
==== Front
Nat Commun
Nat Commun
Nature Communications
2041-1723
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39227369
51647
10.1038/s41467-024-51647-5
Article
Understanding the electrochemical processes of SeS2 positive electrodes for developing high-performance non-aqueous lithium sulfur batteries
Kim Ji Hwan 12
Kim Mihyun 3
Kim Seong-Jun 23
Kim Shin-Yeong 12
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3912-6463
Yu Seungho 45
Hwang Wonchan 12
Kwon Eunji 34
Lim Jae-Hong 6
Kim So Hee 7
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1563-8328
Sung Yung-Eun ysung@snu.ac.kr

12
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4833-3181
Yu Seung-Ho seunghoyu@korea.ac.kr

38
1 https://ror.org/00y0zf565 grid.410720.0 0000 0004 1784 4496 Center for Nanoparticle Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul, Republic of Korea
2 https://ror.org/04h9pn542 grid.31501.36 0000 0004 0470 5905 School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3 https://ror.org/047dqcg40 grid.222754.4 0000 0001 0840 2678 Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
4 https://ror.org/04qh86j58 grid.496416.8 0000 0004 5934 6655 Energy Storage Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
5 https://ror.org/000qzf213 grid.412786.e 0000 0004 1791 8264 Division of Energy & Environment Technology, KIST School, Korea University of Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
6 https://ror.org/02gntzb40 0000 0004 0632 5770 Pohang Accelerator Laboratory, POSTECH, Pohang, Republic of Korea
7 https://ror.org/04qh86j58 grid.496416.8 0000 0004 5934 6655 Advanced Analysis Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
8 https://ror.org/047dqcg40 grid.222754.4 0000 0001 0840 2678 Department of Battery-Smart Factory, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3 9 2024
3 9 2024
2024
15 766911 11 2023
12 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
SeS2 positive electrodes are promising components for the development of high-energy, non-aqueous lithium sulfur batteries. However, the (electro)chemical and structural evolution of this class of positive electrodes is not yet fully understood. Here, we use operando physicochemical measurements to elucidate the dissolution and deposition processes in the SeS2 positive electrodes during lithium sulfur cell charge and discharge. Our analysis of real-time imaging reveals the pivotal role of Se in the SeS2 nucleation process, while S enables selective depositions. During the initial discharge, SeS2 converts into Se and S separately, with the dissolved Se acting as nucleation sites due to their lower nucleation potential. The Se effectively catalyzes the growth of S particles, resulting in improved lithium sulfur battery performance compared to cells using positive electrodes containing only Se or S as active materials. By adjusting the Se-to-S ratio, we demonstrate that a low concentration of Se enables uniform catalytic sites, promotes the homogeneous distribution of S and favours improved lithium sulfur battery performance.

SexSy is a promising positive electrode material for non-aqueous Li||chalcogen batteries. However, the behaviour of S and Se in the electrode is unclear. Here, the authors investigate the physicochemical phenomena of SexSy and the catalytic role of Se during battery testing.

Subject terms

Batteries
Materials for energy and catalysis
Energy storage
Electrochemistry
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003725 National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) NRF-2020R1C1C1012308 Yu Seung-Ho issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Sulfur (S) is considered an appealing positive electrode active material for non-aqueous lithium sulfur batteries because it enables a theoretical specific cell energy of 2600 Wh kg−1 1–3. However, the electronically insulating characteristic of S hinders the possibility of cycling Li | |S cells at high specific current, thus preventing a high technology readiness level development4–7. In this regard, selenium (Se), a non-metal element of the group 16 with d-electrons, is considered as an ideal candidate for addressing the electrical conductivity issues in S-based electrodes. Se shows an electrical conductivity of approximately 1025 times higher than that of S (Se has electrical conductivity of 1 × 10−3 S cm−1 and S has 5 × 10−28 S cm−1 at 25 °C)8–10. However, because of its high atomic number, Se enables a low theoretical specific capacity, i.e., 675 mAh g−1 11.

To effectively address these challenges, researchers have focused their attention on selenium sulfides (SexSy) as a positive electrode active materials12,13. Se and S can be formed in various ratios during the synthesis, and these ratios can be controlled. Therefore, SexSy refers to a Se-S composite where Se and S are present in different ratios14–16. SexSy exhibits higher capacity than pure Se while maintaining improved electrical conductivity compared to S17,18. Nonetheless, a critical barrier remains in understanding the intricate reactions and mechanisms around these materials19. Furthermore, chalcogens such as S and Se typically undergo nucleation and growth mechanisms, given their conversion reactions rather than intercalation20–23. It is crucial to note that uncontrolled nucleation and growth is detrimental for the stable operation of batteries, particularly at high specific currents (higher than 1 C, which corresponds to 1675 mA g−1 for S and 675 mA g−1 for Se), leading to the formation of unreactable precipitates of S and Se24–26. To harness the full potential of chalcogens as positive electrode active materials, a comprehensive understanding of their chemo-mechanistic properties becomes paramount.

In this study, we elucidate the dissolution and deposition mechanism of SexSy by advanced techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission X-ray microscopy (TXM) during non-aqueous Li | |S cell operation, supplemented by density functional theory (DFT) calculations to provide insights into the underlying behavior. Additionally, our results reveal that the mixture of S and Se yields comparable mechanisms and performance benefits to SexSy and provide the optimal element ratio to improve the battery performance on non-aqueous lithium sulfur cells.

Results and discussion

Fundamental studies on behaviors in Li | |SeS2 coin cells

The discharge/charge reaction mechanisms of S, Se, and SeS2 in the chalcogen family were investigated through cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements and analyses, as depicted in Fig. 1a. During the discharge process for all three chalcogen positive electrode active materials, two prominent cathodic peaks were observed. The first cathodic peak corresponds to the reduction of S or Se to high-order lithium polysulfides (Li2Sx, 4 ≤ x ≤ 8) or lithium polyselenides (Li2Sex, 4 ≤ x ≤ 8), while the lower plateau is attributed to their further reduction to the final products, namely lithium sulfide (Li2S) or lithium selenide (Li2Se). However, in the case of SeS2, an additional minor cathodic peak appears at 2.1 V, resembling the position of Se’s first cathodic peak. This observation suggests that reduction to lithium polysulfides (LiPS) and lithium polyselenides (LiPSe) occurs in order, and finally precipitate to Li2S and Li2Se at a second plateau region. When examining the anodic scans, anodic peaks emerge, and they are associated to the Li2S and/or Li2Se final products returning to their original states. The position of the first peak in the anodic scan depends on the reactivity of the final products, which causes the first peak to shift to a higher potential region. While the anodic peaks of S and Se overlap due to multiple reactions occurring simultaneously, SeS2 exhibits two distinct anodic peaks. This phenomenon arises from the varying reaction kinetics of the final products. Specifically, Li2Se has an energy bandgap of 2.997 eV, while Li2S is 3.297 eV27–29. Generally, it is observed that as the energy bandgap decreases, electrical conductivity tends to increase, therefore, Li2Se displays faster reaction kinetics than Li2S due to its higher electrical conductivity. As a result, the fully discharged SeS2 electrode consists of a mixture of Li2Se and Li2S, with Li2Se exhibiting slower reactivity compared to a pure Se electrode, while Li2S reacts more quickly than a pure S electrode. The presence of these two anodic peaks is attributed to the combination of different reaction kinetics between Li2S and Li2Se.Fig. 1 Electrochemical testing of Li | |S, Li | |Se and Li | |SeS2 cells.

a Cyclic voltammograms at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. b Voltage profiles of Li | |S cell at a specific current = 335 mA g−1; Li | |Se cell at a specific current = 135 mA g−1; Li | |SeS2 cell at a specific current = 240 mA g−1 for the first cycle. c Rate performance at different specific currents. d Long-term cycling of Li | |S, Li | |Se and Li | |SeS2 coin cells tested at various specific currents (positive electrode active material mass loading = 2 mg cm−2; ratio of electrolyte to active materials, E/A = 5 μL mg−1; Li | |S current rate = 1675 mA g−1; Li | |Se current rate = 675 mA g−1; Li | |SeS2 current rate = 1200 mA g−1). The electrochemical testing was conducted at 25 °C, and the mass of the specific current refers to the mass of the active material in the positive electrode.

