
==== Front
Health Psychol Rep
Health Psychol Rep
HPR
Health Psychology Report
2353-4184
2353-5571
Termedia Publishing House

176084
10.5114/hpr/176084
Original Article
Problematic overstudying, Big Five personality, and music performance anxiety: associations with well-being and GPA
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6245-3684
Luszuk Piotr M. Study design, Statistical analysis, Data interpretation, Manuscript preparation, Literature search
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2406-6445
Stelnicki Patryk Study design, Statistical analysis, Data interpretation, Manuscript preparation, Literature search
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7966-4293
Lawendowski Rafał Study design, Data collection, Manuscript preparation
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4245-046X
Czerwiński Stanisław K. Study design, Data collection, Statistical analysis, Data interpretation, Manuscript preparation, Literature search
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5707-3882
Atroszko Paweł A. Study design, Statistical analysis, Data interpretation, Manuscript preparation, Literature search
Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR – Paweł A. Atroszko, Ph.D., Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk, 4 Bażyńskiego Str., 80-309 Gdansk, Poland, e-mail: p.atroszko@ug.edu.pl
12 2 2024
2024
12 3 247259
14 7 2023
10 10 2023
29 11 2023
Copyright © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
BACKGROUND

Problematic overstudying is a compulsive and pathological overinvolvement in studying leading to harm and considerable functional impairments. It is conceptualized as “study addiction,” a precursor to work addiction. It has been investigated within the addictive behaviours framework in general populations of students for over a decade. A previous study analysed the problem among young musicians as a particularly vulnerable group. It found some important differences in potential personality risk factors among music academy students compared to general populations of students and showed an important role of social anxiety. The current study aimed to validate these findings in a separate larger sample and extend them by investigating the role of music performance anxiety (MPA).

PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE

The study was conducted among 213 students of music academies. Valid and reliable measures of study addiction, MPA, Big Five personality and well-being were used.

RESULTS

The results showed that MPA played a similar role as social anxiety in terms of being a predictor, mediator, and moderator of the main replicated effects supporting the hypothesised mechanisms regulating study addiction. However, extraversion was not associated with study addiction in multiple hierarchical regression analysis, but conscientiousness and neuroticism were. Study addiction was associated with indicators of decreased well-being, above and beyond MPA, and personality.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that MPA plays an analogous role to social anxiety and that the role of Big Five personality in study addiction among young musicians requires further investigation due to inconsistent findings.

academic performance
learning engagement
personality
musical performance anxiety
study addiction
==== Body
pmcBACKGROUND

Problematic overstudying has been conceptualized as an early form of work addiction which has a relatively long-standing history of research (Atroszko, 2015, 2022a). Problematic overstudying has also been called “study addiction” (Atroszko et al., 2015) or “compulsive study behaviour” (Woropay-Hordziejewicz et al., 2022). So far, systematic studies, including cross-cultural longitudinal surveys, substantiate that study addiction is an early form of work addiction (Atroszko et al., 2016a; see Atroszko, 2022a). It shares the high time and effort involved with learning engagement and consequently is correlated with it (Atroszko, 2015; Atroszko et al., 2015; Czerwiński et al., 2023; Lawendowski et al., 2020; Wróbel, 2020). However, learning engagement is positively associated with well-being and academic/school performance, while study addiction is consistently related to deteriorated psychosocial functioning. Because of that, previous studies showed that associations of learning engagement with other variables are confounded by study addiction and vice versa (Atroszko, 2015; Wróbel, 2020). Study addiction is relatively prevalent among undergraduate and high school students, with estimates between 6.4% to 16.0% depending on the country and sample characteristics (detailed analysis can be found in Atroszko, 2022a).

Professional musicians dedicate significant effort and commitment to mastering their performing skills, which can lead to physical and psychological issues (Spahn et al., 2017). Nowadays, performing skills are not the only concern of a musician because financial stability achieved through music usually demands a lot of additional work put toward marketing and management by the artists themselves (Everts & Haynes, 2021). Research highlights them as a group vulnerable to health problems, imbalanced personal lives, addictions, stress, and lower quality of life (Breitenfeld et al., 2014; Mula & Trimble, 2009; Vaag et al., 2016). Examination of autobiographies of professional musicians shows problematic substance use (mostly alcohol and opiates) as a frequent theme in musicians’ lifestyles (Oksanen, 2013). The health problems associated with a professional musical career seem universal for most creative professions, including art students (Vaag et al., 2021). Recognizing the similarities between overinvolvement in musical training and work addiction, a study by Lawendowski et al. (2020) investigated the potential of applying the theory of behavioural addictions to understand the challenges professional musicians face.

Lawendowski et al. (2020) found that study addiction could be validly and reliably measured among musicians, that 16% of all participants could be classified as at high risk or addicted, and that study addiction was associated with higher perceived stress and lower quality of life, general health, and sleep quality. Unexpectedly, only low extraversion was associated with study addiction, and it showed no relationship with consciousness and neuroticism, which were consistently associated with it in previous studies on general populations of students (see Atroszko, 2022a). It was suggested that this particular finding might be explained by the fact that professional musicians are characterized by high perfectionism (Mor et al., 1995) and higher anxiety levels (Vaag et al., 2016), so the limited variance of scores affected measures of association. Moreover, social anxiety was established as an important factor regulating mechanisms underlying many cases of study addiction. It mediated between personality factors (neuroticism and extraversion) and study addiction. Also, the relationship between social anxiety and academic performance measured by last semester’s grade point average (GPA) became negative only when accompanied by high levels of study addiction.

