
==== Front
BMJ Open
BMJ Open
bmjopen
bmjopen
BMJ Open
2044-6055
BMJ Publishing Group BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR

39214655
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078256
bmjopen-2023-078256
Original Research
Nursing
1715
1506
Characteristics of the studies using realist evaluation to assess interventions that address psychosocial healthcare issues in older adults: a scoping review
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5789-9166
Mitani Shinya 1shinya_mitani@keio.jp

Ogawara Hirofumi 23ogawara@sophia.ac.jp

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4176-7665
Haruta Junji 4junharujp@keio.jp

Sakakibara Tetsuya 5sakakibaratetsuya@gmail.com

Fukahori Hiroki 6fukahori@sfc.keio.ac.jp

1 Graduate School of Health Management, Keio University, Fujisawa, Japan
2 Department of Nursing, Faculty of Human Sciences, Sophia University, Shinjuku-ku, Japan
3 Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
4 Medical Education Center/Center for General Medicine Education, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Japan
5 Department of Philosophy, Tokyo Woman's Christian University School of Arts and Sciences, Suginami-ku, Japan
6 Faculty of Nusing and Medical Care, Keio University, Fujisawa, Japan
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

None declared.

ShinyaMitani; shinya_mitani@keio.jp
2024
30 8 2024
14 8 e07825628 7 2023
01 8 2024
Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

ABSTRACT

Objectives

Interventions to address psychosocial healthcare issues in older adults are increasing. Realist evaluation (RE) helps us understand how these interventions work for their issues. It is significant to obtain implications for further developing such research. We aimed to identify the characteristics of studies using RE to assess interventions that address psychosocial healthcare issues in older adults by mapping relevant literature.

Design

Scoping review.

Data sources

MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ICHUSHI (a Japanese database) and Google Scholar were used for searches between 5 January 2022 and 4 January 2024.

Eligibility criteria

(1) Showing that most of the participants were older adults or their stakeholders; (2) stating in the research background or aim sections that the target interventions aimed at addressing older adults’ psychosocial healthcare issues and (3) using RE to assess these interventions.

Data extraction

Data on country of origin, type of research, study design, qualitative data collection and analysis methods, desirable items for RE and intervention aims and purposes were extracted and summarised using descriptive statistics.

Results

Fifty-four studies were analysed. Most studies were conducted in the UK (54.5%). Mixed methods were used in 28 studies (51.9%), while only qualitative methods were used in 25 studies (46.2 %). Fourteen intervention aims and purposes were identified: improving dementia care, avoiding emergency admissions, preventing social isolation and promoting family involvement in the care of older adults.

Conclusion

RE is useful for promoting an understanding of how interventions work for addressing psychosocial healthcare issues in older adults. RE also promotes the updating of plausible theories that lead to improving interventions. Our findings show the implications of managing time and resources to address the challenge of RE’s time and resource intensiveness and carefully considering the data collection methods to reduce burdens on older adults.

aged
health policy
nursing care
KAKENHI JP20H04024 SPRING JPMJSP2123
==== Body
pmcSTRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY

Evidence supporting the use of realist evaluation (RE) was provided by identifying the characteristics of relevant studies.

The methodological implications of conducting studies using RE were offered by discussing the challenges of conducting studies using RE as well as measures to address these challenges.

This study followed the five-stage framework by Arksey and O’Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for the Scoping Review guidelines.

The search was not updated regularly owing to time constraints.

The quality assessment of the relevant studies was not conducted.

Introduction

Healthcare needs of older adults are becoming increasingly complex.1 In addition to biological factors (eg, cancer pain and advancing chronic diseases),2 psychosocial factors have become salient.3 4 Mental diseases of older adults are anticipated.5 Widespread social isolation and loneliness among older adults are the key risk factors for mental health problems later in life.6 7 Caregivers’ abuse and ageism cause serious consequences, and around 14% of adults aged 60 years and over live with mental disorders (eg, depression).2 8 9 Furthermore, there has been a growing need for older adults to discuss and plan where and with whom they would like to spend their end-of-life (EOL) period and which treatments they wish to receive.10 Studies have shown that the satisfaction of older adults and their families increases significantly when their EOL wishes are met.11 Older adults’ healthcare issues include psychosocial factors and characteristics that influence an individual psychologically or socially. Psychosocial factors include protective psychosocial resources and other risk factors. The former includes social support, social networks, coping ability and self-esteem. The latter includes vital exhaustion, depression and hopelessness.12

Interdisciplinary interventions to address psychosocial healthcare issues among older adults are increasing. These interventions address complex issues because they include multiple components. Some of them have used robust designs such as randomised controlled trials (RCTs).1315 Although RCTs are regarded as the gold standard for establishing intervention effectiveness, the effect size does not provide policymakers with information on how these interventions might be replicated in a specific context, or whether the outcomes will be reproduced.16

To fill this gap, realist evaluation (RE)17 helps describe intervention outcomes and how they work.18 RE is rooted in a paradigm that lies between positivism and interpretivism.19 Realism explains that the real world can be understood using observed objective data and interpretations of human experiences.17 Using both qual and/or quant methods,19 20 RE develops, tests and refines the theory of ‘what works, for whom, in what circumstance?’.20 Realist programme theories can be described in terms of Context (pre-intervention circumstances influencing the mechanisms), Mechanism (processes and stakeholder responses) and Outcome (the main results of the interventions).17 The context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOs)17 help identify specific contexts and mechanisms leading to outcomes.18 RE could enable decision-makers to deeply understand the intervention and how it works effectively.21 22 Despite calls for more methodological guidance,23 RE has been increasingly used.24 To the best of our knowledge, literature reviews of studies using RE have focused on the healthcare system,23 knowledge translation,25 public health,26 nursing interventions27 and health promotion.28 Most studies have originated in the UK232528 and have been qualitative.25 27