Figure 1b compared the voltage profiles in the first cycle for various non-aqueous Li | |chalcogen cells with three different chalcogen-based positive electrodes, revealing differences in the 1st cycle specific discharge capacity (Li | |S cell cycled at 335 mA g−1 delivers 1078 mAh g−1, Li | |Se cell cycled at 135 mA g−1 delivers 458 mAh g−1 and, Li | |SeS2 cell cycled at 240 mA g−1 delivers 817 mAh g−1) in line with their respective theoretical capacities. These profiles also align with the CV peaks observed in Fig. 1a. Notably, SeS2 exhibits two additional plateaus at both high and low voltage regions, indicating differing reaction timings between S and Se. This suggests that SeS2 may possess a combination of the advantages of S and Se, offering improved specific discharge capacity due to enhanced electrical conductivity.

From this perspective, electrochemical analysis of the Li | |chalcogen cells containing the three different S-based positive electrodes were performed, as shown in Fig. 1c, d. In rate performance, we standardized the specific current based on the current per unit mass of active material at the positive electrodes. The loading of active materials was maintained at 2 mg cm−2, and the ratio of the electrolyte to active material (E/A) was set at 5 μL mg−1. In Fig. 1c, rate performance evaluations were conducted for the Li | |chalcogen cells with the three different S-based positive electrodes at various specific currents, ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 A g−1. Notably, the Li | |S coin cell exhibited reversible capacities of 1132, 1040, and 1013 mAh g−1 at rates of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 A g−1, respectively, surpassing the Li | |SeS2 coin cell (852, 750, and 678 mAh g−1) and the Li | |Se coin cell (382, 262, and 182 mAh g−1) in these conditions. However, as the specific currents increased to 0.4 to 1.0 A g−1, reversible capacities of the Li | |S coin cell dropped significantly to 304, 209, and 145 mAh g−1, while the Li | |SeS2 coin cell maintained higher values of 566, 508, and 400 mAh g−1, indicating improved rate performance. In Fig. 1d, we compared the cycle performance at the same C-rate of 1 C for 100 cycles, corresponding to 1675 mA g−1 for Li | |S coin cell, 1200 mA g−1 for Li | |SeS2 coin cell, and 675 mA g−1 for Li | |Se coin cell. We chose this approach over using a fixed specific current because the theoretical capacities of the materials being compared differ, using specific current results in each electrode reacting at a different relative rate. Therefore, the approach using the C-rate rather than specific current offers a more intuitive comparison of the cycle performances among various active materials, ensuring uniform discharge/charge duration. Pre-activation involved 2 cycles at a specific current of 0.1 C-rate to ensure uniform active material distribution and the pre-activation cycle data and its corresponding voltage profiles are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. Li | |SeS2 coin cell exhibited a significantly higher reversible capacity retention of 70% compared to Li | |Se coin cell’s 7.7% retention and Li | |S coin cell’s reversible capacity of only 210 mAh g−1. It is important to highlight that the rate capability and cyclability tests were performed under relatively low electrolyte to active material (E/A) ratio conditions, using pure S, Se, and SeS2 powders as active materials. Thus, although the battery performances at high specific current are limited, the proof of concept demonstrated in this study could lay the foundation for future work in terms of positive electrode active material engineering improvement.

To unravel the dissolution and precipitation mechanism of SeS2, a customized coin cell was designed for operando XRD measurements, with detailed information provided in the method section. Figure 2a shows a voltage profile of a Li | |SeS2 cell subjected to a constant current of 120 mA g−1, with a cell voltage in the 1.7– 2.8 V range during the first cycle, accompanied by the corresponding operando XRD patterns. In the pristine state, the XRD pattern exhibited discernible peaks for SeS2 (JCPDS No. 047-1611) at 20.4°, 23.8°, 24.2°, 25.3°, 26.8°, 27.7°, 28.8°, and 29.5°, as indexed in orange and depicted in Fig. 2b. As the discharge (lithiation) process commenced, the characteristic peaks associated with SeS2 is barely detectable, with an exception being the peak at 23.8°. In the early stage of discharging, this peak shifted slightly to a lower angle before transitioning to a higher angle. Eventually, only the specific peaks attributed to Se remained. This phenomenon suggests that in the ring structured SeS2 composed of both S and Se, S dissolves first in the initial discharge stage. The relatively larger atomic radius of Se than S leads to a larger d-spacing, resulting in the lower-angle shift observed. Once S is completely dissolved, Se takes over, leading to the disappearance of the two characteristic Se peaks. Consequently, Li2S (JCPDS No. 023-0369) is initially generated, followed by the formation of Li2Se (JCPDS No. 023-0072), as marked in green.Fig. 2 Operando XRD measurements of Li | |SeS2 cell.

a XRD patterns recorded during the first cycle at a specific current of 120 mA g−1 and the corresponding galvanostatic curve. b An enlarged XRD patterns of the area marked in blue, black and red in representing the latter part of charging, initial stage for Se nucleation, and the early part of discharging, respectively. This measurement was conducted at 25 °C, and the mass of the specific current refers to the mass of the active material in the positive electrode (positive electrode active material mass loading = 5 mg cm−2; ratio of electrolyte to active materials, E/A = 20 μL mg−1).

Conversely, in the charging (delithiation) process, the Li2Se peak gradually diminishes initially, as shown in Fig. 2b. This is followed by the nucleation of Se (JCPDS No. 006-0362), as indicated in black. As the charging progresses post-Se nucleation, it becomes evident that the reaction mechanism toward a crystal structure distinct from the initial state of SeS2. With the progression of Se nucleation, the emergence of beta phase S (JCPDS No. 071-0137), highlighted in yellow, becomes apparent. By the end of the charging state, a mixed crystal structure comprising Se and beta phase S is observed. Thus, this investigation demonstrates that SeS2 does not revert to its original state after the first cycle but instead crystallizes, undergoing separation into Se and beta phase S.

Understanding the nucleation and growth mechanisms of SeS2-based positive electrodes during Li | |SeS2 cell charging

To visualize the formation of Se and S crystals within the SeS2 positive electrode, we employed operando transmission X-ray microscopy (TXM)25,26,30, as shown in Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Movie 1. In Fig. 3a, we present the cell voltage profile with specific state of charge (SOC) points, each corresponding to the SOC where Se (highlighted in gray) and S (marked in orange) nucleate, as determined from operando XRD pattern analysis. We denoted these SOC points as ‘S digits’ with, for example, S80 indicating an 80% state of charge. Figure 3b, extracted from Supplementary Movie 1 at S100, provides a visual representation of Se and S particles with high intensities (yellow), while the carbon current collector appears as relatively low-intensity background features in blue. To generalize this phenomenon, we divided the field of view into three regions, as depicted in Fig. 3b. These three regions were magnified and tracked in Fig. 3c, corresponding to specific SOC points, to monitor the growth of Se and S crystals. Using XRD results as indicators of crystal formation points, TXM images were categorized into two groups: from S67 to S80 and from S80 to S100. Further detailed analysis and discussion on distinguishing those crystals can be found in Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Note 1. The nucleation of Se seed is indicated by sky-blue arrows, commencing around S67 to S71, and these Se particles develop into dendritic structures until S80. As S particle formation begins, we traced the growth of S particles with red arrows, noting that S tended to grow on the surfaces of the already-formed Se crystals. A comparative analysis of TXM images at SOC points S77 and S100 was conducted, as depicted in Supplementary Fig. 3. Marked by red overlays on the grayscale TXM image at S100, these comparisons reveal distinct features, indicating the distribution of S particles around Se crystals. This implies LiPS oxidation on these crystals during the charging process. To further support the notion of these Se nuclei as seeds for S, additional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was also conducted, as shown in Supplementary Figs. 4, 5 and Supplementary Note 2. The formation of S is more evident in Supplementary Movie 1 than in the figures. The average area of these Se/S crystals was approximately 6700 μm2, calculated using ImageJ software. Moreover, we conducted ex situ SEM imaging in backscattered electron (BSE) mode to reveal the detailed morphology of dendritic Se/S crystals as shown in Fig. 3d. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis of the red box in the SEM image confirmed the presence of S particles (illustrated in yellow) on the surface of Se crystals (displayed in cyan). To ascertain a more accurate Se and S ratio, high-magnification SEM and EDS experiments were conducted, and the results can be observed in Supplementary Fig. 6. As described in Fig. 3e, this result provides experimental proof on the reaction mechanism of non-aqueous Li | |SeS2 cell configuration.Fig. 3 Operando TXM measurements of Li | |SeS2 cell.

