
==== Front
Nat Commun
Nat Commun
Nature Communications
2041-1723
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39227571
51565
10.1038/s41467-024-51565-6
Article
Non-relativistic torque and Edelstein effect in non-collinear magnets
González-Hernández Rafael rhernandezj@uninorte.edu.co

1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0519-1809
Ritzinger Philipp 2
Výborný Karel 2
Železný Jakub zeleznyj@fzu.cz

2
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4768-293X
Manchon Aurélien aurelien.manchon@univ-amu.fr

3
1 https://ror.org/031e6xm45 grid.412188.6 0000 0004 0486 8632 Grupó de Investigación en Física Aplicada, Departamento de Física, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia
2 https://ror.org/053avzc18 grid.418095.1 0000 0001 1015 3316 Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Cukrovarnická 10, 162 00 Praha 6, Czech Republic
3 https://ror.org/035xkbk20 grid.5399.6 0000 0001 2176 4817 Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CINaM, Marseille, France
3 9 2024
3 9 2024
2024
15 766320 9 2023
12 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
The Edelstein effect is the origin of the spin-orbit torque: a current-induced torque that is used for the electrical control of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic materials. This effect originates from the relativistic spin-orbit coupling, which necessitates utilizing materials with heavy elements. Here, we show that in magnetic materials with non-collinear magnetic order, the Edelstein effect and, consequently, a current-induced torque can exist even in the absence of the spin-orbit coupling. Using group symmetry analysis, model calculations, and realistic simulations on selected compounds, we identify large classes of non-collinear magnet candidates and demonstrate that the current-driven torque is of similar magnitude as the celebrated spin-orbit torque in conventional transition metal structures. We also show that this torque can exist in an insulating material, which could allow for highly efficient electrical control of magnetic order.

A major goal of spintronics is to manipulate magnetic order with electric fields. The typical approach is to use a material with spin-orbit coupling, and the resulting Edelstein effect. Here, González-Hernández et al. show theoretically that non-collinear magnets can also host an Edelstein effect, even in the absence of spin-orbit coupling.

Subject terms

Spintronics
Magnetic properties and materials
501100001824 Grantová Agentura České Republiky (Grant Agency of the Czech Republic) 22-21974S 501100003422 KAUST | Global Collaborative Research, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (GCR, KAUST) 2022-CRG10-4660 Excellence Initiative of Aix-Marseille University - A*MIdex Dioscuri Program LV23025 funded by MPG and MEYS TERAFIT - CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004594501100002945 National University of Colombia | Dirección de Investigación, Universidad Nacional de Colombia (Division of Investigations of the National University of Colombia) 202010042199 MinCiencias Conv. 937 Fundamental Researchissue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

In materials and heterostructures with spin-orbit coupling, the interconnection between the spin and momentum degrees of freedom of the electronic Bloch states underscores a rich landscape of microscopic “spin-orbitronics" phenomena, such as anomalous Hall effect1 and anisotropic magnetoresistance2, spin Hall effect3, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction or spin-orbit torques4,5. To maximize these effects, materials displaying reasonably large spin-orbit coupling are necessary, which implies using metals with large atomic numbers Z, such as Pt, W, Bi, etc. Some of these elements are however scarce, expensive, and environmentally unfriendly. In addition, arbitrarily large spin-orbit coupling does not necessarily lead to arbitrarily large spin-orbitronics phenomena6,7 because of the competition with crystal field and exchange.

Contrary to a common conception though, spin-orbit coupling is not a mandatory ingredient to obtain spin-momentum locking. In fact, as noticed by Pekar and Rashba in the mid-sixties8, electronics states in materials with a spatially inhomogeneous magnetization display a spin texture in momentum space that share similarities with the one obtained through spin-orbit coupling. In other words, non-collinear magnetism mimics spin-orbit coupling to some extent and can support a number of phenomena that are well known in spin-orbit coupled materials such as electric-dipole spin resonance8,9, topological Hall effect10–12, spin Hall effect13, and magnetic spin Hall effect14,15, the latter being specific to magnetic materials. It is therefore natural to wonder whether another hallmark of spin-orbit coupled materials, the Edelstein effect16–18 (also called the Rashba-Edelstein effect, inverse spin-galvanic effect, or the magneto-electric effect), and its associated spin-orbit torque can also be achieved in spin-orbit free non-collinear magnets.

The Edelstein effect refers to the generation of nonequilibrium spin density by an applied electric field in non-centrosymmetric semiconducting or metallic materials and heterostructures with spin-orbit coupling. The magnitude of the nonequilibrium spin density is governed by the competition between the spin-orbit coupling energy and the crystal field energy associated with inversion symmetry breaking. In magnetic materials, the spin-momentum locking is governed by the magnetic exchange between local and itinerant electrons, rather than by the atomic spin-orbit coupling, suggesting that a large Edelstein effect can be obtained in non-centrosymmetric magnetic materials. A possible advantage of such a mechanism is that it does not require the presence of heavy elements, and it could exist even in materials with negligible spin-orbit coupling such as organic magnetic materials. In addition, since the magnitude of the Edelstein effect is directly related to the magnetic configuration of the material, it should be highly tunable using an external magnetic field.

Substantial attention has been paid lately to the non-relativistic momentum-space spin texture and splitting in antiferromagnets. Non-collinear antiferromagnets display a spin texture in momentum space that results in the so-called magnetic spin Hall effect, i.e., a transverse spin current whose polarization is governed by the magnetic configuration14,15. Collinear antiferromagnets whose sublattices are connected by a rotation symmetry, recently classified as “altermagnets”19, display momentum-symmetric spin-splitting20–31 that also supports spin currents28,32. These spin currents, which do not generate torque in the bulk material, can exert a self-torque when the antiferromagnet is implemented in a junction33. Whereas all these studies have focused on centrosymmetric antiferromagnets displaying momentum-symmetric spin texture and splitting, it has been recently shown that non-centrosymmetric antiferromagnets naturally display momentum-antisymmetric spin texture and splitting34–36. This non-relativistic antisymmetric spin-splitting gives rise to a global non-relativistic Edelstein effect at the level of the antiferromagnetic unit cell.

In the present work, we demonstrate that wide classes of antiferromagnets lacking a center of inversion, either locally or globally, can support the current-driven Edelstein effect in the absence of spin-orbit coupling. This effect does not necessarily necessitate momentum-antisymmetric spin-splitting and, as such, it is not limited to non-centrosymmetric antiferromagnets but concerns a much broader class of systems including heterostructures and centrosymmetric antiferromagnets. We establish general symmetry principles to discover new materials, propose selected promising candidates, demonstrate and quantify the effect in specific materials, and extend the idea to the case of magnetic multilayers. We implemented an algorithm for determining the symmetry of the non-relativistic Edelstein effect as well as other non-relativistic phenomena and we released it within an open-source code. Remarkably, we show that the non-relativistic Edelstein effect can also be present in insulating materials. This could allow for controlling the magnetic order by a voltage in the absence of any Ohmic conduction, resulting in a much higher efficiency than the conventional current-induced torques.

Results

Conditions for an antisymmetric spin texture

In non-magnetic materials lacking inversion symmetry, the relativistic Edelstein effect is associated with an antisymmetric spin texture in the reciprocal space37. These spin textures arise from the spin-momentum locking imposed by the spin-orbit coupling and are characterized by a spin direction that varies in momentum space. In the absence of spin-orbit coupling and in the presence of non-collinear magnetism, one expects non-relativistic analogs of the antisymmetric spin textures. Therefore, before addressing the non-relativistic Edelstein effect and its associated torque, we first consider the conditions of the emergence of such antisymmetric spin textures. Recently, spin textures in the absence of spin-orbit coupling have been studied in non-collinear14,29,34 as well as in collinear magnetic materials20–31. In collinear systems, however, the direction of spin is fixed and only the magnitude and sign of the spin-splitting varies in momentum space. In addition, most of the non-relativistic spin textures studied so far (with the exception of ref. 34) are typically symmetric in momentum k, Snk = Sn−k, n being the band index, which forbids the realization of the non-relativistic Edelstein effect at the level of the magnetic unit cell.

