
==== Front
J Educ Health Promot
J Educ Health Promot
JEHP
J Edu Health Promot
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
2277-9531
2319-6440
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow India

JEHP-13-60
10.4103/jehp.jehp_845_23
Original Article
Students’ knowledge and attitude concerning organ donation at Iraqi nursing colleges
Majeed Haider Mohammed
Hassan Ahmed Fleih
Mousa Ayad Majid
Department of Adult Nursing, College of Nursing, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
Address for correspondence: Haider Mohammed Majeed, PhD Nursing, Assistant Professor, Department of Adult Nursing, College of Nursing, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. E-mail: haidermm@conursing.uobaghdad.edu.iq
2024
26 2 2024
13 6015 6 2023
05 8 2023
Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Education and Health Promotion
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
BACKGROUND:

Organ transplantation is an effective therapy for end-stage organ failure. However, there is a large gap between the need for and the supply of donor organs.

OBJECTIVES:

This study aimed to assess nursing students’ knowledge and attitudes about organ donation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

This is a descriptive cross-sectional design study. The study was conducted at four faculties of nursing, which were Baghdad, Misan, Tikrit, and Kirkuk in Iraq. The three tools included are as follows: I: Socio-Demographic Questionnaire; II: Organ-Tissue Donation and Transplantation Knowledge Scale (ODTKS); and III: Organ Donation Attitude Scale (ODAS).

RESULTS:

More than two-thirds (71%) of the studied students have an accepted level of knowledge, while 70% of the studied students had a positive attitude toward organ donation and transplantation. There were statistically significant differences (P- value <0.05) between socio-demographic characteristics and knowledge level regarding gender, marital status, and academic year. Also, there were significant differences between socio-demographic characteristics and students’ attitude levels regarding gender and academic year.

CONCLUSION:

More than two-thirds of students had a good and fair level of knowledge and a positive attitude toward organ donation and transplantation. Providing lectures within the curriculum is needed for students to raise their knowledge and attitude about organ transplantation and donation.

Grafting
health personnel attitudes
knowledge
nursing students’
organ transplantation
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Currently, organ donation is an extremely important issue in public health. Organ donation is a complicated and multifactorial problem that involves medical, legal, ethical, and organizational.[1] It is described as an act of providing one or more organs to another individual, without compensation.[2] Living organ transplantation concerns the medical procedure that uses a living donor’s organ to replace the recipient’s failed organ.[3] Living organ transplant is valuable to patients with end-stage organ failure, which could extend their lifespan and improve the quality of their lives. In 2021, the United States performed 6541 living organ transplants.[4] The survival and life quality of patients undergoing organ transplantation have improved in recent years, due to medical and technical developments.[5] Vital organs such as the heart, pancreas, liver, kidneys, and lungs may be transplanted to those whose organs fail, and it enables many recipients to return to a normal pattern of life.[6] Organ transplantation has a tremendous positive effect on the recipient’s general health, reduces the socioeconomic burden, and has become a crucial measure to improve both quality and duration of life.[78] Healthcare workers play an important part in the successful organ donation process.[9] In turn, medical students are the new generation of clinicians who, in the future, will act as a link between donors and recipients. Consequently, obtaining knowledge on the attitudes of medical students concerning organ donation is considered a particularly important issue that has been investigated in the literature.[10] Organ donation is mainly influenced by three factors: knowledge, attitude, and behavior.[11] Nurses are key actors in the organ donation process, and their opinion may affect people’s decisions on organ donation. Furthermore, nurses can help in the educational programs required to promote public organ donation knowledge and attitude.[1213] This study aimed to assess students’ knowledge and attitude toward organ donation and transplantation at selected faculties of Iraqi nursing colleges.

Materials and Methods

Design and setting

A cross-sectional study was conducted to measure the level of knowledge and attitude toward organ donation among 100 students from the third to fourth years of the undergraduate nursing program from different nursing faculties, which includes Baghdad, Misan, Tikrit, and Kirkuk. The study was conducted from December 1, 2020, to April 15, 2021.

Study participants and sampling

A stratified random sample technique was used to select four facilities of conducted study from all facilities in Iraq. The sampling was applied by dividing the university faculties into one stratum for obtaining a homogenous and sharply defined stratum, and then, using a simple randomization technique, the faculties of nursing faculties the investigator chose randomly third- and fourth-year students because they had more years of learning and are more knowledgeable about the aims of this study. The sample size was calculated using the Lawley formula,[14] which was computed as N = P × 20/100, where N = sample size and P = population.

