
==== Front
Trials
Trials
Trials
1745-6215
BioMed Central London

39223575
8430
10.1186/s13063-024-08430-0
Study Protocol
Effect of aerobic exercise program on neuropathic pain and quality of life in person with paraplegia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4756-1875
Gera Ankush 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-8704
Walia Shefali shef0604@gmail.com

12
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9676-7860
Khanna Stuti 1
Wadhwa Garima 1
1 grid.411685.f 0000 0004 0498 1133 Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, New Delhi, India
2 https://ror.org/049zqw361 0000 0005 0271 7547 Department of Physiotherapy, Gurugram University, GURGAON, India
2 9 2024
2 9 2024
2024
25 58018 3 2024
23 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Background

Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) often suffer from neuropathic pain which is often disabling and negatively affects function, participation, and quality of life (QoL). Pharmacological treatments lack efficacy in neuropathic pain reduction hence studying alternatives to drug treatment is necessary. Preclinical evidence of various aerobic exercises has shown positive effects on neuropathic pain but scientific studies investigating its effect in the SCI human population are limited.

Methodology

This study is a double-blind, parallel, two-group, randomized controlled trial with an interventional study design that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of aerobic exercise program on neuropathic pain and quality of life (QoL) in individuals with chronic paraplegia. Thirty individuals with chronic paraplegia with the neurological level of injury from T2 to L2 will be recruited from the rehabilitation department at a super specialty hospital based on the inclusion criteria. Using a 1:1 allocation ratio, the participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups. The intervention group will perform high-intensity interval training (HIIT) aerobic exercise using an arm ergometer based on their peak heart rate, and the control group will perform free-hand arm aerobic exercise. In both groups, the intervention will be delivered as 30-min sessions, four times a week for 6 weeks.

Outcome measures

International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set Version 3.0 will be used for diagnosing and assessing neuropathic pain and its interference with day-to-day activities, mood, and sleep. The International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) QoL basic data set will be used to assess QoL, and 6-min push test distance will be used to assess peak heart rate and aerobic capacity.

Discussion

The effectiveness of the aerobic exercise program will be assessed based on the changes in neuropathic pain score and its interference with day-to-day activities, mood, sleep, QoL, and aerobic capacity after 3 weeks mid-intervention and after 6 weeks post-intervention. The trial will provide new knowledge about the effectiveness of the aerobic exercise program in improving neuropathic pain and QoL in individuals with chronic paraplegia.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials Registry-India CTRI/2023/08/056257. Registered on 8 August 2023.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-024-08430-0.

Keywords

Paraplegia
Neuropathic pain
Aerobic exercise
High-intensity interval training
Randomized controlled trial
issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcBackground

Pain is one of the most common medical consequences following spinal cord injury (SCI). It has high prevalence rates estimated to be approximately 60% [1]. Neuropathic pain following SCI is typically characterized by spontaneous numbness, tingling/shooting, or burning pain which presents significant challenges, with detrimental effects on function, participation, and quality of life (QoL) [2]. The overall prevalence rate for neuropathic pain was established at 53% following SCI [3]. Neuropathic pain is often difficult to treat, and only a few patients experience full relief. The burden of symptoms and complicated treatment of neuropathic pain often comes with high economic costs [2]. Pharmacological treatments are recommended as the first line of treatment for neuropathic pain. It has limited efficacy and various associated events, which limit compliance [4]. Therefore, patient preference is for non-pharmacological treatment. Hence studying alternatives to drug treatment is necessary. Prior studies have examined the effect of several non-pharmacological treatments for the management of neuropathic pain in people with SCI such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) [5], combined visual illusion and transcranial direct current stimulation [6], TENS [7], neurofeedback training [8], breathing-controlled electrical stimulation (BreEStim) [7], and transcranial magnetic stimulation [9]. Exercise has also been proven to be effective in the management of neuropathic pain in various conditions such as chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy [10], and diabetic peripheral neuropathy [2]. The effects of exercise on pain and QoL in the human SCI population have been assessed in very few studies reporting its positive effects on both pain as well as QoL [11, 12]. The immediate analgesic effect of a single session of 15 min of aerobic exercise training using wheelchair propulsion was observed in the SCI population that only persisted transiently [13]. However, the persistent effect of aerobic exercise training alone using different dosages of exercise has never been explored in the human SCI population.

