
==== Front
Can J Respir Ther
Can J Respir Ther
3251
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR
1205-9838
2368-6820
Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists Website: Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy

37781349
87789
10.29390/001c.87789
Research Article
Predictive factors for extubation success in very low and extremely low birth weight preterm infants
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7072-5320
Bastos de Souza Júnior Nilson Willamy 1
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5527-7491
Rosa Tathiane Ribeiro 1
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1979-9700
Cerântola Jane Cecília Kreling 2
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7018-0017
Ferrari Ligia Silvana Lopes 3
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1483-5319
Probst Vanessa Suziane 4
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3270-6940
Felcar Josiane Marques 4
1 Postgraduation Program in Rehabilitation Sciences Londrina State University https://ror.org/01585b035
2 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Londrina State University https://ror.org/01585b035
3 University Hospital, Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Department Londrina State University https://ror.org/01585b035
4 Center of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy Department Londrina State University https://ror.org/01585b035
*Corresponding Author: Josiane Marques Felcar PT, PhD. Maiing address: Robert Koch Av, 60 – Londrina, PR, Brazil. Zip code: 86.038-350. Phone: +55 43 33712490. E-mail: josianefelcar@uel.br
15 9 2023
2023
59 204213
13 11 2022
30 8 2023
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background

Although invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) has contributed to the survival of preterm infants with extremely low birth weight (ELBW), it is also associated with unsatisfactory clinical outcomes when used for prolonged periods. This study aimed to identify factors that may be decisive for extubation success in very low birth weight (VLBW) and extremely low birth weight (ELBW) preterm infants.

Methods

The cohort study included preterm infants with gestational age (GA) <36 weeks, birth weight (BW) <1500 grams who underwent IMV, born between 2015 and 2018. The infants were allocated into two groups: extubation success (SG) or failure (FG). A stepwise logistic regression model was created to determine variables associated with successful extubation.

Results

Eighty-three preterm infants were included. GA and post-extubation arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) were predictive of extubation success. Infants from FG had lower GA and BW, while those from SG had higher weight at extubation and lower post-extubation PaCO2.

Discussion

Although we found post-extubation PaCO2 as an extubation success predictor, which is a variable representative of the moment after the primary outcome, this does not diminish its clinical relevance since extubation does not implicate in ET removal only; it also involves all the aspects that take place within a specified period (72 hours) after the planned event.

Conclusion

GA and post-extubation PaCO2 were predictors for extubation success in VLBW and ELBW preterm infants. Infants who experienced extubation failure had lower birth weight and higher FiO2 prior to extubation.

Prematurity
mechanical ventilation
weaning
The present study was partially funded by the following Brazilian agencies: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001. The study sponsors had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, the manuscript’s writing process and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Although invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is a necessary treatment approach that has contributed to the survival of preterm infants with extremely low birth weight (ELBW) over the years, it is also associated with unsatisfactory clinical outcomes when used for prolonged periods, including bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and neurological injuries. In addition, the risk for serious neurodevelopment impairment increases considerably for each additional week of IMV; therefore, it is highly recommended that weaning and discontinuation of IMV occur as soon as possible.1,2

Extubation failure is associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates in preterm infants; thus, the decision to extubate must be taken with great caution.3,4 Criteria for successful IMV weaning and extubation in the neonatal and pediatric populations remain inconsistent and not well established compared to an adult population, nor are there any reliable, validated tests for extubation readiness in this population. Usually, criteria vary according to each Neonatal Intensive Care Unit’s (NICU) practice.5–7 Currently, some research regarding predictive factors for successful extubation in the neonatal and pediatric population exists; however, most of the results have shown low precision and little benefit in identifying extubation failures.8,9

The present study aims to identify factors that may be crucial for extubation success in very low birth weight (VLBW) and ELBW preterm infants and investigate outcomes associated with extubation failure.

Methods

Study design and sample

A retrospective, cohort, single-center study was conducted at the State University of Londrina–Brazi. All preterm born at <36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) and birth weight (BW) <1500 grams who underwent IMV during hospitalization between January 2015 and December 2018 were eligible. Infants who died before the extubation attempt, who underwent unplanned extubation and did not need to return to IMV after successful non-invasive post-extubation ventilation support, who got transferred to another institution before being discontinued from IMV, who got intubated briefly just for INSURE therapy (INtubation, SURfactant, Extubation) and infants whose data records were incomplete or not found were excluded. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee Involving Human Beings–State University of Londrina–Brazil (CAAE: 48415015.0.0000.5231).