These results provided more in-depth analyses of the potential regulatory mechanisms of study addiction and empirical substantiation of the model conceptualizing it as an ineffective coping strategy (Atroszko, 2015). This model assumes that vulnerable individuals characterized by low emotional stability, high conscientiousness, and low extroversion (especially among musicians; Kemp, 1996; Marchant-Haycox & Wilson, 1992) may experience more social and performance anxiety and make efforts to compensate for it by increasing their involvement in studying (Lawendowski et al., 2020). However, these excessive efforts, together with unresolved underlying problems (e.g., social isolation), lead to chronic and high stress, resulting in mental and physical health problems (Woropay-Hordziejewicz et al., 2022) and deteriorated academic performance (Atroszko, 2015).

Growing literature examining the hardships of a professional career in music allows researchers to assess the problem with precision so that universities can be a supportive community for students. Huang and Yu (2022) highlighted the importance of teacher guidance to enhance resistance to MPA and present many multifunctional strategies embedded in pedagogical practice, such as visual rehearsals and simulations of performances. The authors stated that the majority of students exposed to MPA actively seek support from their peers before a concert and are able to form groups freely so that they can perform alongside their friends.

MUSIC PERFORMANCE ANXIETY AND SOCIAL ANXIETY

Music performance anxiety (MPA) is the experience of marked and persistent anxious apprehension related to musical performance that has arisen through specific anxiety-conditioning experiences (Kenny, 2011). MPA can be observed through disruption of attention, and engagement in unproductive behaviours, which often makes it difficult and even impossible to complete the performance successfully. According to DSM-5 (APA, 2022, p. 203), performance anxiety is a symptom of social anxiety disorder (SAD). Studies showed that MPA is closely associated with social anxiety (Dobos et al., 2019).

Nevertheless, MPA and social anxiety are not exactly the same constructs. While those with performance anxiety fear evaluation, people with social anxiety fear being scrutinised (Stoeber & Eismann, 2007). MPA also has distinctive aspects, such as failure of task mastery (Wilson, 2002) and attempts at tasks that go beyond the performer’s abilities (Fehm & Schmidt, 2006). Although it has been conceptualised that performance anxiety is a manifestation of SAD (Hook & Valentiner, 2006) and should be considered its sub-type, considering them equal is an oversimplification (Dobos et al., 2019; Wiedeman et al., 2021).

THE PRESENT STUDY

The study aimed to validate the previous findings concerning associations among Big Five personality, social anxiety, study addiction and well-being, and academic performance (Lawendowski et al., 2020) in a separate larger sample and extend them by investigating the role of MPA as a crucial variable in the psychology of music. While MPA is closely related to social anxiety, the important question is to what extent the previous findings can be attributed to general anxiety in social situations or performance-specific factors. Also, the current study used the Mini International Personality Item Pool (Mini-IPIP; Donnellan et al., 2006) for measuring Big Five personality. Psychometrically it performs considerably better than the previously applied Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI), which sometimes shows limited criterion validity and some internal consistency problems (Credé et al., 2012).

HYPOTHESES

Based on previous theoretical frameworks and empirical research into work addiction and study addiction (Lawendowski et al., 2020), it is hypothesised that study addiction will be negatively associated with extraversion (H1); study addiction will be positively associated with MPA (H2); study addiction will be positively associated with stress and negatively associated with quality of life, health, and sleep (H3); study addiction will be negatively associated with academic performance (H4); study addiction and learning engagement are different entities, showing opposite relationships with psychosocial functioning (H5); MPA will mediate between neuroticism and extraversion and study addiction (H6); study addiction will moderate the relationship between MPA and academic performance (H7).

PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample was recruited, consisting of 213 music academy students: 135 (63.4%) were female, 73 (34.4%) were male, and 5 (2.3%) individuals did not report their gender. The participants’ mean age was 22.74 years (SD = 3.31). They had attained a mean of 11.25 years (SD = 4.76) of formal musical education. The participants studied at three music academies in Poland. Study addiction was not associated with age or gender in the current sample (see Table 1). There were no significant differences in mean levels of study addiction (F(2, 210) = 0.07, p = .933) across the three academies: the Stanisław Moniuszko Academy of Music in Gdansk (M = 18.07, SD = 5.00), the Feliks Nowowiejski Academy of Music in Bydgoszcz (M = 18.36, SD = 5.94), and the Department of the Fryderyk Chopin University of Music in Białystok (M = 18.32, SD = 5.36). A detailed description of the sample is provided in Supplementary materials. The sample size was based on three premises: i) it should be able to detect previously found effect sizes in a sample of n = 132 (Lawendowski et al., 2020), ii) it should approach the size required for stable estimates of associations among variables (Schönbrodt & Perugini, 2013), and iii) it should be possible to gather practically, considering the relatively small number of music academies’ students in Poland.