In the absence of relativistic spin-orbit coupling, the spin and orbital degrees of freedom are decoupled, which also means that the spin is not coupled to the lattice. In such a case the symmetry of magnetic systems is described by the so-called spin space groups38,39. In addition to crystallographic symmetry operations that form the magnetic space groups, which describe the relativistic symmetry of magnetic systems, the spin space groups also contain pure spin rotations. Elements of the spin space groups can be written in the form {Rs∣∣R∣τ}, where Rs denotes the spin rotation, R is a crystallographic point group operation, i.e., a proper or improper rotation, and τ is a translation. We denote symmetry operations that contain time reversal as {Rs∣∣R∣τ}′.

In a 3D periodic system, the rules for the existence of spin-splitting are simple to determine. For an arbitrary k-point (that is, a k-point lying away from any high-symmetry lines or planes), the only symmetry operations that can keep the spin invariant are the combined space-inversion and time reversal (the so-called PT symmetry), a pure spin rotation, translation, or any combination of these symmetry operations. In a PT symmetric system, the bands with opposite spin must be degenerate, which is known as Kramers degeneracy and holds even in the presence of spin-orbit coupling. If a pure spin rotation is present, the spin of all non-degenerate states must lie along the spin-rotation axis. If more than one spin rotation with different spin axes is present, this cannot be satisfied for non-degenerate states and thus implies a spin degeneracy. This can also be seen from the fact that spin rotations along different axes do not commute. Since translation does not change spin, the same conclusions apply to symmetry operations that contain translation. Thus spin-splitting can exist in all systems, except those that have a PT symmetry or two spin rotation axes in the point group. In ferromagnetic systems, spin-splitting can exist anywhere in the Brillouin zone since no symmetry operations connecting states with opposite spin exist. In spin-split antiferromagnetic materials, there can be specific high-symmetry points where opposite spin must be degenerate. This has been studied systematically for collinear antiferromagnets20–31,40,41. Note that the spin-split collinear antiferromagnets have sometimes been referred to as “altermagnets”19.

In a collinear magnetic system, any spin rotation along the magnetic axis is a symmetry. Thus if there exists another spin rotation around a perpendicular axis, the bands must be degenerate. Such a spin rotation must contain translation (otherwise the system could not be magnetic) and can only be a 180° rotation, which in a collinear system has the same effect on the magnetic order as the time reversal. The existence of such a symmetry thus implies that the system is invariant under a Tτ (combined time reversal and translation) symmetry. Collinear magnetic systems can thus be separated into three types. In systems with PT symmetry, bands are spin degenerate even with spin-orbit coupling. In systems with Tτ but broken PT symmetry, spin-splitting occurs only when the spin-orbit coupling is present. Finally, in systems with broken PT and Tτ symmetries, a non-relativistic spin-splitting can be present. Such systems include both ferromagnets as well as antiferromagnets (we use the term antiferromagnet here to refer generally to all magnetically ordered systems with negligible net magnetization). We note that this separation does not hold for non-collinear magnets since, in those, the time reversal does not have the same effect as a 180° spin rotation, and spin rotations with different angles can also occur. Consequently, there can be non-collinear antiferromagnets with Tτ symmetry that exhibit non-relativistic spin-splitting. This was recently studied in ref. 36.

The existence of antisymmetric spin textures is governed by symmetries that transform k → −k. This involves, in particular, the inversion symmetry, which implies Snk = Sn−k. In systems with inversion symmetry, any spin texture thus must be symmetric. In a coplanar system a combined spin rotation and time-reversal operation {Rs(n^⊥,180∘)∣∣E∣∣E}′ is a symmetry. Here Rs(n^⊥,180∘) denotes a spin rotation by 180° around the direction perpendicular to the magnetic plane n^⊥. As a consequence, it must hold that Snk∣∣=Sn−k∣∣ and Snk⊥=−Sn−k⊥, where S∣∣ and S⊥ denote the components of spin parallel and perpendicular to the plane, respectively. In a coplanar system, the only antisymmetric component is thus perpendicular to the magnetic plane, as in the case studied by Hayami et al.34. We note that even when all magnetic moments lie within a plane, the electron spins can contain an out-of-plane component. In a collinear magnetic system, this is not possible, however, since, in this case, spin is a good quantum number and all spins must lie along a single axis. There, any non-relativistic spin-splitting must thus be symmetric in momentum.

Conditions for nonequilibrium spin densities and torques

Let us now turn our attention toward the non-relativistic Edelstein effect. The nonequilibrium properties of materials obtained via the Kubo formula are often parsed into so-called Fermi surface and Fermi sea contributions42,43, the former being even under T and the latter being odd. In the context of the Edelstein effect, the T-even Fermi surface contribution is related to the antisymmetric spin texture in momentum space16,17, whereas the T-odd Fermi sea contribution is related to the Berry curvature in mixed spin-momentum space in the weak scattering limit44–46. As a consequence, in spin-orbit coupled non-centrosymmetric magnetic heterostructures, the Fermi surface contribution produces the so-called field-like torque whereas the Fermi sea contribution is responsible for the antidamping-like torque5. Notice that the T-odd Fermi sea contribution can also be non-zero in PT symmetric antiferromagnets with Kramers degeneracy. Furthermore, for manipulating the magnetic order in more complex magnetic systems, especially in antiferromagnets, the nonequilibrium spin density one should be concerned with is the local one, projected on the magnetic sublattices, rather than the global one, at the level of the magnetic unit cell42,47. The T-even component of the local Edelstein effect can be understood as originating from the antisymmetric spin texture obtained upon projecting on the local atom. Such a “hidden” texture can again exist even in systems with Kramers degeneracy48. Consequently, the symmetry conditions that allow for the existence of an Edelstein effect and a torque on the magnetic order are distinct from those for the existence of antisymmetric spin textures.

The symmetry of the non-relativistic global and local Edelstein effects and the resulting torque can be determined in a similar fashion as for the relativistic one, just replacing the magnetic space groups with spin groups. The key symmetry that needs to be broken for the existence of the Edelstein effect is the inversion symmetry. This holds regardless of the presence of spin-orbit coupling. For the global Edelstein effect, the global inversion symmetry must be broken, whereas for the local Edelstein effect, it has to be broken locally (e.g., see ref. 48). This means that for the presence of the Edelstein effect on a given magnetic site, there must be no inversion symmetry operation that would leave this site invariant.

As already mentioned, in magnets the Edelstein effect can be non-zero even without spin-orbit coupling, similar to the spin Hall effect, for example49. This applies even to collinear magnets; however, in such a case, the induced spin density must be oriented along the magnetic order and does not lead to a torque (although it could play a role, for example, in the presence of magnons). Consequently, we focus here on non-collinear magnetic systems, seeking the symmetry rules that govern the emergence of T-odd and T-even spin densities, respectively referred to as Sodd and Seven. In the presence of a pure spin rotation {Rs(n^,θ)∣∣E∣∣τ}, where τ could also be zero, the global Edelstein effect must obey S∣∣n. In the presence of spin rotation coupled with time reversal {Rs(n^,θ)∣∣E∣∣τ}′ it obeys Seven∣∣n and Sodd⊥n. The same holds for the local Edelstein effect as long as the site is invariant under τ. Consequently, in coplanar systems, Seven must be oriented perpendicular to the magnetic plane and Sodd must lie within the plane for both the global and the local Edelstein effects.

To determine the full symmetry of the non-relativistic Edelstein effect, it is necessary to consider all the symmetry operations of the spin group. We have implemented an algorithm for determining all spin group symmetry operations of a given magnetic system within the freely available open-source Symmetr code50. The process of determining the non-relativistic symmetry is described in detail in Supplementary materials. We have utilized this program to explore the symmetry of non-collinear materials from the MAGNDATA database of magnetic materials. We have analyzed the symmetry of 484 non-collinear magnetic materials and have found that the global Edelstein effect is allowed in 160 of these materials, whereas the local Edelstein effect on a magnetic sublattice is allowed in 355 compounds. The full list is given in the Supplementary materials. As also described in the Supplementary materials, the Symmetr code allows one to directly obtain the non-relativistic symmetry of the Edelstein effect (as well as other phenomena) for materials from the MAGNDATA.