Data collection

The following data were collected from patients’ data records: a) perinatal variables including gestational age (GA), BW, classification, gender, mode of delivery, 1 and 5 min Apgar scores, antenatal steroid and surfactant administration; b) initial ventilation variables including resuscitation in the delivery room, ventilatory parameters during transportation from the delivery room to the NICU, initial ventilatory parameters at NICU admission and after 24 hours of IMV; c) pre-extubation variables including caffeine and steroids administration, need for endotracheal tube (ET) replacement, unplanned extubations occurrence, PMA and weight at extubation, ventilatory parameters and blood gas variables right before extubation; d) post-extubation variables including first post-extubation respiratory support of choice, post-extubation blood gas variables, length of time on IMV, length of time on non-invasive ventilation (NIV)–continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and/or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), and length of stay in NICU and hospital stay.

Successful extubation was defined as not requiring re-intubation during a pre-specified window of observation of 72 hours. Patients included in this study were allocated into the successful extubation group (SG) and the failed extubation group (FG). Infants under IMV were treated using the Dräger Babylog VN500 ventilator (Dräger, Lübeck, Germany).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics 22 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) and Graph Pad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc.; San Diego, California, USA). Data normality analysis was performed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and data were described as percentages and mean ± standard deviation or median and interquartile range, depending on the normality test. Comparison of variables between groups was performed by Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney test for continuous data, and proportion measurements were analyzed using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Correlation between variables and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation was conducted using Pearson or Spearman rank correlation. Values 0.7-0.89 were considered strong, 0.5-0.69 reasonable, and 0.3-0.49 poor.10

To verify independent factors associated with extubation success, variables with significant differences between infants of the two groups which demonstrated association in a generalized linear mixed model (p<0.05) were included in a binary stepwise logistic regression model presented as odds ratio values and respective 95% confidence interval (95% CI) which indicated the associations’ magnitude. The adjusted logistic regression model included independent variables that showed an association of up to 20% extubation success (univariate model). Extubation success was set as a dependent variable. The statistical significance adopted was p<0.05.

Results

Between 2015 and 2018, 312 preterm babies with GA <36 weeks and BW <1500 grams were born and admitted to the NICU. Among 223 eligible infants, 140 were excluded, resulting in a final sample of 83 patients (Figure 1). No outborn babies were included.

180143 Figure 1. Flowchart of the study.

GA: gestational age; BW: birth weight; IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation; SG: success group; FG: failure group.

Comparisons regarding perinatal variables between the two groups can be found in Table 1. There was a significant difference between them only regarding GA, BW and, consequently, weight classification.

180055 Table 1. Characteristics of patients included in the study.

Characteristics	Success group
(n=64)	Failure group
(n=19)	p	
Gestational age (weeks)	29.1 [27.9-30.4]	26.3 [25.9-27.6]	<0.0001*	
Birth weight (grams)	1100 [923.8-1309.5]	815 [725-1030]	<0.0001*	
Gender, n (%)				
Female	40 (62.5)	8 (42.1)	0.185	
Male	24 (37.5)	11 (57.9)		
Mode of delivery, n (%)				
C-section	49 (76.6)	14 (73.7)	0.77	
Vaginal	15 (23.4)	5 (26.3)		
Classification, n (%)				
ELBW	21 (32.8)	14 (73.7)	0.03*	
VLBW	43 (67.2)	5 (26.3)		
SGA	18 (28.1)	4 (21.1)	0.77	
AGE	46 (71.9)	15 (78.9)		
Antenatal steroid administration, n (%)**				
Yes	51 (79.7)	17 (89.5)	0.5	
No	13 (20.3)	2 (10.5)		
Apgar 1’	5 [3-7]	5 [2.5-6.5]	0.75	
Apgar 5’	8 [7-9]	8 [7-8]	0.23	
Exogenous surfactant administration, n (%)				
Yes	48 (75)	14 (73.7)	0.9	
No	16 (25)	5 (26.3)		
ELBW: extremely low birth weight; VLBW: very low birth weight; SGA: small for gestational age; AGE: appropriate for gestational age; Apgar 1’: Apgar score at first minute of life; Apgar 5’: Apgar score at fifth minute of life; * p<0.05. **

There was no difference between the groups regarding resuscitation in the delivery room, ventilatory parameters during transportation from the delivery room to the NICU and initial ventilatory parameters set at NICU admission (Table 2). Most infants in both groups needed resuscitation in the delivery room. Most infants in the FG group were intubated while still in the delivery room.