a Voltage profile of the SeS2 electrode in charging at a specific current of 600 mA g−1 for the first cycle b TXM image of SeS2 electrode at a state of S100. (Color bar is an index of detected x-ray radiation determined by material’s density). Real-time behavior of the SeS2 electrode in operando TXM observation can be identified in Supplementary Movie 1. c Operando TXM images of the SeS2 electrode at three different enlarged regions (I, II, and III) at various SOCs. d Ex situ SEM image in a BSE mode of the SeS2 electrode at a fully charged state and the EDS images of the red box in the SEM image corresponding to the Se and S atom. e Schematic illustration of the growth mechanism in the lithium | |selenium sulfides cell. This measurement was conducted at 25 °C, and the mass of the specific current refers to the mass of the active material in the positive electrode (positive electrode active material mass loading = 2 mg cm−2).

The DFT calculation results could provide the theoretical support on the reason why S forms preferentially on the surface of pre-formed Se crystals rather than on the carbon current collector. Figure 4 presents first-principles calculations assessing the adsorption energy of LiPS on both graphene layer and Se (100) surfaces. As shown in Fig. 4a, the calculated adsorption energies for LiPS on the carbon surface were −0.58 eV (Li2S), −0.63 eV (Li2S2), −0.53 eV (Li2S4), −0.52 eV (Li2S6) and −0.55 eV (Li2S8). Conversely, on the Se slab, the computed adsorption energies for LiPS were as follows: −2.63 eV for Li2S, −1.50 eV for Li2S2, −1.06 eV for Li2S4, − 1.08 eV for Li2S6, and −1.10 eV for Li2S8, as shown in Fig. 4b. These values highlight the stronger adsorption of LiPS on the Se (100) surface compared to the graphene layer, in line with experimental data, suggesting a preference for LiPS adsorption on Se surface. The transition from Li2S2 to Li2S is identified as a rate-determining step due to its substantial activation energy requirement31–33. Our computational analysis reveals a distinction in the binding energies associated with Li2S2 on different substrates: −0.63 eV for graphene compared to −1.50 eV for a Se surface. This difference suggests a stronger affinity of Li2S2 for Se, implying a favorable interaction that can influence the reaction pathway. Additionally, the energy barrier for dissociation (ΔE) of Li2S2 on graphene is computed at 4.23 eV, notably higher than the 0.36 eV observed for the Se surface (Supplementary Fig. 7). The lower energy barrier on Se indicates a facilitated solid-phase conversion process, essential for efficient reaction kinetics. In conclusion, our DFT-based analysis supports the premise that Se acts as catalyst within the Li | |S-based battery system, promoting the critical Li2S2 to Li2S phase transformation by providing lower energy pathways and stronger adsorptive interactions.Fig. 4 Results of first principle calculations.

a Atomic configurations and adsorption energies of Li-polysulfides on graphene layer. Li, S, and C atoms are represented by the colors blue, yellow, and brown, respectively. b Atomic configurations and adsorption energies of Li-polysulfides on Se (100) surface. Li, S, and Se atoms are represented by the colors blue, yellow, and brown, respectively.

Feasibility of expanding toward blended SexSy

Through XRD analysis, it was demonstrated that the SeS2 active materials eventually undergo reduction into Li2Se and Li2S, and each species subsequently re-oxidizes to form Se and S crystals during the initial charge/discharge cycle of the Li | |SeS2 cell. Notably, due to the preferential absorption of S over Se, S growth occurred in conjunction with the Se nuclei. At this juncture, we focused our attention toward determining if comparable results could be achieved by formulating positive electrodes through the combination of Se and S in an equimolar ratio, similar to that of SeS2.

Figure 5a illustrates that both the voltage profiles of the Li | |S coin cells with the SeS2-based and the blend-based positive electrodes, comprising S and Se, exhibited similarities in terms of voltage plateaus, specific capacity, and voltage profiles. As shown in Fig. 5b, c, operando XRD analysis confirmed that the XRD patterns before the discharging differed, but after initial cycle, both patterns became identical, displaying peaks corresponding to Se and beta phase S crystals.Fig. 5 Operando XRD and TXM measurements of Li | |Se:S (1:2) blended cell.

a Voltage profiles of the Li | |S cells with the SeS2 and Se:S (1:2) blended electrodes at a specific current of 0.2 A g−1 for the first charge/discharge cycle of the cell. Operando XRD patterns of two electrodes at first cycle in early discharge and final charge states are marked in red and blue each for b, c representing SeS2 and Se:S (1:2) blended electrodes, respectively. This measurement was conducted at 25 °C, and the mass of the specific current refers to the mass of the active material in the positive electrode (positive electrode active material mass loading = 5 mg cm−2; ratio of electrolyte to active materials, E/A = 20 μL mg−1). TXM images of Se:S (1:2) blended electrode at a specific current of 600 mA g−1 d from the first nucleation of Se to S79 and e from the first growth of S to S100 of the enlarged area of the yellow box in S79 (scale bar = 50 μm). The corresponding operando TXM movie can be seen in Supplementary Movie 2. f Schematic illustration for SeS2 and Se:S (1:2) blended electrodes for the first cycle. This measurement was conducted at 25 °C, and the mass of the specific current refers to the mass of the active material in the positive electrode (positive electrode active material mass loading = 2 mg cm−2).

Moreover, we conducted TXM analysis as shown in Fig. 5, Supplementary Fig. 8 and Supplementary Movie 2. TXM images revealed the initial growth of Se seeds, followed by the concurrent growth of S particles alongside the Se nuclei, as depicted in Fig. 5d, e. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 9, a comparative analysis of TXM images was also conducted at SOC points S79 and S100, showing the distribution of S particles around Se crystals. Additionally, we conducted high-magnification ex situ SEM and EDS experiments to confirm the presence of S particles (illustrated in yellow) on the surface of Se crystals (displayed in cyan) as illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 10. Therefore, both the SeS2-based and the blend-based positive electrodes exhibited the same crystal formation mechanism after the initial cell discharging, as illustrated in Fig. 5f. However, the initial state of Se peaks in the Se:S (1:2) blended electrode, which appears weaker and broader compared to those in the fully charged state, is not observed in the SeS2 electrode. These differences in crystallinity between the fully charged state and the initial pristine state of Se, particularly the weaker and broader Se peak around 30 ° in the pristine state, result from the ball-milling process. We analyzed the full width at half maximum (FWHM) values in the XRD data of Se powder before and after ball-milling to evaluate the crystallinity changes during sample preparation. The comparison, presented in Supplementary Fig. 11, demonstrates enlarged XRD peaks at 23.5° and 29.7°, corresponding to the (100) and (101) planes, respectively. The FWMH values for these planes in pristine Se powder were 0.450 and 0.370, respectively, which increased to 0.560 and 0.462 after ball-milling, indicating a slight decrement in crystallinity.

Based on these observations, we proposed two cases in Fig. 6a. In Case I, a positive electrode with a high Se ratio in the mixture results in the generation of a significant amount of LiPSe during discharging. During recharging process, once the Se nucleus is formed, there is a preference for growth on pre-existing Se deposits due to favorable energetics when a sufficient amount of LiPSe is supplied. As the Se nucleus grows to a certain extent, the local concentration of LiPSe around the site decreases, leading to a reduced growth rate. Consequently, new nuclei start forming at a distance, and these newly generated nuclei tend to be smaller than the ones already formed, owing to the limited availability of LiPSe. These findings align with results previously reported in the literature, highlighting the impact of the concentration of LiPSe near the formed nuclei on the nucleation and subsequent growth behavior of Se26.Fig. 6 Operando TXM measurements of Li | |Se:S (1:10) blended cell.

a Schematic illustration for comparison of Se crystal growth mechanism based on the Se ratio in the positive electrode and the corresponding crystal growth of SexSy in the case II. (Se = gray, S = yellow, and Li = green). b Voltage profile of the Li | |Se:S (1:10) blended coin cell at a specific current of 600 mA g−1 for the first charging process. c TXM images from S70 to S100 (scale bar = 50 μm). The operando TXM can be seen in Supplementary Movie 4. d TXM images of enlarged two areas of the red and green box of S100 in c from S79 to S100. This measurement was conducted at 25 °C, and the mass of the specific current refers to the mass of the active material in the positive electrode (positive electrode active material mass loading = 2 mg cm−2).