Among the noticeable materials whose crystal structure admits both a global and local (sublattice) torque, we identified ferroelectric antiferromagnets such as orthorhombic DyFeO3, hexagonal HoMnO3, YbMnO3, and LuFeO3, as well as metallic antiferromagnets such as α-Mn, Tb3Ge5 and Tb5Ge4. Interestingly, the centrosymmetric metallic antiferromagnets Mn5Si3, Mn3(Sn, Ge, As), and Mn3CuN do not display a global torque but do admit a local torque on the individual magnetic sublattices. These torques are expected to induce magnetic excitations and potentially magnetic order reversal. In the following, we explicitly compute the global and local Edelstein effects in both LuFeO3 and Mn3Sn as an illustration of both cases.

Non-relativistic Edelstein effect in non-collinear antiferromagnets

To calculate the Edelstein effect and torque we use the Kubo formula within the constant relaxation time approximation. We only consider an Edelstein effect linear in an electric field: δSi = χijEj, where δSi is the induced spin, Ej is the electric field, and χij is a response tensor. The T-even and T-odd components are computed using the Kubo formula derived in refs. 45,51,1 χijeven=−eℏπ∑k,m,nRe[ψknS^iψkmψkmv^jψkn]Γ2(εF−εkn)2+Γ2(εF−εkm)2+Γ2,

2 χijodd=2eℏ∑k,n≠mnocc.munocc.Im[⟨ψnk∣S^i∣ψmk⟩⟨ψmk∣v^j∣ψnk⟩]×Γ2−(εkn−εkm)2[(εkn−εkm)2+Γ2]2.

Here ψkn is the Bloch function of band n, k is the Bloch wave vector, εkn is the band energy, εF is the Fermi energy, v^j is the velocity operator, e > 0 is the elementary charge, S^i is the spin operator, and Γ is a parameter that describes the strength of disorder, which is related to the relaxation time τ = ℏ/2Γ. This parameter is usually chosen to match the conductivity computed numerically with the experimental value. To calculate the local Edelstein effect on a given sublattice, a projection of the spin operator on the sublattice is used instead.

In the limit Γ → 0, Eq. (1) goes to the semiclassical Boltzmann constant relaxation formula, which scales as 1/Γ whereas Eq. (2) goes to the so-called intrinsic formula, which is Γ independent and can be understood in terms of Berry curvature in mixed spin-momentum space46. Equations (1) and (2) are sometimes referred to as “intraband" and “interband" contributions, respectively.

A non-coplanar 3Q antiferromagnet

An example of a non-relativistic Edelstein effect in a non-collinear coplanar antiferromagnet was recently given by Hayami et al.34. In this case, the coplanarity of the magnetic texture imposes the current-driven spin density to be oriented perpendicular to the magnetic plane. Here, we adopt a triangular antiferromagnet with a 3Q spin texture, as displayed in Fig. 1a. This magnetic texture can be stabilized in the presence of 4-spin interaction52,53 and hosts quantum anomalous Hall effect10–12. The 3Q texture is also commonly observed in three-dimensional materials such as γ-FeMn54 and pyrochlores55. We use a simple tight-binding model with a 3Q spin texture to illustrate the physical properties of such systems. The model is given by3 H=−∑<ab>αtabcaα†cbα+J∑aα,β(σ⋅ma)αβcaα†caβ.

Here, c† and c denote the creation and annihilation operators respectively; a, b denote the site index and α, β the spin index. The first term is the nearest-neighbor hopping term, with tab representing the hopping magnitude. The second term represents the coupling of the conduction electrons to the on-site magnetic moments. Here mi is the magnetic moment direction, J is the exchange parameter and σ is the vector of Pauli matrices. We only consider nearest-neighbor hopping. To break the inversion symmetry, we use two different hopping magnitudes, as shown in Fig. 1b. This could be understood as due to the presence of another atom illustrated in Fig. 1a.Fig. 1 Global torque in the 3Q triangular antiferromagnet.

a Sketch of the triangular lattice with 3Q non-coplanar configuration of the magnetic moments. The blue atoms are magnetic and the green atoms break the planar inversion symmetry. b Top view of the triangular lattice. The hopping parameters of the black and red bounds are t and t′, respectively. c In-plane spin texture in momentum space at energy ε = −5 eV, corresponding to the red dashed line in panel (e). d, e Band structure for t′=t and t′=t/2, respectively. In the absence of inversion symmetry breaking, t′=t, the degenerate bands display compensating spin texture in momentum space. When t′≠t, the band degeneracy is lifted and the spin textures no longer compensate. The color scale indicates the value of Sz. f, g T-even (f) T-odd (g) contributions for t′=t/2 and ε = −4 eV when rotating the electric field direction in the (x,y) plane. We set t = 1 eV, Γ = 0.1 eV and the exchange is J = −2 eV.

The band structures of the 3Q antiferromagnet are given in Fig. 1c, f, without and with inversion symmetry breaking. In the absence of inversion symmetry breaking, the band structure is doubly degenerate. Breaking the inversion symmetry lifts the band degeneracy (Fig. 1f) and results in a spin texture, shown in Fig. 1e. This spin texture contains both symmetric and antisymmetric components, the latter giving rise to the current-driven Edelstein effect and its torque. When the inversion symmetry is broken, we observe a finite Edelstein effect as shown in Fig. 1d, g. Several features are worth noticing. First, because the magnetic texture of the 3Q antiferromagnet spans the 3D space, the current-driven spin density possesses all three components, Sx, Sy and Sz, which strikingly contrasts with the result of ref. 34. Second, both T-even and T-odd components contribute with similar magnitude. Finally, for the set of parameters adopted in this calculation, i.e., the exchange and hopping energies are of comparable magnitude (Δ = 2t = 4t′ = 2 eV), we obtain a nonequilibrium spin density of about 10−11 ℏm/V. For the sake of comparison, in a two-dimensional Rashba gas, the nonequilibrium spin density is17 SsurfR/eE=(αR/ℏ2)(m0/πΓ). Taking Γ = 0.1 eV, m0 being the free electron mass, αR = 10−9 eV ⋅ m as the typical Rashba strength expected in transition metal heterostructures56, and (3 Å)2 as a unit cell area, the Edelstein effect yields χS ~ 3.6 × 10−11 ℏm/V, which is in the same range as our calculations for the two-dimensional 3Q system reported in Fig. 1.

A centrosymmetric antiferromagnet: Mn3Sn

In antiferromagnets, and in general in more complex magnetic systems, the magnetic dynamics is not determined by the global Edelstein effect, but rather by the local Edelstein effect on each magnetic sublattice. Consequently, in antiferromagnets, it is the local rather than the global inversion symmetry breaking that is necessary for the existence of the Edelstein effect and the current-induced torque42. An example of an antiferromagnet with a global inversion symmetry and a local inversion symmetry breaking is the well-known non-collinear antiferromagnet Mn3Sn57,58. In this material, the global Edelstein effect vanishes but the local Edelstein effect is allowed on each sublattice, even in the absence of spin-orbit coupling.