180056 Table 2. Initial ventilatory characteristics.

	Success group
(n=64)	Failure group
(n=19)	p	
Resuscitation				
Need for resuscitation, n (%)a				
Yes	43 (69.4)	14 (73.7)	0.78	
No	19 (30.6)	5 (26.3)		
Maximum FiO2	1 [0.4-1]	1 [0.9-1]	0.26	
Need for intubation in delivery room, n (%)b				
Yes	24 (39.3)	11 (61.1)	0.11	
No	37 (60.7)	7 (38.9)		
Transportation from delivery room to NICU				
Respiratory support				
IMV, n (%)	22 (36.7)	10 (55.6)		
NIPPV, n (%)	11 (18.3)	2 (11.1)		
CPAP, n (%)	23 (38.3)	6 (33.3)	0.52	
Supplemental oxygen, n (%)	3 (5)	0 (0)		
Room air, n (%)	1 (1.7)	0 (0)		
Ventilatory parameters at transportation				
Pinsp (cmH2O)	18 [16-20]	18 [18-20]	0.65	
RR (bpm)	40 [40-60]	55 [40-60]	0.18	
FiO2	0.5 [0.3-0.8]	0.55 [0.4-1]	0.25	
Initial Ventilation				
Initial ventilatory parameters				
Pinsp (cmH2O)	18.5 ± 3.2	17.9 ± 3	0.47	
RR (bpm)	50 [40-60]	50 [40-60]	0.75	
FiO2	0.4 [0.3-0.75]	0.4 [0.3-0.6]	0.99	
Ventilatory parameters after 24h				
Pinsp (cmH2O)	17 [15-20]	16 [15-19]	0.83	
RR (bpm)	40 [27.5-45.5]	50 [40-60]	0.32	
FiO2	0.3 [0.22-0.4]	0.3 [0.25-0.4]	0.31	
FiO2: Fraction of inspired oxygen; IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation; NIPPV: nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; Pinsp: inspiratory pressure; cmH2O: centimetres of water; RR: respiratory rate; bpm: breaths per minute; a (SG n=62); b (SG n=61 and FG n=18); c (SG n=60 and FG n=18);** lower sample number due to lack of information regarding resuscitation and transportation of some medical records.

FG infants had lower weight at extubation and, proportionally to SG, had more unplanned extubations and ET replacements. As for the ventilatory parameters right before extubation, SG needed lower FiO2. There was no difference concerning blood gas values. More information on the pre-extubation aspects is shown in Table 3.

180057 Table 3. Pre-extubation variables.

	Success group
(n=64)	Failure group
(n=19)	p	
Corticosteroids administration, n (%)				
Yes	7 (10.9)	3 (15.8)	0.69	
No	57 (89.1)	16 (84.2)		
Caffeine, n (%)				
Yes	58 (90.6)	14 (73.7)	0.11	
No	6 (9.4)	5 (26.3)		
Unplanned extubation requiring re-intubation, n (%)				
Yes	8 (12.5)	7 (36.8)	0.036*	
No	56 (87.5)	12 (63.2)		
ET replacements, n (%)				
Yes	10 (15.6)	8 (42.1)	0.024*	
No	54 (84.4)	11 (57.9)		
Weight at extubation (grams)	1154.5 ± 262	947.7 ± 202	0.002*	
Age at extubation (days)	6 [2-12]	19 [5-27]	0.038*	
PMA at extubation (weeks)	30.3 [28.6-32.1]	29.1 [27.7-30]	0.021*	
Pre-extubation ventilatory parameters				
Pinsp (cmH2O)
VT (ml/Kg)
PEEP (cmH2O)	15 [14-17]
5 [5-5.7]
5 [5-6]	16 [15-17.5]
6 [6-7]
5 [5-5.5]	0.25
0.01*
0.25	
RR (bpm)	20 [20-20]	20 [20-25]	0.32	
FiO2	0.25 [0.21-0.3]	0.30 [0.25-0.3]	0.01*	
Pre-extubation arterial blood gas variables**					
pH	7.34 ± 0.1	7.33 ± 0.1	0.75	
PaCO2 (mmHg)	36.4 ± 9.1	39.7 ± 9.1	0.16	
HCO3- (mEq/L)	19.2 ± 4.6	21.7 ± 5.8	0.05	
ET: endotracheal tube; PMA: postmenstrual age; Pinsp: inspiratory pressure; cmH2O: centimetre of water; VT: tidal volume; ml/Kg: millilitres per kilogram; PEEP: positive end expiratory pressure; RR: respiratory rate; bpm: breaths per minute; FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen; pH: potential of hydrogen; PaCO2: arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide; mmHg: millimetre of mercury; HCO3-: bicarbonate; mEq/L: milliequivalents per litre. *p<0.05. **Arterial blood gases were obtained within 24 hours prior to extubation.

NIPPV was the most used first post-extubation respiratory support of choice in both groups, as presented in Table 4. Post-extubation arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) and bicarbonate (HCO3-) values were higher in FG. Regarding variables during hospitalization, FG infants stayed a more extended time under IMV; length of stay in the NICU and overall hospital stay were also higher in that group.