On the other hand, in Case II, a positive electrode with a low Se ratio generates a lower concentration of LiPSe during the discharging. Due to the reduced and insufficient resource supply, the growth of Se occurs slowly, allowing simultaneous nucleation rather than individual growth. This process leads to smaller and more evenly distributed crystals. A more detailed description of each step can be found in Supplementary Fig. 12 and Supplementary Note 3. Concerning SexSy-based positive electrodes, our previous calculation data confirmed that S particles tend to grow on Se seeds preferentially over carbon fiber. A positive electrode with a lower ratio of Se is expected to result in smaller seeds for the growth of S particles and promote homogeneous SexSy crystal growth.

To validate our hypothesis, operando TXM analysis was conducted on a blend-based positive electrode, comprising the Se:S molar ratio as 1:5 and 1:10, as shown in Supplementary Figs. 13 and 14, respectively. TXM images were extracted from Supplementary Movie 3 and Supplementary Movie 4. As shown in Fig. 6b, the voltage profile of the Li | |Se:S (1:10) blended coin cell during charging enables the visualization of the gray- and orange-colored circles where each selenium and sulfur crystals nucleated. As shown in Fig. 6c, Se crystals, indicated by white circles, appeared smaller than those in positive electrodes with a higher Se ratio such as SeS2. The growth of sulfur particles was indicated by red circles from S79 to S100. In Fig. 6d, the red and light-green square boxes from Fig. 6c were enlarged to provide more detailed views, demonstrating the growth of sulfur particles along with the selenium seeds, as tracked by the respective red and light-green arrows. The average area of the Se:S (1:10) crystal was approximately 545 μm2. Supplementary Fig. 15 illustrates distinct Se nuclei observed in TXM images of each electrode captured prior to S formation. It is apparent that as the Se ratio decreases within the electrode, there is a concurrent increase in the number of Se nuclei along with a decrement in their size. This observation aligns with our hypothesis, providing confirmation of the impact of the Se ratio on nucleation behavior.

Our prior investigation has substantiated that SeS2 exhibits a closely analogous reaction behavior when compared to Se:S (1:2) blended electrodes. This empirical verification is particularly conspicuous within the SEM images. Figure 7 presents SEM images in BSE mode, portraying positive electrodes characterized by varying the Se-to-S ratio. These images offer a comprehensive depiction of crystal morphology and size comparison. We illustrate this tendency in Fig. 7a. Manipulating chalcogen ratios to achieve more uniform distribution of active materials results in enhanced homogeneity in electrochemical processes in lithium chalcogen batteries34–36.Fig. 7 Ex situ SEM measurements of positive electrodes containing various Se:S molar ratio.

a Schematic illustration for the comparison of different Se-to-S ratio positive electrode active materials at fully charged state (Se nuclei = black, Se = grey, and S = dark yellow). b Ex situ SEM images at fully charged state at a specific current of 600 mA g−1 after the first charging process in a BSE mode. The red boxes represent the gradually enlarged SEM images in the vertical direction. This measurement was conducted at 25 °C, and the mass of the specific current refers to the mass of the active material in the positive electrode (positive electrode active material mass loading = 2 mg cm−2).

As shown in Fig. 7b, the appearance of Se in SeS2 and Se:S (1:2) blended electrodes is very similar in terms of shape and dimension. The substantial size of these Se crystals, often ranging in the order of hundreds of micrometers, making difficult to distinguish the presence of S on Se crystal surface. Nonetheless, Fig. 3d provides evidence through EDS analysis, corroborating the simultaneous presence of S on the Se surface. Notably, the influence of Se in facilitating S growth becomes pronounced as Se concentration decreases. Reduced Se concentration leads to a diminishment in Se crystal dimensions to the scale of tens of micrometers, thus establishing catalytic sites conductive to S deposition. Furthermore, an examination of the seed surface in Se:S (1:10) reveals the envelopment of numerous S clusters around Se, thereby reinforcing the claims presented earlier. These findings support Se’s pivotal role as a catalytic site in promoting the uniform deposition of S.

Prior researches on chalcogen composites primarily focused on their application in a singular composite form or materials engineering aimed at achieving Li-based batteries with improved electrochemical energy storage performances37–39. Te has been recently introduced as an additive into S and Li2S-based positive electrodes, resulting in the formation of a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on the surface of the Li metal electrode to enhance battery performance40. While that study primarily addressed the effects on the lithium metal negative electrode, the present study demonstrates the pivotal role of positive electrode active material morphological evolution in affecting battery performance.

Optimization of the Se-S-based positive electrode formulation

Taking into account the results presented in this article, we could summarize that: when a small amount of Se is present, resulting in a low concentration of LiPSe, Se serves as a nucleation seed that uniformly permeates the electrode during the initial charging. Afterward, S growth occurs along these Se seeds. Therefore, by carefully adjusting the Se-to-S ratio, it is possible to grow S on a minor quantity of Se seeds. This is expected to yield a synergetic effect, capitalizing on the rapid kinetics of Se and the high capacity of S simultaneously.

To experimentally validate these claims, we fabricated three electrodes with varying molar ratio of Se:S, ranging from 1:2 to 1:10. We compare the voltage profiles of Li | |S coin cells containing three different Se-S-based positive electrodes varying the specific currents as shown in Fig. 8a–c. It is evident that the galvanostatic discharge/charge voltage profiles of the three Li | |Se-S cells gradually follow the voltage profile of the Li | |S cell as the relative amount of Se decreases. The discharge capacities obtained from the long plateau at 2.1 V and a specific current of 0.1 A g−1 are 759, 691, and 605 mAh g−1 for the Li | |Se-S cells with the 1:10, 1:5, and 1:2 electrodes, respectively. Additionally, the stair-like profile observed in the nearly final discharge state, for the cells with the 1:5 and 1:2 electrode and resembles Li | |SeS2 cell (Fig. 1b), is not observed in the Li | |Se:S (1:10) blended cell. This latter cell, which contains an optimized amount of Se, exhibits the longest voltage plateaus and the least polarization under all specific current conditions. The rate capabilities of these positive electrodes tested in Li | |S coin cell configuration are presented in Fig. 8d. Among the three samples, the 1:10 electrode enables the highest cell reversible capacities, achieving 1077, 908, 844, 815, 801, and 769 mAh g−1 at specific currents of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 1.0 A g−1, respectively. These capacities represent values for intermediate cycles at each given specific current. Particularly, after enduring high specific current, the discharge capacity rebounds to 853 mAh g−1 when the specific current is reduced to 0.2 A g−1. In comparison with the other electrodes, the Li | |Se:S (1:10) blended coin cell exhibits the highest reversible capacity and rate capability, thanks to faster redox reaction kinetics facilitated by the homogeneous nucleation seeds of Se.Fig. 8 Battery performances of Li | |S coin cells with positive electrodes containing various Se:S molar ratio.

a–c Voltage profiles of Li | |S coin cells with various SeS2-based positive electrodes corresponding to the cycle numbers 3, 8, 13, 18, 23, 28, and 33 in (d). d Rate capability tests of Li | |S coin cells with SeS2-based positive electrodes having various Se:S molar ratio (Se:S = 1:2, 1:5 and 1:10) and 2 mg cm−2 of active material loading at various specific currents. e Long-term cycling stability of Li | |S coin cells (at a specific current of 1.0 A g−1) with various SeS2-based positive electrodes with active material mass loading of 2 mg cm−2 and E/A = 5 μL mg−1. This measurement was conducted at 25 °C, and the mass of the specific current refers to the mass of the active material in the positive electrode.

Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 8e, we conducted long-term cycling tests for all the various Li | |S cells with an active material loading of 2 mg cm−2 at a specific current of 1.0 A g−1 for 100 cycles. After pre-activation for 2 cycles at a specific current of 0.1 A g−1, the Li | |S cells with the 1:10, 1:5, 1:2 and SeS2 positive electrodes exhibited capacity retentions of 72%, 64%, 52%, and 67%, respectively. Particularly, the Coulombic efficiency (CE) over 100% during the early cycles in 1:2 electrode is observed as shown in Fig. 8e and the CE data plotted in the 90–103% range are reported in Supplementary Fig. 16. The high CE (>100%) means that the discharge capacity was larger than charge capacity, indicating 1:2 electrode does not undergo the pre-activation as well as other electrodes during early cycles. As shown in this article, the 1:2 and SeS2 electrodes undergo electrochemical reaction through the same mechanism, but the difference in reactivity is observed. In addition, the capacity fading observed in the early cycle performance of the cell with the 1:2 electrode, as depicted in Fig. 8d, e, is more evident when compared to the one of the cell with the SeS2 electrode, despite undergoing similar mechanism. In spite of the similarity, variations in electrochemical properties can be present between SeS2, featuring S and Se in a specific atomic configuration, and the 1:2 blended electrode, which constitutes a simple mixture at a molar ratio in bulk. These distinction impacts the reaction kinetics during cell discharge and charge cycles. To further substantiate the differences in reactivity between SeS2 and the 1:2 electrodes, cyclic voltammetry (CV) analyses were performed, as illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 17a. During the cathodic scan, three representative peaks were observed. We further analyzed the peak potential (Supplementary Fig. 17b) and onset potential (derived by using the tangent method41, Supplementary Fig. 17c) obtained by the CV (Supplementary Fig. 17a). SeS2 exhibited a higher peak potential (2.33 V, 2.17 V, and 2.04 V) and onset potential (2.41 V, 2.30 V, and 2.10 V) than the 1:2 electrode at peaks 1, 2, and 3, respectively, indicating a lower overpotential. Additionally, CV measurements at various scan rates were conducted to examine reaction kinetics, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 18. Analysis of the cathodic peak currents linearly fitted according to scan rates showed that SeS2 exhibited steeper slopes at all peaks, indicating faster redox reaction kinetics. This finding supports our hypothesis that SeS2, with its atomic-level composites, demonstrating improved performance compared to bulk-mixed blended electrodes with the same ratio. At low Se concentrations, the incorporation of Se seeds enables the highest cell rate capabilities and long-term performance, particularly in catalyzing the uniform deposition of S. This can be attributed to Se’s role in facilitating the even distribution of S, resulting in enhanced S utilization and rapid reactivity. Consequently, this leads to the efficient execution of higher-rate charge and discharge processes, ultimately extending the cell’s cycle lifespan.

In summary, this study sheds light on the intrinsic morphological behavior of chalcogen-based positive electrode active materials, particularly focusing on SexSy for non-aqueous lithium sulfur batteries. Our study revealed the behavior of SeS2 as it undergoes separation into Se and S during the initial cycle. During the subsequent charging process, dissolved Se forms seeds with a low nucleation voltage, while S preferentially deposits and grows on these seeds. We found that a mixture of Se and S exhibited analogous behavior to SeS2, emphasizing the catalytic effect of Se seeds and the potential for achieving enhanced performance compared to the separate reactions of Se and S.

In contrast to many prior studies that primarily emphasized performance improvement and focused on the influence at the Li metal negative electrode, our research involves real-time observation of the internal behavior occurring at the positive electrode. Based on this understanding, we have introduced an optimized strategy to maximize the catalytic effects of Se. Ultimately, our work demonstrates that by utilizing a trace amount of Se to create catalytic seeds in the S-containing positive electrode, a synergistic effect can be achieved. This effect enables high cell capacity while enhancing reaction kinetics.

Methods

Operando XRD measurements

We utilized a customized CR2032-type coin cell (316 stainless steel, Welcos) configuration with a central hole punched and sealed with Kapton film. To enhance the transmitted X-ray flux and prevent the overlap of two diffraction peaks (graphite and Li2S), an Al mesh (99.99%, Welcos, pore size: 89 µm) served as current collector for positive electrodes. The slurry consisted of positive electrode active materials, Super P carbon (average particle size: 400 nm, Timcal), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) (99%, Kanto Chemical) with a weight ratio of 70:20:10. These materials were loaded onto the Al mesh as a current collector with a mass of approximately 5 mg cm−2, and the ratio of electrolyte to active materials, denoted as the E/A, was maintained at 20 µL/mgpositive electrode. Afterward, the positive electrodes were punched into discs with a diameter of 11 mm. In a glovebox (O2, H2O < 1 ppm) under an argon (Ar) atmosphere, we assembled a CR2032-type custom-designed coin cell. This cell featured positive electrodes as the working electrode, with a Li metal foil (99.95%, Honjo, thickness: 350 µm) punched into discs with a diameter of 15 mm serving both as the counter and reference electrodes. The separator used in coin cell is PolyPropylene(PP). The organic electrolyte utilized was a solution of 1.0 M lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) (99.95%, Sigma Aldrich) in a 1:1 volume ratio mixture of 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) (anhydrous, 99.8%, Sigma Aldrich) and 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) (anhydrous, 99.5% Sigma Aldrich), added with 0.2 M LiNO3 (99.99%, Sigma Aldrich) additives. Galvanostatic charge/discharge measurements were performed using a potentiostat (ZIVE SP1, WonA Tech, Korea) at 25 °C in a cell voltage range of 1.7 to 2.8 V at a specific current of 120 mA g−1. XRD patterns were acquired at regular intervals of 15 min using a Smartlab X-ray diffractormeter (Rigaku Corp.), equipped with Cu Kα radiation (λ  =  1.5406 Å). The 2θ range covered spanned from 10 to 48 degree, with a step size of 0.01 degrees.

Operando TXM measurements

We utilized a customized CR2032-type coin cell configuration with a central hole punched and sealed Kapton film. The slurry consisted of positive electrode active materials, Super P carbon (average particle size: 400 nm, Timcal), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) (99%, Kanto Chemical), with a weight ratio of 70:20:10. These materials were loaded on AvCarb P50 carbon paper (Ballard, thickness: 184 µm, density: 0.40 g cm−3, compressibility: 14.0%, mean pore size: 10 µm) with a mass of approximately 2 mg cm−2. Afterward, the positive electrodes were punched into discs with a diameter of 11 mm and the thickness was approximately 220 µm. In a glovebox (O2, H2O < 1 ppm) under an argon (Ar) atmosphere, we assembled a CR2032-type custom-designed coin cell. This cell featured SeS2-based and the blend-based positive electrodes as the working electrode, with a Li metal foil (99.95%, Honjo, thickness: 350 µm) punched into discs with a diameter of 15 mm serving both as the counter and reference electrodes. The separator used in coin cell is glass fiber (Whatman, GF/C) membrane. The organic electrolyte utilized was a solution of 1.0 M lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) (99.95%, Sigma Aldrich) in a 1:1 volume ratio mixture of 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) (anhydrous, 99.8%, Sigma Aldrich) and 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) (anhydrous, 99.5% Sigma Aldrich), added with 0.2 M LiNO3 (99.99%, Sigma Aldrich) addtives. A total of 120 µL of this electrolye was added to the cell. Operando TXM analysis was conducted at the beamline 6C of Pohang Light Source-II (PLS-II) which is operated by the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (PAL). An incident X-ray energy of 10 keV was employed, enabling the X-rays to penetrate the entire cell, encompassing the positive electrode, Li negative electrode, carbon paper current collector, and electrolyte. TXM images were acquired at regular intervals of 2 min. This approach ensured that the TXM images accurately represented the morphology of the entire electrode. Image acquisition was carried out using a Pco. Edge 5.5 sCMOS camera. Galvanostatic charge/dischage measurements were performed using a potentiostat (ZIVE SP1, WonA Tech, Korea) at 25 °C in a cell voltage range of 1.7 to 2.8 V at a specific current of 600 mA g−1.