There are various pre-clinical evidence examining the effect of aerobic exercises such as treadmill running, wheel running, body weight supported treadmill training, and swimming on neuropathic pain in different conditions like sciatic nerve injury [14], diabetic peripheral neuropathy [15], complex regional pain syndrome [16], and spinal cord injury [2] which has proven to be effective. According to Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines 2021, there are a very small number of low-quality studies examining the effect of exercise as an effective treatment for neuropathic pain reduction [7].

Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of aerobic exercise program on neuropathic pain, and its interference with day-to-day activities, overall mood, night’s sleep, and QoL in persons with paraplegia. Also, to investigate if the intensity of aerobic exercise matters for its above-mentioned potential benefits. This would help the professionals and persons with SCI to provide evidence for the potential analgesic effect of aerobic exercise training which can be incorporated into the multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. It is hypothesized that a significant reduction in neuropathic pain and its interference with day-to-day activities, mood, and sleep along with improvement in aerobic capacity and QoL of persons with paraplegia will be noticeable after 3 weeks and 6 weeks of HIIT when compared with the active control group performing low-intensity free hand arm aerobic exercise.

Materials and methods

A clinical trial is designed to see the effect of the aerobic exercise protocol on neuropathic pain and QoL in persons with paraplegia.

Patient and study design

A double-blind, parallel, two-group, and randomized controlled trial with equal subject allocation (1:1) will be undertaken. A convenient sample of 30 participants with paraplegia will be recruited from the inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation departments of the Indian Spinal Injuries Centre Hospital, New Delhi, India. All participants will be provided with information sheets, and written consent will be obtained by the principal investigator before recruitment. The demographic details will be obtained, and the participants will be selected based on the eligibility criteria after the neurological examination (Table 1). Table 1 Eligibility criteria

	Criteria	
Inclusion criteria	Willing to participate and sign informed consent	
Traumatic SCI (> 1 year)	
Paraplegics with neurological level of injury T2 to L2	
ASIA- AIS Category A, B, C, and D	
Age: 18–65 (male and female)	
Diagnosis of Neuropathic Pain Using International SCI Pain Basic Data Set	
Without diagnosed cardiopulmonary, neurological, and cognitive deficits	
Self-reported ability to independently self-propel a manual wheelchair	
Ability to complete a 6-min push test (6MPT)	
Exclusion criteria	Self-reported or history of unstable angina or MI within the past 1 month	
Resting Heart rate > 120	
Systolic BP > 180 mm Hg and diastolic BP > 100 mm Hg	
Self-reported active medical issues, such as pressure sores, UTI, and cardiovascular disorders contraindicated for exercise testing	
Musculoskeletal complaints of upper extremity	
Person with neurological deficits (other than SCI) and uncontrolled psychiatric illness	
Individual who self-report the use of type 2 diabetes mellitus medication or on insulin that affects glucose metabolism	

DRRC and RRC of the research department of the Indian Spinal Injuries Centre hold the legal liability and keep the check and record of all potential recruits and monitor the data collection throughout the intervention. The members of DRRC along with the consultants and physiotherapists in the hospital provide day-to-day support to all aspects of the local organization of the trial. The trial is supervised by the guides and co-guides twice a week. This research protocol is consistent with the current Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines (Fig. 1) and follows the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT schedule) (Table 2) [17] and is developed based on the SPIRIT checklist (Additional file 1). A visual description of the study regarding enrolment, assessments, and interventions is shown in Table 2. Baseline assessments (T0) will be done before group allocation. Mid-intervention assessments of both groups (T1) will be taken after the third week which will serve to compare the short-term effects of respective interventions delivered to the subjects. Post-intervention assessments of both groups (T2) will be done after 6 weeks of intervention to detect potential long-term effects.Fig. 1 CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). HIIT + CT, high-intensity interval training along with conventional training; FHAA + CT, free hand arm aerobics along with conventional training

Table 2 Schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials guideline

Variables	Enrollment	Allocation	Baseline
(T0)	Post-allocation	
Mid-intervention
(T1)
(3 weeks)	Post-intervention
(T2)
(6 weeks)	
Enrollment	
 • Eligibility screen	 × 					
 • Informed consent	 × 					
 • Allocation		 × 				
Intervention	
 • HIIT + CT				 × 		
 • Free hand aerobics + CT				 × 		
Assessments	
 • ISCIPBDS	 × 		 × 	 × 	 × 	
 • ISCoS QoL DATA SET	 × 		 × 	 × 	 × 	
 • 6- Minute push test distance 	 × 		 × 	 × 	 × 	
Abbreviations: HIIT high-intensity interval training, CT conventional therapy, ISCIPBDS International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set, ISCoS QoL International Spinal Cord Society Quality of Life

Ethical considerations

The enrolled participants will be informed orally and in writing about the purpose of this trial, its potential risks, benefits of participation, and the right to withdraw from the trial at any point during the study. A written informed consent signed by the participants will be taken from those who are willing to participate in the study.