The crystal and magnetic structure of Mn3Sn are given in Fig. 2c. Mn3Sn has six magnetic sublattices, which are composed of three pairs of sites with equivalent moments connected by inversion symmetry. Notice that we neglected the small spin canting of Mn3Sn induced by spin-orbit coupling as it has a negligible influence on the non-relativistic torque we are concerned about. The inversion partners are denoted by′ in Fig. 2b. Due to the inversion symmetry, the Edelstein effect on the two inversion-connected sites must be opposite. The local Edelstein effect tends to drive the system into a state where the magnetic moments of the inversion-connected sites are not parallel and thus it acts against the exchange. As such, it is unlikely to reverse the magnetic order but it can excite different magnon modes. Leaving the rigorous analysis of the magnetic dynamics to future studies, we emphasize that the global inversion symmetry can be broken, for example, by an interface. Then the two sites with the same moments are no longer connected by inversion symmetry and consequently can experience the Edelstein effect of the same sign, enabling the electric manipulation of the magnetic order.Fig. 2 Local torque in centrosymmetric Mn3Sn.

a, b Calculation of the T-even (a) and T-odd (b) local Edelstein effect in Mn3Sn with (dashed lines) and without (solid lines) spin-orbit coupling. The individual lines correspond to different tensor components, see Eq. (1)-(2). c The crystal structure and magnetic structure of Mn3Sn. The purple and gray spheres represent the Mn and Sn ions, respectively.

We evaluate the Edelstein effect in Mn3Sn using ab initio calculations with and without spin-orbit coupling (see “Methods” for details of the calculation setup). The result of the calculation for Γ = 0.01 eV is shown in Fig. 2a. We find substantial T-even and T-odd Edelstein effect on all sublattices. Including the spin-orbit coupling does not change the results substantially, similar to previous calculations of the spin Hall effect in this material13. Our calculations agree well with the symmetry analysis shown in the Supplementary materials. Notice that, again, the magnitude of the current-driven spin density is rather large, corresponding to a Rashba strength of 10−9 − 10−10 eV ⋅ m.

We note that current-induced switching of Mn3Sn has been experimentally observed in Mn3Sn/non-magnetic metal heterostructures59–62. The switching has been attributed to the spin Hall effect from the non-magnetic metal layer and to spin-transfer torque and inter-grain spin-transfer torque, however, it is possible that the non-relativistic Edelstein effect also contributes.

A non-centrosymmetric antiferromagnet: LuFeO3

As an example of a real non-collinear antiferromagnet that can exhibit a global non-relativistic Edelstein effect and torques, we consider the hexagonal LuFeO3, a multiferroic with antiferromagnetic order. In bulk, LuFeO3 is typically orthorhombic. However, the hexagonal phase has been stabilized in thin layers63 and can also be stabilized in the bulk64. It has a non-collinear coplanar antiferromagnetic structure with magnetic space group (MSG) #185.201 (P63c’m’) as presented in Fig. 3a63,64. The inversion symmetry is broken in this material by the crystal structure, which suggests the possibility of non-relativistic spin torques. The system has a small net moment  of ~0.02μB along the z direction (weak ferromagnetism). This moment is of relativistic origin, and thus, in the absence of spin-orbit coupling, the magnetic structure is perfectly compensated. Apart from the magnetic order, hexagonal LuFeO3 also exhibits a ferroelectric order that is present below  ~1000K and the material has attracted large attention for its multiferroic properties and the possibility of magneto-electric coupling63–65.Fig. 3 The non-centrosymmetric antiferromagnet LuFeO3.

a The crystal and magnetic structure of the hexagonal LuFeO3. b LuFeO3 band structure without spin-orbit coupling. The color denotes the Sx projection. X points represent opposite kx coordinates, Z points represent opposite kz coordinates, and P points represent opposite kx, ky, kz coordinates in the Brillouin zone. Asymmetric -odd in k- and symmetric -even-spin-splitting is labeled in the corresponding k-path. c The spin texture of LuFeO3 at the Fermi surface for Fermi level 0.45 eV below the top of the valence band. We plot the spin texture for two planes corresponding to kz = 0.25 Å−1 and kz = −0.25 Å−1. The center of the figure lies at the Γ point. The arrows represent the spin and we use the color to highlight the z-component of the spin since it would be hard to distinguish otherwise.

The non-relativistic electronic structure is shown in Fig. 3b. The material is insulating; here we only show the valence bands, which are relevant to our calculations. As can also be seen in Fig. 3b, the bands are spin-split and thus there is also a non-relativistic spin texture, shown in Fig. 3c for two cuts through the Brillouin zone. Due to the coplanarity of the magnetic order, the spin texture is symmetric for the Sx and Sy components and antisymmetric for the Sz component. The Sz component is non-zero but very small.

For the calculation of the Edelstein effect, we move the Fermi level into the valence band to simulate doping. Our symmetry analysis shown in the Supplementary materials shows that the Edelstein effect is allowed in LuFeO3 even with no spin-orbit coupling. Results of the calculation for Γ = 0.01 eV with and without spin-orbit coupling are given in Fig. 4. We calculate both the global Edelstein effect and the local one for all Fe sublattices. For brevity though, we only show here the result for the global effect and for one sublattice. The full results are shown in the Supplementary materials.Fig. 4 Edelstein effect in LuFeO3 computed with (dashed lines) and without spin-orbit coupling (solid lines).

Here zero energy corresponds to the top of the valence band. a T-even component of the total Edelstein effect. b T-even component of the local Edelstein effect. c T-odd component of the total Edelstein effect. d T-odd component of the local Edelstein effect.

Our calculations reveal a large non-relativistic global and local Edelstein effect in good agreement with the symmetry analysis. Without spin-orbit coupling for the global effect, only the T-odd component is allowed (Fig. 4b). With spin-orbit coupling, even the global T-even component appears (Fig. 4a). We find that the effect of spin-orbit coupling is quite small for the T-odd component, but fairly large for the T-even component. For the local effect (Fig. 4c, d), both T-even and T-odd components are allowed.

An important remark is in order. The T-even component has to vanish within the gap since it is a Fermi surface property (see Eq. (1)). The global T-odd component vanishes within the gap as well (Fig. 4b). However, we find that the local T-odd components on the Fe atoms are non-zero within the gap, as shown in Fig. 4d and in the Supplementary materials. Only the xz and yz components are non-zero within the gap, reaching a constant value. Such a result is intriguing as within the gap, there is no Ohmic conduction, and thus heat dissipation is absent. This could consequently allow for electric field control of magnetic order in the absence of Ohmic dissipation. The existence of spin-orbit torque in an insulator was previously studied in topological materials46,66,67. Since the T-odd Edelstein effect is related to the Berry curvature in spin-momentum space, it arises from matrix elements between occupied and unoccupied states which do not necessarily vanish in the gap. Our results are similar, except that in the case of LuFeO3, the origin of the torque is non-relativistic, due to the coexistence of the non-collinear magnetic order with inversion symmetry breaking. We point out that the torque is not quantized, contrary to the quantized magneto-electric effect in topological insulators66,68, and therefore unlikely to be of topological origin. We are also not aware of any topological properties of LuFeO3. The T-odd torque is governed by the Berry curvature in mixed spin-momentum space and involves electrically driven interband transitions, resulting in a finite (but not quantized) value in the gap.

We note that in metals the torques induced by an electric field are accompanied by an electric current and thus often referred to as “current-induced” torques. However, even in metals, the torques are, in fact, due to the electric field rather than to the current flow, although the torque cannot exist without Ohmic conduction. In non-centrosymmetric insulating magnets though, Ohmic conduction is suppressed while the electrically driven torque remains sizable, as demonstrated in LuFeO3. This opens promising perspectives for the dissipation-free electrical control of magnetization.

Non-centrosymmetric heterostructures

The examples we have discussed so far all have inversion symmetry (globally or locally) broken in the bulk of their crystal structure. Such a constraint, however, severely restricts the Edelstein effect to the materials listed in the Supplemental materials. For this reason, we propose to exploit the broken inversion symmetry taking place at the interface between the non-collinear antiferromagnet and an adjacent metal. Such heterostructures are commonly utilized for spin-orbit torque, where the ferro- or antiferromagnet is typically interfaced with a heavy element metal such as platinum5. This simple but instrumental configuration allows for observing the spin-orbit torque in a wide variety of systems and enables interfacial engineering of the spin-orbit torque properties.