In some countries (eg, the UK, Australia and Canada), RE has been used to assess interventions that address older adults’ psychosocial healthcare issues.2933 This trend may be explained by the fact that an intervention’s sustainability or success for older adults is context-dependent.34 Context is important because the action of mechanisms depends on the realities of the context.35 From this context, it is useful to explore the characteristics of studies using RE to assess interventions that address older adults’ psychosocial healthcare issues. This exploration could offer implications for promoting RE research to improve the healthcare issues of older adults. However, no literature review has been conducted to date that explores such findings. Given this gap, we aimed to clarify the characteristics of studies using RE to assess interventions that address psychosocial healthcare issues in older adults by mapping relevant studies.

Methods

We conducted a scoping review that systematically identified and mapped the broad evidence available for a particular topic, field, concept or issue.36 To map a wide range of studies, neither specification of settings and participants nor quality appraisal of relevant studies was conducted. The protocol for this review has not yet been registered. This review was guided by the five-stage framework as discussed ahead.37

Stage 1: identifying the research question

The population-concept-context framework38 was used as follows: population as older adults or stakeholders involved in caring for older adults, concept as using RE to assess interventions that address older adults’ psychosocial healthcare issues and context as all settings. Although ‘older adults’ were defined as those aged >65 years, the term was applied based on the pertinent definition in each country where the study was conducted. The stakeholders included families, healthcare professionals, policymakers and volunteers. We operationally defined the interventions as interdisciplinary and aimed to address older adults’ psychosocial healthcare issues (eg, offering dementia-friendly care, supporting one’s preferred EOL and preventing social isolation).

Stage 2: identifying the relevant studies

MEDLINE (via PubMed) was used to identify relevant studies by using keywords and Medical Subject Headings. A combination of search terms was developed by a librarian (online supplemental appendix 1) and adapted to other databases. After selecting all the relevant studies, citation tracking was performed using the reference lists of the included studies. Finally, grey literature was searched using Google Scholar. The search was limited to the articles published in English or Japanese. The English articles were searched using MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (via EBSCO), PsycINFO (via EBSCO), the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Google Scholar. The Japanese articles were searched using Igaku Chuo Zasshi (ICHUSHI) (a Japanese database). No restrictions were applied to the publication year. All searches were performed between January 2022 and January 2024. The final update was on 4 January 2024.

Stage 3: study selection

The eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) showing that most of the participants were older adults or stakeholders involved in the care of older adults, (2) stating in the research background or aim sections that the target interventions aimed to address older adults’ psychosocial healthcare issues and (3) using RE to assess these interventions.

Studies using surgeries or medical treatments were excluded, as these interventions seemed to be aimed only at addressing biological healthcare issues in older adults. This exclusion lies in the limitations of identifying the mechanism (eg, stakeholders’ reactions) that RE attempts to explore during the processes of target interventions. Reviews, syntheses, protocols, commentaries and books were excluded.

EndNote (https://www.myendnoteweb.com/) was used to manage all literature. After removing duplicates, three reviewers (SM, HO and HF) screened all titles and abstracts. Next, a full-text reading of the selected articles was conducted. Disagreements between the reviewers were resolved through discussion. If necessary, an independent reviewer participated in the discussion until a consensus was reached. Finally, all reviewers agreed that the selected studies were relevant to this review.

Stage 4: charting the data

The following data were charted in tabular form (online supplemental appendix 2): author(s), publication year, title, journal, country, aims and purposes, participants and sample size, setting, study designs, data collection and analysis methods, intervention names and contents and intervention providers. We also focused on the desirable items for RE to obtain implications for developing research in this domain. Referring to previous literature,17 25 the presence or absence of the following two items was presented: (1) building initial programme theories (IPTs) or developing theories and (2) using a mixed methods design. Concerning the use of mixed methods, we counted the studies that used mixed methods as part of the same research project (separately from the studies included in this review). After SM charted the data using descriptive statistics, HF and HO verified the form. Furthermore, the intervention aims and purposes were extracted for coding in the next stage, as they were regarded as one of the characteristics of these studies.

Stage 5: collating, summarising and reporting the results

To clarify the characteristics of the relevant studies, the following data were summarised: country of origin, type of research, study designs used in quantitative or qualitative research, qualitative data collection and analysis methods, desirable items for RE and intervention aims and purposes. To summarise the study designs as well as qualitative data collection and analysis methods, we referred to previous literature.39 40 To summarise the intervention aims and purposes, the intervention content was iteratively read. Thereafter, these aims and purposes were extracted and coded. Finally, the codes were integrated based on their similarities. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review guidelines.

Patient and public involvement

No patient or public involvement was observed in this review.

Results

First, we extracted 746 studies from 6 databases. After removing duplicates, the titles and abstracts were screened, followed by full-text reading. This process resulted in 52 studies. Three studies were extracted using Google Scholar. The reading of each full text resulted in two studies. Ultimately, 54 studies were included (figure 1). The key components (table 1) and intervention aims and purposes (table 2) of the studies are summarised.