The data of the participants will be collected, documented, and managed confidentially using the paper-based entry data sets. Only all the authors related to the trial will have access to the final trial dataset. The masked datasets analyzed during the current study and statistical code will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The study protocol has been approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee and the trial is registered with Clinical Trials Registry.

Randomization

Eligible individuals will be assigned randomly to either the Intervention or Control group. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated randomization sequence generated by the Random Allocation Software, using a 1:1 allocation ratio.

To ensure concealment, the allocation sequence will be marked sequentially and sealed in opaque envelopes. An individual not associated with the study will sequentially open the numbered envelopes to reveal the participant’s group allocation. Based upon this, participants will be allocated to group A; intervention, or group B; the control group.

Blinding

The trial is a double-blinded study where the outcome assessor who will be a physiotherapist and participants will be blinded to group allocation. The principal investigator will be informed of the group allocation given the nature of the interventions. Also, the statistician who will perform data analysis would be unaware of the existence of treatment groups.

Exercise intervention

The planned protocol is reported in accordance with the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) checklist. In both groups, the intervention will be carried out individually along with conventional physiotherapy treatment, under the supervision and guidance of the physiotherapist for 30 min each day, 4 days a week for a total of 6 weeks. Special considerations of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) for exercise prescription in spinal cord injury will be followed such as; participants will be asked to empty their urinary bladder before beginning of the exercise session [18]. To compensate for blood pooling, the participants will be required to wear stockings on the legs and abdominal binder during the intervention. Considering the enhanced thermoregulatory drive and lower sweat rates in persons with SCI the use of light clothing and maintaining proper hydration during the intervention will be ensured [19, 20].

The intervention will be divided into three phases for both groups (Table 3). Phase 1 will consist of a warm-up period. Participants will be asked to perform gentle upper extremity stretching exercises and low-intensity arm ergometer exercises at a rate of perceived exertion (RPE) between 2 (light) and 3 (moderate) for 5 to 10 min [11]. This will be followed by phase 2 of the aerobic training, i.e., in the intervention group HIIT will be performed which consists of 20 min of cycling with the arms using an arm ergometer (Thera Trainer) at high and low intensities during 60- and 60-s intervals, respectively, and to repeat this sequence 10 times over a period of 20 min. During the 60-s high-intensity interval, participants will be required to reach their 80- 90% HRpeak which will be achieved during aerobic exercise testing [21, 22]. Each high-intensity interval will be followed by a 60-s active recovery period at low intensity at an RPE between 1 (very light) and 2 (light) on the Borg CR10 scale. Table 3 Description of exercise protocol with intervention

Intervention phase	Details of intervention	
Phase 1 (5–10 min)	low-intensity arm ergometry at RPE between 2 and 3 on the Borg CR10 scale and gentle UE stretching for 5–10 min	
Phase 2 (20 min)	
 Intervention group	• Frequency: 4 times per week, for 6 weeks

• Intensity: 10 × 60 s intervals at 80–90% HR peak with 60 s. active recovery at RPE between 1 and 2 on the Borg CR10 scale in between the intervals

• Progression: intensity will be increased by 5% after every 2 weeks

• Time: 20 min a day

• Type: Arm ergometry

	
 Control group	• Frequency: 4 times per week, for 6 weeks

• Intensity: Low intensity using a metronome at 60 bpm

• Time: 20 min a day

• Type: Free hand arm aerobic exercise

	
 Phase 3 (5–10 min)	Low-intensity arm ergometry at RPE between 2 and 3 on the Borg CR10 scale and gentle UE stretching for 5–10 min	
Abbreviations: RPEs rating of perceived exertion, UE upper extremity, HR heart rate

The active control group was designed to perform free hand-arm aerobic exercise consisting of five dynamic arm movements such as marching with arms, arm-swing side-to-side and front-to-back, and figure-of-eights mimicking kayak paddling [23]. Each movement will be performed for 1 min in a sequence and the whole sequence of these five movements will be repeated 4 times over a period of 20 min. These movements will be performed at low intensity guided by the metronome at 60 beats per minute [24].

