This study showed that the incidence of thrombotic events in PBSC donors was not increased compared with BM donors. This confirmed evidence from another report showing stroke was not increased in PBSC donors17 and that short-term-filgrastim use does not appear to be associated with thrombosis.

There are several limitations to this study. BM donors who were later exposed to filgrastim were censored at the time of filgrastim exposure, thus limiting the follow-up time at risk (this issue is addressed to some degree by the very large number of BM donor follow-up years in this trial). Also, donors that had incorrect contact information were not included in this study. Another limitation is that verification could not be performed for all MAT events during medical record review. To address this specific limitation, we attributed unverified events as an event to overestimate, rather than underestimate, the number of late events. Additional limitations include a relatively short follow-up of 7 years for donors enrolled after 2010, self-reporting, and the fact that donors who did not enroll could have increased late effects. Due to the overestimation of late events and the number of donor-years studied, these limitations are not worrisome.

This is the largest prospective study addressing the safety of filgrastim in URDs. These results provide evidence that filgrastim is not associated with an increase in the incidence of myeloid or lymphoid malignancy, other types of cancer, autoimmune diseases, or thrombotic events. Most importantly, this provides URDs with reassurance that in this large study of thousands of healthy donors followed, on average, for >10 years, we saw no adverse effects associated with receiving filgrastim.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: D.S., C.D.O.B., and J.S. are employed by Amgen and own stocks. B.E.S. reports consultancy from Orca Bio and Mallinkrodt. M.A.P. reports research funding from Adaptive and Miltenyi; reports membership on an entity’s board of directors or advisory committees from GentiBio, Vertex, bluebird, and CARGO; and consultancy from Novartis. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Table

Acknowledgments

This study was fully funded by 10.13039/100002429 Amgen . The CIBMTR is supported primarily by the 10.13039/100007197 US Public Health Service U24CA076518 from the 10.13039/100000054 National Cancer Institute , the 10.13039/100000050 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute , and the 10.13039/100000060 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ; 75R60222C00011 from the 10.13039/100000102 Health Resources and Services Administration ; N00014-21-1-2954 and N00014-23-1-2057 from the Office of Naval Research; support is also provided by Be the Match Foundation, the 10.13039/100008980 Medical College of Wisconsin , the National Marrow Donor Program, 10.13039/100001634 Gateway for Cancer Research , 10.13039/100018758 Pediatric Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Consortium and from the following commercial entities: 10.13039/100006483 AbbVie ; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc; Adaptimmune; Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation; ADC Therapeutics; Adienne SA; 10.13039/100024192 Allogene ; AlloVir, Inc; Amgen, Inc; Angiocrine; 10.13039/100004324 Astellas Pharma US ; 10.13039/100016253 Atara Biotherapeutics ; 10.13039/100017239 BeiGene ; bluebird bio, Inc; Bristol Myers Squibb Co; CareDx Inc; 10.13039/100008322 CSL Behring ; CytoSen Therapeutics, Inc; Elevance Health; Eurofins Viracor, DBA Eurofins Transplant Diagnostics; Gamida-Cell, Ltd; 10.13039/100004330 GlaxoSmithKline ; 10.13039/100006797 HistoGenetics ; 10.13039/100017655 Incyte Corporation ; 10.13039/100005205 Janssen Research & Development, LLC ; Janssen/Johnson & Johnson; Jasper Therapeutics; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc; Karius; 10.13039/501100004072 Kiadis Pharma ; Kite, a Gilead company; Kyowa Kirin; Legend Biotech; Magenta Therapeutics; 10.13039/100014468 Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals ; Merck & Co; Mesoblast; Millennium, the Takeda Oncology Co; Miltenyi Biotec, Inc; MorphoSys; 10.13039/100008272 Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation ; 10.13039/100019510 Omeros Corporation ; OptumHealth; Orca Biosystems, Inc; Ossium Health, Inc; Pfizer, Inc; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie company; PPD Development, LP; Regimmune; Sanofi; Sarah Cannon; Sobi, Inc; Stemcyte; Takeda Pharmaceuticals; Talaris Therapeutics; 10.13039/100011022 Vertex Pharmaceuticals ; Vor Biopharma Inc; and Xenikos BV.