Figure 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram of the selection process. RE, realist evaluation.

Table 1 Key components of the studies included

	N	(%)		N	(%)	
Country of origin (n=54)			Study designs used in qualitative research (n=53)	
 UK	31	(57.4)	 Descriptive qualitative study	32	(60.4)	
 Australia	8	(14.8)	 Case study	19	(35.2)	
 Canada	4	(7.4)	 Grounded theory	1	(1.9)	
 The Netherlands	4	(7.4)	 Ethnography	1	(1.9)	
 Denmark	2	(3.7)				
 Others†	5	(9.3)	Qualitative data collection methods (n=53)*	
			 Interviews	48	(90.6)	
Type of research (n=54)			 Document reviews	27	(50.9)	
 Mixed methods	28	(51.9)	 Observations	18	(34.0)	
 Only qualitative methods	25	(46.2)	 Focus groups	17	(32.1)	
 Only quantitative methods	1	(1.9)	 Others‡	10	(18.9)	
Study designs used in quantitative research (n=29)*	Qualitative data analysis methods (n=53)*	
 Experimental design			 Thematic analysis	20	(37.7)	
 RCTs	8	(27.6)	 Content analysis	4	(7.5)	
 Post-test-only design	8	(27.6)	 Constant comparative analysis	1	(1.9)	
 Pretest-post-test design	7	(24.1)	 Others§	11	(20.8)	
 Non-RCTs	1	(3.4)	 Not specified	18	(34.0)	
 Non-experimental design						
 Prospective cohort study	4	(13.8)	Desirable items for RE (n=54)	
 Descriptive study	4	(13.8)	 Building IPTs or developing theories	37	(68.5)	
 Retrospective cohort study	1	(3.4)	 Using mixed methods	28	(51.9)	
* Multiple items are chosen.

† Brazil, Belgium, Finland, Norway and Sweden.

‡ Expert meetings and reviews of participatory appraisals, postintervention participant feedback forms, previous studies, diaries, field notes and video replays.

§ Cross-case analysis, realist analysis, framework analysis and systematic text condensation.

IPTsinitial programme theoriesRCTrandomised controlled trialRErealist evaluation

Table 2 Intervention aims and purposes

	N	(%)	
Avoiding emergency admissions or reducing the duration of hospital stay3343 44 6673	11	(20.4)	
Improving dementia care3143 45 46 55 57 69 7477	11	(20.4)	
Promoting changes in organisations such as elderly care facilities* 3033 4648 50 51 66 78 79	10	(18.5)	
Promoting independence and care for activity of dairy living† 4950 55 57 78 8082	8	(14.8)	
Supporting ageing in one’s preferred place‡ 4144 67 71 8385	7	(13.0)	
Promoting end-of-life care31 52 67 68 73 75 86	7	(13.0)	
Promoting fall prevention22 30 33 41 55 79	6	(11.1)	
Reducing the family care burden45 75 77 84 87	5	(9.3)	
Improving medication management§ 3234 8890	5	(9.3)	
Preventing adverse events caused by social isolation and loneliness29 55 71 91 92	5	(9.3)	
Preventing the exacerbation of chronic diseases¶ 899395	4	(7.4)	
Promoting family involvement in the care of older adults42 77 84	3	(5.6)	
Improving medical access for older adults** 9698	3	(5.6)	
Fostering active ageing32 92 98	3	(5.6)	
* Improving work through task shifts between healthcare professionals, promoting work efficiency using the latest technology and creating an atmosphere suitable for caring through educational interventions.

† Promoting independence of living motions (seating and transferring) and daily life care such as oral care.

‡ Promoting home medical care, improving the residential environment and providing information about older adults’ housing.

§ Promoting appropriate use of antipsychotics and self-management of benzodiazepines.

¶ Providing education about diabetes mellitus, using eHealth for self-care, and offering rehabilitation to prevent heart disease.

** Improving the care of immigrant older adults and medical access for older adults living in rural areas.

Key components of the included studies

Most studies were conducted in the UK (57.4%). No such studies were conducted in Asian or African countries. Research using mixed methods was the most frequently performed (51.9%). The study designs used in the quantitative research were divided into experimental and non-experimental. In the former, RCTs and post-test-only designs were used in eight studies (27.6%). In the latter, prospective cohort and descriptive study designs were used in four studies (13.8%). Descriptive qualitative design was the most commonly used study design in qualitative research (60.4%). Interviews (90.1%) and thematic analyses (37.7%) were most frequently used for qualitative data collection and analysis, respectively.

Regarding the desirable items for RE, building IPTs or developing theories were included in 37 studies (68.5%). IPTs were developed in 27 studies (47.7%), whereas theories were developed in 10 studies (20.5%). Of the former, 14 studies built IPTs with a single all-encompassing statement regardless of the CMOs (eg, telecare provides improved safety 24/7 and thus enables people to continue living safely in their own homes for longer).41 Conversely, eight studies built IPTs specifying CMOs (eg, if relatives are allowed more open visits (C), they can become care partners and become more involved in planning, implementing and delivering aspects of care (M). This may have a positive impact on reducing harm and improving the quality of care (O)).42 Mixed methods were used in 28 studies (51.9%). Some studies used either quantitative or qualitative methods as part of the same research project (separate from the studies in this review).