In phase 3 of the training, there will be a 5–10-min cool-down period in the form of low-intensity arm ergometry at an RPE between 2 and 3 and gentle UE stretching resulting in a total exercise time of 30 min [11]. No rest will be provided during the session. Participants will be asked to wear an HR monitoring device (Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic) on their wrist during the training to monitor their HR response in real-time. Adverse events will be monitored throughout.

Progression and feedback

To account for changes in fitness and ensure progression, in the intervention group the intensity will be increased by 5% every 2 weeks (i.e., 80% HRpeak for weeks 1 and 2, 85% HRpeak for weeks 3 and 4, and 90% HRpeak for weeks 5 and 6) [22]. In the control group, the intensity will remain the same throughout without any progression. In the intervention group feedback on the heart rate and the time to change the intensity during the intervention will be given by the stopwatch placed in front of the patient and HR monitoring device. Whereas, in the control group the intensity will remain the same throughout the 6 weeks of the program. The participants will receive concomitant auditory feedback of intensity via metronome beats. Motivation will be provided by the therapist to achieve and maintain the targeted intensity.

Termination criteria

The exercise will be terminated if any signs or symptoms of autonomic dysreflexia appear or if any kind of unusual uneasiness is reported by the participants. Protocol modification, if required will be done only after proposing the changes to the Research Review Committee and Internal Ethical Committee and after approval, the same will be notified to CTRI and the Journal. Any deviations from the protocol will be fully documented using a breach report form.

Adherence

The adherence of the participants recruited in the study will be monitored by documenting the details of sessions attended, and the targeted intensity of the training protocol in different phases of intervention. As interval training elicits higher enjoyment, it keeps the person more engaged in the active intervention. Whereas, in the control group, matching the pace of the metronome to achieve the intensity and random order of the dynamic movements may positively influence the adherence and reduce attrition rates.

The participants will be permitted to increase the training duration by 1 week keeping in mind the “intention-to-treat” analysis principle if the participants are unable to complete the total number of sessions within the stipulated 6 weeks. Also, the type, extent, and pattern of missing data throughout the study will be fully reported by the authors.

Outcome variables

International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set Version 3.0: The International SCI Pain Basic Data Set (ISCIPBDS) standardizes the characterization and reporting of pain (primary outcome measure) and pain interference with day-to-day activities, overall mood, and sleep in persons with SCI by interviewing the participants [25]. It is based on the International SCI Pain Classification (ISCIP) which classifies pain based on its type (nociceptive, neuropathic, other, or unknown), subtype (nociceptive: musculoskeletal, visceral, or other), pain locations, intensity of pain on a numerical pain rating scale, frequency, and duration [26]. The ISCIPBDS has good validity and reliability as a self-reported measure of pain in individuals with SCI [27].

International SCI Quality of Life Data Set-Version 2.0: It is a tool to measure QoL in persons with SCI. It reflects subjective QoL based on each person utilizing his or her own personal perspective, internal standards, and assessment to assess his or her own QoL. It considers all factors that they feel contribute to or detract from their QoL, whether these are related to health, pain, family, finances, or any other domains of life. It has four questions in which participants provide a subjective rating of the past 4 weeks in four different domains related to QoL, i.e., general QoL (overall well-being), satisfaction with physical health, psychological health, and social life [21]. Each domain is ranked on a 0–10 scale, where 0 indicates complete dissatisfaction and 10 indicates complete satisfaction. Data will be collected by interviewing the participants. It has good internal construct validity [28].

6- Minute Push Test: Aerobic capacity will be evaluated using a 6-min push test (6-MPT). It is a reliable and valid measure for cardiorespiratory fitness testing in the SCI population (ICC > 0.90) [29]. The guidelines for conducting 6-MPT will follow the standardized American Thoracic Society guidelines and instructions for the administration of 6-MPT [30]. The test will be conducted along a flat corridor with clear space using a personal wheelchair at a 30-m loop course, marked 15 m apart by two cones with 2.8 m on either end to allow space for turning. The distance traveled in 6 min will be used to estimate the aerobic capacity of the individual. This is a valid and reliable measure of aerobic capacity in persons with SCI [29].