Authorship

Contribution: H.E.S designed the research plan, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript; M.K and S.B.-S. analyzed the data; H.K. was the project manager in the clinical trial; D.M. gathered data; J.S., D.S., and C.D.O.B. edited the final version of the manuscript; L.J.B. reviewed medical records and critically reviewed and edited the final version of this manuscript; B.E.S and M.A.P critically reviewed and edited the final version of this manuscript; and J.P.M. and S.M.D designed the research plan, reviewed medical records, analyzed the data, and critically reviewed and edited the final version of this manuscript.

∗ J.P.M. and S.M.D. contributed equally to this study.

The participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly, so due to the sensitive nature of the research, supporting data are not available. Individual data will not be shared. Aggregated data can be obtained upon reasonable request from the corresponding author, Heather E. Stefanski (hstefans@nmdp.org).

The full-text version of this article contains a data supplement.
==== Refs
References

1 Mathe G Treatment of leukemia with allogenic bone marrow transplantation Brux Med 44 1964 559 562 14146793
2 Russel N Gratwohl A Schmitz N The place of blood stem cells allogeneic transplantation Br J Haematol 93 4 1996 747 753 8703799
3 Lane TA Allogeneic marrow reconstitution using peripheral blood stem cells: the dawn of a new era Transfusion 36 7 1996 585 589 8701452
4 Bredeson C Leger C Couban S An evaluation of the donor experience in the Canadian multicenter randomized trial of bone marrow versus peripheral blood allografting Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 10 6 2004 405 414 15148494
5 Burns LJ Logan BR Chitphakdithai P Recovery of unrelated donors of peripheral blood stem cells versus recovery of unrelated donors of bone marrow: a prespecified analysis from the phase III Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network protocol 0201 Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 22 6 2016 1108 1116 27013014
6 Chen SH Yang SH Chu SC The role of donor characteristics and post-granulocyte colony-stimulating factor white blood cell counts in predicting the adverse events and yields of stem cell mobilization Int J Hematol 93 5 2011 652 659 21509437
7 Favre G Beksaç M Bacigalupo A Differences between graft product and donor side effects following bone marrow or stem cell donation Bone Marrow Transplant 32 9 2003 873 880 14561987
8 Fortanier C Kuentz M Sutton L Healthy sibling donor anxiety and pain during bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell harvesting for allogeneic transplantation: results of a randomised study Bone Marrow Transplant 29 2 2002 145 149 11850709
9 Gordon SV Nivison-Smith I Szer J Chapman JR Volunteer unrelated donor experience after administration of filgrastim and apheresis for the collection of haemopoietic stem cells: the Australian perspective Intern Med J 43 11 2013 1183 1190 24007325
10 Heldal D Brinch L Tjønnfjord G Donation of stem cells from blood or bone marrow: results of a randomised study of safety and complaints Bone Marrow Transplant 29 6 2002 479 486 11960266
11 Holig K Kramer M Kroschinsky F Safety and efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell collection from mobilized peripheral blood in unrelated volunteers: 12 years of single-center experience in 3928 donors Blood 114 18 2009 3757 3763 19666868
12 Karlsson L Quinlan D Guo D Mobilized blood cells vs bone marrow harvest: experience compared in 171 donors with particular reference to pain and fatigue Bone Marrow Transplant 33 7 2004 709 713 14755321
13 Kennedy GA Morton J Western R Butler J Daly J Durrant S Impact of stem cell donation modality on normal donor quality of life: a prospective randomized study Bone Marrow Transplant 31 11 2003 1033 1035 12774056
14 Martino M Bonizzoni E Moscato T Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with lenograstim in healthy donors: efficacy and safety analysis according to donor age Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 21 5 2015 881 888 25636377