Aims and purposes of interventions

Fourteen intervention aims and purposes were identified. Multiple aims and purposes were included in some interventions. ‘Avoiding emergency admissions or reducing the duration of hospital stay’ and ‘improving dementia care’ were the most frequently included.

To avoid emergency admissions or reduce the duration of hospital stay (20.4%), dementia care education was provided to care home staff,43 and video conferences were introduced to support the staff while responding to emergencies.44 To improve dementia care (20.4%), a health literacy kit containing important medical and welfare information understandable to people with dementia and their families was developed.45 Furthermore, dementia-sensitive care was offered by general hospitals.46 To promote changes in organisations, such as elderly care facilities, task shifts between healthcare staff were performed,47 and an intentional round was adopted in response to high hospital mortality and patient complaints.48 To promote independence and care for activities of daily living, computer-based home rehabilitation was implemented for poststroke older patients.49 Although not more frequently included than the above-mentioned aims and purposes, those regarded as important were also identified. For instance, to prevent adverse events caused by social isolation and loneliness, befriending services were offered to older adults living alone.29 To promote family involvement in patient care for older adults, the time taken to visit the hospital wards was deregulated.42

Discussion

Our review identified the characteristics of 54 studies that used RE to assess interventions addressing psychosocial healthcare issues in older adults. After considering the evidence to support the use of RE, we examined the methodological implications by discussing the challenges of RE research and measures to address these challenges, as well as other implications, from the perspectives of intervention aims and purposes and country of origin.

Evidence to support the use of RE

Our results found interventions were targeting a broad range of psychosocial healthcare issues in older adults, and using RE to assess those interventions helps to understand how they work. Lewis et al50 assessed how oral care is embedded in routine community-aged care using RE. This indicated that the withdrawal of project resources triggered organisational disengagement, leading to the loss of active oral healthcare. This showed that intervention sustainability for older adults is context-dependent.34 In identifying contextual factors and the causation of interventions, the use of RE was regarded as useful. A better understanding of these processes contributed to the improvement of interventions.22 Furthermore, using RE promoted the updating of more plausible theories. As older adults’ healthcare issues are becoming complex,1 conventional theories may not be valid to explain how interventions work for older adults. To address this gap, the theories were updated by the iterative process of RE.17 Handley et al46 assessed dementia-friendly care using mixed methods with RE to test and refine programme theories built using a realist review. This iterativeness provides a more plausible theory on how interventions work to address the ever-changing psychosocial healthcare issues in older adults.

Methodological implications

Time and resource-intensiveness25 were issues when conducting RE research. Conducting interventions, analyses and evaluations, while facing time and resource constraints, was challenging.51 52 This may be explained by the fact that RE takes a step-by-step approach, along with its evaluation cycle.17 Our results presented that the mixed methods were used in 28 studies (51.9%). This result is consistent with previous reviews of studies using RE concerning knowledge translation and nursing interventions.25 27 Although mixed methods are more than simply collecting both quantitative and qualitative data and insights that are difficult to explore using a single method can be obtained,53 these methods may increase time and resource-intensiveness.

To address this challenge, managing time and resources (eg, manpower and research grants) can be recommended,51 52 especially in RE research. Given the growing complexity of psychosocial healthcare needs in older adults,1 it may be worth considering how to use mixed methods with RE. However, a full RE is not always feasible.54 According to the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES II) quality and reporting standards,20 the use of mixed methods is not clearly described, although RE is usually a multimethod or mixed method. In this context, building IPTs or developing theories using only qualitative methods may be acceptable under time and resource constraints.

Collecting data from older adults can be challenging. This may be related to their vulnerability, as their condition seems susceptible, especially to long-term evaluations. Although Ofosu et al55 conducted a feasibility study using RE in older adults with dementia, some participants passed away or withdrew from the intervention.

One possible way to address this challenge may be to carefully consider less burdensome data collection methods for older adults. Specifically, the circumstances under which data collection is performed should be considered. Most studies have reported negative health effects of relocation on older adults with dementia.56 Given this context, Parker et al49 conducted RE research in their participants’ homes to collect data in their natural and familiar environments. Grace and Horstmanshof45 collected data from older adults with dementia and their families. Family provides a sense of security for those with dementia. Furthermore, Rehman et al57 provided simple and understandable directions to participants with dementia during their intervention. These considerations can reduce the intervention-related burden on older adults and individuals with dementia.

Other implications

The use of RE should be considered in less frequently included intervention aims and purposes. For instance, its use should be promoted to ‘prevent adverse events caused by social isolation and loneliness’. Social isolation and loneliness are common among older adults.6 The recent COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated this issue58 and its recurrence is expected.59 As the structure of loneliness is multidimensional and complex,60 using RE should be promoted to assess interventions to ease social isolation. Its use should also be considered for ‘promoting family involvement in the care of older adults’. In East Asia, advance care planning involves families rather than individuals,61 and caring for older adults is traditionally undertaken by families without using outsourced services.62 Given the ongoing ageing in East Asia, the use of RE is desirable to assess interventions that support family involvement in caring for older adults. Meanwhile, ‘avoiding emergency admission and reducing the length of hospital stays’ were the most frequently included. This may be related to the long-term plan of the National Health Service,63 which is the UK’s publicly funded healthcare system. The plan emphasises support for people to age well and is closely related to ‘avoiding emergency admissions’; some interventions might have been conducted along with the plan.