Sample size

A priori sample size estimation was done using the statistical formula by considering pain intensity as the primary outcome measure. It is based on an expected drop-out of ∼15%. The total sample size was calculated at 28 by using an α level of 0.05, a power of 80%, and a calculated medium effect size of 0.67 at 95% CI. It was increased to 30 on a suggestion from the ethical committee.

Statistical analysis

To check for selection bias, we will apply Pearson’s chi-square test for categorical variables and Student’s t-test for numerical variables. This will be performed to know if the randomization process generated between each group of participants has homogenous clinical and demographic characteristics before the intervention.

Continuous variables will be summarized as mean ± standard deviation for normal distribution and median ± interquartile range for non-normal distribution. The Shapiro–Wilk test will be used to know the normality of data. In the case of normal distribution of data, we will analyze the intergroup comparison by applying a two-sample t-test. In case of skewed data, we will use the Mann–Whitney U test for the intergroup comparison. The intragroup comparison will be analyzed by Repeated measure ANOVA or Friedman’s test (if data is not normally distributed). The final statistical analysis will be performed using IBM SPSS ver. 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). This will be done based on the modified intention-to-treat principle, whereby each participant must complete > 75% (18 of 24 sessions) of planned exercise sessions. The principle of the “last observation carried forward” shall be applied in case of missing data of dropped-out individuals. This means that the missing final values of the outcome variable will be replaced by the last known value. The level of statistical significance is assumed at p-value < 0.05.

Discussion

Neuropathic pain is one of the most disabling consequences following SCI with several detrimental effects on functions and QoL having limited effective treatment options. There are various potential benefits of exercise training in the SCI population which include improving physical health, mental health, and QoL. To the best of our knowledge, no study till now has examined the long-term effect of aerobic exercise training alone for neuropathic pain reduction in the human SCI population. The results of this trial will provide information about the effectiveness of the aerobic exercise program in decreasing neuropathic pain and improving QoL in persons with SCI. This will provide an alternative to the pharmacological treatment which would decrease the global economic burden of neuropathic pain. HIIT in the study keeps the person more engaged and involves a rapid gain in exercise tolerance and cardiorespiratory fitness with minimum time commitment. Also, this trial meets the methodological demand for adequate randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding of outcome assessor and statistician. Future studies can be conducted to identify the impact of intervention with follow-up and to explore the physiological mechanisms for the analgesic effect of aerobic exercise training in the SCI population. The limitation of this trial is that the therapist administering the treatment will not be blinded and the recruitment of participants will be done through a convenience sample which may result in a possible selection bias.

Trial status

The fifth version of the original protocol after amendments was finalized on 07 July 2024. The first participant in the trial was recruited in December 2023 and the expected duration of the participant’s recruitment to complete the study is approximately in August 2024.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. SPIRIT checklist.

Abbreviations

SCI Spinal cord injury

QoL Quality of life

HIIT High-intensity interval training

HR Heart rate

6 MPT 6 Minute push test

RPE Rating of perceived exertion

CT Conventional treatment

AIS ASIA Impairment Scale

BP Blood pressure

UTI Urinary tract infection

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Dissemination policy—trial results

The results of the study will be shared through scientific research publications, databases, the trial register, data-sharing arrangements, social media, and conferences. There are no publication restrictions. Also, a layman’s summary of the results of this study can be provided to all the participants.

Authors’ contributions

All authors were involved in the conception and design of this study. The leading author prepared the protocol manuscript and all authors contributed to the review and approval of the final manuscript.

Funding

There is no funding involved with this trial. This is an investigator-initiated RCT.

Availability of data and materials

Any data required to support the protocol can be provided on request by keeping the participant's details confidential.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The trial is approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Indian Spinal Injuries Centre REGD NO: ECR/96/Inst/DL/2013/RR-19 with reference number ISIC/RP/2023/028. Written, informed consent to participants will be obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable—no identifying images or other personal or clinical details of participants are presented here or will be presented in reports of the trial results. The participant information materials and informed consent form are attached.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this study protocol is reported among the authors.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Stuti Khanna and Garima Wadhwa contributed equally to this work.
==== Refs
References