Ex situ physicochemical measurements

For the SEM measurement, we assembled a CR2032 coin cell. This cell featured positive electrodes punched into discs with a diameter of 11 mm as the working electrode, with a Li metal foil (99.95%, Honjo, thickness: 350 µm) punched into discs with a diameter of 15 mm serving both as the counter and reference electrodes. The separator used in coin cell is glass fiber (Whatman, GF/C) membrane. The organic electrolyte utilized was a solution of 1.0 M lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) (99.95%, Sigma Aldrich) in a 1:1 volume ratio mixture of 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) (anhydrous, 99.8%, Sigma Aldrich) and 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) (anhydrous, 99.5% Sigma Aldrich), added with 0.2 M LiNO3 (99.99%, Sigma Aldrich) addtives. A total of 120 µL of this electrolye was added to the cell. The mass of the specific current refers to the mass of the active material in the positive electrode (positive electrode active matrial mass loading = 2 mg cm−2. Galvanostatic charge/discharge measurements were performed using a potentiostat (ZIVE SP1, WonA Tech, Korea) at 25 °C in a cell voltage range of 1.7 to 2.8 V at a specific current of 600 mA g−1. After recharge, the coin cells were disassembled in a glovebox (O2, H2O < 1 ppm) under an argon (Ar) atmosphere to collect the positive electrodes. Then the positive electrodes were washed several times with DME to remove the residuals. We used a vacuum transfer holder for the ex situ measurements in the glovebox to avoid air contact. All positive electrodes were prepared as above. The top-view scanning electron images and corresponding EDS elemental maps (Figs. 3, 7, Supplementary Figs. 4–6, and Supplementary Fig. 10) were obtained using field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Regulus8230) operating at 15 kV. Three elements (Se, S and C) were included in the calculation of relative atomic composition.

Electrochemical measurements

The SexSy-based positive electrodes are prepared by applying uniform slurry onto a current collector made of AvCarb P50 carbon paper (Ballard, thickness: 184 µm, density: 0.40 g cm−3, compressibility: 14.0%, mean pore size: 10 µm). For the SeS2 positive electrode, the slurry consisted of SeS2 (99%, Sigma Aldrich), Super P carbon (average particle size: 400 nm, Timcal), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) (99%, Kanto Chemical), with a weight ratio of 70:20:10. It was then dissolved in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP) (99%, Sigma Aldrich) solvent, prepared using a mini planetary ball mill (Pulverisette 23 mini-mill, Fritsch) with 15 ml stainless steel jar for 15 min at 20 Hz in air. Subsequently, the electrode was dried under vacuum conditions at 60 °C for 8 h. For the blended electrode, varying molar ratios of Se-to-S were combined to create the active material powder. Blended active materials were composed of S (−324 mesh, 99.5%, Alfa Aesar) and Se (−100 mesh, 99.5%, Sigma Aldrich) powder mixed in a proper molar ratio without solvent using a mini planetary ball mill with 15 ml stainless steel jar for 15 min at 20 Hz in air. The S positive electrodes and Se positive electrodes are prepared by applying uniform slurry onto a current collector made of AvCarb P50 carbon paper (Ballard, thickness: 184 µm, density: 0.40 g cm−3, compressibility: 14.0%, mean pore size: 10 µm). The slurry consisted of active material powder, Super P carbon, and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), with a weight ratio of 70:20:10. It was then dissolved in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP) solvent, prepared using a mini planetary ball mill (Pulverisette 23 mini-mill, Fritsch) with 15 ml stainless steel jar for 15 min at 20 Hz in air. Subsequently, the electrode was dried under vacuum conditions at 60 °C for 8 h. Following this procedure, electrodes are fabricated using the same procedure as previous described. The positive electrode active materials were loaded with a mass of approximately 2 mg cm−2. Afterward, the positive electrodes were punched into discs with a diameter of 11 mm and the thickness was approximately 220 µm. In a glovebox (O2, H2O < 1 ppm) under an argon (Ar) atmosphere, we assembled a CR2032-type coin cell. This cell featured SeS2-based and the blend-based positive electrodes as the working electrode, with a Li metal foil (99.95%, Honjo, thickness: 350 µm) punched into discs with a diameter of 15 mm serving both as the counter and reference electrodes. The organic electrolyte utilized was a solution of 1.0 M lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) (99.95%, Sigma Aldrich) in a 1:1 volume ratio mixture of 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) (anhydrous, 99.8%, Sigma Aldrich) and 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) (anhydrous, 99.5% Sigma Aldrich), added with 0.2 M LiNO3 (99.99%, Sigma Aldrich) additives. The amount of electrolyte was adjusted to an E/A ratio of 5 µL/mgpositive electrode. Galvanostatic charge/discharge measurements were performed using a potentiostat (WBCS3000 cycler, WonA Tech, Korea), which is installed in an environmental chamber that maintains a constant temperature of 25 °C, in a cell voltage range of 1.7 to 2.8 V. Coulombic efficiency is calculated by converting the charge capacity relative to the discharge capacity into a percentage and the mass of the specific current refers to the mass of the active material in the positive electrode. Cyclic voltammetry was carried out at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 to determine the step voltage for subsequent chronoamperometric analysis. For the SEM measurement in Supplementary Fig. 5, in a glovebox (O2, H2O < 1 ppm) under an argon (Ar) atmosphere, we prepared a 0.1 M Li₂S₆-containing electrolyte solution by mixing sulfur and lithium sulfide (99.98%, Sigma Aldrich) in the appropriate ratio in 1 M LiTFSI in DOL/DME electrolyte with 0.2 M LiNO3 at 70 °C for 2 days before use. A total of 120 µL of this 0.1 M Li2S6-contaning electrolyte was added to the cell with a Se positive electrode and a Li negative electrode, using a glass fiber (Whatman, GF/C) membrane. These measurements were conducted at 25 °C, and the mass of the specific current refers to the mass of the active material in the positive electrode (positive electrode active material mass loading = 2 mg cm−2).

Computational calculation

First-principles calculations were conducted employing the Projector Augmented Wave (PAW) method42 in conjunction with the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) Generalized Gradient Approximation (GGA)43. The Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) was utilized as the computational framework44. The calculations were carried out utilizing a plane wave basis set, with an energy cutoff of 550 eV. Convergence criteria were established at 10−5 eV for the electronic self-consistency cycle and 0.03 eV/Å for the ionic relaxation loop. A layer of graphene and a Se (100) slab were employed, with the inclusion of a 20 Å thick vacuum layer to prevent interactions between the individual slabs. Atoms in the bottom layer of the Se slab were kept fixed in their bulk configurations. For the generation of k-points, a 5 × 5 × 1 gamma-centered grid was utilized. Additionally, van der Waals (vdW) interactions were accounted for using the Grimme DFT-D3 method45. To calculate the adsorption energy of Li-polysulfides, denoted as Eads, the following formula was employed: Eads=Eall-Esubstrate-ELiPS, where Eall represents the total energy of the entire system, Esubstrate denotes the energy of the substrate, and ELiPS corresponds to the energy of the Li-polysulfide.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1

Supplementary Movie 2

Supplementary Movie 3

Supplementary Movie 4

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-51647-5.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT)(NRF-2020R1C1C1012308) and the Institute for Basic Science (project code: IBS-R006-A2).