The same concept can be applied to the non-relativistic Edelstein effect. When a non-collinear magnetic material with inversion symmetry is interfaced with a different material, the broken inversion symmetry can result in a non-relativistic Edelstein effect, which in turn generates a torque on the magnetic order. We illustrate this concept using the example of the well-known non-collinear antiferromagnet Mn3Ir, whose crystal and magnetic structures are displayed in Fig. 5a. In this material, each magnetic site is an inversion center, and thus no Edelstein effect is allowed in the bulk. To break the inversion symmetry, we consider a thin layer of Mn3Ir interfaced with a thin layer of a non-magnetic material. When Mn3Ir is grown along the [001] direction, the non-relativistic Edelstein effect in such a heterostructure is only allowed for an electric field along the [001] direction. In such a case no electric current can flow, however. Thus we instead consider Mn3Ir grown along the [111] direction. For this orientation, the symmetry is lowered, and the Edelstein effect is allowed for an electric field oriented along the interface. We consider a structure composed of 12 atomic layers of the Mn3Ir, as shown in Fig. 5b. The individual atomic layers are shown in Fig. 5c.Fig. 5 Local torque in an antiferromagnetic heterostructure.

a Mn3Ir bulk structure, where the purple and golden spheres represent the Mn and Ir ions, respectively. b Top-down view of a single atomic layer in the Mn3Ir [111] bilayer. Here A, B and C denote the three different sublattices. Note that we have constructed the system in such a way that there are 6 Mn atoms in each atomic layer; however, the two atoms for each sublattice are connected by translation and thus there are only three non-equivalent sublattices. c Side view of the Mn3Ir[111] bilayer, where the gray spheres represent the non-magnetic substrate. Here we do not show the magnetic moments. d Edelstein effect calculation in the Mn3Ir [111] for each sublattice as a function of the atomic layer. The top row plots show the T-even component and the bottom plots show the T-odd component.

We utilize a simple tight-binding model that is not meant to give quantitative predictions but rather to confirm that the effect can exist and illustrate its basic properties. The model is analogous to the one we have used for the 3Q antiferromagnet. It is composed of s-electrons on each site with nearest-neighbor hopping and exchange coupling to the atomic magnetic moments. Similar models have been utilized to demonstrate other properties of the Mn3Ir and similar antiferromagnets such as the non-relativistic spin currents13 or the anomalous Hall effect69. We do not include any spin-orbit coupling in the model. The Hamiltonian is in Eq. (3), where we consider nearest-neighbor hopping t = 1 eV and magnetic exchange J = 1.7 eV on Mn atoms (gray and gold atoms representing non-magnetic layer and Ir atoms, respectively, are not endowed with magnetic moment).

The calculated Edelstein effect is shown in Fig. 5c for each sublattice and atomic layer. For this calculation, we have used Γ = 0.01 eV and εF = 0 eV. Our calculations are fully in agreement with the symmetry analysis, shown in the Supplementary materials. Both T-even and T-odd components are present. We find the largest effect close to the interfaces, although the current-driven spin density remains sizable in the center of the Mn3Ir layer. A large effect is found both at the interface with the non-magnetic layer and at the top surface, which illustrates that the presence of another layer is, in principle, not necessary.

In Fig. 5, we only give the result of the calculation for the tensor components that correspond to an in-plane electric field. Interestingly, the out-of-plane components do not vanish even though no current can flow in the out-of-plane direction, similar to the case of the LuFeO3. In this case, however, since the system is metallic, the out-of-plane electric field is screened, and thus the effect is hard to observe in practice.

In addition to the Mn3Ir bilayer, we also include results of analogous tight-binding calculations for the Mn3Sn/Ru bilayer in the Supplementary materials. These results show that, in the presence of interfacial inversion symmetry breaking, the compensation of the Edelstein effect on inversion-pair sublattices that naturally occurs in bulk Mn3Sn is no longer fulfilled. Consequently, a net Edelstein effect emerges, allowing for efficient manipulation of the magnetic order. We have also included preliminary results of first-principles calculations of the Mn3Sn/Ru bilayer. These calculations, only included for illustration, show that the magnitude of the Edelstein effect in the first-principles calculations is comparable to the results of the tight-binding calculations.

Discussion

The torque induced by the non-relativistic Edelstein effect shares important similarities with the conventional spin-orbit torque. Both torques are electrically driven self-induced torques that necessitate inversion symmetry breaking, either locally or globally. The key difference though is that the torque due to the non-relativistic Edelstein effect does not originate from spin-orbit coupling but rather from the non-collinear magnetic order. As a consequence, the microscopic origin of these two torques is quite distinct. In the non-relativistic limit, spin is conserved and the torque is directly associated with a spin current: the torque corresponds to spin sources33 and can be understood as a local transfer of spin angular momentum within the magnetic unit cell.

In the present work, we have computed the non-relativistic Edelstein effect in four different systems, all displaying inversion symmetry breaking, either in the magnetic unit cell or locally. It is quite remarkable that all the examples discussed here display a sizable electrically induced spin density, in spite of the absence of spin-orbit coupling. For the sake of comparison, in our previous calculations of the relativistic Edelstein effect in a collinear antiferromagnet Mn2Au, we found a magnitude of χS ~ 4.3 × 10−11 ℏm/V for Γ = 0.01 eV42, corresponding to a Rashba strength of 10−9 eV ⋅ m, similarly to the magnitude reported in our realistic simulations on LuFeO3 and Mn3Sn. Further systematic studies as necessary to determine the conditions for a maximal non-relativistic Edelstein effect.

A central feature of the non-relativistic nature of the torque is its dependence on the magnetic order. In most magnetic systems, the magnetic exchange is much larger than any other magnetic interactions or torques acting on the system. Hence, during the dynamics of the magnetic order, the angles between the individual magnetic moments stay approximately unchanged. Therefore, the dynamics of the magnetic order are described by an overall rotation of all magnetic moments and a small canting. In the non-relativistic limit (ignoring the small canting) the rotated states are connected by a spin rotation and, consequently, the corresponding torques must also be transformed by this spin rotation. Specifically, any torque acting on magnetic moment Mi can be written as Ti = Mi × Bi, where Bi is an effective magnetic field. When the magnetic moments are rotated by rotation R then the torque reads Ti = RMi × RBi. This is quite distinct from the conventional spin-orbit torque for which the two most important terms are the field-like torque, in which Bi is independent of M, and the antidamping torque, in which Bi ~ Mi × p, p being some constant direction5.

Because of the dependence of the non-relativistic torque on the magnetic order, it may be difficult to realize reversible switching since there can be no magnetic configuration for which the effective field Bi vanishes. This might not be such a limitation in practice, however, since some spin-orbit coupling is always present, which may enable deterministic switching even in cases where the non-relativistic torque is dominant. Furthermore, deterministic switching could be achieved by using field-assisted switching or precise pulse timing. In the presence of antiferromagnetic domain walls, the non-relativistic torque could provide an additional source of spin current and therefore enhance or quench the domain wall mobility, depending on the wall configuration. In fact, the very dependence of the torque on the magnetic ordering makes the interplay between the flowing electrons and the magnetic order particularly rich and, as such, the non-relativistic torque is well adapted to excite magnetic modes and self-oscillations which, in antiferromagnets, are particularly appealing for THz applications.

Methods

The DFT calculations use the VASP code70 and we use the Wannier90 code71 to construct the Wannier Hamiltonian that serves as an input to the linear response calculations. For LuFeO3 we use 9 × 9 × 3 k-point mesh and 520 eV cutoff energy. For the Wannierization, we use the s and d orbitals for Fe, s and p orbitals for O and εF ± 3 eV frozen energy window. For Mn3Sn we use 11 × 11 × 11 k-point mesh and set the cutoff energy to 520 eV. For the Wannierization, we use the s, p, and d orbitals for the Mn atoms, s and p orbitals for the Sn atoms, and we set the frozen energy window to εF ± 2 eV.

For the linear response calculations, we use the Linres code72. This code uses the Wannier or tight-binding Hamiltonian as an input. This Hamiltonian is then Fourier transformed to a dense mesh in the reciprocal space, which is used for evaluating the Kubo formulas as described in ref. 14.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-51565-6.

