
==== Front
Can Geriatr J
Can Geriatr J
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
1925-8348
Canadian Geriatrics Society

10.5770/cgj.27.731
cgj-27-3-307
Original Research
COVID-19–Associated Outcomes of Critical Illness in Patients with Frailty: a Cohort Study
Montgomery Carmel L. RN, PhD 1
Davenport Andrea MD 2
Milovanovic Lazar MD 2
Bagshaw Sean M. MD, MSc 2
Rolfson Darryl B. MD 3
Rewa Oleksa G. MD, MSc 2
1 Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton
2 Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton
3 Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Correspondence to: Carmel Montgomery, rn, phd, University of Alberta, College of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing, 3-141 ECHA, 11405 87 Ave. NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G1C9, E-mail: carmelm@ualberta.ca
9 2024
05 9 2024
27 3 307316
© 2024 Author(s)
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivative license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use and distribution, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background

Pre-admission frailty has been associated with higher hospital mortality in patients with critical illness. We aimed to measure the prevalence of frailty and its associated outcomes in patients with COVID-19 critical illness.

Methods

A historical cohort study of all adults admitted to ICU with a pneumonia diagnosis in Alberta, Canada between May 1, 2020, and October 31, 2020. At ICU admission patients were routinely assessed for frailty using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Frailty was defined as a CFS score ≥5. Primary outcomes were pre-admission frailty prevalence and hospital mortality.

Results

The cohort (n=521) prevalence of frailty was 34.2% (n=178), mean (SD) age was 58.8 (14.9) years, APACHE II 22.8 (8.0), and 39.5% (n=206) were female. COVID-19 pneumonia was diagnosed in (19.0%; n=99) admissions; pre-admission frailty was present in 20.2% (n=20) vs. 79.8% (n=79) non-frail (p<.001). Among ICU patients admitted with COVID-19, hospital mortality in frail patients was 35.4% (n=63) vs. 14.0% (n=48) in non-frail (p<.001).

Conclusion

Pre-admission frailty was present in 20.2% of COVID-19 ICU admissions and was associated with higher risk of hospital mortality. Frailty assessment may yield valuable prognostic information when considering COVID-19 ICU admission; however, further study is needed to identify effect on patient-centred outcomes in this heterogeneous population.

intensive care
COVID-19
frailty
ICU survivorship
pneumonia
Canadian Institutes for Health Research202004FRC CIHRIRSC: 0147008594 Canadian Frailty NetworkFRN#173142
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic and resulting coronavirus disease (COVID-19) resulted in elevated risk of critical illness and mortality in patients with greater number of comorbidities or older age.(1–3) In addition to these indicators, frailty is also an important measure of a patient’s health status. An assessment of baseline functional status may reveal patients who were living with frailty prior to hospital admission.(4,5) Frailty can be measured in critical care settings using validated instruments, such as the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS).(6–9) However, there has been limited evaluation of frailty in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

A limited number of international reports of COVID-19–related ICU outcomes have described an elevated risk of mortality associated with pre-admission frailty.(1,10) Frailty has previously been shown to be superior to chronological age alone, adding incremental value for prognostication. Frailty can inform patient-centred care planning discussions that consider an individual’s acute illness and potential need for invasive interventions, to confirm expectations for a clinical course of ICU treatment.(6,7,11) Although contentious, frailty has been integrated into pandemic hospital surge triage scoring and decision algorithms associated with pandemic surge in multiple countries.(12–15)

The concept of frailty should be at the forefront of acute and critical care assessment for its value in predicting outcomes among the older patient population at risk for ICU admission. Accordingly, we performed a population-based cohort study to evaluate the prognostic value of routinely captured pre-admission frailty scores on outcomes for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to ICU in Alberta, Canada. We hypothesized that critically ill COVID-19 patients with pre-admission frailty would have higher mortality and more frequent adverse outcomes than patients assessed as non-frail.

METHODS

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the University of Alberta (Pro00102891). The requirement for informed consent was waived for use of secondary administrative health data. Verbal consent was received from phone survey respondents. The reporting of this study follows recommendations outlined in the STROBE statement.(16)

Design, Setting, Population

The study population was retrospectively identified from all patients admitted to 14 adult ( ≥18 years) mixed general medical/surgical ICUs. ICUs were in seven cities across Alberta, Canada: Edmonton (5 units); Calgary (4 units); Red Deer (1 unit); Lethbridge (1 unit); Grande Prairie (1 unit); Medicine Hat (1 unit); and Fort McMurray (1 unit). Among the ICUs, two were classified as academic, two tertiary, five community, and five regional, corresponding with hospital size. All ICUs were staffed by intensivists available 24-hours/day, along with residents or clinical associate coverage. All patients were admitted to ICU with a diagnosis that included pneumonia (i.e., bacterial, viral, aspiration, other) between May 1, 2020 and October 31, 2020, prior to COVID-19 vaccines becoming available. During this time, occupancy in Alberta ICUs ranged from 75–86% (mean 81.2%). Speciality ICUs (i.e., neurosciences and cardiovascular surgery) were excluded as admission diagnosis was less likely to be respiratory. Despite the differences in ICU locations, provincial guidelines were available to all ICUs to standardize care of COVID-19 patients.