Author contributions

J.K. conducted the writing the draft and experiments for battery electrochemistry and Operando XRD. M.K. carried out the writing the draft and experiments for imaging analysis and Operando TXM. S.-J.K. conceived and design the experiments and writing and editing the manuscript. S.-Y.K., W.H., J.-H.L., and S.H.K. assist the XRD, SEM and TXM process. S.Y. and E.K. conducted the DFT calculation. Y.-E.S. is a principal investigator of the project and supervised project and reviewed the manuscript. S.-H.Y. is a chief principal investigator of the project and supervised whole process of experiments and writing. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Shizhao Xiong, Lei Tao, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Operando TXM measurements of Li | |SeS2, blended cells with the molar ratio of Se-to-S ratio of 1:2, 1:5, and 1:10 are available in Supplementary Information. Four Movies are available in the Supplementary Information. (Supplementary Movie 1_operando TXM measurements of SeS2 positive electrode, Supplementary Movie 2_operando TXM measurements of Se 1 to S 2 blended positive electrode, Supplementary Movie 3_operando TXM measurements of Se 1 to S 5 blended positive electrode, Supplementary Movie 4_operando TXM measurements of Se 1 to S 10 blended positive electrode).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Ji Hwan Kim, Mihyun Kim, Seong-Jun Kim.
==== Refs
References