Acknowledgements

R.G.-H. was supported by Universidad Nacional de Colombia with QUIPU code 202010042199 and MinCiencias Conv. 937 Fundamental Research. P.R. and K.V. acknowledge the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic Grant No. 22-21974S. J.Z. acknowledges support from the Dioscuri Program LV23025 funded by MPG and MEYS and TERAFIT-CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004594. A.M. acknowledges support from the Excellence Initiative of Aix-Marseille Université, A*Midex, a French “Investissements d’Avenir" program, as well as from King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) under award 2022-CRG10-4660.

Author contributions

A.M. and J.Z. conceived the idea, R.G.-H., J.Z., and P.R. performed the first-principles and tight-binding calculations, and J.Z. performed the symmetry analyses. All the authors contributed to the discussions of the results and the preparation of the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Code availability

The open-source codes used in the work are available on the following links: refs. 50,72.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Nagaosa N Sinova J Onoda S MacDonald AH Ong NP Anomalous Hall effect Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010 82 1539 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1539
Nagaosa, N., Sinova, J., Onoda, S., MacDonald, A. H. & Ong, N. P. Anomalous Hall effect. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010).10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1539
2. Ritzinger P Výborný K Anisotropic magnetoresistance: materials, models and applications R. Soc. Open Sci. 2023 10 230564 10.1098/rsos.230564 37859834
Ritzinger, P. & Výborný, K. Anisotropic magnetoresistance: materials, models and applications. R. Soc. Open Sci. 10, 230564 (2023).37859834 10.1098/rsos.230564
3. Sinova J Valenzuela SO Wunderlich J Back CH Jungwirth T Spin Hall effect Rev. Mod. Phys. 2015 87 1213 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1213
Sinova, J., Valenzuela, S. O., Wunderlich, J., Back, C. H. & Jungwirth, T. Spin Hall effect. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213 (2015).10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1213
4. Soumyanarayanan A Reyren N Fert A Panagopoulos C Spin-orbit coupling induced emergent phenomena at surfaces and interfaces Nature 2016 539 509 10.1038/nature19820 27882972
Soumyanarayanan, A., Reyren, N., Fert, A. & Panagopoulos, C. Spin-orbit coupling induced emergent phenomena at surfaces and interfaces. Nature 539, 509 (2016).27882972 10.1038/nature19820
5. Manchon A Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems Rev. Mod. Phys. 2019 91 035004 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035004
Manchon, A. et al. Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035004 (2019).10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035004
6. Sunko V Maximal Rashba-like spin splitting via kinetic energy-driven inversion symmetry breaking Nature 2017 549 492 10.1038/nature23898 28959958
Sunko, V. et al. Maximal Rashba-like spin splitting via kinetic energy-driven inversion symmetry breaking. Nature 549, 492 (2017).28959958 10.1038/nature23898
7. Železný J Unidirectional magnetoresistance and spin-orbit torque in NiMnSb Phys. Rev. B 2021 104 054429 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.054429
Železný, J. et al. Unidirectional magnetoresistance and spin-orbit torque in NiMnSb. Phys. Rev. B 104, 054429 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevB.104.054429
8. Pekar S Rashba EI Combined resonance in crystals in inhomogeneous magnetic fields J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 1965 20 1295
Pekar, S. & Rashba, E. I. Combined resonance in crystals in inhomogeneous magnetic fields. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 20, 1295 (1965).
9. Ramazashvili R Kramers degeneracy in a magnetic field and Zeeman spin-orbit coupling in antiferromagnetic conductors Phys. Rev. B 2009 79 184432 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.184432
Ramazashvili, R. Kramers degeneracy in a magnetic field and Zeeman spin-orbit coupling in antiferromagnetic conductors. Phys. Rev. B 79, 184432 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.79.184432
10. Shindou R Nagaosa N Orbital ferromagnetism and anomalous Hall effect in antiferromagnets on the distorted fcc lattice Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001 87 116801 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.116801 11531542
Shindou, R. & Nagaosa, N. Orbital ferromagnetism and anomalous Hall effect in antiferromagnets on the distorted fcc lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 116801 (2001).11531542 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.116801
11. Martin I Batista CD Itinerant electron-driven chiral magnetic ordering and spontaneous quantum Hall effect in triangular lattice models Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008 101 156402 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.156402 18999621
Martin, I. & Batista, C. D. Itinerant electron-driven chiral magnetic ordering and spontaneous quantum Hall effect in triangular lattice models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 156402 (2008).18999621 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.156402
12. Ndiaye PB Abbout A Goli VMLDP Manchon A Quantum anomalous Hall effect and Anderson-Chern insulating regime in the noncollinear antiferromagnetic 3Q state Phys. Rev. B 2019 100 144440 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.144440
Ndiaye, P. B., Abbout, A., Goli, V. M. L. D. P. & Manchon, A. Quantum anomalous Hall effect and Anderson-Chern insulating regime in the noncollinear antiferromagnetic 3Q state. Phys. Rev. B 100, 144440 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.100.144440
13. Zhang Y Zelezny J Sun Y Brink JVD Yan B Spin Hall effect emerging from a noncollinear magnetic lattice without spin-orbit coupling N. J. Phys. 2018 20 073028 10.1088/1367-2630/aad1eb
Zhang, Y., Zelezny, J., Sun, Y., Brink, J. V. D. & Yan, B. Spin Hall effect emerging from a noncollinear magnetic lattice without spin-orbit coupling. N. J. Phys. 20, 073028 (2018).10.1088/1367-2630/aad1eb
14. Zelezný J Zhang Y Felser C Yan B Spin-polarized current in noncollinear antiferromagnets Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017 119 187204 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.187204 29219584
Zelezný, J., Zhang, Y., Felser, C. & Yan, B. Spin-polarized current in noncollinear antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 187204 (2017).29219584 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.187204
15. Kimata M Magnetic and magnetic inverse spin Hall effects in a non-collinear antiferromagnet Nature 2019 565 627 10.1038/s41586-018-0853-0 30651643
Kimata, M. et al. Magnetic and magnetic inverse spin Hall effects in a non-collinear antiferromagnet. Nature 565, 627 (2019).30651643 10.1038/s41586-018-0853-0
16. Vasko FT Spin splitting in the spectrum of two-dimensional electrons due to the surface potential JETP Lett. 1979 30 541
Vasko, F. T. Spin splitting in the spectrum of two-dimensional electrons due to the surface potential. JETP Lett. 30, 541 (1979).
17. Edelstein VM Spin polarization of conduction electrons induced by electric current in two-dimensional asymmetric electron systems Solid State Commun. 1990 73 233 10.1016/0038-1098(90)90963-C
Edelstein, V. M. Spin polarization of conduction electrons induced by electric current in two-dimensional asymmetric electron systems. Solid State Commun. 73, 233 (1990).10.1016/0038-1098(90)90963-C
18. Aronov AG Lyanda-Geller YB Nuclear electric resonance and orientation of carrier spins by an electric field JETP Lett. 1989 50 398
Aronov, A. G. & Lyanda-Geller, Y. B. Nuclear electric resonance and orientation of carrier spins by an electric field. JETP Lett. 50, 398 (1989).
19. Šmejkal L Sinova J Jungwirth T Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism Phys. Rev. X 2022 12 040501
Šmejkal, L., Sinova, J. & Jungwirth, T. Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism. Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022).
20. López-Moreno S Romero AH Mejía-López J Muñoz A Roshchin IV First-principles study of electronic, vibrational, elastic, and magnetic properties of FeF2 as a function of pressure Phys. Rev. B 2012 85 134110 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.134110
López-Moreno, S., Romero, A. H., Mejía-López, J., Muñoz, A. & Roshchin, I. V. First-principles study of electronic, vibrational, elastic, and magnetic properties of FeF2 as a function of pressure. Phys. Rev. B 85, 134110 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevB.85.134110