Measure of Frailty

Frailty was defined as a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score ≥5.(5) The 9-point ordinal CFS score reflects the degree of frailty two weeks prior to the index admission, with a score of 1 being very fit and 8 being severely frail (9 indicates terminal illness). The CFS has been validated in hospital settings, including the ICU.(8,9,17) It has frequently been used as a dichotomous descriptor of frailty status in the ICU population.(6,9) Frailty was assessed and documented in the ICU electronic health record by the admitting ICU physician, a routine practice for all adult ICU admissions in Alberta.(7)

Data Sources

Data were captured from the provincial ICU electronic health record database (i.e., TRACER/eCritical Alberta(7)) on all pneumonia admissions and related exposures (i.e., frailty, COVID-19 pneumonia), demographics (i.e., age, sex, comorbid illness, admission type, admission source, diagnostic category), health services use (i.e., duration of ICU and hospital stay, frequency of ICU readmission, illness severity, organ failure score, delirium score, vasoactive, sedation, neuromuscular block infusion, renal replacement therapy, prone positioning frequency/duration, ventilation assistance), and patient outcomes (i.e., survival at ICU and hospital discharge). No data on ethnicity are captured in this database. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed by nucleic acid-based testing, and positive results were verified by the provincial surveillance system of positive cases. Missing data were extracted manually from the health record by authors (CM and LM).

Outpatient outcome data were collected through telephone follow-up at ≥6 months post-hospital discharge from patients who responded to a letter mailed to their home address requesting their participation. Patients were asked to complete the EuroQol 5-dimension, 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) and visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) quality-of-life instruments,(18) frailty assessments (i.e., CFS and the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS)(5,19)), current weight, and living situation (i.e., at home independently or with support) to describe their overall functional status.

Outcomes

The primary exposures were pre-admission frailty and COVID-19 pneumonia. The primary outcomes were prevalence of pre-admission frailty and all-cause hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included ICU survival, measures of organ support (e.g., receipt and duration of invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, vasoactive therapy, renal replacement therapy), health services use (e.g., ICU and hospital duration of stay), post-discharge health-related quality-of-life and frailty scores (i.e., CFS and EFS).

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive characteristics were tabulated according to pre-admission frailty and COVID-19 status. This was also conducted for outcome data. Normally distributed continuous data were reported as means with standard deviations (SD). Non-normally distributed continuous data were reported as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR) or number with frequency (%). Continuous data were compared using t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test for independence.

To describe the association of frailty to hospital mortality in COVID-19 pneumonia patients we performed multivariable logistic regression and multiple linear regression. Covariate inclusion in the model was limited to APACHE IV score at ICU admission, a decision driven by minimal missing scores and the low number of outcome events. A p value <.05 was considered significant for all statistical tests. Analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) and Stata 16 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

RESULTS

Overall Cohort Characteristics

In total, 521 patients were included in the study. The cohort mean (SD) age was 58.8 (14.9) years, APACHE II 22.8 (8.0), admission CFS 4.1 (1.6), 39.5% (n=206) were female. All patients had an ICU diagnosis of pneumonia; 44.0% (n=229) bacterial, 25.7% (n= 134) aspiration, 20.2% (n=105) viral, and 10.2% (n=53) other (i.e., fungal, parasitic). Overall, 19.0% (n=99) were diagnosed with COVID-19 (see Table 1).

Pre-admission frailty (CFS ≥5) was evident in 34.2% (n=178) of patients. The prevalence was greater in older patients, ranging from 27.8% (n=88) in patients <65 years of age to 58.3% (n=7) in those ≥85 years (Table 2). The mean (SD) age of patients with pre-admission frailty was older 62.3 (14.5) vs. 56.9 (14.8; p<.001), and acuity of illness was higher, as demonstrated by admission APACHE II scores 25.6 (7.8) vs. 21.3 (7.7; p<.001), compared with non-frail patients. Initial mean (SD) ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2 in mmHg) to fractional inspired oxygen (PF ratio) at ICU admission for frail patients was 138.3 (60.9) compared with 126.1 (53.1; p=.02), in non-frail, reflecting more severe hypoxemia among non-frail patients at ICU admission. (Appendix A, Table A1) Among all patients, 73.9% (n=385) received invasive mechanical ventilation, 76.4% (n=136) in the frail group vs. 72.6% (n=249; p=0.35), in the non-frail group. Non-invasive ventilation was provided to 18% (n=94) patients, 22.5% (n=40) in the frail group vs. 15.7% (n=54; p=0.06), in the non-frail group (Appendix A, Table A2).

In the overall cohort, hospital mortality was 21.3% (n=111) and in ICU 18.0% (n=94). Of the patients who died in hospital, most died in ICU (94/111, 84.7%). Frail patients had higher unadjusted hospital mortality 35.4% (n=63) vs. 14.0% (n=48; p<.001) compared with non-frail patients (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.73 to 4.33). Mortality in ICU was 29.8% (n=53) in the frail group vs. 12.0% (n=41; p<.001) in the non-frail group (aOR 2.49, 95% CI 1.53 to 4.05) (Appendix A, Table A3). Overall, 4.1% (n=17) of patients were re-admitted to ICU during the index hospitalization, 5.2% (n=6) in the frail group vs. 3.7% (n=11; p=.50) in non-frail. The overall cohort mean (SD) duration of stay in ICU was 9.2 (12.2) days and 16.0 (25.7) days in hospital (Appendix A, Table A2).

COVID-19 Admissions Characteristics & Outcomes

The proportion of frail patients among all patients with COVID-19 was 20.2% (n=20) vs. 79.8% (n=79) non-frail (p=.001). In frail patients with COVID-19, the mean (SD) age was 66.2 (17.4) vs. 59.4 (14.7) years in non-frail patients (p=.07). In COVID-19 admissions, the mean (SD) APACHE II score at ICU admission in frail patients was 24.8 (5.1) vs. 19.2 (8.4) in non-frail patients (p=.001) (Table 1).

Among COVID-19 pneumonia patients, mean (SD) duration of stay in the ICU was 14.2 (9.9) days for frail patients vs. 13.3 (13.3; p=.23) days in non-frail patients. Duration of hospital stay for frail patients was 34.4 (66.7) vs. 14.1 (9.3; p=.03) days in non-frail patients. There was no significant difference in ICU interventions among frail and non-frail patients with COVID-19, including prone positioning in frail patients 25.0% (n=5) vs. 41.8% (n=33; p=.17) in non-frail, use of invasive mechanical ventilation 80.0% (n=16) vs. 65.8% (n=52; p=0.22), and non-invasive ventilation 20.0% (n=4) vs. 8.9% (n=7; p=.16) (Table 2).