Table 1 Mean scores and standard deviations (SD), percentages, reliability coefficients, and correlation coefficients (Pearson product-moment/point-biserial) between study variables

Variable	Mean (SD)/ Percentages	1.	2.	3.	4.	5.	6.	7.	8.	9.	10.	11.	12.	13.	14.	15.	16.	
1. Gendera	63.4% females	–																
2. Age	22.74 (3.31)	.26**	–															
3. Study addiction	18.18 (5.27)	–.11	–.11	.76														
4. Learning engagement	4.87 (1.27)	–.07	.01	.42**	.77													
5. Time spent on studying	13.07 (9.94)	.07	–.12†	.24**	.24**	–												
6. GPA	19.57 (1.90)	–.15*	.02	.14*	.32**	.14†	–											
7. Extraversion	13.34 (3.65)	–.03	.07	–.14*	–.11	–.08	.09	.74										
8. Agreeableness	16.63 (2.43)	–.21**	.01	–.10	.07	–.03	–.03	–.27**	.61									
9. Conscientiousness	12.99 (3.93)	–.03	–.07	.12†	.20**	.11	.16*	–.20**	–.01	.77								
10. Neuroticism	13.92 (3.52)	–.35**	–.19**	.21**	.09	.03	.05	–.11	.03	.01	.71							
11. Intellect	15.96 (2.81)	–.05	.00	–.04	.04	.12	–.18*	–.19**	.18**	–.03	.14*	.64						
12. MPA	110.74 (35.76)	–.24**	–.13†	.27**	–.06	–.04	–.11	–.22**	.04	–.12†	.49**	–.17*	.93					
13. Stress	11.48 (3.07)	–.17*	–.13†	.22**	–.03	–.02	–.11	–.06	–.01	–.16*	.52**	–.03	.39**	.78				
14. General health	5.71 (2.06)	.15*	–.08	–.16*	.04	.12†	.00	–.04	.02	.10	–.27**	–.09	–.27**	–.37**	–			
15. Sleep quality	4.77 (2.26)	.06	–.07	–.18**	.04	.12†	.05	–.07	–.04	.10	–.19**	–.04	–.20**	–.36**	.54**	–		
16. Quality of life	6.86 (1.49)	.02	–.00	–.24**	.18**	.03	.08	.10	.07	–.03	–.31**	.14*	–.34**	–.40**	.43**	.28**	–	
Note. GPA – grade point average; MPA – music performance anxiety; a point-biserial correlation coefficient (0 – female, 1 – male). Reliability coefficients in the present sample are reported on the diagonal in italics. †p < .10, *p < .05, **p < .01. All means, reliability coefficients, standard deviations, and correlations except the variable “time spent on studying” were published previously in Czerwiński et al., 2023

INSTRUMENTS

All used psychometric tools showed good validity and reliability in numerous previous studies and are described in detail in Supplementary materials. Reliability coefficients in the current sample are presented in Table 1. Most of these tools are among the most commonly used measures of the studied variables (study addiction, MPA, stress, personality, and quality of life).

Demographics. Respondents were asked about their age and gender as well as to provide estimates of the total number of hours they devote every week to studying at the university, both in and outside classes (e.g., at home or the library).

Study addiction. Study addiction was measured using the Bergen Study Addiction Scale (BStAS; Atroszko et al., 2015).

Learning engagement. Learning engagement was measured using a single item, the question “How engaged in learning are you?” (Atroszko, 2014), with responses ranging from 1 (I am not at all engaged) to 7 (I am completely engaged).

Big Five personality traits. The Mini-IPIP (Donnellan et al., 2006) was used to measure the Big Five personality traits.

MPA. The Kenny Music Performance Anxiety Inventory – Revised (K-MPAI-R; Kenny, 2009) was used to measure MPA.

Perceived stress. The short version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4; Cohen et al., 1983) was used as a measure of perceived stress.

General quality of life, general health and quality of sleep. Three single-item measures of different aspects of quality of life, developed on the basis of the WHOQOL-BREF (Skevington et al., 2004), were used.

GPA. The students were asked to provide information about their grade point average (GPA) from the semester prior to the study as accurately as possible.

PROCEDURE

Data were collected in May 2019 using a paper-and-pencil cross-sectional survey. Students were invited to participate anonymously and voluntarily during lectures or classes. No monetary or other material rewards were offered. Completion of the survey was regarded as proof that the participant had given their informed consent. The estimated response rate was above 95%.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Descriptive statistics. Means, standard deviations, percentages, and reliability coefficients were calculated.

Correlational analysis. To examine the associations between the study variables, point-biserial and Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were calculated in accordance with the measurement scale employed.

Regression analyses. Six hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted, where study addiction, stress, general quality of life, general health, sleep quality, GPA from the last semester of studies were dependent variables. The independent variables introduced in subsequent steps can be found in Tables 2-4. The same sequence of steps as in the previous study was followed (Lawendowski et al., 2020). For all linear regression analyses, preliminary analyses were conducted to ensure no violation of normality, linearity, multicollinearity, and homoscedasticity assumptions.