180058 Table 4. Postextubation variables.

	Success group
(n=64)	Failure group
(n=19)	p	
Post-extubation respiratory support				
NIPPV, n (%)	56 (87.5)	18 (94.7)		
CPAP, n (%)	5 (7.8)	1 (5.3)	0.31	
Incubator oxygen, n (%)	1 (1.6)	0 (0)	
Room air, n (%)	2 (3.1)	0 (0)	
Post-extubation arterial blood gas variables**				
pH	7.32 ± 0.08	7.30 ± 0.08	0.24	
PaCO2 (mmHg)	36 [32-45]	47 [45-53.5]	<0.0001*	
HCO3- (mEq/L)	18.8 [15.7-22.4]	24.3 [19-27.4]	0.01*	
IMV duration (days)	4 [1.3-8]	37 [8-53]	<0.0001*	
NIV duration (days)				
NIPPV	5 [2.2-10]	9 [2.5-13]	0.15	
CPAP	5 [2-9]	5 [3-9]	0.63	
Length of NICU stay (days)	32 [18.2-48]	58 [47-70.5]	<0.0001*	
Length of hospital stay (days)	58 [44-72]	90 [74-110]	<0.0001*	
NIPPV: nasal intermittent positive pressure; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; PaCO2: arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide; mmHg: millimetre of mercury; HCO3-: bicarbonate; mEq/L: milliequivalent per litre; IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation; NIV: non-invasive ventilation; NICU: neonatal intensive care unit. *p<0.05. ** Arterial blood gases were obtained within 48 hours after extubation.

In FG, a strong and negative correlation was found between IMV duration and GA (r=-0.81; p<0.0001); a reasonable and positive correlation between inspiratory pressure (Pinsp) during transportation, initial set Pinsp and initial set FiO2 with IMV duration (r=0.61, p=0.03; r=0.52, p=0.02 and r=0.54, p=0.01, respectively); a poor and positive correlation between initial set respiratory rate (RR) and IMV duration (r=0.48, p=0.04).

As for SG, a reasonable and positive correlation was found between HCO3- values both prior and post-extubation with IMV duration (r=0.6, p<0.0001 and r=0.63, p<0.0001, respectively); a poor and positive correlation between pre-extubation FiO2, pre and post-extubation PaCO2 with IMV duration (r=0.36, p=0.03; r=0.33, P=0.01 and r=0.26, p=0.02, respectively).

Statistically significant results of associated variables in the univariate analysis were inserted in the multivariate model (Table 5). Final logistic regression identified GA (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23, 0.85, p=0.01) and post-extubation PaCO2 (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0, 1.2, p=0.02) as extubation success predictors. The model was significant (X2 (9) 31.333, p<0.0001, R2 Nagelkerke=0.48) and correctly classified 85.4% of the cases.

180059 Table 5. Logistic regression predicting likelihood of extubation success.

	95% CI for OR		
Variable	B	SE	OR	Lower	Upper	p	
Constant	19.73	8.42				0.01*	
GA	-0.80	0.33	0.44	0.23	0.85	0.01*	
ET replacements	0.74	1.1	1.07	0.13	8.71	0.94	
Unplanned extubation	-1.07	0.95	0.34	0.05	2.21	0.25	
Weight classification	-0.99	1.32	0.37	0.02	4.93	0.45	
Weight at extubation	0.001	0.003	1.0	0.99	1.0	0.67	
Age at extubation	-0.03	0.04	0.97	0.88	1.05	0.49	
Pre-extubation HCO3-	-0.14	0.11	0.86	0.69	1.08	0.21	
Post-extubation HCO3-	0.009	0.11	1.01	0.8	1.26	0.93	
Post-extubation PaCO2	0.1	0.04	1.1	1.01	1.21	0.02*	
B=nonstandard coefficients regression; SE=standard error; OR=odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; GA=gestational age; ET=endotracheal tube; HCO3-=bicarbonate; PaCO2=arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide.

Discussion

The purpose of the present cohort study was to identify factors that may be crucial for extubation success in VLBW and ELBW preterm infants and investigate outcomes associated with extubation failure by analyzing a series of factors that could predict extubation success in order to assist in the decision for the ideal moment of ET removal in these infants. The logistic regression analysis shows that higher GA and lower post-extubation PaCO2 were predictors of extubation success. Manley et al.11 analyzed pre and post-extubation data of 160 extremely preterm infants and, even considering a longer observation window for extubation success (168 hours after ET removal), also showed that GA and post-extubation PaCO2 predicted extubation success.

In clinical practice, arterial blood gas values are vital information to guide the decision to extubate extremely preterm infants.12 The current study showed that post-extubation PaCO2 was more significant as an extubation predictor than pre-extubation blood gas measures. There was no difference regarding Pinsp and RR adjusted at the moment immediately before extubation between the two groups. Since blood gas values strongly depend on these two ventilatory parameters, pre-extubation gasometric values were not appropriate to predict extubation success.