Among COVID-19 admissions, ICU mortality was 40.0% (n=8) in frail patients compared with 13.9% (n=11; p=.01) in non-frail admissions. In patients admitted with non-COVID pneumonia, ICU mortality was 28.5% (n=45) in frail patients vs. 11.4% (n=30; p<.001) in non-frail patients. Hospital mortality among COVID-19 frail patients was 40.0% (n=8) vs. 15.2% (n=12; p=.01) in non-frail patients. Hospital mortality in non-COVID pneumonia admissions with frailty was 34.8% (n=55) vs. 13.6% (n=36; p<.001) in non-frail (Table 3).

COVID-19 Admissions—Regression Models

Using a multivariable regression model, we identified the impact of frailty and APACHE IV score on the odds of hospital mortality in patients admitted to ICU with COVID-19. Frailty status as a dichotomous variable was nonsignificant (aOR 2.80, 95% CI 0.87 to 8.96); however, as a continuous variable the frailty score alone (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.09, per incremental increase in the CFS score) and with APACHE IV score at ICU admission added to the model (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05) showed significant prediction of hospital mortality (Table 4).

Outpatient Follow-up Characteristics

In response to the mailed invitation to participate, 3.8% of the cohort (n=20 patients) provided verbal consent to collection of telephone follow-up assessment of their outpatient functional status and health-related quality-of-life. The mean (SD) age of respondents was 62.1 (11.9) years, pre-admission CFS 3.9 (1.6), APACHE II 22.5 (5.6), 20% (n=4) had COVID-19 pneumonia, 20% (n=5) pre-admission CFS ≥5, and 25.0% (n=5) were female. Their mean (SD) duration of ICU stay was 5.4 (4.3) days and hospital stay 10.4 (5.9) days. The location of ICU admission was 55.0% (n=11) in Edmonton, 30.0% (n=6) in Calgary, and 15.0% (n=3) in regional centres. Patients were contacted by phone at 8.7 (1.4) months following hospital discharge.

During their ICU stay, 75.0% (n=14) of respondents received vasopressors (n=3 with pre-admission frailty) and 65% (n=13) received a combination of continuous sedation, invasive mechanical ventilation, and enteral feeding (n=2 with pre-admission frailty).

Following discharge, 20% (n=2) respondents reported CFS ≥5, 40% (n=8) respondents scored ≥8, indicating frailty on the EFS. On average, respondents reported 5.8 kg weight loss, with 35% (n=7; n=2 with pre-admission frailty) reporting >10% weight loss compared to their ICU admission weight. No patients were readmitted to ICU during the hospital stay.

The reported EQ-5D mean (SD) quality of life index was 0.648 (0.19) with median (IQR) VAS 57.5 (45.0–73.8) (Table 5).

DISCUSSION

In this study describing the impact of frailty on COVID-19 survival outcomes among adults admitted to ICU, the prevalence of frailty among adult COVID-19 ICU admissions was 20.2% and in-hospital mortality was 40.0%. Previous studies have found that severity of baseline frailty influences outcomes of patients with COVID-19 admitted to ICU, reporting greater mortality among patients with incrementally more severe frailty, reaching as much as 40.1% has been reported.(20–23) Disparities among results may be explained by regional variations in ICU patient selection and routine pre-admission frailty assessment.

The contrast in proportion of frail patients compared to non-frail among COVID-19 admissions, particularly in academic centres, raises the question of whether there was non-formal triage of patients, with pre-admission frailty influencing admission decisions. Comparable results were seen in patients with pre-admission chronic kidney disease where the proportion of COVID-19 patients was less than half that of non-COVID admissions. These findings may be linked to effects of bed availability on goals of care discussions during times of limited ICU bed availability, a trend previously documented in Alberta.(24) Other contributing factors may have been selection bias (i.e., older patients with frailty not being referred to ICU) and COVID-19 mortality among frail patients prior to ICU referral, although we do not have supporting data.

In both frail and non-frail patients, the initial measured PF ratio was lower in the COVID-19 pneumonia patients than non-COVID pneumonia admissions. This may reflect the nature of COVID-19 pneumonia being a primarily isolated respiratory disease without other organ dysfunction necessitating ICU admission. During the time frame of this study, larger sites (academic, tertiary, and community hospitals) developed dedicated COVID-19 wards where patients could be managed with higher oxygen demand than is usual practice. Patients transferred to ICU had exhausted the respiratory support available outside of the ICU setting. Non-COVID patients would not have had the same dedicated support in general ward environments. These findings suggest we may have room for improvement in the assessment and support of ward patients prior to ICU admission to ensure equitable care.

Frail patients in the COVID-19 group received more frequent NIV for longer duration than non-frail patients, and shorter duration IMV, suggesting possible limitations on duration and intensity of ICU therapies. This may also be an indicator of pre-determined limitations of intensity of care discussions with these patients. Despite admission sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores being similar in the frail and non-frail COVID-19 patients, the proportion of ICU and hospital deaths were higher among frail patients. These results may imply worsening condition in the frail patients with subsequent limitation of continued ICU therapies, consistent with findings from other studies.(25) There was a higher proportion of frail patients transferred from community hospitals to academic centres, which is congruent with their increased severity of illness but also suggests that frail patients require increased resource utilization compared to non-frail patients. Although not available to this study, routine documentation of discussions encompassing goals of care and limited trials of ICU therapies would be valuable to capture in the ICU electronic health record to help describe planning of patient care.