Promoting the use of RE should be considered in countries other than the UK, where the ageing population is increasing. We clarified the international gap in studies using RE in this domain. Most of these studies were conducted in the UK. This result was consistent with previous reviews of RE research232528 and may be due to the development of RE in the UK. One possible reason for the low number of such studies in Asia may be the low degree of familiarity with RE. The lack of such studies in Africa may be related to less advanced ageing.64 Given the expected population ageing in Asia and Africa,65 promoting the use of RE should be considered in these areas. If RE is not familiar in Asia, disseminating studies on RE may raise its recognition and close international gaps.

Limitations

This review had several limitations. The search was not updated regularly owing to time constraints. Regular updates may have identified new relevant studies. The quality of each study was not assessed, because we focused on mapping a broad range of relevant studies.

Conclusion

We identified the characteristics of studies using RE to assess interventions that address psychosocial healthcare issues in older adults and provided some implications.

Regarding the methodological implications, management time and resources should be considered, especially when using mixed methods. Furthermore, when RE research involves older adults or people with dementia, careful consideration of the data collection methods is required to minimise the burden on the participants. Other implications are the use of RE to explore and improve interventions that aim to prevent adverse events caused by social isolation and to promote family involvement in caring for older adults. Wider use of RE globally can help to generate more granular details in studies that aim to explore and address psychosocial healthcare issues among older adults.

supplementary material

10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078256 online supplemental appendix 1

10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078256 online supplemental appendix 2

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Review Process File
30 08 2024

Funding: This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (grant number JP20H04024) and JST SPRING (grant number JPMJSP2123).

Prepublication history and additional supplemental material for this paper are available online. To view these files, please visit the journal online (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078256).

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Patient consent for publication: Not applicable.

Ethics approval: Not applicable.

Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
==== Refs
References

1 Rudnicka E Napierała P Podfigurna A et al The World Health Organization (WHO) approach to healthy ageing Maturitas 2020 139 6 11 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.05.018 32747042
2 Centers for Disease Control Alzheimer’s disease and healthy aging. Older adults and health aging 2023 Available https://www.cdc.gov/aging/olderadultsandhealthyaging/index.html Accessed 21-Dec-2023
3 Werth JL Gordon JR Johnson RR Psychosocial issues near the end of life Aging Ment Health 2002 6 402 12 10.1080/1360786021000007027 12425774
4 Brady M Pre-hospital psychosocial care: changing attitudes J Paramedic Pract 2012 4 516 25 10.12968/jpar.2012.4.9.516
5 World Health Organization Mental health of older adults 2024 Available https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-of-older-adults Accessed 21-Dec-2023
6 World Health Organization Social isolation and loneliness among older people: advocacy brief 2022 Available https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240030749 Accessed 14-Oct-2022
7 Teo RH Cheng WH Cheng LJ et al Global prevalence of social isolation among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2023 107 104904 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104904 36563614
8 Yon Y Mikton CR Gassoumis ZD et al Elder abuse prevalence in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet Glob Health 2017 5 e147 56 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30006-2 28104184
9 Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation Global health data exchange (GHDx) 2021 Available https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/ Accessed 21-Dec-2023
10 National Health Service Ambitions for palliative and end of life care: a national framework for local action 2021–2026 2021 Available https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/ambitions-for-palliative-and-end-of-life-care-2nd-edition.pdf Accessed 21-Dec-2023
11 Detering KM Hancock AD Reade MC et al The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial BMJ 2010 340 c1345 10.1136/bmj.c1345 20332506
12 Thomas K Nilsson E Festin K et al Associations of Psychosocial Factors with Multiple Health Behaviors: A Population-Based Study of Middle-Aged Men and Women Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 17 1239 10.3390/ijerph17041239 32075162
13 Chi YC Wu CL Liu HT Effect of a multi-disciplinary active aging intervention among community elders Medicine (Balt) 2021 100 e28314 10.1097/MD.0000000000028314
14 Seah B Espnes GA Hong WT et al Salutogenic Healthy Ageing Programme Embracement (SHAPE)- an upstream health resource intervention for older adults living alone and with their spouses only: complex intervention development and pilot randomized controlled trial BMC Geriatr 2022 22 932 10.1186/s12877-022-03605-3 36460959
15 Leinert C Brefka S Braisch U et al A complex intervention to promote prevention of delirium in older adults by targeting caregiver’s participation during and after hospital discharge - study protocol of the TRAnsport and DElirium in older people (TRADE) project BMC Geriatr 2021 21 646 10.1186/s12877-021-02585-0 34784883
16 Moore GF Audrey S Barker M et al Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance BMJ 2015 350 h1258 10.1136/bmj.h1258 25791983
17 Pawson R Tilley N Realistic Evaluation London SAGE Publications 1997
18 Boumans J Scheffelaar A van Druten VP et al Coping Strategies Used by Older Adults to Deal with Contact Isolation in the Hospital during the COVID-19 Pandemic Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021 18 7317 10.3390/ijerph18147317 34299774
19 Westhorp G Prins E Kusters CSL et al Realist evaluation: an overview. Report from an expert seminar with Dr. Gill Westhorp 2011 Available https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/29235281.pdf Accessed 11-Jan-2023
20 Greenhalgh T Greenhalgh J Pawson R et al What is a mechanism? What is a programme mechanism? The ramesesii project 2017 Available https://ramesesproject.org/media/RAMESES_II_What_is_a_mechanism.pdf Accessed 21-Dec-2023
21 Pawson R Greenhalgh T Harvey G et al Realist review--a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions J Health Serv Res Policy 2005 10 Suppl 1 21 34 10.1258/1355819054308530 16053581
22 Haynes A Gilchrist H Oliveira JS et al Using Realist Evaluation to Understand Process Outcomes in a COVID-19-Impacted Yoga Intervention Trial: A Worked Example Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021 18 9065 10.3390/ijerph18179065 34501654
23 Marchal B van Belle S van Olmen J et al Is realist evaluation keeping its promise? A review of published empirical studies in the field of health systems research Evaluation (Lond) 2012 18 192 212 10.1177/1356389012442444
24 Nurjono M Shrestha P Lee A et al Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study BMJ Open 2018 8 e017111 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017111
25 Salter KL Kothari A Using realist evaluation to open the black box of knowledge translation: a state-of-the-art review Implement Sci 2014 9 115 10.1186/s13012-014-0115-y 25190100
26 Lacouture A Breton E Guichard A et al The concept of mechanism from a realist approach: a scoping review to facilitate its operationalization in public health program evaluation Implement Sci 2015 10 153 10.1186/s13012-015-0345-7 26519291
27 Palm R Hochmuth A What works, for whom and under what circumstances? Using realist methodology to evaluate complex interventions in nursing: A scoping review Int J Nurs Stud 2020 109 103601 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103601 32590248
28 Malengreaux S Doumont D Scheen B et al Realist evaluation of health promotion interventions: a scoping review Health Promot Int 2022 37 daac136 10.1093/heapro/daac136 36166263
29 Fakoya OA McCorry NK Donnelly M How do befriending interventions alleviate loneliness and social isolation among older people? A realist evaluation study PLoS ONE 2021 16 e0256900 10.1371/journal.pone.0256900 34499682
30 Francis-Coad J Etherton-Beer C Bulsara C et al Evaluating the impact of a falls prevention community of practice in a residential aged care setting: a realist approach BMC Health Serv Res 2018 18 21 10.1186/s12913-017-2790-2 29334963
31 Kupeli N Sampson EL Leavey G et al Context, mechanisms and outcomes in end-of-life care for people with advanced dementia: family carers perspective BMC Palliat Care 2019 18 87 10.1186/s12904-019-0467-9 31651310
32 Martin P Tannenbaum C A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial BMJ Open 2017 7 e015959 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015959
33 Steven A Wilson G Young-Murphy L The Implementation of an Innovative Hydration Monitoring App in Care Home Settings: A Qualitative Study JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019 7 e9892 10.2196/mhealth.9892 30694207
34 Flynn R Mrklas K Campbell A et al Contextual factors and mechanisms that influence sustainability: a realist evaluation of two scaled, multi-component interventions BMC Health Serv Res 2021 21 1194 10.1186/s12913-021-07214-5 34736470