It is important to emphasize that, even though in the present study, we found post-extubation PaCO2 as an extubation success predictor, which is a variable representative of the moment after the primary outcome, this does not diminish its clinical relevance since the extubation process does not implicate in ET removal only, but it also involves all the aspects that take place within the specified period (72 hours, in this case) after the event (e.g., post-extubation NIV, the possibility of infections, the need for respiratory care). Closely observing post-extubation PaCO2 can possibly indicate an imminent rise in extubation failure, allowing the medical team to take effective measures to prevent it. For example, a better NIV adjustment (i.e., a more suitable NIV interface) and respiratory care optimization (e.g., airway clearance and lung expansion techniques). Re-intubation was considered if the baby presented increased work of breathing, severe apnea and bradycardia events and SpO2 <90% with FiO2 >0.5, indicating failure of NIV support.

Post-extubation arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) and bicarbonate (HCO3-) values were higher in FG. These higher values may be attributed to the fact that these babies experienced more respiratory distress, directly impacting gas exchange and, consequently, blood gases and acid-base balance.13

To date, there is still no consensus concerning the definition of extubation success in preterm infants. Therefore, for this study, we defined extubation success as not requiring reintubation after a specified 72 hour observation window because we understand that extrapolation of this time window to 120, or even 168 hours, could include cases of extubation failure whose causes would not be exclusively respiratory, deviating from the proposal of this study. Gupta et al.,13 faced with these definitions inconsistencies, analyzed predictive factors for extubation success in EPT infants using 72 and 120 hours as observation windows and obtained similar results in both analyses.

Extubation failure is defined as the requirement for re-intubation within a pre-specified observation period due to the inability to sustain spontaneous breathing. The rate of extubation failure in this study was 22.8%, mainly related to recurrent apneas and increased work of breathing, an outcome very similar to the Wang et al.14 study, which included 68 ELBW infants and considered extubation failure as the necessity to return to IMV within 168 hours, they observed an extubation failure rate of 23.5% primarily associated with apneas events, bradycardia and pulmonary hemorrhage. Dimitrou et al.15 and Kamlin et al.5 also presented extubation failure rates similar to this study, 19.4% and 22%, respectively.

Upon extubation, in this study, babies were usually placed on CPAP (PEEP 5-7 cmH2O) and minimum FiO2 necessary to maintain SpO2 levels between 91-95% or NIPPV (PIP 15-20 cmH2O, PEEP 5-7 cmH2O, inflation rates 20-40/minute and minimum FiO2 necessary to maintain SpO2 levels between 91-95%), depending on patient’s clinical characteristics. Weaning from CPAP and NIPPV was considered when the baby had PMA >32 weeks, no signs of increased work of breathing, no episodes of apnea or bradycardia and FiO2 21%. This strategy is in accordance with common practices applied in NICU services to prevent extubation failure.16

Compared to SG infants, FG infants had lower GA and BW, elements which can prove to be quite determinant not only for the occurrence of extubation failure but also for predicting mortality in ELBW infants.17,18 According to Hermeto et al.,17 lower GA was associated with higher rates of extubation failure due to greater pulmonary and muscular systems immaturity, which considerably impacts lung function and work of breathing.

A recent cohort study involving 312 preterm infants born with BW <1.250g found that higher GA, greater age at extubation, higher pre-extubation pH value and lower pre-extubation adjusted FiO2 are predictors for extubation success.13 Lower FiO2 and higher pH right before extubation may indicate better lung maturity and function, enough to favour spontaneous breathing. In our study, FG infants had lower weight and higher adjusted FiO2 at the time of extubation. Furthermore, these babies were older, which corresponds to Costa et al.’s19 findings that observed the greater the age at extubation, the greater the probability of extubation failure due to increased risk of complications such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), hospital infection and lung injury ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI).

In this study, the unplanned extubation rate was 18%, with a higher proportion of these events in FG. This might be explained by the fact that these babies spent more on IMV, which inexorably increases the chances of unplanned extubations. A cohort study by Hatch et al.,20 which included 718 infants under IMV, found that between the first and fourth week of life, the risk for unplanned extubation increases by 36% each week and is associated with substantial damage such as clinical condition deterioration and cardiorespiratory arrest, besides a more extended hospital stay.