At outpatient follow-up of the patients, it was noted that patients reported lower CFS scores on follow-up than was assessed at ICU admission, potentially reflecting bias caused by the effects of acute illness on their apparent functioning as observed by the admitting ICU physician. An observational study examining CFS of patients at three-month follow-up found that approximately 27% of the included patients had increased frailty from their baseline.(26) Overall these findings suggest that frailty exists on a dynamic spectrum and can be changed. Further exploration of the modifiable aspects of frailty may identify patients who would benefit from aggressive interventions, such as multidisciplinary rehabilitation and social supports prior to discharge, to improve outpatient outcomes.(27,28)

Respondents reported a mean utility score of 0.648 in the context of ICU survivorship, suggesting limitations in the five dimensions assessed by the EQ-5D seemingly driven by reported problems with usual activities and pain/discomfort. The median EQ-VAS score (57.5) is context-dependent, but implies that respondents were experiencing health problems and limitations that were impacting their quality of life at eight-to-nine months following hospital discharge. Although we have no baseline scores to compare with, these reported scores are lower than other COVID-19 and ARDS follow-up studies.(29,30) This may be related to the small sample size combined with selection bias of respondents.

Strengths and Limitations

Our study is noteworthy for access to provincial ICU population-level clinical data with routine capture of pre-admission frailty status and clinical details in the electronic health record. Due to the paucity of evidence-based therapies for COVID-19 at the outset of the pandemic, when data from our study was collected, our results demonstrate the most potent effect of frailty on COVID-19 patients. Once specific therapies were used, it is possible that the effect of frailty may have been modulated.

However, our study also has important limitations. First, frailty was assessed by physicians at ICU admission and could be susceptible to misclassification bias, although previous studies have compared intensivist frailty assessment to geriatric medical assessment and concluded the assessment is feasible and valid.(8,31)

Second, no data were available to describe patients who were referred to ICU but declined admission. We are therefore unable to comment on the frailty status of those patients and its influence on ICU admission decisions. In the scenario of COVID-19 pneumonia and its media attention related to suboptimal outcomes in older patients, patients may have been hesitant to move to ICU for what they interpreted as non-beneficial therapies. Similarly, decisions by ICU physicians may have been influenced by early publications highlighting poor ICU outcomes among older and frail patients with COVID-19. Goals of care status at the time of admission and throughout the ICU duration of stay were not available.

Third, long-term condition and survival outcomes of COVID-19 infection and frailty were not available for the cohort. Follow-up data reported in the paper are subject to response bias and were incomplete in some instances. Fourth, although this study included all pneumonia admissions during the study time frame, results from a single Canadian province may not be generalizable to other regions. Finally, these data were collected prior to vaccine availability and reflect the initial six months of a pandemic that has since progressed through multiple waves of significant morbidity across the world.

CONCLUSION

Frailty was observed in 20.2% of adult patients admitted to ICU with COVID-19 pneumonia. Pre-admission frailty was associated with an incremental increased risk of hospital mortality and health services use. Our findings suggest that frailty screening may be an important prognostic tool for ICU discussions about admission for COVID-19 and associated outcomes; however, it must be used as part of a holistic approach to the heterogeneous ICU patient population.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

None to declare.

APPENDIX A TABLE A1 Baseline characteristics of patients admitted to ICU, stratified by frailty status

Variable	Total (N=521)	Frail (N=178)	Non-Frail (N=343)	p	
Patient Characteristics	
 Covid-19, n (%)	89 (17.1)	16 (9.0)	73 (21.3)	.0004	
 Age, years, mean (SD)	58.8 (14.9)	62.3 (14.5)	56.9 (14.8)	<.0001	
 Sex, n (% female)	206 (39.5)	71 (39.9)	135 (39.4)	.91	
	
ICU Characteristics	
 Academic, n (%)	112 (21.5)	41 (23.0)	71 (20.7)	.90	
 Tertiary, n (%)	158 (30.3)	51 (28.7)	107 (31.2)		
 Community, n (%)	151 (29.0)	51 (28.7)	100 (29.2)		
 Regional, n (%)	100 (19.2)	35 (19.7)	65 (19.0)		
	
Source of transfer to ICU, n (%)	
 Emergency Department	162 (31.1)	52 (29.2)	110 (32.1)	.35	
 ICU/CCU	10 (1.9)	1 (0.6)	9 (2.6)		
 OR/Recovery	7 (1.3)	2 (1.1)	5 (1.5)		
 Rural Hospital	89 (17.1)	27 (15.2)	62 (18.1)		
 Ward	185 (35.5)	68 (38.2)	117 (34.1)		
 Other	68 (13.1)	28 (15.7)	40 (11.7)		
	
Severity of Illness	
 SOFA at admit, mean (SD)	8.1 (4.0)	9.1 (3.8)	7.6 (4.0)	<0.001	
 APACHE II, mean (SD)	22.8 (8.0)	25.6 (7.8)	21.3 (7.7)	<.0001	
 APACHE IV, mean (SD)	76.5 (29.0)	85.2 (28.7)	72.0 (28.1)	<.0001	
 CFS at admit, mean (SD)	4.1 (1.6)	5.9 (0.9)	3.1 (1.0)	<.0001	
 Initial PF Ratio, mean (SD)	130.3 (56.2)	138.3 (60.9)	126.1 (53.1)	.02	
 Dialysis at admission, n (%)	13 (2.5)	9 (5.1)	4 (1.2)	.01	
ICU = intensive care unit; APACHE = Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; CFS = clinical frailty scale score; OR = operating room; PF ratio = perfusion to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio; SOFA = Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

TABLE A2 Health services use and treatment intensity of pneumonia ICU admission, stratified by frailty status