1. Hunt C Moman R Peterson A Wilson R Covington S Mustafa R Prevalence of chronic pain after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 46 4 328 336 10.1136/rapm-2020-101960 33408161
Hunt C, Moman R, Peterson A, Wilson R, Covington S, Mustafa R, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46(4):328–36 BMJ Publishing Group.33408161 10.1136/rapm-2020-101960
2. Leitzelar BN Koltyn KF Exercise and Neuropathic Pain: A General Overview of Preclinical and Clinical Research Sports Med Open. 2021 7 1 21 10.1186/s40798-021-00307-9 33751253
Leitzelar BN, Koltyn KF. Exercise and Neuropathic Pain: A General Overview of Preclinical and Clinical Research. Sports Med Open. 2021;7(1):21.33751253 10.1186/s40798-021-00307-9
3. Burke D Fullen BM Stokes D Lennon O Neuropathic pain prevalence following spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis Eur J Pain (United Kingdom) 2017 21 1 29 44
Burke D, Fullen BM, Stokes D, Lennon O. Neuropathic pain prevalence following spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pain (United Kingdom). 2017;21(1):29–44 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
4. Baastrup C Finnerup NB Pharmacological Management of Neuropathic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury CNS Drugs. 2008 22 6 455 75 10.2165/00023210-200822060-00002 18484790
Baastrup C, Finnerup NB. Pharmacological Management of Neuropathic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury. CNS Drugs. 2008;22(6):455–75.18484790 10.2165/00023210-200822060-00002
5. Mehta S Mcintyre A Guy S Teasell RW Loh E Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation for the management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis Spinal Cord. 2015 53 11 780 5 10.1038/sc.2015.118 26193817
Mehta S, Mcintyre A, Guy S, Teasell RW, Loh E. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation for the management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(11):780–5 Nature Publishing Group.26193817 10.1038/sc.2015.118
6. Soler MD Kumru H Pelayo R Vidal J Tormos JM Fregni F Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation and visual illusion on neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury Brain 2010 133 9 2565 2577 10.1093/brain/awq184 20685806
Soler MD, Kumru H, Pelayo R, Vidal J, Tormos JM, Fregni F, et al. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation and visual illusion on neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. Brain. 2010;133(9):2565–77.20685806 10.1093/brain/awq184
7. Loh E Mirkowski M Agudelo AR Allison DJ Benton B Bryce TN The CanPain SCI clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: 2021 update Spinal Cord 2022 60 6 548 566 10.1038/s41393-021-00744-z 35124700
Loh E, Mirkowski M, Agudelo AR, Allison DJ, Benton B, Bryce TN, et al. The CanPain SCI clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: 2021 update. Spinal Cord. 2022;60(6):548–66.35124700 10.1038/s41393-021-00744-z
8. Hassan MA Fraser M Conway BA Allan DB Vuckovic A The mechanism of neurofeedback training for treatment of central neuropathic pain in paraplegia: A pilot study BMC Neurol. 2015 15 1 200 10.1186/s12883-015-0445-7 26462651
Hassan MA, Fraser M, Conway BA, Allan DB, Vuckovic A. The mechanism of neurofeedback training for treatment of central neuropathic pain in paraplegia: A pilot study. BMC Neurol. 2015;15(1):200.26462651 10.1186/s12883-015-0445-7
9. Nardone R Höller Y Langthaler PB Lochner P Golaszewski S Schwenker K RTMS of the prefrontal cortex has analgesic effects on neuropathic pain in subjects with spinal cord injury Spinal Cord 2017 55 1 20 25 10.1038/sc.2016.87 27241450
Nardone R, Höller Y, Langthaler PB, Lochner P, Golaszewski S, Schwenker K, et al. RTMS of the prefrontal cortex has analgesic effects on neuropathic pain in subjects with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2017Jan 1;55(1):20–5.27241450 10.1038/sc.2016.87
10. Wonders KY Whisler G Loy H Holt B Bohachek K Wise R Ten weeks of home-based exercise attenuates symptoms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients Heal Psychol Res. 2013 1 3 e28 10.4081/hpr.2013.1450
Wonders KY, Whisler G, Loy H, Holt B, Bohachek K, Wise R. Ten weeks of home-based exercise attenuates symptoms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients. Heal Psychol Res. 2013;1(3):e28. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/con- 10.4081/hpr.2013.1450
11. Hicks AL Martin KA Ditor DS Latimer AE Craven C Bugaresti J Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury: Effects on strength, arm ergometry performance and psychological well-being Spinal Cord 2003 41 1 34 43 10.1038/sj.sc.3101389 12494319