Table 2 Results of hierarchical multiple regression analyses in which, age, gender, Big Five personality traits and MPA were regressed upon study addiction

Predictor	β	∆R2	Tolerance	VIF	
Step 1		.02			
  Gendera	–.08		.93	1.07	
  Age	–.08		.93	1.07	
Step 2		.08**			
  Gendera	–.05		.81	1.24	
  Age	–.04		.91	1.10	
  Extraversion	–.08		.85	1.18	
  Agreeableness	–.10		.87	1.15	
  Conscientiousness	.11		.94	1.06	
  Neuroticism	.20**		.83	1.20	
  Intellect	–.00		.91	1.10	
Step 3		.03**			
  Gendera	–.03		.80	1.25	
  Age	–.03		.91	1.10	
  Extraversion	–.04		.81	1.24	
  Agreeableness	–.13†		.86	1.17	
  Conscientiousness	.15*		.90	1.12	
  Neuroticism	.09		.64	1.56	
  Intellect	.05		.85	1.18	
  MPA	.22**		.64	1.58	
Total R2		.13**			
Note. MPA – music performance anxiety; a 0 – female, 1 – male. †p < .10, *p < .05, **p < .01.

Table 3 Results of hierarchical multiple regression analyses in which study addiction, learning engagement, gender, age, Big Five personality traits, and MPA were regressed upon the scores for stress, general health, sleep quality and quality of life

Predictor	Stress	General health	Sleep quality	Quality of life	
β	∆R2	β	∆R2	β	∆R2	β	∆R2	
Step 1		.08**		.04*		.05*		.15**	
  Study addiction	.30**		-.23**		-.24**		-.38**		
  Learning engagement	-.15*		.13t		.12		.33**		
Step 2		.03		.04*		.02		.00	
  Study addiction	.28**		-.23**		-.25**		-.39**		
  Learning engagement	-.15*		.14t		.13t		.34**		
  Gendera	- 13†		.18*		.09		.00		
  Age	-.06		-.15*		-.13t		-.05		
Step 3		.23**		.06*		.06*		.10**	
  Study addiction	.19**		-.19*		-.23**		-.32**		
  Learning engagement	-.09		-.11		.11		.34**		
  Gendera	.02		.11		.02		-.09		
  Age	-.03		-.16*		-.14*		-.09		
  Extraversion	.02		-.07		-.11		.02		
  Agreeableness	.03		.05		-.04		-.04		
  Conscientiousness	-.16*		.07		.07		-.05		
  Neuroticism	.49**		-.25**		-.22**		-.33**		
  Intellect	-.111		-.01		.02		.15*		
Step 4		.01		.01		.00		.01	
  Study addiction	.17*		-.15t		-.21**		-.29**		
  Learning engagement	-.09		.09		.09		.31**		
  Gendera	.02		.10		.01		-.10		
  Age	-.03		-.16*		-.14*		-.09		
  Extraversion	.04		-.10		-.12		-.00		
  Agreeableness	.01		.07		-.03		-.02		
  Conscientiousness	-.14*		.05		.06		-.07		
  Neuroticism	.45**		.19*		-.18*		-.27**		
  Intellect	-.09		-.54		.01		.12t		
  MPA	.11		-.16		-.08		-.12		
Total R2		.33**		.16**		.13**		.26**	
Note. MPA – music performance anxiety; a 0 – female, 1 – male. †p < .10, *p < .05, **p < .01.

Table 4 Results of hierarchical multiple regression analyses in which learning engagement, study addiction, age, gender, Big Five personality traits, and MPA were regressed upon the last semester’s GPA

Predictor	β	∆R2	Tolerance	VIF	
Step 1		.10**			
  Learning engagement	.29**		.82	1.22	
  Study addiction	–.04		.82	1.22	
Step 2		.02			
  Learning engagement	.29**		.81	1.24	
  Study addiction	.03		.82	1.23	
  Gendera	–.13		.93	1.08	
  Age	.05		.92	1.08	
Step 3		.06*			
  Learning engagement	.28**		.75	1.33	
  Study addiction	.03		.77	1.29	
  Gendera	–.16*		.80	1.24	
  Age	.06		.90	1.11	
  Extraversion	.14†		.83	1.20	
  Agreeableness	–.13†		.85	1.18	
  Conscientiousness	.13		.91	1.10	
  Neuroticism	–.01		.80	1.25	
  Intellect	.15*		.91	1.10	
Step 4		.00			
  Learning engagement	.27**		.71	1.42	
  Study addiction	.04		.74	1.35	
  Gendera	–.16*		.80	1.25	
  Age	.06		.90	1.11	
  Extraversion	.12		.79	1.26	
  Agreeableness	–.12†		.83	1.21	
  Conscientiousness	.12		.87	1.16	
  Neuroticism	.01		.63	1.58	
  Intellect	.14*		.85	1.18	
  MPA	–.06		.59	1.70	
Total R2		.18**			
Note. GPA – grade point average; MPA – music performance anxiety; a 0 – female, 1 – male. †p < .10, *p < .05, **p < .01.

Mediation and moderation analyses. Two mediation analyses were performed, in which extraversion and neuroticism were independent variables, MPA was the mediator, and study addiction was the dependent variable. Moderation analysis was performed, in which MPA was the independent variable, study addiction was the moderator, and GPA from the last semester of studies was the dependent variable. All tests were two-tailed, and the significance level was set to α = .05. Unstandardized regression coefficients are reported. All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS 24.0 and the PROCESS macro (Hayes, 2013). The moderation plots were prepared using the interactions 1.0.3 package (Long, 2020) and the R language in version 4.0.3 (R Core Team, 2020).