Data collection and instrument tools

In this study, three interview questionnaires used were as follows: I: Socio-Demographic Questionnaire includes gender, age, residences, marital status, faculty of nursing, and academic year. II: Organ-Tissue Donation and Transplantation Knowledge Scale (ODTKS) adapted by Ozturk et al.[15] is translated into Arabic language by the investigator, and it consists of 17 items. On this scale, one point is given for a correct answer with a total score of 17 grades. The scoring system was classified into three categories as follows: good knowledge if the score is ≥75% (13–17 scores), fair knowledge if the score is 50 ≤75% (7–12 scores), and Poor knowledge if score <50% (<6 scores). III: Organ Donation Attitude Scale (ODAS) adapted by Sayin[16] assesses attitude regarding humanity, moral conviction, and fear of medical neglect and bodily mutilation. The scale was modified by the investigator, the investigator omitted the unnecessary items, and the scale was translated into Arabic language by the investigator. Each item was evaluated on the three-point Likert scale (i.e., 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = agree, and 3 = strongly agree). This gives possible minimum and maximum total scores of 10 and 30 for attitude. The total score of the Attitudes Rating Scale was 30 grades; the scores of the items were summed up and converted into a percentage score. The scoring system was classified into two categories as follows: positive attitude if the score is ≥70% (≥23 scores) and negative attitude if the score is <70% (<22 scores).

Data analysis

The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 24. Descriptive statistics were used in this study (e.g., mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage). For quantitative data correlation, the Chi-square test was employed to determine the degree and direction of the relationship between knowledge and attitude. The P- value was considered significant if it was equal to or less than 0.05.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee, College of Nursing, University of Baghdad, Iraq, with an ethical approval number 25/11/2020-16105. Preceding the study, a detailed procedure of the study was explained, and each student signed a voluntary consent form.

Results

Table 1 shows that the mean age of the studied students was 22.44 ± 1.409 years. Moreover, 56% of the participants were aged 22 to 23 and 53% of them were female. Additionally, 86% lived in rural areas and 75% were single. 52% of the students were in the fourth study year.

Table 1 Distribution of the studied students according to their socio-demographic characteristics (n=100 students)

Variables	Groups	Frequency	Percent	
Gender	Male	47	47.0	
Female	53	53.0	
M±SD=22.44 (1.409)	
Age (groups)	20–21	29	29.0	
22–23	56	56.0	
24 and above	15	15.0	
Faculty	Baghdad	25	25.0	
Misan	25	25.0	
Kirkuk	25	25.0	
Tikrit	25	25.0	
Academic year	Third stage	48	48.0	
Fourth stage	52	52.0	
Marital status	Single	75	75.0	
Married	25	25.0	
Residence	Urban	86	86.0	
Rural	14	14.0	
M±SD=mean±standard deviation

Figure 1 shows that 71% of the studied students had fair knowledge, while 12% of the students had good knowledge. Additionally, 17% of the studied students had poor knowledge in all knowledge items.

Figure 1 Distribution of the studied students’ total knowledge level, regarding organ donation and transplantation (N=100)

Figure 2 shows that 70% of the studied students had a positive attitude and 30% of studied students had a negative attitude.

Figure 2 Distribution of the studied students’ total attitudes level, regarding organ donation and transplantation (N=100)

Table 2 shows statistically significant differences between socio-demographic characteristics and level of knowledge regarding gender, faculty, academic year, and marital status at a P- value <0.05.

Table 2 Relationship between socio-demographic characteristics of the studied students and their knowledge level (n=100)

Variables	Groups	Good (n=12)	Fair (n=71)	Poor (n=17)	P	
n	%	n	%	n	%	
Gender	Male	4	4%	35	35%	8	8%	0.000**	
Female	8	8%	36	36%	9	9%	
Age (groups) years	20–21	2	2%	18	18%	9	9%	0.154	
22–23	8	8%	42	42%	6	6%	
24 and above	2	2%	11	11%	2	2%	
Faculty	Baghdad	4	4%	17	17%	4	4%	0.04*	
Misan	0	0	16	16%	9	9%	
Kirkuk	3	3%	19	19%	3	3%	
Tikrit	5	5%	19	19%	1	1%	
Academic year	Third stage	4	4%	33	33%	11	11%	0.000**	
Fourth stage	8	8%	38	38%	6	6%	
Marital status	Single	8	8%	51	51%	16	16%	0.037*	
Married	4	4%	20	20%	1	1%	
Residence	Urban	10	10%	61	61%	15	15%	0.707	
Rural	2	2%	10	10%	2	2%	
n = number, % = percentage *Significant at P < 0.05; **highly significant at P < 0.01

Table 3 shows statistically significant differences between socio-demographic characteristics and attitude levels regarding gender, faculty, and academic year at a P- value <0.05.