Hicks AL, Martin KA, Ditor DS, Latimer AE, Craven C, Bugaresti J, et al. Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury: Effects on strength, arm ergometry performance and psychological well-being. Spinal Cord. 2003;41(1):34–43.12494319 10.1038/sj.sc.3101389
12. Norrbrink C Lindberg T Wahman K Bjerkefors A Effects of an exercise programme on musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury - Results from a seated double-poling ergometer study Spinal Cord 2012 50 6 457 461 10.1038/sc.2011.160 22289901
Norrbrink C, Lindberg T, Wahman K, Bjerkefors A. Effects of an exercise programme on musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury - Results from a seated double-poling ergometer study. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(6):457–61.22289901 10.1038/sc.2011.160
13. Sato G Osumi M Morioka S Effects of wheelchair propulsion on neuropathic pain and resting electroencephalography after spinal cord injury J Rehabil Med. 2017 49 2 136 43 10.2340/16501977-2185 28101562
Sato G, Osumi M, Morioka S. Effects of wheelchair propulsion on neuropathic pain and resting electroencephalography after spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49(2):136–43 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28101562/. Cited 2024 Apr 9. .28101562 10.2340/16501977-2185
14. Sumizono M Sakakima H Otsuka S Terashi T Nakanishi K Ueda K The effect of exercise frequency on neuropathic pain and pain-related cellular reactions in the spinal cord and midbrain in a rat sciatic nerve injury model J Pain Res 2018 7 11 281 291 10.2147/JPR.S156326
Sumizono M, Sakakima H, Otsuka S, Terashi T, Nakanishi K, Ueda K, et al. The effect of exercise frequency on neuropathic pain and pain-related cellular reactions in the spinal cord and midbrain in a rat sciatic nerve injury model. J Pain Res. 2018;7(11):281–91.10.2147/JPR.S156326
15. Ma X Liu S Liu D Wang Q Li H Zhao Z Exercise intervention attenuates neuropathic pain in diabetes via mechanisms of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) Arch Physiol Biochem 2020 126 1 41 48 10.1080/13813455.2018.1489851 30317878
Ma X, Liu S, Liu D, Wang Q, Li H, Zhao Z. Exercise intervention attenuates neuropathic pain in diabetes via mechanisms of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Arch Physiol Biochem. 2020;126(1):41–8.30317878 10.1080/13813455.2018.1489851
16. Martins DF Mazzardo-Martins L Soldi F Stramosk J Piovezan AP Santos ARS High-intensity swimming exercise reduces neuropathic pain in an animal model of complex regional pain syndrome type I: Evidence for a role of the adenosinergic system Neuroscience 2013 7 234 69 76 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.042
Martins DF, Mazzardo-Martins L, Soldi F, Stramosk J, Piovezan AP, Santos ARS. High-intensity swimming exercise reduces neuropathic pain in an animal model of complex regional pain syndrome type I: Evidence for a role of the adenosinergic system. Neuroscience. 2013;7(234):69–76.10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.042
17. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23303884/. Cited 2024 Jan 26.
18. Bouchard C. Acsm. Vol. 41, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2009. 35 p.
19. Armstrong LE Casa DJ Millard-Stafford M Moran DS Pyne SW Roberts WO Exertional heat illness during training and competition Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007 39 3 556 572 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31802fa199 17473783
Armstrong LE, Casa DJ, Millard-Stafford M, Moran DS, Pyne SW, Roberts WO. Exertional heat illness during training and competition. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(3):556–72.17473783 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31802fa199
20. Raymond J Davis GM Clarke J Bryant G Cardiovascular responses during arm exercise and orthostatic challenge in individuals with paraplegia Eur J Appl Physiol 2001 85 1–2 89 95 10.1007/s004210100449 11513326
Raymond J, Davis GM, Clarke J, Bryant G. Cardiovascular responses during arm exercise and orthostatic challenge in individuals with paraplegia. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001;85(1–2):89–95.11513326 10.1007/s004210100449
21. Post MWM Forchheimer MB Charlifue S D’Andréa Greve JM New PW Tate DG Reproducibility of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set: an international psychometric study Spinal Cord 2019 57 11 992 998 10.1038/s41393-019-0302-4 31168051
Post MWM, Forchheimer MB, Charlifue S, D’Andréa Greve JM, New PW, Tate DG. Reproducibility of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set: an international psychometric study. Spinal Cord. 2019;57(11):992–8.31168051 10.1038/s41393-019-0302-4