21. Noda Y Ohno K Nakamura S Momentum-dependent band spin splitting in semiconducting MnO2: a density functional calculation Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016 18 13294 13303 10.1039/C5CP07806G 27119122
Noda, Y., Ohno, K. & Nakamura, S. Momentum-dependent band spin splitting in semiconducting MnO2: a density functional calculation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 13294–13303 (2016).27119122 10.1039/C5CP07806G
22. Okugawa T Ohno K Noda Y Nakamura S Weakly spin-dependent band structures of antiferromagnetic perovskite LaMO3 (M = Cr, Mn, Fe) J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2018 30 075502 10.1088/1361-648X/aa9e70 29189206
Okugawa, T., Ohno, K., Noda, Y. & Nakamura, S. Weakly spin-dependent band structures of antiferromagnetic perovskite LaMO3 (M = Cr, Mn, Fe). J. Phys. Condens. Matter 30, 075502 (2018).29189206 10.1088/1361-648X/aa9e70
23. Šmejkal L González-hernández R Jungwirth T Sinova J Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets Sci. Adv. 2020 6 eaaz8809 10.1126/sciadv.aaz8809 32548264
Šmejkal, L., González-hernández, R., Jungwirth, T. & Sinova, J. Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020).32548264 10.1126/sciadv.aaz8809
24. Naka M Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets Nat. Commun. 2019 10 4305 10.1038/s41467-019-12229-y 31541112
Naka, M. et al. Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets. Nat. Commun. 10, 4305 (2019).31541112 10.1038/s41467-019-12229-y
25. Hayami S Yanagi Y Kusunose H Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2019 88 123702 10.7566/JPSJ.88.123702
Hayami, S., Yanagi, Y. & Kusunose, H. Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 123702 (2019).10.7566/JPSJ.88.123702
26. Ahn K-h Hariki A Lee K-w Kuneš J Antiferromagnetism in RuO2 as d-wave Pomeranchuk instability Phys. Rev. B 2019 99 184432 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.184432
Ahn, K.-h, Hariki, A., Lee, K.-w & Kuneš, J. Antiferromagnetism in RuO2 as d-wave Pomeranchuk instability. Phys. Rev. B 99, 184432 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.99.184432
27. Yuan L-D Wang Z Luo J-w Rashba EI Zunger A Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Z antiferromagnets Phys. Rev. B 2020 102 014422 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.014422
Yuan, L.-D., Wang, Z., Luo, J.-w, Rashba, E. I. & Zunger, A. Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Z antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevB.102.014422
28. González-Hernández R Efficient electrical spin-splitter based on non-relativistic collinear antiferromagnetism Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021 126 127701 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.127701 33834809
González-Hernández, R. et al. Efficient electrical spin-splitter based on non-relativistic collinear antiferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021).33834809 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.127701
29. Yuan L-D Wang Z Luo JW Zunger A Prediction of low-Z collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling Phys. Rev. Mater. 2021 5 014409 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.014409
Yuan, L.-D., Wang, Z., Luo, J. W. & Zunger, A. Prediction of low-Z collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 014409 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.014409
30. Šmejkal L Sinova J Jungwirth T Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: a phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry Phys. Rev. X 2022 12 031042
Šmejkal, L., Sinova, J. & Jungwirth, T. Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: a phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry. Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022).
31. Egorov SA Litvin DB Evarestov RA Antiferromagnetism-induced spin splitting in systems described by magnetic layer groups J. Phys. Chem. C 2021 125 16147 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02653
Egorov, S. A., Litvin, D. B. & Evarestov, R. A. Antiferromagnetism-induced spin splitting in systems described by magnetic layer groups. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 16147 (2021).10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02653
32. Šmejkal L Hellenes AB González-Hernández R Sinova J Jungwirth T Giant and tunneling magnetoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromagnets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling Phys. Rev. X 2022 12 011028
Šmejkal, L., Hellenes, A. B., González-Hernández, R., Sinova, J. & Jungwirth, T. Giant and tunneling magnetoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromagnets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling. Phys. Rev. X 12, 011028 (2022).
33. Ghosh S Manchon A Železný J Unconventional robust spin-transfer torque in noncollinear antiferromagnetic junctions Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022 128 097702 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.097702 35302787
Ghosh, S., Manchon, A. & Železný, J. Unconventional robust spin-transfer torque in noncollinear antiferromagnetic junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 097702 (2022).35302787 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.097702
34. Hayami S Yanagi Y Kusunose H Spontaneous antisymmetric spin splitting in noncollinear antiferromagnets without spin-orbit coupling Phys. Rev. B 2020 101 220403 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.220403
Hayami, S., Yanagi, Y. & Kusunose, H. Spontaneous antisymmetric spin splitting in noncollinear antiferromagnets without spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B 101, 220403 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevB.101.220403
35. Hayami, S., Yanagi, Y. & Kusunose, H. Bottom-up design of spin-split and reshaped electronic band structures in antiferromagnets without spin-orbit coupling: procedure on the basis of augmented multipoles. Phys. Rev. B 102, 144441 (2020).
36. Hellenes, A. B., Jungwirth, T., Sinova, J. & Šmejkal, L. Unconventional p-wave magnets. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01607 (2023).
37. Bihlmayer, G., Noël, P., Vyalikh, D. V., Chulkov, E. V. & Manchon, A. Rashba-like physics in condensed matter. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 642–659 (2022).
38. Brinkman WF Elliott RJ Theory of spin-space groups Proc. R. Soc. A 1966 294 343 358
Brinkman, W. F. & Elliott, R. J. Theory of spin-space groups. Proc. R. Soc. A 294, 343–358 (1966).
39. Litvin DB Opechowski W Spin groups Physica 1974 76 538 554 10.1016/0031-8914(74)90157-8
Litvin, D. B. & Opechowski, W. Spin groups. Physica 76, 538–554 (1974).10.1016/0031-8914(74)90157-8
40. Krempaský J Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy Nature 2024 626 517 522 10.1038/s41586-023-06907-7 38356066
Krempaský, J. et al. Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy. Nature 626, 517–522 (2024).38356066 10.1038/s41586-023-06907-7
41. Hajlaoui, M. et al. Temperature dependence of relativistic valence band splitting induced by an altermagnetic phase transition. Adv. Mater. 36, 2314076 (2024).
42. Železný J Spin-orbit torques in locally and globally non-centrosymmetric crystals: antiferromagnets and ferromagnets Phys. Rev. B 2017 95 014403 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.014403
Železný, J. et al. Spin-orbit torques in locally and globally non-centrosymmetric crystals: antiferromagnets and ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 95, 014403 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.95.014403
43. Bonbien V Manchon A Symmetrized decomposition of the Kubo-Bastin formula Phys. Rev. B 2020 102 085113 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.085113
Bonbien, V. & Manchon, A. Symmetrized decomposition of the Kubo-Bastin formula. Phys. Rev. B 102, 085113 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevB.102.085113
44. Kurebayashi H An antidamping spin-orbit torque originating from the Berry curvature Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014 9 211 10.1038/nnano.2014.15 24584275
Kurebayashi, H. et al. An antidamping spin-orbit torque originating from the Berry curvature. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 211 (2014).24584275 10.1038/nnano.2014.15
45. Li H Intraband and interband spin-orbit torques in noncentrosymmetric ferromagnets Phys. Rev. B 2015 91 134402 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.134402
Li, H. et al. Intraband and interband spin-orbit torques in noncentrosymmetric ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 91, 134402 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.91.134402
46. Hanke J-P Freimuth F Niu C Blügel S Mokrousov Y Mixed Weyl semimetals and dissipationless magnetization control in insulators Nat. Commun. 2017 8 1479 10.1038/s41467-017-01138-7 29133825