Table 3 Relationship between socio-demographic characteristics of the studied students and their attitude (n=100)

Variables	Groups	Positive attitude (n=70)	Negative attitude (n=30)	P	
n	%	n	%	
Gender	Male	33	33%	14	14%	0.000**	
Female	37	37%	16	16%	
Age (groups) years	20–21	25	25%	4	4%	0.986	
22–23	36	36%	20	20%	
24 and above	9	9%	6	6%	
Faculty	Baghdad	25	25%	0	0	0.000**	
Misan	25	25%	0	0	
Kirkuk	20	20%	5	5%	
Tikrit	0	0	25	25%	
Academic year	Third stage	37	37%	11	11%	0.000**	
Fourth stage	33	33%	19	19%	
Marital status	Single	56	56%	19	19%	0.966	
Married	14	14%	11	11%	
Residence	Urban	62	62%	24	24%	0.211	
Rural	8	8%	6	6%	
n=number, %=percentage. Significant at P<0.05. **highly significant at P<0.01

Discussion

Regarding students’ socio-demographic characteristics, the present study findings indicated that more than half of the respondents were female and the remainder were male. The majority of them were in the age group between 22 and 23 years, followed by 20–21 years, and the mean age of students was 22.44 ± 1.409. Study participants’ distribution in the same number for each college within 25% each. The sample consisted of a high percentage from the third class and less than half from the fourth class. Three-quarters of the study sample were single, and the remainder were married. The majority of them lived in urban areas, while the rest of the few percent lived in rural areas. This is in line with[17], who stated that the majority participated in the survey with a response rate of 89.7%. The median age of the participants was 19.6 years (ranging from 16 to 29 years). Among respondents, 44% were males and 56% were females, and more than one-third (40%) were from rural residence, while 60% of participants were from urban residence. The findings are in accordance with the results obtained from[1819], who reported that the majority of subjects (93.3%) had an age range between 18 and 20 years followed by 3.33% who had 21–23 and 24–26 years of age. 91.6% were females, and the rest (8.33%) were males. According to their place of residence, 55% belong to rural areas and 45% belong to urban areas.

The current study showed that more than three-quarters of the students had fair and good knowledge. Additionally, less than one-quarters of students had poor knowledge regarding organ donation and transplantation. These findings agreed with many studies, which found that three-quarters of students agreed that the final decision belongs to the doctor if a deceased patient has not consented to an organ donor card. The interpretation of this result from the researcher’s point of view is that the students in the fourth year had more years of learning, so they had knowledge about the donation. These findings are in accordance with many previous studies obtained from[2021222324252627], who reported that the studies demonstrated the final-stage nursing students had more knowledge from other stages.

The current study findings show that more than two-thirds of students had a positive attitude and one-third of students had a negative attitude. This finding supported by another study’s findings showed that students had varying options and resource regarding organ donation and transplantation, which affect the physical and psychological conditions.[28] This result was consistent with the findings of Kolagari et al.,[29] who showed that organ donor card holders had significantly better knowledge and attitude toward organ donation in comparison with those who did not. The medical community plays a significant role in the procurement of transplantation organs, and this might be attributed to the shortage of organs required for transplantation. According to numerous studies on the belief and awareness of healthcare providers regarding organ transplantation, they demonstrated a welcoming opinion toward transplants.[3031] Knowledgeable students consider the importance of donating organs, saving the patient’s life, and reducing the death rate, and hence, they have positive trends about the importance of organ donation to save their patients’ lives.