ETHICS STATEMENT

The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the guidelines of the Ethics Committee at the Institute of Psychology of the University of Gdańsk. It did not include ethically doubtful procedures, sensitive data, or vulnerable populations. Participants were given detailed information about the study and their role in it, told that they could withdraw at any point, and told that their participation was anonymous.

RESULTS

DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS

Table 1 presents the reliability coefficients, mean scores, standard deviations, percentages, and correlation coefficients for the study variables.

PREDICTORS OF STUDY ADDICTION

The regression analysis for study addiction (see Table 2) showed that the independent variables explained a total of 12.6% of the variance, F(8, 194) = 3.48, p < .001. The significant independent variables in Step 3 were conscientiousness and MPA.

STUDY ADDICTION AS A PREDICTOR OF PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTIONING

The regression analysis for perceived stress (see Table 3) showed that the independent variables explained a total of 33.4% of the variance, F(10, 192) = 9.62, p < .001. The significant independent variables in Step 4 were study addiction, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. The regression analysis for general health (see Table 3) showed that the independent variables explained a total of 15.7% of the variance, F(10, 192) = 3.58, p = .019. The significant independent variables were age and neuroticism. The regression analysis for sleep quality (see Table 3) showed that the independent variables explained a total of 12.7% of the variance, F(10, 192) = 2.78, p = .020. The significant independent variables in Step 4 were study addiction, age, and neuroticism. The regression analysis for general quality of life (see Table 3) showed that the independent variables explained a total of 26.3% of the variance, F(10, 192) = 6.85, p < .001. The significant independent variables in Step 4 were learning engagement, study addiction, and neuroticism.

STUDY ADDICTION AS A PREDICTOR OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

The regression analysis for GPA from the last semester of studies (see Table 4) showed that the independent variables explained a total of 17.5% of the variance, F(10, 179) = 3.79, p < .001. The significant independent variables in Step 4 were learning engagement, gender, and intellect.

MEDIATION ANALYSES

The mediation analyses showed that the relationships between extraversion and study addiction, as well as between neuroticism and study addiction, are fully mediated by MPA (Table 5).

Table 5 Direct, indirect, and total effects as well as 95% confidence intervals in particular mediation models

Independent
variable	Mediator	Dependent
variable	Direct effect [95% CI]	Indirect effect [95% CI]	Total effect [95% CI]	
Extraversion	MPA	Study
addiction	-.144
[-.338; .051]	-.078
[-.155; -.019]	-.222
[-.417; -.026]	
Neuroticism	MPA	Study
addiction	.161
[-.068; .391]	.161
[.036; .301]	.322
[.119; .525]	
Note. MPA – music performance anxiety.

MODERATION ANALYSES

In regression analysis for GPA as the dependent variable, independent variables explained a total of 7.2% of the variance, F(3, 190) = 4.91, p = .003, and the interaction term explained 2.8% of the variance, ∆F(1, 190) = 5.69, p = .018. Figure 1 shows the moderating effect of study addiction on the relationship between MPA and GPA from the last semester of studies. The conditional effects of the focal predictor (MPA) at benchmark values of the moderator variable (study addiction) showed that for low study addiction, there was no significant relationship between MPA and GPA from the last semester of studies (b = 0.001, 95% CI [−0.010; 0.012]), there was no relationship between these variables for mean study addiction (b = −0.007, 95% CI [−0.014; 0.001]), and there was a negative relationship between these variables for high study addiction (b = −0.016, 95% CI [−0.026; −0.006]).

Figure 1 The effect of study addiction on the relationship between MPA and GPA from the last semester of studies with 95% confidence intervals based on standard errors

DISCUSSION

Extraversion and study addiction showed a negative zero-order correlation (H1 partially substantiated). However, in the hierarchical regression model, extraversion was not significantly associated with study addiction, neuroticism was positively associated with it before MPA was introduced, and conscientiousness was positively associated with it after MPA was introduced. Nevertheless, these results align with other studies on the general populations of students showing positive associations of study addiction with neuroticism and conscientiousness (Atroszko, 2015; Atroszko et al., 2015). The surprising results of Lawendowski et al. (2020) may be somewhat associated with the Big Five personality measure used (TIPI), which is less precise than the currently used Mini-IPIP. Together with a smaller sample size, the measure may have led to a lower variance of scores (or biased estimates) in the previous study, which resulted in generally low and mostly non-significant associations between personality and study addiction. Also, sample effects could account for these findings. This is novel finding that shows that music academies’ students may be more similar to the general population of students in terms of personality characteristics than previous findings suggested.

There was a positive relationship between MPA and study addiction (H2 substantiated). The results confirmed the previous findings that study addiction was positively related to perceived stress and negatively associated with general quality of life, general health, and sleep quality (H3 substantiated). After controlling for Big Five personality factors, study addiction was still significantly related to these variables.

The results showed that study addiction was not associated with academic performance after controlling for personality traits and learning engagement (H4 not substantiated). This result is inconsistent with previous studies (Atroszko, 2015; Atroszko et al., 2015). However, a similar lack of association between these variables was found in a sample of high school students (Wróbel, 2020). Generally, samples that are more heterogeneous in terms of universities/high schools, faculties, and courses of study tend to find lower associations between study addiction and GPA, most likely due to numerous factors affecting grading, including different grading systems. The previous study was conducted in only two music academies with the same grading system (Lawendowski et al., 2020).