Proportionally, FG had more ET replacements (42.1%); this can be attributed to the fact that these infants were smaller (i.e., lower GA and BW) and consequently were initially intubated with a smaller diameter cannula. Furthermore, they were submitted to IMV for a longer time, which eventually required ET replacement for a larger size due to tube leakage increase as they grew. According to Mahmoud et al.,21 preterm ELBW infants mechanically ventilated for long periods have a greater risk for air leakage around the ET, mostly due to variations in body weight during hospitalization. Leaks greater than 40% can significantly compromise the delivery of adjusted targeted volume, impairing ventilation as a whole, hence the importance of proper endotracheal tube size placement in these babies according to their body weight.

Caffeine administration and its benefits for preterm infants have been widely investigated over the past two decades. It is routinely administered to extremely preterm neonates to prevent or treat apnea of prematurity.22–24 In our sample, 83% of the babies received caffeine before the first extubation attempt. Although it was not statistically significant, it is important to highlight the 17% difference in caffeine use between the two groups, considering that FG stayed longer under IMV. A large multicenter trial25 showed that caffeine administration in preterm infants born with BW between 500 and 1250 g was associated with a lower occurrence of BPD and faster IMV weaning.

As in previous studies,4,11,26 this study demonstrated that extubation failure occurrence is associated with longer IMV duration and hospital stay, which inexorably expose these patients to greater risks for unfavourable outcomes such as death or moderate/severe BPD as shown by Kaczmarek et al.27

This study has some limitations. First, as this is a cohort study with data from a single center, the generalizability of our findings might be limited. However, the clinical characteristics were similar to other, larger sample cohort studies.13,20 Also, it is noteworthy that the sample was unbalanced since this study had 64 infants in SG and 19 in FG, which might reflect the centre’s good practices regarding weaning and extubation. Another potential limitation is that this study focused only on the first event of extubation failure. It is known that ELBW infants may experience several episodes of extubation failure before finally leaving IMV successfully.

Despite the limitations, this was the first study to investigate the association between ventilatory support during transportation from the delivery room to NICU and initial adjusted ventilatory parameters with extubation success as well as with IMV duration, even though that was not the main purpose of this study. Furthermore, since data from only one center were used, the intubation, extubation, and re-intubation criteria had very little variability since the clinicians’ team followed institutional guidelines regarding these events, contributing to a more consistent clinical practice. Further studies following up on these patients, comparing long-term outcomes such as BPD, mortality, and neuropsychomotor development between FG and SG, might be important to support a likely impact of extubation failure occurrence over time.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we can state that GA and post-extubation PaCO2 were predictive variables for extubation success in VLBW and ELBW preterm infants. Those who experienced extubation failure had lower birth weights and higher adjusted FiO2 right before extubation.

Authorship

All the authors made substantial contributions to the work and declare that they have read and approved the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

Ethical Requirement of Research Ethics Board approval for this project was approved by State University of Londrina – Brazil.