Variable	Total (n=521)	Frail (n=178)	Non-Frail (n=343)	p	
ICU Healthcare Utilization, n (%)	
 IMV	385 (73.9)	136 (76.4)	249 (72.6)	.35	
 NIV	94 (18.0)	40 (22.5)	54 (15.7)	.06	
 HFNC	128 (24.6)	43 (24.2)	85 (24.8)	.88	
 Prone positioning events	69 (13.2)	13 (7.3)	56 (16.3)	.004	
 Tracheostomya	42 (10.9)	14 (3.6)	28 (7.2)	.53	
 CRRT	38 (7.3)	14 (7.9)	24 (7.0)	.72	
 IHD	20 (3.8)	7 (3.9)	13 (3.8)	.94	
	
Duration of Stay	
 ICU days, mean (SD)	9.2 (12.2)	9.5 (15.7)	9.0 (10.0)	.78	
 Hospital days, mean (SD)	16.0 (25.7)	18.9 (29.9)	13.4 (23.1)	.002	
 Readmitted	17 (4.1)	6 (5.2)	11 (3.7)	.50	
a Tracheostomy reflects procedure on patients receiving IMV (n=385).

ICU = intensive care unit; IMV = invasive mechanical ventilation; NIV = non-invasive ventilation; HFNC = high-flow nasal cannula; CRRT = continuous renal replacement therapy; IHD = intermittent hemodialysis.

TABLE A3 Outcomes of ICU admission for pneumonia stratified by frailty status

Variable	Total (n=521)	Frail (n=178)	Non-Frail (n=343)	p	
Mortality	
 ICU death, n (%)	94 (18.0)	53 (29.8)	41 (12.0)	<.0001	
 Hospital death, n (%)	111 (21.3)	63 (35.4)	48 (14.0)	<.0001	
	
ICU Discharge disposition, n (%)	
 Died, n (%)	94 (18.0)	18 (29.8)	76 (12.0)	.003	
 Ward, n (%)	301 (57.8)	87 (48.9)	244 (62.4)		
 ICU/CCU, n (%)	27 (5.2)	7 (3.9)	20 (5.8)		
 Rural hospital, n (%)	14 (2.7)	5 (2.8)	9 (2.6)		
 Home, n (%)	7 (1.3)	2 (1.1)	5 (1.5)		
 Rehabilitation facility, n (%)	1 (0.2)	0 (0)	1 (0.3)		
 Not documented, n (%)	77 (14.8)	24 (13.5)	53 (15.4)		

TABLE 1 Characteristics of the cohort, stratified by COVID-19 status and by frailty status

Variable	Total (n=521)	COVID-19 (n=99)	p	Non-COVID-19 (n=422)	p	
		
Frail (n=20)	Non-Frail (n=79)	Frail (n=158)	Non-Frail (n=264)	
Patient Characteristics	
 Age (years), mean (SD)	58.8 (14.9)	66.2 (17.4)	59.4 (14.7)	.07	61.8 (14.0)	56.2 (14.8)	.0001	
 Female, n (%)	206 (39.5)	6 (30.0)	33 (41.8)	.34	65 (41.1)	102 (38.6)	.61	
	
ICU Characteristics, n (%)	
 Academic	112 (21.5)	4 (20.0)	6 (7.6)	.32	37 (23.4)	65 (24.6)	.67	
 Tertiary	158 (30.3)	4 (20.0)	23 (29.1)		47 (29.7)	84 (31.8)		
 Community	151 (29.0)	7 (35.0)	23 (29.1)		44 (27.8)	77 (29.2)		
 Regional	100 (19.2)	5 (25.0)	27 (34.2)		30 (19.0)	38 (14.4)		
	
Unit Admitted From, n (%)	
 Emergency	162 (31.1)	3 (15.0)	22 (27.8)	.05	49 (31.0)	88 (33.3)	.18	
 ICU/CCU	10 (1.9)	0 (0.0)	4 (5.1)		1 (0.6)	5 (1.9)		
 OR/Recovery	7 (1.3)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)		2 (1.3)	5 (1.9)		
 Rural Hospital	89 (17.1)	8 (40.0)	11 (13.9)		19 (12.0)	51 (19.3)		
 Ward	185 (35.5)	7 (35.0)	39 (49.4)		61 (38.6)	78 (29.5)		
 Other	68 (13.1)	2 (10.0)	3 (3.8)		26 (16.5)	37 (14.0)		
	
Severity of Illness	
 CFS at admit, Mean (SD)	4.1 (1.6)	5.9 (1.0)	3.3 (0.9)	<.001	5.9 (0.6)	2.5 (1.0)	<.001	
 SOFA at admit, Mean (SD)	8.1 (4.0)	8.0 (3.1)	6.3 (4.2)	.07	9.3 (3.8)	8.0 (3.9)	.002	
 APACHE II, Mean (SD)	22.8 (8.0)	24.8 (5.1)	19.2 (8.4)	.001	25.7 (8.1)	22.0 (7.4)	<.0001	
 APACHE IV, Mean (SD)	76.5 (29.0)	84.5 (23.5)	66.4 (32.1)	.004	85.3 (29.3)	73.7 (26.7)	<.0001	
 First PF Ratio, Mean (SD)	130.3 (56.2)	119.0 (62.7)	116.3 (51.5)	.89	140.7 (60.5)	129.0 (53.3)	.04	
 Dialysis at admission, n (%)	13 (2.5)	1 (5.0)	0 (0.0)	.05	8 (5.1)	4 (1.5)	.034	
ICU = intensive care unit; APACHE = Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; CFS = clinical frailty scale score; OR = operating room; PF ratio = perfusion to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio; SOFA = Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