35 Berg RC Denison EM A realist synthesis of controlled studies to determine the effectiveness of interventions to prevent genital cutting of girls Paediatr Int Child Health 2013 33 322 33 10.1179/2046905513Y.0000000086 24196703
36 Munn Z Pollock D Khalil H et al What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis JBI Evd Synth 2022 20 950 2 10.11124/JBIES-21-00483
37 Arksey H O’Malley L Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005 8 19 32 10.1080/1364557032000119616
38 Peters MD Godfrey CM McInerney P et al The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual 2015: Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews Adelaide, SA, Australia The Joanna Briggs Institute 2015 Available https://reben.com.br/revista/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Scoping.pdf
39 Polit DF Beck CT Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. 7th Ed Philadelphia Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2004
40 Thiese MS Observational and interventional study design types; an overview Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014 24 199 210 10.11613/BM.2014.022 24969913
41 Berge MS Telecare – where, when, why and for whom does it work? A realist evaluation of a Norwegian project J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng 2017 4 205566831769373 10.1177/2055668317693737
42 Hurst H Griffiths J Hunt C et al A realist evaluation of the implementation of open visiting in an acute care setting for older people BMC Health Serv Res 2019 19 867 10.1186/s12913-019-4653-5 31752862
43 Sheaff R Sherriff I Hennessy CH Evaluating a dementia learning community: exploratory study and research implications BMC Health Serv Res 2018 18 83 10.1186/s12913-018-2894-3 29402291
44 Newbould L Ariss S Mountain G et al Exploring factors that affect the uptake and sustainability of videoconferencing for healthcare provision for older adults in care homes: a realist evaluation BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021 21 13 10.1186/s12911-020-01372-y 33407437
45 Grace S Horstmanshof L A realist evaluation of a regional Dementia Health Literacy Project Health Expect 2019 22 426 34 10.1111/hex.12862 30604467
46 Handley M Bunn F Goodman C Supporting general hospital staff to provide dementia sensitive care: A realist evaluation Int J Nurs Stud 2019 96 61 71 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.10.004 30545567
47 Lovink MH Laurant MG van Vught AJ et al Substituting physicians with nurse practitioners, physician assistants or nurses in nursing homes: a realist evaluation case study BMJ Open 2019 9 e028169 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028169
48 Leamy M Sims S Levenson R et al Intentional rounding: a realist evaluation using case studies in acute and care of older people hospital wards BMC Health Serv Res 2023 23 1341 10.1186/s12913-023-10358-1 38042788
49 Parker J Mawson S Mountain G et al Stroke patients’ utilisation of extrinsic feedback from computer-based technology in the home: a multiple case study realistic evaluation BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2014 14 46 10.1186/1472-6947-14-46 24903401
50 Lewis A Harvey G Hogan M et al Can oral healthcare for older people be embedded into routine community aged care practice? A realist evaluation using normalisation process theory Int J Nurs Stud 2019 94 32 41 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.12.016 30933871
51 Wiechula R Kitson A Marcoionni D et al Improving the fundamentals of care for older people in the acute hospital setting: facilitating practice improvement using a Knowledge Translation Toolkit Int J Evid Based Healthc 2009 7 283 95 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2009.00145.x 21631868
52 Tolson D McIntosh J Loftus L et al Developing a managed clinical network in palliative care: a realistic evaluation Int J Nurs Stud 2007 44 183 95 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.027 16423354
53 Creswell JW Fetters MD Ivankova NV Designing a mixed methods study in primary care Ann Fam Med 2004 2 7 12 10.1370/afm.104 15053277
54 Astbury B Leeuw FL Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation Am J Eval 2010 31 363 81 10.1177/1098214010371972
55 Ofosu EF De Nys L Connelly J et al A realist evaluation of the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of a digital music and movement intervention for older people living in care homes BMC Geriatr 2023 23 125 10.1186/s12877-023-03794-5 36879201
56 Ryman FVM Erisman JC Darvey LM et al Health Effects of the Relocation of Patients With Dementia: A Scoping Review to Inform Medical and Policy Decision-Making Gerontologist 2019 59 e674 82 10.1093/geront/gny031 29718293
57 Rehman S Likupe G McFarland A et al Evaluating a brief intervention for mealtime difficulty on older adults with dementia Nurs Open 2023 10 182 94 10.1002/nop2.1293 35856469
58 Wu B Social isolation and loneliness among older adults in the context of COVID-19: a global challenge Glob Health Res Policy 2020 5 27 10.1186/s41256-020-00154-3 32514427
59 World Health Organization Western pacific: preparing for pandemics 2024 Available https://www.who.int/westernpacific/activities/preparing-for-pandemic Accessed 10-Jan-2024
60 Yanguas J Pinazo-Henandis S Tarazona-Santabalbina FJ The complexity of loneliness Acta Biomed 2018 89 302 14 10.23750/abm.v89i2.7404 29957768
61 Cheng S-Y Lin C-P Chan HY-L et al Advance care planning in Asian culture Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020 50 976 89 10.1093/jjco/hyaa131 32761078
62 Zhang Y Harper S The impact of son or daughter care on Chinese older adults’ mental health Soc Sci Med 2022 306 115104 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115104 35724587
63 National Health Services NHS long term plan: ageing well 2019 Available https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/areas-of-work/ageing-well/ Accessed 14-Nov-2022
64 World Health Organization The global health observatory: life expectancy at birth (years) 2023 Available https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/life-expectancy-at-birth-(years) Accessed 03-Jan-2022
65 United Nations Department of economic and social affairs. World population ageing 2019 2019 Available https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeing2019-Highlights.pdf Accessed 21-Dec-2023
66 Bailey D Mutale GJ Social work’s contribution to integrated primary health care teams in the UK for older adults with complex needs J Integr Care 2022 30 263 75 10.1108/JICA-10-2021-0053
67 Barker R Wilson P Butler C How does English national end-of-life care policy impact on the experience of older people at the end of life? Findings from a realist evaluation Prim Health Care Res Dev 2021 22 e57 10.1017/S1463423621000621 34702423
68 Efstathiou N Lock A Ahmed S et al A realist evaluation of a “single point of contact” end-of-life care service JHOM 2020 34 365 77 10.1108/JHOM-07-2019-0218