The results of the current study indicated that there is a significant relationship between gender, faculty, academic year, and marital status with the level of knowledge. In a way that females showed higher knowledge and more positive attitudes toward organ donation than males, this result is consistent with the findings of many studies.[263233] There was a highly statistically significant relationship between demographic characteristics and the type of attitude. Moreover, the present study revealed that there was a positive relationship between demographic characteristics and their attitude responses. These results agree with many results that showed a narrative review of attitudes toward organ donation of undergraduate nurse students and found statistically significant improvements in the study group regarding organ transplantation and organ donation, and more than two-thirds of students had good and fair knowledge, revealing a positive correlation between demographic characteristics and attitude among students toward organ donation and transplantation.[32] However, other studies did not confirm any significant relationship between gender, marital status, residence, and attitudes of participants about organ donation.[3435] The researcher believes that it is not necessary to have a statistically significant relationship between students’ attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation with their demographic variables.

Limitations

The major limitation of the study included a smaller sample size, and only selected nursing colleges were included in the study sample.

Conclusions

Approximately three-quarters of nursing students from selected faculty had a fair level of knowledge about organ donation and transplantation. When it came to the attitudes of students on organ donation and transplantation, it was discovered that a high percentage of students polled had a favorable outlook. Students need more lessons throughout the semester regarding organ donation and transplants to improve their knowledge and attitudes about organ donation. We recommended engaging nursing students in continuing education program approach that should be transmitted through electronic and mass media, religious scholars, health worker’s team, and teachers to improve attitudes and beliefs of organ donation among students.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the study participants and data collectors for their full participation.
==== Refs
References