TABLE 2 Health services use stratified by COVID-19 status and by frailty status

Variable	Total (n=521)	COVID-19	Non-COVID-19	
	
Frail (n=20)	Non-Frail (n=79)	p	Frail (n=158)	Non-Frail (n=264)	p	
Duration of Stay	
 ICU days, mean (SD)	9.2 (12.2)	14.2 (9.9)	13.3 (13.3)	.23	8.9 (16.2)	7.7 (8.4)	.79	
 Hospital days, mean (SD)	16.0 (25.7)	34.4 (66.7)	14.1 (9.3)	.03	17.0 (20.9)	14.5 (25.9)	.004	
 Readmitted to ICU, n (%)	17 (4.1)	2 (16.7)	4 (6.0)	.20	4 (3.9)	7 (3.1)	.70	
	
Readmission	
 Readmitted pre 72 hours, n (%)	7 (1.7)	0 (0.0)	3 (4.5)	.45	1 (1.0)	3 (1.3)	.79	
 Readmitted post 72 hours, n (%)	10 (2.4)	2 (16.7)	1 (1.5)	.01	3 (2.9)	4 (1.8)	.50	
 ICU Discharge to readmit, days, mean (SD)	10.6 (15.1)	14.9 (12.0)	14.9 (28.1)	.35	13.8 (14.1)	5.2 (5.1)	0.57	
	
ICU Therapies	
 IMV, n (%)	385 (73.9)	16 (80.0)	52 (65.8)	.22	120 (75.9)	197 (74.6)	.76	
 IMV days, mean (SD)	7.4 (12.2)	12.9 (7.7)	14.8 (12.6)	.84	6.5 (16.5)	5.5 (7.7)	.62	
 NIV, n (%)	94 (18.0)	4 (20.0)	7 (8.9)	.16	36 (22.8)	47 (17.8)	.21	
 NIV days, mean (SD)	1.1 (1.5)	1.4 (1.5)	0.7 (0.5)	.26	1.2 (1.9)	1.0 (1.2)	.94	
 HFNC, n (%)	128 (24.6)	10 (50.0)	24 (30.4)	.10	33 (20.9)	61 (23.1)	.60	
 HFNC days, mean (SD)	2.6 (4.5)	1.8 (1.9)	1.9 (1.7)	.73	3.7 (7.5)	2.3 (3.0)	.68	
 Prone events, n (%)	69 (13.2)	5 (25.0)	33 (41.8)	.17	8 (5.1)	23 (8.7)	.16	
 Prone Frequency, mean (SD)	0.3 (1.1)	0.6 (1.3)	1.5 (2.2)	.12	0.1 (0.2)	0.1 (0.7)	.15	
 Prone days, mean (SD)	1.8 (1.7)	2.1 (0.9)	2.5 (1.9)	.95	0.6 (0.4)	1.2 (1.2)	.32	
 Prone days average, mean (SD)	0.8 (0.8)	1.0 (0.6)	0.9 (1.1)	.48	0.6 (0.4)	0.7 (0.5)	.86	
 Tracheostomy, n (%)	42 (8.1)	1 (5.0)	11 (13.9)	.27	13 (8.2)	17 (6.4)	.49	
 Tracheostomy daysa, mean (SD)	21.2 (25.5)	19.8 (9.4)	15.1 (11.0)	.47	32.6 (41.9)	16.4 (10.9)	.52	
 CRRT, n (%)	38 (7.3)	2 (10.0)	8 (10.1)	.99	12 (7.6)	16 (6.1)	.54	
 CRRT days, mean (SD)	4.2 (5.3)	3.4 (0.1)	3.4 (3.2)	.60	2.8 (2.4)	5.8 (7.4)	.23	
 IHD, n (%)	20 (3.8)	0 (0.0)	3 (3.8)	.38	7 (4.4)	10 (3.8)	.75	
 IHD days, mean (SD)	0.4 (0.6)	0 (0.0)	0.2 (0.1)	.0000	0.4 (0.4)	0.4 (0.8)	.84	
 Transfer Delay, days, mean (SD)	0.6 (1.1)	0.4 (0.8)	0.4 (0.7)	.29	0.6 (1.2)	0.7 (1.2)	.01	
 Sedation, n (%)	362 (69.5)	17 (85.0)	51 (64.6)	.08	109 (69.0)	185 (70.1)	.81	
 Sedation days, mean (SD)	7.2 (10.3)	10.8 (9.4)	19.2 (17.2)	.07	3.5 (4.6)	5.7 (7.5)	.0005	
 Vasopressor, n (%)	359 (68.9)	15 (75.0)	48 (60.8)	.24	120 (75.9)	176 (66.7)	.04	
 Vasopressor days, mean (SD)	2.5 (4.3)	2.8 (3.3)	3.4 (5.0)	.61	2.4 (3.9)	2.3 (4.4)	.12	
 Inotrope, n (%)	45 (8.6)	3 (15.0)	7 (8.9)	.42	12 (7.6)	23 (8.7)	.69	
 Inotrope days, mean (SD)	2.4 (2.4)	3.6 (2.8)	2.7 (3.8)	.43	1.9 (1.9)	2.4 (2.1)	.53	
 Neuromuscular block, n (%)	54 (10.4)	2 (10.0)	19 (24.1)	.17	7 (4.4)	26 (9.8)	.05	
 Neuromuscular block days, mean (SD)	3.0 (3.1)	3.5 (1.6)	5.3 (3.8)	.81	0.8 (0.9)	1.9 (1.8)	.06	
 IMV & NIV, n (%)	62 (11.9)	2 (10.0)	4 (5.1)	.41	19 (12.0)	37 (14.0)	.56	
 IMV & NIV, days, mean (SD)	10.1 (21.1)	17.0 (5.0)	16.6 (14.9)	1.00	15.5 (36.5)	6.3 (5.9)	.18	
a Tracheostomy days reflect procedure on patients receiving IMV.

ICU = intensive care unit; IMV = invasive mechanical ventilation; NIV = non-invasive ventilation; HFNC = high-flow nasal cannula; CRRT = continuous renal replacement therapy; IHD = intermittent hemodialysis.