Both study addiction and learning engagement were positively related to time spent studying but showed opposite associations with well-being indicators (H5 substantiated). It is highly consistent with previous studies and supports the notion that these are related but different phenomena (Atroszko, 2022b).

MPA was shown to be a full mediator between neuroticism and study addiction and between extraversion and study addiction (H6 substantiated). Also, study addiction moderated the relationship between MPA and GPA (H7 substantiated). These results fully replicate intricate associations among personality, study addiction, anxiety associated with performance and social exposure, and academic performance found in the previous study (Lawendowski et al., 2020). It provides more robust substantiation for the hypothesised mechanisms regulating study addiction by showing that dispositional tendency to experience negative emotions and social withdrawal increases anxiety in performance or social exposure situations, and thereby affects higher study addiction as a potential ineffective compensatory mechanism. At the same time, MPA affects academic performance negatively only among students high on study addiction, confirming the pathological and counterproductive nature of this behavioural pattern. The current study suggests that factors common to social anxiety and MPA may be responsible for these effects.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the role of MPA in study addiction. MPA is one of the most commonly investigated problems among musicians and music students, responsible for considerable negative consequences for mental and physical health among those experiencing it, including ruining promising musical careers. The results showing that MPA regulates study addiction similarly to social anxiety is a novel finding suggesting that more general evaluation fear underlying both MPA and social anxiety may be the underlying problem.

A few factors need to be taken into account when considering the practical implications of the current findings. First, study addiction was recently found to be a universal phenomenon in different cultures across the world (Atroszko et al., 2023b). More and more data support the hypothesis that it is an addictive disorder (Atroszko et al., 2023a), and it is more prevalent than most other addictive behaviours, such as video gaming, pornography consumption, food intake, social networking or shopping (Charzyńska et al., 2021; for a detailed analysis of prevalence rates, see Atroszko et al., 2021). It is highly stable in time when unaddressed with any prevention or intervention solutions (Atroszko et al., 2016b), and it may develop into work addiction (Atroszko et al., 2016a), which is likely associated with considerable individual, social, and economic harms and costs (Atroszko et al., 2020; Atroszko & Atroszko, 2020). Recent studies using network analysis suggest that healthy engagement in work may turn into work addiction when the absorption (a component of engagement reflecting a full sustained focus on the tasks and feeling of elation akin to the “high” obtained with drugs) starts to be used to modify mood (a symptom of addiction) and escape from negative feelings and stress (Bereznowski et al., 2023a, b).

The current study’s findings shed light on the potential associated mechanisms that may facilitate the transition from healthy engagement and passion for music to harmful study addiction. They show that MPA, if unaddressed, may increase the risk of study addiction among students who show a proclivity towards negative emotions and are socially withdrawn. Moreover, students experiencing MPA will have poorer performance in their studies (as measured by GPA) if they are addicted to studying. This may create a vicious cycle in which worse achievements increase stress and frustration, pushing young musicians into additional effort (cf. Czerwiński et al., 2023), more pressure on improvement (Atroszko & Atroszko, 2020), and consequently, growing social isolation (cf., Atroszko, 2015; Godzwon et al., 2022), and more fear of evaluation.

The prevention and intervention solutions among young musicians should focus on managing MPA by developing effective and practical stress-coping skills, particularly focused on obtaining social support, and creating a supportive environment (Huang & Yu, 2022). Mindfulness practice may be routinely trained among young musicians to improve emotional and behavioural self-regulation, including skills useful in managing MPA, and focus. Widespread psychoeducation initiatives may raise awareness about study addiction and its consequences and decrease risks at the whole student population level.

STRENGTHS, LIMITATIONS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

In terms of limitations, the results of the present study cannot be generalized to other populations without some reservations because a convenience sample was used. The relatively low sample size restricted the power of the analyses, which might account for the results that were approaching statistical significance in some cases. Also, when interpreting the results, the limitations of self-report data (such as social desirability bias, recall biases, etc.) must be considered.

Regarding the strengths of the present study, to the authors’ knowledge, it is the first study to investigate the role of MPA in study addiction. Several variables comprising the possible antecedents and consequences of study addiction were used, including valid and reliable measures of personality, psychological well-being, health, stress, and academic performance. Moreover, mediation and moderation effects were fully replicated, providing more robust support for the potential mechanisms of study addiction development among musicians. It is particularly significant since mediation and especially moderation effects are often not replicated in the psychological literature.

Future studies should aim to understand better the role of anxiety in study addiction, including the relative significance of MPA, social anxiety, and general anxiety (Wiedemann et al., 2021), especially because the majority of individuals at risk of study addiction or experiencing its symptoms show high risk or presence of clinically significant levels of general anxiety (Woropay-Hordziejewicz et al., 2022). Longitudinal studies may shed light on the bidirectional relationships between anxiety and study addiction, particularly the role of social anxiety as a risk factor. These studies should determine whether general anxiety or rather specific facets of social and performance anxiety account for the observed effects and explain the regulatory mechanisms of study addiction. Also, the role of other personality traits previously found to be associated with study addiction among general populations of students, such as competitiveness (Atroszko & Atroszko, 2019), could be investigated among young musicians to determine whether these constitute universal risk factors similarly to conscientiousness or neuroticism, and to what extent such traits as narcissism (Atroszko et al., 2019; Charzyńska et al., 2021; Kircaburun et al., 2021) are gender-specific risk factors in this group.