69 Gordon AL Goodman C Davies SL et al Optimal healthcare delivery to care homes in the UK: a realist evaluation of what supports effective working to improve healthcare outcomes Age Ageing 2018 47 595 603 10.1093/ageing/afx195 29315370
70 Janssen MM Vos W Luijkx KG Development of an evaluation tool for geriatric rehabilitation care BMC Geriatr 2019 19 206 10.1186/s12877-019-1213-0 31375079
71 Lhussier M Dalkin S Hetherington R Community care for severely frail older people: Developing explanations of how, why and for whom it works Int J Older People Nurs 2019 14 e12217 10.1111/opn.12217 30592173
72 Sheaff R Windle K Wistow G et al Reducing emergency bed-days for older people? Network governance lessons from the “Improving the Future for Older People” programme Soc Sci Med 2014 106 59 66 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.033 24534733
73 Wye L Lasseter G Percival J et al What works in ‘real life’ to facilitate home deaths and fewer hospital admissions for those at end of life?: results from a realist evaluation of new palliative care services in two English counties BMC Palliat Care 2014 13 37 10.1186/1472-684X-13-37 25075202
74 Boumans J van Boekel LC Verbiest ME et al Exploring how residential care facilities can enhance the autonomy of people with dementia and improve informal care Dementia (London) 2022 21 136 52 10.1177/14713012211030501 34215163
75 Dalkin SM Lhussier M Kendall N et al Namaste care in the home setting: developing initial realist explanatory theories and uncovering unintended outcomes BMJ Open 2020 10 e033046 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033046
76 Devi R Chadborn NH Meyer J et al How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation Age Ageing 2021 50 1371 81 10.1093/ageing/afab007 33596305
77 Thijssen M Graff MJL Lexis MAS et al Collaboration for Developing and Sustaining Community Dementia-Friendly Initiatives: A Realist Evaluation Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023 20 4006 10.3390/ijerph20054006 36901017
78 Aagaard K Meléndez-Torres GJ Overgaard C Improving oral health in nursing home residents: A process evaluation of a shared oral care intervention J Clin Nurs 2020 29 3392 402 10.1111/jocn.15373 32533875
79 Leighton PA Darby J Allen F et al A realist evaluation of a multifactorial falls prevention programme in care homes Age Ageing 2022 51 10.1093/ageing/afac263
80 Masterson-Algar P Burton CR Rycroft-Malone J et al Towards a programme theory for fidelity in the evaluation of complex interventions J Eval Clin Pract 2014 20 445 52 10.1111/jep.12174 24840165
81 Schnabel S van Wijck F Kidd L Supporting stroke survivors to meet their personal rehabilitation needs in community-based arm rehabilitation: development of initial programme theories to explore what may work for whom, how and under what circumstances Front Neurol 2023 14 1089547 10.3389/fneur.2023.1089547 37332992
82 Taylor J Barker A Hill H et al Improving person-centered mobility care in nursing homes: a feasibility study Geriatr Nurs 2015 36 98 105 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2014.11.002 25735475
83 Harding AJE Hean S Parker J et al It Can’t Really be Answered in an Information Pack…’: A Realist Evaluation of a Telephone Housing Options Service for Older People Soc Policy Soc 2020 19 361 78 10.1017/S1474746419000472
84 Sanerma P Paavilainen E Åstedt-Kurki P Home care services for older persons. The views of older persons and family members: A realistic evaluation Int J Older People Nurs 2020 15 e12281 10.1111/opn.12281 31621204
85 Sattar Z (Zeb) Wilkie S Ling J The impact of a refurbishment programme on older people living in sheltered housing HCS 2021 24 54 64 10.1108/HCS-02-2021-0004
86 McConnell T O’Halloran P Donnelly M et al Factors affecting the successful implementation and sustainability of the Liverpool Care Pathway for dying patients: a realist evaluation BMJ Support Palliat Care 2015 5 70 7 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000723
87 Lawson S Mullan J Wong G et al Family carers’ experiences of managing older relative’s medications: Insights from the MEMORABLE study Pat Educ Couns 2022 105 2573 80 10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.017
88 Couturier Y Lanneville D Lane J et al Implementation conditions leading to the scale-up of an innovation involving the optimal use of antipsychotics in long-term care centers: The Optimizing Practices, Use, Care and Services-Antipsychotics (OPUS-AP) program Res Soc Admin Pharm 2022 18 2484 8 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.03.017
89 Liu HM Massi L Laba TL et al Patients’ and providers’ perspectives of a polypill strategy to improve cardiovascular prevention in Australian primary health care A qualitative study set within a pragmatic randomized, controlled trial Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2015 8 301 8 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001483 25944629
90 Silva BB Fegadolli C Implementation of pharmaceutical care for older adults in the brazilian public health system: a case study and realistic evaluation BMC Health Serv Res 2020 20 37 10.1186/s12913-020-4898-z 31937299
91 Day A Phelps K Maltby J et al A realist evaluation of loneliness interventions for older people Age Ageing 2021 50 2246 53 10.1093/ageing/afab188 34591956
92 Gorenberg J Tierney S Wong G et al Understanding and Improving Older People’s Well-Being through Social Prescribing Involving the Cultural Sector: Interviews from a Realist Evaluation J Appl Gerontol 2023 42 1466 76 10.1177/07334648231154043 36724235
93 Clark AM Whelan HK Barbour R et al A realist study of the mechanisms of cardiac rehabilitation J Adv Nurs 2005 52 362 71 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03601.x 16268840
94 Coorey G Peiris D Neubeck L et al A realist evaluation approach to explaining the role of context in the impact of a complex eHealth intervention for improving prevention of cardiovascular disease BMC Health Serv Res 2020 20 764 10.1186/s12913-020-05597-5 32811480
95 Pals RAS Olesen K Willaing I What does theory-driven evaluation add to the analysis of self-reported outcomes of diabetes education? A comparative realist evaluation of a participatory patient education approach Pat Educ Couns 2016 99 995 1001 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.006
96 Hoens S Smetcoren A-S Switsers L et al Community health workers and culturally competent home care in Belgium: A realist evaluation Health Soc Care Community 2022 30 e1966 76 10.1111/hsc.13630 34730263
97 Jonsson F Carson DB Goicolea I et al Strengthening Community Health Systems Through Novel eHealth Initiatives? Commencing a Realist Study of the Virtual Health Rooms in Rural Northern Sweden Int J Health Policy Manag 2021 11 39 48 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.08
98 McNeil-Gauthier AL Milot DM Levasseur M How environments can promote active aging: results from a case study of two municipalities in Quebec, Canada Can J Public Health 2024 115 117 31 10.17269/s41997-023-00806-0 37589791