TABLE 3 Outcomes of ICU admission for pneumonia stratified by COVID-19 status and frailty status

Variable	Total (n=521)	COVID-19	p	Non-COVID-19	p	
		
Frail (n=20)	Non-Frail (n=79)	Frail (n=158)	Non-Frail (n=264)	
Mortality, n (%)	
 ICU death	94 (18.0)	8 (40.0)	11 (13.9)	.01	45 (28.5)	30 (11.4)	<.0001	
 Hospital death	111 (21.3)	8 (40.0)	12 (15.2)	.01	55 (34.8)	36 (13.6)	<.0001	
 ICU death within 3 days	28 (5.4)	1 (5.0)	2 (2.5)	.57	18 (11.4)	7 (2.7)	.0002	
	
ICU Discharge Disposition, n (%)	
 Died	94 (18.0)	8 (40.0)	11 (13.9)	.02	45 (28.5)	30 (11.4)	.003	
 Ward	301 (57.8)	9 (45.0)	56 (70.9)		78 (49.4)	158 (59.8)		
 ICU/CCU	27 (5.2)	1 (5.0)	4 (5.1)		6 (3.8)	16 (6.1)		
 Rural Hospital	14 (2.7)	1 (5.0)	0 (0.0)		4 (2.5)	9 (3.4)		
 Home	7 (1.3)	0 (0.0)	1 (0.0)		2 (1.3)	5 (1.9)		
 Rehabilitation Facility	1 (0.2)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)		0 (0.0)	1 (0.4)		
 Not documented	77 (14.8)	1 (5.0)	9 (11.4)		23 (14.6)	45 (17.0)		

TABLE 4 Impact of frailty on hospital mortality for patients admitted to ICU with COVID-19 pneumonia, logistic regression model

Model	Variable(s) a	Odds Ratio	95% CI	
Unadjusted	Frailty (Yes vs No)	3.72	1.25 to 11.01	
	
Adjusted	Frailty (Yes vs No)	2.80	0.87 to 8.96	
APACHE IV Score (continuous)	1.03	1.01 to 1.05	
	
Unadjusted	Frailty (continuous)	1.62	1.18 to 2.22	
	
Adjusted	Frailty (continuous)	1.48	1.04 to 2.09	
APACHE IV Score (continuous)	1.03	1.01 to 1.05	
a Frailty was defined as Clinical Frailty Scale score ≥5; the CFS ordinal scale 1–9 was also assessed as a continuous variable; the number of covariates in model was limited by COVID-19 hospital mortality events (n=20).

TABLE 5 EQ-5D-5L frequencies and proportions reported by dimension and level

	Mobility n (%)	Self-care n (%)	Usual Activities n (%)	Pain/Discomfort n (%)	Anxiety/Depression n (%)	
Level 1 (no problems)	8 (40)	15 (75)	4 (20)	3 (15)	10 (50)	
Level 2 (slight problems)	6 (30)	0 (0)	8 (40)	6 (30)	5 (25)	
Level 3 (moderate problems)	2 (10)	2 (10)	3 (15)	7 (35)	3 (15)	
Level 4 (severe problems)	2 (10)	1 (5)	3 (15)	4 (20)	1 (5)	
Level 5 (severe problems)	2 (10)	2 (10)	2 (10)	0 (0)	1 (5)	
Total	20 (100)	20 (100)	20 (100)	20 (100)	20 (100)	

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES: We have read and understood the Canadian Geriatrics Journal’s policy on conflicts of interest disclosure and declare the following: Dr. Bagshaw is supported by a Canada Research Chair in Critical Care Outcomes and Systems Evaluation. No other authors report competing interests with this work.

FUNDING: This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research under Grant # 202004FRC CIHRIRSC: 0147008594 and the Canadian Frailty Network under Grant # FRN#173142.
==== Refs
REFERENCES