1. Darlington D Anitha FS Joseph C Study of knowledge, attitude, and practice of organ donation among medical students in a tertiary care centre in South India Cureus 2019 11 e4896. 31423375
2. Darwish TH Alwesaibi AA Hussain A Alonayzan A Al-Hassan ZJ Alansari KY Alsaloom AM Acceptance and awareness of Saudi population about organ donation and lung transplantation Age 2021 21 15 8
3. Parsa P Taheri M Rezapur-Shahkolai F Shirahmadi S Attitudes of Iranian students about organ donation: A qualitative study BMC Med Ethics 2019 20 36. 31138188
4. Aubert O Yoo D Zielinski D Cozzi E Cardillo M Dürr M , COVID-19 pandemic and worldwide organ transplantation: A population-based study Lancet Public Health 2021 6 e709 19. 34474014
5. Akbulut S Ozer A Firinci B Saritas H Demyati K Yilmaz S Attitudes, knowledge levels and behaviors of Islamic religious officials about organ donation in Turkey: National survey study World J Clin Cases 2020 8 1620 31 32432140
6. Giri PA Yuvaraj BY Kamble MG Solepure AB Organ donation and transplantation: Knowledge and attitude amongst Indian undergraduate medical students Int J Community Med Public Health [serial online] 2017 4 4303 6
7. Vanholder R Domínguez-Gil B Busic M Cortez-Pinto H Craig JC Jager KJ , Organ donation and transplantation: A multi-stakeholder call to action Nat Rev Nephrol 2021 17 554 68 33953367
8. Aveiro-Róbalo TR Paredes-González X Recalde-Hellman C Barboza-Molinas E Cardozo P Ojeda B , Socio-academic factors influencing knowledge about organ donation among medical students in Paraguay, 2018 Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2021 32 137 45 34145123
9. Sharaan R Alsulami S Arab R Alzeair G Elamin N Alsaywid B , Knowledge, attitude, and willingness toward kidney donation among health sciences students at King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University Front Public Health 2021 9 667582. 34164369
10. Iniesta-Sepúlveda M López-Navas AI Gutiérrez PR Ramírez P Ríos A The willingness to donate organs in medical students from an international perspective: A meta-analysis Transpl Int 2022 35 10446. 35837470
11. Vijayalakshmi P Sunitha TS Gandhi S Thimmaiah R Math SB Knowledge, attitude and behaviour of the general population towards organ donation: An Indian perspective Natl Med J India 2016 29 257 61 28098078
12. Akkas M Anık EG Demir MC İlhan B Akman C Ozmen MM , Changing attitudes of medical students regarding organ donation from a university medical school in Turkey Med Sci Monit 2018 24 6918 24 30269151
13. Hasan H Zehra A Riaz L Riaz R Insight into the knowledge, attitude, practices, and barriers concerning organ donation amongst undergraduate students of Pakistan Cureus 2019 11 e5517. 31687293
14. Lawley SD Universal formula for extreme first passage statistics of diffusion Phys Rev E 2020 101 012413. 32069639
15. Ozturk Emiral G Isıktekin Atalay B Altunok H Gokler ME Onsuz MF Metintas S Development of a reliable and valid organ tissue donation and transplantation knowledge scale Transpl Proc 2017 49 260 6
16. Yazici Sayin Y Turkish validity and reliability of Organ Donation Attitude Scale J Clin Nurs 2016 25 642 55 26388417
17. Sayin Y Dağci M Attitude, knowledge and donor card volunteering of nursing students regarding organ donation Bezmialem Sci 2022 10 512 7
18. Jasim AH Majeed HM Mohammed TR Knowledge and protective health behaviors concerning risk factors for coronary heart disease among Baghdad university students Medico Legal Update 2020 20 234 9
19. Shantha SG Sharma E Effect of structured teaching programme regarding organ donation on knowledge and attitude among nursing students Int J Recent Sci Res 2016 7 12464 7
20. Mane V Markam J William RF Vidya DC Naik TB Organ donation: An assessment of knowledge, attitude and practices among medical students Indian J Forensic Community Med 2016 3 284 7
21. Mohamed DE Hossein YE Eltomy EM Students’ knowledge and attitude toward organ donation and transplantation at selected faculties of Minia university Minia Sci Nurs J 2022 11 32 9
22. Lei L Deng J Zhang H Dong H Luo Y Luo Y Level of organ donation-related knowledge and attitude and willingness toward organ donation among a group of university students in Western China Transpl Proc 2018 50 2924 31
23. Sebastián-Ruiz MJ Guerra-Sáenz EK Vargas-Yamanaka AK Barboza-Quintana O Ríos-Zambudio A García-Cabello R , [Knowledge and attitude towards organ donation of medicine students of a Northwestern Mexico public university] Gac Med Me× 2017 153 430 40
24. Kaistha M Kaistha S Mahajan A A study of factors influencing decisions on organ donation among patient attendees in a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India Chrismed J Health Res 2016 3 101 5
25. Hamed H Awad ME Youssef KN Fouda B Nakeeb AE Wahab MA Knowledge and attitudes about organ donation among medical students in Egypt: A questionnaire J Transpl Technol Res 2016 6 1 4
26. Allahverdi TD Allahverdi E Akkuş Y The knowledge of nursing students about organ donation and the effect of the relevant training on their knowledge Transpl Proc 2020 52 2877 82
27. Ghose TK Deo J Dutt V Agarwal R Patel BB Ganesh M , Knowledge and attitude towards organ donation: A study among medical and nursing students of a medical college Int J Community Med Public Health 2021 8 5398.
28. Salinas AM Martinez-Isasi S Costa EF García AF Dios DJ García DF [Knowledge and attitudes toward organ donation among health professionals in a third level hospital] Rev Esp Salud Publica 2018 92 e201804007. 29662051
29. Kolagari S Bayei J Asoodeh V Rajaee S Mehbakhsh Z Modanloo M Knowledge and attitude of Iranian medical university students about organ donation and transplantation: A cross-sectional study Ethiop J Health Sci 2022 32 127 36 35250224
30. Transplant International Production Office Erratum: The Willingness to Donate Organs in Medical Students from an International Perspective: A Meta-Analysis Transpl Int 2022 35 10820. 36090773
31. Tagizadieh A Shahsavari Nia K Moharamzadeh P Pouraghaei M Ghavidel A Parsian Z , Attitude and knowledge of medical students of Tabriz university of medical sciences regarding organ donation Transpl Proc 2018 50 2966 70
32. Tsubaki M Tougo S Kobayashi M Arakawa S Yoshida K Narrative review on attitudes toward organ donation of undergraduate nurse students Jpn J Nurs Sci 2020 17 e12291. 31454162
33. Montero Salinas A Martínez-Isasi S Fieira Costa E Fernández García A Castro Dios DJ Fernández García D [Knowledge and attitudes toward organ donation among health professionals in a third level hospital] Rev Esp Salud Publica 2018 92 e201804007. 29662051
34. Hassan AF Majeed HM , and Jasim AH Assessment of undergraduate critical care nursing students’ knowledge and attitudes toward caring of dying patients in colleges of nursing at Baghdad University Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2020 14 1142 6
35. Majeed HM Hassan AF Abid RI Evaluation of nurses’ knowledge and attitudes toward pain management at Baghdad Teaching Hospitals Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2020 14 1574 9