15 Miller JP Perry EH Price TH Recovery and safety profiles of marrow and PBSC donors: experience of the National Marrow Donor Program Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 14 Suppl 9 2008 29 36 18721778
16 Mueller MM Bialleck H Bomke B Safety and efficacy of healthy volunteer stem cell mobilization with filgrastim G-CSF and mobilized stem cell apheresis: results of a prospective longitudinal 5-year follow-up study Vox Sang 104 1 2013 46 54 22827736
17 Pulsipher MA Chitphakdithai P Logan BR Lower risk for serious adverse events and no increased risk for cancer after PBSC vs BM donation Blood 123 23 2014 3655 3663 24735965
18 Pulsipher MA Chitphakdithai P Logan BR Acute toxicities of unrelated bone marrow versus peripheral blood stem cell donation: results of a prospective trial from the National Marrow Donor Program Blood 121 1 2013 197 206 23109243
19 Pulsipher MA Chitphakdithai P Miller JP Adverse events among 2408 unrelated donors of peripheral blood stem cells: results of a prospective trial from the National Marrow Donor Program Blood 113 15 2009 3604 3611 19190248
20 Rinaldi C Savignano C Pasca S Efficacy and safety of peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and collection: a single-center experience in 190 allogeneic donors Transfusion 52 11 2012 2387 2394 22452363
21 Rowley SD Donaldson G Lilleby K Bensinger WI Appelbaum FR Experiences of donors enrolled in a randomized study of allogeneic bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation Blood 97 9 2001 2541 2548 11313239
22 Shaw BE Logan BR Kiefer DM Analysis of the effect of race, socioeconomic status, and center size on unrelated National Marrow Donor Program donor outcomes: donor toxicities are more common at low-volume bone marrow collection centers Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 21 10 2015 1830 1838 26116089
23 Dale DC Bolyard A Marrero T Long-term effects of G-CSF therapy in cyclic neutropenia N Engl J Med 377 23 2017 2290 2292 29211670
24 Hershman D Neugut AI Jacobson JS Acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome following use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors during breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy J Natl Cancer Inst 99 3 2007 196 205 17284714
25 Danese MD Schenfeld J Shaw J Association between granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) among elderly patients with breast, lung, or prostate cancer Adv Ther 39 6 2022 2778 2795 35430673
26 Bennett CL Evens AM Andritsos LA Haematological malignancies developing in previously healthy individuals who received haematopoietic growth factors: report from the research on adverse drug events and reports (RADAR) project Br J Haematol 135 5 2006 642 650 17054431
27 Makita K Ohta K Mugitani A Acute myelogenous leukemia in a donor after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed peripheral blood stem cell harvest Bone Marrow Transplant 33 6 2004 661 665 14716337
28 Anderlini P Champlin R Use of filgrastim for stem cell mobilisation and transplantation in high-dose cancer chemotherapy Drugs 62 Suppl 1 2002 79 88 12479596
29 Cavallaro AM Lilleby K Majolino I Three to six year follow-up of normal donors who received recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor Bone Marrow Transplant 25 1 2000 85 89 10654020
30 Halter J Kodera Y Ispizua AU Severe events in donors after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donation Haematologica 94 1 2009 94 101 19059940
31 Jeger A Favre G Lutz JM Tumor incidence in related hematopoietic stem cell donors Bone Marrow Transplant 46 9 2011 1240 1244 21170092
32 Nacheva E Ahyee T Addada J Absence of damaging effects of stem cell donation in unrelated donors assessed by FISH and gene variance screening Bone Marrow Transplant 55 7 2020 1290 1296 32440014
33 Parkkali T Volin L Sirén MK Ruutu T Acute iritis induced by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor used for mobilization in a volunteer unrelated peripheral blood progenitor cell donor Bone Marrow Transplant 17 3 1996 433 434 8704701
34 Burt RK Fassas A Snowden J Collection of hematopoietic stem cells from patients with autoimmune diseases Bone Marrow Transplant 28 1 2001 1 12 11498738