1 Lim JP Low KY Lin NJ Lim CZ Ong SW Tan WY Predictors for development of critical illness amongst older adults with COVID-19: Beyond age to age-associated factors Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2021 May-Jun 94 104331 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104331 33476755
2 Bonanad C Garcia-Blas S Tarazona-Santabalbina F Sanchis J Bertomeu-Gonzalez V Facila L The effect of age on mortality in patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis with 611,583 subjects J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020 Jun 21 7 915 18 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.045 32674819
3 Maltese G Corsonello A Di Rosa M Soraci L Vitale C Corica F Frailty and COVID-19: a systematic scoping review J Clin Med 2020 Jul 4 9 7 2106 10.3390/jcm9072106 32635468
4 Rockwood K Rationing care in COVID-19: If we must do it, can we do better? Age Ageing 2021 Jan 8 50 1 3 6 10.1093/ageing/afaa202 32939534
5 Rockwood K Song X MacKnight C Bergman H Hogan DB McDowell I A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people CMAJ 2005 Aug 30 173 5 489 95 10.1503/cmaj.050051 16129869
6 Bagshaw S Stelfox H McDermid R Rolfson D Tsuyuki R Baig N Association between frailty and short- and long-term outcomes among critically ill patients: A multicentre prospective cohort study CMAJ 2014 Feb 4 186 2 E95 E102 10.1503/cmaj.130639 24277703
7 Montgomery CL Zuege DJ Rolfson DB Opgenorth D Hudson D Stelfox HT Implementation of population-level screening for frailty among patients admitted to adult intensive care in Alberta, Canada Can J Anaesth 2019 Nov 66 11 1310 19 10.1007/s12630-019-01414-8 31144259
8 Shears M Takaoka A Rochwerg B Bagshaw SM Johnstone J Holding A Assessing frailty in the intensive care unit: a reliability and validity study J Crit Care 2018 Jun 45 197 203 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.02.004 29574340
9 Darvall JN Bellomo R Paul E Bailey M Young PJ Reid A Routine frailty screening in critical illness: a population-based cohort study in Australia and New Zealand Chest 2021 Oct 160 4 1292 303 10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.049 34089741
10 Subramaniam A Anstey C Curtis JR Ashwin S Ponnapa Reddy M Aliberti MJR Characteristics and outcomes of patients with frailty admitted to ICU with Coronavirus Disease 2019: an individual patient data meta-analysis Crit Care Explor 2022 4 1 e0616 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000616 35072081
11 De Biasio JC Mittel AM Mueller AL Ferrante LE Kim DH Shaefi S Frailty in critical care medicine: a review Anesth Analg 2020 Jun 130 6 1462 73 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004665 32384336
12 Ontario Health Clinical triage protocol for major surge in COVID pandemic Toronto Ontario Health 2020 [cited Nov 6, 2023]. Available from: https://search.brave.com/search?q=Ontario+Health.+Clinical+Triage+Protocol+for+Major+Surge+in+COVID+Pandemic.&source=desktop&summary=1&summary_og=810dd0bcd08b34616e7137
13 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence COVID-19 rapid guideline: Critical care in adults London, UK NICE Feb 12 2021 [cited Nov 6, 2023]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng159
14 Ehni HJ Wiesing U Ranisch R Saving the most lives—a comparison of European triage guidelines in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic Bioethics 2021 Feb 35 2 125 34 10.1111/bioe.12836 33325536
15 Alberta Health Services Critical care triage during pandemic or disaster: a framework for Alberta Edmonton, AB AHS 2021 [cited Nov 6, 2023]. Available from: https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/about/scn/ahs-scn-cc-critical-care-triage-framework.pdf
16 von Elm E Altman DG Egger M Pocock SJ Gotzsche PC Vandenbroucke JP The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies Lancet 2007 Oct 370 9596 1453 57 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X 18064739
17 Hope AA Hsieh SJ Petti A Hurtado-Sbordoni M Verghese J Gong MN Assessing the usefulness and validity of frailty markers in critically ill adults Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017 Jun 14 6 952 59 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201607-538OC 28358584
18 Herdman M Gudex C Lloyd A Janssen M Kind P Parkin D Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) Qual Life Res 2011 Dec 20 10 1727 36 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x 21479777
19 Rolfson DB Majumdar SR Tsuyuki RT Tahir A Rockwood K Validity and reliability of the Edmonton Frail Scale Age Ageing 2006 Sep 35 5 526 29 10.1093/ageing/afl041 16757522
20 Hewitt J Carter B Vilches-Moraga A Quinn TJ Braude P Verduri A The effect of frailty on survival in patients with COVID-19 (COPE): a multicentre, European, observational cohort study Lancet 2020 Aug 5 8 E444 E451
21 Ramos-Rincon JM Moreno-Perez O Pinargote-Celorio H Leon-Ramirez JM Andres M Reus S Clinical Frailty Score vs. Hospital Frailty Risk Score for predicting mortality and other adverse outcome in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: Spanish case series Int J Clin Pract 2021 Oct 75 10 e14599 10.1111/ijcp.14599 34227196
22 Mendes A Serratrice C Herrmann FR Genton L Perivier S Scheffler M Predictors of in-hospital mortality in older patients with COVID-19: The COVIDAge study J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020 Nov 21 11 1546 54 e3 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.09.014 33138936
23 Okoye C Calsolaro V Calabrese AM Zotti S Fedecostante M Volpato S Determinants of cause-specific mortality and loss of independence in older patients following hospitalization for COVID-19: the GeroCovid outcomes study J Clin Med 2022 Sep 22 11 19 5578 10.3390/jcm11195578 36233447
24 Stelfox HT Hemmelgarn BR Bagshaw SM Gao S Doig CJ Nijssen-Jordan C Intensive care unit bed availability and outcomes for hospitalized patients with sudden clinical deterioration Arch Intern Med 2012 Mar 26 172 6 467 74 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.2315 22412076
25 Blomaard LC van der Linden CMJ van der Bol JM Jansen SWM Polinder-Bos HA Willems HC Frailty is associated with in-hospital mortality in older hospitalised COVID-19 patients in the Netherlands: The COVID-OLD study Age Ageing 2021 May 5 50 3 631 40 10.1093/ageing/afab018 33951156
26 Prampart S Le Gentil S Bureau ML Macchi C Leroux C Chapelet G Functional decline, long term symptoms and course of frailty at 3-months follow-up in COVID-19 older survivors, a prospective observational cohort study BMC Geriatr 2022 Jun 22 1 542 10.1186/s12877-022-03197-y 35768781
27 McCarthy A Galvin R Dockery F McLoughlin K O’Connor M Corey G Multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation for older adults with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and process outcomes BMC Geriatr 2023 Jun 27 23 1 391 10.1186/s12877-023-04098-4 37365515
28 Kaushik R Ferrante LE Long-term recovery after critical illness in older adults Curr Opin Crit Care 2022 Oct 1 28 5 572 80 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000981 35950731
29 Hodgson CL Higgins AM Bailey MJ Mather AM Beach L Bellomo R Comparison of 6-Month outcomes of survivors of COVID-19 versus Non-COVID-19 critical illness Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2022 May 15 205 10 1159 68 10.1164/rccm.202110-2335OC 35258437
30 Brown SM Wilson E Presson AP Zhang C Dinglas VD Greene T Predictors of 6-month health utility outcomes in survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome Thorax 2017 Apr 72 4 311 17 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208560 27440140
31 Surkan M Rajabali N Bagshaw SM Wang X Rolfson D Interrater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale by geriatrician and intensivist in patients admitted to the intensive care unit Can Geriatr J 2020 Sep 1 23 3 235 41 10.5770/cgj.23.398 32904800