1. Urbonaite S Poux T Novák P Progress towards commercially viable Li-S battery cells Adv. Energy Mater. 2015 5 1500118 10.1002/aenm.201500118
Urbonaite, S., Poux, T. & Novák, P. Progress towards commercially viable Li-S battery cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500118 (2015).10.1002/aenm.201500118
2. Park J Yu S-H Sung Y-E Design of structural and functional nanomaterials for lithium-sulfur batteries Nano Today 2018 18 35 64 10.1016/j.nantod.2017.12.010
Park, J., Yu, S.-H. & Sung, Y.-E. Design of structural and functional nanomaterials for lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Today 18, 35–64 (2018).10.1016/j.nantod.2017.12.010
3. Bruce PG Freunberger SA Hardwick LJ Tarascon J-M Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage Nat. Mater. 2012 11 19 29 10.1038/nmat3191
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J. & Tarascon, J.-M. Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage. Nat. Mater. 11, 19–29 (2012).10.1038/nmat3191
4. Zhao M Li B-Q Zhang X-Q Huang J-Q Zhang Q A perspective toward practical lithium-sulfur batteries ACS Cent. Sci. 2020 6 1095 1104 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00449 32724844
Zhao, M., Li, B.-Q., Zhang, X.-Q., Huang, J.-Q. & Zhang, Q. A perspective toward practical lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Cent. Sci. 6, 1095–1104 (2020).32724844 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00449
5. Liu X Huang J-Q Zhang Q Mai L Nanostructured metal oxides and sulfides for lithium-sulfur batteries Adv. Mater. 2017 29 1601759 10.1002/adma.201601759
Liu, X., Huang, J.-Q., Zhang, Q. & Mai, L. Nanostructured metal oxides and sulfides for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1601759 (2017).10.1002/adma.201601759
6. Wang H Zhang W Xu J Guo Z Advances in polar materials for lithium-sulfur batteries Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018 28 1707520 10.1002/adfm.201707520
Wang, H., Zhang, W., Xu, J. & Guo, Z. Advances in polar materials for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1707520 (2018).10.1002/adfm.201707520
7. Fotouhi A Auger DJ O’Neill L Cleaver T Walus S Lithium-sulfur battery technology readiness and applications-a review Energy 2017 10 1937
Fotouhi, A., Auger, D. J., O’Neill, L., Cleaver, T. & Walus, S. Lithium-sulfur battery technology readiness and applications-a review. Energy 10, 1937 (2017).
8. Xiang H A review on electronically conducting polymers for lithium-sulfur battery and lithium-selenium battery: progress and prospects J. Energy Chem. 2021 58 523 556 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.029
Xiang, H. et al. A review on electronically conducting polymers for lithium-sulfur battery and lithium-selenium battery: progress and prospects. J. Energy Chem. 58, 523–556 (2021).10.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.029
9. Eftekhari A The rise of lithium-selenium batteries Sustain. Energy Fuels 2017 1 14 29 10.1039/C6SE00094K
Eftekhari, A. The rise of lithium-selenium batteries. Sustain. Energy Fuels 1, 14–29 (2017).10.1039/C6SE00094K
10. Li X High-performance all-solid-state Li-Se batteries induced by sulfide electrolytes Energy Environ. Sci. 2018 11 2828 2832 10.1039/C8EE01621F
Li, X. et al. High-performance all-solid-state Li-Se batteries induced by sulfide electrolytes. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 2828–2832 (2018).10.1039/C8EE01621F
11. Li, Z., Zhang, J., Wu, H. B. & Lou, X. W. An improved Li-SeS2 battery with high energy density and long cycle life. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1700281 (2017).
12. Li X High-performance Li-SeSx all-solid-state lithium batteries Adv. Mater. 2019 31 1808100 10.1002/adma.201808100
Li, X. et al. High-performance Li-SeSx all-solid-state lithium batteries. Adv. Mater. 31, 1808100 (2019).10.1002/adma.201808100
13. Abouimrane A A new class of lithium and sodium rechargeable batteries based on selenium and selenium-sulfur as a positive electrode J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012 134 4505 4508 10.1021/ja211766q 22364225
Abouimrane, A. et al. A new class of lithium and sodium rechargeable batteries based on selenium and selenium-sulfur as a positive electrode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 4505–4508 (2012).22364225 10.1021/ja211766q
14. Chai L Zhang C Yang X Zhang W Li Z CMK3 collaborated with SexSy to build high-performance rechargeable aluminum-ion batteries J. Alloy. Compd. 2023 952 170006 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170006
Chai, L., Zhang, C., Yang, X., Zhang, W. & Li, Z. CMK3 collaborated with SexSy to build high-performance rechargeable aluminum-ion batteries. J. Alloy. Compd. 952, 170006 (2023).10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170006
15. Du H Feng S Luo W Zhou L Mai L Advanced Li-SexSy battery system: electrodes and electrolytes J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020 55 1 15 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.001
Du, H., Feng, S., Luo, W., Zhou, L. & Mai, L. Advanced Li-SexSy battery system: electrodes and electrolytes. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 55, 1–15 (2020).10.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.001
16. Xu Q-T Xue H-G Guo S-P Status and prospects of SexSy cathodes for lithium/sodium storage Inorg. Chem. Front. 2019 6 1326 1340 10.1039/C9QI00278B
Xu, Q.-T., Xue, H.-G. & Guo, S.-P. Status and prospects of SexSy cathodes for lithium/sodium storage. Inorg. Chem. Front. 6, 1326–1340 (2019).10.1039/C9QI00278B
17. Cui, Y. et al. De)lithiation mechanism of Li/SeSx (x = 0-7) batteries determined by in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 8047–8056 (2013).
18. Sun F Heteroatomic SenS8-n molecules confined in nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbons as reversible cathode materials for high-performance lithium batteries ACS Nano 2016 10 8289 8298 10.1021/acsnano.6b02315 27522865
Sun, F. et al. Heteroatomic SenS8-n molecules confined in nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbons as reversible cathode materials for high-performance lithium batteries. ACS Nano 10, 8289–8298 (2016).27522865 10.1021/acsnano.6b02315
19. Li S Zhang W Zeng Z Cheng S Xie J Selenium or tellurium as eutetic accelerator for high-performance lithium/sodium-sulfur batteries Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2020 3 613 642 10.1007/s41918-020-00072-5
Li, S., Zhang, W., Zeng, Z., Cheng, S. & Xie, J. Selenium or tellurium as eutetic accelerator for high-performance lithium/sodium-sulfur batteries. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 3, 613–642 (2020).10.1007/s41918-020-00072-5
20. Yu S-H Feng X Zhang N Seok J Abruña HD Understanding conversion-type electrodes for lithium rechargeable batteries Acc. Chem. Res. 2018 51 273 281 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00487 29373023
Yu, S.-H., Feng, X., Zhang, N., Seok, J. & Abruña, H. D. Understanding conversion-type electrodes for lithium rechargeable batteries. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 273–281 (2018).29373023 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00487
21. Zhou S Visualizing interfacial collective reaction behavior of Li-S batteries Nature 2023 621 75 81 10.1038/s41586-023-06326-8 37673990
Zhou, S. et al. Visualizing interfacial collective reaction behavior of Li-S batteries. Nature 621, 75–81 (2023).37673990 10.1038/s41586-023-06326-8
22. Xing C Regulating liquid and solid-state electrolytes for solid-phase conversion in Li-S batteries Chem 2022 8 1201 1230 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.01.002
Xing, C. et al. Regulating liquid and solid-state electrolytes for solid-phase conversion in Li-S batteries. Chem. 8, 1201–1230 (2022).10.1016/j.chempr.2022.01.002
23. Singh A Kalra V Electrospun nanostructures for conversion type cathode (S, Se) based lithium and sodium batteries J. Mater. Chem. A 2019 7 11613 11650 10.1039/C9TA00327D
Singh, A. & Kalra, V. Electrospun nanostructures for conversion type cathode (S, Se) based lithium and sodium batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 11613–11650 (2019).10.1039/C9TA00327D
24. Danner T Latz A On the influence of nucleation and growth of S8 and Li2S in lithium-sulfur batteries Electrochim. Acta 2019 322 134719 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134719
Danner, T. & Latz, A. On the influence of nucleation and growth of S8 and Li2S in lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochim. Acta 322, 134719 (2019).10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134719
25. Yu S-H Direct visualization of sulfur cathodes: new insights into Li-S batteries via operando X-ray based methods Energy Environ. Sci. 2018 11 202 210 10.1039/C7EE02874A
Yu, S.-H. et al. Direct visualization of sulfur cathodes: new insights into Li-S batteries via operando X-ray based methods. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 202–210 (2018).10.1039/C7EE02874A
26. Um JH Competitive nucleation and growth behavior in Li-Se batteries Energy Environ. Sci. 2022 15 1493 1502 10.1039/D1EE03619J
Um, J. H. et al. Competitive nucleation and growth behavior in Li-Se batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 1493–1502 (2022).10.1039/D1EE03619J
27. Park H Epitaxial growth of nanostructured Li2Se on lithium metal for all solid-state batteries Adv. Sci. 2021 8 2004204 10.1002/advs.202004204
Park, H. et al. Epitaxial growth of nanostructured Li2Se on lithium metal for all solid-state batteries. Adv. Sci. 8, 2004204 (2021).10.1002/advs.202004204
28. Pan Y Guan W Mao P Insulator-to-metal transition of lithium-sulfur battery RSC Adv. 2017 7 44326 44332 10.1039/C7RA07621E
Pan, Y., Guan, W. & Mao, P. Insulator-to-metal transition of lithium-sulfur battery. RSC Adv. 7, 44326–44332 (2017).10.1039/C7RA07621E
29. Naseri M Lin S 2D Li2S monolayer: a global minimum lithium sulfide sandwich Chem. Phys. Lett. 2019 722 58 63 10.1016/j.cplett.2019.02.047
Naseri, M. & Lin, S. 2D Li2S monolayer: a global minimum lithium sulfide sandwich. Chem. Phys. Lett. 722, 58–63 (2019).10.1016/j.cplett.2019.02.047
30. Jeoun Y Surface roughness-independent homogeneous lithium plating in synergetic conditioned electrolyte ACS Energy Lett. 2022 7 2219 2227 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00974
Jeoun, Y. et al. Surface roughness-independent homogeneous lithium plating in synergetic conditioned electrolyte. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 2219–2227 (2022).10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00974
31. Kim J Atomic structure modification on Fe-N-C catalysts via morphology engineering of graphene for enhanced conversion kinetics of lithium-sulfur batteries Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022 32 2110857 10.1002/adfm.202110857
Kim, J. et al. Atomic structure modification on Fe-N-C catalysts via morphology engineering of graphene for enhanced conversion kinetics of lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2110857 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202110857
32. Jung E Oxygen-plasma-treated Fe-N-C catalysts with dual binding sites for enhanced electrocatalytic polysulfide conversion in lithium-sulfur batteries ACS Energy Lett. 2022 7 2646 2653 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01132
Jung, E. et al. Oxygen-plasma-treated Fe-N-C catalysts with dual binding sites for enhanced electrocatalytic polysulfide conversion in lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 2646–2653 (2022).10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01132
33. Sun W Monodispersed FeS2 electrocatalyst anchored to nitrogen-doped carbon host for lithium-sulfur batteries Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022 32 2205471 10.1002/adfm.202205471
Sun, W. et al. Monodispersed FeS2 electrocatalyst anchored to nitrogen-doped carbon host for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2205471 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202205471
34. Zhang Z-W Peng H-J Zhao M Huang J-Q Heterogeneous/homogeneous mediators for high-energy-density lithium-sulfur batteries: progress and prospects Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018 28 1707536 10.1002/adfm.201707536
Zhang, Z.-W., Peng, H.-J., Zhao, M. & Huang, J.-Q. Heterogeneous/homogeneous mediators for high-energy-density lithium-sulfur batteries: progress and prospects. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1707536 (2018).10.1002/adfm.201707536
35. Yang Z Novel lithium-chalcogenide batteries combining S, Se and C characteristics supported by chitosan-derived carbon interwined with CNTs Chem. Eng. J. 2022 427 131790 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131790
Yang, Z. et al. Novel lithium-chalcogenide batteries combining S, Se and C characteristics supported by chitosan-derived carbon interwined with CNTs. Chem. Eng. J. 427, 131790 (2022).10.1016/j.cej.2021.131790
36. Li Z Li P Meng X Lin Z Wang R The interfacial electronic engineering in binary sulfiphilic cobalt boride heterostructure nanosheets for upgrading energy density and longevity of lithium-sulfur batteries Adv. Mater. 2021 33 2102338 10.1002/adma.202102338
Li, Z., Li, P., Meng, X., Lin, Z. & Wang, R. The interfacial electronic engineering in binary sulfiphilic cobalt boride heterostructure nanosheets for upgrading energy density and longevity of lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 33, 2102338 (2021).10.1002/adma.202102338
37. Zhang W Li S Wang L Wang X Xie J Insight into sulfur-rich selenium sulfide/pyrolyzed polyacrylonitrile cathodes for Li-S batteries. Sustain Energy Fuels 2020 4 3588 3596
Zhang, W., Li, S., Wang, L., Wang, X. & Xie, J. Insight into sulfur-rich selenium sulfide/pyrolyzed polyacrylonitrile cathodes for Li-S batteries. Sustain. Energy Fuels 4, 3588–3596 (2020).
38. Zhang Y A high-performance tellurium-sulfur cathode in carbonate-based electrolytes Nano Energy 2023 107 108141 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.108141
Zhang, Y. et al. A high-performance tellurium-sulfur cathode in carbonate-based electrolytes. Nano Energy 107, 108141 (2023).10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.108141
39. Yang Z Multichalcogen-intergrated cathodes for novel lithium-chalcogenide batteries in ether and ester electrolytes ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022 14 32112 32123 10.1021/acsami.2c08642 35802395
Yang, Z. et al. Multichalcogen-intergrated cathodes for novel lithium-chalcogenide batteries in ether and ester electrolytes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 32112–32123 (2022).35802395 10.1021/acsami.2c08642
40. Nanda S Bhargav A Manthiram A Anode-free, lean-electrolyte lithium-sulfur batteries enabled by tellurium-stabilized lithium deposition Joule 2020 4 1121 1135 10.1016/j.joule.2020.03.020
Nanda, S., Bhargav, A. & Manthiram, A. Anode-free, lean-electrolyte lithium-sulfur batteries enabled by tellurium-stabilized lithium deposition. Joule 4, 1121–1135 (2020).10.1016/j.joule.2020.03.020
41. Miao J Hierarchical Ni-Mo-S nanosheets on carbon fiber cloth: A flexible electrode for efficient hydrogen generation in neutral electrolyte Sci. Adv. 2015 1 e1500259 10.1126/sciadv.1500259 26601227
Miao, J. et al. Hierarchical Ni-Mo-S nanosheets on carbon fiber cloth: A flexible electrode for efficient hydrogen generation in neutral electrolyte. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500259 (2015).26601227 10.1126/sciadv.1500259
42. Blöchl PE Projector augmented-wave method Phys. Rev. B 1994 50 17953 17979 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953
Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953
43. Perdew JP Burke K Ernzerhof M Generalized gradient approximation made simple Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996 77 3865 3868 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 10062328
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10062328 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
44. Kresse G Furthmüller J Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set Phys. Rev. B 1996 54 11169 11186 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169
45. Grimme S Antony J Enrlich S Krieg H A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu J. Chem. Phys. 2010 132 154104 10.1063/1.3382344 20423165
Grimme, S., Antony, J., Enrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).20423165 10.1063/1.3382344