AI statement

The authors confirm that no generative AI or AI-assisted technology was used to generate content.
==== Refs
Extremely low birthweight neonates with protracted ventilation: mortality and 18-month neurodevelopmental outcomes The Journal of Pediatrics Walsh Michele C. Morris Brenda H. Wrage Lisa A. Vohr Betty R. Poole W. Kenneth Tyson Jon E. Wright Linda L. Ehrenkranz Richard A. Stoll Barbara J. Fanaroff Avroy A. 6 2005
146 6 798 804 0022-3476 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.01.047 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.01.047 15973322
Impact of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Results From a National Cohort Study The Journal of Pediatrics Choi Young-Bin Lee Juyoung Park Jisun Jun Yong Hoon 3 2018
194 34 39.e3 0022-3476 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.042 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.042 29198532
Definitions of extubation success in very premature infants: a systematic review Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition Giaccone Annie Jensen Erik Davis Peter Schmidt Barbara 2014
99 2 F124 F127 1359-2998 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304896 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304896 24249694
Markers of Successful Extubation in Extremely Preterm Infants, and Morbidity After Failed Extubation The Journal of Pediatrics Chawla Sanjay Natarajan Girija Shankaran Seetha Carper Benjamin Brion Luc P. Keszler Martin Carlo Waldemar A. Ambalavanan Namasivayam Gantz Marie G. Das Abhik Finer Neil Goldberg Ronald N. Cotten C. Michael Higgins Rosemary D. Jobe Alan H. Caplan Michael S. Polin Richard A. Laptook Abbot R. Oh William Hensman Angelita M. Gingras Dan Barnett Susan Lillie Sarah Francis Kim Andrews Dawn Angela Kristen Walsh Michele C. Fanaroff Avroy A. Newman Nancy S. Siner Bonnie S. Schibler Kurt Donovan Edward F. Narendran Vivek Bridges Kate Alexander Barbara Grisby Cathy Mersmann Marcia Worley Mincey Holly L. Hessling Jody Goldberg Ronald N. Auten Kathy J. Fisher Kimberly A. Foy Katherine A. Siaw Gloria Stoll Barbara J. Buchter Susie Piazza Anthony Carlton David P. Hale Ellen C. Archer Stephanie Wilson Poindexter Brenda B. Lemons James A. Hamer Faithe Herron Dianne E. Miller Lucy C. Wilson Leslie D. Berberich Mary Anne Blaisdell Carol J. Gail Dorothy B. Kiley James P. Poole W. Kenneth Cunningham Margaret Hastings Betty K. Irene Amanda R. Auman Jeanette O'Donnell Huitema Carolyn Petrie Pickett James W. II Wallace Dennis Zaterka-Baxter Kristin M. Van Meurs Krisa P. Stevenson David K. Ball M. Bethany Proud Melinda S. Frantz Ivan D. III Fiascone John M. Furey Anne MacKinnon Brenda L. Nylen Ellen Collins Monica V. Cosby Shirley S. Phillips Vivien A. Rasmussen Maynard R. Wozniak Paul R. Rich Wade Arnell Kathy Bridge Renee Demetrio Clarence Bell Edward F. Widness John A. Klein Jonathan M. Johnson Karen J. Duara Shahnaz Everett-Thomas Ruth Watterberg Kristi L. Ohls Robin K. Rohr Julie Lacy Conra Backstrom Phelps Dale L. Laroia Nirupama Reubens Linda J. Burnell Erica Sánchez Pablo J. Rosenfeld Charles R. Salhab Walid A. Allen James Guzman Alicia Hensley Gaynelle Lepps Melissa H. Martin Melissa Miller Nancy A. Solis Araceli Vasil Diana M. Wilder Kerry Kennedy Kathleen A. Tyson Jon E. Morris Brenda H. Harris Beverly Foley Lis Anna E. Martin Sarah McDavid Georgia E. Tate Patti L. Wright Sharon L. Yoder Bradley A. Faix Roger G. Burnett Jill Jensen Jennifer J. Osborne Karen A. Spencer Cynthia Weaver-Lewis Kimberlee O'Shea T. Michael Peters Nancy J. Sood Beena G. Bara Rebecca Billian Elizabeth Johnson Mary Ehrenkranz Richard A. Jacobs Harris C. Bhandari Vineet Cervone Pat Gettner Patricia Konstantino Monica Poulsen JoAnn Taft Janet 10 2017
189 113 119.e2 0022-3476 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.04.050 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.04.050 28600154
Predicting successful extubation of very low birthweight infants Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition Kamlin C O Davis P G Morley C J 2006
91 3 F180 F183 1359-2998 10.1136/adc.2005.081083 10.1136/adc.2005.081083 16410255
Weaning and extubation readiness in pediatric patients Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Newth Christopher J. Venkataraman Shekhar Willson Douglas F. Meert Kathleen L. Harrison Rick Dean J Michael Pollack Murray Zimmerman Jerry Anand Kanwaljeet J. S. Carcillo Joseph A. Nicholson Carol E. 1 2009
10 1 1 11 1529-7535 10.1097/pcc.0b013e318193724d 10.1097/pcc.0b013e318193724d 19057432
The use of extubation readiness parameters: a survey of pediatric critical care physicians Respiratory Care Mhanna Maroun J Anderson Ingrid M Iyer Narayan P Baumann Amy 2014
59 3 334 339 0020-1324 10.4187/respcare.02469 10.4187/respcare.02469 23942754
Prediction of ventilation weaning outcome: children are not little adults Critical Care Schindler Margrid B 2005
9 6 651 652 1364-8535 10.1186/cc3950 10.1186/cc3950 16356260
Predictors of extubation readiness in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition Shalish Wissam Latremouille Samantha Papenburg Jesse Sant’Anna Guilherme Mendes 2019
104 1 F89 F97 1359-2998 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313878 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313878 29519808
Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research Malawi Med J Mukaka M.M. 2012
24 3 69 71 23638278
Extubating Extremely Preterm Infants: Predictors of Success and Outcomes following Failure The Journal of Pediatrics Manley Brett J. Doyle Lex W. Owen Louise S. Davis Peter G. 6 2016