Supplementary materials are available on the journal’s website.

Supplementary Material

DISCLOSURES

This research received no external funding.

Institutional review board statement: Not applicable.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

TO CITE THIS ARTICLE – Luszuk, P. M., Stelnicki, P., Lawendowski, R., Czerwiński, S. K., & Atroszko, P. A. (2024). Problematic overstudying, Big Five personality, and music performance anxiety: associations with well-being and GPA. Health Psychology Report, 12(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr/176084
==== Refs
American Psychiatric Association (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5-TR (5th ed., text rev.). APA Publishing. 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
Atroszko, P. A. (2014). Developing brief scales for educational research: Reliability of single-item self-report measures of learning engagement and exam stress. In M. McGreevy & R. Rita (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Biannual CER Comparative European Research Conference (pp. 172–175). Sciemcee.
Atroszko, P. A. (2015). The structure of study addiction: Selected risk factors and the relationship with stress, stress coping and psychosocial functioning (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Gdansk, Poland.
Atroszko, P. A. (2022a). Non-drug addiction: Addiction to work. In V. B. Patel & V. R. Preedy (Eds.), Handbook of substance misuse and addictions (pp. 2981–3012). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-67928-6_3-1
Atroszko, P. A. (2022b). Inventory for early screening of work addiction-related behaviors in high school and undergraduate students: features and applications. In V. B. Patel & V. R. Preedy (Eds.), Handbook of substance misuse and addictions (pp. 3157–3198). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-67928-6_3-1
Atroszko, P. A., Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., & Pallesen, S. (2015). Study addiction–a new area of psychological study: Conceptualization, assessment, and preliminary empirical findings. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4 , 75–84. 10.1556/2006.4.2015.007 26014668
Atroszko, P. A., Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., & Pallesen, S. (2016a). The relationship between study addiction and work addiction: a cross-cultural longitudinal study. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5 , 708–714. 10.1556/2006.5.2016.076 27842448
Atroszko, P. A., Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., & Pallesen, S. (2016b). Study addiction: a cross-cultural longitudinal study examining temporal stability and predictors of its changes. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5 , 357–362. 10.1556/2006.5.2016.024 27156381
Atroszko, B., & Atroszko, P. A. (2020). Educational pressure and development of study addiction, work addiction and other mental disorders. Ars Educandi, 17 , 11–39. 10.26881/ae.2020.17.01
Atroszko, P. A., & Atroszko, B. (2019). Type-A personality competitiveness component linked to increased cardiovascular risk is positively related to study addiction but not to study engagement. Current Science, 117 , 1184. 10.18520/cs/v117/i7/1184-1188
Atroszko, P. A., Atroszko, B., & Charzyńska, E. (2021). Subpopulations of addictive behaviors in different sample types and their relationships with gender, personality, and well-being: Latent profile vs. latent class analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 , 8590. 10.3390/ijerph18168590 34444338
Atroszko, P. A., Buźniak, A., Woropay Hodziejewicz, N., Kierzkowski, M., & Lawendowski, R. (2023a). Identifying individual vulnerabilities and problematic behaviours hindering musicians’ development: Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder vs. study addiction. Musicae Scientiae, 27 , 889912. 10.1177/10298649231184920
Atroszko, P. A., Charzyńska, E., Buźniak, A., Czerwiński, S. K., Griffiths, M. D., Jankowska, A., Kamble, S., Mizik, Z., Pontes, H., Shane, J., Sussman, S., Woropay-Hordziejewicz, N., & Pallesen, S. (2023b). Validity, reliability, and cross-cultural comparability of a problematic overstudying scale across European, North American, and Asian countries. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 10.1007/s11469-023-01128-5
Atroszko, P. A., Demetrovics, Z., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020). Work addiction, obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, burn-out, and global burden of disease: Implications from the ICD-11. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 , 660. 10.3390/ijerph17020660 31968540
Atroszko, P. A., Sawicki, A., & Kamble, S. (2019). Cross-cultural pilot study on the relationship between study addiction and narcissism among undergraduate students in Poland and India. Health Psychology Report, 7 , 325–333. 10.5114/hpr.2019.88058
Bereznowski, P., Atroszko, P. A., & Konarski, R. (2023a). Work addiction, work engagement, job burnout, and perceived stress: A network analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14 , 1130069. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130069
Bereznowski, P., Bereznowska, A., Atroszko, P. A., & Konarski, R. (2023b). Work addiction and work engagement: a network approach to cross-cultural data. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 21 , 2052–2076. 10.1007/s11469-021-00707-8
Breitenfeld, D., Krištofić, B., Breitenfeld, T., Vodanović, M., Kostelić, I., Šimunec, I., & Jagetić, T. (2014). Fatal diseases of composers due to tobacco smoking and other addictions. Alcoholism and Psychiatry Research, 50 , 139–153. 10.1007/978-981-10-7530-8_14
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24 , 385–396. 10.2307/2136404 6668417
Credé, M., Harms, P., Niehorster, S., & Gaye-Valentine, A. (2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the big five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102 , 874–888. 10.1037/a0027403 22352328
Charzyńska, E., Sussman, S., & Atroszko, P. A. (2021). Profiles of potential behavioral addictions’ severity and their associations with gender, personality, and well-being: a person-centered approach. Addictive Behaviors, 119 , 106941. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106941