22. Farrow MT Maher J Thompson D Bilzon JLJ Effect of high-intensity interval training on cardiometabolic component risks in persons with paraplegia: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial Exp Physiol 2021 106 5 1159 1165 10.1113/EP089110 33600014
Farrow MT, Maher J, Thompson D, Bilzon JLJ. Effect of high-intensity interval training on cardiometabolic component risks in persons with paraplegia: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Exp Physiol. 2021;106(5):1159–65.33600014 10.1113/EP089110
23. Williams AMM Chisholm AE Lynn A Malik RN Eginyan G Lam T Arm crank ergometer “spin” training improves seated balance and aerobic capacity in people with spinal cord injury Scand J Med Sci Sport 2020 30 2 361 369 10.1111/sms.13580
Williams AMM, Chisholm AE, Lynn A, Malik RN, Eginyan G, Lam T. Arm crank ergometer “spin” training improves seated balance and aerobic capacity in people with spinal cord injury. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2020;30(2):361–9.10.1111/sms.13580
24. Cetthakrikul S Nawarat J Nissapatorn V Pereira M Rungruangbaiyok C The intensity of arm swing exercise with music-movement synchrony in untrained young adults Physiother Q. 2023 31 4 64 9 10.5114/pq.2023.125164
Cetthakrikul S, Nawarat J, Nissapatorn V, Pereira M, Rungruangbaiyok C. The intensity of arm swing exercise with music-movement synchrony in untrained young adults. Physiother Q. 2023;31(4):64–9.10.5114/pq.2023.125164
25. Widerström-Noga E Biering-Sørensen F Bryce TN Cardenas DD Finnerup NB Jensen MP The international spinal cord injury pain basic data set (version 2.0) Spinal Cord. 2014 52 4 282 6 10.1038/sc.2014.4 24469147
Widerström-Noga E, Biering-Sørensen F, Bryce TN, Cardenas DD, Finnerup NB, Jensen MP, et al. The international spinal cord injury pain basic data set (version 2.0). Spinal Cord. 2014;52(4):282–6.24469147 10.1038/sc.2014.4
26. Bryce TN Biering-Sørensen F Finnerup NB Cardenas DD Defrin R Lundeberg T International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Classification: Part I Background and description Spinal Cord 2012 50 6 413 417 10.1038/sc.2011.156 22182852
Bryce TN, Biering-Sørensen F, Finnerup NB, Cardenas DD, Defrin R, Lundeberg T, et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Classification: Part I. Background and description Spinal Cord. 2012;50(6):413–7.22182852 10.1038/sc.2011.156
27. Jensen MP Widerström-Noga E Richards JS Finnerup NB Biering-Sørensen F Cardenas DD Reliability and validity of the international spinal cord injury basic pain data set items as self-report measures Spinal Cord 2010 48 3 230 238 10.1038/sc.2009.112 19786975
Jensen MP, Widerström-Noga E, Richards JS, Finnerup NB, Biering-Sørensen F, Cardenas DD. Reliability and validity of the international spinal cord injury basic pain data set items as self-report measures. Spinal Cord. 2010;48(3):230–8.19786975 10.1038/sc.2009.112
28. Post MWM Fellinghauer CS Charlifue S New PW Forchheimer MB Tate DG Rasch Analysis of the International Quality of Life Basic Data Set Version 2.0 Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 103 11 2120 30 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.02.018 35314170
Post MWM, Fellinghauer CS, Charlifue S, New PW, Forchheimer MB, Tate DG. Rasch Analysis of the International Quality of Life Basic Data Set Version 2.0. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;103(11):2120–30. 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.02.018.35314170 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.02.018
29. Cowan RE Callahan MK Nash MS The 6-min push test is reliable and predicts low fitness in spinal cord injury Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012 44 10 1993 2000 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31825cb3b6 22617394
Cowan RE, Callahan MK, Nash MS. The 6-min push test is reliable and predicts low fitness in spinal cord injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(10):1993–2000.22617394 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31825cb3b6
30. Crapo RO Casaburi R Coates AL Enright PL MacIntyre NR McKay RT ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 166 1 111 7 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102 12091180
Crapo RO, Casaburi R, Coates AL, Enright PL, MacIntyre NR, McKay RT, et al. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111–7 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12091180/. Cited 2024 Jun 21 .12091180 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102