173 45 49 0022-3476 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.02.016 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.02.016 26960919
International survey on periextubation practices in extremely preterm infants Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition Al-Mandari H Shalish W Dempsey E Keszler M Davis P G Sant'Anna G 10 6 2015
100 5 F428 F431 1359-2998 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308549 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308549
A predictive model for extubation readiness in extremely preterm infants Journal of Perinatology Gupta Dhruv Greenberg Rachel G. Sharma Amit Natarajan Girija Cotten Michael Thomas Ronald Chawla Sanjay 27 8 2019
39 12 1663 1669 0743-8346 10.1038/s41372-019-0475-x 10.1038/s41372-019-0475-x
Risk Factors for Extubation Failure in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants Pediatrics & Neonatology Wang Shih-Hsin Liou Jyun-You Chen Chien-Yi Chou Hung-Chieh Hsieh Wu-Shiun Tsao Po-Nien 4 2017
58 2 145 150 1875-9572 10.1016/j.pedneo.2016.01.006 10.1016/j.pedneo.2016.01.006 27349301
Prediction of extubation failure in preterm infants Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition Dimitriou G Greenough A Endo A Cherian S Rafferty G F 1 1 2002
86 1 F32 F35 1359-2998 10.1136/fn.86.1.f32 10.1136/fn.86.1.f32 11815545
Weaning strategies for the withdrawal of non-invasive respiratory support applying continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ Paediatrics Open van Delft Brenda Van Ginderdeuren Filip Lefevere Julie van Delft Christel Cools Filip 11 2020
4 1 e000858 2399-9772 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000858 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000858 33263087
Incidence and main risk factors associated with extubation failure in newborns with birth weight 1,250 grams Jornal de Pediatria Hermeto Fernanda Martins Bianca M. Ramos José R. Bhering Carlos A. Sant'Anna Guilherme M. 18 8 2009
85 5 397 402 0021-7557 10.2223/jped.1922 10.2223/jped.1922
Predicting mortality in extremely low birth weight infants: Comparison between gestational age, birth weight, Apgar score, CRIB II score, initial and lowest serum albumin levels PLoS One Park Jae Hyun Chang Yun Sil Ahn So Yoon Sung Se In Park Won Soon 13 2 2018
13 2 e0192232 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone.0192232 10.1371/journal.pone.0192232 29438382
Fatores preditivos para falha de extubação e reintubação de recém-nascidos submetidos à ventilação pulmonar mecânica [Predictors of extubation failure and reintubation in newborn infants subjected to mechanical ventilation] Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva Costa Ana Cristina Schettino Renata de Carvalho Ferreira Sandra Clecêncio 2014
26 1 51 56 0103-507X 10.5935/0103-507x.20140008 10.5935/0103-507x.20140008 24770689
Effect of Anatomical and Developmental Factors on the Risk of Unplanned Extubation in Critically Ill Newborns American Journal of Perinatology Grubb Peter Markham Melinda Scott Theresa Walsh William Slaughter James Stark Ann Ely E. Hatch L. 11 5 2017
34 12 1234 1240 0735-1631 10.1055/s-0037-1603341 10.1055/s-0037-1603341 28494497
Tracheal tube airleak in clinical practice and impact on tidal volume measurement in ventilated neonates Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Mahmoud Ramadan A. Proquitté Hans Fawzy Naglaa Bührer Christoph Schmalisch Gerd 3 2011
12 2 197 202 1529-7535 10.1097/pcc.0b013e3181e89834 10.1097/pcc.0b013e3181e89834 20581731
Early Caffeine and Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation in Preterm Infants: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial The Journal of Pediatrics Amaro Cynthia M. Bello Jose A. Jain Deepak Ramnath Alexandra D'Ugard Carmen Vanbuskirk Silvia Bancalari Eduardo Claure Nelson 5 2018
196 52 57 0022-3476 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.01.010 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.01.010 29519541
Efficacy and Safety of Different Maintenance Doses of Caffeine Citrate for Treatment of Apnea in Premature Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis BioMed Research International Chen Jing Jin Lu Chen Xiao 24 12 2018
2018 9061234 1 11 2314-6133 10.1155/2018/9061234 10.1155/2018/9061234 30671477
High dose caffeine citrate for extubation of preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition Steer P Flenady V Shearman A 1 11 2004
89 6 F499 F503 1359-2998 10.1136/adc.2002.023432 10.1136/adc.2002.023432 15499141
Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity trial: benefits may vary in subgroups The Journal of Pediatrics Davis Peter G. Schmidt Barbara Roberts Robin S. Doyle Lex W. Asztalos Elizabeth Haslam Ross Sinha Sunil Tin Win 3 2010
156 3 382 387 0022-3476 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.09.069 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.09.069 19926098
Extubation failure in pediatric intensive care incidence and outcomes Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Baisch Steven D. Wheeler William B. Kurachek Stephen C. Cornfield David N. 5 2005
6 3 312 318 1529-7535 10.1097/01.pcc.0000161119.05076.91 10.1097/01.pcc.0000161119.05076.91 15857531
Heart rate variability and extubation readiness in extremely preterm infants Neonatology Kaczmarek Jennifer Chawla Sanjay Marchica Cinzia Dwaihy Meghan Grundy Linda Sant'Anna Guilherme Mendes 2013
104 1 42 48 1661-7800 10.1159/000347101 10.1159/000347101 23711487