Czerwiński, S. K., Lawendowski, R., Kierzkowski, M., & Atroszko, P. A. (2023). Can perseverance of effort become maladaptive? Study addiction moderates the relationship between this component of grit and well-being among Music Academy students. Musicae Scientiae, 27 , 568–595. 10.1177/10298649221095135
Dobos, B., Piko, B. F., & Kenny, D. T. (2019). Music performance anxiety and its relationship with social phobia and dimensions of perfectionism. Research Studies in Music Education, 41 , 310–326. 10.1177/1321103X18804295
Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18 , 192–203. 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192 16768595
Everts, R., & Haynes, J. (2021). Taking care of business: The routines and rationales of early-career musicians in the Dutch and British music industries. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24 , 731–748. 10.1177/13678779211004610
Fehm, L., & Schmidt, K. (2006). Performance anxiety in gifted adolescent musicians. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 20 , 98–109. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.11.011 16325117
Godzwon, J. M., Wielewska, M. K., & Atroszko, P. A. (2022). The relationship of study addiction with social support and satisfaction with intimate relationships. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 10.1007/s11469-022-00874-2
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
Hook, J. N., & Valentiner, D. P. (2006). Are specific and generalized social phobias qualitatively distinct? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9 , 379–395. 10.1093/clipsy.9.4.379
Huang, W. L., & Yu, H. (2022). Social support in university music students’ coping with performance anxiety: People, strategies and performance situations. Music Education Research, 24 , 124–135. 10.1080/14613808.2022.2028752
Kemp, A. E. (1996). The musical temperament: Psychology and personality of musicians. Oxford University Press.
Kenny D. (2009, December). The factor structure of the revised Kenny Music Performance Anxiety Inventory. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Performance Science, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kenny, D. T. (2011). The psychology of music performance anxiety. Oxford University Press.
Kircaburun, K., Süral, İ., March, E., Balta, S., Emirtekin, E., & Griffiths, M. D. (2021). Study addiction and ‘dark’ personality traits: a cross-sectional survey study among emerging adults. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 39 , 307–315. 10.1080/10550887.2021.1872469 33499773
Lawendowski, R., Bereznowski, P., Wróbel, W. K., Kierzkowski, M., & Atroszko, P. A. (2020). Study addiction among musicians: Measurement, and relationship with personality, social anxiety, performance, and psychosocial functioning. Musicae Scientiae, 24 , 449–474. 10.1177/1029864918822138
Long, J. A. (2020). Package “interactions”. Retrieved from https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/interactions/interactions.pdf
Marchant-Haycox, S. E., & Wilson, G. D. (1992). Personality and stress in performing artists. Personality and Individual Differences, 13 , 1061–1068. 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90021-G
Mor, S., Day, H. I., Flett, G. L., & Hewitt, P. L. (1995). Perfectionism, control, and components of performance anxiety in professional artists. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19 , 207–225. 10.1007/BF02229695
Mula, M., & Trimble, M. R. (2009). Music and madness: Neuropsychiatric aspects of music. Clinical Medicine, 9 , 83–86. 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-1-83 19271611
Oksanen, A. (2013). Addiction and rehabilitation in autobiographical books by rock artists, 1974–2010. Drug and Alcohol Review, 32 , 53–59. 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00474.x 22631030
R Core Team (2020). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47 , 609–612. 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., O’Connell, K. A., & WHOQOL Group (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of Life Research, 13 , 299–310. 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00 15085902
Spahn, C., Voltmer, E., Mornell, A., & Nusseck, M. (2017). Health status and preventive health behavior of music students during university education: Merging prior results with new insights from a German multicenter study. Musicae Scientiae, 21 , 213–229. 10.1177/1029864917698197
Stoeber, J., & Eismann, U. (2007). Perfectionism in young musicians: Relations with motivation, effort, achievement, and distress. Personality and Individual Differences, 43 , 2182–2192. 10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.036
Vaag, J., Bjørngaard, J. H., & Bjerkeset, O. (2016). Symptoms of anxiety and depression among Norwegian musicians compared to the general workforce. Psychology of Music, 44 , 234–248. 10.1177/0305735614564910
Vaag, J., Bjerkeset, O., & Sivertsen, B. (2021). Anxiety and depression symptom level and psychotherapy use among music and art students compared to the general student population. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 , 607927. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.607927 34262500
Wilson, G. D. (2002). Psychology for performing artists (2nd ed.). Whurr Publishers.
Wiedemann, A., Vogel, D., Voss, C., & Hoyer, J. (2021). How does music performance anxiety relate to other anxiety disorders? Psychology of Music, 50 , 204–217. 10.1177/0305735620988600
Woropay-Hordziejewicz, N. A., Buźniak, A., Lawendowski, R., & Atroszko, P. A. (2022). Compulsive study behaviors are associated with eating disorders and have independent negative effects on well-being: a structural equation model study among young musicians. Sustainability, 14 , 8617. 10.3390/su14148617
Wróbel, W. K. (2020). Study addiction among high school students: Measurement and relationship with psychopathology, personality, quality of life, and school variables. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Gdansk, Poland.