Hanke, J.-P., Freimuth, F., Niu, C., Blügel, S. & Mokrousov, Y. Mixed Weyl semimetals and dissipationless magnetization control in insulators. Nat. Commun. 8, 1479 (2017).29133825 10.1038/s41467-017-01138-7
47. Železný J Relativistic Néel-order fields induced by electrical current in antiferromagnets Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014 113 157201 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.157201 25375735
Železný, J. et al. Relativistic Néel-order fields induced by electrical current in antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 157201 (2014).25375735 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.157201
48. Zhang X Liu Q Luo J-w Freeman AJ Zunger A Hidden spin polarization in inversion-symmetric bulk crystals Nat. Phys. 2014 10 387 10.1038/nphys2933
Zhang, X., Liu, Q., Luo, J.-w, Freeman, A. J. & Zunger, A. Hidden spin polarization in inversion-symmetric bulk crystals. Nat. Phys. 10, 387 (2014).10.1038/nphys2933
49. Zhang Y Okamoto S Xiao D Spin-Nernst effect in the paramagnetic regime of an antiferromagnetic insulator Phys. Rev. B 2018 98 035424 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.035424
Zhang, Y., Okamoto, S. & Xiao, D. Spin-Nernst effect in the paramagnetic regime of an antiferromagnetic insulator. Phys. Rev. B 98, 035424 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.98.035424
50. Železný, J. Linear response symmetry. Bitbucket https://bitbucket.org/zeleznyj/linear-response-symmetry (2024).
51. Freimuth F Blügel S Mokrousov Y Spin-orbit torques in Co/Pt(111) and Mn/W(001) magnetic bilayers from first principles Phys. Rev. B 2014 90 174423 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.174423
Freimuth, F., Blügel, S. & Mokrousov, Y. Spin-orbit torques in Co/Pt(111) and Mn/W(001) magnetic bilayers from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 90, 174423 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.90.174423
52. Kurz P Bihlmayer G Hirai K Blügel S Three-dimensional spin structure on a two-dimensional lattice: Mn/Cu(111) Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001 86 1106 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1106 11178021
Kurz, P., Bihlmayer, G., Hirai, K. & Blügel, S. Three-dimensional spin structure on a two-dimensional lattice: Mn/Cu(111). Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1106 (2001).11178021 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1106
53. Kato Y Martin I Batista CD Stability of the spontaneous quantum Hall state in the triangular Kondo-lattice model Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010 105 266405 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.266405 21231691
Kato, Y., Martin, I. & Batista, C. D. Stability of the spontaneous quantum Hall state in the triangular Kondo-lattice model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 266405 (2010).21231691 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.266405
54. Endoh Y Ishikawa Y Antiferromagnetism of γ iron manganes alloys J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1971 30 1614 10.1143/JPSJ.30.1614
Endoh, Y. & Ishikawa, Y. Antiferromagnetism of γ iron manganes alloys. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 30, 1614 (1971).10.1143/JPSJ.30.1614
55. Gardner JS Gingras MJ Greedan JE Magnetic pyrochlore oxides Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010 82 53 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.53
Gardner, J. S., Gingras, M. J. & Greedan, J. E. Magnetic pyrochlore oxides. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 53 (2010).10.1103/RevModPhys.82.53
56. Manchon A Koo HC Nitta J Frolov SM Duine RA New perspectives for Rashba spin-orbit coupling Nat. Mater. 2015 14 871 10.1038/nmat4360 26288976
Manchon, A., Koo, H. C., Nitta, J., Frolov, S. M. & Duine, R. A. New perspectives for Rashba spin-orbit coupling. Nat. Mater. 14, 871 (2015).26288976 10.1038/nmat4360
57. Tomiyoshi S Polarized neutron diffraction study of the spin structure of Mn3Sn J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1982 51 803 810 10.1143/JPSJ.51.803
Tomiyoshi, S. Polarized neutron diffraction study of the spin structure of Mn3Sn. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 51, 803–810 (1982).10.1143/JPSJ.51.803
58. Nakatsuji S Kiyohara N Higo T Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature Nature 2015 527 212 10.1038/nature15723 26524519
Nakatsuji, S., Kiyohara, N. & Higo, T. Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature. Nature 527, 212 (2015).26524519 10.1038/nature15723
59. Tsai H Electrical manipulation of a topological antiferromagnetic state Nature 2020 580 608 10.1038/s41586-020-2211-2 32350469
Tsai, H. et al. Electrical manipulation of a topological antiferromagnetic state. Nature 580, 608 (2020).32350469 10.1038/s41586-020-2211-2
60. Krishnaswamy GK Time-dependent multistate switching of topological antiferromagnetic order in Mn3Sn Phys. Rev. Appl. 2022 18 024064 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.024064
Krishnaswamy, G. K. et al. Time-dependent multistate switching of topological antiferromagnetic order in Mn3Sn. Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 024064 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.024064
61. Pal B Setting of the magnetic structure of chiral kagome antiferromagnets by a seeded spin-orbit torque Sci. Adv. 2022 8 eabo5930 10.1126/sciadv.abo5930 35704587
Pal, B. et al. Setting of the magnetic structure of chiral kagome antiferromagnets by a seeded spin-orbit torque. Sci. Adv. 8, eabo5930 (2022).35704587 10.1126/sciadv.abo5930
62. Xie H Magnetization switching in polycrystalline Mn3Sn thin film induced by self-generated spin-polarized current Nat. Commun. 2022 13 5744 10.1038/s41467-022-33345-2 36180425
Xie, H. et al. Magnetization switching in polycrystalline Mn3Sn thin film induced by self-generated spin-polarized current. Nat. Commun. 13, 5744 (2022).36180425 10.1038/s41467-022-33345-2
63. Disseler SM Magnetic structure and ordering of multiferroic hexagonal LuFeO3 Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015 114 217602 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.217602 26066458
Disseler, S. M. et al. Magnetic structure and ordering of multiferroic hexagonal LuFeO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 217602 (2015).26066458 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.217602
64. Suresh P Magnetic ground state of the multiferroic hexagonal LuFeO3 Phys. Rev. B 2018 97 184419 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.184419
Suresh, P. et al. Magnetic ground state of the multiferroic hexagonal LuFeO3. Phys. Rev. B 97, 184419 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.97.184419
65. Das H Wysocki AL Geng Y Wu W Fennie CJ Bulk magnetoelectricity in the hexagonal manganites and ferrites Nat. Commun. 2014 5 2998 10.1038/ncomms3998 24389675
Das, H., Wysocki, A. L., Geng, Y., Wu, W. & Fennie, C. J. Bulk magnetoelectricity in the hexagonal manganites and ferrites. Nat. Commun. 5, 2998 (2014).24389675 10.1038/ncomms3998
66. Garate I Franz M Magnetoelectric response of the time-reversal invariant helical metal Phys. Rev. B 2010 81 172408 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.172408
Garate, I. & Franz, M. Magnetoelectric response of the time-reversal invariant helical metal. Phys. Rev. B 81, 172408 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.81.172408
67. Tang, J. & Cheng, R. Lossless Spin-Orbit Torque in Antiferromagnetic Topological Insulator MnBi2Te4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 136701 (2024).
68. Qi X-L Hughes TL Zhang S-C Topological field theory of time-reversal invariant insulators Phys. Rev. B 2008 78 195424 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.195424
Qi, X.-L., Hughes, T. L. & Zhang, S.-C. Topological field theory of time-reversal invariant insulators. Phys. Rev. B 78, 195424 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevB.78.195424
69. Chen H Niu Q Macdonald AH Anomalous Hall effect arising from noncollinear antiferromagnetism Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014 112 017205 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.017205 24483927
Chen, H., Niu, Q. & Macdonald, A. H. Anomalous Hall effect arising from noncollinear antiferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 017205 (2014).24483927 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.017205
70. Kresse G Furthmüller J Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set Phys. Rev. B 1996 54 11169 11186 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169
71. Pizzi G Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2020 32 165902 10.1088/1361-648X/ab51ff 31658458
Pizzi, G. et al. Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32, 165902 (2020).31658458 10.1088/1361-648X/ab51ff
72. Železný, J. Wannier linear response. Bitbucket https://bitbucket.org/zeleznyj/wannier-linear-response (2024).