35 Openshaw H Stuve O Antel JP Multiple sclerosis flares associated with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor Neurology 54 11 2000 2147 2150 10851379
36 Euler HH Harten P Zeuner RA Schwab UM Recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus associated neutropenia and refractory infections J Rheumatol 24 11 1997 2153 2157 9375876
37 Vasiliu IM Petri MA Baer AN Therapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in systemic lupus erythematosus may be associated with severe flares J Rheumatol 33 9 2006 1878 1880 16832843
38 Ragsdale ME Hall Zimmerman LG Use of colony-stimulating factors in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus J Pharm Pract 36 3 2021 719 724 34748466
39 Snowden JA Biggs JC Milliken ST A randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled, dose escalation study of the tolerability and efficacy of filgrastim for haemopoietic stem cell mobilisation in patients with severe active rheumatoid arthritis Bone Marrow Transplant 22 11 1998 1035 1041 9877264
40 Farhey YD Herman JH Vasculitis complicating granulocyte colony stimulating factor treatment of leukopenia and infection in Felty's syndrome J Rheumatol 22 6 1995 1179 1182 7545756
41 Iida K Honda Y Homma Y Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-induced aortitis with temporal arteritis and monoarthritis BMJ Case Rep 16 2 2023 e251216
42 Iking-Konert C Ostendorf B Foede M Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induces disease flare in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis J Rheumatol 31 8 2004 1655 1658 15290749
43 Anderlini P Körbling M Dale D Allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation: considerations for donors Blood 90 3 1997 903 908 9242518
44 Topcuoglu P Arat M Dalva K Özcan M Administration of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for allogeneic hematopoietic cell collection may induce the tissue factor-dependent pathway in healthy donors Bone Marrow Transplant 33 2 2004 171 176 14647251
45 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program SEER∗Stat database: incidence - SEER research data, 8 registries, Nov 2021 sub (1975-2020) - linked to county attributes - time dependent (1990-2020) income/rurality, 1969-2020 counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program https://seer.cancer.gov/data/
46 Confer DL Miller JP Long-term safety of filgrastim (rhG-CSF) administration Br J Haematol 137 1 2007 77 80 17359373
47 Anderlini P Chan FA Champlin RE Körbling M Strom SS Long-term follow-up of normal peripheral blood progenitor cell donors treated with filgrastim: no evidence of increased risk of leukemia development Bone Marrow Transplant 30 10 2002 661 663 12420204
48 Kodera Y Yamamoto K Harada M PBSC collection from family donors in Japan: a prospective survey Bone Marrow Transplant 49 2 2014 195 200 24076552
49 Pahnke S Nygell UA Johansson J-E Cancer incidence in healthy Swedish peripheral blood stem cell donors Bone Marrow Transplant 57 5 2022 795 802 35256742
50 Farhan R Urbanowska E Zborowska H Biosimilar G-CSF versus filgrastim and lenograstim in healthy unrelated volunteer hematopoietic stem cell donors Ann Hematol 96 10 2017 1735 1739 28801752
51 Pahnke S Egeland T Halter J Current use of biosimilar G-CSF for haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation Bone Marrow Transplant 54 6 2019 858 866 30283148
52 Gascon P Krendyukov A Mathieson N Natek M Aapro M Extrapolation in practice: lessons from 10 years with biosimilar filgrastim BioDrugs 33 6 2019 635 645 31440986
53 Maakaron J Picotte K Tram K Validation of nivestym compared to neupogen: an NMDP analysis J Clin Apher 39 1 2024 e22097
54 Shaw BE Chapman J Fechter M Towards a global system of vigilance and surveillance in unrelated donors of haematopoietic progenitor cells for transplantation Bone Marrow Transplant 48 12 2013 1506 1509 23892330
55 Conrad N Misra S Verbakel JY Incidence, prevalence, and co-occurrence of autoimmune disorders over time and by age, sex, and socioeconomic status: a population-based cohort study of 22 million individuals in the UK Lancet 401 10391 2023 1878 1890 37156255
